The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCAP091312Central Point City Hall 664 -3321 City Council Mayor Hank Williams Ward I Bruce Dingler Ward II Kelly Geiger Ward III Ellie George Ward IV Allen Broderick At Large Carol Fischer Kay Harrison Administration Phil Messina, City Manager Chris Clayton, Assistant City Manager Deanna Casey, City Recorder Community Development Department Tom Humphrey, Director Finance Department Bev Adams, Director Human Resources Barb Robson, Director Parks and Public Works Department Matt Samitore, Director Jennifer Boardman, Manager Police Department Kris Allison, Chief CITY OF CENTRAL POINT City Council Meeting Agenda September 13, 2012 Next Res. 1343 Next Ord. No. 1966 L REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER — 7:00 P.M. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. SPECIAL RECOGNITION V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. CONSENT AGENDA Page 2 - 9 A. Approval of August 9, 2012 Council Minutes VII. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA VIII. BUSINESS 11 - 41 A. Public Discussion - Central Point East Subdivision Curb Ramp Issue (Clayton) 43 B. Contract Approval for Stormwater Master Plan (S amitore) 45 C. Planning Commission Report (Humphrey) IX. MAYOR'S REPORT X. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT XL COUNCIL REPORTS XII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS XIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - ORS 192.660(2)(d) Labor Negotiations The City Council may adjourn to executive session under the provisions of ORS 192.660(2)(d) Labor Negotiations. Under the provisions of the Oregon Public Meetings Law, the proceedings of an executive session are not for publication or broadcast. XIV. ADJOURNMENT WA A CAP091212 Page 1 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT City Council Meeting Minutes August 9, 2012 I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER Mayor Williams called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL: Mayor: Hank Williams Council Members: Allen Broderick, Bruce Dingler, Carol Fischer, Kay Harrison, and Ellie George were present. Kelly Geiger was absent. City Manager Phil Messina; City Attorney Paul Nolte; Police Chief Kris Allison; Community Development Director Tom Humphrey; Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore; and City Recorder Deanna Casey were also present. IV. PUBLIC APPEARANCES Fire District No. 3 Chief Peterson presented the quarterly report for the district. Central Point crews continue to go on the most calls for the district. He explained the call volumes district wide along with Central Point specific volumes. He explained the adopted strategies for the district. Rick Samuelson, Judy's Central Point Florist. Mr. Samuelson stated that the Council has before them a proclamation designating September 5, 2012, as Good Neighbor Day. He appreciates that the Council has always supported this event and encourages them to approve the Consent Agenda and the Proclamation. Nathan Smith, Firefighter /Paramedic District 3. Mr. Smith wanted to thank the Council for their support of the Fill the Boot Event in Central Point. It is a great fund raising event and half of those funds came from the intersections in Central Point. V. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of July 26, 2012, City Council Minutes B. Approval of Good Neighbor Day Proclamation Bruce Dingier made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Carol Fischer seconded. Roll call: Allen Broderick, yes, Bruce Dingler, yes; Carol Fischer, yes; Kay Harrison, yes; Hank Williams, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. CAP091212 Page 2 City of Central Point City Council Minutes August 9, 2012 Page 2 VI. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS, ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS A. Public Hearing - Resolution No. 1342, To Annex 5.93 Acres, Located at 600 Beebe Road and Identified on the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37 2W 02 Tax Lot 3100, Applicant: Shepherd of the Valley Catholic Church Community Development Director Tom Humphrey explained this is a public hearing regarding the annexation of the Shepherd of the Valley Catholic Church. This property is located at 600 Beebe Road and has been initiated by the property owner. All annexation criteria has been met, the city is authorized under ORS 222.120 to hold a public hearing without an election as long as the annexation is a full consent annexation which this is. The City has received written consent, the property is contiguous to city limits and within the Urban Growth Boundary. Public Works has reviewed the existing public facilities and their proximity to the annexation area and concluded that public facilities can be provided or extended to the site. The annexation has been duly noticed and advertised