Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - July 10, 1990Next Resolution No. 199 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING .155 South Second Street July 10, 1990 I. Meeting called to order II. Roll Call - Garth E11ard, David Gilmour, Dick Halley, Karolyne Hugo, Bob Matthews, Chuck Piland III. Approval of Minutes A. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of June 5, 1990 B. Correspondence IV. Business A. Public Meeting - Review and, make recommendation to City Council for a preliminary subdivision plat for Stonecreek No. 4, Phase I, locat- ed west of Hog Creek and North of Beall Lane, further described as 37 2W lODA TL 100 and 200 (Applicant: Gary Whittle) B. Public Meeting - Site plan review for four-unit multiple family development along westside of Tenth Street, North of Laurel Street further described as 37 2W 2CB TL 7306 (Applicant: Ron Collins) C. Public Hearing - Review and determination of a conditional use per- mit application for a West Park Place, a planned unit development located in the approximate vicinity of Northeast corner of Bursell Road and Beall Lane, further described as 37 2W 11D TL 2200 (Appli- cant: Roger Richardson) D. Public Meeting - Site plan review for West Park Place, a planned unit development located in the approximate vicinity of northeast corner of Bursell Road and Bea11 Lane (37 2W 11D TL 2200) (Appli- cant: Roger Richardson) E. Public Meeting - review ad recommendation of preliminary development plan for West Park Place, a planned unit development located in the approximate vicinity of Northwest corner of Bursell Road and Beall Lane (37 2W 11D TL 2200) (Applicant: Roger Richardson) AGENDA.90/PCWORK F. Public Meeting - Site plan review for Ray's Sentry Market expansion located at 126 E. Pine Street further described as 37 2W lOAA Tax Lots 600, 900, 1000, 2200, 3300 and 3400 (Applicant: C & K Market, dba Ray Sentry Market - Ray Nidiffer) G. Public Meeting - Review and determination of a fence variance re- quest for 361 N. Third further described as 37 2W 3DD TL 100 (Applicant: Phillip Rivers) H. Public Meeting - Review and determination of a fence variance re- quest for 815 Freeman Road, further described as 37 2W 11BD TL 9500 (Applicant: David Mittrany) I. Public Meeting - Review and make recommendation to City Council for a final subdivision plat for Jackson Creek Estates No. 2, located along Vincent and Brandon Streets in the southwest quadrant further described as 37 2W 10 TL 3100 (Applicant: Tom Malot) J. Public Meeting.- Review and make recommendation to City Council for a final subdivision plat for Stonecreek No. 3, Phase III, located on Daniel Street between Glenn Way and Timothy Street in the southwest quadrant further described as 37 2W lODB TL 100 (Applicant: Gary Whittle) V. MISCELLANEOUS VI. ADJOURNMENT AGENDA.90/PCWORK CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting June 5, 1990 Page 1 MEETING CALLED TO ORDER Chairman Garth Ellard called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. ROLL CALL Present were Planning Commission Chairman Garth Ellard and Planning Commissioners Dick Halley, Karolyne Hugo, and Chuck Piland. Also present were City Administra- tive Assistant, George Rubaloff, Public Works Director Larry Blanchard, Fire Chief/Building Official Mark Servatius and Administrative Secretary Sandy Berryhill. Planning Commission Dave Gilmour joined the meeting later in the evening due to a conflict of interest. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Halley made a motion to approve the minutes of the Planning Commis- sion Meeting held May 1, 1990 as presented, Commissioner Hugo seconded the mo- tion. Roll call vote: Hugo, yes; Halley, yes; Piland, yes. All the Cottunission- ers voted in favor of the motion, and the motion carried unanimously. CORRESPONDENCE AND PUBLIC APPEARANCES No one came forward for a public appearance. BUSINESS ~row~n nouncary. Roll call of Jackson County Planning Commission: Members present were Ron Wat- son, Tom Giordiano and Jeannie Smith. Overland and Baldwin were excused. Administrative Assistant, George Rubaloff referred to and entered into the record by reference, his Staff Report, dated May 30, 1990, City Council Resolution No. 542 declaring Council's intent to act upon the District No. 6 request, Notice of Public Hearings, Certificate of Posting of Public Hearing Notices, List of Proper- ty owners within 1000 feet radius receiving notice of public hearing, Vicinity Map, Close-up vicinity map, reduced copy of applicant's. tentative map, School District No. 6 Application for Urban Growth Boundary Amendment, Criteria for Urban Growth Boundary Amendment, Applicant's Findings Statement, Affidavit of Publication of Public Hearing Notice for Citizen Planning Advisory (CPAC) meeting of May 8, 1990, CPAC meeting minutes, CPAC Register of Attendance, and Proposed Resolution recommending approval of Minor Urban Growth Boundary Adjustment. PCMIN605.90/PCWORK CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting June 5, 1990 Page 2 Scott Clay, Planner for Jackson County Planning Department referred to and en- tered into the record by reference the File 89-1-UGBA for the Central Point Dis- trict No. 6. Commissioner Dave Gilmour had a conflict of interest and excluded himself from the School District No. 6 portion of this meeting. Chairman Ellard opened the public meeting. Donald Mesmer of 6025 Rock Way, Central Point, came forward to answer any ques- tions regarding the development or usage of the FFA Land Lab. A concern was raised by Commissioners regarding the land being zoned as residen- tial usage to allow the school to use the land, and then later being sold for use as residential property. Staff recommended a Low-Density zone. No one else came forward to speak in favor or in opposition of the proposed minor boundary line adjustment. Chairman Ellard closed the public meeting. Commissioner Halley made a motion that the Commission approve Resolution No. 194, and to waive full reading in the interest of saving time. Commissioner Hugo seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Hugo, yes; Halley, yes; Piland, yes and the motion passed unanimously. - Review and make recommendation to Citv'Council regarding a ckson County School_District No. 6 to amend the City's Comor sive Plan Administrative Assistant, George Rubaloff reviewed and entered into the record by reference his Staff Report dated May 31, 1990, Certificate of Posting and Public Meeting Notice, and the Proposed Resolution recommending approval of the Compre- hensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Gilmour declared a conflict of interest. Chairman Ellard opened the public hearing. No one came forward to speak in favor or in opposition of the amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission members discussed a concern regard- ing potential problems in the future with having farm animals within this zone. Commissioner Halley made a Motion to adopt Resolution No. 195 recommending approv- al of the Comprehensive Plan amendment for inclusion of School District No. 6 property within the Urban Growth Area. Commissioner Hugo seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Hugo, yes; Halley, yes; Piland, yes; and the motion carried. PCMIN605.90/PCWORK CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting June 5, 1990 Page 3 Commissioner Piland made a minute motion make a recommendation to City Council that the Public Land Use Designation be included under the Bear Creek Greenway zoning and to correct the Land Use Designation on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as Public Parks and Open Space. Commissioner Hugo seconded the Motion. Roll call vote: Piland, yes; Halley, yes; Hugo, yes; and the motion carried unanimous- ly. make to contiguous to the City located immediately .south of where Upton Road runs east west (36 2W 34 and 35, Tax Lot 2200 There were no conflicts of interest. Chairman Ellard opened the public meeting. No one came forward to speak in favor or in opposition to the proposed annexation of property. Chairman Ellard closed the public meeting. Commissioner Piland made a motion to recommend approval to City Council to annex a parcel of property contiguous to the City located immediately south of where Upton Road runs east and west. Commissioner Halley seconded the motion. Ro11 call vote: Hugo, yes; Halley, yes; Piland, yes.; and the motion carried. Commissioner.Dave Gilmour joined the Planning Commissioners at 8:40 p.m. the - Review and Korner Road Ci re- TL 1400 Assistant Administrator George Rubaloff referred to and entered into the record his Staff Report dated May 25, 1990, Certificate of Posting, Vicinity Map, Tax Assessors Map, Aerial Map, Reduced copy of Final Annexation Map, and Application and Annexation Petition. There no conflicts of interest. Chairman Ellard opened the public meeting. No one came forward to speak in favor or in opposition of the annexation of a parcel of property known as 37 2W 2D TL 1400. Commissioner Piland made a motion to approve the recommendation to City Council for a request to annex a parcel of property contiguous to the City located along the eastside of Freeman Road between Oak and Chestnut Streets. Commissioner Halley seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Hugo, yes; Piland, yes; and the motion carried unanimously. PCMIN605.90/PCWORK CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting June 5, 1990 Page 4 RECESS AT 8:45 P.M. City Administrative Assistant George Rubaloff referred to and entered into the record by reference, his Staf€ Report dated May 25, 1990, Minor Land Partition Staff Review containing existing site conditions and proposed conditions of ap- proval, Certificate of Posting of Public Meeting Notice, Application for Minor Land Partition, Vicinity Map, Aerial Map, Proposed Minor Land Partition <prelimi- nary Map, and Proposed Planning Commission Resolution recommending approval of partition. There were no conflicts of interest. Chairman Ellard opened the public meeting. Betty M. Hill of 1704 Beall Lane, Central Point came forward to answer any poten- tial questions regarding her application. No one else came forward to speak in favor or in opposition of this application. Chairman Ellard closed the Public Meeting. Administrative Assistant Rubaloff brought forward page 61 of the Planning Commis- sion packet that the applicant Betty Hill was also requesting that the address of 1704 Beall Lane be assigned to the new tax lot and residence and that the exist- ing residence be assigned a new number. Public Works Director Larry Blanchard advised her of the necessary steps to achieve this address change. City Administrative Assistant George Rubaloff reviewed a letter he received from applicant Rivers requesting that this item be carried over to the July meeting as Rivers was unable to attend the June 5, 1990. There was a unanimous concurrence for this item to be carried over to the July agenda. PCMIN605.90/PCWORK Chairman Ellard called the meeting back into session at 8:50 p.m. Commissioner Halley made a motion to approve the recommendation to City Council for a minor land partition located at 1704 Beall Lane located approximately 160 feet east of Snowy Butte Road. Commission Gilmour seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Hugo, yes; Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Piland, yes; and the motion carried unanimously. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting June 5, 1990 Page 5 City Administrative Assistant Rubaloff informed the Commissioners that Applicant Collins is out of state and recommends that this item be carried to the July Agenda. There was a unanimous concurrence to carry this item to the July Agenda. There were no conflict of interest. Chairman Ellard opened the public meeting. Herb Farber came forward to represent Gary Whittle. No one else came forward to speak in favor or in opposition of this recommendation. Commissioner Gilmour made a motion to approve recommendation to City Council for final subdivision plat for Stonecreek No. 3, Phase V. with the completion of Bonding as in CMPC 16.28.080. Commissioner Halley seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Hugo, yes; Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Pilancl,yes; and the motion carried. Administrative Assistant Rubaloff referred to and entered into the record by reference his Staff Report dated May 29, 1990, Minor Land Partition Staff review containing existing site conditions and proposed conditions of approval, Certifi- cate of Posting of Public Meeting Notice, Application for Minor Land Partition, Vicinity Map, Tax Assessor Map, Proposed Minor Land Partition Preliminary Map, Proposed Planning Commission Resolution recommending approval of partition. Dan Slovak of 1611 Johnson, Medford, Oregon and Ernest Strawn of 100 Millcreek, Prospect, Oregon came forward to answer questions for the Commissioners. Commis- sioners questioned the access to Parcels 1 and 2. Parcel 1 has an existing driveway and Parcel 2 will need an Old Upton Road access. PCMIN605.90/PCWORK Administrative Assistant George Rubaloff referred to and entered into the record by re€erence his Staff Report dated May 29, 1990, Certificate of Posting Public Meeting Notice, Public Works Director's Status Report, Proposed Resolution recom- mending approval of Final Plat, Vicinity Maps, Final Plat Map, Application for Final Plat. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting June 5, 1990 Page 6 No one else came forward to speak in favor or in opposition of this partition. Commissioner Gilmour stated a concern about access onto Upton Road during fog or adverse weather conditions. Public Works Director Blanchard stated he wanted to look into the existing permit for access to determine if it is a revocable or irrevocable permit. Commissioner Halley made a motion to approve the recommendation to City Council for a minor land partition located on Upton Road with the condition that the ingress and egress of Parcel one be refined and settled according to the require- ments set forth by Jackson County Public Works. Commissioner Piland seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Hugo, yes; Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Halley, yes; and the motion carried with the condition as set forth above. MISCELLANEOUS Administrative Assistant Rubaloff mentioned that the next scheduled meeting is set for July 3 (the week of the 4th of July). It was unanimously carried that the meeting be extended to July 10, 1990 due to conflicts with the holiday. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Halley made a motion to adjourn. Gilmour seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Hugo, yes; Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Piland, yes. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. PCMIN605.90{PCWORK -- S T A F F R E P O R T-- TO: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant RE: _ Public Meeting - Review and make recommendation to the City Council for Preliminary Subdivision Plat for Stonecreek No. 4, Phase I DATE: June 29, 1990 Gary Whittle has submitted a preliminary subdivision plat applica- tion for phase I of Stonecreek No. 4. Stonecreek No. 4 is generally located south of where the existing phases of Stonecreek development is situated. This particular phase of the development consists of eight (8) lots which range between 7876 and 21,889 square feet. Average lot size in the subdivision is approximately 12,470 square feet. The property is zoned single-family residential (R-1-6). The proposed preliminary plat is a component of a larger subdivision development which is planned by the developer for the entire area south of the existing Stonecreek subdivision, west of Hog Creek and North of Beall Lane. Therefore, the developer has submitted a tenta- tive master plan which illustrates the layout of the forty-one (41) lot subdivision, the layout of Cut-de-sacs and a fifty foot wide extension of Glenn Way from the existing Glenn Way to Beall Lane. Staff has processed the plat in accordance with the procedure out- lined in Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 16 and has reviewed the plat for consistency with City development codes. Public Works Director, Larry Blanchard, has conducted an engineering analysis and has prepared a report which addresses the applicant's master plan and a report which outlines proposed conditions of approval for the preliminary plat. After the Planning Commission conducts a review of the plat and the master plan, Staff will forward the Commission's recommendation onto the City Council at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting. STRP419.90/PCWORK The following items are included for Planning Cormnission review: Item A - Certificate of Posting Item B - Vicinity Maps ItemC - Tax Assessor Map ItemD - Aerial Map Item E - Reduced Version of Tentative Plat Map Item F - Reduced version of tentative master plan Item G - Application for Preliminary Plat Item H - Director's Report regarding Preliminary plat review Item I - Director's Report regarding master plan Item J - Proposed Planning Coir¢nission Resolution STRP419.90/PCWORK /, ` ~- J~ s \o R ~mm 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY CERTIFICATE OF POSTING 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD ~S- AT E ~ TG~.-i / ~~ o DATE I, George Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE. OF Thursday, July 5; 1990 I POSTED A NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON July 10 , 1990, DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REMELT A PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR STONECREEK N0. 4, PFIASE I, SUBMITTED BY GARY WHITTLE ON BEHALF OF PACIFIC CREST PROPERTIES AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE \~ ~\~ //// / ~/ !~ w~ •~. x 490.2 '.