HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - May 7, 1991
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
May 7, 1991 - 7:00 p.m.
3CALLED TO ORDER
Next Resolution No. 218
2olI Ca11 - Garth Ellard - Rick Bettenburg, Dick Halley, Karolyne Hugo,
Bob Matthews, Candace Rayburn and Chuck Piland
PPROVAL OF MINUTES
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 2, 1991
A. Public Hearing - Review and determination of a Conditional Use Permit
Application for Automotive Repair Service at 27 Bush.Street (2W 11BC
TL 3900) (Applicant: Sharon Wilder)
B. Public Meeting - Review and approval of Master/Development Plan for
Green Park Village Subdivision (Applicant: Pacific Trend Development
Company) (37 2W 12C Tax Lots 800, 507, 3100 and 3400) (formerly
'Meadow Creek Subdivision in the southeast quadrant of the City)
C: Public Meeting - Review and Recommendation to City Council for a
Preliminary Subdivision Plat for Phase I of Green Park Village
`~: (Applicant: Pacific Trend Development Company)
D." Public Meeting - Review and recommendation of a Vacation of alleyways
located within a subdivision known as Amy Harbaugh's Addition
'..generally located north of W. Pine and east of Haskell Street
r(Applicant: Steve Rietmann)
$. Status Report on Final Development Plan - Master Street Plan for
Meadow Creek area in southeast quadrant of the City.
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
P/arming Commission Meeting Minutes
April 2, 1991
Page One
I. MEETING CALLED OF ORDER AT 7:00 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL
Those present were Garth Ellard, Rick Bettenburg, Dick Halley, Karolyne Hugo, and
Chuck Piland. Commissioner Bob Matthevvs vvas absent. Also present were George
Rubaloff, City Administrative Assistant, Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director, and
Cecelia Gordon, Secretary.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A: Commissioner Bettenburg moved to approve the March 5, 1991 Planning
Commission Minutes as written and the motion was seconded by Commissioner
Piland. Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg, yes; Halley, yes; Hugo, (abstained, not
present at March 5, 1991 Meeting) and Piland, yes. The motion carried
unanimously.
IV. CORRESPONDENCE
George Rubaloff, City Administrative Assistant, informed the Commission that
Jack Crumm had formally submitted his resignation in a letter to the City dated
3/1.2/91..
Secondly, Rubaloff read to the Commission, the March 5, 1991 letter from
Maple Grove Partners (Ed Dautzenburg -Meadow Creek) requesting 120 day
extension on their Land Use Application, and by reference entered these two
letters into the record.
V. BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing -Resolution #217 -Conditional Use Permit for placement of
Mobile Home for Infirm at 707 Pittview, {37 2W 11 D Tax Lot 400)(Applicant -
Bernice Boring)
., V .. 01
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
P/arming Commission Meeting Minutes
April 2, 1991
Page Two
There were no conflicts of interest on the part of the Commission. Chairman
Ellard opened the Public Meeting.
George Rubaloff, City Administrative Assistant described the application, the
review process,. the alternatives available. to the Planning Commission and
entered into record by reference Vicinity Map, Copy of the Notice of Hearing,
Mailing List (to property owners within 100 foot radius) Tax Assessor's .Map,
Aerial Map, Application Materials, February 21, 1991 City letter to Bernice
Boring, March 20, 1991 Public Works Staff Revievv, and March 13, 1991
Planning Department Staff Review. Rubaloff also entered into the record as
Item M., the March 21, 1991 letter to Dave Kucera and Larry. R. Blanchard from
Robert S. Blanton, P.E. which discussed. the capacity of the storm drain through
the Meadows PUD.
Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director discussed the stages of the Meadow
Creek Storm Drain LID. He explained that the Petition format was now under
legal review and would be mailed to the LID sponsor within the next two
weeks. It would then be up to the LID sponsorto contact the property owners
for signatures on the Petition.
Bernice Boring, Applicant, 707 Pittview Avenue, Central Point, Oregon came
forward in support of the proposed Conditional Use Permit.
The Commission asked Mrs. Boring if she understood the conditions in the Staff
Reports, and she assured them that she did, and that she had met with City
Staff on April 1, 1991, and that they had discussed the conditions in detail.
She also agreed to enter into the Deferred Improvement Agreement in which
she would participate financially for a share of total cost of future storm drain
facility (second by-pass) and that such obligation would run with the land.
No else came forward in support of or in opposition to the Conditional Use
Permit. Chairman Ellard closed the Public Meeting.
~~ 02
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
P/arming Commission Meeting Minutes
April 2, 1991
Page Three
Since there was no written Resolution prepared, George Rubaloff informed the
Commission that they could enter a Motion on an oral Resolution, and Staff
would prepare the written Resolution for the Chairman's signature.
Commissioner Bettenburg moved that the Commission approve the Conditional
Use Permit for the placement of a Mobile Home for Infirm at 707 Pittview,
Central Point, Oregon subject to applicant entering into a Deferred Improvement
Agreement, and meeting all the conditions as set forth in the Staff Review and
the applicant's signed statements.
Commissioner Hugo Seconded the Motion. Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg, yes;
Halley, yes; Hugo, yes; and Piland, yes. The Motion passed unanimously.
VI. Miscellaneous
Public Works Director, Larry R. Blanchard announced that the Meadow Creek
Street Master Plan would be discussed at a Public Meeting on May 7, 1991 at
the regularly scheduled Planning Commission Meeting. Also that a mailing had
gone out April 2, 1991 to all property owners containing information and a
questionnaire and notifying them of the May 7, 1991 Meeting.
VII. Adjournment - A Motion to adjourn was entered by Commissioner Bettenburg
and Commissioner Piland seconded the Motion and the Motion carried
unanimously. The Meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
J J O
STAFF REPORT
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant
DATE: April 29, 1991
SUBJECT: Automotive Repair Service
Conditional Use Permit Request
27 Bush Street (37 2W 11BC TL 3900)
SUMMARY
/off
Applicant Sharon Wilder has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to operate an
automotive repair service at an existing structure within the C-5 zone
(Commercial Thoroughfare) at 27 Bush Street. The Planning Commission is
scheduled to conduct a public hearing at its May 7, 1991 meeting, after which
the commission can make a determination regarding the request.
RACKhRl1i7N11
The Planning Commission may remember the 27 Bush site as Freedom Tire, which was
the subject of zoning violations in 1988, and 1989 when the property was zoned
residential-multiple family (R-3). On March 3, 1989, the City Council approved
global zone map amendments which included a rezoning of this property from R-3
to C-5.
The current application proposes an automotive repair service which includes
general auto repair, brake repair, front-end/rear-end repair, transmission work
and tune-up. The operation will utilize one employee and the expectation is to
maintain a volume of 10-15 cars per week. The site .includes a 1500 square foot
building and approximately 2600 square feet of paved parking area.
Public Notices have been distributed to property owners within 100 feet of the
proposed automotive repair service site. As of this date, the City has not
received any written coirrtnents regarding the Conditional Use Permit application.
STAFF.AUT/PCWORK
~~ 04
An auto repair .service is classified as a conditional use in the C-5 zone
(17.76.030(a)) and must be authorized in accordance with Central Point Municipal
Code 17.76 and other applicable City regulations. Planning, Building and Public
Works Departments have reviewed the proposed conditional use in accordance with
standards outlined in Chapters 17.46, 17.60, 17.64 and 17.76 of the Central Point
Municipal Code, applicable Building Codes and applicable Public Works standards.
Certain findings (criteria, statement of fact and conclusions), shall be made
in granting Conditional Use Permits. CPMC 17.76.040 lists criteria which must
be reviewed by staff, discussed during the Planning Commission meeting and
resolved prior to, making a determination on the Conditional Use Permit
application. Said findings have also been incorporated into the proposed
Planning Commission Resolution.
ATTACHMENTS
The following items are attached for the commission's review and for entry into
the record by reference during the Public Hearing:
Item A - Vicinity Map, Zoning Map
Item B - Notice of Public Hearing, Certificate of Posting, Mailing List
and Tax Assessor Map
Item C - Aerial Map
Item D - Application Materials
Item E - Public Works Staff Review dated April 25, 1991
Item F - Planning Department Staff Review dated April 29, 1991
Item G - Building Department Staff Review dated April 29, 1991
Item H - Proposed Resolution, making findings, exhibiting specific
conditions and approving conditional use permit
STAFF.AUT/PCWORK
~~~ 05
ITEM
,~'~ I _...I ~
+,~ .A,Y.
... i __~_ .. >I
~~ I i ... a
~,` i` ~ O I € \ a
\ . I riw ..,. 1
\\ n~.wo .• fA5 A3T6 a
-~~ $ o ~~
s ~ yr ~~ ~ Y O ~ I Four
sax I. ~'`~ g 5 'QO •..JCOrlIDfO
I \
'~ ~' 1
~~ a. ~^~~
,W. ,..
s Opp` ~~.. WI
r DP Dooooo~, y~~ ~
. E ~ xa KUf ;
s ~g~ Do~O~O~~~pO? o ~' ~ .
~~ ~r00 __\ CD
r.n~ - I ~-- ~ O~~ODO~~D~c~~ ao ~,~ „~.
~njn4~ \
$! r,~ ~ • y ~O ~O O ~~ L`ENTRAL POINT -~ .n\\ \
I PD : r~ ~~.6.T40 ~ 'kt . ~,.
~O ~ ~~ ~ ~Y] ~ c s a ~ ` .1
I ~ la IILJ : l /~ I 1. SMM. NIIIE Y
` ~-
11 III ~~o~~ r • is
- eC ~
~~ ..cl ~~[ CENTRAL .POINT
o IIr JACKSON COUNTYA OREGON
% ~ ~ e I PoPUlatlon 6,740
T. 37 S. R. 2 W. W.AI.
z. I ~ ~ ~ LEGEND mvwu er roc '
~: ~ u N' g1ECg1 OEN ARiUENI Of 1RANSPQiIAipN
/U/// MiEfl9AiC MNBERED RWIE EPo [MPEaR,W nw X[
U.$.OfPAflINENi Ci 1RAN$PoRi.iMY
U.$. MX18ERE011WiE ffCERAI WWWPY ADMM$1RS1XH
$laiE 1u.PENFO RWIf M.y
$I LL O IERUw•rEW w fA srsrfY ~ JANUARY 1987
~: t I ~ wvofo wcrnxr $cAUE
3 // ~i C= sIRELr O°Ex fOi IR•vEL (fir 1`N A py ml
i FOSI afEE ~ RLYEC euEOlxc ~ 1 I I ~
1 scxooE ~ cowl xousE I I I 100 ~
• LfiR•PY i CIIT M•LL
COP[$ p iNi MAP ME ,VAEADLE Ai ,gMIX•L CO$I fRON -- GIY EWIi Y APNOPY
WELD4 DEPT. K 1RANSPoRIAIpx, SaLEU. 0.gEGOH 9]JIO. CWNIER GEI.ERAIEO
ITEM ._~
>y
~ ~.
Cam'
m C
„ ., ~ 0'7
ITEM ~.
155 S0. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
THE HEART OF THE C=TY OF CENTRAL PO2NT
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
NOT 2 CE OF' PUB L'= C HEAR= N G
Notice is hereby given that the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct
a public hearing to review a Conditional Use Permit application submitted by
Sharon Wilder. Said application proposes to operate an automotive repair service
at 27 Bush Street. The site is located within the thoroughfare Commercial
District {C-S zone) and is further 'described-as Jackson County Tax Assessor Map
37 2W 11BC Tax Lot 3900. The proposed automotive repair service would be
operated within the existing building at 27 Bush Street. The proposed automotive
service use includes brake repair, tune-up, transmission repair and front and
rear-end repair.'
The proposed land use` is a'-cohditional use within the C-5 zone, and the
application will be reviewed in accordance with conditional use standards
outlined in Chapter 17.76, and applicable zoning regulations of Title. l7 of the
Central Point Municipal Code.
The Public Hearing is scheduled as follows:
Date: Tuesday, May 7, 1991
Time: 7:00 p.m. (approximate)
Place: Central Point City Council Chambers
155 South Second Street
Said hearing will provide for an opportunity for testimony and,for questions to
be answered. Individuals may submit written comment no later than Thursday,
April 25, 1991. Testimony and written comment must be directed toward the
criteria which is applicable to the proposed land use.
Pursuant to CPMC 1.24.070(5)(C) and ORS 197.763(3)(e), failure to raise an issue
during this hearing, in person or in writing, or failure to raise an issue with
sufficient specificity to afford the decision-maker and the parties an
opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude appeal to the Land Use Board
of Appeals based on that issue.
The application, applicable criteria and staff report will be available for
inspection at Central Point City Hall on Tuesday, April 30, 1991 at approximately
4:00 p.m. or for copies of same at 15 cents per page.
.Fore more information regarding this matter, contact George Rubaloff,
Administrative Assistant, City of Central Point at 664-3321.
NOTICE DATES:
Mailing (Property owners within 100 ft radius) - April 16, 1991
NPHBOSH.91/ADMIN
v v ~ 0 O
ITEM
155 S0. SECOND,ST. CENTRAL ROINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING,.
Sandy Berryhill :.,CERTIFY THAT ON THE
I
FOLLOWING DATE OF Wednesday, May 1,:1991 ; I POSTED A NOTICE
FOR A'PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON May 7 > 1941> DURING WHICH THE
CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICATION FOR AN AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SERVICE AT 27 BUSH STREET (37 2W
11BC Tax Lot 3900)
AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE
2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY
3. CENTRAL POINT CITY EIRE STATION
4.'CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD. ,
I
ATURB
~-,~99 /
DATE
., . p g ,.
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
ITEM ~._,_
MAILING LIST FOR J.00 FOOT MAILING RADIUS
Conditional Use Permit Application
Automotive Service
27 Bush Street
37 2W 11BB TL 7300 Bernadine Smyth
P.O. Box 3665
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 7400 Grange Co-Op
P.0. Box 3637
Central Point, OR 97502
37 2W 11BC TL 2700 Paul'Weber
457 South First
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 2800 Raleigh Greene
5070 Del Mar
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 3300 Janet Miller
431 South First
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 3400 Donald Kegeler
413 South First
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 3500 Edward Koch
P.0. Box 1017
Eagle Point, OR 97524
TL 3600 Howard Misner
414 South First
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 3700 Ruth Rupp
448 South First
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 3800 Alexander Bryce
P.O. Box 135
Jacksonville, OR 97530
TL 3900 Sharon Wilder
1245 Mt. View Dri ve
Eagle Point, OR 97524
v v 1 V
~,
ITEM
TL 4100 Cornett Lumber Company
431 South Front ,
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 4200 Cornett Lumber Company
431 South Front
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 4400 Cornett Lumber Company
431 South Front
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 4401 Timothy Debo
441 South Front
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 4700 W. Thomas Hamlin
P.O. Box 43
Medford, OR 97501
TL 4300 Cornett Lumber Company
431 South Front
Central Point, OR 97502
~~ 11
'r7.t„~,
~~,... " ITEM ._---~-'--
~,
S.W.~/4 N.W. I/4' SAC II T
37 2W 11BC Tax Lot 3900 SCALE I °
' 372W11
.i: ~l i
a? /
e
V
" N. E.COR. ,'
\ !~ l OT 2 ,' . (1
~~V .s ,.~ \3100 ' ~~
J YFti'.~~ \ li~-l0e ~{~
N.W.COR.. o~ \ ~ O ^/
LDT 4 _ 6 -2
j !; 3200\ \ \
N.C.COR. .y ~ 5 ~ ~~ 13 Db ~y \ \ \ \ \I 5t
LoT I \3 OA 5 13 \ 2 yy s+
! P 7 ~".'
VO s ,\ ~y, e \ .^. U'~~ '" 3 ,,., 5 ,, \ 3000 ,e
' G
y~'.r^ ~,~ ; 3504, \3300. 55 ,y ~ I(.?J ,< ~.`Q
N. E.COR >`y q. > 4 %~ a yy '~ ~'1 ,yo se
LOT a ":\ 3~ \ \ ~~ µ.1 .i, \ \ / j ' 2900 ~
~ `•~ 9093900' \ 3600 \ y "~ 280os LK2 `y S.E.COR. x st
yy~sc / /5 A(D \~FO~. _\ ~ .at e\ tl }G~j 7 say ~ l0T I.
T ~ ,/ 1
4100e ~/~9! ~\ s, > \ ~ e, ~ ,S ,~Il'J Sys ~ ~o
ie 3 y ,.)` ~rr° \FL 2 ~ _. /5{'c„\ ° +r„1 . \y2700~ /~6' yt ~ c
N.W.CDR. l(~I L~~ y' ~/ ~ \3700 ,t \ l.(',rj i yt°'
~~, LoT a 4200 y°• / ~/ :\ S , / ' 1900 A zs.~~
INTERSECTION 0 i \'4 %i f~ ~-\ ~\' "y lpV~ r •'' tyt-.o j , ) y'
ELY. R/W OFTHE 't ~t.q'y/ . ' 430 ~'~ - ~.\ 3800 ,, e t+' °+` _ 1
RELOCATED PAC. e ~ ~ ¢ \\ \ y5 y 2400
HWY. a THE S. y.y\440 °, ~ _ ',° `,
,l ,Y
RDN. OF C.P, r440~ ~.; - LK 19 3~3 \s \\59 ''' ryL0T 9/~ ~ ' yy a (P-1608) ',0; ~°•
,. ,, 2000
._ ~ cP~\3'75) e, .. ,.' ,k 2500 ~3'~ .> LK21 ~"`
\ ~~ ~.w ' 6.tts+ ia..~ ~ j `ti-n,N .0 y5 x\'' .\e~ •~"(. ^ /
,.yy°`,;;' .BUSH ` ~' ° _
• 4500 ~ 'c~rv ~ 2600 ~"" ~ y''~ 2300 e' 480(
w r
* s ~ r.,'.
T ~ y
4600 s '~ ~` l P-3106) _ LK2 (P-1465) r J~
0 ~ '
y y 4700 ~.^' `' ° 525 '
s •°
?oR. ~ ~ cY V~ ~ n5~~22001
~j ~ LOT "D 9 l.: '2, ;~
v SNOWY BUTTE FF. ,~ L3f ~ 49
~~w~• 4
t
\ ,
Z t ~ 6-~ 8 °-° ` y ,5100
~O ,{``\
'- <'' . ":
1
~> °~
'~
' ~ ~
{: ~ __,.
Y
~s ~O ITE e-'
%
%
/O + % ~ ~..
U
m m a
%0 ~ ¢ a ~/
N O U
U
U U \ + N
-/ ~/ \ ~1 m
eZ \ ~ f
0
m > o o ~ o O ti w
m a z ~ba ~~~ cr >
N J ~ Q
a o a
a f o i
(~ ~~
e~ a a
\ deb o ~
~J
N s~ OU
~ ~ O
o ~{ _
`//) ~X O ~J + Q
N.. ~ 0 ~ f6
o p O N
~. + Q +
..r m \ U
r
N
O %n~ O
z ~ ~~ ~ ~ o
~KV + a } N
m ~ /~
~ N +~ OO^ ~ ~ ti %
\ ~ N
}~ ~
~ _ ,~s
_a
~:
~__
\~
O ~O
f \ ~ ~~P ti
o.
m m
% ~ V N
O I _~
n
_N U y
O U
~ 9yn~
Qt "~
x
O
~6 ~ v
0~ a vi ~ ~
Q .' m %
J a ~ _
N O ~
~ y N
R K • NN
as ~ NN
ITEM ~,~,:,:>.:„.
"Application Filing Deadline
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT. ,
Application for Conditional Use Permit
Name Sharon Wilder -
Address 12Q5 Pdt View Drive~_~f~e Pointy Off 97524
Phone Number 826-72d~
Proposed Site Location
Address 27 Bush Street
Assessor's Map Page Location Penc3ose~e legal descript Lot(s)
Required Information:
A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot
and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's
Office ,
Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the
site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli-
ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal
Code Section, 17.76.020.