as a public hearing for tonight's City Council Meeting. The Church does plan to expand the church once the annexation and site plan approval have been processed. They have worked with the adjoining property owners who are not interested in annexing at this time to create lot line adjustments creating a small sliver of land to provide access to the lot behind the Church. There was discussion regarding the options of forced annexation in regards to the property surrounding this proposal. In order to force these properties to annex we would need to put it before the Voters of Central Point. The most cost effective way would be to annex all areas within the urban growth boundary at the same time, not just one specific area. Mayor Williams opened the Public Hearing at 7:24 p.m. Herb Farber, Representative for the Applicant Mr. Farber stated that the alley exists so that the property owner in the back has legal access to his property. The Church wishes to annex because the City of Central Point is easier to work with then Jackson County Planning Department. They do plan to expand the church and also the parking area. The Resolution before the Council is not for the site plan approval, this is only regarding the annexation of the property. The CAP091212 Page 3 City of Central Point City Council Minutes August 9, 2012 Page 3 site plan approval and conditions will come before the Planning Commission at a later date. Earnest Mingus, Beebe Road Resident. Mr. Mingus is not against the annexation of the Catholic Church. He disagrees with the Public Works assessment that the infrastructure at the intersection of Beebe Road and Hamrick can handle any increase in traffic. That intersection should have been upgraded years ago according to Transportation System Plan for Central Point. He stated there are accidents at that intersection and believes the annexation should be delayed until the upgrades have been completed by the City. The Church should not be responsible for something the City should have done years ago. Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore explained the transportation service plan and stated that we have had zero growth over the last few years. Growth creates improvements. We have had no funds to invest in this intersection. The site plan and intersection improvements will be discussed during the site plan approval process. The property owners do not need to annex into the city to make improvements. If they apply for building permits with Jackson County the City will have little say in the process and improvements would not be made to the intersection. Bret Moore, Buck Point Street Resident and church member Mr. Moore is in favor of the annexation. The Annexation meets the criteria and should be annexed. The site plan will be worked on later as part of the process and traffic issues will be discussed. The only time people currently park on Beebe Road is during religious holidays a few times a year. As a rule there are no traffic jams because of the church services. He feels that the landscaping along one corner of Beebe /Hamrick could be in the site triangle and in the right of way. If that issue could be fixed there would be less of an issue for traffic and would be very cost effective for the City. Public Hearing was closed at 7:49 p.m. Council would be interested in seeing options for the Hamrick /Beebe intersection in regards to traffic control. This would be a good topic for a future Study Session. Bruce Dingier made a motion to approve Resolution No. 1342, To Annex 5.93 Acres, Located at 600 Beebe Road and Identified on the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37 2W 02 Tax Lot 3100, Applicant: Shepherd of the Valley Catholic Church. Kay Harrison CAP091212 Page 4 City of Central Point City Council Minutes August 9, 2012 Page 4 seconded. Roll call: Allen Broderick, yes, Bruce Dingler, yes; Carol Fischer, yes; Kay Harrison, yes; Hank Williams, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. B. Second Reading, Ordinance No. 1964, An Ordinance Adopting the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan, Including Adoption of a Regional Plan Element as a New Element of the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, An Amendment to the Land Development Ordinance Chapter 17.71 Agricultural Buffering, an Amendment to the Official Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Designating the Urban Reserve Areas, and Approval of an Urban Reserve Management Agreement Between Jackson County and the City of Central Point Community Development Director Tom Humphrey stated there were no recommended changes at the first reading of an Ordinance to adopt the Regional Plan which includes the new element of the Comprehensive Plan and Agricultural Buffering. The Ordinance also approves the Council to sign the Urban Reserve Management Agreement between Jackson