Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes - June 18, 2002City of Central Point Planning Commission June 18, 2002 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chairman Chuck Piland, Rick Perry, Candy Fish, John LeGros, Paul Lunte and Wayne Riggs were present. Don Foster was absent. Also in attendance were Ken Gerschler, Community Planner; Matt Samitore, Community Planner, and Chris Clayton, Senior Public Works'I'echnician. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence. IV. MINUTES Commissioner LeGros made a motion to approve the minutes from the June 4, 2002 meeting as amended. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Perry; yes, Fish, yes; LeGros, yes; Lunte, abstain and Riggs, yes. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Review of the Final Development Plan for Phase 2 (27 lots) of the Miller Estates Planned Unit Development. The subject property is located on Jackson County Assessment Plat 37 2W 03B Tax Lot 501. Matt Samitore, Community Planner, presented the Planning Department staff report. The final development plan appears to match the preliminary development plan. All of Phase II are within the 100-year flood plain. The City is currently working with Hammond Engineering to have a new flood study completed for Griffin Creek. This may have an impact on Phase I. "the special setback for streams is in effect for Phase II. No structures can be built Cii~~ of Ce~ttrrt( Polrrt Plnmeing Cwnwirsiaie e~farrrtet Jm~e ]N, 2002 Page 2 within 2S' from the top of the stream bank. The flood way needs to be delineated on the construction drawings to make sure none of the lots or the RV parking area is located in the floodway. Anew RV parking plan will need to be submitted and accepted for the RV storage area after the flood way is shown. There are other issues involved with the Final Development Plan for Phase 2 that were part of the preliminary development plan which have not been completed. A landscape and irrigation plan will need to be designed, accepted by the City, and constructed for the area bordering Highway 99. A landscaping and irrigation plan will need to he designed and accepted for the area bordering Griffin Creek. The plan will also need to show a "tot lot" and adult recreation areas. The Public Works Department submitted a staff report which dealt with other unresolved issues. These include a permanent barrier for Nancy and Mary's Way. A emergency access gate for Nancy's Way and a latched walking gate for Nancy's Way will need to be submitted and accepted by the City. A striping plan will also need to be submitted showing the no parking areas of the development. Staff recommended that 11 of these be completed prior to the Final Plat be signed by City Staff. The applicant, Brad Miller, stated that all of the homes in Phase I are built above the 100-year flood plain. They have recently hired a landscape company to do the design for both landscaping plans. He would like to work with the City to come up with acceptable striping plan and permanent barrier for Nancy and Mary's Way. Commissioner LeGros made a motion to adopt Resolution 549 approving the final development plan, based on findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval as set forth in Resolution 433 and in the Planning and Public Works Staff Reports. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. B. A Public meeting to review an application for a fence variance at 653 Meadowbrook Drive. The applicant is requesting if portions of proposed fence can be constructed at a height of six feet in a side yard setback where the code allows a maximum height of 42 inches. The subject property is located in the R-1-8, Residential Single Family zoning district on Map 37 2W OIBC, Tax Lot 9300. Ken Gerschler, Community Planner, presented the Planning Department Staff Report. The applicants are requesting a fence variance for a side yard fence on a corner lot. The fence would go out to the property line at a height of six feet. Several neighbors have signed a petition in favor of the placement of the fence. In order for a fence variance to be approved the Planning Commission must find the creation of an unnecessary hardship or six other criteria. City oJCenhnl Poivu P(mnein~ Conm;isciou i4finu7rr /rme 78, 2002 Paxe 3 The applicant, Dan and Kay Berryman, stated that thiswould have an undo hardship because it wouldn't allow for proper screening of the pool and would limit the area of useable property. They also feel that building a three and one-half feet high fence then a four feet fence would not allow for screening of the pool and not to the protection that they would like. They were also not told by the developer of the restrictions on the corner lot. Matt Samitore, told the applicants and commission of the correct right-of-way on the lot and that the fence would need to be setback three feet from the back of the sidewalk. The pool would also have to be setback a minimum of twenty feet from the property line on the side yard. Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 550 approving the fence variance based on the findings of fact contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: The motion passed unanimously. VII. MISCELLANEOUS There were no miscellaneous items. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Lunte made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Fish seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m.