A statement as to how the request will meet each of the following objectives:
A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to acconmto-
date said use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the sub-
ject,zoning district;
B. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the
street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the
traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use;
C. That the proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property or the
permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the Commission shall consid-
er the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress
and internal circulation; setbacks, height of building; walls and fences; landscap-
ing; outdoor lighting; and signs;
~~~ 14
LUAP/ADMINI 10
0
D. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will
not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the surrounding neighborhood and will not be detrimental or injurious
to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of
the communit//y based on the/review of those facts listed in subsection C above;
I, ,~G/Jl~,PI~~L ~~~`/ certify that I am the owner or
authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach
written auth,¢rity)
i'f~~~t~iz. (~f/~~(_-e!,t~~ Date ~ ~~ "-/i
(Signature of owner or authorized agent of owner, please indicate which)
Application Fee: $100
* A filing fee for recording a Deferred Improvement Agreement with the County
Clerk may also be required.
LUAP/ADMINI J v ~ ~ 11
Sharon Wilder
1245 idt. View Drive
liagle Pointy OR 97524
City Council
City of Central Point
Dear Sirs
This is an application for a conditional use permit to allow
an auto repair shop at 27 Bush St.
This site is uniquely suited for such a purpose because of its
strategic location to Hiway 99 and adjacent businesses namely a
radiator repair shop to the north and Central Point Glassy-Auto and
Homey to the south. Both of these businesses will undoubtedly be
augmented by an adjacent car repair shop.
As we all knows small owners operated businesses are the life-
blood of any oommunity but their failure rate is highs due to owner
inexperience, inadequate planning or poor location. However this
certainly is not the case in this situation. Mr Tackson~ as owner-
operator of Advantage Autos (propose name of this businesss~ has
multiple years in. both hands-on auto repair and management of other
auto service centers, namely 8 years as body shop manager for Butler
Ford and 3~ years as Lithia's service manager. He has attended many
service schools: Toyotas r'ord~ V.W. and Datsun~ and has extensive
experience vrith desiel engines. His starting his own business i.s only
a natural outgrotiath of his experience and ability.
The building proposed for this use is itself undergoing extensive
updating to comply vrith all city nodes and regulations. New wiring
by Advanced Electrical Contractors has been completed and G'u~i~•e'fi~t~Yf
water and plumbing for a lavatory are under construction.
Thank you for your consideration of this application
Sincerely
~l ~ hafv~~ requ~_.__ ~d_.~
-7
Sharon Wilder
., ~ 16
e
Supplemental Sheet for
Conditional Use Permit Application:
27 Bush Street
Proposed use= General auto repairs including brakes front end
tuneup~ transmission and rear end repair.. Anticipated employees; one
(otianer). volume of work per caeek: 10-15 cars. Total cars on-site at
any one times 2 in bays 2-3 in parking lot.
Adequate size exists in current parking lot to accomadate current .:
and future volume of business. Both north and south edges of
property are bounded by low concrete walls.
2~ Bush street has 55 feet of street frontage. A :".STgP sigh
already exists at the south end of Bush fronting onto Ilitaay 99.
Since little appreciable voliune of traffic is anticipated, current
traffic control seems adequate.
'On building' name sigzi is proposed and the ohly anticipated sign.
Adequate apace exists between: buildings on all sides to effectively
buffer any excessive noise or fumes from shop. Building currently
has heaver bay doors for additional noise eontral~ if necessary.
Auto shop will maintain normal busihess hours in accordahce
wii~h other businesses in general area.
.~;~~r~. ~ his=
,Applicant Date
V ~ ~~
~~
`V
f ~~
6 \1
,.
h
n
s
~c,
`.~~5~ s- ~~a~ ~
w
~ ~
~b ~
ITEM E
C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
PURL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT
~~A~IF G~~P®G~~
DATE Apri/ 25, 1991
PROJECT.• Conditional Use Permit
LOCAT/ON.• T37S R2W MAP 116C Tax Lot 3900
27 Bush Street
App/icant/
Owner: Sharon Wider
1225 Mt. View Drive
Eag/e Point, OR 97524 Phone (503J 826-7241
TYPE OF
DEVELOPMENT.• Automotive Repair Facility
COND/T/ONS:
1. Provide restroom facilities in the building.
2. Provide a detailed plumbing plan and complete the Sewer Use
Application Permit to determine if pre-treatment is required prior to
discharging to the Sanitary Sewer System.
3. Include with the detailed plumbing plan, information which prevents
grease, oil; or other like materials from entering the Sanitary Sewer
System.
4. Storage of materials, areas for cleaning of parts, etc. needs to be
approved by City of Central Point Fire Chief prior to approving these
areas for said uses.
5. The detailed plumbing plan shall also include any connection to the water
system in order to determine the type of backflow device to be placed
on the meter.
V J y V
WILDER-CONDITIONS
STAFF REPORT -PAGE 2
APRIL 25, 1991
6. The applicant shall be required to install a 5 ft. sidewalk on Bush street
the full length of the property.
7. The review for the Conditional Use Permit by Sharon Wilder was done
in accordance with the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of
the date of this review. Any modifications by the applicant/owner after
City Planning Commission and/or City Council approvals could require
resubmittal of an application and approval by the City planning
commission and/or City Council
8. All costs associated with this project shall be the sole responsibility of
the applicant or owner.
9. No construction will occur until all applicable permits have been obtained
from the City of Central Point and other necessary jurisdictions.
cc: 02=014
WILDRCUP. STF
.. ~ 20
ITEM ~
C'='Z'Y ''OF CENTRAL.. POSNT '
Plailrllia.g Dc=partIYfeiit
STAFF REVS EW '
DATE: April 29, 1991
APPLICATION: Conditional Use Permit
Automotive Repair Service
27 Bush Street (37 2W 11BC TL 3900)
;.~
CONDITIONS
1. Applicant shall obtain a sign permit prior to installing any signs
on the site. Signs shall be permitted and designed in accordance
with the City's sign ordinance and shall conform with the City`s
clear vision standards.
2. In accordance with CPMC 17.64.040(G)(3) and (5), applicant shall
provide five (5) 9 foot by 20 foot parking spaces. Said parking
shall comply with all applicable parking design requirements outlined
in CPMC 17.64.100 and City Ordinance 1512, a copy of which is
attached hereto and incorporated within this document. Said off-
street parking requirements shall include but not be limited to the
following:
a. Minimum driveway width shall be 20 feet
b. Required parking spaces shall be designated with painted
striping
c. Off-street parking shall be designed so that no backward
movements or maneuvering within a street or other public right-
of-way is necessary
d. Parking spaces along the outer boundary of the parking lot
shall be contained by curb or bumper rail so placed to prevent
motor vehicles from extending over public street, public
sidewalk, adjacent property line or required landscaping area
e. Parking, loading and maneuvering areas shall not be located
within the 10 foot front yard area which is required to be
landscaped
....
f. Area used for off-street parking, access and maneuvering of
vehicles shall be paved with durable materials for all-weather
use and shall be adequately drained to prevent flow of runoff
water across sidewalks or other pedestrian areas.
3. In accordance with CPMC 17.46.050, applicant shall maintain a minimum
of ten (10) front yard as landscaped open space. (Note: Since off-
street parking is located in the front of the property, the required
landscape strip-may be reduced to not less than six (6) feet if
approved by the Planning Commission)
4. Applicant has stated that the proposed auto repair service will
maintain normal business hours in accordance with other businesses
in the general area. In any case, applicant shall not conduct its
operations in such a manner ahd at such a time which would adversely
affect the privacy of sleep of persons residing nearby or otherwise
conflict with other community or neighborhood functions.
~~ 22
ORDINANCE iv0. .1512
AN.ORDINANC^c Ah1E:v'DING
THE TEXT OF THE CITY OF CENTRe1L POINT MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION i7.64 PARKING STANDARDS
[dkiEP.F.AS, the City Council of the City of Central Point
deems it necessary to recommend certain amendments relating to the
parking standards found in the Zoning ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing held April 19, 1984 was
published in the Medford Mail Tribune on April 9 and elpril 1.5, 19S!;
and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing testimony from proponents
and opponents was heard or given opportunity to be heard, now,
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 17.64.100 of the Central Point Municioai
Code is hereby amended as follows:
17.64.100 Parking Desigr. Requirements.
A. Size of Parking Spaces. The standard size for automobile
parking spaces shall be nine feet in width by twenty feet in length.
-A compact car parking space shat. 7. r,. eight feet in width by fifteen feet
ir. length, as .gxowided in-Sect.icn..1;54.070.
',_ - B. "Parking-Lot--Aisles{_`~.-The width cf parking lot a'_sles
.'shall be as illustrated in the fblloc•;ing diagram;
...~: .:,
/' .. -
".
<:~ ,.
., ., 2 3
C. :,ccess. There shall be adequ>te provision for ingress
ahd egress to all parking spaces. Where parking areas do not abut a
public street or_alley, access driveways shall be provided that are not
less than ten feet in width for one-way traffic or eighteen feet ir.
width for two-way traffic.
D. Driveways.
1. In any R-l or R-2 district any lot developed with
a'single-family dwelling, two detached single-family dwellings, or an
attached duplex may have one driveway with a minimum width of ten
feet and maximum. width of thirty-six feet, provided the driveway
width does not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot's total width,
as measured at the front property line.
2. A driveway hat serves as required access to a
garage or carport that is not perpendicular to the front property
line, or side property line in the case of a corner lot ,. shall not
exceed twenty feet in width if a turn-around area is provided to
permit two-way ingress and egress.
3; On'properties having two driveway openings,
such as a circular driveway, both openings. must serve the same
driveway; off-street parking shall not be provided for within the
front yard area, and the combined width of the driveways shall not
e:cceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot's total width as measured at
the front property line.
4. In .the R-1 2nd R-2 districts not more than one
driveway opening ,onto a public street shall be permitted for lots
having a street frontage of less than eighty feet.
5. Driveways from a public street to a required
offstreet parking area that serves any R-3 district development, with
the exception of single and two-family dwellings, shall be a'minimum
ofeighteen feet in width. and designed for two-way traffic.
6. The. minimum driveway .width in any nonresidential
district shall be twenty feet. An exception may be made for drive-
ways that are not intended for public use and are blocked or gated
to!prevent such use.
7. The maximum driveway width in any nonresidential
district shall be thirty feet. An exception ay be made by the City
Planning Commission for drive-in type businesses having multiple
lanes or service locations.
E. Improvements of Parking Spaces.
1. All areas utilized for off-street parking, access
andmariuevering of vehicles shall be paved with durable materials
For all-weather use and shall be adequately drained to prevent the
flow of run-off water across'sidew9lks or other pedestrian areas.
2. Required parking areas shall be designed caith
painted striping or other approved method of delineating the individ-
ual spaces with the exception of lots containing single or two-family
dwellings.
3. Parking spaces for uses ether than one and two-
family dwellings shall be designed so that ne backing movements or
other maneuvering i:ithin a street or other pudic righC-of-way siiaii
be necessary.
~~rdinarce Ho. 1912 - ~
., ~ 2 ~
PAKKING STANDARDS
Orci^ance i~12
N _ P- S A C
ANGLE. OF WIDTH OF CURB
PARKING PARKINr DEPTH WIDTH LENGTH,
SPACE SECTION OF STALL OF P..ISLE PER CAR
(DeSrees) (Feet) (.Feet) (Feet) (Feet')
0 32'-0" 9'-0" 14' 22'-0"
30 99'-7" 17'-10" 14' 18'-2"
35 51'-B" 18'-10" 14' 15'.-8"
40 53'-4" 19'-8" 14' 14'-?°
45 55'2" 20'-7" 14' 12'-8"
50 60'-2" '21'_1" 18'.* 11'-8"
55 `61'-2" 21'-7" 1B' * 10'-11"
60 ,61'-8" 21'-10" 18', * 10'-5"
65 66'-0" 22'-0"' 22' * 9'-11"
70 65'-10" 21'-11" 22'„* _9'-7"
75 65'=9"' 21'-8" 22' * 9'-4"
80 68'-8" 21~_4,~ 26' * 9~_?~~
85 67'-10" 20'-11" 26'.* 9'-0"
90 66i:_pn 20'-0" 26' ok 9'-0..
*-Width of aisle permits two-way circulation'
'only when aturn-around is provided.
T Width of aisle permits two-way circulation.
EXAMPLES
I~ i S'1
IC
i
P
Urc'^.c~ ...,. ~ 512 - 2
i
.,~- 25
A
:e'-.
'"C
' ~~~~ .. _
c a c
~F
,.
4. ;,ny lighting used to illuminate off-street parking
or loading areas shall be sc arranged as to reflect the light away
from adjacent streets or properties.
5. Service drives shall have~a minimum vision clear-
ance area formed by the intersection of the driveway centerline, the
street right-of-way line, and a straight, line joining said lines
through points twenty feet from their intersection.
6. Parking spaces located along the outer boundaries
of a parking lot shall be contained by a curb or a bumper rail so
placed to prevent a c!etor vehicle from extending over an adjacent
property line, a public street, public sidewalk, or a required
landscaping area.
7. Parking, loading or vehicle maneuvering areas
shall not be located iaithin the front yard area or side yard area
of a corner lot abutting a street in any residential (R) district,
nor within any portion of a street setback area that is required
to be landscaped in any commercial (C) or industrial (TI) district.
F. Limitation on Use of Parking Areas. Required
parking areas shall be used exclusively for vehicle parking in
conjunction with a permitted use and'shall not be reduced or en-
croached upon in any manner. The parking facilities shall be so
designed and maintained as not to constitute a nuisance at any
time, and shall be used in such a manner that no hazard to persons
or property or reasonable impediment to traffic will result.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication
rof its passage this 17th day of May 1984.
~. ~~
~,_ __
.:.,
.\ ~. P?ayor~ ,~
ATTEST: C c
~~
J -_ -
,~~_._ ';
,\ ..,.
City Representative
Approved by me this 18th da;: of ;•fav 1984.
~' --l _.
/ r'. /_
:fayor
Orc_na^c~ 4c. 151? - :.
~~_ 26
ITEM
TO: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant
FROM: Mark Servatius, Fire Chief/Building Official~~~~
DATE: April 29, 1991.
TOPIC: Recommended Condition for Conditional Use Permit
Automotive Repair Sergice at 27 Bush Street
In accordance with Oregon Structural Specialty-Code, Section 307(a) (use and
occupancy), Applicant, future applicant, owner or assignee shall obtain a
Certificate of Occupancy for the Automotive repair service prior to occupying
structure and obtaining a City business license. The Certificate of Occupancy
shall not be issued until the building is made to comply with requirements of
Oregon Structure Specialty, pursuant to Section 502 (change in use).
., ., ~ 27
STEM /y
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. "
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY
SHARON WILDER FOR AN AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SERVICE AT`
27 BUSH STREET (37 2W 11BC Tax Lot 3900)
WHEREAS, Sharon Wilder submitted an application for a conditional use
permit for an automotive repair service located at 27 Bush Street in the City
of Central Point, Oregon, further described as Jackson Couhty Tax Assessor's
Map Page 37 2W 11BC Tax'Lot 3900, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Central Point Municipal Code 1.24.060 and ORS
197.763(2), a public hearing was scheduled and a notice of said public hearing
was prepared and sent to property owners of record within 100 feet of location
__ of subject conditiohal use, and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point held a public
hearing upon said application for conditional use permit on May 7, 1991 pursuant
to Central Point Municipal Cade Section 1.24.020B, and having at said public
meeting received and reviewed the City staff report, testimony and the
applicant's statements, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" of
this document and which was included in Item D of said staff report (application
materials), and being fully advised now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON AS FOLLOWS:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
AUTO.REPAIR/RESO
„~_ 28
a. Based upon the Ci~y!s C -5 (thoroughfare .commercial) zoning
standards, the applicant has shown that space is available to provide
for the minimum number of off-street parking spaces (five) and the
minimum landscape strip. Based upon the applicant's anticipated
work volume of 10-15 repair jobs per week, the 1500 square foot shop,
equipped with two service bays is adequate in ,size and .shape to
accommodate said use and meet all .other development and lot
requirements of the C-5 zone.:
b. The proposed use is located on Bush Street which is paved and
classified as a local street in fair to poor condition. It is
anticipated. that the proposed auto repair. service will generate
approximately 15 trips per day. Bush Street has a traffic volume
of less than 1500 vehicle. trips per day„and the capacity of the
street will not be exceeded by the proposed use. Therefore, the
existing, street facility ,(Bush Street) is adequate in size and
condition to effectively accommodate the expected.traffic of the
proposed use. The site accesses directly onto Bush. via an 18 foot
driveway. City standards require commercial driveways to be a
minimum of 20 feet wide. Therefore, the site will have adequate
access to Bush Street subject to the applicant upgrading the approach
to the: minimum required 20 feet.
c. Given the applicant's compliance with all the the permit requirements
and conditions, the proposed use will have no adverse effect on
abutting property or permitted use thereof, and will not be
detrimental to the health, safety or .general welfare of persons or
property and improvements in the surrounding neighborhood.
Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby approves the conditional use
permit application for an automotive repair service submitted by Sharon Wilder,
subject to the applicant, or her assignees or future property owners or assignees
meeting all the conditions and requirements set forth in Exhibits "A", "B", and
"C" attachedhereto, and by reference expressly made a part of the within
resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. AUTO.REPAIR/RESO
v .. ..
Passed by the Planning Commission this day of ,
1991, and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of
. 1991.
Planning Commission Chairman
ATTEST:
City Representative
Approved by me this day of 1991.
Planning Con¢nission Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.
AUTO.REPAIR/RESO
..~~ 30
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: Planning Conunission
FROM: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant
~/_
DATE: April 25, 1991
SUBJECT: Master Development Plan
Green Park Village Subdivision
ACTION
Staff has scheduled a Public Meeting for May 7th so that the ConQnission can
review and adopt a master development plan to guide future growth and development
in this area.
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to Chapter 15.16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission is granted the authority to adopt development plans for guidance of
growth and improvement of the City. It is under this authority that staff
submits the attached development plan for the Green Park Village Subdivision to
the Commission for consideration.
Item A - Vicinity Map
Item B - Certificate of Posting for Public Meeting
Item C - Public Works Staff Report dated April 23, 1991
~- 31
I
Meadows Creek
Subdivision'
., _ 32
::~ 1 .4,.!~rii ,
3(',~:
1 ,
I~
,1 i
i
i ~.
~ r ~?t a~
~~~ ~$
t 3~ ,` ~
e-~
J
j
/ ~J'V/
~/~
1 if ~. YI
.3~I 'gl , aI
n ~\4 ' pig '
..~ x\ •YJ `.~
/ xl\~+~~ ~ A~ 01 mud. ?~ , s ]."~.~t ~ t 5~1. r
qi l its ~~
r 3~ d x .,s.
I~ '~~ ~ ~ 5 a 11~~w„ r r~~~
di1 ~ ~ r w .~Ix1 aye .r .t r
,; --;~,~ '~1 /,~ 1 s ~',~s'~ ~ • , s:, r Fib ~ ;
i }j ~ i ~t ~'. ,~ij~g a~ r :•i~s ?~,~ts r~i- t ,! ~ g,^`t~
~;, ,,/ ~ ~ \~ y'.'II stir sil> ~r~c; _~yy ~ ;_~..5~
i~ i 1'•.\~3'y~ l :,y'%, 1 i~11 •.. klyi .3I'~ ~ ~ `s
. , f Sn 1 .,,,F' t .~ r
_ ~r r
y 1
a 5 3 1 t a
a9.~ t ie yl
t ~ ~^ ~.
i u ^a of
jj n-,
d n e. ~ Ytl
`~ ill °\_fl~IR~ ~ ~~a~ °^ bl -1~'~`~. ~. ~.
~ 4 l_ m 7 ) 6 Y 1
P nib ~'"~ ~ al 3as~~ 3~ ~~-5R~ j:~.' .~~:
~.1 v VJY ZI ~ `ry 1>
V '0?
~:~ 33
r
S
'. Y' ..i1-..: -
1'1 j !
I
9` ~I°
/1 J
?I~ $ ~ :i -
y ~^ ~ :~
,.>,
,., ~ ~ ;;
;9~ i ! ~
AJr~ '\
~ ,1
=~~~ ~ a
•1
LI '~~ I gl
ICI J ~ v s
~~ gr ~~ "I
,,I 4
7g1 ~~:' j d j~\
MS y ~ 3 Y / tl / `\
] g !'\
'~i~
r ~~~~
1 \ %~\ 31 V~/.
