The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOrdinances 2124 ORDINANCE NO. 2_12 LI AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TEXT AND MAPS TO ESTABLISH AND APPLY A CLIMATE FRIENDLY AREA (CFA) OVERLAY TO 94.4 ACRES WITHIN A PORTION OF THE EASTSIDE TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, AND AMENDING THE GENERAL LAND USE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION ON 27.6 ACRES WITHIN THE CFA OVERLAY FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL File No. CPA-24001 Recitals: A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning Goals. B. Pursuant to OAR 660-012-0010(3) and 4(a), the City of Central Point is required to designate a Climate Friendly Area (CFA), including adoption of land use regulations consistent with OAR 660-012-300 through OAR 660-012-0330 by March 31, 2025. C. In accordance with CPMC 17.96.200(A), by Resolution No. 929 to the City Council, the Planning initiated the Major Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, including text and maps to designate a 94.4 acre CFA Overlay within a portion of the eastside TOD Overlay. D. In accordance with CPMC 17.05.500, the City of Central Point Citizen's Advisory Committee considered the proposed amendments at their meeting on January 14, 2025 and recommended the City Council approve the amendments. E. In accordance with CPMC 17.05.500 the following duly noticed public hearings were conducted: 1. February 11, 2025 Planning Commission meeting, at which the Planning Commission considered and approved Resolution No. 929 forwarding a favorable recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed amendments; and, 2. February 27, 2025 City Council meeting at which time the City Council considered the first reading of the ordinance amending the Zoning Map and the Central Point Municipal Code in Section 17.08.410 (TOD Definitions), 17.65 (TOD Overlay), 17.75.039 (Bicycle Parking Design Standards) and adding a new chapter CPMC 17.69 (CFA Overlay). Pg. 1 Ordinance No. 2t21--1 (3 /0)/2025) F. Words lined through are to be deleted and words in bold are added. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The General Land Use Plan Map of the City of Central Point is amended to apply the CFA Overlay to a 94.4 acre area within a portion of the eastside TOD Overlay, and amend the land use designation on 27.6 acres within the CFA Overlay from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential as provided in Exhibit A. Section 2. The City of Central Point Land Use Element is amended as provided in Exhibit B. Section 5. Basis of Decision. Based upon all the information received, the City Council adopts Sections 1, 2, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6, 4.1, 4.3, 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 in the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in Exhibit C, hereby incorporated by reference. Section 6. Codification. Provisions of this Ordinance shall be incorporated in the City Code and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "code", "article", "section", "chapter" or another word, and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered, or re-lettered, provided however that any Recitals and boilerplate provisions (i.e. Recitals A-H) need not be codified and the City Recorder is authorized to correct any cross-references and any typographical errors. Section 7. Effective Date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance enacted by the Council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 1')_) day of Act , C i , 2025. ayor Taneea . o ing ATTEST: , c l.L City Recorder Pg. 2 Ordinance No. 2_ 1--1 (J It. /2025) EXHIBIT A CENTRAL Climate Friendly Area (CFA) POINT Current Land Use Designations I Denr4 Resreltrtisi ?Mimi l}rmAy Rowlimird (ItRosl SW = ,== Central Point CFA Boundary and HO Nita(Ritildwleil CUIYent Lend Use Peer, CumrICF4 Genetal.and L'essnIter. Err.r.k.orr, 4-tro to.mid IMO .10.1.111. am. Iladodw•al D:i c. wa 441,64.1,-.•••• ,Neinto IN. SO. 6.1 IrdOw 1,4•,3;1 fo, Pg. 3 Ordinance No. 2._I2L-1 ( 3/13/2025) CENTRAL Climate Friendly Area (CFA) POINT Proposed General Land Use Map Designations N A High Density Residential (HRes) Civic High Density Residential (HRes) CFA Boundary and General Land Use Map • Designations Employment Commercial Q CFA Ovavy seMnY (EC) CFA General Land Use Designations _ na..Fapn Down ewow.eal EC.Eniggmacl Cwnrta0P Cm< aaD dwwaeb sam•ew Pow. CM .Cams«e.2021 sewer CayceC nel Pant OThc o r1e On* Mw.2020:MAP 2pery r 202a)Tronmlaem fiytla n.•,n PMn ITS*) • o.uryw..w.n Ow mw.awuM..gn�a.va Ji+N'.ex.JOH+'arn.wa.wngNuoW. W,MwtL4O 0 125 250 900leol wtteum.a Irsr..w,�nD. Pg. 4 Ordinance No. 212.L (7) /i r/2025) EXHIBIT B CENTRAL LAND USE ELEMENT POINT 2018-2038 City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan \ City Council March 8, 2018 Final Draft Ordinance No. 2043 Pg. 5 Ordinance No. (3/(3/2025) 1. Table of Contents 1. Summary 8 2. Introduction 9 2.1. Buildable Lands Inventory 10 2.2. State Land Use Guidelines 11 2.3. Central Point Forward,A City Wide Strategic Plan 11 2.3.1. City Mission Statement 12 2.3.2. City Statement of Values 12 2.4. The Regional Plan Element 12 2.4.1. Direction of Growth 13 2.5. Land Use and Urban Form 14 2.6. Performance Indicators 14 2.6.1. Committed Residential Density 14 2.6.2. Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas 15 2.6.3. Conceptual Transportation Plan 15 2.6.4. Conceptual Land Use Plan 16 2.6.5. Target Residential Density 16 2.6.6. Land Use Distribution 16 2.6.7. Transportation Infrastructure 16 2.6.8. Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas (Activity Centers) 16 2.6.8.1. Activity Centers 16 3. Land Use Benchmarks 19 4. Current (2017) Land Use Summary 20 5. Land Use Classifications 21 6. Residential Land Use 22 6.1. Residential Land Use Classifications 23 6.1.1. Very Low Density Residential(VLRes) 24 6.1.2. Low Density Residential (LRes) 25 6.1.3. Medium Density Residential (MRes) 25 6.1.4. High Density Residential (HRes) 26 6.1.5. Residential Land Use Plan Map 26 6.1.6. Residential Infill and Redevelopment 27 Pg. 6 Ordinance No. `2_1"L (6 /1312025) 6.1.7. Small Town, Neighborhood Preservation, Identification and Livability 27 6.2. Residential Zoning & Density 27 6.3. Minimum/Maximum Density Calculation 27 6.3.1. Public Parks/Open Space and Residential Density 29 6.3.2. Civic Uses and Residential Density 29 6.3.3. Environmental Lands and Residential Density 30 6.3.4. Residential Goals and Policies: 30 7. Employment Land Use 30 7.1. Commercial Land Use Summary 31 7.1.1. Commercial Land Use Plan 32 7.1.1.1. Neighborhood Commercial (NC). 32 7.1.1.2. Employment Commercial(EC). 33 7.1.1.3. General Commercial (GC) 33 7.1.2. Commercial Development Goals and Policies 33 7.2. Industrial Land Use Plan 33 7.2.1. Industrial Goals and Policies 34 7.3. Civic Land Use 35 7.3.1. Civic Land Use Goals and Policies 35 7.4. Parks and Recreation Land Use 35 7.5. Circulation/Transportation Land Use 35 7.5.1. Circulation Land Use Goal 36 8. Overlay Districts 36 8.1. Central Business District(CBD) 36 8.2. Transit Oriented Development District (TOD) 36 8.3. Environmental Overlay 37 8.4. Airport Overlay 37 8.5. Climate Friendly Area (CFA) Overlay 37 9. Urban Growth Boundary 41 10. Land Use Plan Map 41 Pg. 7 Ordinance No. 2 ' 7 `-‘ (3 /13/2025) 1. Summary The City's urban area encompasses approximately 3,100 acres. Every parcel is assigned to one of six(6)primary land use classifications, which are supported by nine (9) secondary land use classifications, and four overlay districts, for a total of 19 land use classifications. The percentage distribution of land uses within the urban area is illustrated in Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1.Land Ise Distribution, 2017 vs. 2038 ■201- 2038 48%49% 23%21% 8% 8% 10%11% 7% 8% III 1 .■ 4% 3% Residential Commercial Industrial Civic Parks& Public Right- Open Space of-Way The Land Use Element relies on other Comprehensive Plan elements, such as the Population, Housing, Economic, Regional, and Parks and Recreation elements to determine the quantity and classification of land uses necessary to accommodate the City's current and future projected population growth. Over the course of the 2018-38 planning period it is projected that the City will grow by 5,580 residentsl, generating a demand for 2,230 new housing units. To accommodate the expected population growth the City will need an additional 325 gross acres, distributed across all land use classifications. By 2038 the distribution of land uses (Figure 1.1)will be very similar to the City's current distribution, signifying no major changes in land use policy. As in the past the Residential land use will continue to be the dominant land use, followed by Right-of-Way. Another popular measure of land use is the ratio of acres per 1,000 residents. Unlike the percentage measurement the ratio of acres per 1,000 residents does address policy changes in the efficiency of land use. Figure 1.2 illustrates that in 20002 the developed was 171 acres per 1,000 residents. By 2017 the actual ratio was 158 acres per 1,000 residents. By 2038, based on current average minimum density policies, it is expected that the ratio will drop to 142 acres per 1,000 residents; the lower the ratio the more efficient the use of land. The adoption of a minimum residential density of 6.9 dwelling units per gross acre3 is the reason for the lower 2038 ratio. 1 Based on Portland State University's Interpolation Table for 2038 with the 2017 Certified Population as the base year. 2 1980 City of Central Point Land Use Element 3 City of Central Point Regional Plan Element, Section 4.1.5 Committed Residential Density Pg. 8 Ordinance No. '2 e 2 H (3 /1'3/2025) Figure 1.2.Developed Acres per 1,000 Population, 2000,2017 and 2038 180 171 158 160 e 142 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 2000 2017 2038 A unique aspect of the Land Use Element, and the more efficient use of land (particularly residential land), was the introduction in 2012 of the Regional Plan Element (Regional Plan). Adoption of the Regional Plan created eight urban reserve areas (URAs) and a series of Performance Indicators (PIs). The URAs address lands that are eligible for future inclusion into the UGB and annexation to the City, subject to compliance with need and applicable PIs. The most significant PIs that apply specifically to the Land Use Element are the creation of Concept Plans (both land use and transportation) for all URAs. In addition to land use the Concept Plans must address the minimum density standard PIs, and the need to provide for, and identify and monitor, the creation and development in, and of, Activity Centers (mixed- use/pedestrian friendly areas). The Regional Plan Element requires the monitoring of residential and employment development within Activity Centers to assure that they meet minimums as initially established in 2009 Regional Transportation Plan. To monitor development activity in an Activity Center it is necessary to identify those centers. By definition the City has identified, within the current UGB, fourteen(14) activity centers, with the full expectation that additional activity centers will be added as the City's UGB expands unto the URAs. Over the course of the twenty year planning period the only certainty in this Land Use Element is that it will change. Like all elements of the Comprehensive Plan the objective is to create a"living"plan; one that allows, and encourages adaptation to changing circumstances, but all the while maintaining the community's core values and vision. 2. Introduction The primary purpose of the Land Use Element is to: • Identify and map all land use classifications within the City's urban area(city limits and UGB); and Pg. 9 Ordinance No. 2 i 21-) /13/2025) • Track activity through the Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI) for compliance with associated goals and policies identified in related Comprehensive Plan elements; i.e. the Housing Element, Economic Element, Parks and Recreation Element, Transportation System Plan, etc. Simply stated the Land Use Element is responsible for managing and mapping the land use needs of the City as defined in other Comprehensive Plan elements. The Land Use Element does not determine how much of a particular land use is needed. It only determines where that land use will be physically sited and how it will be managed to achieve the City's comprehensive land use goals and policies, particularly those goals and policies from the Housing, Economic, Parks and Recreation, and Urbanization Elements. Currently (2018), the supporting elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan identify a need to add approximately 280 vacant acres to its urban area. The Land Use Element is comprised of two parts; the text (Text), and the Land Use Plan Map (Map). • The Text component addresses the purpose and scope of each land use classification, including issues and land use distribution by acreage. The Text also contains the City's goals and policies for the management of its land use system. The current and actual use of land is maintained in the Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI), which tracks land usage over time. The BLI is an adjunct document to the Land Use Element. The BLI is maintained on a continual basis as applications for land development are received and acted on. • The Map identifies the spatial distribution of all lands in the City's urban area and designates each property with a specific land use classification. As previously noted the amount of land within each land use category is determined by other Comprehensive Plan elements. In addition to the related Comprehensive Plan elements the Land Use Element is guided by the following four(4) documents: 2.1. Buildable Lands Inventory The Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI) is an adjunct document to the Land Use Element. The BLI tracks all land use activity in the City's urban area as changes to a property's development status occurs. Annually, the BLI produces, among many other tables, the following tables tracking changes in land use: • Percentage distribution by land use classification; • Land use classification acres per 1,000 residents • Changes in the vacant land inventory; • Housing and employment in activity centers (mixed use/pedestrian friendly areas). Pg. 10 Ordinance No. 212 i (3/13/2025) Monitoring of the BLI will determine the need and timing to add more land to the UGB per the needs assessment of such Comprehensive Plan Elements as Housing, Economic, Parks and Recreation, etc. 2.2. State Land Use Guidelines The purpose of the State land use guidelines is "To establish a land use policy framework and factual basis for all land use decisions and actions consistent with related elements of the Comprehensive Plan. " The State's land use program requires that all land use plans include identification of issues and problems, inventories and other factual information for each applicable statewide planning goal, evaluation of alternative courses of action and ultimate policy choices, taking into consideration social, economic, energy and environmental needs. City, county, state and federal agency and special district plans and actions related to land use shall be consistent with the comprehensive plans of cities and counties and regional plans adopted under ORS Chapter 268.The required information shall be contained in either the Land Use Element or in supporting documents. The accomplishment of the above required information is delegated to the various elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Element is responsible for managing (goals and policies), and the mapping the land use needs of the City as prescribed in other Comprehensive Plan elements. Changes in the Land Use Element will be predicated on changes in related elements of the Comprehensive Plan. 2.3.Central Point Forward, A City Wide Strategic Plan The City maintains a strategic plan, the purpose of which is to envision a preferred future for the City and to ". . .formulate a way to make this future happen through community teamwork and actions. It is a document that records what people think—the blueprint for positive change that defines the vision, goals and outcomes that must occur to realize the future. "4 The community's mission, vision and values as set forth in the Strategic Plan serve as the foundation of the Comprehensive Plan, including this Land Use Element. The guidance provided by the Strategic Plan that is carried forward in the Land Use Element is to maintain a". . . small town commitment and feel that promotes community pride, safety, and friendliness" and the value of planning for growth ". . . that will retain our small town atmosphere". City of Central Pont Strategic Plan,pp.3,May 24,2007,Resolution No.1143, Pg. 11 Ordinance No. Z \2 ( 3/6/2025) 2.3.1.City Mission Statement The City's mission statement reads as follows: "It is the mission of the City of Central Point to build and maintain a highly livable community by working in harmony and being a catalyst for partnership with all the members of the community,public and private." 2.3.2.City Statement of Values The Strategic Plan contains a set of five values as follows: • Growth: We value planned growth that will retain our small town atmosphere. 0 Managed Growth&Infrastructure, Goal 2-Maintain City of Central Point's small town feel and family orientation even as we grow. • Public Safety: We value a professional service oriented public safety policy that promotes a sense of safety and security in our city. • Transportation: We value a system of transportation and infrastructure that is modern, efficient and sensitive to the environment. • Community: We value a clean and attractive city with parks, open space and recreational opportunities. • Service: We provide the highest level of service possible in the most efficient responsible manner. It is important that these values be repeatedly acknowledged and applied as the foundation for crafting the goals and policies in all elements of the Comprehensive Plan. 2.4. The Regional Plan Element As previously noted the City's Comprehensive Plan elements must be consistent with any applicable regional plan. In 2012 the City adopted a Regional Plan Elements establishing Urban Reserve Areas (URAs) sufficient to accommodate the City's growth needs to the year 2060. The City's Regional Plan Element was prepared in accordance with the County's Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan. The City's Regional Plan Element established eight (8) URAs, totaling 1,721 acres for future use as the City grows. Within the URAs land uses were assigned based on very broad categories; Residential, Aggregate, Resource, Open Space/Parks, and Employment. The Regional Plan Element does not spatially allocate the land use types within any URA, but it does require that Concept Plans6 be prepared and adopted prior to inclusion of a URA, or any part thereof, into the City's urban growth boundary (UGB)7. The Concept Plans are required to address performance indicators, regionally significant transportation corridors, how land uses will be spatially distributed, the encouragement of mixed 5 Regional Plan Element, City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan,Ordinance No. 1964,8/9/2012 6 City of Central Point Regional Plan Element, Section 4.1 Performance Indicators City of Central Point Regional Plan Element, Section 4.1.8 Conceptual Land Use Plans, Pg. 12 Ordinance No. ZALL\ (3/i3/2025) use/pedestrian friendly areas8 (Activity Centers), and minimum residential density requirements. The Concept Plans, when approved, remain a part of the Regional Plan Element. At such time as lands within a URA are added to the UGB the concept plans will be further refined consistent with the level of land use descriptions consistent with the Land Use Element. At the time of inclusion in to the UGB they then become part of the Land Use Element. This Land Use Element does not address lands within the URA. 2.4.1.Direction of Growth The long-term direction of growth for the City is best described in the Regional Plan Element and its accompanying Concept Plans. The Regional Plan Element established eight(8)urban reserve areas (Figure 2.1) into which the City will grow between now and 2060. These urban reserve areas (URAs)have been pre-approved Figure 2.1 UGB and URAs for inclusion in the City's urban growth boundary9, subject to demonstrated land afti. use need and the availability of necessary infrastructure. As illustrated in Figure 2.1, any expansion of the UGB will be to the west and north. The City's easterly and southerly UGB and URA boundaries abut the City of Medford's assigned jurisdictional areas, limiting the City's ability for easterly or southerly expansion. As outlined in the Regional Plan Element most of the residential Lattand warm Obere•Abeas development(55%) will be directed to ,�,„'" the west(CP-6A, CP-6B, and CP-5A), and to the north(CP-1C and CP-2B). .CO.%..... For industrial employment lands the � , primary direction of future growth will Central Pant be to the far northerly urban reserve Urban Reserves Areas (CP-1B). This area is well served with --- - multi-modal transportation infrastructure, i.e. I-5 and rail. Commercial development will be distributed throughout the URAs per the Regional Plan allocations and concept plans. The relationship between the Regional Plan Element and the Land Use Element is timing. When the need is properly demonstrated then land within the URAs can be brought into the UGB. The timing of inclusion to the UGB will be a function of demonstrated need and the ability to develop to urban standards, and annex to the City in a timely manner. 8 Regional Plan Element, Performance Indicators,4.1.6 Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas 9 ORS Pg. 13 Ordinance No. 2-12L I ( 3/)3/2025) 2.5. Land Use and Urban Form The Regional Plan introduces mandatory land use development criteria; a minimum density requirement, and a series of performance indicators (PIs). The increase in density,together with the PIs, will affect the City's future urban form as lands in the URAs are brought into the UGB and annexed to the City. With the increase in density and the imposition of mandatory PIs, it is both timely and appropriate to introduce the basic elements of urban form,particularly as it applies to intensification of residential land uses,the creation of Activity Centers, and the physical relationship between differing land uses and transportation. As used in this Land Use Element the term"urban form"refers the general pattern of use, building height and development intensity and the structural elements that define the City physically, such as natural features,transportation corridors, open space,public facilities, as well as activity centers and other community focal elements. The introduction of urban form is not intended as the answer to good urban design, but it is intended to provide a basic awareness and a palette from which good urban form can evolve. 2.6. Performance Indicators As previously noted the Regional Plan Element established performance indicators as a means to measure compliance with the objectives of the Regional Plan Element. There are eight(8)performance indicators that, via the Regional Plan Element, apply to the Land Use Element as the UB expands into the Regional Plan's URAs. The PIs arelo: 2.6.1.Committed Residential Density Land within a URA and land currently within an Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) but outside of the existing City Limit shall be built, at a minimum, to the residential density of 6.9 dwelling units per gross acre (2010-2035), and 7.9 dwelling units per gross acre (2036-2060). This requirement can be offset by increasing the residential density in the city limit. Prior to annexation each city shall establish (or, if they exist already, shall adjust) minimum densities in each of its residential zones such that if all areas build out to the minimum allowed the committed density shall be met. This shall be made a condition of approval of a UGB amendment. The Housing Element addresses the minimum density requirement and the assignment of residential lands by the appropriate residential land use classification necessary to meet the minimum density standard. io Numbers in parenthesis(4.1.5 through 4.1.8.4)are the reference numbers in the Regional Plan Pg. 14 Ordinance No. 2-LL- (3 /t3/2025) 2.6.2.Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas For land within a URA and for land currently within a UGB but outside of the existing City Limit, each city shall achieve the 2020 benchmark targets for the number of new dwelling units" and employment12 to be located in mixed- use/pedestrian-friendly areas as identified in the 2009 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) or most recently adopted RTP13. Beyond the year 2020, cities shall continue to achieve the 2020 benchmark targets, or if additional benchmark years are established, cities shall achieve the targets corresponding with the applicable benchmarks. Measurement and definition of qualified development shall be in accordance with adopted RTP methodology. The requirement is considered met if the city or the region overall is achieving the targets or minimum qualifications, whichever is greater. This requirement can be offset by increasing the percentage of dwelling units and/or employment in the City Limit. To facilitate compliance with this performance indicator the Land Use Element, in Figure 2.1, identifies mixed-use/pedestrian-friendly areas (Activity Centers), and through the BLI tracks population and employment development within these Activity Centers. It is also anticipated that as the City expands into the URA additional Activity Centers will be added per approved Conceptual Land Use Plans. 2.6.3.Conceptual Transportation Plan Conceptual transportation plans shall be prepared early enough in the planning and development cycle that the identified regionally significant transportation corridors within each of the URA's can be protected as cost- effectively as possible by available strategies and funding. A Conceptual Transportation Plan for a URA, or appropriate portion of a URA shall be prepared by the City in collaboration with the Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization, applicable irrigation districts, Jackson County, and other affected agencies, and shall be adopted by Jackson County and the respective city prior to or in conjunction with a UGB amendment within that URA. The conceptual transportation plan shall ident a general network of regionally significant arterials under local jurisdiction, transit corridors, bike and pedestrian paths, and associated projects to provide mobility throughout the region (including intercity and intracity, if applicable). The Land Use Plan Element includes the street classification system for all streets within the City's urban area. As the City's UGB is expanded the Land "Alternative Measure No.5 requires that 39%of all new residential dwelling units shall be located in mixed use/pedestrian-friendly areas. 12 Alternative Measure No.6 requires that 48%of all new employment shall be located in mixed use/pedestrian-friendly areas. 13 RVMPO Alternative Measures Activity Centers,2017 Pg. 15 Ordinance No. 212 i ( �/13/2025) Use Map must be amended to be consistent with the conceptual transportation plan for the appropriate URA. 2.6.4.Conceptual Land Use Plan A proposal for UGB amendments into a designated URA shall include a Conceptual Land Use Plan prepared by the City in collaboration with Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization, applicable irrigation districts, Jackson County, and other affected agencies for the area proposed to be added to the UGB as follows: 2.6.5.Target Residential Density The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate how the residential density in section 2.6.1 above will be met at full build-out of the area added to the UGB amendment. 2.6.6.Land Use Distribution The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall indicate how the proposal is consistent with the general distribution of land uses in the Regional Plan, especially where a specific set of land uses were part of the rationale for designated land which was determined by the Resource Lands Review committee to be commercial agricultural land as part of a URA, which applies the following URAs: CP-1 B, CP-1 C, CP-4D, CP-6A, and CP-2B. 2.6.7.Transportation Infrastructure The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall include the transportation infrastructure required in section 2.6.3 above. 2.6.8.Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas (Activity Centers) The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate how the commitments of section 2.6.2 above will be met at full build-out of the area added to the UGB amendment. 2.6.8.1. Activity Centers An important consideration related to urban form and the Regional Plan's Performance Indicators is the concept of activity centers. As used in this Land Use Element the term "activity center" is interchangeable with the term Transit-Oriented/Mixed-Use Pedestrian- Friendly areas. Both terms represent the development of a place(s)that encourages higher density mixed-use environments that are neighborhood oriented and designed to increase the convenience of walking, bicycling, and transit. Activity Centers are illustrated in the Pg. 16 Ordinance No. 2 t 2 I (3/13/2025) RVMPO's Alternative Measures Activity Centers' map(Figure 2.1). The concept of activity centers is a key component to the City's success in the retention and creation of neighborhoods and community identity necessary to support the City's small town atmosphere14, and ultimately creates an environment that supports transit use. As used in the Land Use Element there are two types of activity centers; the activity centers that serves a residential neighborhood; and activity centers that serve the broader community's retail and service needs. As used in the Land Use Element activity centers are described as: • Areas of development that contribute to achieving mixed-use, pedestrian friendly development, that is vertically or horizontally supports mixed-use; • Neighborhood commercial/employment centers; • Parks and schools; and • Downtown areas/central business district. Benefits of activity centers include:J31141 • Greater housing variety and density, more affordable housing (smaller units), including life-cycle housing (starter homes to larger homes to senior housing); • Reduced distances between housing, workplaces, retail businesses, and other amenities and destinations; • More compact development, land-use synergy(e.g. residents provide customers for retail which provide amenities for residents); • Stronger neighborhood character, sense of place; and • Walkable, bikeable neighborhoods, increased accessibility via transit, both resulting in reduced transportation costs. The City's activity centers are illustrated in Figure 2.2. As the city grows into the URA's additional, strategically located activity centers will be needed to service both residential neighborhoods and the retail and employment needs of the community. The placement of future activity centers will be addressed in the Conceptual Land Use Plans prepared for each URA. 14 City of Central Point Forward Fair City Vision 2020,a City Wide Strategic Plan,2007 Pg. 17 Ordinance No. 2 �21-1 ( ? /_/2025) Figure 2.2 Activity Centers CENTRAL POINT 8 , i B • ` i • \ ■ I I - — aiugr 72n=r 5:-..,;. \\4447.,Mililli -=,..-_- 1:,,:,,;'....fiii:ELI:,,,,. lin �,,, k,�s'IS.'4!lilt* ..-':r-''q:--"'"'7\ >,�4 .1 r:1:. Y z.�► .'" lC r�� 1. `i'. `t Q1 +_ aifftl v.rl•I L. all a.�m k 7.1'i . = ��G 1=s , `� �r3 R7 ll 4I i [wJ gyry,\ Legend FI a t� .Is's�Pliirni' 1 I f l\ 1, N1'_ C 1 a;11113 __ l,,,�� Actwrty Centers '4A r gfi 1 rky �. 4Vr _E V•xn nc : •q Neighborhood ACOvityCenter(NA) ." l. . IM. _ rS4.-"4rj • ParksAclwtyCenter(PA) "}li► aip:n ;.._,itir r_.:.- fi RJk8 PO Aherna0ve AeeasuresActivity Center(RVMPO) . `._ F YF ._. Land Use Activity Center Map -amor.No 1�A,,�1 201 S - 2038 «..Np.19714.y S1 i Ras mop stn.roed tor atomic 0.Y1b.m comma wpm.0110 Garen:uGa_wGs.M 7.x Pwc00 re tn.:na ed pn11Y m.p. Lie NYI.:=17 Comp Ran(.Ma0 Use1_0515:017 Fle_oar On: acCflR01,nirp GIS 11.0 PI OF[S Gfy PIOftOSCOI11p 0.EemenS.810 L'fe Eeme^JGO..,017 G!It0 01:S.5,0.0, Ee=mOer:L.:017 update.:FeOruer/15.:015 Pg. 18 Ordinance No. 2-12L I ( 3/03/2025) 3. Land Use Benchmarks Depending on changes in land use policy and/or changes in the underlying economy, a community's use of land can vary over time. Knowing the extent of these changes is an important land use tool for measuring policy implementation and economic growth. There are four(4) basic methods of tracking land use that will be used in this Land Use Element: 1. The percentage of a land use classification (developed and vacant)to the total of all land use categories; 2. Gross acres per 1,000 residents (resident ratio) by land use category and total (developed and vacant) of all land use categories; 3. Percentage of dwelling units located in an activity center; and 4. Percentage of employment located in an activity center. The first two measures are typically used for tracking purposes only, unless specifically incorporated by policy reference. As an example, in Table 3.1 the 1980 Industrial land use category targeted 13% for the City's industrial needs by the year 2000. By 2017 the actual percentage of industrial acreage was 9%. What does this mean? Since there were no policies targeting a minimum percentage for industrial lands, the only explanation was that over time the City converted 4% of its industrial lands to other non-industrial uses, which was the case in 2003 and the residential and industrial changes needed for the Twin Creeks TOD. Table 3.1 illustrates the changes in the two benchmarks for the planning period 1980— 2000, 2017 (current), and the planning period 2018 —2038. Since the 1980 Land Use Element was completed the City has more intensely used its land. In 1980 it was estimated that the City would need 171 total acres per 1,000 residents. By 2017 the population benchmark (when measured against developed acreage) was 152 acres per 1,000 residents. By the end of the 2018 —2038 planning period that ratio is expected to be 142 acres per 1,000 population; a 15% increase in development intensity from1980 to 2038. Benchmarks 3 and 4 track the amount of residential households, and employment in activity centers as required by the Regional Plans Performance Indicator 3.1.1.2. Table 3.1 Land Use Benchmarks 2000 2017 2038 Land Use Percentage Acres/1,000 Acres/1,000 Acres/1,000 Classification of Total Pop. % Pop. % Pop. Residential 47% 80 53% 84 49% 69 Commercial 7% 12 6% 9 8% 11 Industrial 13% 22 8% 13 11% 15 Civic 7% 12 4% 6 3% 5 Parks&Open Space 6% 10 6% 10 8% 12 Public Right-of-Way 20% 34 23% 36 21% 30 TOTAL 100% 171 100% 158 100% 142 Source:Buildable Lands Inventory,2017 Pg. 19 Ordinance No. 2--12`-1 (3/i?/2025) 4. Current (2017) Land Use Summary The City of Central Point was incorporated in 1889, and had an estimated population of 500. Over the years the City has grown concentrically around its original core area, with Hwy. 99 and Pine Street serving as the north/south and east/west axis. The City's current Land Use Element was completed in 1983 covering an urban area of 2,736.83 acres. At that time it was expected that the City's urban area(build-out) was sufficient in size to accommodate a population of 16,000 by the year 2000, or 171 acres per 1,000 residents. By the end of 2017 the City's certified population was 17,70015 and the urban area accounted for approximately 3,100 acres of which 2,679 acres were classified as developed16, for a ratio of 158 developed acres per 1,000 residents. Since 1983 the most noticeable change in land use was due to changes in the Industrial and Residential land use classifications. This was the result of land use changes in 2001 allowing for development of the Twin Creeks TOD. At that time the lands currently occupied by the Twin Creeks TOD was designated for industrial use and needed to be changed to residential use to accommodate the Twin Creeks TOD project. This change was off-set by changes in the southeast quadrant of the city from Residential to Industrial land use. Table 3.1 identifies and compares the City's current land use distribution based on the 1983 Land Use Element to year 2000, current land use for 2017, and projected land use needs to 203817. As the City moves toward, and beyond, 2038 the percentage of industrial land in the urban area has the potential, based on Employment designated lands in the Regional Plan Element(CP-1B), to increase its percentage. To attain this potential it will be necessary to monitor Employment land needs and appropriately adjust the Economic Element. The other noticeable change in Table 3.1 was in the Civic classification from a projected 7%of total land area to 4%by 2017. This reduction was the result of changes in accounting methodology for civic land uses. The current figure is based on lands actually designated as Civic use on the Land Use Plan Map and account for such public uses as schools, libraries, and misc. government uses. The earlier 1983 number was based on an accounting of all "civic"uses such as churches,private schools, fraternal organizations, etc. which is located within other land use classifications (predominantly Residential). When all "civic"uses (public and private) are accounted for the actual percentage in 2017 was close to 7%. Going forward the term"Civic"applies to only public or utility related civic uses. Uses such as churches and private schools, because of their size,no longer are limited to the Civic land use classification, but are allowed in other zoning districts as either an out-right permitted uses, or conditional uses. The City BLI will continue to maintain an inventory of these"other civic" land uses and make appropriate adjustments to the underlying land use classification and zoning as they occur. 'SPSU Certified 2017 Population 16 Defined as buildable lands in the BLI 17 PSU Certified 2017 Population Pg. 20 Ordinance No. 2X2-9 (2) /i S/2025) 5. Land Use Classifications The City's current(2017) urban area contains approximately 3,100 acres. Every parcel is assigned to one of six (6)primary land use classifications, which are supported by nine (9) secondary land use classifications (Table 5.1), and five overlay districts, for a total land use system of 20 land use classifications. Table 5.1. Land Use Classifications 1 Residential (Res) Very Low Density (VLRes) Low Density (LRes) Medium Density (MRes) High Density (HRes) 2 Commercial Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Employment Commercial (EC) General Commercial (GC) 3 Industrial Light Industrial (LI) General Industrial (GI) 4 Park and Recreation (P/R) 5 Civic (C) 6. Overlay Districts Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Environmental (E) Airport (A-A) ............................ Central Business District (CBD) Climate Friendly Area (CFA) Table 5.2 identifies the distribution of the different land uses by net acreage for the current planning period (2018 to 2038). In Table 5.2 the additional 240 acres (approx.) represents, by land use, the projected acreage within the current URA that need to be brought into the City's UGB over the course of the next 20 years. As previously noted the acreages and their land use distribution are based on the needs established in such other elements as Housing (residential lands), Economic (commercial and industrial lands), Parks, etc. Figure 5.1 (Land Use Map) represents the spatial distribution of all land as defined in the Land Use Element, less what is shown in Table 5.2 as additional needed net acres uses. Pg. 21 Ordinance No. Z I LLI ( 3/t-L42025) Table 5.2 Projected Urban Area Land Use Needs Additional Total 2038 2017 Inventory Needed(Gross Inventory Land Use Classification (Gross Acres) Acres) (Gross Acres) Residential' 1.491 150 1,641 Commercial 247 29 276 Industrial2 360 - 360 Civic 109 9 118 Parks & Open Space3 227 53 280 Public Right-of-Way4 694 - 694 TOTAL 3,128 241 3,369 Source:City of Central Point Buildable Lands Inventory,2017 Notes:�"Additional Need"Source 2017 Housing Element 2"Additional Need"Source 2013 Economic Element,updated per Ord.2013 3"Additional Need"Source Draft 2018 Parks and Recreation Element 4"Additional Need"not adjusted for future development 6. Residential Land Use In 2017 the City's residential land uses accounted for 52%of the City's total urban land area, representing the largest single land use classification. For a City the size of Central Point the residential inventory is historically typical. The purpose of the residential land use classification is to maintain an adequate supply of buildable land at densities and housing types sufficient to accommodate the City's projected housing needs as set forth in the Housing Element. The Housing Element identifies not only the residential acreage needed during the planning period, but also the acreage allocation by density category and range of housing types. Historically,the primary challenge in administering the residential land use classifications was the reliance on maximum densities,rather than minimum densities. The prior Land Use Element established maximum density as a goal, with the assumption that the private sector would construct, if not at the maximum density, then surely close to it. In 1983, based on the City's range of maximum allowed densities,the average density for new development should have been 11 dwelling units per gross acre. Between 1980 and 2016 the actual average built density was 4.7 dwelling units per gross acre. In 2006 the City amended its Zoning Ordinance adopting both minimum density and maximum density provisions. Residential development post 2006 increased to 5.6 units per gross acre, a significant improvement over the prior twenty years. Moving forward (2018-2038) it is planned, in both the Regional Plan Element and the Housing Element, that the minimum average density for all new residential development will be 6.9 dwellings per gross acre to 2035 and 7.9 thereafter. The residential densities in the Land Use Element are based on the density tables in the Housing Element. The minimum and maximum lot sizes identified in the Land Use Element, and the Housing Element, are suggestions only, and not mandatory. The minimum and maximum lot sizes will be set by the Zoning Ordinance, and can be adjusted from time-to-time,provided they comply with the Pg. 22 Ordinance No. `.- 2-i (��/(3/2025) minimum densities in the Housing Element as carried forward in the Land Use Element. Figure 5.1 Land Use Plan Map AIIlk CENTRAL POINT IlkIlliallill . - - llikii 7-0 ------tli,g, \ '" Llgpttd Mwtw...w.w. M..ew Comm...4r MN".r...um M....CMa tent l 01.wwe ei CC.,a-.a.tr.,Mw ,r..Zest, -sfrom-aea C e•-•-•. ME.r, r Jp/ _.:v. -S'0.,.r,Crro:. -31V. aaa....s Cer/ws uf•4 earrtrpt. Maw ,,w..,-Ze Y, -pre.Ca-Ye. Land Use Map ......a.w...-= 2018 - 2038 yaw,r,,,., .p „xroea apew:aster et aw+ro a1x+e.ra C..e•t.,31..,a.ro..fta$.ewse.e-.ais^ae r.s+•Caro tan aro..e.c.a::' W .a *r,-gO{fret t,ales t'►0..:sCaro.r Irs.%ar'.at Era+..we:. Cm's",/,VA, .vase taw...,:t:01 6.1. Residential Land Use Classifications Since 1980 residential lands have accounted for approximately 50% of all developed lands within the City. Over the next 20 years it is projected that the residential percentage of the City's land inventory will remain at approximately 50%. On a population basis the ratio of population to Pg. 23 Ordinance No. 2-12i-1 ( /v/2025) residential acres was initially planned in 1980 at 80:1,000 (Acres per 1000 residents). By the year 2000 the actual ratio was 80:1,00018 . By 2017 the ratio was 83:1,000. By 2038, with the mandated minimum density at 6.9 the ratio is expected to drop to 77:1,000. There are four(4) residential land use classifications and nine (9) supporting zoning districts. The four(4) land use classifications,their zoning designation, and minimum and maximum densities are: Table 6.1 Residential Land Use Classifications Land Use Permitted Housing Associated Zoning Suggested Classification Types Districts Minimum and Maximum Gross Densities VLRes (Very Low Single-Family R-L 1 to 4 Density) Detached LRes (Low Density) Single-Family R-1-6 4 to 8 Detached and R-1-8 Attached R-1-10 MRes (Medium Single-Family R-2 7 to 20 Density) Attached, Plexes LMR and Apartments HRes (High Density) Single-Family R-3 20 to 50 Attached, Plexes, MMR Apartments HMR The following defines each Residential land use classification: 6.1.1.Very Low Density Residential (VLRes) The purpose of the VLRes classification is to encourage, accommodate, maintain and protect a suitable environment for residential living at very low densities on lands that are impacted by environmental constraints, or agricultural buffering needs. The VLRes classification was initially established to act as a buffer between both the industrial areas to the east and the agricultural lands to the west. The VLRes classification was previously identified as Farm-Residential. As a percentage of the City's residential lands inventory it accounts for slightly over 1%. Today the reliance on buffering from agricultural use has been mitigated by implementation of agricultural buffering standards 19, reducing the reliance on the VLRes classification as the sole solution to agricultural buffering strategy. However, the VLRes classification is still a viable option to agricultural buffering, and in environmentally sensitive lands, such as flood hazard areas and wet lands, where larger lots will facilitate buffering mitigation. 18 The projected need for residential land exceeded the actual population growth by 2000. 19 CPMC 17.71 Agricultural Mitigation Pg. 24 Ordinance No. 2.12 `I ( 3/13/2025) The VLRes land use classification is supported by the Residential Low Density (R-L) zoning district. The minimum and maximum allowed densities and general lot size ranges are illustrated in Table 6.2. The reference to minimum and maximum lot size is not mandatory, but advisory. The setting of minimum and maximum lot size is the responsibility of the City's Zoning Ordinance, provided that the minim and maximum density is com•liant with the Housin• Element. Table 6.2 Very Low Density Residential Zoning Minimum Maximum Suggested Suggested District Density/Gross Density/Gross Minimum Net Maximum Net Acre Acre Lot Size Lot Size R-L 1 4 9,000 sq. ft. 35,000 sq. ft. 6.1.2.Low Density Residential (LRes) The LRes land use classification supports the need for low density housing and represents the City's R-1 zoning district. The LRes classification represents the largest residential land use category, accounting for 60% of the City's residential acreage. The purpose of this land use classification is to accommodate the demand for single-family attached and detached housing. The minimum density is 4 dwelling units per gross acre (R-1-10), with a maximum of 8 dwelling units per gross acre (Table 6.3). Single-family attached housing is permitted within the LRes classification subject to design standards that assure architectural compatibility with abutting single-family detached dwellings. Design emphasis is on massing, fenestration, and pedestrian and vehicular access to assure individual identity for each attached unit. Table 6.3 Low Density Residential Zoning Minimum Maximum Suggested Suggested District Density/Gross Density/Gross Minimum Net Maximum Net Acre Acre Lot Size Lot Size R-1-6 6 8 4,000 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. R-1-8 5 6 6,000 sq. ft. 7,000 sq. ft. R-1-10 4 5 7,000 sq. ft. 9,000 sq. ft. 6.1.3.Medium Density Residential (MRes) The MRes classification's preferred location is within 1/2 mile of activity centers and/or transit facilities. The MRes classification allows for a mix of detached and attached dwelling units either owner and/or renter occupied, subject to compliance with the minimum and maximum density requirements in Table 6.4. The MRes designation covers two zoning districts; the R-2 and the LMR districts. The LMR district is a performance based zoning district that applies to all new development within the UGB. The R-2 district applies to older areas of the City that are already developed. To avoid non-conforming issues properties in the R-2 retains separate Pg. 25 Ordinance No. .212'-j (3/13/2025) development standards from the LMR district, but may in-fill, or redevelop usin: LMR standards. Table 6.4 Medium Density Residential Zoning Minimum Maximum Suggested Suggested District Density/Gross Density/Gross Minimum Net Maximum Net Acre Acre Lot Size Lot Size R-2 7 10 3,000 sq. ft. 5,000 sq. ft. LMR 7 10 3,000 sq. ft. 5,000 sq. ft. 6.1.4.High Density Residential (HRes) This land use classification supports high density housing. The HRes classification's preferred location is within 1/2 mile of activity centers and/or transit facilities. Table 6.5 High-Density Residential (HRes) Zoning Minimum Maximum Suggested Suggested District Density/Gross Density/Gross Minimum Net Maximum Net Acre Acre Lot Size Lot Size R-3 15 20 N.A. N.A. MMR 15 20 N.A. N.A. HMR 20 50 N.A. N.A. The HRes classification supports three zoning districts; the R-3, the MMR, and the HMR(Table 6.5). The only distinguishing factor between the R-3 and MMR zoning districts is that the R-3 district is typically in the older areas of the City and were developed under older standards, while the MMR and HMR are applied to new development within the UGB,TOD and CBD overlay. The HMR district is the City's highest density residential zoning district, which was initially reserved for use in the TOD district/corridor, but is now allowed outside the TOD district/corridor per the Land Use Plan Map (Figure 6.1). 6.1.5.Residential Land Use Plan Map The Land Use Plan Map distributes each of the residential land use classifications based on, and in order of priority, as follows: 1. Acreage needs as identified in the Housing Element. The density mix and acreage on the Land Use Plan Map shall be consistent with the density mix and acreage mix in the Housing Element. 2. Locational factors, such as adjacent land uses, proximity to activity centers, proximity to public transit, and street hierarchy. Pg. 26 Ordinance No. 7129 ( 3 /is/2025) The current Land Use Plan Map Residential land use designations are based on current (2018) designations, and are not expected to be changed in the near future. 6.1.6.Residential Infill and Redevelopment The BLI tracks the City's infill and redevelopment property. Most of the City's residential infill is scattered throughout the City, while redevelopment opportunities are concentrated in and around the downtown and older areas of the City. The Housing Element addresses infill and redevelopment goals and polices. 6.1.7.Small Town, Neighborhood Preservation, Identification and Livability One of the benefits of living in Central Point is its small town character, the importance of which is acknowledged in the City's 2007 Central Point Forward Fair City Vision 2020(Vision Plan) ". . . with a `small town' commitment and feel that promotes community pride, safety, and friendliness;" followed by the value statement that the City values ". . . planned growth that will retain our small town atmosphere." With the ". . . small town aspiration . . ." and increasing residential density urban design is, and will continue to be an important consideration in the City's continuing development. As used in this Land Use Element the term"small town" is qualitative (feel), not quantitative (size of population or building size), with an emphasis on urban design elements to support and enhance the neighborhood feel and pedestrian in scale. 