{ % 492.3 I x 495.2 x 1286.6 x 49.3 x 1265.9 ce Y MM OMn. TIMOTN ~x Rea.6 MM. J ~ ~1 4e>a % j 1 i x 4az.a V ~~ ~ /) \ x 49a.> ~X- ST T z6>.~ x 1290.2 x 490.2 x 48a.4 ~ x X90 - -% /x' M.N. O Cb. x x iz9o.3 FARNS-. (r f 290.3 ~ yyORTH DR (fj c.fi. /( ~ ( ~~ ~- ~ x % 49x.6 M N' - O x 490.6 264,000 _e .J'1 5 L1~ \Y4 4~TIYSwtN~1x.~~1~~~~~~ ) S S7~NFCR ECK N° `I MRSTTR ~LA/V PNf?SE T' Tr'~l/'AT1VE ="' a~n„~.~-r,~xg Loch T:E i./ LeT T .SNDa/y -Q477"S QRUrgR Od' - rS C;ry of C~.vranc R,:..t, .TiFCKSo,JC'ocwt~/OR66~DN. a '.- - °°,•-` - /~= MhP /V•' 3>2,W/OOH /'R /DO, IO~~ Too _ ~-}n-p ~- ES-oG ,5~ 3 ~ ,.10,. .. ~~ ... .~.-. ,, l ....Get N°S. ~ '' ~ I N_~ b `xi~x:.. S /..XI~ /RON pl// !(y~w ~ TL+M ~3 6t+c3 W~u7Gi ~ t5 I ~ 5' .. ... Efr. %'rR~.53 ~~SfoNSU2 I~ ., -ro _ ,> _ _s.a _~s ~...~eu. 60' 6D _ • 6D .'S I ~ TL ./0 0 l37 ~ .. _ ~.., I O LDi tf 3 -°iA4Y 4 ~ •~ J '7 V f • Lor 1/ I LoTZ LoT/S Let /y Ler/S' ~ ~ 13S ~_y, Lor /D ~ ~ I; ~ y •Lor 3p av'i 1 /- I _ 5> -0 ~ sEO __SS-'-•~ v !0'BCrt:pA6E 6a<,fnfa!f . ~' i i H Lor z4 .\ Ler LI I i \\ Oo ~~~. - I Lo! /9 ~ LOT /8 LOT/7 LOT/6 ` - I V LDr L8 ~~ LOT LO I ~ ~ "' ^I `\~ 1 ~ R I ~ c 3 Z°' ~ l~fE: _ n ^~3' i n LOT Z7~ ~ ~~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ LOT L3 I LOTZ/l •. LOT tSI Ler 26 Lof L7 N ~~ - Ler z ~ " Lor ZZ ~ ~` 6 ,. p. I ~ I n r•\ ... ~ : \y, ~ { ~ ~ z58 ' V ` \~ __,..___. - _P~ 59_ ___w-_ I ~ . ' w-- -_ Ba O % lo' DgA •/n L•O ENSf..oSr7 .. C it s5- -/- - e'-F ~= - - -b 2 ~, cor zs 61 ~ \ .~~ L 1 I _ .i_.._ I JI n n~ ..~ Lor ze I '- i ~ s ___ /v.' o `I ! . N I C` I I ~1. ~ 'g LOr z.y~l LOT LS LeY 30; Lor 3/'. LOT SL: LOT 33 V ~I _ /40' bl~ p ~ Lor zs (, O n 6o fa' - 75' i ¢91- - Tl_ 4D0 r~ Loo TL. 300 4> NA a Y o zv/ 1~ e a./~r~a.- -3 ~ oy ; I bn ID'~R9itiA6E I \ •al ~ u EASEME~Y G u n WTI I D° Nry d 10 F[tE ~ ` ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ Q- ~OA/E6 yl I i30' ~ n i O R ~ I -v IQD4i ~j I ~ ~ \W ,. m ~~_ ~ D ' e I I ~ u i ay I I o,r ti ~ loe' . e ,~' Nore; , n I- I . ~ oar p,:// 6. '0 QtDc t LOT LO Qk'fd. I I o, zv8~. Ra.. ~~ ~ ; , ,~ ~ , LND s~ o ~~ /00 ~x I .pT /O ~, 1 } ; lv' DEgr<.fr iNwrE •C <Ew-'E4 04f-<~/Fwu CL 6GTT2 /c .a [,. eao/./G vend 'c ^ 3E,4L L L, A-Nf r ~ Application Filing Deadline CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application for Preliminary Subdivision Plat Name ~a~~ ~i ~1--c ~ ~cs3""~ Address Imo' O ~d X ~G~~~ Phone Number 7~Z'~ ! 7 6 Proposed Site Location Assessor's Map Page Location 3z zu.1 /U L76~}- Tax Lot(s) Z~U, /O Required Information: A legal description as it appears on the deed. Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Requested information as contained in the attached Central Point Municipal Code Sections 16.24.020 to 16.24.070 and completion of a Statement of Water Rights (form attached) I, (Yy-2y yY lh/ 7TL E certify that I am the owner or authorized agent of the own oft proposed site (If authorized agent, attach written uthority)~ ~~, Date ~ z r-9 ~ (Signature ~ owner or authorized agent of owner, please indicate which) Application Fee: $100~~~~zzlOja LUAP/ADMINI 3 ~RS,:::',;'::_ ~-'T~~"~~c ~.'~~s~ATEMENT OF WATER RIGHTS 'SUN WATeiiLbl:: i .:.^ Clu^TR1CT 13 ~ ~ 19eG DATE: ~/ ^ Q ~~>; 1. / The parcels identified within this plan, plat or replat DO NOT"fiave„a water right. How will water be applied to these lands? (i. e. city water supply, . .district supply, or exempt well use) ~ /R2 D rs'7- C/I T Y l.U t4-T~2 Sign this form and file with the plan, plat, or replat. * *~rLr4rir4t* ~twww~t~t x~c+rx-+r x ~+rx+r+~,r*x-wx~~-~t«~x~ +rx~x rt«~x x~+r~+r~rx~irir*x~~*~+t+r~r*~r.~«tx +rxirx~~arx-~r*~ ex~x-~r~rx- 2. T The parcels identified within this plan, plat or replat 00 have a water _ right, as issued to: Permit ~ Certificate ~ Permit 0 Certificate ~ Acres Township Range Section fOT for Tax-Lot Number use use 37S ' Zw . /Od~4 /oy, 7.00 .. ;3:~:Si9n this :eed to back page.alrJ attach'~xtra.,pages.as necessary. and mail with the :plan;r:plat or..replat to Water :Resa es 0ept.:- The above information isarue••acd°_complete to.the.best.of my knowledge:,s=<;:~<-:,::.-. Si9~.,~~,,-.~~2=...~'~/, z3c~--' Oate: tf-/.7-9C~ Name: (type or print) I~EkBF-2T ~-•' ~'~B~Q L~2E~''/S ~~ ~iHttit*Sr~x~rx~~r~n-~r+rxir x~i~r~r«~t~r«~w'+u~tx~~+r~r,tx~,E«~«~«~«-x-*x~«ir,F«~,~rt«~t~t«~,Ex~«.t . ~~:w,. .. .- ~ ~.'____ ~~.~~ .~~..- L...l ..... 44.5.. li.... ~ .. ::oThe information"available is inadequate ;to dE location- of:_:.the water, right': ,, ,,. ~~~., w ;:^ ,""`'FoY'the't+later">Resources~^Departmenty~. s~ *?~ ~~ .. i /rr.fl ra!! •o en -"' , ---~ ~ ~ 620U , 6100 •~~~ •• _ft rt_ ~' ~~ ~• + ~ ~ ~ = i ~ 5600 2 sr I : ~' ~ IMn t •4.p , ' 400 200 ~~ 100 Na' !it an 5500 ~. .. >L ( ~ rt. .a . , r I 5400 ~~ L LKaa 530C ItiIn.IN TITLE ~OM(S NY tr-erst 'iFY ~f1' A~_?55UR'S J~ PIS t :''~~ SrriEIY TO ASSLST J LO• ~ ~ '• SUratCl PROPERTY. NU _ +; IS .ASS.U.±hfR. BY_ FOP. i { ~ 52 ' t I':~ES IIJ TIiIS MAP A OUT• W /,tit? THE ALG©h!f.~: 5ltd3 ~++ ~: :' . .. ... .. ... ..,..::. :.n,r.! ~. ..5., ~- ~ .~ ,~ • •~ 6 -2 . ;~ .~ ~ ~~ ~ . + ,,,, ~o ' ,r -- > ~ - ..,: t g rooo ;, ~ ~~ z ~ ' 4~ • .I ~. . _ 1 ~ ..:. _ ._ 44! ... . •-s • • _ --~ t t • • S j ' ~: q i. . ~ t f^; 7 • r ~ `' ~'~ ^'ra~i'!'i .~F .1~y~ 11~' ~ ,~~+~e~l ~ 576~7.":Ht~ic .. ••.`... George Rubaloff City of Central Point 155 S. Second Street Central Point, OR 97502 Thurman and Helen Barnes 1576 Beall Lane Central Point, OR 97502 Dear Mr. Rubaloff, r:~ >~r~r _ " 1.R J~ . . ~~ I, Thurman 0. Barnes and Helen Barnes, owners of property at 1576 Beall Lane in Central Point Map ~~37-2W-lODA/ Tax Lot ~/100 do authorize Gary Whittle to act as our agent in the transaction of doing a minor partition of said property. Sincerely, Date C I T Y O F C E N T RA L PO I N T PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: June 29, 1990 PROJECT: Stonecreek No. 4, Phase I LOCATION: T37S R2W WM Section 10DA TL 100 and 300 ZONE: R-1-6 NO. OF ACRES 11 N0. OF LOTS 14 NO. OF DWELLINGS 41, One (1) per lot SUBDIVIDER/OWNER Pacific Crest Properties c/o Gary Whittle P.O, Box 1488 Medford, OR 97501 Ph. 772-9764 SURVEYOR: Farber Surveying P.O. Box 1488 Medford, OR 97502 Ph. 664-5034 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Residential Subdivision I. Preliminary Plat Requirements (Check One) Meets iT'tle Description Standard 18.24.010 Fi1in9 Fee X 16.24.020 Scale X 16.24.030 General Conditions a. Name oP 9ubtli vi sign X b. Date North Arrow Seale X c. Legal location oP subdivision X d. Names/Address oP owner engineers X 16.24.040 Existing Conditions a. Location oP street witlths and easements, etc. X b. Topographic Info e. Bench mark establiahetl X d. Location antl direction oP all water courses X e. Natural features rock out- eroppinga, marshes, wooded areas X P. Exiatin9 uses oP the lantl X g. Location oP all existing streets and utilities X h. Zoning on and adjacent to tract is compatible X (Title 16.24) Not Does Not Applicable Meet Standard X 1 Conditions (1) (Check One) Meets Not Does Not Title Description 9tandartle Aoolicab7e Meet Standard Gondi tions 18.24.050 Proposed Plan a. Street Location, antl the lanes, grades, radius oP - curves,relationship to other existing or proposed streets and other utilities. b. Eaeements- widtha/Purposes X c. Lot Dimension X 18.24.080 Partial Development Is other property ad3acenL to Chia property being conai dared in the design. This property can be owned by the subdivider. gee Master Plan 16.24.070 Explanatory Information a. Vicinity maps to explain relationship to existing streets can.requi re correction to existing street. b. Proposetl Deed Restrictions c. Center lane profile of streets to show grade ( 100' beyontl street) d. Approx imete location and proposed size of utilities 18.32.020 Requirements Generally II. Subdi vision Layout X Need a list X (2) gee Master Plan Comments Provide information on Pina1 construction drawings X (Check One) Ti 1e Deseriotion 16.16.010 87ocks Length Width R-1-6 Shape Not greater 1200' 18.18.020 87ocks Sizes 16.16.090 Blocks Easements a. Utilities b. Water Courses c. Pedestrian Ways 16.18.040 Lota - Shapes A Size 16.18.050 Lota-Size b Determination (Lot length greater than 2 1/ times wi tlth prohi bitetl) 16.16.060 Through lots 18.18.070 Lot si defines 18.16.080 Largs Lot 9ubdivisi one Meets Not Standartl Aoolicable X x X x x X X X X 2 X x X x Does Not Meet Standard Conditions 2 III. Street Improvements A. Existing Conditions 1. Street No. SA 14, Street Name - Bea71 Lane, Street Classification - Secondary Arterial, Street Jurisdiction - Jackson County, curb/gutters, future curb/gutters - required, existing sidewalks - none, future sidewalks - required, existing street lights - none in vicinity, future street lights - required, existing traffic volume - 3000 vt/d, traffic volume this project - 205 vt/d, total traffic volume w/this project - 3205 vt/d, total traffic volume this street can carry - 7500 vt/d. 2. Street No. - CS 6, street Name - Glenn Way, Street Classification - Collector Street, Street Jurisdiction - City, curb/gutters - existing, future curbs/gutters - required, sidewalk - existing, future sidewalks - required, existing street lights - yes, future street lights - required, existing traffic volume - 1250 vt/d, traffic volume this project - 205 vt/d, total traffic volume w/this project - 1460 vt/d, total traffic volume this street can carry - 3500 vt/d. B. Street Standards 16.12.010 (Check One) Mesta Not Doea Not Title Description Standards Applicable Meet Standard Conditions 18.12.040 Street Oeneraily a. Location X b. Width X (2) e. Grade X d. Re lati onahip Lo exiati ng street gee Comment (8) e. Topography as it relates to tlrai Wage X (1) P. Provide Por stree t construction X (4) g. Follows a master - plan h. TraPPic volume X i. 9aPety Features X 16.12.080 Street R.O.W. 8 Widths X (5) 16.72.080 Street Reserve Strip X (8) 78.72-070 Street - A119nment X 78.12.080 Street - Extension % 18.12.090 Street -Intgrsection Angles 90 X 18.12.100 Existing Streets Additional Width X (4) 18.12.710 Half Street X 78.72.120 Cut-de-Sac and/or dead end streets a. Shall not serve more then 12 lots X Meets Title Deaeri otion Standard b. Shall not be greater than 400' X 18.12.130 Street Names X 18.12.140 Street Grades and Curves - MA SACS not greater than 8% - Not greater than 12% X on L9 - Cannot be leas than 1% X - Shall have at minimum 100' curve radius. X Not Dons Not Aoolicable Meet Standard Condition IV. Water system A. Existing Conditions A i2" Water Main Exists on Glenn Way to where Glenn Way ends with a i2" water main on Bea]1 Lane. B. Water System Standards Meets Not Does Not Title Deseriotion Standards Aoolicable Meet Standard Condition 18.32.080 Water System Provided Main X Service Laterals 1 each lot X (T) Fire Hydrants not greater than 500' apart X (8) Fire FIoH 1000 gpm provide minimum pressure 40 psi X V. San itary Sewers A. Existing Conditions A 12" sanitary sewer is ]ocated in the proposed street extension of Glenn Way. B. Sanitary Sewer System Standards Meets Not Does Not Title Deecriotion Standard Aoolicable Meet 9tantlard e Contlitiona 18.32.050 Adequate Sizing Mainline X Services X (7) 4 VI. Storm Drainage A. Existing Conditions 7. Daisy Creek is located along the easterly property Iine. B. Sanitary Sewer System Standards Meets Not Doea Not Title Description Standard Aoblicable Meet Standard Conditions 18.32-040 Surface - Provide draina8e through the subtlivision X (9) - Are there adverse effects placed on down-stream X (10) structures? - No catch basin located greater than 350 Pt. Por any curb and gutter X (Y1) section. 5 CONDITIONS STONECREEK #4, Phase I 1. Include topography of the property with proper 2' contours. 2. Identify the street design section dimensions and special design considerations. 3. Glenn Way is listed as a collector street and the collector route designation is Glenn Way/Malabar. Glenn Way connects to W. Pine Street, Malabar connects to Beall Lane. Installation of another collector street which would only carry the traffic volume of a local street places a financial requirement on a developer without the traffic volume present to establish the requirement. This area shall be served by a 50' right of way, 36' curb to curb street. 4. The developer shall construct curb/gutter sidewalk, street lights, driveways on the lots abutting Beall Lane and design the street for 10,000 vt/d 10% truck traffic. Full street width should be 48'. 5. The developer shall dedicate an additional 10' of property for street right of way, construct the curb and gutter section 10' from the property line to the south. 6. Place a 1' reserve strip across the northern most portion of the street. 7. Place note on preliminary plan that each lot shall have a water, sanitary sewer, and a storm drainage connection to the lot. 8. Fire hydrants shall be spaced as approved by the Central Point Fire Department. 9. Identify the location for the storm drainage system for this subdivision. 10. Storm drainage calculation shall be provided by the engineer with final construction drawings to assure proper sizing. 11. Catchbasins must be located no greater than 350 feet for any section of curb and gutter. 12. Street name signs including posts, labor and equipment for installation of street signs shall be paid for by the developer of this subdivision and the installation shall be completed by the City. 6 12. Street name signs including posts, labor and equipment for installation of street signs shall be paid for by the developer of this subdivision and the installation shall be completed by the City. 13. A traffic control signing plan shall be included as a part of the final construction plans, and will be installed by the City and all costs associated with traffic control sign installation shall be paid for by the Developer. 14. A street lighting plan shall be included in the construction documents according to the requirements of the Public Works Director. A11 intersections shall be illuminated. Developer to install all pads and conduits for street lights as a part of the construction of the subdivision. The developer shall also pay for street lights and for the installation of all street lights in this subdivision. 15. Ladder rungs shall be installed in each sanitary sewer manhole of a depth greater than 3.0 feet to the flow line of the manhole. Developer shall use ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works Department. 16. There is a small seasonal stream which flows through this property. Developer shall construct a storm drainage system which collects the flow from this stream .and carries the flow through this subdivision in such a manner as to not cause flooding of any lot. 17. Developer shall design the storm drainage system to meet the design requirements in accordance with the City of Central Point Public Works Standards. 18. Developer shall install or cause to be installed, conduits for utilities at intersections, or locations determined by utility companies. Developer shall also provide conduit crossings for utility companies who will not install their services until after the subdivision is constructed. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the installatin of these conduit crossings. 19. The water system shall be designed to provide a minimum flow at each fire hydrant in the subdivision of 1000 gpm. 20. A11 construction for utilities, streets and other structures discussed herein within rights of ways owned or to be owned by the City of Central Point, shall be done so according to all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions, and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for construction of this subdivision. 7 21. The Preliminary Plat Review for the preliminary plat submitted hereby by Gary Whittle (Pacific Crest Properties) was done in accordance with the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by the developer which would allow this subdivision NOT to meet standards set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code, or would require staff to complete a new preliminary plat review shall require a new submittal of preliminary plat for City approval. S M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 3, 1990 TO: George Rubaloff - Administrative Assistant FROM: Larry R. Blanchard - Public Works Director ~ ~/3 RE: Master Plan - Stonecreek No. 4 As a part of the preliminary plat submitted by Pacific Crest Properties c/o Gary Whittle, a Master Plan for Stonecreek No. 4 was also. submitted. I have reviewed this Master Plan and make the following comments: The Developer shall: Design all proposed cul-de-sacs for 1000 vt/d and 2% trucks, Glenn Way shall be designed for 2500 vt/d and 5% trucks. 2. Provide a water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage services for each lot. 3. Five hydrants shall be spaced as approved by the Central Point Fire Department. 4. Street name signs including posts, labor and equipment for installation of street signs shall be paid for by the developer of this subdivision and the installation shall be completed by the City. 5. A traffic control signing plan shall be included as a part of the final construction plans, and will be installed by the City and all costs associated with traffic control sign installation shall be paid for by the Developer. 6. A street lighting plan shall be included in the construction documents according to the requirements of the Public Works Director. All intersections shall be illuminated. Developer to install all pads and conduits for street lights as a part of the construction of the subdivision. The developer shall also pay for street lights and for the installation of all street lights in this subdivision. 7. Ladder rungs shall be installed in each sanitary sewer manhole of a depth greater than 3.0 feet to the flow line of the manhole. Developer shall use ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works Department. 