The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning Commission Packet - June 5, 1990/~ ,~., Next Resolution No. 194 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 155 South Second Street Sune 5, 1990 I. Meeting called to order II. Roll Call - Garth Ellard, David Gilmour, Dick Halley, Karolyne Hugo, Bob Matthews, Chuck Piland III. Approval of Minutes PAGES 1 - 5 A. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of May 1, 1990 B. Correspondence IV. Business 6 - 3~ A. Joint Public Hearing (Central Point Planning Commission and Jackson County Planning Commission) - Joint consideration of proposed minor boundary line adjustment relative to School District No. 6 applica- tion for inclusion within City's UGB. 3~ - 37 ~g, public Hearing - review and make recommendation to City Council re- garding request from Jackson County School District No. 6 to amend the City's comprehensive plan. 38 - 45 public Meeting - Review and make recommendation to City Council ~~ regarding request from Jackson County School District No. 6 to annex a parcel of property contiguous to the City located immediately south of where Upton Road runs east and west, (36 2W 34 and 35, Tax Lot 2200) , 46 - 55 D. Public Meeting - Review and make recotmnendation to City Council regarding request from Jean Korner to annex a parcel of property contiguous to the City located along the eastside of Freeman Road between Oak and Chestnut Streets (37 2W 2D TL 1400). 56 - 70 E Public Meeting - Review and make recommendation to City Council for a minor land partition located at 1704 Bea11 Lane located approxi- mately 160 feet east of Snowy Butte Road (37 2W lODA Tax Lot 1000) (Applicant: Betty M. Hill) 71 - 94 F. Public Meeting - Review and determination of a fence variance re- quest for 361 North Third Street further described as 37 2W 3DD, Tax Lot 100 (Applicant: Phillip Rivers) AGENDA.90~PCWORK - " - '- -"- - -- -- - - - " PAGES 95 - 112 G. Public t4eeting - Site Plan Review for four unit multiple family development along the westside of Tenth Street, North of Laurel Street (37 2W 2CB TL 7306) (Applicant: Ron Collins) 113 - 120 H. Public Meeting - Review and make recommendations to the City Council for a final subdivision plat for Stonecreek No. 3, Phase V, (37 2W lODB TL 100) (Applicant: Gary Whittle) 121 - 135 I. Public Meeting - Review and make recommendation to the City Council for a Minor Land Partition located on Upton Road (36 2W 34D TL 1400) (Applicant: Dan Slovak for Ernest Strawn) VI. Miscellaneous VII. Adjournment ii . ~ L~ --AGENDA.90/PCWORK ~) ~ City of Central Point Planning Commission Meeting May 1, 1990 Page 1 MEETING CALLED TO ORDER Chairman Ellard called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. ROLL CALL Present were Planning Commission Chairman Garth E11ard and Planning Commissioners Dave Gilmour, -Dick Halley, Karolyne Hugo, Bob Matthews and Chuck Piland. Also present were City Administrative Assistant, George Rubaloff, Public Works Director Larry Blanchard, and Secretary Cecelia Gordon. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Halley made a motion to approve the minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting held March 6, 1990 as presented, Commissioner Gilmour seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Gilmour, Yes, Halley, yes; Hugo, yes; Matthews, yes; Piland, yes. All the Commissioners voted in favor of the motion, and the motion carried unanimously. CORRESPONDENCE AND PUBLIC APPEARANCES City Administrative Assistant, George Rubaloff announced that he had received a letter from Mr. Ernest Strawn, wherein Mr. Strawn had expressed concern over the change in the zoning of his property on Old Upton Road. Mr. Strawn came forward and presented his concerns. The Commission requested that Staff prepare an informational packet, and present it to them in time to review before the next scheduled Commission meeting on Tuesday, June 5, 1990. BUSINESS James Dorev and Chervl Smith). _. .... Q ®1 ~ ~ City of Central Point Planning Commission Meeting May 1, 1990 Page 2 Administrative Assistant, George Rubaloff referred to and entered into the record by reference, his Staff Report, dated April 18, 1990, Notice of Public Hearing, Certificatioh of Posting of Public Hearing Notice, Application for Conditional Use Permit, Applicant's Conditional Use Statement, Location Map and Proposed Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit. There were no conflicts of interest. Chairman Ellard opened the public meeting. James Dorey and Cheryl Smith, of 140 N. 7th Street, Central Point, came forward. Mr, Dorey stated that they had 13 tanks (aquariums) at present, and would not be putting in any more for some time. The Commission was concerned that there would not be enough electrical outlets for this business, but Mr. Dorey said that there were, and eventually as their business expanded and the added electrical demand would make it necessary to rewire. No one .else came forward to speak in favor or in opposition -the proposed Conditional Use Permit. Chairman Ellard closed the public meeting. Commissioner Piland made a motion that the Commission approve Resolution 189, Commissioner Matthews seconded the Motion. Ro11 Call Vote: Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Hugo, yes; Matthews, yes; Piland, yes; and the motion passed unanimously. Administrative Assistant, George Rubaloff reviewed and entered into the record by reference his Staff Report dated April 13, 1990, Certificate of Posting and Public Meeting Notice, Application for Minor Land Partition, Vicinity Map, Aerial Map, Proposed Minor Land Partition Preliminary Map and Proposed Planning Commission Resolution recommending approval of partition, Rubaloff stated that existing site condition No. 8 on April 13, 1990 Staff Report, which indicates that water and sewer goes to one lot, may conflict with actual condition. Applicant has indicated that said services come to Parcel No. 2 via Upton Road. ;(T~An 1 ~ City of Central Point Planning Commission Meeting May 1, 1990 Page 3 There were no conflicts of interest. Chairman Ellard opened the Public Meeting. Applicant, E.C. Brittson of 5395 Teresa Way, Central Point came forward and stated that he had reviewed all proposed conditions for approval prior to the meeting. No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the proposed Minor Land Partition. Chairman Ellard closed the public meeting. Commissioner Dick Halley moved that the Commission approve Resolution #190 as written. Commissioner Hugo seconded the Motion. Roll call vote: Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Hugo, yes; Matthews, yes; and Piland, yes. All the Commissioners voted in favor of the Motion and the Motion carried unanimously. There were no conflicts of interest. Chairman Ellard opened the Public Meeting. Tom Malot, 525 Rene Circle, Central Point, came forward. In response to the Commission's concern about drainage, Public Work's Director Larry R. Blanchard stated that the plat followed the Stonecreek Drainage Basin Master Plan, and this was entered into the record by reference. No -one else came forward in favor of or in opposition to the preliminary subdivision plat. Chairman Ellard closed the public meeting. Commissioner Halley moved that the Commission approve Resolution #191. Commissioner Gilmour seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Hugo, yes; Matthews, yes; and Piland, yes. All commissioners voted in favor of the Motion and the Motion carried unanimously. .;:,'- ~~03 Administrative Assistant, George Rubaloff referred to and entered into the record by reference the Certificate of Posting, Proposed Planning Commission Resolution, Public Works Director's Report, Preliminary Plat Application, Location Map and Reduced version of tentative Plat Map. City of Central Point Planning Commission Meeting May 1, 1990 Page 4 George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant, referred to and entered into the record, the Certificate of Posting of Public Meeting, Public Works Director's Status Report, May 1, 1990 Memo from Larry Blanchard to Planning Commission re: The Meadows - Phase IV, Final Plat Approval which was distributed to the Commissioners at this meeting, General Vicinity Map, Project Map, Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plat Applications, Planning Commission Resolution recommending Preliminary. and Final Plat approval. There were no conflicts of interest. Chairman Ellard opened the Public Meeting. Applicant, Neil Scheuneman, 555 Freeman Road, Central Point came forward. In answer to the question raised about Item 2 in The Public Works Director's report concerning the amount due, Mr. Blanchard stated that this information would be provided later when all costs were in. In reviewing the items to be completed in Public Works Director's report, the Commission decided that the City should require the developer to post a performance bond for the items not completed and the time the Plat is submitted to the City Council. Chairman Ellard said that this should be entered as a separate motion. No one else came forward in favor of .or in opposition to the proposed Subdivision Plat. Chairman Ellard closed the Public Meeting. Commissioner Halley moved that the Commission approve Resolution #192. Commissioner Hugo seconded the Motion. Roll call vote: Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Hugo, yes; Matthews, yes; and Piland, yes. All tho Commissioners voted in favor of the motion and the motion carried. Commissioner Piland made the Motion recommending to City Council that in the event the Developer does not compete the requirements as reflected in Resolution 192, the Developer in accordance with Chapter 16.28.080 would post a performance bond of $60,000 and that Staff would be able to recommend to the Council an amendment to that amount according to whatever requirements are still incomplete just prior to Council approval. Commissioner Halley seconded the Motion. Roll call vote: Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Hugo, yes; Matthews, yes; and Piland, yes. A11 the Commissioners voted in favor of the motion and the motion carried. George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant, referred to and entered into the record by reference, the Certificate of Posting, Publio - Meeting Notice, Public Works Director's Status Report April 30, 1990 Memorandum from Larry Blanchard to Planning Commission re: 004 City of Central Point Planning Commission Meeting May 1, 1990 Page 5 Stonecreek Subdivision No. 3, Phase IV, final plat approval distributed to the Planning Commission at Meeting., Proposed Resolution recommending approval of Final Plat, Vicinity Map, and Final Plat Map. There were no conflicts of interest. Chairman Ellard opened the Public Meeting. Gary Whittle, Applicant, 843 E. Main, Medford, Oregon came forward. (His engineer, Herb Farber was in the audience). Mr. Whittle stated that he had reviewed the conditions of approval with staff prior to tonight's Planning Commission Meeting. No one else came forward in favor of or in opposition to the proposed Final Subdivision Plat. Chairman Ellard closed the public meeting. Commissioner Halley made the Motion that the Commission approve Resolution #193. Commissioner Matthews seconded .the Motion. Ro11 call vote: Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Hugo, yes; Matthews, yes; and Piland, yes. A11 the Commissioners voted in favor of the Motion and the Motion carried unanimously. Miscellaneous Mr. Ernest Strawn approached the Commission once more and was concerned that. perhaps the City did not have a clear understanding of the history of the former zoning, and Chairman Ellard reassured Mr. Strawn that Staff would research and prepare an informational packet, including definitive maps and have this available for the next Commission meeting Tuesday, June 5, 1990. There were no further miscellaneous items. Commissioner Matthews made a motion to adjourn, and it was seconded by Commissioner Piland. Roll call vote: Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Hugo, yes; Matthews, yes: Piland, yes. The motion carried unanimously and Chairman Ellard adjourned the meeting at 8:55 p.m. ®®J ----- MEMORANDUM ----- TO: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff inistrative Assistant DATE: May 30, 1990 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Review and make recommendation regarding minor urban growth boundary adjustment for 36 2W 34 and 35 Tax Lot 2200 (Applicant: School District No. 6) ISSUE Jackson County School District No. 6 needs water at Future Farmers of America Land Lab and Mel Anhorn Baseball Field. Relative to this need, District No. 6 has made application to Jackson County for a minor urban boundary adjustment so that the 23-acre parcel described above can be included within the City's Urban Growth Area. Once that step is accomplished, the District will need to request that the City annex said property so that the District can utilize municipal services to operate its facilities. BACKGROUND It is staff's understanding that the proposed boundary adjustment and comprehen- sive plan change would have no significant affects beyond the immediate area of the District's property, and therefore, the proposal is being processed as a minor boundary line adjustment. The Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement calls for a joint review between jurisdictions (City and County) and a decision based upon the same seven urbanization factors required to make a major boundary or policy amendment to the City's and County's Comprehensive Plan. Staff has reviewed the School District's application and is in agreement with the findings presented by the applicant. On April 19, 1990, the City council declared its intent to amend the City Comprehensive Plan to provide for the School Dis- tricts' request, and scheduled an appropriate series of public hearings during which the matter could be considered. On May 8, 1990, the Central Point Citizen's Planning Advisory Committee conducted a public hearing to review the question and has recommended that the School District's request be granted. COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission is scheduled to conduct a joint public hearing, receive testimony, review applicant findings and then formulate a recommendation to the Central Point City Council. MEM10531.90/PCWORK f~, ® ~+ The following items are hereby entered into the public record by reference and submitted for the Commissioners' review. Item A - Central Point City Council Resolution No. 542 declaring Council's intent to act upon the District No. 6 request Item B - Notice of Public Hearings slated for June 5, 1990 Item C - Certificate of Posting of Public Hearing Notices Item D - List of Property owners within 1000 feet radius receiving notice of public hearing Item E - Vicinity Map Item F - Close-up vicinity map Item G - Reduced copy of applicant's tentative map Item H - School District No. 6 Application for Urban Growth Boundary Amendment Item I - Criteria for Urban Growth Boundary Amendment Item J - Applicant's Findings Statement Item K - Affidavit of Publication of Public Hearing Notice for Citizen Planning Advisory (CPAC) meeting of May 8, 1990 Item L - CPAC meeting minutes Item M - CPAC Register of Attendance Item N - Proposed Resolution recommending approval of Minor Urban Growth Boundary adjustment 00( _.-_, ~}-~MEM10531.90/PCSQORK EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION NO. 542 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE COUNCIL'S INTENT TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN, TO ANNEX A PARCEL OF PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY WITHOUT AN ELECTION, TO WITHDRAW THE SAME FROM SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND TO ESTABLISH THE ZONE THEREON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND MAP, AND SETTING DATES FOR HEARINGS WHEREAS, Jackson County School District No. 6, hereinafter called "Owner", owns real property on Upton Road commonly known as "Future Farmers of America Land Lab" and "Mel Anhorn Baseball Field", a more particular description of which property is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and is by this reference incorporated into the within Resolution, and said Owner has requested annexation into the City, and WHEREAS, said property is presently outside of the City's Urban Growth Boundary, and the procedures for minor adjustments thereto as set forth in Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 17.96 and the Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement require public hearings before the Central Point Citizens' Planning Advisory Committee (hereinafter referred to as "CPAC"), the City Planning Commission and the City Council, and further require review at a joint City and County Planning Commission meeting, and WHEREAS, with reference to the request for annexation, the same complies with Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 1.20 and has been submitted with the requisite preliminary plat and exterior boundary description, and the Council has elected pursuant to ORS 222.120 to dispense with an election submitting the proposed annexation to the electors of the City and in lieu thereof to fix a time and date for a public hearing before the Council at which time all persons may appear and be heard upon said proposed annexation, and Chapter 1.24 of the Central Point Municipal Code provides for a review and recommendation of the application for annexation by the City's Planning Commission, and WHEREAS, in the event of said annexation, it is the Council's intention to withdraw said territory from Jackson County Fire Protection District No. 3 and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority, and to establish the zoning district therefor pursuant to the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Municipal Code Section 17.12.060, and Central Point Municipal Code Section 1.24..020 provides for a review and recommendation function by the Planning Commission on zoning matters, now, therefore, RESOLUTION NO. 542 _ 1 (SCHOOLDS.RES - 032190) .f~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CENTP.AL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby declares its intention to amend the City's Comprehensive Plan by making a minor adjustment to the Urban Growth boundary line of the City, by including therein the property of Owner described hereinabove, and pursuant thereto, declare that public hearings shall be held before the Citizens' Planning Advisory Committee (CPAC), the City Planning Commission and the City Council in accordance with the following schedule: CPAC: Date: P•1dy 8 1990 Time: 7:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time Place: Central Point City Hall Planning Commission: Date: June 5 1990 Time: 7:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time Place: Central Point City Hall City Council: Date: June 21 1990 Time: 7:00 p.m. Pacific Standard Time Place: Central Point City Hall It is ordered and directed that at said public hearings the Citizens' Planning Advisory Committee, the Planning Commission and the City Council shall address the public need and justification for the proposed change, and make specific findings, reciting the evidence in support thereof, and shall base the decision upon the seven urbanization factors set forth in the Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement. Section 2. The Central Point Planning Commission shall, either in addition to the public hearing scheduled hereinabove, or concurrently therewith, jointly meet with the Jackson County Planning Commission, pursuant to said Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement, for the purpose of joint consideration of the proposed minor boundary line adjustment. Section 3. Proceedings are hereby initiated for the annexation to the City of the parcel of real property adjacent to the City described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The public hearing on the question of said annexation, the withdrawal of the same from Jackson County Fire Protection District No. 3 and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority, and the establishment of zoning district(s) of said property shall be held on the same date and RESOLUTION NO. 542 _ 2 (SCHOOLDS.RES - 032190) ~, -~. ~~ ,) 1 ;_ ' time at the same place set forth hereinabove for consideration by ~~ the Central Point City Council of the amendment to the Urban Growth Boundary, which date, time and place shall be the $ day of May 1990 at 7:00 p.m. at the Central Point City Hall Council Chambers. The review hearing on the question of annexation by the Central Point Planning Commission shall be held on the same date specified hereinabove for the Planning Commission public hearing on the issue of amendment of the City's Comprehensive Plan, which date, time and place shall be the 5 day of June 1990 at 7:00 p.m. at the Central Point City Hall Council Chambers. At the public hearing on the question of annexation before the Central Point City Council, all persons may appear and be heard on said question of annexation, special district withdrawal and establishment of zoning district. Section 4. The City Administrator is directed to cause notice of each of the foregoing public hearings or meetings to be published once each week for two successive weeks prior to the date of said public hearing or meeting in the Medford Mail Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Central Point, Oregon; with the second publication, in the case of public hearings, to be no less than twenty-four hours prior to said hearing, and further to cause notices of said public hearings to be posted in four public places in the City for two successive weeks prior to the date of said public hearing. APPROVED by me this ~_~day of (~C_/.