HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - July 1, 2008`~`
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
July 1, 2008 - 7:00 p.m.
Next Planning Commission
Resolution No. 747
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Connie Moczygemba, Candy Fish, Damian Idiart, Chuck Piland, Pat Beck, Mike Oliver,
and Justin Hurley
III. CORRESPONDENCE
IV. MINUTES -Review and approval of June 3, 2008 Planning Commission Minutes
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
VI. BUSINESS
Pgs. 1 - 19 A. File No. 08175. A public hearing to consider an application for a major modification
to the conditional use permit for the McDonald's restaurant approved August 6,
1996. The modification is in accordance with CPMC Section 17.09.300 and is in
preparation for the site plan review (File No. 08180) for an addition to the existing
building. The project site is in the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning
district. The McDonald's restaurant is located at 43 South Ninth Street and is
identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 02 CD, Tax Lots 2900
and 3000. Applicant: Glen Chavez; Agent: Josh Wells, Westech Engineering,
Inc.
Pgs. 20 - 38 B. File No. 08180. A public hearing to consider a Site Plan application for the
construction of a 1,794 square foot addition to the existing McDonald's building
bringing the total building size to 4,501 squaze feet. The project site is in the C-4,
Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district. The McDonald's restaurant is
located at 43 South Ninth Street and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's
map as 37S 2W 02 CD, Tax Lots 2900 and 3000. Applicant: Glen Chavez; Agent:
Josh Wells, Westech Engineering, Inc.
Pgs. 39 - 75 C. File No. 08160. Consideration of a Resolution Declaring the Planning Commission's
Intention of Amending the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan to Update the
Buildable Lands Inventory Section of the Land Use Element. Applicant: City of
Central Point
Pgs. 76 - 79 D. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting Criteria for approving Decorative Exterior
Murals in accordance with CPMC Section 17.67.OSO.M.1.C
VII. DISCUSSION
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS
IX. MISCELLANEOUS
X. ADJOURNMENT
MCDONALD'S -
MAJOR MODIFICATION TO CUP
Planning Department
STAFF REPORT CENTRAL Tom Humphrey,AICP,
POINT Community Development Director/
Assistant Ciry Administrator
STAFF REPORT
July 1, 2008
AGENDA ITEM: FILE NO. 08175
Consideration of the Major Modification application to the Conditional Use Permit for the McDonald's
restaurant approved August 6, 1996. The modification is in accordance with CPMC Section 17.09.300
and is in preparation for the site plan review (File No. 08180) for an addition to the existing building.
The project site is in the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district. The McDonald's
Restaurant is located at 43 South Ninth Street and identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as
37S 2W 02 CD, Tax Lots 2900 and 3000. Applicant: Glenn Chavez; Agent: Josh Wells, Westech
Engineering.
STAFF SOURCE:
Connie Clune, Comm 'ty P`
The current McDonald's, a fast food restaurant, was originally approved as a Conditional Use (CUP) i~
the C-4 zoning district as evidenced by Resolution No. 362. Expansion of the building is considered a
modification of the prior approved CUP and as such, an application for a Major Modification is
necessary. The site plan application (File No. 08180) has been submitted simultaneously with the
modification application. All conditions of approval of the original CUP were met.
General Project Description: The proposed project is a 1,794 square foot addition to the existing
McDonald's building bringing the total building size to 4,501 square feet. The modification is for
review of the proposed increase in the floor area of the existing structure by more than fifteen (l5)
percent as required by CPMC Section 17.09.300(5). The single story addition will provide additional
seating and a play area and a cashier booth for the drive-thru window.
Conditional Use Criteria: When considering a Major Modification to a Conditional Use in the C-4,
Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district, key criteria in the CPMC include:
1. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and to meet all
other development and lot requirements for the zoning district; and
2. That the site has adequate access to a public street and that the street can effectively
accommodate traffic that may be generated by the proposed uses; and
3. That the proposed uses (an addition to an existing fast-food restaurant) will have no significant
adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted uses thereof; and
Page 1 of 2 1
4. That the conditions required for approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health
safety and general welfare.
In reviewing the Modification application, it has been determined that as presented, the play area
addition and cashier booth are in compliance with the above key criteria (see Attachment "D" for
detailed findings).
Parking Spaces: CPMC Section 17.64(Gx7) for afast-food restaurant requires one space per one
hundred feet of floor area for a total 45 spaces and three stacking spaces for the drive-thru window. The
project provides for 51 pazking spaces parking spaces with the appropriate number of dedicated ADA
spaces. The length of drive-thru lane has the ability to provide the required three stacking spaces. The
project satisfies the off-street parking spaces required by CPMC Section 17.64.
FINDINGS:
See Attachment "D"
ISSUES:
There are no identified issues.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
There are none.
ATTACHM_ENTS/EXHIBITS: _ __
Attachment "A"-Site Plan
Attachment "B"- Applicant's Findings
Attachment "C"- Building Department Staff Report
Attachment "D"- Findings
Attachment "E"- Resolution
ACTION: _
Consideration of Resolution No. ,approving the Major Modification application to the
Conditional Use Permit, Resolution No. 362, for a proposed structural addition to the existing
McDonald's restaurant (File 08175).
Approval of Resolution No. ,granting approval of the Major Modification to the Conditional Use
Pernut, Resolution No. 362, for a proposed structural addition to the existing McDonald's restaurant
(File 08175).
Page 2 of 2 2
~i~w \\ a uvolm 1a4 laueMU nw~ u.w0" °•'
woa tn\1 w0 aolen(~ ~ ..._-r.i.lwo
1.N.O.iib.lnNi ~•.1Y4..1 . TM~ m ::,:...I.. - ~ ,~.,~
nlwre un \pelr\1ro ew'o ea nr Iv uaw4~" ~_
YI-tO 1b4 My IIOOWI 11M1M W01~ed~Y/ ~
rr rrlrir+ •11Q a w. w
NW 1JA NYTO W'Rl ___.
MMw• INION'Va+~r~ aWAO iNA~ f.1G\W !w ri rw~i
hl \W:rbn 11nM Ir•bbO ~ IT M - 1 \ ' ` ~'//~ \ \ / d,r,i ~A T ` ` ~ 'r'r I I
w\n.e tlr f.-.e V411 MY v1+1..i1.r\ bNR1YO / ;_
~ ~~ ~ . ~,.- 1 mM
101 r0Y 17/ Y - - •' ; ~ '- t~ J y' ~ i
~\rnnn ria<u wnblom iOi as=`+P,f
.~
N•41 iMl. li. fYMi YftYM~ ., i , 0 ', } 0 ~, , ~.4_-. r
,_..,~_, 1111 1 "\~ ,
._, ~' ,.
.` ,,\ , `+
.~ _ i ~ ,,
1/11104 - } '•:\ ^ ~ ,`\ 1'~ ~'/y
r rM MaoMO. \ ° plc„ pl ~~ /l u
_ ___ +t xurvln - ~ ~~~\YYww ~ tti ~ - - ~ t,~ ,~(~'~ ~~ ~rr}~P/~
IMF~}1~ irNl A 4 - 1~ ~ ~' i i _ ~ J ,. ~ ~f ~~ ~ _~'~ll.;
-. __- .-... dHyl r1117'1~71h -__ .+. r. • muvr• wW •lm - l~ 1~u `~\r~ ~•\ ~ ~\ !~ /^
n Mrn11n....1.rA`.i : ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ n
„d.•N ,,, \
.o.a.+ ..b • ---~
MtH - \ %
4rii .1yM PN 1f( \ / \
` r.: •_
.~ ~ j „41., ,,
. ~. \ ir] t rr~u ovyy~vumV oe ~ o
\ _ lmu f/de a aei 11eW ~~i.•u i e
10/\Ur A A` mMEH RI71n
AC • .I ]'IY'9i \1uw1 mw-r\e or Sarre ~ `w1• w1'~i.wvi ~N°i4uiwioa'~'4 lo/ e~w
N1tlON "" o, ,..1..<.N~1,.u...,,44.m. IIII( lu~1w~ : w ~1 u~1.1+1n~1 1.
~~14«~ 4 ioe.n.n rr,..w 1~1 ~ Y!•NII V ~•N\ 1 _ ~ LI \ rrtln •14 Yf 40R1W111~1
~ W JIg10~ 1MN: glylliNlO 1l lYlriD IW iQ t!I/~ N OfM OblrfW M WIMO nU
\ V r iL r .rte
1 i1. ~ f.~\:, . .,..._ r.. , ^ rin "~~`•~: ~tii. .ry _ r•R ~. . ~\.'^Y,t'.'.".~ f' 1~,}.ia 'r~i
U
Q
Q
~yATtO~
a ~,~,
PAR1'~~' ~' ~yp~T10K
~`~'~
U
d
'~
~ ~srrart~
~A~ ~
~A~
=ACHMENT "~"
PROPOSED FINDINGS FOR
MODIFICATION TO THE EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Date: May 14, 2008
Address: Between Ninth Street & Freeman Road along Pine Street
Project: McDonald's Restaurant Drive-Thru Modification, Play Place and Cash
Boot Addition
Overview: The McDonald's restaurant has been in business for 12 years at this
current location and operating under an existing conditional use permit.
The improvements include the addition of a Play Place for kids in order
to enhance the dinning experience. The applicant also wishes to modify
the drive-thru to a tandem drive thru and add a cash window. These
tandem drive thru and cash window function together to increase the
efficiency of the drive-thru and decrease the wait times for drive-thru
orders. The applicant must also restripe some of the parking lot to meet
the existing parking lot requirements in the code.
Modification to the existing conditional use permit is required because
the existing McDonald's restaurant is allow under an approved existing
Conditional Use Permit. Due to the scope of improvements to the existing
restaurant the applicant is required to complete a Modification to the
existing Conditional Use Permit. As a result the applicant has prepared
findings to the Condition Use Permit Criteria.
**Below the Criteria is in italics and the applicants findings are in bold.
17.76.040 Findings and conditions.
The planning commission in granting a conditional use permit shall find as follows:
Criteria A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject
zoning district and all other provisions of this code;
Proposed Finding of Fact: The proposed use of the site has already been
approved during the original conditional use permit. However, the addition
to the building square footage requires additional parking stalls totally 51.
The improvements include striping improvements that will increase the
number of parking stalls to 51. All the provisions of the code have already
been approved via the original conditional use permit and as noted in the
Standards review findings. Therefore this criteria can be met.
s
Criteria B. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street
or highway is adequate in size and condition to ej)ectively accommodate the
traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use;
Proposed Finding of Fact: The existing site already has two access points, a
right-in right-out located along Freeman Road and a fuU access located at
Ninth Street. The existing McDonald's Restaurant has been accommodating
traffic through the site for approximately 12 years and haven't had any
accessibility problems. With the tandem drive-thru and cash booth
improvements the traffic circulation efficiency will increase, thereby
reducing any potential for trafDc circulation problems. Therefore this
criteria has been met.
Criteria C. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property
or the permitted use thereof. In maln'ng this determination, the commission shall
consider the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress,
egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings and structures;
walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs;
Proposed Finding of Fact: The proposed use will not change from the
approved conditional use permit, nor will the improvements effect the use on
abutting properties. Please refer to the site plan for an illustration of the
improvements. As shown
Criteria D. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for rill
comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore
will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing
or working in the surrounding neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or
injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general
welfare of the community based on the review of those factors listed in subsection
C of this section;
Proposed Finding of Fact: The maintenance or operation of the use will not
effect surrounding property owners as the applicant does not wish to change
the use of the property from the current use
Criteria E. That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to
protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include:
1. Adjustments to lot size or yard areas as needed to best accommodate the
proposed use; provided the lots or yard areas conform to the stated minimum
dimensions for the subject zoning district, unless a variance is also granted as
provided for in Chapter 17.13,
Proposed Finding of Fact:
2. Increasing street widths, modif cations in street designs or addition of street
signs or traffic signals to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed
use,
Proposed Finding of Fact: This existing use will not change from the
already approved conditional use permit, nor will the improvements generate
any additional traffic. Therefore this criteria has been met.
3. Adjustments to off=street parla'ng requirements in accordance with any unique
characteristics of the proposed use,
Proposed Finding of Fact: The existing use has already been approved
under the existing conditional use permit. The applicant does not wish to
adjust he off-street parking requirements. Therefore this criteria has been
met.
4. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress,
Proposed Finding of Fact: The applicant does not wish to change the points
of access from the already approved locations. Therefore this criteria has
been met.
S. Requiring landscaping, irrigation systems, lighting and a property
maintenance program,
Proposed Finding of Fact: The existing restaurant is already landscaped
and has an irrigation and lighting system. The existing site is currently
maintained. Therefore this criteria has been met.
6. Regulation of signs and their locations,
Proposed Finding of Fact: The applicant does not intend do add any signs
to the site with the exception of building signs that are located on new play
place. Since these building signs are compliant with the sign code, this
criteria has been met.