6.2. Residential Zoning & Density The residential densities shown in the above tables are based on gross acres as defined in Section 6.3. All residential development must meet the minimum density requirement based on its land use classification20 and the applicable underlying zoning district. The minimum and maximum net lot area shown in the above tables are advisory only. The designation of minimum and maximum lot size for each residential district is the responsibility of the City's Zoning Ordinance, which may be modified from time-to-time provided they comply with the applicable densities set forth in the Housing Element for each associated residential land use classification. 6.3. Minimum/Maximum Density Calculation The Regional Plan Element measures density in terms of dwelling units per gross acre (43,560 sq. ft.). To calculate residential density per gross acre it is 20 City of Central Point 2018 Housing Element Pg. 27 Ordinance No. L It 5/2025) sometimes necessary to remove other non-residential use areas within the proposed project that will be given a land use reclassification from the Residential inventory to another approved land use(excepting right-of-way). The range of residential units allowed within any particular land use classification and zoning district can be calculated by taking the gross acreage (43,560 sq. ft. per gross acre) less any areas proposed for public parks/public open space, civic uses and environmental lands as that term is defined in the Land Use Element Environmental Overlay (Section 6.3.3). Below are two examples of how to calculate the minimum/maximum density for the all residential zoning districts. Example 1: Property is 2.5 gross acres within the R-1-8 zoning district(5 units minimum per gross acre).No proposed acreage deductions for Environmental, public parks/open space, or civic uses. Gross acreage equals 2.5 acres Minimum required density 5 units/gross acre. Maximum allowed density 6 units/gross acre. 2.5*5=12 minimum number of dwelling units. 2.5*6=15 maximum number of dwelling units. Allowed Density Range for the property: 12 to 15 units. Example 2: Property is 2.5 acres within the R-1-8 zoning district(5 units/gross acre). There is 0.75 acres designated for public parks/open space, 0.25 acres for a church and 0.25 acres within the floodway (exempt acreage) for an adjusted total gross acreage of 1.25. Gross acreage equals 2.5 acres minus 1.25 acres ((exempt acreage) = 1.25 acres Minimum required density 5 units per gross acre. Maximum allowed density 6 units per gross acre. 1.25*5=6.25 rounded to 6 minimum number of dwelling units. 1.25*6=7.5 rounded21 to 8 maximum number of dwelling units. Allowed Density Range for the property: 6 to 8 dwelling units per gross acre. Over the course of the next 20-year planning period the City will need approximately 250 acres of residential land to meet its expected population growth22. The below tables illustrate how the new residential lands are scheduled to be distributed by land use classification23 as necessary to meet the minimum density standards of the Housing Element. 21 Conventional rounding method 22 City of Central Point Housing Element 23 City of Central Point Housing Element Pg. 28 Ordinance No. 2-12-H ( 3/13/2025) Table 7.6 Pro i i sed Maximum and Minimum Gross Densit ,Zonin_ Cross Residential Minimum Maximum Minimum Acres Build-Out Maximum Gross Gross Build-Oat Zoning District l'crcenta2c Gross Density seeded (Nis) Density .tcres (DI's) R-L 5% I.00 12 12 2.50 12 30 Total 5% 1.00 12 12 2.50 _ 12 30 R-1-6 30% 6.00 76 456 8.00 76 608 R-1-8 18% 5.00 46 228 6.00 46 274 R-1-10 12% 4.00 30 122 5.00 30 152 Total 60% 5.30 152 806 7.19 152 1,094 LMR 10% 7.00 26 182 10.00 26 260 R-2 10% 7.00 25 175 10.00 25 250 Total 20% 7.00 51 357 10.00 51 510 R-3 6% 12.00 15 182 20.00 15 304 MMR 5% 12.00 11 137 20.00 11 228 HMR 5% 25.00 11 285 50.00 11 569 Total 15% 15.90 38 603 29.00 38 1,101 Grand Total 1 IIIII'6,1 7.03 I 253 I 1,778 I 10.81 253 I 2,734 Periodically, through the BLI, the need for urban land will be monitored and the UGB amended as necessary to maintain an inventory of vacant land adequate to meet demand (Gross Residential Acres Needed) as noted in Table 7.6. In addition to the above residential acreage need identified in Table 7.6, additional residentially designated acreage will be needed within the residential land use classification to accommodate public parks and open space, and private sector civic uses, and the residential land inventory appropriately adjusted. 6.3.1.Public Parks/Open Space and Residential Density The City's Parks and Recreation Element does not identify specific locations for future parks, but instead provides proposed target areas needing parks (Figure 6.1). To maintain the park land to population ratio noted in the Parks and Recreation Element an additional 42 acres of park land will need to be acquired and developed by 2038. Generally,the location of parks and open space lands are associated with residential lands. At such time as parks and open space lands are designated and acquired within the Residential land use classification, then the Residential lands acreage will need to be adjusted to accommodate the loss in acreage due to the park land need. Until such time as park lands are acquired the residential land inventory includes, in the aggregate, the 42 acres projected for public parks and open space. As park lands are identified the Land Use Element will be amended to reflect the change. 6.3.2.Civic Uses and Residential Density The designation of Civic lands, as with parks and open space, predominantly responds to residential development. Similar to the provision to adjust residential lands for park and open space development, when civic uses, such as churches, develop within the Residential land use classification, then the residential lands must be appropriately adjusted to accommodate the loss in acreage. As civic uses are developed the change will be reflected in the BLI. Pg. 29 Ordinance No. 2J.2`-1 (3 /i3/2025) 6.3.3.Environmental Lands and Residential Density Throughout the City there are lands that are developmentally encumbered as a result of flooding or other environmental constraints. The presence of environmental constraints is maintained in the BLI and is deducted from the density calculation in Section 6.3. 6.3.4.Residential Goals and Policies: Residential Goal 1: To ensure a high degree of livability and environmental quality in all residential areas of Central Point. Residential Goal 2: To support a well-balanced variety of residential densities and housing opportunities/types for all residents of the community as described in the Housing Element. Residential Goal 3: To preserve the value and character of older-single-family neighborhoods through proper zoning, including reasonable efforts to encourage maintenance and rehabilitation as an alternative to transitional development at higher densities. Residential Goal 4: To encourage and make possible innovative residential planning and best practices development techniques that would help to increase land use efficiency, reduce costs of utilities and services, and ultimately reduce housing costs. Residential Policy 1: To continue to ensure that long-range planning and zoning reflects the need to locate the highest densities and greatest numbers of residents in closest possible proximity to existing and future activity centers. Residential Policy 2: To continue to update the Zoning Ordinance, as necessary to take advantage of planning innovation, best practices, and technological improvements that could have applications in Central Point to the benefit of the community. Residential Policy 3: In areas where residential neighborhoods abut commercial or industrial areas, orient the residential structures and local streets away from these land uses to avoid any undesirable views and to strengthen neighborhood solidarity. Residential Policy 4: In any area where development of one or more parcels may create obstacles to development of others, the initial developer shall develop a specific plan that would provide for the future development of the entire area, including the provision of adequate access to potentially landlocked properties. 7. Employment Land Use The Employment land use category is comprised of six (6) supporting land use classifications addressing the City's land use needs for commercial, office, and industrial acreage. The City has a total 2017 inventory of 511 acres within the urban area designated for employment purposes. Based on the findings of the Economic Element it is estimated that by the year 2033 the City will have a need for 59 to 64 Pg. 30 Ordinance No. (3 /i3✓2025) additional gross acres24, or 13 acres per 1,000 residents of employment lands to meet its 2033 year growth projection. The Economic Element was based on the assumption that by 2033 the population would be 27,410. Portland State University Population Research Center's25 official forecast for 2033, was 22,257, was considerably lower. By 2038 it is projected to be 23,290. Because the 2038 population projection does not exceed the Economic Element's 2033 population projection the estimated demand of 59—64 additional acres for employment purposes will be acceptable for the 2018 — 2038 planning period. Table 7.1. Projected Employment Land Use Needs Needed New Total 2038 Land Use Classification 2017 Inventory Gross Acres Inventory Commercial 236 14 250 Industrial 275 49 325 TOTAL 511 64 575 Source:City of Central Point Buildable Lands Inventory,2017 7.1. Commercial Land Use Summary The City's commercial land use classification is comprised of three secondary classifications: • Neighborhood Commercial (NC) • Employment Commercial (EC); and • General Commercial (GC) The EC and GC have been redefined from their prior descriptions to broaden the scope of allowed land uses. Of the 511 acres designated for employment purposes 235 acres are identified for commercial use (Figure 7.2). By 2038 it is expected that (technically) an additional 14 gross acres will be needed per the Economic Element. However; this projected need is based on the general relationship of total commercial acreage to population—supporting neighborhoods. With the exception of the NC classification this relationship is reasonably accurate. For the NC classification additional commercial lands will be needed to service new neighborhoods as the City expands in to the Urban Reserve Areas. The Concept Plans for each URA will address location and acres needed for future NC locations. 24 Adjusted for 47 acre 2015 Industrial UGB expansion,Ordinance No.2013 25 Coordinated Population Forecast 2015 through 2065Jackson County,Portland State University Population Research Center. Pg. 31 Ordinance No. L1-2-LI (3/G/2025) Table 7.2. Commercial Land Use Distriubtion,2017 Percentage Total Urban of Total Comprehensive Plan Designation Gross Acres Land Use Neighborhood Commercial(NC) 22.00 1% Employment Commercial(EC) 145.00 5% General Commercial(GC) 68.00 2% TOTAL COMMERCIAL 235.00 8% 7.1.1.Commercial Land Use Plan The City's commercial land use plan is based on the Economic Element's analysis of commercial, office, and tourist needs of the community for the planning period (2013-33). At the time the Economic Element was completed (2013)the City's commercial lands accounted for 8% (235 acres) of the City's total land inventory. At 8% of the total land area the population to commercial land use ratio was 13 acres of commercial land for every 1,000 population by the year 2033. This ratio remains consistent with the standard adopted in the 1983 Land Use Element, and is supported by the Economic Element which notes that there are sufficient commercial lands within the current urban area to address future commercial land needs to meet the 2033 population. However, not all of the commercial lands are effectively distributed to serve the needs of an expanding UGB. As the urban area expands into the URA there will be a logistical need for additional commercial lands that exceed the benchmarks. From an urban design perspective there will be a need for additional commercial lands to serve growing neighborhood needs outside the current UGB. The location and acreage of new Commercial lands are addressed in the Concept. The Land Use Plan includes three (3) commercial land use classifications: 7.1.1.1. Neighborhood Commercial (NC). Neighborhood Commercial, provides for small neighborhood convenience retail and services needs of adjacent residential neighborhoods. To assure that Neighborhood Commercial districts are sized to service neighborhood needs. Neighborhood Commercial districts should be limited to approximately 3-5 acres with a typical service area of 3 miles. The NC district should be located along collector and/or arterial streets and designed to complement the retail and service needs of abutting residential neighborhoods. The design of this commercial district should be at a scale and architectural character that complements and functionally compatible with the neighborhood and emphasizes pedestrian and bicycle convenience. Currently, there are three (3)NC districts in the City, three (3) on the west side approx. 1 acre in size, and one (1) on the east side, approx. 7 acres in size. Pg. 32 Ordinance No. 212-L1 (3 A3/2025) 7.1.1.2. Employment Commercial (EC). The EC classification is designed to accommodate a wide variety of retail, service, and office uses in an environment that is pedestrian oriented in scale and amenities and supports pedestrian, bicycle, and transit use. Residential uses above the ground floor are encouraged. The EC land use designation replaces the prior Tourist and Office-Professional classification. 7.1.1.3. General Commercial (GC). The GC classification is designed to accommodate commercial, business, and light industrial uses that are most appropriately located along or near major highways or arterials and are largely dependent of highway visibility and access. The GC land use designation replaces the prior Thoroughfare Commercial classification. 7.1.2.Commercial Development Goals and Policies Commercial Goal 1: To create an economically strong and balanced commercial sector of the community that is easily accessible, attractive, and meets the commercial needs of the local market area. Commercial Goal 2: Continue to pursue implementation of the Downtown and East Pine Street Corridor urban renewal plan. Commercial Policy 1: Maintain the zoning of all commercial areas of Central Point as necessary to comply with the Economic Element. Commercial Policy 2: Undertake an in-depth study of the downtown business district and develop a comprehensive improvement plan that would include such considerations as traffic circulation and off-street parking, pedestrian and bicycle facilities and access, structural design guidelines, and guidelines for landscaping and signing. Commercial Policy 3: Encourage the development of shared commercial parking areas in the downtown area to be carried out by the local businesses with City assistance. Commercial Policy 4: Promote the planned integration of abutting commercial development for the purpose of more efficient customer parking, better design and landscaping, coordinated signing, and increased retail sales. Commercial Policy 5: For that section of Highway 99 between Beall Lane and the High School implement the 99 Corridor Plan to improve the corridor, traffic circulation, and the overall visual and aesthetic character of the area. 7.2. Industrial Land Use Plan It was determined in the 1980 Land Use Plan that a typical city in Oregon similar in size to Central Point had approximately 15 acres of industrial land per 1,000 residents. At that time the City's industrial lands inventory accounted for only 4.1 acres per 1,000 residents. Today (2018) the City has 14.87 acres per 1,000 residents, Pg. 33 Ordinance No. 212L1 (3 /13/2025) and industrial acres in number and size to provide an attractive inventory of industrial lands. The City's vision plan restates the continuing need to improve the industrial, employment, and economic health of the Community as a major goal, and to mitigate the City's "bedroom community" image. Since 1980 the City has successfully pursued this goal, having attained a current ratio of 14.87 industrial acres per resident. The industrial land use classification is divided into two sub-classifications; Light Industrial and Heavy Industrial. Together they total 275 acres, of which 54 acres are considered vacant. The Economic Element determined that by 2033 an additional 49 gross acres26 will be needed for industrial purposes. This need determination was based on a 2033 population projection of 27,410. Since adoption of the Economic Element Portland State University's Population Research Center, in accordance with recently adopted legislation, completed an updated population estimate for 2015 through 2060. The projected population for 2038 is 23,29027 which is less than that used in the Economic Element. As such, and since population was used as an indicator of future need, the Economic Element's project need is deemed acceptable for 2038 use. 7.2.1.Industrial Goals and Policies Industrial Goal 1: To support and maintain a strong and diversified industrial sector in accordance with the Economic Element. Industrial Goal 2: To maximize industrial expansion and new development opportunities in locations that utilize existing highways and other infrastructure, are in close proximity to employee housing areas, and will minimize conflicts with all non-industrial land uses. Industrial Goal 3: Through the BLI monitor and manage the use of industrial lands. Industrial Goal 4: To encourage light industrial uses in the General Commercial district subject to site and architectural standards that ensures compatibility with adjacent commercial uses. Industrial Policy 1: Within CP-1B maximize the industrial development potential of the Highway 99/Central Oregon and Pacific Railroad (CORP) corridor to meet the City's industrial needs to the year 2038. Industrial Policy 2: Work toward the development of requirements, incentives, and guidelines for the establishment of industrial parks or other forms of master planning in the industrial development category. Industrial Policy 3: Ensure through the plan review process that all industrial development proposals adequately address the importance of maintaining environmental quality,particularly air and water quality. Industrial Policy 4: Continue to support the landscape requirements for industrial development as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Industrial Policy 5: Maintain a minimum industrial lands ratio of 15 acres of industrial land per 1,000 residents. 26 City of Central Point Economic Element,Table 5.2-2 27 Portland State University, Population Research Center Interpolation Table Pg. 34 Ordinance No. 7 1'1. ► (?/i;/2025) 7.3. Civic Land Use Lands designated for this use consist of a variety of uses considered to be public in nature or perform public services, particularly public schools, which account for the largest percentage of acreage in this classification. In 2016 the ratio of Civic lands to 1,000 residents appeared to be significantly below the projected 2000 ratio. This discrepancy was a result of the methodology used in calculating Civic land uses. In the previous Land Use Element all civic land uses were inventoried regardless of the land use classification. As illustrated in the below table only lands within the Civic classification were included in the inventory. If all civic land uses were accounted for in the below table the ratio is the same as the 2000 ratio. Going forward only public civic uses will be counted in the Civic classification. Quasi-public uses will be noted, but will be relegated to an allowed use in other land use classifications. 7.3.1.Civic Land Use Goals and Policies Goal 1: To include in each land use category sufficient public lands for land uses related to community public facilities, such as city hall, public schools, community centers, etc. Other quasi-public uses such as utilities, churches, etc. will be relegated to other land use classification consistent with past practices. Civic Lands Policy 1. Ensure that any major public or quasi-public facility that is proposed to be located within a residential neighborhood is located along a collector or arterial street, is compatible with surrounding land uses, and does not contribute unreasonably to traffic volumes within the neighborhood. Civic Lands Policy 2: Work with officials of School District 6 to develop and implement a school site acquisition program that is consistent with the long-range comprehensive plans of the City and the District. Civic Lands Policy 3: Continue to emphasize the need for pedestrian and bicycle access to all public facilities and areas frequented by local residents. 7.4. Parks and Recreation Land Use The City's park and recreation needs are addressed in the Parks and Recreation Element. Parks and Recreation Goal 1: To integrate into the Land Use Plan the parks and recreation, and open space needs as set forth in the Parks and Recreation Element. Parks and Recreation Policy 1: Whenever possible, encourage the location of public park sites adjacent to public school sites to establish neighborhood educational/recreational "centers"that can benefit by the joint utilization of both types of facilities. 7.5. Circulation/Transportation Land Use The Land Use Plan maintains the City's public street system as a percentage of the City's total land inventory. As a typical rule-of-thumb the right-of-way needs of a typical community averages 25%28 of all land uses within an urban area. In 1980 it was estimated that by the year 2000 the City's street right-of-ways would account for 20%of the City's total land area. By 2017 the figure was actually 22%. Statistically the 2% 28 Pg. 35 Ordinance No. 2_12q ( 3/i3/2025) difference is insignificant when the methodology for determining right-of-way is considered. As explained in the BLI with the exception of right-of-way all other parcels (A) are based on the tax assessors information. The City's GIS system uses a shape file for the City's urban area(B). When A is deducted from B the result is right-of-way. The City's circulation planning is the responsibility of the City's Transportation System Plan. The Transportation System Plan address not only the City's street right-of-way needs, but also, rail, bicycle, pedestrian, and air. 7.5.1.Circulation Land Use Goal The most significant relationship between land use and circulation planning is the reliance of circulation/transportation planning on its ability to provide an acceptable level of services based on the underlying land use mix. Typically, as land use intensifies traffic volumes increase. The Land Use Element and the Transportation System Plan are currently in balance. As land use changes are proposed it is necessary that the impact of the change is evaluate for compliance with transportation standards and mitigate as necessary. This occurs at two levels; when projects of a certain size are developed, and as land is brought into the UGB. Circulation Goal 1: To effectively manage the use of land within the Central Point Urban Area in a manner that is consistent with, and that supports the successful implementation of the City's Transportation System Plan. Circulation Policy 1: Prior to inclusion of lands from the URAs into the UGB a traffic impact analysis shall be completed to determine level of service at time of development. 8. Overlay Districts As previously noted there are five (5) overlay districts that affect the various land uses. Those districts are shown in Figure 8.1 and are described as follows: 8.1. Central Business District (CBD) The Central Business District (CBD) Overlay represents the City's historic business center of the community. As an overlay district the CBD encompasses a mix of commercial (retail and office) and residential use classifications that support its use and development as an Activity Center. The CBD Overlay extends along Pine Street; from First Street and Seventh Street. The CBD Overlay is intended to identify and strengthen the commercial core area as a unique area of the City. 8.2. Transit Oriented Development District (TOD) The TOD overlay represents the existing TOD is to encourage, through a master plan process, development that includes a mixture of housing, office, retail and/or other amenities integrated into a walkable neighborhood and located within a half-mile of public transportation. Pg. 36 Ordinance No. 2-1'2_`I (3 /13/2025) 8.3. Environmental Overlay The Environmental Overlay identifies lands that are environmentally constrained such as high risk flood hazard areas and/or environmentally sensitive lands such as wetlands, riparian areas, etc.,that are not developable. Figure 8.1 Overlay Map identifies the area covered by each overlay. The Environmental Overlay includes the floodway plus 25-ft or the top-of- bank plus 25-ft,whichever is greater. The objective of this overlay flood overlay is to reduce flood risk to the community while restoring and/or preserving floodplain and riparian areas, which provide multiple community benefits (i.e. meet state and federal regulatory requirements, reduce the cost of flood insurance, improve fish and wildlife habitat, increase neighborhood recreation areas,mitigate increased flood hazards generated by new land divisions in the flood overlay zone, etc.). 8.4.Airport Overlay The Airport Overlay includes two overlays; the Airport Approach Overlay and the Airport Concern Overlay. The Airport Overlays are intended to reduce risks to aircraft operations and land uses near airports and heliports. These overlays are required pursuant to federal and state laws, specifically Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR, Part 77) and Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR 660-013 and OAR 738-070). 8.5. Climate Friendly Area (CFA) Overlay The CFA Overlay represents an area designed to encourage an urban mixed-use area with higher-density housing,jobs,business and services that are accessible via high quality, connected bicycle,pedestrian and transit networks and services. The CFA Overlay includes a land area with sufficient zoned building capacity to accommodate 30 percent of the City's current and future housing need and applies land use and development standards consistent with the requirements provided in Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012-0300 through 0325. The City's CFA Overlay is 94.4 gross acres with 66.8 net developable acres after deducting existing and future right-of-way. The CFA Overlay is 1,226 feet wide measured at the narrowest area along East Pine Street. As illustrated in Figures 8.5.1, the CFA is located within the TOD Overlay north of East Pine Street between Bear Creek and Hamrick Road on the east side of Interstate 5. It is planned to accommodate a mix of high density residential, employment commercial and civic land uses (Figure 8.5.2) Pg. 37 Ordinance No. '2 VL`l (3 /6/2025) Figure 8.5.1. CFA Overlay Map A Climate FriendlyArea (CFA) CENTRAL POINT • it f 74 At a 1 ■ e k t 1 .f I f — e x . i 1 ii CFA Existing Conditions l.r Pie(Noway Pound, Streams ___uyl.<rvlFdy M.Pt t.t.vox,nY billows.Powe5 er J Oats Docent.5 2011 Source fey off Pan,fhWosm aifiAagi _ y 2au o SW 2C2 Tr/mewl/eon SYNan Hu .,.. n,5, ! _ - �— 0 115 1Sti SCO F. '1 '� 't - ... = $ — Pg. 38 Ordinance No. L A LH ( 2)/17D/2025) Figure 8.5.2. CFA General Land Use Plan CEL Climate Friendly Area (CFA) POINT N A High Density Residential (HRes) Civic High Density Residential (HRes) CFA Boundary and General Land Use Map Designations Employment Commercial p CFA owray Bounden (EC) CFA General Land Use Designations HRes Won Dene.ly Resaereal GC.[mgoymanl Cu(Aeacui kW Created Sten+ame Pavers Deta UC oy Cl 16.2024 Source'CM d Centro Poull Propose 7° y yondlyMae.202e,0014 Zoane Meu.Ma,TrAneonrlarion Sylvan Plan r,TSAII Cwma„u,.n e.reauwt..r evrmea.Adea a.eaaeya.Dot.Rate ry,aO tu,<4wv ela+cs wmumn 0 RS 250 500 Feel 'ea^ iucef Pg. 39 Ordinance No. ( 3/13/2025) Figure 8.1. City of Central Point Overlay Districts Map /011111 CENTRAL POINT J \• TA, .7---.1 9R9�� , ter�'_ _ R _� _ , l w ,r PA. §l 5 N - �- Legend '''N SUSS.TOO OVerBv li ONO GenB716:ibnebb Dig CI CV Oa, F7AStream CoInoorOVero, OOG OVerr,• -AIgo RApp roe cri Overta, Mood WI C:ern CVe rlar, VCB Land Use Overlay Map .wowed Qs.No.1960Mq.:01: 2018 - 2038 Ord.No.H71 U.313 MI my t9lbkes berspoc etgq r_CNsney P Spew one Wren VOB:ergs rm 7ex Pact re N9resen2d on:M nwo. Fie Nigro:2017 Como M“and Usy_09:11:017 FIl.00E On:1Vp0 PI.raMP116 NM Pror[41G01 Rgeel9C0 Prn Ekmerad:.aC UM Elmo,U96sx:017 Purled Dy 6.Holley de oXnler S.=17 Weals:Feorury a.:01R Pg. 40 Ordinance No. 2121 (3/i 6/2025) 9. Urban Growth Boundary As the City grows it will be necessary to expand the UGB to accommodate the projected growth. The preferred protocol is to expand the UGB provided the criteria set forth in CPDC, Section 17.96.500 are met. Based on the BLI and findings in Housing, Economic, and Parks and Recreation Elements the UGB needs to expand to include an additional 240 acres (approx.), distributed as shown in Table 9.1. Table 9.1 Projected Urban Area Land Use Needs Additional Total 2038 2017 Inventory Needed(Gross Inventory Land Use Classification (Gross Acres) Acres) (Gross Acres) Res ide ntiall 1.491 150 1,641 Commercial 247 29 276 Industrial2 360 - 360 Civic 109 9 118 Parks & Open Space3 227 53 280 Public Right-of-Way4 694 - 694 TOTAL 3,128 241 3,369 Source:City of Central Point Buildable Lands Inventory,2017 Notes:'"Additional Need"Source 2017 Housing Element z"Additional Need"Source 2013 Economic Element,updated per Ord.2013 3"Additional Need"Source Draft 2018 Parks and Recreation Element 4"Additional Need"not adjusted for future development 10. Land Use Plan Map Figure 10.1 is the City's Land Use Plan Map for 2018-2038. This map identifies and distributes all land use classifications within the City's urban area. The Land Use Plan Map has been prepared in compliance with such other Comprehensive Plan elements as the Housing Element, the Economic Element, the Parks and Recreation Element, etc. The City's Zoning Map shall be consistent, at all times, with the land use classifications in the Land Use Element. When amendments to the UGB are proposed they must be found consistent with the applicable Concept Plan(s) in the Regional Plan Element. Pg. 41 Ordinance No. 2-121 (3/13/2025) Figure 10.1. City of Central Point, Land A CENTRAL POINT s ma JV11 1 L lain'1' -'-'s,- , 4 , m\ t L 1r' nigrzi\.; 5 y �i - l .r 1i 9� .k 1, -..!: '4i:T'':::7:F:-.1.-ilikiek ' me st.5 -,.S ` ate= l%� �. s�- 1 � ` 11‘ - — tt: ®® ., 8 4 Y .'lt :Illy;I®u A ,` 1. v ,'``'t a�a ...'. y * _ „...144,.._ •,•31.4.-.4.2,..., ..i.,_411 1,,:)."",-;.'0:*;;-: _ .fib / y la - s e t k. f sLL �i � _� 1" }F[ A„$ N; LagarNi Proposed a.s,e.ee1 Proposed cemmorar Proposed rd... Proposed Cads,Pa rat a Open Same ®GM aro Mx Valli Arta Nlr,-ow J.., -Neatest roll CMmCCM OM i_pn: Cmc O.Isse) �p`{��1rS _ow Dusty -E)epbym nmtl Central ers CoClsi _Cen EllPipes ss ere Ca 50e 2 iq ser '1:Is aet Ke Nes Um:-.De TJ -Om.."*"nvtlN _.On Jenty Land Use Map as Us1ed:Cad No 1960 Nq-M 2018 - 2038 ed = Ore.NO.1971 day 2.3 We ma ab arded Imprecate eb,sr.0 Dan,:q Dvomes D-y Curers UOa:s s eM Tax Prces ere recces...p^.:•.s roD F1t N.nr'.2017 Como Ilan C..ee o!:_00.2D C17 Fit.oa,tn:llmpnPsnxcO15 eteD=rug=S Ct,FID4:ECC^e D'.^E.. 3.rC.ee Elmem&a...a 2017 Malta by:I.HOMY femme"21.217 Warted:Fairway 21.201$ Pg. 42 Ordinance No. 2( 2J-( (3 /t3/2025) EXHIBIT C Climate Friendly Area (CFA) Designation Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law File No. CPA-24001 and ZC-24002 Applicant: City of Central Point ) Findings of Fact 140 South 3rd Street ) and Central Point, OR 97502 ) Conclusions of Law 1 Introduction The City is amending its Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinance to accomplish the following: • Amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element to establish a Climate Friendly Area (CFA) Overlay; • Amend the General Land Use Map (GLUP) to apply the CFA Overlay to 94.4 acres and to amend the land use designation on 27.6 acres from Medium Density Residential (MRes) to High Density Residential (HRes); • Amend the Zoning Map to apply the CFA Overlay to 94.4 acres and to re-zone 27.6 acres from Low Mix Residential (LMR) to Medium Mix Residential (MMR) within the CFA Overlay area; • Add a new CFA Overlay chapter and make various amendments to other chapters in Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) Title 17, Zoning. The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map and text amendments respond to amendments to portions of the Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities (CFEC) rules (Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-012-0300 through 0330), which require cities greater than 10,000 in population to establish at least one (1) Climate Friendly Area (CFA) that is subject to land use and transportation planning requirements that aim to create dense urban mixed-use centers where people can live, work and play without owning a car. The purpose of these findings is to demonstrate that the City's proposed CFA is consistent with the locational, capacity and land use requirements set forth in OAR 660- 012-0310, 0315 and 0320, respectively, as well as the Statewide Planning Goals, Central Point Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 1.1 Applications There are two (2) applications required to establish the CFA Overlay as provided below: 1.1.1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Land Use Element Text and General Land Use Plan Map (File No. CPA-24001) The proposed amendment to the Land Use Element includes text amendments to describe the purpose and applicability of the new Climate Friendly Overlay, as well as the map amendments to establish the 94.4-acre CFA Overlay; and re- designate 27.6 acres within the CFA Overlay area from Medium Density Residential (MRes) to High Density Residential (HRes). 1.1.2 Zoning Text and Map Amendment (File No. ZC-24002) The proposed Zoning Map Amendment applies the CFA Overlay to 94.4 acres and re-zones 27.6 acres from Low Mix Residential (LMR) to Medium Mix Residential (MMR) consistent with the Comprehensive Plan GLUP Map amendment (Figures 3 and 4). The proposed Zoning Text Amendment amends relevant definitions for types of land uses, amends selected transit-oriented development (TOD) standards that apply to the proposed CFA and beyond, and introduces standards for a new CFA overlay zone that allow a broad mix of uses at intensities that support walkable, mixed-use patterns of development. 1.2 Procedural Requirements The proposed amendments include change to a 94.4-acre area within the City, including policy, regulatory and map changes. Given the broad scope of the changes that will apply new policies and regulations, all three (3) applications qualify as major legislative amendments pursuant to CPMC 17.96.300 and CPMC 17.10.300(A) and are being processed using Type IV (Legislative) procedures in a consolidated proceeding. 1.3 Approval Criteria Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments, text and map changes are subject to overlapping approval criteria as follows: • OAR 660-012-0310, Climate Friendly Areas • OAR 660-012-0315, Designation of Climate Friendly Areas • OAR 660-012-0320, Land Use Requirements in Climate Friendly Areas • OAR 660-012-0325, Transportation Review in Climate-Friendly Areas and Centers • OAR 660-012-0330, Land Use Requirements • Statewide Planning Goals • Central Point Comprehensive Plan • CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments • CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and Text Amendments 1.4 Document Organization These findings are presented in four (4) sections as set forth below: 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Applications 1 1.1.1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Land Use Element Text and General Land Use Plan Map (File No. CPA-24001) 1 1.1.2 Zoning Text and Map Amendment (File No. ZC-24002) 2 1.2 Procedural Requirements 2 1.3 Approval Criteria 2 1.4 Document Organization 2 Page 2 of 77 2 Background 9 2.1 CFA Study 9 2.1.1 CFA Candidate Areas 10 2.1.2 Housing Need 11 2.1.3 RVCOG CFA Study Housing Capacity Summary 11 2.1.4 Housing Capacity Analysis Update 12 2.2 Proposed CFA 12 2.2.1 Location 12 2.2.2 Current Land Use 14 2.2.3 Housing Inventory 14 2.3 Proposed Land Use 16 2.4 Anti-Displacement & Housing Production Strategies 16 2.5 Multimodal Gap Summary 24 2.6 Highway Impact Summary 24 3 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 25 3.1 State Climate Friendly Area Rules (OAR 660-012-0310 to 660-012-0330) 25 3.2 Statewide Planning Goals 41 3.2.1 Goal 1— Citizen Involvement 41 3.2.2 Goal 2—Land Use Planning 42 3.2.3 Goal 3—Agricultural Lands 42 3.2.4 Goal 4—Forest Lands 42 3.2.5 Goal 5—Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces 42 3.2.6 Goal 6—Air, Water and Land Resources Quality 43 3.2.7 Goal 7—Areas Subject to Natural Hazards 44 3.2.8 Goal 8—Recreational Needs 44 3.2.9 Goal 9—Economic Development 45 3.2.10 Goal 10—Housing 45 3.2.11 Goal 11—Public Facilities and Services 46 3.2.12 Goal 12— Transportation 47 3.2.13 Goal 13—Energy Utilization 47 3.2.14 Goal 14— Urbanization 47 3.3 Central Point Comprehensive Plan 47 3.3.1 Housing Element 48 3.3.2 Economic Element 55 Page 3 of 77 3.3.3 Land Use Element 60 3.3.4 Transportation Element 63 3.4 CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments 64 3.5 CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and Text Amendments 66 3.6 Summary Conclusion 69 4 Exhibits 70 4.1 Exhibit 1 —Planning Commission Resolution No. 929 71 4.2 Exhibit 2—Planning commission Resolution No. 930 72 4.3 Exhibit 3 —Land Use Element with Redline 73 4.4 Exhibit 4—Zoning Text Amendments 74 4.5 Exhibit 5 —Multimodal Gap Summary 75 4.6 Exhibit 6—Highway Impacts Summary 76 4.7 Exhibit 7—Updated Housing Capacity Analysis Calculations 77 Page 4 of 77 Figure 1. Current GLUP Map Designations within the CFA Overlay Climate Friendly Area (CFA) CENL p N O Cenral Ceral Land Use Mao Designations meg A wa3,n Da*raanll • NON 1#, 1�` iz • s it r i .(79fr7MI ir sr, l leg +kf Zwis sr 4®4s411 IHlei YACnardvy sr el bsir+rt Ut op+l are •..y��y lam...- W. oram,1TiM1wob •.w l•i+C�M1....N.li nwMs 4 �' a.1 .m Page 5of77 Figure 2. Proposed GLUP Map Designations within the CFA Overlay Climate Friendly Area (CFA) CENTRAL POINT Praposec General Land Use Map Designations A F CFA EID6ndwy arrd General laihd USfi Map Darqnarlionts {�f W'irJ hf: 4 CA;h1-A7 ffiYBFLe�{.wba:. . W. •.ai 4srr.Rvarbaneal.Io slaws.11,ea•ai lws V.v•sasr a.��us..s^r.w.n vsw+w aJa.#:n-...x.�..a.a.�_y s a �k' Iv Poo f1-fA's •.a f+�� Page 6 of 77 Figure 3. Current Zoning Designations within the CFA Overlay. CENTRAL Climate FriendlyArea (CFA) POI hir Current Zoning A f L�1h MhDZ III 2 1.0 IIIII 1 p•r4R 1 Ft4R CFABwrfdrry Cartcrr, 7t491 a.,v x*,r.*4 ;AP`:ear 0r.w .:6 Jammu:, >.a Lin. ..M„+..ml•� f f 1 1 Page 7 of 77 Figure 4. Proposed Zoning Designations within the CFA Overlay A. Climate Friendly Area (CFA) CENTRAL POI NT Proposed Zoning A r 1 ._ F1 ik F4I R 1h1C Mgt h1Nk T� 101 Hr4R 1.3 A!hounder'.Nnd Proposed ZonP+q �r.w..r:,w X. ar.:....r._,..m sv ws•LIN%MW1 6w�L1nthem .IS mroeW s Y+ v-� ss�.nrra.�.�ua�^e..w�e vv.e Page 8 of 77 2 Background The City of Central Point has been committed to promoting multi-modal transportation options through the use of compact land development patterns and complete street design and construction for over two decades. These land management approaches have received increasing attention as an important way to reduce reliance on passenger vehicles by promoting active transportation, such as walking and cycling. On March 10, 2022, Governor Kate Brown issued Executive Order 20-04, directing state agencies to reduce climate pollution. The Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) adopted Climate Friendly & Equitable Communities (CFEC) rules in July 2022, which fundamentally alters the way communities plan for and implement land use and transportation and includes designation of Climate Friendly Areas (CFAs). Since LCDC's adoption of the CFEC rules, the City of Central Point has accomplished the following: • Eliminated off-street parking mandates in alignment with OAR 660-012-0420; • Reformed parking lot design standards to increase tree canopy coverage and promote solar power generation and Electric Vehicle (EV) charging capacity in alignment in OAR 660-012-0405 and 660-012-0410; and, • Studied potential CFA locations. At this time, the City is establishing a CFA to meet OAR 660-012-0310 to 660-012-0320 sized to accommodate at least 30% of Central Point's current and future housing needs within a mixed-use district where residents, workers and visitors can meet most of their daily needs via a multimodal system that provides frequent, comfortable, and convenient connections to key destinations within the city and the region. Parking lots within CFAs are not required. However, if provided, they are designed to provide abundant tree canopy and other design elements that support pedestrian and bicycle use. 2.1 CFA Study In 2023, the City partnered with the Rogue Valley Council of Governments (RVCOG), 3J Consulting and the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) to study potential CFA locations in Central Point (Exhibit 6). The Study documents the 8- step process including: 1. Develop a Community Engagement Plan; 2. Locate CFA candidate areas; 3. Size the CFA to accommodate 30% of current and projected housing needs; 4. Evaluate existing development standards for conformance with CFA requirements; 5. Identify needed zoning changes, if any; 6. Calculate CFA capacity; 7. Conduct an equity analysis to improve outcomes for underserved populations; and, 8. Complete the Study. Page 9 of 77 2.1.1 CFA Candidate Areas The CFA Study identified two CFA boundary scenarios on the east side of Interstate 5 both including lands within the Eastside Transit Oriented Development (ETOD) Overlay area. Scenario 1 was roughly 110 acres and included lands outside the ETOD west of Bear Creek that are planned for heavy commercial use and open space (Figure 5). Scenario 2 is roughly 86 acres and has the same boundary as Scenario 1 minus the lands west of Bear Creek (Figure 6). Proposed CFA Overlay implements the Scenario 2 boundary. Figure 5. CFA Study:Scenario 1 Candidate Area FE 4 q I ., s CiItT1,lTE FRIENDLY AREA E41. r"-- --, Multiple Family . CANDIOA.TES Ii \\I le:53 -: lay.od ; _ 1 Civic -r ' .tL 1 MC! l NNW iSing I RCS C ili �>-,, aacrr,a :as,how y1.NtiGAA. 41 " t 4w a — Ill .0.6.111.�uhY.-144 ..14%a i PNO TM MTu'_4Ai1M f11P.3{ y-- * it R.TI 1�W IR slims 1w.LMSNnn( ' ��r^_' 1 .2 .. pvtak MwYe .risk WYPiWY. f.. �,I YSiLlsi .,aw 1 Aawa4_Blii�.ill Trtl,.ai....", b:.. Page 10 of 77 Figure 6. CFA Study:Scenario 2 Candidate Area FE CANDIDATES iES N[MY A4fff�A — , _ i y ! Mulb&�$Family • Residential Civic trrs7�r�.r-.6.sxo.. ..�...., r• Singi efiao a Rea 11, gico ado mis 1/0 1ae ^ 4111,Ai.is{rnrY(skid►:h .06.1064.40.1.11,1 2.1.2 Housing Need The Central Point CFA study relied on the acknowledged Housing Needs Analysis to determine the current and future housing needs in the CFA (Table 1). Based on evaluation of current and future housing, the CFA is required to provide zoned building capacity for 2,926 dwelling units. Table 1. CFA Housin• Needs Table 1. CFA Housing Needs 2019 Existing Housing Units 6,864 2039 Forecast Units Needed 2,887 Total Needed Housing Units 9,751 Required CFA Housing Capacity (No. Units) 2,926 2.1.3 RVCOG CFA Study Housing Capacity Summary Based on the City's acknowledged Housing Needs Analysis for 2019-2039, the City has 6,684 and needs an additional 2,887 units to accommodate forecast population growth. In accordance with OAR 660-012-0315(1), the CFA Overlay must have zoned capacity to accommodate 30% of the current and forecast housing need, which is equivalent to 2,926 housing units. The RVCOG Housing Capacity Analysis for the proposed CFA Overlay/Scenario 2 is provided on Pages 43-46 in Exhibit 6. The analysis calculated housing capacity for each of the zones within the CFA was based on the land use distribution in Table 2. Page 11 of 77 Table 2. Ori•inal CFA Scenario 2 Land Use Distribution Gross and Net Develo•able Acrea.e NDA CFA Study Scenario 2 Land Use Distribution (Acres) LMR MMR HMR Civic EC Total 22 37 7.43 6 14.14 86.57 Based on the above distribution and the assumed block lengths (360' * 260'), the CFA Study concluded that the CFA Overlay area would have capacity to accommodate 3,779 units, which exceeds the required zoned housing capacity by 853 units. 2.1.4 Housing Capacity Analysis Update The City's proposed CFA Overlay does not modify the Scenario 2 boundary. However, review of the study identified several changes needed to update to the Housing Capacity Analysis calculations: reducing the assumed maximum block length from 360- ft to 350-ft consistent with OAR 660-012-0310(2)(a) and updating the acreages based on the proposed land use and zoning changes being adopted as part of the project (Table 3). Table 3. Corrected Land Use Distribution Gross and Net Develo•able Acrea•e NDA CFA Overlay Corrected Land Use Distribution (Acres)1 LMR MMR HMR Civic EC Total Gross Acres 0 71.0 7.4 5.9 10.1 94.4 NDA 0 50.2 5.3 4.2 7.1 66.8 The updated Housing Capacity Analysis indicates that the proposed CFA Overlay can accommodate 4,056 dwelling units based on the proposed land use distribution, which continues to exceed the zoned housing capacity requirement to provide 2,926 units. (See Exhibit 7.) 2.2 Proposed CFA 2.2.1 Location The City's CFA is located within a portion of the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay east of Interstate 5 (Figure 7). The 94.4-gross-acre CFA is bound by East Pine Street to the South, Hamrick Road to the east, Bear Creek to the west and undeveloped lands planned for residential use to the north. The CFA is within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) with roughly 29.4 acres located outside the city limits boundary. 1 Acreages for the updated Housing Capacity Analysis are based on calculation of GIS shapefile geometry for zoning district boundaries,tax lots and right-of-way deductions.This accounts for the minor discrepancies in the net acreage totals for the CFA between Table 1 and 2. Page 12 of 77 Figure 7. CFA Overlay Aerial Photo Showing Existing conditions A CENTRAL Climate FriendlyArea (CFA) POINT Existing Conditions .i , f g . x i ., . II ///, / • Ifs i 't I .. • . 1 1 H, . ..* . : • . ' . I ' _ ,, R ., ,..�s pt; — Ha _., ; # P :yy F Y 1 yit I a CFA Fanning�Condihono JI mot_ r 1. 1. ' ''''*' _ \ , _i .. ... '�,..I.fl•Res. M N.M' J'Sf1i•Ma..tivelr 11F d. *Y.r�r P.. f' i—..f AR I Y .�.� L ? Page 13 of 77 2.2.2 Current Land Use The current land use and zoning provides for a mix of medium and high density housing, civic and commercial uses (Figure 1 and 3; and Table 4). Table 4. CFA Current Land Use and Zoning Distribution Current Land Use Gross Acreage Current Zoning Gross Acreage Medium Density 27.6 Low Mix 27.6 Residential Residential (LMR) (MRes) High Density 50.8 Medium Mix 43.4 Residential (HRes) Residential (MMR) High Mix 7.4 Residential (HMR) Employment 10.1 Employment 10.1 Commercial Commercial Civic 5.9 Civic 5.9 TOTALS: 94.4 94.4 Existing Right-of- Existing Right-of- Way 9.09 Way 9.09 Total Net Total Net Acreage: 85.3 Acreage: 85.3 2.2.3 Housing Inventory Based on the most current tax assessor's records and the City's Buildable Lands Inventory, the CFA has 62 residential dwelling units, including the following housing types (Table 5): • Single-family Detached (SFRD) • Single-family Attached (SFRA) • Mobile Home • Manufactured Dwelling (MFD) • Multifamily Apartments • Dwelling Group • Residential Care Home According to the Oregon Affordable Housing Inventory2, there are no existing or pending income-restricted affordable housing units within the CFA Overlay. However, there are two newer developments on Hamrick Road including a 12 unit apartment building with four (4) accessible ground floor units and a single-story, 15-unit residential care facility that is designed for accessibility. Although the mortgage and/or rental rates are unknown for the housing stock within the proposed CFA, there is a 1972 single-wide mobile home, a 1977 double-wide manufactured dwelling and a 2019 manufactured dwelling. These units are typically more affordable home ownership options. 2 https://geo.