-L~~~ 1990. Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 542 - 3 (SCHOOLDS.RES - 032190) -~r~ Passed by the Council and. signed by me in authentication of Exhibit B 155 SO. SECOND ST CENTRAL POINT, OREGOi! 97502 6p4-3321 C I T Y O F C E N T R A L P O I N T NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS Notice is hereby given that the Central Point Planning Commission will conduct the following: 1. Joint Public Hearing with the Jackson County Planning Commission for the purpose of joint consideration of the proposed minor boundary line adjustment relating to a 23-acre parcel, known as FFA Land Lab and Mel Anhorn Baseball Field located immediately south of where Upton Road runs east and west, further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor map, page 36 2W 34 and 35, Tax Lot 2200. The two Plan- ning Commissions will formulate a recommendation regarding inclusion of said parcel within the City of Central Point Urban Growth Bounda- ry Area and forward said recommendations to the respective governing bodies of the two jurisdictions. 2. Public hearing during which the Planning Commission will review a request from Jackson County District Number Six to amend the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan relative to the parcel described above. The. public. hearings will begin at approximately 7:00 p.m. on .Tuesday, June 5, 1990 in the City of Central Point Council Chambers, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. George Rubaloff Administrative Assistant City of Central Point DATE: TIME: PLACE: Medford Mail Tribune June 5, 1990 7:00 p.m. (approximate) Council Chambers 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Please publish 2 times: Friday, May 25,1990 Friday, June 1, 1990 and provide affidavit of publications ~~~ PCNOPH.90/NOTICES THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY o\ GgNTRq~ ,o /~ ~ ~ :icy 2\ U - -1 1, •` ~ ~~.I 1 s~~C3' Nom!`°~~ OREGON THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY 1 Exhibit C 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGGN 97502 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Georqe Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF Wednesday, May 23, 1990 and Wednesday, May 30, 1990, I POSTED A NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON JUNE 5, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND JACKSON COUNTY PLAN- NING COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER A PROPOSED MINOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUST- MENT RELATIVE TO SCHOOL DISTRICT N0. 6 APPLICATION FOR INCLUSION WITHIN THE CITY'S URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY. AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD ~ 30 aj o DATE POSTINGI.CER/NOTICES 604-3321 :....01-2 500' & 1000' PROPERTY OWNERS School Dist. T6 89-1-UGBA SCHOOL DIST NO 6 451 N SECOND CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 BENJAMIN & JAN CARTER 5113 UPTON RD CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 MARION BERTRAM CASTER 656 WOODBERRY LANE JACKSONVILLE OR 97530 ORVILLE O CASTER 2252 TABLE ROCK RD MEDFORA OR 97501 THOMAS '& BEVERLY HANSON P O BOX 3968 CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 RICHARD & LORENA HERGENRETHER 5294 UPTON RD CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 JACKSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE MEDFORD OR 97501 Exhibit D VIRGINIA B JOHNSON PROPERTY M_auVAGEa`~~NT 5230 UPTON RD ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE CENT.'2AL POINT OR 97502 10 South Oakdale Medford, OR 97501 STEPHEN/MARCELINE TALLANT 5196 UPTON RD CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 TERRY RALPH WADSWORTH. 5402 UPTON RD CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 F.RP*1K & ELIZABETH KUONI 5041 UPTON RD CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 MARK & LAURIE MOORE 4969 UPTON RD CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 MARGARET U MORRIS P O BOX 3462 CENTRAL POIDIT OR 97502 TERRY/CHRISTIANE WADSWORT:.: ERNEST R STRAWN 5402 UPTON RD 4964 UPTON RD CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 WILLIAM S YOROZU RODI H MILLER TRUSTEE 13335 32ND AVE S P O BOX 196 SEATTLE WA 98168 EAGLE POINT OR 97502 JOHN & YVONNE BECKWITH 4971 UPTON RD CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 E C & CHARLAINE BRITTSAN 5394 TERESA WAY CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 ® ~~ EXHIBIT E ~. Uri 4 ~~~ ,,.~ EXHIBIT F C) u N C N m v H C Gl V1 M b T G N ~ ~~ e M 0 3 ~ {q N N -^-. ~O W U M ~ n L ~ y ~ 6 L C G u N O M A L L ~ X +~ v v A N C .-1 O C O O O 'O S+ G U fr N N v J .. ~ ~ ~-- EXHIBIT G J a o. ~a-~j = neV~ ,~~~G ' eai~t s a,a ( o , e sl ti ~u w I ~~ S / ti ?3 / / I 3 e \ o / 1~ O '~ 4 • r / W ~ o~ n V a C V / h ~ ~ ~ N 1 ~ a / ry ~ / N Y / ry b b / ~ / ~ / 3 o~ t^ I e ` ~ a o~ ~ ~ ~;a ~ ~ ~ l a_ ~ O ° Y 1 .:~~. ~~a ' ~ ° o r ~ ~. ~ <a 1 ~ e I ek 1 ry~ ry `V a~~: \ `- • e' o_ \ I i ~ b o c 1=~ i ~~ ti' ^.~ ~ ± ~ ~ .. 'J \ / .. ` ~ . ~ 1 O O •v d ~Q a ~GdJ M .t c ~' N Om ~ WN m ~ b a H . 5 1 ~~. O ~~j. T. L ~Q16 EXHIBIT H .JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON (Please print in black ink, or I OFFICF. USE ONLY type all information except UGHA1 Rev. 9/3/85 where a signature is required.) File No. Exhibit No. APPLICATION FOR AN URBAN GP.OIa,~TH BOUNDAPY AMENDP'.ENT Legal Description of subject property property(s): Township 36 South Range 2 Tiest Section Map= 35 P~Perty in 34 & 35 Tax Lot(s) 2200 Date of Tax Lot Creation 7-31-1953 Acreage 23 Acres Assessor's Property Class Code 6-77 If a person other than the owner of the subject property is'filing this application, or acting as authorized agent in behalf of this owner, a notarized affidavit or power of attorney must be sub- mitted with this application. Comp Plan/Zoning Planning Area Pre-Application Received by: Pre-Application Conference Date: Fee $ Receipt Application Accepted by Date Accepted Amendment Type: Major Minor - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PLANNING COMMISSION Hearing Date Decision BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Hearing Official Map Corrected by Certified Copy of Map Amendment recorded by APPLICANT: Name School District Nwnber 6 Address 45~ North 2nd Street City Central Point State Oregon Zip Code 97502 Telephone 66¢-6611 THE PERSON OR FIRM LISTED BELOW IS ALSO A PARTY TO THIS APPLICATION AS IDENTIFIED. (Check Appropriate) AGENT X FEE OWNER CONTRACT PURCHASER MORTGAGOR Name Robert C. Marton-Business Manager Address Same City Zip Code Telephone_ State s .~ ~i,l}.. Urban Growth Boundary Amendment -2- I. AMENDMENT PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS: A) An application for a minor amendment to an IIrban Growth Boundary may be filed by a property owner or an authorized agent. 8) AlI applications must be submitted on forms provided by the Department. It is necessary that each applicant for an Urban Growth Boundary Amendment provide the following information. You may find it advantageous to submit the support data by use of a separate document. If so, indicate below. Not all of the questions are applicable to every situation. If you feel that a question does not apply to your particular application, indicate "N.A." in the space provided. C) All applications must be reviewed at a pre-submittal conference prior to official acceptance of the application. The applicant or agent must be present at the pre-submittal conference. D) Applications are heard annually according to a prearranged schedule with each individual city.. Please check with this department to .determine filing dates and hearing schedules. E) You will receive a staff report on this application one week prior to the public hearing, and either you or your agent is required to be present. You will also be sent notification of the Citizen Advisory Committee meeting at which your application will be reviewed. You should attend that meeting as well. You may present any additional evidence or produce witnesses at the public hearing. Any exhibits entered into the record of the public hearing process must remain as part of the official record and are not returnable, unless by prior arrangement. Please list the names and addresses of any additional persons whom you feel should be notified of these hearings. F) Written information submitted as an addendum to the application after the staff report has been prepared or at the hearing may result in a'postponement or continuance of that hearing to allow for written analysis of the addendum. II. BASIC PROPOSAL The purpose of this amendment is• School District #6 desires to connect to the City Central Point water supply to serve the facilities located on the subject property, namely the FFA land lab and 2Qe1 Anhorn Field. Annexation to the City of Central Point would allow for this happen. In order to be annexed the property must be included in the Urban Growth Area. No urban development is contemplated for the property, rather, the amendment would simply allow for the above noted water hook up. . - ~ ti~v `l ~ ._ . IIrban Growth Boundary Amendment -3- III) FINDINGS OF FACT PERTAINING 2V THE SU&TECT PROPERTY(S) AND AREA: A) CURRENT IISE: Sow is the subject property presently being used? In the past, has it been used differently? (Disregard if the application is for a policy revision.) Currently used for baseballfield (hiel Anhorn Field and Future Farmers of America land lab.(Animal and crop-studies. Past use would be farmland. 8) AVAILABLE SERVICES AND FACILITIES: Check the appropriate spaces for the types of services available and name the agency providing the service: TYPE 1) WATER SUPPLY X 2) PUBLIC SE'v7ER R 3) FIRE PROTFX;TION R 4) IRRIGATION WATER R 5) SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL X 6) SCHOOL DISTRICT R NAME City of Central Point City of Central Point City of Central Point Fire Dist. Rogue Valley Irrigation District Rogue Disposal Service Inc. School District ~6 C) CAARACTERISTICS: Describe any unique or special characteristics of the area which might have a bearing on your application, including the relationship of the property to the existing IIrban Growth Boundary. Generally not a good well area. A'portion of the Westerly boundary of-the propert; constitutes the existing Urban Growth Boundary. City water and sewer lines are both less than 100 feet away. D) What are the soil types and conditions: A ~~~. Ur' .~ . . 1) Yes R No ~ Does the property contain soils with an agricultural capability classification of I-IV? or 2) Yes No R Forest cubic foot site class rating of 2 through 6? -- IIrban Growth Boundary Amendment -4- 3) Specify ratings and the approximate acreage involved. Provide a map if available. Cite the source of the soils information (if not II.S. Soil Conservation Service you must 'include verification of the information by the Soil Conservation Service): The majority of the property is Class 1 soil, about 15 acres. There are some Class 2 and soils alon the creek. 4) Describe soil types and characteristics (drainage, suitability for dwelling and road construction, shrink-swell, etc.): Good drainage capability, construction suitability not a factor. E) Describe the on-site vegetation: Grass on baseball field, some alfalfa, small corn atch some trees and brush along Bear Creek. F) Topography (i.e. slopes, gullies, drainage patterns): Level to gentle slopes all toward Bear Creek. .. G) Does the property contain sensitive fish or wildlife habitat? Bear Creek flows through a small portion of the property. H) Zs the property irrigated or does it have access to irrigation? 1) Yes R No Explain (acreage irrigated and source): In Rogue Valley Irrigation District. Water diverted from Bear Creek. Z) Adjoining properties under the same ownership: None J) Is the property subject to flooding or other natural hazards? A small portion would be subject to a large flood. Specifically that land along creek. See attached map for flood zones. - - - ` Q ~~ 1 IIrban Growth Boundary Amendment -5- R) Detail previous official land use action by application number and date: 81_35-FP 10-13-81 Elevation certification for mobile home. L) Zf applicable, is the request within the respective City's Area of Future IIrbanization7 The property is within the City's projected sewer water service area per 1979 and 1985 studies by CH2M Hill. IV) FINDINGS: In order to approve an application which will change the comprehensive plan, all of the following findings must be documented. NOTE: ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES AS NECESSARY TO ALLOW YOII RO ADEQIIATELY ADDRESS THESE ISSUES. A) Bow can the need far the proposed change to either accommodate unpredicted, population trends, satisfy urban housing needs, or assure adequate employment opportunities, be demonstrated? Providing en educational opportunity would be more easily demonstrated in this case. Additional Jackson Count 's roblem with excessive well drilling has been recently documented. B) Bow does the proposed change provide for the orderly and economic provision of urban facilities and services? Existing 12" water line ends about 5U' from the Westerly boundary of subject property. Existing 8" sewer line lies about ']0' from the Westerly boundary and a B.C.V.5.A. trunk lir traverses the property near the Southerly line. C) In what way has maximum efficiency of land uses within the current urbanizable area been made? N/A D) What are the that would occur as providing water via Ci environmental, energy, economic and social consequences a result of approving this request? of Central Point would have lesd impact upon the environment, use less energy, have a positive effect on the School District and therefore the community and as previously noted enhance the education opportunities for the students of School Districtfr`6. ~~~ ,~ IIrban Growth Boundary Amendment -6- E) How is the proposed change compatible with the city and county comprehensive plans? Note: Contact the affected city for additional information. (You will need to add additional sheets to complete this section) The 1979 and 1985 studies of water and sewer service master plans for the City include this property in the service area. The property was not included in the current U.G.B. due to~it's close proximity to the County Expo Park, which was requested for ezclueion. Had the problem witY: potable water supply been known at that time, it would have been F) Compliance with the Statewide Planning Goals: the following as they pertain to your application. You must address all of GOAL 14, IIRBAN LANDS: IIrban growth boundaries shall be established to identify and separate urbanizable land from rural land. Establishment and change of the boundaries shall be based upon consideration of the following factors. IIrban growth boundary amendments will be approved based, in large part, on your responses to the following goal-related isues. Provide complete responses to each of the following demonstrating how your application will, if approved, further these goals. a) Demonstrated need to accommodate long-range urban population growth requirements consistent with LCDC goals: while this property will not be developed for housing, supplying it with a dependable source of potable water will allow for continued operation of this facility and go hand in hand with projected population ~xowth. b) Need for housing, employment opportunities, and livability: Students trained at this facility will be better prepared for agricultural employment. c) Orderly and economic provision for public facilities and services: See Section IV, paragraph B~. d) Maximum efficiency of land uses within and on the fringe of the existing urban area: The current (and proposed) use of this property would seem to be optimal. It's close pro~dmity to urban housing schools and semi-rural areas provides the School District with an excellent tool for education. e) Environmental, energy, economic and social consequences: See Section IV Paramaoh D ,7 :~}~2 2 ~ ~ IIrban Growth Boundary Amendment -7- f) Retention of agricultural land as defined, with Class I being the highest priority for retention and Class VI the lowest priority: All of the agricultural lend oa this property will be retained. g) Compatibility of the proposed urban uses with nearby agricultural activities: N~A A GOAL 3, AGRICIILTORAL LANDS: As previously noted, the current agricultural use of this property would be continued and enhanced by the approval of this amendment. GOAL 4, FOREST LANDS: N/A GOAL 11. PDBLIC FACILSTIES AND SERVICES: As previosly noted this property lies within the projected service area of the City of Central Point £or sewer and water. The existing water and sewer lines are located less than 100 feet from this property. GOAL 12, TRANSPORTATION: No effect would be realized on the transportation system as a result of this amendment. The current status and condition of Upton Road wiil be maintained. GOAL 5, OPEN SPACES, NATIIRAL RESOIIRCES, SCENIC OR HISTORIC AREAS: _ N~A GOAL 7, NATURAL DISASTERS OR HAZARDS: See attached map for areas of this property subject to flooding. ~.~ o'~~ ,. ~) ~ Urban Growth Boundary Amendment -8- GOAL 10, HOIISING: N~A GOAL 9, ECONOMY: BY allowing for the connection to existing City water, School District # 6 will avo~.d having to search and drill for water, maint wining poor wells and therefore any costs which would be incurred. These savings will be realized by the patro: of the District. GOAL 6, AIR, WATER, oR LAND QIIrwiTY: Connecting to City water will have positive effects to water quality, namely the xater table in this area. No adverse effects wi will be realized to air or land quality. GOAL i3, ENERGY CONSERVATION: Much energy should be saved as a result of nc having to pump water from wells, drilling and possibly re-drilling wells. GOAL 8, RECREATION: The benefits of astable potable water supply to Mei Anhorn baseball field are numerous. V) CONCLIISION AND SIIF42ARY: Please use this space to summarize your application. Explain 'how you feel approval would be in compliance with the LCDC statewide goals and further the policies of the Jackson County Comprehensive Plan. This application is submitted for the sole purpose of allowing this School District property to served by the City of Central Points potable water supply. No adverse effects to any facet of economy, environment or the public in general will occur. To minimize reliance on subsurface wa' supplies should be a foremost goal to the State and Jackson County. VI) Are you either the. owner of the property or do you have written authorization from the property owner to submit this application in their behalf? Yes ~ No THIS APPLICATION IS HERESY SIIBMITTED AND THE STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION HEREIN CONTAINED ARE IN ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO TAE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. Applicant A ent Signature School District Number 6 Signature-~~p (~~E.t~'lc Date Date , ) , / ~ p ~~ 2(' A Please provide simple directions from Medford on how to get to, and recognize your site. T ake I- Northerl to E 5 y xpo~Central Point exit. Turn left onto East Pirtea5l:. Go 4fest and turn right on iv h St. Follow 10th St. AT~ly to Upton Road. Turn right onto ~7pton Rd.; i ~ T C i L .. i i.. ~~_ i_11_ ..: ..Li A_~d L~_-i iL_ i__ 1tr..-.-i.. on~.