7. Requiring fences, berms, walls, landscaping or other devices of organic or
artificial composition to eliminate or reduce the effects of noise, vibrations,
odors, visual incompatibility or other undesirable effects on surrounding
properties,
Proposed Finding of Fact: The existing site already has a sight obscuring
fence that surrounds the property and landscaping that separates abutting
properties. Since the existing fences and landscaping was approved under
the original conditional use permit and no changes are proposed they should
be approved with the modification. Therefore this criteria bas been met.
8
8. Regulation of time of operations for certain types of uses if their operations
may adversely affect privacy of sleep of persons residing nearby or otherwise
conflict with other community or neighborhood functions,
Proposed Finding of Fact: The use has already been approved and will not
change. The applicant does not wish to change the time of operation,
therefore the use will not affect persons residing nearby. Therefore this
criteria has been met.
9. Establish a time period within which the subject land use must be developed,
Proposed Finding of Fact: The existing land use has already been developed
approximately 12 years ago, however the proposed additions will follow a
construction schedule. Therefore this criteria can be met.
10. Requirement of a bond or other adequate assurance within a specified period
of time,
Proposed Finding of Fact: Prior to the issuance of a building permit the
applicant or the applicants contractor could put up any bond that is required
by the City. Therefore this criteria can be met.
11. Such other conditions that are found to be necessary to protect the public
health, safety and general welfare,
Proposed Finding of Fact: The existing use has been approved ~za the
original Conditional tise permit and the proposed improvements meet the
requirements of the Code. Therefore this criteria bas been met.
12. In considering an appeal of an application for a conditional use permit for a
home occupation, the planning commission shall review the criteria listed in
Section 17.60.190. (Ord. 1823 ,¢S, 2001; Ord. 1684 X72, 1993; Ord. 161 S
ASS, 1989; Ord. 1533 ~1, 1984; Ord. 1436 ~2(part), 1981).
Proposed Finding of Fact: The applicant is not considering a home
occupation, therefore this criteria is not applicable. This criteria has been
met.
9
-~ ~~-~- ATTACHMENT "=
y
City of Central Point, Oregon CENTRAL Building Department
140 S Third Street, Central Point, OR 97502 POINT Todd Meador, Building Official
541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.161 I
www.ci.central-point.or us
BUILDING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
DATE: 6/7/08
TO: Planning Department
Planning file: 8175/8180
FRO~VI: Building Department
SUBJECT: McDonalds addition
Name:
Address:
C itv
State: Zip Code:
Property Description: 37 2W 02 CD TL 2900%3000
PURPOSE:
The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant
regarding City Building Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design
and development of the proposed project.
This is not a plan review. This report is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the
Central Point Planning Conunission.
140 S Third Street Central Point. OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.1611
~.
Building Dept. Staff Report, Page
BL; ILDING DEPARTMENT COM_VIENTS
1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted
codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department.
?. If a private storm drain system is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued b~~
the Central Point Plumbing Department.
3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point
Electrical Department.
4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC
Appendix J and chapter 18 of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include,
but need not be limited to, the following information:
a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations.
b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered.
c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered.
d. Recommendations for foundation nape and design criteria, including bearing
capacity, provisions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects
of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads.
e. V~Then expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the
foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said
design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations.
5. Grading/excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and
chapter 18 and regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the
foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering
practices. .
A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including
special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building Official,
shall be submitted prior to final of the grading,~excavation permit. Building permits will not be
issued until gradinglexcavation permit is finaled.
Exception:
1. The upper 1.5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of--way.
2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular
access ways or parking areas.
140 S Third Street Central Point. OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.1611
11
Building Department Staff Report, page 3
6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building
Department for permit requirements.
7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on
the property.
8. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate
located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development
Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code 8.24.120.
9. Dust control, erosion control, and track out elimination procedures must be
implemented.
10. Application for building permits will require three sets of complete plans indicating
compliance with Oregon Structural Specialty Code (2007).
11. Fire District 3 will determine fire hydrant locations, as well as access to buildings.
Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's
contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work.
If questions, please call Todd Meador.....664-6325, ext. 228.
140 S Third Street Cenfra! Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.1611
12
Attachment "D"
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
File No: 08175
INTRODLTCT'ION
In the matter of the Major Modification application to the Conditional Use Permit for the
McDonald's restaurant approved August 6, 1996 in accordance v•7th CPMC Section
17.09.300. The modification is in preparation for the site plan reviev~~ (File No. 08175) for
an addition to the existing building. The project site is situated in the C-4, Tourist and
Office-Professional zoning district. The McDonald's Restaurant is located at 43 South
Ninth Street and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 02 CD, Tax
Lots 2900 and 3000. Applicant: Glen Chavez; Agent: Josh V~'ells, V~'estech Engineering.
CPMC 17.09.300 Major modifications.
A. ~'llajor .Modification Defined. The community development director shall determine
that a major modification(s) is required if one or more of the changes listed below are
proposed:
5. An increase rn the floor area proposed for nonresidential use by more than fifteen
percent x~here previously specif ed;
Finding: The current McDonald's, a fast food restaurant, was originally approved
as a Conditional Use (CUP) in the C-4 zoning district as evidenced by Resolution
No. 362.
Finding: The proposed 1,794 square foot addition of a Play Place and cashier
vti7ndow to the existing McDonald's restaurant structure is a 66% increase in the
floor area. Expansion of the building is considered a modification of the previously
approved CUP and as such, an application for a major modification is necessary-.
Finding: An application for a major modification to the Conditional Use Permit
approved August 6, 1996 as evidenced by Resolution No. 362 has been submitted for
review th accordance w1th CPMC Section 17.09.300(A)(5).
Conclusion: It has been determined that a major modification application is
required for the 1,7 94 square foot addition to the existing McDonald's building as
provided in CPMC 17.09.300 (A).
7. Change to a condition of approval, or a change similar to subsections (A)(1) through (6)
of this section. that could have a detrimental impact on adjoining properties. The city
planning official shall have discretion in determining detrimental impacts warranting a
major modification.
Page 1 of 5 13
Finding: At this time, no request for a change to conditions of approval has been
submitted.
Conclusion: The proposal complies.
CPMC 17.09300 B. Major Modification Applications; Approval Criteria. An
applicant may request a major modification using a Type II or Type III review procedure, as
follows:
1. Upon the community development director determining that the proposed
mod cation is a major modification, the applicant shall submit an application form, filing
fee and narrative, and a site plan using the same plan format as in the original approval.
The community development director may require other relevant information, as necessary,
to evaluate the request.
2. The application shall be subject to the same review procedure (Type II or Illj,
decision-making body, and approval criteria used for the initial project approval, except
that adding a conditional use to an approved project shall be reviewed using a Type III
procedure.
3. The scope of review shall be limited to the modification request. For example, a
request to modify a parking lot shall require site design review only for the proposed
parking lot and any changes to associated access, circulation, pathways, lighting, trees, and
landscaping. 1~'otice shall be provided in accordance with the applicable notice
requirements for Type 11 or Type III procedures.
4. The decision-making body shall approve, deny, or approve with conditions an
application for major modification based on written ftndings on the criteria.
Finding: The Applicant submitted an application for review by the Planning
Commission of a T}~pe III major modification to the Conditional Use Permit.
Resolution No. 362 in compliance with CPMC section 17.09.300 (B).
Conclusion: Application complies
CPMC 17.76.040 Conditional Use Permit: Findings and conditions. The planning
commission in granting a conditional use permit shall find as follows:
A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and
all other provisions of this code;
Finding: The project is a single story, 1,794 square foot addition to the existing
McDormld's restaurant. The addition is to be constructed on the west side of the
building in an area that is currently in lawn.
Finding: The completed structure is 4,501 square feet located on a 0.88 acre parcel of
property. The property is adequate in size to provide for the proposed addition and
off street parking requirements of the CPMC as evidenced by the submitted site plan,
Sheet C-1 (Attachment "A").
Conclusion: The project can meet this criterion.
Page 2 of 5 14
CPMC 17.76.040 (B). That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and
that the street or highx~ay is adequate in sue and condition to effectively accommodate the
traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use;
Finding: Access to the restaurant is provided by two ingress/egress points from
Freeman Road and South Ninth Street. The restaurant will use the existing ingress
and egress points with no additional access points requested.
Finding: The City Public Works Department reviewed the proposed project and
found the existing access points to be acceptable. The Public Works Department
further found that a traffic impact analysis is not required.
Conclusion: The project can meet this criterion.
CPMC 17.76.040 (C). That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on
abutting property or the permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the
commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular
ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings and structures; walls
and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs;
Finding: The site has an existing and operating McDonald's restaurant. The
proposed addition to the restaurant is a play area. The restaurant will continue to
operate as a McDonald's fast food restaurant and as a result, no change is expected to
the abutting property.
Conclusion: The proposed use is consistent with the C-4 zoning district and the
City's intent for this area.
CPMC 17.76.040 (D). That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied
for will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will
not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in
the surrounding neighborhoods and rill not be detrimental or injurious to the property and
improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community based on the
review of those factors listed in subsection C of this section;
Finding: The play area will be located writhin a newly constructed addition that has
met or exceeded structural requirements. The facility will be operated as a
McDonald's restaurant.
Finding: A building permit is required for construction of the addition.
Conclusion: The proposal complies.
CPMC 17.76.040 (E). That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed
necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include:
Page 3 of 5 15
1. Adjustments to lot size or yard areas as needed to best accommodate the proposed use;
provided the lots or yard areas conform to the stated minimum dimensions for the subject
zoning district, unless a variance is also granted as provided for in Chapter 1; .13,
Finding: The site plan of the proposed addition to the building illustrates that the
structure has been located in such a way that all required setbacks have been meet or
exceeded.
2. Increasing street widths, modifications in street designs or addition of street signs or
traj~c signals to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed use,
Finding: As discussed in Finding B-1, the project site is located on the corner of
South Ninth Street and Freeman Road. Both streets are improved City streets with
sidewalks. The site has an existing McDonald's restaurant with existing ingress and
egress from both streets.
Finding: No new signs are requested with this application.
3. Adjustments to off-street parking requirements in accordance with any unique
characteristics of the proposed use,
Finding: Revised CPMC Section 17.64(G)(7) requires one (1) pazking spaces per one
hundred feet of gross floor area, plus three (3) stacking spaces for the drive-thru
window.
Finding: The project provides 51 parking spaces with the appropriate number of
dedicated ADA spaces. The length of the drive-thru lane has the ability to provide the
required three stacking spaces. The project satisfies the off-street pazking spaces
required by CPMC Section 17.64.
4. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress,
Finding: As stated in Finding B-1, the restaurant has existing ingress and egress
points with no additional access points requested.
S. Requiring landscaping, irrigation systems, lighting and a property maintenance
program,
Finding: Mature landscaping and the irrigation system aze in place as required by
the original site plan and CUP. The location of the play area addition is currently
lawn area adjacent to this portion of the building. The property is landscaped with
perimeter plantings and street trees. The planting areas will be retained and the
irrigation system will be reconfigured for the construction of the addition.
6. Regulation of signs and their locations,
Page 4 of 5 16
Finding: The existing sign w•as constructed according CPMC 15.24. No new signs
are being requested with this application.
~. Requiring fences, berms, x~alls, landscaping or other devices of organic or artificial
composition to eliminate or reduce the effects of noise, vibrations, odors, visual
incompatibility or other undesirable effects on surrounding properties,
Finding: The existing fencing will be maintained and no additional fencing is
requested with this application.
8. Regulation of time of operations for certain types of uses if their operutions may
adversely affect privacy of sleep of persons residing nearby or otherwise conjlict x~ith other
community or neighborhood functions,
Finding: The hours of operation will continue as originally approved, from 6:00 am
to midnight. The applicant is not requesting a change to the hours of operation.
9. Establish a time period within which the subject land use must be developed,
10. Requirement ofa bond or other adequate assurance x~ithin a specified period of time,
11. Such other conditions that are found to be necessary to protect the public health, safety
and general welfare,
12. In considering an appeal of an application for a conditional use permit for a home
occupation, the plamring commission shall reviex~ the criteria listed in Section 1 ? 60.190.
Finding: The proposed addition is expected to be complete by the fall of 2008 or
spring 2009.
Conclusion: The proposal complies.
Page 5 of 5 i 7
i
ATTACHMENT " ~ "
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A MAJOR MODIFICATION
APPLICATION TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ADDITION TO
THE EXISTING MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT
Applicant: Glenn Chavez; Agent: Josh Wells, Westech Engineering.
