HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - April 2, 1991
Next Resolution No. 217
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
April 2, 1991
ETING CALLED TO ORDER
Call - Garth Ellard - Rick Bettenburg, Jack Crumm, Dick Halley,
lyne:Hugo, Bob Matthews, and Chuck Piland
~ROVAL OF MINUTES
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 5, 1991
"`Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit for placement of mobile home
at`-707 Pittview (Applicant: Bernice Boring)
C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
P/arming Commission Meeting Minutes
March 5, 1991
Page One
/. MEET/NG CALLED TO ORDER - 7:00 p.m.
//. ROLL CALL
DRAFT
Those present were Garth Ellard, Rick Bettenburg, Dick Halley, Bob Matthews
and Chuck Piland. Also present were George Rubaloff, City Administrative
Assistant, Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director and Cecelia Gordon,
Secretary. Karolyne Hugo and Jack Crumm had each phoned in and asked to
be excused from tonight's meeting in order to attend other business matters.
///. APPROVAL OF M/NOTES
Commissioner Halley moved to approve the February 5, 1991 Planning
Commission Meeting Minutes and the Motion was seconded by Commissioner
Bettenburg. Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg, yes; Halley, yes; Matthews, yes;
Piland, yes; and the Motion carried unanimously. ,
/V. CORRESPONDENCE
George Rubaloff read into the record, Calvin Martin's letter dated February 20,
1991 Mr. Martin requested an extension of time on the West Park Place
development.
V. BUS/NESS
A. Pub/ic Meeting -Review of Development P/an -Street Master P/an for area
known as Meadow CreekDrainage Basin in the Southeast Quadrantof The Citv
of Central Point.
City Administrative Assistant, George Rubaloff, read his March 1, 1991
Memorandum and entered it into the record by reference along with the
attachments of the Vicinity Map, Certificate of Posting and Mailing and the
Public Works Staff Report dated February 28, 1991. Rubaloff also handed out
a copy of CPMC Ordinance 15.52, Chapter 15.16 defining the Planning
Commissions role in establishing Development Plans. At this point, Public
Works Director Larry Blanchard placed a transparency of the Street Master Plan
for the Meadow Creek area on the overhead projector and explained to the
public the definition of a Master Plan.
~1
C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
P/anniny Commission Meetins Minutes
March 5, 1991
Page Two
~+~aa~
The Commission asked Larry Blanchard if running streets through the middle of
property would cause any undesirable conditions such as sub lots or flag lots,
and if so, would the City be willing to purchase these pieces of property: Larry
Blanchard stated that sometimes land is divided by roads, but that this Master
Plan was just an engineering framework to show where the best topographical
areas for streets would be. George Rubaloff commented that every entity such
as the City of Central Point needs to have Master Plans for streets in order to
avoid uncontrolled placing of streets, etc.
Garth Ellard, Commission Chairperson, stated that at this point, the suggested
layout for streets in this Master Plan were not written "in stone", that this was
merely a proposed plan at this point, and opened the Public Meeting.
The persons that came forward, their addresses and concerns are as follows:
Ron McAvin, son of Geneva Hitt, 3458 Bursell Road, Central Point, expressed
opposition to any development of new streets, as he felt there were too many
streets in the area already. He also expressed his opposition to the Storm
Drainage LID and the Sanitary Sewer LID.
Michael Sowell, 3363 Marilee, expressed his opposition to any new
development, and asked if the majority of acreage vote would outweigh the
majority of property owners vote in whether or not to develop the proposed
Meadow Creek LIDS. Larry Blanchard explained that this was a time to discuss
the Street Master Plan and that there would be a time set aside to discuss the
other concerns, and that the Planning Commission would make
recommendations based on the consensus of the majority of property owned,
but that the City Council would make their determination based on their
decision as to the best interest of the City, and that the Commission could not
second guess what the Council would do.
Charles Olson, 3358 Bursell, expressed his opposition to the development of
any additional cul-de-sacs or enclosed circles in the Meadow Creek Drainage
Area, as he had already lost value on two lots from cul-de-sac design and
would lose availability to other property he owned if the Street Master Plan
were to be developed as shown. He also expressed opposition to paying for
development of the two proposed LIDS.
~~
C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
P/arming Commission Meeting Minutes
March 5, 1991 -Page Three
:'' S 1 , :a
i , , „ ~"
i ~ (`
Robert Johnson, 654 Beall Lane (representing himself and new property owner,
Harold Thies) expressed his opposition to the street layout as shown on the
Master Plan, especially the cul-de-sacs and circles, and was also opposed to
paying for the development of the proposed storm drainage and sanitary sewer
LIDS.