3a` ~ +.
d ~6~~~
~ It'~F ' EI 5.
\~, ,i ~
ii, ;~,
s }
Yl' _G•
~~Y~ ~ ~ .
-s ~~o3 del
e3
L
>.
1T>•.r~l _ ~___._
155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I SANDY BERRYHILL CERTIFY THAT ON THE
FOLLOWING DATE OF WEDNESDAY, May 1, 1991 , I POSTED A NOTICE
FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON May 7, , 1991> DURING WHICH THE
CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR GREEN PARK VILLAGE SUBDIVISION (37 2W.12C TL 800, 807, 3100 and
3400) _ ____
AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE
2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY
3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION
4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD
C~/®~rr O a.s.t.~i~i«~>
-~ SI TURE
,5=/-9/
DATE
664-3321
~~~ 34
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
~~
c~oT~ ®~ ~r~~~~~ ~®ol~T
PURL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT
~?G,IEG~ Gil ° oL~p
DATE:
PROJECT.-
LOCAT/ON.•
ZONE.•
No. of Acres:
No. of Lots:
No. of
Dwe//ings:
SUBD/V/DER/
Apri123, 1991
DEVELOPMENT PLAN (Green Park Village Subdivision)
T37S R2W WM Section 12, TL 3100, 3400
800-N, 808-N, 809-N
R-1-6
45 acres
167
167 (One (11 per Lotl
OWNER: Pacific Trend Bui/ding Company
1014 N. Riverside
Medford, OR 97501 (5031 773-4385
Representative- Mike Mahar
SURVEYOR: Hoffbuhr and Associates
219 N. Oakda/e
Medford, OR 97504 (5031 779-4641
Representative -Dennis Hoffbuhr
ENG/NEER: Jensen & Associates
1237 N. Riverside Suite 28
Medford, OR 97501 (503) 779-4352
Representative -John E. Jensen
TYPE OF
DEVELOPMENT.- Residential Subdivision
NAME OF
DEVELOPMENT.- Green Park Vi//age Subdivision
(formerly Meadow Creek Subdivision)
arEr~----~ ...._ ..
~~~ 35
Green Park Dev. -Staff Report
Apri/ 23, 1991 -Page Two
1. Street lmprovements
A. Existing Conditions:
1. Street No. SA 15-Street Name-Beall Lane, Jurisdiction- Jackson County.
Existing ROW - 60 Ft., Future R.O.W. - 80 Ft., Existing Street Width-24 ft.,
Future Street Width-60 ft. Existing Curb/Gutter-None, Future Curb/Gutter-
Required. Existing Sidewalks-none, Future Sidewalks-required, Existing Traffic
Volume-3590 vt/d. Projected Traffic Volume this development-1670 vt/d.
Projected Traffic Volume, including this development-4170 vt/d. Existing
Street Lights-None, Future Street Lights-Required. Existing Traffic Control-
minimal, Future Traffic Control-Design Master Plan required. Distance to
nearest intersection-650 ft., Circlewood Drive. Condition-Poor.
2. Street No, SA 17, Street name-Merriman Road; Jurisdiction-Jackson County.
Existing R.O.W.-60 ft., Future R.O.W.-80 ft. Existing Street Width-24 Ft.
Future Street Width-60 ft. Existing Curb/Gutter-none. Future Curb/Gutter-
required. Existing Sidewalks-None. Future Sidewalks-required, Existing Traffic
Volume-no date available. Traffic Volume that street can carry-no data
available. Existing street Lights-none, Future Street Lights-Required. Existing
Traffic Control-Minimal, Future Traffic Control-Design Master Plan Required.
Distance to nearest intersection 650 ft., Circlewood Drive. Condition-Poor.
3. Glen Grove Avenue -This is a City of Medford Street @ City Limits.
4. Far West Avenue -This is a City of Medford Street @ City Limits.
B. Proposed Improvements:
1. Street No. LS Street Name-Farwest Avenue
Classification: Local Street
Stationing:
From To
Merriman Road Silverwood Court
O+OON 3+30N
Silverwood Court Woodridge Court
0+30N 5+40N
Woodridge Court Southgate Court
5+40N 10+90E
~- 36
Green Park Dev. -Staff Report
Apri/ 23, 9991 -Page 3
Stationing- Cont.
From To
Southgate Court Castlewood Court
10+90E 13+80E
Castlewood Court Glen Grove Avenue
13+80E 16+50E
Glen Grove Ave. Medford City Limits..
16+50E 35+90S
Street R.O.W.-60 Ft., 100' N. of Merriman, 50' remainder
Street Width-40 Ft, 100' N. of Merriman, 36' remainder
2. Street No;' Street Name-Silverwood Court
Classification:
Stationing:
From To
Silverwood court End (Cul-de-Sac)
00+OOE 1 +25E
Street R.O.W. - 50 ft.
Street Width - 36 ft.
3. Street No. LS Street Name-Woodridge Drive
Classification-Local Street
Stationing:
From To
Farwest Avenue End
O+OOW 2+40W
Street R.O.W.- 50 ft.
Street Width - 36 ft.
.. ~ 37
"Green Park Dev. -Staff Report
April 23, 1991 -Page 4
4. Street No. LS Street Name Southgate Court
Classification-Local Street Cul-de-Sac
Stationing:
From To
Farwest Avenue End
O+OOS 1 +80S
Street R.O.W.-50 ft.
Street Width-36 ft.
5. Street No. LS Street Name-Castlewood Court
Classification-Local Street
Stationing:
From To
Farwest Avenue End ICul-de-Sac)
O+OOS 1 +80S
Street R.O.W. - 50 ft.
Street Width-36 Ft.
6. Street No. LS Street Name-Arnwood Street
Classification -Local' Street
Stationing:
From To
Medford City Limits End
O+OOW o+40W
Street R.O.W.-50 ft.
Street Width-36 ft.
7. Street No. LS Street Name-Glen Grove Avenue
Classification-Local Street
Stationing:
From
Medford City Limits
O+OON
To
Keystone Court
1 +60N
~- 38
Green Park Dev. -Staff Report
April 23, 1991 -Page 5
Stationing- Cont.
From To
Keystone Court Woodbury Court
1 +60N 4+20N
Woodbury Court Farwest Avenue
4+20N 7+40N
Farwest Avenue Gatepark Dr./Ct. Collector Street
7+40N 13+75N
Queens Gate Ct. End Collector Street
13+75N 17+95N
Local Street R.O.W.-50ft . Collector Street R.O.W. - 60 Ft.
Local Street Width-36 ft. Collector Street Width - 40 Ft.
8. Street No. LS Street Name-Keystone Court
Classification-Local Street
Stationing:
From To
Glen Grove Ave. End (Cul=de-Sac)
O+OOE 0+80E
Street R.O.W. - 50 ft.
Street Width-36 ft.
9. Street No. LS Street Name-Woodbury Ct.
Classification-Local Street
Stationing:
From To
Glen Grove Ave. End (Cul-de-Sac)
O+OOE 0+80E
Street R.O.W.-50 ft.
Street Width-36 ft.
10. Street No. LS Street Name-Shadow Wood Ct.
Classification-Local Street
~~~ 39
~' Green Park Dev. -Staff Report
Apri/ 23, 9991 -Page 6
,, Stationing:
From To
Farwest Avenue End (Cul-de-Sac)
O+OOW 3+70W
Street R.O.W.-50 ft.
Street Width-36 ft.
11. Street No. LS Street Name-Glen Grove Ct.
Classification-Local Street
Stationing: .
From To
Glen Grove Ave. .End (Cui-de-Sac)
O+OOE 0+50,E
Street R.O.W.-50 ft. ,
Street Width-36 ft.- ,
12. Street No. LS Street Name-Gate Park Drive
Classification-Local Street
Stationing:.
From To
Glen Grove Ave. End
O+OOW 4+80W
Street R.O.W. -50 ft.
Street Width-36 ft.
13. Street N. LS Street name-Queens Gate Court
Classification-Local Street
Stationing:
From To
Glen Grove Ave:, End
O+OOW 1 +60W
Street R.O.W.-50 ft.
Street Width-36 ft.
COND/T/ONS; See Exhibit ':4 " ~ V 4
Grnprk.dev
Exhibit "A"
~~~w~~op~~~~ p~~ ~®~oo~oo~~
GREEN PARK V/LLAGE SUBD/V/S/ON
1. The review for the Green Park Village Subdivision Master Development Plan
submitted hereby Pacific Trends Building Company-Mike Mahar representative,
was done in accordance with all applicable rules, regulations, and ordinances
in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by the developer of
this Master Plan after Planning Commission approval, which would intensify the
use of the property by the addition of lots, increase discharge of wastewater-
storm water, increase the demand for water or fire protection, increase the
traffic volumes, or other transportation issue will require re-submittal of the
Master Development Plan for Planning Commission Approval:
2. To provide a base for determination of intensification of use of the property, an
estimate of consumption, discharge and transportation requirements is listed
below.
a) Wastewater/Sanitary Sewer:
-Daily discharge 167 lots x 2.3 persons/Lot x 100 gpcd = 39,000 g/d
-Peak Demand 3.5 x DD = 136,500 g/d
6,000 g/hr.
b) Water Consumption-Fire Protection:
-1000 Cubic ft/Month/Unit x 167 = 167,000 cubic ft./month
-1000 gpm Fire Flow/Hydrant
c) Storm Drainage Discharge:
Q=CIA -
= 27 CFS
d) Traffic From This Development:
1670 VT/D
3. The approval of the Development does not constitute an approval of any
subdivision phase of Green Park Village Subdivision. Each phase of Green park
Village Subdivision shall require separate tehtative and finaF Plat Approval as
required by C.P.M.C. Title 16.
~~~ ~i
Green Park Conditions
April 23, 1991 -Page 2
4. All costs associated with the construction of this Development Plan shall be the
sole responsibility of the owners/applicant, unless otherwise stipulated.
5. No construction will occur for any phase of this Development Plan until all
applicable permits have been obtained from the City of Central Point and other
jurisdictions requiring permits.
The conditions listed above are a part of the Staff Report dated April 23, 1991, as
Exhibit "A".
cc: 02-014
cc: 02-040 -Development Plans
GRPKDEV.CND
~~ 42
STAFF REPORT
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant /{//`~
DATE: April 25, 1991 /.
SUBJECT: Public Meeting - Review and make recommendation to the City Council
for Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval for Green Park Village
Phase I
' SUMMARY
The Commission is scheduled to conduct a public meeting, receive and review the
staff report and receive testimony regarding subject preliminary subdivision plat
application. At the conclusion of the public meeting, the Commissioners can
formulate and forward a recommendation to the City Council for the Council's
May 15th meeting.
BACKGROUND
Pacific Trend Building Company applied for and received preliminary subdivision
approval for Meadow Creek Subdivision in March, 1990. The time period for
obtaining final plat approval expired and the developer has reapplied for
preliminary plat approval for Phase I of Green Park Village; essentially the same
subdivision as illustrated on the Meadow Creek Subdivision Plat.
The proposed subdivision is located on approximately 45 acres in the far
southeast quadrant of the City, bordered by I-5 on the east and the City limits
on the south. The property is zoned (R-1-6) single family residential. The
total development consists of 167 lots which range in size between 6,825 square
feet and 20,800 square feet. Average lot size is 9,211 square feet. Phase I
of the four-phase development consists of 44 lots and is located in the
southwesterly corner of the proposed subdivision where the subdivision entrance
connects to Merriman Road.
~~ 43
The developer has submitted a preliminary plat which also serves as a master
plan. Staff has reviewed the plat in accordance with the following standards:
1. Chapter 16 of Central Point Municipal Code relating to subdivision
development.
2. City of Central Point Public Works Standards.
3. Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code
The Public Works Department has analyzed the plat and prepared a staff report
containing proposed conditions of approval.
The following items are included in the Agenda packet for the Planning
Commissions review:
Item A - Vicinity Map
Item B - Certificate of Posting
Item C - Preliminary Plat Application
Item D - Map: Assessors Map (Note: Aerial map will be available at the
r meeting since it is too large to include in
the agenda packet - Map 2834)
Item E - Public Works Staff Report
Item F - Proposed Resolution recommending approval of Preliminary Plat
subject to conditions of approval
~- 44
R2
M2
A M-1 i
R• I-8 R 2~ M-1
,'
g ~~ r
of
,-~
9M
G _ -._ ' j ~ J ~ -'~
_ ~ _,... -
__ _ ~~ .. _ e.}__
_ _ _-_:~-
~'~, rR-1-8 ~ ~~
i r x -
`' - ~ i
'~ a _- _
R-1c6 R-1-&
' ~ ~"~ cti -
V -
!~ ~ ' ~ C-4 R-3 I .
n C'
_ ~ ~ ~•~' ,
- . .~.
~, ~ ~ jK-1 i Meadows Creek
~~ : _ .1 _ .
.,~-. Subdivision
_ ~ =~~~~~ ~ R-1 8
1 _ - ~ '~
~~~ 45
ITEM ~ ~~
155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I SANDY BERRYHILL
CERTIFY THAT ON THE
FOLLOWING DATE OF WEDNESDAY, MAY 1, 1991 I POSTED A NOTICE
FOR A PUBLIC -MEETING SCHEDULED'ON May 7 >..1991. DURING WHICH THE
CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION:WILL REVIEW A PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
PLAT APPLICATION FOR GREEN PARK VILLAGE SUBDIVISION ( 37 2W 12C TL 800,
807, 3100 and 3400)
AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE
2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY
3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION
4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD...
SIG URE
.~ -/ -9/
DATE
~~ 46
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
ITF~M C"
Application Filing Deadline
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Application for Preliminary Subdivision Plat
Name 1~+~~1V 1P-~~aP ~Utl-A~/.-ll~ ~'
Address ~~ 1 /k t~ . (Z-IJ~2SID~ ~~. 1'~fX~pp~, CC~Cl~ aS"l`JO~
Phone Number ~1 ~' q~~~
Proposed Site Location ~Op~ $p7,
Assessor's Map Page Location ~J7 2-~ 5£~OrJ ~ Tax Lot(s) 31~J } 3~QO
Required Information
A legal description as it appears on the deed. Deed copies may be obtained at the
Jackson County Assessor's Office
Requested information as contained in the attached Central Point Municipal Code
Sections 16.24.020 to 16.24.070 and completion of a Statement of Water Rights
(form attached) ,~cf~~y ~~~ c~~Er,,~ ie~.uo.~s~ '~Jt3MiYT~o.
~121'aU(JI UJbt3~"P 1`h'~T~ 6
I,u I,ur
authorized
owner or
Application Fee: $
`~ ~~
LUAP/ADMINI
$LIIS t~• r1A.ala-n,2_ certify that I am the owner or
owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach
Date
mthorized agent of owner, please indicate which)
~~ 47
CQ'.
-.
-;
,:u y
,~,
"~
~~
%I
~.
(o /
~~~
3~~
~~~~ ~ r i3
1 A t, _ ~y
~. ~ :... 1~i,. ':
B~\
r,> ~ ~.I a~~~y J.
a
r
Q ~
:~
y v .
J Y
?d.~'i 3'~
~
i ~ o -
J .r~ .^ J ~
F
W ~ c
h ~ •
g
F ~ ~ ~x ~
~
~ 1 ~
J
0..
~f
_ >
~ ~ ~~~ ~~
o ~ ~ya
A _ .y-
. , ~ ~~ ds r
.:~ ~ f
r ~~v ~
~•
4~
a''~
F~ n.1x o3.l ~i I
~~ I ~ r ~..:'; ~ ';
I~ i1•
F~I (:~ r'}I'f 4 ~ ~ :y~
c ~Iyn
.; .~ ~,~.-'I ~ r to .r
~~~ ~.,,~,.~'y1~~'I ~ ~; ,jl
~:u-
~~Y S+~ ~. o T'~~r. '~ r s•'-I ~
F M`
=~
s L~
is
9
~ y .
~~
`~ 3RJ
~~V ~ ~
~~J._f:..
g
\-~ \- 9
~ ~~ i m ~~ y~
SS
7 ~ ~ ~ ~4 :6
~
P°O-Sew ~
t~Z6 F.. li^.o Soi~ .
~~: .
(1
1 ~~~
a'~ ~F
Vi~~ Oo
~fi ~ • ~ •i
t pps(i
Y$S~" PFD
~`~~~ ~lg
a
`t: • 4 ~
ITEM _.~~
P ~,,.
:tai' ~ •• Z f a
~.. ~ ~; . I
Mr•' ;";.
~fy'' R:~°~~ I `
$ '- n
h ;
.. ~ I ~J,
A ~: i'
..h h
~:•'. ~ I V
^~ A
. M
~ i.
~ ~ F..~
p ~v P
+~ (!/G/iii LlJ-L .J. ~~i ~~ ~~ ~<.r< ,~
~, ~...' , ,I ' r ~
~d'.'
,..
..:
'" ~ o I-; I
J ~ (r'
N
~ \ .1
~ ° 2 .~.
~ a° w ~ ;..
z~ o. °' ~ M ,c ..~
.~
1 ~ srLS cz[rg 3' `s ~ +~
D a ~ ~ ~~
e ~ ..---~~....
~.
•:•:
~ ^\ . .~
~' ~ ~ .
.r.::~~
~~ j,:
,~
'.
o~
P ~o
' ^ iµ
6 ~
•• ~:: pt.l ZY'Opff xa Lp'ff JT -- ~ T.r'GBSa r
~ ~~; s
.; _ 49
_.,, ,
~~
':
r:
': 37 2W' 128 .,
:'
'
.:
_ ..
~:
.
SW~-SEC 12 TWP3TS. R 2W -W M~. s~oi•
,: ~ ~~ ..
.~,..
~w Mi [~~! L. .
... 301 e-.~ s.'~
4
' \
.~~ ~.
h.
' /~\/~/~
:i:~ 1/IVW~~. O ~~.
..
~: ~ ~ 2~
:.
,
. ._
o~ _..
_.
:~ ~B
~
3400 ~'_
!
~ ;,,~
~„
! ~::.
,q~
,x tt
~~,..
o
Y I
~ 2 ,•.
6 ,:.
!
i ":y.1
I - '~•
~
,
9 ;
~
~~ ~. . r.
l' f Q
\~~ - D~4 ~ ..''..b
N Iv
~
1+1 •
~u~ '
y
a i ~ ~
,!
- 800-N
21.63 AC
v;
~.:
Lo'f ~
~9.
.
.: '.S~l7012 sa ~ 0.02AC ~, 1 _ /I ~~ .
I~ ? ~ ~ ~;
~
~ ~,
~
1
I ~` -
r
i
' f J ./ ;.
a
" `L o'8 EncehWalker Sub. Lot 7 • )
y \~.
~ h
~ ~+
•'
a ~ 809-N
7 C.14Ac
54
_. , . ~
ITEM E - -
Q;OTY ®P C[~INT(~~L ~®ON1f
PURL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT
~5~G1G~G~ Gs'G ° oG~p
DATE: Apr// 25, 1991
PROJECT.- SUBDIV/S/ON TENTAT/VEPLAT (Green Park Village Subdivision)
LOCAT/ON: T37S R2W WM Section 12, TL 3100, 3400
800-N, 808-N, 809-N
ZONE: R-1-6
No. of Acres: 45 AC.