• ~~ SCHOOL DISTRICT 6 Central Point ... Cold Hill ... Sams Valle}' Administration Office 451 N. 2nd Street Central Point. Oregon 91502 (503) 664-6611 Creative Education I~'ith Practical Coals October 16, 1989 To Whom It May Concern: ADMINISTRATION Clarence E. Baker Superintendent-Clerk Robert C. Marton Business Manager Deputy Clerk Chazles FYisk Director of Person nel/Curriculum Larry Peterson Director o/ Student Services/ Special Education The agent for annexation for School District #6 is Robert C. Marton, the Business Manager. Sincerely, ~~u ~d Clarence Baker Superintendent CB/P7 <; Q5. PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE OFFICIALLY ACCEPTED UNTIL DEPARTMENT STAFF HAS DETERMINED THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN COMPLETELY FILLED-OUT AND THE MAP HAS SEEN COMPLETF,D CONSISTENT WITH MAPPING REQUIREMENTS AS SET FORTH WITHIN THE APPLICATION. Dnless advised in writing by the department that the application and/or map is unacceptable, the application will be officially accepted. Signed~+,~ nuX ~ tS •IYtcl' ~b Applicant ~~i~~(~L~ Agent Information to be completed by_ counter staff Applicant's Name: " ' Agent: 'Staff .person accepting application: Date: (NOT OFFICIAL ACCEPTANCE) Receipt # Fee Paid: Date: " Tax Code: Planning Area: Zoning District: Assessor's Code: •• Legal Description: " '~ Formal Acceptance or Rejection of Application Initial: • ~ Application Complete a Map Rem+t•ements Complete • ~ Authorization for Agent Submitted, if Applicable o Return Application and Map to Applicant: Reason: Application Deficient • Map Deficient • No Authorization for Agent Comments: Staff Person Accepting Application and Map: Name DATE APPLICATION OFFICIALLY ACCEPTED: DATE FOR FINAL ACTION: .. Date ~~~ EXHIBIT I CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF A CENTRAL POINT t3RBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY Ah1ENDAAENT Approval of a minor urban growth boundary amendment shall be based on findings documenting the existence of the following: I. A demonstrated need to accommodate long-range urban population growth requirements, consistent with Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) goals; 2. Need for housing, employment opportunities, and liveability; 3. Orderly and economic provision for public facilities and services; 4. Maximum efficiency of land uses within and on the fringe of the existing urban area; 5. Environmental, energy, economic and social consequences; 6. Retention of agricultural land, with Class I being the highest priority for retention and Class VI the lowest priority; and, 7. Compatibility of the proposed urban uses with nearby agricultural activities. a r ~ .i: Q~i EXHIBIT J APPLICANT'S FINDINGS ?age 1 0 2 MINOR URBAN BOUNDARY LINE RDJUSTh1ENT (36 R2W 34 and 35 TAX LOT 2200) Jackson County School District No. 6 desires to obtain municipal water services for it's property known as the Future Farmers of America Land Lab and Mel Anhorn Baseball Field located in the vicinity of the northeast quadrant of the City south of where Upton Road runs east and west and north of Bear Creek and has therefore requested that said property be included within the City of Central Point Urban Growth Boundary Area so that it would be eligible for annexation into the City of Central Point. FINDINGS: 1. Subject property is used for the (Future Farmers of America) land laboratory which provides for District 6 animal and crop studies. The property also accon¢nodates the Mel Anhorn Baseball Field. These two facilities provide positive educational and recreational opportunities and thus help to satisfy the continuing demand for such facilities by urban populations (Statewide Goal 11). While said facilities and services do not satisfy a need for hous- ing or large scale employment opportunities, they do help to enhance the livability of the City of Central Point Urban Growth Boundary Area. 2. Subject property does not provide adequate well water to support it's facili- ties and services. City of Central Point water main is located within a one-hundred (100) foot distance from the westerly boundary of the property. Municipal water services will provide for an orderly and economic provision of Urban Facilities and Services as defined in Statewide Planning Goal No. 11. 3. Approximately 15 acres of subject property has a soil capability of Class 1 and is thus very suitable for growing field crops and a portion of the land is used to grow alfalfa, corn, and other crops. The farm use also facili- tates the educational use described in Section 1 of this document, and there- fore serves a greater and higher need by promoting agricultural knowledge, agriculture enterprise and agricultural productivity for future generations. Such activities along with the recreational benefits provided by Mel Anhorn Baseball field lend themselves to increased efficiency of subject property which is proposed to be included within the Central Point UGB. 4. Under the District's strategy, the facility will operate by means of munici- pal water service rather than an inadequate supply of well water. Such services will be made available less expensively, and more efficiently than by way of costly searching, drilling and maintaining poor well water facili- ties. The resulting efficiencies and cost savings gained through providing a stable potable water supply will benefit those who receive educational and recreational services from District No. 6. 5. A major portion of subject property is classified for agricultural use as a Class I with other soils along Bear Creek holding Class 2 and 4 status. A11 agricultural land on subject property will be retained within it's agricultur- al status and soil capability class. Said agricultural status will also be enhanced by approval of proposed Minor Urban Growth Boundary Adjustment and Annexation. MUBLA2.290/PORES - - - Page 2 of 2 6. School District #6 has developed plans for the Rogue Ecosystem Project which will provide for an advanced biology course, a learning center and an ecological park. The project is planned to occur in three phases and is designed to promote community-wide active participation, understanding and improving the Rogue Basis Ecosystem and man's relationship with it. The District's project, which is underway with the salmon hatchery component of the advanced biology course and the development of nature and agricultural trails, helps to accomplish statewide Planning Goal #5 in that said project will preserve open space and natural biological habitats. Our coming into an urban setting would enhance development. 7. Whether included or not included within the Central UGB area, said facility will exist and operate harmoniously with surrounding land uses. Besides providing an educational facility for increasing populations with the UGB area, said property will: a. preserve agricultural lands b. preserve aesthetics and scenic benefits of open space c. satisfy recreation needs d. facilitate delivery of educational and recreational services. X29 ~l EXHIBIT K . _ CfTY OF CENTRAL POIM :""""~'" =:A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING `-~ Notiu b hereby ggiven that Me Gllzem' .Planning Advisory Cemmlttes (CPAC11 will ' caduN a public hearing during whkh fhs :Committee wilt review a requet from lack. 'son Ceunh Shcaol Ofdrlef Number Six to amend the qty's Comprehanslvs land Use %an arM amex c parcel of preperh contig- "uaus to the GH. The Sdeel Ifm.w•. oa_,,... .~~~ttui~ of ~uirlirtt~iIIn State of Oregon, )} u. County of Jackson MA'. 1 5 R:CO Gs 60 L nn Smith ........., being first duly t..........Y . .................................._...._......__.._.._............ ' - afely sauM of where Upron Rood runs east and west, ~Jurther described as laekson Counh Tax AYessor maP, Page 36 2W 34 ' ~ -and 35, Tax Lot 2200: Relative to rile Shcool. ' _•. , DbfrkfS 'request, sold hearing will also In- dude a:revlew o6 : ~' ' (1J'an arlfidpated~wilhdrdwal frem spe- ' -dal dismieh. ' (2~Ms esfablldlmenf of Me approprtafe C lond ws zone(s), and (31 the pproposed minor beLndary ad(ust- ment whkfi Is sdreduled for Iolnf review • by fha Ch of Cenhal Polnl and Jackson "~ Thery ppublk~hearingwlll begin atop- . ~ ~ ~p~roxlmatelY 7:00 pm. on Tuesday, May 8 " 1990 In the Ch of CentralPaint"Counci~ ' - Olambers, 155 South Second Sheet, Central . ~ Pelnt, Oreg9on. ~ ^"- ~ ~'~ George Rubaloif, Adminlshallve Assistant '.. Gty of Central Pains i DAT6 May 8, 1990 _ I :'-~TIM6 7:00 PM (A proxlmate( ~. PLACE Coundl Chamber '~ 155 South Seeond Sfreef ' . ~Cenmal Polnf, Oregon 97502 ~~-.. sworn, depose and soY that I am thc ......................................._..................................... IOWNLI. LOROA~ PDaa91611~ YAHACCA. ,,,,.,.,,,,, Principal Clerk ADV9AT191N0 YANAGEAr PAINOIPAL CLEALr PAINTER Oq PAINTCAY TOg9YAH1 of Medford Moil Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation, as defined by ORS 193,010 Dori 193,020; printed and published pt Medford In the ofaresaid caunh and state; rhar the ...CitY...of._Central.._Poir}t_..-...s?Q_~3.9.~.._52.~...._...._..... Public Hearing a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published (n the entire issue of said newspoper for ............ Z ................. successive Dori consecutive ............... WeekS............ in the following issues ........ Ap ri 1... 2 7.f... Mdx.. 4.,.._19 9 0 ............. IHEPB SCT TOgTH DATC9 OP IS&UG4 IH WMin~LHC 4AYC WA9 PV96LSMLDI . . 1 ~, ' Subscribed and sworn to before m hi ~t'h d1~_ 19 90, ~. ~ HerAAr soauc ron oAZCOx My Commission expires 2nd gay of December 19 90' ~~'.~ EXHIBIT L CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Citizens' Planning Advisory Committee Meeting May 8, 1990 - 7:00 p.m. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER Chairman Robert Dunn called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ATTENDANCE Robert Dunn, Nancy Blood, Don Blankenship and City Administrative Assistant George Rubaloff were present. (Attendees signed a register of attendance which is on file at City Ha11) BUSINESS Chairman Dunn opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. to review the minor urban growth boundary adjustment for 36 2W 34 and 35, Tax Lot 2200 proposed by property owner School District No. 6. Chairman Dunn asked the committee members to declare any conflicts of interest regarding the item of business before the committee. There being no conflicts of interest, Chairman Dunn asked staff to present the staff report. City Administrative Assistant George Rubaloff gave a general description of the item as provided in a staff report dated May 4, 1990 from George Rubaloff to the Committee. Mr. Rubaloff also entered into the record by reference Exhibit A, Notice of the May 8, 1990 Public Hearing, Exhibit B, Certificate of Posting, Mailing and Publishing hearing notice, Exhibit C, vicinity map of subject proper- ty (36 2W 34 and 35 TL 2200), Exhibit D, reduced copy of preliminary annexation map of subject property, Exhibit E, Criteria for approval of Central Point Urban Growth Boundary Amendment (from UGB and Policy Agreement), Exhibit F, Applicant's Finding Statement dated February 2, 1990. Opportunity for applicant, other proponent and opponent testimony was provided during the hearing, however, no one else besides staff and the committee members were present at the meeting. The Public Hearing was officially closed at 7:20 p.m. Administrative Assistant George Rubaloff asked the committee if they felt it was necessary for him to highlight the applicant's findings. The Committee members responded that they had carefully studied the agenda packet and that they were ready to make a recom- mendation. ;42N10508.90/PCMIN _ . ~~ z, ,., CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Citizen's Planning Advisory Committee Meeting May 8, 1990 Page 2 Chairman Dunn asked staff to poll the Committee members regarding the question of whether the City should approve a minor urban boundary line adjustment for inclu- sion of the School District No. 6 parcel (36 2W 34 and 35, Tax Lot 2200) within the City's urban growth area, minor amendment of City's comprehensive plan, annex- ation of said parcel, and, withdrawal of said parcel from special districts in light of the applicant's findings. Nancy Blood voted yes; Don Blankenship voted yes; Robert Dunn voted yes. The committee requested that its recommendation be forward onto the Central Point Planning Commission for the Commission's June 5, 1990 meeting. The committee meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. !i MIN10508.90/PCMIN -- - - - ~~~ EXHIBIT rt REGISTER OF ATTENDANCE Citizen's Advisory Committee of May 8, 1990 TOPIC: Minor Urban Boundary Line Adjustment to include a parcel described as Jackson County 36R 2W 34 and 35, Tax Lot 2200. 1) ~ 6 ,~ ~L~` 1 /J /~~~t/ 14 ) 2) ~///G~~ ~ /.i/" 15 ) ,~i 3) ~A1 l~yUi~=r"""°L~r4 16 ) ~/~ 4) ` ~~`"v ~r 17 ) J~ 5) 18) 6) 19) 7) 20) g) 21), 9) 22 ), 10) 23 ), 11) 24 ), 12) 25 ), 13) 26 ), }~ c"r]Er110503.90/DF4~IEr1O ~± ~ t] FLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MINOR URBAN BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT TO INCLUDE A PARCEL DESCRIBED AS JACKSON COUNTY 36 R2W 34 and 35 TAX LOT 2200 WHEREAS, Jackson County School District No. 6 desires to obtain municipal water services for it's property known as the Future Farmers of America Land Lab and Mel Anhorn Baseball Field located in the vicinity of the northeast quadrant of the City south of where Upton Road runs east and west and north of Bear Creek and has therefore requested that said property be included within the City of Central Point Urban Growth Boundary Area so that it would be eligible for annexa- tion into the City of Central Point, and; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement, the Citizen's Planning Advisory Committee conducted a public hearing to review said request for a Minor Urban Growth Boundary Adjustment on May 8, 1990, and after conducting said hearing, has recommended that the School District's request be granted, and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement, the Central Point Planning Commission and the Jackson County Planning Commission conducted a joint public hearing to review said request for a minor Urban Growth Boundary Adjustment on June 5, 1990 and having at said public hearing received, reviewed the testimony and applicant's findings, being fully advised BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point, Oregon, that the Commission hereby accepts the applicant's findings set forth in Exhibit A; attached hereto, and by this reference expressly made a part of the within resolution and that the Commission hereby recommends approval to the City Council of the Minor Boundary line Adjustment to include the area described here- in within the City's Urban Growth Area. Passed by the Planning Commission this day of June, 1990 and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of June, 1990. Planning Cormnission Chairman ATTEST: Representative Approved by me this day of June, 1990. Planning Commission Chairman Planning Commission Resolution No. MUBLA.590/PORES ~~~~ ----- MEMORANDUM ----- TO: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff, inistrative Assistant DATE: May 31, 1990 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Review and make recommendation regarding re- quest from Jackson County School District No. 6 to amend the City Comprehensive Plan (36 2W 34 and 35 Tax Lot 2200) ISSUE .. This agenda item parallels the previous agenda item relating to a minor urban growth boundary adjustment for inclusion of School District No. 6 property within the City's Urban Growth Area. BACKGROUND On April 19, 1990, the City Council declared its intent to amend the City's Com- prehensive Plan and scheduled a series of public hearings before the Citizen's Planning Advisory Committee, The city's Planning Commission and the City Coun- cil. The Citizen's Planning Advisory Committee conducted its public meeting on May 8, 1990 After deliberating, the committee recommended that all of the School District's request be granted so that the property in question could be included within the City's Urban Growth Area and eventually annexed to the City of Central Point. COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission is scheduled to conduct a public hearing, receive testimo- ny, review the applicant's findings statement and then formulate a recoicmiendation to the Central Point City Council. A proposed resolution is included with the agenda packet for the Commission's consideration. With the exception of the following exhibit, staff refers the commission to Exhib- its A through M (except B) listed in the May 30, 1990 memorandum relating to subject Minor Urban Growth Boundary Adjustment (Planning Commission Agenda Item A). Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting Exhibit N - Proposed Resolution recommending approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment MEM3531.90/PCWORK 0'35 e Ui A ?~/C~°\~jm°/ 155 SO. SECOND ST THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY EXHIBIT B CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Geor4e Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF Wednesday, May 23, 1990 and Wednesday, May 30 1990 I POST- ED A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED ON JUNE 5, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A REQUEST FROM JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 6 TO AMEND THE CITY'S COMPREHEN- SIVE LAND UE PLAN RELATIVE TO THE DISTRICT'S REQUEST FOR TERRITORY TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE CITY'S URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY. (36 2W 34 and 35 TL 2200) AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD I TU 3p ~~O POSTZNG2.CER/NOTICES 604-3321 ~usii7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. `~ EXHIBIT N A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO INCLUDE A PARCEL DESCRIBED AS JACKSON COUNTY 36 R2W 34 and 35 TAX LOT 2200 WITHIN THE CITY'S URBAN GROWTH AREA WHEREAS, Jackson County School District No. 6 desires to obtain municipal water services for it's property known as the Future Farmers of America Land Lab and Mel Anhorn Baseball Field located in the vicinity of the northeast quadrant of the City south of where Upton Road runs east and west and north of Bear Creek and has therefore requested that said property be included within the City of Central Point Urban Growth Boundary Area so that it would be eligible for annexa- tion into the City of Central Point, and; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement, the Citizen's .Planning Advisory Committee conducted a public hearing to review said request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment on May 8, 1990, and after conducting said hearing, has recommended that the School District's request be granted, and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 17.96 of the Central Point Municipal Code, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 5, 1990 to review said request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and having at said public hearing received, reviewed the testimony and applicant's findings, and being fully advised BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point, Oregon, that the Commission hereby accepts the applicant's findings set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and by this reference expressly made a part of the within resolution and that the Conunission hereby recommends approval to the City Council of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to include the area described herein within the City's Urban Growth Area. Passed by the Planning Commission this day of June, 1990 and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of June, 1990. Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of June, 1990. Planning Commission Chairman Planning. Commission~Resolution No.- - MUBLA1.590/PORES ~03'~ ----- MEMORANDUM ----- TO: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff Administrative Ass ant SUBJECT: Review and make recommendation to City Council regarding the intent to annex School District No. 6 property south of where Upton Road runs east and west (36 2W 34 and 35 TL 2200) DATE: May 29, 1990 ISSUE Jackson County School No. 6 has requested and consented to annex a 23-acre parcel to the City. The area proposed for annexation is located in the northeaster quad- rant of the City approximately north of Bear Creek and south of where Upton Road runs east and west. A11 the landowners and more than 50~ of the electors living within the contiguous area proposed to be annexed and have signed a petition requesting annexation to the City. 