43 South Ninth Street (37S 2W 02 CD, Tax Lots 2900 and 3000)
File No. 08175
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a Major Modification to the Conditional Use Permit
(Resolution 362) application fora 1,794 square foot addition to the existing McDonald's
building approved within the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district and located
at 43 South Ninth Street and, in the City of Central Point, Oregon; and
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2008, the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a
duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff report
and heard testimony and comments on the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the
standards and criteria applicable to Major Modifications in accordance with Section
17.09.300, C-4 Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district Section 17.44, and
Conditional Use Permit Section 17.76, of the Central Point Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after duly considering the applicant's request, it is the Planning Commission's
determination that the application does comply with applicable standards, criteria and subject
to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report (Exhibit
"A") dated July 1, 2008;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on
the findings and conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Department
Staff Report dated July 1, 2008, which includes attachments, which is attached hereto by
reference and incorporated herein.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
1st day of July, 2008.
Planning Commission Chair
18
Planning Commission Resolution No. (7/1/2008)
ATTEST:
City Representative
Approved by me this 1st day of July, 2008.
Planning Commission Chair
~9
Planning Commission Resolution No. (7/1/2008)
MCDONALD'S
SITE PLAN
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM: FILE NO. 08180
CENTRAL
POINT
STAFF REPORT
July 1, 2008
Planning Department
Tom Humphrey, AICP,
Community Development Director/
Assistant City Administrator
Consideration of a Site Plan review for the construction of a 1,794 square foot addition to the existing
McDonald's building bringing the total building size to 4,501 square feet. The project site is in a C-4,
Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district. The McDonald's restaurant is located at 43 South Ninth
Street and identified on the Jackson County- Assessor's map as 37S 2VJ 02 CD, Tax Lots 2900 and 3000.
Applicant: Glenn Chavez; Agent: Josh Vi~'ells, Westech Engineering.
STAFF SOURCE: ~~
Connie Clune, Comm 't}' Plat~ier
BACKGROLfiD:
Consideration of a Major Modification to the approved Conditional Use Permit (File loo. 08] 75) for the
addition to the McDonald's restaurant preceded this site plan application on this agenda.
General Project Description: The proposed 1,743 square foot single story addition to the existing
building will provide additional seating and a play area. The play area addition is to the west side of the
existing building and is designed to continue the existing architecture of the structure. The project will
also add a 51 square foot cashier booth to the north side of the building. In addition, modification to the
drive-thru lane will create a tandem drive-thru for more efficient service.
Landscaping: Mature landscaping and the irrigation system are in place as required by the original site
plan and CUP. Construction of the play area addition will necessitate removal of the lawn area adjacent
to the building. The property is landscaped with perimeter plantings and street trees. The planting areas
will be retained and the irrigation system will be reconfigured to allow for construction of the addition.
Parking: CPMC Section 17.64(G)(7) for afast-food restaurant requires one space per one hundred feet
of floor azea for a total 45 spaces and three stacking spaces for the drive-thru window. The project
provides for 51 parking spaces parking spaces w7th the appropriate number of dedicated ADA spaces.
The length of drive-thru lane has the ability to provide the required three stacking spaces. The project
satisfies the off-street parking spaces requirements.
FINDINGS:
See Attachm
Page l of 2 n O
ISSUES:
As part of the Ninth Street realignment project, the abandoned portion of South Ninth Street was vacated
in 1994 (Ord. No. 1706). A majority of the vacated road bed is now part of the site's landscaping with a
small portion utilized as the drive-thru exit lane. The submitted site plan identifies the location of
existing sanitary sewer and storm drain lines located in the vacated road as illustrated with Attachment
A. These existing utilities were grouped or located in the center of the abandoned road; however, a
specific Public Utility Easement (PUE) for the sanitary sewer line and storm drain was not recorded for
this property. As a condition of approval, recording of a PUE for the sanitary sewer and storm drain will
be necessary.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. A Public Utility Easement for utilities, to include sanitary sewer line, the sewer main and the
storm drain shall be recorded and a copy provided to the City prior to issuance of a building
permit. The PUE shall be of a width necessary to accommodate the sanitary sewer and storm
drain lines. Due to the grouping and close proximity of each line, a combined PUE width of
sixteen (16) feet is allowed.
2. Conditions as listed by the City of Central Point Building Department (Attachment E) and
Rogue Valley Sewer Services (Attachment F).
3. Site Plan Approval shall lapse and become void one (1) year following the date on which it
becomes effective unless construction has commenced.
ATTACHMENTS/EXHIBITS:
Attachment "A"- Sanitary sewer and storm drain illustration
Attachment "B"- Site and Landscape Plan, Sheet C 1
Attachment "C"- Building Elevations, Sheets 1 and 2
Attachment "D"- Applicant's Findings
Attachment "E"- Building Department Staff Report
Attachment "F"- RVSS Comments
Attachment "G"- Findings
Attachment "H"- Proposed Resolution
ACTION:
Consideration of a Site Plan Review for the 1,794 square foot addition to the existing McDonald's
restaurant building (File No. 8180).
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of Resolution No. ,granting Site Plan approval for the 1,794 square foot addition to the
existing McDonald's restaurant (File No. 8180).
21
Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT "~"
Sanitary Sewer
Storm drain lines
located in the abandoned Ninth Street roadbed
~ _
rte fR • 6. 1 • -
f.l .~ 1 r
cIC a cIC -
=~. wsiti r` w~ ~ ~ f r ti
* fir - i-1 ~ f s n - ~'~
1 r .1 as
/ fFf - 1 1•L
1 l i ~ H
~ f 1 t ~ K
I f.. K
.f 11 f ~ K
. -7 ft ~ 11tt %
r '~
ti
~ ~ 1 e
~ .. •~s .. ~ 1 141s ... 1 t:TC wi u 1i~ 1 ~w~t
I:rl ~ ~ 'r c i c c •1~1~ Yc f c ~1 ,~ - .. I .s +_ w ~TN
f n •i ~ . 11t ~ ffr: i• r ~i J° r ii r r C6 fIf c r •wf ~ ' 6GAL! ,. ~ ~,
TC
_ ~ _ , ~' C T L t- TI
' ~' tC T~
~.~~
_- n ~ T 1 1 T T. ~t 1
i,
! y, y [ ~ `
, ~
- .t
•
r ,~ •
~
`\
•
`
4
~
.
~
~
~ -
~
~
L
s
-. rf,. ,
c
t a
..~
~:
22
~. Q U'
~~~~~~~
~~ ~ Z ~ a~j
~~~~~-~
~ ~!
ar
~~
e.x c
~a
`~$~
. ~!
4~
r
~.TTACHMENT ° L' "
FRONT STREET ELEVATION
:~,~~ ire„ : ,,_o.
PARKING SIDE ELEVATION
scue: ire. , ,,~.
~i~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ r i T n ~ ~~
Ba~cx«e ~~vaTtior~
,.o,a„r..,,...~.
__ -'x~ ~~ IIII I~~ III ~.'. III ~ III ~ 4 ~~.~~'~...:.. rI rtRl'' ~'
.~-~^^^~- _ _~ I ~~~ IIII ~~~ III ~. III I ~~ ,III ~ Il ~ ~~n' ~~. ~~ 1 IIII I
~~~ l b _ ~ ~~ ~~ I~~ ~~ ~i! IIII ~~ IIII ~ I
III ~ _ _._ °"~-.. i ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~.,I I ~ ~ ~ ~
- - _y-.. --- d
_ -_.-
DR~~a NRU Slq~ ELEVATIO
. , •.
~~~ ~ ~
ATTACHMENT "~---"
Proposed Findings of Facts for the Design Standards
Date: 1\iay 14, 2008
Address: Beriveen plinth Street & Freeman Road along Pine Street
Central Point, OR
Project: 1\IcDonald's Restaurant Play Place Addition, Cash Booth Addition,
Drive-thru M1lodification and Parking Lot Striping
Improvements: The applicant wishes to modify the existing drive-thru restaurant to
improve the efficiency and customer satisfaction at the ~'IcDonald's
restaurant. The improvements to the existing building include the
addition of a play place for kids and a cash booth. Additions to the
site include the reconfiguration of the existing drive-thru to a tandem
drive-thru. The drive-thru modifications in combination with the
cash booth addition will increase the number of customers able to be
served in the drive-thru and decrease the drive-thru waiting period
for each customer.
**Belo~v the Standards are in italics and the Proposed Findings of Fact are
bold.
17.72.040 Standards.
In approving, conditionally approving, or denying the plans submitted, the city shall base their
decision on the follo~~~ing standards:
Standard .a. Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site in such a
manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere ~1~ith tl:e landscaping
scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner as to use the same to screen
such activities and sights as might be heterogeneot~.r to existing neighborhood
uses. The planning commission may require the maintaining of existing trees for
sereenirtg purposes and for sound and sight insulation from existing
neighborhood use;
Proposed Finding of Fact: The existing site is fully landscaped per the City
requirements and therefore is similar to the surrounding neighborhood. The
proposed restaurant improvements including the play place addition, drive-
thru modification and cash booth addition, will not remove any existing
trees, or construct any walls. As shown on the site plan, the proposed drive-
thru modification ~~~ill remove a very small portion of grass landscaping to
allow for and ne~ti~ curb and asphalt placement to all for required turning
radius for the drive thru. Therefore this standard has been met.
lofi
26
Standard B. Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to improve and to
avoid interference with the rra f c f1o~~ on public streets;
Proposed Finding of Fact: The proposed improvements titi•ill not alter the
design, or number and location of ingress and egress points of the existing
restaurant. Since the number and location of ingress and egress points and
design has already been approved. The drive-thru modification will actually
increase the driti•e-thru capacity and decrease ~-•ait times, thereby reducing
the potential of interference with traffic flow on public streets below what the
existing drive-thru conditions are. Therefore this standard has been met.
Standard C. To provide off street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian mtd vehicle
flog:~ facilities in such a manner as is compatible ia~ith the use for ~t~hich the site is
proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and
avoid interference ~=ith the traf~c.floze• on public streets;
Proposed Finding of Fact: The existing restaurant alreadi• has an approved
drive-thru, off-street parking, and pedestrian access via public sidewalk and
existing sidervall:s. The proposed improvements are compatible with the
existing use, as the applicant does not propose to change the existing use.
The drive-thru modification i-ill actualh• increase the dri~•e-thru capaein-
and decrease wait times, thereby reducing the potential of interference with
traffic flog on public streets below what the existing drip-a-thru conditions
are. Therefore this criteria has been met.
Standard D. Signs and other outdoor adi~ertising structures to ensure that they do not conflict
rsith or deter from traffic control signs or devices and that they are compatible
i~~ith the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract
from the appearmice or visibility of nearby signs;
Proposed Finding of Fact: ~s illustrated on the site plan the proposed Play
Place addition is approximately 35 feet to Pine Street and 4S feet from ;Sinth
Street. The existing building is approximately 40 feet from Freeman Road.
The proposed play place dill ha~~e signage per the building elevations and
due to the distances from the aforementioned streets should not be in conflict
»•ith, or deter from traffic control signs or dei•ices located in these streets.
The proposed improvements will also include tw•o new illuminated menu
boards as part of the drip a-thru modifications. These are faced towards
Freeman Rd at a screwed angle, very similar to the existing menu board.
Due to the e1e~•ati:on difference bets:~een Freeman Road and the proposed
2ot3
27
menu boards conflicts ++~ith traffic control signage or devices are negated.
Therefore this standard has been met.
Standard E. .9ccessibility and suff ciency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to
prop-ide for the reasonable safeh• of life, limb and propert~~, including, but not
limited to, suitable gates, access roads acid fire lanes so that all buildings on the
premises are accessible to fire apparatr~s;
Proposed Finding of Fact: The existing restaurant has two access locations
that access t+vo different public streets that are not gated and provide
writable access to the existing restaurant. The fire apparatus is accessible
from a public street and the proposed improvements do not affect the
accessibilih' or abilih• to pro+~ide for reasonable safeh~ of life, limb and
properh•. Therefore this criteria has been met.
Standard F. Compliance ~:pith all citZ~ ordinances and regulations, including Section 16. ?0. (180
pertaining to the maximum number of single family dwellings or drt~elling units
alloy:•able orr cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state lazas;
Proposed Finding of Fart: Phis project does not pertain to single-farnih•
dwellings therefore this standard is not applicable.
Standard G. Compliance z:~itli such architecture and design standards as to provide aesthetic
acceptabilitti~ in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point area and its
environs. The architecture and design proposals may be rejected by the planning
commission if found to be incompatible with the existing architectural or design
characteristics of adjacent properties or uses. In addition, the plarrnirrg
commission reserves the right to establish additional height, setback, buffering, or
other development requirements that ma~• be necessary to ensure land use
compatibility and ensure the health, safety, and privacy of Central Point
residents. (Ord. 170? t 4, 1994; Ord. 1684 x'67, 1993; Ord. 1436 ,~2(part), 1981).