No. of Lots: 167
No. of
Dwe//ings: 167 (One (11 per Lotl
SUBD/V/DER/
OWNER: Pacific Trend Bui/ding Company
1014 N. Riverside
Medford, OR 97501 (5031 773-4385
Representative -Mike Mahar
SURVEYOR: Hoffbuhr and Associates
219 N. Oakdale
Medford, OR 97504 (5031 779-4641
Representative -Dennis Hoffbuhr
ENG/NEER: Jensen & Associates
1237 N. Riverside Suite 28
Medford, OR 97501 (5031 779-4352
Representative -John E. Jensen
TYPE OF
DEVELOPMENT.- Residential Subdivision
NAME OF
DEVELOPMENT.- Green Park Vi//age Subdivision -Phase /
(formerly Meadow Creek Subdivision)
~- 51
Staff Report-Tentative P/at
Green Park-Apri/25, 1997
Page Two
/. Tentative P/at Requirements /Tit/e 16.24)
(Check Onel
Meets Not Does Not
Title Descrindon Sfendard Applicable Meet Standard Condtiore
16.24.010 Filing Fee X
16.24.020 Scale X
18.24.030 General Conditions
a. Name of Subdivision X
b. Date North Arrow Scale X
o. Legal location of
Subdivision X
d. Names/Addresses of Owner
Engineers X
16.24.040 Existing Conditions
a. Looation of street
widths and easements, etc. X (1)
b. Topogrephio Info X ..
o. Benchmark established X
d. Location end direction
of ell water courses X
e. Natural features rock
outcroppings, marshes,
wooded areas. X
f. Exleting uses of the lend X
g. Location of ell existing
streets and utilities X 12)
h. Zoning on and adjacent to
tract is compatible X
16.24.050 Proposed Plan
a. Sweet LoceUOn, and the
lanes, grades, radius of
curves, relationship to
other existing or proposed -
streets, and other utilities X
b. Easements-WidthalPurposes X (1)
c. Lot Dimension X (3)
16.24.060 Partial Development
Is other property adjacent to
this property being considered
in the design? This property can
be owned by the subdivider. See Master Plen 14)
18.24.070 Explanatory Information
a. Vicinity maps to explain
relationship to existing
streets, can require
correction to existing
streets. X
b. Proposed Deed Restrictions Need a list
c. Center Lane profile of streets
to show grade (100' beyond street) Provide information on final oonst ruction drawings
d. Approximate location and proposed
size of utilities. - X
16.32.020 Requirements Generally X
.• V W
'Staff Report -Tentative P/at
Green Park -April 25, 1991
Page Three
//. Subdivision Layout
/Check One1
Meets Not Doea Not
Title DeseripUon Standard Applicable Meet Standard _. Condiric~
16.18.010 Blocks Length
Width R-7-8 X (3)
Shape
Not greater 1200' X
16.16.020 Blocks Sizes X
16.16.030 Blocks Easements
a. Utilities X lU
b. Water Courses X
c. Pedeatdan Ways X
18.16.OA0 Lots -Shapes and Size X l31
16.16.050 Lota-Size & Determination
(Lot length greater than
214 times width prohibited. X
16.18.060 Through Lota x
76.16.070 Lot sidelines X
16.78.080 Large Lot Subdivislona x
III. Street Improvements
A. Exisdng Conditions
t. Street No. - SA 15, Street Name -Beall Lane, Jurisdiction-Jackson County, Existing
R.O.W.-60 ft., Future R.O.W.-80 ft., Existing Street Width-24 ft., Future Street
Width-60 ft., Existing Curb/Gutter-None, Future Curb/Gutter-Required, Existing
Sidewalks-None, Future Sidewalks-Required, Existing Traffic Volume-3500 VT/D,
Projected Traffic Volume this Development - 1670 VT/D, Projected Traffic Volume
including this development - 4,100 VT/D. Traffic Volume street can carry - No
information available. Street Lights-None, Future Street Lights-Required. Existing
Traffic Control-minimal, Future Traffic Control-Design Master Plan required. Distance
to nearest intersection-650 Ft., Circlewood Drive. Condition Poor.
2. Street No.-SA 17, Street Name -Merriman Road, Jurisdiction-Jackson County.
Existing R.O.W.-60 ft., Future R.O.W.-80 ft., Existing Curb/Gutter-None,. Future
Curb/Gutter-Required. Existing sidewalks-None, Future Sidewalks-Required, Existing
Traffic Volume-No Data Available. Traffic Volume street can carry - no data available.
Existing Street Lights-None, Future Street Lights-Required. Existing Traffic Control-
Minimal. Future Traffic Control-Design Master Plan required. Distance to nearest
intersection-650 ft. Circlewood Drive. Condition Poor.
3. Glen Grove Avenue -This is a City of Medford Street @ City Limits
4. Far. West Avenue -This is a City of Medford Street @ City Limits.
~~ 53
Staff Report-Tentative P/at
Green Park - Apri/ 25, 1991
Page Four
B. Street Standards - 16.12.010
Meets Not
Title Description Standards Aocliceble
16.12.040 Street Generally
a. Location X
b. Width
c. Grads X
d. Relationship to
existing atreet X
e. Topography as it
relates to drainage. X drain to atreet
f. Provide for street
construction X
g. Follows a Master Plan X
h. Traffic Volume X
i. Safety Features
16.72.050 Street R.O.W. & Widths
Local ROW 50'
Street Width 38' X
Secondary Arterial 80'
ROW Width 80'
Street Width 40'
16.12.080 Street Reserve Strip
16.72.070 Street Alignment X
18.72.080 Street EMenaion X
16.12.090 Street lnteraection
- ..Angles 90° X
18.12.100 Existing Streets
Additlonel Width
18.12.110 Half Street
16.12.120 Cul-da-Sao and/or
dead-end streets
a. Shall not serve
more then 12 lots X
b. Shall not be greater
.then 400' X
18.12.130 Street Names
18.72.140 Stteet Grades end Curves
-MA SACS not greater
then 8°.6 X
-Not greater than 72°h
on LS X
-Cannot be less then 1 °h X
Curve Radius
-LS-100' X
-CS-100'
-sc-2oo'
-MS-300'
Stationing
X
X
Does Not
Meat Standard
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
~- 54
Conditions
151
16)
15)
(7)
(8)
(5)
(9) -
<\
Staff Report -Tentative P/at
,• Green Park - Apri/ 25, 7991
Page Five
/V. Water System
A. Existing Conditions
1. An 8" ductile iron pipe is located at the intersection of Circlewood Drive and Beall Lane.
A 12" line extends east from this location approximately 20 ft.
Meets Not Doea Not ~-
Title Description Standards Aoalicable Meet Standard Conditions
18.21.060 Water System
Provided Mains X (10)
Service Laterals
1 ea. lot X (101
Fre Hydrants
not greater then
500'apart X (11)
Flre Plow 1000 gpm
provide minimum
pressure, 40 psl X
V. Sanitary Sewers
A. Existing Conditions
An 18" Sanitary Sewer Main located adjacent to the west, ROW line to I-5 is available for
connections. For as-built information, contact Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority.
8. Sanitary Sewer Standards
Meeta Not Does Not
Tlde Deaedatlon Standard Aco/icsb/e Meet Standards Cand2bra
16.32.050 Adequate Sizing X (13)
Mainline
Services
V/. Storm Drainage
A. Existing Conditions
1. An 84" CPM Storm Drainage Pipe is located approximately 100' north of the northeast
corner of this development.
2. A 48" and 60" Storm Drainage pipe is located in the southeast segment of the
property.
3. Two seasonal streams traverse the southwest and southeast portions of this property.
~- 5a
Staff Report-Tentative P/at
Green Park-April 25, 1991
Page Six
B. Storm Drainage Standards
T!t/e Desedptlon
18.32.040 Surface Drainage
and storm sewer system
-Provide dralnege through
the subdivision
-Are there adverse effects
planed on downstream
structures?
•No catchbasin located
greater than 350 ft. for
any curb and gutter section.
Meets
Standard
SEE COND/T/ONS
ATTACHED AS EXH/B!T "B"
GRPKTNT.PLT
Not Does Not
ADalicab/e Meet Standards Conddiorx
X (14)
X (15)
X (161
~~~ 56
<•.
EXH/B/T "A"
C~~f~~~~DOof~~
GREEN PARK V/LLAGE SUBD/V/S/ON -PHASE /
1. Easements for the Sanitary Sewer relocation, Storm Sewer relocation, and 12"
Waterline installation shall be shown on the Tentative Plat.
2. The Tentative Plat shall identify the nearest location to connect utilities (i.e.
Water, sewer, storm drainage.
3. Lot dimensions must comply with Section 16.24.050C of the CPMC which
requires minimum lot width of 60 ft.
4. Attached with this Report is the proposed Green Park Village Subdivision Street
Master Plan.
5. Beall Lane, Merriman Road shall be constructed to a 48' curb to curb width 100
ft. south of the subdivision's ingress/egress and north to the southwest
property corner with tapers to match pavement widths. The widening shall
include curbs/gutters, sidewalks, street lights, storm drainage, street
improvements for a southbound left turn pocket on Merriman Road, and a
northbound right turn pocket, minimum width 48', curb to curb.
Farwest Avenue shall be widened to a 60' right of way at Merriman Road to
provide two 12' lanes and one 18' lane at 40' curb to curb, at the entrance.
This will provide right and left turn lanes at the main ingress/egress to the
subdivision.
6. A Master Traffic Delineation Plan shall be developed to provide adequate sight
distance, stopping distance, clear vision at intersections for Beall Lane and
Merriman Road.
7. A one (1) foot reserve strip shall be placed at the end of Farwest Avenue in the
Phase I @ Station 12+65E.
8. Meadow Creek Drive is now Farwest Avenue.
9. Follow the stationing requirements outlined in the Development Plan Staff
Report.
Green Paik
Tentative Plat - Ex. A"
- ~ 57
Exhibit ':4" -Tentative P/at
Green Park -Conditions
Apri/ 25, 9991 -Page 2
10. The water system shall be designed from the 12" on Beall and continue to
Merriman and Farwest Avenue. From this point, the Subdivision shall be fed
by an 8" service. All through streets shall be stubbed with an 8" DIP and a
valve for future connection
11. Fire hydrants shall not be spaced greater than 500' final spacing plan to be
approved by the Central Point Fire Department. Fire hydrants shall be
connected from an 8" water main.
12. Services shall be spaced as much as possible to locate one on each side of a
front property line, one foot on' either side of the property corner.
13. Sanitary sewer system shall be designed to provide 4" services per lot, and
stubbed to provide for future connections on through streets.
14. Two seasonal streams traverse the southwest and southeast portions of this
development. The developer shall design a storm drainage system which
collects the flow from these seasonal streams and this subdivision, and carries
the flow through the subdivision irr such a manner that would not flood any lot
ih this subdivision based on the design standards required in the Public Works
Standards.
15. Developer shall provide engineered drainage calculations to determine proper
sizing of the storm drainage system as if relates to the drainage area in which
this development is located.
16. Developer shall design the storm drainage system to meet the design
requirements in accordance with the City of Central Point Public Work
Standards.
17. Street name signs including posts, labor and equipment for street sign
installation shall be paid for by the developer of this Subdivision, and the
installation shall be completed by the City.
18. A Traffic Control Signing Plan shall be included as a part of the final
construction plans, and will be installed by the City and all costs associated
with traffic control sign installation shall be paid for by the Developer.
Green Park
Tentative Plat -Exhibit A"
~- 58
Exhibit "A" -Tentative P/at
Green Park -Conditions
Apri/ 25, 1997 -Page 3
19. A soils engineer must evaluate the strength of the soil (R-value) to determine
the street section design. The City's engineer shall be used, and the developer
shall pay for the costs of these services. A design life for Merriman and Beall
Lane shall be a minimum 20 year life, given a daily traffic volume of 10,000
vehicle trips per day, and 10% truck traffic. A design life for Farwest Avenue
shall be a minimum 20 year life, given a daily traffic volume of 2000 vehicle
trips per day and 2% truck traffic. The remaining streets shall be designed for
a 20 year life, 1000 vehicle trips per day and 2% truck traffic.
20. A street lighting plan shall be included in the construction documents according
to the requirements of the Public Works Department. All intersections shall be
illuminated and all local streets shall have a minimum street light spacing of
200'. Developer is to install all pads and conduits for streetlights as a part of
the construction of the subdivision. The developer shall also pay for street
lights and for the installation of all street lights in the subdivision.
21. Ladder rungs shall be installed in each sanitary sewer manhole of a depth
greater than 3.0 feet to the flow line of the manhole. Developer shall use
ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works Department.
22. Developer shall install or cause to install conduits for utilities at intersections,
or locations determined by utility companies. Developer shall also provide
conduit crossings for utility companies who will not install their services until
after the subdivision is constructed. Developer shall be responsible for all costs
associated with the installation of these conduit crossings.
23. The water system shall be designed to provide a minimum flow at each fire
hydrant in the Subdivision of 1000 gpm.
24. The final plat for this subdivision shall not be approved by the City Council until
all conditions as herein stipulated and approved for this Subdivision have been
met.
25. The Tentative Plat Review for the Tentative Plat submitted herein by Pacific
Trend Building Company was done in accordance with the rules, regulations
and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by
Green Park
Tentative Plat -Exhibit A"
~- 59
M1
Exhibit "A" -Green Park
Tentative P/at -Conditions
Apri/ 25, 1997 -Page 4
the developer which would allow this Subdivision NOT to meet standards set
forth in the Central. Point Municipal Code, or would intensify the use of the
property greater than the standards set forth herein shall require resubmittal of
the Tentative Plat to the Planning Commission.
26. No driveway accesses shall be allowed from lots that abut Merriman Road or
Beall lane. All accesses shall be designed in accordance with the City of
Central Point Public Work Standards.
27. No construction will begin on this .project until such time as plans and
specifications have been reviewed and approved, and a Public Works Permit is
issued.
GREEN PARK
TENTATNEMAT • IXR/B?'A'
GPTNTPLT.CND
60
ITEM _~~„
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY
PLAT FOR PHASE I OF GREEN PARK VILLAGE SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, Mike Mahar, on behalf of Pacific Trend Building Company, has
submitted a preliminary plat for Phase I of Green Park Village Subdivision, a
subdivision located north of Beall Lane and west of Interstate 5 Freeway in the
southeast quadrant of the City, further described as Jackson County Assessors
Map 37 2W 12C Tax Lots 800, 807, 3100 and 3400 and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point held a public
meeting upon said application for approval of the preliminary plat on May 7,
1991, pursuant to Central Point Municipal Code Section 1.24.020C, and having at
said public meeting received and reviewed the City staff report and testimony,
and being fully advised, now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon the staff report evidence, and record relating to
said application, the Planning Commission hereby finds that said application
meets the requirements for preliminary plat applications, that said preliminary
plat as proposed is in compliance with the City's comprehensive plan and zoning
code, and if the conditions set forth hereinafter are met, said application meets
the City's requirements for subdivision layout, park dedication, street
standards, water system standards, sanitary sewer standards, lot size and storm
drainage standards.
Section 2. The Planning commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of the preliminary plat submitted by Mike Mahar, for Phase I of Green
Park Village Subdivision subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto, and by this reference expressly made a part of the within
resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. /r~kS PREPLAT.GRN/RESO
e ~ " V M.
Passed by the Planning Commission on
by me in authentication of its passage this
ATTEST:
day of
1991 and signed
. 1991.
Planning Commission Chairman
Planning Commission Secretary
.Approved by me this day of 1991.
Planning Commission Chairman
RESOLUTION N0:
PREPLAT.GRN/RESO
~~. 62
STAFF REPORT
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant /G//I~
DATE: April 26, 1991
TOPIC: Public Meeting - Review and make recommendation concerning vacation
of alleyways located in the Amy Harbaugh Addition
Ci1MMARV
Steve Rietmann, owner and developer of the Quality Fence Project, has submitted
a request for vacation proceedings on the Council's own motion for alleys located
within the Amy Harbaugh Addition Subdivision. (Item A illustrates the proposed
alley vacations) Pursuant to Chapter 1.24 of the Central Point Municipal Code,
the Planning Commission is required to review and make recommendations to the
City Council regarding all street and alley vacations.
Staff has discovered that the Quality Fence Company building, currently under
construction, is atop a 20 foot wide portion of alleyway which was established
within the Amy Harbaugh's Addition in 1889. The alley is not visible and, to
the best of staff knowledge, has not been used as a right-of-way for a number
of years. The property owner and developer, Steve Rietmann, desires to vacate
this particular alleyway along with other alleys which were. originally platted
in this subdivision during the late 1800's. Mr. Rietmann is requesting a
vacation "on the Council's own motion" as provided under Section 271.130 of the
Oregon Revised Statute.
ANAT.VCTG
Staff has addressed two primary issues relating to the proposed vacations:
1. Will the alley or street be needed now or in the future to serve the
motoring public?
2. Do utilities exist in the alley or street and will vacation impact
the agencies responsible for maintaining such facilities? Are future
utilities planned for the street or alley? If utilities do conflict
63
with the proposed vacation, can they be physically relocated and is
the developer willing and able to pay for the relocation? If there
is a utility vacation conflict, will a public utility easement
satisfy the needs of the responsible utility agency?
Incorporated within this report is a Public Works review (Item G), which
discusses the .transportation issue and the utility issue from the City's
standpoint. Staff's conclusion is that the alleys in question are not needed
to serve the motoring public and do not contain any municipal utilities. On
April 16, 1991, other utility agencies were notified and given an opportunity
to submit a written report setting forth any necessary conditions which would
be necessary for approval of the vacation request. As of the date of this
report, the City has not received any such reports which indicate that there are
conflicting utilities or that special conditions need to be included with a
vacation approval.
ATTACHMENTS
The following attachments are provided for the commissions review and for
entering into the meeting record by reference:
Item A - Map illustrating general area
Item B - Certificate of Posting
Item C - April 5, 1991 letter to Rietmann
` Item D - April 11, 1991 letter to Rietmann
Item E - Vacation Application materials
Item F - April 16, 1991 Notification to Utilities
Item G - Public Works Staff Review dated April 25, 1991
Item H - Proposed Resolution recommending approval of alley vacations
64
~ P • ~~~ • ~
lI/TS - CENTRAL PO/NT TAYLOR STREET
.+• 100 •s. s.-
~' \~
r ~ ~ ~ -
200 ~~ + ~
~# c O ~ ' \ \ ,Q9
\6~1
~~ \
400 \\ ~,
300 ,, ~ ~
'CKS /,3,4,5, 8 6
NBAUCH3 ADO.
w7 P.~e4
P~oR
> Y~\
~~0 -~
~ ~ ~~`
/~'~ cC`
~ 00.~~~
_ NS~~ ` /
J ~ / .
~~~fr C~~29)
,~~
~T00 a~ ~
e" Q. A ...
o_ . (~ `..
m / ~~
J~
a
o L ~ t
~~
` e
R~SG.
(~R~
p,.
~~ ~'
~ ,,
~~ ,o
i'6~
y~~
~4
e~'~
Proposed'
Alley vacations TEM
37 2W IOA~ \
37 2W 3DD \
~ _ `~~~~ ,
T ...:
~j,'in '. .;.ryq~~
Y ~ ~/:' F'.. ..~n
1 ~ .. ~. {. ff ~~~F
w., ..; ., ..,o
_n 1 \ V~y ~~IjJ
F ~ :. ~ u
rr` T c
_ Quality
qs ° ; Fence Bldg.
(05 _ '~_ ~
s~,
F~
\~
W
A' ~ ~`
ITEM -JfL~
155 SO. SECOND ST
CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I Sandy Berryhill CERTIFY THAT ON THE
FOLLOWING DATE OF Wednesday May 1 L991 , I POSTED A NOTICE
FOR A PUBLIC MEETING' SCHEDULED ON May 7, ,. 194 L DURING WHICH THE
CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A REQUEST FROM STEVE.
REITMANN FOR VACATION OF AN ALLEY WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS AMY
HARBAUGH ADDITION GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF WEST-PINE AND EAST OF
HASKELL. SAID NOTICES WERE POSTED
AT-0R NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE
2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY
3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION
4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD
SIG \URE
~' /-9,~
DATE
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
April S, 1991
155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502
Mr. Steve Rietmann
Quality Fence Company
P.O. Box 3985
Central Point, OR 97502
Dear Mr. Rietmann:
ITEM ~_,
664-3321
It has come to the City's attention that the northern portion of the building
you are constructing on West Pine Street actually sits on a City alley. The
alley was not shown on the site plan application materials you submitted to the
City, the City was unaware'of the alley, and the site plan was approved. While
the City has the-power 'to i$sue a stop work order on the project, we have decided
against that for the time being. However, you, should be on notice that there
is-a problem.
The approbed'site plan also provides for parking on the east side of the building
in the vicinity of Amy Street. At his point, we are. not convinced that Amy
Street (alley) is correctly located on your site plan. The City may require that
the site plan be modified since no off-street parking activities can occur within
City alleys. Please be on notice of this problem as well.