8. There is a small seasonal stream which flows through this property. Developer shall construct a storm drainage system which collects the flow from this stream and carries the flow through this subdivision in such a manner as to not cause flooding of any lot. 9. Developer shall install or cause to be installed, conduits for utilities at intersections, or locations determined by utility companies. Developer shall also provide conduit crossings for utility companies who will not install their services until after the subdivision is constructed. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the installation of these conduit crossings. 10. All construction for utilities, streets and other structures discussed herein within rights of ways or to be owned by the City of Central Point, shall be done so according to all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions, and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for construction of this subdivision. 11. The Master Plan submitted by Pacific Crest Properties (c/o Gary Whittle) for Stonecreek No. 4 was done in accordance with the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modification to this Master Plan prior to submittal of a preliminary plat for any phase of this development shall require an update of the Master Plan in conjunction with the preliminary plat approval. If staff determines that a change has occurred which violates sections of the Central Point Municipal Code, then the Master Plan shall be resubmitted for approval by the Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR STONECREEK N0. 4, Phase I WHEREAS, Gary Whittle, on behalf of Pacific Crest Properties, has submit- ted a preliminary plat for a subdivision Located in the southwest quadrant of the city west of where Hog Creek runs approximately north and south, further de- scribed as Jackson County Assessors map 372W lODA Tax Lots 300, and 100, and, WHEREAS, the proposed preliminary plat for Stonecreek No. 4, Phase I is a component of a larger subdivision development which is planned for the tract controlled by the developer, further described as Lot T, Snowy Butte Orchards, Jackson County .Assessor Map No. 37 2W lODA, Tax Lots 100, 200, 300 and 400, and, WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a tentative master plan dated June 26, 1990, which illustrates the layout of the forty-one (41) lot subdivi- Sion, the layout of cul-de-sacs and a fifty (50) foot wide extension of Glenn Way which would connect at the existing Glenn Way and intersect at Beall Lane, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point held a public meeting upon said application for approval of the preliminary plat on July 10, 1990, pursuant to Central Point Municipal Code Section 1.24.020C, and having at said public meeting received and reviewed the application, tentative master plan, City staff report and testimony, and being fully advised, now, therefore, RESOLUTION N0. - 1 PREPLAT.JCE/PORES BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Based upon the staf€ report evidence, and record relating to said application, the Planning Commission hereby finds that said application meets the requirements for preliminary plat applications, that said preliminary plat as proposed is in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning code, and if the conditions set forth hereinafter are met, said application meets the City's requirements for subdivision layout, park dedication, street stan- dards, water system standards, sanitary sewer standards, and storm drainage stan- dards. Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of the preliminary subdivision plat submitted by Gary Whittle, for Stonecreek No. 4, Phase I subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and by this reference expressly made a part of the within resolu- tion. Passed by the Planning Commission on and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of 1990. 1990 Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: Planning Commission Secretary RESOLUTION N0. - 2 PREPLAT.JCE/PORES ----- MEMORANDUM ----- TO: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff Administrative Ass'stant DATE: May 29, 1990 SUBJECT: Site Plan Review for Four-Unit Multiple Family development along westside of Tenth Street north of Laurel (37 2W 2CB TL 7306) (Appli- cant: Ron Collins) Pursuant to Section 17.72.060 of the Central Point Municipal Code, subject develop- er is required to obtain site plan approval prior to being issued a City building permit. The following items are attached for the Planning Con¢nissions review: Item A - Planning and Public Works Department ,Site Plan Review Item B - Public Workds Deparment Site Plan Review Item C - Certificate of Posting Item D - Site Plan Application Item E - Vicinity Map Item F - Tax Assessor Map Item G - Reduced Copy of Site Plan Item H - Rendering of proposed Multiple-Family Structure MEM50530.90/GRCORR EXHIBIT A CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW DATE: May 29, 1990 PARCEL: 37 2W 2CB Tax Lot 7306 Located on North Tenth Street, North of where Laurel Street intersects with Tenth Street. APPLICANT: Ron Collins 1. Subject property is approximately 10,019 Square feet (.23 acre) located in the R-3 zone (multiple-family district). The R-3 zone is appropriate for the type of development that is being proposed. 2. Developer is proposing a four-unit two-story apartment building. Unit size is as follows: Unit 1 840 sq. ft. Unit 2 820 sq. ft. Unit 3 820 sq. ft. Unit 4 640 sq. ft. Plan appears not to exceed the maximum lot coverage (aggregate building coverage) of 50~. 3. Developer is proposing the minimum off-street parking requirement of 2 spaces per living unit (8 spaces), four of which will be covered and one additional guest parking space. Developer has designed parking so that no backward movements or maneuvering occur in the public right-of-way. 4. Developer is proposing landscaping of approximately 1600 sq feet within the 30 foot front yard on each side of the access to and from Tenth Street. Said land- scape meets the City's development standards. 5. Plan appears to meet the following minimum yard requirements: a. Front yard 60 feet from Centerline of North Tenth Street b. Side yard - 10 feet (5 feet per story) c. Rear Yard - 10 feet MEM70530.90/GRCORR 6. The distance between the principal multiple-family structure and the detached carport or any other detached accessory building shall be at least ten feet. 7. Building Height shall not exceed 35 feet. 8. Ingress and Egress shall avoid interference with traffic flow on public streets and shall facilitate adequate access for life support and other emergency vehicles. 9. Developer shall pay a $200 per lot Parks Development fee prior to obtaining a building permit for construction of the multiple-family project. 10. Prior to being issued a building permit for the project, developer shall pro- vide a sufficiently detailed plan to illustrate that storm drainage will be proper- ly managed on the site. 11. North Tenth Street is a 60 foot wide secondary arterial right of way with a 40 foot street section which is classified in poor condition. Curb, gutter and sidewalk fronts the property. 12. Developer shall meet all applicable conditions of approval that were placed upon the property at the time the City granted a minor land partition on February 20, 1979 which created Tax Lots 7306, 7305 and 7301. MEM70530.90/GRCORR EXHIBIT B PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR STAFF REPORT DATE: May 31, 1990 T0: Planning Commission RE: Site Plan Review for Four (4) Unit Multiple Family Development along westside of N. 10th Street, North of Laurel Street Tax Lot: T37S R2W WM Section 2C6 TL 7306 Applicant: Ron Collins I. Streets A. Existing Conditions 1. N. 10th Street - secondary arterial, City juris- diction, 60' right of way, 40' curb to curb width, existing sidewalk, no street lights, traffic control devices already installed, existing access curb cut to property, traffic volume 3000 VT/D. 2. Laurel Street - Local street, City jurisdiction, 60' right of way, unimproved section gravel only, no sidewalk, no curb and gutter, no traffic control devices, no street lights, no established access to property, traffic volume 200 VT/D. 8. Required Improvements N. 10th Street a. Provide additional right of way on N. 10th Street as required by Public Works Department. b. Driveway access shall provide 25' clear vision sight triangle each side of the driveway. c. Driveway width can be a maximum of 30' and shall be 100' from the nearest access. This will require the placement of the access at the S.E. property line. The existing curb cut shall saw cut and replaced with regular curb/gutter. 1 d. A street light shall be installed at the driveway facing N. 10th Street. This will be a light to match the light pole style in the area. Light type 9500 high pressure sodium vapor light, mounted behind sidewalk. e. No parking allowed on N. 10th Street. f. A 5' sidewalk shall be cleaned and repaired on N. 10th Street for the property adjacent to N. 10th Street. g. All vehicle maneuvering and parking shall be done on the property and not in the public right of way. Follow the requirement in 17.64.030 of the Code. h. All utility improvement for power, telephone, cable t.v., gas, and other similar services for crossings, etc. shall be provided by the developer. 2. Laurel Street a. According to the approval of the original minor land partition that created this lot, the developer was to construct curb/gutters, sidewalks, asphalt, paving, storm drains, street lights, 8" sanitary sewer, 8" water lines for a standard 36' wide paved street according to the construction standards of Central Point. These improvements were to be completed at such time as adjacent properties are developed. The improvements shall be completed as a part of the construction of this development to assure these improvements are done. II Storm Drainage A. Existing Conditions 1. N. 10th Street - 24" storm drain is located in the eastern portion of N. 10th Street. Discharge Basin - Mingus Creek Floodway or Zone - None 2 2. Laurel Street - 12" storm drain is located at the intersection of Laurel Street and N. 10th Street, N.W. corner. Discharge Basin - Mingus Creek Floodway or Zone - None B. Requirements N. 10th Street a. This storm drain system on site shall collect all runoff from impervious areas which include, but not exclusively, asphalt, concrete and roofs. The storm drain shall be connected by a properly designed system that connects to the 24" storm drainage system in N. 10th Street. b. Design criteria shall be a 10 year storm with an intensity of 2" ip/hr. for 15 minute duration. c. An acceptable storm drainage system requires a minimum 12" storm pipe with catchbasin located to collect the runoff. 2. Laurel Street a. A storm drainage system shall be designed to collect the runoff from the proposed street and developed properly and discharged to the 12" storm drain pipe at Laurel Street and N. 10th Street. Follow the guidelines set forth in Public Works Standards. III. Water System A. Existing Conditions 1. N. 10th street 8" water line western portion of the street. Fire Hydrant: N.W. corner of Laurel Street and N. 10 Street. Static pressure: 60 psi Residual pressure: 50 psi Fire Flow: 750 gpm 3 2. Laurel Street - no water main from N. 10th Street to N. 9th Street. Fire Hydrant: At Laurel Street and N. 9th Street, S.E. Corner Static Pressure: 50 psi Residual Pressure: 40 psi Fire Flow: 500 gpm B. Requirements 1. N. 10th Street a. A water connection shall be made on the 8" main located in N. 10th Street. b. A 12" water main will be installed by the City on N. 10th Street from Manzanita Street to Hazel. This will increase both flow at fire hydrants, and residual pressure in the main line. 2. Laurel Street a. An S" water main shall be constructed on Laurel Street to connect the 8" on N. 10th Street to the 4" at Laurel Street and N. 9th Street. b. Service laterals to any remaining vacant lots shall also be installed prior to paving of Laurel Street. IV. Sanitary Sewer A. Existing Conditions 1. N. 10th Street service to this property was listed as a requirement of the original minor land partition. Actual location has not be verified. 2. Laurel Street - No sewer present at this location. B. Requirements 1. N. 10th Street a. As a part of the final plans and specifications, the developer must identify where sanitary sewer service will be connection, and the size of said service. 4 b. If no service exists on the property, the developer shall connect an adequately sized service to the 24" sanitary sewer main located in N. 10th Street and construct said service to service all lots of minor land partition. 2. Laurel Street Construct services to all vacant lots from N. 10th Street to N. 9th Street prior to paving Laurel Street. V. Additional Requirements 1. Storm drainage calculation shall be provided by the engineer with final construction drawings to assure proper sizing. 2. On Laurel Street, street name signs, including posts, labor and equipment for installation of street signs shall be paid for by the developer of this multi-family development and the installation shall be completed by the City of Central Point. 3. A traffic control signing plan shall be included as a part of the final construction plans, and will be installed by the City and all costs associated with traffic control sign installation'shall be paid for by the Developer for Laurel Street. 4. A soils engineer must evaluate the strength of the soil (R-value) to determine the street section design. The City's engineer shall be used, and the developer shall pay for the cost of these services. A design life for Laurel Street shall be a minimum 20 year life, given a daily traffic volume not to exceed 1000 vehicle trips per day and 2% truck traffic shall be used. 5. A street lighting plan shall be included in the construction documents according to the requirements of the Public Works Director. All intersections shall be illuminated. Developer to install all pads and conduits for street lights as a part of the construction of the multi-family development for Laurel Street and N. 10th Street. The developer shall also pay for street lights for these streets. 6. Ladder rungs shall be installed in each sanitary sewer manhole of a depth greater than 3.0 feet to the flow line of the manhole. Developer shall use ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works Department. 5 7. Developer shall design the storm drainage system to meet the design requirements in accordance with the City of Central Point Public Works Standards. 8. Developer shall install or cause to be installed, conduits for utilities at intersections, or locations determined by utility companies. Developer shall also provide conduit crossings for utility companies who will not install their services until after the subdivision is constructed. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the installation of these conduit crossings. 9. All construction for utilities, streets and other structures discussed herein, within rights of ways owned or to be owned by the City of Central Point, shall be done according to all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions, and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for construction of this multi- family development. 10. The site plan review for the multi-family development submitted hereby by Ron Collins was done in accordance with the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by the developer which would allow this project not to meet the standards set forth in the Central Point Municipal Code, or would require staff to complete anew preliminary plat review, shall require a new submittal of preliminary plat for City approval. 11. The developer shall pay a $200 per dwelling unit park development fee prior to issuance of a building permit for this development. 12. Each individual lot created by this minor land partition shall have individual water, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer discharge services. 13. No construction or placement of structures within a public utility easement (except for fences by permit only). 14. Contractor shall be responsible to protect property corner monuments. If monuments are disturbed, damaged or removed, the contractor shall replace monument prior to certificate of occupancy being issued. The contractor may want to verify location of property lines prior to construction. 6 15. All construction material and debris shall be removed and/or cleaned up at the end of each work day. In any event, the Public Works Department shall require immediate response by the contractor to remove all debris from the street that will or may obstruct the street. 16. All roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces shall have positive drainage away from the structure, and shall be connected to a curb drain or an approved storm sewer. 17. No occupancy of any structure constructed or placed on this property will be allowed until a "Certificate of Occupancy" has been signed by both the building Official and the public Works Director. Temporary water service will be provided for construction purposes only. Residential water service will no be turn on to this structure until a "Certificate of Occupancy" is completed. 7 N ?~~/~~°~°\~/„e0/ 155 SO. SECOND ST EG EXHIBIT C CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, George Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF Thursday, July 5, 1990 I POSTED AN AGENDA NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON July ID, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A SITE PLAN FOR A FOUR-UNIT MULTIPLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON NORTH 10th STREET AT 37 2W 2CB TL 7306 (Submitted by Ron Collins). AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD SI N 7/ S/~ o DATE POSTCER1.90/NOTICES .{ , > - EXHIBIT D ~'j Application Filing Deadline ~//B~ ::; CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application for Site Plan Approval w (~ .;~ Name Ro..