Barbara Ritter, 794 Pittview, asked what the City planned to do with Pittview
Avenue, that it in poor condition now and traffic load would increase if the
street were improved. She also was concerned about why she should pay for
storm drainage that benefitted someone else who was profiting by new
development in that area.
Mitchell Hull, 764 Pittview, expressed his concerns about the storm drainage
and sanitary sewer development in that area. Larry Blanchard explained that
good planning looks at all the needs, and explained the planning process once
more and that the decision on the drainage issue would be up to the City
Council.
Di Grensky, 910 Beall Lane, expressed her opposition to paying for any new
development in that area. She also was concerned about whether new
development would disturb wetlands, if any of the land were determined to be
wetlands. Larry Blanchard said that he had invited one of the representatives
from the Oregon Division of State Lands to come on-site and make a wetland
determination. He asked Mrs. Grensky if she would like to go with them that
day. Mrs. Grensky informed Mr. Blanchard that she is in close communication
with Steve from the State Division of Lands and that she would depend on him
to give her any news or information. Larry Blanchard explained that the correct
process is for the City to communicate with the Division of State Lands then
the State could notify the property owner.
George Rubaloff, City Administrative Assistant stated that in any Land Use
Application that the wetlands determination is part of the process.
Clifford Fuchs, 3476 Bursell, expressed his opposition to new development,
that he wished to keep open areas such as the Meadow Creek Drainage Area
is now, that he opposed increased traffic load and speed on improving existing
streets and developing new streets.
- V J
~.
C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
P/arming Commission Meeting Minutes
March 5, 1991 -Page Four
+-~;:
i„-:r__
' r t __ r'4%1
~ ~~ ~
Robert Blanton, Engineer, 130 W. 9th Street, Medford, Oregon, stated that
development should be organized and have a basic pattern for traffic. That a Street
Master Plan is the first step in this process.
Larry Blanchard told the property owners present that another Meeting would be
scheduled to continue the Street Master Plan, and that they would be notified by mail.
No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the Street Master Plan.
Garth Ellard thanked the participants and closed the Public Meeting.
The Commission voted by consensus that they would carry this item over into a future
Planning Commission Meeting. At 8:55 p.m. Chairperson Garth Ellard granted a 5
minute recess. The Meeting resumed at 9:00 p.m.
B., Pub/ic Meeting -Site P/an Review -for First Presbyterian Church Addition at 456
W. Pine /37 2W 106D TL 4100 and 37 2W 106A TL 700/ /App/icant.• E/der
and Trustees of the First Presbyterian Churchl.
George Rubaloff, City Administrative Assistant, entered into the record by reference,
his Memorandum of February 28, 1991, the Vicinity Maps, Certificate of Posting for
Public Meeting, Site Plan Application Materials, Tax Assessor Map, Aerial Map, and
the Public Works Department Site Plan Review dated February 27, 1991.
He also stated that Mark Servatius, Fire Chief/Building Official was ill and could not
be present tonight but wished to be consulted in the placement of the proposed fire
hydrant to be located on the property.
George Rubaloff also informed the Commission that the applicants had reviewed the
required conditions and had agreed to comply.
Garth Ellard, Chairperson, opened the Public Meeting.
Dwayne Brown, 671 Prairie Court, Central Point, Church Trustee and Jerry Hunter,
Architect, 839 E. Main, Medford, Oregon came forward in support of the proposed
Church Addition in the Site Plan Review. The Commission asked if they understood
the requirements for the Deferred Improvement Agreements. Mr. Hunter said that
they understood and were willing to meet these requirements. Garth Ellard,
Commission Chairperson, asked if there were any others that wished to come forward
in support of, or in opposition to the Site Plan Review. Being none, Ellard closed the
Public Meeting.
- U4
ii
C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT
P/arming Commission Meeting Minutes
March 5, 1991 -Page Five
DRAFT
George Rubaloff, City Administrative Assistant, informed the Commission that the
Plan submitted shows future additional building, and that the City would require an
additional Site Plan at that time.
Commissioner Piland moved that they approve the Site Plan for the First Presbyterian
Church Addition at 456 W. Pine (37 2W 106D TL 4100 and 37 2W 10BA TL 700).
Commissioner Matthews seconded the Motion. Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg, yes;
Halley, yes; Matthews, yes; and Piland, yes. The Motion carried unanimously.
V/. M/SCELLANEOUS
There were no miscellaneous items.
V//. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Halley moved that the meeting adjourn. Commissioner Bettenburg
seconded the Motion. The Motion was carried unanimously by voice vote. The
Meeting adjourned at 9:12 p.m.
