HomeMy WebLinkAboutDCP102212Members: Hank Williams
Allen Broderick
Brice Dingler
Carol Fischer
Ellie George
Kelly Geiger
Kay Harrison
Staff Liaison: Chris Clayton
Don Burt
City of Central Point
Development Commission
Meeting
Monday, October, 22, 2012
6:00 P.M.
Central Point
Council Chambers
140S.3 rd Street
Central Point, Oregon
Meeting time, date, or location may be subject to change. Please contact the City Recorder at
541- 423 -1026 for additional information.
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER — 6:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
III. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Rogue Creamery Hwy. 99 Streetscape Proposal
B. New Railroad Xing, Hwy. 99 & Twin Creeks Crossing
C. FY 12 -13 Budget Update
IV. BUSINESS
V. ADJOURNEMENT
r ru ■ • ■i w r
AGENDA ITEM: IV -C
STAFF REPORT
October 22, 2012
Discussion, Rogue Creamery Streetscape Proposal for Hwy. 99
STAFF SOURCE:
Don Burt, Planning Manager
BACKGROUND:
Tom HumphrL, r
�Al,
The Rogue Creamer has been planning on developing a plaza in front of their facility on Hwy. 99. They
have worked with Staff on various options and are prepared at this time to present their proposal to the
Development Commission. Their objectives are to:
1. Explain their proposal and seek comments /endorsement from the Development Commission; and
2. Request financial participation by the Agency in the cost of streetscape improvements.
As the Development Commission is aware the City is proceeding with streetscape improvements along
HwN-. 99. These improvements are grant funded. The Creamery s proposal requires upgraded
improvements along their frontage, the cost of which exceeds the budgeted improvements. Funding for
the Creamery s improvements (Hwy. 99 Streetscape) could be paid by urban renewal.
ISSUES:
Project Definition. At this time the scope of the project, relative to the Development Commission's
participation is not clear. Based on the applicant's presentation, if the Development Commission
is comfortable with the general direction of the applicant's proposal, then staff will refine the
project scope (design and costs) and bring it back to the Commission for final action.
Financial Participation. The Creamen- s request, provided it remains within the public right -of -way, is
part of the urban renewal plan, and as such is a legitimate project (Project No. 4, HwN-. 99
Corridor Improvements).
Financial Costs and Timing. At this point in the process Staff is not familiar with the requested amount
of funding, or the specific use of the funding. Even if the Development Commission agrees to
fund the project, it currently is not in a financial position to do so. This does not preclude
participation at this time. The Development Commission can enter into an agreement with the
applicant to repay in the future based on agreed terms.
EXHIBITS /ATTACHMENTS:
Site Plan presented at meeting by applicant.
ACTION:
Applicant presentation and discussion
Page 1 of 2
RECOMMENDATION:
Provide direction to the Staff regarding:
1. General design acceptance of proposed plan with comments; and
2. Willingness to participate in funding, including limitations;
Page 2 of 2
r ru ■ • ■i w r
AGENDA ITEM: IV -A
STAFF REPORT
October 22, 2012
Discussion, New Railroad Xing at Hwy. 99 & Twin Creeks Crossing
STAFF SOURCE:
Don Burt, Planning Manager
BACKGROUND:
Tom HumphrL, r
�Al,
The Urban Renee -al Plan identifies, as a project, participation in the improvement of a new railroad
crossing at Hwv. 99 & Twin Creek Crossing extension (the "Project "). The purpose of the discussion is to
familiarize the Commission with the Project; including related issues, and the role and timing of the
Commission's participation in the financing and construction of the Project. At the meeting the following
topics will be presented and discussed:
1. Historic Background
2. Current Status and Estimated Costs
3. Construction Timing
4. Funding Options
For the Commission's information a copy of the Pre - Annexation Agreement is included as a part of this
staff report. It should be noted that the Pre - Annexation Agreement expired on January 5, 2008.