~a (~ ~' eo 1 (: ws `''•;, n Address aoz~ O I~ wt~ 1 ~ tav„ Rc:l C, ~. bR. ". Phone Number ~~,~{ -HG i l ~ 355 -~~.2y1 J Proposed Site Location nn ~. Address lra f/ S,( Cetil~o / Yo,'u ~ (i(/o f'~d/ , fss~K~Q~ Assessor's Map Page Location 3'J 2L(?o~ L~/j Tax Lot(s) ?`~U~ Required Information: A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli- ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal Code Section 17.72.030. Name of Builder DR 1-~ctw~w~rv ~'oKS~ Addres Phone Number ~`y -~((, ~ v I, R6HCi1Cl ~ lo(~:tis certify that I am the owner or authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach written out~rity), /, ~i (~o,,,~,/~/ ~~ ~K~~O Date S' / 7 - `/ 0 (Signature of owner or authorized agent o€ owner, please indicate which) Application Fee: $0 * A filing fee for recording a Deferred Improvement Agreement with the County Clerk may also be required ~.. 5/8 ojo LUAP/ADMINl ~ 21 EARNEST MUNEi' HLi;EIPi bnd AGIitiEMENT OF SALE i ~Q E3OYD REAL ESTATE ~ - ' inB B A LEGALLY aNp: .IMCi f NpI NLLY VxEEPSiCN. SEEa L(MIFETEMi ApICE Agreetl lhs_]$_tlayd~pril_, 1g4f], on properly tlescnbetl hardn and known as listing number: 96~ SELLER John H..ud Alice D. Blair a+mvsaarsr. w+aonu ----- Inwnatlerstbndihecltmd E ]BESM Oq to be lulN paitl as set forth herinafter, seller agrees to sellaM buyer agrees ' b WrChase Ilse IONOWkq deaCdbetl real estate bCaletl in the CiN d__S~l]fi'lLPQ1111. _.___ _.. CpunN ol_-Jf1&k50R Stele d Ore(wEN . 10 wil:__~7~Z_~-_-_ _-- _ .a... bgghsy xrth the Iolb.Yrlq Personal WOpeM: NONE _____-_ .- the buyer agrees b pay rte purcpaea prka gn Iha Idbwirg terms, to wit: - _--~---~ _ - -- Tilepurchaeepricaherinebaemenfaned._E19hL10~11_t]NNISMd fire tiundrod----------_dalara EBmeal nanny paid upon exsulbn of this agreement (cash, check,-___.__..-__. ) • SQQ.QQ. _.- ^ ql 1g_ Omowrar'e arceplarae )S as edtlil'anal aarneslmmeY•the sum ol . .... .. ........... L __-.. Upon dOS'vq a acceptarae d htle a canvacL me sum of .. _ ....... _ .. _ _ _ .. r ]fl,fN10.--_ eaiaraea__INIiIS_AS.ASH-PiIBGIASE~_._.----..--._-------._ - _-..-----------apilara Parable as lolbws: ._- IL_1@.54D.Q0 P_1$.,54Q.D0 ~r - ----. __.._ _"-- r Intlablcdnes3 i3 essumetl in this Iransactbn, buyer agrees to pay any assumplbn Ise antl reimburse seller for reserve account lurbs. The seller, - blbvirq patlamaCe by the buyer in the manner and al the time herein speCiliM shall lurniah buyer with a title insurance policy in the amount of the 1 ~"purchase price d the real asbte Irpn a lilts insurance Company showing good and marketable ells. In the event tills to saitl premises is not marketablo or - 'Cannot be matle sowilhin (3g) tlays alter a written sblemenl pl detects is tlaliveretl to selbr. me earnest money herein receiplM Ia shall tR reluntletl. Bul it the share sale is epProved by the seller antl title 10 the premises is marketable. antl the buyer tails Ip perform as herein Orovitletl. Iha earnest money herein receipted la aM any adtlilbnal earnasl money shall M IoHeiletl. 0e cost of title insurance, escrow antl attorney's less paid. and be remaintler Oak) to aeNer as Ipugatetl damages. The broker or escrow agent is hereby aulhoriie0 to tlisburse the emnesl money as providetl for herein wilhwl additional talks toalnelruClbns Iran dryer. Allhqugh etltlilianal conlracltlxumenls are conlemplalM by the parties, the parties inlets that buyer shall be entitled b enlace IhlB agreement by spgCilic petlormance a by other court proceeding as prpvidM by Law The propaM shall ba conveyed tree antl char of all lions and encumbancee oxcepl ammq pnl,n:nu:ns. UUikling reslrclions. Federal patent reserv:mons. easenlenld recortl and_-_---.._-__ __._________-__--__._-__ _ _- __ _ _ __._.__. AY tlelerretl payments cartied by sal'sr shall be evganeM by 1. a note securetl by a Irusl tleM or mongaBe, a ~ , a IoM sales contract, to be delivered al Cb%OI escrwr. Proparry taxes, rents antl insuance premiums are to be praatetl at cbse of esaorv. Risk of tlamege a bss by lire or act of GM prvx to cbse of esaax H assutred by seller. Buyer antl seller agree Ihat the Iransaclion is b be cbsM in escrow, Iha cost of whbh is 1p be paitl'h by seller antl'!, by buyer. Oocumenl praparatbn a other cbsing lees:. _. _ -., _. The b Wa eM seller acknaxlMge Thal properly may be sublecl to city. County or slats smoke detector requirements, antl it new conslruclion. Federal FTC hsulalion tliscbsure requirements. ' ~- THIS INSTRUMENT W ILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRISEO IN THIS INSTRUMENT TO RE IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LANG "^ USE LAWS AND REGULATpNS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT. THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SMWIA CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING GEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES. It U agreed between buyer antl seller Thal all tootle paid as earnasl money shall la tleposilM i~ LEL Eovoclienl Irusl account i~KX fit ____--__..___..._-..__...-_.._ iimeis of theeaaenCBa this cpnbapt. ESCrowshall cbseaM legal possession shall be given buyer on or helots _ .N~rnn lSs---_.___._..199(}. Physkal possesson shall begiven buyerw ar 4alae_E]W~_~r _____ . 19..9Q, or as soan'Iherealler as existing laws and rsgulalnns permit the removal al tenants. it any. Il is agreed Ihel the buyer raYas solely on his own jutlgmenl in making This agreement, Thal buyer has Ihaoughly examined the property to M conveyed. aM that there are no agreements, representalbns w untlerstantlinBS matle by seller or seller s agents That era not set lath herein. -:' II H agreed and Wltleretpatl that the terms aM conditions conbined herein are to apply Ip and bintl the heirs, executors, atlministratas aM assgns of -..the respecgve penles. i h tl19 event d em/ soil. ecaon, proceeding or appeal Iherelrom, in connection with this agreement invaving seller. buyer a LsE eovo, it's agents or '~- errlplOYees. Ble bring party 9ha11 pay the ceud cOSts aM agorney's lees of the prevailing party includi;p (hose of Lss Sovo, ifs agents a empbyees. This proYSipn shall nd be tleemed to be mergetl a inlegraled into any subsequent tla;uments. but shall survive. SeYer apnea to eN terms erg cababns of this agreement. Seller agrees to pay brdver on tlemantl acanmissbn ae provbM for in the listing agreement :~' Ipr aeNICB9 IBrWered. h tl10 eenba soil i3 brWghl t0 Cglkcl saitl commissbn, seller agrees to pay such Mtleional sums as the court may atljutlga 4- ~leasoneble edomay'a lees to be albwed in seitl suit. j greenre Vto haaa Agrepmant to sell 8 ... . - ..r. -<- ._ --_-- _- _- ~,.,`>/ Suysr'a reteipl for/C~apy/si/gnlN by seller Broker's race t for earnasl money -~,Tr.,~~~.~ -1.- ~J•L~+--.c-. _ f-daz-2°- \L E~pY ~ y//~ ~l~~U -~- -- ----- - -~k - - ~--- ~-- eu•ree•s Rr;P(. ccrr -41108 EXHIBIT A Commencing at a 2" pipe marking the Southwest corner of Donation Land Claim No. 55 in township 37 South Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, in Jackson County, thence on the west line of said Donation Land Claim No. 55 North 00° 25' 09" West 247.50 feet, thence leaving said west line, North 89°54'25" East 240.24 feet, thence North 00°25'09" West 101.40 feet to the true point of beginning; thence from said point of beginning North 45°00'00" East 80.00 feet; thence on a line parallel to the north line of Laurel Street, North 89°54'25" East 43.00 feet; thence North 67°29'15" East 81.11 feet to a point on the southwesterly line of Tenth Street, said point being on a curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 160 feet; thence in a Southeasterly direction on the arc said curve a distance of 69.84 feet to the end of said curve (the chord bears South 10°06'56" East 69.28); thence South 02°23'20" West 19.20 feet; thence leaving the westerly line of tenth street, South 89°54'25" West 185.86 feet to the point of beginning. (Code 6-2 Account #1-63977-9 Map #372W2CB Tax Lot #7306) EXHIBIT E --' t •~\ `~ .. \. x- i- :~-_-___ *`T itit-1 ~~ l~ , ~ . ~M ~~ - i_' '-- ~: i__ ~ _.... - - ik ~ i _ :.... ti .. - ~ _ .. _ ....................~.. r ~ - ,~ --{ ' A-1-6 A-i-8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ( - _ _L ~.~~~ 1 C-4 _ ~ A-3• ~~~ ~ ~~ ,__. - ly_:t rF _ fp li~- ~ .' ~` a : ... , •. - `S it ~ ~:~: I ' <: ;. ~\~`~~~~.~ -~,' ~ '"'~ '" I ; ~ ~_ _ a ~~ ,; ~ ye 3~ ,~j5 ~ f .~ q~' Y 7302 ~. na ~~..,,. 0 ~p-4z 9) EXHIBIT F I. 2GL. Ao ~.c y . awre'l I n. -. 7300 ~~- ~I (V. , 0 7202 7~3 u `,~ '3,~ I ~ a ,cew m ~ \ I M 2 ~1 0 ~ Nc m ' v O,.d f 7100 ~^ " S3. a I ' w 7~Q6 ~ ~~ I ~J 'p .'76 Bw ~~os.~• aO taol 7000 °° _'~. I ~ 7345 0'-: 7301 0;~ I 'a r I _ STREET '- f - ' ~.~. '•° ,' I 7600 : ~' 7900 8000 y w ~l''~~9% ~ I ' ~ 7700 `~' t I ~ I I `,T = O. Z• n I 5ryb~ 8200 I A ~ I 7soo ;~Q- ; ~~ 1 z ° ->, 3 . I - `--~ ..•~ _ _ _ _ _ _ a A - D.L.C. 55 3~ m L N 1 7(,` ~\~ ~ . .. Fr I In Inr I end i. .~ r piny assume: nn Ilj!i'~ .. ~,. fn il T1F;n SIJOS 8nC I C J :, ? . _ . .. :ray. OiViSIJlOrCO!~ill~cr:TR! L^•`,9YERSTITLECO. ,,.: :~1-Va IA;,iI: i.. i79:i:i C'. i-p~Uh°i. ORtf, (1 P+ 372.rc~2C/3 ,~'_ . ~, 1 ---~ i .~ ~, ,,, ~`~: "; ~~; t. i,~. =, ' ~: EXHIBIT G EXHIBIT H 1 I Z 00 1 ~-,1 I///% / I (r// / ,, .',, r ,.. , %i 1' ' I' 1 ~ I 1 ~. o~ I ~ ~/ i// 1 ! ~ /; J 'T+ ' ~I 111! Y~ %. / _ ! 'I 1 I.1 .' //ii 1 i~ III n l~ lii~llll 1 \ \ ~~ ! I ( I'~i~11 1 ~ \ I':I I I II- I I,i,lll J ~' III,! 1 i \' 0 o I ~I S I .\ \, O U C F~ _ ~ ~~; .may ~' r +7 ~ ~.~. "'I 11 \ I-~ III Lp: ,III II Ili '\\i ~- 1 i II II 1111 II F i'alilll ll1111'll j" \ ~. ' I' Illl ~'LI(Irl+~~h ~-11'11 \~~ I 1 \ ~h!!I~ 'ifI I , o n - it I ~ ..~ -- .` ! - ~ Illli r 1 ~. m ~\ ~~. ~ , 1 11711 I I 11 \ _ I j~ . Jt'1 i ~ ~i~ `` ! 1~L11'I~IIi ~~. `. \~ '1' 1'- P~j IfI II- I~~ ~. IT ~ r 11 .III. 1'' , ~\ . . ~` lr... { ILI .I ` ~~ .I I ~11 ! IIII ~I~~I 1 'I ~ \ ~\ \\\l~ III i Iillij~ll ~'; ,ti ~ , PIIII``, I ~ '/' / v e I 1 I 1'i' i,.Igll 'II s !I I.~pV,1 ~i~ yi II. `~ ~ ~ .. . ;. x _ ~ COVER MEMORANDUM DATE: 5th July, 1990 T0: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff - Administrative Assistant Subject: West Park Place Project (ten-unit Planned Unit Development.) (37 2W 11D Tax Lot 2200) Background: On behalf of Roger Richardson and Tom Harrison, L. Calvin Martin has submitted a Land Use Application (Conditional Use Permit, Planned Unit Development and Site Plan) for a ten-unit P.U.D. The project site is located within the City's R-2 Zone, on a 1.41 acre site, generally located on a reverse L-shaped parcel in the northeast corner of where Beall Lane and Bursell Road intersect. In June, 1987, the Planning Commission reviewed a similar Land Use Application to allow a dwelling group consisting of 5 duplex units. The Commission adopted Resolution No. 124 approving the Conditional Use Permit, conditioned upon the applicant entering into a D.I.A. for general public works improvements and providing a 30 foot setback on Beall Lane to conform to further additional right-ow- way. The project did not develop. In April, 1989, the Planning Commission reviewed a request by the developer to create three individual lots from the parcel via Minor Land Partition. The Commission recommended approval and the City Council approved the Minor Land Partition. Under a P.U.D. approach, the developer is now proposing to build ten (10) common-wall living units averaging 1,150 square feet in size. Total lot area will consist of approximately 22,032 square feet and the proposed common area is 39,392 square feet. The developer intends to develop the project in three phases over the next twelve months, beginning in August 1990. The R-2 zone (two-family district) provides for a planned unit development under a Conditional Use Permit. Therefore, the developer is required to work through several parallel and similar land use procedures -Conditional Use, Planned Unit Development and Site Plan. The following summarizes the processes before The Commission: Land Use Proceas ~ Meetin c Format ReaUlt Planned Unit Development Publie Meeting Formulate recommendation to Council via praposetl Reaolution Conditional Use Public Hearing Crant or deny Conditional Use Permit via Resolution Site Plan Public Meeting Approve or deny via Minute Motion Attachments The following items are attached for entering into the official meeting record by reference and for the Commission's review of the West park Place Project: Item A - Director's Report Item B - Certificate of Posting Item C - Notice of Public Hearing for Conditional use Permit Item D - Application materials for Conditional Use Permit Item E - Vicinity Map Item F - Tentative Plat (reduced copy) Item G - Proposed Resolution approving Conditional use Permit CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: PROJECT: LOCATION: No. of Acres: No. of Lots: No. of Dwellings OWNER: AGENT: SURVEYOR: TYPE OF July 3, 1990 WEST PARK PLACE T37S R2W WM Section 11D - Tax Lot 2200 Zone: R-2 1.41 Acres 10 Lots 10 Units Roger Richardson Cal Martin Richard L. Bath LS No. 1069 809 Keith Avenue Medford, OR 97504 Phone 779-3542 Jackson County Title 502 W. Main Street Medford, OR 97502 Phone 779-2811 DEVELOPMENT: Planned Unit Development Site Plan Review Conditional Use i. Street Improvements A. Existing Conditions 1. Street No. SA 15, Street Name - Beall Lane, Street Classification - Secondary Arterial, Street Jurisdiction - Jackson County, Existing R.O.W. - 60', Future R.O.W. - 80', Existing street width - 24', Future street width - 48', Existing curb/gutter - none, Future curb/gutter - required, Existing sidewalks - none, Future sidewalks - required, Existing street light - intersection with Bursell, Future street lights ~ ingress/egress, existing traffic volume - no information available, traffic from this project - 100 vt/d, total traffic this street can carry - 7500 vt/d. 2. Street No. CS 5, Street Name - Bursell Road, Street Classification - Collector Street, Street Jurisdiction - Jackson County, Existing curbs/gutter-none, Future curbs/gutter - required, Existing sidewalks - none, Future sidewalks - required, Existing street lights - yes, Future street lights - @ ingress/egress, Existing public R.O.W. - 60', Future R.O.W. - 60', Existing traffic volume - 2500 vt/d, Traffic volume this project - 100 vt/d, Traffic volume w/this project - 2600 vt/d, Total traffic volume this street can carry - 5000 vt/d. B. Developer's Required Conditions 1. An additional 10' of right-of-way shall be dedicated for street purposes. 2. Beall Lane shall have a 56' curb to curb section at the intersection with Bursell Road. This development is responsible to pave 28' from centerline, plus a 10' taper past centerline, curbs/gutter, and sidewalks. 3. Bursell Road shall have a 44' curb to curb section at the intersection with Beall Lane, this development is responsible to pave 22' plus a 10 ' taper, curbs/gutter and sidewalk. 4. A street light shall be installed at the ingress/egress to Bea11 Lane set back of sidewalk. This street light shall be a 9500 lumen high pressure sodium vapor mounted on a steel pole. 5. A 55' clear vision triangle shall be maintained on both sides of the access on Beall Land and at-the intersection of Beall Lane and Bursell Road. 6. All costs associated with the relocation any power, telephone, cable tv or gas line for construction of Bursell and Beall shall be the responsibility of the developer. 7. A street traffic control plan shall be completed as a part of the final construction drawings and costs associated with installation of street signs and traffic marking shall be that of the developer. 8. The ingress/egress controlled by a curb of 50' . II. Sanitary Sewer Improvements A. Existing Conditions to the property shall be cut with maximum throat width 1. A 42" trunk main exists in Bursell Road. This mainline can be tapped and service taken from an 8" mainline to the property. B. Developer Required Conditions 1. Construct an 8" mainline sanitary sewer from Bursell to the S.W. property corner. 2. Provide individual service for each lot. 3. On site sanitary sewer shall be designed water tight and installed utilizing proper techniques. III. Water System Improvements A. Existing Conditions 1. An existing 8" water main is located in the northern portion of Beall Lane and an 8" water main is located in the eastern portion of Bursell Road. 2. The nearest fire hydrant is Tocated 1800 LF north of this property at the South East corner of Bursell and Pittview Avenue. B. Developer's Required Conditions 1. An additional fire hydrant shall be located in the vicinity of the ingress/egress to this property. A fire hydrant may be required within the PUD, however this determination will be made by the Central Point Fire Department. 2. The developer is to provide adequate looping and may want to install a 6" water line along the northerly property line from Bursell Road. 3. The on property water main shall be installed off the ingress/egress and shall be a minimum 8" ductile iron pipe. 4. If a homeowner's association maintains common areas, only 1 meter would be required for domestic water supply to each unit, and 1 meter for irrigation. However, the developer has the option to provide individual meters for each unit. If this is done, the mainline shall be constructed within an easement. IV. Storm Drainage Improvements A. Existing Conditions: The runoff from this property discharges to Meadow Creek. A11 runoff from this property currently discharges to ditches along Bursell Road and Beall Lane. Developer's Required Conditions The Maple Grove Estates Subdivision was tabled until the storm drainage issue is corrected. West Park Place is within this drainage area, and shall be required to participate it's share of the costs of these improvements. 