'When these conditions exist, ORS 222.125 provides for contiguous annexa- tion of property without an election and without a public hearing. At its regular meeting of April 19, 1990, the City Council declared intent to annex said area along with other specific activities (Urban Growth Boundary Amendment, Comprehen- sive Plan Amendment, Withdrawal from Special Districts and establishment of zoning districts) in conjunction with the proposed annexation. The City Council also set a hearing for June 21, 1990 during which Council will review the question of withdrawing said territory from special districts. ACTION The commission is scheduled to conduct a public meeting after. which the commission should deliberate and formulate recommendations to the City Council regarding: 1. Proposed annexation 2. Establishment of zoning district(s) for the proposed new territory 3. Withdrawal of said territory from special districts The commission may make its recon¢nendations in the form of a minute motion. hlEMii0530.90/GRCORR Pa •30 The following items are provided for entry into the public record and for Planning Commission review. Item A - Certificate of Posting Item B - Annexation Petition Item C - Vicinity Map Item D - Map of Proposed Annexation MEMR0530.90/GRCORR ~t'; 039 EN /U j ,.~~1~~~ 2 -. ~ ~.. ~~~° Ty~Ow 155 SO. SECOND ST OREGON THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY EXHIBIT A CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I George Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF Wednesday, May 30, 1990 I POSTED A NOTICE e FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON June 5 , 1990, DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A REQUEST FROM JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT N0. 6 TO ANNEX A 23-ACRE PARCEL INTO THE CITY (36 2W 34 and 35 TL 2200) AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD ,Z, S'- ®~~ i ~v f v ATE EXHIBIT B ANNEXATION PETITION THE UNDERSIGNED hereby request and consent to the annexation to the City of Central Point, Oregon, of the real property contiguous thereto described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part of the within petition. By their signature hereto,.•the undersigned certify that they are either "owners" of land in the territory proposed to be' annexed as described in Exhibit "A", or are "electors" registered in the territory proposed to be annexed as described in Exhibit uAn- This petition, containing the request and consent to said annexation, must be filed with the Central Point City Council on or before the date of the public hearing to be held upon the proposed annexation pursuant to ORS 222.120. "Owner" is defined.by ORS 222.120 as meaning the legal owner of record or, where there is a recorded land contract which is in force, the purchaser thereunder. If there is multiple ownership in a parcel of land, each consenting owner shall be counted as a fraction to the same extent as the interest of the owner in the land bears in relation to the interest of the other owners, and the same 'fraction shall be applied to the parcel's land mass for purposes of the consent petition. If a corporation owns land in a territory proposed to be annexed, the corporation shall be considered to be the individual owner of that land. "Elector" is defined in said statute as an individual qualified to vote under Article II, Section 2 of the Oregon Constitution, which in turn requires that the individual be 18 years of age or older, a resident of the area in question, and registered to vote as required by applicable state law. Furthermore, ORS 222.170(2) requires that electors petitioning for annexation be registered in the territory proposed to be annexed. Elector or Property Owner: (If Property Owner, insert Name• p'ope"ty desc-'iption) Signature: Date: 5chooi District # 6 T36-~~-35 Tag Lot 2200 ///l ~~~ ANNEXATION PETITION (120887) r :~ EXHIBIT B ANNEXATION PETITION THE UNDERSIGNED hereby request and consent to the annexation to the City of Central Point, Oregon, of the real property contiguous thereto described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part of the within petition. By their signature hereto ,. the undersigned certify that they are either "owners" of land in the territory proposed to be' annexed as described in Exhibit "A", or are "electors" registered in the territory proposed to be annexed as described in Exhibit uAn This petition, containing the request and consent to said annexation, must be filed with the Central Point City Council on or before the date of the public hearing to be held upon the proposed annexation pursuant to ORS 222.120. "Owner" is defined.by ORS 222.120 as meaning the legal owner of record or, where there is a recorded land contract which is in force, the purchaser thereunder. If there is multiple ownership in a parcel of land, each consenting owner shall be counted as a fraction to the same extent as the interest of the owner in the land bears in relation to the interest of the other owners, and the same 'fraction shall be applied to the parcel's land mass for purposes of the consent petition. If a corporation owns land in a territory proposed to be annexed, the corporation shall be considered to be the individual owner of that land. "Elector" is defined in said statute as an individual qualified to vote under Article II, Section 2 of the Oregon Constitution, which in turn requires that the individual be 18 years of age or older, a resident of the area in question, and registered to vote as required by applicable state law. Furthermore, ORS 222.170(2) requires that electors petitioning for annexation be registered in the territory proposed to be annexed. Elector or Property Owner: (If Property Owner, insert i`Iame: property description) Signature: Date: ~J M, A/J~p~(J 36 2T•1 34 and 35 TL 2200 S-3v-9o ANivEXATION_.PETITION ~~`~ ANNEXATION PETITION J EXHIBIT B THE UNDERSIGNED hereby request and consent to the annexation to the City of Central Point, Oregon, of the real property contiguous thereto described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part of the within petition. By their signature hereto ,, the undersigned certify that they are either "owners" of land in the territory proposed to be' annexed as described in Exhibit "A", or are "electors" registered in the territory proposed to be annexed as described in Exhibit uAu This petition, containing the request and consent to said annexation, must be filed with the Central Point City Council on or before the date of the public hearing to be held upon the proposed annexation pursuant to ORS 222.120. "Owner" is defined by ORS 222.120 as meaning the legal owner of record or, where there is a recorded land contract which is in force, the purchaser thereunder. If there is multiple ownership in a parcel of land, each consenting owner shall be counted as a fraction to the same extent as the interest of the owner in the land bears in relation to the interest of the other owners, and the.. same 'fraction shall be applied to the parcel's land mass for purposes of the consent petition. If a corporation owns land in a territory proposed to be annexed, the corporation shall be considered to be the individual owner of that land. "Elector." is defined in said statute as an individual qualified to vote under Article II, Section 2 of the Oregon Constitution, which in turn requires that the individual be 18 years of age or older, a resident of the area in question, and registered to vote as required by applicable state law. Furthermore, ORS 222.170(2) requires that electors petitioning for annexation be registered in the territory proposed to be annexed. Elector or Property Owner: (If Property Owner, insert property description) Signature:. Date: Z)e.4nG .~ ~'fY) ~10/n 36 247 34 and 35 TL 2200 ~~ ~ ,~ 5-30'~O ANNEXATION PETITION (12osa7) _ - ,'~' ~ ~ EXHIBIT C 044 / ad `y ~~ _~~~ N /~ i` Map to accompanying Description I I (Exhibit A) of 23-Acre parcel ~ owned by Jackson County School District No. 6 and proposed to I I v 1 be Annexed to The City of 0 Central Point, Oregon - ~ l (36 2W 34 and 35 TL 2200) I ~ ~o Z. m 1 qq .. ~.Q`t ~ E°` I ~ „ sg>• '~° • •~ 4 ' £ ~ 3 ma ~ L Q Zn~ ' ~' ~ :.. - ~ I N A .. a ~ ~ , ~" : rv F ^ y 'a u O a .'. $ I ~ 3 ~~ 4 ~~ i~ R V 1 ~ .F ~ / n / ~ GI . 4 °,~ / z N 'e y ~ °: / >u / o$ { / ^R ~ ~ ~ ~ n / e e ~ N / ^ ~ N .. a4 / p°.. a ~ ~ °. ~ ~ ~ ~ / £ O F$ ~ E / ~ - o V R F a / ~ I g g 2 / ` r ~ - -- 4 ~ O / ~ "~ / / / I $ S. osL ~ t . ) r . I y ~~° `Q~ / I ~ l J I l ~- -- --- EXHIBIT D c O~ 4 ti m N c~ o^ o, .O a a o~ I~ [q (OS ~ f I~ t ~~sq ^ ~ :F '~ ~ h e A n Z n P ;_ n (, y .A STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff Administrative Assist t TOPIC: Review and make recommendation to City Council regarding a request to annex an area of land described in Jackson County Tax Assessor Map as 37 2W 2D Tax Lot 1400 DATE: May 25, 1990 ISSUE Jean Korner has submitted a request to annex a 1.5 acre parcel of land to the City. The proposed area is located on the eastside of Freemen Road between Oak and Chestnut Streets. The Commission's role in this matter is to review Ms. Korner's request, formulate a recommendation and forward said recommendation to the City Council. BACKGROUND ORS 222.125 provides for the annexation of property .contiguous to the City without an election and without a public hearing when all of the owners of land and not less than 50% of the electors residing in the territory to be annexed consent in writing to an annexation. Jean Korner is the owner and sole occupant of the property and has signed and filed the appropriate petition forms with the City. At future Council meetings, the Council will deliberate on the following items: 1. Declare Council's intent to annex said area 2. Declare Council's intent to withdraw area from special district (s) 3. Set a public hearing on the question of withdrawal of subject territory from specific districts 4. Proclaim the annexation of said contiguous area.. ATTACHI~fENTS The following items are provided for the Commission's review and to be entered into the public record by reference: MEAf60530.90/GRCORR ~,~ 1 ~) Item A - Certificate of Posting of Planning Commission Agenda of June 5, 1990 Item B - Vicinity Map Item C - Tax Assessors Map Item D - Aerial Map Item E - Reduced copy of Final Annexation Map Item F - Application and Annexation Petition NIEMA60r5~30 .90/GRCORR - - - - - - - ~'`3 9 EXHIBIT A 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, George Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF Wednesday, May 30, 1990 I POSTED AN AGENDA NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON JUNE 5, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A REQUEST FROM JEAN KORNER TO ANNEX A PARCEL OF PROPERTY CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY LOCATED ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF FREEMAN ROAD, BETWEEN OAK AND CHEST- NUT STREETS. AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD ~1 U 5/30/ o DATE POSTING.CER/NOTICES +-~•+::-Q'_-.~ c t THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLE`( EXHIBIT B "L]: ~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~. ; . 9 .,"~ ~ ` N I ~ .~-'- _ ----r--------- ~ ~_ .. , .~.~ , • ~ - +., "'` ~ 0 ~`~ _ p _I M-1 ~~. - ~~~ Ins' ~ a i i c•i -~R•1.8i A-`z ~'i' M'1 ~,,1.;:~•`~~~~~. `'.y, -~.. -~ I ~, ~ ~~ ~-~ r i ~- - •.. ~ - 9 O , l ~: i~ I~ ~~' . a -I - ;~ F~-1 8 ~ _,,~ i - M-1 ~, ~.. ~r~ i \~_ .L._ . ~ ~ C :~.~. . I ' ~" ~' L I I ',1. it ~- '~ ~ - ~ __~ r ^~E'_ i ' i`a.~~~r A;~? ` - _ _fl`4 9 r '~ i26a.9 x ~o ~ _ _ ~~ _ - - .~ -- , o _ _ ~~ ~ ~~_ o -K ~_ , I oo ^ o= ~ a i.li llti r';_. ~. ~I~ ~ o t oAK vi -- - . _ / X 1268.5 1 Z X20 .4 __ a ~ n _ -~ - w w ~ ~-: ,~ _%-_ __ . ~ l sole " x 1273.0 . .+. "`~ ~ ~2 ~ ~ x x- __.~ PAR KIN6 ~~ x O _ - ,( X" _ x J C : L X 8 R. % 1256.2 \ . ~\l _ _~ll 1 BR. „"~_`` ~l l 1 `t l j( 0 X 1256.6 x12576 IT C N 268,000 x i257z O %1236.9 j/'~~) \/ X 126 ~.2 '®JO M1 3 0 ~ W i S4 ,~ ~ ~ ~ EXHI D ~ OI ~' O- N N \ O I~~ /: M1 ~ 1 ~,~ 1\~ M „ 8 8 ~~-~~ ~~ .../ Gtr ' / d ~ `~ 1 ` r1' m ~ I .. a i P O ' 1 J ^ j h ~:~ ~ ,i_ 00 ~ I ~ _ _ ~ ~ r ~ :~~ ~ _ '.° ~ Z y c.. m C -f / y> .1 1 .. t0 /~. ^ IY t~ /^^` .I J > •n l r~. ( i ' CG S t~ i - M ~. 1 m ; i d. .. ~ ~. • ~,~ - I ~ , , -, .. I_>' I O ' ..i Tx ~. .. __ ~u ii ~j P - Z~ I V~ i~a 7NJ i y\j ~ N~ -~ I / I iT>/ >e'>.e • _ > i • • ~ ~- - ~ / ~, m ; ... m _ / L£ N i ' ~ >, C~Z MZ L£ a .r I z ~' Q. N .a _ '~.~~~ \ EXHIBIT E O ~ d z ~- ~ ~ ~ wn Z~ ~ z u x s ~9 < V Z w Z w z J ~ JWS~~S 2 Q ~ W ~"' U u( ~tf~~g g a O V p N g rc~..~~ W F... p zs i ° ~ a ~ ~ ~' w 15 ~ F= z r~gz~`'o J wd O ~SO~ X .~. W x ~ w~ V~ T F ~ } z ~ ~ w F- d ~ Q Z NF-O N } N F-Z ~ p O z w 2 rn7 V \\\~ '- y„ (O d ~ NmZw ~ y ti \\1 ~ !V-O ~Z m ~H=~ ¢ w H \l z¢~ p ~"' NOF-w ~ U W ~ ~ FW Z 4 J O ~ ~\ ~vaiQO rn ~ .091 \~ ~ Z i- ` ~ ~ W ~ZVai~ ' / \ `~V1 ~ O O Vf ~ \\y Z OnOWU O I „~~, \`~ a n ~ \yl 4llZ~w Q J a N O U~ Z 0 } ? OZ3w?c0 U () .Z 2N~OW W \07 00 W ~ v~dm°o `.~ d°. 'n Z d7~~2~Ov 4. ~~ 1 ~ ~ w ~ w ~ J ~ o V/ °~Z ~ I zo o_ ~ --~ ,091 ~QQ z z w - avow Nvwa3a~ ®~ `~ EXHIBIT F App i_ ration Filing Deadline CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application for Annexation Nafie~7Pan K. KnrnPr Address 2 7 Fr .. n 'Rd. Phone Number FF,4_22fi1 Proposed Annexation Location Assessor's Map Page Location #372W2D Tax Lot(s) #±1400 Required Information: Requested information as contained in the attached Central Point Municipal Code Sections 1.20.020 to 1.20.050 Submittal of Annexation Petitions representing a majority of owners and electors within the proposed annexation area (sample form attached) I' daa~ Y Ya~n~r certify that I am the owner or authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach written authority) ~ ~r C ~ Date ~.; l ~srt, i ocan (Sign r of owner or authorized agent of owner, please indicate which) 72ecei ycd 5/2/,90 Application Fee: $325 Rec~.,otva s7/8 ~ In the event the City incurs pro- cessing expenses in excess of $325, payment of such expenses shall be a condition of final approval. LUAP/ADMINI 17 Fl~~: ~~ ~ L-40111E EXHIBIT A Beginning at a point on the west boundary line of Donation Land Claim No. 56 in Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian in Jackson County, .Oregon, said point being 17.59 chains South of the northwest corner of said Claim; thence East 408.0 feet; thence North 160.0 feet; thence West 408.0 feet; thence South 160.0 feet to the point of beginning. (Code 6-18, Account #1-19614-9, Map #372W2D, Tax Lot #1400) ~~~ EXHIBIT F THE UNDERSIGNED hereby request and consent to the annexation to the City of Central Point, Oregon, of the'real property contiguous thereto described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part of the within petition. By their signature hereto,.•the undersigned certify that they are either "owners" of land in the territory proposed to be annexed as described in Exhibit "A", or are "electors" registered in the territory proposed to be annexed as described in Exhibit uAn~ This petition, containing the request and consent to said annexation, must be filed with the Central Point City Council on or before the date of the public hearing to be held upon the proposed annexation pursuant to ORS 222.120. "Owner" is defined.by ORS 222.120 as meaning the legal owner of record or, where there is a recorded land contract which is in force, the purchaser thereunder. If there is multiple ownership in a parcel of land, each consenting owner shall be counted as a fraction to the same extent as the interest of the owner in the land bears in relation to the interest of the other owners, and the same 'fraction shall be applied to the parcel's land mass for purposes of the consent petition. If a corporation owns land in a territory proposed to be annexed, the corporation shall be considered to be the individual owner of that land. "Elector" is defined in said statute as an individual qualified to vote under Article II, Section 2 of the Oregon Constitution, which in turn requires that the individual be 18 years of age or older, a resident of the area in question, and registered to vote as required by applicable state law. Furthermore, ORS 222.170(2) requires that electors petitioning for annexation be registered in the territory proposed to be annexed. Elector or (If Proper Property Owner: y Owner, insert descriotionl ANNEXATION PETITION (120887) __ ..~.- -' ~+~J ----- MEMORANDUM ----- TO: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff Administrative As i tant TOPIC: Public Meeting - Review and recommendation to City Council - Minor Land Partition submitted by Betty M. Hi11 for property known as Tax Lot 1000, Jackson County Assessor's Map Page 37 2W lODA DATE: May 25, 1990 Staff submits the following exhibits for the official record and for the Planning Commission's review: Exhibit A Minor Land Partition Staff Review containing existing site conditions and proposed conditions of approval B Certificate of Posting of Public Meeting Notice C Application for Minor Land Partition D Vicinity Map E Aerial Map F Proposed Minor Land Partition Preliminary Map G Proposed Planning Commission Resolution recommending approval of partition -~ MEM20530.90/GRCORR O~j 1~ V Exhibit A CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MINOR LAND PARTITION STAFF REVIEW DATE: May 25, 1990 PARCEL: 37 2W lODA Tax Lot 1000 (Located on Beall Lane approximately 160 feet east of Snowy Butte Road - 1704 Beall Lane APPLICANT: Betty M. Hill (representative: Bert West) EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 1. City zoning is R-1-6 (Residential single family) which provides for urban low density residential environment. The city comprehensive plan also designates this area low density. 2. Minimum R-1-6 Lot area is 6,000 square feet. The applicant is pro- posing to create two (2) lots from the one (1) acre parcel. Parcel one is approximately 22,923 square feet (.53 acre) and parcel two is 20,725 square feet (.48 acre). 3. Minimum R-1-6 lot width applicable to .interior lots is 60 feet. The applicant is proposing two rectangular-shaped lots. Parcel one is 78.66 feet wide and Parcel two is 87 feet wide 4. No Public Utility Easements were discovered on the property. An approximate 2200 square foot, two-story single family structure is planned for Parcel one. 5.. Existing structures include a single family residence on Parcel two and a 35 x 25 foot barn structure on Parcel one. 6. Bea11 Lane, which fronts the property, is a 36 foot wide secondary arterial within a 60 foot right of way that is classified as in good condition that is currently a Jackson County road. The streets have gravel shoulders and ditch drainage. 7. A special assessment (LID) is noted in the City's Lien Docket Summa- ry record for this parcel, the balance of which is $2,280 as of the date of this review. 8. City Sanitary sewer mains and water mains are located in the north side of Bea11 Lane. Property does have individual city water and sanitary services to lot two. The additional lot will require new service laterals to be installed. A private well is located on parcel one. -.. MLP.ECB/PCWORK V~ i PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Pursuant to CPMC 16.44.040 applicant or assignee shall provide for storm drainage, street lights, curbs, gutters or street improvements or any combination of the same on that portion of tt~n Roa - a ^~a [T}stea-&aae7 which fronts property. Pursuant to CPMC Sections ~' 12.02.010 and 12.04.015, the aforementioned requirements conditions are hereby waived provided that applicant consents to inclusion in any future local improvement districts for the improvements stated above.Applicant shall further agree not to remonstrate against any such improvements. A de€erred improvement agreement reciting these conditions shall be recorded in the Jackson County Deeds and Records and shall be binding upon applicant's heirs, successors, or assigns and shall run with the land herein above described for each lot of this minor land partition. 2. All costs associated with this development shall be the sole respon- sibility of the applicant or owner. The review done on this Minor Land Partition utilized the rules and regulations in effect as of May 29, 1990. Any modifications to the Minor Land Partition will require a new review and requirements set forth herein can be modi- fied based on any proposed changes. 3. All construction within Public Rights of Way, easements or storm drainage systems shall be built according to the City's and/or Coun- ty's public Works' Standards in effect at the time of application for permits. 4. Applicant or assignee shall pay a $200 per lot parks development fee prior to obtaining a building permit for construction on any of the lots created by this minor land. partition. 5. Each individual lot created by this minor land partition shall have individual water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer discharge services. 6: Pursuant to Chapter 11.08 of Central Point Municipal Code, applicant or assignee shall submit the appropriate application form to the City requesting the City to make a just and equitable segregation of the assessment for the lots being created by the minor land parti- tion, if an LID exists on subject property. 7. No construction or placement of structures within a public utility easement (except for fences by permit only). 