ISSUES:
Financing participation and timing
EXHIBITS /ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance No. 1817, Pre - Annexation Development Agreement
ACTION:
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
None
Page 1 of 1
I z I,-"-
NOW,
a b A
2. The City has considered whether the proposed Pre-Annexation Developmen'j
Agreement and its associated Master Plan addresses the requirements and contains the
elements specified in ORS 94.504(l)-(6).
4. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in ORS 94.513 and local regulation, the City
has conducted the following duly advertised public hearings to consider the proposed
amendments:
(a) Planning Commission hearing on December 5, 2000.
(b) City Council hearings on December 14, 2000 and January 4, 200 1.
UEMM=
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, DO ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 2. The City hereby approves a pre-annexation development agreement and
master plan with W.L. Moore Construction, LLC as set forth in Exhibit "A" and illustrated in
Exhibit "B" with changes through January 4, 2001 including all maps and attachments to said
exhibit, which are attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
I - Ordinance No. 4IJ-7_ (12280CZ
Section 3. The City Administrator is directed to implement the pre-annexatil
ifevelopment agreement and master plan described in Exhibits "A" and "B" and furth
Mrticulated in the Central Point Comprehensive Plan and CPMC Chapter 17.65. 1
wzm,��
Approved by me this S'� day of \"-C� ci-�. , 2001.
or Bill Walton
2 - ordinance No. (122801
W
13
RECITALS
14
15
A.
Developer is the owners rt:pr&sentative of the real property located in .14ckson County,
16
Oregon, more commonly described in tax records as -Section C", Containing
17
approximately — 230 acres and more particularly described in Exhibit A-Twin Creeks
I s
TOD Masterplun.
Developer plans to apply for annexation of 194 [verify] acres of said prppetry into the
21
city-
22
23
C.
Said Property lies within the jurisdictional boundary of [be Urban Growth Boundary and
24
Policy AgromenE between Jackson Co=ry ("County,) and City.
25
26
D.
The City's current comprehensive plan desigaittion for said property has recently been
27
innanded. to 4 new TOD (Tr4risit-Oriented Development) Di g
28
7onmg designations (which permit low, medium, and high mix resideud4L commercial,
29
civic, parks and opm space uses) and specific dedp studards.
30
31
F.
71hc parties desire to set forth an agmement: whereby Elie City and Developer agree to the
32
pennitted uses, required fees, exactions and re"nsibilities for providing 1p'frastructure in
33
connection wirh development of said Property.
Cantrai Point Tmnsit Onentod ae-ov—slopment Pm-Annexation Deveiapment Agnmment
JANUARY 4.2001 — FINAL VERSION pop 1
4
nl�
,
C 2 Said property shall be Permitted Eo establish aud courinue uses at tho types, densirias, intensity of
JANUARY 4, 2001 - FINA1. VERSION 74mem
��
��
I
4
5
6
7
II
12
13
14
Is
16
17
Is
19
20
21
22
23
24
2S
26
27
29
29
30
31
32
33
..`. 's =-77�flm
h"..' AgrCe Tb4t the property as Oveloped will generate a requirement for gic ConstluctioLe
Of istfiUmItCune as set foah in this Section.
r
As listed in Section 5. 1, Developor or developMear applicanta;rees to Panicipate in or perouf el
Construction of the following improvements for be locations shown in Exhibit A-Twin Cre
TOD Mas=plan Development Triggers
MEM
At Ehe Eime any of The Propejay is developed, Developer or development appli I cau agrees I
Development PM-Anneastion Development Agreement
JANUARY 4,2001 - FINAL VERSION Pace 3
W
entral Point Trinsit Onentea DevWpmnt r. .lo Ag
JANUARY 4, 2001 -FINAL VERSION
P419
rl",
FM
I
the existing vignal at Highway 99, to minimize the queue length on ohe
2
wesrbound approach to Haskell,
3
4
b) PHASF-S U
5
- 5760 Additional Average Daily Trips (after improvements ro Pine,
6
Haskell, Taylor an4 intersectlon of Highway 99)
7
a
Hufs". Geometric improvements shall be made to pine, H4skea ana
9
Taylor Streets and affected portions of High-way 99 at the Pine Street
10
intersection , and Vgradew Shall be made to the Pine 'Street railroad
11
Crossing.