County and the City of Central Point. The Council held a public hearing on July 26, and accepted public testimony for and against the recommendation to adopt the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan, Comp Plan Amendments, and Chapter 17.71. After the public testimony the Council moved the ordinance to second reading with no changes. Kay Harrison made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 1964, An Ordinance Adopting the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan, Including Adoption of a Regional Plan Element as a New Element of the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, An Amendment to the Land Development Ordinance Chapter 17.71 Agricultural Buffering, an Amendment to the Official Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Designating the Urban Reserve Areas, and Approval of an Urban Reserve Management Agreement Between Jackson County and the City of Central Point. Allen Broderick seconded. Roll call: Allen Broderick, yes, Bruce Dingler, yes; Carol Fischer, yes; Kay Harrison, yes; Hank Williams, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. C. Second Reading, Ordinance No. 1965, An Ordinance Adding Section 5.34.025 to the Central Point Municipal Code to Require Pawnbrokers and Second Hand Dealers to Retain Property Prior to Resale CAP091212 Page 5 City of Central Point City Council Minutes August 9, 2012 Page 5 Police Chief Kris Allison explained that there were no recommended changes at the first reading of an ordinance stipulating that businesses such as Pawnbrokers and Second Hand Dealers be required to retain items they purchase for a certain amount of time before resale is allowed. This will give the victim time to report it stolen, the police time to get it in the system and search the database. There were no recommended changes at the first reading. Kay Harrison made a motion to approve Ordinance No. 1965, An Ordinance Adding Section 5.34.025 to the Central Point Municipal Code to Require Pawnbrokers and Second Hand Dealers to Retain Property Prior to Resale. Ellie George seconded. Roll call: Allen Broderick, yes, Bruce Dingler, yes; Carol Fischer, yes; Kay Harrison, yes; Hank Williams, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. VIII. BUSINESS A. Appointment of Parks and Recreation Commission Chair Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore stated that with the passing of County Assessor Kerry Bradshaw Central Point also lost a very active community member. He had also been the Central Point Parks and Recreation Chair for several years. His passing leaves the Chair position vacant on the Parks and Recreation Commission and a vacancy on the Commission. Staff recommends Mark Ludwiczak as the new Chair. Mark has been very active as a committee member since he was appointed in 2010; he attends all fundraising events and meetings on a regular basis. Allen Broderick made a motion to appoint Mark Ludwiczak as Parks and Recreation Committee Chair. Ellie George seconded. Roll call: Allen Broderick, yes, Bruce Dingler, yes; Carol Fischer, yes; Kay Harrison, yes; Hank Williams, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. B. Planning Commission Report Community Development Director Tom Humphrey presented the Planning Commission Report for August 7, 2012: • The Commission denied a request to remove a tree and directed staff to trim and repair it. They accepted recommendations from City Staff and Ms. Grosenbach to remove the mature tree that has had some damage done to it and is dropping fruit in a sidewalk landscape strip. The code directs that the Planning Commission review requests and authorize tree removal. In this case the Commission found that the tree was healthy and did not jeopardize the safety of the public. CAP091212 Page 6 City of Central Point City Council Minutes August 9, 2012 Page 6 The Commission considered the Minor Modification to the Tentative Map for North Village Phases 1 and 2 in Twin Creeks. The City has approved previous extensions for this subdivision however, the adoption of new Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Changes to the City's Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance necessitated modifications to the Tentative Map and more stringent conditions for this extensive request. There was discussion of East Pine Street Master Plan — Residential Density Options. The Commission was introduced to preliminary TOD- related land use work that planning staff is performing at the direction of the City Council. Staff is evaluating the possibility of using residential density targets that the City committed itself to in the Regional Plan. Higher densities have been used successfully in Twin Creeks and may make sense on the east side of the freeway if the City creates another TOD. The Commission wants staff to return with some possible scenarios at future