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=cdd80b0c47054fbbbc8995055ae6fe6b Page 14 of 77 Table 5. CFA Tax Lot and Housing Inventory CFA Overlay Tax Lot and Housin• Inventory Address Year No. MapLot Account Acreage Number Street Name guilt Housing Type Units 372W01CB1100 10195515 0.48 4475 HAMRICK RD 2021 Multifamily Apartments 12 372W022900 10195881 6.67 BEEBE RD 1978 WA 0 372W01 BC 10200 10195339 0.17 444 BEEBE RD 1957 SFRD 1 372W01C2400 10195572 1.05 495 BEEBE RD 1956 SFRD 1 372W01 BC 10100 10195321 1.66 446 BEEBE RD 1954 SFRD 1 372W020200 10195921 1.00 511 BEEBE RD t950 SFRD 1 372W01C1800 10195507 0.26 4497 HAMRICK RD 1949 SFRD.ADU 2 372W01C2200 10195540 0.76 443 BEEBE RD 1949 SFRD 1 372W01C2300 10195556 1.18 477 BEEBE RD 1949 WA 0 372W01C2500 10195581 1.04 507 BEEBE RD 1949 SFRD 1 372W01C1700 10195491 0.57 4511 HAMRICK RD 1947 SFRD.ADU 2 372W01CB1000 10195523 0.91 4461 HAMRICK RD 1947 Dwelling Group 3 372W01BC10000 101953t2 2.27 4615 HAMRICK RD 1910 NiA 0 372W023000 10195899 8.57 628 BEEBE RD 1900 N/A 0 372W01BC9900 10195299 4.06 456 BEEBE RD 0 Vacant 0 372W01C2301 10195564 1.18 445 BEEBE RD 1972 Mobile Home 1 372W01CB900 10195531 0.72 4439 HAMRICK RD 2013 Residential Care 15 372W022700 10195872 14.39 718 BEEBE RD 0 Vacant 0 372W022701 10575641 0.41 BEEBE RD 0 Vacant 0 372W023100 10/95904 5.49 600 BEEBE RD 0 Church 0 372W02D100 10195947 21.12 1777 E PINE ST 0 Vacant 0 372W02D300 10195939 8.95 587 BEEBE RD 1977 Manufactured Home 1 372W020300 10195939 0.21 587 BEEBE RD 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD100 11014132 0.08 4762 GEBHARD RD 2024 SFRA.ADU 2 372W02AD200 11014133 0.08 4758 GEBHARD RD 2024 SFRA 1 3721N42AD300 11014134 0.06 4754 GEBHARD RD 2024 SFRA 1 372W02AD400 11014135 0.08 4750 GEBHARD RD 2024 SFRA.ADU 2 372W02AD500 11014136 0.08 4746 GEBHARD RD 2024 SFRA ADU 2 372W02AD600 11014137 0.06 4742 GEBHARD RD 2024 SFRA.ADU 2 372W02AD700 11014138 0.08 4738 GEBHARD RD 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD800 11014139 0.06 4734 GEBHARD RD 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD900 11014140 0.06 4730 GEBHARD RD 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD1000 11014141 0.08 4726 GEBHARD RD 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD1100 11014142 0.06 4722 GEBHARD RD 0 Vacant 0 372W02ADt200 11014143 0.08 4718 GEBHARD RD 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD1300 11014144 0.08 4714 GEBHARD RD 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD1400 11014145 0.06 4710 GEBHARD RD 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD1500 11014146 0.06 4706 GEBHARD RD 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD1600 11014147 0.07 4702 GEBHARD RD 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD1700 11014148 0.08 1101 ANNALISE ST 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD1800 11014149 0.06 1105 ANNALISE ST 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD1900 11014150 0.06 1109 ANNALISE ST 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD2000 11014/51 0.06 1113 ANNALISE ST 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD2100 11014152 0.06 1117 ANNALISE ST 0,Vacant 0 372W02AD2200 11014153 0.06 1 121 ANNALISE ST 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD2300 11014154 0.06 1125 ANNALISE ST 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD2400 11014155 0.08 1129 ANNALISE ST 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD2500 11014156 0.08 1133 ANNALISE ST 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD2600 11014157 0.06 1137 ANNALISE ST 0 Vacant 0 372W02AD2700 11014158 0.08 1141 ANNALISE ST 2024 SFRA ADU 2 372W02AD2800 11014159 0.06 1145 ANNALISE ST 2024 SFRA.ADU 2 372W02AD2900 11014160 0.06 1149 ANNALISE ST 2024 SFRA 1 372W02AD3000 11014161 0.06 1153 ANNALISE ST 2024 SFRA.ADU 2 372W02AD3100 11014162 0.06 1157 ANNALISE ST 2024 SFRA 1 372W02AD3200 11014163 0.08 1161 ANNALISE ST 2024 SFRA.ADU 2 TOTALS: 85.32 62 Page 15 of 77 2.3 Proposed Land Use The proposed land use, as shown in Table 6, would change the land use and zoning of 27.6 gross acres from Medium Density Residential (MRes) and Low Mix Residential (LMR) to High Density Residential (HRes) and Medium Mix Residential (MMR). The change will facilitate a greater variety of housing types, increased density and building heights consistent with the CFA land use requirements. Table 6. Pro•osed CFA Land Use and Zonin. Distribution Proposed Land Gross Acreages Current Zoning Gross Acreage Use Medium Density 0 Low Mix 0 Residential Residential (LMR) (MRes) High Density 78.4 Medium Mix 71 Residential (HRes) Residential (MMR) High Mix 7.4 Residential (HMR) Employment 10.1 Employment 10.1 Commercial Commercial Civic 5.9 Civic 5.9 Total Gross Total Gross Acreage: 94.4 Acreage: 94.4 Existing Right-of- Existing Right-of- Way 9.09 Way 9.09 Total Net Total Net Acreage: 85.3 Acreage: 85.3 2.4 Anti-Displacement & Housing Production Strategies As part of the CFA Overlay designation project, the City has identified and selected housing production strategies that aim to mitigate impacts of gentrification on state and federal protected classes. Gentrification occurs when redevelopment results in attractive, modernized and competitively priced developments that can displace protected classes. The 2023 City of Central Point Climate Friendly Area Study evaluated the neighborhood typology within the CFA Overlay area using the DLCD Anti- Displacement Map, which classifies neighborhoods based on their income profile, vulnerable classes, amount of precarious housing, housing market activity and overall neighborhood demographic change. There are seven neighborhood typologies: 1. Affordable and Vulnerable. 2. Early Gentrification 3. Active Gentrification 4. Late Gentrification 5. Becoming Exclusive 6. Advanced Exclusive 7. Unassigned Page 16 of 77 As shown in Figure 11, the CFA Overlay area is within the Late Gentrification neighborhood typology. This type of neighborhood does not have predominantly low- income households, but still has a population that is vulnerable to gentrification. By definition, the housing market in this neighborhood typology exhibits high housing prices with high appreciations as they have a relatively low share of precarious housing. The neighborhoods in this typology typically have experienced significant changes in demographics related to gentrification. RVCOG identified several potential housing production strategies to minimize impacts on existing population displacement, promote housing affordability and equitable outcomes within Categories A through F in Figure 8. (Exhibit 2) Also worth noting is that although the CFA Overlay area is identified as a Late Gentrification neighborhood typology, there are relatively few existing homes in the area (62 homes in 94.4 acres, as shown in Table 5) and the majority of the overlay area is undeveloped. Thus, there are significant opportunities to introduce housing affordable to a range of households as new housing is built to promote equitable outcomes, in addition to anti-displacement strategies. Figure 8.Anti-displacement Strategy Categories I`ut au IJ JTfa R'J II Y'JI./IJ'I::Nt LLI IUM'I:711J1R`JMa•uRaIuw1 Category at Zanl-rp n c1 wilt:Changes wa:t J INL`elr y y'J J IL I•JF:Ly!wr1•y.lrJ tv..ruin td►t x 1rtiw Wall It Irrr lit: ,i.Wa w:ual v^n a wa.ro'v:etty[yas a:a TM_ rrtn rtrai;kc Adman Imam I p:,y to ixrn,rt net 1atad41 h:.aiiryl C:luvey^II 'He' Ita.rIuma,ltrt'ullIgry,errarmmnnll, I:tear_. i &in tiMltUMi a/ateltll.tw'l.I"Jlys'rl r1Nsal•:Ora'-S sUadew.la. Callrgrty C F 1rara:llll IncBlillyta I'434 ant a Itlal IJlaraaal tl Lll;Jwa UH._l•cVJ.4J:Ire Lail y1N W Iaan si alums-aps hart W yrvr4:a INaYW honing eYL IItY'3 J!'y t^aar all I tiI u!IaVA.wt it imagismal lit,k1:el Vailt1AI!Siting!%M 11 \�77i��•7. 1'Hili11+L`111)RaiiI.iur jt. hat:an FiiuiN r1:w#lit IuJltil'.tNgRSA Taw"wolf.ut Mau flldatia mM itr lmprn.:ah antra kr aftrrdatla hstr;rq Ii-sa zest III a lu rtl'la**MOW,J.ad phanaITwr pinJtxrr. 1II JM tlnrahs Catcapnl'•E Tal Et crti a..t ind A6Gdi2rnotN n■rrn.rtgt Asm4yJnr to ptMtln epuhp. I-awe III JJJlapan J II4I•Jr:Lly Irlr.lit larta J f11414 IH.uIt,.UN 4aIJf ul CategcryF t_-anc.act.Ilslbcr Lsax,and ParinorshIF'I rdl:r math trail y.IlaA MI&deka,twatsy ea wits-la. h•cater Numb;am:Ir.i nn Smarltt n:r'ki 1In nart4.creak A Ittatrigh F CafwgnNy a .I' CI aJt.alr t t1tgntt 4Ir?talattlrina•akhta m lrpinrrerr a.11 hn n it lard M rt:etart to kid IA eV 5 To encourage production of affordable housing and mitigate displacement of protected classes, the City has identified the following current and proposed strategies: 1. Eliminate Ground Floor Commercial Requirement (Category A). The City's proposed CFA Overlay allows affordable multifamily housing and single-family attached housing within the Employment Commercial (EC) zone without any ground-floor commercial requirement. This is a departure from current regulations in the EC zone, which only permits multifamily residential when located above ground-floor commercial. According to the market feasibility analysis, there is low demand for mixed-use development with ground floor commercial and residential units above at this location. By eliminating the ground floor requirement for affordable multifamily housing, the City is encouraging provision of affordable housing along with attached single-family that is typically more affordable at market rates. Page 17 of 77 Strategy: Allow affordable multifamily affordable housing without ground floor commercial and single-family attached as permitted uses. Status: Will be completed with CFA adoption. The provisions are included in the proposed code amendments for the CFA Overlay. Monitoring: Track and report the number of inquiries/land use applications/permits and units constructed. Although the City cannot mandate the construction of housing at this location, we can promote it through more flexible regulations. If we start to see this strategy generating development interest or action, this will provide an opportunity to expand this housing production strategy to other areas and in other zones that have ground floor commercial requirements. 2. Public Facility Planning/Urban Renewal (Category B). There is a 21-acre area within the CFA that is included in the City's Urban Renewal District. This property is planned and zoned for high density residential and Employment Commercial uses. Per the City's Transportation System Plan, Gebhard Road, a Collector, will be extended from the north part of the CFA to East Pine Street at a future signalized intersection (Figure 9). This future roadway project will be completed as a function of development in the area and will provide for multimodal connections between existing and future streets in the CFA. Due to lack of existing development in the area, System Development Charge (SDC) credits available are limited to the cost of roadway construction above the local street standard. Additionally, a large segment of the roadway extension and the signal at East Pine Street are identified in the Downtown and East Pine Street Corridor Revitalization Plan as eligible projects to receive urban renewal funding, which can help incentivize both residential and commercial development at this location, which may be a catalyst for more residential development throughout the CFA. Page 18 of 77 Figure 9. Urban Renewal Boundary and the Gebhard Road Extension Project. C+ty of Central Poini Urban Renewal Boundary at_rva MU — s 0 thtan Renewal Botrbiary - " Urban Renewal Parcels -„vi,,,. cs,-14,0tv.:';'&;,`. - t, \ "ii �t 'fir ,(,.Irk,' 'fV r_ t.. \\, ,.•,,0"...*,,,:•4,,t W.c0.;',, 1.1 14 1---:,... \__, r 7 t f ciihii w, 4 .Illf I , }} �\ \ : ' \ _, \ e r1 . • . Strategy: Make funding available for the portion of the Gebhard Road extension project and East Pine Street signal. Status: In Progress. The projects have been in the Urban Renewal Plan since 2012. There are development restrictions on the subject property from the prior landowner, which has been an impediment to the site's development. The City will continue to work with developers and discuss this funding opportunity subject to performance of the Urban Renewal District. Monitoring: Report on any funds allocated through Urban Renewal and the number of units and estimated jobs produced as a result. 3. Multiple Unit Tax Exemption Program (Category E). The City will pursue formation of a Multiple Unit Tax Exemption Program (MUPTE) to promote the development of multifamily housing types, including middle housing (e.g. duplex, triplex, fourplex, cottage clusters) within portions of in the City, including but not limited to the CFA. The community has a vision to maintain the community's small-town feel as it grows. In conversations with community members, small- town feel is derived from a combination of community connectivity and human- Page 19 of 77 scale design. More work is needed to understand the community's definition of small-town relative to design features as part of the MUPTE program creation. Notwithstanding, the preliminary concept is to incentivize the development of higher density multifamily developments that apply site and building form and design that is human-scale; promotes connectivity between the public and private realms to foster social connection; informal street surveillance for crime prevention and safety, multimodal transportation features and housing affordability. Strategy: Pursue formation of a MUPTE Program that applies to the CFA. Include public features that support multimodal transportation, design components that align with the small-town preference of the community and housing affordability. Status: Not Started. Monitoring: Report on the formation of the MUPTE Program, including stakeholder engagement to customize the program to meet community needs and preferences, adoption, implementation and units produced. 4. Middle Housing Pre-Approved Plans (Category B). The City allows several forms of middle housing, such as accessory dwelling units (ADUs), townhomes, duplexes, triplexes, four plexes and dwelling groups. However, some forms of middle housing have not been produced (i.e. stacked duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes; dwelling groups/cottage clusters). To promote middle housing types, reduce applicant cost, uncertainty and processing timelines, the City plans to budget for professional services to develop pre-approved plans. Due to the small size of the City and funding availability, this strategy will be considered during budget planning relative to other professional and contract services needs for the City's Planning Department and whether this strategy has worked. Our vision is to create a growing set of plans that can be used in the CFA and other areas of the City. Strategy: Hire an architect to develop pre-approved plans including but not limited to: ADUs, stacked duplexes/triplexes/fourplexes, live-work units. Status: Not Started. Monitoring: Performance of this strategy will be based on development of the pre-approved plans and frequency of their use measured annually and overtime. This strategy will be successful if it increases the development of middle housing. Page 20 of 77 5. Partnerships (Category F). The City has a history of working collaboratively with the private sector and non-profits to support development of affordable housing projects with in-kind staff support and resources as they are available. Past actions taken to support housing development have included city-initiated land use/zoning changes, public improvement assistance, and right-of-way vacations. The City will continue to partner with private, non-profit and governmental agencies to support affordable and market rate housing production, as well as by providing financial contributions to directly support vulnerable populations in the community (e.g. St. Vincent de Paul, Access, etc.). Strategy: Partner with the public and private sector and non-profits to directly support vulnerable populations in the community, incentivize and remove obstacles to housing production in the City. Status: Ongoing. Recently, the City has partnered with the Housing Authority of Jackson County to prepare a site for mixed-income housing development through adoption of Comprehensive Plan and zoning map amendments (Ordinances 2111 and 2112) and approval of a partition (PAR- 23002). The preliminary development plan shown in Figure 10 was the subject of a Pre-Application Conference held on October 19, 2021 for the site. Monitoring: Report on annual financial assistance and in-kind support to produce housing, support vulnerable populations. Page 21 of 77 Figure 10. Preliminary Development Plan, 1777 East Pine Street(Submitted for 2021 Pre-Application Conference) .wh. '."'J•-'•9A k kf, r -ice. ---- ". . . A w 1F 1 s y .i:• '#. '�`a:. .r. s � ; { 11 .' 'f• 1 r -►e rr—yc d 4 •� 1,.'1 'rt •, • '-; ' i,. 1 a rf 33 • l • "�A+l++,. Ft dear) • y . ••l`1,•1' . [ ' • Yr 1. . ` f-�`kSM./•*.if-Ot.• �;INIli.•. •cw :,1-:,12/� +t.•7a�,'. ;,..0 •%•+ I 1. .7.•-S . I �.,�.. 1 1!•s ?•iriftkir 1 - Ir , , .ti II 77ck.s.,*- • ..? ''f'.jf P• 'fie s- r '7 V • r•-", ;.Y° e: '" r�,-17 2. •'.�..0 '.1.`. .". •.:sue' - --..43 +ia l .� r 4b•,• .;,_, ..—K*41 ;Z=L,Its/'r:f` r•.. . •k•J . :,,4 -.•`.`, •• '. ._.= , i•ttix r! }1� .� 'r• L. F 1 ,.r• ••'� ri S ry ti• 1. .Ih IrI• Y, 41,E _} 4 . �1 .1. I :••r . ,'•:.y.. :s`y...• I „.,-: 1 �..:f • } i►fk.V . I • Page 22 of 77 Figure 101. Central Point CFA Anti-Displacement Map Central Point CFA Overlay Anti-Displacement Map �,�bUIl Wmv Kn'n,;""War ./a•v••. lt•,,n ur Rs4 C" oe'.""IblA kd . • J? Sr � l..le C" 1 2/2 712 02 4 1 1?,939 Anti_Displacernent_Typologies_2022 II (,I of 0 15 031m 0 0.13 D25 0.5km Late gentrification <Null> trn Cerm.n�r Y.w Cu4iwlo...Ch el Madam/Cem1'u+•wlr.:Al Jr.Wr" 14I. hale. I.I.B el Orpwr r:EU Evr I,,Tren Unrtn � Suihr r1r )•T4Tr.fuyK I,.RET&N434_u94S BuY.V J WYr rb•opirron EP.L MP5.U3Caraxl6441a"USDA U6f+e3 .J,,1 Page 23 of 77 2.5 Multimodal Gap Summary Pursuant to OAR 660-012-0325(4), the City has prepared a Multimodal Gap Summary that summarizes the existing multimodal inventory, including the street, bicycle, pedestrian and transit system. Since the CFA is largely undeveloped, there are significant gaps in the system that require urban upgrades, new bicycle lanes, sidewalks and transit stops. The multimodal system gaps and infill approaches are also addressed in the Multimodal Gap Summary document (Exhibit 4) 2.6 Highway Impact Summary Pursuant to OAR 660-012-0325(5), the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) coordinated with the City to prepare a Highway Impact Summary since the CFA is within the Interchange Area Management Plan area for Exit 33 (Exhibit 6). The highway impact summary identifies how the highway system will be impacted by implementation of the CFA and includes the following components: • Summary of the changes in development capacity based on the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments; • Summary of additional vehicle trips during the 20-year planning period (2019- 2039); • Summary of traffic related injuries and deaths within the CFA during the past 5- years; The Highway Impact Summary considers that the CFA is already planned and zoned to be a higher density, mixed-use neighborhood within the City's Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay. It concludes that changes from the current undeveloped conditions will result in an impact to the highway system. However, the impact resulting from the proposed land use and zoning will be less than the impact of the current plan for land use/zoning. This accounts for the decrease in the commercial land. Page 24 of 77 3 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law The City of Central Point has been committed to promoting multi-modal transportation Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law must show compliance with relevant Oregon Administrative Rules (OARs) for Climate Friendly Areas (CFAs), statewide planning goals, the Central Point Comprehensive Plan, and approval criteria for comprehensive plan and zoning map and text amendments in the Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC). 3.1 State Climate Friendly Area Rules (OAR 660-012-0310 to 660-012-0330) OAR 660-012-0310: Climate-Friendly Areas (1) This rule, OAR 660-012-0315, and OAR 660-012-0320 apply to cities and counties that: (a) Are within a metropolitan area other than the Portland Metropolitan Area; (b) Are inside incorporated cities or areas within an urban growth boundary as provided in section (3); and (c) Have a population of more than 5,000 within an urban growth boundary. (2) Cities and counties shall study and zone climate-friendly areas for locations that meet the following requirements. (a) Locations able to support development consistent with the land use requirements of OAR 660-012-0320. (b) The locations shall be in existing or planned urban centers, including downtowns, neighborhood centers, transit-served corridors, or similar districts. To the extent practicable, climate-friendly areas should be located within, or in close proximity to, areas planned for, or provided with, high-density residential uses and a high concentration of employment opportunities. (c) The locations shall be in areas that are served, or planned for service, by high quality pedestrian, bicycle, and transit services. (d) The locations shall not be in areas where development is limited or disallowed by provisions adopted pursuant to Statewide Planning Goal 7. Climate-friendly areas may be designated in such areas if the local government has adopted requirements for development that will mitigate potential hazards to life and property, in compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 7. (e) Cities may designate climate-friendly areas within the urban growth boundary, but outside the city limits boundary, if the following requirements are met: (A) The area is contiguous with the city limits boundary; (B) The provision of urban services is contingent upon annexation into the city limits and the area is readily serviceable with urban water, sewer, stormwater, and transportation. "Readily serviceable" means that urban infrastructure services are nearby and could be provided to allow construction on the site within one year of an application for a building permit; Page 25 of 77 (C) The zoning that will be applied upon annexation, based on the city's comprehensive plan designation for the area, is consistent with climate- friendly area requirements; (D) The county in which the subject area is located has adopted a consistent comprehensive plan designation for the area; and (E) The city can demonstrate that at least 70 percent of complete annexation applications within the last five years have been approved within one year of the date of complete annexation application. (f) Climate-friendly areas shall have a minimum width of 750 feet, including any internal rights of way that may be unzoned. Contiguous climate-friendly areas with distinct land use requirements may be considered cumulatively to demonstrate compliance with the minimum width requirement. Exceptions to these minimum dimensional requirements are allowed due to natural barriers, such as rivers; or due to long-term barriers in the built environment, such as freeways. Exceptions are also allowed if potential climate-friendly areas are constrained by adjacent areas planned and zoned to meet industrial land needs. Finding, OAR 660-012-0310: The City of Central Point is subject to the CFA requirements, per section (1). The proposed CFA is located within a planned urban center, an area designated and zoned as the Eastside Transit Oriented District (ETOD) since 2000. The ETOD is intended to and zoned for a range of commercial, employment and residential uses at a range of densities and mix of housing types, with additional proposed code amendments to fully align with the CFA land use requirements in OAR 660-012-0320, satisfying subsections (2)(a) and (b). (CPMC 17.65 to 17.69, as proposed.) Bicycle lanes and sidewalks are planned for all arterials and collectors within the ETOD; because this area is largely undeveloped, most of these facilities will be constructed at the time of future development. (2030 TSP, Figure 8.1.) Within the ETOD, the City has adopted additional standards addressing the design of sidewalks within commercial areas, including provisions for landscaping, lighting, delineation, and on-site connectivity between adjacent developments to provide an environment that encourages walking. (2030 TSP, Section 8.6.) The proposed CFA is also adjacent to the Bear Creek Greenway, a 20-mile, multi-use path from Central Point south to Ashland that serves both transportation and recreational uses. (2030 TSP, Section 8.9.) The Rogue Valley Transportation District (RVTD) incorporates the proposed CFA as a planned transit-oriented development and a new transit route is proposed to serve the area as part of the Short-term Preferred System— 2027, with implementation underway for 2025. (2040 Transit Master Plan, Figure 25.) Together the planned bicycle, pedestrian and transit improvement will provide high-quality service to the proposed CFA, satisfying subsection (2)(c). There are no areas within the proposed CFA that are Goal 7 identified hazard areas, satisfying subsection (2)(d). (Comprehensive Plan Environmental Management Element, page VI-29.) Page 26 of 77 While the majority of the proposed CFA is within the City limits, a 29.4-acre portion is outside the current limits within the UGB. Per subsection (e), the area is contiguous with the existing City limits and is readily serviceable, per adopted utility master plans. Comprehensive plan designations and zoning consistent with the CFA requirements are proposed with this application, as shown in Figures 2 and 4. The City has approved 100% of recent annexation applications: five applications were submitted within the past five years and approved within one year. (Council Resolutions 1613, 1690, 1723, 1747, and 1774.) The proposed CFA is approximately 2,700 feet north-south and 1,200 feet east- west at its narrowest along E Pine Street, satisfying subsection (2)(f). Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0310: This rule is met. OAR 660-012-0315, Designation of Climate Friendly Areas (1) The designation of climate-friendly areas refers to the process of studying potential climate-friendly areas and adopting land use requirements and climate-friendly elements into comprehensive plans, as provided in this rule. Cities and counties subject to the requirements of OAR 660-012-0310 with a population greater than 10,000 shall designate climate-friendly areas sufficient to accommodate at least 30 percent of the total identified number of housing units necessary to meet all current and future housing needs by calculating zoned building capacity as provided in section (2), or using an alternative methodology as provided in OAR 660-012-0320(10). (a) A local government may designate one or more climate-friendly areas to accommodate at least 30 percent of housing units. (b) The total number of housing units necessary to meet all current and future housing needs shall be determined from the local government's most recently adopted and acknowledged analysis of housing capacity and needed housing consistent with ORS 197.296 at the time it was adopted, by adding the total number of existing dwelling units identified in the buildable land inventory to the anticipated number of future needed housing units over the planning period of the housing capacity analysis. Finding, OAR 660-012-0315(1): The City's population exceeds 10,000 and is subject to this section. One CFA is proposed to accommodate 30% of housing units, determined to be 2,926 units. (See calculation of housing need in Section 2.1.2.) Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0315(1): This rule is met. (2) Cities and counties subject to section (1) shall calculate the housing unit capacity within climate-friendly areas, as follows: (a) Regardless of existing development in a climate-friendly area, determine the potential square footage of zoned building capacity for each net developable area based on proposed development standards for the climate-friendly area, including applicable setbacks, allowed building heights, open space requirements, on-site parking requirements, and all other applicable regulations that would impact the developable site area. Within developed areas with no blocks greater than 5.5 Page 27 of 77 acres, analysis of net developable areas may be conducted for each city block, without regard to property boundaries within the block. Within areas of 5.5 acres or more bounded by streets, the local government shall assume the same ratio of gross land area to net land area as that which exists in the most fully developed urban center within the city or county. (b) Where the local government has not established a maximum building height, i assumed building height shall be 85 feet. For the purpose of calculating zoned building capacity, cities and counties may assume the following number of floors within multistory buildings, based on allowed building heights: (A) Thirty feet allows two floors. (B) Forty feet allows three floors. (C) Fifty feet allows for four floors. (D) Sixty feet allows for five floors. (E) Seventy-five feet allows for six floors. (F) Eighty-five feet allows for seven floors. (c) If a local government allows height bonuses above the maximum building heights used for calculations in subsection (b), the local government may include 25 percent of that additional zoned building capacity when the bonuses: (A)Allow building heights above the minimums established in OAR 660-012- 0320(8); and, (B) Allow height bonuses for publicly-subsidized housing serving households with an income of 80 percent or less of the area median household income, or height bonuses for the construction of accessible dwelling units, as defined in OAR 660-008-0050(4)(a), in excess of minimum requirements. (d) Local governments shall assume that residential dwellings will occupy 30 percent of the zoned building capacity calculated in subsections (a), (b), and (c) within climate-friendly areas. Public parks and open space areas within climate- friendly areas that are precluded from development shall not be included in calculations of zoned building capacity, but may be counted towards minimum area and dimensional requirements for climate-friendly areas. Zoning and development standards for public parks and open space areas are exempted from compliance with the land use requirements in OAR 660-012-0320 if the existing zoning standards do not allow residential, commercial, or office uses. (e) Local governments shall assume an average dwelling unit size of 900 square feet. Local governments shall use the average dwelling unit size to convert the square footage of zoned residential building capacity calculated in subsection (d) into an estimate of the number of dwelling units that may be accommodated in the climate-friendly area. Finding, OAR 660-012-0315(2): The proposed CFA has been shown to have capacity to accommodate 4,056 housing units using the methodology in this section. (See Housing Capacity Analysis Update in Section 2.1.4 and Exhibit 7.) Page 28 of 77 Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0315(2): This rule is met. [...] (6) Cities and counties must adopt land use requirements as provided in OAR 660-012- 0320, and clearly identify the climate-friendly areas in their comprehensive plan maps, comprehensive plans, zoning maps, or zoning codes; indicated by land use designation, overlay zone, or similar mechanisms. Adoption of land use requirements and findings for the plan, code, or map amendment shall include the following: (a) Cities and counties subject to section (1) shall provide maps showing the location of all adopted climate-friendly areas, and supplemental materials to demonstrate that climate-friendly areas contain sufficient zoned residential building capacity to accommodate 30 percent of total housing units as provided in section (2), or using an alternative methodology as provided in OAR 660-012-0320(10), and based on adopted land use requirements in these areas as provided in OAR 660-012-0320. Cities and counties subject to section (3) shall provide maps showing the location of the adopted climate-friendly area. Local governments subject to (1) or (3) shall include findings containing the information and analysis required in section (4) for any climate-friendly areas that were not included in the initial study specified in section (4). (b) Documentation of the number of total existing dwelling units, accessible dwelling units, and income-restricted dwelling units within all climate-friendly areas. Where precise data is not available, local governments may provide estimates based on best available information. (c) Documentation that all adopted and applicable land use requirements for climate-friendly areas are consistent with the provisions of OAR 660-012-0320. (d) Adopted findings shall demonstrate compliance with the provisions of OAR 660-012-0310 through 660-012-0325, and shall include: (A) Identification of all ongoing and newly-added housing production strategies the local government shall use to promote the development of affordable housing in climate-friendly areas. The local government may use the Housing Production Strategy Guidance for Cities to review and identify potential strategies, as provided in OAR 660-008-0050(3). These strategies shall be incorporated into future housing production strategy reports, as provided in OAR chapter 660, division 8. (B) Identification of all ongoing and newly-added housing production strategies the local government shall use to prevent the displacement of members of state and federal protected classes in climate-friendly areas. Findings shall include a description of how the strategies will be implemented based on consideration of identified neighborhood typologies and the most effective measures to prevent displacement based on typology. The local government may use the Housing Production Strategy Guidance for Cities, along with the department's "Anti-Displacement and Gentrification Toolkit" to identify the most effective measures to prevent displacement based on neighborhood typologies. These strategies shall be incorporated into future Page 29 of 77 housing production strategy reports, as provided in OAR chapter 660, division 8. Finding, OAR 660-012-0315(6): Proposed comprehensive plan map and zoning map amendments include a proposed CFA overlay to clearly identify the CFA, as shown in Figures 2 and 4. Exhibits 6 and 7 include supplemental documentation of the CFA housing capacity showing that there is capacity for 4,056 housing units, well over the required 30% of total housing units or 2,926 units determined for Central Point. Documentation of existing dwelling units by category is provided in Section 2.2.3, in response to subsection (6)(b). These findings include documentation that the existing and proposed land use requirements for the proposed CFA meet the CFA rules in -0310 to -0325, satisfying subsections (6)(c) and (d). Relevant housing production strategies that promote affordable housing and prevent displacement are detailed in Section 2.4, satisfying subsection (6)(d). Given the relatively low population within the proposed CFA, the City's primary efforts will be to support a mix of housing types affordable to households at a variety of income levels to integrate affordable housing into the CFA as it develops because there are relatively few existing units to preserve. Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0315(6): This rule is met. OAR 660-012-0320, Land Use Requirements in Climate Friendly Areas (1) Cities and counties subject to the provisions of OAR 660-012-0310 shall incorporate the requirements in sections (2) through (7) of this rule into policies and development regulations that apply in all climate-friendly areas. Cities and counties shall either incorporate the provisions in section (8) into development regulations for climate-friendly areas, or shall demonstrate with adopted findings and analysis that alternative development regulations for climate-friendly areas will comply with the requirements in section (9). If adopting more than one climate-friendly area, a city or county may demonstrate compliance with either section (8) or section (9) for each climate-friendly area, provided that all requirements for each respective climate-friendly area are met. (2) Except as noted in subsection (a) and section (3), development regulations for a climate-friendly area shall allow single-use and mixed-use development within individual buildings and development sites, including the following outright permitted uses: (a) Multi-unit housing and attached single-unit housing. Other residential building types may be allowed, subject to compliance with applicable minimum density requirements in section (8) of this rule, or alternative land use requirements as provided in section (9). Notwithstanding this section, local governments may require ground floor commercial and office uses within otherwise single-use multi- unit buildings, unless a multi-unit building will contain units subject to a recorded agreement that runs with the land and requires affordability for an established income level for a defined period of time. (b) Office-type uses. Page 30 of 77 (c) Non-auto dependent retail, services, and other commercial uses. (d) Child care, schools, and other public uses, including public-serving government facilities. Finding, OAR 660-012-0320(2): Single uses and mix of uses are generally permitted with no restrictions on mixing within buildings or sites. Multiple primary uses are permitted for a development. (CPMC 17.08.410(B)(1).) The following uses are permitted or proposed to be permitted by zone: • Medium Mix Residential (MMR): Duplexes, multifamily dwellings (3+ units) and attached row houses are among the permitted residential building types, with no ground floor commercial requirement. Office, commercial, child care, schools and other community service uses are permitted or proposed, with the exception of areas north of Beebe Rd that are instead proposed to meet the residential standards of OAR 660-012- 0320(3) discussed below. (Proposed CPMC 17.65 Table 1 and 17.69.040.) • High Mix Residential(HMR): Duplexes, multifamily dwellings (3+ units) and attached row houses are among the permitted residential building types, with no ground floor commercial requirement. Office, commercial, child care, schools and other community service uses are permitted or proposed. (Proposed CPMC 17.65 Table 1 and 17.69.040(C).) • Employment Commercial(EC): Duplexes, multifamily dwellings (3+ units) with ground-floor commercial (except within qualifying developments with affordability requirements), and attached row houses are among the permitted residential building types. Office, commercial, child care, schools and other community service uses are permitted or proposed; auto-oriented vehicle sales and services uses are not proposed. (Proposed CPMC 17.65 Table 1 and 17.69.040(D).) • Civic (C): Duplexes, multifamily dwellings (3+ units), and attached row houses are among the permitted residential building types, with no ground-floor commercial requirement. Office, commercial, child care, schools and other community service uses are permitted or proposed. (Proposed CPMC 17.65 Table 1 and 17.69.040(E).) The above uses are permitted through Site Plan and Architectural Review (Type I or II review, residential with 3 or fewer units exempt), and development sites within the CFA are proposed to be exempt from the TOD Overlay Master Plan (Type Ill review). (CPMC Table 17.05.1, 17.66.030(A), proposed 17.69.080(A).) Multifamily and row house developments within the CFA are proposed to be exempted from the TOD housing mix requirements that otherwise require a mix of housing types on a site. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.070(A).) Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0320(2): This rule is met. (3) Portions of abutting residential or employment-oriented zoned areas within a half- mile walking distance of a mixed-use area zoned as provided in section (1) may count Page 31 of 77 towards climate-friendly area requirements, if in compliance with subsections (a) or (b). Notwithstanding existing development, zoned residential building capacity shall be calculated for the abutting areas based on allowed building heights and existing development standards in these areas, as provided in OAR 660-012-0315(2) or using an alternative methodology as provided in OAR 660-012-0320(10). Residential densities for abutting areas shall correspond to the climate-friendly area type, provided in subsections (8)(a), (b), or (c) or (9)(a), (b), or (c). Employment densities for abutting areas shall comply with the thresholds in subsection (b). If subsections (a) or (b) are met, no changes to existing zoning or development standards are required for these areas. (a) Residential areas with minimum residential densities or existing residential development equal to or greater than the densities provided in section (8); or [...] Finding, OAR 660-012-0320(3): The area north of Beebe Rd with proposed MMR zoning is proposed as part of the CFA under these residential provisions. The area is within one-half mile walking distance of the mixed-use areas south of Beebe Rd that are proposed for a full mix of uses: although the road network is not fully constructed within this area, the total straight-line distance from Beebe Rd to the northern edge of the CFA is approximately 1,300 ft so future walking distances will not be greater than one-half mile (2,640 ft) even with slight out-of- direction travel. Per subsection (a), the area north of Beebe Rd is proposed to be zoned MMR with a minimum density of 15 units per acre, meeting the density required in section (8) for a city under 25,000. Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0320(3): This rule is met. (4) Local governments shall prioritize locating government facilities that provide direct service to the public within climate-friendly areas and shall prioritize locating parks, open space, plazas, and similar public amenities in or near climate-friendly areas that do not contain sufficient parks, open space, plazas, or similar public amenities. Local governments shall amend comprehensive plans to reflect these policies, where necessary. Streetscape requirements in climate-friendly areas shall include street trees and other landscaping, where feasible. Finding, OAR 660-012-0320(4): There are no current public school, library, fire or police stations, or civic service facilities currently located within or near the CFA; there is a private school, Chesterton Academy of the Rogue Valley, and the Shephard of the Valley Catholic Church. Most of these government facilities are sited by special districts independent of the City: Schools are sited by the Central Point School District 6, libraries by Jackson County Library Services, and fire stations by Jackson County Fire District 3. The Public Facilities & Services Element of the Comprehensive Plan generally prioritizes providing facilities and services as the city grows, which can include future development within the CFA. The 2018 Parks Element of the Comprehensive Plan identifies the need for a new community park within the CFA to meet existing and future needs. (Parks and Recreation Element Map 5.) Adopted policies prioritize "equitable access"to Page 32 of 77 parks so that all residents are within X mile of a park, and prioritize parks acquisition and development in underserved areas. (P&R Element Policies 3.2, 3.3.) Acquisition guidelines direct the City to prioritize acquisition of large sites or multiple adjacent properties because large sites are most limited, and to apply acquisition criteria that include distribution equity, site suitability and site-specific concerns, such as environmentally sensitive areas or hazards. (P&R Element Section 6.1.) Together these policies and maps will guide siting of new parks facilities within the proposed CFA as it is developed. Within the proposed CFA, TOD requirements include street trees along both sides of all public streets spaced 20 to 40 feet apart. 17.67.050(K)(5) Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0320(4): This rule is met. (5) Local governments shall establish maximum block length standards as provided below. For the purpose of this rule, a development site consists of the total site area proposed for development, absent previously dedicated rights-of-way, but including areas where additional right-of-way dedication may be required. (a) For development sites less than 5.5 acres in size, a maximum block length of 500 feet or less. Where block length exceeds 350 feet, a public pedestrian through-block easement shall be provided to facilitate safe and convenient pedestrian connectivity in climate-friendly areas. Substantial redevelopment of sites of two acres or more within an existing block that does not meet the standard shall provide a public pedestrian accessway allowing direct passage through the development site such that no pedestrian route will exceed 350 feet along any block face. Local governments may grant exceptions to street and accessway requirements as provided in OAR 660-012-0330(2). (b) For development sites of 5.5 acres or more, a maximum block length of 350 feet or less. Local governments may grant exemptions to street requirements as provided in OAR 660-012-0330(2). Finding, OAR 660-012-0320(5): Block length standards specific to the CFA are proposed with a maximum block length of 350 feet, up to 500-foot spacing for sites smaller than 5.5 acres in size if off-street bike/pedestrian pathways are provided. Block spacing may be modified based on site-specific factors. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.090(A).) Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0320(5): This rule is met. (6) Development regulations may not include a maximum density limitation. Finding, OAR 660-012-0320(6): No maximum density limits are proposed within the CFA Overlay; see proposed CPMC 17.69.050(A) applying to MMR zone and 17.65.040 Table 2 for other zones. Additionally, minimum lot sizes or average minimum lot sizes are not proposed to apply within the CFA Overlay in order to avoid creating de facto maximum densities. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.060(A) and (B).) Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0320(6): This rule is met. Page 33 of 77 (7) Local governments shall adopt policies and development regulations in climate- friendly areas that implement the following: (a) The transportation review process in OAR 660-012-0325; (b) The land use requirements as provided in OAR 660-012-0330; (c) The applicable parking requirements as provided in OAR 660-012-0435; and (d) The applicable bicycle parking requirements as provided in OAR 660-012-0630. Finding, OAR 660-012-0320(7): See findings below for each applicable OAR. Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0320(7): This rule is met. (8) Local governments shall adopt either the following provisions into development regulations for climate-friendly areas, or the requirements in section (9). Local governments are not required to enforce the minimum residential densities below for mixed-use buildings (buildings that contain residential units, as well as office, commercial, or other non-residential uses) if the mixed-use buildings meet a minimum floor area ratio of 2.0. A floor area ratio is the ratio of the gross floor area of all buildings on a development site, excluding areas within buildings that are dedicated to vehicular parking and circulation, in proportion to the net area of the development site on which the buildings are located. A floor area ratio of 2.0 would indicate that the gross floor area of the building was twice the net area of the site. Local governments are not required to enforce the minimum residential densities below for redevelopment that renovates and adds residential units within existing buildings, but that does not add residential units outside the existing exterior of the building. (a) Local governments with a population greater than 5,000 up to 25,000 shall adopt the following development regulations for climate-friendly areas: (A)A minimum residential density requirement of 15 dwelling units per net acre; and (B) Maximum building height no less than 50 feet. [...] Finding, OAR 660-012-0320(8): Minimum density of 15 units per net acre is proposed in the MMR and C zones within the CFA Overlay; see proposed CPMC 17.65.040 Table 2 and 17.69.050(C). A minimum density of 25 units per net acre applies to the HMR zone, and is proposed for the EC zone within the CFA Overlay. (See CPMC 17.65.040 Table 2 and proposed 17.69.050(B).) A maximum height of 50 feet is proposed in the MMR and C zones within the CFA Overlay; see proposed CPMC 17.69.060(D). A maximum building height of 60 feet applies to the HMR and EC zones. (See CPMC 17.65.040 Table 2.) Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0320(8): The minimum density and height requirements of this rule are met. (9)As an alternative to adopting the development regulations in section (8), local governments may demonstrate with adopted findings and analysis that their adopted development regulations for climate-friendly areas will provide for equal or higher levels Page 34 of 77 of development in climate-friendly areas than those allowed per the standards in section (8). Additional zoned building capacity of 25 percent may be included for development regulations that allow height bonuses for additional zoned building capacity above established maximums that are consistent with OAR 660-012-0315(2)(c)(B). Specifically, the local government must demonstrate that the alternative development regulations will consistently and expeditiously allow for the levels of development described in subsections (a)-(c). Alternative development regulations must require either a minimum residential density of 15 dwelling units per net acre or a minimum floor area ratio of 1.0, as described in section (8). [...] (10) A local government may provide an alternative methodology for zoned residential building capacity calculations that differs from OAR 660-012-0315(2). The methodology must clearly describe all assumptions and calculation steps, and must demonstrate that the methodology provides an equal or better system for determining the zoned residential building capacity sufficient to accommodate at least 30 percent of the total identified number of housing units necessary to meet all current and future housing needs within climate-friendly areas. The alternative methodology shall be supported by studies of development activity in the region, market studies, or similar research and analysis. Finding, OAR 660-012-0320(9) and(10): The City does not propose alternative development regulations or alternative methodology for zoned building capacity; Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0320(9) and(10): These sections are not relevant. OAR 660-12-0325, Transportation Review in Climate Friendly Areas (1) Cities or counties shall use the provisions of this rule to review amendments to comprehensive plans or land use regulations in lieu of the provisions of OAR 660-012- 0060 when the amendment is: (a) To adopt a climate-friendly area as provided in OAR 660-012-0310 through OAR 660-012-0320, or a Metro Region 2040 center; or (b)Within an adopted climate-friendly area or Metro Region 2040 center. (2) Cities and counties considering amendments to comprehensive plans or land use regulations to adopt or expand a climate-friendly area as provided in OAR 660-012- 0310 through OAR 660-012-0320, or a Metro Region 2040 center, must make findings, including: (a)A multimodal transportation gap summary as provided in section (4); and (b) The multimodal transportation gap summary must include a highway impacts summary as provided in section (5) if the designated climate-friendly area as provided in OAR 660-012-0315 or Region 2040 center contains a ramp terminal intersection, state highway, interstate highway, or adopted ODOT Facility Plan. Finding, OAR 660-012-0325: The proposed action is to adopt a CFA including amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and zoning code for consistency with OARs pertaining to CFAs. A multimodal transportation gap summary has been Page 35 of 77 prepared and is provided in Exhibit 4, which identifies bicycle, pedestrian and transit opportunities existing and proposed within the CFA. The study identifies that the multimodal transportation system gaps will be connected as a function of land development within the CFA and in accordance with the City's land development codes, including walkable design standards that promote increased connectivity. Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0325: This rule is met. OAR 660-12-0330, Land Use Requirements (1) Cities and counties shall implement plans and land use regulations to support compact, pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use land use development patterns in urban areas. Land use development patterns must support access by people using pedestrian, bicycle, and public transportation networks. Finding, OAR 660-012-0330(1): This rule applies to the entire city of Central Point and must be met at the time the City adopts its next Transportation System Plan (TSP) update. The rule applies specifically to the proposed CFA per OAR 660-012-0320(7)(b) and the findings below are specific to the proposed CFA. Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0330(1): This rule is met. (2) Cities and counties may allow exemptions to provisions in this rule when conditions on a site or class of sites would make those provisions prohibitively costly or impossible to implement. Cities or counties may adopt land use regulations that provide for exemptions as provided in this section. Any allowed exemption shall advance the purposes of this rule to the extent practical. Conditions that may provide for an exemption include, but are not limited to: (a) Topography or natural features; (b) Railroads, highways, or other permanent barriers; (c) Lot or parcel size, orientation, or shape; (d) Available access; (e) Existing or nonconforming development; (f) To provide for accessibility for people with disabilities; or (g) Other site constraints. Finding, OAR 660-012-0330(2): Block spacing and thus pedestrian connectivity within the CFA may be modified based on site-specific factors such as topography, permanent barriers, or natural resources. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.090(A), referencing 17.67.040(A)(5).) Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0330(2): This rule is met. (3) Cities and counties shall have land use regulations that provide for pedestrian- friendly and connected neighborhoods. Land use regulations must meet the following requirements for neighborhood design and access: Page 36 of 77 (a) Neighborhoods shall be designed with connected networks of streets, paths, accessways, and other facilities to provide circulation within the neighborhood and pedestrian and bicycle system connectivity to adjacent districts. A connected street network is desirable for motor vehicle traffic but may be discontinuous where necessary to limit excessive through-travel, or to protect a safe environment for walking, using mobility devices, and bicycling in the neighborhood. (b) Neighborhoods shall be designed with direct pedestrian access to key destinations identified in OAR 660-012-0360 via pedestrian facilities. (c) Cities and counties shall set block length and block perimeter standards at distances that will provide for pedestrian network connectivity. Cities and counties may allow alleys or public pedestrian facilities through a block to be used to meet a block length or perimeter standard. (d) Cities and counties shall set standards to reduce out-of-direction travel for people using the pedestrian or bicycle networks. Finding, OAR 660-012-0330(3): The proposed CFA will be developed with a connected network of streets, alleys and major off-street bike/pedestrian pathways as required by the existing TOD design standards and proposed block spacing standards of 350 to 500 feet to meet OAR 660-012-0320(5), with options for major off-street bike/pedestrian pathways. Together these standards will reduce out-of-direction travel for people using the pedestrian or bicycle networks. Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0330(3): This rule is met. (4) Cities and counties shall have land use regulations in commercial and mixed-use districts that provide for a compact development pattern, easy ability to walk or use mobility devices, and allow direct access on the pedestrian, bicycle, and public transportation networks. Commercial or mixed-use site design land use regulations must meet the following requirements: (a) Primary pedestrian entrances to buildings must be oriented to a public pedestrian facility and be accessible to people with mobility disabilities. An uninterrupted accessway, courtyard, plaza, or other pedestrian-oriented space must be provided between primary pedestrian entrances and the public pedestrian facility, except where the entrance opens directly to the pedestrian facility. All pedestrian entrances must be designed to be barrier-free. (b) Motor vehicle parking, circulation, access, and loading may be located on site beside or behind buildings. Motor vehicle parking, circulation, access, and loading must not be located on site between buildings and public pedestrian facilities on or along the primary facing street. Bicycle parking may be permitted. (c) On-site accessways must be provided to directly connect key pedestrian entrances to public pedestrian facilities, to any on-site parking, and to adjacent properties, as applicable. (d) Any pedestrian entrances facing an on-site parking lot must be secondary to primary pedestrian entrances as required in this section. Primary pedestrian entrances for uses open to the public must be open during business hours. Page 37 of 77 (e) Large sites must be designed with a connected network of public pedestrian facilities to meet the requirements of this section. (f) Development on sites adjacent to a transit stop or station on a priority transit corridor must be oriented to the transit stop or station. The site design must provide a high level of pedestrian connectivity and amenities adjacent to the stop or station. If there is inadequate space in the existing right of way for transit infrastructure, then the infrastructure must be accommodated on site. (g) Development standards must be consistent with bicycle parking requirements in OAR 660-012-0630. (h) These site design land use regulations need not apply to districts with a predominantly industrial or agricultural character. Finding, OAR 660-012-0330(4): The TOD design standards that apply to the CFA include, but are not limited to: • Requirements for buildings to have pedestrian-oriented, accessible entrances facing toward the street and connected to the street with a pedestrian walkway. (CPMC 17.67.070(C).) • Parking areas are required to be located to the side or rear of buildings, with parking in front of buildings prohibited. (CPMC 17.67.050(J)(1).) • On-site pedestrian and bicycle circulation is required to connect sidewalks and building entrances, parking areas, and through sites to supplement the public right-of-way. (CPMC 17.67.040(C).) • Main building entrances for nonresidential uses must front on pedestrian streets and remain open during regular business hours. (CPMC 17.67.070(C)(2).) • Transit stations require additional pedestrian-scaled amenities like benches and plantings within the adjacent sidewalk area, and buildings shall provide canopy coverage over the sidewalk. (CPMC 17.67.040(A)(8)(b) and 17.67.070(D)(2)(b).) Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0330(4): This rule is met. (5) Cities and counties shall have land use regulations in residential neighborhoods that provide for slow neighborhood streets comfortable for families, efficient and sociable development patterns, and provide for connectivity within the neighborhood and to adjacent districts. Cities and counties must adopt land use regulations to meet these objectives, including but not limited to those related to setbacks, lot size and coverage, building orientation, and access. Finding, OAR 660-012-0330(5):Areas within the CFA may develop as residential areas or mixed-use areas. Street standards will residential street standards to be developed within the CFA to serve new development; residential streets include travel lanes, on-street parking, landscaping and sidewalks. (Central Point Department of Public Works Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details, Tables 300-1 C and 1 D.) The block spacing standards of 350 to Page 38 of 77 500 feet to meet OAR 660-012-0320(5), with options for major off-street bike/pedestrian pathways, will provide for connectivity within the area and beyond. Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0330(5): This rule is met. (6) Cities and counties shall have land use regulations that ensure auto-oriented land uses are compatible with a community where it is easy to walk or use a mobility device. Auto-oriented land uses include uses related to the operation, sale, maintenance, or fueling of motor vehicles, and uses where the use of a motor vehicle is accessory to the primary use, including drive-through uses. Land use regulations must meet the following requirements: (a) Auto-oriented land uses must provide safe and convenient access opportunities for people walking, using a mobility device, or riding a bicycle. Ease of access to goods and services must be equivalent to or better than access for people driving a motor vehicle. (b) Outside of climate-friendly areas, cities and counties may provide for exemptions to this rule in cases where an auto-oriented land use cannot reasonably meet the standards of this rule. Standards developed in cases of an exemption must protect pedestrian facilities. Finding, OAR 660-012-0330(6): Drive-throughs are proposed as a limited use within the portion of the CFA zoned EC, limited to two total facilities and subject to design standards that minimize conflicts between vehicles and people on foot or bike and provide for equivalent access to goods and services. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.040(D)(2) and 17.69.090(C).) Other auto-oriented uses including auto service, sales and repairs are proposed to be prohibited within the CFA. (CPMC 17.65.040 Table 1 and proposed 17.69.040(D).) Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0330(6): This rule is met. OAR 660-12-0435, Parking Reform in Climate-Friendly Areas (1) This rule applies to cities and counties that: (a) Are within a metropolitan area; and (b) Have not adopted land use regulations without parking mandates as provided in OAR 660-012-0420. [...] Finding, OAR 660-012-0435: The City adopted land use regulations without parking mandates consistent with OAR 660-012-0420 with Ordinance 2100 in 2023. Per CPMC Table 17.64.02, no minimum off-street parking standards apply to development citywide including within the proposed CFA. Therefore, this rule specific to CFAs does not apply. Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0435: This rule is not applicable. OAR 660-12-0630, Bicycle Parking Page 39 of 77 (1) Cities and counties shall require and plan for adequate parking to meet the increasing need for travel by bicycle and other small-scale mobility devices. (2) Cities and counties shall require bicycle parking for the following uses: (a) All new multi-unit development or mixed-use development of five residential units or more as provided in section (3); (b) All new retail development; (c) All new office and institutional developments; (d) All major transit stops, and any park-and-ride lots that require land use approval; and (e) Any land use where off-street motor vehicle parking is mandated. (3) Cities and counties shall require a minimum of one-half of a covered bicycle parking space per unit for multi-unit and mixed-use residential uses. Cities and counties may: (a) Allow for reductions or exemptions to the minimum parking requirement based on development-specific considerations; and (b) Exempt or reduce the minimum parking requirement for certain types of residential uses that are likely to have less future demand for bicycle parking. (4) Cities and counties shall adopt development regulations requiring all required bicycle parking provided must: (a) Either allow ways to lock at least two points on a bicycle, or be within a lockable space only available to authorized users; (b) Be installed in a manner to allow space for the bicycle to be maneuvered to a position where it may be secured without conflicts from stairs, other parked bicycles, walls, or other obstructions; (c) Be in a location that is convenient and well-lit; and (d) Include bicycle parking spaces to accommodate large bicycles, including family and cargo bicycles. Finding, OAR 660-012-0630(1) to (4): Minimum bicycle parking ratios for multifamily residential (1 space per unit), commercial, office, institutional and transit stations apply to new development. (CPMC Table 17.64.043.) Design standards require that bike parking be located near well-used entrances with access from ROW. Spaces must meet minimum 6-foot by 2-foot dimensions, with maneuvering aisles and thorough illumination. (CPMC 17.75.039(H).) Proposed code updates include provisions for larger parking spaces for cargo/large bicycles, and lockable provisions to enhance security. (Proposed CPMC 17.75.039(H).) Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0630(1) to (4): These rules are met. (5) Cities and counties shall provide for public bicycle parking and allow and provide for parking and ancillary facilities for shared bicycles or other small-scale mobility devices Page 40 of 77 in climate-friendly areas, Metro Region 2040 centers, and near key destinations identified as provided in OAR 660-012-0360. Finding, OAR 660-012-0630(5): It is premature to provide public bicycle parking within the CFA because it has not yet been developed; the City will look to site public bicycle parking. Any public uses that are proposed will be required to provide bicycle parking meeting the City's adopted minimums. (CPMC Table 17.64.043.) The City has no prohibitions on facilities for shared bicycles or other small-scale mobility devices and would work with any operator proposing to locate such a service within the CFA and/or elsewhere in the City. Conclusion, OAR 660-012-0630(5): This rule is met. 3.2 Statewide Planning Goals In accordance with CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and Text Amendments and CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments, the Statewide Planning Goals apply to Comprehensive Plan amendments. The Statewide Planning Goals 1-14 are addressed below for File No. CPA-24001, ZC-24002, ZC-24003. Goals 15-19 involve coastal lands and areas in the Willamette Valley, which do not apply to the City of Central Point. 3.2.1 Goal 1— Citizen Involvement To develop a citizen's involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process. Finding, Goal 1: The City's Citizen Involvement Program is set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and CPMC 17.05. This program specifies that a broad spectrum of affected citizens be involved throughout preparation, implementation, monitoring and amendment of plans, including but not limited to a Citizen's Advisory Committee. Procedures in CPMC 17.05 establish notification and involvement requirements relative to each application type (i.e. Type I, II, Ill, IV). The City has engaged specifically on the proposed CFA designation and zoning through a number of public events: • Interviews with three community stakeholders active in the development industry in Central Point in Spring 2024. • A joint work session with Planning Commission and City Council on June 17, 2024. • A public open house on September 16, 2024 that was attended by 24 members of the public. • A public survey on preferred zoning concepts in October-November 2024 that garnered 72 responses. • A Planning Commission briefing on December 3, 2024. Additionally, the Proposed Amendments have been processed in accordance with Type IV procedures, including mailed and posted notices of the public hearings scheduled for the Planning Commission on February 11, 2025 and the Page 41 of 77 City Council on February 27, 2025. Additionally, the City posted notice of the proposed amendments on the DLCD Post Acknowledgement Plan Amendment (PAPA) portal on December 31, 2024 and revised this notice on January 29, 2025. Conclusion, Goal 1: The proposal is consistent with this goal. 3.2.2 Goal 2— Land Use Planning To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual basis for such decisions and actions. Finding, Goal 2: The City's land use planning process and policy framework is provided in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and Central Point Municipal Code in Title 17. The proposed Major Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendment introduce a new CFA Overlay for a 94.4-acre portion of the City, re-designate a 27.6-acre portion of that area from MRes to HRes, and rezone the same area from LMR to MMR to implement the state's new rules for CFAs. The proposed Zoning Text Amendment modifies the existing TOD standards that apply to the proposed CFA and introduces new standards for the proposed CFA Overlay. Approval of the proposed amendments is subject to the criteria for Comprehensive Plan Amendments in CPMC 17.96 and Zoning Amendments in CPMC 17.10. Conclusion, Goal 2: The City has applied its land use planning process and policy framework to the proposed map and text amendments. 3.2.3 Goal 3—Agricultural Lands To preserve and maintain agricultural lands. Finding, Goal 3: The proposed Major Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments are to lands within the city limits or within the City's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and do not involve or otherwise affect agricultural lands. Conclusion, Goal 3: Not applicable. 3.2.4 Goal 4— Forest Lands To conserve forest lands by maintaining the forest land base and to protect the state's forest economy by making possible economically efficient forest practices that assure the continuous growing and harvesting of forest tree species as a leading use on forest land consistent with sound management of soil, air, water, and fish and wildlife resources and to provide for recreational opportunities and agriculture. Finding, Goal 4: The proposed Major Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments are to lands within the city limits or within the City's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and do not involve or otherwise affect forest lands. Conclusion, Goal 4: Not applicable. 3.2.5 Goal 5— Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces To protect natural resources and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces. Page 42 of 77 Finding, Goal 5: Pursuant to Goal 5, the City is required to adopt programs and regulations that protect natural resources and conserve scenic, historic and open space resources. Goal 5 resources that must be inventoried include: wetlands, riparian corridors, wildlife habitat, federal wild and scenic rivers, state scenic waterways, groundwater resources, approved Oregon recreational trails, natural areas, wilderness areas, mineral and aggregate resources, energy sources, and cultural areas. Local governments are also encouraged to inventory historic resources, open space and scenic view and sites. The proposed Major Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments and Zoning Text Amendments for the proposed CFA include land that is within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and riparian corridor for Bear Creek, in the southwest corner of the proposed CFA north of E Pine Street. All future development will be subject to development standards in CPMC 8.24 to reduce risks and impacts associated with development within areas of special floor hazard. At this time, the City is updating its Environmental Element of the Comprehensive Plan including a local wetland and riparian inventory. The lands with identified natural resources will be managed as a function of the land development process consistent with local implementing regulations for natural resources including floodplain, riparian areas and wetlands, as well as state and federal requirements. Conclusion, Goal 5: The proposal is consistent with this goal. 3.2.6 Goal 6—Air, Water and Land Resources Quality To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state. Finding, Goal 6: Goal 6 requires that all waste and process discharges from existing and future development will not threaten to violate or violate applicable state or federal environmental quality statutes, rules and standards. There is no interpretive rule for Goal 6. The City finds that air, water and land resource quality will be addressed by the City's land use, transportation and environmental programs that minimize, mitigate or avoid conflicts with Goal 6 associated with land development: In this case, the proposed actions to establish the CFA overlay through map and zoning text amendments and to modify the designation and zoning for a portion of residential land will allow for future mixed-use development served by multimodal transportation options. No development is proposed with this application. Future land development proposals will be subject to the City's land use, transportation and environmental programs that minimize, mitigate or avoid conflicts with Goal 6, including: • Land Use and Transportation Planning. The land use and development regulations that apply to the properties that are the subject of this amendment, will be in the TOD Overlay and the proposed CFA Overlay. The TOD and CFA Overlay standards promotes multi-modal transportation in neighborhoods with mixed-use opportunities and human- scale design. This supports the ability of residents to have needs met Page 43 of 77 within walking distance and thereby reduces vehicle miles traveled, which is associated with air and water pollution. • Stormwater Management. The City of Central Point manages all land development in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Phase II Program. This includes erosion and sediment control, as well as post-construction runoff treatment to protect water quality from pollutants and increased volume associated with increased impervious surface area and land development. The proposed Amendments do not cause land development; however, future land development will be subject to the City's stormwater management program to protect water quality. • Floodplain Management. The City's Floodplain Management regulations are set forth in CPMC 8.24 and address risk reduction, as well as higher standards that buffer floodways and preserve riparian corridors. Future land development proposals for the subject properties will be subject to the City's Floodplain Program, including preservation of open space within the floodway and floodway buffer. • Urban Forestry. Central Point is a Tree City USA and implements regulations (CPMC 12.36, CPMC 17.75, and CPMC 17.67) and programs to increase the urban forest canopy in the City. Trees are shown to promote cleaner air and water(photosynthesis, through fall, evapotranspiration), cooler ambient air temperatures (shade from increased canopy) and increased soil quality (by increasing soil infiltration and beneficial soil organisms). The City will continue its program of requiring street trees, along street frontages and within parking areas development buffers. This will apply to the properties that are within the proposed CFA Overlay at such time they are developed. Conclusion, Goal 6: The proposal is consistent with this goal. 3.2.7 Goal 7—Areas Subject to Natural Hazards To protect people and property from natural hazards. Finding, Goal 7: The proposed Major Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments include areas within the Bear Creek area of special flood hazard along the southwest boundary north of E Pine Street. Future land development proposals in this area will require conformance with CPMC 8.24, Flood Damage Prevention. Conclusion, Goal 7: Protection of people and property from flood hazards will be managed consistent with CPMC 8.24 at the time of land development application consistent with Goal 7. 3.2.8 Goal 8 — Recreational Needs To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors and, where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destination resorts. Page 44 of 77 Finding, Goal 8: The proposed Major Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map and Text Amendments respond to state requirements to create a CFA that supports a mix of uses within a walkable urban center. Recreation needs are managed through the City's Parks Element, which identifies the need for a new community park within the CFA to meet existing and future recreation needs. Future development within the CFA will be required to meet the TOD Overlay standards for public parks and open space in conjunction with new residential development. (CPMC 17.67.060.) Conclusion, Goal 8: The proposed map and text amendments, through the future land development process, are supportive and consistent with the need to provide for the recreational needs of the community. 3.2.9 Goal 9— Economic Development To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety of economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon's citizens. Finding, Goal 9: The proposed Map and Text Amendments apply land use and zoning designations, including the new CFA Overlay and changing the residential zoning and designation of a portion of the proposed CFA. The proposed amendments maintain the existing EC zoning along E Pine Street, and maintain commercial development potential within that area by limiting competition with residential uses: the code amendments maintain existing requirements for ground- floor commercial with any multifamily residential uses and require row houses to be set back at least 100 feet from E Pine Street. (CPMC 17.65.040 Table 1 and proposed 17.69.040(D)(1). The existing TOD standards and additional CFA standards provide for a range of commercial and employment uses within the area zoned EC, and expand provisions for commercial and employment uses within areas zone MMR south of Beebe Rd, HMR and C. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.040.) Conclusion, Goal 9: The proposed amendments are consistent with the need to provide economic opportunities. 3.2.10 Goal 10— Housing To provide for the housing needs of the state. Finding, Goal 10: The proposed Map and Text Amendments include several provisions that will expand housing opportunities within the proposed CFA: • The proposed map amendments redesignate 27.6 acres of residential land north of Beebe Rd from MRes to HRes, and rezone the areas from LMR to MMR zoning that permits greater variety and density of housing types. • The proposed text amendments slightly increase the minimum density for residential development in all TOD areas zoned MMR, inside and outside of the CFA Overlay, from 14 units per net acre to 15 units per net acre. (Proposed CPMC 17.65.040 Table 2.) While only required for areas within the CFA Overlay, the proposed change would apply to all TOD areas based on Council input. Page 45 of 77 • The proposed text amendments increase allowed building heights in areas zoned MMR from 45 to 50 feet, and eliminate maximum densities and minimum lot sizes in those areas to allow more flexibility. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.050 and .060.) The amendments maintain the existing 60-foot height limit in areas zoned HMR and EC, where no maximum density currently applies. (CPMC 17.65.040 Table 2.) • The proposed text amendments limit single-family detached dwellings within CFA areas zoned MMR, only permitting them as a portion of a site developed with a master plan meeting minimum densities. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.040(A)(1).) This change is intended to spur more varied, higher-density development that incorporates some single-family detached housing that responds to market demand as part of a mix of housing types. • The proposed text amendments continue to permit duplexes, multifamily and row houses within areas zoned MMR and HMR. • The proposed text amendments introduce row houses as an additional permitted housing type within areas zoned EC, and encourage a mix of residential and commercial uses. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.040(D).) • The proposed text amendments make master plans optional within the CFA Overlay, which will eliminate a discretionary review requirement for residential development, and allow developments of apartments and row houses without requiring a mix of housing types that otherwise applies within the TOD Overlay, which could make such projects more feasible to develop without assembling multiple housing type plans, construction teams and financing. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.070 and .080.) In total, the proposed CFA is estimated to have capacity for 4,056 dwelling units using the CFA capacity methodology detailed in OAR 660-012-0315 above. The additional capacity created in the CFA through the map amendments, increased minimum densities, and removal of maximum densities meets or exceeds the City's needed housing supply of 2,887 units. (2019 Housing Needs Analysis, 2039 Forecasted Units.) Conclusion, Goal 10: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments are consistent with providing needed housing consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 10. 3.2.11 Goal 11 — Public Facilities and Services To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. Finding, Goal 11: The proposed Map Amendments are served by existing and planned public facilities and services per the Public Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the Transportation System Plan, Water System Master Plan and Stormwater Management Plan. Construction of extended facilities and services will occur as a function of land development. Conclusion, Goal 11: The proposal is consistent with this goal. Page 46 of 77 3.2.12 Goal 12— Transportation To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. Finding, Goal 12: The proposed Map Amendments are in an area with existing and planned transportation facilities. Extension of facilities and services, such as roads, sidewalks, bike lanes and transit stations will be a function of land development. Development of properties in the TOD Overlay and CFA Overlay emphasizes compact land development patterns and provision of multi-modal transportation facilities and services that are necessary to support highly livable neighborhoods for all segments of the population, including those who do not own a car. Conclusion, Goal 12: The proposal is consistent with this goal. 3.2.13 Goal 13— Energy Utilization To conserve energy. Finding, Goal 13: The proposed Map Amendments do not impact energy utilization in and of themselves; however, future land development within high density, mixed-use neighborhoods reduces energy consumption by promoting multi-modal transportation options and locating jobs within walking distance of housing. This may have the added benefit of reducing the need for automobile ownership as the area develops. Conclusion, Goal 13: The proposal is consistent with this goal. 3.2.14 Goal 14— Urbanization To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities. Finding, Goal 14: The proposed Map Amendments are within the UGB and apply land use designations that transition density within the context of surrounding land use/zoning designations. The portion of the CFA Overlay proposed to be re- designated and rezoned from LMR to MMR will allow for more intense urban development and will maintain consistency with adjacent land uses: the area directly south is already zoned MMR and areas to the north are zoned LMR, so the proposed map amendments effectively move the dividing line between MMR and LMR areas further north, shifting but maintaining the existing transition between zones. The proposed CFA Overlay provides for urban-level residential and employment development and efficient use of land, which will concentrate development within the UGB to decrease the need for further UGB expansion. Conclusion, Goal 14: The proposal is consistent with this goal. 3.3 Central Point Comprehensive Plan A review of the Central Point Comprehensive Plan finds that the Land Use, Housing and Economic Elements apply to the proposed Plan and Zoning Amendments. In Page 47 of 77 accordance with CPMC 17.10 and CPMC 17.96, the Comprehensive Plan applies to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA-24001), the Zoning Map Amendment (ZC- 24002), and the Zoning Text Amendment (ZC-24003). The goals and policies for the applicable Elements are set forth and addressed below. 3.3.1 Housing Element The Housing Element aims to assure that the City's land use policies support a variety of housing types at densities and locations that provide and encourage opportunities of for the provision of adequate numbers of needed housing units at price ranges and rent levels commensurate with the financial capabilities of the City's households. It also aims to open and maintain communication between private industry and local public officials in seeking an improved housing environment within the Greater Bear Creek Valley Region. It contains seven (7) goals and twenty-seven (27) policies. Housing Goal 1. To provide an adequate supply of housing to meet the diverse needs of the City's current and projected households. Housing Policy 1.1. Continue to support new residential development at the new minimum residential densities. Finding, Housing Policy 1.1:At the time of land development, the City will apply the TOD minimum densities of 15 units per net acre in areas zoned MMR (increased from 14 units per net acre) and C and 25 units per net acre in areas zoned HMR and EC. Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.1: Complies. Housing Policy 1.2. Develop a Housing Implementation Plan that is regularly updated based current market conditions. Finding, Housing Policy 1.2: The City adopted the Housing Implementation Plan (HIP) on December 13, 2018 (City Council Resolution No. 1560). The HIP sets forth a housing strategy for a 5-year period, 2019-2024. Adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments furthers the goals of the HIP to plan for a support development of mixed-use/pedestrian friendly areas and does not interfere or otherwise conflict with the City's policy to regularly update it based on current market conditions. Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.2: Consistent. Housing Policy 1.3. Provide an efficient and consistent development review process. Finding, Housing Policy 1.3: The City's proposed Zoning Text Amendments simplify the development review process for projects within the CFA Overlay by eliminating the requirement for a Type III Master Plan application for larger developments; new developments will be reviewed subject to Site Plan and Architectural Review (Type I or II) and Master Plans will be optional. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.080.) Page 48 of 77 Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.3: Consistent. Housing Policy 1.4. Work with regional partners to develop and implement measure that reduce upfront housing development costs. Finding, Housing Policy 1.4: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments aim to provide needed housing in accordance with the Housing Element. At present, there is a low supply of housing available that contributes to high cost. Although the proposed Map Amendments do not directly affect upfront cost, the proposed Map Amendments increase the amount of housing that can be built by increasing the minimum density for areas zoned MMR, re-designating and rezoning 27.6 gross acres from lower-density LMR to higher-density MMR, and eliminating maximum densities within the CFA Overlay, which together can help increase supply of housing units. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.050.) This does not affect other efforts to work with regional partners to implement measures that directly reduce upfront housing development cost. Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.4: Consistent. Housing Policy 1.5. Support UGB expansions and annexations that can be efficiently provided with urban services and that will in a timely manner meet the City's housing needs. Finding, Housing Policy 1.5: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not require or otherwise involve a UGB Amendment or Annexation application. As demonstrated in response to OAR 660-012- 0310(2)(e), the City has a demonstrated history of reviewing annexation applications in a timely manner and will do so when those areas of the CFA Overlay currently outside of City limits are proposed for annexation. Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.5: Consistent Housing Policy 1.6. When properly mitigated to preserve the integrity of existing neighborhoods support higher density residential development within the Downtown and older surrounding residential areas, capitalizing on availability of existing infrastructure and supporting revitalization efforts. Finding, Housing Policy 1.6: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not interfere or otherwise conflict with higher density infill developments within the downtown or older surrounding residential areas. The proposed CFA is located away from the downtown. Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.6: Not applicable. Housing Goal 2. To encourage the development and preservation of fair and affordable housing. Page 49 of 77 Housing Policy 2.1. Through a Housing Implementation Plan explore and promote federal, state, and regional programs and incentives that support new affordable housing. Finding, Housing Policy 2.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not include specific proposals for affordable housing development. The CFA Overlay includes a 21.1-acre parcel owned by the Housing Authority of Jackson County that has been rezoned and partitioned to support the Housing Authority's future plans to develop affordable housing on the site. (Ordinances 2111 and 2112, and partition (PAR-23002).) These proposed amendments maintain the existing land use and zoning map designations for that property as well as maintaining and expanding the scale of development that is permitted on the site. The applications do not interfere or conflict with other efforts to explore federal, state and regional programs and incentives. Conclusion, Housing Policy 2.1: Not applicable. Housing Policy 2.2. Support and participate in the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan's program addressing regional housing strategies, particularly as they apply to affordable housing. Finding, Housing Policy 2.2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not interfere or otherwise conflict with the City's ability to support and participate in the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan's program addressing regional housing strategies, including affordable housing. Conclusion, Housing Policy 2.2: Not applicable. Housing Policy 2.3. Support regional efforts addressing homelessness, medical and social services for special need households. Finding, Housing Policy 2.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not affect the City's support for regional efforts to address homelessness or services for special needs households. Conclusion, Housing Policy 2.3: Not applicable. Housing Goal 3. To maintain a timely supply of vacant residential acres sufficient to accommodate development of new housing to serve the City's projected population. Housing Policy 3.1. Provide a sufficient inventory of residential planned and zoned vacant land to meet projected demand in terms of density, tenure, unit size, accessibility, and cost. Finding, Housing Policy 3.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments modify the land use and zoning designations to support high density housing by redesignating and rezoning 27.6 gross acres from LMR to MMR. The amendments do not affect the amount of total residential land within the UGB for housing. Page 50 of 77 Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.1: Consistent. Housing Policy 3.2. Throughout the 2019-2039 planning period the City's new vacant residential land use mix shall support an average density of not less than 6.9 dwelling units per gross. Finding, Housing Policy 3.2: The current land supply in the city limits and UGB support attainment of 6.9 units/gross acre. The added high-density residential land within the proposed CFA Overlay, increase to MMR minimum density, and elimination of maximum density in the CFA Overlay is consistent with and supportive of attaining higher densities within the urban area. Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.2: Consistent. Housing Policy 3.3. Update the Housing Element's vacant acreage needs every four-years consistent with the PSU Population Research Centers update of population. Finding, Housing Policy 3.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not affect the City's schedule for updating the Housing Element. Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.3: Not applicable. Housing Policy 3.4. To avoid speculation the City shall, when expanding the UGB establish procedures that give priority to lands that will be developed in a timely manner and with a residential mix and density consistent with the Housing Element. Finding, Housing Policy 3.4: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not include expansion of the UGB. Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.4: Not applicable. Housing Policy 3.5. Monitor residential in-fill development activity and develop and enact programs that encourage the expanded use of in-fill as a component to the City's residential land use inventory. Finding, Housing Policy 3.5: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not include specific development as in-fill or other development. Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.5: Not applicable. Housing Goal 4. To ensure that a variety of housing will be provided in the City in terms of location, type, price and tenure, according to the projected needs of the population. Page 51 of 77 Housing Policy 4.1. Residential land use designations on the General Land Use Plan and the Zoning Map shall be compliant with the residential land use needs and housing types identified in the Housing Element. Finding, Housing Policy 4.1: The proposed land use and zoning designations for the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments align with the land use and housing needs identified in the Housing Element by providing for a range of housing types: single-family detached, row houses, and duplexes, multifamily, mixed-use developments. The proposed map change from LMR to MMR will expand the development capacity of that portion of the CFA Overlay to allow creation of more housing to meet local needs. Conclusion, Housing Policy 4.1: Consistent. Housing Policy 4.2. Based on the findings of the Housing Implementation Plan incentivize housing types that are needed but not being provided in adequate numbers by the private sector market forces. Finding, Housing Policy 4.2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments does not affect the City's ability to enact findings of the Housing Implementation Plan, including but not limited to incentives for underrepresented but needed housing types. No additional incentives are proposed with these applications. Conclusion, Housing Policy 4.2: Not applicable. Housing Policy 4.3. In larger residential developments (in excess of 5 acres) encourage a mix of densities and housing types to accommodate a variety of households based on age and income levels. Finding, Housing Policy 4.3: The proposed Zoning Text Amendments include changes to the TOD master plan requirements and housing mix requirements in order to comply with OARs for the CFA. The proposed amendments would make master plans optional, rather than required, for land development proposals on sites greater than 2 acres, to ensure that there is no discretionary review requirement for residential development per ORS 197A.400. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.080.) The TOD housing mix requirements are also proposed to be eliminated within the CFA overlay to ensure that multifamily and row houses are permitted outright per OAR 660-012-0320(2). (Proposed CPMC 17.69.070.) The CFA Overlay does include provisions for applicants to propose a master plan if they wish to incorporate single-family detached housing types within a development, which will encourage a mix of housing types beyond the single- family detached housing type that predominates in Central Point. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.080.) The overall mix of zones proposed within the CFA Overlay and the variety of housing types permitted within those zones will continue to encourage a mix of densities and housing types. Conclusion, Housing Policy 4.3: Consistent. Page 52 of 77 Housing Policy 4.4. Support programs that encourage the ability of older residents to age in place by making existing housing more age friendly and accessible. Finding, Housing Policy 4.4: The proposed amendments do not apply to existing housing. Conclusion, Housing Policy 4.4: Not applicable. Housing Goal 5. To ensure that municipal development procedures and standards are not unreasonable impediments to the provision of affordable housing. Housing Policy 5.1. As part of a Housing Implementation Plan periodically evaluate development procedures and standards for compliance with the goals of this Housing Element and modify as appropriate. Finding, Housing Policy 5.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not affect or otherwise preclude the City's ability to review and amend development procedures and standards for compliance with the Housing Element. Conclusion, Housing Policy 5.1: Not applicable. Housing Goal 6. To develop and maintain a Housing Implementation Plan that includes programs that monitor and address the housing affordability needs of the City's low- and moderate-income households. Housing Policy 6.1. Support collaborative partnerships with non-profit organizations, affordable housing builders, and for-profit developers to gain greater access to various sources of affordable housing funds. Finding, Housing Policy 6.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments arise out of need to comply with state CFA rules and include commitment to partnerships with non-profit organizations and affordable housing builders as an HPS/anti-displacement measure. (See Section 2.4, Strategy 5.) Conclusion, Housing Policy 6.1: Consistent. Housing Policy 6.2. Support and participate in the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan's program addressing regional housing strategies. Finding, Housing Policy 6.2: The City participated in and continues to support the regional housing strategies program as evidenced by approval and implementation of the Housing Implementation Plan. The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendment applications do not preclude or otherwise conflict with the City's continued participation in the Regional Plan's program addressing affordable housing. Page 53 of 77 Conclusion, Housing Policy 6.2: Not applicable. Housing Policy 6.3. Address the special housing needs of seniors through the provision of affordable housing and housing related services. Finding, Housing Policy 6.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not affect the City's ability to address the special housing needs of seniors. The proposed text amendments maintain standards that permit multifamily housing types including senior housing in all zones within the proposed CFA Overlay. (CPMC 17.65.040 Table 1.) Conclusion, Housing Policy 6.3: Consistent. Housing Goal 7. To assure that residential development standards encourage and support attractive and healthy neighborhoods. Housing Policy 7.1. Encourage quality design throughout the City that acknowledges neighborhood character, provides balanced connectivity (multi- modal), and integrates recreational and open space opportunities. Finding, Housing Policy 7.1: The proposed CFA Overlay is located entirely within the existing TOD Overlay. Future land development will be subject to design and development standards that promote multimodal transportation options, inclusion of recreation and open spaces to support housing and high quality, pedestrian scale design. The proposed zoning text amendments also include new design standards for drive-through facilities to ensure they do not conflict with walkable design goals within the CFA. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.090(C).) Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.1: Consistent. Housing Policy 7.2. Provide flexible development standards for projects that exceed minimum standards for natural resource protection, open space, public gathering places, and energy efficiency. Finding, Housing Policy 7.2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendment applications do not affect or otherwise preclude the City's ability to provide flexible development standards. Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.2: Not applicable. Housing Policy 7.3. Where appropriate encourage mixed uses at the neighborhood level that enhance the character and function of the neighborhood and reduce impacts on the City's transportation system. Finding, Housing Policy 7.3: The existing TOD zoning districts provide opportunities for mixed-use, and the proposed map and text amendments expand the mix of permitted uses within the proposed CFA Overlay. Row Page 54 of 77 houses, multifamily, commercial, office and public uses are all proposed as permitted uses, individually or in a mixed-use configuration, within the CFA Overlay. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.040.) Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.3: Consistent. Housing Policy 7.4. Support minimum parking standards for multiple family development served by public transit. Finding, Housing Policy 7.4: The City of Central Point no longer requires minimum parking for any development in accordance with Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities rules adopted as part of OAR-660-012. The proposed CFA Overlay is located within the TOD Overlay which aims to support public transit, as evidenced by the Rogue Valley Transportation District's 2040 Transit Master Plan. Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.4: Not applicable. Housing Policy 7.5. Maintain and enforce Chapter 17.71 Agricultural Mitigation ensuring that all new residential development along the periphery of the Urban Growth Boundary includes an adequate buffer between the urban uses and abutting agricultural uses on lands zoned Exclusive Farm Use (EFU). Finding, Housing Policy 7.5: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not include or affect agricultural lands or otherwise preclude the City's ability to maintain and enforce the regulations for Agricultural Mitigation in CPMC 17.71. Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.5: Not applicable. 3.3.2 Economic Element The Economic Element provides a framework for meeting the City's economic goal to diversity its economic base. Economic Element Goals: 1. To actively promote a strong, diversified and sustainable local economy that reinforces Central Point's "small town feel" and family orientation while preserving or enhancing the quality of life in the community as a place to live, work and play. Because this Economic Element concludes that there will be economic uncertainty in the short-term, it is important that Central Point work to diversify and strengthen its economy. By continuing to analyze economic trends, Central Point will be able to continue growing strong throughout the 2019-2039 period. 2. To create meaningful incentives to encourage and support economic development. Central Point has historically been a bedroom community where people live but Page 55 of 77 work elsewhere. In order to maintain a strong tax base and to ensure continued economic prosperity, Central Point must take an active role in encouraging economic development. 3. To encourage and promote the development, redevelopment, and enhancement of retail and office areas to achieve a vibrant shopping entertainment, living and working experience in the downtown area. This goal is important because Central Point needs a vibrant downtown in order to ensure future economic prosperity. Further, based on the current BLI and the project land use needs, Central Point is going to need targeted redevelopment strategies to encourage these types of activities in the future. 