12
13
SPecific 'mProvemenis shall include (1) adding an exclusive left-lurn lane)br
14
easrbound traffic on Pine Streel; (2) adding an exclusive righx-rurn law and
is
an additional through lane for wvsrbou?td rr4fflc an -Piae Street and (3)
16
adding a a hbound exclusive right-rarn lane an Highway 99.
17
is
OR
19
4000 Additional Average Daily Trips (after rhe new road, railroad
20
crossing a4d related highway intersection improvements)
21
22
Afidgat&n- Geometric improvementy and signatization improvements shall
23
be made at the new intersection of the TOD Activity Center and Highway 99
24
("rossfrom Crater High School).
25
26
S p e c # 7 c improvements shall include (1) an exclusive left jum lane along
27
affected Portions of HShwaY 9:9, (2) adding an exclusive rig4f turn lane for
29
soorhbound rrqffic along Highway 99
29
30
A new road extending eastward to Highway 99, 4 railroad crossing, highway
31
iniersecrion signalization and grome;nc improvemeary s be installed.
32
The new road is livred in the Regional Transportation Plan as a 77er 1,
33
Medium Range project and shall require thr issuance of an Order from the
Centmi Pa;nt Transit Onenwd CIftwopment PmArInOxaton-Ch—welogment Agmement
JANUARY 4. 2001 — FINAI- VERSION page 6
Elm
"M
I j) Year 2009. *150 units (cumulative EOUI=1500)
2 k) Year 2010.- 1-150 uniys (cumulative total=1650)
9
4
® To ensuTe that infrastructure is appropriately Planned and constructed, anaual
5 commercial and civic development sha4l occur accordmg to the following tales:
6
7
a)
Year 2000.- 0 square feet
b)
You 2001: *20,000 square feet (cumnla4ve rOM1.20,000 Ff.)
c)
Year2002: *20,000 square feet (cutuWadve goral=Q,000 sp
10
d)
Year 2003. *20,000 r-qu4re feet (cumulative Taml=60= sf)
11
e)
Yea 2004: *20.000 squac feet (cumulative wml--8o,ow sf.)
12
1)
Year 200S.- t2O.MG square feet (cumulaove ;oT4=joO,DOO sf.).
13
s)
Yettr 2006: *20,000 square feet (cumulative toml=120,000 SO
14
b)
Year 2007; -r2OOOO squm feet (cumulaTiVO rou4=140,000 sf.)
Is
1)
Year 2008. t2 OOO square feet (cumuladvo wmi=160,000 sf.)
16
j)
Year 2009: -t20,000 square feet (cumulative loml=180,000 sp
17
L)
Year 2010: 1-20,000 squate feel (Cumulative totai=200,000 sf.)
Central Point Transit Onenm Deveopmeni Pro-Annexation Development Ag
JAISIUARY 4.2001 — FINAL VERSION We
P18ge
1 0,
j, L
J w
M
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
11.1 N06ce. A nofice or coMmunicalion un4er This Agreement by eirber ParTy Shall be
dispuched by registered or cardfied muiL postage prep4id, rentru reccipE reqpeslad: and
3MR.M.
A= - ------
1Y In respect to a iluty as that Finy may, from time w ritne,
designate in writing dispatched as providW in TWs section.
11.2 Heading$. Any tidds Of the sections of this Agreemars are inserted for Convenience of
mference Only aAd $hall be difftgwded in c0lstridD9 Or i1tterMilug any of ils provisions.