-- U5
STAFF REPORT
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: George Rubaloff, dministrative Assistant
DATE: March 25, 1991
SUBJECT: Application for Conditional Use Permit for temporary mobile home
placement for infirm at 707 Pittview Avenue (37 2W 11D Tax Lot 400)
(Applicant: Bernice Boring)
SUMMARY
The conditional use permit application referenced above.'has been received,
processed and reviewed in accordance with the City's municipal codes. After
closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission can deliberate and then
decide to approve or deny the request, or if additional information is necessary,
carry the item forward to another meeting.
Racxaunnun
Section 17.20.30(f) of the Central Point Municipal Code provides £or the
temporary placement of mobile homes on single lots for the purpose of providing
full-time care for the infirm, subject to the issuance of a conditional use
permit. Applicant Bernice Boring has requested such a permit to facilitate the
care of her sister-in-law, Margaret Blanchard, who is totally disabled with
Alzheimer's Disease, and who is incapable of maintaining a residence on a
separate property. The use is proposed for a 1.5 acre property located in the
R-1-S zone at 707 Pittview in the southeast quadrant of the City. Public hearing
notices have been sent to property owners of record within a 100 foot radius of
the subject property. The City has not to date received any written continent
regarding the permit application.
ANALYSIS
The application has been reviewed by City staff in accordance with those
regulations outlined in Chapter 17.20, Section 17.60.055, Chapter 17.76, Titles
12,13, 14, and 15 of the Central Point Municipal Code, and the Public Works
standards. These guidelines include topics relating to setbacks, distance
between buildings, lot size, verification of need, mobile home skirting, size
of site, water and sewer hook-up, impact to abutting properties, general health
and safety of surrounding neighborhood, streets, sidewalks, storm sewer and
~- UG
building and construction. Contained within the commission's April 2, 1991
agenda packet, are written reviews from the Planning and Public Works
Departments. After completing its review, staff continues to recognize that a
serious technical storm drainage problem exists in the Meadow Creek drainage
area, and that it would be prudent to resolve the storm drainage problems in this
area prior to any further development.
PLANNING COMMISSION ALTERNATIVES
Alternative No. 1 - Deny request
Consequence:
For the time being, applicant would be unable to resolve individual hardship.
As another possible avenue to resolving the hardship, applicant could exercise
appeal rights. An appeal would consume more of the applicant, staff, commission
and Council's time and resources. Denial would be generally consistent with
City's position on previous land use applications in the Meadow Creek area, i.e.,
West Park Place, Maple Grove.
Alternative No. 2 - Postpone the decision. (Encourage applicant to extend the
• application determination timeframe)
Consequence:
If applicant agreed to seek extension, applicant would not have a decision in
the land use matter and would therefore, be unable to resolve the hardship.
Applicant would not be able to exercise appeal rights. Application would be in
the same status as West Park Place P.U.D. and Maple Grove Subdivision and
awaiting resolution of Meadow Creek Storm Drainage situation.
ALternative No. 3 - Approve request (with no special conditions)
Consequence:
The drainage problem would remain unresolved. Action would assist applicant with
resolving immediate hardship. Action does not establish any specific conditions
by which to ensure future participation of applicant in future drainage solution.
Alternative No. 4 - Approve request subject to installation of an acceptable
storm drainage system within one year timeframe.
Consequence:
Applicant may not be able to meet condition, but at least application would be
granted subject to known requirement relating to resolution of drainage problem.
While an LID may never be formed or a developer may never install system, the
applicant, at the minimum, has an opportunity to obtain a permit within a year's
time, without having to reapply for a Conditional Use Permit.
o~
L'
Alternative No. 5 - Approve the request subject to applicant entering into a
Deferred Improvement Agreement, whereby applicant will
participate financially for a share of total cost of future
storm drain facility (second by-pass) which directly
benefits applicant's property.
Consequence:
Action recognizes that a hardship case is germane to City's role of maintaining
welfare of its citizens and thus recognizes the hardship as an exception. Action
ensures a commitment that applicant would participate in an area-wide solution
to storm drainage in the future.
Alternative No. 6 - A combination of any of the above-mentioned conditions or
any other conditional statements deemed appropriate by the
Planning Commission.
Item A - Vicinity Map
Item B - Copy of Hearing Notice and listing of property owners within
100 feet radius of site
Item C - Application materials
Item D - Aerial Map, Tax Assessor Map
Item E - February 21, 1991 City letter to Bernice Boring
Item F - March 13, 1991 Planning Department Staff review
Item G - March 20 1991 Public Works Department Staff review
:_)
z i '
m m '.
~-
K
\:
\`~,.
