HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - January 8, 1991i
Next Resolution No. 213
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning CommJJJ'~~~ on Agenda
January 8; ~9~7:00 p.m.
1U~BJ\~
I
Meeting called to Order
II. Ro11 Ca1L• Garth Ellard, Rick Bettenburg, Jack Crumm, Dick Halley,
Karolyne Hugo, Bob Matthews and Chuck Piland
III. Approval of Minutes
IGES 1 - 4 A. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of December.4, 1990 -
B. Correspondence l
IV. Business
5 - 32 A. Public Meeting - Review and determination for a Conditional Use
permit for KOPE-FM radio station (Medford Judeo-Christian Outreach,
Inc.) at 744 E. Pine. (37 2W 2CC TL 7500) (Applicants: Richard and
Carmelita Wright)
33 - 52g, public Meeting - Review and recommendation on a Preliminary
Subdivision Plat for Stonecreek No. 4 - Phase 1 - located south of
Glenn Way and North of Beall Lane. (Applicants: Gary Whittle, Dennis
C.W. Smith and Gina Smith) (37 2W lODA TL 100, 200, 300 and 400)
53 - 66C. Public Meeting - Review and reconunendation for a Minor Land Partition
at 446 West Pine (Applicant: Don Wilson) (37 2W lOAB Tax Lot 2300)
67 - 89D. Public Meeting - Review and determination on a site plan application
for Quality Fence Project located 'on the north side of"West-Pine
between Amy and Haskell Streets ab 37 2W lOAB Tax. Lots 1000 and 1100.
(Applicant/Owner:. Steve Rietmann)
V. Miscellaneous
VI. "Adjournment
{. i ~)
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
December 4, 1990
Page One
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Those present were Garth Eliard, Rick Bettenburg, Jack Crumm, Dick Halley, Karolyne
Hugo, Bob Matthews and Chuck Piland Also present vvere George Rubaloff, City
Administrative Assistant, Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director and Cecelia
Gordon, Secretary.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Commissioner Halley moved to approve the November 6, 1990 Planning
Commission Meeting Minutes as amended on Page Two and was seconded by
Commissioner Bettenburg. Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg, yes; Crumm, yes; and
Halley, Yes; Hugo abstained; Matthews, yes; and Piland, yes. The motion
carried.
BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing Resolution #212 - -Conditional Use Permit for Southern
Oregon Child and Family Council -Inc for Applicant/Owner Gloria Dei Lutheran
~hui•ch for Operation of an Early Childhood Development Facility (Southern
Oar gon Head Start) Gloria Dei Lutheran Church 372W 3AD TL 4700.
City Administrative Assistant, George Rubaloff, entered into record by reference
the Notice of Hearing. mailed to adjacent property ...:owners, .Mailing List,
Application Materials, Public Works Staff Report, Planning Department's
Conditions of Approval, Aerial Map, Vicinity Maps, and Tax Assessor's Map,
proposed Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit.' He also handed out a
copy of Item H, containing information on water meters, which was an
addendum to the Public Works Staff Report,
None of the Commissioners had a conflict of interest. Chairman Ellard opened
the Public Hearing.
vUi
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
December 4, 1990
Page Two
Representing Applicant, Gloria Dei Lutheran Church, was a church member,
Walt Kingman, 500 N. Keeneway Drive, Medford who came forward to answer
questions and discuss the project with the Commission and Staff members.
Carol Douglas, Administrative Assistant from Southern Oregon Head Start also
came forward to respond to any concerns from the Commission or Staff.
The Commission asked the applicants if they understood the conditions in the
conditional use permit. Carol Douglas, Head Start, said that she, Reverend
Kyle, Larry Blanchard and George Rubaioff had met on December 3, 1990 and
had thoroughly discussed the conditions. Ms. Douglas explained that their
Head Start Program would service 36 children, on a half-day schedule, 5 days
a week. She also addressed the Commission's questions concerning meals, that
the children would be served twice a day, one morning snack and a hot lunch
according to USDA guidelines. Also that the Head Start Program would not
.need to change or remodel the church facilities, that it was adequate just as it
is. Mr. Kingman said that the only new building that the church expected to
do ih the near future was a separate housing unit for seniors, and that it would
not involve the .present facility or the Head Start Program.
Carol Douglas requested that the Conditional Use Permit be issued for a period
of five 15) years.
No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the Resolution.
Chairman Ellard closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner entered the motion that the Commission approve Resolution 212
for Conditional Use Application for the Southern Oregon Child and Family
Council and the Gloria Dei Church at 745 North Tenth Street further described
as Jackson County Tax Assessor Map 37 2W 3AD Tax Lot 4700, for an Early
Childhood Development Operation (Southern Oregon Headstart) for a period of
5 years subject to review by City Staff if there are any changes.
Commissioner Crumm seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Bettenburg, Yes;
Crumm, Yes; Halley, Yes; Hugo, Yes; Matthews, Yes, and Piland, Yes. The
Motion carried unanimously.
„_
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
December 4, 1990
Page Three
B. Determination regarding Conditional Use Permit application, Planned Unit
Development Permit Application and Site Plan for West Park Place a planned
~Applicant• Roaer Richardson).
Administrative Assistant, George, Rubaloff referred to and entered into the
record by reference his Staff Report dated December 4, 1990, the proposed
Resolution, and the letter dated December 3, 1990 from L. Calvin Martin, the
applicant's agent (which was handed out to the Commissioners at the
beginning of this item of business) see Exhibit "A" attached.
After the review of the Staff Report, Chairman Ellard opened the matter to a
minute motion. Commissioner Piland entered a Motion that the Commission
recommend. granting an extensiori of 120 days. for the City to make a
determination in the Conditional Use Permit Application for the Planned Unit
Development Permit for West Park Place, a planned unit development located
in the .approximate vicinity of the northeast corner of Bursell Road and Beall
Lane, further described as 37 2W 11 D TL 2200 (Applicant: Roger Richardson)
Commissioner Bettenburg seconded the Motion. Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg,
Yes; Crumm, Yes; Halley, Yes; Hugo, Yes; Matthews, Yes, and Piland, Yes,
and the Motion passed unanimously.
Miscellaneous:
City Administrative Assistant, George Rubaloff announced that the next
Planning Commission Meeting as regularly scheduled on the first Tuesday of the
Month would fall on New Year's Day, and asked the Commission if they had
any objections to moving that meeting to the next Tuesday, January 8, 1991.
There were no objections.,
Bettenburg moved that the meeting be adjourned, Crumm seconded the motion.
Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg, yes; Crumm, yes; Halley, yes; Hugo, yes;
Matthews, yes and Piland, yes. The motion carried unanimously. The meeting
was adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
~' I I ; i ~ ~ c'~
EXHIBIT A
Decembex 4, 1990 Planning Commission Minutes
December 3, 199G
Mr. George Rubiloff
Planning Director
City of Central Point
155 S. Second Street
Central Point, Oregon 97502
Re: West Park Place
Dear George:
:ned,
D
Thank you for your phone call,. After consideri.nc~ all options
available, Mr. Richardson has decided to_request an extension
of applications for at least I20 days.
We feel that the drainage problem should be reso9.ved or a.t least
more clearly defined by that time. I do not intend to attend
the City Council meeting ou this mati.er unless you feel it is
necessary. The application for Mr.Dautzenbery's proposed sub-
division has been extended twice for the same reason. I be-
lieve there is no reason why the Council would not extend the
same. consideration to our request.
Thank: you for your assistance in this matter.
Sinc ely,
~~
L. Calvin Martin
Agent for Roger Richardson .and
Thomas Harrison
cc :Roger Richardson
Thomas Harrison
Ps.
~~,~:y ~ ~.~ .
~~tr~P
~0~
STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commissip~t~'on//
FROM: George Rubaloff,{!(~idministrative Assistant
DATE: January 2, 1991 11
SUBJECT: KOPE-FM .Radio Station
Conditional Use Permit request and site plan for 744 E. Pine
(37 2W 2CC Tax Lot 7500)
SUMMARY
On behalf of applicant Richard Wright, Chuck Findley has applied for a
Conditional Use Permit which,`if approved, would allow Medford Judeo-Christian
Outreach, Inc. to operate the studio and offices of KOPE-FM, a new radio station,
at 744 East Pine within the C-4 (tourist and office professional) zone of the
City. The Planning Commission is scheduled to conduct a public hearing at the
January 8, 1991 meeting, after-which the Commission can deliberate upon the
permit request.
BACKGROUND
The proposed radio station would be operated within the existing structure which
is currently used as a Beauty Salon (House of Perms). The project also includes
such improvements as sight-obscuring fencing, placement of'off-street parking,
installation of satellite dishes and appropriate screening-for the dishes.
Public Notices have been distributed to residents and property owners within 100
feet of the proposed radio station site. As of this date, the 'City has not
received any written continents regarding the Conditional Use Permit application.:
Planning and Public Works Departments have reviewed the proposed Conditional Use
in accordance with those standards outlined in Chapters 17.44, 17.60, 17.64,
17.72 and 17.76 of the Central Point Municipal Code and applicable public works
standards. The proposed use meets the general intent of the City's Tourist and
office professional zone and is classified under section 17.44.030(A)(17) as a
Television and Radio broadcasting station.
Staff's overall finding is that the proposed land use (KOPE-FM Radio. Station)
would be consistent with the City's land use rules subject to the applicant
meeting certain Conditions of Approval which are included as exhibits to the
proposed Planning Commission Resolution.
OUP
d.(j..
ATTACHMENTS
The .following items are attached for entry into. the official record by reference
and for the Commission's review of the Conditional Use Permit
Item A - Vicinity Map
Item B - Notice of Public Hearing, Certificate of Posting, Mailing-List,
and Tax Assessor Map
Item C - Aerial Map
Item D - Application materials
Item E - Public Works Staff Report:
Item F - Planning Department Conditiohs of Approval
Item G - Proposed'Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit
/_....
C-
372W 2CC TL 7
744 East-Pine
T
~_
U_~
C
ITEM
C
155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502
THE HEART OF THE C2TY OF CENTRAL PO=NT
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
NOT S CE OF PUB L 2 C HEAR = N G
664-3321
Notice is hereby given that the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct
a public hearing to review a Conditional Use Permit application submitted by
Richard and Carmelita Wright. Said application proposes to operate studios and
offices of KOPE-FM, a new radio station serving the Central Point - Medford area
at 744 East Pine, in a building where The House of Perms currently operates.
The site is located in the Tourist and Office Professional District (C-4 Zone)
and is further described as Jackson County. Tax Assessor Map 37 2W 2CC Tax Lot
7500. The .proposed facility will be operated within the existing building and
will include the site improvements to provide for satellite receiving dishes,
a small microwave. antenna and additional off-street parking.
The proposed land use. is a conditional use within the (C-4 zone) zone, and the
application will be reviewed in accordance with conditional use standards
outlined in Chapter 17.76 and applicable zoning regulations of Title 17 of the
Central Point Municipal Code.
The Public Hearing is scheduled as follows:
Date: Tuesday, January 8, 1991
Time: 7:00 p.m. (approximate)
Place: Central Point City Council Chambers
155 South Second Street
Said hearing will provide for an opportunity for testimony and for questions to
be answered. Individuals may submit written comment no later than Thursday,
January 3, 1991. Testimony and written comment must be directed toward the
criteria which is applicable to the proposed land use.
Pursuant to CPMC 1.24.070(5)(C) and ORS 197.763(3)(e), failure to raise an issue
during this hearing,'in person or in writing, or failure to raise an issue with
sufficient specificity to afford the decision-maker and the parties an
opportunity to respond to the issue will preclude appeal to the Land Use Board
of Appeals based on that issue.
The application, applicable criteria and staff report will be available for
inspection at Central Point City Hall on Friday, January 4, 1991 at approximately
3:00 p.m. or for copies of same at 15 cents per page.
Fore more information regarding this matter, contact George Rubaloff,
Administrative Assistant, City of Central Point at 664-3321.
NOTICE DATES:
Mailing (Property owners within 100 ft radius) - December 18, 1990
NPHHDST.90/ADMIN
ITEM --
155 S0. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Sandy Be;=ryhill , CERTIFY THAT ON THE
FOLLOWING DATE OF Tuesday December 18, 1990 , I POSTED A NOTICE
FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON January 8 , 1991, DURING WHICH THE
CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY RICHARD AND CARMELITA WRIGHT WHO PROPOSE TO
APERATE STUDIOS AND OFFICES OF KOPE--FM, A NE[d RADIO STATION SERVING
THE CENTRAL POINT ~ MEDFORD AREA AT 744 EAST PINE.
AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE
2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY
3. CENTRAL POINT CITX FIRE STATION
4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD
SIG tiTURE
~o~o~~~ ~8 ~94~
DATE
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
ITEM
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
KOPE-FM Radio (Applicants Richard & Carmelita Wright)
38 2W 2CC Tax Lot 7500
Properties Noticed. Names & addresses
37 2W 2CC TL 7500 Richard Wright
744 E. Pine
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 7400 Nadine Branch
734 E. Pine
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 7300 Karolyne Hugo
724 E. Pine
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 4500 Celia H. Hays
733 E. Pine
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 4400 OCCUPANTS
745 E. Pine
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 7600 Rudolph Hansen
802 E. Pine
Central Point, OR 97502
TL 8100
TL 8200
TL 8401
TL 8400
Vincent Beusan
c/o Lisa Ford, Manager
50 South 9th, #2
Central Point, OR 97502
David Kinyon
70 North 9th
Central Point, OR 97502
Robert R. Smith
220 South 8th
Central Point, OR 97502
Robert R. Smith
47 South 7th
Central Point, OR 97502
~. coo
~,_~
Elizabeth Bethany
609 Vista Park Drive
Eagle Point, OR 97524
Alan Corbeth
Medford Judeo-Christian
Outreach, Inc.
P.O. Box 811
Grants Pass, OR 97526
Chuck Findley
206 N.E. 7th Street
Grants Pass, OR 97526
The Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to the above listed property
owners on December 18, 1990.
e} [ ~,~
G3.1
6~ `! ~ 2 ~ ~1 y, V~ ~.r ~ ash', ~Cp: s:
,,p, ~
- ,tieN ~ Oar ~(_ s. ~~ ~ I'CEM _ ~____-_~-
51oa \~ ' r1 ~~~ r' ~ .r.. .~ ~~ `~~ ~ ~yh
. 1,1 ~ 6
ti
ss ~i//~~ ~ ~2 a~, ~~ ~ hjo.
`D ~ ~` \ 6 ~
es ~ ,~ ~ va ~1~y s;
a 2 e .1 ~ 6 . q~.
(~ „ yo 5
2~~ ~ V - h \ ~i ~~~
~ ~ c3
~S5 e
,~ S °`'~ .
\` 1 `, ~ ~ ~~ A9
~ o ~ 9 .2 ~ v
~'~, V.. ~ ~\ 6 ~~y by ~ 4
9
~; \ .h
~ ~ 6 pal 0~X o
1 4~`
n ~
ZJ ~ ~
~` ~` ~ db y4 0~ 0 b.
` ~ _\ ~ v i
`~(j~ . ~ ..~1 by / \ ~.
\ ~ ~a
.1~~ t.a^'..
s5n \ ~ °
372 w 2 cC
0~ \~ ~ °' Sec to a ;. N o 37 2'~ Z
/~ ~
\ ~ S~
i
,~ ~ ~
C,~,,e~ ~ ° ~^`
y.
5~ ~
~~
\ ~i
\ ~. ~i.
~, ~R
b 0
~M
n
G~ o
(^~~"
~C
^` OO
\0~ 2
HIS MAP fOR ASSESSR4E~~17
& TAXA710N PURPOSPS
' ONLY
o prP ~%~ i I n `~ I ~I -I ITEM ~~,_
~ t% ~~ I+fl I % I ~ -
~ +
(~`1 QM. H. 1259.4 1206%.2 ` O Ol./
~ ~ (`~~
% /l/ _~ \
r % M.H.
T
\ M.H. * T~7i
S 10261.2 ''s
/~ ~`l M.H /
(~ o
N
5~. D O 2T ~~ / j O
^O y ~ " c.
ti * O Q// sT
MO.H. ' Q ~ ~ O
%
~.8.
1269.0_' ,~
'~' S %1259.0
~P ~ c e
`~
/Y~`~G 3-17 12%8.9
PPS ~'.p~ QPa + C.B.. X26 Q
Q ~ PARKING
E.B.
Sf. '.. PAVED
PARKING
~ ~ ~ o
\~/ / \ M.H.
\ /` //\\ ~~ * X 1261.8 \ \
/O q~ ,
1269.6
C.B. %
C.B.
I
~~
Q~ ~ PAF
PpR KING
\ 0
lrT GJP
\ 1264.5
_ %
~+ l \ ~\ i /~/~
\\ b-+ o
~ %
o ~
(:.B
%
_ ~B. %
^ / OMH' PVD.
~1'y PARKING
~y' P~`C~~ 'F ~
Qp
G
C.
~X
O
x _ Q
1~Y zd /~,
ITEM
Application Filing Deadline
December 17, 1990 for the
January 8, 1991 Planning Commission
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Meeting
/Appl/ica/tion fory~ Conditional Use Permit
Name ~ u lL ~~ G4- ~/ +~v N ,~ ~ `'t. ~~
Address Jr6¢6 ~~6h~rd C-/~. ~~5"Dz-
Phone Number ~' 2' ""~'/ r5
Proposed Site Location
Address
~ c~ ~~ L c~,~
/~~)na ~ ~, /' y~
l ~`,//r~svf r~/-
~v.1~//
Assessor's Map Page Location 3 7-Z ~'U`-C7Z ~C- Tax Lot(s) 7_S~ U
Required Information:
A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot
and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's
Office
Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the
site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli-
ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal
Code Section, 17.76.020.
A statement as to how the request will meet each of the following objectives:
A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommo-
date said use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the sub-
ject zoning district;
B. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the
street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the
traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use;
C. That the proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property or the
permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the Commission shall consid-
er the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress
and internal circulation; setbacks, height of building; walls and fences; landscap-
ing; outdoor lighting; and signs;
` V
..r .~ ~~
.. LUAP/ADMINl 10
D. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will
not be detrimental to the health,. safety or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the surrounding neighborhood and will not be detrimental or injurious
to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of
the community based on the review of those facts listed in subsection C above;
I C`1 µ-c ~ ~ i Y1 d /L~/ certify that I am the owner or
authorized agent of the owner of he proposed site (If authorized agent, attach
writren authority) ~ ~~ ~
(Signature of owner or a
Application Fee: $100
* A filing fee for recon
Clerk may also be required.
Date l Z _ ! ~ ~ / d
of owner, please indicate which)
Agreement with the County
a.~ o~//f/ ~~ S' ~~~.¢ ~,-.rte.-~,% /fir a~-V.
5-~ ~ -~ -ti-f° ~~
.~ :,
~ ~'~ 11
LUAP/ADMINI
Xx~"" f /!
~~~~~ fry ~~ ~ ~
.~ - ~~~~~
~ ~,/ ~~
))~~ JL. ~___ ..
~~b
~~ .d ~.~
z
11110 Ix n A,crnw mm~ . ,..... .......... 1 V C/ 1 L 1
.Of1yaD0CEfll~i~~ '.'Y^'~-9AlEA0flFFMENTd9O•
ry WMn KMYa( IalMminxx
1. NM(e
x. n(IwNLj~(~Q--~~W("ON~0.ht.~wA.^ ~ .twudr(we"Ixx:'Ixmax.w
!. W rxwaN W bwaNNmMdryYdwaxexwh X970
(+~..R~Q~,~1~ e~^~1~AN//~P IAPKbfIP+ IN 4a1NpNn. YxNx NIpYIIw: '~~
e.~IWiDL1LJ.-IUx~'~ 1~
!. ~A4 EAST P ~ iw.n NY«It
'I. RN IaNMx411LLNN(tlIW((OAM Ye01dMmMYMId NIWkINpNINIMNMWINeN!Y11 a1mmglA'alrA
T.IpW;.wNrb T~~MOF48THOUSP!'1D000M~D~DDDU.ARS ~~ , 48,000A~
Sao
1. MWYN0M9Yln:W(Ye1nwN1'(NwnNNNW.«... ..............«...«_.......«.-.........................1~+_'__" _x~
((-~~1~~~ Iba 1leV'~, NNItlMIbNM nNf.Wlw0........~w...~ ...............x~._-~x~x(-~-.~'~" '
a~ 49x~m
6 }{^~IIOY1-1WlRNAN- Imo.' ~' ............~...... x~`I'~~(~ 1 I a~ .
...,,_..........NIw WINKIN~MOtwulYlN~d~T7'Y"e""~••_.«•••• -MINI !
n. Nrw
n..
t4.
M..
N..
n.
1A
n...
1L..
it IAN pIAIla4Q Y~ N M INM N MNI r11FY1 FeNp: hlw Iry1tlYY1N III
t1.N IWI W-lAUNMNNMNwlI111N°N°E,NtW YINYtlIrYNNNIrW,ihtlM
YMIY eYnMA MYIIw NNm IN
xLwI.PR#m........-.....~ _ _... _... .
d.YUdll WtehwYlI, NINNMMIbbIOyIAIII,MIIKVe111N bypT lYblla#l tInIPNNIrInY
z. T '
N. NM nU1CRi0xMINl NYtl Ndlw! NrI11NW rnrmlpNiwlY W NnNNrIN
:YlgpW wNGL10lN Pm(YW NwIMYNNWrvMw(YWIIn111NIPINI iM MnPY'(.
>?. p~
N.N ~eml WI b ~ N 1 mgpM YNIbTAI N WAYt wA rIP(YII. AUA10At0 I/xIl bx • WINnry III YN INNC N wN h AeNI
W YYPNIINtlI()Ll alsOlpxM~IMbR1 (Wtl11 wl(1 (ix, n:p
N.NlLLefl f{QFx11[>7 NT6 TWAT p)MpFN N'aU(INNI MxYNrNNW AWYNW NIMNIUIa lxrra.111We'NMINMPMIANY(N/+. (IN6NMrynI1N111~(n11NY
N(M^Y
N.Tw.wN,NnNIeINIY
N.nxnxo mtrtuAxoTxxcaxaaulxm.I.rp1l.Ylmmxx•^•^
# N.
# 61.
N.11LGHrl xull cnnncu, .rv......... -.
#ILUONINW C
n.Aeelw r
# N.Mn ~ 1(c'x
# N.11 pAl n I w( W.. uP mwrn.bn d1I A( IMIIO a b+'
N. ACCEPTANCE OF OFFEfl, CL091N0IN$TPUCTICNS
Iv.ImexN N Ny p1PYNm 111 p
un .,,IM
NxN WN W W InMNMNItlI NM.NwmItMNYpMIMAIAIIOAM 41V11MIN'M~IwllNlanln
.. ...uu«. uxM,. w.Y Y M MxPI x.(Ilx%'M IQIN WH1 FPlld.}9 bIIN YM 1N nYW 11104
iUHES.
T 4~I.I.Itp ONLYI UNLEbN~~ `WISH aT.s`TOeO~I ly~I
Nom. ~._ ~.m.
ACCEPT90ula'..PX IxMxm. x'a,Xln. waMbMm M bnX.wm.Ix~ruU'xux PUtIOPY
W xvxx (XM(6M.'N.n. W MkIM*'.a.IVM,\.,n emllxl ar lNXwlemmga,IM \.x ow•x'mlleln,
Ax wlmly~ IIn111Y1(uxle.a(nI111mm aw.IH+n M,Nll xfUfT_--Y•P(Xt10Ai" Y`
j(AXY..ln ~ ~P[RnµPS 1Ni(Al(POA(EM(X(IMJNN P(LUY(DALOMnnflY l1LLf01XIMY
T L' )11._• Fyn---m
I
II
MEDFORD
P.O. Box 811 • Grants Pass, OR 97526
(503) 479.0549 • (503) 476.7445
Mr. George Rubaloff December 17, 1990
City Of Central Point
155 S. grid Street
Central Point, Or. 97502
Dear Mr. Rubaloff:
Contingent upon. approval from the city of Central Point, we have
agreed to purchase a house located at 744 East Pine Street in the
city of Central Point. This property is presently being used as a
beauty. parlor. Our intention is to locate the studios and offices of
KOPE-f=M, a 'new radio station serving the Medford metropolitan area.
We do not. anticipate making any major alterations to the outside of
the structure other than. to generally improve it's appearance by
painting and other simple cosmetic inhancements. We will however
need to locate two or three satellite receiving dishes on the land
adjacent to the rear of the `house. At this time, it is our belief that
two dishes will be adequate. In any event, they will be camouflaged
with fencing, plants, and landscaping. This will insure that the
receiving dishes are unobtrusive, and that they are protected from
vandalism. The property contains ample space for this purpose.
Driving access to the station is from 8th Street and an alley way
bordering the rear of the property. There are'presehtly three
existing parking spaces consisting of the garage and driveway, and
we will construct an additional four .spaces at the rear. of the
property. These spaces will have access from the alley way. This
will provide for more than enough parking considering that the
building is approximately 1,150 square feet. It is unlikely that
people connected with the radio station will ever need to park, on 8th
street. '
The "dishes" will be simple receiving units used for the purpose of
obtaining network radio feeds, and will not differ in appearance to
those used in private homes throughout the county.
... {1.~.
i R Y.:. !
There will also be a small microwave antenna located on a simple
pole mast attached to the side of the house. This is for the
transmission of a very low powered microwave signal that will be
used to send our programs from the studios to our transmitter site
located approximately three miles from Jacksonville on highway
238. This antenna will actually be considerably smaller than most
normal home television aerials. Because of the very. low power of
the signal, the extreme directivity, and high frequency, this system
will not cause any interference to nearby radio and television
reception.
The .main renovation will take place within the structure, and not be
visible from the outside. At this time it is anticipated that two
studios will be required. One being for live broadcasting, the other
for production work. The rest of'the space will be utilized for
simple offices.
