HomeMy WebLinkAboutDCP042612
Meeting time, date, or location may be subject to change. Please contact the City Recorder at
541-423-1026 for additional information.
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER – 6:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Development Commission Minutes from April 12, 2012
V. BUSINESS
A. 2012-2013 Project List Discussion
VI. ADJOURNEMENT
City of Central Point
Development Commission
Agenda
April 26, 2012
6:00 P.M.
Central Point
Council Chambers
140 S. 3rd Street
Central Point, Oregon
Next Resolution No.
Members: Hank Williams
Allen Broderick
Bruce Dingler
Carol Fischer
Ellie George
Kelly Geiger
Kay Harrison
Staff Liaison: Chris Clayton
Don Burt
DCP042612 pg 1
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Development Commission Minutes April 12, 2012
I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER Bruce Dingler called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Commission Members: Bruce Dingler, Allen Broderick,
Carol Fischer, Kay Harrison, and Ellie George were present. City Manager Phil Messina; Community Development
Director Tom Humphrey; Parks and Public Works
Director Matt Samitore; and Planning Secretary Didi Thomas were also present. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Kay Harrison made a motion to approve the Development Commission Minutes from January 26, 2012. Carol Fischer seconded. Roll call: Allen Broderick, abstained; Bruce Dingler, yes; Carol Fischer, yes; Ellie George, yes; and Kay Harrison, yes. Motion approved.
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Recording of the Ordinance 1955 approving the Downtown & East Pine Street Corridor Revitalization Plan
Community Development Director Tom Humphrey advised that Ordinance
1955, the ordinance approving the Urban Renewal Plan, had been recorded by the Jackson County Recorder pursuant to ORS 457.125. B. 2012-13 Budget Schedule
Mr. Humphrey presented a Budget Calendar for fiscal year 2012-13 and estimated that it would only take one meeting to review the proposed budget. This meeting has been scheduled for April 23, 2012 at 6:00 p.m. Initially, funds will be loaned from the City of Central Point to cover the cost
certain proposed projects in the first year.
DCP042612 pg 2
C. Proposed Projects for FY 12/13 Mr. Humphrey then proposed four (4) initial projects for fiscal year 2012-13
for the Development Commission to consider. These specific projects are
intended to address preliminary planning for future development as follows: 1. Streetscape Improvements, Construction (Project No. 4) – Pedestrian
lights with frontage along Highway 99 estimated at $50,000;
2. Parking Lot Improvements, Construction (Project No. 6) – Parking lot lights for City parking lot at the corner of Third and Oak Streets estimated at $25,000;
3. Gebhard Road Extension, Concept Plan Development (Project No. 8) –
Planning for extension of Gebhard Road, location, general design requirements, signalization, cost estimates, etc. to enhance development of the general area, estimated at $50,000; and
4. Streetscape Improvements along S. Second St., Concept Plan
Development (Project No. 1) – Design of Second Street streetscape to understand limitations and potential costs to facilitate development of the Asante hospital site. Estimated cost: $25,000.
Funds for these proposed projects will come from tax increment revenue
estimated at $50,000 with a $125,000 loan from the City’s general fund. Projects and funds will have to be authorized by City Council and the Development Commission. Following discussion of the proposed projects, Commission members
determined that they would require additional time to consider these
projects and asked that discussion be continued to the next regularly scheduled meeting. V. BUSINESS
DCP042612 pg 3
A. Approve Resolution appointment the Central Point Development Agency Budget Committee Tom Humphrey advised that the same procedural requirements that apply
to the City budget process must also be followed by the Development
Commission for Urban Renewal. A Budget Committee must be created and a Budget Officer selected. Staff recommends that the Development Commission utilize the same seven member Budget Committee that serves as the City Budget Committee and designate the City Manager as the
Commission’s Budget Officer. Staff will make a presentation to the Budget
Committee and they in turn will make a recommendation to the
Development Commission. Kay Harrison made a motion to approve Resolution No. 2012-02 appointing the Central Point Development Commission Budget
Committee and Budget Officer. Carol Fischer seconded. Roll call: Ellie
George, yes; Allen Broderick, yes; Bruce Dingler, yes; Carol Fisher, yes. Motion carried. VI. ADJOURNMENT
Kay Harrison moved to adjourn. Carol Fischer seconded. All said “aye” and the meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
Dated: _____________________________ Bruce Dingler
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Recorder
DCP042612 pg 4
Page 1 of 2
STAFF REPORT
April 12, 2012
AGENDA ITEM: IV-C
Discussion of proposed projects for FY12/13.
STAFF SOURCE:
Don Burt, Planning Manager
BACKGROUND:
With the approval of the Downtown & East Pine Street Corridor Revitalization Plan the Commission,
beginning in FY12/13, can commence implementation of the Plan. It is proposed that for the
Commission’s initial projects the following projects/activities be considered:
1. Streetscape Improvements, Construction (Project No. 4) – Within the Urban Renewal Area
there are two pending projects with frontage along Hwy. 99. It is proposed the Commission
assume the cost of the pedestrian lights. Estimated Cost: $50,000.
2. Parking Lot Improvements, Construction (Project No. 6) – The City has received a grant for
the construction of the parking lot on Third and Oak. The cost of constructing the parking lot
exceeds the grant amount. It is proposed that The Commission assume the expense for the
parking lot lights (2). Estimated Cost: $25,000.
3. Gebhard Road Extension, Concept Plan Development (Project No. 8) – The old Wal-Mart
site represents a significant commercial development opportunity. As part of the development of
the Wal-Mart site it will be necessary to extend Gebhard Road. It is proposed that the
Commission begin planning for the extension. This would include location, general design
requirements, signalization, cost estimates, etc. This information would then be used in a
proactive way to facilitate development of the general area. The alternative is to wait until a
development is proposed for the site, and then react to their plans, including possible participation
in the construction of the Gebhard Road extension. Responsibility for development of the Gebard
Road extension is not an outcome of the Concept Plan Development, but it will give the
Commission valuable insights into the development of the general area. Estimated Cost: $50,000.
4. Streetscape Improvements along S. Second St., Concept Plan Development (Project No. 1) –
Similar to the Gebhard Road extension project it is recommended that similar efforts be applied
to Second Street south of East Pine Street. Redevelopment of the old hospital property is
considering Second Street as their primary access. It is to the advantage of the Commission to
begin conceptual design of the Second Street streetscape, not only to understand limitations and
potential costs, but also to show the Commission’s initiative in advancing development of the
hospital (Asante) site. Estimated Cost: $25,000.
Before any of the projects proceed any further than the budget process they will be presented in detail to
the Commission approval. Each project will be further defined and approved by the Commission before
DCP042612 pg 5
Page 2 of 2
any expenditures are actually made. Inclusion in the budget does not assure that the projects will be
undertaken during the fiscal year.
Funds for the proposed projects will come from tax increment revenue, estimated at $50,000 and a
$125,000 loan from the City. As with the projects the proposed City loan will have to be authorized by
the Council and the Commission.
ISSUES:
None.
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS:
None.
ACTION:
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct Staff to include the above projects in the proposed budget.
DCP042612 pg 6