R-~1-6
U
155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
Cx TY OF CENTRAL PO= NT
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER vALL~' OT= CE OF PUBL2 C HEAR=NG
Notice is hereby given that the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct
a public hearing and decide on a conditional use permit application submitted
by Bernice Boring. The applicant is proposing the temporary placement of a
mobile home on her 1.5 acre tax lot located at 707 Pittview Avenue, more
specifically described as Jackson County Tax Assessor Map 37 2W 11D Tax Lot 400.
The proposed temporary mobile home placement is intended for occupancy by an
infirm relative of the applicant to facilitate the care of that infirm person.
Such a temporary mobile home placement is a conditional use within the
residential single family district (R-1-8 Zone). The application will be
reviewed in accordance with criteria and standards provided in Section 17.60 and
applicable zoning regulations in Title 17 of Central Point Municipal Code. Such
standards, criteria and regulations are available for review at Central Point
City Hall.
The Planning Commission will conduct its hearing as follows:
Date: Tuesday, April 2, 1991
Time: 7:00 p.m. (approximate)
Place: Central Point City Council Chambers
Said hearing will provide for an opportunity for testimony and for questions to
be answered. Individuals may submit written comment no later than Friday,
March 22, 1991. Testimony and written comment must be directed toward the
criteria which is applicable to the proposed land use.
Pursuant to CPMC 1.24.070(5)(C) and ORS 197.763(3)(e), failure to raise an issue
during this hearing, in person or in writing, or failure to raise an issue with
sufficient specificity to afford the decision-maker and the parties an
opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude appeal to the Land Use Board
of Appeals based on that issue.
The application, applicable criteria and staff report will be available for
inspection at Central Point City Hall on Monday, March 25, 1991, at approximately
4:00 p.m. or for copies of same at 15 cents per page.
Fore more information regarding this matter, contact George Rubaloff,
Administrative Assistant, City of Central Point at 664-3321.
NOTICE DATES:
Mailing (Property owners within 100 foot radius) Thursday, March 7, 1991
NOPHBORING.ADMIN
10
The Notice Of Public Hearing was mailed to the following property
owners on March 6, 1991.
Tax Lot ~/ property Owner
37 2W 11D 1300 Ethel Riley
3311 Edella
Central Point, OR
37 2W 11D 500 Ernest McCartney
721 Pittview
Central Point, OR
37 2W 11D 400 Bernice Boring
707 Pittview
Central Point, OR
37 2W 11D 300 Royce Holmes
683 Pittview
Central Point, OR
37 2W 11D 200 Laurence Wold
900 Freeman Road
Central Point, OR
37 2W 11A 2901 Burnis Newell
702. Pittview
Central Point, OR
37 2W 11A 2902 Darryl Rodman
and 2900 664 Pittview
Central Point, OR
37 2W 11A 2800 T.M. McCartney
726 Pittview
Central Point, OR
9
Application Filing Deadline
.Dye = Febr~g~~~ /~~/
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT r O~ ~A~CLj 5, / 9 ~
/ C /~e.~'~'/n~
Application for Temporary Mobile Home Conditional Use Perrtut
Name Bernice N. Boring
Address 707 Pittview Avenue, Oentral Point, OR
Phone Number 664-5826
Proposed Site Location
Address
Assessor's Map Page Location 3 ~ Z (,J ~( ~ Tax Lot(s) ~ Q®
Reciuired Information:
` A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot
and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's
Office
`:~~ Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the
site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to detdrmine the compli-
ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal
Code Section 17.76.020.
r'~v~l A written statement from a medical doctor licensed by the State of Oregon stating
that the infirm person is not physically or mentally capable of maintaining a
residence on a separate property and is dependent upon someone being close by to
assist them.
A'.statemerit as to how the request will meet each of the following objectives:
~'. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommo-
date said use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the sub-
ject zoning district;
B. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the
street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the
traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use;
C. That the proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property or the
permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the Commission shall consid-
er the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress
and internal circulation; setbacks, height of building; walls and fences; landscap-
ing; outdoor lighting; and signs;
LUAP/ADMINI ~j 7
YSi
-:x~
°D: That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will
not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the surrounding neighborhood and will not be detrimental or injurious
to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of
the community based on the review of those facts listed in subsection C above;
I~ Bernice N. Boring certify that I am the owner or
authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach
written authority)
~~~~ ~` p~N,.~~ V w-! (x/i/ Date 3 ~ 5 ~ 91
(Signature of owner o authorized agent of owner, please indicate which)
Application Fee: $100
* A filing fee for recording a Deferred Improvement Agreement with the County
Clerk may also be required.