4. To encourage active communication and cooperation between the City, local and state agencies, and local businesses concerning economic development, education and workforce development. The city cannot reach its goals without the assistance of others. As a result, the City needs to be receptive to suggestions and aid from others and also needs to be active in communicating its needs and plans. 5. To encourage and support growth, particularly in the targeted industries (specialty food manufacturing, and trucking and warehousing sectors). These targeted industries are where the City could make strides. It is important that the City help maintain and grow these industries now and in the future. 6. To maintain at all times an adequate supply of suitable short-term (five-year) employment lands. Central Point does not have an adequate short-term supply of lands for institutional/government and other employment types. As a result, the City should plan to add to the land supply in the near future. 7. To prepare and maintain a City of Central Point Economic Development Manual identifying and monitoring economic development strategies and programs available to the City. 8. Create a positive environment for industrial, commercial and institutional job growth and development by maintaining an adequate land supply; providing a local development review process that is predicable, responsive, and efficient; and delivering high quality public facilities and services. 9. Assure, through the UGB process, that adequate commercial lands are planned and designated for the development of pedestrian oriented neighborhood commercial centers to serve the City's new residential neighborhoods. The Economic Element Goals are implemented through the following ten (10) policies: Economic Policy 1, Participation. The City shall participate on the regional and state level in the development and programming of alternative financial incentives and initiatives for economic development, including education and workforce development that are consistent with the City's economic development goals. Page 56 of 77 1 and proposed 17.69.040(D)(1).) The existing TOD standards and additional CFA standards provide for a range of commercial and employment uses within the area zoned EC, and expand provisions for commercial and employment uses within areas zone MMR south of Beebe Rd, HMR and C. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.040.) Conclusion, Economic Policy 4: Consistent. Economic Policy 5, Business Innovation. Encourage innovation, research, development, and commercialization of new technologies, products and services through responsive regulations and public sector approaches. Finding, Economic Policy 5: Business innovation activities by the City are not affected or impeded by the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments. Conclusion, Economic Policy 5: Not applicable. Economic Policy 6, Tolo Area. The City shall in collaboration with Jackson County continue planning the Exit 35 area—also called "Area CP-1 B (Tolo)"—in the Regional Plan Element to capitalize on economic opportunities, especially for transportation- based economic activity and truck/rail freight support services. This area also contains the aeronautics manufacturing company Erickson Air Crane and serves aggregate uses; these uses have many specific and unique dimensions that should be carefully considered. Plans and land use regulations applicable to this area need to account for the site requirements of firms in these sectors. Because the area is currently constrained as a result of a lack of access to water, the City should begin planning how to make water more readily available so as to make these lands available for more economic development. Finding, Economic Policy 6: The CP-1 B Tolo area is not included in either the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Map Amendments. The proposed Amendments do not affect the City's ability to develop and implement plans in this area. Conclusion, Economic Policy 6: Not applicable. Economic Policy 7, Monitor Regulations. The City shall periodically evaluate its regulations for employment related development, particularly as it relates to targeted industries, as well as compatibility with adjacent non-employment lands to ensure that regulations are consistent with applicable best practices. Regulations found to no longer be appropriate should be amended as soon as practicable thereafter. Finding, Economic Policy 7: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not interfere with other otherwise conflict with the City's ability to evaluate and update its land development regulations relative to employment uses. 11 The proposed Zoning Text Amendments expand provisions for mixed-use development, both on individual sites and within the CFA Overlay generally, which Page 58 of 77 Finding, Economic Policy 1: The City's proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not preclude or otherwise conflict with the City's participation on the regional or state level in development and programming for financial incentives.and initiative for economic development. Conclusion, Economic Policy 1: Not applicable. Economic Policy 2, Refine Policies. The City shall continue to monitor and refine its land development and fiscal policies as they relate to economic development to ensure that the City's economic development programming can be effectively implemented. { Finding, Economic Policy 2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not interfere with or otherwise conflict with the City's ability to monitor and refine policies relative to economic development. Conclusion, Economic Policy 2: Not applicable. Economic Policy 3, Monitor Long-Term Consequences. Consider economic development incentives as an inducement to development only when it can be demonstrated that the short-term consequences are understood and found to be acceptable and the long-term consequences are determined to be beneficial to the City. Finding, Economic Policy 3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not interfere with or otherwise conflict with the City's ability to consider or implement incentives for beneficial economic development. Conclusion, Economic Policy 3: Not applicable. Economic Policy 4, Small Business. Central Point concludes that the City has experienced the loss of cottage industry and expanding small businesses due to a lack of vacant available employment related buildings (flex-space3) and the City cannot attract small businesses from elsewhere for the same reason. Finding, Economic Policy 4: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments retains the existing commercial land supply through the opportunity for a mix of residential and commercial uses. Although the land use and zoning designations (current and proposed) do not result in the immediate construction of needed building space, the Amendments support these activities as necessary to address the loss of cottage industry and expanding small businesses. The proposed amendments maintain the existing EC zoning along E Pine Street, and maintain commercial development potential within that area by limiting competition with residential uses: the zoning text amendments maintain existing requirements for ground-floor commercial with any multifamily residential uses and require row houses to be set back at least 100 feet from E Pine Street. (CPMC 17.65.040 Table 3 An industrial or commercial/office building designed to provide the flexibility to utilize the floor space in a variety of configurations. Usually provides a configuration allowing a flexible amount of office or showroom space in combination with manufacturing, laboratory, warehouse distribution, etc. Page 57 of 77 can expand employment opportunities and minimize conflicts by integrating uses within a broader neighborhood framework rather than isolating them. Conclusion, Economic Policy 7: Consistent. Economic Policy 8, Adequate Short-Term Supply. The City shall assure that, through its Capital Improvement Program, public facilities and transportation facilities are available and adequate in capacity to maintain a supply of competitive short-term buildable lands sufficient to meet employment needs within a 5-year period, particularly for the retail, specialty foods, professional health care and trucking sectors. Finding, Economic Policy 8: The City's public facility plans for transportation, water and stormwater have all been updated. There are adequate facilities planned and available to serve development within the proposed CFA Overlay. Conclusion, Economic Policy 8: Consistent. Economic Policy 9, Prepare for Long-Term Needs. The City shall maintain a supply of competitive short-term employment lands in the medium and large site categories equivalent to the twenty-year demand for those categories. The supply of short-term employment land shall be reviewed and updated annually. When it is determined that the supply of land as measured in terms of the number of sites and/or acreage in the medium and large site categories is inadequate to serve the twenty-year land needs, then the City shall amend the UGB to include additional short-term (5-year) employment lands. Finding, Economic Policy 9: The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment retains employment lands via mixed-use zoning. This is consistent with the short- term supply for large and mediums sites. Conclusion, Economic Policy 9: Consistent. Economic Policy 10, Pedestrian Oriented Neighborhood Commercial Centers. As the City expands the UGB it will include in the land use mix adequate commercial lands for the development of Pedestrian Oriented Commercial Centers designed to complement the physical character and encourage neighborhood pedestrian use. Adequacy of the acreage needed for Pedestrian Oriented Commercial Centers will be guided by the Regional Plan land use allocation. Finding, Economic Policy 10: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not involve a UGB Amendment. The proposed CFA Overlay is located within an existing Mixed-use/Pedestrian Friendly Activity Center, and the proposed Zoning Text Amendments further expand the mix of uses that will be permitted within the area. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.040.) Conclusion, Economic Policy 10: Consistent. Page 59 of 77 3.3.3 Land Use Element The Land Use Element is responsible for managing and mapping the land use needs of the City as described in other Comprehensive Plan elements. The Land Use Element sets forth goals and policies for Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Civic, Parks and Recreation and Circulation land uses. Since these Amendments do not include industrial lands, the policies for industrial lands are not addressed in these findings. Residential Land Use Policy 1: To continue to ensure that long-range planning and zoning reflects the need to locate the highest densities and greatest numbers of residents in closest possible proximity to existing and future activity centers. Finding, Residential Land Use Policy 1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments for the proposed CFA Overlay is part of the TOD Overlay, a Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Activity Center. Proposed land use and zoning designations are consistent with this policy to increases the number of people living within these Mixed-use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas. Conclusion, Residential Land Use Policy 1: Consistent. Residential Land Use Policy 2: To continue to update the Zoning Ordinance, as necessary to take advantage of planning innovation, best practices, and technological improvements that could have applications in Central Point to the benefit of the community. Finding, Residential Land Use Policy 2: The proposed Zoning Text Amendments make minor amendments to the existing definitions to reflect changes in state laws (e.g., definitions for child care facilities) and to TOD standards (e.g., differentiating duplexes from multifamily uses) that are consistent with evolving state zoning rules and practices. The most significant Zoning Text Amendments introduce new standards for the proposed CFA Overlay that fully implement new state rules for Climate-Friendly Areas, a state-led initiative as part of the Climate-Friendly and Equitable Communities program that responds to Governor Brown's Executive Order 20-04 (EO 20-04) directing certain state agencies to take specific actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and mitigate the impacts of climate change. Conclusion, Residential Land Use Policy 2: Consistent. Residential Land Use Policy 3: In areas where residential neighborhoods abut commercial or industrial areas, orient the residential structures and local streets away from these land uses to avoid any undesirable views and to strengthen neighborhood solidarity. Finding, Residential Land Use Policy 3: The proposed CFA Overlay is in areas planned and zone for medium and high-density housing and mixed-use opportunities. The TOD standards and proposed CFA Overlay standards promote a mix of uses to better integrate commercial uses into the neighborhood, rather than Page 60 of 77 separating them. The street system is planned and designed to support attractive neighborhoods with multimodal transportation facilities consistent with the land use pattern typical of the TOD Overlay areas. Conclusion, Residential Land Use Policy 3: Consistent. Residential Land Use Policy 4: In any area where development of one or more parcels may create obstacles to development of others, the initial developer shall develop a specific plan that would provide for the future development of the entire area, including provision of adequate access to potentially landlocked properties. Finding, Residential Land Use Policy 4: No site-specific development is proposed with these Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments. Conclusion, Residential Land Use Policy 4: Not applicable. Commercial Land Use Policy 1: Maintain the zoning of all commercial areas of Central Point as necessary to comply with the Economic Element. Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments maintain the existing EC zoning along E Pine Street, and maintain commercial development potential within that area by limiting competition with residential uses: the zoning text amendments maintain existing requirements for ground-floor commercial with any multifamily residential uses and require row houses to be set back at least 100 feet from E Pine Street. (CPMC 17.65.040 Table 1 and proposed 17.69.040(D)(1).) The existing TOD standards and additional CFA standards provide for a range of commercial and employment uses within the area zoned EC, and expand provisions for commercial and employment uses within areas zone MMR south of Beebe Rd, HMR and C. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.040.) Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 1: Consistent. Commercial Land Use Policy 2: Undertake an in-depth study of the downtown business district and develop a comprehensive improvement plan that would include such considerations as traffic circulation and off-street parking, pedestrian and bicycle facilities and access, structural design guidelines, and guidelines for landscaping and signing. Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not affect the City's plans to study the Central Business District. Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 2: Not applicable. Commercial Land Use Policy 3: Encourage the development of shared commercial parking areas in the downtown area to be carried out by the local businesses with City assistance. Page 61 of 77 Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not affect the downtown area. Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 3: Not applicable. Commercial Land Use Policy 4: Promote the planned integration of abutting commercial development for the purpose of more efficient customer parking, better design and landscaping, coordinated signing, and increased retail sales. Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 4: The Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments designate the proposed CFA Overlay within the existing TOD Overlay. Future development within the CFA will be subject to existing TOD standards for site design. (CPMC 17.67.) Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 4: Consistent. Commercial Land Use Policy 5: For that section of Highway 99 between Beall Lane and the High School, implement the 99 Corridor Plan to improve the corridor, traffic circulation, and the overall visual and aesthetic character of the area. Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 5: The proposed Amendments do not affect or otherwise preclude the City's ability to implement the Highway 99 Corridor Plan. Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 5: Not applicable. Civic Land Use Policy 1: Ensure that any major public or quasi-public facility that is proposed to be located within a residential neighborhood is located along a collector or Arterial Street, is compatible with surrounding land uses, and does not contribute unreasonably to traffic volumes within the neighborhood. Finding, Civic Land Use Policy 1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not include siting any public or quasi-public facility. The proposed Zoning Text Amendments include expanding permitted public and quasi-public uses within all portions of the CFA, including within mixed-use residential areas zoned MMR and HMR. (Proposed CPMC 17.69.040.) Future site-specific development of any public uses will be required to meet existing TOD design standards to ensure compatibility within a mixed-use context. Conclusion, Civic Land Use Policy 1: Consistent. Civic Land Use Policy 2: Work with officials of School District #6 to develop and implement a school site acquisition program that is consistent with the long-range comprehensive plans of the City and the District. Finding, Civic Land Use Policy 2: School District 6 has a land bank for future school sites. No sites are proposed as part of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments. Consequently, this application does not affect or otherwise Page 62 of 77 preclude the City and School District#6 from continuing to work together on long- range planning and school site acquisition. Conclusion, Civic Land Use Policy 2: Not applicable. Civic Land Use Policy 3: Continue to emphasize the need for pedestrian and bicycle access to all public facilities and areas frequented by local residents. Finding, Civic Land Use Policy 3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendment proposals are within the existing TOD Overlay which is a Mixed- use/Pedestrian Friendly Activity Centers designed to encourage safe, convenient and comfortable walking and bicycling facilities as part of the street network. Conclusion, Civic Land Use Policy 3: Consistent. Parks and Recreation Land Use Policy 1: Whenever possible, encourage the location of public park sites adjacent to public school sites to establish neighborhood educational/recreational "centers" that can benefit by joint utilization of both types of facilities. Finding, Parks and Recreation Land Use Policy 1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not include public parks, as there is no site-specific development proposed at this time. Public parks designation has already occurred consistent with the Parks Element. Conclusion, Parks and Recreation Land Use Policy 1: Not applicable. Circulation Land Use Policy 1: Prior to inclusion of lands from the URAs into the UGB a traffic impact analysis shall be completed to determine level of service at time of development. Finding, Circulation Land Use Policy 1: The Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Amendments do not include moving land from the URAs to the UGB. Conclusion, Circulation Land Use Policy: Not applicable. 3.3.4 Transportation Element The 2030 Transportation System Plan (TSP) has been adopted as the City's Transportation Element. The TSP identifies and plans for a coordinated network of transportation facilities that serves current and future state, regional and local multimodal transportation needs. Most of the transportation goals and policies address building transportation systems, which are not directly applicable to this proposed map and text amendment because no transportation facilities are proposed at this time. The Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities program includes updated transportation planning direction, which will be implemented into the City's next TSP update that kicks off this year and will be completed prior to December 31, 2029 as required by OAR 660- Page 63 of 77 012-0012(4)(a). Several of the current TSP's Land Use Goals are relevant to the proposed amendments, as addressed below. Transportation Goal 3.1: To effectively manage the use of land within the Central Point Urban Area in a manner that is consistent with, and that supports, the successful implementation of this Transportation System Plan. Finding, Transportation Goal 3.1: The proposed CFA adoption and the implementing map and code amendments refine the existing TOD standards for the area, maintaining effective land management through a mix of uses that can be supported by multimodal transportation facilities planned in the TSP. Conclusion, Transportation Goal 3.1: Consistent. Transportation Policy 3.1.1: The City shall manage the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan in a manner that enhances livability for the citizens of Central Point as set forth in the Transportation System Plan. Finding, Transportation Policy 3.1.1: The proposed CFA adoption and the implementing map and code amendments support the development of a walkable, mixed-use urban neighborhood within the ETOD area that supports livability with a mix of residential, commercial, civic and open spaces interconnected with sidewalks, bicycle routes, transit, and roads consistent with the TSP. Conclusion, Transportation Goal 3.1.1: Consistent. Transportation Policy 3.1.2: The City shall continuously monitor and update the Land Development Code to maintain best practices in transit-oriented design consistent with the overall land use objectives of the City. Finding, Transportation Policy 3.12: The proposed CFA adoption and the implementing map and code amendments update the City's existing TOD standards consistent with the state requirements for transit-oriented design within CFAs. Conclusion, Transportation Goal 3.1.2: Consistent. 3.4 CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments The findings and conclusions for CPMC 17.96 are set forth below. 17.96.100 Amendments--Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide procedures for amendments to the city's comprehensive plan, including amendments to the urban growth boundary, that may be necessary from time to time as the public necessity and convenience and general welfare requires. Amendments may be made to the comprehensive plan by following the procedural requirements set forth in Section 17.05.500 and this chapter. Page 64 of 77 Finding CPMC 17.96.100: The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (File No. CPA-24001) has been prepared and processed in accordance with this procedure set forth in this Chapter as necessary to implement state rules for Climate Friendly Areas (CFAs). Conclusion CPMC 17.96.100: Consistent. 17.96.200 Initiation of amendments. A proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan or urban growth boundary may be initiated by either: A. A resolution by the planning commission to the city council; B. A resolution of intent by the city council; or C. An application by one or more property owners, or their agents, of property affected by the proposed amendment. Finding CPMC 17.96.200: The Planning Commission, per Resolution Nos. 929 recommended the CFA Comprehensive Plan. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.200: Consistent. 17.96.300 Major revisions and minor changes. Proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan, including urban growth boundary amendments, are categorized as either major or minor amendments as defined in Section 17.10.300. Proposals for major revisions shall be processed as a Type IV procedure per Section 17.05.500. Proposals for minor changes shall be processed as a Type III procedure per Section 17.05.400. Finding CPMC 17.96.300: In accordance with Finding CPMC 17.10.300(A), the proposed amendments constitute a legislative policy decision and are therefore subject to a Type IV procedure. The application has been scheduled for two duly noticed public hearings by the Planning Commission and City Council on February 11, 2025 and February 27, 2025, respectively. Public notice was published in the The Daily Courier on January 31, 2025. Written notice was provided to DLCD on December 31, 2024 and amended on January 29, 2025. All notices are available in the file for viewing upon request at City Hall located at 140 South Third Street in Central Point, Oregon. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.300: Consistent. 17.96.400 Submittal timing of proposals. Applications for an amendment to the comprehensive plan, or urban growth boundary, may be submitted at any time. Once accepted proposals shall be scheduled by the city council by resolution of intent. The applications and review thereof shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.05 and all applicable laws of the state. Finding CPMC 17.96.400: The proposed amendments were submitted on, based on work completed in 2024 to develop the proposed CFA boundaries and implementing regulations. The application has been reviewed in accordance with Type IV procedure per CPMC 17.05.500, as detailed above. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.400: Consistent. Page 65 of 77 17.96.500 Approval criteria. A recommendation or a decision to approve or to deny an application for an amendment to the comprehensive plan, or urban growth boundary shall be based on written findings and conclusions that address the following criteria: A. Approval of the request is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals; Finding CPMC 17.96.500(A): See Findings in Section 3.2, Statewide Planning Goals. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.500(A): Consistent. B. Approval of the request is consistent with the Central Point comprehensive plan; Finding CPMC 17.96.500(B): See the Findings in Section 3.3, Comprehensive Plan. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.500(B): Consistent. C. For urban growth boundary amendments findings demonstrate that adequate public services and transportation networks to serve the property are either available, or identified for construction in the city's public facilities master plans (major and minor amendments); and Finding CPMC 17.96.500(C): The proposed change is to the Comprehensive GLUP Map and Land Use Element, which does not involve an amendment to the UGB. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.500(C): Not applicable. D. The amendment complies with OAR 660-012-0060 of the Transportation Planning Rule. Finding CPMC 17.96.500(D): Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to adopt a CFA and to amend regulations within a CFA must comply with OAR 660-012-025, Transportation Review in Climate-Friendly Areas and Centers, in lieu of OAR 660-012- 0060. Compliance with OAR 660-012-0325 is included in Section 3.1. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.500(D): Consistent. 3.5 CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and Text Amendments CPMC 17.10.100 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures for major and minor amendments to this code or the Central Point city zoning map (zoning map), herein referred to as "map or text amendments." Finding CPMC 17.10.100: The proposed application is for a Major Zoning Map Amendment (File No. ZC-24002) and Zoning Text Amendment (File No. ZC-24003) that aims to adopt and implement land use regulations for a Climate-Friendly Area consistent with the proposed Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment (File No. CPA- 24001). Conclusion CPMC 17.10.100: Consistent. CPMC 17.10.200 Initiation of Amendments Page 66 of 77 A proposed amendment to the code or zoning map may be initiated by either: A. A resolution by the planning commission to the city council; B. A resolution of intent by the city council; or for zoning map amendments; C. An application by one or more property owners (zoning map amendments only), or their agents, of property affected by the proposed amendment. The amendment shall be accompanied by a legal description of the property or properties affected; proposed findings of facts supporting the proposed amendment, justifying the same and addressing the substantive standards for such an amendment as required by this chapter and by the Land Conservation and Development Commission of the state. Finding CPMC 17.10.200: The Planning Commission initiated the proposed Zoning Map and Text Amendments by Resolution No. 930. Conclusion CPMC 17.10.200: Consistent. CPMC 17.10.300 Major and Minor Amendments There are two types of map and text amendments: A. Major Amendments. Major amendments are legislative policy decisions that establish by law general policies and regulations for future land use decisions, such as revisions to the zoning and land division ordinance that have widespread and significant impact beyond the immediate area. Major amendments are reviewed using the Type IV procedure in Section 17.05.500. B. Minor Amendments. Minor amendments are those that involve the application of adopted policy to a specific development application, and not the adoption of new policy (i.e., major amendments). Minor amendments shall follow the Type III procedure, as set forth in Section 17.05.400. The approval authority shall be the city council after review and recommendation by the planning commission. Finding CPMC 17.10.300: The proposed Amendments include a Major Map Amendment to adopt a CFA Overlay and rezone a portion of the Overlay from LMR to MMR and a Zoning Text Amendment to adopt general policies and regulations for future land use decisions within the CFA Overlay and is therefore a Major Amendment. The application has been scheduled for two duly noticed public hearings by the Planning Commission and City Council per CPMC 17.05.500 on February 11, 2025 and February 27, 2025, respectively. Public notice was published in the Daily Courier on January 31, 2025. Written notice was provided to DLCD on December 31, 2024 and amended on January 29, 2025. All notices are available in the file for viewing upon request at City Hall located at 140 South Third Street in Central Point, Oregon. Conclusion CPMC 17.10.300: Consistent. CPMC 17.10.400 Approval Criteria A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a text or map amendment shall be based on written findings and conclusions that address the following criteria: Page 67 of 77 A. Approval of the request is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals (major amendments only); Finding CPMC 17.10.400(A): See Findings in Section 3.2, Statewide Planning Goals. Conclusion CPMC 17.10.400(A): Consistent. B. Approval of the request is consistent with the Central Point comprehensive plan (major and minor amendments); Finding CPMC 17.10.400(B): See Findings in Section 3.3, Comprehensive Plan. Conclusion CPMC 17.10.400(B): Consistent. C. If a zoning map amendment, findings demonstrating that adequate public services and transportation networks to serve the property are either available, or identified for construction in the city's public facilities master plans (major and minor amendments); and Finding CPMC 17.10.400(C): The proposed Zoning Map Amendment apply to a 94.4-acre site proposed as the CFA Overlay bounded by E Pine Street to the south, Hamrick Rd to the east, Cleo Street to the north and Gebhard Road to the west. As demonstrated in the Transportation System Plan, Water System Master Plan and Stormwater Management Plan, there are adequate public facilities available and planned for the area as follows: • Transportation: This area includes E Pine Street (Primary Arterial), Hamrick Road (Secondary Arterial), Beebe Road (Collector), Gebhard Road (Collector), and several local streets. Per the Transportation System Plan, Gebhard Road is planned to be extended through the area from Beebe Road to East Pine Street (Projects No. 258-260), E Pine Street is planned to be widened to include bike lanes and sidewalks (Project No. 233), and Beebe Road is planned to be widened to include bike lanes and sidewalks (Project No. 209). New local streets will be required within the CFA to create an interconnected network of multimodal transportation facilities. • Water: Per the Water System Master Plan, there is a 12-inch waterline in E Pine Street, a 16-inch waterline in Hamrick Road, and a 16-inch waterline in Gebhart Road that is available to the area. (Water System Master Plan, Figure ES-1.) Additional distribution pipes within the CFA Overlay are proposed as developer-built projects to occur at the time of future development. (Water System Master Plan, Figure 8-1.) • Stormwater:As shown in the Stormwater Master Plan, there are stormwater lines in Hamrick Road, Beebe Road and E Pine Street. Additional facilities are planned to serve future development within the CFA Overlay, shown as the Eastside TOD capital improvement projects 15-1 and 15-2 along the northern boundary of the proposed CFA. (Stormwater Master Plan, Figure ES-1.) Page 68 of 77 Conclusion CPMC 17.10.400(C):As shown in the findings above, there are adequate public facilities available and planned to serve the area. D. The amendment complies with OAR 660-012-0060 of the Transportation Planning Rule. Finding CPMC 17.10.400(D):Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to adopt a CFA and to amend regulations within a CFA must comply with OAR 660-012- 025, Transportation Review in Climate-Friendly Areas and Centers, in lieu of OAR 660-012-0060. Compliance with OAR 660-012-0325 is included in Section 3.1. Conclusion CPMC 17.10.400(D): Consistent. 3.6 Summary Conclusion The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA-24001) has been prepared and reviewed for conformance with CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments, and found to comply with Comprehensive Plan policies, statewide planning goals, and relevant Oregon Administrative Rules (OARs) as demonstrated in Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 and 3.5 of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment (ZC-24002) and Zoning Text Amendment has been prepared and reviewed for conformance with CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and Text Amendments and found to comply with Comprehensive Plan policies, statewide planning goals, and relevant Oregon Administrative Rules (OARs) as demonstrated in Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 and 3.4 of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Page 69 of 77 4 Exhibits 4.1 Exhibit 1 — Planning Commission Resolution No. 929 4.2 Exhibit 2 — Planning commission Resolution No. 930 4.3 Exhibit 3 — Land Use Element with Redline LAND USE ELEMENT A. 2018-2038 1%it , t . ai' ;.-,., . ..„3., .,,, ..„,,, . vva City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan A v 4 4 City Council t.,. 'Sk 1� March 8, 2018 Final Draft n.,, \f Ordinance No. 2043 Page 1 of 40 1. Table of Contents 1. Summary 5 2. Introduction 6 2.1. Buildable Lands Inventory 7 2.2. State Land Use Guidelines 8 2.3. Central Point Forward,A City Wide Strategic Plan 8 2.3.1. City Mission Statement 8 2.3.2. City Statement of Values 9 2.4. The Regional Plan Element 9 2.4.1. Direction of Growth 10 2.5. Land Use and Urban Form 10 2.6. Performance Indicators 11 2.6.1. Committed Residential Density 11 2.6.2. Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas 11 2.6.3. Conceptual Transportation Plan 12 2.6.4. Conceptual Land Use Plan 12 2.6.5. Target Residential Density 12 2.6.6. Land Use Distribution 12 2.6.7. Transportation Infrastructure 13 2.6.8. Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas (Activity Centers) 13 2.6.8.1. Activity Centers 13 3. Land Use Benchmarks 16 4. Current(2017)Land Use Summary 17 5. Land Use Classifications 18 6. Residential Land Use 19 6.1. Residential Land Use Classifications 21 6.1.1. Very Low Density Residential (VLRes) 21 6.1.2. Low Density Residential (LRes) 22 6.1.3. Medium Density Residential (MRes) 22 6.1.4. High Density Residential (HRes) 23 6.1.5. Residential Land Use Plan Map 23 Page 2 of 40 6.1.6. Residential Infill and Redevelopment 24 6.1.7. Small Town,Neighborhood Preservation, Identification and Livability 24 6.2. Residential Zoning& Density 24 6.3. Minimum/Maximum Density Calculation 24 6.3.1. Public Parks/Open Space and Residential Density 26 6.3.2. Civic Uses and Residential Density 26 6.3.3. Environmental Lands and Residential Density 27 6.3.4. Residential Goals and Policies: 27 7. Employment Land Use 27 7.1. Commercial Land Use Summary 28 7.1.1. Commercial Land Use Plan 29 7.1.1.1. Neighborhood Commercial (NC). 29 7.1.1.2. Employment Commercial (EC). 30 7.1.1.3. General Commercial(GC) 30 7.1.2. Commercial Development Goals and Policies 30 7.2. Industrial Land Use Plan 30 7.2.1. Industrial Goals and Policies 31 7.3. Civic Land Use 32 7.3.1. Civic Land Use Goals and Policies 32 7.4. Parks and Recreation Land Use 32 7.5. Circulation/Transportation Land Use 33 7.5.1. Circulation Land Use Goal 33 8. Overlay Districts 34 8.1. Central Business District(CBD) 34 8.2. Transit Oriented Development District(TOD) 34 8.3. Environmental Overlay 34 8.4. Airport Overlay 34 8.5. Climate Friendly Area (CFA) Overlay 35 9. Urban Growth Boundary 39 10. Land Use Plan Map 39 Page 3 of 40 Page 4 of 40 1. Summary The City's urban area encompasses approximately 3,100 acres. Every parcel is assigned to one of six (6)primary land use classifications,which are supported by nine(9)secondary land use 1 classifications, and four overlay districts,for a total of 19 land use classifications. The percentage distribution of land uses within the urban area is illustrated in Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1.Land Use Distribution,2017 vs.2038 ■2017 E 2038 48%49% 23%21% 14 8% 8% 10%11% 7% 8% II 111 4% 3% Mil ■ Residential Commercial Industrial Civic Parks& Public Right- Open Space of-Way The Land Use Element relies on other Comprehensive Plan elements,such as the Population, Housing,Economic,Regional, and Parks and Recreation elements to determine the quantity and classification of land uses necessary to accommodate the City's current and future projected population growth. Over the course of the 2018-38 planning period it is projected that the City will igrow by 5,580 residents', generating a demand for 2,230 new housing units.To accommodate the expected population growth the City will need an additional 325 gross acres,distributed across all land use classifications. By 2038 the distribution of land uses(Figure 1.1)will be very similar to the City's current distribution,signifying no major changes in land use policy. As in the past the Residential land use will continue to be the dominant land use, followed by Right-of-Way. 1 Another popular measure of land use is the ratio of acres per 1,000 residents.Unlike the percentage measurement the ratio of acres per 1,000 residents does address policy changes in the efficiency of land use. Figure 1.2 illustrates that in 20002 the developed was 171 acres per 1,000 residents. By 2017 the actual ratio was 158 acres per 1,000 residents. By 2038,based on current average minimum density policies,it is expected that the ratio will drop to 142 acres per 1,000 residents; the lower the ratio the more efficient the use of land.The adoption of a minimum residential density of 6.9 dwelling units per gross acre' is the reason for the lower 2038 ratio. ' Based on Portland State University's Interpolation Table for 2038 with the 2017 Certified Population as the base year. 2 1980 City of Central Point Land Use Element 3 City of Central Point Regional Plan Element,Section 4.1.5 Committed Residential Density Page 5 of 40 Figure 1.2.Developed Acres per 1,000 Population, 2000,2017 and 2038 180 171 _- 160 158 1 - 142 40 120 100 80 60 40 20 2000 2017 2038 A unique aspect of the Land Use Element, and the more efficient use of land(particularly residential land),was the introduction in 2012 of the Regional Plan Element(Regional Plan).Adoption of the Regional Plan created eight urban reserve areas(URAs)and a series of Performance Indicators(PIs). The URAs address lands that are eligible for future inclusion into the UGB and annexation to the City, subject to compliance with need and applicable PIs. The most significant PIs that apply specifically to the Land Use Element are the creation of Concept Plans (both land use and transportation) for all URAs. In addition to land use the Concept Plans must address the minimum density standard PIs,and the need to provide for,and identify and monitor,the creation and development in,and of,Activity Centers(mixed-use/pedestrian friendly areas). The Regional Plan Element requires the monitoring of residential and employment development within Activity Centers to assure that they meet minimums as initially established in 2009 Regional Transportation Plan.To monitor development activity in an Activity Center it is necessary to identify those centers. By definition the City has identified,within the current UGB,fourteen(14)activity centers,with the full expectation that additional activity centers will be added as the City's UGB expands unto the URAs. Over the course of the twenty year planning period the only certainty in this Land Use Element is that it will change. Like all elements of the Comprehensive Plan the objective is to create a"living"plan; one that allows, and encourages adaptation to changing circumstances,but all the while maintaining the community's core values and vision. 2. Introduction The primary purpose of the Land Use Element is to: • Identify and map all land use classifications within the City's urban area(city limits and UGB); and Page 6 of 40 • Track activity through the Buildable Lands Inventory(BLI)for compliance with associated goals and policies identified in related Comprehensive Plan elements; i.e.the Housing Element,Economic Element,Parks and Recreation Element,Transportation System Plan,etc. Simply stated the Land Use Element is responsible for managing and mapping the land use needs of the City as defined in other Comprehensive Plan elements. The Land Use Element does not determine how much of a particular land use is needed. It only determines where that land use will be physically sited and how it will be managed to achieve the City's comprehensive land use goals and policies,particularly those goals and policies from the Housing,Economic,Parks and Recreation, and Urbanization Elements. Currently(2018),the supporting elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan identify a need to add approximately 280 vacant acres to its urban area. The Land Use Element is comprised of two parts;the text(Text),and the Land Use Plan Map(Map). • The Text component addresses the purpose and scope of each land use classification, including issues and land use distribution by acreage.The Text also contains the City's goals and policies for the management of its land use system. The current and actual use of land is maintained in the Buildable Lands Inventory(BLI), which tracks land usage over time. The BLI is an adjunct document to the Land Use Element. The BLI is maintained on a continual basis as applications for land development are received and acted on. • The Map identifies the spatial distribution of all lands in the City's urban area and designates each property with a specific land use classification. As previously noted the amount of land within each land use category is determined by other Comprehensive Plan elements. In addition to the related Comprehensive Plan elements the Land Use Element is guided by the following four(4)documents: 2.1. Buildable Lands Inventory The Buildable Lands Inventory(BLI)is an adjunct document to the Land Use Element. The BLI tracks all land use activity in the City's urban area as changes to a property's development status occurs. Annually,the BLI produces, among many other tables,the following tables tracking changes in land use: • Percentage distribution by land use classification; • Land use classification acres per 1,000 residents • Changes in the vacant land inventory; • Housing and employment in activity centers (mixed use/pedestrian friendly areas). Page 7 of 40 Monitoring of the BLI will determine the need and timing to add more land to the UGB per the needs assessment of such Comprehensive Plan Elements as Housing,Economic,Parks and Recreation,etc. 2.2. State Land Use Guidelines The purpose of the State land use guidelines is"To establish a land use policy framework and factual basis for all land use decisions and actions consistent with related elements of the Comprehensive Plan."The State's land use program requires that all land use plans include identification of issues and problems,inventories and other factual information for each applicable statewide planning goal,evaluation of alternative courses of action and ultimate policy choices,taking into consideration social,economic,energy and environmental needs. City,county,state and federal agency and special district plans and actions related to land use shall be consistent with the comprehensive plans of cities and counties and regional plans adopted under ORS Chapter 268.The required information shall be contained in either the Land Use Element or in supporting documents. The accomplishment of the above required information is delegated to the various elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan.The Land Use Element is responsible for managing(goals and policies),and the mapping the land use needs of the City as prescribed in other Comprehensive Plan elements.Changes in the Land Use Element will be predicated on changes in related elements of the Comprehensive Plan. 2.3.Central Point Forward,A City Wide Strategic Plan The City maintains a strategic plan,the purpose of which is to envision a preferred future for the City and to ". . .formulate a way to make this future happen through community teamwork and actions.It is a document that records what people think—the blueprint for positive change that defines the vision,goals and outcomes that must occur to realize the future."4 The community's mission,vision and values as set forth in the Strategic Plan serve as the foundation of the Comprehensive Plan, including this Land Use Element.The guidance provided by the Strategic Plan that is carried forward in the Land Use Element is to maintain a". . .small town commitment and feel that promotes community pride, safety, and friendliness"and the value of planning for growth ". . . that will retain our small town atmosphere". 2.3.1.City Mission Statement The City's mission statement reads as follows: "It is the mission of the City of Central Point to build and maintain a highly livable community by working in harmony and being a catalyst for partnership with all the members of the community,public and private." a City of Central Pont Strategic Plan,pp. 3,May 24,2007,Resolution No.1143, Page 8 of 40 2.3.2.City Statement of Values The Strategic Plan contains a set of five values as follows: • Growth: We value planned growth that will retain our small town atmosphere. o Managed Growth&Infrastructure, Goal 2-Maintain City of Central Point's small town feel and family orientation even as we grow. • Public Safety: We value a professional service oriented public safety policy that promotes a sense of safety and security in our city. • Transportation: We value a system of transportation and infrastructure that is modern, efficient and sensitive to the environment. • Community: We value a clean and attractive city with parks, open space and recreational opportunities. • Service: We provide the highest level of service possible in the most efficient responsible manner. It is important that these values be repeatedly acknowledged and applied as the foundation for crafting the goals and policies in all elements of the Comprehensive Plan. 2.4. The Regional Plan Element As previously noted the City's Comprehensive Plan elements must be consistent with any applicable regional plan.In 2012 the City adopted a Regional Plan Elements establishing Urban Reserve Areas(URAs)sufficient to accommodate the City's growth needs to the year 2060. The City's Regional Plan Element was prepared in accordance with the County's Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan. The City's Regional Plan Element established eight(8)URAs,totaling 1,721 acres for future use as the City grows.Within the URAs land uses were assigned based on very broad categories; Residential,Aggregate,Resource,Open Space/Parks,and Employment.The Regional Plan Element does not spatially allocate the land use types within any URA,but it does require that Concept Plans6 be prepared and adopted prior to inclusion of a URA,or any part thereof,into the City's urban growth boundary(UGB)'. The Concept Plans are required to address performance indicators,regionally significant transportation corridors,how land uses will be spatially distributed,the encouragement of mixed use/pedestrian friendly areas8(Activity Centers),and minimum residential density requirements. The Concept Plans,when approved,remain a part of the Regional Plan Element.At such time as lands within a URA are added to the UGB the concept plans will be further refined consistent with the level of land use descriptions consistent with the Land Use Element.At the time of inclusion in to the UGB they then become part of the Land Use Element. This Land Use Element does not address lands within the URA. s Regional Plan Element,City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan,Ordinance No. 1964,8/9/2012 6 City of Central Point Regional Plan Element,Section 4.1 Performance Indicators City of Central Point Regional Plan Element,Section 4.1.8 Conceptual Land Use Plans, 8 Regional Plan Element,Performance Indicators,4.1.6 Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas Page 9 of 40 2.4.1.Direction of Growth The long-term direction of growth for the City is best described in the Regional Plan Element and its accompanying Concept Plans.The Regional Plan Element established eight(8)urban reserve areas (Figure 2.1)into which the City will grow between now and 2060. These urban reserve areas(URAs) have been pre-approved for inclusion in the City's urban growth boundary', subject to demonstrated Figure 2.1 UGB and URAS land use need and the availability of necessary infrastructure. ctt As illustrated in Figure 2.1,any expansion of the UGB will be to the west and north.The City's easterly and southerly UGB and URA boundaries abut the City of Medford's assigned jurisdictional areas,limiting the City's ability for easterly or southerly expansion.As outlined in the Regional Plan Element most of the residential development (55%)will be directed to the west(CP-6A,CP-6B, and CP-5A),and to the north(CP-IC and CP-2B). Lewd '"'""'~`""~ For industrial employment lands the primary 111""'" direction of future growth will be to the far northerly urban reserve(CP-1B). This area is well eV.Yana. served with multi-modal transportation o.....r..