As you probably know, neither the City staff nor the Planning Commission can
effect vacations of alleys. Only the City Council, after, proper notices have
been given and a public hearing has been held, has. the power to vacate land_
You should not assume that either or both of .the. alleys in question will be
vacated, although that is certainly possible.
We recommend that youjoinwith'us in taking a look at the possibleresolutions
to the above-mentioned problems': Because of the importance of these issues, we
urge you to contact either me or Larry Blanchard at City Hall to .set up an
appointment to discuss the situation.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter, and we look forward to
hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
~~ ~ ..
~ LC/'~
` George Rubaloff ~ ~
Administrative Assistant
City of Central Point
_ ~ 6'7
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
rt
ITEM !~
155 SO. SECOND ST: CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
P,pril il, 1991
P1r. Steve Rietmann
Quality Fence Company
P.0. Box 3895
Central Point, OR 97502
s
Dear Steve:
During our April 8, 1991 meeting, you, Public Works Director Larry Blanchard and
I'discussed the concerns outlined in the City's April 5, 1991 letter, generally
regarding the Quality Fence Project and.right-of-way., vacations. The following
points were made during the meeting:
1. At the minimum, you should submit a vacation request for that portion
of alley which runs east and .west between Tax, Lot 1,000 and 1,100
of Jackson County Assessor Map 37 2W 10AB, currently. beneath the
new Quality Fence Company building. The City will consider the other
alleys in the northwesterly section of the. subdivision.
2. The City's'postion at this time is to keep Amy Street a right-of-
way primarily because .the City requires an unclouded right to
maintain its sewer and water utilities. Therefore, ,you will need
to resubmit'a revised site plan which addresses a modified off-street
parking scheme for the required 19 ;spaces .since. the current
arrangement would cause vehicular maneuvering in the right-of-way.
In 'order for the City to have an opportunity, o review your revised
plan and process it for the May 7, 1991 Planning Commission meeting,
you will need to submit the completed plan by Wednesday,. April 17,
1991.
3. 'A's a means by which to facilitate our review of any future vacation
requests on your property, the City encourages you to submit a master
plan/development plan of the entire property. This plan would, at
a minimum, include precise locations of streets, alleys, tax lots,
proposed buildings, existing buildings, etc. The Planning commission
has the authority to approve master plans to serve as a guide to
future development and to assist the City in reviewing .'future
development applications.
.. ~'
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
r
Steve Rietmann
Quality Fence Company
April 11, 1991
Page Two
4. Additional information will be required to review a request to vacate
the entire subdivision known as Amy Harbaugh Addition, particularly
as it would relate to vacating Manzanita Street. It is unknown if
that portion of Manzanita adjoining the properties will serve the
public at some future time. The City would need to rely upon a
traffic engineer opinion to address that concern. As a condition
of vacation approval, applicants are required to pay for all costs
reasonably related to processing the vacation petition. A traffic
engineering study would need to be done, at your expense, if you
pursue a vacation request for Manzanita Street.
Steve, I appreciate your cooperative efforts. Let's stay in touch as we work
through the process toge£her.
Sincerely,
eorge Rubaloff
Administrative Assistant
City of Central Point
GR:sb
~~- 69
ITEM
PETITION FOR VACATION OF STREET,
ALLEY OR OTHER PUBLIC PLACE
THE UNDERSIGNED APPLICANT hereby petitions the City Council
of the City of Central Point, Oregon, for the vacation of the
street, alley or other public place designated below.
This request is-for:
1. ORS 271.080 (petition by property owners)*
X- ORS 271.130 (vacation on Council's own motion)
2. The legal description of the property proposed to be vacated
is as follows (also attach a map showing the property
proposed to be vacated):
See Attached Exhibit "A" for legal description.
See Attached Exhibit "B" for map of proposed vacation.
3. The purpose for which the property is proposed. to be used is
as follows:
Co~runerical/Light Industrial
4. The reason for the proposed vacation is as follows:
1.) Eliminate public access via existing alleys
within project boundaries.
i
PETITION FOR VACATION OF STREET, ALLEY OR
OTHER PUBLIC PLACE - 1 (072589)
..., ., t Q
n
5. If the proposed vacation is pursuant to ORS 271.130 (vaca-
tion on Council's own motion), the names and addresses of
all persons owning or claiming any interest in the property
abutting the. property to be vacated are as follows (attach
title report, lot book report or 'other verification of
identity of ownership of abutting property owners):
6. The undersigned warrant and represent that they are the.
owners of record. or contract purchasers of property.
abutting the. foregoing proposed alley vacation; that the
same will not adversely substantially affect the market.
value of such abutting property, or in the event of a
substantial adverse affect thereupon; that they nonethe-
less consent to the 'proposed vacation and waive damages.
7. Tendered. with this application is a non-refundable fee of
5325.00: The undersigned applicant hereby agrees to pay,
in addition to said fee, all costs incurred by the City
in processing the within application, including, but not
limited to, gross personnel costs, materials, attorney
fees, recording costs, publication costs and all other
costs reasonably related to the processing of the within
application and verification of information. Said costs
shall be paid prior to final Council action upon the
within application.
DATED this 30th day of January 19 91 .
~ ~J~ir
. ~~
(If individual)
STATE OF OREGON )
ss.
County of Jackson ) DATED:
Personally appeared the above named
PETITION FOR VACATION OF STREET, ALLEY OR
OTHER PUBLIC PLACE - 2 (072589)
~ ~ ~~
-- and acknowledged the foregoing Consent to
be his or her voluntary... act and deed...
BEFORE ME:
Notary Public for Oregon
My Commission Expires:
(If Corporation)
STATE OF OREGON )
)i ss.
County of Jackson ) DATED: January 30, 1991
Personally appeared Steve E. Rietmann and
G.rP..A F_ R;armann who, being duly sworn, each
for himself and not for the other, did say that the former is the
President and that the latter is the Secretary of
W. F. S. Materials, Inc. a corporation,.and that the seal
affixed to-.the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said
corporation and that .said. instrument. was signed and sealed in'
behalf of said corporation bg.authority of its Board of
Directors, and-each of-them acknowledged the forego ng Consent to
be its voluntary act and deed.
BEFORE ME:
Not y u is -for Oregon
My Commission Expires: 9/10/93'
* If this urocedure is chosen, please attach a completed petition
on forms provided'by the City..
FOR CITY USE ONLY
Date filed with City
Received by
PETITION FOR VACATION OF STREET, ALLEY OR
OTHER PUBLIC PLACE - 3 (072589)
~~ 72
APPENDIX 7'O PETITION FOR VACATION
OF STREET. ALLEY OR OTHER PUBLIC PLACE
(Consent of Owners)
Description of proposed vacation of street, alley or other public
place: - ,
Sae--Ex,HIBIT 'A', akGashed
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS:
ORS 271.080(2) requires that any petition for vacation shall have
appended thereto as a part thereof and as a basis for granting
the same "the consent of the owners of all abutting property and
_ of not less than two-thirds (2/3) in area of the real property
affected thereby". The real property affected thereby shall be
deemed to be the land lying on either side of the street or
. portion thereof.prbposed to be vacated and extending laterally td
the next atreet that serves as a parallel street, but in any case
not to exceed two hundred (200) feet, and the land for a like
lateral distance on either side of the street for four hundred
(400) feet along its course beyond. each terminus of the part
proposed to be vacated. Where a street is proposed to be vacated
to its termini,-the land embraced in an extension of the street
for a distance of four hundred (400) feet beyond each terminus
shall also be counted. In the vacation of any plat or part
thereof, the consent of the owner or owners of two-thirds (2/3)
in area of the property embraced within such plat or part thereof
proposed to be vacated shall be sufficient; except where such
vacation embraces street area, when, as to such street area, the
above requirements shall also apply. Consent of the owners of
the required amount of property shall be in writing and duly
acknowledged before an officer authorized to take such ack-
nowledgment of 'deeds.
~ CONSENT'
The undersigned represents and warrants that he or she is the
owner of record or contract purchaser of real-property affected
by the vacation proposal described hereinabove, said affected
APPENDIX TO PETITION FOR VACATION OF STREET,
ALLEY OR OTHER PUBLIC PLACE - 1 (072589)
~~~ 73
EXHIBIT 'A'
Those certain alleys or portions thereof within Block 2 and
Block 7 of AMY and HARBAUGH'S ADDITION to the City of Central Point
in Jackson County, Oregon, more particularly described as follows:
That alley lying northeast of and adjoining the northeast boundary
of Lot 2 in Block 7, from the most northerly: corner of said Lot 2
to the most easterly corner of said Lot 2; Also those entire alleys
in Block 2, Jying between Lots 7, 8, 9 and. Lots. 4, 5, and 6, and
between.Lots 1, 2, 3 and Lots 4 and .9.
REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR
JULY 14, 1978
ROGER R. ROBERTS
1656
Roger R. Roberts
LANDMARK SURVEYING
-- 74
EXH181T 'B'
Page 2 of 2
E
e
c3
.~.... .
...:.
I'1'EM r
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
Date: April 16, 1991
C 2 TY OF CENTRAL PO2 NT
NOTS CE TO AGENC 2 E S
[X] City. of Central Point
[ ] .Rogue Valley Transit Dist.
[X] AT & T
[ ] School District No. 6
[ ] Rogue River Irrigation Dist
[ ]
[ ] BCVSA [X] C.P. National
[X] P P & L [ ] TCI Cablevision
[X] U.S. Sprint [X] U.S. West
[ ] Jackson County. [ ] State Hwy. Div
[] [l
Re: Proposed Vacation of Alleyways as per attached map
Attached you will find material(s). relating to the referenced application.
Please review these materials and submit to the Central Point Planning Department
a written report setting forth any necessary conditions as required by your
agency for approval of said request. Your concerns may relate to future
utilities as well as utilities which are currently in place within the right-
of-way.
Please provide maps to illustrate the location of your facilities. If no
comments are received by Thursday, April 25, 1991, the Planning Department will
assume that your agency does not have any comments regarding the application.
Sincerely,
G orge Rubaloff
Administrative Assistant
GR:sb
Enclosure
NOTICE TO AGENCIES.ADMIN
v .. ..
ITEM `_
C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT
~1r~r~F ~~~®~~
DATE.- 4/25/91
PROJECT.- Vacation ofA//eyways
LOCAT/ON: Between T37S R2W Map 10A6 TL 1000 & 1100
Between T37S R2W Map f0A8 TL 200 & 300-400
Between T37S R2W Map 10AB TL 100 & 200
Between T37S R2W Map 10AB TL 500-400
AREA TO BE
VACATED: TL 1000 & 1100 2080 SF
TL 200 & 300-400 2240 SF
TL 100 & 200 1000 SF
TL 500 &400 " 1~.Q0 SF
Tota/ 6620 SF
APPL/CANT.- Qua//ty Fence P.O. Box 3985
Central Point, OR 97502
Representative: Steve Rietmann
SURVEYOR: Roger Roberts
Existino Utilities:
1. A 3/4" waterline is located 15' north of the new Quality Fence Building
and serves the house located behind and north of 136 E. Pine.
2. No other City Utilities are Idcated in the remainder of the proposed alley
vacations.
COND/TlONS:
1. It may be necessary to service the home behind 136 E. Pine from
another direction if the operation of the fencing facility. will interrupt
usage of water.
cc: 02-014
13-040
ALLEYWYS.QLY
1
ITF,M _, ~ ~_
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE VACATION OF CERTAIN ALLEYS
LOCATED WITHIN AMY HARBAUGH'S ADDITION, A SUBDIVISION PLATTED
IN 1889, LOCATED GENERALLY NORTH OF WEST PINE, EAST OF HASKELL STREET,
SOUTH OF TAYLOR STREET AND WEST OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD
IN CENTRAL POINT, OREGON
WHEREAS, Steve Rietmann has requested a vacation of certain alleys
described in Exhibit A and illustrated in Exhibit B, both of which are attached
hereto and made a part of this document, and,
WHEREAS, the Central Point Planning Commission held a public meeting upon
said request for alley vacation on May 7, 1991, pursuant to Central Point
Municipal Code Section 1.24.020C, and having at said public meeting received the
application, City Staff Report and testimony., and being fully advised, now
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That based upon the Staff Report, evidence and record relating
to said application, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows:
a. Alleys will not be needed now or in the future to serve the motoring
public.
b. Utilities do not exist in the' alleys and there are no utilities
planned for future installation within the .alleyways.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. HARBAUGH.VAC/RESO
., ~ ~ ~ g
The Planning Commission therefore concludes that granting the proposed alley
vacations with Amy Harbaugh's Addition will be in the public interest.
Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval to the City
Council of said request for vacation of an alley described in Exhibit A and
illustrated in Exhibit B attached hereto.
Passed by the Planning Commission on the 7th day of May, 1991, and signed
by me in authentication of its passage this day of May, 1991.
Planning Commission Chairman
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Secretary
Approved this day of May, 1991.
Planning Commission Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
HARBAUGH.VAC/RESO
~- 79
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Planning Commission /' '
FROM: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant I~~~/
DATE: April 25, 1991
TOPIC: Master Street and Development Plan
Meadow Creek Area
ACTION
This item is continued from the March 5, 1991 Planning Commission Agenda. Under
the authority of Chapter 15.16 of the Central Point Municipal Code, the
Commission may adopt the master development plan to serve as a guide to future
growth and development in the Meadow Creek area. However, the report provided
in your packet is informational and the commissioners are not being requested
to adopt the plan at this time.
On March 5, 1991, the Planning Commission conducted a public meeting during which
public input was received. Staff has reviewed public's input and prepared a
status report which highlights the proposed revisions to the draft plan.
ATTACHMENTS
Item A - March 5, 1991 Planning Commission Minutes
Item B - Public Works Staff Report dated April 25, 1991
n r,
" - ~ 1
ITEM
i'^ ;•
~'
~`' C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
~' P/arming Commission Meeting Minutes
::t3;'~
~, ~ March 5, 199 9
<s~~~~~ Page One
. ly;„ i
-~^~•`•ii /. ' MEET/NG CALLL'D TO ORDER- 7:00 p.m.
//. ROLL CALL
Those present were Garth Ellard, Rick Bettenburg,'Dick Halley, Bob Matthews
and Chuck Piland. Also present were George Rubaloff, City Administrative
Assistant, Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director and Cecelia Gordon,
Secretary. Karolyne Hugo and Jack Crumm had each phoned in and asked to
,. -:;, .1 be excused from tonight's meeting in order to attend other business matters.
~.. ;,
///. APPROVAL OF M/NOTES
-~•~~:~~` Commissioner Halley moved to approve the February 5, 1991 Planning
~~`~"~' Commission Meeting Minutes and the Motion was seconded by Commissioner
"" Bettenburg. Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg, yes; Halley, yes; Matthews, yes;
,., ;r Piland, yes; and the Motion carried unanimously. ,
~:~«
`4;.~. /V. CORRESPONDENCE
-; ~,°
«x=;!
~,~~;, George Rubaloff read into the record, Calvin Martin's letter dated February 20,
.:NR;a::-.. 1991 Mr. Martin requested an extension of time on the West Park Place
development.
. V. BUS/NESS \
A. Pub/ic Meeting Review of Deve/opment P/an -Street Master P/an for area
known as Meadow Creek Drainage Basidin the Southeast Quadrant of The Citv
of Central Point.
City Administrative Assistant, George Rubaloff, read his March 1, 1991
Memorandum and entered it into the record by reference along with the
attachments of the Vicinity Map, Certificate of Posting and Mailing and the
Public Works Staff Report dated February 28, 1991. Rubaloff also handed out
a copy of CPMC Ordinance 15.52, Chapter 15.16 defining the Planning
Commissions role in establishing Development Plans. At this point, .Public
Works Director Larry Blanchard placed a transparency of the Street Master Plan
for the Meadow Creek area on the overhead projector and explained to the
public the definition of a Master Pian.
g~
C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
P/arming Commission Meeting Minutes
March 5; 1991
Page Two
."'"t~::"ef~'
f~''`w ;~~`~;~
The Commission asked Larry Blanchard if running streets through the middle of
property would cause any undesirable conditions such as sub lots or flag lots,
and if so, would the City be willing to purchase these pieces of property. Larry
Blanchard stated that sometimes land is divided by roads, but that this Master
Plan was just an engineering framework to show where the best topographical
areas for streets would be. George Rubaloff commented that every entity such
as the City of Central :Point needs to have Master Plans for streets in order to
.avoid uncontrolled placing of streets, eta
Garth Ellard, Commission Chairperson, stated that at this point, the suggested
layout for streets in this Master Plan were not written "in stone", that this was
merely a proposed plan at this point, and opened the Public Meeting.
The persons that came forward, their addresses and concerns are as follows:
Ron McAvin, son of Geneva Hitt, 3458 Bursell Road, Central Point, expressed
opposition to any development of new streets, as he felt there were too many
streets in the area already. He also expressed his opposition to the Storm
Drainage LID and the Sanitary Sewer LID.
Michael Sowell, 3363 Marilee, expressed his opposition to any new
development, and asked if the majority of acreage vote would outweigh the
majority of property owners vote in whether or not to develop the proposed
Meadow Creek LIDS. Larry Blanchard explained that this was a time to discuss
the Street Master Plan and that there would be a time set aside to discuss the
other concerns, and that .the Planning Commission would .make
recommendations based on the consensus of the majority of property owned,
but that the City Council would make their determination based on their
decision as to the best interest of the City, and that the Commission could not
second guess what the Council would do.
Charles Olson, 3358 Bursell, expressed his opposition to the development of
any additional cul-de-sacs or enclosed circles in the Meadow Creek Drainage
Area, as he had already lost value. on .two lots from cul-de-sac design and
would lose availability to other property he owned if the Street Master Plan
were to be developed as shown. He also expressed opposition to paying for
development of the two proposed LIDS.
., ~ ~ 82
~; ~ ~ '~
C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT ~`~'
P/arming Commission Meeting Minutes -
March 5, 1991 -Page Three
Robert Johnson, 654 Beall Lane (representing himself and new property owner,
Harold Thies) expressed his opposition to the street layout as shown on the
Master Pian, especially the cul-de-sacs and circles, and was also opposed to
paying for the development of the proposed storm drainage and sanitary sewer
LIDs.
Barbara Ritter, 794 Pittview, asked what the City planned to do with Pittview
Avenue, that it in poor condition now and traffic load would incrdase if the
street were improved. She also was concerned about why she should pay for
storm drainage that benefitted someone else who was profiting by new
development in that area.
Mitchell Huli, 764 Pittview, expressed his concerns about the storm drainage
and sanitary sewer development in that area. Larry Blanchard explained that
good planning looks at all the needs, grid explained the planning process once
more and that the decision on the drainage issue would be up to the City
Council.
Di Grensky, 910 Beall Lane, expressed her opposition to paying for any new
development in that area. She also was concerned about whether new
development would disturb wetlands, ifiany of the land were determined to be
wetlands. Larry Blanchard said that, he had invited one of the representatives
from the Oregon Division of State Lands to come on-site and make a wetland
determination. He asked Mrs. Grensky if she would like to go with them that
day. Mrs. Grensky informed Mr. Blanchard that she is in close communication
with Steve from the State Division of Lands and that she would depend on him
to give her any news or information. Larry Blanchard explained that the correct
process is for the City to communicate with the Division of State Lands then
the State could notify the property owner.
George Rubaloff, City Administrative Assistant stated that in any Land Use
Application that the wetlands determination is part of the process.
Clifford Fuchs, 3476 Burrell, expressed his opposition to new development,
' that he vvished to keep open areas such as the Meadow Creek Drainage Area
is now, thaf he opposed increased traffic load and speed on improving existing'
streets and developing new streets.
~~ 83
;:
CITY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
P/arming Commission Meeting Minutes
March 5, 1991 -Page Four
.. ~ r,
-~ _.~ U
Robert Blanton, Engineer, 130 W. .9th Street,. Medford, Oregon, stated that
development should be organized and have a basic pattern for traffic, That a Street
Master Plan is the first step in this: process.
Larry Blanchard told the property owners present that another Meeting would be
scheduled to continue the Street Master Plan, and that they would be notified by mail.