8. Contractor shall be responsible to protect property corner monu- ments. If monuments are disturbed, damaged or removed, the contrac- tor shall replace monument prior to certificate of occupancy being issued. The contractor may want to verify location of property lines prior to construction. MLP.ECB/PCWORK--- - ~ ~ - - - ~ -~ _ p ®J8 9. All construction material and debris shall be removed and/or cleaned up at the end of each work day. In any event, the public works department shall require immediate response by the contractor to remove all debris from the street that will or may obstruct the street. 10. All roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces shall have positive drainage away from the structure, and shall be connected to a curb drain or an approved storm sewer. 11. NO OCCUPANCY OF ANY STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTED OR PLACED ON THIS PROPERTY WILL BE ALLOWED UNTIL A "CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY" HAS BEEN SIGNED BY BOTH THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. TEMPO- RARY WATER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES ONLY. RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVICE WILL NOT BE TURNED ON TO THIS STRUCTURE UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS COMPLETED. 12. Beall Lane is classified as a secondary arterial and will be widened to a 40 foot to 44 foot curb to curb street width when traffic vol- umes require. The applicant of this minor land partition shall sign a Deferred Improvement Agreement to participate in the cost of con- structing street paving, curb/gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage, traffic control devices, and utility crossing for the widening of Beall Lane for each parcel of this minor land parti- tion. 13. Each access on Beall lane for Parcel one and Parcel two shall not allow any maneuvering, backing or parking to occur within Beall Lane right of way. 14. An additional 10 feet of right of way on Beall Lane shall be dedicat- ed to the public for public right of way free and clear of all liens, taxes and encumbrances. MLP.ECB/PCWORK €~~9 N~Tgq~ .> T .o\ EXHIBIT B "\~~~~° ~ ,00 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 OR GOt~ THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Georqe Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF Wednesday, May 30, 1990 I POSTED AN AGENDA NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON JUNE 5, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A MINOR LAND PARTI- TION REQUEST FROM BETTY M. HILL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON BEALL LANE APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET EAST OF SNOWY BUTTE ROAD IN CENTRAL POINT AT~OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD -m ' ~'_ 7/'>D ~ of O DATE r- --- POSTING.CER/NOTICES _ L 1 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Appl.~ ation FilingyDeadline Application for Major/Minor Land Partition Proposed Site Location Address ~ / d T ~1~~ (~m-~ Assessor' s Map Page 'Location .1 ~- Z ~-~ ~0 ~ ,Q Tax Lot (s ) (`~ Re4uired Information: A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Con¢nission to determine the compli- ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal Code Section 16.44.030 and completion of a Statement of Water Rights (form at- tached) We woc~.l~~//',('~ ~ /an~~~e., ~~ a~(~vesr a~ 174 B~//~l~~.e a ~s/~~?e,~ ~ /~~ heed iak la l`~ ~/ b~~,', ~~, ' 7/-~ ~~,r/ 14~g . Y~./'t~2yic-~ lid a~.L~~ b.z u/'/'~~h e~ ~z. 1~~U~ ~~rh~~~-. I, 1J ~. ~I/ ~ h`/~~ certify that I am the owner or authorized agen of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach written authority) ~~xQ Date ~~ /~ , / of owner or a~xrized agent of owner, please ind'cate which) Application Fee: $100 I •- ~" * A filing fee for recor~Yig'a"befe'rred Improvement Agreement with the County Clerk may also be required LUAP/ADMINl ~U ~~r /~ ~ 1 ~~9V3~11 :,: ,0`61 _.- _ . Phone Number~~~ ' ~ 7d l /a~e~ 3,~,) ~ ~ ~V e B e r~ GJe.r~ aGGYh. aJ^i~z ~%ow ~ L~~v~es~-~h>e. B~ ~-- ~~ ~/~ s/~a/9~ os~z ROGUE ~21i~~C V~«Ey 112~296A.?ION ®IST~ICT 3139 MERRIMAN RGAD d MEGFGFD, OREGON 9'1401 • 1277 d SSG 71 77 ~•fi 127 May 15, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: This is to certify that, as of this date, May 15, 1990, the property owned by Jack L. and Betty M. Spencer, known as District Tract 4920-5, Account 4637-2W-lODA Tax Lot 1000, has a bonded irrigation water right on 1.00 acre. Sincerely, ROGUE RIVER VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT Wanda McCormick Office Manager ,cc. - - _ ,i9~R/a~ ~• FEl l~4'/E7 " V.'Ar ~:,:.f: •'--^ c~sraicr r ~ A~~ _ 130 •. DATE: ~ Ih/L~D ~ ~. a s /6 9 STATE,*tENT OF WATER RIGr1T5 `'""'^^^'^-~ 1. ~ The parcels identified within this plan, plat or replat CO NOT have a water right. How will water be applid to these larrJs? (i. e. city water supply, district supply, or exermt well use) Sign this form aryl file with the plan, plat, or replat. 2. /_~. The parcels identified within this plan, plat or replat DO have a water right, as issued to: Permit # Certificate ~ Permit ~ Certificate P for use far use Pcres Township Rance Section Tax-pct Number I , ~1 a W ~o _^I~A ~ ion Proceed to back page and attach extra pages as ne:essary. Sign this farm ark mail with the plan, plat or replat to Water Reseurces Oept. The above information is true arb ccmple*_e to the best of my knowledge. Siend Date: Name: (type r print)~~„ y/'J ..F•_f~l ~~ Please do not write below this line. ' AC~(NO S~G~(E*!T The Oregon Water Resources Department has r~eived a statement of water right and revised plan, plat or replat far the property listed below. % /The larcls identified within this plan, plat or replat DO NOT have a r~orded water right. / % The lards identified within this plan, plat or replat DO have a re::orded water richt, as issued to: Permit ~ Certificate ~ Fc res Township Rance Section Use --9P-4 EXHIBIT A Ccmmencing at the Southwest corner of Snowy Butte Orchards in Section 10, Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette :ieridian in Jackson County, Oregon, according to the official plat thereof, now of record, thence East along the South bound- ary of said Snowy Butte Orchards and the center line of Bea11 lane 615.02 feet to the point of beginning; thence North paral- 1el with the west boundary of said Snowy Butte Orchards, a dis- tance of 263.48 feet; thence East parallel with the South boundary of Lot "S" of said Snowy Butte Orchards, a distance or '_65.33 feet; thence South, parallel with the West boundary of said Snowy Butte Orchards, a distance of 263.48 feet; thence West along the South boundary of said Lot "S" and the center line of Beall Lane a distance of 165.33 feet to the. point of beginning. ~~-065 J \ EXHIBIT D 066 x c. '', i L. '~i I --x x• BE ii*~~ •: , EXftIBIT E ,~ 6j ~ ~ EXHIBIT F ~Q3~ ~, ~~ ~' ~ ~~ 0.~ Ng 2 ~ q ~ Ot p! ~ ~ 1. ~ ~ o Q ~~ n ~ 4JIV ,~~~0~ ~ e ~~ 4 ~ W o o iil ~~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ n I 0 ~~E~z -~. r J `~ V N I I !P ' L , 1~ iv ~ ~ 1'1 Pe M ~ ° ~ s ~. I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i m a ~` _ ~~~ ~~s ~ ~~' ~~ ¢ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~41~ a Oa 40 ~ ^ V ~ ~ ~ .~r S o ~ ~, ~ ~ N ~ ~ .~ ~ ~~ m o ~, J ~ (~~ O 1+~( r~ og 4j N ~ TPO~6, ~ ~ yea h a ~~~ ~ ~ N ~n'a- ~~iOS~ off of ~ \ _ ' Qom' ~1117g ~ M OlvS ~ ~. I- ~~osg PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO GRANT A MINOR LAND PARTITION (Betty M. Hill) WHEREAS Betty M. Hill has submitted an application for a minor land parti- tion of a one (1) acre parcel, located on Sea11 Lane approximately 160 feet east of Snowy Butte Road (37 2W lODA TL 1000), and WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point held a pub- lic meeting upon said application for minor land partition on June 5, 1990 pursu- ant to Central Paint Municipal Code Section 1.24.020C, and having at said public meeting received and reviewed the City staff report and testimony, and being fully advised now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Based upon the staff report, evidence, and record relating to said application, the Planning Commission hereby finds that said application meets the .requirements for minor land partition, that said minor land partition as proposed is in compliance with the City's comprehensive plan and zoning code, and if the conditions set forth hereinafter are met, said application meets the City's requirements for minor land partition. Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of the minor land partition application submitted by Betty M. Hill, subject to the condi- tions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and by this reference expressly made a part of the within resolution. RESOLUTION NO. -1 MLP05.90/RESO . -` ~p6g Section 3. In accordance with Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 1.24, this resolution of the Planning Commission, including the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, shall be forwarded to the City Administrator who shall sched- ule a public hearing before the City Council. After conducting said public hear- ing, recording and reviewing the city staff report and testimony, the City Council may decide in the matter of said minor land partition. Passed by the Planning Commission this day of June, 1990, and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of June, 1990. Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of June, 1990 Planning Commission Chairman RESOLUTION NO. -2 -- - _ MLP05.90/RESO Vf~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission 1,~n/~/ FROM: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant~(I~J DATE: May 31, 1990 ~~~"` SUBJECT: Review and determination of a fence variance request for 361 North Third Street (Applicant: Phillip Rivers) ISSUE Applicant Phillip Rivers has utilized the variance application process to request approval to construct a six (6) foot fence on his property within the setback line. DISCUSSION Provided in the Commissioner's packets are written findings statements furnished by the applicant. Such statements were made in response to the variance criteria outlined in CPMC 17.80 and 15.20 Upon reviewing the applicant's findings, staff has discovered that some of the conclusions are valid and some are not. for exam- ple, staff would agree with the applicant that special circumstances exist which pertain to the property and which were not created by the action of the property owner, primarily the proximity to vehicular and pedestrian traffic generated from the schools: On-the-other-hand, staff does not agree entirely with the finding which relates to safety to the neighborhood or the City. The proposed fence may provide for clear sight vision as prescribed in CPMC section 17.60.120, however, the structure does not appear to provide for clear site distance at the corner and at the driveway access which is another standard that the City must maintain for the safety and welfare of the residents, as well as the general motoring public and pedestrians. While staff thinks that the applicant has presented some logical findings, and while there appears to be favorable neighborhood support for the variance, 1oba1 governments and the courts have come to insist that a variance be granted only if all variance criteria can be met. ALTERNATIVES 1. Planning Commission can take no action 2. Planning Commission can deny the variance request 3. Planning Commission can approve variance as proposed by the applicant 4. Planning Commission can grant the variance with conditions of approval designed to protect the interests of the City as a whole MEM10601.90/GRCORR . ~ ~~1t, 1 ~~ 5. Planning Commission can continue the public meeting to July 3, instructing the applicant to modify his site plan to mitigate site distance problems. 6. The applicant also has the choice of pursuing Public Works Director Larry Blanchard's recommendation of initiating a street vacation. 7. Applicant can also opt to build a 42" fence according to City rules. Such a structure would still define property lines, ensure a degree of security and privacy, define space, enhance the property and thus benefit the applicant. Staff recortunends alternative 6 or 7. The following are provided for the Commissions review and for entering into the official record: Item A - Certificate of Posting Item B - Vicinity Map Item C - Fence variance application Item D - Staff report from Public Works Director MEM10601.90/GRCORR n ,. ~, t_ EXHIBIT A 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, George Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF Wednesday, May 30, 1990 I POSTED AN AGENDA NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON JUNE 5, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW AND DECIDE IN THE MATTER OF A FENCE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 361 NORTH THIRD STREET. AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD S G U 30/°0 DATE POSTING.CER/NOTICES ~~ ~~ THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY E}CHIBIT B Y' ~tx~ @`i~ .~ ~® ' ~...~e ~..LE Q~.'® ~ ~ n LA VIIEL 1 I - ~ -~ ° ~ ~ - C iL_ it ~ -A- la -~ ~ - _ : ~~ i '-~; r BCG~ - l .c i ~ ~K ~ ,r ; "~ AEI °..... ~? '~"~ ~ .a A-1.6 ~I 13-1-8 ~ ~_ ~. - V ~'~ ! ~ i ~ 2 ~i R'1~6 ii ~i - Jf'~j-~ tb-_i _3 i ,~ '' ' ' i iii ;, ,~, ~ ~~%. ~`° -°.: :: ~ ~~' ~-1 :: (rt•i•s; 13-2;~ M'1 i i-~'.~''~ c~ '.~ •.... _ ~ ~ II ' ii ,. ~~5 ~ ~ E 'I '~ 'rte. J• l ~. n^\\ :•V ~ • ~'~Lr ~i ~-~ i ~~ ~, ,.. B~_.. o_ _ •,. . V~ -.._ _ ~a y EXHIBIT C i Ap,, ~eation Filing Deadline CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application for Variance Name Philip R. Rivers Address 361 North 3rd St., Central Point, OR Phone Number 664-6852 hm 770-6613 wk Proposed Site Location Address 361 North 3rd St., Central Point, OR Assessor's Map Page Location 1-014018-1 37-2W-3DD Tax Lot(s) 100 Required Information: A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the site must be adequate to enable the PLanning Commission to determine the compli- ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal Code Section 17.80:010. A statement as to how the request will meet each of the following objectives: A. The variance will provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the City; such as beautification or safety B. The variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighbor- hood; C. The variance will utilize property within the intent and purpose of the zone district. D. Circumstances affect the property that generally do not apply to other proper- ty in the same zoning district. E. The conditions for which the variance is requested were not self-imposed through the applicant's own actions, nor the actions of the applicant's agents, employees, or family members. I, Philip R. Rivers certify that I am the owner macx irk x~cXla~t2i of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach written au o y) Date ~ ~ / ~ / ~ (Signature of owner or authorized agent of owner, please indicate which) ~~~•i -~ Application Fee: $100 PA ID~'Jy~~~ n~~~~~ * A filing fee for recording a Deferred Improvement Agreement with the County Clerk may also be required LUAP/ADMINI X75 Legal Description 361 N. 3rd St., Central Point, OR GI.L~ ~'t~~j , _. ... ", I 89=16030 ~ ~ Title No. 608052 ~~~ •~ ~~ .. ti Beginning at tiie moat Northerly cozner of Lot OneX(11 in. Block ..._SiEp~Th;ee_. j~3j_of the ei ty, ot_Centzal_POlnt. Jackson County, Oregon, according to the official plat thereof, now of ceeordt thence South 35. 30' Eact70.0 feet along the Noctheeeterly line of Bald lot; thence South 51. 30' Ylest 110.0 feet to the Southwesterly Ilne of lot 2t thence Nocth 35. 30' Hest along said line a distance of 70.0 feet to the Northwesterly corner of Lot 2r thence north 5/• 30' East along the Northerly line of lots 2 and 1 s distance of 110.0 feet to tt~e tzue point of beginning. 1 ~ O172ClAI. IiTrnACB ,3.•03 ~u~ 2s ~a9o°.~s. uIxiEEH S Bt:et:LZz ~ c anEa '.~~~~ . . Q~S Proposed Projec#~ -Descr ption 361 N. 3rd, Central Point, OR It is proposed that the occupants/owners of the described nronerty construct a 6 foot fence adjacent to Cherry Street as illustrated in the Proposed Project Plan. The fence is proposed to be con- structed on the property line of the given lot. A fence variance request will be necessary prior to obtaining a bu?lding permit, and actual construction. Primary mop:ivation of the owners/biiilder~ are the foglowing: 1. Saftey for ynune children/neighborhood. 2. Increase livability of the homesir.e. 3. Noise reduction from neighboring Hieh School/ResidenceG. 4. Stimulate/increase market ~~alite. 5. Deter Criminal activities. h. Beautification of the Gite and neighhorhoo~l. 7. Defining boundries. The primary issue of concern is Saftey. .,,, , . ®~~ Proposed Project Plans 361 N. 3rd St., Central Point, OR Page One of Two 53 ~ _ '.+'~rif~r~N~ SIUEWgI.~ p ~ 1 ~ L~ >~ g o ~~ ~~ s - L ~ .....------ --- ,- L is1 Q ' ~ ~ P ~ st' ' ~~ r ~~ Ct ~"' . e . t(~~.~- _ ' - I,y~ ~ N ~n ~. ~ sQ U ~ ` 3 ._. .._.__... 0 ~ a~ S-rR~ET ~~.. :~r ..~ .". . CweR AoRGti PA0.LO13 G~+xU.E G L+v ~ N~ , &~aaor1 Roots ;,; ~~% ; ; . (~iNNINU ~ .~` _~ ~ ,'. Q~ i"': ,~ IJ~gOOM ~171~ ~~~ ' _ ~ l)INGL.6 ~ GaRq~E i _. ,~`~$ Proposed Project Plans 361 N. 3rd St., Central Point, OR Page Two of Two style and advantages of fence Protection and security. Depending on the height, and on how close together the boards are placed, it can provide a high level of both. Visual privacy. Closed styles can pro- vide total closure. Semiopen styles pro- vide somewhat less. Tempering the environment. The closed surface blocks noise and sun but forces wind into downdrafts. Defining space. II boards are closely spaced, can literally define space the way a wall does. Can seem heavy-handed unless softened by plantings. Suitable finish treatment. Stain, paint, or let it weather naturally. _L s- z stria per 4x: 6, pact !n/ill 2x4 stringer r~~~,r~ar ~ Stringer ~~ ls2 1x6 it{Till iiyiU Post i %:i O' STATEMENT OF CRITERIA: "The variance will provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the City; such as beautification or saftey." Chapter 17.80 Paragraph D item 1 DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: The proposed fence would be constructed six feet in height of quality lumber as described in the attached "proposed Project Plans", which would beautify the property and enhance the City Street and right of way. The proposed project would also increase market value of the given neighborhood. The project would designate boundries and right of ways. (Please review exhibit A for documentation of improved market value.) JUSTIFICATION: It would be beneficial to the property owners and the City of Central Point to approve the variance to allow the proposed project to implement the given advantages; Beautification, Saftey, Market Value, and designation of Boundries. ;.0 .~ STATEMENT OF CRITERIA: "The variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood." Chapter 17.80 Paragraph D item 2 DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: The proposed fence will reduce noise and increase livability to the neighbors and the City of Central Point. The Neighbors have been notified of the proposed project and approve of the same. The proposed project will stimulate market appeal for the City of Central Point and the neighborhood. This project will be constructed to allow clear vision to motorists as outlined in the "Clear vision Triangle" guideline. (Please review exhibit B and C for neighbors consents, and for actual measurments of the clear vision triangle.) JUSTIFICATION: Neighbors and motorist will find the project appealing and safe and support approval the the Fence Variance Application. y ®~`1 STATEMENT OF CRITERIA: "The variance will utilize property within the intent and purpose of the zone district." Chapter 17.80 Paragraph D item 3 DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: The zonning of the lot under consideration is R1. The project would reinforce the single family residence code. (See exhibit D for actual zonning.) JUSTIFICATION: The occupants of the home would utilize the property for a single family dwelling and this would not adversely effect the assigned zonning. ,.~~'.