2. All on site storm drainage shall be collected from roofs and catchbasins and connected to pipes and discharged according to the Master Plan adopted as a part of the Meadow Creek Storm Drainage Plan developed by Blanton Engineering and approved by the City of Central Point. No building permits will be issued until the storm drainage issue is resolved. V. Additional Requirements A $200.00 per unit Park Development Fee shall be paid at the time building permits are issued. 2. Developer shall install or cause to be installed, conduits for utilities at intersections, or locations determined by utility companies. Developer shall also provide conduit crossings for utility companies who will not install their services until after the subdivision is constructed. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the installation of these conduit crossings. 3. A11 construction for utilities, streets and other structures discussed herein within rights of ways owned or to be owned by the City of Central Point, shall be done so according to all rules, regulations, ordinance, resolutions, and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for construction of this P.U.D. 4. The review for the PUD submitted hereby by Cal Martin for Roger Richardson was done in accordance with the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by the developer of this P.U.D. after City approvals could require resubmittal of an application and approval by the City if the modification does not meet the standards set forth in the code. 5. All costs associated with this development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant or owner. Any modification to the proposed plan will require a new review, any requirements set forth herein can be modified based on the change of plan. 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, GEORGE RUBALOFF, CERTIFY THAT ON THE.FOLLOWING DATE OF THURSDAY, JULY 5TH, 1990, I POSTED A NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR JULY 10, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR WEST PARK PLACE, A PROPOSED 10-UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATION ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER WHERE BURSELL ROAD AND BEALL LANE INTERSECT, AT OR NEAR: 1. Central Point City Ha11 2. Central Point Library 3. Central Point Fire Department 4. Central Point Post Office i ~ur Date 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL °OINT, OREuON X7502 564-332' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that L. Calvin Martin, on behalf of Roger Richardson and Tom Harrison, has applied to the City for a Conditional Use Permit for West Park Place, a ten Unit Planned Unit Development, located in the southeast quadrant in the vicinity of the northeast corner of Burseli Road and Beall Lane, further described as Jackson County Assessor Map 37 2W 11D Tax Lot 2200. The Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing, review the application according to the standards outlined in Chapter 17.76 of The Central Point Munici- pal Code and then make a determination to grant or deny the request. Said hearing is scheduled as follows: Date: Tuesday, July 10, 1990 Time: 7:00 p.m. (approximate) Place: Central Point City Council Chambers 155 S. 2nd Central Point, Oregon Said hearing will provide for an opportunity for testimony and for questions to be answered. Individuals may submit written comment no later than Thursday, July 5, 1990. Testimony and written comment must be directed toward the criteria which is applicable to the proposed land use. Failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, or fail- ure to raise an issue with sufficient specificity to afford-the decision maker and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue, will preclude appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals based on that issue. The application, applicable criteria and staff report will be available for in- spection at Central Point City Ha11 on Monday, July 9, 1990 or for copies of same at 15 cents per page. For more information regarding this matter, contact George Rubaloff, Administra- tive Assistant, City of Central Point at 664-3321. NOTICE DATES: Publishing Medford Mail Tribune Monday, July 2, 1990 and Monday, July 9, 1990 NOPH0627.90/NOTICES THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLE'f Application Filing Deadline CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application for Conditional Use Permit G4c1~V I N ~.{ D~l-J Address ~'~~ ~C.~1"T{--I ~~ ~ ~ ~ j~~(~QI~ ~'~ '~'~l Phone Number ~~ ~ • r ~.~ -TJ Proposed Site Location Address YJF ~ ~~ ~ ~6EP'L-L. L...A~N ~ L' ~L11Z~ELA_. ~20P~Y~ Assessor's Map Page Locatiort~j_'JT~kg~ j.~+ ~~j7 Tax Lot(s) 22~ Required Information: V A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli- ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal Code Section, 17.76.020. A statement as to how the request will meet each of the=following objectives: A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommo- date said use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the sub- ject zoning district; B. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use; C. That the proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property. or the permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the Commission shall consid- er the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks, height. of building; walls and fences; landscap- ing; outdoor lighting; and signs; LUAP/ADMINl 10 D. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhood and will not be detrimental or injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community based on the review of those facts listed in subsection C above; I, L.. ~i~U l ~ t..f'~y~J certify that I am the owner or authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach writtey~,uthority) ~ L ~ Date ((~ ' 2 ~ • qa owner or a ~°li~+rize~l ag~}nl~ of owner, please indicate which) Application Fee: $100 ~~ ~% ~j„~~~ Re~i°l"nrb•6o4o * A filing fee for recor d Improvement Agreement with the County Clerk may also be required. LUAP/ADMINI 11 i! ~Gr~ c~ C:~'~~:~,Tj'~I ~l~/~7~' 'I~~t/~ ~ti~ ~~ ~~ ~ l~~ ~ ~l.~~l l~~ a i ~. ~~ ,26-1, ~lr~, 7z. G ~l~u ~ ~7y ~ ~-l~ ~ :~f~i--'7-7 Dlr.! l~ CONDITIONRL USE PERMIT The Rpplicant is applying far a Candi tienal Use Permit to allow the development of a 10 unit Planned Unit Development consisting of five duplex type buildings lten units) on a 1.41 acre parcel of land owned 6y Mr. Roger Richardson. This application is in accordance with the requirements of the City of -~ Central Point, including the provisions of Zoning Ordinance Section 17.76 Conditional Use Permi ts~ and with other city land development requirements. Dwelling groups are listed as a "Conditional Use" in the R-2 zoning distr ict~ Section 17.24.020 (G). The parcel in question is zoned R-2. ._ .~. ~- _, .. ,. ~ es-. ... _ _ ,. DEFORE THE CITY OF CENTRRL POINT CGUNTY GF JRCKSON, STATE GF OREGON IN THE MRTTER OF R REDDEST FOR R ) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF A DWELLING ) GROUP IN THE R-2 20NING DISTRICT. ) Roper Richardson. Applicant. ) INTRODUCTION RND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 8 FINDINGS OF FRCT As shown in the attached map, the subject property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Rursell Road and Oeall Lane in the City of Central Point. The subject property consists of 1.41 awes in an irregular shape, but fronting on both Bursell Road and Beall Lane. The property is shown on the Comprehensive Plan Map of Central Point as "Medium-density Residential" and on the Official 2aning Map as "R-2, Residential Two-family". The property currently contains one single-family dwelling, which is proposed to 6e demolished. There are also a number of attractive trees on the site, which the applicant will attempt to preserve, although some will be eliminated out of necessity. (See attached landscape plan.) The applicant has a three-phase plan for the sub je[t property. He would like to construct five new duplex residential structures, or ten dwelling units, on the property. This would he done under the City's "dwelling group" provisions, and executed as a Planned Unit Development. Those provisions allow dwelling groups, provided there is at lease 2,500 square feet of lot area far each unit. This proposal would allow nearly 6,140 square feet per unit. In other words, the proposal is less than one-half the permitted density for this parcel. The initial development would take place on the west side of the property. A tentative design for a P.U.D. on this parcel is being included with this application. CONSISTENCY HITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The following find ing5 of fact are presented to show that this proposal is consistent with the long-range intent and purpose of the Central Point Comprehensive Plan. 1. The proposal calls for a total of 10-dwelling units on the 1.41 acre parcel, or an overall tlensity of 7.1 dwelling units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan's "Maximum Residential Density" for Medium Density areas is established at 12 dwelling units per acre. This proposal is well within that limitation. 2. Rs stated in Chapter XiI (Land Use Planl o{ the Comprehensive Plan, certain areas were designated for Medium-density development under R-2 zoning because they were suitable for that level of development. A number of factors cantr ibute to that suitability, including existing development in the area, access to transportation routes, public facilities and services, etc. This par kicular site is included in the one of those areas that was designated for R-R development. 3. The subject site is in a good location to accommodate the proposed development for the following reasons. fa) It is at the intersection of two important streets. Rursell Road is designated as a Collector Street and Beall is a designated Secondary Rrter ial, intended to shuttle traffic between Highway 99 to the west and Table Rock Road to the east and south. Therefore, . 't" any traffic generated 6y the proposed development will have direct access to an arterial street (Beall Lane) and will not impact any neighborhood local streets in the area. fb) The general area consists of a combination of newer and older homes, a few mobile homes, and a variety of agricultural uses. This development will provide new development in the area and could have a positive impact in encourag inq other similar new development or redevelopment of other properties in the area. It will enhance the residential image of the neighborhood, and make it more attractive for further investment. fc) Public water, sewer, electric and other utilities are already in the vicinity and the applicant intends to connect to those systems as pert of the pro ject~ and in accordance with City requirements. 4. The City of Central Point has begun the process of developing a master plan for the overall long-range development of the Elk Creek Neighborhaad~ which includes this parcel. That plan has not been completed. However, since this parcel is at the extreme southwestern corner of the large neighborhood area, and because of its unusual shape and relationship to other surrounding parcels it would be difficult to incorporate this lot into an overall master plan in any way other than proposed by the applicant at this time. This proposal makes this property virtually self-sufficient in terms of utilities and access without adversely affecting future neighborhood development concepts. 5. The proposal is consistent with the City's growth projections and Urbanization policies since it is already within the Urban Growth Boundary and has been annexed to the City of Central Point and zoned R- 2for multiple-family development. b. Rccord ing to the Housing Element of the Central Point Comprehensive P1 an, the Medium-density areas are intended to develop within a density range of b-12 dwelling units per .acre. This proposal calls for approximately 7 units per acre, which is consistent with the Plan. Rccord ing to the City's "Residential Inventory"~ conducted in March, 1980, the City had only 5R duplex units, which comprised only 2.5 percent of the total housing stack. The Housing Element discusses the need to provide for a balanced variety of housing types to meet local housing needs, including the needs of renter households. This development will help alleviates to a very small extent, the shortage of duplex units in Central Paint and increase housing opportunities for househa lds that are Seeking moderately-priced rental housing. B. Policy N1 under Conclusion N4 of the Housing Element states: "Promote clustered housing and other development designs that minimize the need for costly and unnecessary streets, walks and other municipal expenditures. Encourage the use of cul- de-sac streets inn residential neighborhoods whenever possible in lieu of the "rid" pattern of streets." The applicant's proposal is directly consistent with this policy in that ten new residential dwellings are proposed without any additional or immed iete municipal costs for utilities or streets. These units will be served 6y a central driveway and, if the applicant later decides to subdivide the praperty~ a central cul-de-sac private street will 6e constructed to City standards to serve the development at the applicant's cost. The cul-de-sac design promotes privacy and safety and also limits direct street access to one paint, rather than 10 individual driveways. The property is not within a floodp lain or area that could he considered an ecologically fragile area or wildlife habitat. This development will have no impact on the natural environment. .. ,' ~ . The following findings are intended to demonstrate that the proposed development is consistent with the Central Point Zoning Ordinances as well as with other local development requirements. 1. As already stated, the proposed "Dwelling Group" is listed as a Conditional Use in Sec tian 17.24.02018) of the Central Point Zoning Drd inance~ under the R-2, Residential Two-family District. 2. The "Dwelling Group" provisions of the R-2 district require a minimum of 2,500 square feet for each duplex dwelling. This proposal includes more than twice that amount of land area per unit, and is well within the G-12 units per acre density limitation of the distr ict~ as stated in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Lot area, width and yard requirements specified in Section 17.24.050 of the Zoning Ordinance have been designated into the proposal. 4. Lot coverage in the R-2 district is a maximum of 50 percent. The proposed structures including garages and driveways would cover only about 24 percent of the property, well within the limitations. 5. Distances between principal buildings vn the same ]ot can 6e nv closer than 12 feet, The current proposal would provide at least a 12 foot separation between buildings and would ensure that building setbacks will conform to the district's requirement. 6. Section 17.24.080 of the Zani ng Ordinance allows additional dwellings an the same lot only if the proposal meets the following criteria: (a) Lets meeting the requirements of this title can be created by partition for each of the additional dwelling units proposed ar by - use of a P.U.D. process and format. lh) Unoccupied and unobstructed access not less than fifteen feet wide shall he provided from the street fronting the lot to tl~e rear dwelling ar dwellings on the lot. (The applicant intends to serve each of the proposed duplex units with a central driveway of at least twenty-two feet in width with a single access to Beall lane of twenty-four feet. lc) Primary access to each dwelling unit is not gained through an alley for either pedestrians ar vehicles. (There are no alleys in this area. This is not a problem.) CDMPLIANCE KITH CDNDITIONN. USE APPROVAL CRITERIR Section 17.76.040 of Central Point's Zoning Ordinance lists the criteria for granting approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The following is a summary of that criteria and findings as to the applicant's compliance. 1. The site for the proposed use must he adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and all yards, spaces, walls and fences, parking, loadings landscaping and other features, to adjust said use with land and uses in the neighborhood. la) The site is 1.41 acres in size. The proposed development of ten duplex units (five strut tures)~ is easily consistent with the density allowed by this zoning district. <6) Although the shape of the subject property is unusual it is not impossible to deal with. The P.U.D. concept lends itself well to the problems of an irregular site and the proposed development can easily he accommodate on the site. 3 r.. fc) Site development parameters, su[h as setbacks, walls fences, landscap ing~ off-street parking, etc., have been taken into consideration in the design of this development. In this case, the development is of a residential nature that will be campatib le with other residential development that already exists or that may be permitted. There will be no need far unusual buffering or other spe[ial treatment. 2. The site relates to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated. fai Rs previously stated, this site is at the intersection of a ,. collector street and a se[ondary arterials bath capable of handling the additional traffi is that might be generated 6y these additional ten dwelling units. 3. The proposed use will have no adverse. effects on abutting property. ia) qll abutting properties are also residential and have already been developed to a similar density, ar are planned and zoned for such development. The proposed development will he compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and will have no adverse impacts. 4. Conditions may he required 6y the Planning Commission If necessary to prote[t the public healthy safety and general welfare. Thane specific types of conditions are listed in Section 17.76.040iDi. ial Because no adverse effects of this development are anticipated, and because all provisions of the City's development codes are being adhered tug-the applicant sees no reason to expect any _ _-.