The station will consist of a small full. time staff of approximately
eight people. It should be noted that these people will not be
present at the studios at the same time. They. will be spread.
throughout the twenty four hour day.. It should further be mentioned
that the overnight. programing will be coming into our station via-
satellite,. and will. only require one on duty person. We .are certain
that our facility will present a very low profile to the neighborhood,
and we are of the belief that the beauty shop presently located on
the premises under discussion, is generating far more traffic than
the radio station will.
We are going to be a commercial. radio station with a news talk
format. It is our intention to be both informative.. and entertaining ' to
the community. As a commercial entity,. we anticipate having a
sales staff of approximately two people. As a general rule, these
sales people will visit clients at their places of business. It will
very much be the exception that .clients will actually visit our
premisses.
If you have any questions, or require further information, please
don't hesitate to contact me.
R pectfullY~_,Q/-
~J/~ ~i~7
Alan Corbeth
~~; ~. • f
tsi9
At this time, it is our belief that two dishes will be adequate. In
any event, they will be camouflaged with fencing, plants, and
landscaping. This will insure that the receiving dishes are
unobtrusive, and that they are protected from vandalism.
Any signage will be in accordance with a sign permit from the city
of Central Point and be small and unobtrusive. There will be no
noise generated other than what one would expect from a normal
office building.
D. E-1, Not applicable.
E-2 The station will consist of a small full time staff of
approximately eight people. It should be noted. that these people
will not be present at the: studios at the same time. They will be
spread throughout the twenty four hour day. It should further be
mentioned that the overnight programing will be coming into our
station via satellite, and will only require one: on duty person. We
are certain that our facility will present a very low profile to the
neighborhood, and we are of the belief that the beauty shop presently
located on the premises under discussion, is generating far more
traffic than the radio station will. Since the traffic generated will
be less than is now apparent, we anticipate no need to increase
street widths or .modify street design.
E-3
Fl dJ ~ 7~ -n.,..~ T o o-f' s ~ v:~a` ~~ c~-. k ; .v > r! 6
F o v;-.r ~ d ; 7 ; o,., ..A p ~ r ~ "S sr cua~ w7~ G.o r eev
e a. ~l a~ ~~~"~
~'~° 'r ~-~ ?
'
E-4 No changes in points of vehicular ingress and egress are Y
~ "~
needed because of the low impact of the radio station traffic.
E-5 Appropriate landscaping will be provided to screen the
satellite dishes and enhance the property.
E-6 Any signage will be in accordance with a sign permit from
the city of Central Point and be small and unobtrusive.
E-7 .Fences will be added to the property as noted in the scale
drawing under the.. appropriate permits from the -city of Central
Point.
E-8 The overnight programing will be coming into our station
via satellite, and will only require one on duty person. No regulation
needed due to low impact.
E-9 Not applicable.
E 10 .Not applicable.
E-11. No other conditions are necessary to protect the public
health, safety and general welfare.
.:~1
~~~
The legal description of the property is as follows: Lot 4, Block 1,
Griffiths addition to the .city of Central Point, Jackson County,
Oregon.
A. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use in
that no other buildings other than those existing are needed. The
scale drawing shows the existing buildings and the fencing and
space for satellite dishes and allows space for additional parking.
B. The driving access to the station is from 8th Street and an alley
way bordering the rear of the property. There are presently three
existing parking, spaces consisting of the garage .and driveway, and
we will construct. an additional four spaces, at the. rear of the
property. These spaces will have access from the alley way. This
will provide for. more .than enough parking considering that the
building is approximately 1.,150. square. feet. It is unlikely that
people connected with. the radio station .will ever need to park on 8th
street.
C. We are going to be a commercial radio station with a news talk
format. It is our intention to be both informative and entertaining to
the community. As a commercial entity, we anticipate having a
sales staff. of approximately two people. As a general rule, these
sales people will visit clients at their places of business. It will
very much be the exception that clients will actually visit our
premisses.
There will also be a small microwave antenna located on a simple
pole. mast attached to the side of-the house. This is for the
transmission of a very low powered microwave signal that will be
used to send our programs from the studios to our transmitter site
located approximately three miles from Jacksonville on highway
238. This antenna will actually be considerably smaller than most
normal home television aerials. Because of the very low power of
the signal, the extreme directivity, and high frequency, this system
will not cause any interference to nearby radio and television
reception.
The satellite dishes required .will be simple receivirig units used for
the purpose of obtaining network radio feeds, and will not differ in
appearance to those used in private homes throughout the county.
~1~
'w-;i
06'99
~ of /y
,Y
,~
~~
n ~ ~~ I
,. ~ ~~ I
l
I
4 ~~~ I
u
I
I ~
W 1
x I
___. _-- ~
/ I i ~
_,_ µo-dev i ~ ~ ii ~
~ o.. ~_
s
/~ ~ a I
Q 1( S I ' rtt Q =
v. ~ ~ s n I I J ~
Z ~~ r ~ j 0 w
~ ~ ~ ~ J a
~ I i v
H _ _ ~ ..___._ _~ m.
' ___
• 092 : 4 xc °
~ ~) ~~ ~ N
~- -- - -- o
_.._. ~
Nr
133b1S 3NId 1St/3 NO
X
MQ
" - V~~
e, 1
ITEM ~______~
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
S5f'AF~ R[s(F'®R~f'
DATE: January 2, 1991
PROJECT: Review and Recommendation for a Conditional Use Permit for KOPE-FM
Radio Station
PROJECT
OWNER: Medford Judeo Christian Outreach, Inc.
P.O. Box 811
Grants Pass, OR 97526
PH (503) 479-0549
LOCATION: Township 37 South, Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian
Section 2CC, TL 7500
ZONE: C-4
TYPE OF
DEVELOPMENT: Radio Station
I. Street /mprovements:
A. Existing Conditions:
1. Street No. MA-2, Street Name - E. Pine Street, Street
Classification -Major Arterial, Street Jurisdiction -City of Central
Point, Existing R.O.W. - 80', Future R.O.W. - 80', Existing Street
Width - 64', Future Street Width - 64'. .Curb and Gutter -
Existing, Sidewalks -Existing, Street Lights -Existing, Traffic
Volume - 20,000 VT/D+.
2. Street No. LS 84, Street Name - S. 8th Street, Street
Classification-Local Street, Street Jurisdiction-City of Central
Point, Existing Right of .Way-60', Future Right of Way-60',
Existing Street Width-36', Future Street Width-36', Curb and
Gutter-existing, Existing Sidewalk-None, Future Sidewalk-
Required, 5' curbside.
Page Two
Staff Report
KOPE Radio
B. Developer's Required Conditions:
1. Parking Spaces shall be as required by 17.64.050(H)(1) C.P.M.C.
2. Off-Street parking.shall be paved with asphaltic concrete prior to
occupancy of the structure for use as defined in this Application.
3. A 25' vision clearance distance shall be maintained at the
intersection of S. 8th Street and E. Pine Street.
4. If a Building Permit is Issued, a payback of the cost for paving the
alley between 7th. and 8th in the amount of S shall be
reimbursed to Mr. Bob Smith.
5. Six foot (6') fences can be installed within 20' of the property line
when adjacent to a public street or alley. A 42" fence can be
installed at the property line. (See C.P.M.C. 15.20). The six foot
(6') fence shown on the east and north property must be adjusted
to meet code requirements.
6. Provide a 15 foot 115') vision clearance area for your
ingress/egress locations.
7. Install a 5' curbside sidewalk on S. 8th Street on property which
abuts S. 8th Street, prior to occupancy of the structure for use as
defined in this Application.
//. Storm Drainage System
A. Existing Conditions:
1. A 36" storm drainage pipe is located in the alley between S. 7th
and S. 8th Street.
B. Developers Required Conditions:
1. All roof drains, area drains, parking areas and crawl spaces shall
be connected to a curb drain or an approved storm drainage
system prior to occupancy of the structure for the use as defined
in this Application.
.,
Page Three
Staff Report
KOPE Radio
///. Additiona/Requirements:
A. The review for the development submitted by Judeo Christian Outreach,
Inc. was done in accordance with the rules, regulations, and ordinances
in .affect as of the date of this review. .Any modifications by the
developer of this development.. after City Planning Commission and/or
City Council approvals could require resubmittal of the application and
approval by the City: Planning Commission and/or City Council
B. All costs associated with this development shall be the soleresponsibility
of the developer/applicant/owner which ever the case may be.
KOPERAD.10
t ., ::a Lti~
r
~,
ITEM
COND= T= ONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING DEPARTMBNT REVIHW
Conditional Use Permit - KOPS-FM Radio Station
Applicant: Richard Wright
Land Use Agent: Chuck Findley (Realtor)
Land Use: KOPE-FM Radio Station, owned and operated by Medford Judeo-
Christian Outreach, Inc.
Site: 744 East Pine
Southwest corner of East Pine and 8th Street
(37 2W 2CC Tax Lot 7500)
1. Applicant shall ensure that any on-site lighting improvements shall be so
designed and installed so that direct rays are not directed toward a public
street or residential property.
2. Applicant shall ensure that operation other than during normal business
hours shall be conducted in such a manner that it does not deprive
residents of sleep or conflict with any other community or neighborhood
functions.
3. Satellite dishes are considered accessory structures. Applicant shall
maintain a minimum setback of 5 feet on the interior side, 20 feet on the
street side, and 10 feet on the rear for such accessory structures.
Applicant shall also screen the satellite dishes with fencing or
landscaping.
4. Applicant Shall provide a minimum of four (4) parking spaces and said
spaces shall meet the parking design requirements outlined in Central Point
Municipal Code 17.64.100 (attached).
GR:sb
` + ~ie 4
p .,, i~
.,
t~
ORDINA.~CE \0. 112
AN ORDINANCE tli`4E:r'DING
THE TEXT OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL 'rOINT MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION 17.64 PARKING STANDARDS
I,RiERF.AS, the City Council of the City of Central Point
deems it necessary to recommend certain amendments relating to the
parking standards found in the zoning ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing held April 19, 1984 was
published in the Medford Mail Tribune on April 9 and April 1.5, 19Su;
and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing testimony from proponents
and opponents was heard or given opportunity to be heard, now,
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 17.64.100 of the Central Point Municipal
Code is hereby amended as follows:
17.64.100 Parking Desigr. Requirements.
A. Size of Parking Spaces. The standard size for automobile
parking spaces shall be nine feet in width by twenty feet in length,.
A compact car parking space shal.7. b- eight feet in width by fifteen feet
ir. length,,,as":ptoXided in Secricn l; 54:070.
"„ ~~ B: "'Farking~Lot~Aisles:.'-The width,cfparking lot aisles
'-shall be as illustrated in the~~fbllowing diagram:
~ ~ ~ - -
.~-' '
:~
'>`,/, _ -
,.a.,. -
(j~ ~~
PARKING STANDARDS
OrG{nom^LC 117
N
P.NGLE OF
PARKING
SPACE
(Degrees) p
WIDTH OF
PARKING
SECTION
(Feet) S
DEPTH
OF STALL
(Feet) A
WIDTH
OF P.ISLE
{Feet) C
C(~RB
LENGTH
PER CAR
(Feet')
0 32'-0" 9'-0" 14' 22'-0"
30 49'-7" 17'-10" 14' 18'-2"
35 _S1'-8" 18'-10" 14' 15'-8"
40 53'-4" 19'-8" 14' 14'-1„
45 55'-2" .20'-7" 14' 12'-8"
50 60'-2" 21'-i" ,18' ~ 11'-8"
55 61'-2"' 21'-7" 18' * 10'-11"
60 61'-8" 21'-10" 18' * 10'-5"
65 66'-0" 22'-0" 22' * 9'-11"
70 65'-10" 21'-11" 22' * 9'-7"
75 65,_q„ 21'-8„ 22~ * 9'-4„
80 68'-8" 21'-4" 26' * 9'-1"
85 67'-10" 20'-11" 26'.?k 9'-0"
* Width of aisle permits two-way circulation
only when aturn-around is provided.
* Width of aisle permits two-way circulation.
EXAMPLES
~s
>.o-~;
i P
S A i
~o ~.-~e
P
. ~~ ,~
.o.
_.
----~„
~: _
~~~ ~~ _
~ ~~~ ~_
ni ,~
C. :,ccess. There stall be acequate provision £or ingress
and egress to all parking spaces. k`here parking areas do ret abut a
public street or alley, access driveways shall be provided that are not
less than ten feet in width for one-way traffic or eighteen feet ir.
width for two-way traffic.
D. Driveways.
1. In any R-1 or R-2 district any lot developed with
a single-family dwelling, two detached single-family dwellings, or an
attached duplex-may have one driveway with a minimum width of ten
feet and maximum width of thirty-six feet, "provided. the driveway
width does not exceed fifty percent (502) of the lot's total width,
as measured-at the front property line.
2. A driveway that serves as required access to a
garage or carport that is not perpendicular to the front property
line, or side property line in the case of a corner lot, shall not
exceed twenty feet in width if a turn-around area is provided to
permit two-way ingress and egress.
3. On properties having two driveway openings,
such as a circular driveway, both openings must"serve the same
driveway; off-street parking shall not be provided for within the
front yard area, and the combined width of the driveways shall not
exceed fifty percent (502) of the lot's total width as measured at
the front property line.
