Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - November 6, 2007CE~~tAL CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA November G, 240'7 - 7:00 p.m. Next Planning Commission Resolution No. '736 I, MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Connie IVloczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian ldiart, Chuck Piland, Pat Beef, Mike Oliver, and Justin Hurley IIL COH:RESPONDENCE IV, MINUTES A. Review and approval of October 2, .2007 Planning Commission Minutes V. P~t7BLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS Pis. ~ - 28 A. File No. 08I42. A public hearing to consider a request for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of constructing a Southern Oregon Head Start facility consisting of two classrooms on the Central Point Elementary School campus. The subject property is located in the R-1-6, Residential Single-Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 1188, Tax Lot 6700. The proposed project area is located at 450 South Fourth Street. Applicant: Southern Oregon Head Start; Agent: Kenneth Ogden, AIA, Architect Fps. 29 - 56 $. File No. 0$143. A public hearing to consider a Site Plan application for the construction of a Southern Oregon Head Start facility consisting of two classrooms an the Central Paint Elementary School campus. The subject property is located in the R-1-6, Residential Single-Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2tiV 11BB, Tax Lot 6100. The proposed project area is located at 450 South Fourth Street. Applicant: Southern Oregon Mead Start; Agent: Kenneth Ogden, AIA, Architect Pgs. 5'~ - 83 C. File Nos. 08144. A pul3lic meeting to consider a Site Pian application for the puzpose of expanding the existing facilities far Conger-Morris Funeral Directors' Central Paint Chapel. The expansion will consist of additional indoor storage, garage and crerr~atariurn. The sulaject property is located in the T4D-GC, General Canunerciai zoning district at 800 S. Franc Street, south of Cupp Drive, north of Beall Lane and is identified on the ,lacicson County Assessor's reap as 3'7 2W 11 CB, Tax Lot 104. A~S~licao~/Agent: S & S Western, LLC VIL MISCELLANEOUS VIII. ADJOURNMENT City of Central Paint Planning Commission Minutes September 4, 2007 L MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL. Commissioners Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian ldiart, Mike Oliver, Pat Beck, Chuck Piland, and Justin l-luxley were present. Also in attendance were: Tom Ilumphrey, Community Development Director; Don Burt, Planning Manager; Connie Clune, Community Planner; Lisa Morgan, Planning Technician; and Didi Thomas, Planning Secretary. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Candy Fish. made a motion to approve the minutes of the August 7, 2007 Planning Commission meeting. Pat Beck seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Idiart, abstained; Oliver, abstained; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Huxley, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances, VL BUSINESS A. File No. 0813$. A public hearing to consider a request for Conditional Use Permit for a proposed City of Central Point police substation within the Twin Creeks Retirement Center building located in the TOD-HMR, High Mix Residers#ial zoning district and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03CB, Tax Lot 7300. The proposed project area is located at 888 Twin Creeks Crossing. Applicant. Twin Creeks Retirement, Oregon Limited Partnership; Agent: Ronald Grimes, Architect There were no conflicts ox cx paxte communications to disclose. Justin Pluxlcy and Mike Oliver indicated they had made site visits. PlaMning CommissiQ» Minutes September 4, 2QC17 Page 2 Cammunity Planner Cannie Chine presented the staff repart far this canditianal use permit application far the presence of a police substatian within the Twin Creeks Retirement Center, advising that offzcers and volunteers would come and ga at the site, performing safety tasks and meeting with citizens. Ms. Chine pointed out that Twin Creeks Grassing is a public street with an-street parking available for use by police vehicles. Findings and conditions of approval were reviewed, and the public portion of the hearing was opened. Ron Grimes, applicant's agent, came forward and stated the staff report was accurate as presented, and he was baking forward to providing a new facility for the Central Paint Police Department. Tam Humphrey, Community Development Director, mentioned that there is a ponce substatian located at the Pilot Center, and it is the Chief s intent to demonstrate a police presence in the community. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Justin Hurley made a motion to adapt Resolution 734 granting a Conditional Use Permit for a police substation located within the Twin Creeks Retirement Center based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report. Candy Fish seconded the motion. RGLL CALL: Fish, yes; ldiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; Flurley, yes. Mohan passed. B. Fife No. 0$139. A public hearing to consider a request for a Class B Variance to the TfJD off street parking standards of CPMC Section 17.65.050; the number of required parking and covered parking spaces. The subject property is located in the T©D-HMR, High Mix Residential zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03CB, Tax Lot 7300. The proposed project area is located at 888 Twin Creeks Crossing. Applicant: Twin Creeks Retirement, ©regon Limited Partnership; Agent: Ronald Grimes, Architect There were no conflicts or ex parte communications to disclose. Justin Hurley stated he had made a site visit. Cannie Clune, Community Planner, presented the staff report far this variance request to reduce the number of required parking spaces for the Twin Creeks Retirement Center. Commissioners discussed the possibilities available for transit service to be provided in the T4D district. Mr. Humphrey advised Commissioners that he and Planning Manager Don Burt had already met with the Rogue Valley Transportation District to discuss future provision of transit services within the subject area. The public portion of the hearing was opened. Planning ~OriTYittSSion Minutes Septern6er 4, 2(J(I7 Page 3 Ron Cxrimes, applicant's agent, answered questions presented by Commissioners pertinent to available parking, covered garages, and average length of residency in these types of retirement centers, Mr, Crimes added that they feel comfortable with what they are providing and have been very successful in the past at what they do. The public portion of the hearing was then closed. Damian ldiart nrrade a motion to adopt Resolution '735 granting a variance to the TC1D off street parking standards of the Central Point Municipal Code, reducing the number of required parking and covered parking spaces to be located within the Twin Creeks Retirement Center (Jackson County Assessor's map 37 2W 03CD, Tax Lot 7300 based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report. Mike Oliver seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; ldiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beek, yes; Piland, yes; Hurley, yes. Motion passed. C. File Nos. 46082 and 6095. A public meeting to consider a request for an extension of Home Brothers' Site Plan and Tentative Plan for five (5) attached single family residences on .18 acres located at 124 North Third Street, in a TUD-HMR, High Mix Residenfiial zoning district. The subject property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 03DD, Tax Lot 7700. Applicant: Home Brothers, LLC; Agent: Shane Elsdon There were no conflicts or ex parte comrr~unications to disclose. Planning Technician Lisa Morgan presented the staff report, recommending that Commissioners approve an extension request for bath site plan and tentative plan in connection with this proposed development. Commissioner Fish mentioned that the property appears to be in the process of being remodeled. Ms. Morgan responded that it does not affect this proceeding. Lion Burt, Planning Manager, added that the applicant is only protecting their right to subdivide the property. Chuck Piland made a motion to grant a one (1} year extension to Home Brothers, LLC for the Site Plan and Tentative Plan previously approved (,Tackson County Tax Assessor's map 37 2W 03DD, Tax Lot 7744} based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff report. Mike Oliver seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; ldiart, yes; Oliver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; l-lurley, Yes. Motion passed. D. File No. 47032. A public meeting to consider a request for an extension of a 53 lot Planned Unit Development located in the R-2, Two- Family zoning district located on the south side of Vilas Road approximately Pla~rning Commission Mf»utes September 4, .2Qt}7 Page 4 500 feet west of Table Rock Road and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's reap as 37 2W OlI3A, Tax Lots 500 and "700. Applicant: Heritage Development, Inc.; Agent: Jim Clark There were no conflicts or ex pane communications to disclose. Planning Technician Lisa Morgan presented the staff report. Chairperson Connie Moczygemba asked about the provision for open space within the development, Ms. Morgan advised based on the proximity of an adjacent public park, the developer has agreed to pay for the full construction of a basketball court in Don Jones Park in exchange for right-of=way access to N. Mountain Avenue. Ms. Morgan recommended approval of a six {~} month extension request for the Planned Unit Development. Damian Idiart made a motion to grant a six {6} month. extension to Heritage Development, Inc. for the Planned Unit Development to be located at 1.3'7 and 165 VE'est Vilas Road (Jackson County Tax Assessor's map 3'7 2W O1BA, Tax Lots 500 and '700} based on the standards, findings, conclusions and recommendations stated in the staff' report. Candy Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; idiart, yes; C7liver, yes; Beck, yes; Piland, yes; burley, yes. Motion passed, VII, MISCELLANECIUS Regional Prvblent Solving Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director, informed Commissioners that the Regional Problem Solving process vans moving towards completion. A subcommittee of the Policy Committee which is editing the plan has developed a stakeholders agreement for all parties to enter into. A representative group of participants traveled to Salem to meet with State representatives to ensure support at State level. No other RPS process has thus far succeeded within the State of (Jregon and Mr. Humphrey hopes that this will be a first. Transnvrtation System Plan Planning Manager Don Burt advised that the Citizens Advisory Committee has completed a review of the goals and policies of the Transportation System. Plan and will commence a review of the chapters of the Plan. A draft of the chapters will be presented to Commissioners for their review as well. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Chuck Piland made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Mike C7liver seconded the motion. Meeting was adjourned at x:55 p.m. PlanningCammissian Minutes September ~, 2()Q7 Page S The foregoing zx~inutes of the September 4, 2007 Punning Commission meeting were approved b~ the Planning Commission at its meeting ozx November 6, 2007. Punning Commission Chair ~C)UTH~R.N QR~Ct,~~i ~~AD ~-TART C,:t~~I]ITt~~IAL [,.5~ p~~~~T ®V~ ~3er r~~ QQ~ S S U C Co .e dune, Comm its Plan; ~'~ ~,. ~,, .,: ~.~ ~~ ~~~~:~ M r t f Early childhood d prekindergarten progr s are a roistered by the Oregon Dep meat of ~.w.~m, w ~~ f ' w° ~ , ,o a~ ~ ~, ,p i lar~nin art t Tom Humphrey, A3CP, Community Development [7irector! Assistant City Administrator d,, q Education, The Chegon prekindergarten program is operated in eoardinatian with the federal Head Start program. 4regan defines prekindergartens as programs that are recognized by the department that provide comprehensive education to maximize the potential of children three and four years of age. General Project Description: The proposed 3,700 square ft. single story (lead Start facility, with two {2} classrooms, 39 students and nine {9} employees on the maximum shift {14 employees total}, is located in the northeast career of the Central Paint Elementary campus. Students would attend either an a.m. or a p.m. session, similar to kindergarten. The building footprint will accupy an area approximately 57 ft. by 72 ft. with a future playground parallel to Ash Street. In fatal, the Head Start facility will accupy an area measuring approximately 120 ft. {S. Fourth Street} by 220 ft. {Ash Street}. The proposed facility, in relation to the elementary school and the administration building is illustrated in Figure 1. The Head Start building has been situated in the northeast corner of the Campus to maintain the Third Street visual corridor far the historic 19{}8 brick administration building. Qn the Campus, there are 135 existing off street parking spaces. The proposed Head Start facility does not include any additional off-street parking. Table 1 is inclusive of the Head Start facility and provides a summary of the currently available Campus parking. Conditional Use Criteria: When considering a Conditional Use in the R-1-6 zoning district it is necessary that the Planning Commission address five {5} criteria as set forth in CPMC Section 17,76.040{E}. Each of these five criteria has been reviewed and favorably addressed in Attachment "E" Planning Department Findings. It needs to be noted that preparation of Attachment "E" is based on an interpretation of the use classification of the Head Start facility as follows: The Head Start facility, as part of the Campus, is classified as a subordinate and sanctioned educational use to the Central Point Elementary School, and as such is distinctly drfferent from the City's def nitrnn ref .l?ay Care Center1. This interpretation is based an the presence of an educational curriculum administered by the State {see discussion above. On its own merits, the interpretation is warranted. However, it should be noted that the interpretation does affect the off-street parking requirements for a day care center verses an elementary school. As an adjunct tc> the elementary school, the Head Start facility would be required to have a minimum of six {6} ' CPMC 17.0$.0 l0, Day Care Center Page 2 of 4 parking spaces {Table 1}. As a day care center, the Head Start facility would be required to have one {1} space per employee {on the maximum shift} and one {1 }space per f ve {~} children for a minimum of seventeen {17} spaces {Table 2}. As a day care center, the Campus still has adequate of£ street parking to serve both the elementary school, administration building, and (lead Start. Table 2. Central Paint Elementary Schaal Campus Parking Inventory, with Head Start Facility as aPre-Schaal ......__.~,.__._....__~. ~ .. ___........_ ~~__ __~_ _..__ . , ... w _ ~_ ... _ ~_.... ___ Use Na. Pkg. Ratio ~ Req. Pkg. Classroorr~s 23 ' 3/classroom 63 _. Office 1.6,6{}0 ' ll300 GFA _ ~ SS w.~_,. ~_-___..._..~__...._...._ .. _...~n~,,w ~. ,_.. _...._.. .._._.......~_ ._~___ . _.....~~_ ._ ............ .. .......__ _ ... _ _.. ItEnr~p. & I tS Pre-Schoc>I ~ 9138 ~ Students 1'T ,.~.~~.~ Total 135 Par 104 ~.~ 0 The existing Campus parking satisfies the off=street parking spaces required by CPMC Section 17.64. For a further discussion of the parking analysis, see Attachment "E>', Planning Department Findings. FINDINGS: See attached Attachment "E" ISSUES; l . The interpretation that Head Start is considered an educational facility, therefore the parking ratio for elementary schools would apply and the minimum required off-street parking is six {6} spaces. CONDITIQNS CaF APPRC7VAL: 1. Central Point Building Department {Attachment "C"} and Rogue Valley Sewer Services (Attachment "D"). 