Proposed Finding of Fact: The existing restaurant has alread~~ been
approved and therefore it should provide acceptable aesthetics in relation to
the neighborhood and the general Centra! Point area. Since the proposed
improvements will add a play place to the existing building as illustrated on
the building elevations, c+~hich is architectura!!~ similar, the improvements
should meet this standard. Therefore this standard can be met.
3 of 3
28
~~~~- ATTACHMENT " E "
City of Central point, Oregon CENTRAL Building Department
140 S Third Street, Central Point, OR 97502 POINT Todd Meador, Building Official
541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.161 I
www.ci.central-point.or us
BLTILDI'_VG DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
DATE :6!7/08
TO: Planning Department
Planning file: 8175/8180
FROM: Building Department
SUBJECT: McDonalds addition
Name:
Address:
City•
State: Zip Code:
Property Description: 37 2W 02 CD TL 2900/3000
PURPOSE:
The staff report is to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Applicant
regarding City $uilding Department requirements and conditions to be included in the design
and development of the proposed project.
This is not a plan review. This report. is preliminary and compiled solely for use by the
Central Point Planning Commission.
140 S Third Street Central Point. OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664. 1611
29
Building Dept. Staff Report, Page
BL 1LDliVG DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
1. Applicant, agent and contractors must comply with all current State of Oregon adopted
codes, and apply for all permits through the Central Point Building Department.
?. If a private storm drain system. is proposed it must be reviewed and a permit issued by
the Central Point Plumbing Department.
3. Any private street lighting must be reviewed and permitted by the Central Point
Electrical Department.
4. Provide the building department with a Geotechnical report as required by OSSC
Appendix J and chapter 18 of the OSSC. A written report of the investigation shall include,
but need not be limited to, the following information:
a. A plot plan showing the location of all test borings and/or excavations.
b. Descriptions and classifications of the materials encountered.
c. Elevations of the water table, if encountered.
d. Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing
capacity, pro~~isions to mitigate the effects of expansive soils, provisions to mitigate the effects
of liquefaction and soil strength, and the effects of adjacent loads.
e. When expansive soils are present, special provisions shall be provided in the
foundation design and construction to safeguard against damage due to expansiveness. Said
design shall be based on geotechnical recommendations.
5. Grading.~excavation permits are required in accordance with OSSC Appendix J and
chapter 18 and regarding any fill material placed on the site. Fills to be used to support the
foundation of any building or structure shall be placed in accordance with accepted engineering
practices. .
A soil investigation report, and a report of satisfactory placement of fill (including
special inspections of placement of fill and compaction) acceptable to the Building OfFcial,
shall be submitted prior to final of the grading/excavation permit. Building permits will not be
issued until grading/excavation perniit is tinaled.
Exception:
1. The upper 1.5 foot of fill placed outside of public rights-of--way.
2. The upper 1.5 foot of fill that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular
access ways or parking areas.
140 S Third Streef Central Point. OR 97502 0 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.1611
30
Building Department Staff Report, page 3
6. To move or demolish any existing structures located on the property, call the Building
Department for permit requirements.
7. Notify the City Building Department of any existing wells, or septic systems located on
the property.
$. Any development (any man-made change) to improved or unimproved real estate
located within the flood hazard area of the City of Central Point shall require a Development
Permit as set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code $.24.120.
9. Dust control, erosion control, and track out elimination procedures must be
implemented.
10. Application for building permits will require three sets of complete plans indicating
compliance with Oregon Structural Specialty Code (2007).
11. Fire District 3 ~~•ill determine fire hydrant locations, as well as access to buildings.
Any changes proposed shall be submitted in writing by the Applicant, or Applicant's
contractor to the Building Department for approval prior to start of work.
If questions, please call Todd Meador.....664-6323, ext. 2?8.
140 S Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 .547.664.3321 Fax 541.664.1611
31
ATTACHMENT "~'
+~Y ~W~~
~ - `~ ROGUE VALLEY SEINER SERVICES
~ L~ation 1 ~* \\ ~t'\'ila~ Ro::d Cenral Pot n'. OR - \tei'~[~~~ Andre-; P O Brix 31 ~U, Cenval Pcict. (1}; ,it.•i ila
= Tt: ~~»J 6~~-S~CF., E~~ 5~~ t•~t-~1-I t:tt,c RVSS a-.
May z9, zoo8
Connie Clune FAX 664-6384
City of Centra[ Point Planning Department
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon 47502
Re: Site Plan review for McDonald's, File ~ 08175, 08180
There is an 8 inch sewer main which runs through the property in a North-South
direction. The sewer main appears to be located along the Westerly edge of the new
play area, This sewer main pre-dates RVS management of the sewer system in Central
Point and we do not have any record of an easement. However, as this is an
established public use RVS would oppose any new structures within 5 feet of the sewer
main. Fences, paving, landscaping and similar uses are allowed within the sewer
easement.
The property is within the NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Quality management area.
Since the project site is currently alt paved there wilt be no additional requirements
for stormwater management.
There does not appear to be any new plumbing fixtures or other construction that
would require a permit or SDC payments to RVS.
Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of the proposed development be
subject to the following conditions:
Applicant must dedicate an easement to Rogue Valley Sewer Services for
the existing sewer main. This easement must be at least 10 feet wide
centered on the existing sewer main. This requirement would be met if the
applicant is able to produce the original easement for the sewer.
Applicant must submit a site plan to RVS demonstrating that the proposed
expansion does not violate the sewer easement.
Feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding this project.
Sincerely,
i~ ~ ~~`
G--
Carl Tappert, PE
District Engineer
32
K:\DAT.A\.4gencies\CENTP'I\PLANIv'G\SitePlanRe~iew\2008\08175 ?~4cDonalds.doc
Attachment "G"
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAVV
File'.vo: 08180
INTRODUCTION
In the Matter of a Site Plan Review for the construction of a 1,794 square foot addition to
the existing McDonald's restaurant bringing the total building size to 4,501 square feet.
The project site is in the C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district. The
McDonald's restaurant is located at 43 South Ninth Street and identified on the Jackson
County Assessor's map as 37S 2V~' 02 CD, Tax Lots 2900 and 3000. Applicant: Glenn
Chavez; Agent: Josh R'ells, VVestech Engineering.
CPMC 17.20.030 Conditional uses C-4, Tourist and Office-Professional zoning
district.
The following uses are permitted in the C-4 district x~hen authorized in accordance
with Chapter 17.76:
1 S. Drive-in fast food outlets;
Finding: The McDonald's restaurant is considered a fast food outlet and permitted
by a Conditional Use Permit approved August 6, 1996 as evidenced by Resolution
No. 362.
Finding: Expansion of the building is considered a modification of the prior
approved CUP and as such, an application for a major modification is necessary. The
Applicant has applied for a major modification as evidenced by application File No.
08175.
Conclusion: The applicant has met the procedural requirements with the filing of a
major modification application to the approved Conditional Use Permit (File No.
08175).
CPMC 17.72.010 (A) Purpose. The purpose of site plan, landscaping and construction
plan approval is to review the site and landscaping plans of the proposed use, structure
or building to determine compliance with this title and the building code, and to promote
the orderly and harmonious development of the city, the stability of land values and
investments, and the general welfare, and to promote aesthetic considerations, and to
help prevent impairment or depreciation of land values and development by the erection
of structures or additions or alterations thereto without proper attention to site planning.
landscaping and the aesthetic acceptability in relation to the development of neighboring
properties.
CPMC 17.72.020 Site plan approval required:
(A) A site plan application conforming to the requirements of Section 17.7 2.030 shall be
made:
1. For all construction requiring issuance of a building permit; or
Page 1 of 4 3 3
2. G'pon a change of use.
Finding: The application and supporting documents provide the information
necessary for review of the proposed addition to the existing McDonald's restaurant.
The proposed addition will require issuance of a building permit.
Conclusion: A Site Plan Review for the proposed structure is necessary and the
submitted application complies.
CPMC 17.72.030 (A) - (E) Information Required This section of the code addresses
all of the necessary information to make a decision for approval or denial of the site plan
application.
Finding: The applicant has provided all of the necessary information as outlined in
the above referenced code.
Conclusion: The proposal complies.
CPMC 17.72.030 (F) In the discretion of the city, a traffic study performed by a
licensed professional engineer;
Finding: A traffic study was not required for this application.
Conclusion: The proposal complies.
CPMC 17.72.040 Standards. In approving, conditionally approving, or denying the
plans submitted, the city shall base their decision on the follox~ing standards:
CPMC 17.72.040 (A). Landscaping and fencing and the construction of walls on the site
in such a manner as to cause the same to not substantially interfere with the landscaping
scheme of the neighborhood, and in such a manner as to use the same to screen such
activities and sights as might be heterogeneous to existing neighborhood uses. The
Planning Commission may require the maintaining of existing trees for screening
purposes and for sound and sight insulation from existing neighborhood use;
Finding: The existing landscaping was implemented as per the planting plan of the
original approved site plan as part of the CUP. The existing landscaped areas and
existing irrigation system will remain. The subject construction site is a lawn area
adjacent to the existing building.
Finding: The property is landscaped with perimeter and street trees. The planting
areas will be retained and the irrigation system will be reconfigured to allow for the
construction of the building and walkways.
Finding: No additional landscaping is planned or required for this application.
Conclusion: The proposal complies.
Page2of4 34
CPMC 17.72.040 (B) Design, number and location of ingress and egress points so as to
improve and to avoid interference with the traffic flow on public streets;
Finding: The access to the restaurant is provided by two existing ingress/egress
points from Freeman Road and South Ninth Street. The City Public Works
Department reviewed the proposed project and found the existing access points to be
acceptable.
Conclusion: The proposal complies.
CPMC 17.72.040 (C) To provide off-street parking and loading facilities and pedestrian
and vehicle flow facilities in such a manner as is compatible with the use for which the
site is proposed to be used and capable of use, and in such a manner as to improve and
avoid interference x~ith the traffrc flow on public streets;
Finding: CPMC Section 17.64(G)(7) for afast-food restaurant requires one space per
one hundred feet of floor area for a total of 45 spaces and three stacking spaces for
the drive-thru wrindow. The project provides for 51 pazking spaces to include
dedicated ADA spaces. The length of the drive-thru lane has the ability to provide
the required three stacking spaces.
Conclusion: The proposal complies.
CPMC 17.72.040 (D) Signs and other outdoor advertising structures to ensure that they
do not conflict with or deter from traff c control signs or devices and that they are
compatible with the design of their buildings or uses and will not interfere with or detract
from the appearance or visibility of nearby signs;
Finding: No new signs aze proposed with this application. The existing sign(s)
received permits and were installed in conformance Frith applicable requirements.
Conclusion: The proposal complies.
CPMC 17.72.040 (E) Accessibility and suffrciency of firefighting facilities to such a
standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but
not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and ftre lanes so that all buildings on the
premises are accessible to fire apparatus;
Finding: Fire District No. 3 w111 review the structural plans and comment during the
building permit process.
Conclusion: Fire District 3's requirements can be monitored in the building permit
review process.
CPMC 17.72.040 (~ Compliance with all city ordinances and regulations, including
Section 16.20.080 pertaining to the maximum number of single family dwellings or
dwelling units allowable on cul-de-sac streets, and applicable state laws;
Page 3 of 4 3 5
Finding: No single-family dwellings are proposed with this application.
Conclusion: Not applicable
CPMC 17.72.040 (G) Compliance with such architecture and design standards as to
provide aesthetic acceptability in relation to the neighborhood and the Central Point
area and its environs. The architecture and design proposals may be rejected by the
Planning Commission if found to be incompatible with the existing architectural or
design characteristics of adjacent properties or uses. In addition, the Planning
Commission reserves the right to establish additional height, setback, buffering, or other
development requirements that may be necessary to ensure land use compatibility and
ensure the health, safety, and privacy of Central Point residents.
Finding: The addition is designed to blend with the existing structure and meets the
height and setback requirements of CPMC Section 17.44.
Conclusion: The proposal complies.
Page 4 of 4
36
ATTACHMENT " ~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,794 SQ. FT. ADDITION TO THE EXISTING
MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT
Applicant: Glenn Chavez; Agent: Josh Wells, Westech Engineering.
43 South Ninth Street (37S 2W 02 CD, Taz Lots 2900 and 3000)
File No. 08180
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a Site Plan application fora 1,794 square foot
addition to the existing McDonald's building approved within the C-4, Tourist and Office-
Professional zoning district and located at 43 South Ninth Street and, in the City of Central
Point, Oregon; and
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2008, the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a
duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff report
and heard testimony and comments on the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the
standards and criteria applicable to C-4 Tourist and Office-Professional zoning district
Section 17.44, Off-Street Parking and Loading Section 17.64, and Site Plan, Landscaping and
Construction Plan Section l 7.72 of the Central Point Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after duly considering the applicant's request, it is the Planning Commission's
determination that the application does comply with applicable standards, criteria and subject
to compliance with conditions as set forth in the Planning Department Staff Report (Exhibit
"A") dated July 1, 2008;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission, by this Resolution No. does hereby approve the application based on
the findings and conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", the Planning Department
Staff Report dated Julyl, 2008, which includes attachments, which is attached hereto by
reference and incorporated herein.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
1st day of July, 2008.