~~ STATEMENT OF CRITERIA: "Circumstances affect the property that generally do not apply to other property in the same zoning district." Chapter 17.80 Paragraph D item 4 DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: The property is a corner Lot with the only livable outdoor area adjacent to Cherry Street. Current codes outlined in Section 15.20.030 would prohibit use of this area for small children without presenting safety problems for motorist, pedestrians, and the occupants. The home was constructed in 1895, prior to existing land use ordinances, and did not anticipate limited use of the side lot adjacent to Cherry Street. The current owners did not have the privilege or voice to prevent existing conditions. The property is Located one block from the City of Central Point School District #6 Crater High School and Central Point School District Transportation Headquarters. The property is subjected to heavy School bus noise and traffic of the same as well as pedestrians JUSTIFICAT/ON: The applicant now has opportunity to follow city statutes to allow the property to be used in the most effective, livable manner possible given current conditions. The occupants and the City of Central Point would benefit by approval of the variance due to the unusual circumstances of the given property. _~ ~~~ STATEMENT OF CRITERIA: "The conditions for which the variance is requested were not self-imposed through the applicant's own actions, nor the actions of the applicant's agents, employees, or family members." Chapter 17.80 Paragraph D item 5 DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: The occupants purchased the property July of 1989. Although extensive refurbishing has taken place, the property location could not be manipulated or altered by the applicants of this variance, agents, employees or family members. There is not an existing structure which violates current ordinances. JUST/F/CAT/O~V: The variance applicants have had no control of the status of the existing property, finding the applicants in compliance with the criteria set forth. -.084 STATEMENT OF CRr~ ERIA: The variance will provide safety to the neighborgood r'or the city. "* 15.20.080 page 167 (Central Point 9/82) *(This item appears to be a condition of granting a variance which was not listed in chapter 17.80 paragraph D as an item) DESCRlPT1ON OF FACTS: The Primary reason for the propsed project is to provide safety to three children under the age of six. This project would also provide safety for motorists, and pedestrians near on on the premisis. Crater High School is within one Block of the proposed site which causes Cherry Street to be a major course of traffic for motorist, and pedestrians. Saftey of the same should be the most poignant consideration. The proposed project would deter assailants and criminal activity, i.e. abductions, molestation, harassment, etc. The proposition will not adversely affect Fire saftey standards. JUSTIFICATION: To a11bw saftey to motorist from playing children, pets; and visitors, a fence should be constructed at least six feet in height to Limit acesses and exits to given points of safety, i.e. front sidewalk and rear auto acess driveway. To allow safety to motorists and pedestrians a fence of six feet in height would prevent flying articles, mis-laid debris, and hazardous distractions, i.e. Ba11s, Bikes, Toys, etc. V 0$rJ STATER~IENT OF CRITERIA: "The variance will provide protection to the neighborhood or the city. "* 15.20.80 page 167 (Central Point 9/82) *(This item appears to be a condition of granting a variance which is not listed in chapter 17.80 paragraph D as an item) DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: Protection would be afforded the City of Central Point and neighbors by allowing clear vision to the City Right of Ways and thourough-ways. Hazards would be contained within the property lines of the site. Protection would be enhanced to the neighborhood and to the City of Central Point by clearly establishing boundries and maintenence of the premisis. Protection would be afforded motorist who park on Cherry Street for high School activities, and neighborhood visiting by establishing a boundry for parking of their autos a safe distance from traffic thourough-ways. JUSTIFICATION: Safety and protection to the City of Central Point and to the neighborhood would be primary reasons for approving the variance application and completion of the proposed project. ~$~. ~ Exhibit' A Improved Market Value underwriting cnidalinee ~ FannieMae Property antl Appraisal • Analysis !~ Section 404.09 Selling acceptable for maximum financing. Because of their location, these properties frequently will have enough advantages over newer prop• erties in outlying areas to create equal or greater market demand. Certain older properties also may be in demand because of their unique architectural design or other factors. Section 404.09 Our appraisal report forms provide neighborhood ratings that are Neighborhood Analysis designed to summarize principal items in a neighborhood that Rating generally aze considered important 6y purchasers when they select a home. If any rating is less•than•"average," the appraiser must com- ment on the reasons for the rating and its effect on the property's mazketability and value. Maximum Financing should not 6e ollered to a borrower unless the property is in a location with at least "average" overall neighborhood amenities, public services, and prop- erty conditions. The appraiser should also explain any changes, either favorable or unfavorable, that have occurred (or are currently underway) if they will affect the marketability of the properties withih the neighborhood. There should be sufl"icent market demand for the neighborhood to support an active market Cor the subject property. Two items of particulaz importance in determining whether a neighborhood will support an active market aze discussed below: A. General appearance. The general appearance of the properties in the neighborhood is a key factor. The appraiser must consider the extent to which the propertie9 are receiving proper maintenance. Signs of maintenance and care usually reflect a strong neighborhood with stable or increasing values. B. Appeal to market. Essentially, this is a summary rating of the extent to which all aspects of the neighborhood will appeal to the typical purchaser is the market. An individual property by itself cannot overcome a generally prevailing reluctance of the mazket to invest in a neighborhood. On the other hand, a relatively weak property in a strong, viable neighborhood is likely to sustain its value, although it still must be carefully analyzed. The appraiser must rate the various aspects of a neighborhood by comparing the characteristics for the subject neighborhood to those for competing neighborhtlods. ratings: Page 48 ~y ((~~ Ol r04i88 VtJ~ Exhibit B Neighbor Notification/Consents Page One of Three May 10, 1990 RE: Proposed improvements to: 361 North Third St., Central Point, OR Phi11p R. & Becky M. Rivers as owners. To all concerned: It is proposed that the owners of:the described property be allowed to build a fence of six feet in height adjacent to Cherry Street. The fence would be constructed on the owners property if approved by the City of Central Point through a fence variance application. The fence variance application would be submitted to Che City of Central Point only after approval of the majority of immediately effected neighbors. The fence would allow adequate visual clearance to rand thourough-ways and City right-of-ways. i Please review the attached "Proposjed Project Plans"and indicate your satisfaction or disaitisfaction of the same. A specfic area is given for your opinion and comments. Thank you for your consideration aid time. /S//i/j/'1~~//~//////e l y , t / `~VV"./ ~/~~~ i Philip3~~s ~ 361 N. 3rd St. ~ Central Point, OR 97502 (503)664-6852 /pr Attachments ~~ I~~~ ~ Exhibit B ~ Neighbor Notification/Consents Page Two of Three To Whom Zt May Concern: The undersigned have reviewed the attached "Proposed Project Plans" and offer the following observations and comments. We reccomend the follwoing action of the proposed variance application: Approval ~,_ _~~ ;:{ ~ ~' / ` !~ :_.. _ . i/ X ~ , ~ ~~ Decline Name/Address/Comments ~~>> N . 3~"c~ S7• ,~ ~ 7s ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~, 3~5 ~"1~ C~ ~c7trr.~, ~ .r Q ~~ ~ y 7 ~~" ~~ c~~ ~. i 7 S~ ~ `.... Y '~ ~~~ i. Exhibit B Neighbor Notification/Consents. Page Three of Three Comments of Neighbors Mr. & Mrs. Pearce of 347 North 3rd St. comment that they have always been concerned for the saftey of the small children of the neighborhood who seem to gather near Cherry Street. Due to the unruly be- havior of the high school students, and motorists which use Cherry Street, saftey has always been a major concern. They support the fence variance request for the saftey of all children in the neighborhood. They feel the fence will add a sense of responsibility to pedestrians and motorists of Cherry Street. Mr. & Mrs Deacon of 247 Cherry Street, comment that due to the frequent mischievous activities of the students of Crater High School, the fence variance request will further secure the neighborhood as well as beautify the proposed project, thus promoting the neighborhood. Mr. & Mrs. Deacon were pleased with the fence design and support the construction of the fence to benefit the neighborhood. Mr. & Mrs. Stadig of 247 Cherry Street, support the fence variance due to the constant criminal activity which seems to surround the neighborhood relating to drugs. Mr. & Mrs. Stadig commented on the frequency they had witnessed the transfer, sale, and consumption of drugs in our neighborhood, and state that they have notified the City of Central Point Police on several occasions to control the same. - y ~ ~. .. ; ~ '; Exhibi~t~ C Measurments of Clear Vision Triangle ~il w3 O 4 ~ ~ ~~ 0 J '. ~. ~-.. ~ --~U.~S ."1 . ~~ ~ S~ 3 r.,,-~ ~, Y~^~~. s ~.~ _ , K.K. .^ * . `y„ k Y ~ r. mow.. mt -„J" _.. :4 ~ In excess of 33 feet ~ i ~~ i ~ '~i i • '~ i i ~~~ '. C~vER ' -------------~J ' aOR,C. • P~~ R c. a~ L, ~ ~ n~ ~ 'L ,~ i~ ~. ~~ .p ~W ~, i k,T~ I [~~ TH Exhibit D Zonning of Residence ~.f !/4 SE I/~ S~c.~ T.~: NC COR ~ u'N y'~ l/{~~ o ¢~ o ~ S`yy0 ~1 \ ~ / ~ V ~~ • G~ "R.T ~ ,,,. ,, ~ .~ ~ .,g1 ~ ~av ; A~' 9~ ,;,;~~ ..~ ~~ ~5 ., . ~ ~ , F,~ y,- ~~ ~,, ~~ ~\~3 `ry5 6D =1~~~ ~~ ~~~ \'~ ~P.u~~ ~; -g tie` L _t>>0 s~~~ ~~~ / ~~ ~~ °; ~/ ~i. P~¢ ~~ ~~ ~'a ~~ ~ ~i ./ `~0~, \\ ,\•. .. S~,V_ '~ ~ ~~ ~~ EXHIBIT D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: May 31, 1990 T0: Planning Commission FROM: Larry R. Blanchard - Public Works Director !~/~ RE: Fence variance 361 N. 3rd Street T37S R2W Section 3DD Tax Lot 100 Existing Conditions: 1. N. 3rd Street, 40' street, 60' right of way; 2. Cherry Street, Unimproved street 80' right of way. Comments: According to Webster's Dictionary a variance is defined part 4)..."a license to do some act contrary to the usual rule". I emphasize the last 5 words of this definition, contrary to the usual rule. Webster's also defines code as: 1. A systematic statement of a body of law, one gives statutory force. 2. A system of principals or rules. I bring these definitions to you in an effort to analyze this variance in relationship to the intent of the code. According to Chapter 15.20.07 variance: A. General: A variance MAY be granted, as provided in this chapter, where strict application of the provisions of this chapter would result in unnecessary hardship. To grant a variance, a determination must be made that the property in question by not allowing a 6' fence is given an unnecessary hardship. Also in granting a variance, a specific list of findings must be generated.to allow an act which is contrary to the usual rule. :09.3 1 In these findings, a comparison must be made with other situations where a fence variance might be considered, and determine if these situations warrant an unnecessary hardship to allow an act which is contrary to the usual rule. Codes are written to provide a system of principals or rules for which citizens of the community use. City officials and legislative bodies review these codes in the operation of the City, and allowing an exception must be closely monitored and justified in order to reduce our liability. Conclusions: 1. It is the Public Works Department's opinion that not allowing a 6' fence would not cause an unnecessary hardship to the owner. The property owner would be allowed a 42" fence which would provide for the beautification and safety for the property. 2. There are numerous properties located within a five block radius of the high school, each of these property owners could request the same variance for the same reason. 3. Traffic volumes on Cherry Street are normal for a typical residential street. N. 3rd Street does receive more vehicular traffic including trucks, however, the overall noise level would not be reduced substantially by installing a 6' fence vs a 3 ~' fence. Recommendation: 1, Deny the variance for the reasons stated above. 2. The property owner could approach the City to vacate a portion of the existing right of way from the present SO' width to 50'. This would provide for an additional 15' of set -back which would place the fence 5' back from the location proposed by the owner. A street vacation would require all property owners on Cherry Street from 2nd Street to 3rd Street to petition for the vacation. Also the City would require the street to be improved in return for the vacation. This would provide all the necessary requirements outlined in Mr. River's variance request: a. Safety; b. Beautification; c. Increase the market value of the given neighbor. ,' cc: Plan Reviews - 02-006 0 9,4 -- MEMORANDUM ----- TO: FROM DATE: Planning Commission George Rubaloff Administrative Ass'stant May 29, 1990 SUBJECT: Site Plan Review for Four-Unit Multiple Family development along westside of Tenth Street north of Laurel (37 2W 2CB TL 7306) (Appli- cant: Ron Collins) Pursuant to Section 17.72.060 of the Central Point Municipal Code, subject develop- er is required to obtain site plan approval prior to being issued a City building permit. The following items are attached for the Planning Commissions review: Item A - Planning and Public Works Department Site Plan Review Item B - -Public Workds Deparment Site Plan Review Item C - Certificate of Posting Item D - Site Plan Application Item E - Vicinity Map Item F - Tax Assessor Map Item G - Reduced Copy of Site Plan Item H - Rendering of proposed Multiple-Family Structure MEM50530.90/GRCORR e. ®95 .J EXHIBIT A CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW DATE: May 29, 1990 PARCEL: 37 2W 2CB Tax Lot 7306 Located on North Tenth Street, North of where Laurel Street intersects with Tenth Street. APPLICANT: Ron Collins 1. Subject property is approximately 10,019 Square feet (.23 acre) located in the R-3 zone (multiple-family district). The R-3 zone is appropriate for the type of development that is being proposed. 2. Developer is proposing a four-unit two-story apartment building. Unit size is as follows: Unit 1 840 sq. ft. Unit 2 820 sq. ft. Unit 3 820 sq. ft. Unit 4 640 sq. ft. Plan appears not to exceed the maximum lot coverage (aggregate building coverage) of 50%. 3. Developer is proposing the minimum off-street parking requirement of 2 spaces per living .unit (8 spaces), four of which will be covered and one additional guest parking space. Developer has designed parking so that no backward movements or maneuvering occur in the public right-of-way. 4. Developer is proposing landscaping of approximately 1600 sq feet within the 30 foot front yard on each side of the access to and from Tenth Street. Said land- scape meets the City's development standards. 5. Plan appears to meet the following minimum yard requirements: a. Front yard 60 feet from Centerline of North Tenth Street b. Side yard - 10 feet (5 feet per story) c. Rear Yard - 10 feet MEb'.70530.90/GRCORR - ,i3~~ 6. The distance between the principal multiple-family structure and the detached carport or any other detached accessory building shall be at least ten feet. 7. Building Height shall not exceed 35 feet. 8. Ingress and Egress shall avoid interference with traffic flow on public streets and shall facilitate adequate access for life support and other emergency vehicles. 9. Developer shall pay a $200 per lot Parks Development fee prior to obtaining a building permit for construction of the multiple-family project. 10. Prior to being issued a building permit for the project, developer shall pro- vide a sufficiently detailed plan to illustrate that storm drainage will be proper- ly managed on the site. 11. North Tenth Street is a 60 foot wide secondary arterial right of way with a 40 foot street section which is classified in poor condition. Curb, gutter and sidewalk fronts the property. 12. Developer shall meet all applicable conditions of approval that were placed upon the property at the time the City granted a minor land partition on February 20, 1979 which created Tax Lots 7306, 7305 and 7301. MEMnn70530.90/GRCORR ---- - - -- ` ~ va7~ EXHIBIT B PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR STAFF REPORT DATE: May 31, 1990 TO: Planning Commission RE: Site Plan Review for Four (4) Unit Multiple Family Development along westside of N. 10th Street, North of Laurel Street Tax Lot: T37S R2W WM Section 2C6 TL 7305 Applicant: Ron Collins I. Streets A. Existing Conditions 1. N. 10th Street - secondary arterial, City juris- diction, 60' right of way, 40' curb to curb width, existing sidewalk, no street lights, traffic control devices already installed, existing access curb cut to property, traffic volume 3000 VT/D. 2. Laurel Street - Local street, City .jurisdiction, 60' right of way, unimproved section gravel only, no sidewalk, no curb and gutter, no traffic control devices, no street lights, no established access to property, traffic volume 200 VT/D. B. Required Improvements 1. N. 10th Street a. Provide additional right of way on N. 10th Street as required by Public Works Department. b. Driveway access shall provide 25' clear vision sight triangle each side of the driveway. c. Driveway width can be a maximum of 30' and shall be 100' from the nearest access. This will require the placement of the access at the S.E. property line. The existing curb cut shall saw cut and replaced with regular curb/gutter. 1 pass d. A street light shall be installed at the driveway facing N. 10th Street. This will be a light to match the light pole style in the area. Light type 9500 high pressure sodium vapor light, mounted behind sidewalk. e. No parking allowed on N. 10th Street. f. A 5' sidewalk shall be cleaned and repaired on N. 10th Street for the property adjacent to N. 10th Street. g. A11 vehicle maneuvering and parking shall be done on the property and not in the public right of way. Follow the requirement in 17.64.030 of the Code. h. All utility improvement for power, telephone, cable t.v., gas, and other similar services for crossings, etc. shall be provided by the developer. 2. Laurel Street a. According to the approval of the original minor land partition that created this lot, the developer was to construct curb/gutters, sidewalks, asphalt, paving, storm drains, street lights, 8" sanitary sewer, 8" water lines for a standard 36' wide paved street according to the construction standards of Central Point. These improvements were to be completed at such time as adjacent properties are developed. The improvements shall be completed as a part of the construction of this development. to assure these improvements are done. I2. Storm Drainage A. Existing Conditions 1. N. 10th Street - 24" storm drain is located in the eastern portion of N. 10th Street. Discharge Basin - Mingus Creek Floodway or Zone - None ,; ., 2 ,~ 2. Laurel Street - 12" storm drain is located at the intersection of Laurel Street and N. 10th Street, N.W. corner. Discharge Basin - Mingus Creek Floodway or Zone - None B. Requirements 1. N. 10th Street a. This storm drain system on site shall collect all runoff from impervious areas which include, but not exclusively, asphalt, concrete and roofs. The storm drain shall be connected by a properly designed system that connects to the 24" storm drainage system in N. 10th Street. b. Design criteria shall be a 10 year storm with an intensity of 2" ip/hr. for 15 minute duration. c. An acceptable storm drainage system requires a minimum 12" storm pipe with catchbasin located to collect the runoff. 2. Laurel Street a. A storm drainage system shall be designed to collect the runoff from the proposed street and developed properly and discharged to the 12" storm drain pipe at Laurel Street and N. 10th Street. Follow the guidelines set forth in Public Works Standards. III. Water Svstem A. Existing Conditions 1. N. 10th street 8" water line western portion of the street. Fire Hydrant: N.W. corner of Laurel Street and N. 10 Street. Static pressure: 60 psi Residual pressure: 50 psi Fire Flow: 750 gpm 3 ~~~ ,~ 2. Laurel Street - no water main from N. 10th Street to N. 9th Street. Fire Hydrant: At Laurel Street and N. 9th Street, S.E. Corner Static Pressure: 50 psi Residual Pressure: 40 psi Fire Flow; 500 gpm B. Requirements 1. N. 10th Street a. A water connection shall be made on the 8" main located in N. 10th Street. b. A 12" water main will be installed by the City on N. 10th Street from Manzanita Street to Hazel. This will increase both flow at fire hydrants, and residual pressure in the main line. 2. Laurel Street a. An 8" water main shall be constructed on Laurel Street to connect the 8" on N. 10th Street to the 4" at Laurel Street and N. 9th Street. b. Service laterals to any remaining vacant lots shall also be installed prior to paving of Laurel Street. IV. $anitarv Sewer A. Existing Conditions 1. N. 10th Street service to this property was listed as a requirement of the original minor land partition. Actual location has not be verified. 