No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the Street Master Plan.
Garth Ellard thanked the participants and closed the Public Meeting.
The Commission voted by consensus that they. would carry this item over into a future
Planning Commission Meeting. At 8:55 p.m. Chairperson Garth Ellard granted a 5
minute recess. The Meeting resumed at 9:00 p.m.
B.
and Trustees of the First Preshvterian Churchl.
George Rubaloff, City Administrative Assistant, entered into the record by reference,
his Memorandum of February 28, .1.991, the Vicinity Maps, Certificate of Posting for
Public Meeting, Site Plan Application: Materials, Tax Assessor Map, Aerial Map, and
the Public Works Department Site Pian Review dated February 27, 1991.
He also stated that Mark Servatius, Fire Chief/Building Official was ill and could not
be present tonight but wished to be consultedin the placement of the proposed fire
hydrant to be located on the property.
George Rubaloff also informed the Commission that the applicants had reviewed the
required conditions and. had agreed to comply.
Garth Ellard, Chairperson, opened the Public Meeting.
Dwayne Brown, 671 Prairie Court, Central Point, Church Trustee and Jerry Hunter,
Architect, 839 E. Main, Medford, Oregon came forward in support of the proposed
Church Addition in the Site Plan Review. The Commission asked if they understood
the requirements for the Deferred Improvement Agreements. Mr. Hunter. said that
they .understood and were. willing to meet .these ,requirements. Garth Ellard,
Commission Chairperson, asked if there were any others that wished to come forward
in support of, or in opposition to the Site Plan Review. Being none, Ellard closed the
Public Meeting.
~_ 8~
ITEM
CU1P4( ®IE C(E(RI'~4~A~ ~®ORJT
PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT
~~~~~ G~[~~®G~~
DATE: Agri/25 999f
PROJECT: MEADOW CREEK
Master Street and Development Plan.''
AREA: See Attached Map
Authorizing
Legis/ation: C.P.M. C. 15.16 Ordinance 9652
PROPERT/ES /NCLUDED /N DEVELOPMENT PLAN BOUNDARY
TAX LOTS OWNER ACREAGE
372W 11 D 3600 Alger .67
372W 11 D 3301 Gilman 1.3
372W 11 D 3300 3.4
372W 11 D 3200 Metz 1.49
372W 11 D 3100 Maehren 3.00
372W 11 D 3000 Thies 2.48
372W 11 D 2900 Grensky --
372W 11 D 2800 Johnson .28
372W 11 D 2700 .18
372W 11 D 2601 .24
372W 11 D 2600 Hulse 3.13
372W 11 D 2501 1.9
372W 11 D 2500 Sowell 1.89
372W 11 D 2401 Maple Grove 7.15
372W 11 D 2400 Close 2.5
372W 11D 2300 Dale 2.1
-1-
~~
Tax Lot Owner
372W 11 D 2202 Richardson
372W 11 D 2201 "
372W 11 D 2200 "
372W 11 D 2100 Campbell
372W 11 D 2000 Hendrickson
372W 11 D 1901 .Brewer
372W 11 D 1900 Hough
372W 11 D 1800 Cartwright
372W 11 D 1700 Beale
372W 11 D 1600 Olsen
372W 11 D 1500 Straus
372W 11 D 1400 Fellows
372W 11 D 1300 McCoy
372W 11 D 1200 McAvin
372W 11 D 1102 Fuchs
372W 11 D 1101 Samples
372W 11 D 1100 Weber
372W 11 D 1000 Russell
372W 11 D 901 Shannon
372W 11 D 900 Dodge
372W 11 D 805 Schipper
372W 11 D 804 "
372W 11 D 803 "
372W 11 D 800 "
372W 11 D 700 Hale
372W 11 D 600 Rosenberger
372W 11 D 500 McCartney
372W 11 D 400 Boring
372W 11 D 300 Holmes
372W 11 D 200 Wold
372W 11 D 100 Horsley/
Cooper
372W 11 A 2901 Newell
372W 11 A 2902 Casey
372W 11 A 2900
372W 11 A 2800 McCartney
372W 11 A 2700 Hull
372W 11 A C 100 Ritter
372W 11A 1800 Horsley/
Cooper.
372W 12C 3300
372W 12C 3200 "
372W 126 500 "
372W 12C 3400 Gilman
2
V ..
Acreage
.31
.93
.17
.34
.26
1.53
.51
1.01
1.01
3.11
.46
4.3
4.6
.67
.42
.39
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.50
.5
1.0
14.77
1.05
2.00
.37
1.21
1.78
2.91
29.06
29.06
7.14
13.00
2.00
20.87
86
DES/GNATED STREETS
7. Loca/ Street 7 E/W
Location: Southerly Boundary 37 2W 11 D 1300
Northerly Boundary 37 2W 11 D 1400
Approximate length: 1670 Ft.
From: Bursell Road To: 1670 Ft. E.
Required R.O.W. - 50 ft.
Required Street Width - 36 Ft.
Projected Traffic Volume -Less than 1500 vt/d
2. Loca/ Street 2 E/W
Location: 600' north of Beall Lane between Marilee Street and Lot
1700/1800.
Approximate Length:. 775'
From: Tax Lot 1700/1800 To: Marilee' Street.
Required R.O.W. - 50 ft.
Required Street Width - 36 ft.
Projected Traffic Volume -Less than 1000 vt/d
3. Loca/ Street 3 E/W
Location: 600' north of Beall Lane between Marilee and Gilman Drive
Approximate Length:, 1200. ft.
From: Marilee St. To: Gilman Dr.
Required R.O.W. - 50, ft.
Required Street Width - 36 ft.
Projected Traffic Volume -Less than 1000 vt/d
4. Loca/ Street 7 N/S
Location: 510' E. of Bursell Road
Approximate Length:. 1130 ft.
From: Beall Lane Toi local Street 1 E/W '
Required R.O.W. - 50 ft.
Required Street Width.- 36 ft, "
Projected Traffic Volume -Less than 1000 vt/d
-3-
~- 8~
5. Loca/ Street 3 N/S
Location: 1000' E. of Bursell Road
Approximate Length: 600 ft.
From: Beall Lane To: Local Street 2 E/W
Required R.O.W. - 50 ff.
Required Street Width - 36 ft.
Projected Traffic Volume -Less than. 1000 vt/d
6. Mari/ee Street
Location: 1280 Ft. E. of Bursell Road.
Approximate Length; 1130 ft.
From: Beall Lane To: Local Street 1 E/W
Required R.O.W. - 50 ft.
Required Street Width - 36 ft.
Projected Traffic Volume -Less than 1000 vt/d
7. Loca/ Street 3 N/S
Location: 450' N. of Beall Lane- 450' E. of Marilee St.
Approximate Length: 2700 ft.
From: Beall Lane To: Glen Grove Avenue
Required R.O.W.. - 50 ft.
Required Street Width - 36 ft.
Projected Traffic Volume -Greater than 1500 vt/d.
8. Loca/ Street 4 N/S (Gi/man Road1
Location: 1200' E. of Marilee Road
Approximate Length: 1000 LF
From: Beall Lane To: Gate Park Drive.
Required R.O.W. -,50 ft.
Required Street Width - 36 ft.
Projected Traffic Volume -Less than 1000 vt/d
9. Pitty/ew Avenue - Co/%ctor Street
Location: 900 ft. S. of Hopkins Road, 1700 ft. north of Bursell off
Beall Lane.
Approximate Length: 2700 LF
From: Bursell Rd. To: Glen Grove Avenue
Required R.O.W. - 60 ft.
Required Street Width - 40 Ft.
Projected Traffic Volume -Greater than 1500 vt/d
-4-
., - 8 8
COMMENTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS:
1. Of the total of'43 property owners in this Master Street and Development Plan,
13 property ovvners responded to the Questionnaire. (See Exhibit "1 ") A
summary of the Questionnaire is shown in Exhibit " 2".
2. Comments from property owners were as follows regarding screening:
HORSLEY.• Since it is farm land and being farmed, there is no need to do
.anything different from its present state.
BOR/NG: Leave as is.
WEBER: I believe the property that is developed should be responsible for
screening property from theirs. Do not put Pittvievv Through.
GRENSKY: I have not thought how to screen my property from development.
I should think that it would be necessary to know what the development looked
like before making that decision. I doubt that there is any effective screening
for something of this nature.
ROSENBERGER: Just leave it the way it is.
HULL: I can see nothing wrong with the Proposed Plan as presented this April
1, 1991, looks as though finally someone is getting the message after looking
at all the hodge podge subdivisions, that are now in and wondering what to do
as far as utilities and etc. is concerned. Has been ~ Planning done, on most
of them to may way of thinking.
MAEHREN: The property I have is long. There is no way I can put it into lots.
The only vvay is if someone would buy that land next to mine and make it one
piece, so all this is doing is costing me a lot of money and doing me no good.
HOLMES: The most attractive, economical separationwould be to plant trees
or hedges. If my finances change for the better, I might even look into building
a new structure that is placed in a different location on my lot. Thank you for
listening to my input.
STRAUS: 8 foot fence around it with bared wire on top.
OLSEN: If proper streets are laid out on a city block system, screening of
property is moot in that back yard and people's property abut and then it will
be an individual prerogative whether a fence is needed. This type city layout
automatically causes traffic onto street instead of through other people's
property. Pedestrian traffic would not wish to travel through other people's
property to get to their destination.
-5-
89
see that in less than 50 years the automobile, as we know it, will probably be
aching of the past. Shortages of petroleum and environmental problems will
dictate. change; We need to .think of how streets 'should relate to such
changes, obviously down through history, before automobiles, streeta were laid
out in city blocks to facilitate most sorts of traffic flow. It was probably a good
plan thought though, .over several hundred years..
COND/T/ONS:
1. The street layout needs to follow the guidelines established by the hierarchy of
streets (See Exhibit "3"1.
2. The streets in this Development Plan are located to accommodate the drainage
of properties which abut the street and the entire Meadow Creek Drainage
Basin.
3. Utilities shall be designed according to the Central Point Public Works
Standards and shall follow the proposed Street .Plan....
4. Individual properties will need to design access and street improvements to
connect to streets designated in this Development Plan.
5. These streets are an approximate location and. final location will be determined
at the time individual subdivisions are final platted.
6. No street will be constructed or subdivision built until the property owners
receive the proper land use approvals .and applicable permits have been
received.
7. The comments from property owners includes a comment that Pittview Avenue
should not be constructed as a through street. Although our preliminary review
based on projected traffic volumes identified Pittview Avenue as a Collector
Street, a final review may be appropriate.
Recommendation:
1. Prior to final approval of this Development Plan, a Traffic Engineer should
review the plan and provide a letter of recommendation regarding the final
street location and classification
Attachments: Exhibit."1" -April 1, 1991 Letter, .Questionnaire
Exhibit " 2" -Questionnaire Resu,its
Exhibit "3" -Map
cc: 02-014
cc: 13-160 -6-
90
EXHIBIT "1"
~m°~/ 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 (503) 664-6325
.~
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT April 1, 1991
LARRY R. BLANCHARD
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
Re: Street Master Plan -Meadow Creek Area
As discussed during the Planning Commission Meeting held March 5, 1991, the City wilt continue the discussion with
property owners regarding the Street Master Pian -Meadow Creek area. Another Public Meeting will be held on May
7, 1991 at 7:00 p.m. with the Planning Commission to review a final report from staff regarding the Street Master
Plan.
Staff in reviewing the comments from the property owners needed to consider aii .aspects of development of this
property. As you know, the zoning established in this area is R-2 -Multi-Family development and R-1-6, Residential
f dingle Family 6000 square ft. minimum lot size. This is an urban standard that is normally accepted within Urban
Growth Boundaries.
One of the LCDC functions is to assure land within existing urban growth boundaries is maximized prior to approving
future expansion of Urban Growth Boundaries. Each individual property owner will eventually identify the type (if any)
of development that will occur on their property. The City will look at each property owner's response and develop
a Street Mastet Plan keeping all property owners responses in mind.
I have attached a questionnaire for you to complete, and a map showing the proposed Street Master Plan. Please fill
out the questionnaire completely, and draw on the Map any changes, additions or deletions to your property you would
like to make at this time. Return the map and completed questionnaire to the Public Works Department at the address
listed above.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at 664-6325. Thank you for your continued cooperation
Sincerely,
Larry R. Blanchard
Public Works Director
Attachment: Comp Plan Pg. XI-1 to XI-12
Comp Plan Pg. III-7 to III-14
Proposed Street Master Plan
Questionnaire
Map
cc: 13-160
sfnrstrp/.mdw
~~~ 91
~~EE~ ~~~~E~ P~~ - MEAD®W c~EEOS AG~IEA
QUEST/ONNA/RE
Property Description
Property Owner
(PLEASE CHECK YES OR NO)
1. Do you plan on developing your property in the next 3-5 years? [ ]YES (]NO
2. If you are planning to develop your property does the Proposed Street Master
Plan meet with your approval? [ ]YES [ ]NO.
3. If the Proposed Street Plan does NOT meet with your approval, have you
included those changes on the attached map? (]YES (]NO.
4. Do you think that through streets should be constructed instead of cul-de-sac
streets after reading Page XI-97 (See hierarchy'of streets on: Page XL-4)
[ ]YES [ 1N0.
5. Will you be attending the next-Planning. Commission Meeting to be held May
Z, 1991? [?YES [ ]NO.
If you do not plan to develop your property; how would you screen it from other
.developments:
stmstrpl.mdw
~~ 92
i
I. ,ICZ
/ ~~
~qP
~~
~~~
6
/ P~
~~~
~j
i~,;-
,_.
~_ 93
.~
~.
^ E
3
O ~ 3
2 "~
J ~I I11
N 2°
Vj m
- ~ ~
ail ,
xf x m
x~
v2 X
yl
ai
x
xx
y Z
X X
Q
~ W
tl >I X
Q
W
~
W
~ 3
4 O
~
Q
N ~ ~ C
^ ~
~ N o X m
~y C
ti
y
y
c>
zz. z z. z. z ~ zzz~°CS ~~~~
zzz ~. z ozz?z zzzz
~
....
C T C _
m m m~
~ N C
m
~ U
>
Z
3
I `m
b o m ~. ~ =. ; H
~ E m m
m o• .
m Q s
m
m mss . E c;~ C a
m°~
m m m o m m !'
o o a °
~' O
~ ~ m
t
'Q U' .~~ F (7 -~ r.= r M f m
_
C7 U O K s s U Z a0 = U m O M LL~ ~ LL
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 8 ~p
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O In ,T
0 tON pO O N O O O O O O O O O O O N
Q O O ~O O O O ^O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V M N'-
MNNN~-O NMMI~~O N
tpM MN~OOf W 1~
M M M M M M N N N N N N N N _
N N N N N N N
'' y ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~'~ O D
33333333333333 33333333333333333
~C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
n
^
MM
n
n
^ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
M M M '
MM M
M MM
^
n'
M MMMM
n
ti c
'/M
gMM t
q MC
qM M M t
~!
t ..
.
t
+l t
1
t
9
~_. 94
r
m
NZ m X X X Nj,
y ~ m m
J ~I m } f
~y ~, ~ X X X XXX nM
m
X X
V 2I X
W m m
~ m m m
~ a
m m
m m ' m m
M m
y2 X X X X XX XXX m~
W
>
tl X N
y?
X X X m
X X X 00
X X X
m
'~ }~
c> f ~v
^O
y2 X x xx x xx xxx
a >I
ac ¢~¢¢ ¢..z ~ a2¢ z
T z
z zzzz. z m zz. ~,
N y ~
m
m
O ~
tl m
m
a ~
W m T
- O
.
m c m a c m a m m ~ T
`m m> m m
`m
d l
Z E a of m a t e .. m N U ~ E° .m. 0 3 q s U- m ~ o° •• '
O N 3KNONs e s 2K~Nm 232 UZUe ~SOC S U s r
m
,W
c
c
o
K
.y 2.
m
an d
0 0 ~
O In Y M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N O O O O O
0 O
O M '
u.
m
m O O 00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M T M M M W I~~ O N M N ~ M
m m N W n M O
m ~~ N N N N N O M N m
H~j y 0000000000000000 QQQQQQQ U00 '~~
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N d 0
m m )(
1%1~ H M~n+1M MMMMMCn~IMMMM~MM ~^'/~^'lMM MMM Mt^~l 1^(1Q
95
EXHIBIT "3"
The Central Point Circulation/Transportation Element is concerned
with five basic classifications of streets and highways_ The
following illustration and brief descriptions of each type show
the relationships of each street type to the others and the
functions of.each, based on what is often termed the "hierarchy
of streets".
A -- Freeways are the largest of the street and highway types.
Because of their size, traffic capacity and traffic speed,
access is provided to the freeway only by major arterials.
Freeways are grade-separated at intersections with other
freeways or streets and direct access is not permitted
from adjacent properties.
B -- Major Arterials are the main arteries of the City. Because
they carry large amounts of traffic, including trucks, they
are intended primarily to move traffic and not to provide
access to property.
C•-= Secondary Arterials serve
'to distribute traffic from
the major arterials to the
business districts and
other centers of Community
activity, and also to the
collector-streets.
A -- Collector Streets, as the
name imp ies, collect the
traffic from residential
areas and local streets
and transfer this traffic
to the arterials. These
streets serve to "feed"
traffic in and out of the
neighborhoods.
E -- Local Streets are intended
to provide access to homes
and not intended to carry
through traffic. All
local streets should
connect with a collector
or secondary arterial to
provide a safe transition
out of the. neighborhood
and onto larger thorough-
fares.
' a i » a-
-
w'
- L.'' .
i
x
z~ ~ -~
~
h ~ 2=cx+
w
"
~55
s'` ~
~
-q'
~ ~~
95' ~'2
-
)
> /Yy ~i y~. x
~x
,~
~
r e
x•.
~
y;~
s
~
~~..) ~;5~ M "y` ?~'~ R~ti'~va ~ 9 -.
b ~ 3 x s i
~
a'~..'a~.. ~F,~. ..
.~~ :ta~ a'k~ F ~:S~.ct,''~3.5 £~'S'..Sx:.Ys~e' ~.r~4 ~a~.F
,`~i w.F;~.a;°«
.~-_,
~~ 96
A
STAFF REPORT
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant
DATE: April 25, 1991
~~
TOPIC: Public Meeting - Review and make recommendation to City Council for
preliminary plat for Jackson Creek Estates Unit No. 3, Phase I
PRRF-f`F
In accordance with the procedure outlined in CPMC 1.24, the Planning Commission
is scheduled to review the proposed preliminary subdivision plat and then
formulate a recommendation for the City Council.
BACKGROUND
On May 17, 1990, the City Council approved the preliminary plat for Unit No. 3
of Jackson Creek Estates. The subdivider was required to obtain final plat
approval within one year after such approval. Developer Tom Malot does not
intend to seek final plat approval by the May 16th deadline. Therefore,
according to City procedures, Mr. Malot has resubmitted a preliminary subdivision
plat application to the City. The original preliminary plat consisted of 65 lots
in the R-1-8 zone ranging between 8,000 and 16,200 square feet, with an average
lot size of approximately 9,800 square feet. The proposed plat has been modified
over the original preliminary plat with regard to the unit being divided into
two phases. George Flanagan has renewed a particular property lease for a
portion of Tax Lot 3100 for another year and the lessee has planted a crop of
alfalfa and rye grass on the southerly portion of where Unit No. 3 is planned.
Thus, the proposed preliminary plat for Phase I of Unit No. 3 extends
southeasterly from Vincent Avenue in Unit No. 2 of the Subdivision and includes
the most northerly 39 lots of the original Unit No. 3 Plat. Phase I of Unit
No. 3 includes 39 lots.
The proposed preliminary plat is slightly different than the conceptual Jackson
Creek Neighborhood Development Plan adopted in April 1985 (Planning Commission
Resolution No. 95). However, all of the same opportunities exist within the
proposed subdivision layout for traffic circulation. The proposed plat follows
the master utility plan prepared on March 11, 1988 and received by the City on
May 6, 1988.
9'7
Staff has reviewed the preliminary plat application in accordance with the
following:
1. Chapter 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code relating to City's
requirements for subdivision layout, park dedication, street
standards, water system standards, sanitary sewer standards and storm
drainage standards.