2. The applicant shall submit signage plans prior to building permit approval. Said plans shall be consistent with the provisions of CPMC Sections 15.4. 3. The approved conditional uses will comply with local, state, and federal health and safety regulations. 4. The Conditional Use Permit approval shall lapse and become void one {1 }year following the date on which it becomes effective, unless use is in operation. EXIIIBITSIATTAC~CMENT5: Attachment ``A" -Aerial campus site map Page 3 0#'4 Attachment G°~!! -Building Department Staff Report Attachment "D" - RV S S Continents Attachment "E" -Planning Department Findings Attachment "F" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit for the Southern Oregon Head Start facility located on the Central Point Elementary School campus. REC1Jl1~IMENDATIUN: Approval of Resolution No. , granting a Conditional Use Permit for the new Head Start facility located on the Central Point Elementary School campus. Page ~ of 4 Southern c~regon Head Start Central Point Elementary Campus 450 South Fourth Street ~~~~H ~ E~ t sc ~ tt N A 37 2w fi fi BB T[.: 67'00 OgdenRoemerWilkerson Archi~ec~ure'A Opl.I.ABORATiVE APPROACH- FtOkEST DESIGFt 295fl east taarnett road medford or~:gon 975Q4 541 779.5237 54'I 772.8472 f www.ORW arc h i kecture. com August 28, 2007 Environmental Impact Statement Southern Oregon Head Start Central Paint Elementary Schaal Campus Ta t~hom It May Concern: ORW Architecture has been retained to provide architectural design and construction document services for a new 3,7(}0 single story Head Start Facility located in Central Point, Oregon. The subject pzoperty is located on in the Northern canner of an existing elementary school campus, located at the intersection of 4'~ Street and Ash Street in Central Point Oregon. The suzrounding neighborhood consists of established single family and mul' family residences intermixed with commercial facilities. Tlae elementary school campus has occupied this site far over '~S years and was re-~iuilt approximately IO years ago. During the planning of the now campus, the area where the new Head start facility is to be located was designated as a future campus expansion area. The District felt this program was compatible with the elementary school functions and be an asset to the community. The portion of the elementary school campus where Head Start will be located is approximately 120' {4~' St} x 220' {Ash St}. Fourth Street defines the Northern edge of the subject parcel, Ash street defines the Western Edge. The Primary Bus loop entraa~ce for the elementary school is located to the South and the existing faculty and guest parking lot is located to the East. When the elementary school was constructed this fuhzre expansion area was temporarily developed as a manicured lawn. There are na natural features associated or impacted with development. All utilities have previously been stubbed out to the building pad area with the expectation a building would. be constructed on this site. The addition afthe Head Start facility to this campus is consistent with the overall occupancy and usage. No new ar different functions with a greater impact will be introduced into the surrounding neighborhood. The Central Point Elementary School District welcomes this component to it's campus. In my opinion, due to the fact this is apre-developed site, no environmental issues, modifications to the natural habitat or neighboring context is being introduced, a further detailed environmental study is not necessary. Attached is the Head Start check list along with comments. Respectfully submitted, I~ennetit J. Ogden, AIA Principal I~°~' EAST ENTRANCE Ogle ers~n Architec~ureA~~ .. ~ -;. SC7UTHVVEST CORNER -I N©RTHV4rEST C©I~;IVER Ogcfe R ersc~n Archi~c~ureA~~ cfwg, 9199(2007 1D:52:03 AM, Krsh ~` / y~~S ~~ 14 ` 4 ~ ~~+ ______.. ~. m ~_~____ h t 3 E~~ I r , •..-.•-•.-~ I SOl.09 ~, ~ o F ~ ~N I 30.00 ' ` ' 22 92 -a 26' i 4E ~R!~t i ti f ~ ~ ( ~ i ~ i~ 4 I i ., 7 t L ~ ~;. }0, I ~m ~` + ~' I ' ~ -- - -___ - 2 f . ~ i Z fi N I i ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~c M~ 1 4 ......__ .. »~ .. E Q o ~'' m 'AS ~ '1r «~ 3 ' I ~ ~ ~ `~ o « y'~ I rn b '-' R7g. c i $ I m 'A~ ~ I SD x I ~ a t. >. a -- ~ o ~ E i i ~ I ~ ~ 45 6' 20 EO' 20 ,~ 26' ~ 1F~ ~~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~ ~ 'o E o y~ t+i ~~ ~ I "--~ pr6, ~ *a ~ to ~ N + `a1 ~ ~ -a• s E° ` ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ i m° ; ; ' .: :~ :~ ~ ', _ r I 3 N of ~f ~~++ryry ~ 20' y I . A ~ j~?« W G C~"t ~ t i m P' " F' ~ -b # ~C' i' ~-' R,g, 29'-B' 26' S0' 2&' ~ 30` `~ I ~N'' 2 ' ` Rs ( o 6S -2 ...+ PHASE ONE BOUttOARY ItNE /53 ~s" ~ ~ ~ I G ~ ~ b f V -~ „ . s ~ ~ r rm ~s^'~ ~_~."++.. southern 4regcrn Head Start Central Point Elementary ~wvwpn w+y w~P'RQ~~W"uroe,va~«< ~~~~[ Ogderx~cemertr'filkersan z aca `vJSO: ~ ,~ yen rve^rw~+arvawxaw ~ Central Point, C}regon ,,,mi~ Architecture ~,~rn~~x~ ,>u.p..~,.,.,.~,,..»,~,,,,,,,.~, ..,,prxua,aee„tea., 17.76.40 Findings and conditions. The planning commission in granting a conditional use permit shah find as follows: A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of this code; The subject parcel for this application is a portion of fhe 7.8 acre Central Point Elementary School campus. The portion to be occupied by Southern Oregon Head Start is a parcel approximately 924' x 224' in size and is locafed in the northern most corner of the campus and is edged on two sides by 4th Street and Ash Street. The existing faculty and guest parking lot is located to the east, the bus drop off and pick up loop is located to fhe South. When the Central Point Elementary Schaal was redesigned approximately 7 years ago, this area was allocated for future schoal expansion. The current site is a lawn area with a few trees with a caliber of approximately 2"- 3'; One of the existing trees will be relocated. B. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use; The neighborhood is currently impacted by the traffic generated by the elementary school campus. The hours of aperafion for the new Nead Start facilr"ty will be staggered slightly from fhe schools schedule. The proposed facility will contain two new classrooms. The points of entry and exit will remain the same. The district will allow the exiting bus loop fo serve as fhe parent drop off point for head start due fa the fact the busses will not be occupying fhe site at those Times. C. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings and structures; walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs; The proposed facility is consistent with the function of the elementary school. No new activifies will be introduced fa the site. New building is approxrmately 3,744 square feet: It is a single story structure with materials and colors similar to those of the elementary schoal. The refuse and recycling area will be screened with a 6' concrete block enclosure with a solid steel gate. Mechanical units will also be screened from view. The proposed play area for head start will be fenced far the safefy of the children. As mentioned in the above paragraph B, vehicle circulation will not be alfered with this proposal. New exterior lighting will consist of building, soffit mounted and pathway lighting only. No new light standards are being proposed. All lighting will screened fo focus an the specific task areas and reduce light spill to neighboring properties. D. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied far will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or t© the general welfare of the community based on the review of those factors listed in subsection C of this section; Head Start operafion guidelines specify minimum standards for facility maintenance and operations. These guidelines have been developed specifically to address fhe health and life safety of fhe children. These guidelines are specifically monitored at regular intervals for facilify licensure. As mentioned above, the activities of fhe proposed facility are consistent with those of fhe elementary school. E. That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include: 1. Adjustments to lot size or yard areas as needed to best accommodate the proposed use; provided the lots or yard areas conform to the stated minimum dimensions for the subject zoning district, unless a variance is also granted as provided for in Chapter ~7.'l3, The proposed building has been located such that all required setbacks have been satisfied 2. Increasing street widths, modifications in street designs or addition of street signs or traffic signals to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed use, No modifications to existing streets, parking lots or vehicle pathways are being modified with this application. Anew Head Start sign wild be placed on the building but will be under a separate sign permit application. 3. Adjustments to off-street parking requirements in accordance with any unique characteristics of the proposed use, IVo adjustments fo off street parking are being requested in this application. 4. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress, No modifications fo Vehicular ingress and egress are being requested in this application. ~. Requiring landscaping, irrigation systems, lighting and a property maintenance program, The subject,site is currently a manicured lawn area. This lawn area and irrigation system will be removed and reconfigured as required for construetian of the building and new walks. Once completed the lawn and irrigation area will be healed and repaired. The existing tree within the proposed building pad wiH be relocated prior to the start of canstruetion. ~, Regulation of signs and their locations. IVo new signs are being requested within this applicafion, new building signage will be requesfed under a separate sign permit application. 7. Requiring fences, berms, walls, landscaping or other devices of organic or artificial composition to eliminate or reduce the effects of noise, vibrations, odors, visual incompatibility orother undesirable effects on surrounding properties, New fencing will be provided far the children's safety and fo mark the boundaries of the play area, New visual screens will be provided for the refuselrecycling areas and mechanical units. 8, Regulation of time of operations for certain types of uses if their operations may adversely affect privacy of sleep of persons residing nearby or otherwise conflict with other community or neighborhood functions, The hours of operatr'on will be consistent with those of the elementary school. time, 9. Establish a time period within which the subject land use must be developed, Construction is anticipated to be complete by the fall of Zaf18. 10. Requirement of a bond or other adequate assurance within a specified period of Not applicable. 11. Such otkter conditions that are found to be necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, No other conditions are expected fa effect the public health safety and welfare of the general public. 12. ]n considering an appeal of an application for a conditional use permit for a home occupation, the planning commission shall review the criteria listed in Section 17.60.190. {©rd. 1823 §5, 20(}1; flrd. 3 684 X72, 1993; flrd. 1615 §55, 1989; flrd. 1633 §1, 1984; Ord. 1436 ~2{part), 1981 This is not a home occupation, therefore not applicable. Central Point Elementa School Parkin anal sis --- Date Time School Parkin; Lot Administration Parkin Lot Ash Street October 8, 2007 9:0{3 40 13 ~ 11:3{} 39 11 1 1:00 29 9 0 4:00 10 11 0 October 9, 2007 8:45 39 15 0 10:45 45 17 0 1:00 35 17 0 3:00 28 20 0 October 10, 2007 9:00 44 1C~ 1 11:31} 43 19 1 1:00 32 6 3:00 30 6 October 11, 2007 9:00 45 14 0 9:45 am 49 15 0 11:00 49 19 0 1:30 28 41 0 October 12, 2007 9:45 9 S 0 10:45 8 10 0 2:30 2 4 0 -- UgdenRoc:merW~lketsort '0 .~.rchi~ecture COLLA90RATIYE AFPAOACH -HONEST DESIGN 2950 east Barnett road reed€ord oregon 97504 541 779.5237 541 772.8472 ~ Central 1'oizzt School I}istrict Estimated Area Analysis for the Adzninistxation Building First Floor 5 478 s ft Offzce/Work Room 2,741 Circulation(1~ails/Stairs 1,428 Utilzt /7anitoriMech 714 Story e S95 Second Fiaor 5 561 s ft OffceJWork Room 2,1.20 CircuiationtHalis/Stairs 2,444 Unlit /Janitor 11.7 Story e 192 Board Room 1,088 Third Floor 5 561 s ft C}ffrces 3,676 Circulation 1,607 Unlit /JanitorJMech 108 Story e 170 Attic Not calculated ~~ City of Central Point, Oregon 140 So.Third St.,Central Point, or 97502 541.664,3321 Fax 541.664.5384 www.c i.cent ra i-po i nt.o r. u s CENTRAL POINT LETTER flF AUTHtJRZZATION Punning Department Tcsm Humphrey, AtCP, Community Development pirectorl Assistant City Administrator Let it be known that KEN C3GI}EN (C7RW ARCHITECTI3RE is hereby authorized to act on behalf of the undersigned with regard to the development of the described property. This authority shall include all matters including applications, conferences, documents, permits, and mapping issues. Authorization shall pertain to all governing agencies associated with the project, PRC7JECT: soV~x~~.N OREGON HEADSTART Central Point, Oregon. Fees or other costs of this development project are the responsibility of the owner/applicant. Applicant Date '-~;~:~~--' Vicki L, Robinson _~-=~:; Director of Business 5etviceslDe~sut~' Clerk ~ ~ -~' 1 Property Owner ~ . Date Property Owner Date '~~ ~ Agent Date ~. x. . ;~ City of Central Point, Oregon 140 S Third Street, central Poinc, OR 97"502 54 f .bb4.3321 I:ax 541.6t-4.1611 www.ci.central-point.or us BUILDING DEPARTI4~ENT STAFF ~EPQRT LATE: 1014/07 TC?: Plar~.rling Leparlarnent Planning file: 08142/48143 FROM: Building Leparl;ment SUBJECT: So. Oregon Head St;~.z ~t I'wTame: So. Oregon Head St;~.rt Address: 1001 Beal Lane City: C.P. State: Or. Zip Code: 17502 Property Lescription: 37-2W-11BB-6700 PURPOSE: The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Lepat~tment requirements a.nd conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Commission. 1 14t7 S Thin Straet + Central Poinf, OR 97542 + 541. fiS4.3321 • Fax 5~ ~~`~ii~~4j~ ~. rVNT Todd Meador, Building Official Oregan ATTACHMENT '"..~ " t i i Building Dept. Staff Report, Page Z BITILAING I~EPA~2.'~~El~~' Ct'JN~1t;Erl'TS l . Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with. all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central .Point Building Department, 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Deparl:ment. ~. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4, Provide the building depaa~txnent with a Geotechnical report as required by 4SSC Appendix J and chapter 18 of the OSSC. A written rep©rt of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the follov~ring information; a. A plot plan shovring the location of all test borings and/or excavations, b, Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soli strength, and the effects of adjacent loads, e. 'When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations, S, Gradinglexcavationpeanits are required in accordance with 4SSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any fill material placed on the site, 1{ills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with. accepted engineering practices, . A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building {Jfficial, shall be submitted prior to final of the gradinglexcavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until gradinglexcavation permit is fnaaled. Exception; 1. The upper l .S foot off 11 placed outside of public rights-of way. ~. The upper LS foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 14t? S Third Street • Central Point, C3R' 9T5©~ • 549.684,3321 • Fax 541:fis4.9691 Building Department Staff 1Z.eport, page 3 6, To move or demolish any existing structures located on the pr©perty, call the Building Department for pexxuit requirements. 