+an infrastructure,i.e.I-5 and rail.Commercial Cows'NOM Wow"oss^as Arno development will be distributed throughout the URAs per the Regional Plan allocations and concept plans. The relationship between the Regional Plan Element and the Land Use Element is timing. When the need is properly demonstrated then land within the URAs can be brought into the UGB. The timing of inclusion to the UGB will be a function of demonstrated need and the ability to develop to urban standards,and annex to the City in a timely manner. 2.5. Land Use and Urban Form The Regional Plan introduces mandatory land use development criteria; a minimum density requirement,and a series of performance indicators(PIs).The increase in density,together with the PIs,will affect the City's future urban form as lands in the URAs are brought into the UGB and annexed to the City.With the increase in density and the imposition of mandatory PIs,it is both timely and appropriate to introduce the basic elements of urban form,particularly as it applies to intensification of residential land uses,the creation of Activity Centers,and the physical relationship between differing land uses and transportation. As used in this Land Use Element the term"urban form"refers the general pattern of use, building height and development intensity and the structural elements that define the City physically, such as natural features,transportation corridors,open space,public facilities,as well 9 ORS Page 10 of 40 as activity centers and other community focal elements.The introduction of urban form is not intended as the answer to good urban design,but it is intended to provide a basic awareness and a palette from which good urban form can evolve. 2.6. Performance Indicators As previously noted the Regional Plan Element established performance indicators as a means to measure compliance with the objectives of the Regional Plan Element.There are eight(8) performance indicators that,via the Regional Plan Element,apply to the Land Use Element as the UB expands into the Regional Plan's URAs.The PIs are10: 2.6.1.Committed Residential Density Land within a URA and land currently within an Urban Growth Boundary(UGB)but outside of the existing City Limit shall be built, at a minimum, to the residential density of 6.9 dwelling units per gross acre(2010-2035), and 7.9 dwelling units per gross acre(2036- 2060). This requirement can be offset by increasing the residential density in the city limit. Prior to annexation each city shall establish (or, if they exist already, shall adjust)minimum densities in each of its residential zones such that if all areas build out to the minimum allowed the committed density shall be met. This shall be made a condition of approval of a UGB amendment. The Housing Element addresses the minimum density requirement and the assignment of residential lands by the appropriate residential land use classification necessary to meet the minimum density standard. 2.6.2.Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas For land within a URA and for land currently within a UGB but outside of the existing City Limit, each city shall achieve the 2020 benchmark targets for the number of new dwelling units"and employment12 to be located in mixed-use/pedestrian-friendly areas as identified in the 2009 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)or most recently adopted RTP".Beyond the year 2020, cities shall continue to achieve the 2020 benchmark targets, or if additional benchmark years are established, cities shall achieve the targets corresponding with the applicable benchmarks.Measurement and definition of qualified development shall be in accordance with adopted RTP methodology. The requirement is considered met if the city or the region overall is achieving the targets or minimum qualifications, whichever is greater. This requirement can be offset by increasing the percentage of dwelling units and/or employment in the City Limit. To facilitate compliance with this performance indicator the Land Use Element,in Figure 2.1, identifies mixed-use/pedestrian-friendly areas(Activity Centers),and through the BLI tracks 1°Numbers in parenthesis(4.1.5 through 4.1.8.4)are the reference numbers in the Regional Plan "Alternative Measure No.5 requires that 39%of all new residential dwelling units shall be located in mixed use/pedestrian-friendly areas. 12 Alternative Measure No.6 requires that 48%of all new employment shall be located in mixed use/pedestrian- friendly areas. 13 RVMPO Alternative Measures Activity Centers,2017 Page 11 of 40 population and employment development within these Activity Centers.It is also anticipated that as the City expands into the URA additional Activity Centers will be added per approved Conceptual Land Use Plans. 2.6.3.Conceptual Transportation Plan Conceptual transportation plans shall be prepared early enough in the planning and development cycle that the identified regionally significant transportation corridors within each of the URA's can be protected as cost-effectively as possible by available strategies and funding.A Conceptual Transportation Plan for a URA, or appropriate portion of a URA shall be prepared by the City in collaboration with the Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization, applicable irrigation districts,Jackson County, and other affected agencies, and shall be adopted by Jackson County and the respective city prior to or in conjunction with a UGB amendment within that URA. The conceptual transportation plan shall identify a general network of regionally significant arterials under local jurisdiction, transit corridors, bike and pedestrian paths, and associated projects to provide mobility throughout the region (including intercity and intercity, if applicable). The Land Use Plan Element includes the street classification system for all streets within the City's urban area.As the City's UGB is expanded the Land Use Map must be amended to be consistent with the conceptual transportation plan for the appropriate URA. 2.6.4.Conceptual Land Use Plan A proposal for UGB amendments into a designated URA shall include a Conceptual Land Use Plan prepared by the City in collaboration with Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization, applicable irrigation districts,Jackson County, and other affected agencies for the area proposed to be added to the UGB as follows: 2.6.5.Target Residential Density The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate how the residential density in section 2.6.1 above will be met at full build-out of the area added to the UGB amendment. 2.6.6.Land Use Distribution The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall indicate how the proposal is consistent with the general distribution of land uses in the Regional Plan, especially where a specific set of land uses were part of the rationale for designated land which was determined by the Resource Lands Review committee to be commercial agricultural land as part of a URA, which applies the following URAs: CP-1B, CP-1 C, CP-4D, CP-6A, and CP-2B. Page 12 of 40 2.6.7.Transportation Infrastructure The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall include the transportation infrastructure required in section 2.6.3 above. 2.6.8.Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas (Activity Centers) The Conceptual Land Use Plan shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate how the commitments of section 2.6.2 above will be met at full build-out of the area added to the UGB amendment. 2.6.8.1. Activity Centers An important consideration related to urban form and the Regional Plan's Performance Indicators is the concept of activity centers. As used in this Land Use Element the term"activity center"is interchangeable with the term Transit- Oriented/Mixed-Use Pedestrian-Friendly areas. Both terms represent the development of a place(s)that encourages higher density mixed-use environments that are neighborhood oriented and designed to increase the convenience of walking, bicycling,and transit. Activity Centers are illustrated in the RVMPO's Alternative Measures Activity Centers' map (Figure 2.1).The concept of activity centers is a key component to the City's success in the retention and creation of neighborhoods and community identity necessary to support the City's small town atmosphere14,and ultimately creates an environment that supports transit use. As used in the Land Use Element there are two types of activity centers; the activity centers that serves a residential neighborhood; and activity centers that serve the broader community's retail and service needs. As used in the Land Use Element activity centers are described as: • Areas of development that contribute to achieving mixed-use,pedestrian friendly development,that is vertically or horizontally supports mixed-use; • Neighborhood commercial/employment centers; • Parks and schools; and • Downtown areas/central business district. Benefits of activity centers include:1'114i • Greater housing variety and density,more affordable housing(smaller units), including life-cycle housing(starter homes to larger homes to senior housing); 14 City of Central Point Forward Fair City Vision 2020,a City Wide Strategic Plan,2007 Page 13 of 40 • Reduced distances between housing,workplaces,retail businesses,and other amenities and destinations; • More compact development,land-use synergy(e.g. residents provide customers for retail which provide amenities for residents); • Stronger neighborhood character,sense of place; and • Walkable,bikeable neighborhoods,increased accessibility via transit,both resulting in reduced transportation costs. The City's activity centers are illustrated in Figure 2.2.As the city grows into the URA's additional,strategically located activity centers will be needed to service both residential neighborhoods and the retail and employment needs of the community.The placement of future activity centers will be addressed in the Conceptual Land Use Plans prepared for each URA. Page 14 of 40 Figure 2.2 Activity Centers Adiliiii CENTRAL POINT , • 1111 — Illll 6%, , -- ,..W:47.P.tr—4:::::X::::.:::.'r ei ee :_ ''4 ti sMill jj; iii illiviii‘ : 1 it 4 4r.=. G il, i. k. „is .4:: memir.." ......s 11-,4 I \ 1 i- li MI! P110 \Legend P I: N 1 1 -_ :_ Activity Centers SI,111,e Liitib.%ii "a11.4N464 DA x i:l'�eq � `t`' tephtortmoa Acavitycenter(NA) t ii:i"'Pi 2. .1 m�y g�.: L \ Parks At;tivRyCerter(PA) NAar. .1 irs,ui�� r �"€III RVM PO Alrernabve Measures Activity Center(RVAtPO) —• UGB Land Use Activity Center Map .a.uaedm:ae No.,,6e,1.q�,: 2018 - 2038 Ge No-1471 aq 221 7110 nibe sandedcr Re 4C MOW all PIIM-c Ducats 0'1- c.0ren UGB-trnrs ad A.Moots se rmaraa Or tns mo FM NYR:2017 Cats An Gard SJW_0512C.017 FR_Oaten:..atfrplsfrd 018 Mao g0te5C*,.14F:'S.Cer'e Doe Ee"Kn5-no JX Er',_'coat[2217 Creams ay:b.Fnad fepkrteC 21 2217 1s3.101 Far ay 15.201. Page 15 of 40 3. Land Use Benchmarks Depending on changes in land use policy and/or changes in the underlying economy, a community's use of land can vary over time. Knowing the extent of these changes is an important land use tool for measuring policy implementation and economic growth. There are four(4)basic methods of tracking land use that will be used in this Land Use Element: 1. The percentage of a land use classification(developed and vacant)to the total of all land use categories; 2. Gross acres per 1,000 residents (resident ratio)by land use category and total(developed and vacant)of all land use categories; 3. Percentage of dwelling units located in an activity center; and 4. Percentage of employment located in an activity center. The first two measures are typically used for tracking purposes only,unless specifically incorporated by policy reference. As an example, in Table 3.1 the 1980 Industrial land use category targeted 13%for the City's industrial needs by the year 2000.By 2017 the actual percentage of industrial acreage was 9%. What does this mean? Since there were no policies targeting a minimum percentage for industrial lands, the only explanation was that over time the City converted 4%of its industrial lands to other non- industrial uses,which was the case in 2003 and the residential and industrial changes needed for the Twin Creeks TOD. Table 3.1 illustrates the changes in the two benchmarks for the planning period 1980—2000,2017 (current),and the planning period 2018—2038. Since the 1980 Land Use Element was completed the City has more intensely used its land. In 1980 it was estimated that the City would need 171 total acres per 1,000 residents. By 2017 the population benchmark(when measured against developed acreage)was 152 acres per 1,000 residents. By the end of the 2018—2038 planning period that ratio is expected to be 142 acres per 1,000 population; a 15%increase in development intensity from1980 to 2038. Benchmarks 3 and 4 track the amount of residential households,and employment in activity centers as required by the Regional Plans Performance Indicator 3.1.1.2. Page 16 of 40 Table 3.1 Land Use Benchmarks 2000 2017 2038 Land Use Percentage Acres/1,000 Acres/1,000 Acres/1,000 Classification of Total Pop. % Pop. % Pop. Residential 47% 80 53% 84 49% 69 Commercial 7% 12 6% 9 8% 11 Industrial 13% 22 8% 13 11% 15 Civic 7% 12 4% 6 3% 5 Parks&Open Space 6% 10 6% 10 8% 12 Public Right-of-Way 20% 34 23% 36 21% 30 TOTAL 100% 171 100% 158 100% 142 Source:Buildable Lands Inventory,2017 4. Current (2017) Land Use Summary The City of Central Point was incorporated in 1889, and had an estimated population of 500. Over the years the City has grown concentrically around its original core area,with Hwy. 99 and Pine Street serving as the north/south and east/west axis. The City's current Land Use Element was completed in 1983 covering an urban area of 2,736.83 acres. At that time it was expected that the City's urban area(build-out)was sufficient in size to accommodate a population of 16,000 by the year 2000,or 171 acres per 1,000 residents. By the end of 2017 the City's certified population was 17,70015 and the urban area accounted for approximately 3,100 acres of which 2,679 acres were classified as developed16,for a ratio of 158 developed acres per 1,000 residents. Since 1983 the most noticeable change in land use was due to changes in the Industrial and Residential land use classifications.This was the result of land use changes in 2001 allowing for development of the Twin Creeks TOD.At that time the lands currently occupied by the Twin Creeks TOD was designated for industrial use and needed to be changed to residential use to accommodate the Twin Creeks TOD project. This change was off-set by changes in the southeast quadrant of the city from Residential to Industrial land use. Table 3.1 identifies and compares the City's current land use distribution based on the 1983 Land Use Element to year 2000,current land use for 2017,and projected land use needs to 203817. As the City moves toward,and beyond,2038 the percentage of industrial land in the urban area has the potential,based on Employment designated lands in the Regional Plan Element(CP-1B),to increase its percentage. To attain this potential it will be necessary to monitor Employment land needs and appropriately adjust the Economic Element. The other noticeable change in Table 3.1 was in the Civic classification from a projected 7%of total land area to 4%by 2017.This reduction was the result of changes in accounting methodology for 15PSU Certified 2017 Population 16 Defined as buildable lands in the BLI 17 PSU Certified 2017 Population Page 17 of 40 civic land uses. The current figure is based on lands actually designated as Civic use on the Land Use Plan Map and account for such public uses as schools,libraries,and misc. government uses. The earlier 1983 number was based on an accounting of all"civic"uses such as churches,private schools, fraternal organizations,etc.which is located within other land use classifications(predominantly Residential).When all"civic"uses(public and private)are accounted for the actual percentage in 2017 was close to 7%. Going forward the term"Civic"applies to only public or utility related civic uses.Uses such as churches and private schools,because of their size,no longer are limited to the Civic land use classification,but are allowed in other zoning districts as either an out-right permitted uses, or conditional uses.The City BLI will continue to maintain an inventory of these"other civic" land uses and make appropriate adjustments to the underlying land use classification and zoning as they occur. 5. Land Use Classifications The City's current(2017)urban area contains approximately 3,100 acres. Every parcel is assigned to one of six(6)primary land use classifications,which are supported by nine(9)secondary land use classifications(Table 5.1),and four-five overlay districts,for a total land use system of 4-9-20 land use classifications. Table 5.1. Land Use Classifications 1 Residential(Res) Very Low Density(VLRes) Low Density(LRes) Medium Density(MRes) High Density(HRes) 2 Commercial Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Employment Commercial (EC) General Commercial(GC) 3 Industrial Light Industrial(LI) General Industrial (GI) 4 Park and Recreation(P/R) 5 Civic (C) 6. Overlay Districts Transit Oriented Development(TOD) Environmental(E) Airport(A-A) Central Business District(CBD) Climate Friendly Area (CFA) Table 5.2 identifies the distribution of the different land uses by net acreage for the current planning period(2018 to 2038). In Table 5.2 the additional 240 acres(approx.)represents,by land use,the projected acreage within the current URA that need to be brought into the City's UGB over the course of the next 20 years.As previously noted the acreages and their land use distribution are based on the needs established in such other elements as Housing(residential Page 18 of 40 lands), Economic (commercial and industrial lands),Parks, etc. Figure 5.1 (Land Use Map) represents the spatial distribution of all land as defined in the Land Use Element,less what is shown in Table 5.2 as additional needed net acres uses. Table 5.2 Projected Urban Area Land Use Needs Additional Total 2038 2017 Inventory Needed(Gross Inventory Land Use Classification (Gross Acres) Acres) (Gross Acres) Re side ntialt 1,491 150 1,641 Commercial 247 29 276 Industrial2 360 - 360 Civic 109 9 118 Parks &Open Space3 227 53 280 Public Right-of-Way4 694 - 694 TOTAL 3,128 241 3,369 Source:City of Central Point Buildable Lands Inventory,2017 Notes:I"Additional Need"Source 2017 Housing Element 2"Additional Need"Source 2013 Economic Element,updated per Ord.2013 3"Additional Need"Source Draft 2018 Parks and Recreation Element 4"Additional Need"not adjusted for future development 6. Residential Land Use In 2017 the City's residential land uses accounted for 52%of the City's total urban land area, representing the largest single land use classification.For a City the size of Central Point the residential inventory is historically typical. The purpose of the residential land use classification is to maintain an adequate supply of buildable land at densities and housing types sufficient to accommodate the City's projected housing needs as set forth in the Housing Element.The Housing Element identifies not only the residential acreage needed during the planning period, but also the acreage allocation by density category and range of housing types. Historically, the primary challenge in administering the residential land use classifications was the reliance on maximum densities,rather than minimum densities. The prior Land Use Element established maximum density as a goal,with the assumption that the private sector would construct, if not at the maximum density, then surely close to it. In 1983,based on the City's range of maximum allowed densities,the average density for new development should have been 11 dwelling units per gross acre. Between 1980 and 2016 the actual average built density was 4.7 dwelling units per gross acre. In 2006 the City amended its Zoning Ordinance adopting both minimum density and maximum density provisions. Residential development post 2006 increased to 5.6 units per gross acre,a significant improvement over the prior twenty years.Moving forward(2018-2038)it is planned,in both the Regional Plan Element and the Housing Element, that the minimum average density for all new residential development will be 6.9 dwellings per gross acre to 2035 and 7.9 thereafter. Page 19 of 40 The residential densities in the Land Use Element are based on the density tables in the Housing Element. The minimum and maximum lot sizes identified in the Land Use Element,and the Housing Element,are suggestions only,and not mandatory.The minimum and maximum lot sizes will be set by the Zoning Ordinance,and can be adjusted from time-to-time,provided they comply with the minimum densities in the Housing Element as carried forward in the Land Use Element. Figure 5.1 Land Use Plan Map R" s CENTRAL POINT '_ - i� l T_ q ' 4..+3 (\ 1 Y w:i *, ... t ew r ' _ � nail{ lie .4111111 NM it ,,, . , irt ,-, '017 * '.!,! _,._,,..., /-- t4 Legend eeenseuWww. •ne••e C•.n•e.w enwses•es.w ..ew•w OW..en.a Oa.woo ,TZ.,cat.....ew,a a,a.ar c flvraw+..w:r.-.w Sr :ve•ew. dig.A ....a•.b -rea.-,or-wt.. -arw MEeeeew Cow lifts•,n.. :MaM sow MB use,.atC, -Srr.Ca+r a. W-rarr, Land Use \lap avw.eo..e.wcnsx•' 2018 - 2038 .,..e.•r+Wu X.3 "A+.o s 0WOOS V rw•<et.,w avow,orsaw as C.ii11'ev98...sent!..Mee re.ee.ea.r+•e ne 4rw b.'r,.v ti`..r.ale.c.•=or •s..rM wr"..•a.4W..oesse f.e.a.0 a,rr errs_re A..rr-.14.11x... Owe",I..a4 larr.wr a.arr -Ow wen a Coss Page 20 of 40 6.1. Residential Land Use Classifications Since 1980 residential lands have accounted for approximately 50%of all developed lands within the City. Over the next 20 years it is projected that the residential percentage of the City's land inventory will remain at approximately 50%. On a population basis the ratio of population to residential acres was initially planned in 1980 at 80:1,000(Acres per 1000 residents). By the year 2000 the actual ratio was 80:1,00018 . By 2017 the ratio was 83:1,000. By 2038,with the mandated minimum density at 6.9 the ratio is expected to drop to 77:1,000. There are four(4)residential land use classifications and nine(9) supporting zoning districts. The four(4)land use classifications,their zoning designation, and minimum and maximum densities are: Table 6.1 Residential Land Use Classifications Land Use Permitted Housing Associated Zoning Suggested Minimum Classification Types Districts and Maximum Gross Densities VLRes(Very Low Single-Family R-L 1 to 4 Density) Detached LRes(Low Density) Single-Family R-1-6 4 to 8 Detached and Attached R-1-8 R-1-10 MRes(Medium Single-Family R-2 7 to 20 Density) Attached, Plexes and LMR Apartments HRes(High Density) Single-Family R-3 20 to 50 Attached, Plexes, MMR Apartments HMR The following defines each Residential land use classification: 6.1.1.Very Low Density Residential (VLRes) The purpose of the VLRes classification is to encourage, accommodate,maintain and protect a suitable environment for residential living at very low densities on lands that are impacted by environmental constraints,or agricultural buffering needs. The VLRes classification was initially established to act as a buffer between both the industrial areas to the east and the agricultural lands to the west.The VLRes classification was previously identified as Farm-Residential. As a percentage of the City's residential lands inventory it accounts for slightly over 1%. Today the reliance on buffering from agricultural use has been mitigated by implementation of agricultural buffering standards19,reducing the reliance on the VLRes classification as the sole solution to agricultural buffering strategy. However,the VLRes classification is 18 The projected need for residential land exceeded the actual population growth by 2000. 19 CPMC 17.71 Agricultural Mitigation Page 21 of 40 still a viable option to agricultural buffering,and in environmentally sensitive lands, such as flood hazard areas and wet lands,where larger lots will facilitate buffering mitigation. The VLRes land use classification is supported by the Residential Low Density(R-L) zoning district. The minimum and maximum allowed densities and general lot size ranges are illustrated in Table 6.2. The reference to minimum and maximum lot size is not mandatory,but advisory. The setting of minimum and maximum lot size is the responsibility of the City's Zoning Ordinance,provided that the minim and maximum density is compliant with the Housing Element. Table 6.2 Ver Low Densi Residential Zoning Minimum Maximum Suggested Suggested District Density/Gross Acre Density/Gross Acre Minimum Net Lot Maximum Net Lot Size Size R-L 1 4 9,000 s.. ft. 35,000 si. ft. 6.1.2.Low Density Residential (LRes) The LRes land use classification supports the need for low density housing and represents the City's R-1 zoning district. The LRes classification represents the largest residential land use category, accounting for 60%of the City's residential acreage. The purpose of this land use classification is to accommodate the demand for single-family attached and detached housing. The minimum density is 4 dwelling units per gross acre(R-1-10),with a maximum of 8 dwelling units per gross acre(Table 6.3). Single-family attached housing is permitted within the LRes classification subject to design standards that assure architectural compatibility with abutting single-family detached dwellings. Design emphasis is on massing, fenestration, and pedestrian and vehicular access to assure individual identity for each attached unit. Table 6.3 Low Densit Residential Zoning Minimum Maximum Suggested Suggested District Density/Gross Acre Density/Gross Acre Minimum Net Lot Maximum Net Lot Size Size R-1-6 6 8 4,000 s.. ft. 6,000 s.. ft. R-1-8 5 6 6,000 s•. ft. 7,000 s•. ft. R-1-10 4 5 7,000 se. ft. 9,000 s.. ft. 6.1.3.Medium Density Residential (MRes) The MRes classification's preferred location is within 1/2 mile of activity centers and/or transit facilities. The MRes classification allows for a mix of detached and attached dwelling units either owner and/or renter occupied,subject to compliance with the minimum and maximum density requirements in Table 6.4. The MRes designation covers two zoning districts;the R-2 and the LMR districts. The LMR district is a performance based zoning district that applies to all new development within the UGB. The R-2 district Page 22 of 40 applies to older areas of the City that are already developed.To avoid non-conforming issues properties in the R-2 retains separate development standards from the LMR district, but may in-fill,or redevelop using LMR standards. Table 6.4 Medium Densi Residential Zoning Minimum Maximum Suggested Suggested District Density/Gross Acre Density/Cross Acre Minimum Net Lot Maximum Net Lot Size Size R-2 7 10 3,000 s•. ft. 5,000 s.. ft. LMR 7 10 3,000 s•. ft. 5,000 s•. ft. 6.1.4.High Density Residential (HRes) This land use classification supports high density housing. The HRes classification's preferred location is within 1/2 mile of activity centers and/or transit facilities. Table 6.5 Hi.h-Densi Residential(HRes) Zoning Minimum Maximum Suggested Suggested District Density/Gross Acre Density/Gross Acre Minimum Net Lot Maximum Net Lot Size Size R-3 15 20 N.A. N.A. MMR 15 20 N.A. N.A. HMR 20 50 N.A. N.A. The HRes classification supports three zoning districts; the R-3,the MMR,and the HMR (Table 6.5). The only distinguishing factor between the R-3 and MMR zoning districts is that the R-3 district is typically in the older areas of the City and were developed under older standards,while the MMR and HMR are applied to new development within the UGB,TOD and CBD overlay. The HMR district is the City's highest density residential zoning district,which was initially reserved for use in the TOD district/corridor,but is now allowed outside the TOD district/corridor per the Land Use Plan Map(Figure 6.1). 6.1.5.Residential Land Use Plan Map The Land Use Plan Map distributes each of the residential land use classifications based on,and in order of priority,as follows: 1. Acreage needs as identified in the Housing Element.The density mix and acreage on the Land Use Plan Map shall be consistent with the density mix and acreage mix in the Housing Element. 2. Locational factors, such as adjacent land uses,proximity to activity centers, proximity to public transit,and street hierarchy. Page 23 of 40 The current Land Use Plan Map Residential land use designations are based on current (2018)designations, and are not expected to be changed in the near future. 6.1.6.Residential Infill and Redevelopment The BLI tracks the City's infill and redevelopment property. Most of the City's residential infill is scattered throughout the City,while redevelopment opportunities are concentrated in and around the downtown and older areas of the City. The Housing Element addresses infill and redevelopment goals and polices. 6.1.7.Small Town, Neighborhood Preservation, Identification and Livability One of the benefits of living in Central Point is its small town character,the importance of which is acknowledged in the City's 2007 Central Point Forward Fair City Vision 2020(Vision Plan)". . .with a `small town' commitment and feel that promotes community pride, safety, and friendliness;" followed by the value statement that the City values ". . .planned growth that will retain our small town atmosphere."With the". . . small town aspiration . . ."and increasing residential density urban design is,and will continue to be an important consideration in the City's continuing development. As used in this Land Use Element the term"small town"is qualitative (feel),not quantitative (size of population or building size),with an emphasis on urban design elements to support and enhance the neighborhood feel and pedestrian in scale. 6.2. Residential Zoning& Density The residential densities shown in the above tables are based on gross acres as defined in Section 6.3. All residential development must meet the minimum density requirement based on its land use classification'and the applicable underlying zoning district. The minimum and maximum net lot area shown in the above tables are advisory only. The designation of minimum and maximum lot size for each residential district is the responsibility of the City's Zoning Ordinance,which may be modified from time-to-time provided they comply with the applicable densities set forth in the Housing Element for each associated residential land use classification. 6.3. Minimum/Maximum Density Calculation The Regional Plan Element measures density in terms of dwelling units per gross acre(43,560 sq. ft.). To calculate residential density per gross acre it is sometimes necessary to remove other non-residential use areas within the proposed project that will be given a land use reclassification from the Residential inventory to another approved land use (excepting right-of-way). 20 City of Central Point 2018 Housing Element Page 24 of 40 The range of residential units allowed within any particular land use classification and zoning district can be calculated by taking the gross acreage(43,560 sq. ft. per gross acre)less any areas proposed for public parks/public open space,civic uses and environmental lands as that term is defined in the Land Use Element Environmental Overlay(Section 6.3.3). Below are two examples of how to calculate the minimum/maximum density for the all residential zoning districts. Example 1: Property is 2.5 gross acres within the R-1-8 zoning district(5 units minimum per gross acre).No proposed acreage deductions for Environmental,public parks/open space,or civic uses. Gross acreage equals 2.5 acres Minimum required density 5 units/gross acre. Maximum allowed density 6 units/gross acre. 2.5*5=12 minimum number of dwelling units. 2.5*6=15 maximum number of dwelling units. Allowed Density Range for the property: 12 to 15 units. Example 2: Property is 2.5 acres within the R-1-8 zoning district(5 units/gross acre). There is 0.75 acres designated for public parks/open space,0.25 acres for a church and 0.25 acres within the floodway(exempt acreage)for an adjusted total gross acreage of 1.25. Gross acreage equals 2.5 acres minus 1.25 acres((exempt acreage)= 1.25 acres Minimum required density 5 units per gross acre. Maximum allowed density 6 units per gross acre. 1.25*5=6.25 rounded to 6 minimum number of dwelling units. 1.25*6=7.5 rounded21 to 8 maximum number of dwelling units. Allowed Density Range for the property: 6 to 8 dwelling units per gross acre. Over the course of the next 20-year planning period the City will need approximately 250 acres of residential land to meet its expected population growth22. The below tables illustrate how the new residential lands are scheduled to be distributed by land use classification23 as necessary to meet the minimum density standards of the Housing Element. 21 Conventional rounding method 22 City of Central Point Housing Element 23 City of Central Point Housing Element Page 25 of 40 Table 7.6 Pro•o sed Maximum and Minimum Gross Densit ,Zonin_ Gross Residential Minimum Maximum Minimum Acres Build-Out Maximum Gross Gross Build-Out Zoning District Percentage Gross Density Needed (DUs) Density Acres (Dlis) R-L 5% 1.00 12 12 2.50 12 30 Total 5% 1.00 12 12 2.50 12 30 R-1-6 30% 6.00 76 456 8.00 76 608 R-1-8 18% 5.00 46 228 6.00 46 274 R-1-10 12% 4.00 30 122 5.00 30 152 Total 60% 5.30 152 806 7.19 152 1 094 LMR 10% 7.00 26 182 10.00 26 260 R-2 10% 7.00 25 175 10.00 25 250 Total 20% 7.00 51 357 10.00 51 510 R-3 6% 12.00 15 182 20.00 15 304 MMR 5% 12.00 11 137 20.00 11 228 HMR 5% 25.00 11 285 50.00 11 569 Total 15% 15.90 38 603 29.00 38 1,101 Grand'fatal 1I1111%I 7.03 1 253 1 1,778 1 111.81 253 1 2,734 Periodically,through the BLI,the need for urban land will be monitored and the UGB amended as necessary to maintain an inventory of vacant land adequate to meet demand(Gross Residential Acres Needed)as noted in Table 7.6. In addition to the above residential acreage need identified in Table 7.6,additional residentially designated acreage will be needed within the residential land use classification to accommodate public parks and open space,and private sector civic uses, and the residential land inventory appropriately adjusted. 6.3.1.Public Parks/Open Space and Residential Density The City's Parks and Recreation Element does not identify specific locations for future parks,but instead provides proposed target areas needing parks(Figure 6.1). To maintain the park land to population ratio noted in the Parks and Recreation Element an additional 42 acres of park land will need to be acquired and developed by 2038. Generally,the location of parks and open space lands are associated with residential lands. At such time as parks and open space lands are designated and acquired within the Residential land use classification,then the Residential lands acreage will need to be adjusted to accommodate the loss in acreage due to the park land need. Until such time as park lands are acquired the residential land inventory includes,in the aggregate,the 42 acres projected for public parks and open space. As park lands are identified the Land Use Element will be amended to reflect the change. 6.3.2.Civic Uses and Residential Density The designation of Civic lands, as with parks and open space,predominantly responds to residential development. Similar to the provision to adjust residential lands for park and open space development,when civic uses, such as churches,develop within the Residential land use classification,then the residential lands must be appropriately Page 26 of 40 adjusted to accommodate the loss in acreage. As civic uses are developed the change will be reflected in the BLI. 6.3.3.Environmental Lands and Residential Density Throughout the City there are lands that are developmentally encumbered as a result of flooding or other environmental constraints.The presence of environmental constraints is maintained in the BLI and is deducted from the density calculation in Section 6.3. 6.3.4.Residential Goals and Policies: Residential Goal 1: To ensure a high degree of livability and environmental quality in all residential areas of Central Point. Residential Goal 2: To support a well-balanced variety of residential densities and housing opportunities/types for all residents of the community as described in the Housing Element. Residential Goal 3: To preserve the value and character of older-single-family neighborhoods through proper zoning, including reasonable efforts to encourage maintenance and rehabilitation as an alternative to transitional development at higher densities. Residential Goal 4: To encourage and make possible innovative residential planning and best practices development techniques that would help to increase land use efficiency, reduce costs of utilities and services,and ultimately reduce housing costs. Residential Policy 1: To continue to ensure that long-range planning and zoning reflects the need to locate the highest densities and greatest numbers of residents in closest possible proximity to existing and future activity centers. Residential Policy 2: To continue to update the Zoning Ordinance, as necessary to take advantage of planning innovation,best practices, and technological improvements that could have applications in Central Point to the benefit of the community. Residential Policy 3: In areas where residential neighborhoods abut commercial or industrial areas, orient the residential structures and local streets away from these land uses to avoid any undesirable views and to strengthen neighborhood solidarity. Residential Policy 4: In any area where development of one or more parcels may create obstacles to development of others,the initial developer shall develop a specific plan that would provide for the future development of the entire area,including the provision of adequate access to potentially landlocked properties. 7. Employment Land Use The Employment land use category is comprised of six(6) supporting land use classifications addressing the City's land use needs for commercial,office,and industrial acreage. The City has a Page 27 of 40 total 2017 inventory of 511 acres within the urban area designated for employment purposes. Based on the findings of the Economic Element it is estimated that by the year 2033 the City will have a need for 59 to 64 additional gross acres24, or 13 acres per 1,000 residents of employment lands to meet its 2033 year growth projection. The Economic Element was based on the assumption that by 2033 the population would be 27,410. Portland State University Population Research Center's25 official forecast for 2033,was 22,257,was considerably lower.By 2038 it is projected to be 23,290. Because the 2038 population projection does not exceed the Economic Element's 2033 population projection the estimated demand of 59—64 additional acres for employment purposes will be acceptable for the 2018—2038 planning period. Table 7.1. Projected Employment Land Use Needs Needed New Total 2038 Land Use Classification 2017 Inventory Gross Acres Inventory Commercial 236 14 250 Industrial 275 49 325 TOTAL 511 64 575 Source:City of Central Point Buildable Lands Inventory,2017 7.1. Commercial Land Use Summary The City's commercial land use classification is comprised of three secondary classifications: • Neighborhood Commercial(NC) • Employment Commercial(EC); and • General Commercial(GC) The EC and GC have been redefined from their prior descriptions to broaden the scope of allowed land uses. Of the 511 acres designated for employment purposes 235 acres are identified for commercial use(Figure 7.2). By 2038 it is expected that(technically)an additional 14 gross acres will be needed per the Economic Element. However;this projected need is based on the general relationship of total commercial acreage to population—supporting neighborhoods. With the exception of the NC classification this relationship is reasonably accurate. For the NC classification additional commercial lands will be needed to service new neighborhoods as the City expands in to the Urban Reserve Areas. The Concept Plans for each URA will address location and acres needed for future NC locations. 24 Adjusted for 47 acre 2015 Industrial UGB expansion,Ordinance No.2013 25 Coordinated Population Forecast 2015 through 2065Jackson County,Portland State University Population Research Center. Page 28 of 40 Table 7.2. Commercial Land Use Distriubtion, 2017 Percentage Total Urban of Total Comprehensive Plan Designation Gross Acres Land Use Neighborhood Commercial(NC) 22.00 1% Employment Commercial(EC) 145.00 5% General Commercial(GC) 68.00 2% TOTAL COMMERCIAL 235.00 8% 7.1.1.Commercial Land Use Plan The City's commercial land use plan is based on the Economic Element's analysis of commercial, office,and tourist needs of the community for the planning period(2013-33). At the time the Economic Element was completed(2013)the City's commercial lands accounted for 8%(235 acres) of the City's total land inventory. At 8%of the total land area the population to commercial land use ratio was 13 acres of commercial land for every 1,000 population by the year 2033. This ratio remains consistent with the standard adopted in the 1983 Land Use Element,and is supported by the Economic Element which notes that there are sufficient commercial lands within the current urban area to address future commercial land needs to meet the 2033 population. However,not all of the commercial lands are effectively distributed to serve the needs of an expanding UGB. As the urban area expands into the URA there will be a logistical need for additional commercial lands that exceed the benchmarks. From an urban design perspective there will be a need for additional commercial lands to serve growing neighborhood needs outside the current UGB. The location and acreage of new Commercial lands are addressed in the Concept. The Land Use Plan includes three(3)commercial land use classifications: 7.1.1.1. Neighborhood Commercial (NC). Neighborhood Commercial,provides for small neighborhood convenience retail and services needs of adjacent residential neighborhoods.To assure that Neighborhood Commercial districts are sized to service neighborhood needs.Neighborhood Commercial districts should be limited to approximately 3-5 acres with a typical service area of 3 miles. The NC district should be located along collector and/or arterial streets and designed to complement the retail and service needs of abutting residential neighborhoods. The design of this commercial district should be at a scale and architectural character that complements and functionally compatible with the neighborhood and emphasizes pedestrian and bicycle convenience. Currently,there are three(3)NC districts in the City,three(3)on the west side approx. 1 acre in size, and one(1)on the east side,approx. 7 acres in size. Page 29 of 40 7.1.1.2. Employment Commercial (EC). The EC classification is designed to accommodate a wide variety of retail, service,and office uses in an environment that is pedestrian oriented in scale and amenities and supports pedestrian, bicycle,and transit use. Residential uses above the ground floor are encouraged. The EC land use designation replaces the prior Tourist and Office-Professional classification. 7.1.1.3. General Commercial (GC). The GC classification is designed to accommodate commercial, business,and light industrial uses that are most appropriately located along or near major highways or arterials and are largely dependent of highway visibility and access. The GC land use designation replaces the prior Thoroughfare Commercial classification. 7.1.2.Commercial Development Goals and Policies Commercial Goal 1: To create an economically strong and balanced commercial sector of the community that is easily accessible,attractive,and meets the commercial needs of the local market area. Commercial Goal 2: Continue to pursue implementation of the Downtown and East Pine Street Corridor urban renewal plan. Commercial Policy 1: Maintain the zoning of all commercial areas of Central Point as necessary to comply with the Economic Element. Commercial Policy 2: Undertake an in-depth study of the downtown business district and develop a comprehensive improvement plan that would include such considerations as traffic circulation and off-street parking,pedestrian and bicycle facilities and access, structural design guidelines, and guidelines for landscaping and signing. Commercial Policy 3: Encourage the development of shared commercial parking areas in the downtown area to be carried out by the local businesses with City assistance. Commercial Policy 4: Promote the planned integration of abutting commercial development for the purpose of more efficient customer parking,better design and landscaping, coordinated signing,and increased retail sales. Commercial Policy 5: For that section of Highway 99 between Beall Lane and the High School implement the 99 Corridor Plan to improve the corridor, traffic circulation, and the overall visual and aesthetic character of the area. 7.2. Industrial Land Use Plan It was determined in the 1980 Land Use Plan that a typical city in Oregon similar in size to Central Point had approximately 15 acres of industrial land per 1,000 residents. At that time the City's Page 30 of 40 industrial lands inventory accounted for only 4.1 acres per 1,000 residents. Today(2018)the City has 14.87 acres per 1,000 residents,and industrial acres in number and size to provide an attractive inventory of industrial lands. The City's vision plan restates the continuing need to improve the industrial, employment, and economic health of the Community as a major goal, and to mitigate the City's"bedroom community" image. Since 1980 the City has successfully pursued this goal,having attained a current ratio of 14.87 industrial acres per resident. The industrial land use classification is divided into two sub-classifications; Light Industrial and Heavy Industrial. Together they total 275 acres, of which 54 acres are considered vacant.The Economic Element determined that by 2033 an additional 49 gross acres26 will be needed for industrial purposes. This need determination was based on a 2033 population projection of 27,410. Since adoption of the Economic Element Portland State University's Population Research Center, in accordance with recently adopted legislation, completed an updated population estimate for 2015 through 2060. The projected population for 2038 is 23,29027 which is less than that used in the Economic Element. As such,and since population was used as an indicator of future need,the Economic Element's project need is deemed acceptable for 2038 use. 7.2.1.Industrial Goals and Policies Industrial Goal 1: To support and maintain a strong and diversified industrial sector in accordance with the Economic Element. Industrial Goal 2: To maximize industrial expansion and new development opportunities in locations that utilize existing highways and other infrastructure, are in close proximity to employee housing areas,and will minimize conflicts with all non-industrial land uses. Industrial Goal 3: Through the BLI monitor and manage the use of industrial lands. Industrial Goal 4: To encourage light industrial uses in the General Commercial district subject to site and architectural standards that ensures compatibility with adjacent commercial uses. Industrial Policy 1: Within CP-1B maximize the industrial development potential of the Highway 99/Central Oregon and Pacific Railroad(CORP)corridor to meet the City's industrial needs to the year 2038. Industrial Policy 2: Work toward the development of requirements, incentives, and guidelines for the establishment of industrial parks or other forms of master planning in the industrial development category. 26 City of Central Point Economic Element,Table 5.2-2 27 Portland State University,Population Research Center Interpolation Table Page 31 of 40 Industrial Policy 3: Ensure through the plan review process that all industrial development proposals adequately address the importance of maintaining environmental quality,particularly air and water quality. Industrial Policy 4: Continue to support the landscape requirements for industrial development as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Industrial Policy 5: Maintain a minimum industrial lands ratio of 15 acres of industrial land per 1,000 residents. 7.3. Civic Land Use Lands designated for this use consist of a variety of uses considered to be public in nature or perform public services,particularly public schools,which account for the largest percentage of acreage in this classification. In 2016 the ratio of Civic lands to 1,000 residents appeared to be significantly below the projected 2000 ratio. This discrepancy was a result of the methodology used in calculating Civic land uses. In the previous Land Use Element all civic land uses were inventoried regardless of the land use classification. As illustrated in the below table only lands within the Civic classification were included in the inventory. If all civic land uses were accounted for in the below table the ratio is the same as the 2000 ratio. Going forward only public civic uses will be counted in the Civic classification. Quasi-public uses will be noted,but will be relegated to an allowed use in other land use classifications. 7.3.1.Civic Land Use Goals and Policies Goal 1: To include in each land use category sufficient public lands for land uses related to community public facilities, such as city hall,public schools,community centers, etc. Other quasi- public uses such as utilities, churches,etc. will be relegated to other land use classification consistent with past practices. Civic Lands Policy 1. Ensure that any major public or quasi-public facility that is proposed to be located within a residential neighborhood is located along a collector or arterial street,is compatible with surrounding land uses, and does not contribute unreasonably to traffic volumes within the neighborhood. Civic Lands Policy 2: Work with officials of School District 6 to develop and implement a school site acquisition program that is consistent with the long-range comprehensive plans of the City and the District. Civic Lands Policy 3: Continue to emphasize the need for pedestrian and bicycle access to all public facilities and areas frequented by local residents. 7.4. Parks and Recreation Land Use The City's park and recreation needs are addressed in the Parks and Recreation Element. Page 32 of 40 Parks and Recreation Goal 1: To integrate into the Land Use Plan the parks and recreation, and open space needs as set forth in the Parks and Recreation Element. Parks and Recreation Policy 1: Whenever possible, encourage the location of public park sites adjacent to public school sites to establish neighborhood educational/recreational"centers"that can benefit by the joint utilization of both types of facilities. 