LUAP/ADMINI
8
'~ .`~
_ ~-150,08-'j
NOr£= R-i-a
-, I CPMC t7.2o.oSo
MIN, zNT~'/r/O)Z 1_o'r-wr07N 60
FRONT' ~p
S~/0E 6fT, •P~R SYaRY
cn x'7.60. oss (z>C~)
~ cn. - ..
_~
r.
m
>v
o
z ,~
'° tl a
+v, o
'o
GINkJ/ RQPF;IPf L tµE
~ -:~
~7,E'MQaRY ~1681t,~ i~ "A
r
.. 7REAP AS ~ ~ . .
r7Q[MA'2Y SYRUCTUR~ ~ -\
fOR SETBACK r RESULT of TfFrS
PuR POSES ~ 26 ~ ~ SEY' RACK A~KItLYS/S;
~ ~ I
is ~ 39 -~ - /yEEyS 9TE~NOARDS
I o ~
I ~ Im y~``I
I ~ n' }
~ ~ ~/~~~
' ~ I ~ 6L „O
'F! IC Pof.E ~ ~ ni I e
I _ J i
v
B~F
~ +. N~ , ~ ~
~~ ~ ~' I
~~ j
fv ~ i--~ I
[ I !
C
i r ~~
:~.:
~j ~ ~ ~
~- ~~;~~ I
r~ t
i c
_._ __
~~-~=Y
PlTTVIE\~l A~= u~
14
February 10, 1991
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I am requesting a set permit to put a mobile home on my property on a
hardship case.
My brother and sister-in-law are living with me. My sister-in-law has
Alzheimers. In the very near future we will need a hospital bed and
.it will not fit in either one of my two bedrooms. She needs 2~ hour care.
My property is 1 1~2 acres with a small house on one corner of it. I
have a double wide gate and driveway entering from the street.
I haven't any utilities on this part of the property and will have them
completed when I get the set permit.
I believe I have everything you request for this permit.
T NK YOU,
„~~~. ~
Bernice N. Boring
707 Pittview Avenue
Central Point, OR
~J
Conditional Use Findings Statement
Temporary Placement of Mobile Home (Infirm)
at 707 Pittview Avenue
A. The site is a 1.5 acre-rectangular parcel, meets the 1 acre minimum for
placement of mobile home for infirm and therefore is adequate in size and
shape to accommodate said temporary use.
e. The proposed temporary mobile homeplacement will not generate any notable
additional traffic volumes on Pittview Avenue, a local access street which
serves my property.
The proposed temporary mobile home placement will meet required yard
requirements and to the best of my knowledge, will not cause any adverse
effect on abutting properties. ~,
The proposed temporary mobile
requirements (setbacks), be s
home standards, and will not,
to the health, safety or gene
will not be injurious to the
or to general welfare of the
home placement will meet all required yard
et up in accordance with all applicable mobile
to the best of my knowledge, be detrimental
ral welfare of surrounding neighborhoods or
property and improvements in the neighborhood,
community.
Applicant Name: Bernice Bori
Address: 707 Pittview Ave.
Central Point, OR. 97502-2946
Applicant Signature:~~9J ~ Date: ~ -~ ~ ~
16
A. I will comply with City and State code requirements for
providing water and sewer disposal systems for the mobile home.
B. I will bear the full responsibility of certifying to the City
that such a temporary placement of the mobile home will not
violate any deed restrictions or subdivision convenent for the
property.
C. I agree to remove the mobile home within 45 calendar days after
the unit has ceased to be used for the person for which the permit
was issued.
D. I will place skirting around the entire perimeter of the temporary
mobile home.
E. I will notapply for a land partition or subdivision for the life of
the permit which would separate the temporary mobile home from the
primary structure for which the temporary mobile home would be assessory.
Applicant Signature: Qn,~.~,rc ~n~q~ Date: .~ ,~
~.
~~ ~ '~-
1.8
'1
~~
z
J
U
Q
3
Nh
M
~z
s
N
ooo'ase'i
~, \ ` J`1.
~y~04 . Q J
~.'~~~
mow;' ~ '~ ~.~/
~~~\~~~~
o a
o
~ 3
m a+ N
aa° ~
6 ~ M
F
3
Ol
1./ A
N
W 3
N
O t~
f~ M
Ayy'i
N
h
O
O
rip
oN
~~
LM[
O
I~
~ I~
.Y•IY N
N
A
VVC~ AYM C/M M/
'° _$
€:
!~ 1O ,~•cce
~n O
~+ p
B~ ~ ~ 6s •[r7 !