2. City of Central Point Public Works Standards relating to subdivision
development.
3. Applicable zoning standards contained in Chapter 17 of the Central
Point Municipal Code.
The Public Works Department has analyzed the plat and has prepared a staff report
which contains a list of proposed conditions of approval.
Item A - Vicinity Map
Item B - Certificate of Posting
Item C - Preliminary Plat Application
Item D - Assessors Map
Item E - Public Works Staff Report dated April 25, 1991
Item F - Proposed Resolution recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat
... ~ _ 98
~,
ITEM ~! ___
~- 99
ITEM
155 SO. SECOND SL 'CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Sandy Berryhill CERTIFY THAT ON THE
FOLLOWING DATE OF Wednesday May 1, 1991 I POSTED A NOTICE
FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON May 7 +. 1941 DURING WHICH THE
CENTRAL POINT' PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVEIW A PRELIMINARY
SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR JACKSON CREEK ESTATES PHASE I OF N0. 3 (37 2W 10 Tax
lot 3100) _ -
AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE
2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY
3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION
4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD
irr~~ ~ Q if~.oiooyl
S TU
DATE
100
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
ITEM Ci
Application Filing Deadline
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
,(' Application for Preliminary Subdivision Plat
Name ~~ V~'lIQ-~s~`~'
j~.ddress~t-.O ~Uox 3€~4~t ~'~
Phone Number LQCs ~- IZ-S8
Proposed Site Location
Assessor's Map Page Location Tax Lot(s)
Recxuired Information:
A legal description as it appears on'the deed. Deed copies may be obtained at the
Jackson County Assessor's Office
.Requested information as contained in the attached Central Point Municipal Code
Sections 16.24.020 to 16.24.070 and completion of a Statement of Water Rights
(form attached)
I, ~ certify that I am the owner or
authorized agent: of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach
written authority)/~~ `%//ny¢o
~~ ~. .iIiL~G~~L~G(/`' ..Date ~ Z~C 9~
(Signature of owner.. or authorized agent of owner, please in icate ich)
Application Fee: ',$1D0~
~~2 ~
LUAP/ADMINI ~ 1 O 1 3
~.~~ z
~.~
r~ iy~,
,y tn'
4, '
~,p~
~~
yyggY Y
'.~~~8Xm~~~„~o~B~COV .
xaRFasassaa~xs_
~~c3og~~a~n~~"sa~~~
{.:c'.
.~
-..c::
'. ~J'.
.'. ;~
~~
i; ';
i
~ RnRA~~.'°,F P.FR0 g0Y0Y08RR
Z
a :A~88888=8888
ariaaedxdda~sa~
5
W
~
~
o
O q
S
8 p.Wpu
18s R,n"IB F. d IBFW--§8
2 ~ i SiY L108888..8NYa$
~4aa~~~~s~~~~~
~ - a
Z u
i i
4
....n....~aaa:
3U
O 3~
Nm
Z Y
¢U
N ;~
~
W N
~
~`1
~ m
m Q ~~
y ~ °O
a
„
y ~~
0
~ u~
u
0
u
~U
w
Y °
0
Y
U
~SS
r 5
i ~y
9
a
D
"x
4
a
14 ctc;
102
N
k
0
N
u
m
m
N
sie~s'saagaaiaea:.aieea9s~~~'aspsa~es
A898~aX~8R 6,~fl~YHSd 6~nA9Y411B~6=RFRF
BReaF9.tA8A8ARRA86S:R0R08RRA8RX
wR«iI7 Yt«'7Nk«Si Bfl IB %19 TI=RYI tId $.C g1lG 7..
88R,Y 0884a89RRR8Ril99A07,,08898g4 R'
9Ra:il:FMJ3R-=piRCf 1U S'OC9atl17 :fit F.2AR
R7dFaA88gVRA8E9,S8axR~RRASOVaRA
TIB Ff17FR:AR«fA :.8RAg91'«AIPaRFY.IgFF7:
88888888°.,888888888888888888888
ARRRRRRRRRA X'K'I~AAAgRRBR.R RRSAA~%J
F 8~WYIBRSB~BCtltt1 FI S~d~~8~f7 W~9 ~RpR8:il (7
L8~.1:RYF A8~R888RRR99737x9a8ffiR8
~7B$AA7RRRRAAWRR A:EF~RhB098~99
..«...e~esR:paEa:°.BaRNAPAARAAAA
M ~~
'I
:,:
i to lo. e5 ut• /' h' ~«; roti I ~ 0y- .e ~ M
1.
5q 60 b. „y •' Ob 4l bb a0
.. ' ~ ~ .: ~ g_IroM _ 9~ep:o 45 / .~Q i 6~rou~ ~ '{cxV'.^e rxmoe
+ lajw f h' _ I _ po
.. ~ ~ "io- - la= )i-t' $o• ~ '°'~ 5 v 1o-15Fb~i T8, / ~1"~
:. _y,-h1- Q•lou. ~c,. .or ~°e'^~~QSo. A 10. 1,
p /1
- _ 10 P,J. 01 BL 0 ~ 1 r'V ~ p. ~ i v' 9} .i~^r N.aooC I
~o ~
1,ieo4 .' 9,tmT $ 16iyo+~ '`~. ~,`/ Sti.. ' .4,woV u '~.
... _-_ 0A to. m ly
moo; l0 5; `~ 85• Qv\ t ~''-`_t' l5 ~
_ _ _ 5u So \ lti hl ` fl, ~~ °~' 'I.i,oeaP ~ ~i
_ _ _ CIF 111>ao'} q~5ob .`°~ 0'1 ~e. it lx
-- - lyrox.a ie. o' 11. J 6. ti L.loo •P ~ ~
- -' - 0 9i: ,+'~y e• ~ B~wo4 N Nnwo * ~ ~~ ^~r IY:j`1 ~ ~
r° 6 be
Y IaSw4 F 9•}0. G 15 '~' -' 100.,4 1 ~_ O•
4 I _ .~ 14u .~'~ I ,
. ~.' ~ '. . qs )!• lo'- le• ~M'' vi a r° ', B.bJJ r° i
"\-' to' -, 95 .1y ~•R - 9l 8 90 e ! 1~ ' h
' ~ . I f5.. '\eoo4 , .bbd} ' B,•IcoP aP'0Q 4moP ` ~ - n e_,4ma ~
' r ./ ~ PP lao 3, gg9o+ v 3 : 4,MC6'm IO~OIf `I .
~)AgKgv11 :JiH P•Y. ~ i ~ )gp/wp .,o' ~ ~
Its tA'I•~e ~_ --t 141 2\ A
01x1 ' Id.^.~ ~ ' '~ ~iC 4~eo '\r~'.. 'q^oo d• \1 ~ ,
' I ~~ ` IoL ~ 111 L' IrS 114 _ IIS :a 1
emu, , la ae+. u,~w ._. taew+ ~ elewa ~ ~.~„~ \S ~5 ~? 1.
I • /~ S g ~ - - ~ - - _
~~ ~\~° a
/ ~ _ _
a. \ S 415' ~ ' It\MwF 1
8 ,ice v // Ilo :.. un F,So' _
a+o
` Ie9 Wlo °I )oOp p . Ib.ooo'+ 1. _ __ ,.e•e.-____
o Ile, ^ e p1,~oQ e°~ ~ y SY ''~ a , 5 ~ l 'S. Ati.". , 1c
104 ~ L i \ I ,~. `~~ wa..o4 to
td `~' ,\
~- 17 ~ / ! ~ I, - - ;~ 110 3 I'9 `[~:.
~.
Icy .I I O. ii ~.8 ...._
~ 2.4m § «^. I?`t7o ~ 1 i'z / ' ~'. y _ - 110. ~ ~\ •.
1~ f'
lob ~ Se 9boo°
0 111°°'d,y Icl \-.p ----~~ ----..
~om0°
~ i~ ) L.ny. b• i
- 'LC HIYb. x:.1,5 ~i ;~ 1
5(000: ~K)I. J~.>I). •. I.rJ( 1'Fu•...J•~. 1' 1.. .~. :1 :.
E.cuq 1t9, 6. o... t..)
4b•1 1'I.
arl+Rrn)c, g~. ~ ~ ITEM ;, ts..
' n ~'
a ~~ ~,
~N i^+ •'•
.1
~ ry
\ i
'SEE .MAP IOBD ice"
~ 41CAONV.LN ~0. Ka
' u. CEV TR6. JAI ~E Y- ~ ~OR ~ F~
~'4j
T ~.
. .. -J ~••, `.i4 f ~ ~ III
~~....
• 15- ... ...... .....rcm.. ........ .. .. .....
~ • lid! ~ IM ~J '~.. ~I F- ~ ,~
YI ~~m .av`. 'a
'• 4169 AC w1` e
~~~, ~ Jackson Creek Estates a,l H II I
..
Io
and 2 ~
i. Units
to ' ~• ,-
I~ ~ N
' 3? 2 ` IOpB
~•
3
37 Z IA CA ~ ~:~
• i 2~ E Ley S.
r I,
y o
S.W.COR. lOT N
~ ~ ~~'~
' SNOWY BUTTE `~' ~"
~ - ORC NARCS ~ :'
t16 ..... ... .. .. .... .. N,
;., 1 s
i ~:, ~ ~__.. S.W.a:ORI
) I' • ;I LrT L
II 31C I i I.I
`I ~ i. I 1~ Xc ~ : ~
\~ •" ~ \ ~ R ~ ~' S I
~. ~ o
~ ~,~ .; ~, ~, I" SEE
w
~\, .•
~_1~~~~
N.W.COR. N.E. COR. I - N.W. COR
~ DLC 66 DLC 66 i DLC 65
Cfi-TZmv)
~ ~~ _
I \ /~
I i ~ 1~. I ~
-1 - _ - .
~1.0' I I~~ 80. 18 CN. GlO I +I 2oi5.94 Gl0'
I :5291.88) I 1,• I ~
~ ,: ~
,I
37~W15 A
1U"
ITEM
~oT~r ®~ ~E~T~AL P®o~T
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT'
DATE: April 25, 1990
PROJECT: Jackson Creek Estates Unit #3
LOCATION: T37S R2W WM Section 10 TL 3100
ZONE: R-1-8
NO. OF LOTS 39
NUMBER OF DWELLINGS 39 -One (1) per lot
SUBDIVIDER/OWNER Tom Malot Construction
P.O. Box 3847
Central Point, OR 97502 PH. 664-1258
SURVEYOR: Hoffbuhr and Associates
219 N. Oakdale
Medford, OR 97504 PH. 779-4641
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Residential Subdivision
TYPE OF LAND USE ACTIN: Tentative Plat
/. TENTATIVE PLAT REQU/REMENTS: lTit/e J6.24)
(Check One)
Meets Not Does Not
Title Description Standard Acalicable Meet Standard
76.24.010 Filing Fee X -
18.24.020 Scale X - -
18.24.030 General Conditions
a. Name of Subdivision X
b. Date North Arrow Scale X
a Legal location of
subdivision X
d. Names/Address of owner - -
engineers X'-
16.24.040 Existing Conditions
a. Location of street
widths and
easements, eta X
b. Topographic dnfo X
c. Bench mark established X
d. Location and direction
of all water courses X
1.
Conditlons
(7)
~ ~~~
}
(Check One)
t~Aeets Not ~ Does Not
Title Description Standards Applicable Meet Standard
e. Natural features rack out-
croppings, marshes,
wooded areas. ~ X
f. Existing uses of the land X
g. Location of all existing
streets and utilities X
h. Zoning on and adjacent to
tract is compatible X
16.24.050 Proposed Plan
a. Street location, end the
lanes, grades, radius of
curves, relationship to
other existing or proposed
streets and other
utlllges. X
b. Easements-
widthe/Purposes ~. X
c. Lot Dimension X
16.24.060 Partial Development
Is other property adjacent to
this property being considered
in the design. This property can
be owned by the subdivider. Sae Master Plan
16.24.070 Explanatory Information
a. Vicinity maps to explain
'relationship to existing -
sveeta can require
correction to existing -
street. X
b. Proposed Deed Restrictions N eed a list
o. Center lane profile of ...
streets to show grade
(100' beyond street) Provide information on final construction drawings
d. Approximate location end
proposed size of utilities X See Master Plan
16.32.020 Requirements Generally X
2
CondiSons
(2)
(3)
(11
(4) - ,
106
ll. Subdivision Layout
(Check One)
Meets Not Does Not
Title Description Standard Applicable Maet Standard Conditions
76.16.010 Blocks Length X
Width R-1-8 X
Shape X
Not greater 1200' X
16.16.020 Blocks Sizes X
16.16.030 Blceka Easements
a. Utilities X l11
b. Water Courses X
c. Pedestrian Ways X
16.16.040 Lots -Shapes & Size X (4)
16.78.050 Lots•Size & Determination
(Lot length greater than 2 1/2
times width prohibited) X
16.16.060 Through lots X
16.76.070 Lot sldelinea X
16.16.080
I Large Lot Subdivisions X
/ll. Street improvements
A. Existing Conditions
f. Connecting Street
Street No. - LS 93 Vincent Avenue, local street, city jurisdiction, Existing R.O. W.- 50 FL, Future
R.O.W. - 50 Ft. Existing pavement width - 36 ft., Future street width -'36 ft., Existing curbs and
gutters, existing sidewalks
traffic volume street can carry 1000 vehicle trips/day
existing traffic volume - 250 vehicle trips/day
traffic from this project - 390 vehicle trips/day
Iota/ traffic including this project 630 vehicle trips/day
B. Street Standards 16.12.010
(Check Onel
Meets Not Does Not
Title Description Standards Applicable Meet Standard. Conditions
16.12.040 Street Generally
a. Location X
b. Width X
c. Grade X ~ !4)
d. Relationship to
existing street X
3
107
Meets Not Does Not
l
Ti Description Standards Applicable Meet Standard
e
t
e. Topo0raphy as
it relates to
drainage X
f. Provide for street
construction X
g. Follows a Master
Plan X
h. Traffic volume X
i. Safety Features X
16.12.050 Street R.O.W. & Widths
Local ROW 50'
S[reet Width 36' X
16.12.060 Street Reserve Strip X
16.12-070 Street -Alignment X
16.12.080 Street -Extension X
16.12.090 Street-Interaectian
Angles 90° X
16.12.100 Existing Streets
Additional Width X
16.12.110 Haif Street X
16.72.120 Cul-de•Sac and/or
dead end streets
e. Shell not serve more
then 121ota X
b. Shell not be greeter
then 400' X
18.12.130 Street Names X
18.12.140 Street Grades and Curves
- MA SACS not greater
than 8% X
- Not greater then 12°~6 X'
on1S
-Cannot be leas than .5% X
- Shall have at minimum
100' curve radius. X
lV. Water System
A. Existing Conditions
An 8" Water Main Exists on W. Pine with an 8" water main
on Blandon Street and Vin cent Street
B. Water System Standards
Meets Not Does Not
Title Description Standards Applicable ~ Meet Standard
16.32.060 Water System -
Provided Mains X
Service Laterals
1 each lot X
Firs Hydrants -
not greater than
500 ft. apart X
Fire Fiow 1000 gpm
provide minimum
pressure 40 psi X
4
Conditions
(5)
(31
(3)
(3)
Condition
(it)
~n~
V. Sanitary Sewers
A. Existing Conditions
2. An 8"sanitary sewer is stubbed from the manho% at the intersection of Jackson Creek Drive and
Brandon Street and at the end of Vincent Street.
B. Sanitary Sewer System Standards :
Meets Not Does Not
Title Deacriotion Standard Aoolicable Meet Standards Conditions
18.32.050 Adequate Sizing X
Mainline X
Services X 161
Vl. Storm Drainage
A. Existing Conditions
! An f8" storm sewer is located for this portion of the Jackson Creek Development. The storm sewer
was installed as a part of Jackson Creek Estates, Unit. # f
B. Storm Drainage Standards
Meets Not Doea Not
Title Deaicnation Standard Aoollcable Meet Standard Condition
18.32.040 Surface Drainage
end Storm Sewer System
-Provide drainage through
the aubdivlsion X (5)
• Are there adverse effeots
placed on down-stream'
etmotures7 X (14)
- No catch basin located
greeter then 350 ft. for
any curb and gutter
section. X
if, 115)
JCKSN.NEW i
5
~.0 g
~~~~~®~a ~r~~~~ ~~T~~~~ a~u~oT u~®. ~, r~~~~~ o
1. Provide the easement information for the Storm Drainage System between Lot
80 and 81. Also show the Sanitary Sewer Easement required to service this
Development.
2. The Developer shall provide information from the Division of State Lands that
this Development does not impact designated Wetlands within the proposed
Development.
3. Place a note on the Tentative Plat, that street grade shall not exceed 6% nor
be less than .5%. Radius of curves on residential streets shall exceed 100 ft.
4. Lot 86 and 87 need a minimum of 60' street frontage.. Only cut-de-sacs can
have street frontage less than 60'.
5. All roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces shall have positive drainage away
from the structure, and shall be connected to a curb drain or an approved storm
sewer. Provide topographical information to determine that all lots will drain and
all streets will drain.
6. Provide a Plan Profile on the Construction Drawings that gives proper cover and
fall for all sanitary sewer services.
7. Street name signs including posts, labor and equipment for installation of street
signs shall be paid for by the Developer of this Subdivision, and the installation
shall be completed by the City.
8. A Traffic Control Signing Plan shall be included as part of the final construction
plans, and will be installed by the City and all costs associated with traffic
control sign installation shall be paid for by the Developer.
9. A soils engineer must evaluate the strength of the soil (R-value) to determine
the street section design. The City's Engineer shall be used, and the developer
shall pay for the costs of these services. A design life for Vincent Street in the
subdivision with a minimum 20 year life, given a daily traffic volume not to
exceed 1000 vehicle trips per day and 2% truck traffic shall be used. All other
streets shall be designed fora 20 year life, a daily traffic volume of 1000
vehicle trips per day and 2% truck traffic.
~1~
Jackson Creek 3, Phase I -Conditions
April 30, 1991 -Page Two
10. A Street lighting Plan shall be included in the construction documents
according to the requirements of PP&L. Ail intersections shall be illuminated.
Street lights shall be located no greater than every 200 feet. Developer is to
install ail pads and conduits for street lights as a part of the construction of this
subdivision. The Developer shall also pay for street lights and for the
installation of all street lights in this subdivision.
11. The Developer shall construct a valve aYthe end of the street in this phase for
the future connection of the next phase of this development.
12. Ladder rungs shall be installed, in each sanitary sewer manhole of a depth
greater than 3.0 feet to the flovv line of the manhole. Developer shall use
ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works Department.
13. There is a small seasonal stream which flows through this property at its
northern property line. Developer shall construct a storm drainage system
which collects the flow from this subdivision and carries it through this
subdivision in such a manner as to not cause flooding of any lot in the drainage
.area of this seasonal stream.
14. According to the. Master Plah for Jackson Creek Estates, a 15" storm pipe
would cross between Lot 80 and 81. The storm sewer will cross lots 80 and
81 and discharge directly to Griffin Creek.
15. Catchbasins must be located no greater than 350' feet for any section of curb
and gutter.
16. Developer shall design the storm drainage system to provide for discharge of
properties in future phases or within the drainage service area of this
subdivision's storm drainage system. The developer shall follow the Storm
Drainage Plan done as a part of the Stonecreek Subdivision No. I, Master Plan,
a copy of which may be obtained at the Public Works Department in Central
Point City Hall.
17. As originally approved iri Jackson Creek Estates Unit #1, the Developer shall
provide park land in lieu of paying S200.00 per tot development fee for property
located along Griffin Creek as a part of the Park Master Plan. This property is
to be dedicated as the requirements set forth in Title 16.20. Total park land
to be transferred to the City free and clear of taxes and/or liens is 4.67 acres.
~i~
Jackson Creek 3, Phase I -Conditions
April 30, 1991 -Page Three
18. The Developer shall install or cause to be installed conduits for utilities at
intersections or locations determined by utility companies who will not install
their services until after the subdivision is constructed. The Developer shall be
responsible for all costs associated -with the installation of these conduit
crossing.