7. hTotify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property. 8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central. Point shall require a Development Penmit as set forth in the Central Paint Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, erasion control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10. Application for building permits will require three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with C}regan Structural Specialty Code (2005). 11. Fire District 3 will detez~mine fire hydrant locations, as well as access to buildings. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department far approval prior to sti~.rt of work. If questions, please call 'fold Ivleador.....6f 4-X6325, ext. 228. 3 94A S Third Street +~ t;entr~i Point, QR 97542 + 549.664.3329 ~ Fax 549.664.969 ~ A~'TA~~MF~1`T " ~ ~~ Location: 138 West Vitas Road, Centel Point, QR -Mailing Ar}dress: P.Q. Box 313, Central faint, QR 75fl2-t)Ot?5 Tel, (541} 664.630D, Fax X541}664-7171 www.RV3S.us actober 1 D, 2047 Connie Chine City of Central Paint Planning Department '155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 975(}2 Re: Southern Oregon Head Start, File # 08142-CUP, 48143 -Site Plan There is a 10 inch sewer main on bath F©urth and Ash Streets. Sewer service to the proposed development will require a tap into one of these locations. The permit far the tap will be issued by RVS upon payment of related development fees. The proposed development will be required to meet starmwater quality standards as defined in the Rogue Valley Sewer Services Stormwater C2uality Design Manual. RV5 requests that approval of the proposed development be conditioned upon the fallowing: 1. Applicant must obtain sewer connection permits and pay all related development charges to RVS prior to the start of construction. 2. The applicant must provide a storrnwa#er management plan for approval by RVS prior to the start of construe#ian. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Carl Tappert, PE District Engineer .. Attachment u~" FINDINGS flF FACT AND CUNCLUSIflNS flF LAW File Na: 08142 Il~'TRflDUCTIflN In the Matter of a Conditional Use Permit for the purpose of constructing a Southern Oregon Head Start facility consisting of two (2} classrooms. The new facility is to be located on the Central Point Elementary School campus. The subject property is located ua the R-1-6, Residential Single-Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 3?S 2 W 11 BB, Tax Lot 6?00, APIA 10146129, (Applicant: Southern flregan Mead Start, Agent: Kenneth Ogden, AIA, Architect} CPMC 17.20.030 Conditional uses R-1 Residential Single-family. The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted in an R-1 district when authorized in accordance wr'th Chapter 17 ~6: C. Public and parochial early childhood development preschools, nursery schools, kindergartens or day care centers; Finding: The proposed Head Start facility is considered an early childhood development center ar a preschool and may be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit, Conclusion: The applicant has met the procedural requirements with the Filing of a Conditional Use Permit application, CPMC 17. ~'6.tl4tl Canditinnal Use Permit: Findings and cvnditinns. The planning commission in granting a conditional use permit shalZ~nd as follows: A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet all other development and Zot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of this code; Finding: The project is a single story facility to be located on the ?,$ acre Central Paint Elementary campus. The facility will occupy approximately 124 ft. X 220 fl. of land area in the northeast corner of the campus, Finding: The facility is 3,?00 sq, fl. with two {2} classrooms, a kitchen, a multi- purpose room and staff office space. The structure is designed to meet the proposed learning activities. Conclusion: The project can meet this criterion. CPMC 1 ~ 7'b.f14(1(B). That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in sine and condition to ef,~ectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use; Page 7. of 7 `~.' Finding: The project site is located on the corner of Ash and ~. FourEh Streets. Both streets are improved City streets with sidewalks. The site is a part of the existing Central Point Elementary campus with existing ingress and egress from both Ash and S. Fourth Streets. An existing bus loop on Ash Street and the existing drop- offloop from South Fourth Street axe currently used for student access. The applicant states that the Central Point School District will allow both to service Head Start students, therefore, Head Start will use the existing ingress and egress points with no additional access paints requested. Conclusion: The project can meet this criterion. ~PMC 11.76.(144 (e). Thai the prep©sed use will have nQ signifcant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use therenf. In making this determination, the commissir~n shall consider the proposed location of improvements an the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings and structures; walls and fences; landscaping; Qutdnor lighting; and signs; Finding: The proposed structure is a single story, 3,700 sq. ft. facility designed with roof and siding materials to blend with the existing school and historic administration buildings. The applicant states that the future playground will be fenced for child safety utilizing appropriate fencing materials. Finding: The site plan for the proposed structure provides the necessary setbacks as required within the R-1-~ zoning district. A clear vision triangle in excess of 25 ft. is maintained at the corner of Ash and Fourth Streets. A 30 ft. side yard setback from Ash Street has been planned. Finding: As discussed in Finding B-1, the project site has public street access with existing ingress and egress, drop-off and bus loops. Finding: The Head Start building has been situated in the northeast corner of the campus to maintain the "bird Street visual corridor for the historic 1908 brick Administration building. Thais location also provides access to the existing paved parking lot, bus and drop off loops. The existing internal circulation pattern will not be altered with this application. Finding: The site for this proposed project was identified during the 2001 review for the Central Point Elementary School (File No. 41038) as evidenced by the proposed site plan illustration, StalTReport dated August 1, 2001, and Resolution 526. Canclusinn: The proposed use is consistent with the R-1-6 zoning district and the City's intent for this area. Page 2 of 7 ~ '. CPMC .19, fib. (14t1 {.~). What the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied far will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety ar general welfare ofpersons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community based on the review of those factors fisted in subsection C of this section; Fiadiags The Head Start facility will be within a newly constructed building that has met or exceeded structural requirements. The facility will be operated by Southern. Oregon Head Start. Finding: Head Start operation guidelines specify minimum standards for facility maintenance and operations. These guidelines have been developed specifically to address the health and safety of the children. Conclusion: The proposal complies. ~'PMC 17.76,(1411 {E). That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include; 1. Adjustments to lot size or yard areas as needed to best accommodate the proposed use; provided the lots or yard areas conform to the stated minimum dimensions far the subject zoning district, unless a variance is also granted as provided for in Chapter 1 x.13, Finding: The site plan of the proposed building illustrates that the structure has been located such that all required setbacks have been met or exceeded, 2. Increasing street widths, mod cations in street designs or addition of street signs ar traffic signals to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed use, Finding: As discussed in Finding B-l, the project site is located on the corner of Ash and S. Fourth Streets. Both streets are improved City streets with sidewalks. The site is part ofthe existing Central Point Elementary campus with existing ingress and egress from both Ash and S. Fourth Streets. An existing bus loop on Ash Street and the existing drop-off loop from Fourth are currently used for student access. The applicant states that the Central Point School District will allow both to service Head Start students, therefore, Head Start will use the existing ingress and egress points with no additional access points requested. Finding: A new Head Start sign will be placed on the building and a sign permit will be required. Sign standards and permit requirements are found in Section 15.24 of the CPMG 3. Adjustments to a, f, f-street parking requirements in accordance with any unique characteristics of the proposed use, Wage 3 of ~ ~ the applicant is proposing the use of six {6} existing off street parking spaces. The campus has 135 existing offstreet parking spaces, including loading, drop-off and bus loops. The parking space allocation include: 63 spaces for the Central Point Elementary School and 55 spaces for the Administration Building as required by CPMC Section 17.64.040. The existing parking on the campus is adequate in number to accommodate the needs ofthe Head Start Facility (see Table 1}. However, it needs to be noted that this finding is based on the interpretation that the Head Start facility is a subordinate and sanctioned educational use to the Central Point Elementary School campus. Table 1. Central Paint Elernen~tary_Schaal.Campus___._____._.._. Parking Inventaxy, rr~ith Head Start Facility Use No, Pkg. Ratia t Rect. Pkg. Existing_Classroor_._...___...__...._..._..___~.._....._._ 21 .,~..___.._..~Iclassroam _._` 63 t7ffrce 16 600 ~ 1!300 GFA .. ____...~__.,.__.._._..___..._._...--55 z Head Start ! 2 . ~_~ i 6 -~'- Total 124 Existing Parking Spaces ------ ~ ....._104 ........ .. . ....~ _. __.._.._a_...___._. .., ~..____.__.__.... Dro Off S ces ~ ~ 31 Sux~-lusl{Deficitl Parking 11 This interpretationlclarification is presented under the authority of CPMC 1"7."76.040{E}{3}, which allows the Planning Comu~ission to adjust offstreet parking requirements in accordance with any unique characteristics of the proposed use. Rather than adjust off street parking requirements the interpretation clarification of the use classification of the Head Start program is presented, Finding: A definition for "clay care center" is provided, however curriculum standards and the classroom setting is absent from the definition. Finding; tJregon Revised Statutes, Act For 21S` Century Reform, provides the policy that Qregon is to implement programs for early childhood education {4R5 329.160}. This section also states that The (Jregon prekindergarten program shall continue to be operated in coordination with the federal Head Start program. Oregon prekindergartens mean programs that are recognized by the State Department of Education that maximize the potential of children three and four years of age.' Finding: Head Start is a national program that prorrtotes school readiness with a special focus on helping preschoolers develop the early reading and math skills they need to be successful in school. Head Start services are provided to children with curriculum standards. ~ ©RS 329.16-1?(l Early Childhood Education Page 4 of 7 need to be successful in school, Head Start services are provided to children with curriculum standards. Finding: The proposed Head Start facility provides preschool level instruction for children primarily in a classroom setting. Qregon Revised Statutes 329.17{?{1}{b} def nes prekindergartens as progruns that are recognized by the department {the Qregon Department of Education} that provide comprehensive education to maximize the potential of children three and four years of age. The early childhood education program is consistent with the function of the existing elementary school, a permitted use in the R-1-b zoning district. Finding: The Head Start facility, as part of the Campus, is classified as a subordinate and sanctioned educational use to the Central Point Elernent<u~' School, and as such is distinctly different from the City's definition of a Day Care Centerz. This interpretation is based on the presence of an educational curriculum administered by the State {see discussion above}. Finding: The Head Start facility must meet the early childhood education performance curriculum standards of both state and federal statutes, By defining the Head Start facility as an educational facility, the parking ratio for elementary schoal would apply and the minimum required ofd street parking. Finding: As an adjunct to the elementary school, the Head Start facility would be required to have a minimum of six {6) parking spaces {Table 1 }. As a day care center, the Dead Start facility would be required to have one {1 }space per employee and one {l}space per five {S} children for a minimum of seventeen {17} spaces {Table 2}. As a day care center, no additional Campus parking spaces would be required. ;Table 2. Central Point Elementary 5chool.Campus„__~_. _........ Parking Inventory, with Head Start Facility as a Pre-School Use No. Pkg. Ratio Req. Pkg. `Classrooms ._........... ~_..__.._.____..._..w __...____.,, ..__~__....... 23 ~ ...__..... ~_~._..._._..___ __...__.__.... 3/classroom ... _....._..___.___..__ .___..__w.._.____,__... ..... 63 .. ........_--.. _. _.__.., C`~ffice ~ 16,600 f 1/300 CFA SS _._ ..._._ __.. _ _._ ,..._. .........~__.. _ ____ ..______-_-___ i _ _ 1lEtnp. & 1 /5 Pre-schoal 9138 Students 17 :Total - ~, 135 Exist' Par S ces 1C?4 i I7ro Off 5 Ces ~ 31 Surplusl(Ueficit} Parking 0 z CPMC 17.oS.o I o, Day Care Center Page 5 of ~ ~ ~ Conclusion: Based on the finding that the Head Start facility provides an acknowledged and sanctioned educational service and as such is classified as an educational facility, the parking standards set forth in Section 17.64.040{E}{2} far an elementary school apply. The minimum required off street parking is six {6} spaces. The existing campus parking is suff dent in number to meet the required off street parking requirements. 4. Regulation of points cif vehr'cular ingress and egress, Finding: As stated in Finding B-1, the campus has existing ingress and egress points with no additional access points requested. 5. Requiring landscaping, r'rrigation systems, lighting and a property maintenance program, Finding: The project site is currently landscaped with planting areas and manicured lawn area. The applicant states that the lawn area and irrigation system will be reconfigured as required for the construction of the building and new walkways. This disturbed area will be replanted. The applicant states that existing trees within the building pad will be relocated prior to the start of construction. 6. Regulation of signs and their locations, Finding: Anew Head Start sign is expected to be placed. on the building. Prior to installation, a sign permit is required. The proposed sign will be reviewed for compliance with the sign requirements. No new signs are being requested with this application. 