J ; .N
~o £ ~ off,
.~
'mod ~ ` N.n ~[v, '; T cb•osv
~~ `~< 133a1s
'J
K'1~
N m
• O
~` J
U
O
~O
h
~ AI
m m ~~
a~ s
N ~
13
0
~ ~~
;N
~I ~~
"' ~ O
/ ~O
a
(~ ~ ~~s
od
/\
d
Q
b
o C
.°~ i. = a
~ o
~ u •
u •°
• v
ogo^'o
~ ~ !. M
u O ~ v
~/
,; ~~
N
f
_~
Q P
N
Y
N `v
i
• ~
'° ~
° ~ i-.
~
a
~ n d J
f N l ,
• • A • r
\/ W `~
0 \R
O « O
\
N ~ ~I~
so
bb J~ dP
o a
.o
V~ j
f ~.
.so ,~~ ~o
155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
February 21, 1991
Bernice N. Boring
707 Pittview Avenue
Central Point, OR 97502
Re: Application for Temporary Mobile Home
Conditional Use Permit
Dear Ms. Boring:
On February 11, 1991, you delivered the following application materials to City
offices for my review prior to any formal submittal of a conditional use permit
application: ~~
1. Unsigned application form referencing Tax Lot 400 of Tax
Assessor page 37 2W 11D
2. Excerpts from CPMC 17.60.055 which are included in all City
application packets for instruction
3. A scale 1=50 plot plan illustrating the existing structures lot
dimensions, trees and proposed temporary mobile home site
4. February 10, 1991 Letter addressed to Whom it May Concern requesting
a permit to temporarily place a mobile home on your 1.5 acre property
to facilitate the continual care of your sister-in-law who has
alzheimers disease
5. February 8, 1991 letter to Whom it May Concern from Dave
Sonasson, M.D., stating that your sister-in-law Margaret Blanchard
is disabled with alzheimer's disease and therefore needs to be
in the close proximity of your residence for full-time care
6. Copy of Instrument No. 85 12711 (Warranty Deed) conveying subject
property (37 2W 11D Tax Lot 400)
Upon reviewing the materials which you delivered to City offices, I have
determined that you will need to include the following items in your application
prior to the application being accepted as complete:
~ 1
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
1. Show any other proposed improvements on the plot plan such as
fencing, paving, utility lines, electric pedestal, drainage,
imaginary property line between mobile home and existing structure
and required setbacks. (If you need City staff to explain the
imaginary property line, feel free to contact me so we can meet in
person)
2. A signed statement explaining how you will meet the four conditional
use objectives A through D; a sample is enclosed for your
convenience.
3. Clarify who is engaged in caring for Mrs. Blanchard; you, Mr.
Blanchard or both?
4. Provide a signed written statement regarding the following:
A. That you will comply with City and State code requirements for
providing water and sewer disposal systems for the mobile home.
B. That you will bear the full responsibility of certifying to
the City that such a temporary placement of the mobile home
will not violate any deed restrictions or subdivision covenant
for the property.
C. That you agree to remove the mobile home within 45 calendar
days after the unit has ceased to be used for the person for
which the permit was issued.
D. That you will place skirting around the entire perimeter of
the temporary mobile home.
E. That you shall not apply for a land partition or subdivision
for the life of the permit which would separate the temporary
mobile home from the primary structure for which the temporary
mobile home would be assessory.
As has been explained to you in previous correspondence from the Central Point
Public Works Department, storm drainage runoff from your property goes northerly
through a private system in The Meadows Mobile Home Park. This system is
designed to accommodate the property generally located east of Bursell Road and
north of Beall Lane. However, in order for anyone to develop any of this
property or build additional housing in this area, a new storm sewer system needs
to be developed which will accommodate the resulting increased runoff. The city
is currently involved in developing a local improvement district (LID) which is
designed to distribute the cost of the storm drainage system amongst benefitting
property owners.
Your request for a Conditional Use Permit of this type, raises a question as to
whether the hardship you describe is truly an exception to the technical
requirements which must be placed upon developments within the Meadow Creek
~~
Drainage Basin. It should be clear to you, prior to you submitting your
application, that upon completing a review of your application, staff may
recommend to Planning Commission and City Council that your request be denied
or that your request be approved subject to LID construction within a specific
timeframe.
Please understand that the city desires to help you resolve your problems in any
way that is possible. Unfortunately, we are confronted with a serious technical
drainage problem in the Meadow Creek Drainage area which must be resolved prior
to any further development.
I wish I could tell you what the odds are of obtaining your conditional use
permit. It is advisable not to count on permit approval until you actually have
your permit in hand.
Your application is considered incomplete at this time,
if you satisfactorily include the items outlined above.
questions, please feel free to phone me at city offices.
