HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes - July 21, 1998CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
July 21, 1998
I. MEETING CALLED 70 ORDER at 7:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Angela Curtis, Jan Dunlap, Candy Fish, Don
Foster, Karolyn Johnson. Bob Gilkey was absent. Also present were Tom
Humphrey, Planning, Director, Lee Brennan, Public Works Director, Ken
Gerschler, Planning Technician, and Arlene LaRosa, Public Works Secretary.
III. CORRESPONDENCE
There was no correspondence.
IV. MINUTES
Commissioner Johnson made a motion to approve the Minutes of July 7,
1998, as written. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Foster. ROLL
CALL: Curtis, abstain; Dunlap, yes; Fish, yes; Foster, yes; Johnson, yes.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
There were no public appearances
VI. BUSINESS
A. Continuation of Public Hearing to consider a request' by Michael
Burton to varv from the maximum fence height requirements on
property located at 1130 Mayfair Place in the R-1-6 zoning district
Tom Humphrey gave the Commission a summary of a meeting on July
20, 1998, attended by Michael Burton, Tiffany Smith, and Mark
Solomon, the three property owners instrumental in developing an
access to the Southwest park. Everyone in attendance was in favor
of having an access to the park across their property with some
stipulations: (1) they would prefer a block wall 7'4" high, and all were
opposed to chain link fence with slats. Privacy is important to each
of the families. (2) actual property acquisition was more acceptable
than an easement. Monetary compensation was discussed but
property would be relinquished if the City paid for the block waft. (3)
There was a willingness to give up more property to have a net width
of 6 foot for the access path. Bret Moore agreed to have a surveyor
City of Central Point
Planning Commission Minutes
July 21, 1998 -Page 2
design and stake where the wall would go to show how much land
would need to be acquired. Bret Moore would like the Planning
Commission to provide a blanket variance for each of these three lots
and leave the specifics of property acquisition to the City Council.
Bret Moore, 1243 Looking Glass Way, Central Point, agent for the
Burtons, stated that the main issue is allowing a taller fence to
provide more privacy.
Tom stated they would have to renotice for the other two properties
concerned before a blanket variance can be decided upon by the
Planning Commission.
The commission discussed the height of the fence and agreed that it
needed to be higher than 6 foot, possibly 7'4" in height.
Commissioner Fish made a motion to have the neighbors noticed for
the two additional properties, at 1134 Mayfair Place and 1158
Hampton Drive, and to continue the public hearing until the next
scheduled Planning Commission. Commissioner Curtis seconded the
motion. All said "aye" and the motion passed.
B. Public Hearing to consider a request by Stan Renderer to varv from
the front vard setback and review a Site Plan facilitating the
There were no ex-parte communications. Commissioner Fish stated
that the applicant is her insurance agent but they have had no
conversations concerning the application. Commissioner Johnson
stated that the applicant called her to ask her information about the
meeting but the application was not discussed.
Tom Humphrey reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report. This
is for the remodel and minor expansion of an existing commercial
business. The intent of the applicant is to improve the overall
appearance, function and internal efficiency of the business and make
it ADA functional. Because of an uncertainty about building
modifications encroaching on the right-of-way a few inches, a
condition has been recommended that any new construction must be
entirely within the property boundary. A second variance may need
City of Central Point
Planning Commission Minutes
July 21, 1998 -Page 3
to be considered for the parking in the alley. The expansion of the
building will not impact the current parking arrangements; however
they do back out into a public right-of-way (the alley). A note was
received from Central Point Florist stating their support of the
application.
Lee Brennan stated that Public Work's concerns are: (11 the vehicles
parking in the alley and backing into the alley. The alley has a lot of
traffic; however, Public Work's recommendation would be that the
commission grant a variance for backing out into the alley. (2) the
area between the existing sidewalk and back of the curb creates a
slip and trip hazard. Public Works is requesting the applicant improve
that portion by placing concrete in it. If the whole sidewalk has to be
replaced, the city would pay for the replacing of the sidewalk and the
applicant would replace the portion between the sidewalk and the
curb; (3) the applicant owns half of the paved area to the north of the
proposed project; the Laundromat owns the other half. Our concern is
the approach (apron), does not meet ADA standards or City
standards. The applicant needs to pay for one-half the apron and the
City will pay for the other half or persuade the Laundromat to pay for
half or require reimbursement if the Laundromat redevelops the
property later.
Stan Henderer, 60 No. 4t'' Street, Central Point, applicant, stated that
he would like the option to defer the improvements suggested by
Public Works for two years. He stated his first goal is to take care of
the ADA requirements and remodel to make the building more
functional.
Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 428, approving
the request by Stan Henderer to vary from the front yard setback and
approve a Site Plan facilitating the expansion and remodel of a
commercial building on property located at 60 North 4"' Street in the
C-2 zoning district, including the written and verbal conditions of the
staff reports, approve a variance for the preexisting parking, and
approve the possibility of deferring the payment for the extra concrete
work required by Public Works for two years. Commissioner Dunlap
seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Curtis, yes; Dunlap, yes; Fish,
yes; Foster, yes; Johnson, yes.
City of Central Point
Planning Commission Minutes
July 21, 1998 -Page 4
VII. MISCELLANEOUS
Tom Humphrey discussed further agendas. Tom suggested going to one
meeting a month beginning in August.
Tom noted that at the last meeting the shopping center was renamed
"Mingus Creek Plaza" However, the previous owners, in memory of their
mother, wanted to call it "Mountain View Plaza". The applicants wanted to
ask the commission if they would reconsider the name for the shopping
center and call it "Mountain View Plaza".
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Johnson made a motion to adjourn. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Curtis. All said "aye" and the meeting adjourned at 8:00
p.m.