7. Requiring fences, berms, walls, landscaping or other devices of organic or artificial composition to elimr'nate or reduce the effects of noise, vibrations, odors, visual incompatibility or other undesirable effects on surrounding properties, Finding: The applicant states that new fencing will be provided for the children's safety and to mark the boundaries of the play area. 8. Regulation of time of operations for certain types of uses if their operations may adversely affectprivacy of sleep r~fpersons residing nearby or otherwise conflict with other community or neighborhood functions, Finding: The hours of operation will be consistent with those of the elementary school. 9. establish a time period within which the subject land use must be developed, 1 f1. Requirement of a bond or other adequate assurance within a specked period of time, Page b of ~ 11. Such ether conditions that are found to be necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, 1 ~. ~n considering an appeal o, f an appl ication for a conditional use permit, for a home occupation, the planning commission shall review the criteria listed in Section 17.6(?.19ft. Finding. The proposed Head Start facility is expected to be completed by the Fall of 240$. Conciusic~n. The proposal. complies. Page 7 of 7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 3,700 SQ. FT, SOUTHERN OREGON HEAD START FACILITY Applicant: Southern Oregon Head Start, Agent: Kenneth Ogden, AIA, Architect (37S 2W 11 BB, Tax Lot 6'700 450 South Fourth Street } Fade No. 08142 WHEREAS, the applicant submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit for canstz~ction a of 3,74(} sq. ft. Southern C7regon Flead Start facility located on the 7.8 acre Central Point Elementary School campus. The subject property is located in the R-1-6, Residential Single-Family zoning district and is identif ed on the Jackson County .Assessor's rnap as 37S 2'tN I IBB, Tax I,ot 6744, APN 14146129. WIIEF:EAS, on November 6, 2447, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed. the City staff report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the R-1-6, Residential Single-Family zoning district section 1'7.24, Off-Street Parking and Loading section 17.64 and Conditional Use Permit section 17.76 of the Central Paint Municipal code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as part of the Conditional Use Permit application, has considered and finds per the Staff Report dated November 6, 2447, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the conditional use permit is consistent with the intent of the R-1-6, Residential Single-Family zoning district, now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Paint Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Staff Report dated November 6, 2.{}07, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 6`~ day of November, 2{}07. Planning Conunission Chair Planning Commission Resolution No. {11064'7} A'T'T`EST: City Representative Approved by me this 6`~` day of November, 2fl(}7. Flanx3in~ Commission Chair Planning Cornmissz©n Resolution No. __~ (1206{)7} +DL.~TH~F~~I t'~~~Ct~~ H~AL~ TAF~T ~~iT~ PLKAI~ lar~nin art +~~ ...._ Tarn ~Umpnrey, AiCP Camtt~unity C~eve3ap~r7t Girectar/ Assistant City Administratar 1'~oveber , 2007 S A Co 'e Clunk, Co unity 1'1 er AC U Consideration of a Conditional 1.Tse Pe it {File 210.08142) for the Southern t~regon Head S facility preceded this site plan application. 6tli.Gily 611G d"dGCIU. t~lQit ddLilldt'~V! will occupy an area measuring approximately 120 ft. (S. Fourth Street} by 220 ft. (Ash Street). The Head S building has been situated in the no east corner of the c pus to maintain the Third Street visual co 'dor for the historic 1908 brick Ad` 's Lion building» The facility design is similar to other Head S centers in the area. The building's a tans exterior is designed to blend with the existing Central Point Elemen School. The material d roof color of the inistration building d the eleen school will be used for the new facility. Page 1 of 3 The building will have two (2} classrooms, a multipurpose room, kitchen, staff af~ice space and restroams. The future playground area west of the proposed building will be fenced for the safety of the children. The agent indicates that the fence materials will be decorative or similar to wrought iron fences. Landscaping: The subject site is currently lawn area of the campus. The campus is landscaped with perimeter and parking aisle plantings, a playground and street trees. The planting areas will be retained and the irrigation system will be reconfigured for the construction of the building and walkways. An existing tree located in the building footprint will be relocated prior to the start of construction. Parking. The Campus has 135 existing off=street parking spaces, including loading, drop-off and bus loops. As an adjunct to the elementary school, the Head Start facility would be required to have a minimum of six (6} parking spaces. The Campus parking is allocated as follows; Central Point Elementary School, 63 spaces, the administration building, 55 spaces and Head Start, 6 spaces for a total of 124 parking spaces. As a day care center, the Head Start facility would be required to have one ~1}space per employee and one (1} space per five children for a minimum of 17 spaces for a total of 135. As a day care center, no additional Campus parking spaces would be required. The existing Campus parking satisfies the off= street parking spaces required by CPMC Section 1'7.64. FINDINGS: See attached Attachment i°D>' ISSUES: 1. The site plan provides that the refuse and recycling area will be screened with a six {6} fl. concrete block enclosure with a solid steel gate. Red brick has been used on the existing elementary and administration buildings, The use of red brick, or similar material, for the enclosure would be in keeping with the existing architecture. C4NDITIdNS flF APPROVAL. 1. Conditions as listed by the Central Point Building Department (Attachment B} and Rogue Valley Sewer Services (Attachment C}. 2. The Applicant shall submit a signage plan prior to building permit approval. Said plan shall be consistent with the provisions of CPMC Sections 15.24, 3. Site Plan Approval shall lapse and become void one {I}year following the date on which it becomes effective unless construction has commenced, ATTACHMENTSIEXIIIBITS Attachment "A"- Applicant's submittal Attachment "B"- Building Department Staff Report Attachment "C"- RVSS Comments Attachment "D"- Findings Attachment "E"- Proposed Resolution Page 2 of 3 ACT~QN: Consideration of a Site Plan Review for the Southern Oregon Headstart facility located on the Central Point Elementary School campus. RECQMMENDATIQN: Approval of Resolution No. ,granting Site Plan approval for the Southern Uregon Head Start facility located on the Central Point Elementary School campus. Page 3 of 3 + 4gdenRc~emerWilkerson A.rchz~ecture'a COI.(.A80RATIVE APPROACH ~ FSONESt DESIGN 2950 east Barnett road medPord oregan 97544 541 779.5237 541 772.8472 ~ wwvn. Q R W ere h itecture. aam 1~TTA~H~~NT ".~~...~~ August 28, 2047 Environmental Impact Statement Southern Oregon Head Start Central Point Elemen#ary Schaal Campus To Wham It May Concern: ORW Architecture has been retained to provide architectural design and construction document services for a new 3,700 single story Head Start Facility located in Central Point, Oregon. The subject property is laaated an in the Northern earner of an existing elementary school campus, located at the in#ersection of4`~' Street and Asia Street in Central Point Oregon. The surrounding neighborhood consists of established single family and multi family residences intermixed with commercial facilities. The elementary sclaaal campus has occupied this site far aver 7S years and was re-built approximately 10 years ago, During the planning of the new campus, floe area where the new Head start facility is to be located was designated as a future campus expansion area. The District felt this program was compatible with the elementary school functions and be an asset to the community. The portion of the elementary school campus where Head Start will be located is approximately 120' E¢th St) x 220' Ash St}. Fourth Street defines floe Northern edge of the subject parcel, Ash street defines the Western Edge, The Primary Bus loop entrance far the elementaiy school is located to the South and #lae existing faculty and guest parking lot is located to the East. When the elementary school was constructed this future expansion area was temporarily developed as a manicured lawn. There are no natural features associated or impacted with development. All utilities have previously been stubbed out to the building pad area with the expectation a building would be constructed an this site. The addition of the Head Start facility to this campus is consistent with the overall occupancy and usage. No new or different functions with a greater impact will be introduced into the surrounding neighborhood. The Central Point Elementary School District welcomes this component to it's campus. In my opinion, due to the fact this is apre-developed site, no enviranrriental issues, modifications to the natural habitat ar neighboring context is being introduced, a fizrther detailed environmental study is not necessary. Attached is the Head Start check list along with comments. Respectfully submitted, ~,.. Kenneth 7. Ogden, AIA Principal r w SC}UTHEAST CC}RNER tigde R arson Archie tureA~~ S4UT~~U4~EST CC7RNER NtJRT~~'WEST CtJRNER Ogle arson ArchitctureA~~ .ciwg, 91i8124t#7 t0:52:o3Atvf, Josh ~~ ~~~ ~~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ - _ _ -- 9 --Z ~_ ~ ~outl~ern t~regon Head Start ~~~~~ ....y ~ Ct'.13'tr~l {~t71r1t ~IF;[7~~ntary ogden~oemyrl~.i[~erson 2,«~`siso: Architecture'` ~"""~'' ~ Central Point, C?regon "f:n~'~• l+~MiM-,9+Xi*M ww.gfSMitGrkKtsiy,yyr. 919812(}x37 2:33;1D PM, josh --1 ~* -i a SE y §$ n - ---_~ --_ -F._.. _ ...p..,,e.~w.pc~n~.wa........~^..u„•ranvm,.+ogn.. w.~. w.aron«r.. ~3 '~ ~ ~~ ~ Southern Qregan Head Mart ~~e~~ ~~'~ 2~~~;~< ....~ ;: Central Paint Elementary ..... , ~;~;,~~ Arcl3itecture 3.:~n$<~z• Cen#ral Point, Oregon ,..~..,,m,..»,.~.• »~„a,z. .~.~,.,~tt„~~„ 9/18f2~47 2:33:48 PM, josh it( tR r... (ti C --# w^^^°^- wwwet i•Ch4f+ww!'H"8~~~~1wuRw'+W.etpdwbW w+iee,•Mpe~yxG+gswMbr YLeux 4tlMalvtWfwxw Wa+t~Y/,vYw• pH to rj eMa ppyq yr`erM~Y~~rtfr.aAabtwn aflrypfn lle~r YMSn4dNewr 9 "'~ m ~~ ~ S{o~upt}hyef~ryn 4/r~egc~npHy}~~padt~~~it o ae~~~~~t~ sdn z~~,.~,~t,., A Vi.:il lti Gl~ PVlnt ~~.~iii ii:intQ~ ~ M' t Y R f mtGbr4cnNa 4l54f ^- usrrssar• Central Painf, pregan Arckzitecture s<,rrzsa,r. NiO~+IrtSA~rarcwr~uxxrpicx xw,IX'{xittAYKI~seLCKi ~ozr~,aw~, sl~s~zoor ~ ~:za:iz art, ~osn ~ CD CD [~ E i I I F f 3 3 I ~~ ~~ggp~K~ ~~`~~ a~~~~~~~ ~ ~. ~_~ :~~ RR i rte" t~yt(SK~J Y`i 1 Q I II _ C,iJ „ 9 ~ ~ n~ _ ____ __ _ _ Southern Oregon Head Start Central Point I~letnentary awp..,.n+'4~°,t,Y''^tt'+.rY.euw.x<.. wwrnrcwr«c ~ ~~,~ Ogd¢nRaemerWilkersan sssa ~~s~`sae . _ • Y Q ~ , wn., n,.r orsr.a,~ ..tom ~ ~ Central Point, Oregon f I S~J Architecture" ~.,Tn.~.TZ• WJFlnt4+raaarc.K.x(s~ct+sx WNx,Q7Mi YtilCCfvrtgc r tr 0 ~_ 1"1 '~ ~ I ~ ~.. I I a~ 3 I F -F _ l t {.. [L~.~~' ..1..~ $ 0 ....~ ~~ 5 F Q rt I ~~ ~ ~ ; ~ i~~ ~' I ____ L ~ iS 3 __~_.__ ...».f».' ~ 1 ~~ a~~'- ~" ~°__ yI ~ I _ Y y/jj/ w ~ + ~ t ' ~ /, [fit V ^ ~ Y 1 ~ ~ > w C~ ~o _ _ f 3 ~ 1.. .... . _ ._.....___...,~_ ~_ , P ~ S ~ . -.. .~.... ~ ~f f~ ~ ~ v i ~~ d u v ! , ri} YK} ~, 4 ~~ ,` A 4 ~ Y ...~ ~ u a ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (, t * . < t ~+ _ < __ yY '4' LR w ! fa' 'K ~ !'Y O u Y ~ ~'-..-..........~........~ ~ i ~ ____3 f 6 ~ F L __.______....»..„». t § s 1 ~ __..______.«..r»... 3 ~ I I ;~ F ~ f `_' ~ ~ {,j yy . ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ fF ~ I s K ~ 3 ~ I I 1 I F © ~ ~ ; E ~ ~ i i i ^ ~ Pre-Construction issues and E~peratona~ Concerns Checldist ~ ~~~ - ~ ~ ~~tF'~ L~. - _ F'~~ (:~~~stru~fion ~ r~~~~~ ,~rtatio'n ! Comply with local or tribal site review by ~,.~ -r-~L„ ~.,rf~q~ planning office if project is new construction ~~~- Aliow adequate staging area on site i€ ~#trsYi,~r~, pr?~,.,~l~.r~, ~T ro'ect is new construction ~ Site center near public transportation or within walking distance in community {In #,~ urban areas - - -- . .,Fr~ ~,~xtstruet;on...,:~!~ c,l~tY_:._:--=_ - _ Select asite where other pollution sources will not be substantially Increased by other nearb sources During construction, comply with State air ~,,, ~~. ~f-~~~~ra~,.a' ualit standards for all_~ollution - - F?re l~L~1~St Uc ~1#J[1 A~3Sth~tics - - ; - - - -- Comply with local ordinances governing .~ ._ ~ ~ p~~avuru~ ta,~r~ r,.x~r~i.`t outside ap{aearance of neighborhood „~„-"G#~~SL• 1~/.S"7l~IGY ~~1~Gl ~'~e~C,41~M1~tr~iCtlO~l - `d~,~aste i'~lana~ement ~ - _ Properly dispose o€ all construction waste _.- - - ~~~~ ~~~cr~ material, including hazardous materials ~ ~u~>-n~~ such as paints, building materials, and waste from portable restrooms ~'re-G:~nst.ti~c~n - !-~~al~h and }f~«~ar; ~ _ __ S ers.~s _ ___ _ _ a -- - _-~ - Select caste Where both the Head Start - ~` - _ ~_ ~'~~~ r5 s~s~~~r~~-cy staff, children and nei hborin sensitive g g ~a~r~r! ~,~rrr! C~'X~ populations (hospitals, schools, etc.} will ~/' Gt„~~ams Jr,t.~~Ct9.~..1 be minimally Impacted by construction and ~~~rLY r.~~ t=~c~'r~ ex ansion Adhere to all construction safety ~,c, co,~ta~r>~t_f' regulations, as governed by the State, ~ local, or tribal government M . ~.-H. ... .. ~ Comply with local recreation plans and _ _ -____ ~G~,~l~11w~ ~~~ ~~~ ordinances in renovation or expansion ..! plans by avoiding building into fields, j/ ~-~1~~/p~~ ,err-~~ trails, paths, etc. that are marked for recreation purposes or further recreation ac uisition accordin to the Ian ~9 Pre-Construction issues and C)perational concerns Checklist ~~ ~_~~{~ _ ~ ~ . ,~ ~ ~~ *~ :~ ~s Pre Cnras#ru~tioYn - U#ilities .., ~ _ _ Comply with State, local, andlor tribal _ _ t/'c~~&tG 5~pn building codes and licensing requirements U' ~,uu~~cr7o~ ;~v~rc~r.~ for se #ic andlor sealer s stems and water Comply with regulations for elec#ricity and ~ ~ra~ vrtc~r~-rr~'~' ~~~~ as_provistons to buildi~__ _._..._._ -- ~Y'atrrn ~' St'+'~' __. _ . Pre C,c~ns#ructon -Public Servil~es . Comply with State, local, andlor tribal ~'"Jf~~ H5~vt2x~~/~ regulations for location of center in relation ~ f~lc.,~r~u.~' to fire hydrants {e.g. wi#hin 45E~' in many laces IMocate center within adequate response time of fire and police services _ ._ _ _ _ - _ `f ... - Pre' Cor~.St~ ti~`ion - I~~r~iS~ _ -..~_.._ -u.r-....- -~. - ----- ---- Select a site where construe#~on noise will _ __ _ 6c. ~-,,,,,,,~L, ---- not violate State, local, and tribal ~ ~o~v1>ra~1 re ulations Select a site where daily noise generated ~~~~,~~ ,~~ by the facility {children, additional traffic, ~ f ~~~,,f,,~ r~~v~~,z~• etc.7 will adhere #o State, local, and tribal 5'~t~,r... re ulations Select a site where neighboring praise ~ ~~ ~~`~ eneration will not im act the facilit .... ~. s .f r U~er,~~ions ,~,[r'~u~ r~ , __~ .~- - _ During operation of the facility, comply -____ _ -_-- _ with all State air quality standards for air rr'~ pollutants ~< _ Gp~er~tic~ns - 11~,.re~t[o~r~ .._w_.__ - ,_._ _ - Complywith Sta#e, local, or tribal regulations and design standards governing safety of children near active recreation locations {e.g, lakes, active trai~l{s, pools} r~ jjy~~y'Ci ~' tV r~ i ~r1~r ff ~ ~:l 'fi`t - .._--~5~~~--. - -. 