Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes - September 3, 1991 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 3, 1991 - Page One I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL: Present were: Garth Ellard, Rick Bettenburg, Candace Fish, Karolyne Hugo-Johnson, Lloyd Governor, and Chuck Piland. Bob Matthews was absent. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Piland moved to approve the Minutes of the August 6, Q 1991 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Commissioner Bettenburg seconded the Motion. Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg, yes; Fish, yes; Governor, yes; Hugo-Johnson, yes and Piland, yes. The Motion passed by a unanimous vote. IV. CORRESPONDENCE - None V. BUSINESS A. Public Meeting - Review Development Plan for Griffin Creek Estates. George Rubaloff referred to the items listed in his Staff Report of September 3, 1991, which were: Location Map, Certificate of Posting, Reduced Copy of the Development Plan, Public Works Staff Report dated August 27, 1991 and Sample Consent Statement and entered them into the record by reference. Larry Blanchard, Public Works Director reviewed his staff report of August 27, 1991, and explained that the Development Plan outlines a base for reviewing any necessary requirements in that particular development. There were no conflicts of interest or ex pane communication on the part of the Commission, Chairperson Ellard opened the Public Meeting. Herb Farber, 102 Corcoran Lane, Central Point came forward as the representative for Ted Branch, Nadine Branch, Bob Bauman in support of the Development Plan. CITY OF CENTRAL PO/NT Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 3, 1991 - Page Two The Commission asked Herb Farber if there was an Agreement reached between the Presbyterian Church and the Applicants for the proposed Nadine Avenue. Mr. Farber said that they had a verbal commitment, but that the Church wanted to make sure the wording was correct for a written agreement. The Commission also needed to know about Lot #12 on the Plan which was a flag lot. Mr. Farber explained that he had revised the configuration of the 15 lots on the Plan and that the 15 lots now did not contain a flag lot. Staff reminded Mr. Farber that the revised plan needed to be in place for the City Council Meeting on September 19, 1991. In answer to the Commission's concern about drainage, Larry Blanchard assured them that the Master Plan shows adequate drainage. No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the Development Plan. Commission Chairperson Ellard closed the Public Meeting. Mr. Farber remained seated at the table during the Public Meeting on the Tentative Plan. Commissioner Fish moved that they approve the Development Plan for Griffin Creek Estates located generally south of Flagstone Subdivision in the vicinity of where Corcoran Lane intersects with West Pine Street. (37 2W 10AB Tax Lots 2100 and 2500) by minute motion, subject to conditions contained in the Staff Report dated 8/27/91. The Motion was seconded by Bettenburg. Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg, yes; Fish, yes B. Public Meeting: Tentative Plan - Review and recommendation for a Tentative Plan for Griffin Creek Estates located generally south of Flagstone Subdivision in the vicinity of where Corcoran Lane intersects with West Pine Street (37 2W 10AB, Tax Lots 2100 and 2500) (Applicants: Ted Branch, Nadine Branch and Bob Bauman). George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant referred to his Staff Report of September 3, 1991, and the attached items, which were the Location Map, Certificate of Posting, Tentative Plan Application, Reduced Copy of Tentative Plan, Assessors and Aerial Maps and Public Works Staff Report dated August 27, 1991 and entered them into the record by reference. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 3, 1991 - Page Three Larry Blanchard reviewed his Staff Report of August 27, 1991, and entered the following corrections for the record. On the Conditions listed, #4 would be taken out as Lot 12 is not now a flag lot. This would cause all items to be numbered down 1 number. (Item 5 becomes Item 4, etc.) NOn No. 13, the wording is Flood Plain (Not Flood Plan). UNo. 15 of the Conditions would become #14, and would read as follows: m A Traffic Control Signing Plan shall be included as part of the final Q construction plans, and will be installed by the City and all costs associated with Traffic Control Sign installation shall be paid for by the Developer. No parking will be allowed along the curbs adjacent to lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Item # 23 shall now read: "A 25' clear vision area at all intersections shall be noted as a part of the Subdivision Construction plans. An additional condition is added as item #27 and would read: "Where there is a discrepancy between Title 17 and the Covenants and Restrictions for the subdivision, if the CC&R's are less restrictive, Title 17 shall prevail. George Rubaloff also made a correction to the wording in the Resolution, which would now read "Park SDC" rather than "Park Dedication". The Commission expressed concern about fire and safety equipment turn-around room in that type of cul-de-sac. Mark