(Simal —P*$M nsit —Ormnlad Development Pre Annemation Dsvetopment Agreement
JANUARY 4, M01 — FINAl- VERSION page 11
COMM Pon 5t1-..., _a Development .... . ...
,. » )M Z... .a
p m 90
in
r ru ■ • ■i w r
AGENDA ITEM: IV -B
Discussion FY 12 -13 Budget Update
STAFF SOURCE:
Don Burt, Planning Manager
BACKGROUND:
STAFF REPORT
October 22, 2012
Tom HumphrL, r
�Al,
The Urban Renewal Plan was approved on March 8, 2012 and recorded on March 15, 2012. The Plan has
passed its appeal date without incident, and is now official. The only oversight is the timing between the
time the Plan was approved and the qualification date for receiving tax increment revenue. To receive tax
increment revenue for FY12 -13 the Plan must have been approved prior to January 1, 2012 (ORS
457.450). We did not make that deadline and therefore will not receive tax increment revenue until FY13-
14. For purposes of calculating the Base Value of the Urban Renewal District the Assessor will use the
FY12 -13 values, which will be available late October. Although we missed the deadline for tax increment
collection this year the good news is that changes in the District's overall values between this year
(October 2012) and last year (October 2011) may have declined. We may have more information
regarding actual values for the meeting.
With regard to the impact of the tax increment funds delay on the budget, the Development Commission
will need to maintain a balanced budget, reducing the approved budget by $50,000 (the estimated amount
of tax increment revenue to be received). Currently, the Development Commission has not authorized anv
capital project expenditures, and as of this date (10/22/2012) there have been no operational expenditures.
Budgeted projects for FY12 -13 are:
1. Streetscape Improvements, Construction (Project No. 4) — Within the Urban Renewal Area
there are two pending projects with frontage along Hwy. 99. It is proposed the Commission
assume the cost of the pedestrian lights. Estimated Cost: $50,000.
2. Parking Lot Improvements, Construction (Project No. 6) — The City has received a grant for
the construction of the parking lot on Third and Oak. The cost of constructing the parking lot
exceeds the grant amount. It is proposed that the Commission assume the expense for the parking
lot lights (2). Estimated Cost: $25,000.
Gebhard Road Extension, Concept Plan Development (Project No. 8) — The old Wal -Mart
site represents a significant commercial development opportunity. As part of the development of
the Wal -Mart site it will be necessary to extend Gebhard Road. It is proposed that the
Commission begin planning for the extension. This would include location, general design
requirements, signalization, cost estimates, etc. This information would then be used in a
proactive way to facilitate development of the general area. The alternative is to wait until a
development is proposed for the site, and then react to their plans, including possible participation
Page 1 of 2
in the construction of the Gebhard Road extension. Responsibility for development of the
Gebhard Road extension is not an outcome of the Concept Plan Development, but it will give the
Commission valuable insights into the development of the general area. Estimated Cost: $50,000.
Streetscape Improvements along S. Second St., Concept Plan Development (Project No. 1) —
Like the Gebhard Road extension project it is recommended that similar efforts be applied to
Second Street south of East Pine Street. Redevelopment of the old hospital property will use
Second Street as its primary access. It is to the advantage of the Commission to begin conceptual
design of the Second Street streetscape, not only to understand limitations and potential costs, but
also to show the Commission's initiative in advancing development of the hospital (Asante) site.
Estimated Cost: $25,000.
Due to the postponement of tax increment revenue it will be necessary to postpone expenditures on the
above by $50,000. Before any of the projects formally proceed they will be presented in detail to the
Commission for approval. Each project will be further defined and approved by the Commission before
any expenditure of funds. As note during the budget process inclusion in the budget does not assure that
the projects will be undertaken during the fiscal year.
ISSUES:
None
EXHIBITS /ATTACHMENTS:
None
ACTION:
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
None
Page 2 of 2