4. In the R-1 and R-2 districts not more Chan one
driveway opening onto a public street shall be permitted for lots
having a street frontage of less than eighty =eet.
5. Driveways from a public street to a required
offstreet parking area that serves any R-3 district development, with
the exception. of single and two-family dwellings, shall be a minimum
of eighteen feet in width and designed for two-way traffic.
6. The minimum driveway width in any nonresidential
district shall be tcaenty feet. An exception may be made for drive-
ways that are not intended for public use ant are blacked or gated
to prevent such use.
7. The maximum driveway width in any nonresidential
district shall be thirty feet. An exception Ray be made by the City
Planning Commission for drive-in type businesses having multiple
lanes or service locations.
E. Improvements o£ Parking Spaces.
1. All areas utilized for o££-street parking, access"
and manuevering of vehicles shall be paved with durable materials
for all-weather use and shall be adequately drained to prevent the
flow of run-off water across sidewalks or other pedestrian areas.
2. Required parking areas shall be designed with
painted striping or other approved method of celineating the individ-
ual spaces .with the exception of lots containing single or two-family '
dwellings.
3. Parkingspaces for uses ether than one and .two-
family dwellings shall be designed so that ne backing movements or
other maneuvering within astreet or other public right-of-way shall
be necessary.
Crcinance Hc. 1512 ~
~! !.% V
;r
4. :,ny liehting u_ed tc illuminate off-street parking
cr loading areas shall be sc arranged as to reflect the light away
from adjacent street's or properties.
Si Service dri~•es shall have a minimum vision clear-
ance area formed by the intersection of the driveway centerline, the
street right-of-way line, and a straight line joining said lines
through points twenty feet from their intersection.
6. Parking spaces located along the outer boundaries
of a parking lot shall be contained by a curb or a bumper rail so
placed to prevent a motor vehicle from e_:tending over an adjacent
property line, a public street, public sidewalk, or a required
-landscaping area.
7. Parking, loading or vehicle maneuvering areas
shall not be located within the front yard area or side yard area
of a corner lot abutting a street in any residential (R) district,
nor within any portion of a street setback area that is required
to be landscaped in any commercial (C) or industrial (Pf) district.
F. Limitation on Gse of Parking Areas. Required
parking areas shall be used exclusively for vehicle parking in
conjunction with a permitted use and shall not be reduced or en-
croached upon in any manner. The parking facilities shall be so
designed and maintained as nor to constitute a nuisance at any
time, and shall be used in such a manner that no hazard to persons
or property or reasonable impediment to traffic will result.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication-
of its passage this 1?th day of May 1984.
` ~
~-~ ---~i
Mayor , j'
• Approved by me this 18th day of *tay 1984.
ATTEST: ~, ~.
J~
C ~~
~'~. _
., .\ .
City Representative ~~,
~.~ -
"`
;tayor
,. ;.1 ~ U;30
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION.NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY
CHUCK FINDLEY FOR APPLICANT/OWNER RICHARD WRIGHT
FOR OPERATION OF THE STUDIO AND OFFICES OF KOPE-FM, A RADIO
STATION OF MEDFORD JUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH, INC.
(37 2W 2CC TL 7500)
WHEREAS, agent Chuck Findley, on behalf of applicant/owner Richard Wright,
submitted an application for a conditional use permit .for operating the studio
and offices of KOPE-FM at 744 East Pine in the City of Central Point, Oregon,
further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's Map Page 37 2W 2CC, Tax Lot
7500, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Central Point Municipal Code .1.24.060 and 4RS
197.763(2), a public hearing was scheduled and a notice of said public hearing
was prepared: and sent to property owners of record within 100 feet of location
of proposed conditional use, and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point held a public
hearing upon said application for conditional use permit on January 8, 1991
pursuant to Central Point Municipal Code Section 1.24.020B, and having at said
public meeting received and reviewed the applicant's findings which are attached
hereto as Exhibit A of this document, City staff reports and testimony and being
fully advised now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon the staff report, evidence, applicant's findings
and record relating to The Conditional Use Application, the Planning Commission
hereby finds as follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. KOPE-F'M/RESO
(01/010291)
:s ~ ~~~.
;~~.
a. The property and existing improvements at 744 East Pine are adequate
in size and shape to accommodate the land use described as the studio
and offices of KOPE-FM radio station and subject to proposed
improvements, will meet applicable development and zoning
requirements.
b. Vehicular traffic will enter and exit the site from the alley
adjacent to proposed off-street parking. Approximately two off-
street parking spaces on existing driveway will be accessed from
Eighth Street. Said access points are adequate in size and condition
to accommodate anticipated traffic generated by the land use.
c. Upon review of the application for conditional use and associated
development and zoning standards, it has been determined that said
project will not have any adverse affect upon abutting properties.
d. Upon review of the Conditional Use Permit Application, it has been
determined that the proposed land use will not diminish the health,
safety and welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding
neighborhood.
Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby approves the Conditional Use
Permit Application submitted by Chuck Findley, on behalf'of applicant Richard
Wright subject to the applicant meeting the conditions which are a requirement
of-said approval and which are set forth in Exhibits A, B and C, attached hereto,
and by this reference expressly made a part of the within resolution.
Passed by the Planning Commission this day of 1991,
and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day 'of
1991.
Planning Commission Chairman
ATTEST:
City Representative
Approved by me this day of 1991.
Planning Commission Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. KOPE-FM/RESO
' (01/010291)
.~5-~~ - - {;~
- - - STAFF REPORT - -- -
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: George Rubaloff dministrative Assistant.
DATE:- January 3, 1991
RE: Public Meeting - Review and make recommendation to the City Council
for Preliminary Subdivision Plat for Stonecreek No. 4, Phase I
SUMMARY
Developer. Gary. Whittle has combined Phases I and III of Stonecreek No. 4
subdivision to form a new proposed Phase I. Applicants Gary Whittle, Dennis
Smith and Gina Smith have submitted a preliminary plat application for. the new
Phase I. The Planning Commission is scheduled to conduct a public meeting on
January. 8, 1991, after. which the commission may formulate a recommendation for
the City Council.
nn~xrannnm
On July 10, 1990, the Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat for
Phase I of Stonecreek No. 4, an 8-lot component of Stonecreek No. 4 located at
the southerly end of the development. The Planning Commission forwarded its
recommendation for approval. o~ the preliminary plat. to City Council via
Resolution No. 199. After conducting a public hearing on July 19, 1990 and
deliberating, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 557 approving the
preliminary plat for Phase I of Stonecreek No. 4. The developer has now combined
the original Phase I and the originally planned 18-lot Phase III into a new 27-
lot Phase L.
The lots of the proposed subdivision phase, range in size from 6,000 to 22,000
square feet. The overall development is located south of existing Stonecreek
developments, west of Hog Creek and North of Beall Lane.
ANALYSIS
Staff has processed the plat in accordance with the procedure outlined in Central
Point Municipal Code Chapter 16 and has reviewed the plat for consistency with
City development codes. Public Works Director, Larry Blanchard, has conducted
an engineering analysis and has prepared a report which addresses the applicant's
master plan and a report which outlines proposed conditions of approval for the
preliminary plat.
VJ~
'4. E
In order to avoid a slight angle point of the centerline for Glenn Way, the
applicant is requesting that the City grant excess right-of-way (approximately
5 :feet) from the 30 by 320 foot parcel which was deeded to the City in
conjunction with a minor land partition application. Staff suggests that this
be handled through a separate process for street vacation.
After the Planning Commission conducts a review of the plat and the master plan,
Staff will forward the Commission's recommendation onto the City Council at the
next regularly scheduled Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
The following items are included for Planning Commission review:
Item A - Vicinity Maps
Item B - Certificate of Posting
Item C - Tax Assessor. Map
Item D - Aerial Map
Item E - Reduced Version of Tentative Plat Map
Item F - Application for. Preliminary Plat
Item G - Director's Report regarding Preliminary plat review
Item H - Proposed Planning,Commission Resolution
i i~
~: ~ `L
ITEM
..
Vei..1
,....
{1~~
ITEM
155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Sandy Berryhill , CERTIFY THAT ON THE
FOLLOWING DATE OF Friday, January 4, 1991 I POSTED A NOTICE
FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON Jannuary 8 , 1991, DURING WHICH THE
CENTRAL POINT PLANNTNG COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
PLAT FOR STONECREEK N0. 4, PHASE I SUBMITTED BY GARY WHITTLE; DENNIS
C.W. SMITH AND GINA SMITH.
AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE
2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY
3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION
4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD
N E
~y
DATE
'v c/ +f
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
- _ - -- l ~rn~ __ G,-.._,
.~_.. -ti ,.,, w .w~
:~:~
~~ ~ 6200 ;~ ~ 6100 __ _ft ta_
''~'~ ~ r ~ Y = ~ 560U
2 ~ r 1
- .s.
-~ ~ IH v(r av.M ,
~ 400 ~ Na. :
200 '100 /~t an
5500
5400
..•._.; I ; l.K j
L~. F 1)•
I 530C
AIN 7111E ~OMfS~NY i~-°r°f ~ .,
U~ A$'.'t,SSOR'S /h PIS ~ \
S~)LEIY TO ASSLST J LO• ~
f41Tp PROPERTY. <
ASSU.'e4fQ.ilY_ P. ~ 52:
^~f51fJ TfiIS MAP A C -
!+ THE A~CQM.T',C, Yf#d < u
.. .. .....4 .... rwf:. iwr wrJ
J p i
1 ~ •~
^ ~
., .
1 ~ r
{ .. )j
. + S
~~ _ - f ,~
~. ~ 'tlYy
. ~ ~ «~
~ Aaj i
} ~. ~ ~
-~~,, g
>o
.' ~~ q
_ r,5
.. . I -~ •
!40
.... -
1
~.
• ~ F + _
._ - -
. .. ...i.c;;.
ITEM _.~_
264,000
. c,. t~ .. ~Je7
_.. N
Q Y ro;
W
v
~
b .i.
3 a
~
° ~i ~ a ~ f ~
b~
o
u G
ITEM .~
A ~~' ~ ~
~
~~ ~ Y~
w
n ~N ~ te' `Y 1
C` N
w 3 ~
p
~An U~ i~HnS
Ua
F
G
2 O
'r'~
:~ K
4 u°oo 1N1~~
t~
~
^~ J
Nxl .
0 r
e
Y
e
.
y
L~
~ Zv~4~ ~~~
.
.~...
~ ?q
~ ~
W Wb 4 .N• ]]
pp
.._
1
.y tl ~'U ~dS~4
]
WY
A
tl .
I
ti
.+1~' 1 x`081 1 0. kAa~ 4 U _ Ill ~YY ; {
a
o{J+
~
~ ,~ 4
j. Y~~ • ~ yy
~1N ~4Q Lh ~ 4 < ~ Zjyl ol Fb +~I 1
l
9-Ib . Curves T%V baBb~
+ Z
e
N yg
N ~1 ° , Y
J ~Q J Z'. ~ Y r ~
f!`/~ ~ k M _ _ _
i ~^'t bm ~ ~Ri
/ r
~ N IN .N , t ~ q V •a~.
w N
tr • y .1 ~ a ~. ~,... ~
.1 ' J ~
O
.f Y< r i'A< ~ ~ X IC r.0'JI ? '
rs< •'s~
lA~9l. W ' M 'lS/YI e.yM ViM ~~ N A ~( .'
> Y~N~s~ -_ _ rm n Yt9~r -~ __ _~ .__ W t
v~ -~' ~ Trw9 -jx~r~- Sh/lLRO ^
Jt _____ _ __ _ 1 ~
3o O n ..M
1 Q~y 9
/ ~ ,
µµ w ~ _. r. ,~ .s< .se s< .zo
f+ p ~ 4 ~y I ~4 p -
u ~~w s ~ 3 ~ / / 1 uA ~~_
A ~N ~ ' r
~ 9o a a
9 .~.
n
~ ° ~ ~ 1
m Y • 1 0 ~
1 z r M 4
~ N N r a ~ ~.
~ o• r H
t) \ J
W
h • M ~ ~
N 1, _._ -_-..__
~ 3 S
9 0 ~ ~
~ T 1
~ ~ .. ... 1
9-/b Qa^Y
n~ ~ _l
_~,
~~=; i
=~k;. ~
.~,;~~ £;
~~ ~~.~ j
~~~o
_~. ~.~
ITEM ~
Application Filing Deadline
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Application for Preliminary Subdivision Plata
Name }~Rc l F (C ~° R EST I~RoPGR.'7~ ~S , /NC . -
Address ~® L~O X ~ ~ 8~
Phone Number 77z'476y
Proposed Site Location
Assessor's Map Page .Location 3T Z w /OD/~} Tax. Lot(s) x/00, 3OU zGY>~ /p~j
Required Information:
A legal description as it appears on the deed. Deed copies 'may be obtained at .the
Jackson County Assessor's Office.