4a. -- - - Properly dispose of waste generated via normal operations, such as household arba e t/` 119 Pre-Construction issues and +C~pera~ional Concerns Check~~st ~~ ~j _C~perat~ns - Hwman_ H ,z~ t1~ ~t~d Safety ~.:_~~~._ .,_i:.. _. --_---_-~_- _ --- -- Adhere to all State, local, and tribal regulations regarding safety procedures in child care facilities, such as radon testing, fire safety regulations, child to staff ratios, first aid requirements, and any other a licabie health and safet re ulations Observe safety guidelines found in Head Start Performance Standards and local codes, such as eliminating lead paint dangers, maintaining lighting requirements, maintaining play area safety, and ether applicable health and safet re uirements ~I Central Point Element School Parkin anal sis Date Time School Parking Lot Administration Parkin Lot Ash Street October 8, 2007 9:00 40 13 0 11:30 39 11 1 1:00 29 9 0 4:00 10 11 0 October 9, 20(}7 8.45 39 15 0 10:45 45 17 0 1:00 3S 17 0 3:00 28 20 0 October 10, 2007 9:00 44 16 1 11:30 43 19 1 1.00 32 ~ 3:00 30 6 October 11, 2007 9:00 4S 14 0 9:45 a 49 15 0 11;00 49 19 0 1:30 28 41 0 October 12, 2007 9;45 9 S 0 10:45 8 10 0 2:30 2 4 0 ; ~gt~nRo~ml~rWllketson '~ .~-.rchitec-~ure C4t4.A96RA7tVE APPRQACN - WONE57 l7ESiC,N 295Q east barneft road medford Oregon 97804 54'1 7?9.5237 541 772.84721 Central l~pirit ~Chppl District Estimated Area AnalyslS fpr ~e Adi7fllri~Stratlpri Bu~ld~ng First ~Ippr ~ 47~ S ~t {~fficettVprk Room 2,741 CirculatipilJHalls/Stairs 1,428 Unlit /JanitorlMech `714 Stara e S4S Second Flpor 561 s ft OfficelWorlc Rppm 2, I2{3 Cixculatianll-IallslStairs 2,(}44 Unlit /Janitpr 117 Stara e 142 13pard Room 1,0188 Third Flapr 5 561 s ft C}ffices 3,676 Circulation 1,6fl7 Utili l.Tanitar/Mech 1{78 Stara e 1717 Attic Not calculated City of Central Point, t7regon 140 So.Third St., Central Point, C}r 97502 541.664.3321 fax 541.664.6384 www.ci.centra#-po i n t.o r. u s CENTRAL POINT LETTER C?F AUTHQR.IZATI{~N Planning C7epartment Tom Humphrey, AKP, Community Deve#optx~ent [7irectori Ass#stant City Administrator Let it be known that K11N {}GLEN ~ ORW ARCHITECTURE is hereby authorized to act on behalf of the undexsigned with regard to the development of the described property. '1'h%s authority shall include all matters including applications, conferences, documents, pexxnits, and trapping issues. Authorization shall pertain to all governing agencies associated with the project. PIt©jECT: SbUTHERN OREGON HEAI7START Central Point, ©regon. Fees or other costs of this development project axe the responsibility of the owner/applicant. f ~ w Applicant ~~~ ~ r rt.~ Date G'~`~. ~t'~4" Applicant Date i ~- -~ Vicki L. kobinson - -__ .. _= . ~ .. _ ~. ~Bhector of Business Services/Dsputy Cterk : _=:~ (~~ roperty Owrter Bate Property C}wnex Date ~/~~,~~~ Agent Date ~~ ~. ,~ ...t,~ Clty of Central Paint, C7regan ~E~'~"~'~~i~1~. Building De~a~ment t40 S Third Street, Central Point, dR 97502 ~~ ~ 1 Todd Meador, Building C3fiicial 541.664,3321 Fax 54 ! .664.16 f I 1 www.ci.central-point.or as C?regon BUILDING DEP~-RT1ViENT STAFF REPORT .DATE: I U141{l7 T4: Planning Department Planning file: 48142/08143 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: So. Oregon Head Start Name: So. Oregon Head St~~,rt Address: 1001 Beal Lane City: C.P. State: Or. Zip Code: 9502 Property Description: 37-2W-11BB-b700 PZ~RP4SE. The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan Ireview. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Point Planning Comn:~ission. 1 14~ S Thirty Street • Central Point, DR 975©2 •541.fifi4.332~t • Fax 54~:~S~l'~`'~ ,. ~ ~. Building Dept. Staff Repart, Page 2 BUILDING DEPAR7'1VILl~t'T CfJ1V~;MEI"~'TS I . Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with ail current State of (Jregon adapted codes, anal apply for all permits through the Central Paint Building Department. 2. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department. 3, Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Department. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC Appendix T and chapter I $ of the t)SSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information: a, A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geoteciinical recommendations. S. Crradinglexcavation permits are required in accordance with QSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any fill material placed on the site, Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. . A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill {including special inspections of placement of X11 and compaction} acceptable to the Building Qf~~icial, shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until gradinglexcavationpeanit is finaled. Exception: 1. The upper I,5 foot of fill placed outside ofpublicrights-of--way. 2. The upper I.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 2 940 S Thin! Street • Central Point, C.~R 9751~2.549.6fi4.3329 • Fax 549:66.9611 Building Department Staff Report, page 3 6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property, $. Any development {any man-made ehange~ to irnpraved or uni3mproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120. 9. Dust control, erosion control, and tracl~ out elimination procedures must be implemented. 10. Application for building permits will require three sets of complete plans indicating compliance with C7regon Structural Specialty Code (2005}. 11. Fire District 3 will determine :C~re hydrant locations, as well as access to buildings. Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of worl~. If questions, please call Todd Meador.....664-6325, ext. 228. 3 74tJ S Third Straeet • Central Point, QR 975172 •541.fifi4.3~21 • Fax 541.fifi4.1 fi91 RC~CUE VA.~EY ~FW~R ~ERV~~~ l,,ocation: 138 West Vitas ltaact, ilcntral Point, Olt -Mailing Acldxess: P.t). Box 3130, Centxat Point, OR 7502-0{}05 Tel. (541} bb4~300,1~ax {541} b64-7171 www.liVSS.us October 10, 2007 Connie dune City o€ Central Paint Planning Department ~ 55 South Second Street Central Paint, Oregon 91502 Re: Southern C}regon Nead Start, File # 08'142-CUP, 08143 --Site Plan There is a 10 inch sewer main on both Fourth and Ash Stree#s. Sewer service to the proposed development will require a tap into one of these locations. The permit for the tap will be issued by RVS upon payment of related development fees. The proposed development will be required to meet stormwater quality standards as defined in the Rogue Valley Sewer Services Stormwater Quality Design Manual. RVS requests that approval of the proposed development be conditioned upon the following. 1. Applicant must obtain sewer connection permits and pay all related development charges to RVS prior to the start of construction, 2. The applicant must provide a stormwater management plan for approval by RVS prior to the start of construction. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Carl Tappert, PE District Engineer Attachment "D" FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No: 08143 INTRODUCTION 1n the Matter of a Site Plan Review for construction of a 3,'700 square foot, single-story Southern Oregon Head Start facility. The new facility is to be located an the 7.8 acre Central Point Elementary School campus. The subject property is located in the R-l, Residential Single-Family zoning district and is identified on the sackson County Assessor's map as 3'7S 2W 11BB, Tax Lot 6'700, APN 10146129. {Applicant: Southern Oregon Head Start, Agent: Kenneth Ogden, AIA, Architect) ~'PMC' 17.20.030 Conditional uses R-1 Residential Single-family. The following uses and their accessary uses are permitted in an R-1 district when authorized in accordance with chapter 17 76: C: Public and parochial early childhood development preschools, nursery schools, kindergartens or day care centers; Finding: The proposed Head Start facility is considered an early childhood. development center, preschool or prekindergarten and may be permitted with a Conditional Use Permit, Conclusion: The applicant has met the procedural requirements with the filing of a Conditional Use Permit application {File No. 0$142). CP.M~C 17.72. Cll t1(f#} Purpcase. The purpose of site plan, landscaping and construction plan approval zs to review the site and landscaping plans of the proposed use, structure or building to determine compliance with this title and the building code, and to promote the orderly and harmonious development of the city, the stability of land values and investments, and the general welfare, and to promote aesthetic considerations, and to help prevent impairment or depreciation of land values and development by the erection of structures ar additions or alterations thereto without proper attention to site planning, landscaping and the aesthetic acceptability in relation to the development of neighboring properties. GPMC' 17.72. t12t1 Site plan approval required: {~1) .~ site plan application conforming to the requirements of Section l7.7.2. f13t} shall be made: 1, For all construction rerluiring issuance of a building permit,• or 2. Upon a change of use. Finding: The application and supporting documents provide the information necessary for review of the proposed Head Start building. The proposed building will require issuance of a building pezrnit. Page ~. of 6 Conclusion: A Site Plan Review far the proposed structure is necessary and the submitted application complies. CPMC l7 72. tI3tJ {A) -- {E) Itzfvrntativn Required This section of the code addresses all of the necessary information to make a decision far approval or denial of the site plan application, Finding: The applicant has provided all of the necessary information as outlined in the above referenced code. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC ~ 7, 72.43tI {F} 1'n the discretion of the city, a traffic study performed by a licensed professional engineer; Finding: A traffic study was not required for this application. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CPMC I7.72. tl4tl .~'tandards..tn approving, conditionally approving, or denying the plans submitted, the city shall base their decision on the following standards: CPMC X 7.72.44(I {A}, Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner as to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses, The Planning Commission may require the maintaining of existing trees for screening purposes and for sound and sight insulation from existing neighborhood use; Finding: The existing landscaping was implerr~ented as per the planting plan of the August 1, 2001, File No. 01038, Applicant Sheet LI Site Plan Review. The existing landscaped area with remain. The subject construction site is a lawn area of the elementary campus. Finding: The campus is landscaped with perimeter and parking aisle plantings, a playground and street trees. The planting areas will be retained and the irrigation system will be reconfigured for the construction of the building and walkways. An existing tree located in the building footprint will be relocated prior to the start of construction. Finding: The future playground area west of the proposed building will be fenced for the safety of the children. The agent indicates that the fence materials used will be decorative or similar to wrought iron fences. Conclusion: The proposal complies. Page 2 oi' 6 CPMC 17, 72.4411 (B} .Design, number and Zoeation of ingress and egress paints so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; Finding: The project site is located an the corner of Ash and S. Fourth Streets. Bath streets are improved City streets with sidewalks. The site is part of the existing Central Point Elementary campus with existing ingress and egress from both Ash and S. Fourth Streets. An existing bus loop on Ash Street and the existing drop-off loop from South Fourth Street are currently used for student access. The applicant states that the Central Paint School District will allow both to service 1-lead Start students, therefore, I-lead Start will use the existing ingress and egress points with no additional access points requested. Conclusion: The proposal complies. CP.~14C 17.72.444 (C} To provide off=street parking and Zaading.facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use, for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traj~c flow on public streets; Finding: As discussed in Finding B-1 above, the bus and drop-off loops will be utilized by the facility. Finding: CPMC Section 1'7,64{E}{2} requires three {3}parking spaces per classroom far a total of six {6} parking spaces required of the Head Start facility. As presented, the applicant is proposing the use of six {6} existing off street parking spaces. The campus has 13 S existing off street parking spaces, including loading, drop-off and bus loops. The parking space allocation includes: 63 spaces far the Central Point Elementary School and 55 spaces for the administration building as required by CPMC Section 1'7.64.C}4~. The existing parking an the campus is adequate in number to accommodate the needs of the Head Start Facility {see Table 1 }. However, it needs to be noted that this finding is based on the interpretation that the Head Start facility is a subordinate and sanctioned educational use to the Central Point Elementary School campus. Table 1 Centra~i Pont Elements School Caam~ us Parking Inventory, with Head Start Facility T .___..__..~_ .___._..w._ Use No. Pkg. Ratio Req. Pkg. Exist~n Classroori 21 ~ 3/classroom _~..~..._~~__~_._.__._. ~.~..~., .:.~._____.__.___w..__~..__._~..~.~~_._._.._...___._....__.._..__._ 63 Off~e ......~~.__._ .___.._.._~.___.._. _a...__.__ ..._.16,6(?(? ~ 1/3UC~ GFA ~ ~ _~_. _.._._..~__~_.~.____~~_..,_._...~..~_......m._.__...,. ...._ ~..~..~.._......._.. 55 .._ _._____...._w H e a d Start 2 i 1 6 / ~ / Total '( ~"} / ~ 12~ ~E~isting Parking Spa.ces ~ 104 ...__.._. €17ra ©ff S ces = 31 Surplus/(Deficit) Parking ~ 11 Page 3 of 6 Finding: As an adjunct to the elementary school, the Head Start facility would be required to have a minimum of six {6} parking spaces {Table I}. As a day care center, the Head Start facility would be required to have one {1}space per employee and one {1}space per five children for a minimum of 17 spaces {Table 2}. As a day care center, no additional Campus parking spaces would be required. Table ~. Central Point Elementary School Campus _ _.... _ Parking Inventory, with Head Start Facility„as a Pre School Use No, _._ . Pkg. Ratio Req. Fkg. Classrooms ~3 ... __._ _3lclassroom ~ ~~ ... ©ffice.._.._._.. _ .,. ~ 1 6,600 ; ._.-.____ .. 1!300 GFA _...__.__._ ._---....__ .. . 55 .,_..._.,._._... _._ .. , 1/Emp. & 115 _.