Planning Commission Chair
3'7
Planning Commission Resolution No. (7/1/2008}
ATTEST:
City Representative
Approved by me this 1st day of July, 2008.
Planning Commission Chair
38
Planning Commission Resolution No. (7/1/2008)
BUILDABLE LANDS INVENTORY
Planning Department
STAFF REPORT CENTRAL TomHumpnrey,AICP,
POt NT Community peveiopmeni Director/
Assistant City Administrator
STAFF REPORT
July ~, 2oos
AGENDA ITEM: File No. 08160(02)
Consideration of a Resolution Declaring the Planning Commission's Intention to Amend the City of
Central Point Comprehensive Plan, the Buildable Lands Inventory Section of the Land Use Element.
AppticAnt: City of Central Point
STAFF SOURCE:
Don Burt, Planning Manager
~lhe Planning Department has produced a Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI) as part of the
Comprehensive Plan update. The BLI will ultimately be a section of the Land Use Element. The
purpose of this section is to provide a record of the availability of lands for residential, commercial,
and industrial development. The BLI is prepared in response to ORS 197.296(2) requiring that cities
maintain an inventory of buildable lands sufficient to provide a twenty (20) year supply to
accommodate projected growth needs.
The calculation of buildable vacant land is based on specific terms that define the various buildable
land classifications, Many of these definitions are prescribed by law, and as such, are acknowledged
in the BLI as both a reference and confirmation of compliance with state requirements.
The BLI maintains an accounting of buildable lands by land use classification and zoning. The City's
Comprehensive Plan contains five (5) basic land use classifications and thirteen (13) sub-
classifications. Each of the land use classifications are supported by one of twenty (20) zoning
districts.
ISSUES:
Key findings within the BL1 are as follows:
General: As of July 1, 2008, the City of Central Point's urban area contained a total of 2,891 gross
acres. Public right-of--way, parks/open space and civic uses account for 31 % of the City's total gross
acreage, while residential, commercial, and industrial accounted for the remaining 69%. When public
right-of--way is removed, there aze 2,271 net acres within the City's urban area, Approximately 401
acres of the total net acreage of the City is defined as Net Buildable Land.
Page 1 of 2 3 9
Residential Buildable Land: Within the City's urban area, there are 1,506 acres of residential land
distributed over four (4) residential land use classifications. Approximately 15% (228 acres) of the
City's total residential land is considered net buildable residential land.
IndustriaVEmployment Buildable Land. There aze approximately 489 acres of land within the
industriaUemploymentclassification, which is distributed over three (3) land use categories: mixed-
use. commercial, and industrial. Approximately 35% (172 acres) of the industriallemployment lands
are considered buildable.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
No conditions
EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A" -City of Central Point Buildable Lands Inventory
Attachment "B" -Resolution of Intent
~onsiaeranon of a Kesotution Declaring the Planning Commission's Intention to Amend the City of
Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Buildable Lands Inventory Section of the Land Use Element.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Resolution of Intent and set the first evidentiary hearing for the Buildable Lands
Inventory for the August 5~' Planning Commission meeting.
Page 2 of 2 4 (~
City of Centr
Buildable Land
City of Central Point -Planning Department
draft 5/2008
41
1. PURPOSE
The rate of use and availability of buildable land is a critical component in the calculus of a community's
growth and development. The purpose of the Buildable Land Inventory (BLI) is to maintain a record of
the availability of lands for residential, ~~
commercial, and industrial development. The
BLI is prepared in response to ORS 197.296(2)
requiring that cities maintain an inventory of
buildable Lands sufficient to provide a twenty
(20) year supply to accommodate projected
growth needs. The BLI has no purpose other
than to track the availability and distribution of
the City's buildable lands. The adequacy of the
City's buildable lands required to satisfy growth
needs during the planning period will be
addressed in the Land Use, Housing, and
Economic Elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
The term "buildable lands" is defined as lands in
urban and urbanizable areas that are suitable,
available and necessary for residential uses.
Buildable lands include both vacant land, infill
Land, and developed Land likely to be
redeveloped.
~'y
F i~^re 1.1
I~RBAN REM 2M7
The BLI reports on the following types of buildable land:
1. Residential LandZ
a. Vacant lands planned or coned for residential use;
b. Partially vacant lands planned or zoned for residential use;
c. Lands that may be used for a mix of residential and employment uses under the existing
planning or zoning; and
d. Lands that may be used for residential infill or redevelopment.
2. Industrial and other Employment Land
a. Vacant lands planned or zoned for industriaVemployment use;
b. Partially vacant lands planned or zoned for industriaUemployment use;
c. Lands that may be used for a mix of residential and emplo}~nent uses under the existing
planning or zoning; and
d. Lands that may be used for industrial/employment infill or redevelopment.
Not only does the BLI maintain an accounting of the City's buildable lands, but it also identifies the
geographic distribution of buildable lands by Statistical Planning Areas (SPA). All land within the City's
1 ORS 197.295(1)
Z ORS 197.296(3)
Draft -May 2008
42
Page 1 of 34
urban area is allocated to one of nine (9) SPAS. For purposes of infrastructure planning, the availability
of a buildable land, accounting by SPA offers insights into where future urban services such as streets.
schools, water, etc. will be needed and the ability of those systems to support future growth.
The BLI has been structured to accommodate periodic updates with minimal effort. It is recommended
that at a minimum the BLI be updated once every five (5) years. It is preferred that the BLI be maintained
on an annual basis.
2. DEFINITIONS
The calculation of buildable vacant land is based on specific terms that define the various buildable land
classifications. Many of these definitions are prescribed by law, and as such, are acknowledged in this
BLI as both a reference and confirmation of compliance with legal requirements for calculating buildable
lands. For purposes of convenience, the definitions used throughout the BLl (bold) are presented in
Appendix A.
3. SAFE HARBORS
OAR 660-024-0060 permits cities with a population under 25,000 to use defined safe harbors in
calculating buildable lands for residential and industriaVemployment uses. A "safe harbor" is defined as
an optional course of action that local governments may use to satisfy a requirement of Goal 14 -
Urbanization. The use of safe harbors is intended to satisfy the requirement for which the specific safe
harbor is prescribed. A safe harbor is not the only way, or necessarily the preferred way, to comply with a
requirement. [t is not used in the context of this BLI to interpret the requirement for any purpose other
than applying a safe harbor within the structure of OAR 660-024-0060.
The safe harbors used in preparation of this BLI are:
1. Net Buildable Acre. OAR 660-024-0040(9): Permits a local government to estimate that the 20-
year land needs for streets and roads, parks, and school facilities will together require an
additional amount of land equal to 25 % of the net buildable acres determined for residential land
needs under section (4) of this rule. For purposes of this rule, a "Net Buildable Acre" consists of
43,560 square feet of residentially designated buildable land, after excluding present and future
rights-of--way, restricted hazard areas, public open space and restricted resource protection areas.
2. Buildable Residential Land OAR 660-024-0060(2xa): The infill potential of developed
residential lots or parcels of one-half acre or more may be determined by subtracting one-quarter
acre (10,890 square feet) for the existing dwelling and assuming that the remainder is buildable.
3. Buildable Residential Land, OAR 660-024-0060(2xb): Existing lots of less than one-half acre
that are currently occupied by a residence may be assumed to be fully developed.
4. Vacant Iudustrial/Employment Land, OAR 660-024-0060(3xa): Lots or parcels equal to or
larger than one-half acre, if the lot or parcel does not contain a permanent building. This was
calculated by identifying all industrially and commercially zoned lands of one-half acre or more
with an improved value less than $100,000 as noted on the Jackson County Assessors Records
5. IndustriaVEmploymeot Land, OAR 660-024-0060(3)(b): Lots or parcels equal to or larger than
five acres, if less than one-half acre of the lot or parcel is occupied by a permanent building.
Draft -May 2008 A ~ Page 2 of 34
4. LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONSANO ZONING
The BLI maintains an accounting of buildable lands by land use classification and zoning. The City's
Comprehensive Plan contains five (5) basic land use classifications and thirteen (13) sub-classifications.
Each of the land use classifications are supported by one of twenty (20} zoning districts. In Appendix B
of the 8LI an accounting is also maintained of the buildable lands inventory by Statistical Planning Area
(SPA) and Transportation Area Zone (TAZ).
5. METHODOLOGY
To maintain consistency in the
management of the BLI the methodology
used in the BLI is presented in Appendix
$ for reference purposes.
6. BUILDABLE LAND SUMMARY
As of ]uly 1, 2008, the City of Central
Point's urban area contained a total of 2,891
gross acres (Table 1). Public right-of--way,
parlcslopen space and civic uses account for
3l % of the City's total gross acreage, while
residential, commercial, and residential
accounted for the remaining 69%. When
public right-of--way is removed, tht:re are
2,271 net acres within the City's urban area.
Approximately 401 acres of the total net
acreage of the City is defined as Net
Buildable Land.
The suitability of the net Buildable Land
acreage for development is defined as
follows:
1. Vacant Land -These are vacant
lands on which there is no
development. Infrastructure is
generally available. These lands are
intended to satisfy 70% of the City's
future growth needs.
2. lnfill Land -These are lands which
are partially developed. lnfill land is
intended to satisfy 20% of the City's
future growth needs. And
Table 1
City- of Ceetral Poiet
Grne»1 land [~st Distribetioe
Zoeieg/t.aed C'se Total .4crcage Pereeetage
Very Low Denst'ty l~l-DRj
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Medium Dcttsity Residential (HDR I
High Densiq Residential (HDR) 112.47
903.79
245.49
244.04 3.89%
31.27%
8.49%
8.44%
A A 1 _.
Mired Use, Residential
Mixed Use. Comrttereial I8?2
65.25 0.63°'0
2.26•io
C•2 (M)
Commercial Neighborhood 1CM
1"fCPO)
'fhorot-ghfare Commercial fTC) 12.08
18.12
11739
8.79 0.42%
D,63°-.
4,06°r°
0,3D°r°
A M A 1 _ 5.41 /.
Emplormenl Commercial (EC)
Light Industrial (LII
Genera( [ndtutriat (G(1 24.69
152.46
72?8 0.85°ro
5.27%
2.50%
A A °
rvtc 1 _ ro
A t .1 .64
Bear Creek Greenw~a}
Open Space 77.38
92.86 2.68%
3.21%
A A
o to ht-0 - sy L4 ti
TOTAL ALL L.4~'b l :SE CATEGORIES 2&90.53 1110.00%'°
3. Redevelopment Land -These are lands which are improved, but the improvements are generally
old and the land value exceeds improvement value, Redevelopment Land is intended to satisfy
10`/° of the City's future growth needs.
Draft - Ma}' 2008 4 4 Page 3 of 34
The distribution of'Jet Buildable Land is categorized as either residential, or industrial%employment land.
6.1. Residential Buildable Land
Within the City's urban area, there are 1,505 acres of residential land distributed over four
residential land use classifications. Approximately 15% (229 acres) of the City's total residential
land is considered net buildable residential land. Table 2 identifies the distribution of the
Residential Gross Buildable Land by vacant land type (vacant, infill, redevelopment). Figure 1
illustrates the geographic distribution of Gross Buildable Land.
The estimation of Residential Redevelopment Land used U.S. Census American Housing
Survey (AHS) formula for calculating housing loss and using the higher state average for housing
loss, it is estimated that during the period 2008 through 2030 the City of Central Point will lose
an estimated I4 residential units per year for a total of 310 dwelling units. Using an average
residential density of six (6) units to the acre, this is equivalent to 52 net acres of Residential
Redevelopment Laad. The rate of demolition versus new construction should be monitored and
adjusted in accordance with actual redevelopment activit~~.
As indicated in Figure 2, the majority of the City's buildable residential acreage is located within
SPA G and H.
6.2 IndustriaVEmployment Buildable Land. There are approximately 489 acres of land within
the industrial/employment classification, which is distributed over three land use categories:
mixed-use, commercial, and industrial. Approximately 35% (172 acres) of the
industrial/employment lands are considered buildable. Table 2 identifies the various vacant land
types within each industriaUemployment buildable land category.
6.2.1 Mined-Use Land. The City's mixed use lands total 84 acres, of which 17% (17
acres) are considered buildable land, The mixed-use classification can be found within
the Transit Oriented Districts and allows for a mix of uses from predominantly residential
to predominantly commercial,
6.2.2 Commercial Land. The City's commercial lands total 156 acres. of ~z~hich 46°% (61
acres) are considered buildable land.
6.2.3 Industrial Land. The City's industrial lands total 249 acres of which 38°io (9?
acres) are considered buildable land.