'Requested information as contained in the attached Central Point Municipal Code
Sections 16.24:020 to 16.24.070 and completion. of a Statement of Water Rights
(form attached)
~~
u
I , ...~-w~ W/ ~t,.~ti -
authorize agent of the owner
written authority)
certify that I am the owner or
proposed site (If authorized agent, attach
_.~VN~ C«D ~~~ Date ~~."" ~-~-9D
(Signature of owner or authorized agent of owner, please indicate which)
Application Fee: $100 ~ ~~ n~ ~ !~
~~ 4 U ~~0~
LUAP/ADMINI (2}',,f~
~~i
3
FARBER SURVEYING
-...
FORESTRY CONSULTANT-OREGON LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR-WATER RIGHTS EXAMINER
TIMBER CRUISING - PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXPERT - PLANNING REPORTS - CONSTRUCTION STAKING
December 21, 1990
George Rubaloff
City of Central Point
P.O. Box 3576
Central Point, Oregon 97502
Re: Application fox Stonecreek No. 9, Phase I.
Dear George,
At your request here is a narrative of the changes from
previous applications for these parcels.
Block 4 which is east of Glenn Way is the same as has been
previously submitted.
The area shown on the tentative map as an existing 30 foot
right of way, which is that parcel deeded to the city by CW
Smith. Stonecreek No. 4 has a right of way for Glenn Way of
50 feet with 25 feet on each side of the center line. If I
hold the east edge of the right of way, of said deed, for the
center line of Glenn Way there will be a slight angle point
in the street. The intent is to have a center line traveling
in a straight line. Since we have a lessor right of way
width it leaves an excess of 4.5 to 5 feet on the West side
of the street. Rather than having a variable right of way
width I would recommend that the city grant the excess right
of way back to private ownership by an acceptable method.
The only other change is this application is a shift to the
east of the cul de sac in Block 5. With a slight variation
of lot sizes, which is ± 2 feet in depth, this makes this cul
de sac a mirror image of the cul de sac in Stonecreek No. 4,
Phase II to the north.
At the request of Gary Whittle we hereby with draw the
application for the Minor Partition of Tax Lot 100, 392W10DA.
if you have any other questions please contact me. nscisTEnaD
PROFESSIONAL
Sincerely, + Lt%T;D SUF~VEYOR '
~.. ~.,.,~.,e: m :..............~.._.,.~. ~.,..,~.,_._.d~
Herbert A. Farber, PLS
WHO REGON ~~
1VtV 26, 1985
^(~ / HERBERT A. FARBER
V V ~ ~V ...~..:..... 2189 .~».....a..s,,.
HERB FARBER P.O. BOX 5286 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 (503) 776-0846 (office) . (503) 664-5034 (home)
e
DATE:
PROJECT:
PROJECT N0:
LOCATION:
ZONE:
NO. OF ACRES
ITEM G
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
January 2, 1991
Stonecreek No. 4, Phase
PW 90016
T37S R2W WM Section 10DA TL 100, 200, 300 and 402
R-1-6
NO. OF LOTS 27
NO. OF DWELLINGS 27, One (1) per lot
SUBDIVIDER/OWNER Pacific Crest Properties c/o
' Gary Whittle
P.O. Box 1488
Medford, OR 97501
Ph. 772-9764
SURVEYOR: Farber Surveying
P.O. Box 1488
Medford, OR 97502
Ph. 664-5034
TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Residential Subdivision
1. Preliminary Plat Requirements /Title 16.241
(Check OneJ
Meets
Title Description Standard
16.24.010 Filing Fee X
76.24.020 Scale X
16.24.030 General Conditions,:
e. Name of Subdivision X
ti. Date North Arrow Scale X
c. Legal location of
aubdiviaion X
d. Names/Address of owner
engineers X
16.24.040 Existing Conditions
a. Location of street
widths and
easements, etc. X
b. Topographic Info
c. Bench mark established X
1
..: o.`,)
Dennis & Gina Smith
1642 Beall Lane
Central Point, OR 97502
Not
Applicable
V '} `Y
Does Not
Meet Standard Conditons
X (t)
Meets Not
I bl
Title Descriotlon Standard Acal ce e
d. Location end direction
of ell water courses
e. Natural features rock out-
croppings. marshes,
wooded areas
f. Existing uses of the land X
g. Location of ell exiating
streets and utilities X
h. Zoning on end adjacent to
tract is compatible X
16.24.050 Proposed Plan
e. Street location, end the
lanes, grades, radius of
- curves, relatlonehlp to
other existing or proposed
streets end other
utilities.
b. Easementa-
widths/Purposes X
c. Lot Dimension X Fnal Dimension shell be shown on Final Piat
18.24.060 Partial Development
la other property adjacent to
this property being considered
in the deli n This property oen
Does Not
Meet Standard
X
X
X
Condilions
(s1
(6)
(2)
e•
be owned by tha ~ubdivider.See Master Plan See Master Plan Comments
18.24.070 Explanatory Information
e. Vicinity maps to explain
relatlonehip to exiating
streets can require
correction to exiating
street. X
b. Proposed Deed Restrictions Need a list
c. Center lane profile of
streets to show grade
( 100' beyond attest) Provide Information on final construction drawings
d. Approximate location and
proposed size of utilities X
18.32.020 Requirements Generally
ll. Subdivision Layout
(Check One)
Meets
Title Descriction Standard
16.16.010 Blocks Length X
Width R-1-8 X
Shape X
Not greater 1200' X
16.16.020 Blocks Sizes X
16.16.030 Blocks Easements
a. Utilities X
b. Water Courses
c. Pedestrian Weys X
~ s ', i
Not Does Not
Acciicable Meet Standard
2
.. (:~cf
Conditions
X (6)
n;
Meets Not Does Not
Title Desoriotiod Standard Aoalicabla Meet Standard
16.16.040 Lots -Shapes & Size X
16.16.050. Lots-Size & Determination
(Lot length greater then 2 1/2
times width prohibited) X
16.16.060 Through lots X
16.18.070 Lot sidelines X
16.16.080 Large Lot Subdivisions X
l/l. Street /mprovemenfs
A. Existing Conditions
Condifions
1. Sheet No. SA 14, Street Name -Beall Lane, Street Classification.-Secondary Arterial, Street
Jurisdiction -Jackson County, ex/st/ng curb/gutters -none, future curb/gutters -required,
existing sidewalks -none, future sidewalks -required, existing street lights -.none in vicinity,
future street lights -required, existing traffic volume - 3000 vt/d, traffic vo/ume fhis project -
205 vUd, total traffic volume w/this pro%ect - 3205 vUd, total traffic volume this street can
carry - 7500 vt/d.
2. Street No. - CS 6, Street Name -Glenn Way, Streef Classification -Col%ctor Street, Street
Jurisdiction -City, curb/gutters -existing, future curbs/gutters -required, sidewa/k =existing,
' future sidewalks -required, existing street lights -yes, future street lights- required, existing
traffic volume - 1250 vUd, traffic volume this project - 205 vUd, total traffic volume w/this
project - 1460 vUd, total traffic volume this street can carry - 3500 vt/d.
B. Street Standards 16.12.010
itle
16.12.040
16.12.050
Deacriution
Street Generally
a. Location
b. Width
c. Grade
d. Relationship to
existing street
e. Topography as
it relates to Drainage
f. Provide far street
construction
g. Follows a master
plan
h. Traffic volume
I. Safety Features
Street R.O.W. & Widths
Street Reserve Strip
Street -Alignment
Street -Extension
Street -Intersection
angles 90%
Meets Not
Standards Acciicable
X
X
See Comment
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Does Not
Meet Standard Conditions
X (2)
16.12.060
16.12-070
16.12.080
16.12.090
3
1 •} - GY6
(8)
X (1)
X 14)
X (5)
Meets Not Does Not
Title Description Standards Acdiceble Meet Standard Condidans
16.12.100 Existing Streets
Additional Widths X (4)
16.12.110 Half Street X
16.12.120 Cul-de-Sac end/or
deed end streets
a. Shell not serve
more than 12 lots X
b. Shall not be greeter
than 400' X
18.72.130 Street Names X
78.12.140 Street Grades and Curves -
- MA SACS not greater
then 8%
-Not greater than 12% X
on LS
- bennot be less then 1 °h X
' -Shell have et min(mum
100' curve radius. X
lV. Water System
A. fxlsting Conditions
A f0" Water Main Exists on Glenn Way to where G/enn Way ends with a 12" Watei Main on Beall Lane.
B. Water System Standards
Meets
Title Description Standards
16.32.080 Water System
Prov(ded Mein X
Serviceiaterals
1 eech.lot
Fire Hydrants
not greater then
500'apart
Fire Flow 1000 gpm
provide minimum
pressure 40 psi X
Not Does Not
Aoalicable Meet Standard
X
X
Coriditlon
(7)
(8)
V. Sanitary Sewers
A. Existing Conditions
A 8" sanitary sewer is located in the proposed street extension of Glenn Way..,.....
B. Sanitary Sewer System Standards
4
5
ri
Meats Not - Does Nat
Title Description Standard Applicable Meet Standards Conditions
16.32.050 Adequate Sizing
Mainline X
Services X (7)
Vl. Storm Drainage
A. Existing Conditions
1. Daisy Creek is located sloop the easterly property line.
B. Sanitary Sewer System Standards
Meets Not Does Not
Description Standard
Titl licable Meat Standard Conditions
e
~~ 18.32-040 Surfaoe
-Provide drainage through
the subdlvlsion X (9)
-Are there adverse effects
s
placed on down-stream X (10)
structurea7
- No catch begin located
greater then 350 ft. for
any curb and gutter X (11)
section.
-Wetland Designations X (61
5
G~$
p4` I
CONDITIONS
STONECREEK #4, Phase I
1. Include topography of the property with proper 2' contours.
2. Identify the street design section dimensions and special design considerations.
3. Glenn Way is listed as a collector street and the collector route designation is Glenn Way/Malabar.
Glenn Way connects to W. Pine Street, Malabar connects to Beall Lane. Installation of another
collector street which would only carry the traffic volume of a local street places a financial
requirement on a developer without the traffic volume present to establish the requirement. This area
shall be served by a 50' right of way, 36' curb to curb street.
4. The developer shall construct curb/gutters, sidewalk, street lights, driveways on the lots abutting Beall
Lane and design the street for 10,000 vt/d 10% truck traffic. Full street width shall be 48'.
5. The developer shall dedicate an additional 10' of property for street right of way. Construction of the
gutter section for Beall Lane shall match those constructed east of Daisy Creek.
6. The developer shall verify in writing from the Division of,State Lands that there are no wetlands in this
development or that the developer has adequately mitigated the affect of development within the
wetland area.
7. Place note on preliminary plan that each lot shall have a water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage
connection to the lot.
8. Fire hydrants shall ba spaced as approved by the Central Point Fire Department..
9. Identify the location for the storm drainage system for this subdivision.
10. Storm drainage calculation shall be provided by the engineer with final construction drawings to assure
proper sizing.
11. Catchbasins must be located no greater than 350 feet for any section of curb and gutter.
12. Street name signs including posts, labor and equipment for installation of street signs shall be paid for
by the developer of this subdivision and the installation shall be completed by the City.
13. A traffic control signing plan shall be included as a part of the final construction plans, and will be
installed by the City and all costs associated with traffic control sign installation shall be paid for by
the Developer.
14. A street lighting plan shall be included in the construction documents according to the requirements
of the Public Works Director. All intersections shall be illuminated. Local street spacing shall not be
greater than 150'. The Beall Lane street light shall have a 22,000 lumen HPSV light mounted on a
steel pole. Developer to install all pads and conduits for street lights as a part of the construction of
the subdivision. The developer shall also pay for street lights and for the installation of all street lights
in this subdivision.
6
a.
b :j
_ (J11~
15. Ladder rungs shall be installed in each sanitary sewer manhole of a depth greater than 3.0 feet to the
flow line of the manhole. Developer shall use ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works
Department.
16. There is a small seasonal stream which flows through this property. Developer shall construct a storm
drainage system which collects the flow from this stream and carries the flow through this subdivision
in such a manner as to not cause flooding of any lot.
17. Developer shall design the storm drainage system to meet the design requirements in accordance with
the City of Central Point Public Works Standards.
18. Developer shall install or cause to be installed, conduits for utilities at intersections, or locations
determined by utility companies. Developer shall also provide conduit crossings for utility. companies
who will not install their services until after the subdivision is constructed. The developer shall be
responsible for all costs associated with the installatin of these conduit crossings.
19. The water system shall be designed to provide a minimum flow at each fire hydrant in the subdivision
of 1000 gpm.
20. All construction for utilities, streets and other structures discussed herein within rights of ways owned
or to be owned by the City of Central Point, shall be done so according to all rules, regulations,
ordinances, resolutions, and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for construction
of this subdivision:
21. The Tentative Plan Review for the Tentative Plan submitted hereby by Gary Whittle (Pacific Crest
Properties) ,and Dennis and Gina Smith, was done in accordance with the rules, regulations and
ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by the developer which would
allow this subdivision NOT to meet standards set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code, or would
require staff to complete a new Tentative Plan review shall require a new submittal of Tentative Plan
for City approval.