2. Laurel Street - No sewer present at this location. B. Requirements 1. N. 10th Street a. As a part of the final plans and specifications, the developer must identify where sanitary sewer service will be connection, and the size of said service. a ~~~ __ . '~ If no service exists on the property, the developer shall connect an adequately sized service to the 24" sanitary sewer main located in N. 10th Street and construct said service to service all lots of minor land partition. Laurel Street a. Construct services 10th Street to N. Laurel Street. to all vacant lots from N. 9th Street prior to paving V. Additional Requirements 1. Storm drainage calculation shall be provided by the engineer with final construction drawings to assure proper sizing. 2. On Laurel Street, street name signs, including posts, labor and equipment for installation of street signs shall be paid for by the developer of this multi-family development and the installation shall be completed by the City of Central Point. 3. A traffic control signing plan shall be included as a part of the final construction plans, and will be installed by the City and all costs associated with traffic control sign installation shall be paid for by the Developer for Laurel Street. 4. A soils engineer must evaluate the strength of the soil (R-value) to determine the street section design. The City's engineer shall be used, and the developer shall pay for the cost of these services. A design life for Laurel Street shall be a minimum 20 year life, given a daily traffic volume not to exceed 1000 vehicle trips per day and 2% truck traffic shall be used. A street lighting plan shall be included in the construction documents according to the, requirements of the Public Works Director. All intersections shall be illuminated. Developer to install all pads and conduits for street lights as a part of the construction of the multi-family development for Laurel Street and N. 10th Street. The developer shall also pay for street lights for these streets. Ladder rungs shall be installed in each sanitary sewer manhole of a depth greater than 3.0 feet to the flow line of the manhole. Developer shall use ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works Department. q.p- - ,,~ 7. Developer shall design the storm drainage system to meet the design requirements in accordance with the City of Central Point Public Works Standards. Developer shall install or cause to be installed, conduits for utilities at intersections, or locations determined by utility companies. Developer shall also provide conduit crossings for utility companies who will not install their services until after the subdivision is constructed. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the installation of these conduit crossings. All construction for utilities, streets and other structures discussed herein, within rights of ways owned or to be owned by the City of Central Point, shall be done according to all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions, and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for construction of this multi- family development. 10. The site plan review for the multi-family development submitted hereby by Ron CO11ins was done in accordance with the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by the developer which would allow this project not to meet the standards set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code, or would require staff to complete anew preliminary plat review, shall require a new submittal of preliminary plat for City approval. 11. The developer shall pay a $200 per dwelling unit park development fee prior to issuance of a building permit for this development. 12. Each individual lot created by this minor land partition shall have individual water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer discharge services. 13. No construction or placement of structures within a public utility easement (except for fences by permit only). 14. Contractor shall be responsible to protect property corner monuments. If monuments are disturbed, damaged or removed, the contractor shall replace monument prior to certificate of occupancy being issued. The contractor may want to verify location of property lines prior to construction. - lU3 ~ ~ 15. All construction material and debris shall be removed and/or cleaned up at the end of each work day. In any event, the Public Works Department shall require immediate response by the contractor to remove all debris from the street that will or may obstruct the street. 16. All roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces shall have positive drainage away from the structure, and shall be connected to a curb drain or an approved storm sewer. 17. No occupancy of any structure constructed or placed on this property will be allowed until a "Certificate of Occupancy" has been signed by both the building Official and the public Works Director. Temporary water service will be provided for construction purposes only. Residential water service will no be turn on to this structure until a "Certificate of Occupancy" is completed. -,. .- 7 _ ' ~~ Q'4 EXHIBIT C 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, George Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF Wednesday, May 30, 1990 I POSTED AN AGENDA NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON JUNE 5, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A SITE PLAN FOR A FOUR-UNIT MULTIPLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON NORTH 10th STREET AT 37 2W 2CB TL 7306 (Submitted by Ron Collins). AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD SIGN ~/30/~ o DATE r v '1~~.s~) POSTCER1.90/NOTICES _.- ~_-.. THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY ~.~ .. ~ ~ ExxISIT D Application Filing Deadline 5//B~ °J o CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application for Site Plan Approval Name Rc~~a I c~ ~' ~0 11: w J Address ,aez'I CIA ~iL~1,+av„ Pti~ C.P. ~~'. :J Phone Number ~6K -`I ~ i 1 ~ X55 -~~~241 Proposed Site Location Address ~pn~~i -S~ ~rw~~i4/ /o.•K ~ (.too ~~d~ r~rs~KeD) Assessor's Map Page Location. 3'7 2 W o?e CR Tax Lot(s) 7`3U~ Required Information: A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli- ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal Code Section 17.72.030. Name of Builder D2 I-law~~rv 1 oKS~ Address 3d Phone Number 6(.y -<(Z (~ I, R6HQ~ CY ~ ~a ((: ,n s certify that I am the owner or authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach written out rity/) /,~ ~/ - ~j v~,,,n,Ld /` ~N~O Date •S' / 7 - `~ 0 (Signature of owner or authorized agent of owner, please indicate which) Application Fee: $0 * A filing fee for recording a Deferred Improvement Agreement with the County Clerk may also be required o i ~ ~: S /~Q °~ o /~/.~~ ~V LUAP/ADMINl 21,, '~~ ~~ ~ -Q. BOYD REAL ESTATE Ena B~lEW.4.LY BNLY. ~\I INai Ey~Er Vn<fg9Ep'p yEx t'WPEiEnrxptlE /greed Me~a~dry d~BLL. 19~, pn propaAy tleacribetl hxen orb known as listing number. 767 ' euYER Roaald Coilias uM~wilas .iaa 1 ~ wme...Erevr~wwor ----- SELLER EIEIr~ N..and A11n D. Blair ss.maew.rar.am~ --- hrxlrsxtlxelicndthewmd E ]BES(Y].fYL- ' b pureheae tlse biawirq tlaB«ibetl real 69db Ip<eled set lonh hernalter, selbr agrees ro sail antl Ouyx agrees __ _._..count'a_slackson .,...lagatllx rills Use bbwinq pxaorrl PaapxN: iY1NE _--.__ T1r onyx agrees b PaY Xse pur<nam prca~m~,.I{h.o~ ~Idk~nrin~gLt~er.ms. ro wib _._-_ ___ _ _ _ TM purchase price nxxlebare manlia,ee_E19hYM~_L~lisa~d fire hUBdrod--------_-=dawrs r_IB.500.00 -~ Eemasl rrwlsy paid upon exaeulbn of ma apreenlam !rash. cyreck.. .___....._. ! ._..SDD.f10. pen , I9_l ' pgtpwrlBf•S aCLLptanp I aaatldXbnalearnealrrpney, lnesum of.. .. r _-_. Upon cbskq aaccepbncadlilbaconlmct. maauma...... ... ..._.. _ .... r1BrQQQ I)0 P 18.500_DD ealen<ad.~ll5_.IS,A_LASILPURGNSE.----------`... _..---------.dalar9 tr_-._.._---' 1' . - '~~ ^ kltleb4dnesa 's aswmetl in this Iransacdon, buyx agrees to pay any assumplgn lee antl reimburse seller for reserve accWnl lochs. The seller, blkrx'vq peAOrmara by the buyer in Ills manner and al IM lime herein speciliM shall Iurm3h buyer wdh a line insurance pOliry in the nmounl of Iho `''~pY!<ha%p/xI9 d Ilg !fiat e91d19 UOn191i1b inSUren<a <pmpeny Shorting good aM ma(xelubb bile. In the avant line la 98id pfemis¢S i3 npl marketable W - ' Cann01 be made ao wMb (b)elays allx a wriXen statement a deleclss tlalivered to seler. Ina earnest money herein receipled for shall be reluntlctl. Gul it NB 8b0.698b i9 approved by the S61br aM lilb 10 the premses i8 marketable, and the buyer tails to perform as herein prOVdetl. the eamesl mwet' M1erein re<eVted IOf and any a0tlilgnal earnest money shall be lorfeiletl, the cost of lilb insurance, escrow alb allplney 6 Teas pad. orb Iho remainder pexl to . aabr es lquidatetl tlamages. The broker or escrow agent b hereby authoriEEb to tlisburse the earnest money as prpvded for herein wkhWl atlalwnal IIp1iCe (0IX Y1sINC1iIX191rpm buyer. Allhq/gll 8ddili0llal COnlra<t dpCUmenls afe contempbled by Ilse Parties. the paAies inl6lb Thal buyer shall be enltlf0 b enlorce This agreement by specilk peAarman<e or by other coon proceetling as provgetl by law. ' Tlr WOpaAY SM1SEbeCPnWYntl ilea orb char Ol alllbns and encumbances excapl[aen9 mlbnvrn:us. buibinq reSlrx;lions. Federal patent reservalrons. asamantd record rxl _..__.- .__ _.._._._._._____-___ .. _ .._._ _ -- AJ tlalarted peymenla camietl by seler shall be avderbed by _ a note secured by a (rust tleetl or mortgage, a, . a bM sales conlrecl. Io betleliveretl al <bsa 01 escrw.. PrapeM texas, rents antl insurance premiums are Io be praraletl al cbse of escrow. Risk of tlamaga or bss by lire a act of God prior tp cl0ae of escrow is °°=umed by seller. Buyer and seller agree Thal the Transaction is l0 be cbsetl in escrpw, the cost of which i31o be paA'.S by seller arb'i try buyx. Oocumenl praparalbn w Other cbsing lees:-__ _-__._--._-___ .. __ _ - .._ _._ _ The buyx and SaN3T eUnOwbtlga that property maybesublect tociN, county pr stale smoke deleclor reguiremenls. antl it new cOnslruclion, Federal fTC v1SUklipll dlb<k6u19 raquHxnenl3. ' ~ TH191NSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USEOF THE PROPERTY OESCRIRED IN THIS INSTRUMENT TO REIN VIOLATION OFAPPLICASLE LAND "" USE LAWS AND REGULATK)NS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THI3INSTRUMENT. THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOUID CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. X b agreed between buyx and seller Thal atl lunch pab as earnest money shall bedepD3iletl i~ LEE eprp cdanl Irusl account i~~ 81 ____._-_.__.__-___. ... Timei3 of the essence of Ibis CPnlrept. Escrow shall ^.cbse orb legal possessbn shall bagiven buyx an orbelae ./..ws 1G ,199Q. Physical possessbn 9ha4 begnen buyer on or belOre~..~~_w~--__-. T ~ ~ t S 19..x, or as soon therealler as existing Wws and regublbns permit the rema+al of Tenants, it any. Xis a9reetl Ihet the buyx cedes sdeN On his own jutlgment ro making 1hL5 agreement. Inal buyer has thoroughN examined the property to be conveyetl. alp that Mxe era no agreanlents. represenlalons or urbxstantlings made by seler or selbr s agents That era not sal lorlh herein. - - II U agreed arq untlaral0od That Iho terms antl cOndilbns contained herein are to appN to antl bind the hays, executors, atlminislrelors orb assgns of .- UIB mspecdsa Parties. dI XN avant d arty auX. option, pro<eetlinq or appeal Iherelram, ro connectgn with IhiS agreement invdvinq seller, buyer or LES Soro, it's agents or `• Cmpbyeea, die bsiq party Shall pay lha muA wsls antl atbnley's lees of the prevaililg party inclutling those PI LeE EOro, it's agents a empbyees. This pf0.141IXI8haL nil t9 dpBlllpd Ip be merged x inlegr8led inl0 anY aubaagUBm dOCUmH119. bpi Shall SUNIVa. Seder agreea to at tams antl cIXbXbns of lhb agreement. Selbr agrees ropey broker an demandacommi35un as provAetl for in the listing agreement :' Ic! 9erviCB9 rarYlBretl. b Xye evenl.a soil La braughl to mlte<t saitl CCmmlasgn, seller agrees to PaY such arltldbnal sums as the <ouA maY adlu09a i ~reasarbb eXOnsey'e lees to be adlyrtatl in saitl soil. . i . / graeme Ylo Peen Apreemenl la sell J Buyer s receipt for/c~oot/alpnetl by aelbr 6rokar s race t for eamesl money -~..rtG~-•`'---[-UGC ...o.- f a.~-~°- L E pY // _ t//~~/r~ I.`,~J, -itl il~ -l~r ----._ _-_-_ _ -- -._ -A~~.-~-~ __- - -------~-----IIw---- -- - ~ CL'YEfl'S F1nAl Gfi?t ~~~ -41108 EXHIBIT A Commencing at a 2" pipe marking the Southwest corner of Donation Land Claim No. 55 in township 37 South Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, in Jackson County, thence on the west line of said Donation Land Claim No. 55 North 00° 25' 09" West 247.50 feet, thence leaving said west line, North 89°54'25" East 240.24 feet, thence North 00°25'09" West 101.40 feet to the true point of beginning; thence from said point of beginning North 45°00'00" East 80.00 feet; thence on a line parallel to the north line of Laurel Street, North 89°54'25" East 43.00 feet; thence North 67°29'15" East 81.11 feet to a point on the southwesterly line of Tenth Street, said point being on a curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 160 feet; thence in a Southeasterly direction on the arc said curve a distance of 69.84 feet to the end of said curve (the chord bears South 10°06'56" East 69.28); thence South 02°23'20" West 19.20 feet; thence leaving the westerly line of tenth street, South 89°54'25" West 185.86 feet to the point of beginning. (Code 6-2 Account #1-63977-9 Map #372W2CB Tax Lot #7306) 108 ~ EXHIBIT E ~-- i. .~ ~ ~ ~ - M 2. ,~ ... _ . , ,_ e. ,r •. _____~ ~f, . 3 ------______~____. ~R'1'8~ A-2 i~ M'1 I.~' ~ y. -. ~L ~.... ~ I 1'1-1 ~ ~, ~~ ~r r` ~ =i~ ~ -t , ,v , ~, ,_-mm-.-.T,-~, -; ~ I y _I ,~ A-1-8 ~~~- I M-i \~_ '.i._ ~r~ ; ~ A- L ~~ ~~ =_ _,__ -r- ~ ~~r- R. 2 ~-', ,. _ .:~:~9 .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ EXEIBIT F i. 1~ ~~ s~ ';.. ,,. at '302 J. A~ __ , . .:.; / rIJ l/' 0 (p-4z 9l zu. so '.e y~ / 7300 (P-7375) I.. ._ I ~ -. I c ' I~ J I ~ _ .. ~~ ~ ~' A ~' Y ~ ! ~ - I ~ - ~ .. .. __ • a ~I fV n u ~0 . ., ,, ~ 3- 7202 703 0 `= ~e~ ~ -, a ' el S• h 1<.... Se ! \ I ~ loo Qnc m ' ~IJ, 7100 .~ " u 1 a 1 7~g a ,. ~J 'p-'J68w. se ~aol 7000 gas, oa ee s.oe ~ 7~4~ os 7301 0,? I ~a I Sb.S~ =,74' ~ =577 - __ •_~ I . _ST REE7 ~- °'°' r- h1 ~}\ 7600 e : ~' 79pO 8000. y Ih~ .~~ ~~ W)1 J ~ I m I ~ w (n aygJ ~ I ' ~ 7700 `~y t I ~ ,~ I I i ~~ = 0 z ~ ~ 5y'°~ 8200 A ~ '- I 7eoo ~~' ;~ 1 3 \ 1 30 O.L.C. 55 ,~o R. L 7L` - T\~ 'fie ., ;ua, ~~r asr~l,uu, m Inr ~ , , ,Jane assm:~e: nn Iib:P ; _ i.:: ,. in ;icnensi•ms anc I,C I. .. - .~. ...iv%. Ui4'i3:J:'40~''i~~~i~:n'~T.`==.! L',:7`rFRSTITLECO. ~?j 72.GC/ Z C !s V ~ ~ i- EXHIBIT G ' 1 J -.,- ... :~y ~ ~ \ 1 ~ . ;~ r '`~ I,~ ~ ~ 1. n,~ fff ~~ _ - - - - _. , ~ ~ ./ ~ ~ 7 ~v'~ ~ .,, ~j~~/S, .,, j ~ ~ . is ~~ /.~ ~i j~ w ii. is ~./. ~! ;;~ r/` o 4 o i ~ , ti i~ `' rv rv ~i~ t i!~ ~ '~ ~~ ~~ e ^.\ \ ~oa / e • V-• v \ ~f ~ ~ \ r ~ f n ~- „v ___ V --''~ ...:-. .i-_q F - ...i, syx~ Y'~y ""`a'cct"' z j ~. • _ %,t `.~~.~ ' ~.. ~. _•~ ,'~~ \~`\ ;~~ . ;~.` ~~` ~~ :_•: ~/ s. 2 e ,_ ' EXHIBIT H ,.,~ ----- MEMORANDUM ----- T0: Central Point Planning Comm' Sion ~:~, FROM: George Rubaloff Administrative Assi nt DATE: May 29, 1990 1 TOPIC: Public Meeting - Review and recommendation to the City Council re- garding Final Subdivision Plat approval for Stonecreek No. 3, Phase V Gary T. Whittle has submitted an application to the City for final subdivision plat approval for Phase V of Stonecreek No. 3. Public Works Director Larry Blanchard ha reviewed the subdivision agreement and has identified those items that will need to be completed prior to final City Council approval of the final plat. Staff has also ensured that the final plat is technically correct and that it is consistent with the preliminary plat which was granted tentative Council approval on March 15, 1990. The subdivision layout is currently in progress. Staff will monitor the project activities up until Tuesday evening's Planning Commission meeting and will present a Director's Status Report at that time. The following exhibits are provided for the City record and for the Commissioner's review: Exhibit A - Certificate of Posting Public Meeting Notice Exhibit B - Public Works Director's Status Report (will be available at the meeting) Exhibit C - Proposed Resolution recommending approval of Final Plat Exhibit D - Vicinity Maps Exhibit E - Final Plat Map (reduced photocopy) Exhibit F - Application for Final Plat MEM40530.90/GRCORR__ 3,~~ ~ENTRq~ // o\ sv a ~ ~~` ~ o U ~ _i '.. _ ~ _ _ 0REG0~ THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY I, ..~ 155 SO. SECOND ST l EXHIBIT A CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-332' CERTIFICATE OF POSTING George Rubaloff CERTIFY T'rIAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE. OF Wednesday, May 30, 1990 I POSTED A NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON June S , 1990, DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION [•]ILL REVIEW A FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR STONECREEK N0. 3 PHASE IV, SUBMITTED BY GARY 4IILITTLE (37 2W lODB TL 100) AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD / TUR'E ~j 30 O~ p DA E .. , 14 ~/ \ EXHIBIT B PUBLIC S10RKS DIRECTOR'S STATUS REPORT FOR THIS AGENDA ITEM WILL BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DURING THE JUNE 5, 1990 MEETING. i ~, ~7' PLANNING COtR~IISSION RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR PHASE V OF STONECREEK NO. 3 WHEREAS, Gary T. Whittle filed an application with the City for prelimi- nary subdivision plat approval for Phase V of Stonecreek No. 3 on February 20, 1990, and, WHEREAS, on March 15, 1990 the Central Point City Council adopted Resolu- tion No. 541 granting tentative approval of said preliminary subdivision plat, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point conducted a public meeting on June 5, 1990 during which the Commission reviewed the City staff report, and being fully advised, now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Central Point Planning Commission hereby recom- mends approval of the final subdivision plat for Phase V of Stonecreek No. 3 provided that the conditions set forth in Exhibit A of this document are met by applicant Gary T. Whittle. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentification of its passage this day of 1990. Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: Planning Cort¢nission Secretary Approved by me this day of 1990. Planning Commission Chairman RESOLUTION N0. -~ - i4PL05:90JRES0 ---~ -y ' ,L~V ~~~ ~~ EXHIBIT D i - _. . '~ ~ I' _ '-: ~ ' j 1~ : ~k r __ _.... - - I _ n~ (~ \\y`~ I - -- - ~ \~ ®®,4~ ~ I ~ - `~ R-1-6~-~~ ~ -1 - .A-1-S ~ ~ ~~; ~ ~` ~, 'iC . Ys =i.~J't k wig-\' i . } ~ '(, l----__ bi-1 _____ ~ ~" - F' ,~ . -; ; a -1 `ice _- ~. ~ ~~i . ~~ IR_1.81 R-211 ht-1 ' l., 1 `f_~ -\ 1 . . \ ~ NL2 ' , f~:~ ~ ~ I -~„ ~ i .-~ - Y ~. :( ~ 19r ~ :2 ., -.~ _, _ ~ ~ . EXHIBIT D ~`~~„~ 0 im ~• S~g N ma° ~,~ WCY a a S ~~2 •.~ ~ N ~ O 0 b ; \ ~O ~ e ~ ~ ~ N ~ N K ~_~~ y w.. .. .. ~~ N ~-_- _ 3 V° y w °a i°e S.a V ~1 e~ w~ ° w R-__ eN m: 'o e-- - . ~~~i.'3' d'l i 11 ~ tl `p;(1 "~m"~ \ ~N 1 ~ O WIZo u~ ~ .a 1 a~ ~ ix 1 s/N2r~~ ~ ~ ; 1 pie N~QO~~~S.13.w O12bg9 ~f _4Y~1~~~ 1 ~~a ios'~~ ~ „ ~ tl{' i ~ ~ W u a ~ N ~ ; e °vs fi~ V y mE a o ~-~.. N W .:. h W e ~` 0 r N 0 ~ N tl0 00 .w~6V,lVOVtl ,\ /OYL9 N/8 00'00/ 3„!/,IWON ~~N/ r 6 o ~p~4~O~be m.m:~h~ h V N ~1 N~ b b h O ,W F tW tW WtW,; y,. ~;3 ~ $~k2g13o via `g~p~p~S(aa$'~ p S N~ N 2 N 2 N I\ ~ iqm` .. -008[..• I r \ tea.. auo7 ,~ a{!ng .fLNOUS ~ o q ~ ~ a m . ~ ~ a . ~: e ~ \_ Va$8A:mN~~ I p a$ ~ o~~ o o.