__--[„ additional conditions of approval at this time. 4 ..: q._ The developer intends to develope WEST PARK PLACE in three phases: PHASE I - Units A, B, C, 6 D Garages i, 2, 3, 4, & 5 PHRSE II - Units E, F, G, 5 H Garages b, 7, 8, 9, 10, 8 11 PHASE III - Demolish existing residence and garage Units I 6 V Garages 12 ~ 13 Note: road, parking and related sidewalks would be completed with Phase II. Construction is intended to begin on Phase 1 on or about August 1, 1990. Phase II would begin March 1, 1991. Phase III would begin August 1, 1991. A flour to five month construction period is contemplated with each phase for a completion date at or near January 15, 1992. MARKET ANALYSIS According to information available from the Medford Board of Realtors and the Southern Oregon Listing Service, in 1989, 707 homes sold in Jackson County far an average price of $80,877 with 60 homes in the Central Point area averaging #65,508. In 1990, through May 25, there have been 100 homes sold in the Central Point area averaging #74,062 for an increase in average of 58,554 per residence of 13Y.. It is estimated that the residences in this project will come in the lower end of the market where a price of 565,000 for a 3-bedroom, 2 bath residence is increasingly a good value. Median income in 1974-80 (source U.S. Census) was 517,799 and per capita income was 58,712 in 1979. By 1987, per capita income was 512,532 for 6~ growth per year suggesting an increase to 514,070 for per capita income in 1989 and an increase in median income to 528,478. A standard rule of thumb for housing is 1/3 of gross personal income towards housing meaning that the median family should 6e able to afford 59,492 or 5730 per month. A 565,000 residence will have taxes of 51,569.75 (524.15 tax rate) or 5130.81 per month leaving 5600 per month for mortgage payments and insurance which places a 565,000 residence barely within reach of the median income. This project addresses the need far lower cost housing while preserving the quality of community maintained amenities and landscaping. As economic conditions have changed there are more double income working families who are interested in the convenience of community maintained amenities. This type of development also fits the profile of the more mobile retired couple moving into Jackson County who wish freedom from maintenance. R-a ~~ ~ ~_ ~ ~..., ,~ I ~ x AMAN I C - N f O~~ 1 p 2 ~ m c i JACKSON COONTY ASSESSOR'S MAP -.G ~~ 250 0.6' )O 6500 ~ 6400 6300 6200 6100 6000 5900 o '~ ~ w i _ r A _ M o N d - ri Ji ~ ~ a p~ q P P 711 7200 7300 7400 7500 7600 7700 6 --- -- --T L. i___, 4 ~j. ~~,~= _ ~. { ~ ~ r: lip 6x62 ~; _ _ -, `~ . ~, _. 6z , `,`( S 262. . . "^"„~ ..62~ 1 `~ _ % ~.l ~ .I~ o % v y~ ~ n ~1 1` ~ l 0 '~ O ) z ~ f , ~ ~ ~- + ~ _ I 11438 9 26Zi. z ~ C'E62: __. HW z £ 682 0 682: 0o6~6Zi 82~ K t'062i % ..y ~i : o~a ~ {~`~ o I r^( ~ % ~ ~ J •, ~~~./ ~z ti6Z: ~ ~~ Q .` %' ~ ~ .0 I z ~ 0 i ~~, a C? ~ % % ~ ~I 6 IjS2i % - z % I O'i6 i z . _. i- I ~, ~ z % ~ ~I-I ` O6`~ x U U ~ - ~ '~ j- L S D6 :'n ~- i ~ ~ ~: _ _. _ t _ I .~ ' i I i .62: z I _ ~ L~J\ ~j ~~ _ % '>267 x m C ~. l ~~~~~ ROGER ~~ - ,QICNARDSON ~0°• - - ' L Y4.SL 39. 12p VV. V.. TOM - - NARK I SON '~ I«..;<d I.e~ q. p; 3l ZW IID T'L. 2200. l.or5 .. Le. r, ' . - '"sfLS.g,K •p 5y.µ .. ~ .. ,i4 . (1yFj4T twL MACTI4 - Boq Ke.rtN AvG '- MGOb¢O 049TSOJ - - ' - ~ ,.. SuevErpz: R:G.n¢» l.P .T« s ' ~sa' ' ~usxacopr.ry nriz ' b2 W. MwIM aL MLOCO¢O~oC.9r¢ol - ' l'19'2H11 aau:1 ' PflOFE5510MA1 ~ 9 . nnLA^^rvo s^^V av¢Y^Oa,' ~p'r T=r..L A¢an < IAI wceas '~yer '.S -' + ~ of '.. .. 1 Q / . l l ~ '; j Lor 3. ~~ ..n • ',~_ ~~~: .... -.m- ~~i 3T w. F.. L r - , 11 ~ : it via'I Siµ r n u p. 1 a~ ')r 1 . - r L5la rlft ~ I !.i wa ie t i~ , ylr YP s t S ' 11 1 LI . S 8 b t ~ w xo + F ~ rj. ^ ~~ r t~ r K - ~ I r S F. ~ .~ : i > ~ + 1- ~ o x Tr + + I ~ le < ~ ~ .: Lor 2: .. , ~ ~e ; ti Lbr'9 ~ ~ i~' < ! I J 1'}I zlzlfl N' Fl ~ xalq ff:r c ` I a i - - .. ` <,' _ ! ~ :!.. r of .' .. . . :. ~ ,~ ~~ or : 3 ! i n - ~ ~ ~ rc3 . H., '~ ~ Lod ID - s . ' I vi 1 i ~ .. - r - : ~ , ~ . .5 1 ... -- .. ! I. . 1 s3 4+0 0 s 1: '.,!3p I '~ ' mo . ~ N 0 50'3fi' E 19<.092 - _ _. . r3EA~L LAN E ~~ ~ ~~ SvJ G..O~C t~. 58 ..' . . `R ~ cF . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY L. CALVIN MARTIN FOR ROGER RICHARDSON AND TOM HARRISON FOR A TEN-UNIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-WEST PARK PLACE WHEREAS L. Calvin Martin, submitted an application for a conditional use permit for a Planned Unit Development, to be located generally in the northeast corner where Beall Lane and Bursell Road intersect in the City of Central Point, Oregon, further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's Map Page 37 2W 11D, Tax Lot 2200, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point held a public hearing upon said application for conditional use permit on July 10, 1990 pursuant to Central Point Municipal Code Section 1.24.0208, and having at said public meeting received and reviewed the City staff report, testimony and applicant's findings, and being fully advised now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Based upon the staff report, evidence, applicant's findings and record relating to The Conditional Use Application, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: a. The development site is adequate in size and shape. To accommodate the proposed land use, the proposal calls for ten dwelling units on the 1.41 acre parcel, and this is slightly more than half the medium density of twelve units per acre established within the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Planning Commission Resolution No. b. The proposed development meets all other applicable standards outlined in Chapter 17.24 (residential two- family district) outlined in Central Point Municipal Code and is therefor consistent with the City's zoning ordinance. c. The proposed development has adequate access to a public street and, if conditions set forth hereinafter are met, said street(s) will be adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is anticipated as a result of the proposed use. d. The proposed use will have no significant adverse effect upon adjacent properties if zoning -and development standard set forth hereinafter are met by the developer. e. The proposed development will comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations. f. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the welfare or the surrounding neighborhood or community and will, in fact, enhance the residential image of the neighborhood. Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby approves the conditional use application submitted by L. Calvin Martin, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and by this reference expressly made a part of the within resolution. Passed by the Planning Commission this day of July, 1990, and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of July, 1990. ATTEST: City Representative Planning Commission Chairman Approved by me this day of May, 1990 Planning Commission Chairman Planning Commission Resolution No. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: 5th July, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: West Park Plaza (Proposed P.U.D.) Planned Unit Development Application Attached you will find the following materials to assist you in your review of The Planned Unit Development Application for the proposed project. Item A - Certificate of Posting Public Meeting Notice. Item B - P.U.D. Application Item C - Proposed Resolution recommending approval of Planned Unit Development Application 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, GEORGE RUBALOFF, CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF THURSDAY, JULY 5TH, 1990, I POSTED A NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JULY 10, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR WEST PARK PLACE, A PROPOSED 10-UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATION ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER WHERE BURSELL ROAD AND BEALL LANE INTERSECT, AT OR NEAR: 1. Central Point City Hall 2. Central Point Library 3. Central Point Fire Department 4. Central Point Post Office Si- tur JT ~~% /~?°O,o Date THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY Application Filing Deadline CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application for Planned Unit Development Address ~y'-7 K~/7 E-{ ~1~~ 7,ifE/Q ~~ (~~~~~ Phone Number ~7-~' ~ ' ~~~ Proposed Site Location Address ~/~ COi2lJ~l2_s ~~ Z. L_.KIJ~, E ~.J~S~LL (2Y~, Assessor's Map Page Locatio~~G~ iR2~-~j i 1 ) D Tax Lot(s) ~~pD Required Information: ~~`~ A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) .Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli- ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal Code Sections 17.68.010 to 17.68.140. I, L..~(/)IJ ~~f1U , certify that I am the owner or authoriz d agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach writtethority) ~ (Signature of owner or Application Fee: $3 * A filing fee for record Clerk may also be required _ Date CO • 2~ ' ~n owner, please indicate which) 6a4o Improvement Agreement with the County LUAP/ADMINI 13 +503-776-1375 H-r_UBED E7UIPMEhIT r ';~ ~ ~~ 16B P71 JUN 25 '90 15:77 d l ~ ~ 7"L G ~.,a ~1+~/ ~ ~ ~~ ~T ~~~,vr~ ,~ 5r,~ ~~v ~vll~~ , ~~ ~ . 3 I J /r~ `_L Y J•/ ~"~ -~C~~-~n_ lid ~X--~. P.U.D. APPLICATION - FINDINGS GF FACT In reference to Section 17.68.020. Size of the Planned Unit Development Site, the Applicant wishes to justify the P.U.D. on a site pf less than five acres by addressing the following condition. The property is of irregular shape with limited access, or has unusual dimensions or characteristics which would make conventional development unreasonably difficult and expensive. (Drd. 1615 G65, 1989. This property is of a very irregular shape and occurs at a corner. The property has a handle which extends north, and is narrow (89'). The limitation of size and shape make it difficult or impossible to reach the density allowed in the R-2 zone of 12 units per acre. If developed as duplex lots, the density would be considerably less than allowed. The P.U.D. process used as a tool can bring the design into closer conformance with R-2 development standards, and at the same time hold the cost of the individual dwelling unit down. Amenities of privacy and quality of environment, i.e. landscaping and finish can be added. In addition, the site is covered with beautiful trees and the P.U.D. will allow the developer to save as many of these as possible which is an enhancement and a benefit to the neighborhood. 504 Wnt Maln 9t. Pftone 778-7Y5J Medloro, OreBOn 87501 CRATER TITLE I1d1SURANCE CO. Aeftle1nd, ~ ep n 978: Serving all of Jackson County "~. ~ ~ I ~I= _, 6-6 D I TOO +'7s.a' PO P • n GA ~ • ~ OP2a6 ,;., ~; 1800 4~4..e• u ~ ~ J h 54?. / ' ~ ~ - _ a ~a o ~i9a~ 474.6• ~ ya ~ ~ ~ -1900- :».,4~~~ ~o • ~ 2JO.I?' 2J~,4 ' • 000 2300 X X k • I~o • 2100 200 m r N X n M S{ir N Z ~ I ~ O sF ~ ? ~ ~ 0 ri ~ s °~ ° e c ~, 3 ~, - r •„ a7~ r r~ r Jc r ~ i /+ 9,90 s' j ' ~ee,~s' 700 ~ r` .~5' ao' G(gCS) i O Gx GG O 0 1 r a b7Vl t I 710 7191 ~. . ~P= $~ i ~: ~ X I ~~ o zozs•~ , Co-~) E l lEN 1400 ,~ ,..:. -- JO,, 5,. ~ ~.• , Q~," - .L ~~-• ~~ Isoo - 250 X ~ ~l'01' ~ e"E' 7'Fi I I I I SR~~ ~~ f . o I ~2400 'nc ~ Z' A. II b ' IV ~ m m ~ I ; © I w i I 2JI.G' , J 9.5' d.1le0~ n .z s. G~N400 ,. G3~ G2 .. _ G H .: p ~: 0 • • I sO O 59 0 ^ q N X d = J< ,d A x ,/1 o X y( „ X O Q Q P P 7200 7300 7400 7500 7600 7700 S Rxl x o o C~ , __ _ _ _ AVENUE '_ 1 "''`' E TOWNSHIP RANGE SECTION THIS SKETCH IS FOR LOCATION PURPOSES ONLY. NUMBERS ON SKETCH ARE COMPANY NUMBERS AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR'VARIATIONS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY OR COUNTY RECORDS. 3~ 2~ a y i 'o ~~~~ ~ ec\~ ~.dY~2 b. The proposed development is integrated, harmonious, gains the most effective use of open space and therefore justifies exceptions to normal zoning requirements. c. The proposed development is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinances d. The location, size and design of the proposed development will have minimal adverse impact upon surrounding neighborhood and will, in fact, enhance residential image, enhance property values and encourage planned development of the surrounding area. e. The applicant has demonstrated that the developer is financially able to carry out the proposed project and that project construction will begin within six months. f. The proposed development has adequate access to a public street, and if conditions set forth hereinafter are met, said street(s) will be adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is anticipated as a result of the proposed use. g. The developer intends to save most of the mature trees which exist on the property as part of his plan to preserve the natural features of the site. h. The open space landscaping and attractive dwelling units will be highly compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. i. The proposed development includes a tot lot which wilt help reduce the need for public park areas that are typically needed by other apartment type dwellings. Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval the Planned Unit Development and tentative plat submitted by L. Calvin Martin, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and by this reference expressly made a part of the within resolution. Passed by the Planning Commission this day of July, 1990, and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of July, 1990. Planning Commission Resolution No. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY L. CALVIN MARTIN FOR ROGER RICHARDSON AND TOM HARRISON FOR A TEN-UNIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-WEST PARK PLACE WHEREAS L. Calvin Martin, submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development, to be located generally in the northeast corner where Beall Lane and Bursell Road intersect in the City of Central Point, Oregon, further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's. Map Page 37 2W 11D, Tax Lot 2200, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point held a public meeting upon said application for Planned Unit Development on July 10, 1990 pursuant to Central Point Municipal Code Section 1.24.020C, and having at said public meeting received and reviewed the City staff report, applicant's preliminary development plan which included the tentative plat dated June 26, 1990 and findings of fact, and all testimony 'given during the public meeting and being fully advised now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON AS FOLLOWS:' Section 1. Based upon the staff report, evidence, applicant's findings and record relating to The Planned Unit Development Application, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: a. The proposed Planned Unit Development is on a tract of land that is more than one acre and less than five acres. In accordance with the applicant's findings of fact statement, labeled Exhibit A and by this reference made a part of the within resolution, said P.U.D. would be in the public interest because property is of irregular shape and has unusual dimensions which would make conventional development difficult. Planning Commission Resolution No. ATTEST: Planning Commission Chairman City Representative Approved by me this day of May, 1990 Planning Commission Chairman Planning Commission Resolution No. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: 5th July, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff - Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: West park Plaza (Proposed P.U.D.) Site Plan Review Attached you will find the following materials to assist you in your review of the Site Plan for the proposed project. Item A - Certificate of Posting Public Meeting Notice Item B - Site Plan Application 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, GEORGE RUBALOFF, CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF THURSDAY, JULY 5TH, 1990, I POSTED A NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JULY 10, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A SITE PLAN FOR WEST PARK PLACE, A PROPOSED 10-UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATION ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER WHERE BURSELL ROAD AND BEALL LANE INTERSECT, AT OR NEAR: 1. Central Point City Hall 2. Central Point Library 3. Central Point Fire Department 4. Central Point Post Office '~ ~~ ~ _ ' g r,~dt e 5" ~Ta~~ l°» v Date THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY Application Filing Deadline CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application for Site Plan Approval Name L , CA'LV I -J 1~-1'/aclz:l~1~.1 Address ~~!!1~ fThy#- ;~1.~'~ T~FS71~-0i"~C~ ~' ~G~,~' Phone Number 7' ~ - '-~' r~r~-~ Proposed Site Location Address~fD= CJ~l~1~.~2. ~~' ~ ,.1~'LLr ~~~ ~ ~U2~~~L-1- 12-L~ Assessor's Map Page Location ~~ '75 .~2 J~ +( / / D Tax Lot(s) 22QQ Required Information: A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli- ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal Code Section 17.72.030. Name of Builder ~YZ--~-- )•"'~.(i~. ~i~/~~~~j'"~~~/~ Address ~VxN Phone Number ~]~ ~ ~ ~jL~ I, L • (/rte ~ ~ ~v-.