22. The developer, prior to submittal of the Tentative Plan to City Council for review, shall determine the
method of completing the improvements according to Title 16. for this subdivision so this information
can be entered into the record.
STNCRK4.1
7
i_ a .._
V~~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY
SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR STONECREEK N0. 4, PHASE I
WHEREAS, Gary Whittle, Dennis C.W. Smith and Gina Smith, have submitted
a preliminary plat for a subdivision located in the southwest quadrant of the
City west of where Hog Creek runs approximately -north and south, further
described as Jackson County Assessors map 37 2W lODA Tax Lots 100, 200, 300 and
400, and.
WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary plat combined with Stonecreek No. 4
Phase II currently being constructed, forms the entire Stonecreek No. 4
subdivision development also described as Lot T, Snowy Butte :Orchards, Jackson
County Assessor Map 37 2W IODA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300 and 400, and,
WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a tentative master plan dated
.June 26, 1990, which illustrates the layout of the subdivision and a fifty (50)
foot wide extension of Glenn Way which would connect at the existing Glenn Way
and intersect at Beall Lane, and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point held a public
meeting upon said app~.ication for approval of the preliminary plat on
January 8, 1991, pursuant to Central Point Municipal Code Section 1.24.020C, and
having at said public meeting received and reviewed the application, City staff
report and testimony, and being fully advised, now, therefore
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
RESOLUTION N0.
(O1 010391)
\i ij
PREPLAT.ST4/RESO
~.~i.~{
Section 1. Based upon the staff report, evidence, and record relating to
said application, the Planning Commission hereby finds that said application
meets the requirements for preliminary plat applications, that said preliminary
plat as proposed is in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
code, and if the conditions set forth hereinafter are met, said application meets
the City's requirements for subdivision layout, park dedication, street
standards, water system standards, sanitary sewer standards, and storm drainage
standards.
Section 2. The Planning Conunission hereby recommends to the City Council'
approval of the preliminary subdivision plat submitted by Gary Whittle, Dennis
C.W. Smith and Gina Smith for Stonecreek No. 4, Phase I subject to the conditions
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and by this reference expressly made
a part of the within-resolution.
Passed by the Planning Commission on
signed by me in authentication of its passage this
1991.
1991 and
day of
Planning Commission Chairman
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Secretary
RESOLUTION N0.
(Ol 010391)
PREPLAT.ST4/RESO
~~ ~ - t.~ ` ~ _ V i~ rGi
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: George Rubaloff,~soministrative Assistant
DATE: January 3 199111''
SUBJECT:. Public Meeting - Review and recommendation to City Council - Minor
Land Partition submitted by Don Wilson for property known. as Tax Lot
2300, Jackson County Assessor's Map Page 37 2W lOAB
The proposed minor land partition is located in the northwest quadrant of-the
City in the R-1-8 zone (single family residential). The applicant plans to
eventually place a mobile home on the rear lot in conformance with any new
standards which are established by the City in response to new state laws which
provide for placement of manufactured housing on individual lots outside of
manufactured housing subdivisions. The Planning Commission is scheduled to
conduct a public meeting on Jahuary 8, 1991, after which the Commission may
formulate a recommendation for the City Council.
The following lots would be created from the proposed and partition:
Parcel 1 - 10,627 square feet
Parcel 2 - 18,341 square feet
The .67 acre parcel is located in the R-1-8 zone. The City's R-1-8 requirements
call for a minimum 8,000 square foot lot and a 16,000 square foot flag lot.
Therefore, the proposed lots are consistent with the City's lot size standards.
However, the proposed access to the property (see tentative partition plat) does
not meet the minimum 20 foot width for flag-configured lots. The applicant can
remedy this deficiency by shifting the mutual private access easement line on
Parcel No. 1. In addition, the City is anticipating development to the north
of the site. Said development may provide the applicant with an opportunity to
access Parcel twc from a local street. The comprehensive plan policy specifies
that residential properties should be accessed by means of a local street to
provide safe transition out of a neighborhood and onto a larger thoroughfare.
Since the opportunity may arise in the future, staff is treating the required
access off West Pine as a temporary improvement.
MLP.WILSON/PCWORK
Staff submits the .following items for the official record and for the Planning
Commission'sreview:
Item A - Vicinity'Map
Item B - Certificate of Posting
Item C - Application for Minor Land Partition
Item D - Aerial Map
Item E - Tax Assessor Map
Item F - Proposed tentative partition plat
Item G - Minor Land Partition Staff Review
Item H - Proposed Planning Commission Resolution recommending
approval
MLP.WILSON/PCWORK
•^~.::1
~v i
~J~'
.. -
ITEM ~ --~---°
ITEM
155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I Sandy Bairyhill , CERTIFY THAT ON THE
FOI:LOWING DATE OF Friday, January 4, J.99L , L POSTED A NOTICE
FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON January 8 1991, DURING WHICH THE
CENTRAL POINT RLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A MINOR LAND PARTITION..
REQUEST FROM DON WILSON FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 446 WEST PINE STREET
AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE
2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY
3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION
4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD
S TURE (/,/~
ATE~~~
e » ~ ~
L J Ft.'r
THE HEARTOF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY,.
ITEM G
Application Filing Deadline
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Application for Major/Minor Land Partition
Name Don Wilson
Address P.0. Box 3613 Central Pointy Oregon
Phone Number 66q-1918
Proposed Site Location
Address yy~ ~ es ~- P i n.Q Sf. C¢„ frw ~ ~o: n f
37-2W-1oaB 2300
Assessor's Map Page'Location Tax Lot(s).
Required Information:
A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot
and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's
Office
Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the
site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli-
ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached 'Central Point Municipal
Code Section 16.44.030 and completion of a Statement of Water Rights (form at-
tached)
I, Donald Wilson certify that I am the owner or
authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach
wri n authority)
gp~ ~f/~~~~ Owner Date December 17 ~ 1990
( ignature of owner or authorized agent of owner, please indicate which)
Application Fee: $100 Q ~~ 2 ~ X990
* A filing fee for recording a Deferred Improvement Agreement with the County
Clerk may also be required
- fislwl
LUAP/ADMINl ,~i.~~.i 1
L-38341 _'
EXIiIHIT A
Commencing at a l-1/4" pin located at the intersection of the centerline
of West Pine Street with the north boundary of Donation Land Claim No. 54
in Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian in Jackson
County, Oregon, (said pin being 1758.2 feet South and 1337.7 feet East
from the northwest corner of Donation Land Claim No. 53 said Township and
Range), thence North 54°51'30" East, along the centerline of said Street,
487.73 feet, thence North 20°04'10" West 41.42 feet to a 5/8" iron pin
located on the northwesterly boundary of Pine Street for the true point
of beginning; thence North 20°04'10" West 250.00 feet to a 5/8" iron pin;
thence North 54°51'30" East 120.00 feet to a 5/8" iron pin; thence South
20°04'10" East 250.00 feet to a 5/8" iron pin located on said Street-
boundary; thence South 54°51'30" West 120.00 feet to the true point of
beginning.
(Code 6-2, Account #1-14238-g, Map #372W10AB, Tax Lot #2300)
I l ill l_ I ~~~ ~~ I) I ~ ~ Y I1111x ITEM ~ "
2500
errs 4^ s
_. ~~
_T
2300
(~ /734) ~J.~`
,_
9° :.
~ '
~ ~a ~,~ ,
o
a ~{
~ 2503 ~`b ~ '
~ ~, >.
~_ 'e /
M. i ~ J~f~
~,
~~
rk~ ,~.,
wtj
2~.
~ .,r ~iVV
n
opt
op .
v2
9Z~
37 2W/oAB
ITEM ~
ITEM /
PARCEL 2
/B, 34/ Sq. F/.
E/i~efe o
OeeN '"N
E/isfin9
Gaye
o. '~
f1 0
s+N _ 90~~"' ~ Sole///le \ Q
- OhA ~' o
~N
PARCEL / ~
Proposed 'iNu/uo/Piivale
/O, 627 Sq. F/. \` Access Eosemen/".
/4"Phe
ese ~ Trce
1N9~ - ~ i
E~
.o ~~, ~, ,
o ~~ ~ ~ \ Fd 5/B"diam,
t~ / ~ eron Ple
Ji \»"//~
' ~ N. 35.08' 30" W„ 6.00'
/ `ZOp
1 t\ STRE~~
o `'
X
P~~~
. ,.
f;~~.
\,,~
.T
ITEM G
60>lS/ Oo(~ 6GG~UG~Q ~/n/~'l~'
~O~LSOOG IwNOL31YS~ ~L~PC^J~'7~Gt>~l nMp
S7?G^JG~G~ G~f~° oG~S~
DATE: January 3, 1991
PROJECT: Review and Recommendation for Minor Land Partition
PROJECT
OWNER: Donald Wilson
P.O. Box 3613
Central Point, OR 97502
LOCATION: T37S R2W Section 10A6 Tax Lot 2300
446 W. Pine Street
ZONE: R-1-8
ACREAGE: .66 Acres
TYPE OF
DEVELOPMENT: Minor Land Partition
I. Street /mprovements:
A. Existing Condition:
1. Street No. MA-4, Street Name - W. Pine Street, Street
Classification-Major Arterial, Street Jurisdiction - Jacksoh County,
Existing Right of Way-60', Future Right of Way-80', Existing
Street Width-32', Future Street Width-48', Existing curb and
gutter-None, Future curb and gutter-required, Existing sidewalk-
none, Future sidewalk-required, Existing street lights-spacing is
not uniform, Future street lights-steel post 22,000 Lumen HPSV
required @ intersections and not less than 350', Existing traffic
volumes - 11,000 VTlD.
B. Developer's Required Conditions:
1. The developer sha-I dedicate to the City of Central Point, an
additional 10 feet of right of way for future street improvement
from the most southerly portion of the property. This dedication
shall be done as a part of approval of the minor land partition.
L1;1ti
Page Two-Staff Report
Donald Wilson
2. Ingress/Egress to parcel 1 shall be done at the most westerly
portion of the lot frontage on W. Pine St. Ingress/Egress to parcel
2 shall be done at the most easterly portion of the lot frontage on
W. Pine Street. No backing will be allowed on W. Pine Street. All
maneuvering and parking shall occur on the property, not within
the public right of way.
3. The ingress/egress to parcel 2 shall be closed at the. time a
driveway is provided on the northern property line.,
4. Ingress/Egress for Parcel 2 shall be 20 feet in width. Normally a
flag lot would require 6" of 3/4"-0 minus crushed rock compacted
to 95% T-180 with 2" of Class "B" asphaltic concrete, however,
in this case crushed rock would be adequate since this driveway
may be temporary.
//. Sanitary Sewer /mprovements:
A. Existing Conditions:
1. An 8" Sanitary Sewer is located on the north side of W. Pine.
Invert elevation of pipe in front of 446 W. Pine is 1270. Ground
elevation of Parcel 2 is 1270. Sanitary Sewer service for Parcel 2
will probably require a pump to discharge to the W. Pine Street
Sewer Main.
B. Developer's Required Conditions:
1. Developer shall prepare a plan to show how sanitary sewer will be
provided for Parcel 2.
2. if a pump station is required, it shall be installed according to the
latest edition of the Uniform Plumbing Specialty Code.
///. Water System /mprovements:
A. Existing Conditions:
1. An 8" AC waterline is located in W. Pine Street.
B. Developer's Required Conditions:
,~i,;j 4tilci
Page Three -Staff Report
Donald Wilson
1. Each parcel shall have its own separate water service and meter.
The meter shall be installed at the time building permits are taken
out by the developer of Parcel 2.
2. All cost associated with the meter installation, shall be the
responsibility of the owner or builder of the Parcel 2, at the time
building permits are required for building on this parcel
iV. Storm Drainage System /mprovements:
A. Existing Conditions:
1. No storm drainage pipe exists in W. pine Street. A storm drainage
ditch is located along the W, pine frontage of this property.
B. Developer's Required Conditions:
1. All roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces shall have positive
drainage away from the structure and shall be connected to curb
drain or an approved storm sewer. This requirement shall be tied
to the future expansion of the street facility as per Deferred
Improvement Agreement.
V. Additions/ Requirements:
A. The developer shall be required to sign a Deferred Improvement
Agreement (DIA) for .each parcel for future street. widening
improvements, curbs and gutters, storm drainage, sidewalks, driveways,
street lights, and traffic control devices for W. Pine Street. W. Pine
Street vvill be widened approximately 8' on each side with the above
improvements to be included.
B. The review for the development submitted hereby by Donald Wilson was
done in accordance with the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect
as of the date of this review. Any modifications by the developer of this
development after City Planning Commission and/dr City Council
approvals could require resubmittal of an application and approval by the
City Planning Commission and/or City Council
C. All costs associated with this development shall be the sole responsibility
of the applicant or owner.