Most of the City's Industrial/Employment Buildable Land is located in SP.A I {Figure 1 ). ~1hi:.h
accounts for ~ ~°~~, of alt Industrial~'Employment Buildable Lan.t'
Draft -May 2008 ~ ~ Pale 4 of 34
Tobk 2
City of Ceatrol Post
Net Baildobk Load hsvntsry ~ by Lead Use CLstNkstisa
ACREAGE
Tool Grog Eavir. Ner
Zoaio6/Lsod Use Acrege •'oaot 1x071 RederdoP Bts7dobk Contniaed Po Nic Loads BoildaMe
Very Lase Deosiry (VLDR) 112.47 0.65 21.48 16.54 38.68 9.67 29 OI
Low Density Resideoosl (LDR) 903.79 53.00 71.50 1539 139.89 - 34,97 104 92
Mrdium Dennty RrsidentisJ IHDR) 243 49 57.?? 26.48 73.01 97.21 i43 2282 68.47
High Deasiry Residennd (HDR) 244 04 16.26 9.21 1037 35.81 0.50 6.83 26.48
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 1,55.79 127.58 126.70 33.31 311.60 6.43 76.29 225.68
Nixed Cu, Residrntial 18.32 0.69 - G B I 1.50 - 038 1.13
Mixed L'u. Cortuncrcial 6'.25 8.39 7.24 i I3 17 i5 - 4A4 Is.32
TOTAL MIXED USE 63.57 9.06 2.24 1.91 1916 - 4.82 11,45
c-2 (tit) 17 06 - - 1.46 146 - 0.37 1.11
Cammat:ial Neighborhood (CK) 18.12 0.37 0.33 5.11 6.21 - L53 4.66
Tourist Carsnacisl sod Profasioasl Offs
(TCPO) 117.39 30.33 7.73 6.42 64.46 - ]6.12 48.36
Thorou64f'areCanmercisl(TC) 6.79 3.35 3.16 0.00 8.34 - 2.13 6.40
TOTALCOMNERCIAL 13f.36 sf.25 11.41 13.01 60.71 - 20,17 60,53
EmploymrntComrnercid~EC) 24.69 119 3.32 3J5 827 - 2,07 6.20
light hdtumsl (Lp 152.46 71.85 16.42 I L60 102.87 - 25J2 77.15
(imerslhtdustrisJlGll '2.28 21.56 - 3.6. 25.19 729 4.48 13A3
TOTAL INDUSTRIAL 219.13 97.60 19.74 16.90 136.33 7.29 3217 96,76
Civic i C) f03 f2 4.58 - 0.18 0.(i6 - - 0.66
TOTAL CI~7C 163.12 IS8 - _ 0,66 _ 0,66
Bar Crest CneeaR 4} 77 38 - - _ _ -
Opea Space 92 86 2.80 - - - - -
TOTALOPEN SPACE 170.21 2.60 - _ _ _
TOTAL ALL L4ND l SE
C.4TEGORlES 2,270.51 297.9@ 262.13 95.42 348,57 (3.T2 (33,55 101.30
Dtaft -May 2008 A c Page 5 of 34
Figure 1. City of Central Point Buildable Lands Inventory
Undordevtloptd Commucial d.lnduatrial Undordtvelopod RosideMial
- WcsnR Cornmorcial d.lndustrial Wcant Resid~ni~l
Buildable Land Inventory
km
Draft -May 2008 Page 6 of 34
47
APPENDIX A
Definitions
Development Constraints: Factors that temporarily or permanently limit or prevent the use of
land for economic development. Development constraints include, but are not limited to,
wetlands, environmentally sensitive areas such as habitat, environmental contamination, slope,
topography, cultural and archeological resources, infrastructure deficiencies, parcel
fragmentation, or natural hazard areas (OAR 660-009-0005(2)).
Environmentally Constrained Land: Lots, parcels, or portions thereof that are unbuildable due
to environmental constraints such as floodways, slope, wetlands, etc.
Gross Buildable Acre: Consists of 43,560 square feet of residentially designated buildable land
that includes future rights-of--way, restricted hazard areas, proposed public open space and
restricted resource protection areas.
Land to Improvement Ratio (L:I Ratio): The ratio between the value of land and the value of
improvements as measured by taking the value of a parcel divided by the value of the
improvements based on the latest Jackson Count}' Assessor records.
Industrial Use: Employment activities generating income from the production, handling or
distribution of goods. Industrial uses include, but are not limited to: manufacturing; assembly;
fabrication; processing; storage; logistics; warehousing; importation; distribution and
transshipment; and research and development. Industrial uses may have unique land,
infrastructure, energy, and transportation requirements. Industrial uses may have external
impacts on surrounding uses and may cluster in traditional or new industrial areas where they are
segregated from non-industrial activities (OAR 660-009-0005(3)}.
Industrial Lands
Industrial, Buildable bands:
Industrial, Developed Land: Non-vacant land that is likely to be redeveloped during the
planning period (OAR 660-009-OOOS(1).
Industrial, Redevelopment Land:
Industrial, Prime Lands: Lands suited for traded-sector industries as well as other
industrial uses providing support to traded-sector industries. Prime industrial lands
possess site characteristics that are difficult or impossible to replicate in the planning area
or region. Prime industrial lands have necessary access to transportation and freight
infrastructure, including, but not limited to, rail, marine ports and airports, multimodal
freight or transshipment facilities, and major transportation routes. Traded-sector has the
meaning provided in ORS 2858.280 (OAR 660-009-0005(8)).
Draft -May 2008 Page 7 of 34
48
Industrial, Short-Term Supply of Land: Suitable land that is ready for construction
within one year of an application for a building permit or request for service extension.
Engineering feasibility is sufficient to qualify land for the short-term supply of land.
Funding availability is not required. "Competitive Short-term Supply" means the short-
term supply of land provides a range of site sizes and locations to accommodate the
market needs of a variety of industrial and other employment uses (OAR 660-009-
0005(] 0)).
Industrial, Site Characteristics: The atp-ibutes of a site necessary for a particular
industrial or other employment use to operate. Site characteristics include, but are not
limited to, a minimum acreage or site configuration including shape and topography,
visibility, specific types or levels of public facilities, services or energy infrastructure, or
proximity to a particular transportation or freight facility such as rail, marine ports and
airports, multimodal freight or transshipment facilities, and major transportation routes
(OAR 660-009-0005(1 l )).
Industrial, Total Land Supply: the supph~ of vacant and developed land estimated to
be adequate to accommodate industrial and other employment uses fora 20-year planning
period. Total land supply includes the short-term supply of land as well as the remaining
supply of lands considered suitable and serviceable for the industrial or other
employment uses identified in a comprehensive plan (OAR 660-009-0005(13)).
Industrial, Vacant Land: A lot or parcel a) Equal to or larger than one half-acre not
currently containing permanent buildings or improvements; or b) Equal to or larger than
five acres where less than one half-acre is occupied by permanent buildings or
improvements (OAR 660-009-0005(14)).
Net Buildable Acre: Consists of 43,560 square feet of residentially designated buildable land,
after excluding present and future rights-of-way, restricted hazard areas, public open space and
restricted resource protection areas.
Other Employment Use: All non-industrial employment activities including the widest range of
retail, wholesale, service, non-profit, business headquarters, administrative and governmental
employment activities that are accommodated in retail, office and flexible building types. Other
employment uses also include employment activities of an entity or organization that serves the
medical, educational, social service, recreation and security needs of the community typically in
large buildings ormulti-building campuses (OAR 660-009-0005(6)).
Planning Area: The area within an existing, or proposed, urban growth boundary. Cities and
counties with urban growth management agreements must address the urban land governed by
their respective plans as specified in the urban growth management agreement for the affected
area (OAR 660-009-0005(7)).
Residential Lands
Residential, Buildable Land; Residentially designated vacant and, at the option of the
local jurisdiction, redevelopment land within the Metro urban growth boundary that is not
Draft -May 2008 Page 8 of 34
~9
severely constrained by natural hazards (Statewide Planning Goal 7) or subject to natural
resource protection measures (Statewide Alarming Goats 5 and I5). Publicly owned land
is generally not considered available for residential use. Land with slopes of 25 % or
greater unless otherwise provided for at the time of acknowledgment and tend within the
100-year floodplain is generally considered unbuildable for purpose of density
calculations (OAR 660-008-0005(2)).
Residential, Developed Land: Residentially designated lots or parcels with an L:I Ratio
of 0.30 or greater.
Resideatial, Infill Land: Developed Residential Land of one-half acre or more, less
ore-quarter acre (10,89(? square feet). OAR 660.024-0(?SO(2)(a)
Residential, Redevelopment Land: Land zoned for residential use on which
development has already occurred but on which, due to present or expected market
forces, there exists the strong likelihood that existing development will be com~erted to
more intensive residential uses during the planning period (OAR 660-008-0005(12)).
Residential, Suitable and Available Land: Residentially designated vacant and
redevelopment land within an urban growth boundary that is not constrained by natural
hazards, or subject to natural resource protection measures, and for which public facilities
are planned or to which public facilities can be made available. Publicly awned land
generally is not considered available for residential use (OAR 660-008-0005(13)).
Residential, Total Land Supply: The supply of vacant and developed land estimated to
be adequate to accommodate residential uses fora 20-year planning period. Total land
supply includes the short-term supply of land as well as the remaining supply of lands
considered suitable and serviceable for residential uses identified in a comprehensive
plan.
Residential, Vacant Land: All residentially designated lots or parcels not currently
containing permanent buildings or improvements. For purposes of determination of the
presence of permanent buildings/improvements all residential lots or parcels with an
improvement value of zero (Oj, as determined by the Jackson County Assessor, are
considered vacant. (OAR 660-024-4050(2xb))
Safe Harbors: An optional course of action that a local government may use to satisfy a
requirement of Goal 14.
Statistical Planning Area: The Central Point Planning Area is divided into nine (9) Statistics! Planning
Areas, each representing a unique geographic area of the City.
Satiable: Sen~iceable land designated for industrial or other employment use that provides, or can be
expected to provide, the appropriate site characteristics for the proposed use {OAR 660-009-0005(12)).
Draft -May 2008 Page 9 of 34
50
APPENDIX B
Methodology for Calculation of Buildable Land
The methodology used to inventory and calculate buildable lands is based on the definitions of buildable
land types as defined in Appendix A. The base data source for identification of buildable lands is the
Jackson County Assessor's Records dated April 17, 2008, which has been modified to include such
additional information as Comprehensive Plan designations, SPA, TAZ, etc. The modified database is
referred to as the Central Point Land Use Database (CPLUD).
5.1. Buildable Residential Laod
The methodology for calculating Buildable Residential Land involves seven steps as follows:
Step 1. Sum acreage for all Residential Vacant Land. The CPLUD identifies all tax
lots by their land use designation (Land_Use), development status (Dev_Stat), and
improvement value (Imp_Val). When the improvement value of a property is zero the
property is defined as Residential Vacant Land. The BLI sums the acreage for all
Residential Vacant Land by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ.
Step 2. Sum acreage for all Residential Redevelopment Land. The CPLUD identifies
all residential tax lots by the year the primary residence was built (YEARBLT). Using
the U.S. Census housing loss methodology presented in Appendix C, residential
redevelopment land is calculated for lots less than .5 acres as follows:
a. For all developed residential lots less than .5 acres sort according to year
built and place into one of seven age categories (Appendix B).
b. Multiply the area of each lot by loss rates for age category (Appendix B) to
yield annual redevelopment acres.
c. Sum annual redevelopment acres.
d. Multiply the annual estimated redevelopment acres by 22 (years in planning
period) to yield total estimated Residential Redevelopment Laod.
The BLI sums the Residential Redevelopment Land for all residentially designated properties
by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ.
Step 3. Sum acreage for all Residential Infill Land. The CPLUD identifies all
residential tax lots for their Infill potential. All residential properties in excess of .5 acres
and with an improvement value in excess of zero are defined as Residential Developed
Land. By deducting 10,890 sq. ft. from each Residential Developed Land record the
balance is defined as Residential Infill Land (Res_Infill). The BLI then sums the
Residential Infill Land for all residentially designated properties, by land use, zoning,
SPA, and TAZ.
Drag -May 2008 ~ ~ Page 10 of 34
Step 4. Calculate Gross Buildable Residential Lands. Llsine the sum of the totals
generated from Steps 1 through 3 the BLI calculates the Grass Buildable Residential Land
by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ.
Step 5. Sum acreage for all Environmentally Constrained band. The CPLUD
includes information on the acreage within each tax lot that is considered to be
environmentally constrained (Envir_Const). The BLI sums the Environmentally
Constrained Land for alt residentially designated properties, by Land use, zoning, SFA,
and TAZ.
Step 6. Sum acreage for all Public Need Land. Using the "safe harbor" described in
OAR 660-024-0040(4) the Public Need Land is calculated by taking 25% of the gross
buildable residential acreage (Step 4), less environmentally constrained acreage (Step 5).