~ssKy ~ 1~~ certify that I am the owner or authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach wr~i~tyt/en. ut~hority) ? ~( • ~~'Ui~l~~~ Date ~ ~ 2a~ < </ ~ (Signature of owner or aut}j ze agenze agen {~f owner, please indicate which) Application Fee: $0 * A filing fee for recordin rovement Agreement with the County Clerk may also be required LUAP/ADMINI 21 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: 5th July, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff - Administrative Assistant Topic: Expansion of Ray's Sentry Market Site Plan Review Background On behalf of Ray's Sentry Market, Ray Nidiffer has submitted a Site Plan to the City for a 11,920 square feet addition to the Ray's Sentry Retail Grocery Market located in the block adjoining Pine, Second, First and Oak Streets. The proposed project calls for razing the buildings currently located in the northwest and northeast corner of the block to provide for the required off- street parking. The plan also includes overfill and employee parking spaces on parcels located along Oak Street south of the backside of the market. Discussion Zoning: The property lies upon two commercial zones, C=2 and C-3. The C-2 zone permits supermarkets, however, the C-3 zone (downtown business district) does not name supermarkets as a permitted use. There are several ways to facilitate the zoning so that it provides for the use. The most practical approach is to make findings that the off- street parking facilities which are proposed for that portion of the block which lies in the C-3 zone is similar and compatible to a commercial parking lot permitted C-3 use. Site Plan: Upon reviewing the applicable development codes which relate to the Site Plan Application, staff outlined the following as conditions of approval for this project. This list shall not exclude other applicable zoning standards with which the applicant will need to conform: 1. The additional structure shall not exceed fifty feet in height. (17.36.040) 2. The front yard area shall be landscaped in accordance with City Codes. (17.36.050 D) 3. Lighting and signs shall not interfere with traffic and shall conform to Central Point Municipal Code 17.36.070. 4. Ingress and egress points shall be provided in the design, location and size to facilitate efficient traffic flow of public streets. (17.72.040 B). 5. All buildings shall be accessible to fire protection and life support equipment. (17.72.040 E). 6. New construction shall be aesthetically and architecturally compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. 7. A minimum 10 foot wide, 35 foot long, 12 foot high off- street loading berth shall be provided as part of this project. (17.64.020 (1) ) 8. A minimum of one (1) space per each two hundred (200) square feet of net floor area (exclude storage and non- sales area) (17.64.040 G) Based upon the subject Site Plan, 20,888 square feet of sales and display area calls for 105 parking spaces. 9. Parking lot aisles shall be consistent with parking standards contained in city Ordinance 1512. (17.64.100) 10. Off-street parking facilities shall be paved with durable materials for all-weather surface and shall be adequately drained to prevent run-off flow across the public right- of-way. (17.64.100 E-1) Said facilities shall be properly striped. (17.64.100 E-2) 11. Parking spaces along the outer boundaries of the parking lot shall have curb and bumper rail. (17.64.100 E-6) 12. All maneuvering associated with parking activities shall occur on site. (17,64.100E-3). Attachments: The following items are attached for the Commission's review and to be entered into the public record by reference. Item A - Certificate of Posting of Public Meeting Item B - Public Works Director's report. and conditions of approval. Item C - Vicinity Maps Item D - Site Plan Application 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, GEORGE RUBALOFF, CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF THURSDAY, JULY 5TH, 1990, I POSTED A NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JULY 10, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A SITE PLAN FOR EXPANSION OF RAY'S SENTRY MARKET LOCATED AT 116 AND 148 EAST PINE STREET AT OR NEAR: 1. Central Point City Hall 2. Central Point Library 3. Central Point Fire Department 4. Central Point Post Office ~- ~~3~~~ S t e -y~- 5~~ /~~a Date THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY C I TY O F C ENT RA L POINT P U B L I C WORKS D E PARTM E NT STA F F R E PORT DATE: PROJECT: LOCATION: ZONE: NO. ACRES: NO. OF LOTS: STRUCTURE: OWNER: SURVEYOR: July 6, 1990 Ray's Sentry Market No. 9 T37S R2W Section 10AA Tax Lot 1000, 900, 600, 2200 C-2 and C-3 1.57 Acres 4 Shopping Facility Ray Niddifer L. J. Friar & Associates 717 W. 10th Street Medford, OR 97502 Phone 772-2782 TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: Site Plan Review - Land Use Process I. Street Improvements A. Existing Conditions 1. Street No. - MA 2, Street Name - E. Pine Street, Street Classification - Major Arterial, Street Jurisdiction - Jackson County, Existing R.O.W. - 85', Future R.O.W. - 85', Existing Street Width - 56', Future Street Width - 56', Curbs/Gutters - Existing, Sidewalks - Existing, Street Lights - Existing, all four corners, Existing Traffic Volume - 20,000+ vt/d, Traffic from this project - 750 vt/d. 2. Street No. LS 72, Street Name - S. 1st Street, Street Classification - Local Street, Street Jurisdiction - City of Central Point, Existing R.O.W. - 60', Future R.O.W. - 60', Existing Street Width - 36', Future Street Width - 36', Curb and Gutters - Existing, Sidewalks - Existing, Street Lights - Existing @ intersections, Existing Traffic Volume - 1500 vt/d, Traffic this project - 375 vt/d. Street No. CS 74, Street Name - S. 2nd Street, Street Classification - Local Street, Street Jurisdiction - City of Central Point, Existing R.O.W. - 60', Future R.O.W. - 60', Existing Street Width - 44', Future Street Width - 44', Curbs and Gutters - existing, Sidewalks - existing, Street Lights - at intersections, existing Traffic Volume - 2000 vt/d, Traffic Volume this project - 375 vt/d. 4. Street No. LS 95, Street Name - Oak Street, Street Classification - Local Street, Street Jurisdiction - City of Central Point, Existing R.O.W. - 80', Future R.O.W. - 80', Existing Street Width - 40', Future Street Width - 40', Curbs and Gutters - existing, Sidewalks - existing, Street Lights - @ intersections, Existing Traffic Volume - 1000 vt/d, Traffic Volume this project - 0 or minimal. B. Developer's Required Conditions E. Pine Street is 20,000+ vt/d and per year. Whenev parking restricti provide traffic intersections. T Pine Street. shall curb and sidewalk 3 4. a major collect increasing at app er possible, dir ons should be i control at he driveway access be eliminated, installed in its or street with roximately 17% ect access and mplemented to major street connecting E. and a straight place. Clear vision areas shall be provided in the following manner: - E. Pine Street @ 1st & 2nd - 55' triangle - S. 1st Street @ Oak Street - 25' triangle - S. 2nd Street @ Oak Street - 25' triangle - Oak Str eet @ S.1st & 2nd - 25' triangle - At all driveways - 25' site triangle On street parking shall be restriped according to Central Point Public Work's Department requirements. Driveway accesses can be taken approximately mid block on S. 1st Street & S. 2nd Street. Maximum width shall be 30' for vehicles only, and 50' for vehicles with truck loading and unloading. Eliminate the existing driveways and install straight curb, gutter and sidewalk in their place. If no street light is available adjacent to these driveways, one shall be installed at each driveway. 6. Street signing shall be modified to accommodate this project. 7. Oak Street is an 80' right of way with a 40' street section. Therefore a 20' strip remains between the face of the curb and property line. Based on preliminary measurements, the existing and proposed structure is in or will be constructed in the Public Right of Way. The developer shall have a survey completed to determine if the existing structure is in the R.O.W. If this survey reveals that the existing structure is in the Oak Street Right of Way, the developer shall take the proper steps to assure that the structure will not remain or be placed in the Public Right of Way. 8. Sidewalks, curbs and gutters that are in need of repair based on a review by the Public Work's Department shall be repaired as a part of this project. II. Sanitary Sewer Improvements A. Existing Conditions 1. An 8" sanitary sewer main is located on the north side of E. Pine Street and north side of Oak Street. B. Developer Required Conditions 1. The developer shall complete a calculation to determine the amount of discharge and determine the location of the service lateral. 2. The developer shall provide information whether the discharge would be of a quantity or strength warranting an industrial waste discharge permit. III. Water System Improvement A. Existing Conditions 1. An 8" water main is located in E. Pine Street. A 4" water main is located in Oak Street. A 12" water main is located in S. 2nd Street. 2. Fire Hydrants are located at the corner of S. 1st Street and S. 2nd Street on E. Pine Street, and at the S.E. corner of Oak and S. 2nd Street. 3. The property is served by One (1) 3/4 inch meter. B. Developer's Required Conditions 1. The Central Point Fire Department shall make a determination whether an additional fire hydrant is required for this development. 2. The developer shall provide calculations of water usage to determine whether a larger meter is required. 3. Whether a larger meter is required or not, a backflow device based on the degree of hazard shall be installed as a part of this project. IV. Storm Drainage Improvements A. Existing Conditions 1. A storm drainage system is located in E. Pine Street at all four corners of the intersection with 1st Street. also a 12" storm drain is located at S. 2nd Street and Oak Street. B. Developer's Required Conditions 1. Parking lot runoff and roof runoff shall collect at a catchbasin and discharge to a storm drain pipe. 2. The Developer shall provide storm drainage calculations for runoff from this development. V. Other Conditions The Developer Shall Also Be Required to Complete: Developer shall install or cause to be installed, conduits for utilities at intersections, or locations determined by utility companies. Developer shall also provide conduit crossings for utility companies who will not install their services until after the subdivision is constructed. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the installation of these conduit crossings, and any cost associated with moving utility poles. 2. All construction for utilities, streets and other structures discussed herein within rights of ways owned or to be owned by the City of Central Point, shall be done so according to all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions, and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for construction of this facility. 3. The review for this site plan, submitted by Ray's Sentry Market was done in accordance with the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by the developer of this site plan after City approvals, could require resubmittal of an application and approval by the City if the modification does not meet the standards set forth in the code. 4. All costs associated with this development and the conditions set forth herein shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant or owner. Any modification to the proposed plan will require a new review, any requirements set forth herein can be modified based on the change of plan. 1UI~1 29 ' 90 1 O: 06 PRGE.003 7 'iica~ion Filing Deadline June 26, 1990 CI:Y OF CENTRAL POINT AMENDEDApplication for Site Plan Approval Name C & K Market, Inc., dba Rav's Sentry Markets Address p•0. Box 730, $roo'rinas, OR 97415_ Phone Number (503) 469-3113 Proposed Site Location Address 116-148 East Pine Street Assessor`s Nap Page Location 372W10AA Tax Lot(s)hnn.900 _L000,2200 3300;'& 3400 Required Information: A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed oopies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawine o£ the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine t1:e compli- ance of the proposal with the requirements of the a*_tached Central Point Municipal Code Section 17.72.030, Name o£ guilder Undetermined at thi9 timA Address Phone ~r I, ~~ri L_ NiA+frp~ Prflc;rl~-r, C & K D1~-" Tr>r. certify that I am the owner or authorize_~gent of the owner of the proposed site (I£ authorized agent, attach wri~terf~aSthorithy~~,.-~ ~ R/_ ~ ~ ~ Agplication Fee: $0 Date 6/25/90 owner, p3~c~.~css) " A filing fee for recording a Deferred Improvement Agreement with the Gounty Clerk may also be required LIIAP/ADMINI zl ~uv c.7 aG 1G:1'ja ~it7THQFiI zAT ZC727 PAGE.007 I, bAT.E VAN WaY, her2hy authorize C & . K *farkat, Inc. , dba Rrty~e Sentry Markets, to puxsue•site plan approval Prom the City of Cnrtral Pcint £ox the proposed project involving property located within the city or Central Paint as :~nra particularly described in the attached Application for Sits ?ion Agprcvsl, which property is now awned by me. DATED: June ,~i•+'', 1990. DALE AN r ' ,~ - W ~ >L {.: r--,rte-----®~_ ~ ~ ~ , __ ~_._.._ :- ~ .,, •. ~ \_ ~ ~r _ ~, I ~ i :, Ij ir1-I "rr_ --h ~J ~`~~~.. ~y ai I I c•i i°~`~~~ IR-1•$ R-2'I M~1 i I'l`~".>" ~ •~~.sy``!? r ~}'~l .. . I ~_ i ~I ~•' lI i i i 1: ~Y' -.Y ~ i li ;~• I-+-~-'+i ~:;~•~r~Y", l`..,+)'• is ~"-~E; . ; j; I ~ ~ ~ ~~~ =°_ r-- ~--~ i ---ter ,_.. ,,; - A-1-s ,. ~ ~ \. ,.~ "-" - 'y ~~t-ice ~' _r~':~= _ --', ''`-' j J ~~~~~ V~~ 1 °n ~E~~`~C 51~~ .. 7 .~. r, •.. .: 4 _ ~`; rr: a y ~1i~~ ~~~ .r. ~~ ~ ~~ .~t ~ , ~' ~P. , ~p ,'• ~ .~.~ ~ i `off°,~~~ ~.~o~,. __ : /o ~~~-'~. ~\~C'1~~-~~~ Pine Street i • Y:,, '~'1f- ~~I, i ~ ~yp ~ ~. - i Sg ~ ~ cv. {' ~ - ,~~ -- , ~ Q -~ ~ ~ ~-~ , I~~ ._ ._..._ J' \\ ~::~ ~h N u yJ ~ ~/ ' ~ ~ ' to J`~/~~/ ~ " '/~ •rl i ~ i __ _..... ... ice:°~.._. 3' ~ ~ ~ i f ~ ii/~ ~o Sg 57 i i /~ ' ~ / ___ Yi0.0' [..a c Y _ OaK 6r. sv .. ~~ _. ~~~) Y_,i' ._ ... \ . ~ ..- ~~~ \. `.~ C ~ i'_~ ~ '~ u j ~ ~ / / ~1 / i / ' W H o y~ 8 m L ~' ~. F. O V N b O S .e' PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT T0: Planning Cortunission , An/// FROM: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant~~+/~/ DATE: May 31, 1990 ~I('' SUBJECT: Review and determination of a fence variance request for 361 North Third Street (Applicant: Phillip Rivers) ISSUE Applicant Phillip Rivers has utilized the variance application process to request approval to construct a six (6) foot fence on his property within the setback line. DISCUSSION Provided in the Commissioner's packets are written findings statements furnished by the applicant. Such statements were made in response to the variance criteria outlined in CPMC 17.80 and 15.20 Upon reviewing the applicant's findings, staff has discovered that some of the conclusions are valid and some are not. for exam- ple, staff would agree with the applicant that special circumstances exist which pertain to the property and which were not created by the action of the property owner, primarily the proximity to vehicular and pedestrian traffic generated from the schools. On-the-other-hand, staff does not agree entirely with the finding which relates to safety to the neighborhood or the City. The proposed fence may provide for clear sight vision as prescribed in CPMC section 17.60.120, however, the structure does not appear to provide for clear site distance at the corner and at the driveway access which is another standard that the City must maintain for the safety and welfare of the residents, as well as the general motoring public and pedestrians. While staff thinks that the applicant has presented some logical findings, and while there appears to be favorable neighborhood support for the variance, local governments and the courts have come to insist that a variance be granted only if all variance criteria can be met. ALTERNATIVES 1. Planning Commission can take no action 2. Planning Commission can deny the variance request 3. Planning Commission can approve variance as proposed by the applicant 4. Planning Commission can grant the variance with conditions of approval designed to protect the interests of the City as a whole MEM10601.90/GRCORR 5. Planning Commission can continue the public meeting to July 3, instructing the applicant to modify his site plan to mitigate site distance problems. 6. The applicant also has the choice of pursuing Public Works Director Larry Blanchard's recommendation of initiating a street vacation. 7. Applicant can also opt to build a 42" fence according to City rules. Such a structure would still define property lines, ensure a degree of security and privacy, define space, enhance the property and thus benefit the applicant. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends alternative 6 or 7. ATTACHMENTS The following are provided for the Commissions review and for entering into the official record: Item A - Certificate of Posting Item B - Vicinity Map Item C - Fence variance application Item D - Staff report from Public Works Director MEM10601.90/GRCORR 06/05/1990 15:42 WESTERN BANK CRATER &R June 4, 1990 Mr. George Rubaloff Administrative Assistant City of Central Point 155 South 2nd Street Central Point, OR 97502 Mr. Rubaloff and Council: 1 503 779 6972 P.01 Please accept this letter as authorization to table my application for a fence Variance until your July melting. business schedule has made it impossible for nie to meet with you and the council until that t1 me. If it is possible I would prefer that I represent myself with this fence variance request, {unless ofcourse your council is ready to approve t~je variance with no, or minor changes). Should you have any questions please contact me at the numbers listed on the application. Thank you for your very helpful attitude and attentien, and please ace.apt my apologies for any inconvienenca I may have caused you due to my last minute request for delay. Si c 1 f Phi i R. Rivers 361 N. 3rd Central Point, OR 97502 TfITGI P. G11. EXHIBIT A 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 OF POSTING I, George Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF Thursday, July 5;. 