Wilson.prt
C - (r" r! ~
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. __
A RESOLUTION .RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO GRANT
A MZNOR LAND PARTITION
(Don Wilson - 37 2W lOAB TL 2300)
WHEREAS, Don Wilson has submitted an application for a minor land partition
of a .66 acre parcel, located at 446 West Pine Street located in the northwest
quadrant of the City, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Conttnission of the City of Central Point held a public
meeting upon said application for minor land partition on'January S, 1991,
pursuant to Central Point Municipal Code Section 1.24.020C, and having at said
public meeting received and reviewed the City staff report and testimony, and
being fully advised, now therefore,.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon the staff report, evidence,. and record relating to
said application, the Planning Commission hereby finds that said application
meets the requirements for minor land partition, that said minor land partition
as proposed is in compliance with the City's comprehensive plan and zoning code,
and if the conditions set forth hereinafter are met, said application meets the
City's requirements for minor land partition.
Section 2.'The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of the minor
land partition application submitted by Don Wilson, subject to the conditions
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference expressly made a
part of the within resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. MLP.WILSON/RESO ,,
~ ti~.i
(~~5
Section 3. In accordance with Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 1.24,
this resolution of the Planning Commission, including the conditions set forth
in Exhibit A, shall be forwarded to the City Administrator who shall schedule
a public hearing before the City Council. After conducting said public hearing,
recording and reviewing the city staff report and testimony, the City Council
may decide in the matter of said minor land partition.
Passed by the Planning Commission this day of January, 1991 and
signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of January, 1991.
Planning Commission Chairman
ATTEST:
City .Representative
Approved by me this day of January, 1991.
Planning Commission Chairman
RESOLUTION NO.
F Lb~i
4 ',. , !
MLP.WILSON/RESO
- - - STAFF REPORT - - -
T0: Planning Commissio
.~
FROM: George Rubaloff Administrative Assistant
DATE: January 3, 1991
TOPIC: Quality Fence Project
Site Plan Review
(37 2W lOAB Tax Lots 1000 and 1100)
Raymond Kistler (Agent), on behalf of Owner/applicant Steve Rietman, has
submitted a site plah application for the Quality Fence Project located in the
M-1 Zone (Industrial District) on the north side of West Pine Street, west of
Amy Street. The project consists of a 6000 square foot metal building to provide
for industrial operations, sales and display activities and administrative'
functions. The project also includes off-street parking, gravel-surfaced work
yard, landscaping, fencing, vehicular accesses and a variety of other on-site
improvements. The Planning Commission is scheduled to conduct a public meeting
after which the commissioners may deliberate and render a decision oh the site
plan application.
Planning and Public Works staff reviewed the site plan application and pertinent
zoning and development regulations, and have prepared reports which outline the
recommended conditions of approval. Attached are the following materials for
the commission's review and for entry into the public record by reference.
Item A - Vicinity Maps
Item B - Certificate of Posting for Public Meeting
Item C - Site Plan Application Materials
Item D - Other maps: Tax Assessor, Aerial
Item E - Planning Department Site Plan Review
dated January 3, 1991
Item F - Public Works Department Site Plan review
dated January 3, 1991
Item G - Full size copy of site plan for Quality Fence
Project
,:s~fJ
- LJ
ITEM A
~,.
(: C1
Ui
i`
4
ENT
^0m 155 SO. SECOND ST.
ITEM
CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321
- ~
OREG~~
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, Sandy Berryhill CERTIFY THAT ON THE
FOI:LOWING DATE OF Friday, January 4; 1991 , I POSTED A NOTICE.
FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON January 8 ,.1991,. DURING WHICH THE.
CENTRAL POINT. PLANNING CON.I`1ISSION WILL REViE41 A SITE PLAN FOR QUALITY
FENCE PROJECT,LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF I~IEST PINE STREET BET[dEEN
HASKELL AND AMY STREETS
AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL .POINT POST OFFICE
2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY '
3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION
G. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD
SIG URE
/- y- 9/
DATE
` L~ }
,:
,,
~.
,7
,.
ITEM
Application Filing Deadline
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Application far Site Plan Approval
Phone Number ~o ~ ~{- ' z Z ~ I
Proposed Site Location
l A
~ Address ~ l've- F J~1 ~^'~-r c~"/" !(.~~ r `/.iitl
~ Assessor's Map Page Location 3 7 Z (/~ - ~Vg ~ Tax Lot(s)
Required Information:
A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot
and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's
' Office
Acourate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the
site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli-
ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal
Code Section 17.72.030.
Name of Builder,~r./Gf IOJC
Address rj~9O TaB~ ~. Qo~;_ (-~G,n/]' ~T. Dom. 9502
Phone Number ~oC®`~-//o h
~ I,~i .• iLl s certify that I am the owner or
authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach
written authority)
/s~O,V Date ! .7~-.r"~ . ~, ~9i~
(Signature-of ow r or u horized agent f owner, please indicate which)
Application Fee:
JAN 2 1991 ~
* A filing fee for recording a Deferred Improvement Agreement with the County
Clerk may also be required
LUAP/ADMINI lj,~~ 21
c 1 '. 1
EAST ELEVATION
~z
-- -..
~ c-=°- -- - ~ -
1 1 ~.---_ ~'~
- - '
SOUTH ELEVATION
_~,,+ - - x'13
~ ~,a0ga ~, '_
.i
I/TS. - CENTRAL PO/NT ~ _ \ 3T ZW IOAB
i~
~. ~~ •/,)
C~ r>
~S
r
JKS /,3,~,5,Q6
ie~ucHS woo.
~ ~
~ \ ~
~ ~~t~
~1 ~~ ~ :r
~~ 400 ~~ ,~ ~ r' ~'~
aoo , ~\ ~ ~~~~
`~ ~ r ,gip. ~ ~
J `~ ~ ~ ^/
P /~ ~~ 4
y wWNP"
w V~ •S(
v. ~ .
a
0
~ ~/
N1 a~ ~,.5o'r'
s!/' ~~
~o~,H
~)
~~~ ,,
j ,o
~,. ~~~
6'~
7 ^
CJ~
37 2W 3D0 ~\
~ o
yo
,, lMPQRTA~T
~ ,~ ~ IS MAP FOR ASSESS~u:
F ~ a ~ TQXATION_PURPOS;
_~r ' c UNLY .
. ~~ .
.. ,.
~,- 0~~
~~
~-
7 ~,e~ ~ roo ~~+ •.
0 `.
j ~'+.
~ ~
o_ •,
1~0 ~\ = F 4
~,'J~ q ~ I/ ..
> 60 ~ ~ «~
Q
a;
s n
N
_ V ~~ M
i -
i ..
/~
PARKING
o C.B.
~a~
~~~
~~~
1
PAVED /'
KING
..8. ~ 1271.2 X
:~
% 1270.6
~.
;~ ~°~~
D~/ ay
,-
+ O/
\ RAMP \ /
(~
~ OM.. ~
4\~
\11 ~~ 1273.0
1272.'1// ~/ \ \
x ,~
\. ~ X1273.2 \\
-~
~ ~ ~^~ ~
O\\~
~I
n M.t
v
~~
~~~
\,
~~
®,
~. ,
1271.3
x
k
T.S.
~~ <
4
\ S
O
GTyF
~\\~ ~2
~~ \\ / 274.3 \
O ~/ O ~ \ \M.H.
X
I\
M H.
•n ..
0
PARKING
99
~/~~\
\ ^TS.
w~
/~ 5.0
//
1 \ ,
\~\ i,
~~ y~. ~~
5 12728 f /~
~ K /,~i
r,
ITEM E
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
SITE PLAN REVIEW
DATE: January 3, 1991
PROJECT: Quality Fence Project
Located on the north side of West Pine
between Haskell and Amy Streets
(37 2W 10AB TL 1000 and 1100)
DEVELOPER/
APPLICANT/OWNER: Steve Rietman
Upon reviewing the applicable City development codes, staff has outlined the
following requirements which shall be met by the developer as a condition of site
plan approval for the Quality Fence Project:
1. Developer shall store all raw materials, finished projects, machinery
and equipment (with the exception of trucks and automobiles normally
used in business) within an entirely enclosed building or sight-
obscuring, non-pierced fence not less than six feet in height.
2. Developer shall provide and maintain a ten-foot landscape strip along
the edge of the property abutting West Pine Street. Said landscape
strip shall be completely free of parking or loading facilities and
shall be planted with trees appropriate for the neighborhood, ground
cover or other landscaping materials that are consistent with the
general existing character of the area, or that will establish a
landscape theme for other developments to follow.
3. Developer shall provide for a setback between building structures
and parking areas and the property line and therefore place said
improvements at least seventy (70) feet from the centerline of West
Pine Street.
4. Developer shall provide a minimum of one ten by thirty (10 X 30) foot
off-street truck loading and unloading berth. Said berth shall be
designed and located as to avoid undue interference with the public
use of streets or alleys.
QUALITY.SITE/PCWORK
~.;
~,
5. Developer shall provide a minimum of 19 parking spaces, 14 of which
shall be standard 9 X 20 foot size spaces and 5 of which may be
8 X 15 foot compact size spaces. Compact spaces shall be clearly
marked "compact parking" and maneuvering for compact spaces shall
be standard. All off-street parking shall conform to the attached
parking design standards.
Attachment
Ordinance No. 1512 (Parking Standards)
QUALITY.SITE/PCWORK
~ 1 ,3 - ~%~~f~
,,
~'
ORDINANCE N0. 1512
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
THE TEXT OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION 17.64 PARKING STANDARDS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Central Point
deems it necessary to recommend certain amendments relating to the
parking standards found in the zoning ordinance; and
WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing held April 19, 1984 was
published in the Medford Mail Tribune on April 9 and April 15, 1984;
and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing testimony from proponents
/ and opponents was heard or given opportunity to be heard, now,
therefore,.
BE IT RESOLVID BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 17.64.100 of Che Central Point Municipal
Code. is hereby amended as follows:
17.64.100 Parking Design Requirements.
A. Size of Parking Spaces. The standard size for automobile
parking spaces shall be nine feet in width by twenty feet in length.
A compact car parking space shall be eight feet in width by fifteen feet
in length, as provided in Section 17.64.070.
B. Parking Lot Aisles. The width of parking lot aisles
shall be as, illustrated, in the following diagram:
Ordinance No. 15.12 - 1
V ~/~ 4l
i., v ..
,,
PARKING STANDARDS Ordinance 1512
N P S A C
ANGLE OF WIDTH OF
PARKING
DEPTH
WIDTH CURB
LENGTH
PARKING
SPACE SECTION OF STALL OF AISLE PER CAR
(Feet)
(Degrees) (Feet). (Feet) (Feet)
0 :..32'-0" 9._U.. 14' 22'-0..
30 49'-7" 17'-10" 14' 18'-2"'
35 51~_g~~ 1S~_10~~ 14' 15'-8"
40 53'-4" lg~_g~~ 14' 14'-1..
45 35'-2.. 20'-7" 14' 12'-8..
50 60'-.2" 21'-1" 18' * 11~_g~~
55 61'-2" 21'-7" 18' * 10'-11..
60 61'-8" 21'-10" 18' * 10'-5..
65 66'-0" 22'-0" 22' * 9'-11..
•
70 65'-10" 21'-11" 22' *
9•_7
'
75 65'-4.. 21'-8" 22' * g~_4~~
80 68~_g~~ 21'_4" ' 26' * 9'-1"
85 67'-10" 20'-11.. 26',* 9'-0"
90 g6~_0~~ 20'-0" 26' * 9'-0..
* Width of aisle permits two-wag circulati on
only when aturn-around is provided.
* Width of aisle permits two-way circulati on.
EXAMPLES
~'1
C. Access. There shall be adequate .provision for ingress
and egress to all parking spaces. Where parking areas do not abut a
public street or alley, access driveways shall be provided that are not
less than ten feet in width for one'-way traffic or eighteen feet in
width for two-way traffic.
D:` Driveways.
1. In any R-1 or R-2 district any lot developed with
a single-family dwelling, two detached single-family dwellings, or an
attached duplex may have one driveway with a minimum width of ten
feet and maximum width of thirty-six feet, provided the driveway
width does not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot's total width,
as measured at the front property line.
2. A driveway that serves as required access to a
garage ar carport that is not perpendicular to the front property
line, or side property line in the caserof a corner lot, shall not
exceed twenty feet in width if a turn-around area is provided to
permit two-way ingress and egress.
3. On properties having two driveway openings,
such as a circular driveway, both openings must serve the same.
driveway; off-street parking shall not be provided for within the
front yard area, and the combined width of the driveways shall not
exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot's total width as measured at
the front property line.
4. In the R-1 and R-2 districts not more than one
driveway opening onto a public street shall be permitted for lots
having a street frontage of less Chan eighty feet.
5. Driveways from a public street to a required
offstreet parking area that serves any R-3 district development, with
the exception of single and two-family dwellings, shall be a minimum
of eighteen feet in width and designed for two-way traffic.
6. The minimum driveway width in any nonresidential
district shall be twenty feet. An exception may be made for drive-
ways that are not intended for public use and are blocked or gated
to prevent such use.
7. The maximum driveway width in any nonresidential
district shall be thirty feet. An exception may be made by the City
Planning Commission for drive-in type businesses having multiple
lanes or service locations.
E. Improvements of Parking Spaces.
1. All areas utilized for off-street parking, access
and manuevering of vehicles shall be paved with durable materials
for all-weather use and shall be adequately drained to prevent the
flow of run-off water across sidewalks or other pedestrian areas.