The BLI sums the Public Need Land for alt residentially designated properties, by fend
use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ.
Step 7. Calculate Net Buildable Residential Land. The BLI takes the resuhs from Step 4
less the results from Step 5 and 6 to yield Net Buildable Residential Land by Land use,
zoning, SPA, and TAZ,
Section 5.2. Buildable IndustriaUEmployment Lands
The methodology for calculating Net Buildable Industrial,'Employment Lands differs slightly
from the methodolo~~ for residential lands, and as such is restated in the seven (?) following
steps:
Step 1. Sum acreage for all Industrial/Employment Vacant Land. The CPLUD
identifies all tax lots by their land use designation (Land_Use), development status
(Dev_Stat), and improvement value (lmp_Val). When the improvement value of
industriaUemployment property is zero the property's development status is defined as
Industrial/Employment Vacant Land. The BLl sums the acreage for all
IndustrzaUEmployment Vacant Land for alt industrial/employment designated
properties by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ.
Step 2. Sum acreage for all Industrial/Employment Redevelopment Land. The
CPLUD identifies all IndustriaUEmployment tax tots for their redevelopment potential.
IndustriaUEmployment tax lots that are less than ,5 acres and have an impmvemer.t ~,
land value (I:L ratio) of 30% or less are defined has having redevelopment potentiai
(Resid_Redev). The BLI sums the IndustriaUEmployment Redevelopment Land t.:r
afI industriaUemptoyment designated properties by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ.
Step 3. Sum acreage for alt IndustrzaUEmployment Iafitl Lands. The CPLUD
identifies all residential tax lots for their infill potential. All residential properties in
excess of .S acres and with an improvement value in excess of zero are defined as
Residential Developed Land. By deducting 10,890 sq. ft. from each Residential
Developed Land record the balance is defined as Residential Infill Land (Res Infill).
Draft - '~1a~ 2008 Page 1 l of 34
~ ~- 52
The BLI then sums the IndustriaUEmployment Infill Land for all
industriaUemployment designated properties by land use, zoning, SPA, and TA2.
Step 4. Calculate Gross Buildable Industrial/Ernploymeni Land. The BLI totals the
results from Steps 1 through 3 by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ.
Step 5. Sum acreage for all Environmentally Constrained Industrial/Employment Land.
The CPLUD includes information on the acreage within each tax lot that is considered to
be environmentally constrained (Envir_Const). The BLI sums the Environmentally
Constrained Land for all industria!/employment designated properties by land use,
zoning, SPA, and TAZ.
Step 6. Sum acreage for all Public Need Lands. Using the "safe harbor" described in
OAR 660-024-0040(9) the Public Need Land is calculated by taking 25% of the gross
buildable residential acreage (Step 4), less environmentally constrained acreage (Step 5).
The BLI sums the public needs acreage for a!! industrial/employment designated
properties by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ.
Step 7. Calculate Net Buildable IndustriaVEmployment Land. The BLI takes the results
from Step 4 less the results from Step 5 and b to yield Net Buildable
Industrial/Employment Land by land use, zoning, SPA, and TAZ.
A summary of the results of each of the above steps is presented in Tables l through 3, and discussed in
Section 5, Buildable Land Summary.
Draft -May 2008
Page 12 of 34
53
APPENDIX C
Estimated Residential Housing Loss - U.S. Census 1997-2003
For the purpose of calculating housing loss (residential redevelopment land), the City of Central Point
uses the methodology developed by U.S. Census. The U.S. Census calculates housing loss by applying
an annual rate of loss to the total existing residential housing units (HL~) inventory•. For the purpose of
this calculation, estimates of housing unit loss are based on data derived by the U.S. Census from the
1997-2003 American Housing Survey (AHS) national sample. This survey is done on an annual basis for
states, counties, and metropolitan areas. In developing the methodology, the following are considered to
represent permanent loss of a housing unit:
• Interior exposed to the elements
• Demolished or disaster loss
• House or mobile home moved
Since the U.S. Census no longer collects information on demolition permits, annual housing unit loss
rates are based on structure type and age of structure. This data is gathered and averaged from the annual
AHS sampling. The standard annual loss rates by year built are as follows:
Mobile Homes: 1.58%
House, Apartment, or Flat built in:
• 1990-1999: 0.031
• 1980-1989: 0.054%
• 1970-1979: 0.103%
• 1960-1969: 0.172%
• 1950-1959: 0.249%
• 1940-1949: 0.324%
• Pre-1940: 0.364%
• Overall loss rate: 0.295%
Data for residential housing by year built for the City of Central Point is collected every ten years as part
of the decennial census. Information on the year built is also maintained by the County Assessors Office
and is included in the CPLUD. Table 1 provides an estimate of the annual housing loss based on the U.S.
Census loss rates noted above. Table 2 is the same information using the most recent CPLUD data,
including acreage information.
Table 1. City of Central Point -Estimated Annual Residential Horsing Loss, 2000 Census
Year Structure Built Residential % of Housing Housing Loss Annual
Housing Units Inventory Rates* Housing Loss
Mobile Homes 430 8.35% 1.58% 6.79
1999 to 3/2000 372 7.22% 0.0310% .12
1995 to 1998 908 17.63% 0.0310% 0..28
Draft -May 2008 Page l3 of 34
54
APPENDIX D
Buildable Lands by SPA and TAZ
Tabte C.I
C ir. of C Cld'fl Pout
Buildabl. Land Iu~ eatw,' b~ Stdnsncal Planning
T end i'•.
rea
Total
A
'anx
R
TrfGll
derrlop
mEn
errs
Grog Emir.
RnilAaAl• (nnvrain.vl
ublic
I awd~
et
RnilAa}.k P
celt
- ~? .1 1 0 ~.
HDR TOT.~L HIGH D=~STI7 FE~E~TL~L (HDl 16 `5 C•. ~-: C.. ` 16` ' +5 G (C ~ 59 1 '6 6'C~' °
3fi' TOTAL MIXED CSE 0.00 G.OC O.OG CC{~ G G' G (: U.4? ;~ [K~ p C^.'+.
CC 70T.~LCOaUii?TITCOal1fERCL•~L
C~ 20T.~L \'>•1rHEOR_HOOD C D~L~IEACL~. 9.?6
1.Eib 1.1~
0 G^ L•l0
0 « .0`
;'1 4.E~
C~ -" 0(C
G fC :.15
^ to :-~9
J c- 0~'.
:J Ifs'
.J ~ u J ~., amt .I
1 r ~ ~ J J C~ J 0 J1.°
I
L re -. 56 _ -ts E • c . # E ~ st ~3 a :• = sret~ ,~F~-c'-wx,
Ta b[e [: _!
C tn~ of Central fora[
Buildable Lani Iu~ cnarr' b~• Staosneal Planany Area
Laud L-x Total
B
'acaat ~
511
dESEbp
[seat J...
rn
Grocc
Bmldabk C C.6.
~.;r.
o®straiaed .'~
J.
ublic
Lauds B ,
1_
.t pe
a~7dabk ! ae,
cenr
v r. 1 .. J. ..~ G [
J ,,•, !
\fT1R Tt~T~t \fl'11111T RFCTTI'\'7T~T `6 1' [: ~' A fY; - ^ 47 [ ' S ^ e: q cq<,
!i[)et ! V [A[. !t[(iH Ll~>>[I S :tLJIIJL_~ IL1L. (ifLF :` SS :.5~ U.V;; ~.:. „!!'J 1;.-: : y.'- •
\A' TOTAL MIXED USE 1~ U` 1.:. O.C~ C,9t ' :*~ [.n7 C. ~' :.55 I E-°
C C TOTAL :O~~iL?71T C O~AlFRCL11
~- 1. `£ C.aO O.C~: ^.S" _^.4~ [~.:_ G 1E' .
6 C4=
CV J V. 1 J ... Jl
l'., Y)
J , L ,
t._;E ~ S~_'ESl~:_~E E•: SL Ia CI~:St'!E:'~:S{'-'hd)
Draft -May 2008
Paee l5 of 34
56
Table C -!
C in ~f Crnaal Pont
Rnilrah~r T and 1 n-Fnrm ~' h* ~ran~nral Tlanni~g >wa
Land [ se Iota]
('
`'acau
t
Iafil
~
edes'ebp-
meat
ttf
Gross
Bra7dablt C
rKir.
oastraitaed
tiWc
L,as~s $>
K
$dabk
ercent
\ LLk 101.11 \ ik1 LU11 UL~~111 KtS1Ut_~lLi y.U~ U. ((, S..b L.I,ti $.:S ~.li:; '!;; C.~~ ,..';`.
LDR TOI_iLLOR'DL~SITII:LSIDL~TLiL 5?.'6 G.C- 0.00 G2` G.;2 G.O;; c.C~4 C': '~~.
~ .1 1. C. ~ ..v_ ~.,. 1..1
~ .~1. 1.13 l.._ 1.~", 3. :,, 1 :~
O !. ~ 1 ~ ~ 1._.
C_ ~ l.i. 1.' G.±' l.lt
! J 4 C. ' :. J.~
C 1.11 6. „ :'~°.
POS TU7~I. T•LAbS ~ OpE~ SPACE '--- O.CC O.Ori CC•: G.O: t.p: C.;; ; ~?'.
TOT.LL ,1LL Lt\D CSE C,LIECORIES T1.f8
Tabu C-1
C itr o! C corral Pviar
Bn~iabk Land lug rcton h. Sahsncai Plantun; Arta
Laud i <e Total 1.::
D
\'aearx Lt.IU
R
lip '31
A
ed.~ebp-
mmr :1.tA 0.00
aet
Cxo•s E>asv
Bo7dabk C>•straaed F.49
a6);:
I.at~d! $t 18.f:
ec
iidabk ~.'SM
t:'cetat
\1DR TOI.~iL 1~R1 LOLT DE~Sff2'RE~IDE.~7Lai DUC~ L'.h~ L.A: ~.J~ :.:?? ~.UJ ?x~ ~.>i ?.*'+°.
L.DF TOI.~? LOR~ DE~SITL' RESIDL~TL•~ 1'U c~ " l- ~ eo ^ p0 ^ a- - a• ; ~ 1•
i~ 1 .~
C . ~ ..v ~.~ ~ ! v.,-.~
C C ~s% ,,.~ ..,r ~ ~ ~ ,
;,~
I ~ J Y
.l/_I•
cmc ToriLrn~c aa~ G.Ga c:o. c:~~ t.~s ~.a_~ oan c.~ ~s~.
PC-~ Tt~TAT T4R1;S.4 (1PF~ GP~CF '1 fi,
1(71.;1.. L~V3CSEC:~1E.ts"[Jf(!LS Lsfl.'.
..~ _ 5E_-~s •.._3~ w.K>> ~~ : stns: •.~h-s..c%.,w
Draft -May 2008
±i f: si f.~ fY'
:.1~ Y.1.e
~ ~ ^. f1'i
..6.1 ' 's';
1-.lp ^. [Y'i
d.110 '1fMl ^ r11 1 fYt•.
JK 11 ~: ~.?Jh
~
Page 16 of 34
Table C-~
C in o(C e~mal ~otat
Buildable Laud lut entor' b•' Stattsncal PlanrlaY .1rea
land l <e 1 Ota.
E
1 aeaat
r
L~ttill
+
d~'rlo~
uat
[!S
Gross
Bt+$dabl~
mit.
C oa!traused
ab&
Lsd:
ilt
Baadabl~
rtertit
{1DR IOT.>1.1~R1" LO{1 DE-tiSIT1~ RESIDE-~'TL4I C.7~ U.:O C.UO U U( U.CCi U CC O UC U-07 C QO' e
IDR 707.~L10{{DEti5II1'RESIDI~TUI. :'".1-t "`= ::~3_ 1_~ :0.1' U(G ~OJ 151: 5_F'.
3. ~ 9 a
19 1 _. 11. ~ :'.
.3
> > u ,, ~ r t n
CX AL. .. ~ ~.r, ~ ( Ui ~
C .t ~ i J '. lM,•.,
~ ~.J ~.. ~ ~~ ^. G ~
CTCC TOT.~I. CI1TC x.17 O.:G C.GU UGC O.C{ G CG 0 G: 7 GG A .'•,
POS TOT.~I. PARES S OPE_~ SP ii E :.?: O.tl~ ~ 'T; n CK r, Ct n rr J n_ ~ m ~ rr • ,
tUL;LA[.LLt~[1tJtC:Attf:C?K[LS :A[I:
~._:e c. 5~.-esa•;_ieru~3a~_+t•er-,~r-s-c'-wa~,
TabkC-d
C ttc d C rnml Yoift
Build~blr Laud Ir,crnro t' b~ >tah~ual flaunir.g Arra
IaudC-x Total :[:t
F
'scaat off-dtf
rd
IafiO [t.7:
1t
erebP-
~t B 517
rt
Cam:
dldabk C V.ttl
tty.
oasnaiard [,!.<6
ab6c
Laad~ $ <[.tl4
iH P
taildabk [7.V[!ra
r•eat
-
{TDE TOT.iL«R]-LOti1 DE~iIT'1 RESIDE-~7I~,I D.Cr~ O.x~ G.Cr :.OG :.~: C.): C.C~~ £~.G: L :n.