- n ~ a ~ '~ ~ I i o: . g i'. b N q N s .. N N S gQ . EXHIBIT F Application Filing Deadline CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application for Final Subdivision Plat Name ~ tv ,n e ~ r-e ~ /`~ o Address '1' ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~' Gvl ~ l'L. Phone Number 7 ~ Z - Proposed Site Location Assessor' s Map Page Location 3 7 ~ w' / ~ L~ ~ Tax Lot (s ) ~d Required Information: Requested information as contained in the attached Central Point Municipal Code Sections 16.28.030 and 16.28.040. I, Cr'!4'2 ~% Vv l'1 i TI l 'e certify that I am the owner or authorized agent of the ow er of „the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach writte authoritTy) /fj. Ir~ ~li'~.k~ Date S ~~ ~~ (Signature o owner or authorized agent of owner, please indicate which) Application Fee: No. of Lots 10 or less 10 to 25 25 to 50 50 to 100 over 100 Amount of $ 45 100 210 320 540 plus $2.00 for each lot over 100 RGCeiva~ h/2~~9e 5 ~J ~ ~~ ----- MEMORANDUM ----- TO: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff Administrative As tant TOPIC: Public Meeting - Review and recortunendation to City Council - Minor Land Partition submitted by D.L. Slovak (for E.C. Strawn) for proper- . ty known as Tax Lot 1400, Jackson County Assessor's Map Page 36 2W 34D DATE: May 29, 1990 Staff submits the following exhibits for the official record and for the Planning Coimnission's review: Exhibit A Minor Land Partition Staff Review containing existing site conditions and proposed conditions of approval B Certificate of Posting of Public Meeting Notice C. Application for Minor Land Partition D Vicinity Map E Tax Assessor Map F Proposed Minor Land Partition Preliminary Map (reduced copy) G Proposed Planning Commission Resolution recommending approval of partition MEM10530.90/GRCORR ~1~~ Exhibit A CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MINOR LAND PARTITION STAFF REVIEW DATE: May 29, 1990 PARCEL: 36 2W 34D Tax Lot 1400 (Located where Upton Road and Old Upton Road intersect) APPLICANT: D. L. Slovak (for E. R. Strawn) EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 1. City zoning is R-L (Residential Low Density) which provides for semi-rural residential environment. The city comprehensive plan also designates this area low density. 2. Minimum R-L Lot area is 15;000 square feet. The applicant is propos- ing the creating of two (2) lots from the .84 acre parcel. Parcel one is 18,500 square feet (.42 acre) and parcel two is 18,000 square feet (.41 acre). 3. Minimum R-L lot width is 75 feet. The applicant is proposing two odd-shaped lots. Parcel one is approximately 210 feet along its front adjoining Upton Road an Parcel two'is approximately 158 feet ' along its front adjoining Old Upton Road 4. A ten foot Public Utility Easement is proposed to run north and - south along the western lot line of Parcel two. A portion of a 30 foot utility easement for the BCVSA trunk line cuts across the most southerly corner of Parcel one. 5. There are no existing structures on either of the proposed lots. The Applicant and the property owner plan to construct a 1600+ single family dwelling on each of the two lots as soon as possible. 6. Old Upton Road, which runs adjacent to and North of Parcel two, is a 24 foot wide in a 60 foot right of way local street that is in gener- ally fair to poor condition and that is recommended for eventual widening to 36 foot curb to curb. Upton Road is a 30 foot wide secondary arterial street located in a 60 foot right of way in poor condition and is recommended for widening to a 40 foot curb to curb. Both streets are under County Road jurisdiction. The streets have gravel shoulders and ditch drainage. Curb, gutter and sidewalk is nonexistent in this general area. 7. The City's Lien Docket Summary reveals that said property has a special assessment for water and sewer improvements with a current balance of $1,842. City records also show that a DIA has been en- tered into for future improvements to Upton Road. MLPSL0.90/PCWORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~~ ~) l 8. City Sanitary Sewer mains and water mains are located in Upton Road. Property does not have individual city water and sanitary ser- vice s The lots will require .new service laterals to be installed. PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Pursuant to CPMC 16.44.040 applicant or assignee shall provide for storm drainage, street lights, curbs, gutters or street improvements or any combination of the same on that portion of Upton Road and Old Upton Road which fronts property. Pursuant to CPMC Sections 12.02.010 and 12.04.015, the aforementioned requirements conditions are hereby waived provided that applicant consents to inclusion in any future local improvement districts for the improvements stated above.Applicant shall further agree not to remonstrate against any such improvements. A deferred improvement agreement reciting these conditions shall be recorded in the Jackson County Deeds and Records and shall be binding upon applicant's heirs,. successors, or assigns and shall run with the land herein above described for each lot of this minor land partition. 2. All costs associated with this development shall be the sole respon- sibility of the. applicant or owner. The review done on this Minor .Land Partition utilized the rules and regulations in effect as of May 29, 1990. Any modifications to the Minor Land Partition will require a new review and requirements set forth herein can be modi- fied based on .any proposed changes. 3. All construction .within Public Rights of Way, easements or storm drainage systems shall be built according to the City's and/or Coun- ty's public Works' Standards in effect at the time of application for permits. 4. Applicant or assignee shall pay a $200 per lot parks development fee prior to obtaining a building permit for construction on any of the lots created by this minor land partition. 5. Each individual lot created by this minor land partition shall have individual water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer discharge services. 6. Pursuant to Chapter 11.08 of Central Point Municipal Code, applicant or assignee shall submit the appropriate application form to the City requesting the City to make a just and equitable segregation of the assessment for the lots being created by the minor land parti- tion, if an LID exists on subject property. 7. No construction.or placement of structures within a public utility easement (except for fences by permit only). 8. Contractor shall be responsible to protect property corner monu- ments. If monuments are disturbed, damaged or removed, the contrac- tor shall replace monument prior to certificate of occupancy being issued. The contractor may want to verify location of property lines prior to construction. _ __ MliPECB.90/PCWORK. 123 .;, 9. All construction material and ,debris shall be removed and/or cleaned up at the end of each work dag, In any event, the public works department shall require immediate response by the contractor to remove all :debris from the street that will or may obstruct the f street. 10. All roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces shall have positive drainage away from the ~tru6tre, and shall be connected to a curb drain or ate approved st rm sewer. t 11. NO OCCUPANCY OF ANY STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTED OR PLACED ON THIS PROPERTY WILL BE ALLOWED UNTIL A~"CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY" HAS BEEN SIGNED BY BOTH THE BUILDING OFFjICIAL AND THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. TEMPO- RARY WATER :SERVICE WILL :BE PROVIDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES ONLY. RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVI E WILL NOT BE TURNED ON TO THIS STRUCTURE UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF ~CCUPANCY IS COMPLETED. 12. Access for~Parcel one sHa11 be provided by a 20 foot Public Assess Easement along the westerly property line of parcel. The reasons for this requirement are as follgEvs: %, a. The present accessfis on'''a horizontal curve of Upton Road b. 'The present acdessiis on a vertical curve of Upton Road. c. The present access~is on a super elevated portion of Upton Road d. The access drivewa entering onto Upton Road is on a steep grade e. Speeds on Upton Ro d are in excess of 40 m.p.h. f. A secondary arteri 1 street is intended to transfer traffic from collector str ets to major arterials. Access from residen- tial properties sh ld be limited to local streets to provide safety on the seco ary,arterial, by not allowing individual access onto second y arterials. See page IX-4 Hierarchy of street identified i the comprehensive plan. 13. The developer shall si lot within thi$ minor constructing o~"street curbs and gutters, tra Upton Road. MLPECB.90/PCWORK a deferred improvement agreement for each partition for its share of the cost of ving;.street lighting, storm drainage, c control devices, and sidewalks for Old X24 EXHIBIT B 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 OFPOSTING I, George Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF Wednesday, May 30, 1990 I POSTED AN AGENDA NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON JUNE 5, 1990 DURING SVHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A MINOR LAND PARTI- TION REQUEST FROM D.L. SLOVAK (for Ernest Strawn) (36 2W 34D TL 1400) AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD S GNFy ~~~p DATE POSTING.CER/NOTICES y;.~~ THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY EXHIBIT C Application Filing Deadline CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application for Major/Minor Land Partition Name D. L. SLOVAK Address 1611 JOHNSON ST., MEDFORD, OR 97504 Phone Number 773-3883 Proposed Site Location Address UPTON ROAD (Northeasterly from Interstate 5 Freeway) Assessor's Map Page Location T36-2L9-34D Tax Lot(s) 1400 Required Information: A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli- ance of the proposal. with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal Code Section 16.44.030 and completion of a Statement of Water Rights (form at- tached) I, ~ ~ ~.~ certify that I am the owner or authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach written authority) (Signature of owner or Application Fee: $100 * A filing fee for record Clerk may also be required Date ~' ~ -C - ~(/ of owner, please indicate which) Rece~ f-NT,. s'6 °~ 7 Agreement with the County LUAP/ADMINI -. - ~~,~ MAY 21, 1990 I, Ernest R. 3trawn and Jean Strawn, owners of that tract of land described in Instrument No. 87-12992, Official Records of Jackson County Oregon, hereby authorize D. L. Slovak to be my agent in processing this Minor Land Partition through the Central Point Planning CYOtmmisston. ~Varu '~,e6t'';c,r ,t i ~~~' ;.. ' ..~1P~Y~mnMxx, S.i% ~.. .. '•1 I a. 1 ~'' 1 •, .w `' R 4.+ ~~: ._ a k~ • ~ ~ ~ . - I ~ - • .ruN... nl..tntu"wu_[w_.IL_.~_e_.ra. ~. ......,..~.,... ,.. IO R /~ro ~~h ~~ µ IA[OAIN AxO IAII Lltp ., yy ~ ~ •ldT~~',~.tlY3YZ 10.fA .. I f.., r Ernest R~ Strewn And Jcan Strewn 1 ~ I~/urelacaOlYJwfZ~]r7~R>r~~$N1sfThll..___.~t.._.._.......«.:.._ '` .446.4>UAtDIIrRdxftDirYIA.,PetnrmOa~kB31175n'• ~,r _..ueua.rd _ , Im. ,rr `~' ' lo/1lutonJdn,llpn funlnNN'rtdd,du,MnbT(rwwrbnWroe I/aldc,nrer+/nlen...« ~,. `_ Ernest..R..Strmnl..Md.,Jebn...5trawn_496,4..Upton. Rd. Lentcgl.P.O.tnt..Otm„9]502 :~± funhufb/ oiled (nnlu, ,nd uNe /r,n4/. Mln, wcueeon ,nd uJ/qef dl o! Ih,l uruln ud Proprtly wllh Ilu bmminn, Mtdlfurwnll ,rd ,plMrfelunae Ihumnlo 6JoNIN o/ In ,n xlu epPerldnln/, Jluebd fn IM C,un1Y i Yr l _ _ o/...JaCkadn -..«..-.....--. Sbu d On/on, delerlb(d a l,llowp lo•wll ~i / f ~` ~ T' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .~ ~ _ " ~1 -' Parcel No. 7 Lot Ltne Correction ~~ _ v._~~.~ Ernest R. 3trawn Partf tfon :. 8`' ' Commencing at the southeast corner of Donation Land. Claim No. 57 Township ~ ~^t,}`¢a k ,+: 76 South, Ran9e.2 Wett of the W111amette NerlJtan iii Jackson County Ore9on,t \ .~i~~~ ?' thence along the soubh boundaryof said Claim, North Onahblrcn pistlocated %yl~ ~~, Rej+ Yeet; thence Soutb 0 07 40" Wost 20.00 teat to+a 7/, Q rlt lt\ ~ on the southerly right of, way tthe of Upton Road; thence-.South 89 56'20 Ez~ sfe +~;? d r ~ ' along s td right of way tine 214.96 feet to the'BoJoC of: begf nntn9 thenc4iyt~a _~\, ~t~ SOUth 0872'23' fast 150.00 feet thence North 89 56720" West 80:00 feet ty-1177 r r 1, f ~~'~ thence South Oo~2'23"'East 17a8~~eeor leszcdtstanae of51612feotstoi intersee0 _~t} ~-;'-,,•~ ~ thence SoutA 29 41'70" East, n'i.~F?.. the northwesterly right of way Itne of relocate) Upton Road; thence along Bald t_C,j~ iu'.•- reloeated Upton Roadlino to a northeasterly direction to a point opposite -.-/nu ~~_~[ ~ Engineer's Centerl the Station P.S.C. 27+90.51; thence northwesterly alon0 ~ ;, wb• the southwesterly Tight of way line of Said relooa teehencenalong Safd Upton '~'. 5 - sect the southerly right of Y,Ay dine of Upton Road;, - oj 1 ~~ Road right of way i1ne, Hortn 89 56'20" West, a more or lass .distance of 155 rj~ s"'o~n Y ~ feet to the Point of beginning. V J ,/~ 71J, •S y: ., )0.K ' ' ' 1 >: . l Iu ulGl nN.Vnwxl tanlMl[ olu ICN al'flvl {I {mil' I~1' ~"t : ~ To Nm ,rid le Nald IM ume unto the utd /rant nd p nh r1Adn, rueeulnn end uJ/lit lorivu _ ~ 71w Im ,rd ,elvd wlWduNlPn paid lot IIJe It ruf r Uebd Inl4rnu of JYllue, U / '1/ Orla./~ f kl°" ' 0llowtvtr,. IM ,[lud eorufdltdlen wndth o/ o/ IrNfudn all r ProP~rlY ar vdw IIvIR or Promlud wIJ[M1 Ii n ,t{Ii prMIIM[OMIJII,IIOn(IIdINIl wldchl•~ITM rMUwWbonrM,r iaN 0:1(~mNP/16"Wp IM1wIJWJIIJi ORi1JA10.) '~ In tontlruiN Ihie dud end wfun fM eonN+l to Ienulnl, llu Nn4ul{t hltludtt IM P/uraf nd dl«/rimmNl[d ~~'{, ' cll,n(u Nlellb Implied to m,luffm PraYLloru Mnal,PPIY e4vdlY meoro,ullom.nJ tGlpolvfdu~b' ~~t(' -y~.A. .. IgWlfuu lVMrld,IM/rm(orMUnwbdlWt lmbunwnl lhlees:a!~....dey of ... ~ lea x! , b~O3~.a ~ ll , +arPar,le U,nfo/ /l MI uuud Ih rwm, to be d/nW ,nd laol dll+M N/!ur /Y , 11 orlud fluele 6y ~_~. , '`P g.Yns ~ ~- erdu al 1(I bond N dlreelorl. LT.t(lYt.•r '*•YY ~:;, - '-. nlu INtmuutxr wlu xot umw uta or rx[ rROr[Rt~ o[. « y '. - ICRIIIp IN 1111iIN{IRYN[Mt IX YlOld110N OI AIfLICAVt[ ANO L~ -.'? ~, ~' t1151IN41w M[NL 111[trl R{OX tACOYIRIIl01IR l~rLt lO tllll 41 ~~,~ 5 ~ rxvan wamo <n[eA wnx n¢ unor,uu enY o, -..«_«„ .. ,,: _«........»._.....«.. -~~-~-~--•«' {{-^~n - COYMIY /IANMIXO ptIARIY[Xf lO Y[RI(Y nIIROV[O Wt4 ' r~ Ybnr4~y 1.. 1 IIIn Sit"T i1J.1Y~.b//,-.q xlw".l NU IIrAIn ,--_._._.:.---.--~lu. - iTATE OIOR600N C rY v/. 4 ~r~(.ad P.,~do ~µ Tf I 1 ll ! 1 i IJ/JWlwe WI 'ik ~4M Z •. ..._ _~... ~~; 1 ''\Y•TM IYi2Y Iru w I ,w.~xl Iw.LNIN bfw. n NJ M xI LY -H I .3;,. in/1 t:mZY..'Ld~~~ u.>Pl'..ar _ / r 1 ?} N -.t r t a f _ ~i" f •; ( ~'11.. ~' ~}~ ~t •~ ..isttd! ~..~ R_. ..__......_.. w u e wr N NIM w tl n ~~~ '_\y {r ~~Y/.. ,r•~~ ,...Y~^1 • ~f~~i~n MWMV I Lll ! O. nn ~ ~ (idAL) \+ .1i`F ' + a,S.~ArPr«INJY1Mexelleu 9~a s~9/ MYe.." JJ M r 11 x."J ~i M~ Yfi~{ 1>u- ? ~~ . . J h. 5 O , 11\ llrl_t _: 1 ~ ._._.........__.__. _._~. T 8_ P AEC ..... bu u - L \ ~. ~ _~-.._. .IIJn 1 ~Fr•;.:: +.: .. .... ._. .... .__.. _____..___._.__.- Joc~1oR Counly,Omdoo ,U_.-.., "y -. ~ ~ ia~ Reootd.d ... a,; t~` `~ '% -~ ~ •'~----T_~~-~~~--- _ bG'FICIAL AECORD9 nd ne,ldd _} i A ` ••!'~"^ ----- 1D•j~ JUN 25 ~87R,M r. __.. }1z - ' . ' .:..".. .. .___._---__- Y1ITHLEEN,B BECYETT and wN of . e ,~' , ,L. _._.. _.. _......__ ___ CLEAC m A~CORDEfl '1.~~1,; V."I,N,.1•,IY.,N~YY WY„r~Y N+YYWYMM,-Yt NYr i IY'Y ..,. __. "',11[. Vii! ernrs+..5+rnwn .. _,.. , .*;i;: ' c 9ro4 .G.plo(t _.kd:-_.__--_ ~; ....-.._... _«nrpl.ry' ,_ «. #;. ~.t!tYl~ral_.Polnh__ok.~17~Q.'~-_ ;~ ur......,............_~- ... ..........Iw `~.x ~{`. ' ~`~?' ,> 1 How will water be applied to these larsds? (i. e. city water supply, distr~ supp,~y,yr: ~,~cem~pt well use) „, ~.G7 STATEMENT OF WATER RIGriTS 1. % The parcels identified within this plan, plat or replat DO NOT have a '-' water right. Sign this form and file with the plan, plat, or replat. 2. % / The parcels identified within this plan, plat or replat DO have a water _ right, as issued to: Permit P Certificate ~ for use Permit ~ Certificate ~ for use Peres Township Ranpe Sevtion Tax-dot Number Prcce~ to back page amJ attach extra pages as n~essary. Sign this Porm arzf mail with the plan, plat or replat to Water Reso~es Oept. The above informatipn is true aM complete to the best of my knowledge. Signed• Name:. (type or print) Date: Please do not write below this line_ ~~~ AGCNO EDGc't•tENT ' The Oregon Water Resoutves Department has re`eived a statement of water right and revised plan, plat or replat for the property listed below. % /The lards identified within this plan, plat or replat DO NOT have a recorded water right. / % The lands identified within this plan, plat or replat 00 have a r~orded water `- right, as issued to: Permit 0 Certificate ~ pores Township Rance Section Use )`~~ For t.`.e Water Resct:~^.:=; Deparcme'~_,~_ Date: r sr ~~ ~ r ~~ ,a. ~~,_ EXHIBIT D y~~ ~,-~_ ~~ I ~ i _ e R -~ I _~ \ i Q i - I ! -~\= ,, ~I EXHIBIT D .~` i ~, ~ 1 ~~ 3 2 9 o ® ~ ®~ ._]_.. :. :. ~~ ~_ Y o s • '. 1 1 ~. °~ ' -_~~ ~ ~ ~ ®~ ~ . ~~.~~~~~~v ___ ~~ ~\~ ~ .~I 1 \/~ PET \ /~ S.E.. i/4 S E C. 3 r"~ TWP. 36• S . R.2!~. W.M. SCO/2 / ~~= 2t3~~ 1 EXHIBIT E 36 2W 34 ;n.•VS°.~' 230 Y~~ 209 229 210 23I 206 ~2 2ii ~r73.a~ • • Sp. ~~a r/~~d ~ ~d~~a 09K ry plS ev~la»h `~~2~~ 212 ~ 100 II ,, y s ~q~ • 3 131 2a r00' ,,,,, „• 1 y 10 ~ i ~ s ~. .O.Y. ~ ,' IL ,OO , • 80ES AVENUE ~o, a za~,~ t'~ ~D ! ~C7 • 4Y 0. ~i 1 So57 ~ ' ~- • ` =i ~ .3 ,Q ~ • 27 5 ,.•„ • i1i .o 228 .'~ ~ ,~ s , 3 ; zz. ~ • 223 ~ 3b°~ ~„ 22. ~ ~ vx. (•r ~; 233 a+ ~'i~ ~ ` Q r -~ 224 ~~~'~ y Z Q ~ . ~ i13.as A.I Q ~ 200 775 /. ^ 1 ~• ~ \ (P.fua11 ^ zs~ e'n ~ lo».u'a1 ~ ae.e 1 . Yas i ~„ lu v Y a '~ 239 . 204 7 ,~.1 ~ p.'af • lq . i c+ 0 '` '~~ o _ _ ~ o ee r 0 .e. .s ' ' ~, ~ 3 24.,, 3 5''' nY.eo 16 ,. ,, 15 0> xxxrs'~15: • 222 "''OO 234 P~^~3~ r >3~, , 227 220 °' Sg53 'J 3~0 w 17 14 xxx' xxx• a 205 ~ 3'i S. 236 u~ 3~ j ~ J 226 0 / 219 ~3 17 r_ 3 a . 18 l3 azx• xx>,r •q 235 w 232 e q ~ • 12. ' 218 s 4 q q 21 ~~ JJ i 5 ~ 4].4G' q p q 1 x YSr 4x• 19 12 ~lir°r 208 ! tot 5 ymr ~ ~y7 •Q _ ~ ~ Y" 9G. 84~ %• • ~ _.. ~ ~ A• 11 SL 1 n * k ~ ~ ~yH •I .,~ 20 11 y5K5 13 .ti'J' .^ 7 , 213 5 3`1 a a 214. Q 9 ' tel: '~ 5 „-~.~ar 215 EFU a ~:33~ , 4 " 339.4ir 216 a ~ 53~"~ ~-~ , V/ ~ W 3 • ~' 159.64.' W F- u%sa• 225 • 203 . ; „ • i ~ w • N 4~'t • ,~ Ro9 202 2 ; 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ` . .T 0 . S l cries= ~ zi B.y ~-....' F~. as ->e .,¢9a.3 P NLi~ \ _ - lain i ,>.A ~P.'r0 N ,• x\ •- Y•,,,/„ 4Vd•4ryac4 1200 vri ~ 1300 o.~ iT. 9G 140! .~by BO.°O 1402 ° - • 4 ` . 300 d-2:. °.it .a co 8 ~~H w o e p, ~F Ya .~ , ~T ~>- ~. ~ . H97o . ~.. I 1, ~ d' G + II4.LB • .~ \ ~ ~1. /. Y~. • 1^ i. (. ee.i. ~ _~ r` • Ji. J. • `p 33 ~ ~ . /~ /1 9' s 3 SIfiIH7C3 ~• •~ n. .. w e. o s ~I ~~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ossx/o6•sTa~k _ _ T- •oN Nolyn~ossa uor}nTosaz uzq}rM aq} 3o gzad e apew ITssazdxa aouaza3az sTq} bq pue 'o}azaq pagoe}}e '~ }Tgrgxg uT q}zo3 }as suoi} -rpuoo aq} o} }oaCgns 'xenoTS •7•Q bq pa}}rwgns,uoz}eoTTdda uoT}r}zed pueT zourw aq} 3o Tanozdde spuawwooaz dgazau uotsstwwo0 buruueTa aqy •Z uor}oag UOT}T}zed pUET zouTw zo3 s}uawastnbaz s,eL}ZO aq} s}aaw not}eotTdde press '}aw aze za}3eutazaq q}zo3 }as soot}rpuoo aq} 3t pue 'apoo bu'ruoz pue ueTd anrsuagazdwoo s,b}TO aq} q}iM aouazTdwoo ut sz pasodozd se uoT}T}zed pueT zouzw pees. }2q} 'uor}r}zed puaT zouTw zo3 s}uawazrnbaz aq} s}aaw UOi}eOTTdde pTPS }ei{} spur; .igazaq UOTSSTUIlUO~ bUTUUeTd aq} 'UOT}eOTTdde pTES O} bui}eTaz pzooaz pue 'aouaptna '}zodaz 33e}s aq} uodn paseg •T not}oag SMO'I'I03 SK ' NOJff2I0 ' yNIOd 'IK2IyN30 30 I.yIO 3Hy 30 NOISSINN00 JNINNK'Id SI-Iy xff QSA'IOSff2I yI Hff 'azo3azaq} Mou pasTnpe ~TTn3 6uraq pue 'duourr}sa} pue }zodaz 33e}s d}r0 aq} paMaznaz pue panTaoaz 6uT}aaw oTTgnd peas }e 6urneq pue 'OOZn'6Z'T uoT}oag apoo TedroTunN }uTog Tez}ua0 0} }ue -nsznd 066T 'S aunt uo not}t}zed pueT zoutw zo3 UOT}EOiTdda peas uodn but}aaw ozT -qnd a pTaq }urod Tez}ua0 3o d}r0 au} 3o UOSSSTI11010~ bUTUllaTd aq} SKffiI3HM P~ '~OO~T 'Iy QbE MZ 9E) }oasza}ur peog uo}dn pTp pue peog uo}dn azagM pa}eooT 'Taozed azoe yg• a 3o voT}i}zed pueT zourw a zo3 uoi}eo -rTdde ue pa}}rwgns seq xenoT3 •Z •Q 'uMez}$ }sauzeg 30 3Teyaq uo SKff2I3HM Nolylyx~a oc~rl aoNIN ~ yNrrxo roy Tanoaaa~ oxiaNSxxo~~x Nolyn~dsax ~ •oN Nolyn~osax NOISSIYiW00 ONINNH'Id L,.®..~'~:~m.~i ~e,~.(ry.e~~~.:'V• W:.:. an....et ~b qn•1' r.~.:f ~ 1! J/I®.,q~~~...p.ore.,e.,e,~.,.,f:.,~®,~~u,wuo."wa,~..~ OS X21/06'ST d'IW uEwzrEgO uotsstwwo0 butuueTd 066T 'aunt 3o bEp ~~~ Z- ' ON NOIJ,II'IOS~2I srt~~ a~u Iq panozddy anr~E~uasazdag b}r0 sssss~r TIEWiTE[{~ SIOTSSTUAIIO~ bLTIiUETd '066T 'aunt 3o I.Ep srq abESSed sit 3o voz~eoz~uaq~nE ur aw dq paubzs PuE `0661 ' aunt 30 7Ep srq} uorss-rwwo0 buruuEZd aq~ dq passEd •uor~r~aEd poet zoiITw pTES 3o za~~Ew aq~ ui aproap bEw Tiouno0 b~r0 aq~ 'duourr~sa; pue ~zodaz 33E~s b~to aq~ buiMatnaz puE buTpzooaz 'but -zeaq otTgnd pzES but~onpuoo za~~ •Tiouno~ d~t0 aq~ azo3aq burzeaq orTgnd E aTn -pagos T'IEus oqM zo~ez}sru~rwp~ x~T~ eq~ o~ papzgrnzo; aq ZTEgs '~ ~tqr~ ur t~~zo3 has suor~ipuoo auk buTpnTour 'uozssrwwo5 6u~uvETd aq~ 3o uot~nTosaz srq} 'qZ•T za~dEuO apo0 TEdroruny~ ~utog ZEZ~uaO u~tM aouepzoooE uI •£ uoi~oag ~' ++~u:w.~w.+a.,.:~~w.,.~.1~e«.r„~ ' '~Y~it~b~~NntfMYw~M'AV.R~l1a.9r.~{AOR~~q~' .,