Servatius, Fire Chief/ Building Official talked about the room needed to turn fire apparatus around in the cul-de-sac and the reason for no curbside parking. No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the approval of the Tentative Plan. C. Resolution No 226, A Resolution Recommending Approval of a Tentative Plan for Griffin Creek Estates located generally south of Flagstone Subdivision in the vicinity of where Corcoran Lane intersects with West Pine Street. (372W 10AB Tax Lots 2100 and 2500) Applicants: Ted Branch, Nadine Branch and Bob Bauman). CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 3, 1991 - Page Four Commissioner Fish moved that they approve Resolution 226. Commissioner Piland seconded the Motion, Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg, yes; Fish, yes; Governor, yes; Hugo-Johnson, and Piland, yes, and the Motion passed unanimously. D. Public Meeting - Review and Recommendation for a Tentative Plan for Phase II of Unit 3 of Jackson Creek Estates located generally where Vincent Avenue extends in a southerly direction from existing phases of Jackson Creek Estates. (37 2W 10TL 3100) (Applicant: Tom Malot) George Rubaloff referred to his Staff Report, dated September 3, 1991, and entered the following items into the record by reference: The Location Map, Certificate of Posting for Public Meeting, Tentative Plat Application, Assessors Map and PW Staff Report dated August 27, 1991 . Mr. Rubaloff informed the Commission that Mr. Malot and Staff had reviewed the conditions previous to the Planning Commission Meeting. Larry Blanchard made the following corrections to his Staff Report dated August 27, 1991 : In the Conditions, the paragraph between Items 14 and 15 became Item #15, and all remaining items moved up one number. (#15 became #16, etc.) and an Item #27 was added which reads as follows: "Where there is discrepancy between Title 17 and the Covenants and Restrictions for the Subdivision, if the CC&R's are less restrictive, Title 17 shall prevail." There were no conflicts of interest or ex parte communication on the part of the Commission. Chairperson Ellard opened the Public Meeting. Tom Malot, Applicant, 525 Renee's Circle, Central Point, Oregon came forward in support of the Tentative Plan for Phase II of Unit 3 of Jackson Creek Estates. Staff clarified the status of the Park Dedication, that this phase of Jackson Creek Estates would still come under the Dedication process, and that any new phases beyond Mr. Malot's planned 200 units would come under the new Park SDC requirement. There were no other questions. No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the Tentative Plan. i CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 3, 1991 - Page Five E. Commissioner Piland moved that the Commission approve Resolution No. 227, a Resolution Recommending Approval for a Tentative Plan for Phase II of Unit No. 3 of Jackson Creek Estates, located generally where Vincent Avenue LO extends in a southerly direction from existing phases!of Jackson Creek Estates. (v (37 2W 10TL 3100) (Applicant: Tom Malot) U Commissioner Fish seconded the Motion. Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg,yes: Fish, m yes: Governor, yes; Hugo-Johnson, yes; and Piland,yes. The vote was Q unanimous and the motion passed. F. Public Meeting - Site Plan Review and determination for a Community Recreation Center located at the southwest corner of Oak and First Street (37 2W 10AA TL 3600) (Applicant: Dale Mauck for First Baptist Church). George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant, referred to his Staff Report of August 27, 1991 and entered the following items into the record by reference: Location Map, Certificate of Posting, Site Plan Application, Tax Assessor and Aerial Maps, Planning Department Site Plan Reviewl Requirements, and Public Works Sit Plan Review. Rubaloff explained that the applicant would have to revise the on-site, in order to position off-street parking out of the Public Right of Way. Rubaloff reviewed the Planning Department Site Plan Review Requirements. I Larry Blanchard referred to his report of August 29, 1991 and reviewed the conditions from the Public Works Department. There was no ex-parte communication or conflict of interest on the part of the Commission, Chairman Ellard opened the Public Meeting. I Dale Mauck, 2348 Beall Lane, Central Point and Jeff Venables, 52 Oak Grove, Medford came forward in support of the proposed Recreation Center. After staff's explanation of the requirements, the Appplicants stated that they would be willing to go through the lengthy process of having land vacated in order to meet the parking requirements. Because of the changes needed in the site plan to meet requirements, the Applicants voluntarily withdrew their application, while they make other arrangements to request vacation of public right of ►way that is the northerly I area adjacent to Oak. (Then applicants would re-apply). VI. Appendices VII. Miscellaneous - There were no miscellaneous items. VIII. Adjournment Commissioner Bettenburg moved that the meeting be adjourned. Commissioner Piland seconded the Motion. The Meeting was adjourned on a unanimous voice vote. The Meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m.