LDR T07~L. LCn DE.~STR-RESIDEti"ILLL :.3 '- ±-:' 6 ~8 5.'3 •5 ct C.DO ? 9: 1: '; F ~:` •
1. i.l:
~ S L ±: ~ .1 ~ 1.~ ~.
_.1. ' J ~.~: 1. ~ 1
~ C.J.. ~.5: J .15 '.3, .:
~ . J ~ J (. 4 ~.('.
C v C ~ C. ,;. ~.
4L I aw 4.. "~`
(T{Tf T17T>T fT,IC fi 7i f 7f f~ 6^. ..'. fKi ^. 6f ^. !w^, f 0' G Rt G : ',
PC1~ TOT.~L. P.~1R1C5 d OPE_~ SPACE C.UU C.O~ O.GC C.Ca? " ;~' C :„; C OC C 0: G a~',
70T.~I. ~I.L L~~ t'SE CATE.-ORIES 110.78 16.e: f.~ 7.M. 2.s.OS x.90 Ell 1S.lf 1'.d8ti
Draft -May 2008 ~ Q
v Page l7 of 34
7a11f C-'
C rr o(imcal Punr
BnildaDlr Laud Lts rota ~' b~ ~tati~rical Plannic; Area
. G
Ac
res
Latd t •~
Tail
\'aeat Red
Infill ~,rlop- C
went Bn norr
t~dabk Co _an-i..
r<stralaed I'ab1y.
l.aad~ \ef
EIDldtble Prtreat
\1DR IOT~L`~RI~LOR"DE~iITT12E~IDE~TL~1 :: ": 1.09 D.~~ 1.`- :.t; C.(Y ~.:5 l.i` C.~'.
J 0.. J J , J a.DV ~.
JIDR rOL111[F~ILI_ `. FtE~IDE~71~I. S4 GG 3: SO ..65 a,? •' ~0 t n: • C ~' iG:r: „ -••
13DR IOL~L. HIGH DE~SITl' EESIDE_~TL~ (~F ?9' s.»1 o.'?i 1 'C ~.bl ; S~a 1..5 3.E» ' "°
\R TOTAL 1!IIX~ U5E 1`_ 0` -~: 2:ai .:C '.:a C.Oa O.S. 1.~- ' :3•.
cc roru.coaaR~m•coaQ~ct~ Da ;.co c.~G oa c.o~ o.o~ ~?.oG o.a: c.x~•,
c ~ ro1.{t. ~~lc.~oRHOOn a o~n~xa~ o W i.aa c.c><~ a oc a.oa a.oa a x~ o ec ; a.' ,
J. J 7. ! ,..,J ! lCt .!',
~. D. J ~. J J..!
I.:A A rC.'K f•.. aE f. K-: Cy _~ . St-!!"'~*:S~C~-M3~ r
Zabif C_S
C in~ o f C ena al F otnr
Bmldable Laui lurrntn,' b, ~tap;ncai P4nnitg .~rra H
Ac res
F ede•dop Gross Emit. Ptrbbc ~H ?erceat
La td L':t Total \'ataat Ia60 mNt Be8dsala C ontsraiafd Lsads BnJdabJe
~1DF.TOT.~L't-ER1'L011DE-~~III'RESIDL~T[~I G.9: C.Cr )~~J 4x~ 9C>i :ari ~.C-a C.oO C.a:~'.
LLA TOT.it~O~"DE~'SITI'FESbE~"II.~1 ~'~: ~t.c~ e.. E.. a ;; JO .110 5~'6
~• ~ 1 l i oS•
- J..,. v ~.l a ~.Olr ,
G.. _ ~ ~Ar 31 U ».OS <
L ~. ~ a
f iilC TI~T~T '?1lC n ^c c r.~ r, rr~ r, rn ,. ~ ^ ~ ~ ^ n•, r, eR .:
YG~ 1 V l ~L Y.~!(1~~ S Ut~~ >YA~t l'.::: L-l:: i~!K~ ::. p. : 1 ~ ;; ].~ ;;.yJ ;:.>,!, ,:.,fir,
TC~T~I. All. L~~'bCSE CAIECiJR>`S :S'9! 71.13 61.lF ~,ic 1Kl0 900 d;6 l:.s.l1 d6.??Si
Draft -May 2008 Page 18 of 34
,] ~ n
~7
Table (-9
Cir: ofCennalPmar
Buildable Lat:d lu<earor~' 1~~ ~tamncal Plannln~ Area
Laud L~=r Total
1
H
i'xaat Ia6ll
tit
ederc4op-
went B
es
Moss t
nildabk Cot
n~u.
tsaained
nbLc
Lords B
ic[
mldabk
~°t
1Lllt:lUla11 K~LU11llt~~11~1:L~lUt~ L J ' U.,}! t:.U,; :.P! VUl VV~ !!U; V.V'. U.G(,"<
]IDR TOT.~I. atIDR'!I RE~1DE~T1.4I. J
0 C{'
0.00
G.OC
O.oU
U OC' ~!;
U CC U
U CK~
O.GC °
G.U" <
HDR TOT.3L HIGH DE~SIT1' RESIDE~'7'L.iL fHDI OUG G.00 G.OC 0 oU G UO U G{ U UG O.OC G.G~° <
\R' TOTAL MIXED USE UOG C.~:- G.G: ~.OU O OG U OG 0 OG O.OG O.GC° <
C C TOT.~L CO]M1'I'I1 CO]L~~RCZ~[. 5' `5 _i.:`_ 6.C9 :.u : ~ 5f G C4 a UC .F ~ S.-=`
C ~ T07AI. ~~IGBBORHOOD CO~IERCZ~L ? UG G.00 G.OC 0.'x~ U UG ~i Ct 4 OC O.C~C C xC' °
CG ~ !.1 ,. ! ~s _ 1: .3U
r+
I._:E ~~.'FSF:._]F F~St Ie `~_:St'FF'.'~:S{'-ws-.
Draft -May 2008
c O
V
Page 19 of 34
Table C-10
Draft -May 2008 ~ ~ Page 20 of 34
Draft -May 2008 Page 21 of 34
62
Table C-11
Draft -May 2008 c ~ Page 22 of 34
Draft -May 2008 Page 23 of 34
64
Table C-12
Draft -May 2008 Page 24 of 34
s5
Draft -May 2008 Page 25 of 34
66
Table C-13
Draft -May 2008 Page 26 of 34
6'7
Draft -May 2008 Page 27 of 34
6$
Table C-14
Draft -May 2008 Page 28 of 34
69
Draft -May 2008 Page 29 of 34
~~
Table G15
Draft -May 2008 ~ ~ Page 30 of 34
Draft -May 2008 Page 31 of 34
7~
Table C-16
73
Draft -May 2008 Page 32 of 34
Draft -May 2008 Page 33 of 34
7~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLL°I'ION NO.
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S INTENTION TO
AMEI~~ THE CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BUILDABLE LANDS
INVENTORY SECTION OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Central Point Municipal Code, Section 17.96.020(A) an
amendment to the Central Point Comprehensive Plan may be initiated by adoption of a resolution
of intention by the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission further acknowledges it is the City's objective to
sequentially update all elements of the Comprehensive Plan over the course of the next two years
and that in doing so hereby waives the provisions of Central Point Municipal Code, Section
17.96.030 limiting review of comprehensive plan amendments to January of even numbered
years; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point deems that the public
necessity and convenience and general welfare of the public require such an amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, that it is the intention of Planning Commission to
amend the Buildable Lands Inventory section of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive
Plan.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
1 S` day of July, 2008.
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
City Representative
Approved by me this day of , 2008.
Planning Commission Chair
'7 5
Planning Commission Resolution No. (07/01/2008)
CENTRAL POINT ARTS COUNCIL
City of Central Point, Oregon Planning Department
140 So.Third St.,Central Point, or 97502 Tom Humphrey,AICP,
541.664.3321 fax 541.664.6384 Community Devebpment Director/
www.ci.central-point.or.us Assistant City Administrator
CENTRAL
~' N~
MEMORANDUM
July 1, Zoos
TO: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Tom Humphrey AICP, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Consideration and Approval of Mural Criteria to Satisfy CPMC Section 17.67.050
BACKGROtiND:
Eazlier in the year the Planning Department was approached by a couple of people who were interested
in painting murals on blank building walls in the Downtown to improve the general appearance and to
create a theme (historic or otherwise) that w711 draw favorable attention to Central Point. It was pointed
out at that time that there is very limited language and/or guidance in the municipal code regarding the
murals other than the following:
"Decorative exterior murals are allowed and are subject to review and criteria by planning commission
or architectural review committee appointed by city council. (17.67.OSD.M.I.c.)
At its last meeting, the Planning Commission was presented with a set of `criteria' to be used to consider
new mural proposals in Central Paint. A group of local artists formulated the criteria or guidelines from
their independent reseazch. Commission members responded to the presentation with suggestions
(during and after the meeting) and staff has made changes to the guidelines based on those suggestions.
Planning staff would now like to institutionalize these criteria so that any new mural proposal can be
fairly evaluated consistent wYth the code section listed above.
To this end, the Planning Staff has attached the re~lsed Arts Council guidelines and a draft resolution
with which to adopt the guidelines for use. If it becomes necessary to codify the guidelines, planning
staff with ask the Council to initiate that process.
The Planning Commission is free this evening to approve the attached resolution and to use the
guidelines should a mural proposal be submitted to the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Mural Guidelines from Central Point Council for the Arts (as modified)
B. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4
7s
Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT " ~'
Criteria for Planning Commission Approval of Decorative Exterior Murals
Central Aoint Council for the Arts (CPCA) Recommended Guidelines as of 6/24108
1. Funding
a. Funding tivill be the required first step of any arts project proposed
b. Monies will be accepted for arts projects from pubic or other donations, grants,
committee fundraising events, etc.
c. No monies shall be accepted to produce arts projects for the main purpose of advertising
or personal gain.
2. Proposed arts projects
a. Themes allowed for proposed arts projects will encompass history, agriculture, recreation
or culture representing the City of Central Point
b. Submission criteria for arts projects to be approved by the CPCA will consist of a black
and white rough sketch. Once approved, a full color rendition will be presented to City
government for final approval.
3. Approval of .Artist
a. Artist approval by CPCA
b. Complete Proposed Artist Contract
4. Site approval
a. Site for arts project must be approved by the City as structurally sound and/or free of
public utility conflicts
b. Site determined to be within the Arts District
c. Complete Proposed Building Owner Contract
d. Determine and specify any City Permits or licensing requirements
e. Verification of insurance required in the Artist Agreement
5. Committee final approval of ans project
a. Gain CPCA approval of art project
~~
Presentation to City of Central Point government
a. Present the Art Project at a Public Meeting far comment
b. Present to Planning Commission for approvaUdisapproval
7. .Arts project construction
a. Arts project timeline and guidelines enforced by CPCA as authorized by City government
fp
ATTACHMENT " ~~ ' "
PLAtitiLtiG COl~iti1ISSI0'S RESOLE-TIOti \U.
A RESOLE TIOti OF THE PLA\\I\G COtiitiIISM01 AD()YTI\G CRITERIA FUR
APPROVI\G DECORATIVE EXTERIOR :~itiRALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CPMC SECTION 17.67.OSO.M.1.C
`W`HEREAS, on January 1 ~, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point, was
presented with a mural rendering and asked by the applicant to approve a new Decorative
Exterior Mural in DoH~ntow~n Central Point; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission became aware of an absence of criteria to e~~aluate
Decorative Exterior Murals in accordance with CPMC Section ] 7.67ASO.M.I .c; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Department sought, through input from the Citizens Ads ison
Committee, the Strategic Plan Downtown Subcommittee and the Central Point Council for the
Arts (CPCA) Ad Hoc Committee, to deg elop criteria in accordance «ith CP~1C Section
17.67.OSO.M.I.c; and
~;'HEREAS, after revie«ing the proposed general criteria formulated by the CPCA «ith input
from the other groups mentioned, the Planning Commission determined the general criteria for
e~~aluating Decorative Exterior .L1urals to be complete and adequate to satisfy CP'tfC Section
1 %.67.OSO.M.I .c.
\OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of thc, City of Central
Point, Oregon that the criteria listed in Exhibit A attached hereto. shall be used to evaluate
proposals for Decorative Exterior ~-lurals until such tune that other criteria is established b. the
City.
Passed by the Planning Commission and signed b~ me in authentication of its passage this
day of ,''008.
Planning Commission Chair
A T"I L= ST
R_,
Plannin~~ Con;mi~ion ~ flair
fr