2. Required parking areas shall be designed with
painted striping or other approved method of delineating the individ-
ual spaces with the exception of lots containing single or two-family
dwellings.
3. Parking spaces for uses other than one and two-
family dwellings shall be designed so that no backing movements or
other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way shall
be necessary.
Ordinance No. 1512 - 3
L~~
4. Any lighting used to illuminate off-street parking
or loading-areas shallbeso~arranged as to reflect the light .away
from adjacent streets or properties.
5. Service drives shall have a minimum vision clear-
ance area formed by the intersection of the driveway centerline, the
street right-of-way line, and a straight line joining said. lines
through points twenty feet from their intersection.
6. Parking spaces located along the outer. boundaries
of a parking lot .shall be contained by a curb or a bumper rail so
placed to prevent a motor vehicle :from extending, over an adjacent
property line, a public street, public sidewalk, or a required.
landscaping area.
7. Parking, loading or vehicle maneuvering areas
shall not be located within the front yard area or side yard area
of a corner lot abutting a atxaet do any residential {R) district,
nox within any portion of a street setback area that ie required
to be landscaped in any commercial (C) or industrial (M) district..
F. Limitation-on Use of Parking Areas. Required
parking areas shall be used exclusively. for. vehicle parking in
conjunction with a permitted use and shall not be reduced or en-
croached upon in any manner. The parking facilities shall be so
designed and maintained as not to constitute a nuisance at any
time, and shall be used in such a manner that no hazard to persons.
or property or reasonable impediment to traffic will result.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication
of its passage this 17th day of Mav ,1984.
Mayor
Approved by me this 18th- day of
1984.
.Mayor -
Ordinance No. 1512 - 4) ~ ~~
1 (:) i.
n
G0~7 O!~ GgGUpti' ^ Q ° o0GU5~
XUlL~3C~04C~ GMOoG3'aC~ DCG°~QG3'7~GVU7GN%l
~S7~L^,Il~~r G~L~° oL~~
DATE: January 3, 1990
PROJECT:. Review and Recommendation for a Site Plan Review
PROJECT.
OWNER: Quality.Fence Co.
420 N. Front Street
Central Point, OR 97502
ARCHITECT/
PLANNER: Abeloe/Breeden A.I.A.
816 W. 10th Street
.Medford, OR 97501
LOCATION: T37S R2W, Section 10 AB Tax Lot 1000 and 1100
ZONE: M-1
TYPE OF
DEVELOPMENT: Fencing Contractor, Building and Storage Facility
/. Street /mprovements:
A. Existing Conditions:
ITEM ~~
1. Street No.-MA3, Street Name-W. Pine Street, Street
Classification-Major Arterial, Street Jurisdiction-City of Central
Point, Existing Right of Way-60', Future Right of Way-88',
Existing Street Width-46' to 50', Future Street Width-66', 5 lanes,
Curbs and Gutters-Existing, Future Curbs and Gutters-to be moved
8' to 10' toward the property on each side of W. Pine Street,
Existing Sidewalks-None, Future Sidewalks-5' curbside required,
Street Lights-Existing at Railroad crossing, southwest side, Future
Street Lights-22,000 HPSV at intersections and not less than
350', Existing Traffic. Volume-11,000 VT/D+, Future Traffic-
20,000 VT/D, Existing Traffic Control-Pine Street and Highway 99
(Front Street), Future Traffic Control-Pine Street and Haskell
Street.
1i~f~
;; ;.;
Page Two
Staff Report
Quality Fence
2. Street No. SA 12, Street Name-Haskell Street, Street
Classification-Secondary Arterial, Street Jurisdiction-Jackson
County, Existing Right of Way-60', Future Right of Way-80' @
intersection with West Pine Street, Existing Street Width-24',
Future Street Width-56' at West Pine Street, 100' north, 48' from
100' north to Taylor Road, Existing Curbs and Gutters-None,
Future Curbs and Gutters required, Existing Sidewalks-None,
Future Sidewalks-Required 5' curbside, Street light-Existing at E.
Pine Street, Future Street Lights-9500 HPSV at intersection and
not more than every 200', Existing Traffic Volume-1500 VT/D,
Future Traffic Volume-7500 VT/D, Existing Traffic Control-None,
Future Traffic Control-Signal at Haskell and West Pine Street.
3. Street No.-SA 13, Street Name-Amy Street, Street Classification-
Secondary Arterial, Street Jurisdiction-Public Right of Way, No
Jurisdiction, Existing Right of Way-20', Future Right of Way-May
be vacated? City must maintain utility easements.
4. Street No.-LS10, Street Name-W. Manzanita Street, Street
Classification-Local Street, Street Jurisdiction-City of Central
Point, Existing Right of Way-40', Future Right of Way-60',
Existing Street Width-Unimproved, Future Street Width-40',
Existing Curbs/Gutters-None, Future CurbsJGutter-Required,
Existing Sidewalks-None, Future Sidewalks-Required 5' curbside,
Existing Street Lights-None, Future Street Lights-Required, 9500
Lumen HPSV @ intersection and not more than every 200',
Existing Traffic Control-None, Future Traffic Control-Possible Stop
Sign (Warrants).
B. Developer's Required Conditions:
1. Additional Right of Way-In order to accommodate future traffic
volumes and land configuration, additional right of-way is required
on the property abutting W. Pine Street and Haskell Street. The
Right of Way necessary is as follows:
- W. Pine Street-14'
-Haskell Street-10', within 100' at the W. Pine Intersection
- Manzanita Street-10'
- Amy Street-May want to retain as utility easement
;,r:;f 7
- ~il7f
Y
Page Three
Staff Report
Quality Fence
The Right of Way dedication for W. Pine Street shall be done prior
to issuance of a building permit. Right of Way dedication for
Haskell Street shall occur at the time this property is approved for
development by the City, and prior to issuance of Building
Permits. Right. of Way dedication for Manzanita is contingent
upon whether the applicant can determine how the remaining lots
will be served for ingress/egress.
2. Ingress/Egress - .Ingress to the development can occur at the
location shown on W. Pine Street, approximately 50' West of the
railroad tracks. No egress will occur at this location. Ingress can
also occur at Manzanita and Haskell. Egress shall only occur at
Manzanita and Haskell Street.
3. Street Improvements -The developer/applicant/owner shall agree
to sign a Deferred Improvement Agreement (DIA) for the following
improvementsc
a. W. Pine Street -Street Structural Repair and
Rehabilitation
-Street Widening 8' to 10'
-Sidewalk Installation
-Traffic Control Installation
Street Light Installatioh
-Storm Drainage Improvements
-Curb and Gutter Installation
-Bikeway Improvements
-Proportional cost of Engineering
Surveying, Administration, Building,
Legal, and other related expenditures.
Haskell Street -Street Structural Repair and
Rehabilitation
-Street Widening 12'
-SidewalkJnstallation
-Traffic Control Installation
-Street .Light Installation
-Storm Drainage Improvements
-Curb and Gutter Installation
-Bikeway Improvements
,>
Page Four
Staff Report
Quality Fence
-Proportional cost of Engineering
Surveying, Administration, Building,
Legal, and other related expenditures.
Manzanita Street -Complete construction of the street to
serve the'remainder of the lots including
this development. If lots are sold, this
obligation will remain vvith the lot.
-Sidewalk Installation
-Traffic Cohtrol Installation
-Street Light Installation
-Storm Drainage Improvements
-Curb and Gutter Installation
-Proportional cost of Engineering,
Surveying, Administration, Building,
Legal and-other related expenditures.
b. At the ingress from W. Pine Street to the property, the curb
on the east side of the ingress shall be built to the widened
standard identified in IB 3a. above.
4. Street Light Installation -Street lighting shall be placed at the
ingress/egress at Manzanita and Haskell Street. This improvement
shall be done as a part of the construction of this project.
5. Traffic Control
a. Oh Site -Proper signing according to the Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices requirements shall be
installed to assure that no egress occurs onto W. Pine
Street.
b. W. Pine Street signage shall be modified according to
M.U.T.C.D. 'requirements to accommodate the
ingress/egress improvements.
c. These installations shall be done as a part of the
construction of this project, and shall be approved by City
of Central Point Public Works Department prior to building
permits being issued.
~ ,) r
Page Five
Staff Report
Quality Fence
6. Curbs/Gutters -The new curbs and gutter section on W. Pine
Street shall be installed as approved by the Public Works
Department as a part of the construction of this project.
7. Driveways
a. The driveway at Manzanita Street and Haskell Street shall
be of a temporary nature as approved by the City of Central
Point Public Works Department, but will provide for
adequate drainage across this ingress/egress area. The
developer wilt maintain this access at all times, and upon
notification by the City of Central Point Public Works
Department, the owner will regrade and roll. The surface
shall be kept free from dust during the summer months by
methods approved by D.E.Q. and the City of Central Point
Public Works Department.
b. The ingress from W. Pine Street shall be concrete in the
location approved by the City of Central Point Public Works
Department. Construction of this driveway shall be as
stipulated in the Public Works Standards.
8. Bike Path/Way -See Condition 163
9. Sidewalks -See Condition 1 63
10. Parking Design -The parking area shall be surfaced with asphaltic
concrete adequately designed to carry the maximum load to this
development.
11. Building Set Backs - Be sure to follow the requirements of
17.60.090. Special setbacks to include the additional right of
way required from this project.
12. Vision Clearance - A 25' Clear Vision Triangle shall be maintained
at all ingress/egress locations for this project.
//. Sanitary Sewer System /mprovements:
A. Existing Conditions
_,
L~~
~,,
:,
t
Page Five
Staff Report
Quality Fence
6. Curbs/Gutters -The new curbs and gutter section on W. Pine
Street shall be installed as approved by the Public Works
Department as a part of the construction of this project.
7. Driveways
a. The driveway at Manzanita Street and Haskell Street shall
be of a temporary nature as approved by the City of Central
Point Public Works Department, but will provide for
adequate drainage across this ingress/egress area. The
developer wilt maintain this access at all times, and upon
notification by the City of Central Point Public Works
Department, the owner will regrade and roll. The surface
shall be kept free from dust during the summer months by
methods approved by D.E.Q. and the City of Central Point
Public Works Department.
~, b. The ingress from W. Pine Street shall be concrete in the
location approved by the City of Central Point Public Works
Department. .Construction of this driveway shall be as
stipulated in the Public Works Standards.
8. Bike Path/Way -See Condition 163
9. Sidewalks -See Condition 163
10. Parking Design -The parking area shall be surfaced with asphaltic
concrete adequately designed to carry the maximum load to this
development.
11. Building Set Backs - Be sure to follow the requirements of
17.60.090. Special setbacks to include the additional right of
way required from this project.
12. Vision Clearance - A 25' Clear Vision Triangle shall be maintained
at all ingress/egress locations for this project.
//. Sanitary Sewer System /mprovements:
A. Existing Conditions
<,
l; i3 ~
~,~ +~.
~,~,;~
Page Seven
Staff Report
Quality Fence
1. A 12" storm sewer is located in W. Pine Street, however, its
depth is relatively shallow in relationship to the topography of this
property.
2. Storm drainage in Haskell Street is accomplished by 12"..culverts
placed across driveways.
B. Required Conditions
1. Developer, at the time of submitting plans, shall provide storm
drainage calculations to assure proper sizing and to provide
drainage for this project and other projects that may connect in
the future.
Af
2 Minimum sizing for storm drainage systems is 12" based on Public
Works Standards.
3. Downstream culverts may need to be sized to provide for
additional runoff. Minimum requirement if upsizing is not required,
will be to clean and flush existing culverts.
4. Permits from Jackson County Department of Public Works shall be
required for any work performed in the Jackson County Right of
Way.
V. Additional Requirements
A. Developer shall install or cause to be installed, conduits for utilities at
intersections, or locations determined by utility companies. Developer
shall also provide conduit crossings for utility companies who will not
install their services until after the facility is constructed. The developer
shall be responsible for all costs associated with the installation of these
conduit crossings.
B. All construction for utilities, streets and other structures discussed herein
within rights of ways owned or to be owned by the City of Central Point,
shall be done so according to all rules, regulations, ordinances,
resolutions, and other applicable requirements of the City of Central
Point for construction of this development.
.L
~f 1 , f
~~!)
~~~
~l
??F
Page Eight
Staff Report
Quality Fence
C. The review for this Site Plan Review submitted by Abeloe/Breeden AIA
on,behalf of .Quality Fence. was .done so in accordance with the rules,
regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any
modifications by the developer of this development after City Planning
Commission and/or City<Council approvals could require resubmittal of
an application and approval by the City Planning Commission and/or City
Council.
D. All costs associated with this development shall be the sole responsibility
of the applicant or owner..
E. RV'1'D Bus Stop will need to be moved to a suitable location, any
improvements necessary to accommodate this relocation shall be the
responsibility of RVTD and the owner. The City of Central Point Public
Works Department shall approvethe location of the RVTD Bus Stop prior
to its installation.
2QUALITY.FNCS
'f``,
c~~?
- ~,~~c~