-. Pre-School 9/38 ' Students 17 Total ~ ._.,.,. _ _ _ 135 Existing Parking„Spaces ~ 104 Dro ©ff S aces z € 3 31 Surplusl(Deficit} Parking 0 Finding: The Head Start building has been situated in the northeast comer of the campus to maintain the Third Street visual corridor for the historic 1908 brick administration building. This location also provides access to the existing paved parking lot, bus and drop-off loops. The existing internal circulation pattern will not be altered with this application. Finding: Planning Department Findings, Attachment E to the Staff Report dated November 6, 200'] of the Conditional Use Permit provide detailed unique characteristics and parking analysis. Finding: The applicant provided a Central Point Elementary School Parking analysis conducted between the hours of 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM the week of C?ctober 8`~' -12`x'' . The vehicle parking count analysis, Attachment ``A" found that during school hours an average of 52.31 parking spaces were utilised of the 104 aisle parking spaces. At the peak, 69 aisle spaces were used leaving 35 spaces available. Conclusion: Based on the finding that the Head Start facility provides an acknowledged and sanctioned educational service and as such is classified as an educational facility, the parking standards set forth in Section 17.64.040{E}{2} for an elementary school apply. The minimum required off-street parking is six {6} spaces. The existing campus parking is sufficient in number to meet the required off street parking requirements. CPMC I ~ 92. f14~ {Z?) Signs and rather outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they dry not c~nfliet with or deter from traffic eontrvl signs yr devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; !'age 4 of 6 Finding: Anew Head Start sign will be placed on the building and a sign permit will be required. Sign standards and permit requirements are found in Section 15.24 of the CPMC. Conclusion; Compliance with CPMC 15.24 Sign Code will be monitored during the sign or building permit process. CPMC I T. X2.444 (E) accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety cf life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes sc~ that all buildings an the premises are accessible tc fire apparatus; Finding; Fire District No. 3 will review the structural plans and comment during the building permit process. Conclusion; Fire District 3's requirements can be monitored in the building permit review process. CPMC 17.72.444 (F} Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations, including :Section ZS.24. 0184 pertaining to the maximum number of single family dwellings or dwelling units allowable on cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws; Finding; No single-family dwellings are proposed with this application. Conclusions Not applicable CPMC 17.12.444 ~~~} Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the G'entral Paint area and its environs. Z'he architecture and design proposals may be rejected by the Planning Commission if found tc~ be incompatible with the existing architectural or design characteristics cif adjacent properties or uses. fn addition, the Planning Commission reserves the right to establish additional height, setback, buffering, or rather development requirements that may be necessary to ensure land use compatibility and ensure the health, safety, and privacy of Central Point residents. Finding: Applicant's site plan and building elevations {Attachment "A>'} illustrate the proposed design of the building. The design is similar to other Head Start centers in the area and is compatible with the existing elementary school structure. The building's earth tone exterior is designed to blend with the existing Central Point Elementary School. The material and roof color of the administration building and the elementary school will be used for the new facility. Findings The site plan provides that the refuse and recycling area will be screened. with a six {~} ft. concrete block enclosure with a solid steel gate. Red brick has been used on the existing elementary and administration buildings. The use of red brick, or similar material, for the enclosure would be in keeping with the existing architecture. This is brought to the attention of the Planning Commission is listed as item 1 under "issues" of the Staff Report dated November ~, 200'7. Page 5 of ~ Finding: The building will have two (~} classrooms, amulti-~~utpose room, ~it~h~n, staff office space and restrooms typical of a school structure. Finding The Head Start building has been situated in the northeast corner of the campus to maintain the Third Street visual corridor for the historic 19(}$ brick administration building. Conclusion: The proposal complies. Page 6 of 6 ~TTAC ~ N! E NT ".~~,.." PLANNING CtJMMISSIUN RES+DLUTIC~N NQ. A RESQLUTIt7N GRANTING APPRfJVAL (~F A SITE PLAN FdR THE C()NSTRUCTIdN C7-F A 3,700 SQ. ~". 5f1-UTHERN OREGON HEAD START FACILITY.' Applicant: Southern Oregon Head Start, Agent: Kenneth Ogden, AIA, Architect (375 2W 11. 8B, Tax Lot 6700 450 South Fourth Street ) File No. 081.43 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for Site Plan approval for the construction a 3,700 set. fl. Southern C7regon Head Start facility located on the 7.8 acre Central Point Elementary School campus. The subject property is located in the R- 1-6, Residential Single-Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11BB, Tax Lot 67U(}, APN 1(1146129, WI3EREA5, on November 6, 2007, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which tune it reviewed the City staff' report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the R-1-6, Residential Single-Family zoning district section 17.20, Clff-Street Parking and Loading section 17.64 and Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan section 17.72 of the Central Foint Municipal code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, as part of the Site Plan application, has considered and f nds per the Staff Report dated November 6, 2{}07, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the conditional use permit is consistent with the intent of the R-1-6, Residential Single-Family zoning district, now therefore; BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Staff' Report dated November ~5, 2C}C17, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 6~ day of November, 2fl(}7. Planning Commission Chair Planning Commission Resolution I1lo. (I~.0607~ ATTEST: City Representative Approved y me this 6~' day o~November, 20(7'7. Punning Coxnn-~ission Chair Planning Coxr~inission Resolution No. {7.106E7~ ~~ ~ i ~ ~ I ;;:, I j~, r ~3:~rza 1inr~ij?Itrr~y ,yiE ~' ~o11i;;?l='tt,Iy 3~tiVttiiJ(~lil(ttll' 1 h -C'[r,>,{ ~`ssizit;r:t C_ify F~c,n,i~aistritol' Ca~a~ic1~l~~atita« c> ~ ~Si~{~ Js1~1~1 r4. ~1c;~~ liar ~~~.laaxasiza~~t clt~lac, ~.~~sti~a~. ~..cai1~=,~~~-~vlcal,-i5 f~~~i111~~;~j. ']'11{~ svla~~,~~i tarcal~~•~ ~~• is ~{a~ad~tl (-(~l_:3~-~~~", ~)€^zac.r~ll t.'o~aa~7l'rci~al, ~~lacl. is icl~~~~tifit~~l iatt tlXz, ,l~~c(~t>tara £.tat~r;.~ -'~,:, ,~ ~;;,~~' , ~ii;~a, ~~s .3 ~`~ ~~,`' 11C"l~, "I'~a~ Lc~2 100, tzlsca J.~aca~,~.~~a a~ t100 ~. )i~'~~oaai ~~r•~c:~. (~^ ~a~~~ .:~;~, Lash ?~~or~Y~at1. 1']G~ra~aiial, "1'~;clarai~.ia7a 1„ ~+ ', ~ ~~ . \ ~ e' B ~. ,~. a _- 1(Kr 4 ~fAF' 3`~ 2W li' , ~, ~~ 109 IS-.S `-YZ ~„ 0. ~ ` %,r,,~ ~ y},~ l J }r~ ~ 49L ~~ ~' ~~~ ,s k4 1'.ia~ti 7tal,jet,t lal'ca~a~,~iv i~, ]c~c., ;,gal C'.Ol~lla-1{;i'L;7Ell lULIPYI~? Ll1Sl-°i(:(~ <~ . ti~~iila ~a ~a~~s{: ~taa~ira~, 01 C_--:~, C.:'o~zarsaGa'c:;i~~l '1 (ICa,oa_i~l~arc=,. A ~7~1~rc~l ~~~it11 a~a o~, ~ 1 ia~~ ~i11 cal~~a~~~ r rl~~; cl~~ca°~:°tz{a~~ ~1'v~~iaic,I~ ~;tarli~l~ clisia ~c ~ crlt~ri~_~ u~ x7ac;c:t~, Ira t}1i~ ca~c, tlac° ~~prl~li~a~a~ ~lat~sc~ ~c> process the x`31((:" 1~1~1i1 L1ilCJ~" ~ ~)1~°-t_~, i'f;Cll.Zli'~'IIIG'Ia1 s. l~1~i11Y]111L? ~cl~ar~~~c:r7t l~cco~t'cls cio nog iladic~t~; ila~t~ a. C;LJT' la~jd c~,-er l~c;~.~:n iss>.~c;ci ar Cota~;a~i° ~~or~~is ~i•ior 1o car af«;r ctaYastrazc'tiQn ~~~ ih~ existing ~~cilicy. From a use ~~d sift. la1_~~~ i~c~~'s~~~ctive, the c~i#~erer?ee between the twn zr~n~~ r~i:~t~'.i~is: 1. 'I~ho C-5, Co ercial T"o~°o>7rta~ar-~; r~~c~~ria'c; coneli~~it>n4~1 ~~s~. i~ -'~~z~:li f~r° s~ o ~, The C-5, Commercial Thoroughfare requires a mori~urarY to have one {1}parking space per 50 square feet of gross floor area. 1n this case, the required parking would be 10? spaces. 3. The TOD- GC, General Commercial zone would designate this existing business as a "Personal Service" and as such, is a permitted uses, 4, The required number of parking spaces in the TOD-GC is one {1}parking space per 500 square feet of floor area for a total of eleven { 11 }required parking spaces. Tax Lot 100 has a lot dimension of 150' x 294' deep, for a total of 43,500 square feet. {Figure 1 }. To the north, south, and west the surrounding properties are zoned TOD-GC, General Commercial. To the east {rear} the adjacent property is zoned R-3, Residential Multiple Family. General Project ,Description: The existing and proposed use is classified by definition as Personal Services3, which is a permitted use within the TOD-GC zoning district. The project as proposed is for an expansion of their existing facility to include a receiving area, additional indoor temperature controlled storage, and a crematorium, The construction and use of a crematorium is regulated by the State of Oregon. The existing fzrst floor {3,14? square feet} and second floor area {949 square feet} is approximately 4,096 square feet, and was constructed in 19?6. The proposed addition is for a single story consisting of 1,25? square feet to be situated behind the existing building, if approved, the structure's adjusted total gross floor area will be 5,353 square feet, fora 31 °lo expansion. The applicant is proposing to enclose the existing covered drive {carport} by adding garage doors at the west and east ends. There will not be any changes to the original footprint of the carport. Density, Lot Area and Coverage: The maximum allowed lot coverage for TOL7 -General Commercial zoning is 100°l0 {all impervious surfaces count toward lot coverage}, with a minimum requirement of 15°!0 landscaping. The total proposed lot coverage {building and impervious area} is approximately ?&°lo or 33,060 square feet. The landscaping is approximately 24 °lo or 10,355 square feet, which is in compliance with CPMC. There is additional landscaping {approximately 1,820 square feet} located within the public right of way for Highway 99, which is discussed in greater detail under issues of this sniff report, Setbacks: The existing structure is not subject to review for setback requirements. The proposed expansion must meet the following current setback requirements: The rear yard setback is 0' {unless adjacent to a residential zone, the minimum setback is 15'}. The portion of South First Street that was vacated cannot have any structures located within those 40 feet. However, it is used in calculating the required distance from a residential zone, overall landscaping requirements and maximum lot coverage. Parking: The parking requirements for personal services located within the TOD District /Corridor are one {1 }space per 500 square feet of gross floor area, for a total of 11 spaces required. The existing parking provides 49 spaces. The proposed addition will consume an area equivalent to seven {?} of the existing parking spaces leaving a total of 42 parking spaces, which, as proposed, meets and exceeds the minimum number of parking spaces required. z CPMC 1?.0$.410 {U) {b} _ Definitions of Personal Services s CPMC 1.65.054) --Table 1 ¢ 1?.65.054} -Table 3 - T4~D Districts and Corridor Parking Standards Page 2 of S t;~t3l''~~~F~~~~CJ~F~i~ ~~~iTRAL, P't~Il`IT ~HAPFL, ITF` PL~A~~ Architectural Design: The Site Plan application includes elevations, parking and landscaping plans {Attachment A). The building elevations of the existing building and proposed expansion are architecturally consistent with the design criteria far the T4D District & Corridor, Landscaping and Buffering: The subject property includes 12,1'75 square feet of an-site landscaped area accounting far 24°fo of the total property area. The minimum landscape requirement is 15°fo~ . The landscaping is situated along the entire perimeter of the property, as well as raised brick wall planters on the northwest corner of the property and within the existing parking lat. The landscaped area located to the rear of the property consists of approximately 6,OOf} square feet and will provide additional buffering to the R-3, Multiple Family residential area located to the east. The minimum buffering required is 15'. The applicant has met and exceeded the minimum landscaping and buffering requirements, Access: There are three {3}existing access paints to the subject property, one {1) from Highway 99, and the other two {2) from Cupp Drive. The applicant will not be making any changes to existing access points. FINDINGS: See attached Attachment "G" ISSUES: l . Highway 99 Right of Way: Based an the Jackson County Assessment map, field measurements and with other information available to staff, the right of way far Highway 99 in front of Conger -Morris is approximately 112 feet in width. The paved area of Highway 99 is approximately 67 feet from curb to curb, Measuring from the center line of Highway 99 towards Conger-Morris the right of way is approximately 56 feet with approximately 33 feet paved to front of curb. This leaves a remaining right of way beyond the existing curb of approximately 23 feet. The site plan is inconsistent with the measurements taken by staff, and would place the applicant's monument sign, the trees recommended for removal and their parking lot lighting all within the public right of way. Prior to issuance of any construction permit, the applicant will be required to provide a corrected site plan. 2. Non Conforming Screening: There is existing nonconforming fencing that consists of • A forty-two {42"~ inch chain link fence along the property sine adjacent to Cupp Drive, and, • East of the second driveway from Highway 99 there is an existing seventy-two {72"} inch chain link fence. Chain link fencing with or without slats for screening is prohibited in the T4D DistrictlCorridor7. The applicant is eonditianed to replace the chain link fencing with a fence constructed of acceptable materials. The fencelscreen will be a ~ 17.6? -Design Standards - T4D District and Corridor ~ CPMC Section 17.65.050 Tabis 2 ~ CPMC 1'7.67.050 {4} Page 3 of 5 minimum of six {6} feet in height around the service areas, and shad not obstruct adequate sight distance for vehicles entering and exiting the parking lot or service areas. 3. Sidewalks and Landscaping Strips: Currently there are no sidewalks along the project's frontage adjacent to Highway 99. The applicant must provide sidewalks and a landscape strip consistent with Public Works Standards along the frontage of the property, There are three {3} mature trees along Highway 99 which are currently causing the asphalt in the parking lot to raise and break apart. These trees are also located within the area proposed for the sidewalk. Public Works Specifications for improvements along a five {S} lane arterial {Drawing No. ST-32}, requires a six {6} foot sidewalk and seven and a half foot {7,5} landscape strip. The three {3}trees along Highway 99 presently causing damage shall be removed and replaced with trees chosen from the City of Central Point approved street tree list . 4. Existing Monument Sign: The existing monument sign is located almost entirely within the public right of way and will need to be relocated, if the applicant wishes to replace the sign, they will be required to obtain a sign permit. The new sign shall be compliant with the sign regulations for the TC}D - GC District/Corridor. S. Rogue Valley Sewer Services. RVSS is requiring the applicant to locate the existing sewer service lateral and replace or relocate the pipe as needed in coordination with RVSS. {Refer to Attachment "E"). CQND~TlC4NS OF APPROVAL: 1. Applicant shall comply with all requirements of outside agencies. 2. Applicant shall relocate or remove the existing monument sign to allow for a new sidewalk and landscaping strip within the public right of way once verified by a surveyor. 3. Applicant shall replace existing chain link fencing with a material acceptable for the TUD District and Corridor. 4. Applicant shall screen the compressor for the temperature controlled storage area, using materials similar or complimentary to the existing screening of the HVAC unit on the east side of the building. 