Sincerely,
George R Toff
Administrative Assistant
GR:sb
Enclosures: 1. Sample Findings Statement
2. Original Application Materials
but will be acceptable
If qou should have any
~. ~~
P L ANN = N G DEPARTMENT REV'S EW
TYPE: Conditional Use Permit for temporary placement of mobile home
for infirm purposes
SITE: 707 Pittview Avenue (37 2W 11D TL 400)
APPLICANT: Bernice Boring
DATE APPLICATION
RECEIVED: March 5, 1991
DATE OF REVIEW: March 13, 1991
1. Review process was done under authority of CPMC 17.20.030(f)
2. Setbacks as illustrated on site plan in application conform to CPMC
17.20.050 and 17.60.055 (2g)
3. The infirm person, Margaret Blanchard, is related to the applicant
Bernice Boring by in-law and, due to a physical and mental
impairment, Mrs. Blanchard is incapable of maintaining a separate
residence (CPMC 17.60.OS5A)
4. Minimum lot size for temporary mobile home placement for infirm is
(1) one acre. The applicant's property is 1.5 + acres. Site is
adequate in size and shape to accommodate proposed use.
5. Dave Jonasson, M.D., a licensed physician in the State of Oregon,
verified the infirmity of Margaret Blanchard and her dependency for
full-time care (CPMC 17.60.055(2b)).
6. Applicant has agreed to comply with City and State code requirements
with regard to providing water and sewer hookups to the proposed
mobile home (CPMC 17.60.055(2d)).
7. Applicant has agreed to obtain an appropriate mobile home set up
permit (CPMC 17.60.055(2d)).
8. Applicant has agreed to appropriately register the mobile home with
the State Department of Motor Vehicles .^(CPMC 17.60.055(2f)).
k' ,
9. Applicant agreed to bear full responsibility of certifying to the
city that temporary placement of the mobile home will not violate
any property deed restrictions or applicable subdivision covenant.
(CPMC 17.60.055(2h)).
10. Applicant has agreed to remove mobile home within 45 days after unit
has ceased to be used for individual for which permit was issued.
(Margaret Blanchard) (CPMC 17.60.055(21))
11. Applicant has agreed to install skirting around entire perimeter of
mobile home (CPMC 17.60.055(2J))
12. Applicant has agreed that she will not apply for a minor land
partition during life of permit which would result in separating
primary structure from mobile home (CPMC 17.60.055(2k)).
13. An approval of the proposed land use will result in the placement
of a temporary 1700 foot + square foot structure on the property
site. Said structure will generate a quantity of additional storm
run off, a percentage of which will saturate into the ground, and
the majority of which will drain into The Meadows P.U.D. storm drain
system. Relative to this drainage concern, the March 20, 1991 Public
Works Staff Report (Boring C.U.P), contained in the April 2, 1991
Planning Commission Agenda Packet, provides a set of findings which
support recommended conditions of approval necessary to protect
public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Central
Point (CPMC 17.76.040 E11)
~~
,;
C~~T1`~ ~~ C~LU~~G~QL G°'~OMT
PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
DATE.• March 20, 7991
PROJECT.• Conditional Use Permit
PROJECT
OWNER: Bernice Boring
707 Pittview Avenue
Cents/ Point, OR
LOCAT/ON.• T37S R2W 11D Tax Lot 400
ZONE: R-1-8
ACREAGE.• 1.5 Acres
Type of
Development Temporary Mobi/e Home Placement for the /nfirmed
/. STREET /MPROVEMENTS:
A. Existing Conditions:
1. Street No. LS 65, Street Name -Pittview Avenue. Street
Classification -Local Street; Street Jurisdiction -Jackson County,
Public Works Department; Existing Right of Way - 60 ft., Future
Right of Way - 60 ft.; Existing Street Width - 36 ft., Future Street
Width - 36 ft.; Existing curb/gutter -none, Future Curb/gutter -
required; existing sidewalk -none, Future Sidewalk -required;
Existing Street Lights -None, Future street Lights - 5800 Lumen
HPSV - 150 ft. spacing maximum distance; Existing Traffic
Control -Stop sign @ Bursell, Future Traffic Control -depends on
traffic volumes, Existing Traffic volume - 200 VT/D, Future Traffic
Volume - 800 VT/D.
~~
PW Staff Report -Boring C.U.P.
March 20, 1991 -Page Two
B. Required Conditions:
1. The developer shall sign a Deferred Improvement Agreement for
the future improvements to Pittview Avenue for street
construction to a local street standard, curbs and gutters, storm
drainage improvements within the street section including:
catchbasins, sidewalk construction the length of the property
abutting the street, driveway approaches for each dwelling unit,
street lights, traffic control devices, utility crossings,
administration, construction management, engineering and
construction contingency.