7.5. Circulation/Transportation Land Use The Land Use Plan maintains the City's public street system as a percentage of the City's total land inventory. As a typical rule-of-thumb the right-of-way needs of a typical community averages 25%28 of all land uses within an urban area. In 1980 it was estimated that by the year 2000 the City's street right- of-ways would account for 20%of the City's total land area. By 2017 the figure was actually 22%. Statistically the 2%difference is insignificant when the methodology for determining right-of-way is considered. As explained in the BLI with the exception of right-of-way all other parcels(A)are based on the tax assessors information. The City's GIS system uses a shape file for the City's urban area(B).When A is deducted from B the result is right-of-way. The City's circulation planning is the responsibility of the City's Transportation System Plan. The Transportation System Plan address not only the City's street right-of-way needs,but also,rail,bicycle, pedestrian, and air. 7.5.1.Circulation Land Use Goal The most significant relationship between land use and circulation planning is the reliance of circulation/transportation planning on its ability to provide an acceptable level of services based on the underlying land use mix.Typically, as land use intensifies traffic volumes increase. The Land Use Element and the Transportation System Plan are currently in balance. As land use changes are proposed it is necessary that the impact of the change is evaluate for compliance with transportation standards and mitigate as necessary. This occurs at two levels; when projects of a certain size are developed,and as land is brought into the UGB. Circulation Goal 1: To effectively manage the use of land within the Central Point Urban Area in a manner that is consistent with,and that supports the successful implementation of the City's Transportation System Plan. Circulation Policy 1: Prior to inclusion of lands from the URAs into the UGB a traffic impact analysis shall be completed to determine level of service at time of development. 28 Page 33 of 40 8. Overlay Districts As previously noted there are five(5) overlay districts that affect the various land uses. Those districts are shown in Figure 8.1 and are described as follows: 8.1. Central Business District (CBD) The Central Business District(CBD)Overlay represents the City's historic business center of the community. As an overlay district the CBD encompasses a mix of commercial(retail and office)and residential use classifications that support its use and development as an Activity Center. The CBD Overlay extends along Pine Street; from First Street and Seventh Street.The CBD Overlay is intended to identify and strengthen the commercial core area as a unique area of the City. 8.2. Transit Oriented Development District (TOD) The TOD overlay represents the existing TOD is to encourage,through a master plan process, development that includes a mixture of housing, office,retail and/or other amenities integrated into a walkable neighborhood and located within a half-mile of public transportation. 8.3. Environmental Overlay The Environmental Overlay identifies lands that are environmentally constrained such as high risk flood hazard areas and/or environmentally sensitive lands such as wetlands, riparian areas,etc.,that are not developable. Figure 8.1 Overlay Map identifies the area covered by each overlay. The Environmental Overlay includes the floodway plus 25-ft or the top-of-bank plus 25- ft,whichever is greater. The objective of this overlay flood overlay is to reduce flood risk to the community while restoring and/or preserving floodplain and riparian areas, which provide multiple community benefits (i.e.meet state and federal regulatory requirements,reduce the cost of flood insurance,improve fish and wildlife habitat, increase neighborhood recreation areas,mitigate increased flood hazards generated by new land divisions in the flood overlay zone,etc.). 8.4. Airport Overlay The Airport Overlay includes two overlays; the Airport Approach Overlay and the Airport Concern Overlay. The Airport Overlays are intended to reduce risks to aircraft operations and land uses near airports and heliports. These overlays are required pursuant to federal and state laws, specifically Federal Aviation Regulations(FAR, Part 77)and Oregon Administrative Rules(OAR 660-013 and OAR 738-070). Page 34 of 40 8.5. Climate Friendly Area (CFA) Overlay The CFA Overlay represents an area designed to encourage an urban mixed-use area with higher-density housing,jobs,business and services that are accessible via high quality, connected bicycle,pedestrian and transit networks and services.The CFA Overlay includes a land area with sufficient zoned building capacity to accommodate 30 percent of the City's current and future housing need and applies land use and development standards consistent with the requirements provided in Oregon Administrative Rule 660- 012-0300 through 0325. The City's CFA Overlay is 94.4 gross acres with 66.8 net developable acres after deducting existing and future right-of-way. The CFA Overlay is 1,226 feet wide measured at the narrowest area along East Pine Street. As illustrated in Figures 8.5.1,the CFA is located within the TOD Overlay north of East Pine Street between Bear Creek and Hamrick Road on the east side of Interstate 5. It is planned to accommodate a mix of high density residential, employment commercial and civic land uses(Figure 8.5.2) Page 35 of 40 Figure 8.5.1. CFA Overlay Map NW— CENTRAL Climate Friendly Area (CFA) POINT yr« � • I i — t CFI ! E • r I F • u a.. �. CFA Existing Conditions R�r cA rnv,Bowaw . 111 i Mo ovaa,a,onr a tlo Pole 04*ntsoly Mee]1<011cpe� :i,: - zon,w Woo mxa:*a.n,pw,uw, Syatorn Kan,:Si I tp 0 125 150 Page 36 of 40 Figure 8.5.2. CFA General Land Use Plan CENTRAL Climate Friendly Area (CFA) POINT N A High Density Residental (HRes) Civic High Density Residential (HRes) CFA Boundary and General Land Use Map Designations Employment Commercial p cc.oV.ay 00„41a., EC) CFA General Land Llse Designations .lae...nn c....y a.b.r.,, EC. et wit t...1 Pn.s O. 0 2024 S....01,,aC ads Pant e,.row ..40 F..Ny A...2024.00.2 • .. .. sva.a NM:WI w...v.,..,.OR Yu.w LAW w+rm,••<.sate o..J.....ao.m sx v.mon•,r<o c.,,., 0 125 250 5Uo Nei .K I'N v ins. Page 37 of 40 Figure 8.1. City of Central Point Overlay Districts Map A CENTRAL POINT \ 4 00 1 -"ir ,- Irg, 1■ %die 0116 . ,':,a1'1 . . \ , Legend Same 100 overly Ingnlal edalea9 Dent O ertri 3beim COOWrOre Oa/ Mal O9Mef —Alpo 4 AoproaChOveRa7 AlVoll Concern Overtr, — lie Land Use Overlay Map :a4.bdeleL:Od.no.19133 ne.233: 2018- 2038 Ord.no.1971 May=I 3 RR S MO 1.1rnerdea WWII:0k MOW t0 0.3 ns9 ann.=a1.. Oven U0e-wan an!Toe Prams at rep merest an on.moo Fe Mann 2017 Ceara Pin LAM 1304-097Y.01? cit.Mtn:'ia101Flrow00s Map Pto9:etsC,PRROW=9e'M oat Eencrs.ra-It Etna,Joule X 1- Cann try E.dame! Sectarian'i.2317 lsdeee:Fear um=2.011 Page 38 of 40 9. Urban Growth Boundary As the City grows it will be necessary to expand the UGB to accommodate the projected growth. The preferred protocol is to expand the UGB provided the criteria set forth in CPDC, Section 17.96.500 are met. Based on the BLI and findings in Housing,Economic,and Parks and Recreation Elements the UGB needs to expand to include an additional 240 acres(approx.), distributed as shown in Table 9.1. Table 9.1 Projected Urban Area Land Use Needs Additional Total 2038 2017 Inventory Needed(Gross Inventory Land Use Classification (Gross Acres) Acres) (Gross Acres) Residential' 1,491 150 1,641 Commercial 247 29 276 r Industrial2 360 - 360 Civic 109 9 118 Parks &Open Space3 227 53 280 Public Right-of-Way4 694 - 694 TOTAL 3,128 241 3,369 Source:City of Central Point Buildable Lands Inventory,2017 Notes:I"Additional Need"Source 2017 Housing Element 2"Additional Need"Source 2013 Economic Element,updated per Ord.2013 3"Additional Need"Source Draft 2018 Parks and Recreation Element 4"Additional Need"not adjusted for future development 10. Land Use Plan Map Figure 10.1 is the City's Land Use Plan Map for 2018-2038. This map identifies and distributes all land use classifications within the City's urban area.The Land Use Plan Map has been prepared in compliance with such other Comprehensive Plan elements as the Housing Element,the Economic Element,the Parks and Recreation Element,etc. The City's Zoning Map shall be consistent,at all times,with the land use classifications in the Land Use Element. When amendments to the UGB are proposed they must be found consistent with the applicable Concept Plan(s)in the Regional Plan Element. Page 39 of 40 Figure 10.1.City of Central Point,Land Use agrom- CENTRAL POINT i \\.... ,,A,A, - III s11,' : < -`ate! ��Im 11/4wii 1 lBe file..!`.:.,, men iliF } Stk C i �� i �r ,.. LA j= : ;::.: r • w t Legend Propose neslaen..l Prop.s.d C onions.al Propo...lna a stool Proposed Chap.Parts Open leaoe ®C27.1-aro Use STAA,Mea %dr,..s Oe-5L sle0^aawva Cr1-1,=e .0'• OMa PAasx0 VOB .ow 3 erg y -e1ap.1net Corn ros_a ME Genera: 4Ra oC OOen Bead(Maslej • e.nra Nee r..e..el]e nsu -Gores C0-i-1s 7a -.0'007s7, Land Use Map -"dtld'edi Ced Ma 19B0 Alp 2612 2018 - 2038 Oro.50 1171 May 201 J This seed a Mended ax'ore:Pk=OOly sv 0'0'e rg O+Oaasi ant'. 6nen108_PPM and Tx Prase re rorresnsola+•ns ow Pee NO M:2017 Carp Ref Card U1e1_09203017 Pt_GOZbt'.cepo M aReedi016 Map Prof 1sCy°ro)0 50.n7 Ow EKrlere,.an Jse ECneer Umax2017 Crenea to B Money Bep1MDC 2.2017 +1pOafe0:Sebum,3.2014 Page 40 of 40 1 4.4 Exhibit 4 — Zoning Text Amendments Central Point Municipal Code Page 1/8 Chapter 17.08 DEFINITIONS Chapter 17.08 DEFINITIONS 17.08.410 TOD overlay definitions and uses. A. Definitions of Land Use Types. The purpose of this section is to classify land uses and activities into use categories for the TOD overlay in Chapters 17.65, 17.66, and 17.67 on the basis of common functional,product,or physical characteristics. Characteristics include the type and amount of activity, the type of customers or residents,how goods or services are sold or delivered, and certain site factors. The types of uses allowed in the various zones are based on the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. B. Considerations. 1.Uses are assigned to the category whose description most closely describes the nature of the primary use. Developments may have more than one primary use,and accessory activities may also be present. Primary and accessory uses are addressed in subsections(B)(2) and(3)of this section. 2. The following factors are considered to determine what category the use is in,and;whether the activity(ies)constitute primary or accessory uses: a. The description of the activity(ies)in relationship to the characteristics of each use category; b. The relative amount of site or floor space and equipment devoted to the activity; c. The relative amount of sales from each activity; d. The number and type of customers for each activity; e. The relative number of employees in each activity; f. Hours of operation; g. Building and site arrangement; h. The number and type of vehicles used with the activity; i. The relative number of vehicle trips generated by the activity(ies); j. Signs; k. How the use advertises itself; and 1. Whether the activity(ies)would be likely to be found independent of the other activities on the site. 3. Multiple Primary Uses. When a development has a number of primary uses that fall within one use category,then the development is assigned to that use category. For example, if a development includes a grocery store and pharmacy,the development would be classified as a commercial retail sales and service use. When the primary uses in a development are within different use categories, each primary use is classified in the applicable category and is subject to the regulations for that category. CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 2/8 Chapter 17.08 DEFINITIONS 4. Accessory Uses.These uses are allowed by right and are regulated in conjunction with the primary use unless otherwise stated in this title. 5. Examples and Exceptions. To help illustrate the types of uses allowed or not allowed under a specific uses category, examples and/or exceptions are given. They are based on the common meaning of the terms and not on what a specific use may call itself. C. Residential Use Types. 1. Dwelling, Single-Family. An attached or detached dwelling unit located on its own lot. a. Large and Standard Lot Single-Family,Detached.These include dwellings located on individual lots. Homes which are constructed on site or manufactured homes are included under this definition. b. Zero Lot Line,Detached. These residences are detached with building setbacks on the property line. Examples include Charleston row houses and courtyard cluster residences. c. Attached Row Houses. These residences are attached along common side lot lines with adjoining units. They are classified as single-family residences because each unit is located on a separate lot,and they do not share common floors or ceilings with other dwelling units. 2.Dwelling,Duplex.A structure that contains two dwelling units which share common walls, floors,or ceilings on a single lot.A single-family dwelling with an accessory unit dwelling is not considered a duplex. 2 3. Dwelling,Multifamily. A structure that contains two three or more dwelling units which share common walls, floors, or ceilings on a single lot. a. Plexes. These include two three or more attached units on a single lot. They may have single or multiple stories. They share common walls with other dwelling units,but not common floors or ceilings. b.Apartments and Condominiums. These include two three or more attached units on a single lot.They typically have multiple stories. Common walls,floors and ceilings are shared with other dwelling units. Apartment complexes that have accessory services such as food service, dining rooms,and housekeeping are included under this use type. 3 4. Dwelling,Accessory Unit. An auxiliary living unit with separate kitchen,living and sleeping facilities in a single-family structure or in a separate accessory building on the same lot as a primarily single-family residence. 4 5. Boarding and Rooming Houses. See Section 17.08.010. S 6.Family Care Facility. This includes two types of child care services and one type for adults. > amily Day rare s defined by Oregon state statute refers to the r of day c for children ..ith o ..ithout.. etion n the home of tho_...+regiyer F mily f fe rt tim childr Du g the chool . e fe ily d ,ide a f.. • r7 Such childre„ m .st be at least three. of age, p to a of four hours r r day Na a the a total of to childr cluding the .ider's childr mean he p nt CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 3/8 Chapter 17.08 DEFINITIONS a. Family Child Care Home.As defined by Oregon state statute, a child care facility in a dwelling that is caring for not more than 16 children and is certified under ORS 329A.280 (When certification required) (2)or is registered under ORS 329A.330(Registration requirements) b Day Ca e Gv Hn .� dl fined O L L L L L L• L 77 �N b. Child Care Center.As defined by Oregon state statute,a child care facility,other than a family child care home,that is certified under ORS 329A.280(When certification required) c. Adult Day Care.A community-based group program designed to meet the needs of functionally or cognitively impaired adults through an individual plan of care. It is a structured, comprehensive program that provides a variety of health, social,and related support services in a protective setting during part of a day but for less than twenty-four hours. These facilities have an enrollment of ten or more individuals. 6. Home Occupation. See Section 17.08.010. 7. Residential Facility. A residential care,residential training, or residential treatment facility licensed or registered by the state(Mental Health and Developmental Services Division)as defined in ORS 443.400 where supervision;protection; assistance while bathing,dressing, grooming or eating; management of money; transportation; recreation; and the providing of room and board or a combination thereof are provided for six or more physically disabled or socially dependent individuals, in one or more buildings on contiguous properties. A residential facility does not include a residential school; state or local correctional facility;juvenile training school;youth care center operated by a county juvenile department;juvenile detention facility; nursing home; family care facility; or children's or adult day care as defined by state law. 8. Residential Home.A residential treatment or training or an adult foster home licensed by or under the authority of the state(Mental Health and Developmental Services Division),which provides residential care alone or in conjunction with treatment or training or a combination thereof for less than six individuals. These individuals need not be related. Staff persons needed to meet licensing requirements shall not be counted in the number of facility residents, and need not be related to each other or to any resident of the residential home. 9. Senior Housing. Housing designed and constructed to accommodate the needs of seniors and includes the following as defined in Section 17.08.010,Definitions, specific: independent living, senior apartments, and assisted living facilities. Senior housing does not include nursing facilities. D. Commercial Use Types. 1. Entertainment. Businesses such as restaurants, cafes,and delicatessens;bowling alleys;health clubs; gyms; and membership clubs and lodges. 2. Professional Office. A use that is conducted in an office setting generally for business, government,professional,medical,or financial services. CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 4/8 Chapter 17.08 DEFINITIONS Examples include professional services such as lawyers,accountants,engineers,or architects; financial businesses such as lenders,brokerage houses,bank headquarters,or real estate agents;data processing; sales offices; government offices and public utility offices;television and radio studios; medical and dental clinics,medical and dental labs;and blood-collections facilities. 3.Retail Sales and Service.Businesses that are involved in the sale,lease,or rental of new or used products to the general public.They may also provide personal services or entertainment,or provide product repair or services for consumer and business goods. Such uses are conducted indoors with limited provisions in this title to allow outdoor storage of material or merchandise.Categories and examples of retail sales and service uses include: a. Sales-Oriented. Stores selling,leasing,or renting consumer,home,and business goods including appliances,art supplies,bicycles,clothing,dry goods,electronic equipment,fabric, furniture,garden supplies,gifts,groceries,hardware,home improvements,household products, jewelry, liquor,pets,pet food,pharmaceuticals,plants,printed material, stationery,and videos; and food sales. b.Personal Service-Oriented.Businesses such as branch banks;urgency medical care;dental and medical offices;laundromats;photo or laundry drop-off;photographic studios;photocopy and blueprint services;hair,tanning,and personal care services;business,martial arts,and other trade schools; dance or music classes;mortuaries;veterinarians;and animal grooming. c.Repair-Oriented.Businesses such as repair of televisions,bicycles,clocks,watches,shoes, guns,appliances and office equipment;tailor;locksmith;and upholsterer. d.Drive-Through Facilities.Vehicle drive-up windows associated with restaurants,banks, laundries,photo processing,and similar uses. e. Quick Vehicle Service.A business that provides direct services for motor vehicles where the driver generally waits in the car before and while the service is performed. The use includes a drive-through facility and the area where the service is performed. Examples include: i.Full-service and mini-serve gas stations; ii.Unattended card key stations; iii.Carwashes; and iv. Quick lubrication services.This use type does not include servicing of vehicles over ten thousand pounds gross cargo weight(except for gasoline),body repairs,welding,or painting. f.Vehicle Sales/Rental and Repair. Sale,retail,and/or rental of autos,noncommercial trucks, motorcycles,motorhomes,and trailers less than ten thousand pounds gross cargo weight, together with incidental maintenance, such as automobile dealers,car rental agencies,or recreational vehicle sales and rental agencies.Also,repair of automobiles and light vehicles under ten thousand pounds gross cargo weight,including body repairs,welding and painting. Uses not included,thus prohibited,as part of this definition are: i. Lumber yards and other building material sales that sell primarily to contractors and do not have a retail orientation; ii. Landscape materials stored outside,including bark chips,rock,fertilizer,and compost; CFA Code Updates:December 29,2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 5/8 Chapter 17.08 DEFINITIONS iii.Repair,sale,rental,or leasing of vehicles over ten thousand pounds gross cargo weight, commercial or consumer vehicles,and industrial vehicles and equipment. 4. Tourist Accommodations. This definition includes two use categories: a.Bed and Breakfast Inn.A structure designed and occupied as a residence in which sleeping rooms are provided on a daily or weekly basis for use by travelers or transients for a charge or fee paid or to be paid for the rental or use of the facility. The bed and breakfast establishment has no more than five guest sleeping rooms provided on a daily or weekly basis for the use of no more than a total of ten travelers or transients at any one time; b. Motel or Hotel. Establishments primarily engaged in providing lodging services on a temporary basis with incidental food,drink,and other sales and services intended for the convenience of guests. E. Industrial Use Types. 1.Manufacturing.The manufacturing,processing, fabrication,packaging,or assembly of goods. Natural,manmade,raw,secondary,or partially completed materials may be used. Products may be finished or semi-finished and are generally made for the wholesale market, for transfer to other plants,or to order for firms or consumers. Goods are generally not displayed on site,but if so,they are a subordinate part of sales. Relatively few customers come to the manufacturing site. 2. Industrial Services.The repair,servicing,and storage of industrial,business,or consumer machinery,equipment,products,or by-products. Contractors and building maintenance services and similar uses can perform services off-site.Few customers,especially the general public,come to the site. Categories and examples of industrial service uses include: a. Light.These activities are generally conducted indoors,but may have related outdoor activities including parking or storage of operable vehicles and equipment and finished products. Examples include welding shops;machine shops;tool,electric motor,and scientific or professional instruments repair;metal and building materials;towing and vehicle storage;heavy truck servicing and repair;truck stops;building,heating,plumbing,or electrical contractors; printing,publishing and lithography shops; exterminators;janitorial and building maintenance services; laundry,dry-cleaning,and carpet cleaning plants;photo-finishing laboratories;and warehousing. b. Heavy.Activities are conducted indoors and outdoors,and outdoor activities may include storage of inoperable vehicles and equipment, scrap metal,other salvage or recyclable materials, and stockpiled material such as gravel, construction debris,or compost. Examples include sales, repair,storage,salvage or wrecking of heavy machinery; auto and truck salvage and wrecking; tire retreading or recapping; fuel oil distributors;and solid fuel yards. 3.Wholesale Sales. The sale, lease,or rent of products primarily intended for industrial,institutional, or commercial businesses. The uses emphasize on-site sales or order-taking and often include display areas. Businesses may or may not be open to the general public,but sales to the public are limited. Products may be picked up on the site or delivered to the customer. Examples include sale or rental machinery,equipment,heavy trucks,building materials, special trade tools,welding supplies, machine parts,electrical supplies,janitorial supplies,restaurant equipment and store fixtures;mail order houses; and wholesale of food,clothing,auto parts,and building hardware. F. Civic Use Types. CFA Code Updates:December 29,2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 6/8 Chapter 17.08 DEFINITIONS 1. Community Services. Uses of a public,nonprofit,or charitable nature generally providing a local service to people of the community. Generally,they provide other service on the site or have employees at the site on a regular basis. The service is ongoing,not just for special events. Community centers or facilities are open to the general public or have membership provisions that are open to the general public to join at any time(for instance,any senior citizen could join a senior center). The use may also provide special counseling,education,or training of a public,nonprofit,or charitable nature. Examples include libraries,museums, senior centers,community centers,publicly owned swimming pools,youth club facilities,hospices,drug and alcohol centers, social service facilities, vocational training for the physically or mentally disabled,cemeteries,crematoriums,and mausoleums. Not included as part of this definition are: a. Private lodges; b. Clubs; or c. Private or commercial athletic or health clubs(these uses are classified as retail sales and service). 2. Hospital. A use which provides medical or surgical care to patients and offers overnight care. 3. Public Facilities. Public uses that provide support,transportation, safety,and emergency services to the general public. Examples include police stations,fire stations, ambulance stations,public utility offices, operations centers, transit stations,and park-and-ride facilities for transit.This definition excludes streets. 4. Religious Assembly. Institutions that are intended to primarily provide meeting areas for religious activities. Examples include churches,temples, synagogues,and mosques. Includes related facilities such as the following in any combination: Rectory or convent,meeting hall,offices for administration of the institution,or cemetery. 5. Schools. Public and private kindergarten,primary, elementary,middle,junior high,or high schools that provide state mandated basic education and colleges and trade schools.Includes related dormitory facilities or staff housing. 6. Utilities. Infrastructure services which need to be located in or near the area where the service is provided. Basic utility uses generally do not have regular employees at the site. Services may be public or privately provided. Examples include water and sewer pump stations; electrical substations; water towers and reservoirs; stormwater retention and detention facilities;telephone exchanges;and recycling drop-off. This definition excludes wireless communication facilities and structures as defined in this chapter. G. Open Space Use Types. 1. Parks and Open Space. Public or private land that is primarily left in a natural state or landscaped with few structures. Examples include parks,play grounds,golf courses,public squares,recreational trails,botanical gardens,and nature preserves. H. Sign-Related Definitions. 1. A-board sign. A double-face temporary rigid sign which is self-supporting. CFA Code Updates: December 29,2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 7/8 Chapter 17.08 DEFINITIONS 2.Area of Sign. The area of a sign shall be the entire area within any type of perimeter or border which encloses the outer limits of any writing,representation, emblem, figure,or character. If the sign is enclosed in a frame or cabinet,the area is based on the inner dimensions of the frame or cabinet surrounding the sign face. When a sign is on a base material and attached without a frame, such as a wood board,the dimensions of the base material are to be used. The area of a sign having no such perimeter,border,or base material shall be computed by enclosing the entire area within the parallelogram or a triangle of the smallest size sufficient to cover the entire message of the sign and computing the area of the parallelogram or a triangle.For the purpose of computing the number of signs, all writing included within such sign structure,which shall be counted as one sign per structure. 3. Balloon. See definition under Temporary Sign. 4. Banner. See definition under Temporary Sign. 5. Building Face. The single wall surface of a building facing a given direction. 6. Directional Sign. A permanent sign which is designed and erected solely for the purpose of traffic or pedestrian direction and placed on the property to which the public is directed. 7. Flashing Sign. A sign any part of which pulsates or blinks on and off.This excludes message signs. 8. Freestanding Sign. A sign supported by any structure primarily for the display and support of the sign. 9. Height of Sign. Height is measured from the grade of the curb line closest to the base of the sign to the highest point of the sign. In the absence of a curb line, the edge of the street pavement shall be used. In the absence of street pavement, the ground level shall be used to measure the height. 10. Lawn Sign. See definition under Temporary Sign. 11. Lighting Methods. a. Direct. Exposed lighting or neon tubes on the sign face; b. Flashing. Lights which blink on and off randomly or in sequence; c. Indirect or External. The light source is separate from the sign face or cabinet and is directed toward the sign so as to shine upon the exterior surface of the sign; d. Internal. A source of illumination from within a sign. 12. Message Sign. A sign with a maximum area of eight square feet,which can change its message electronically and is designed to display various messages, including but not limited to signs displaying time and temperature. 13. Multi-Faced Sign. A sign which has two or more sign faces,contained in a single sign structure. 14. Projecting Sign. A sign that is mounted perpendicular to the face of a building or that hangs from a canopy or awning. 15. Real Estate Sign. A sign for the purpose of rental,lease, sale,etc., of real property,building opportunities,or building space. CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 8/8 Chapter 17.08 DEFINITIONS 16. Roof Sign. A sign any portion of which is displayed above the highest point on the roof. 17. Sign Face. Surface of a sign containing the message. The sign face shall be measured as set forth in the definition for sign area. 18. Temporary Sign.A sign not permanently affixed to a structure on a property. These signs primarily include,but are not limited to,canvas,cloth,or paper banners or posters hung on a building wall or on a permanent pole such as on a free-standing sign support. a. Temporary Rigid Sign. A temporary sign, other than a lawn sign,made of rigid materials such as wood,plywood, or plastic. This includes A-board signs. b. Lawn Sign. A freestanding sign in a residential zone which is exempt from sign permit requirements for one or two signs which do not exceed six square feet per sign face or three feet in height. Examples include real estate signs and election signs. 19. Wall Sign.Any sign attached to,painted on,or erected against the wall of a building or structure with the exposed face of the sign in a plane parallel to the wall. 20. Reader Board. A sign that conveys information about a variety of subjects,including advertising for products or services,travel,news or event information. 21. Scoreboard. A large internally illuminated sign located within a sports stadium or in conjunction with a sporting event field on which the score of the sporting event is shown and intended for viewing primarily by persons participating in such sporting events and/or spectators of such sporting events. (Ord. 2100 B 4, 2023; Ord. 2028 131, 2016; Ord. 2014131(part),2015; Ord. 1815 131(part), Exh. D, 2000). CFA Code Updates: December 29,2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 1/9 Chapter 17.65 TOD OVERLAY Chapter 17.65 TOD OVERLAY Sections: 17.65.010 Purpose. 17.65.020 Area of application. 17.65.025 Special conditions. 17.65.030 Conflict with other regulations. 17.65.040 Land use. 17.65.050 Zoning regulations. 17.65.010 Purpose. The purpose of the Central Point transit oriented development(TOD)overlay is to promote efficient and sustainable land development and the increased use of transit as required by the Oregon Transportation Planning Rule. 17.65.020 Area of application. These regulations apply to the Central Point TOD overlay as shown on the official city comprehensive plan and zoning maps. A development application within the TOD overlay shall comply with the requirements of this chapter. 17.65.025 Special conditions. On occasion it may be necessary to impose interim development restrictions on certain TOD overlay areas. Special conditions will be identified in this section for each TOD overlay. A. Eastside Transit Oriented Development Overlay(ETOD)Agricultural Mitigation. All development shall acknowledge the presence of active farm uses within the ETOD area by recording a right-to-farm disclosure statement as a condition of final plat,transfer of property,or site plan and architectural review approval. The ETOD agricultural mitigation shall be removed at such time as the urban growth boundary is incorporated and completely builds out. B. Eastside Transit Oriented Development Overlay(ETOD) Shallow Wells. Prior to development within the ETOD, a water table analysis shall be conducted to determine the local water table depth. Any development impacting the water table will require further analysis to determine the effect on neighboring wells and the development shall be expected to mitigate that impact. The ETOD agricultural and shallow wells mitigation shall be removed at such time as the urban growth boundary is incorporated and parcels within the ETOD are built to urban standards and connected to city water. (Ord. 2100 B 10(Exh. B),2023; Ord. 1971 134(Exh. C) (part),2013). 17.65.030 Conflict with other regulations. When there is a conflict between the provisions of this chapter and other requirements of this title,the provisions of this chapter shall govern. (Ord. 2100 B 10(Exh. B),2023; Ord. 1971 B4(Exh. C) (part), 2013; Ord. 1815 B1(part),Exh. B(part),2000). 17.65.040 Land use. Four special zone district categories are applied in the Central Point TOD overlay. The characteristics of these zoning districts are summarized in subsections A through D of this section,with specific uses further defined in Section 17.65.050,Table 1. CFA Code Updates: December 29,2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 2/9 Chapter 17.65 TOD OVERLAY A.Residential(TOD). 1. LMR--Low Mix Residential.This is the lowest density residential zone in the district. Single- family detached residences are intended to be the primary housing type;however,duplexes,attached single-family and lower density multifamily housing typesf4ueh-as-duplex-and4r-iplexrfer— examplef are also allowed and encouraged. 2. MMR--Medium Mix Residential.This medium density residential zone focuses on higher density forms of residential living. The range of housing types includes higher density . , attached single-family dwellings,duplexes.and a variety of multifamily residences. Low impact commercial activities may also be allowed. 3. HMR--High Mix Residential/Commercial.This is the highest density residential zone intended to be near the center of the TOD district. High density forms of multifamily housing, such as multiplexes or apartments,are encouraged along with complementary ground floor commercial uses. Low impact commercial activities may also be allowed. Low density residential types,including large and standard lot single-family detached housing,are not permitted. B.Employment(TOD). 1.EC--Employment Commercial. Retail,service,and office uses are primarily intended for this district.Activities which are oriented and complementary to pedestrian travel and transit are encouraged.Development is expected to support pedestrian access and transit use.Automobile- oriented activities are generally not included in the list of permitted uses.Residential uses above ground floor commercial uses are also consistent with the purpose of this zone. 2.GC--General Commercial.Commercial and industrial uses are primarily intended for this district. Activities which are oriented and complementary to pedestrian travel and transit are encouraged. Residential uses above ground floor commercial uses are also consistent with the purpose of this zone. C.C--Civic(TOD). Civic uses such as government offices, schools,and community centers are the primary uses intended in this district.These uses can play an important role in the vitality of the TOD district. D.OS--Open Space(TOD).Because the density of development will generally be higher than other areas in the region,providing open space and recreation opportunities for the residents and employees in the TOD district becomes very important.This zone is intended to provide a variety of outdoor and recreation amenities. (Ord.210013 10(Exh.B),2023; Ord. 1971 134(Exh. C)(part),2013;Ord. 1867!34(part),2006; Ord. 1815131(part),Exh.B(part),2000). 17.65.050 Zoning regulations. A.Permitted Uses.Permitted uses in Table 1 are shown with a"P."These uses are allowed if they comply with the applicable provisions of this title.They are subject to the same application and review process as other permitted uses identified in this title. B.Limited Uses. Limited uses in Table 1 are shown with an"L."These uses are allowed if they comply with the specific limitations described in this chapter and the applicable provisions of this title.They are subject to the same application and review process as other permitted uses identified in this title. C. Conditional Uses. Conditional uses in Table 1 are shown with a"C."These uses are allowed if they comply with the applicable provisions of this title.They are subject to the same application and review process as other conditional uses identified in this title. CFA Code Updates:December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 3/9 Chapter 17.65 TOD OVERLAY D. Density. The allowable residential density and employment building floor area are specified in Table 2. E. Dimensional Standards. The dimensional standards for lot size, lot dimensions,building setbacks, and building height are specified in Table 2. F. Development Standards. 1. Housing Mix. The required housing mix for the TOD district is shown in Table 2. 2. Accessory Units. Accessory units are allowed as indicated in Table 1. Accessory units shall meet the following standards: a. A maximum of one accessory unit is permitted per single-family unit; b. An accessory unit shall have a maximum floor area of eight hundred square feet; c. The applicable zoning standards in Table 2 shall be satisfied. 3. Parking Standards. The off-street parking and loading requirements in Chapter 17.64 shall apply to the TOD overlay. Table 1 TOD District Land Uses Use Categories Zoning Districts LMR MMR HMR EC GC C OS Residential Dwelling, Single- Family Large and P L5 N N N N N standard lot Zero lot P P N N N N N line, detached Attached P P P C N N N row houses Dwelling,Duplex P P P Ll Ll N N Dwelling, Multifamily Multiplex, P P P Ll Ll N N apartment Senior L6 P P Ll L1 N N housing Accessory Units P1 P1 P1 C N N N Boarding/Rooming N C C N N N N House CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 4/9 Chapter 17.65 TOD OVERLAY Table 1 TOD District Land Uses Use Categories Zoning Districts LMR MMR HMR EC GC C OS Family Care Facility Family day P P P N-P N-P N N care-child care home fie- C-N C-N gN N-P N-P N-P N group- home- Child care center Adult day C C C N N N N care Home Occupation P P P P N N N Residential Facility P P P N N N N Residential Home P P P N N N N Commercial Entertainment N N C P, L7 P, L8,L9 N N Professional Office C L3 L3,L4 P P P N Retail Sales and Service Sales- C L3 L3 P P N N oriented Personal C L3 L3,L4 P P N N service- oriented Repair- N N N P P N N oriented Drive- N N N P P N N through facilities Quick N N N P P N N vehicle service Vehicle N N N P P N N sales, rental and repair CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 5/9 Chapter 17.65 TOD OVERLAY Table 1 TOD District Land Uses Use Categories Zoning Districts LMR MMR HMR EC GC C OS Tourist Accommodations Motel/hotel N N C P P N N Bed and C C P P P N N breakfast inn Industrial Manufacturing N N N N P N N Industrial Service Light N N N N P N N Heavy N N N N C N N Wholesale Sales N N N N P N N Civic Community Services C C C N N P C Hospital C C C C N C N Public C C C C C C N facilities Religious C C C C N P N assembly Schools C C C N N P L2 Utilities C C C C C C C Open Space Parks and Open Space P P P P P P P N Not p mitted 1' Per tted--use. N--Not permitted. P--Permitted use. Pi--Permitted use, one unit per lot. C--Conditional use. L1--Only permitted as residential units above ground floor commercial uses.Affordable housing is permitted according to ORS 197A.445(1). L2--School athletic and play fields only. School building and parking lots are not permitted. L3--Permitted in existing commercial buildings or new construction with ground floor businesses with multifamily dwellings above ground floor. Maximum floor area for commercial use not to exceed ten thousand square feet per tenant. L4--Second story offices may be permitted in areas adjacent to EC zones as a conditional use. CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 6/9 Chapter 17.65 TOD OVERLAY L5--Only permitted as a transition between lower density zones and/or when adjacent to an environmentally sensitive area. L6--Permitted only when part of an existing or proposed senior housing project on abutting property under the same ownership within the MMR or HMR district. L7--Mobile food vendors,pods and mobile food courts are prohibited as provided in Chapter 5.44, Mobile Food Businesses. L8--Mobile food vendors and pods are subject to the application requirements and provisions in Chapter 5.44,Mobile Food Businesses. L9--Mobile food courts may be permitted in the GC zone as a conditional use in accordance with Chapter 5.44,Mobile Food Businesses and per Chapter 17.76,Conditional Use Permits. CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 7/9 Chapter 17.65 TOD OVERLAY Table 2 TOD District Zoning Standards Standard Zoning Districts LMR MMR HMR EC GC C OS Density--Units Per Net Acre(f) Maximum 12 32 NA NA NA NA NA Minimum 6 44-15 25 NA NA NA NA Dimensional Standards Minimum Lot or Land Area/Unit Large single- 5,000 SF NA NA NA NA NA NA family Standard 3,000 SF NA NA NA NA NA NA single-family Zero lot line 2,700 SF 2,700 SF NA NA NA NA NA detached Attached row 2,000 SF 1,500 SF 1,200 SF NA NA NA NA houses Duplexes 3,000 SF 2,700 SF 1,200 SF NA NA NA NA in in Multifamily NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Average Minimum Lot or Land Area/Unit Large single- 7,500 SF NA NA NA NA NA NA family Standard 4,500 SF NA NA NA NA NA NA single-family Zero lot line 3,000 SF 3,000 SF NA NA NA NA NA detached Attached row 2,500 SF 2,000 SF 1,500 SF NA NA NA NA houses Duplexes 4,500 SF 2,700 SF 1,500 SF NA NA NA NA ill ill Multifamily NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Minimum Lot Width Large single- 50' NA NA NA NA NA NA family Standard 50' NA NA NA NA NA NA single-family CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 8/9 Chapter 17.65 TOD OVERLAY Table 2 TOD District Zoning Standards Standard Zoning Districts LMR MMR HMR EC GC C OS Zero lot line 30' 30' NA NA NA NA NA detached Attached row 24' 22' 18' NA NA NA NA houses Duplexes 50' 30' 18' NA NA NA NA Multifamily NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Minimum Lot Depth 50' 50' 50' NA NA NA NA Building Setbacks(k) Front(min./max.) 10'/15' 10'/15' 0'/15' 0' 0'/15' 0'/5' 15' Side(between bldgs.) 5'detached 5'detached 5'detached 0' 0' 0' 5' (detached/attached) 0' 0' 0' 10'(b) 15'(b) 20'(b) attached attached attached (a)(c) (a)(c) (a) Corner(min./max.) 10'/NA 10'/NA 0'/10' 5'/10' 15'/30' 5'/10' 15'/NA Rear 10' 10' 10' 0' 15'(b) 0' 5' 10'(b) 0' 20'(b) Garage Entrance (d) (d) (d) (e) (e) (e) NA Maximum Building 35' 45' 60' 60' 60' 45' 35' Height Maximum Lot 80% 80% 85% 100% 100% 85% 25% Coverage(g) Minimum Landscaped 20%of 20%of 15%of 0%of 15%of 15%of NA Area(i) site area site area site area(j) site area site area site area (h) Housing Mix Required housing types < 16 units in development: 1 NA NA NA NA as listed under housing type. Residential in Table 1. 16--40 units in development: 2 housing types. >40 units in development: 3 or more housing types(plus approved master plan) Notes: NA--Not applicable. (a) The five-foot minimum also applies to the perimeter of the attached unit development. CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 9/9 Chapter 17.65 TOD OVERLAY (b) Setback required when adjacent to a residential zone. (c) Setback required is ten feet minimum between units when using zero lot line configurations. (d) Garage entrance shall be at least ten feet behind front building facade facing street. (e) Garage entrance shall not protrude beyond the face of the building. (f) Net acre equals the area remaining after deducting environmental lands,exclusive employment areas,exclusive civic areas and right-of-way. (g) Lot coverage refers to all impervious surfaces including buildings and paved surfacing. (h) Parking lot landscaping and screening requirements still apply. (i) Landscaped area shall include living ground cover,shrubs,trees,and decorative landscaping material such as bark,mulch or gravel.No pavement or other impervious surfaces are permitted except for pedestrian pathways and seating areas. (j) Rooftop gardens can be used to help meet this requirement. (k) Where a building setback abuts a public utility easement(PUE),the building setback shall be measured from the furthest protrusion or overhang for the structure to avoid utility conflicts. (1) For the purposes of calculating maximum density,a duplex shall be counted as a single dwelling unit.A duplex shall be counted as two dwelling units for purposes of calculating minimum density. (Ord. 210013 10(Exh. B),2023; Ord. 2089132,2022; Ord.2064 f35,2020;Ord.2047131,2018; Ord.2034 131310, 11,2017;Ord.2014 f310(part),2015; Ord. 2002132(Exh.A)(part),2015; Ord. 1981 134(Exh. D), 2014; Ord. 1971 134(Exh.C)(part),2013; Ord. 1867 134(part),2006; Ord. 1815 131(part),Exh.B(part), 2000 CFA Code Updates:December 29,2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 1/5 Chapter 17.69 CFA OVERLAY(new) Chapter 17.69 CFA OVERLAY(new) Sections: 17.69.010 Purpose. 17.69.020 Area of application. 17.69.030 Relationship with other regulations. 17.69.040 Land uses. 17.69.050 Density. 17.69.060 Dimensional standards. 17.69.070 Development standards. 17.69.080 Application review process. 17.69.090 Design standards. 17.69.010 Purpose. The purpose of the Central Point Climate-Friendly Area(CFA) overlay is to promote climate-friendly development where residents,workers,and visitors can meet most of their daily needs without having to drive. The CFA overlay permits a variety of housing,jobs,businesses,and services in an area supported by high-quality pedestrian,bicycle,and transit infrastructure, as required by the Oregon Transportation Planning Rules. 17.69.020 Area of application. These regulations apply to the Central Point CFA overlay as shown on the official city comprehensive plan and zoning maps.A development application within the CFA overlay shall comply with the requirements of this chapter. 17.69.030 Relationship with other regulations. The provisions of this chapter apply in addition to other applicable TOD overlay zoning district standards and other requirements of this title.When there is a conflict between the provisions of this chapter and other requirements of this title including the TOD overlay standards,the provisions of this chapter shall govern. 17.69.040 Land uses. Permitted, limited and conditional uses are allowed according to Table 1 of Section 17.65.050,with the following exceptions: A. Within areas zoned MMR north of Beebe Road: 1. Large and standard lot and zero lot line single-family dwellings are permitted as a limited use,only as part of a TOD Master Plan subject to Section 17.69.080(A)(1). 2. Child care centers are permitted. B. Within areas zoned MMR south of Beebe Road: 1. Large and standard lot and zero lot line single-family dwellings are prohibited. 2. Child care centers are permitted. CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 2/5 Chapter 17.69 CFA OVERLAY(new) 3. Entertainment uses that are restaurants,cafes, delis or other food and beverage-related establishments are permitted. Mobile food vendors,pods and mobile food courts are prohibited as provided in Chapter 5.44,Mobile Food Businesses. 4. Professional offices are permitted. 5. Sales-oriented,personal service-oriented and repair-oriented retail sales and services are permitted. 6. Community services are permitted. 7. Public facilities are permitted. 8. Schools are permitted. C. Within areas zoned HMR: 1. Child care centers are permitted. 2. Entertainment uses that are restaurants, cafes,delis or other food and beverage-related establishments are permitted. Mobile food vendors,pods and mobile food courts are prohibited as provided in Chapter 5.44,Mobile Food Businesses. 3. Professional offices are permitted. 4. Sales-oriented,personal service-oriented and repair-oriented retail sales and services are permitted. 5. Community services are permitted. 6. Public facilities are permitted. 7. Schools are permitted. D. Within areas zoned EC: 1. Attached row houses are permitted as a limited use,only where they are not fronting an arterial. 2. Drive-through facilities are permitted as a limited use, limited to a maximum of two total drive- through facilities within the CFA Overlay. Drive-through facilities are subject to proposed design standards in Section 17.69.090(x)). 3. Quick vehicle services are prohibited. 4. Vehicle sales,rental and repair are prohibited. 5. Community services are permitted. 6. Public facilities are permitted. 7. Schools are permitted. E. Within areas zoned C: 1. Attached row houses are permitted. 2. Duplex dwellings are permitted. CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 3/5 Chapter 17.69 CFA OVERLAY(new) 3. Multiplex, apartment and senior housing multifamily dwellings are permitted. 4. Entertainment uses that are restaurants, cafes,delis or other food and beverage-related establishments are permitted.Mobile food vendors,pods and mobile food courts are prohibited as provided in Chapter 5.44,Mobile Food Businesses. 5. Sales-oriented,personal service-oriented and repair-oriented retail sales and services are permitted. 6. Public facilities are permitted. 17.69.050 Density. The allowable residential density standards in Table 2 of Section 17.65.050 shall apply,with the following exceptions: A.No maximum density applies within areas zoned MMR. B. A minimum density of 25 units per net acre applies within areas zoned EC. C. A minimum density of 15 units per net acre applies within areas zoned C. 17.69.060 Dimensional standards. The dimensional standards in Table 2 of Section 17.65.050 shall apply,with the following exceptions: A. Minimum lot standards do not apply within areas zoned MMR or HMR. B. Average minimum lot standards do not apply within areas zoned MMR or HMR. C. A maximum front setback of 15 feet on an arterial or 5 feet on all other streets applies within areas zoned EC. D. A maximum building height of 50 feet applies within areas zoned MMR or C. 17.69.070 Development standards. The development standards of Section 17.65.050(F)shall apply,with the following exception: A. The required housing mix standard does not apply to developments within the CFA overlay that include all attached row houses or multifamily dwellings. 