5. Applicant shall install a sidewalk and landscaping strip along the frontage adjacent to Front Street {Highway 99} that is compliant with the Public Works Specifications (Drawing No. ST-3~} {Refer to "Sidewalks" under issues for full condition of approval}. This shall be done prior to issuance of a building permit. Prior to construction of the sidewalks, applicant shall provide a landscaping and irrigation plan for the frontage landscape strip. The landscape plan shall be based on the landscape plan proposed for the Providence facility south of this project, d, Applicant shall provide a revised site plan drawn by a licensed surveyor reflecting actual property boundaries, and measurements prior to issuance of a building permit. ~ CPMC 17.&7050 (4) {a} ~ CPMC 17.67,050 (5) Page 4 of 5 N©TES: Approval ofthis Site Plan shall be valid for a period of one year and shall expire on Thursday, November 6, 20(}8. EXIIBITSIATTACHI4fiENTS: Attachment "A" -Building Elevations & Landscaping Plans Attachment "B" ~- Applicant Project Narrative Attachment "C°' -~ Public Works Correspondence Attachment "D°' -Building Department Staff Report Attachment "l1" - RVSS Correspondence Attachment `°F" -Department of Environmental Quality Correspondence Attachment "G" -Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Attachment "H" -Proposed Resolution ACTION: Consideration of approval for the Site Plan Application. RECflMMENDATIUN: Approve Resolution Number granting Site Plan approval, based on the Staff Report dated November &, 2007 which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. ~. Page S of 5 . ~ ~ AT~`ACNM~NT `~ ~ -~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~. ~~ ff~ti~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ - -..._..._..._...._....pac.r~c ~wY ~~-...~...,_...._..~... ~, ~~ ~~ A ~~ ~ ~~ II 't f i 'tea E 8~~ ~......f [~ ,..,.9a:.......i ...,......r*~.....,~ ..............~.., .. I ~ ~ ~ ~ r~osev )+~irlatra..a1 nooz~zorl r«~ CHARLES ~.. BALKER! CHARLES A BECK ~ac:Hr:~cr, nsrl $ CC?~VGER~-MC?RR~S //~~tyy ~~ +~-~ ( } t F~ ~ ' ~N~~~ ~~I~1T ~~~~~. ,, C ~ ~r ri /t'7J 1 lC1J~T 1©I`# TEp F FLETSGHER ~-. ~+~~ s -,a»~,...~...~,.r c~u.: sat- ,n~ss~~: na- e.+~+~s.~enerA.~.irr+w. wiFaww AMar.«a+wcr a 800 Sa. FRGih}i" 5'i'. CE`~!'i'RAL PUIN3', OR 9619 ROSS I.AtJE, CEN'iRA1, POIN3', t7R. zs a a~a~~o»vvzu:~riwr. #sn C7R f -867- 9 ~+ ~~ i£ { II 4 _ ft It w~~i t f I E`XZSTIN6 MORTUARY N ___-_ ~_.....__..._---.___._...__.__r ~_.._.._- _.....,_____-__ £ ~ I £ Ii £ o ~ " € £ £ r F I ~ 3 £ i a £ £ .. ~__ £ I I I } I 1 £ ~ I i ' f ! f I # £ I I E f F I I € I i t I 4° £ ! ! 1 I £ # I q~ ~~ E ,£ I I £ f 4~ I f i F I L__~__ 1 I £ 3 £I £ I £ I i { r+ I # I •~ lruw.rMi~-i~: ~~e ~ p f r~ ; F~ ,. 3 I RE If I I jt Ii I '~ ~ ~~ s t i 3 £ f tY I i #~ I 1 r i £ £ F t r I Yh~ i ~ kr ~ i } ~, I £ I £ £ ~£ I ~ i i I I I I t l I I ~"' i ~~ i w ~ i~~ I l~-_ Sf I I I I w } S~ ~` I I. ~ ~ £1 C,. . ... ... ... .. ....... _.., • .... .. ~ L ..... t L _ _ " _ ... .. .., .„ r~._1___ _~J_....___. h .. ~_~__.._.._.... _~- 4 £ £ ' s t a I € 3 pi £ I it i Ei i ..>. F }#~ ~ £ I £ F T r I ~I I ~~ t s~ 4 1 I I } t~ £ {1 I ~ I i I I 4 £ ~ §~ ~ i Et ~ f £ irA I ~ £ R~ # I __ b _ _ TI j ]14~ i j £ ( I I f ~~ [ F I £ £ I ~~{ t I ! 1 'I £ f . I 3 t I } I. G ...... ...... ... ...~.,..., ... _ ' trt 1MMa .r w wuunlr a' ~ raoPOa~ts sIe~MOaa. ~ ADD~SON }a~ ~ ` CHARLES l. BALKEN CHARLES A, BEAK ARf~ttf~CT, ATA S y} ~#y~//'~! ji!~/~~y~ ~©ili~T~~"fYltJl'C1- Z~ . . ,,. . . . ~} . Hr +nolecrwASSOa~rn~ Fta r~+rttl ? t ~~~~~ T h ~ ~~*E ~ ~ ~u~ ~ ~ ~~I 7v j ~ { ~ ~~ET~trTl~R CA. ARCHITECT' ~LJ F ~ POS ~ ~~ IYUI!!£r7dr£ivr,wFwtwwyr CEit,:btY1.9479 MEssA6E:776•~406f} . «'~e>iq~d~iwe/+~.xkcMtra.t~k.reMr«r 84?0 5a. FRONT 5T: CENTitA~ POINT. OR ~ 3619 Ross l.AhtE, CENTRAL P017Ji', at, 2966 7ACK50lJVtiLE N4VY. #171 F71t i i CUPP bRIVE REAR„VI,~W ~UPP bRIVE FRC?IVTAL VIEW LEFT REAR VIEW RIGNT REAR VIEW ` C~ ~llb SALE REAR ~'LEVAT;CQN REAR 4V~RVIEW AT~'A~HME~JT " ~' City of Central Point Planning Department Subject: CPMC 1'7,76 Conger-Morris Central Point Chapel 840 So. Front Street Central Point, C}regon 97502 Froposed Project: GaragelStorage Building and Crematory A, The site for the proposed project is within the existing lot lines, B. The addition will have adequate access from existing streets, North Front Street to the west and Cupp Drive to the north. No additional traffic will be generated from this project. C. There will be no adverse effect from the project to the surrounding properties. There will be sufficient ingress and egress to the facility. Set backs, fences, and landscaping will be adhered to for the project, D. The safety and welfare of the surrounding neighbors will neither be detrimental nor hazardous to their health. Operation of the crematory is governed and licensed by bath the Oregon State Cemetery & Mortuary Beard, and also the Department of Environmental Quality. There are no structures within a 144 ft of the proposed project. Sincerel , ' ~~~ ._-. Robert M Neff - Owne Steven C. Morris -Owner ~T~~cN~n~~Y ;~_ _~, Public Works L~-epar~t»ent .~ NT Bab Pierce, Director Matt Sarnitare, Manager P~IB'~IC T~f.31'.1~~5' ~`TA~F REPORT October 2S, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: Commercial Addition Applicant: S&B Western, LLC. Zoning: T£)D-GC, General Commercial Trs~ffic: No traffic study is warranted for this development. Eacistin Infrastructure: All utilities are present. Issues: There are no sidewalks existing at this site. Engineering and Development Plans anal Permits: The Central Point Public Works Department is charged with management of the City's infrastruchtre, including streets, waterworks, and storm, water drainage facilities. In general, the Department's "Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction" shall govern how public facilities are to be constructed. The Developer is encouraged to obtain the latest version of these specifications from the Public Works Department. In general, the plan submittal shall include plan and profile for streets, water, storm drainage and sanitary sewers, storm drainage calculations, storm drainage basin map, erosion control plan, utility and outside agency notifications and approvals. The plan may also include applicable traffic studies, legal descriptions and a traffic control plan. A Public Works Permit will only be issued after the Department Director approves the final construction drawings. After approval, the fees associated with the development will be calculated and attached to the public works permit. All fees are required to be paid in full at the time the Public Works Permit is issued, except Public Works Inspection fees. After project completion during the final plat application process, the Public Works Inspector will calculate the appropriate amount of inspection time to assess the developer. Before the final plat application is processed the developer must pay the relevant inspections fees and bond for any uncompleted improvements (as determined by the Public Works Director). 94Q South 3'~ Street ~ Central Paint, 4R 975©2 •547.fi64.3327 • Fax 549.fifi4.fi384 Condih~ns of Approval: 1. Sidewalks and Landscape Strip: Subject to Municipal Code Section l2.{}4 sip foot side sidewalks steal[ be required as part of the proposed addition, along the frontage of property within the right of way for Highway 99. Additionally, a seven and a half (7.5} foot landscape strip shall be required to be installed concurrently. The configuration of the landscape strip and sidewalk will be in compliance with Public Works Standards and Specifications drawing CRST- 32. 2. Street Tree Plan: Prior to issuance of the final building occupancy, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Public Works Director, or his designee, a landscape plan for the areas designated for landscape strips. Landscape strips for the proposed. development shall be placed immediately behind the proposed sidewalk location. Street trees shall be planted thirty-feet on center around the perimeter of the property, The plan shall include construction plans, irrigation plans, details, specifications and species of the trees selected from the City's approved street tree list anal are to be planted within the landscape strips. Plantings shall comply with Municipal Code Section 12.36. Tree plantings shall have at least a 1 'lz" trunk diameter at the time of installation. All street trees shall be irrigated with an automatic underground irrigation system. Maintenance of the landscape raw will be the responsibility of the property owners who own the property directly adjacent to the landscape strip. 140 South 3'~ Streef • Central Point, 4R 9?502 « 541. fifi4.3321 « Fax 541. fifi4. fi384 City, of Central. Paint, C}regon_.. . _ .. 140 S Third Street, Centrat Point, QR 975Ei~ 541.664.33 f Fax 541.664. ! 611 www.ci.central-point.or us Litt o€ Pt~t[~IT ~a ~~~~~ ATTACHMENT " ~ wilding Department .... .. Todd Meador, Building Official BUILDING DEPART'Iti~EI~'~' ST.A~" REPORT DATE:141~U107 TC?. Planning Department Pla~.~ning f le: 481441018145 FROM: Building Department SUBJECT: Conger Morris AdditionlR.emodel APPLICA.~~T': S&B LLC Property Description: T3?S R2W 11 144 P~:IRP~DSE: CUP1Site Plan Review The st~~ff report is to provide information to the Platan.ing Commission and the Applicant regarding City $uilding Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed project. This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the Central Paint Planning Comrrnission. 94f} S Third Stt~eet ~ Central Paint, QR 9?5f12 ~ 541.664.3323' ~ Fax 547.fi64.1fi1 ~' BUILDING DEPARTI4ZENT C011~IN~NTS L Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Paint Building Depax~nent. ~. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by the Central Point Plumbing Department. 3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point Electrical Depaz~ment. 4. Provide the building department with a Geotecl~nical report as required by OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 of the ()SSC. A written report of the investigation shall include, but need not be limited to, the following information. a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings andtor excavations. b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered. c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered. d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects ofliquefaction and soil stren8;th, and the effects of adjacent loads. e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said design shall be based on geotecl~nical recommendations. 5. C~radinglexcavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and chapter 18 and regarding any fill material placed on the site, Fills to be used to support the foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering practices. Ali private storm drain work must be pez~rnitted and inspected by City Building Department {prior to backfxll). A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill including special inspections of placement of fill and compaction} acceptable to the Building tJfficial, shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be issued until gradinglexcavation pex~nit is finaled Exception: l . ':lhe upper 1.5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of--way. 2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. 944 S Thirrri Str~ef ~ ~entrai Point, OR 97'542.549.6fi4.3329 ~ ;Fax 54 ~'. 8fi4. ~ 8? ~ .. Building Deparl~aent 5taff'Repart, page 3 6. T© move or demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building Department for permit requirements. 7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on the property, 8. Any development (any man-made change} to improved or unimproved real estate located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central. Point shall require a Development Permit as set forth. in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.12fl. 9. Bust control, and track out elimination procedures must be implemented. A comprehensive erosion control plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Depaa~tment prior to start of work. l fl. Application for building permits will require four sets of complete plans indicating compliance with C3regon Structural Specialty Code ~2~3(31}, The International Fire Cade (with the State of Oregon Amendments-2(10'7}, rIFPA l3, C}regon Mechanical Specialty Cade (2001},,Uniform Plumbing Code (with Oregon Blue Pages-amendments}. Plan check may take from 3 to 8 weeks, depending on completeness when submitted.....if requested, plan check my be in%tiated simultaneously with Pianr~ing Dept. evaluation {Plan Check Fee must be paid prior to start of plan check}. A complete code analysis should be a part of the submitted plans. l l . Fire District 3 ~v%11 determine fire hydrant locations, as well as access to buildings. 12. Crematorium unit must be Listed and Labeled and installed to Manufactures Instructions. 13. Room containing Crematorium must be 2 Hour. Fire Protection} Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work. If questions, please call Todd Meador.....664-6325, ext. 228. 14Q S Third Street ~ Central Paint, QR 976Q2 ~ 54 9.664.332 9 ~ Fax 54 9.864.9 fi 11 ATTACHMENT "" ~.r sea, _ ~~ C7ctober 12, 2{}0'7 RCJGU~ VA~.~EY ~~VV~~ SFRV~C~~ Location: 138 West Vilas Road, Central Point, C}R -Mailing Address: P.C}. Box 3130, Central Point, flR 7502-0405 Tel. {5d l) bfs4-b304, Pax {541 } 6f34-7171 www,RVS3.us l..isa Morgan City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, ~}regon 9502 Re: S&B Western, ~L.C, File # 08144-GUP, 08145 -Site Plan The existing building is served by a connection to an 8 inch sewer main on 1 ~t Street. The exact location of this service is unknown but it is possible that the proposed building addition will cover the sewer service lateral. if this is the case, the service lateral will need to be either re-located or replaced using a material that is approved for use under the building. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of this project be subjected to the following condition. 1. Applicant must locate the existing sewer service lateral and replace or relocate the pipe as needed in coordination with Rogue Valley Sewer Services. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~~~_ Garl Tappert, PE District Engineer K:tDATA1AGENCIESICE~Z'P'J'IPLANNGICUFl24()8148144-CC]NBERMC~R.RIS CHAPEL,DOC r ATTA~~MENT " ~ ~~ ~~ 'Theodore It. Kulongoski, Goveznox October 15, 2007 Ms. Lisa Mangan City of Central Point 140 So. Third St. Central Point, flR 97502 RE; Chance to comment on S & B Western, LLC Dear Ms. Morgan: Department of Environmental Qualify Western. Region 221 Stewart Ave., Suite 201 Medford, C7R 97501 541-T76-6010 SAX 541-776-6262 Thank you for the opportunity tc> comment on S&B Western's application for an expansion ofthe Conger Morris Central Point Chapel, located at 800 So. Front Street, Central Point. According to OAR 340-216-002(1, a facility planning on operating a crematorium, is required to obtain. an Air Contaminant Discharge Permit from the Degartment of Environmental Quality prior to the operation of the crematorium. The applicant can contact me at 776-6010 ext. 237 for an application packet. Thank you. Sin ely, Kemmerer Environmental Specialist '7 2 ATTA~HMEI~T "_.~ ~.-" Findings of Fact And Conetusions of Law Applicant: S & B Western, LLC (dba: Conger-Morris) Fite No.: 08145 r7.6S.