19. All construction for utilities, streets and other structures discussed herein in
rights of way owned or to be owned by the City of Central Point, shall be done
according to all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions, and other applicable
requirements of the City of Central Point for construction of this Subdivision.
20. The Final Plat for this Subdivision. shall not be approved by the City Council
until all conditions as herein stipulated and as approved for this Subdivision
have been met, unless adequate provisions have been made according to
C.P.M.C. 16.28.070 and 16.28.080.
21. The review for this Tentative Plat submitted herein by Tom Malot Construction
was-done in accordance with the rules, regulations, and ordinances in effect as
of the date of this review. Any modifications by the Developer which require
further conditions to meet standards set forth in the City of Central Point
Municipal Code or would intensify the use of the. property beyond the standards
set forth herein, shall require resubmittal of the Tentative Plaf to the Planning
Commission.
22. The Developer must remove the 1 ft. reserve strip from Unit No. 2 on Vincent
Avenue.
23. A 25' clear vision area at all intersections shall be noted on the Tentative Plat
and provided as a part of the Subdivision Construction Plans.
24. Driveway accesses at street intersections shall be placed at the furthest point
on the lot away from the intersections.
25. No construction will begin on this project until such time as plans and
specifications have been reviewed and. approved, and a Public Works Permit is
.issued.
cc: 02-014
PW 90015
- 112
ITEM
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY
SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR JACKSON CREEK ESTATES UNIT N0. 3, PHASE I
WHEREAS, Tom Malot has submitted a preliminary plat for Jackson Creek
Estates Unit No. 3, Phase I, a subdivision located in the southwest quadrant of
the city where Vincent Avenue is proposed to extend easterly ahd southeasterly,
further described as Jackson County Assessors map 37 2W 10 Tax Lot 3100, and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point held a public
meeting upon said application for review of the preliminary plat on May 7, 1991,
pursuant to Central Point Municipal Code Section 1.24.020C, and having at said
public meeting received and reviewed the City staff report and testimony, and
being fully advised, now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMIMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon the staff report evidence, and record relating to
said application, the Planning Commission hereby finds that said application
meets the requirements for preliminary plat applications, that said preliminary
plat as proposed is in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and zoning
code, and if the conditions set forth hereinafter are met, said application meets
the City's requirements for subdivision layout, park dedication, street
standards, water system standards, sanitary sewer standards, and storm drainage
standards.
Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council
approval of the preliminary plat submitted by Tom Malot, for Jackson Creek
Estates Subdivision Unit No. 3, Phase I, subject to the conditions set. forth in
Exhibit A, attached hereto, and by this reference expressly made a part of the
within resolution.
RESOLUTION N0.
PREPLAT.JCE/RESO
113
}
Passed by the Planning Commission on 1991 and signed
by me in authentication of its passage this day of 1991.
Planning Commission Chairman
ATTEST:
Planning Conmiission Secretary
J~pproved by, me this day of 1991.
Planning Commission Chairman
RESOLUTION N0. PREPLAT.JCE/RESO
114 x
,~
i
M O C K
STAFF REPORT
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant ~~
DATE: April 25, 1991
TOPIC: Mock Public Meeting: Site Plan Review of Industrial Park and Quality
Fence Project, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 1000,
1100, 1200 and 1300, 37 2W (Mock Applicant: Gordon Hancock of Tri-
Arch, Inc.)
SUMMARY
Upon request by Crater High School, Planning and Public Works Staff has been
working with a group of Drafting students to help simulate a site plan review
process, thus giving the students a learning experience which approximates the
real world. Students Gorden Hancock, Jason Jenkinson and Luke Cuttbirth have
prepared a Mock Site Plan of an industrial park development located in the M-1
zone generally west of the railroad tracks east of Haskell, south of Taylor and
north of West Pine.
The Commission is scheduled to conduct a public meeting, receive the staff
report, take testimony and decide on the proposed site plan, all in mock fashion.
ASSUMPTION
To facilitate the review of this Mock Site Plan, Staff has made the assumption
that:
1. Streets and alleys existing on the property in question did not have
utilities and would not be needed to service the current or future
transportation needs of the motoring public. Therefore, all existing
streets and alleys were previously vacated by the Central Point City
Council.
f
115
i
8. Condition: Off-Street parking facilities shall comply with all
applicable design requirements in Section 17.64.100, a copy of which
is attached to this report. Head in parking shall be changed to
slant in parking on Amy Street to accommodate one way traffic.
MOCK ATTACHMENTS
Item A - Parking design standards (Ordinance No. 1512)
Item B - Vicinity Map
Item C - Certificate of Posting for Public Meeting Notice
Item D - Maps: Tax Assessor, Aerial
Item E - Public Works Staff Review dated April 29, 1991
Item F - Site Plan and application form
116
°.
~:~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW
The Site Plan application was reviewed by the Planning Department for compliance
with Chapters 17.48 (M-1 Industrial Zone), 17.00 (General Regulations), 17.64
(Off Street Parking and Loadinq), and 17.72 (Site Plan, Landscaping and
Construction Plan approval).
1. The Site Plan provides for permitted uses (warehouse, general repair
shops, quality fence, industrial something) and therefore, meets the
general purpose (light industrial zone) of the M-1 zone.
Condition: Developer shall select tenants in accordance with CPMC
17.48.020 permitted uses or CPMC 17.48.040 for any land uses deemed
to be'conditional uses.
2. Condition: CPMC 17.48.030 - All raw materials finished products,
machinery and equipment with the exception of automobiles and trucks
normally used in the business, shall be stored within an entirely
enclosed building or sight-obscuring fence (minimum six feet in
height).
3. Proposed .site plan conforms with landscaping requirements in CPMC
17.48.030.
4. Condition: Structural elevations were not provided in this site
plan. All buildings or structures shall not exceed a height of 60
feet as per CPMC 17.48.050.
5. Yard requirements are consistent with 17.48.070 and 17.60.090.
6. Condition: As per 17.64.020, 29,070 square foot shop building in
center of the development shall require a minimum 10 x35 ft landing
berth with a minimum height clearance of 12 feet.
7. Condition: Development is short 113 9 x20 off-street parking spaces.
Buildings need to be scaled down to provide for the required number
of parking spaces.
a. Warehouse 47,130 square feet calculated on standard 17.64.040
I-2 one space per 1000 square feet.
b. Shops 29,070 square feet calculated on standard 17.64.040 G-
5 one space per 300 square feet of gross floor area.
c. Quality Fence - 21 spaces.
d. Industrial something 11,820 square feet calculated on standard
17.64.040 I-1 - one space per 500 square feet or gross floor
area
~i
PARKING STANDARDS
Orci^.2nce ijt2
N P S A C
P.NGLE OF WIDTH OF CU?2B
PARKING "PARKING DEPTH WIDTH LENGTH
SPACE SECTION OF STALL OF AISLE PER CAR
(Degrees) (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) (Feet)
p 32~_p~~ 9~_p.. 14' 22'-0"
30 99'-7" 17'-10" 14' 18'-2"
35 51'-8" 16'-10" 14' 15'-8"
40 53'-4'' 19'-8" 14' 14'-1"
45 55'-2" 20'-7" 14' 12'-8"
50 60'-2" 21'-1" 18' * 11'-8"
55 61'-2" 21'-7" 18' * 10'-11"
60 61'-8" 21'-10" 18' * 10'-5"
65 66'-0" 22'-0" 22' * 9'-11"
70 65'-10" 21'-11" 22' * 9;'-7"
75 65'-4" 21'-8" 22' * 9'-4"
80 68'-8" 21`-4" 26' * 9'-1"
85 -67'-10" 20'-11" 26'.* 9'-0"
90 66'-0" 20'-0" 26' * 9'-0"
* Width of aisle permits two-way circulation
only when a turn-around is provided.
* Width of aisle permits two-way circulation.
EXAMPLES
I- rs'
I` ~: .
~i i ~ ~o..
t~
y;
.-~,.o.-. ~.~- ,.
F ~,~ ..
Or~_~ance `~:c. 1512 - 2 r ~ ~ O
~~l
..,~-- ~:
~:
c
4. Any lighting u<_ed to illuminate off-street parking
or loading areas shall be so arranged as to reflect tl~e light awa}•
from adjacent streets or properties.
5. Service drives shall have~a minimum vision clear-
ance area formed by the intersection of the driveway centerline, the
street right-of-way line, and a straight line joining said lines
through points twent}• feet from their intersection.
6. Parking spaces located along the outer boundaries
of a parking lot shall be contained by a curb or a bumper rail so
placed to prevent a motor vehicle from e_<tending over an adjacent
property line, a public street,. public sidewalk, or a required
landscaping area.
7. Parking, loading or vehicle maneuvering areas
shall not be located within the front yard area or side yard area
of a corner lot abutting a street in any residential (R) district,
nor within any portion of a street setback area that is required
to be landscaped in any commercial (C) or industrial (PI) district.
F. Limitation on Use of Parking Areas.. Required
parking areas. shall be used exclusively for vehicle parking in
conjunction with a permitted use and shall nob be reduced or en-
croached upon in any manner. The parking facilities ehall be so
designed and maintained as not to constitute a nuisance at any
time, and shall be used in such a manner that no hazard to persons
or property or reasonable impediment to traffic will result.
Passed by the Council. and signed by me in .authentication
of its passage this 17th day of May 1984.
_.- /C~f
., r ~;.~:,~ ,,
c Mayor , ~~
'~ -
ATTEST; ~ e
J ~~_
a' • ,
City Representative
Approved by me this 18th day of itav 1984.
~_ i_ •~
~ -
~._ /~
-=,
Mayor
,, _~
,. ._-nanoa ~Jo. .ill' _ ~.
.i~
121
~1i ~ ITEM
r
122
t;
ITEM
CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Sandy Berryhill CERTIFY THAT ON THE
FOLLOWING DATE OF Wednesday,-May 1, 1991 , I POSTED A NOTICE
FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON .May-7, + 1941, DURING'WHICH THE
CENTRAL POINT. .PLANNING COMMISSION WILL"REVIEW A MOCK SITE PLAN FOR
INDUSTRIAL PARK PROJECT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WEST PINE BETWEEN
HASKELL AND AMY STREETS
AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE
2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY
3. CENTRAL POINT CITY'FIRE STATION
4. CITY HALL BULLETIN .BOARD
~~~ ~~~
ATURE
-~- ~~
DATE
i~
123
155 SO. SECOND ST
C
664-3321
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
___ _
'75. R2 W ~I ~. ~.'•'<~a.~.Ff~"i~~~~ G~ `-seaO e~ - T~h1
J S~ i0 ~i,
r p''0g -
7727-77{nT777777771777:i TfT7~~1.•: ~1~~r \
AI/TS. - CENTRAL PO/NT ~ 37 ZW LOAB
K.6e `
900 37 2W 300
~:..
~~ _ 9~' _ yoo '
tE~PQRT~~~`
IS MAP FOR ASSESSfr~.
TAXATION PURPOSI
ONLY
---~~.
7
~~ , :, ~.
~~ ~~
S y
• T
~l ~ 9-~
°-
~CKS /,3,s,5, 9 6
,ae~ucHS woo.
J
m a~ a say'' , . ~ ~~
~~ ylrt) ~~ ~ Cl 6~ ..
~ ,~ J
~ ~ ~~~~`'
~~ ~,. ~ s~
y6
.l
1~ <,
..,
00.
<~
~~~
,_
_ '~
Y ~~
~~.
.~
.a
a,
n
` N
M
,., 124
n
1
~^.
4
:~
\a
~~\\\~
~\\
~~
\~~~~
-~ ' ~
1,,.
r ,
` .
____--
CURB _.
~ ppRKING
oC.e.
1272.7/
X
~ 4~ ~
. \11~//~\ 1273.0 \\ \
U \ \
-- ~ X1273.2 \\
,~
l~~
t~
> ~-
PAVED
iKING~
R. ~ 1271.z f,
x
.?
% 1270.6
~r
%~ ~~
D~~ ~d
y
~ o,,,~
J \ \ RPMP \
1 /~
~ ~ OM (~
YV)
1272.8
X
M.HO
0
/+
~ ~~~
~~. _~
~~,
~ ~~ o
Q \\~ <
~'r
~. i
1271.3
TS.
~ <
4
~ s
0
\ ~ G~'YF.
~ ~ ~~
~~ ,
~ k
~~\\/ 1274.3 ~ ~~\~
:~_.O \ \M.N.
Q ~ x
x
1\
~~ ~.~+ ~ ~
~,~,
/~ 5.0
//
ppRKING
99
~-~
TS.
I \
\+\
ITEM ~ ---'~
:,
DATE.•
PROJECT.•
PROJECT OWNER:
REPRESENTAT/VE.•
ARCH/TECT.•
LOCAT/ON:
ZONE:
TYPE OF LAND
M O C K
C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Apri/ 29, 1991
%ndustria/ Park
Tri Arch /nc.
4410 N. Rogue Va//ey 8/vd.
Central Point, OR 97502
Gordon Hancock
Tri Arch /nc.
T37S R2W Section 10AB, Tax Lots 100, 200, .300
400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300,, 2900
M-1
USE ACT/ON; S/TE PLAN REV/EW
APPL/CABLECODES; 15.40 Pub/ic Works Standards
17.72 Site P/an Review
ASSUMPTIONS:
1. W. Manzanita Street has been vacated and all required utilities have been
relocated.
2. A complete Traffic Analysis was completed on Haskell Street, W. Pine Street
and Manzanita Street. The Traffic Engineer determined that W. Manzanita
Street should not be constructed across the railroad tracks to provide for a
second crossing.
3. Amy Street has been built to a City Standard 50' right of way, and street width
36' curb to curb.
4. West Pine Streef and Haskell Street have already been improved to the required
right,of way width and street width.
126 ~~
Mock Staff Report
April 29, 1991 -Page 2
5. Amy Street is a right turn in/right turn out only, a median curb has been
installed on W. Pine Street to restrict turning movement from Amy and W. Pine
Street.
6. Haskell Street has been improved to a secondary arterial standard with a
median curb 250 north of W. Pine Street.
7. All traffic control signing, striping etc, has been installed.
8. Bike paths have already been installed.
9. 1/isiori cleararice has been maintained at the intersection of Amy/West Pine,
Haskell/W. Pine, and Haskell/Taylor.
10. Sanitary sevver connections have been provided for each building.
STREET /MPROVEMENTS:
A. Existing Cohditions
1. Street No.-MA 3, Street Name-W. Pine Street, Street Classification-
Major Arterial, Street Jurisdiction-City of Central Point, .Existing Right of
Way-60', Future Right of Way-88', Existing Street Width-46' to 50',
Future Street Width-66', 5 lanes, Curbs and Gutters-Existing, Future
Curbs and Gutters-to be moved 8' to 10' toward the property on each
side of W. Pine Street, Existing Sidewalks-None, Future Sidewalks-5'
curbside required, Street Lights-Existing at Railroad Crossing, Southwest
side, Future Street Lights-22,000 HPSV at intersections and_not less
than 350', Existing Traffic Volume-11,000 VT/D+, Future Traffic
Volume 20,000 VT/D, Existing Traffic Control-Pine Street and Highway
99 (Front Street), Future Traffic Control-Pixie Street and Haskell Street.
2. Street No.-SA 12, Street Name-Haskell Street, Street Classification-
Secondary Aerial, Street Jurisdiction-Jackson County, Existing Right of
Way,,-60', Future .Right of Way-arterial' @ intersection with West Pine
Street, Existing Street Width-24', Future Street Width-56' at West Pine
St[eet,100' North, 48' from 100' North to Taylor Road, Existing Curbs
and Gutters-None, Future Curbs and Gutters-Required. Existing
Sidewalks-None, Future Sidewalks-Required 5' curbside, Street Lighting-
Existing at E. Pine Street, Future Street' Lights-9500 HPSV at inter-
section and spaced not more than every 200', Existing Traffic Volume-
1500 VT/D, Future Traffic Volume-7500 VT/D, Existing Traffic Control-
None, Future Traffic Control-Signal at Haskell and West Pine Street.
X27
Mock Staff Report
April 29, 1991 -Page 3
B. Developer's Required Conditions
1: Ingress/Egress
a. W. Pine Street -Right Turn in/Right Turn Out only. Solid
median curb has been installed on either side of the
driveway to prevent left hand turns from and to W. Pine
Street.
b. Haskell Street -Full service driveway can be installed on
Haskell Street.
c. Create a Tee intersection. design at Haskell Street and
Taylor Road to provide adequate traffic control according to
MUTCD.
2. Street Lighting shall be installed at all ingress/egress locations. }
Street lights shall be 9500 lumen, high pressure sodium vapor,
...mounted on aluminum poles.
3. The Parking areas shall' be surfaced with asphaltic concrete
designed to carry the maximum loads to the development.
4. Developer .shall complete the application for sewer use to
determine if an industrial waste discharge permit is required. If
required a permitshall be submitted by the developer to The
Regional Rate Committee.
5. Developer shall submit. a complete plumbing. plan so a
determination can be made on the amount for the Regional
Systems Development Charge and whether a backflovv device is
required on the meters.
6. Separate water meters can be installed for each building based on
the. size stipulated by the developer's engineer. Large size meters
3" or above, require a vault and a remote reader for the meter.
The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with
these installations.
128
~'~
Mock Staff Report
April 29, 1991 -Page 4
7. The developer shall complete a storm drainage system analysis for
the development, and design or cause to be design; a system
which carries the storm waterrunoff from this site, and properties
upstream fora 26 year storm 1" per hour intensity. Determine
the maximum duration impact. -
8. Maneuvering of trucks -for loading and unloading shall not be
allowed within the City's Right of Ways.'Developer is to provide
a detail on final construction plans and specifications which show
the maneuvering pattern for loading and unloading.
9. Developer shall install or cause to be installed, conduits for utilities
at intersections, or locations determined by utility companies.
Developer shall also provide conduit crossings for utility
companies who will not install their services until after the facility
is constructed. The developer shall be responsible for all costs
associated with the installation of these conduit crossings.
10. All construction for utilities, streets and other structures discussed
herein within rights of ways owned, or to be owned by the City
of Central Point, shall be done so according to all rules,
regulations, ordinances, resolutions, and other applicable
requirements of the City of Central Point for construction of this
development.
11. The review for this Site Plan Review submitted by Tri Arch, Inc.
was done so in accordance with the rules, regulations and
ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any
modifications by the developer of this development after City
Planning Commission and/or City Council approvals could require
resubmittal of an application and approval by the City Planning
Commission and/or City Council.
12. All costs associated with this- development shall be the sole
responsibility of the applicant or owner.
13. All roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces shall have positive
drainage away from the structure, and shall be connected to a
curb drain or an approved storm sewer. Developer shall provide
the building's finished floor and property topographical elevations
to determine that all structures will drain properly.
129
;l
Mock Staff Report
April 29, 1991 -Page 5
14. The Developer shall provide information from the Division of State
Lands that the development does. not impact any wetlands.
15. No construction will begin on this project or any building in this
development until such time as plans and specifications have been
reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, and a
. construction permit has been issued for each portion of the project
:requiring a permit.
MOCKSTFF.RPT
cc: 02-014
13p
ITEM r'
Application Filing Deadline
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
MOCK
Application for Site Plan Approval
Name / n; Arm ~ ZnG. CC'~ -- -- - ------
Address ~~ ~Q ~eC f ~ ~ac, t:c /Ywy.
~~/ i
Phone Number (z~ J ~~~
Proposed Site Location
Address ~~ / ~tS _I f ; n c J~•
Assessor's Map Page Location Tax Lot(s)
Reouired Information:
A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot
and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's
Office
~ Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the
site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli-
ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal
Code Section 17.72.030.
Name of
Address y~~~0 ~,(ol`~'~ ~ ac: t ~c ~v
// // i
Phone Number 6 (, y - /, b
I, (J~f~eiJ H-ar,coc~ certify that I am the owner or
authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach
written authority)
~Y'~- ~~~ ~.--~L..~ Date /'~~ 4 / 1
(Signature of owner or authorized agent of owner, please indicate which)
Application Fee: $0
* A filing fee for recording a Deferred Improvement Agreement with the County
Clerk may also be required
LUAP/ADMINl
21