17.69.080 Application review process. Development within the CFA overlay shall be subject to the review procedures established in Chapter 17.66,Application Review Procedures for the TOD Overlay,with the following exceptions. A. Master plans shall be optional for development or land use applications. Applicants may elect to propose a master plan for: 1. A development including single-family detached dwelling units within areas zoned MMR north of Beebe Road. A master plan may be approved where the single-family detached dwelling units comprise no more than fifty percent of the total dwelling units,the development meets a minimum density of 20 units per net acre, and the development meets all other CFA overlay standards, applicable TOD standards and master plan requirements of Chapter 17.66, Application Review Process for TOD Overlay. 2. Any other development. CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 4/5 Chapter 17.69 CFA OVERLAY(new) 17.69.090 Design standards. The design standards of Chapter 17.67,Design Standards—TOD Overlay,and Chapter 17.75,Design and Development Standards, shall apply,with the following exceptions: A.Block Lengths. 1. For development sites less than 5.5 acres in size(excluding existing rights-of-way but inclusive of any proposed right-of-way dedication),block lengths for public streets shall not exceed 500 feet between through streets,measured along street right-of-way.Where block length exceeds 350 feet,a major off-street bike/pedestrian pathway meeting the requirements of Section 17.67.040(A)(9)(b) shall be provided midblock. 2. Substantial redevelopment of sites 2 to 5.5 acres within an existing block that does not meet the 500-foot block length standard shall provide major off-street bike/pedestrian pathways allowing direct passage through the development site such that no pedestrian route will exceed 350 feet along any block face. 3. For development sites of 5.5 acres or more,block lengths for public streets shall not exceed 350 feet between through streets,measured along street right-of-way. Major off-street bike/pedestrian pathways may not be used to meet this requirement. 4.The block length standards may be modified consistent with Section 17.67.040(A)(5). B. Transitions in Density.The transitions in density standards in Section 17.67.050(I) shall not apply.The following standard shall apply: 1.Building height within 20 feet of a property line shared with single-family detached dwellings built prior to approval of this code shall be limited to 35 feet. C.Drive-Through Facility Design. The following standards apply to new developments with drive- through facilities,the addition of drive-through facilities to existing developments,and the relocation of an existing drive-through facility. 1.Pedestrian Service Areas a.Drive-through facilities must provide at least one walk-up service area. Examples of a walk-up service area include an indoor service area directly accessible from a public street or an outdoor walk-up service window. Walk-up service areas must be accessible by customers arriving on foot, using a mobility device,or by bicycle. Customers using a walk-up service area must have the same or better access to goods and services as customers using the drive-through. [Vehicle- serving uses] are exempt from this standard. b. If the walk-up service area is limited to an outdoor service window,it must meet the following standards: i.The walk-up service area must not also be used by vehicles. ii.The walk-up service area must abut or be connected to a pedestrian amenity space.The space must be hardscaped for pedestrian use,be a minimum of one hundred square feet, and must include benches or seating that provide at least five linear feet of seats.The seating CFA Code Updates:December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 5/5 Chapter 17.69 CFA OVERLAY (new) surface must be at least fifteen inches deep and between sixteen and twenty-four inches above the grade upon which the seating or bench sits. c. Service access for pedestrians and bicyclists must be connected to the street by a direct and convenient pedestrian walkway. 2. Vehicle Service Areas and Stacking Lanes a. All driveway entrances,including stacking lane entrances,must be at least fifty feet from any street intersection. If a drive-through facility has frontage on two streets,the drive-through facilities must receive access from the street with the lower classification. b. Service areas and stacking lanes must not be located between the building and a street lot line. c. Stacking lanes must be designed so that they do not prevent access to parking stalls.The minimum length of stacking lanes must be a minimum of one hundred-fifty feet for a single stacking lane or seventy-five feet per lane when there is more than one stacking lane. A stacking lane is measured between the lane entrance and the service area. 3. Alternative Design.The applicant may propose an alternative drive-through facility design as a conditional use to be reviewed as provided in Chapter 17.76, Conditional Use Permits. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternative drive-through facility design equally or better meets the intent of this subsection, and that: a. The design supports pedestrian-oriented site design and limits the negative impact of facilities oriented to vehicles. b. The design orients buildings to the sidewalk and offers points of entry and service that can be directly accessed on foot. c. The design provides visible, safe,and clearly defined routes for pedestrians and bicyclists. d. The design provides for adequate vehicle queuing space. CFA Code Updates: December 29, 2024 Draft Central Point Municipal Code Page 1/1 Chapter 17.75 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Chapter 17.75 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 17.75.039 Off-street parking design and development standards. All off-street vehicular parking spaces shall be improved to the following standards: [...] H. Bicycle Parking. The amount of bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 17.64.050,provided that at least one or five percent of required bicycle parking spaces,whichever is more,shall meet the cargo/large bicycle parking space dimensions per Item 2(b)(ii) below,and constructed in accordance with the following standards: 1. Location of Bicycle Parking. Required bicycle parking facilities shall be located on site in well-lit, secure locations within fifty feet of well-used entrances. Bicycle parking shall have direct access to both the public right-of-way and to a main entrance of the principal use. Bicycle parking may also be provided inside a building in suitable,secure and accessible locations. Bicycle parking for multiple uses(such as in a commercial center)may be clustered in one or several locations. 2. Bicycle Parking Design Standards. All bicycle parking and maneuvering areas shall be constructed to the following minimum design standards: a. Surfacing. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced in the same manner as a motor vehicle parking area or with a minimum of a three-inch thickness of hard surfacing(i.e., asphalt, concrete,pavers or similar material). This surface will be maintained in a smooth,durable and well-drained condition. b. Parking Space Dimension Standards. i. Standard Bbicycle parking spaces shall be at least six feet long and two feet wide with minimum overhead clearance of seven feet. ii.Cargo/large bicycle parking spaces shall be at least eight feet long and three feet wide with minimum overhead clearance of seven feet. c. Lighting. Lighting shall be provided in a bicycle parking area so that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks or motor vehicle parking lots during all hours of use. d. Aisles. A five-foot aisle for bicycle maneuvering shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking. e. Signs. Where bicycle parking facilities are not directly visible from the public rights-of-way, entry and directional signs shall be provided to direct bicycles from the public rights-of-way to the bicycle parking facility. f. Security.Bicycle parking spaces shall either allow ways to lock at least two points on a bicycle,or be within a lockable space only available to authorized users. CFA Code Updates:December 29, 2024 Draft 4.5 Exhibit 5 — Multimodal Gap Summary Central Point Climate Friendly Area (CFA) Project Narrative, Multimodal Gap Summary and Anti-displacement Strategies The City of Central Point is designating 94.4 gross acres as a CFA pursuant to OAR 660-012- 0310. As shown in Figure 1, the CFA is located east of Interstate 5, north of East Pine Street between Bear Creek and Hamrick Road. The area is largely rural with large tracts in active farm use, several rural dwellings and some residential uses at urban densities. The City's objective is to foster creation of a highly livable area that reflects the community's preference to maintain a small-town feel while meeting the CFA requirements. The City selected this location due to the low levels of existing development and existing designation within the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay. These two characteristics provide a couple of advantages that make this area desirable for locating a CFA: 1. The CFA land use regulations required in OAR 660-012-0320 require densities and development standards that are similar to those provided in the TOD Overlay; and, 2. The availability of larger tracts of land that are largely undeveloped or developed to rural densities decreases the likelihood for non-conforming uses, developments and lots. Existing Conditions The CFA is 94.4 gross acres with roughly 9.09 acres of existing public right-of-way resulting in 85.3 net acres'. At the narrowest location near, East Pine Street, the CFA is 1,226.4-ft according to measurement of the GIS shapefile. Given the rural character of most of the CFA, there are limited streets and multimodal facilities currently. These will be developed consistent with the City's land development and Public Works Standard Specifications as the area develops. Existing facilities, system gaps and future standards for streets, sidewalks and bicycle lane construction are listed in Table 1 and illustrated in Figures 2-4. Central Point is also served by three (3) transit routes that provide connectivity within the City, including the CFA, and the region (Figure 5-6). These include: • Route 40— Provides 30-minute service from Front Street Station in Medford to 3rd and 10th Street in Central Point with connection to Route 24 at the Rogue Valley Mall. This route provides service in the downtown core, serves Crater High School. Also will provide connection to the new cross-town circulator in 2025 (Route#41). • Route 41 — Provides 60-minute service from Twin Creeks Crossing in west Central Point to the Jackson County airport with stops throughout town, including the CFA, downtown area, Scenic Middle School, Albertson's shopping center, and East Pine Street shopping center where the new Goodwill will be located. Provides connection to Route 61. • Route 61 —The Rogue Community College Table Rock route provides service from Front Street Station in Medford to the RCC Campus and Cascade Shopping Center on Antelope Road in White City. This route has stops at the shopping Center on Popular, McAndrews and the Jackson County Airport. 1Right-of-way is determined by deducting the area of tax lots within the CFA from the gross acreage of the CFA.Acreages are based on calculation of shapefile geometry in ArcGIS Pro. Figure 1. CFA Location&Existing Conditions 111111;-- A ' I. Climate Friendly Area (CFA) CENTRAL POINT Existing Conditions t• -: 1 114,' - , i I . f4 .��.� '^rtti.,fit • S 4,x i ma CFA Existing Conditions r \ . a-., ,w«.242 Mk.. 1 Figure 2. Current CFA Street Classifications Climate CENTRAL Friendly Area (CFA) POINT Street System A • 1I • \\. al :: 11111 .i -.•• k•-- P sal t P I z. CFA Boundary and Street System 1 Q Raaen CFRBw,d Kprlmal Kra... Gr[OaeO Aim N1e1W Pr000seardecto Nnp C. d0Y SYOMrr R>.Gn .. a Cab.funibn a.2024 utiw1.. Saco,COTS CwWY Gan Gmya2 CMS.Fnwvry4GG.2024;(noel 2onn0 U.S.2024:Tranaportatan System fn.n:TS) S Cungar�K.i 0n hnnvarnd nwywer+.9aaagn.25002,44!'CO C2.e1(y.v4 0 In 2S0 500f�f1 mnlc*5SEN,Uw ETC AVG. I . r I Figure 3. CFA Bicycle System Nerw- 4/416. Climate Friendly Area (CFA) CENTRAL POINT Bicycle System N A . ril . _ mil• . .t OM i -\ ti -.« L tylf tr. a14� I 'Z• N; ! i 11111111 fl CFA Boundary and Bicycle System 0 Pram.CFA Seta ry \ Mar Catalog.Y-SMrl.d.ra.els o.m oarnd.2024 Sourer C.yd C.. raw .m ra.a Oanal.Fn. ns&A 2024.Off. za..ao.Mp,2024.1,napo+rm Soh.rynit Sl ,.»,........o...,.....e..w•.e*a.4 ua,.a..n..S o.r aa.....,1o.0..au mc....o..�e..c.... 0 '25 220 500F.d MRMrar uwx.m lna• Figure 4. CFA Sidewalk System NM- CENTRAL Climate Friendly Area (CFA) POINT Sidewalk System N 1 ' I, tot in 1— - 5\-r<" • .. ,. --\ ... ... ky..., .... ? ,,,,.,,, i 1.1 ■11 C 4 _r I 1- - Nov gai • CFA Boundary and Sidewalk System Q>•wo...CF.S... O. hcon py.S 202Y.o P.m S.M.CA,Oi C.20N 5' GIF o�CrN.I PtlM F,...... C 2os00 M.O.202.:Tro sport.lon Sypsn PMn(I51 0 125 250 ab Feet �u.,mr...,oa ym.�ue ..y ..ve.0 , w....n m,Y;+v�.. •Y rcr.n.rv,n�ms.frn utn / Table 1. Multimodal Inventory and Street Standards Roadway Name Jurisdiction Classification Description East Pine Street Jackson County Intermodal Currently developed with 5-vehicle Connector/Primary travel lanes, east and west bound Arterial bicycle lanes (shoulder), no existing sidewalks. Street standard (ST-32) requires 6-ft sidewalk with 7.5-ft landscape row or 12-ft sidewalk with tree wells and 6-ft bicycle lanes at the time of development. Hamrick Road City of Central Secondary Arterial Developed with 3-vehicle lanes, Point southbound bicycle lane within the CFA, intermittent sidewalks where urban development has occurred. Street standard (ST-30requires 6-ft sidewalk and landscape or 12-ft sidewalk with tree wells and 6-ft bicycle lane. Beebe Road City of Central Collector Developed with 2-vehicle travel Point lanes. No sidewalks or bicycle lanes currently. City standard (ST21) requires 3-vehicle travel lanes, 6-ft bicycle lane, 5/6-ft sidewalks and 6-ft landscape row. Gebhard Road City of Central Collector Developed with 2-vehicle travel Point lanes. Sidewalks and bicycle lanes are limited to the area adjacent to Willow Bend Phase 1 between Hartgrave Way and Denson Street. City standard (ST21) requires 3- vehicle travel lanes, 6-ft bicycle lane, 5/6-ft sidewalks and 6-ft landscape row throughout the CFA.. Hartgrave Way City of Central Collector This street segment is part of the Point future Gebhard Road extension. It was built with sufficient right-of-way width to accommodate all improvements consistent with ST- 21. Until the project is connected, it is built with two travel lanes, shared bike lane, 6-ft sidewalk, 6-ft landscape row on the north side of the street. South side improvements will be constructed with the next phase of development. Denson Street City of Central Local Developed 2-vehicle lane street with Point on-street parking and 5-ft sidewalk and 6-ft landscape row(ST-15)on the south side of the street. Sidewalks and landscape rows on the north side of the street will be constructed when the adjacent property develops. Roadway Name Jurisdiction Classification Description Annalise Street City of Central Local Developed with 2-vehicle lanes with Point parallel on-street parking on the west side, 5-ft sidewalks and 6-ft landscape row. The east side has diagonal on-street parking to serve a future neighborhood park. Sidewalks and landscaping will be constructed with the next phase of development. Figure 5. Transit Routes Serving Central Point and the CFA AClimate Friendly Area (CFA) CENTRAL POINT Transit Routes A 1 .1.5011181 # I 5p s 1 a2 `= y1 t wort on+ahy�a #'d•iw.sp� I. M1 x \ ax � I 6 se. 5 ,, \ 4 w7, T NR W w x it' 1;lreAr" g 9 .moo .i+c a,y ,; a is e $ 11.4 wen 2 .. pne 'vni ��y 'k. e�e.W$ F nw Mai: a a try �` � p $ $9H z p 4 MAMMY V,s,P b d M:!` - -. q I �i gip(, . d'',. '� i e, ir,n ty, s g m S $ Central Point&CFA Transit Routes pww.. .wr —FM/rare, —wmpm.t - P... —wma....e ...d 3!flt Meat...by MeV...,P0..15. Seam,Ca,do o..Pam Prop.. CI*RM.,'Amu 2024 ollaeti System Mao MN,T.....T.....System.p Few n.n usPt p SUp t,p00 l000 Feet i 'tl Figure 6. Transit Route#41 Serving the CFA Nitro— C L Climate Friendly Area (CFA) POINT Transit Routes INN • MI CI •,.. /FL P .61 111 I- int A CFA Transit Route(#41) p CFA Oven.awns, Tank.ularaa —_FWD flew.61 —RVID Ram41 Sp..n. MWPCMMMIby SMyrone Pnwen ,.i.. .., own D.wmpaa 2024 00.40.Cty M Can.Port Proposes CM,M fIMndyMµ 2024.ON. Zonn0 Wp,20I<',T.mna0Ma, *Morn Plan 1i5P1 0 125 250 500 Fps. Connecting the Multimodal System The multimodal transportation system gaps will be connected as a function of land development within the CFA and in accordance with the City's land development codes, including walkable design standards that promote increased connectivity. Street System The City's transportation System Plan (TSP) identifies gaps and infill strategies for arterials and collectors throughout the City, including within the CFA (Table 2, Figures 7-8). A vital component of the area's buildout will be construction of the Gebhard Road extension from Beebe Road to East Pine Street. This will provide north-south connectivity for vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians, as well as an opportunity for increased transit service by Route #41. Beebe and Gebhard Road are currently developed as 2-lane county roads and require urban upgrades to bring them to City standards, including provision of bicycle lanes and sidewalks. As development occurs within the CFA, this will increase traffic volumes to warrant installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Beebe/Hamrick Road. Additionally, Beebe Road is planned to be extended westward across Bear Creek to connect with Peninger Road adjacent to the Jackson County EXPO, Central Point Community Center, Family Fun Center, the Bear Creek Greenway and a future commercial area. In addition to providing multimodal connectivity to key destinations west of Bear Creek, filling this gap in the street system will improve circulation for cars, bicycles and pedestrians and add another emergency evacuation route. As development occurs throughout the CFA, the street system will be subject to the walkable design and circulation standards for the CFA Overlay codified in CPMC 17.69, 17.67 and 17.75 as applicable. Bicycle & System Providing adequate facilities and programs that support bicyclist and pedestrian needs is an important transportation strategy for promoting alternatives to the automobile. It is the City's goal to continually seek bicycle and pedestrian system improvements that will encourage use of these systems for journey-to-work trips as well as the non-work/recreational trip. Increases in bicycle and pedestrian use will reduce the City's reliance on automobile use through reductions in vehicular miles traveled and parking demand. The City's current street standards for arterial and collectors include bike lanes. Since 2000, all new arterial and collector streets have been required to include bike lanes. However, the City's older arterial and collector streets have gaps where bike lanes do not currently exist. Over time, it is expected that these street sections will be modernized to include bike lanes. Short-term and long-term strategies for closing these gaps are presented in Table 3. As the CFA develops, new sidewalks will be built for all street classifications consistent with the Public Works Standard Specifications for street construction. Additionally, the CFA walkable design standards reduce the City's current block length standard from 600-ft to 350-ft, which can be met by providing separated bicycle and pedestrian accessways. This has the potential to increase safe routes for bicycle and pedestrian travel within the CFA and will enhance facilities constructed as part of the street system. Transit Public transportation services fulfill two roles. First, they provide transportation for those who cannot or choose not to drive their own automobile. The majority of Central Point transit riders would likely fall into this category. Secondly, the provision of a comprehensive local transit service is a key measure of quality of life within a community. In concert with walking and bicycling, transit provides an alternative to driving. Transit is also an important component in the toolbox of strategies that can support Smart Growth through higher density, mixed use development, and a more compact form of urban development where the dependency on automobile use is minimized. The growth of transit service, in terms of ridership, will necessitate a variety of strategies that need to be simultaneously employed. These strategies include a variety of disciplines such as economics, land use and transportation planning, and urban design that when considered collectively will provide a solid infrastructure to build future transit ridership. The CFA Overlay design standards for walkability combined with those for the Transit Oriented Development Overlay work in concern to provide a physical environment that facilitates connections between transit facilities, parking areas, housing, employment and recreation areas. These regulations will continue to be implemented through the Site Plan and Architectural Review process to assure that the CFA is built to accommodate increased transit service and ridership. Figure 7. Existing and Future Street Classifications _ A 1 I �A'+,f POINT --- +sue. a $ r 1 \♦ I Gibbon Rd %. I \ I ♦ I S. ♦� u ♦_-- ♦. \ \ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ •♦- \ ♦ 1 ♦% �,� Wilson Rd ♦• I I,' 1 ASP- ♦♦ 1 r 1 11 m ♦♦ I r--fr- S 1 4 • ♦ 1 1 s T-1 ,5 1 ♦\• ♦ U n Rdl e I 9 Scenic Ave t I 1 6re ♦....P`� t" > Beebe Rd '-'. z - 1 I S - i #3Q\e • ne laE A .,,i d, cc .,�...R_ Taylor Rd ' Q ♦ u a rY _-� Hopkins Rd o Ca1 T z Si ` I m a wa 'p m Beall Ln 4+,,,1 — Principal Arterial Central Point City Boundary r s rA,,, ---- Intermodai Connector Public Parks Minor Arterial Water Future Minor Arterial Medford City Boundary Collector ;'J Urban Growth Boundary Future Collector Functional Classification Plan ?" Local Central Point, Oregon Figure 8. Tier 1 Street Projects r-\ AIF 1__I 44 P CENTRAL o POINT • r r r 1 1 t♦ 1 Gibbon Rd ♦ -I ♦ I a ♦. . ♦ . . . . . ♦♦ ♦1 ♦ t = ♦ Wilson Rd ) �♦♦ itI i �'- `'� ♦ 1 r____I I 1 N� /-♦ ♦ I I -: I 1 I ♦,-♦ I_-Upton Rdl 1 ti, I 1 _ Scen c Ave "-'w ♦♦ I t is arm - v ,55 ZY 0 M \♦o ♦♦ • I—" z 'Ssf --7 ;-- , ♦ 1 (V I ♦e�♦ ♦♦- 1. y� 439 E Pine sbt 6,>'P - a Tay tor Rd O a I cS J, ,r1Q� Hopkins Rd r 0 j-1 • u 1 G t a 1 y H c .3 1 i CO 1 Beall In ♦♦.,1 IntersectionShort-Term Projects Public Lands Boundary ,' City rY 110 Medium/Long-Term Water Street Projects Medford City Boundary Short-Term Medium/Long-Term Tier 1 Projects Central Point, Oregon , Table 2. Street System Capital Improvement Projects within the CFA v u v C w a m v f0 t N E « .2 °q « a° o d OVA t �. C V .2w f6 r 0 3 Ti d -� L l0 > m ~ lL Q U V „ V Ref. Project L a "' O - No. Location Project Description 209 Beebe Rd.: uu Widen to collector standards with • V Gebhard Rd.to sidewalks&bike lanes. Hamrick Rd. 211 Beebe Rd.& p Add traffic signal. • • • V • • ♦ Hamrick Rd. intersection 212 Hwy.99, p Cupp Street Gateway. • • Project No.4 214 Scenic Av.: uu Add bike lanes&sidewalks. V Mary's Way to Scenic Middle School. 216 E.Pine St.& minor Widen west and south approaches to • • V V Hamrick Rd. add a second eastbound left turn lane Intersection and second receiving lane.Restripe northbound approach to include dual left turns and a single through- shared-right turn.Restripe southbound approach to include a left turn,through,and exclusive right turn lanes. 220 Gebhard Rd.: uu Realign,widen to 3 lanes,and install • • • V UGB to Beebe separated bike-ped path on west side Rd. 257 Beebe Rd nc Extend Beebe Rd west to Peninger Rd • V V V • Extension —project includes a bridge over Bear Creek 258 Gebhard Rd& major Install a traffic signal,a third • V V Pine St westbound through lane(beginning intersection east of Table Rock Rd and extending to the I-5 northbound ramps),dual eastbound and southbound left-turn lanes,and dedicated westbound and northbound left-turn lanes to support future traffic volumes when the Gebhard Rd Extension is complete 259 Gebhard Rd nc Extend Gebhard Rd from north of • V V V • Extension Pine St south to Pine St(west of (Phase 1) Hamrick Rd)—Coordinate with Project#258 260 Grant Rd nc Realign Grant Rd south of Taylor Rd • • • V V Realignment to align with Grant Rd north of Taylor Rd.Install two-way stop-control at Taylor Rd/Grant Rd and Grant Rd/ CP-6A 263 Gebhard Rd& minor Install all-way stop-control when • V ♦ Wilson Rd warranted intersection 265 Gebhard Rd& major Install a roundabout when Gebhard • V V V • Beebe Rd Rd Extension is complete intersection 266 Gebhard Rd& major Install a roundabout when Gebhard V V V • Local Gebhard Rd Extension is complete Rd intersection 267 Gebhard Rd nc Extend Gebhard Rd from Gebhard Rd • • • V V V • Extension (north of Beebe Rd)to north of Pine (Phase 2) St—coordinate with Projects#259 and#261 Figure 9. Bicycle Plan Map ram\ .. I t-r, I- .1°,F CENTRAL _I®;% POINT r t I t♦ I Gibbon Rd •-. t ♦ 1 ♦ I \♦ \ 4 ♦., ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦♦ ♦ • / \ t \ems\ Wilson Rd 'Po \`•c` I I I,�.=q ♦ •. I A ♦ 1 It - ♦♦♦\` I 1 '- I \tea♦ I_-Upton Rd! I II y`Z 1 r-` ,a Scenic Ave t , 1 T. i\ I t les ` 0a r a. ♦ \ i . 2 \\ e - ti 1 Ao0 CC S,, •\\ Q � ♦ : Beebe Rd - z --? t- I •♦ 1 �\ _ tiF ��e E Pine Si �� I o ♦J'i I Taylor Rd c ♦ o 1 a ix 1 • O !-t �J Hopkins Rd `, o, - 0- l_ I♦�...� - ~O ♦ fYp o 73 m a y I o- 4 ♦♦ t i m ♦\ I 1 = • Beall Ln .-/`• ..I Planned Bicycle Lanes Central Point City c.5 n,,iles 0 Planned Bear Creek Boundary Greenway Path Public Parks North Bound Front Street Water Bicycle Lane Planned Medford City Boundary i' Urban Growth Boundary Bicycle Plan Central Point, Oregon Table 3. Bicycle System Infill Strategies Short-Term Strategy Description Objectives of the Strategy Fill in Gaps Improve/construct facilities • Increase percentage of bicycle facilities on arterial and collector streets linking existing and planned • Improve connections to employment centers,commercial districts,transit bikeways(filling in"missing centers,institutions,and recreational destinations when possible links") • Increase percentage of daily trips made via bicycle Long-Term Strategy Description Objectives of the Strategy Focus on Schools Provide bikeways to/from all • Primarily improve connections to schools public schools where none • Secondarily improve connections to employment and commercial districts, exist(emphasis on arterials transit,institutions,and recreation and collectors) • Encourage and facilitate safe and convenient bicycle transportation for younger riders • Increase percentage of daily trips made via bicycle • Secondarily increase percentage of bicycle facilities on arterial and collector streets Focus on Parks and other Provide bikeways to/from • Primarily improve connections to employment and commercial districts, Activity Centers commercial and neighborhood transit,institutions,and recreation employment centers and parks • Increase percentage of daily trips made via bicycle where none exist(emphasis on • Increase percentage of bicycle facilities on arterial and collector streets arterials and collectors) • Encourage and facilitate safe and convenient bicycle Connect to Transit Routes Provide bikeways to/from • Primarily improve connections to transit major transit stops where • Secondarily improve connections to employment and commercial districts, none exist(emphasis on institutions,and recreation arterials and collectors) • Increase percentage of daily trips made via bicycle and transit • Encourage and facilitate safe and convenient bicycle transportation 4.6 Exhibit 6 -- Highway Impacts Summary Highway Impacts Summary: City of Central Point Climate-Friendly Area Site E Planning Context Location Description The Climate Friendly Area (CFA)is in the Eastern Central Point on the axes of East Pine Street and Hamrick Road. It is located on the east side of Interstate 5 (1-5) and adjacent to the identified management area of Interchange 33. The Bear Creek Greenway runs alongside the western boundary of the proposed CFA and offers a unique opportunity to connect this proposed mixed-used core to a regional multimodal pathway. There are also additional plans from the City of Central Point to connect Beebe Road to Peninger Road via a bridge. Central Point has designated this area within their Comprehensive Plan as a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay. The City and Rogue Valley Transit District have been working on improving transit within the CFA. CFA Acreage The proposed CFA is approximately 94 gross acres and 65 net acres. 11Page January 22, 2025 Figure 2. Central Point ETOD area (Scenario 2) CF E _ {Lld7AT1 FINENULY AREA ri , ....:,) r ,.., Multiple Family .r cm'Iv ".1: , Residential M1 L nA , . _ , . t \!- j i i - i 7 -- 1 I Civic 1 LMR, "EMI' Sind ETOD RCS .. I_ . k. . - 3-1 T.as.�. - '` Q amount. ,, r _ ,�Garamar iat IIwi,i : ' w fl �.,ny:4nm yy �x U :�._ mmercial' Highway Impacts Summary Trigger The CFA, Scenario 2, is within the study area boundary of the adopted 1-5 Exit 33 Interchange Area Management Plan. Key Destinations and Services Shipment stops; diverse commercial uses: large box stores, medical offices, gas stations, restaurants, hotels; government services; community college; adjacent to the Eastern TOD. There are 58 dwelling units located within the subject area. Multi-use path west of the CFA, east of 1-5, and adjacent to Exit 33. Existing Land Uses Primarily commercial development along East Pine Street and mostly rural residential and agricultural uses in the vicinity of Beebe and Gebhard Road. Rail Crossings within 500 ft of the CFA There is no rail crossings identified within 500 feet of the CFA. The nearest rail line is approximately one mile to the west adjacent to OR 99. Freight Routes Hamrick Road and E. Pine Street are heavily used routes for freight accessing onto Interstate 5 via Exit 33. 21Page January 22, 2025 Land Use Changes Existing Zoning • Civic (C), Low Mix Residential (LMR), and Medium Mix Residential (MMR), High Mix Residential/Commercial (HMR), Employment Commercial (EC). Proposed Zoning • Acreage Breakdown Area (Acres) LMR MMR HMR Civic EC Total NDA Total* 0 71 7.4 5.9 10.1 94.4 65.1 *NDA— net developable area is the total area after all the deductions. Existing and Proposed Allowed Building Height by Land Use Zone (per current Central Point Zoning Code) • LMR: 2 floors (35-feet); 2 floors (50 feet) • MMR: 3 floors (45-feet); 4 floors (50 feet) • HMR: 5 floors (60-feet); no change proposed • Civic: 3 floors (45-feet); 4 floors (50 feet) • Employment Commercial (EC): 5 floors (60 feet); no change proposed Proposed Land Use Regulations Changes The purpose of the Central Point Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay is to promote efficient and sustainable land development and the increased use of transit. In general, the TOD district scores the highest and it is more compatible with the land use requirements for CFAs; specifically, the high-density zones like MMR, HMR, EC and GC. • Low Mix Residential (LMR): o This medium density zone is the lowest density residential zone in the TOD Overlay. Single-family detached residences are intended to be the primary housing type; however, attached single-family and lower density multifamily housing types are also allowed. As part of the CFA designation project, the lands zoned LMR will be re-zoned to MMR. • Medium Mix Residential (MMR): o This high-density residential zone focuses on higher density forms of residential living. The range of housing types includes higher density single-family and a variety of multifamily residences. Low impact commercial activities may also be allowed. To meet CFA requirements, the City is establishing a CFA Overlay zone and making minor adjustments to the MMR zone to comply with the land use requirements in OAR 660-012-0320, including increasing the minimum density to 50units/acre, eliminating the maximum density requirement, increasing the maximum building height to 50-ft and adopting new block length standards. 3 ' Page January 22, 2025 • High Mix Residential/Commercial (HMR): o This is the highest density residential zone intended to be near the center of the TOD district. High density forms of multifamily housing are encouraged along with complementary ground floor commercial uses. Low impact commercial activities may also be allowed. Low density residential uses are not permitted. The HMR zone already aligns well with CFEC land use regulations. As part of the CFA designation project the City's CFA Overlay outright permits government facilities, parks, and open space uses in the zone and adopt CEFC block length requirements. • Employment Commercial (EC): o This district was designed to host retail, service, and office uses are primarily intended for this district. Activities which are oriented and complementary to pedestrian travel and transit are encouraged. Residential uses above ground floor commercial uses are also consistent with the purpose of this zone. To meet the CFA land use requirements, the City is proposing to establish a CFA Overlay to outright permit government facilities, parks, and open space uses in the zone and adopt CEFC block length requirements. Since the EC zone is adjacent to East Pine Street and land zoned MMR, the City is establishing a minimum density of 25 units/acre for residential development in the EC zone. • Civic (C): C o Civic uses such as government offices, schools, and community centers are the primary uses intended in this district. These uses can play an important role in the vitality of the TOD district. To amend this zone, the city would need to allow a wider array of uses like allow residential and commercial uses, mandate a minimum density of 15 units/acre, and introduce a new building height minimum of 50 feet, 5 feet more than what is currently allowed. Adopt CEFC block length requirements. Estimated Existing Dwelling Units Based on the current Jackson County Assessor's records and the City's Buildable Lands Inventory, there are 58 dwelling units in the CFA. Projected Housing Capacity The project housing capacity is 4,056 housing units based on the proposed land use changes. The estimated housing units needed to accommodate the 30% of the City's total current and future units is estimated at 2,926 total housing units. 4 ' Page January 22, 2025 @ m # m k := cu0 < < q 7 rsi O azzE0 z z � ° a $ �$ I � � q q \ L 0 c \ 0 c c _ o o o / o e 22 � % 7 6 0 7 \ / O _ # 2 3 m a a 00 LO 00 Q. UJ cc E m \ / L % °� cr m Tr S $ v1 7 J k m a 0 E g o (N m 0 m @ § mU ■ 2 $ E $ E J $\ ° 2 & = E. I = N E ^ 0 \ \ 2 ° _ \ L 6 k o > § N CO m 7 ▪ � a � _ m . . k 2 ® ' 'a + - o m m } (N ( % 01 CI S ƒ $ @ § a _ ■ w w 4 � q Q o E e « o e ° .> @ 0. In 3 k En_ U o © §cts cCLI o .§ k u 2 C 9 \ k k k 2 2 T / a) E 0 0@ o 7 m ELO k we o w - / ^ 2 00 0 2 : c W ) § M c)k i k £ � J E ) k q + 2 b E E E E E q a) \ ) . 0 0 k § 0 7 2 \ § ƒ E u Q u _ Z Z - Z - § 4' 4' 4' « 4' -, 4. Ln o �, CO s� ai .c -to += 0 o v Ni o 0 H E i e N m N. 0 a 3 O = c —I m To Q. C O N u a L 48 LNn N CO 000 Oo N f0 i N lD N LD L Q O 0 0o L.ri of 0 `� rn oo 00 m Ln N O C X Oy 1. CO 'C 0 RI = 00 W Z ii t l0000 A mNmlO)Q,t 11 0 0N O• a IT Ln .1 N L.n 03 y mV U G C N a) E L N Ln 4 L.II E L L .0 O O — O -0 co ca Z G I cam.) • 0 cs Lon lon in Lc 0 w 3 '5 °_' 0 W L O L rE... Q m a) C E (I)CT - 00 in Q) O �� d 'Q 0 .-I in Ol 0 Z 0. ca $ O N oo CU V R) o m Q tV N N c-I m C O. 1- .0C CO CO 0 O (0 yr = a) O1 d .—I N .L.... 0 a) to E +' Q' V Q) Q. O O :a C O Z d cv -p > G 'a "� O a) a To 00 V L < Q a) (0 0. N 2 E C.) as 0 o O w 2 o w 0_ c N O. N N •V E N > n N R N E i U >, N a) O 0 ? 70 -o_ � U o f L� 0 a) (0 L aa'3 y. > 00I— ct 2ct 2 = U WU 1-- Z 0 0 m D as CL ; I 7 q N 2 ■ o 00 N e w E ~ $ m co 0. l- 7§ 74 ° w ■ 0. 7 k m 7 • AL. — a 4 @ 4 5 �� I ▪ J . c F- >. " o . 13 C to C = $ 2 : % \ ■ cl)E e 2 E 5 ') % 2 / § 0) 2 Ec g ° m o � 0 " c ./ q / m m m m 0 - kI- \ / \ co 70- / w o MI MI N Oa k a) o ■ \ t.0 q % I =% § 6 R c EgL- D i $ 0 au) © o 117+• 2 E £ � k2 z § � � a O o. Lu z / # © \ k p 2 N 2 C 0 ■ e \ U) q W D q 2 2 I a" cc a) _ c co _ I . -) I 1 ko N. m / w ' Cl) 3 , .> E a' C _ U o @ o co■ � � 0 ' I oaca 22o2 q § > 5acC Ct a k a .0 4-7 TO C "_ /_ \ o a / D2 § - E < I Iii .... / 2 V) g a) -a CI CI 'a CO § m a ca oe 7 $ .0 § ca o m >+� C a) Tii c / E2 EL ■ a 0 _ k OF " E . 03 b c £ & \ Q 'e 2 CU k () � § 2C. -0 O. S � § & t 2 / $ 0 CO / / / / 2 E ■ © E e w g = ° @ to o = c = ao o CO m c � _ L / � c . / / ' k k co o \ 2 § ® 2 N e § &c m E . � � iti <a cm Et2 O . a) ° ■ E E \ N E cD � � 0 \ / & q C a, 0 t5R ■ QWIn � 2 ■ z : E 3 2 co _ k (z ° « I D � . co o 0./ ; 2 2 i- ooa � E c e o a $ ■ k \ w ƒ 2 a § 15 ® b "a. ■ k 2mc 2 0 ■ EAiq I2 q / k � • k k 0 co�_< › O - LN k j 2 2 O. § 7 2 al / $ p @ k C O � � � _c .- E k 0 § ¢ $ £ 2 � E � k a) a)E 0 U) o 0 gC - . p § ° O E -o— •- > 0. % a) a)— U) q C U 03 .- o >, a) a) _a E E > E 2 -c C a) 3 _ > e %C U) @ 2 2 « o a $ - § % ' � � a k § = : » E 2 . @o as v � ) 0k \ C .§ a) £ ° o - : k a) % aa. co 2 0 2 a)/ 2 V U ca ¢ _ 0 J 2 m @ @ V 0 0 : U 2 k : 2 § •- « D = q o k a) CIm .gt '- q o ¢ @ 0 a) a) a / V = c § .k 2 0 Safety Within the past five years of reported data (between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022), there have been multiple minor property damage crashes and serious injury crashes within the CFA, Scenario 2. These crashes are mostly east of Exit 33, along E. Pine Street and Hamrick Road. 10 ' Page January 22, 2025 Figure 3. Serious Injury Crashes in the CFA, 2018-2022 >, • _�. # $i§ 4 �•.Ati'f. ' lip -NIT 1 '- I 1.* e !I 40' • 'XiE.-1 ,. ! lir" r '%1'MinE,—E 0. _41" ,• . *. ,„_-_, do, ... -I,„ _ 9 . : , 3 t 1 `gy p k• .1 i :7,„.1.;)0. .-* 4,-* ,...,,,,e, r il { ``:tipL,., a k h 'Iiie son ,4 s ..- -` ? ` =#'a iif �; r � a 9. r tt e . r_ .. ••SSE v. — o D L•E- * s 1t s024 215=3FM 'yp H 1 FIC60C9Eni CFA I I g-rt(a VNY\olk , i / - . i' t1‹.,-32)16- JC21 ma n1 i c:t}�Li • Frt i = Sld:e Bcufi•levy rrrp.171M..In1 I.{CITH.-eny:c+nnTIb I l Wino I.t Wd Vcr-eu:..I n;ur•; a c3t.ntd tirg.1,ra..-n.nIgrrns :1•Arrtri.nnir.ri•tircc I.r IIb •snvri 11 1 Page January 22, 2025 • There are no fatal injury accidents in the CFA between the timeframe of 2018 — 2022. • Most of the accidents recorded are classified as property-damage or possible injury crashes. Table 6. Serious Injury Crashes in the CFA, 2018-2022 Weather& Traffic Road Control Highest Road & Crash Surface Device Injury Intersectin Type Collision Descriptio Descriptio Crash Severity Date Time g Road Desc Type Desc n n Cause Description Road Weather Description Desc& & Road Traffic Intersecting Crash Surface Control Crash Highest Injury Crash Crash Hour Road Type Collision Condition Device Cause 1-3 Severity Date Description Description Desc Type Desc Desc Description Desc Description From opposite Turning direction Movement; -one left clear&dry; Suspected 8/26/22 10:00 AM to turn, one Turning Traffic Traffic Serious Injury 5:00 AM 10:59 AM Biddle Rd straight Movement clear&dry Signals Signals (A) From opposite Turning direction Movement; Biddle Rd -one left clear&dry; Suspected 4/26/22 10:00 PM to &Hamrick turn, one Turning Traffic Traffic Serious Injury 5:00 AM 10:59 PM Rd straight Movement clear&dry Signals Signals (A) From same Beebe Rd direction Rear-End; Suspected 11/29/22 04:00 PM to & Hamrick -one clear&dry;Serious Injury 4:00 AM 04:59 PM Rd stopped Rear-End clear&dry Stop Sign Stop Sign (A) 12 IPage January 22, 2025 Safety Priority Index System (SPIS) This data includes the most recent crash data available (currently 2015-2018) for the top 10% (90%-100%) of sites in Oregon, located within Central Pont's CFA, Scenario 2 (E. Pine Street and Hamrick Road) Table 7. SPIS Data ODOT Percent Hi hwa Mile Effective Crash Data SPIS (5%or SPIS Record ID 9 y point Date Years Percentile Score Number 10%) Local 3.95 2018 2015-2017 85%-89.99% No 44.87 40,466 Local 4.01 2018 2015-2017 85%-89.99% No 47.4 116,838 Local 4.03 2018 2015-2017 85% -89.99% No 47.35 40,460 Local 4.02 2018 2015-2017 85%-89.99% No 47.41 116,839 Local 3.95 2018 2015-2017 85%-89.99% No 44.87 116,833 Local 3.71 2018 2015-2017 90% -94.99% No 49.76 40,462 Local 3.97 2018 2015-2017 85%-89.99% No 44.88 116,834 Local 3.77 2018 2015-2017 85%-89.99% No 47.35 40,463 Local 3.99 2018 2015-2017 85%-89.99% No 47.37 116,836 Local 3.89 2018 2015-2017 85%-89.99% No 44.87 40,465 Local 3.98 2018 2015-2017 85%-89.99% No 47.36 116,835 Local 4 2018 2015-2017 85%-89.99% No 47.38 116,837 Local 3.83 2018 2015-2017 85%-89.99% No 44.87 40,464 Local 4.03 2018 2015-2017 85%-89.99% No 44.95 185,423 Local 3.97 2019 2016-2018 90% -94.99% No 47.23 104,512 Local 4.01 2019 2016-2018 90%-94.99% No 47.23 104,516 Local 3.98 2019 2016-2018 90%-94.99% No 47.23 104,513 Local 3.95 2019 2016-2018 90%-94.99% No 47.23 104,511 Local 4 2019 2016-2018 90%-94.99% No 47.23 104,515 Local 3.99 2019 2016-2018 90%-94.99% No 47.23 104,514 Local 4.03 2019 2016-2018 85%-89.99% No 44.77 104,518 Local 4.02 2019 2016-2018 90%-94.99% No 47.23 104,517 • Safety Narrative The most recent crash data would indicate that this section of E. Pine Street is not a SPIS site. However, because of inattentiveness by drivers and high traffic flow, there are numerous rear end crashes resulting in property damage and possible injury crashes (3 noted serious injury crashes). 13 ' Page January 22, 2025 Financially Constrained Projects Among the relevant financially constrained projects within or abutting the CFA, there are several that would help address crash-related incidents and improve bicycle-pedestrian access and use. Some of these projects have already been completed (example: duel right turns onto E. Pine Street from the Northbound 1-5 ramp. Table 8. Summary of TAMP Improvements Implementation TO .o w o E ,� :E., Estimated 25 Improvement Description Priority Trigger o m g Cost' co N 3 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO MAINTAIN SAFE AND EFFICIENT OPERATIONS 1-5 SB • Monitor queuing on the Ramp SB off-ramp and maintain • Queuing 1 Terminal at traffic signal timing to Ongoing on the off- ✓ ✓ <$5,000 ✓ ✓ East Pine safely manage queues ramp St TSM on the ramp. 1-5 NB • Monitor queuing on the Ramp NB off-ramp and maintain • Queuing 2 Terminal at traffic signal timing to Ongoing on the off- ✓ ✓ <$5,000 V V East Pine safely manage queues ramp St TSM on the ramp • Maintain signal progression to avoid • WB queuing that affects the I- 5 SB ramp terminal queuing • Implement that affects protected/permissive left- SB ramp turn phasing on NB and terminal East Pine SB approaches • Congestion 3 St at 10 • Extend left-turn lane Ongoing on 10th St/ ✓ ✓ $50,000 V ✓ St/Freeman Freeman Rd TSM striping on East Pine St Rd to provide more queue • WB storage for WB left-turn movement and consider queuing restricting access that affect between 10th St and SB ramp Jewett School Rd to right terminal turns only • • Maintain signal EB progression to avoid queuing East Pine queuing that affects the I- that affects 4 St at 5 NB ramp terminal NB ramp Peninger Implement Ongoing terminal ✓ ✓ $25,000 ✓ V Rd TSM protected/permissive left- • Congestion turn phasing on NB and and delays SB approaches on Peninger 14 ' Page January 22, 2025 Rd • Maintain signal • EB East Pine progression to avoid queuing 5 St east of I- queuing that affects the I- Ongoing that affects ✓ ✓ <$5,000 ✓ 5 TSM 5 NB ramp terminal NB ramp terminal BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS TO ADDRESS EXISTING DEFICIENCIES • Add a 5-ft sidewalk to South south side of bridge by Sidewalk replacing railing and on East restriping roadway with High to • Current 6 Pine St narrower travel lanes3 Medium deficiency ✓ ✓ ✓ $1,200,000 ✓ ✓ between • Connect bridge sidewalk Ramp to the existing sidewalk Terminals network and the ramp terminals Bike Lane ■ Restripe eastbound travel on East lanes between 9th Street Pine St and the I-5 southbound between ramp to improve bike • Current 7 10"' lane transitions3 High deficiency ✓ ✓ ✓ $25,000 ✓✓ St/Freeman Rd and 1-5 SB Ramp Terminal • Widen East Pine St beginning at the west end . Queuing I-5 SB of the freeway overpass on the off- to add a second WB left- Ramp ramp at turn lane with up to 200 Medium to cannot hbe ✓ ✓ $1,300,000 ✓ ✓ 8 Terminal at feet of additional storage3 Low East Pine Widen the SB on-ramp to managed • St with signal create two receiving lanes that merge to a timing single lane • Widen NB off-ramp to • Queuing 1-5 NB provide a second right- on the off- Ramp turn lane with ramp that Medium to 9 Terminal at approximately 350 feet of Low cannot be ✓ ✓ $1,700,000 ✓ ✓ East Pine storage managed St with signal timing • Implement Central Point TSP Tier 2 Project#236 —Widen East Pine St to • Queuing East Pine accommodate a third WB and 10 St at through travel lane that Low congestion ✓ ✓ $150,0002 ✓ Peninger will feed into the existing that affects Rd right-turn lane at the 1-5 NB ramp NB on-ramp; Maintain operations bike lanes; Add sidewalks where 15IPage January 22, 2025 necessary(revised project description) • Implement Central Point TSP Tier 1 Project#216 East Pine —Widen west and north • Intersection 11 St at approaches to add a dual Medium congestion ✓ ✓ $600,0002 ✓ Hamrick Rd eastbound left-turn lane or queuing and second northbound receiving lane SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES Transportation System Management Measures to Maintain Safe and $90,000 Efficient Operations Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Projects to Address Existing Deficiencies $1,225,000 Roadway Infrastructure Projects Needed to Meet Future Demand $3,750,000 TOTAL $5,065,000 Acronyms: NB = northbound, SB = southbound, EB =eastbound, WB =westbound Notes: 1. Cost estimates were prepared in year 2012 using present day dollars and are consistent with standard estimating methods. 2. The costs for the Central Point TSP projects are taken from Table 12.4 (Tier 1 —Medium Term Projects)and Table 12.6 (Tier 2 Projects)and increased by approximately 20 percent to account for inflation since the TSP was prepared. 3.A design exception will be required. *These estimates need to be updated as this TAMP was adopted in 2016. 16 ' Page January 22, 2025 Figure 4. Identified ODOT Projects within and around the CFA 0 t.,_ a 5 N 1 - .. P1) ,�( '- {:fi t... _ _ it ..' # ......r am,.* 1531Im ail: ifie:43_,..7„, ,:,...0„..• iii. ir\rivir , ,e- ill,' zs gi 16 . . g .., 0 h5Seuthbotrnd Ramp Terminal/East Pine Street TSM -Signal Iiming Modifications!,Mcnnraintrif1 si>r.-iat 1irwIu Cu Weil::"a cur ut,toes on die SS L:j.!on'.p fa v ut.ro i ® 1-5.Northbound Ramp Tiornirrol/Fest Pine Street TSM -Sienei Timing Modifications•Akii•lrrrin ooj.it 4,,,mit I:r 0,9 ri..1,►'ly:mfr.:3]P abr..w;col Ow tiRrrrj-ns,it,j,,,rdn9.1 © lath Straat/Frai man RoadjEast Pim Strlaret ISM-Signal Timing Madillcatannsand Quasi*Siensga: VAatnrain%roat prigrsr&&' t nrr c.19.nui ni:rxs r.nS vesthr.,:na`I+r?a !?.no arrrptgg rr F.,.sr P it Storm to xosVek:mare quax.staroge,aains.dcr arcrcc m i,rnt, to:rnFrc+^saf^t,prig...") © Periarger RaadIEost Pate Street ISM-Sgnal Timrng Modifications:.1R1crnrain mono)otooressx l to oistod ne inq cc.t that affects..a is'8 Nasrtc i trrr„.a".arc'change sane pharang!rirraisinqi ® Last Pine Street 1SM-Sigr l Trmir:l adilicahvns:Malntair.::pnaicmgvesslan.por!iralafy.T;fc SLAOIJC•.t.CL.:.er......nok i5 Z 1 er.1:6 ;:!:,':-Avork.3`.r6 Cole- ,uS_SPoira#that ./ itxibiElrxig.sII� °1e.utti J1 ::1 •8iV" :4Sier atsasit4 led3f&AlWil ,kekez i.iite. ste 00:45,'i. Si:V.:vta'.1 t47. ..:.i°Nfv scw's5&;ir 4!.+ ii4,feS alik titers iZsithgadtrh fti7.+ 'Fein 5r Ix 1-1 ill' .ai!rg:Nti/sWa1:.• ihilt -*: 14 dzlrxv F+� 34 a..^� y $3•.:„T J� ,4,,,,- ;1k5-,'lap;ow'r,�.„k41c:,,,,,k.4airx ;.t +d47.,..A. . ff.,,N„Aari, :�...i. r.,04 .ao-,in�.„....t iCVJ1,..i',?,4;A 0F.i..4.�....a , ,,,,.......f sr `.:v'rof.., 0 Eli ti:3r�•t..kaxl Ta7V'ty"n}t.•:yi1 -•`.'a4t�a . A!itiliP'.�,.v.Ir.-Ais raflmss1-..,±7�.i•S .444( sr i#R art-Wri7e7,. R-1m::aiS:'wak 7VS�iyx�*}y?bo y��fe'7CI,am�wl.,:gy4r..�'�,pydy�.LTr�6- war 2041 �,,,y7�, Q p�,ph +1C:V Eittl ttle. r-�.�JC•.a Mir: �TNALVS1'�Yv aSsii Y'SCYS L' .fa 7i7o-}3fv4'43 ``!R� epaa .01-1-Ae.4 AI*x ad /f_,&Ika t.tt-x i..sa",Wbeji'dui':.lir'..•`4i';: aes:a {7 aZ;k!LIII' —Oidwi;DPI f4.3a eul.katiltr.luotes:tovfik Acedsw_e rer :, ,r.:ytwr s,us.a.'ectfriaro-w`.ia:x: ; . 41+: rA .�r ry'.3}.�rge�i SLilrlarli':,}��tt '•.h lea••.0. .iTti:i.%tr. IAN•?•'i. � .7ish •VL?YfHi1T•Y Lr.S :i Rom,7 1:06 l4ifs>bi 1:3$3ruaF 17lPage January 22, 2025 4.7 Exhibit 7 -. Updated Housing Capacity Analysis Calculations C G in 3 c 3 0 O I- N p LL M coo U.. - 'o o O N ci p co CT. p _ ` N 7 CO CO c0 C fn CO 7 co co N 7 N 0 N Ct O CO N L V O) co M r coE O (D lL) N C V o N N O- N N W M Z CO O ` Z M 00 V d r to N cop A O In O V V O V N CO Q 7 0 r0 Q f� V 7 V cn N O V N O .- N Q ) Nn Q N O a th O Nn _ n n N C e e _ _ y13, N cn > C > C C u 7 Co top _C Q a. I Q I U u V •° go p v d C y A m N Q m m 2 Q y W 01 Z d 07 C Q Z C E N Q Z C E a Q. a o N O N p Z 0 - 2 I— Z 2 0 C I— Z N o v o 0 CO 0 10a m C N m (//) cn 10 M W Y o (.1) I— O O Up O CO p O O U O i i C CO m N 13 U O O M O o ` o '� N a) 2 U V N N LL• D ll.I as O l0 O U a a a w -2x Q U j 0) N fn 0 0 N i , N 0 N i LL O Q QG C O U o o O CC C a •5 co Q nOEgo N E CL co i La co co N co co N N F. V N IN (C a o O o , rn p o M CON CON • C N 7 — U o o _ c cn d CT a C N IJ O Z n N K O N — N O W G G t` 0 '0 7 7 U RE 2 co a) Cr. a) V al 22 Y N p = 0 O D Ul .N m >, o u. 3To 0 0 2 u. m N o .a m Q E c m Q E C J I O > •Q N C 7 N N (0 C N iT Y 7 > -Y _U _U C @ E. U 2 O 15 R ' o U a a N N j a a N > m F- 0 R m F F 2 CC Q F. F- 2 K Q N o a• o 'algeuen A;l0 Eolge!Jen vd3 oalgeuen A;;1z>Igeuen V:3 O z C C V co c co 3 a) 3 a) (C co O F to O F _O . LL pj -O N o LC. ^ L o Ci M N dp Lc) N co t0 co - O V1 O C O O M cG N. N N- In Ln • CO O) .-- to E O (O O E CO N CO CO C CO )` O )-- C .- )` CO Y) N O (C 'I" N Z M ` a) C Z oO c, CO a.,, LO CO U U = (6 )` (C U O V R CO CO CO V N M NO uCO CO Q U (V .- co p Q N 3 t, CO U co a Q N O V Q Ln O to U C .y O x N N Q LL j e U O) m in .O _ T C _ T C A ` N A (4o d 2 t4 O 2 to O 4) U Q Q C x Q A x C Q d Y 0 Y cc U v 2 Q O " -c ` O (' U d U 0 O (� C d U m C 4) U Q Z a) O D d Q co _ 7 4) Q Q Q i d co Z 4) O) Z LL LL N Q z c E m Q z c E d U U c Q m w Q = .- Q 2 .. A m ` ). o O LL C O o O LL C O O a) I- z x e n r z I e = 1- I- a e e m A E `m a co o oY U O • • . U O o • i I O O O OO co m m O 15 e e U Y) d L U N U O N O W O `1 P. Q Q C O O N O O N O O N O V CO am to t0 V V 7 C al i E C Q C < O O O X H a U� a n c U N O p 7 O O E _� O N 7 CO N N N o O W N N c O Z to Q ` . V O c. Q . LC) O O �p 0 N p O M 0, p O C,) 0, :j = Ln O c'n N Cc, N Q N V • C tT Q T .V N N co ii 0. to C C _ C C O U - m E.).Y N _O D C . T 0 p a) C U _� LL (0 p O N LL (0 0 CP 7 Q Ea .7 7 C a) m Q E C a) 0 4) m E cma (�° E m = a U_ U_ p w a a @ 4`�i > aT n a) O C 1- r 2 cr Q r r 2 cC ¢ !- D oe gepen 43)Ige!Jen yjo oaigeuen Apo Ngepen yA3