(1S1J .Zvningregrtlatuans-»TG-Udistric~ A. Permitted ~Tses. Permitted uses in Table 1 are shown with a "P. " These uses are allowed if they comply with the applicable provisions of this title. They are subject to the same application and review process as other permitted uses identified in this title. Findings: Staff has determined the existing use and proposed use is classified as Personal Services. Conclusion: Personal Services are a permitted use in the T(~U-GC, General Commercial District & Corridor zoning;. Table 1 Tt~D .District Land Uses Use ~`ategories Zoning DtStrictS LMR ~~ HMR Ec rc c os Residential Dwelling, Single-Family Large and standard lot Zero lot line, detached P P LS P N N N N N N N N N N Attached row houses P P P C N N N Dwelling, 111Iu1t family Multiplex, apartment P P P LI LI N N Accessory tTnits Pl PI PI C N N N BoardinglRooming House N C C N N N N Family Care Family day care Tray care group home P C P C P P N N N N N N N N Adult day care C C C N N N N Home f.?ccupation P F P P N N N Residential Facility P P P N N N N Residential Home P P P N N N N Senior Housing N P P LI N C N Commercial Entertainment N N C P P N N Findings of Fact -Page ] of 9 Professional t~ffice C L3 L3, L4 P P P N Retail Sales and Service Sales-oriented C L3 L3 P P N N ~ Personal service-r~riertted C C` C P 1' N N Repair-oriented N N N P P N N Drive-through facilities N N N P P N N Quick vehicle service N N N P P N N Vehicle sales, rental and repair N N N P P N N Tourist Accommodations Motelllzotel N N C F P N N Bed and Breakfast inn C C P P P N N Industrial Manufacturing N N N N P N N Industrial Service Light N N N N P N N Heavy N N N N C N N i~holesale Sales N N N N P N N CIVIC Community Services C C C N N P C hospital C C C C N C N Public facilities C C C C C C N Religious assembly C C C C N P N Schools C C C N N P L,2 tltitities C C C C C C C Jpen Space Parks and tapers Space P P P P P P P N=-Not permitted. P--Permitted use. P.I--Permitted use, one unit per lot. -Conditional use. LI--t?nly permitted as residential units above ground floor commercial uses. L2--School athletic and play fields only. School Building and parking lots are not permitted. L3--Ground flr~or business within a multifamily Building. Maximum floor area of ten thousand square feet per tenant. L4--Second story offices may be permitted In areas adjacent to EC zones as a conditional use. LS--C1nly permitted as a transition between lower density zones andlor when adjacent to an environmentally sensitive area. Findings of Fact -Page 2 of 9 Table 2 _ __ T41.~ I?istrict Zoning Standards Standard Zoning Districts LMR MMR HMR EC' ' 'GC C 4S Density--Units Per Net Acre ~ _ Maximum 12 32 NA NA NA NA NA Minimum 6 14 34 NA NA NA NA Dimensional Standards Minimum Lot or Land ArealLTnit Large single family 5, 444 SF NA NA NA NA NA NA Standard single family 3, 444 SF NA NA NA NA NA NA Zero lot Tine detached 2, 744 SF 2, 744 SF NA NA NA NA NA Attached row houses .2, 444 SF 1,544 SF 1,244 SF NA NA NA NA Multifamily and senior housing 2, 444 SF 1,544 SF 1, 444 SF 1, 444 SF NA NA NA Average Minimum Lot or Land AreatUnit Large single family 7,544 SF NA NA NA NA NA NA Standard single family 4,544 SF NA NA NA NA NA NA Zero lot line detached 3, 444 SF 3, 444 SF NA NA NA NA NA Attached row houses 2, 544 SF 2, 444 SF 1, 544 SF NA NA NA NA Multifamily and senior housing ,2, 544 SF .2, 444 SF 1,544 SF 1,544 SF NA NA NA Minimum Lot i~'idth Large single family 54' NA NA NA NA NA NA Standard single family 54' NA NA NA NA NA NA Zero lot line detached 34' 34' NA NA NA NA NA Attached row houses 24' 2~' 18' NA NA NA NA Multifamily and senior housing NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Minimum Lot Uepih .....,._w 54' SCI' SC1' N~1 NA N.~4 N1I __ 13uilding_Setbaeks Findings ot'Fact -Page 3 of 9 Front (min,lmax~ 14'f15' 1Q'f1S' 4'f15' fJ' 1.5' S' 1S' Side (2`ietrveen bldgs,~ (detachedlattached) S' detached (l' attached fa)(c1 5' detached t7' attached fa)~c) 5' detached U' attached ~a} 4' 1(?' (b) f1.' I,) lh1 p = 2f1' (b) S Corner(minfmax.) 5'f14' S'flt~' tl'llti' S'f1fJ' IS%3U' S'flt?' 1S'fN~f Rear 15' 15' 1Q' (1' 1Q' fh.~ 1S' ~J U' p' 2il' ~.~ ,~' Garage Entrance (d) (d) (d,} (e~ (~i (e) NA Maximum Building Height 35' 4S' 60' 6(1' 6lJ' 45' 35' Maximum Lot Coverage {g} 8a°~ 8t1°'o 85.% .Ill(1°-n 1(10.'.'~~; 85% 25% Minimum Landscaped Area (i) 2fl/ o, f site area 2~°0 of site area I5% of site area (I,} Q~ of site area (h) I j iii Uf Sl fE' area .~,~t~ t7f Site area N~ Findings of Fact -Page 4 of ~ Finding: The building was constructed in 19'76 and is considered an existing use. No partior- ofthe existing structure with the exception of the proposed expansion is subject to the setback requirements cf the TC}D DistrictlCorridar. Finding: The proposed expansion is set back approximately SE} feet from the rear property line, A minimum of 15 feet is required if adjacent to a residential zanizag district. Cpnclnsipn; The applicant has met and exceeded the minimum rear yard set back requirement. Notes: N~1--Not applicable. (b) Setback required when ad, jacent to a residential zone. (,~ Lflt coverage re, fens to all impervious surfaces including buildings and paved surfacing. (h,~ Parking lot landscaping and screening requirements still apply. {i) Landscaped area shall include living ground cover, shrubs, trees, and decorative landscaping material such as bark, mulch or gravel. No pavement or other impervious surfaces are permitted except for pedestrian pathways and seating areas. Table 3 TC?D District and Corridor Parking Standards Use Categories Minimum Required Parking Residential Dwelling, Single-Family 2 spaces per unit. Large and standard lot Zero !ot tine, detached Attached row hawses Dwelling, MulfifamHy 1.5 spaces per unit. Plexes Apartments and condominiums Dwelling, Accessory Unit 9 space per unif. 8oarding/Rooming House 1 space per accommodation, plus 7 space for every 2 employees. Family Care 1 space for every ~ children or clients (minimum 7 space); plus 9 space for Family day care every 2 employees. Day care group hams Adult day care Nome 4ccupafion Shaft meet the parking requirement for the residence. Residential Facility 1 space per unif. Residential Home 7 space per unif Senior Housing 9 space per unit. Commercial Entertainment 1 space per 250 square feet of floor area, except for theaters which shall provide 1 space per 4 seats. Professional C?~ce 1 space per 400 square feef of floor area. Retail Sales and Service ~~ Findings cf Fact - Page S of 9 Sates-otrented 9 space per ~ square feet of floor area. Persona! servlce- ry. __.._ _ ._ ;, ... _~__ ~ space per 5411 square feet of floor area. ~rla~tted Repair-oriented 1 space per 500 square feet of floor area. C3rrve-thraugh facilities Parking as required 6y the primary crse. Quick vehicle service 7 space per 75l7 square feet of floor area. Vehicle sales, rental and ('space per 1,000 squaro feet of floor area. repair 3. Parking Standards. The off street parking and loading requirements in Chapter .17.64 shall apply to the Tt~p district and T4.1~ corridor, except as modijred by the standards in this section. Finding: As specified in Table 3 -Parking Standards; the applicant is required to have a total of l l spaces as a personal service oriented business with an adjusted Hoar area of 5,353 square feet. Finding: The site currently has a total of 49 spaces. The proposed expansion of the existing facility will result in a lass of seven (7) spaces, leaving a fatal of 42 parking spaces, Conclusion: The applicant meets and exceeds the minimum number cif required parking spaces. 1 ~ 6~ 45a Site design standards. ~. Respect for Existing Facilities and C?n-Site Features. 1. r#djustments should lie made during land division and site design to improve the overall relationship of a development or an individual building to the surrounding context. Finding: The existing building and proposed expansion are consistent with the design criteria of the TtJD District Corridor. Finding: The applicant will be replacing and/or painting some of the existing exterior siding, and is ca~mpliant with design criteria of the TDD District 1 Corridor. Finding: There are na existing sidewalks slang the frontage of the property adjacent to Highway 99, The development to the south includes an existing Dutch Brother's coffee stand with a camtnercial rental building, which has a sidewalk along the frontage abutting the curb. Further south the Providence Medical center approved far canstructian includes installing a sidewalk and landscaping strip as part of their approval. Finding: A condition of approval for this application is to install sidewalks and a landscaping strip along the frontage of Highway 99. The three (3) existing trees along the frontage are presently located within the area proposed for sidewalks will require removal and replacement with trees from the City's approved street tree list. Finding: The public right of way extends approximately 23 feet to the east beyond the existing curb. The existing trees recarrrmended far removal and replacement, the manurnent sign, and the parking let light pale are all located within the public right ofway. Findings of Fact -Page 6 of 9 Conclusion: The applicant meets or will meet this criterion with conditions of approval which will improve the overall relationship to the development of the surrounding area by providing pedestrian connectivity. 4. Service Areas. Service areas, loading zones, waste disposal ar storage areas must be fully screened from public view. .Prohibited screening includes chain link fencing with or without slats. a. Acceptable screening includes: i, ~ six font masonry enclosure, decorative metal fence enclosure, a wood enclosure; or other approved materials eomptementary to adjacent buildings,• or ii, A six foot solid hedge or other plant material screening as approved. Finding, There is an existing forty-two inch chain link fence slang Cupp Drive, with an existing seventy-two inch chain link fence along the rear property line. Finding: Chain link fencing is a prohibited screening material in fine TC}D DistrictlCorridor. Finding: The applicant will be replacing the chain link fencing with fencing made of decorative metal or vinyl, Conclusion: This is a condition of approval for the site plan to bring the applicant's screening into compliance with this criterion, 11. T2.44© ,Site Plan -Standards. ~`n approving, conditionally approving, or denying the plans submitted, the city shall base their decision on the following standards: A, Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner as to use the same to screen such activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The planning commission may require the maintaining of existing trees for screening purposes and for sound and sight r"nsulation from existing neighborhood use; Finding: There is existing landscaping that accounts for approximately 24% of the subject property. The proposed expansion will not interfere with the existing landscaping scheme. Finding; Approximately 1,820 square feet of the existing knot calculated in onsite landscaping percentages) exist within the public right of way. Finding: The landscaping within the public right of way, will be replaced with a '1.5 foot landscaping strip with trees selected from the City's approved street tree list. Conclusion: The applicant meets this criterion. B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; Conclusion: There are no changes proposed, :~ Findings of Pact -Page 7 of 9 C: ~"o provide off~street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible wr'th the use for which the site is proposed to be used and capable of use, ar~d in such a manner as to improve and avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets; Finding: The expansion is located at the rear of the existing building and will not have an impact to existing vehicle flow, Conclusion: The vehicle flaw will not change. D. Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict with or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs; Finding: The existing monument sign is located within the public right of way for Highway 99. This sign will have to be relocated to the east or removed out of the public right of way. Public Works Specif cations require a six ~6} foot sidewalk and 7.5 foot landscaping strip on a f ve (5} lane arterial street. Finding: Conger -Morris is willing to relocate or remove the monument sign. Conclusion: If Conger -Morris replaces the existing monument sign, applicant shall apply far a sign permit and shall be designed in accordance with the TC}D District /Corridor design standards for signs and will not be located within the public right of way. E. Accessibility and sufficiency offtre fghting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, r'ncluding, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus; Finding; The applicant is not proposing any changes that would affect the existing accessibility. Conclusion; Not applicable. b: Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations, including Section 16.21. CI8f1 pertaining to the maximum number of single family dwellings or dwelling units allowable on cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws; Finding: Not applicable. Canclusionr Nat applicable. G. Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Por"nt area and its environs. The architecture and design proposals may be rejected by the planning commission if found to be incompatible with the existing architectural or design Findsngs of Fact -Page 8 of9 characteristics of adjacent properties or uses. In addition, the planning commission reserves the right to establish additional height, setback, buffering, or other development requirements that maybe necessary to ensure land use compatibility and ensure the health, safety, and privacy of C`entraZ Point residents. Finding: Conger Morris is not changing or altering the existing characteristics ol`the property. Conclusion. Not applicable. Findings of Fact -Page 9 of 9 A-r~eA~~~~~r ~j~ PLANNING COMMISSION RES©LL]'I'ION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR AN EXPANSION OF EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATET) AT 8{10 SOL3TH FRONT STREET {HIGFIWAY l9} Applicant: S & B, LLC dba: Conger-Morris Central Point Chapel (37S 2W T1CB, Tax Lot 100} File No. 087.45 ~+YHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for a Site Plan approval for expansion of existing facilities Located at 800 South Front Street {Highway 99}, and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11CB, Tax Lot 100, in the City of Central Point, Oregon, and ~'VHEREAS, on November 6, 2007, the Central Point Planning Corrrmission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at ~vhieh time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application; and ~'VHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the Application Review Process Section 17.05, Permitted Uses and Development Standards 17.65.050, and Site Design Standards 17.67 of the Central Point Municipal code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Corrrnn°~.ission, as part of the Site flan application, has considered and finds per the Staff Report dated November 6, 2007, that adequate findings have been made demonstrating that issuance of the Site Plan is consistent with the intent of the TOD -Transit Oriented District; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on the findings and conclusions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Staff Report dated November 6, 2007, which includes attachments, attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. Planning Commission Resolution No. X11062007} PASSED by the Punning Cornntission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 6th day of November, 2007. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this 6th day of November, 2007. Planning Corxuxussion Chair Planning Co~ssion Resolution No. {11062007