2. Provide a separate driveway for the Mobile Home. Obtain the
necessary permits from Jackson County Public Works
Department.
//. STORM DRA/NAGS /MPROVEMENTS:
A. Existing Conditions:
1. This property presently discharges runoff toward the east of
Kingsland Manor Subdivision, north through vacant land (tentative
suburban subdivision, and then throughThe Meadows PUD storm
drainage system across I-5 and into Bear Creek.
2. A small drainage channel exists through this tax lot at the
approximate location of the temporary Mobile Home.
3. Findings:
a. Pursuant to Section 17.76.040(E)(11) and 17.68.120 of
the Central Point Municipal Code, the City may impose
conditions of approval upon developers which are found
necessary to protect public health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of Central Point.
b. Robert Blanton Consulting Engineering has confirmed that
the private storm drainage system, which serves The
Meadows' Planned Unit Development, was not designed to
provide for all future development in the Meadow Creek
Basin, and this property is not within the area to be drained
by The Meadows system.
w1
PW Staff Report -Boring C.U.P.
March 20, 1991 -Page Three
The following is the method recommended to provide
drainage for future development in Meadow Creek Basin:
(1) Install diversion pipe under I-5 to Bear Creek
to provide for an area-wide storm drainage
system.
c. Unchecked development in the Meadow Creek Drainage
Basin will result in flooding of properties and improvements
within that basin, if the basin is fully developed and a 100
year storm occurs.
d. On March 15, 1990, the City Council postponed its
decision to grant preliminary subdivision approval for Maple
Grove Estates Subdivision located within Meadow Creek
Drainage Basin, until developer submits an acceptable plan
for correcting storm drainage deficiencies associated with
the project. Maple Grove Developer is, still working on the
formation of an LID.
e. Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report dated
July 3, 1990 for the West Park Place PUD, proposed a
required condition stating that all on-site storm drainage be
collected from roofs and catchbasins and connected to
pipes and discharged according to the Meadow Creek
Storm Drainage Plan approved by the City of Central Point.
t. An area-wide storm drainage system is necessary for the
Meadow Creek Drainage Basin and the installation of a
diversion pipe under I-5 to Bear Creek will more efficiently
and effectively serve drainage needs.
g. As a planning agency, the City of Central Point is
responsible for ensuring the public facilities are designed,
constructed and operated so that they effectively protect
property owners and provide for future growth. The
Meadow Creek Basin requires a plan which will give the
City overall guidance for the development of an area-wide
storm drainage system. The Developer has not provided a
solution to prevent discharge of storm drainage from the
property into The Meadows PUD private storm system.
~~
PW Staff Report -Boring C.U.P.
March 20, 1991 -Page Four
2. Recommended Conditions:
a. All on-site storm drainage generated from this property shall
be connected to and discharged to a second bypass which
collects flow to property in a developed state from The
Meadows Creek drainage system, and diverts the flow to
a bypass under I-5.
b. The small drainage channel on this property shall be
rerouted according to design requirements set forth in the
Central Point Public Works Standards, and shall be
designed by a professional engineer to assure all runoff is
taken across this property and connected to the
downstream end of this drainage channel at the northeast
corner of the property.
///. SAN/TARY SEWER /MPROVEMENTS:
A. Existing Conditions:
1. An 8" sanitary sewer is located in the northern portion of the
Pittview Right of Way.
B. Required Conditions:
1. The owner shall install, or cause to be installed, a separate
sanitary sewer service connection to the temporary mobile home
from above the above mentioned 8" sanitary sewer main.
2. The owner shall pay a Sewer Systems Development Charge as
has been previously established by the Regional Rate Committee.
/V. WATER SYSTEM /MPROVEMENTS:
A. Existing Conditions:
1. An 8" water line is located in the southern portion of Pittview
Avenue.
e7
iY
I
PW Staff Report -Boring C.U.P.
March 20, 1991 -Page Five
B. Required Conditions:
1. Owner shall install or cause to be installed a separate water
service and a new water meter to the temporary mobile home.
V. ADD/T/ONAL REQUIREMENTS:
A. The review for the Conditional Use Permit submitted hereby by Bernice
Boring was done in accordance with the rules, regulations and
ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications of
this Conditional Use Permit after City Planning Commission and/or City
Council approvals could require resubmittal of an application and
approval by City Planning Commission and/or City Council.
B. All costs associated with this development shall be the sole responsibility
of the applicant or owner.
C. Prior to any construction or placement of any structures, the owner or
applicant, whichever the case may be, shall obtain ,all PERM/TS from the
City of Central Point or other agencies that may have jurisdiction over
construction of this Conditional Use Permit.
cc: 02-014
BORING. CUP
(S U