meetings There was discussion regarding the need for a motion to accept or approve the Planning Commission report. City Attorney Paul Noltey stated that there is an appeal period and the Council could appeal a decision of the Planning Commission but by the time this report is usually presented that time has passed. The need for a motion is no longer necessary because of changes to CPMC administrative review processes. Community Development Director Tom Humphrey stated that he would be happy to prepare a report for the Council the day after a Planning Commission so they would know what decisions were made and can request a review if they feel it necessary. Allen Broderick made a motion to accept the Planning Commission Report for August 7, 2012 as presented. Carol Fischer seconded. Roll call: Allen Broderick, yes, Bruce Dingler, yes; Carol Fischer, yes; Kay Harrison, yes; Hank Williams, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. IX. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Williams reported that he attended a Medford Water Commission meeting and the Oregon Mayor's Conference. There were 18 State Department Heads in attendance for one on one discussion time. It was educational for the attendees. X. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Phil Messina reported that there are no items for a Study Session or second Council meeting for August. A motion to cancel the August 23rd Council meeting is in order. Allen Broderick made a motion to cancel the August 23, 2012 Council meeting. Ellie George seconded. Roll call: Allen Broderick, yes, Bruce Dingler, yes; Carol Fischer, yes; Kay Harrison, yes; Hank Williams, yes; and Ellie George, yes. Motion approved. XI. COUNCIL REPORTS CAP091212 Page 7 City of Central Point City Council Minutes August 9, 2012 Page 7 Council Member Allen Broderick reported that the green house on N. 2nd Street needs to be removed. It is in bad shape and the owners have not been able to fix it. We have had complaints about this place in the past and nothing has been done. He would like to see the City remove this hazard. He attended the D.A.R.E Cruise and noticed participants were confused about how to enter the event. There should be a designated entrance point for those who are registered to be in the cruise. Council Member Kay Harrison reported that: • she attended the service for Kerry Bradshaw. It is a shame to lose such an active community member. • She is working with RVCOG on their performance reviews. • She has not heard any MPO reports from Mike Quilty recently. If he is going to be on those committees to represent Central Point we should have a schedule of reports. Mr. Messina stated that he would contact Mr. Quilty to provide a report to the Council. Council Member Bruce Dingler asked when the yellow curbs would be painted on Pine Street. Mr. Samitore stated that he would find out the schedule for Pine Street. Council Member Carol Fischer reported that she attended the Citywide Yard Sale at Pfaff Park. Council Member Ellie George reported that she attended a meeting regarding the curb issue in Central Point East. This issue will come before the Council next month for further discussion. XI 1. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Community Development Director Tom Humphrey reported that: • The city has mark ups on options for Pine Street improvements. He presented handouts to the Council members to review prior to a study session on this topic in September. • He will be meeting with local businesses regarding the next round of boot camp exercises. They are still showing excitement in the program. Chief Kris Allison reported that: • The department participated in Shop with a Cop event at Target and was able to help local children shop for school supplies. • A lot of positive things happening in the department. Police Explorers went to Seaside to compete against other explorer teams in state competition. Our kids did a great job and we are very proud to support then. • She will be attending a meeting with Fire District No. 3 to discuss partnership opportunities through the community. • There will be a police department open house on September 15th from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. the public to meet the officers and tour the lab. Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore reported that: CAP091212 Page 8 City of Central Point City Council Minutes August 9, 2012 Page 8 • We will be cutting the creek starting Monday as a phase to the Water Reservoir. • We will be noticing 200 residents in Central Point East in regards to the curb issue. This will be advertised to come before the council for discussion in September. XIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - None XIV. ADJOURNMENT Allen Broderick moved to adjourn, Carol Fischer seconded, all said "aye" and the Council Meeting was adjourned at 8:54 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the August 9, 2012, Council meeting were approved by the City Council at its meeting of September 13, 2012. Dated: Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: City Recorder Ket ur n t o Agenda CAP091212 Page 9 Public Discussion Central Point East Curb Ramp CAP091212 Page 10 Staff Report AW-7 79M CENT ML Administration Department Barb Robson, Human Resources Director TO: City Council FROM: Chris Clayton, Matt Samitore AGENDA DATE: September 9th, 2012 SUBJECT: Central Point East Subdivision Curb Ramp Issue BACKGROUND: Beginning in the late 1990's multiple phases of the Central Point East Subdivision were developed using "rolled curb" (see attached photo /standard drawing). Although economical for builders and developers, rolled curb provides a cost saving to developer /builders because it does not require replacement when a driveway apron location is determined by and individual property owner; the rolled curb design presents a variety of issues for adjacent property owners. These issues include limited drainage opportunities from adjacent private property, difficult navigation by passenger type vehicles, and reduced property, infrastructure and pedestrian protection from vehicles in the traveled way. In an effort to mitigate the navigation issue (jarring when entering or exiting a driveway), a number of property owners have purchased removable " Bridjit" style (see attached product information) ribber ramps and placed them in the curb line /public right -of -way. While extremely effective at alleviating the jarring that occurs when entering or exiting a driveway, these ramps also create several public right -of -way concerns and are a violation of the current City of Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC). Property owners currently using the Birdjit style ramps have been contacted by the Central Point Community Services Officer and warned of the (CPMC) violation. After receiving an opportunity to remove the ramps without citation, the property owners were given a second warning that included a timeline for issuance of a citation for non- removal /compliance. CAP091212 Page 11 PROPOSAL: In an effort to continue using the Birdjit style ramps and avoid citations, multiple property owners have requested that City Staff bring the issue to City Council for direction on a possible Central Point Municipal Code Amendment. Section 12.20 of the Central Point Municipal Code prohibits the following: 12.20.020 Prohibited. A. It is unlawful for any person to place or allow in or over any alley, street or sidewalk, or any street or alley right -of -way, whether improved or not, any of the following: 1. Any garbage or refuse of any nature, provided, however, that garbage or refuse in enclosed containers may be temporarily placed within the street right -of -wav upon garbage collection days; 2. Any building, fence, or other structure, including items which are by design intended to be portable, provided however, that fences (subject to subsection B of this section) and mailboxes may be placed in a right -of -wav, at the owners expense, if the same do not impede sight distance necessary for the safe use of the street, alley, driveway or sidewalk by vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and further provided that the same shall be removed upon the request of the city. Should the City Council direct Staff to amend section 12.20.020 of the CPMC to accommodate the Birdjit style ramps, Staff would suggest amending the code to allow the Public Works Director to issue right-of-way - encroachment permits that allow certain structures to be placed in public rights -of -way. The Public Works Director would retain the authority to issue and revoke permits in the best interest of the Public. NEGATIVE IMPACTS: 1. As the public record reflects, many residents of Central Point East find the ramps unsightly. 2. While the Bridjit style ramps contain a small orifice to accommodate gutter flow, the 2.5 -inch diameter orifice will not accommodate the 10 -year storm flows required by the Central Point Public Works Standards and Specifications. Furthermore, during heavy rainfall events, the Bridjit style ramps will direct gutter flow into the traveled way. 3. The Bridjit style ramps are heavy and constricted from durable material; however, these ramps prevent the City's street sweeper from cleaning the entire street. CAP091212 Page 12 POSITIVE IMPACTS: 1. The property owners using Bridjit style ramps are attempting to avoid the jarring that occurs when entering and exiting their driveway. The installation of these ramps has produced a smoother transition from the driveway apron to the public right -of -way. FISCAL IMPACT: 1. If the Council directs staff to amend the current code and issue an annual right -of -way encroachment permit for each of these ramps a small amount of revenue will be generated. Approximately 15 property owners have installed the ramps and if required to obtain an annual right -of -way encroachment permit ($50.00), the total amount of annual revenue would equal $750.00. The generated revenue would cover staff time to perform routine inspections and observe the ramps during significant rainfall events. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Direct Staff to enforce the current Central Point Municipal Code that does not allow portable strictures in the public right -of -way. 2. Direct Staff to prepare a Central Point Municipal Code amendment allowing the Public Works Director to permit certain portable strictures in the public right -of -way. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Rolled Curb Standard Drawing /Photo 2. Birdjit curb ramp product information. 3. Public input on the curb ramp issue. 4. Photos of currently install " Birdjit" style ramps. Ket ur n t o Agenda CAP091212 Page 13 -.4 6" 6. ' T7 FINISH GRADE • ,e4' DEPRESSED CURB FOR DRIVEWAY (3/4- MAX LPG) as 'M I .4 )EPRESSED CURB .f%D WUC*Cl PUAID -U=. 1. ALL RADII SHALL BE 3/4- EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 2. ISOLATION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED ONLY AS SPECIFIED. 3. CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT 10' INTERVALS AND SHALL EXTEND AT LEAST 50% THROUGH THE CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER. oft MYOF CENTRAL POI \0 1 NT CENTRAL 1 gKI,yam \ \ im-11 wall ME IM r • r � � /: X99 � \ � � � /: X99 ] . ;\ � �» � *» ~lop f< \AR, > .\ ] m X99 I \ j \ :f I ~lop f< \AR, > .\ 4p m X99 I \ j \ :f I ,rr n U • s y> • ICS: Page 18 s w • +# � \dp \ »< � «+ ` dp . . dD dp ! dw \ ` 2 40 % \k` � Ap \� , m I �113 S Page 19 \dp \ »< � . . dD dp . ` 2 40 S Page 19 El .1 a: Page 20 i l r w a, 1, l • • El .1 a: Page 20 E 91 � \� ^� � «« ? � E X92 4 � ?k : ffz ct 91 � X92 4 � ?k : ffz ct X92 � � \ . « «? .� X92 Page 23 \ »� }� \ «� � � � � \ 4 � � Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 ow Alm Page 27 I I"I, Page 28 s ae s •I; • Page 29 �1 r- �q 0 Page 31 RM Myron and Jana Harvey 134 Meadowbrook Dr. Ket ur n t o Agenda Central Point, OR 97502 Administration Department City #2C i Point 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 03qm�� Thank you for allowing a meeting where we? discuss he curb ramps. We hope you will see what a help they are to all of us and not a hindrance in any way to the city. Unfortunately, we are unable to attend th fm ee «ng on August 9 regarding the Bridjit cu6 ramps due to a prior commitment, but would like to share our thoughts on this matter. CAP091212 Page 32 Chris Clayton From: Linda Borurn <findaborurn@yahoo.corn> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 9:50 AM ® Chris Clayton Subject: Fw: Rubber Curb Mats ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Linda Borurn <iindabor ibggtg[02��> T Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2012 11:06 AM Subject: Rubber Curb Mats 1. Flooding due to difficulty of drainage for gutters, the holes in the mats would eventually fill with debre and water which would create drainage problems. 2. Dirt and refuge would eventually collect on ends and around the mats. Which would result in streetsweepers having difficulty maintaining the streets. They do not move, cars eventually do, we also have in place a 48 hr. window for parking with our CC&R's as well as city laws. 3. If one person uses them, anyone could purchase and use them in the subdivision, which would certainly add to the problem. 4. There is a possible danger for children or adults riding bikes, especially in the evening hours. unhl�= � CAP091212 PTe 33 . � 1 C! CAP091212 Page 34 4,45 �-Nffi IMMOW4104 11 kl= 16- W- 0 1 RI VIM MA To J F ox 313 Saskatogn , SK S7K 3J7 Shercom Industries' Curb Ramp pmduct has been promoted by the City of Saskatoon fbr a number of years as an acceptable method of improving the transition between the road and sidewalk at legal crossing areas. Many modem vehicles, particularly cars, have trouble mounting steep rolled curbs that were constructed in the 1960's and 1970's. Curbs constructed in that era were designed for cars, which were much larger than the average car on the road today. In addition, climates that subject subgrades to freeze/thaw cycles can result in movement in all sicTewalks which can cause the curbs to become steeper than onally designed. the road and sidewalk. These permanent ramps are illegal and can be removed at the homeowner's cost when City Bylaws are enforced. style for many years. City HO Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K OJJ Phone �3t6) 975-2454 Fax (306) 975-2971 www, city. saskato on. t ca CAP091212 Page 35 erg vil@71plash IN Iwo r r i,fr�,� j t s $ �j 1� �` °�� r tf`�Y l'E�� E G �: a i �� ,,}} a' ` �� v�W�f�l �� . 1� �, �� t sr.��! � �f �,,�,