1990 I POSTED AN AGENDA NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON July ID, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW AND DECIDE IN THE MATTER OF A FENCE VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 361 NORTH THIRD STREET. AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD S G TU ~-/~~~o DATE POSTING.CER/NOTICES THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY EXHIBIT B ®EM® .® N Q ® l\ ~®~®0~i®uAilF .~~® ~® ~,~ ~'Cm ~* LAUREI e n, I _-- r _ 1-M-1 _ '~ ~~`' ~ _ kkk ~~.~j C-4 •~J A-3• _ ~I^v ~ e I i of • ~R•i•Sj A-`Z,~~ M-1 ~,1. 4 */. „~ - .:.n I ~ \ {I 1~1 ~~ r i ,cam,. =. j., .. ~~~~~~ ~~~_. ' A-1-s W L A -6~ ' = I ~_ ~c, B _~~ ~ ~ - EXHIBIT C Application Filing Deadline CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application for Variance Name Philip R. Rivers ' Address 361 North 3rd St., Central Point, OR Phone Number 664-6852 hm 770-6613 wk Proposed Site Location Address 361 North 3rd St., Central Point, OR Assessor's Map Page Location 1-014018-1 37-2W-3DD Tax Lot(s) 100 Required Information: A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli- ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal Code Section 17.80:010. A statement as to how the request will meet each of the following objectives: A. The variance will provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the City; such as beautification or safety B. The variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighbor- hood; C. The variance will utilize property within the intent and purpose of the zone district. D. Circumstances affect the property that generally do not apply to other proper- ty in the same zoning district. E. The conditions for which the variance is requested were not self-imposed through the applicant's own actions, nor the actions of the applicant's agents, employees,. or family members. I, Philip R. Rivers , certify that I am the owner ~cx ~1°*b:^""!~~aY k~c~t}aasxx of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach written au o y) Date -~ ~ / ~ / ~ (Signature of owner or"authorized agent of owner, please indicate which) Application Fee: $100 QAID~~7~~ n~~~A~ * A filing fee for recording a Deferred Improvement Agreement with the County Clerk may also be required LUAP/ADMINI Legal Description 361 .N. 3rd St., Central Point, OR ., I r - ~ ~~ ~I. _ e~isoso ~ Title No. 608052 Beginning at tt~e most Northerly corner of Lot~Onex(1) in. Block _Slat~rhtee..i4dLQ~he City,of_Centtal_PDlnta Jackson County, Oregon, according to the official plat thereof, now of ceeordi thence South 35. 30' East 70.0 feet along the Nottlieaeterly line of safd lots thence South 5/' 30' Ylest 110.0 feet to the Southwesterly line of lot 21 thence North 35. 30' Hest along said line a distance of 70.0 feet to the Northwesterly corner of Lo[ 2t thence ttoreh 5/• 30' Eest along the Northerly line of lots 2 and 1 a distance of 110.0 feet to the true point of beginning. Joeboa~~ gppa O1FICIIIL HECOIIDH ,,3'03 JUL 26 8890~Td. ltlllfII.EEN & HECELTt C riDEa trr. Proposed Project Description 361 N. 3rd, Central Point, OR It is proposed that the occupants/owners of the described nronerty construct a 6 foot fence adjacent to Cherry Street as illustrated in the Proposed Project Plan. The fence is proposed to be con- structed on the property ling of the given Lot. A fence variance request will be necessary prior to obtaining a budding permit, and actual construction. Primary mo1:ivation of the owners/b~iilder~ are the following: 1. Saftey for ynun2 children/neighborhood. 2. Increase ].inability of the homesite. 3. Noise reduction from neighboring High School/Residences. 4. Stimulate/increase market ~~altte. S. Deter Criminal activities. ~. Beautification of the site and neighhorhood. 7. Defining boundries. The primary issue of concern is Saftey. Proposed Project Plans 361 N. 3rd St., Central Point, OR Page One of Two ~ Ru S-ra~E-r- ~. ~ ; 5TH nl ~ ``••-s i bow R!k ~ ~ w'~'~~~~,:--~~~..~ 1 ~~ ~~ 0 F~ j9 .....--------- 6~~ Cw&Rr`9 ~-- ~ ; ~ AoRCt1 ~ ~ PgRr.ol~ o~~ ~A ~, c ------11!-. Ip ' GIIIIN(7 ¢' ~ P~waoati Roots ~?; }. ~ z //,%/ ,~ .{ CC h ~;~ - a ~~~NnuNU /~ kiTCdtN RoorR ~~Nffi+ T .ice..: v ~ ~~ j.: , / J V6pRO0M g}iTH J~R~M ~ ' 3 •-• - •----- 0 ~- 0 Proposed Project Plans 361 N. 3rd St., Central Point, OR Page Two of Two style and advantages of fence Protection and security. Depending on the. height, and on how close together the boards are placed, it can provide a high level of both. Visual privacy. Closed styles can pro- vide total closure. Semiopen styles pro- vide somewhat less. Tempering the environment. The closed surface blocks noise and sun but forces wind into downdrafts. Defining space. If boards are closely spaced, can literally define space the way a wall does. Can seem heavy-handed unless softened by plantings. Suitable finish treatment. Stain, paint, or let it weather naturally. ~ i;~nu ~~,riu Post «~~ STATEMENT OF CRITERIA: "The variance will provide added advantages to the neighborhood or the City; such as beautification or saftey." Chapter 17.80 Paragraph D item 1 DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: The proposed fence would be constructed six feet in height of quality lumber as described in the attached "proposed Project Plans", which would beautify the property and enhance the City Street and right of way. The proposed project would also increase market value of the given neighborhood. The project would designate boundries and right of ways. (Please review exhibit A for documentation of improved market value.) JUSTIFICATION: It would be beneficial to the property owners and the City of Central Point to approve the variance to allow the proposed project to implement the given advantages; Beautification, Saftey, Market Value, and designation of Boundries. STATEMENT OF CRITERIA: "The variance will not have any significant adverse impacts upon the neighborhood." Chapter 17.80 Paragraph D item 2 DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: The proposed fence will reduce noise and increase livability to the neighbors and the City of Central Point. The Neighbors have been notified of the proposed project and approve of the same. The proposed project will stimulate market appeal for the City of Central Point and the neighborhood. This project will be constructed to allow clear vision to motorists as outlined in the "Clear vision Triangle" guideline. (Please review exhibit B and C for neighbors consents, and for actual measurments of the clear vision triangle.) JUSTIFICATION: Neighbors and motorist will find the project appealing and safe and support approval the the Fence Variance Application. STATEMENT OF CRITERIA: "The variance will utilize property within the intent and purpose of the zone district." Chapter 17.80 Paragraph D item 3 DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: The zonning of the lot under consideration is Rl. The project would reinforce the single family residence code. (See exhibit D for actual zonning.) JUSTIFICATION: The occupants of the home would utilize the property for a single family dwelling and this would not adversely effect the assigned zonning. STATEMENT OF CRITERIA: "Circumstances affect the property that generally do not apply to other property in the same zoning district." Chapter 17.80 Paragraph D item 4 DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: The property is a corner lot with the only livable outdoor area adjacent to Cherry Street. Current codes outlined in Section 15.20.030 would prohibit use of this area for small children without presenting safety problems for motorist, pedestrians, and the occupants. The home was constructed in 1895, prior to existing land use ordinances, and did not anticipate Limited use of the side lot adjacent to Cherry Street. The current owners did not have the privilege or voice to prevent existing conditions. The property is located one block from the City of Central Point School District #6 Crater High School and Central Point School District Transportation Headquarters. The property is subjected to heavy School bus noise and traffic of the same as well as pedestrians JUSTIFICATION: The applicant now has opportunity to follow City statutes to allow the property to be used in the most effective, livable manner possible given current conditions. The occupants and the City of Central Point would benefit by approval of the variance due to the unusual circumstances of the given property. STATEMENT OF CRITERIA: "The conditions for which the variance is requested were not self-imposed through the applicant's own actions, nor the actions of the applicant's agents, employees, or family members." Chapter 17.80 Paragraph D item 5 DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: The occupants purchased the property July of 1989. Although extensive refurbishing has taken place, the property location could not be manipulated or altered by the applicants of this variance, agents, employees or family members. There is not an existing structure which violates current ordinances. JUSTIF/CATION: The variance applicants have had no control of the status of the existing property, finding the applicants in compliance with the criteria set forth. STATEMENT OF CRJTERIA: The variance will provide safety to the neighborgood „or the city."* 15.20.080 page 167 (Central Point 9/82) *(This item appears to be a condition of granting a variance which was not listed in chapter 17.80 paragraph D as an item) DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: The Primary reason for the propsed project is to provide safety to three children under the age of six. This project would also provide safety for motorists, and pedestrians near on on the premisis. Crater High School is within one Block of the proposed site which causes Cherry Street to be a major course of traffic for motorist, and pedestrians. Saftey of the same should be the most poignant consideration. The proposed project would deter assailants and criminal activity, i.e. abductions, molestation, harassment, etc. The proposition will not adversely affect Fire Saftey standards. JUSTIFICATION: To allow Saftey to motorist from playing children, pets, and visitors, a fence should be constructed at least six feet in height to Limit acesses and exits to given points of safety, i.e. front sidewalk and rear auto acess driveway. To allow safety to motorists and pedestrians a fence of six feet in height would prevent flying articles, mis-laid debris, and hazardous distractions, i.e. Balls, Bikes, Toys, etc. STATEMENT OF CRITERIA: "The variance will provide protection to the neighborhood or the city."* 15.20.80 page 167 (Central Point 9/82) *(This item appears to be a condition of granting a variance which is not listed in chapter 17.80 paragraph D as an item) DESCRIPTION OF FACTS: Protection would be afforded the City of Central Point and neighbors by allowing clear vision to the City Right of Ways and thourough-ways. Hazards would be contained within the property Lines of the site. Protection would be enhanced to the neighborhood and to the City of Central Point by clearly establishing boundries and maintenence of the premisis. Protection would be afforded motorist who park on Cherry Street for high School activities, and neighborhood visiting by establishing a boundry for parking of their autos a safe distance from traffic thourough-ways. JUSTIFICATION: Safety and protection to the City of Central Point and to the neighborhood would be primary reasons for approving the variance application and completion of the proposed project. Exhibit A Improved Market Value Underwriting Guidelines Property and Appraisal Analysis FannieMae section 4oa.o9 Selling acceptable for maximum financing. Because of their location, these properties frequently will have enough advantages over newer prop- erties in outlying areas to create equal or greater market demand. Certain older properties also may be in demand because of their unique architectural design or other factors. Section 404.09 Our appraisal report forms provide neighborhood ratings that are Neighborhood Analysis designed to summarize principal items in a neighborhood that Rating generally are considered important by purchasers when they select a home. If any rating is less-than-"average," the appraiser must com- ment on the reasons for the rating and its effect on the property's marketability and value. Maximum financing should not be offered to a borrower unless the property is in a location with at least "average" overall neighborhood amenities, public services, and prop- erty conditions. The appraiser should also explain any changes, either favorable or unfavorable, that have occurred (or are currently underway) if they will affect the marketability of the properties within the neighborhood. There should be sufticent market demand for the neighborhood to support an active market for the subject property. Two items of particular importance in determining whether a neighborhood will support an active market aze discussed below: Pegs 48 A. General appearance. The general appearance of the properties in the neighborhood is a key factor. The appraiser must consider the extent to which the propertie9 are receiving proper maintenance. Signs of maintenance and care usually reflect a strong neighborhood with stable or increasing values. B. Appeal to market. Essentially, this is a summary rating of the extent to which all aspects of the neighborhood will appeal to the typical purchaser in tha market. An individual property by itself cannot overcome a generally prevailing reluctance of the mazkec to invest in a neighborhood. On the other hand, a relatively weak property in a strong, viable neighborhood is likely to sustain its value, although it still must be cazefully analyzed. The appraiser must rate the various aspects of a neighborhood by comparing the characteristics for the subject neighborhood to those for competing neighborhoods. ratings: 01/04/88 Exhibit B Neighbor Notification/Consents Page One of Three May 10, 1990 RE: Proposed improvements to: 361 North Third St., Central .Point, OR Philip R. & Becky M. Rivers as owners. To all concerned: It is proposed that the owners of the described property be allowed to build a fence of six feet in height adjacent to Cherry Street. The fence would be constructed on the owners property if approved by the City of Central Point through a fence variance application. The fence variance application would be submitted to the City of Central Point only after approval of the majority of immediately effected neighbors. The fence would allow adequate visual clearance to raod thourough-ways and City right-of-ways., PLease review the attached "Proposed Project Plans"and indicate your satisfaction or disatisfaction of the same. A specfic area is given for your opinion and comments. Thank you for your consideration and time. ~~ ly, ~~~ ~~ Phili~ R ers 361 N. 3rd St. Central Point, OR 97502 (503)664-6852 /pr Attachments Exhibit B Neighbor Notification/Consents Page Two of Three To Whom It May Concern: The undersigned have reviewed the attached "Proposed Project Plans" and offer the following observations and comments. We reccomend the follwoing action of the proposed variance •application: 'i Approval Decline Name/Address/Comments ~- 3~i~ N , 3 i^ c~- 5? ~-t Y17r ~.. -ao~~- C^ r-ec rr~ ~ 7s~ ~ ,., ~ ~ ~~ ,- 3~~ tT1 ~ _ .._... ~~ ~ v~~I 5. ~ ~ ~N~,~ a~3~ cl~~~ s-E- Exhibit B Neighbor Notification/Consents. Page Three of Three Comments of Neighbors Mr. & Mrs. Pearce of 347 North 3rd St. comment that they have always been concerned for the saftey of the small children of the neighborhood who seem to gather near Cherry Street. Due to the unruly be- havior of the high school students, and motorists which use Cherry Street, saftey has always been a major concern. They support the fence variance request for the saftey of all children in the neighborhood. They feel the fence will add a sense of responsibility to pedestrians and motorists of Cherry Street. Mr. & Mrs Deacon of 247 Cherry Street, comment that due to the frequent mischievous activities of the students of Crater High School, the fence variance request will further secure the neighborhood as well as beautify the proposed project, thus promoting the neighborhood. Mr. & Mrs. Deacon were pleased with the fence design and support the construction of the fence to benefit the neighborhood. Mr. & Mrs. Stadig of 247 Cherry Street, support the fence variance due to the constant criminal activity which seems to surround the neighborhood relating to drugs. Mr. & Mrs. Stadig commented on the frequency they had witnessed the transfer, sale, and consumption of drugs in our neighborhood, and state that they have notified the City of Central Poiht Police on several occasions to control the same. Exhibit C Measurments of Clear Vision Triangle 3 R~ S-r `rr A _ ~.. ~ .. .e. rgs r r wi ti ~- W3 oQ 4 ~ t~ ~~ Q ~. ~-.. C~ ~ On excess of 33 feet ~ i „, a~ ~, ~ ~ ~~, .. -- • - .. r ~~ ~~ ,~ •a ~N ,~ P~~ R c. o>~ F,~oa.norl f~i~1 TH C~vER (~ORC L~~~nl -~p01 k1T~ Exhibit. D Zonning of Residence .,:. s~~. ~ ~r.~ r' ~~~ t/4 S E 1/~ ' -" _ wo' Gr ~ ~ 3 i Zl' NFCOR ,w `!4 ~ ` ~ 4~y4 O `]~ a ~ ~~~ ~6 \ a ~ ,; ,~, ~ . ~ ~ ~ 'v ~ R~ o !1 ,e1 , ~9t \ - ~ ~ry ~. n' ~ )t S I ~ \ V~ ~• f~M.J ~\ / A ~~~ `~o ,\`. ~ , ~~ ~~'. '~ v c.(iA .~ 3 \ i~2c~ 6~ S~~l ~\/ v~\ /c ~- / ~ /~ 7 \~ ~' A ~` ~~ 1~ ` '•-tiec ~~iC~ ' ^ ~ F ~,,a ~~' ~ ~ ~' ' M~ ~~ r `~~~ ~. ~~ ~~~, ~.'`, s, EXHIBIT D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: May 31, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Larry R. Blanchard - Public Works Director ~/~ RE: Fence variance 361 N. 3rd Street T37S R2W Section 3DD Tax Lot 100 Existing Conditions: 1. N. 3rd Street, 40' street, 60' right of way; 2. Cherry Street, Unimproved street 80' right of way. Comments: According to Webster's Dictionary a variance is defined part 4).,."a license to do some act contrary to the usual rule". I emphasize the last 5 words of this definition, contrary to the usual rule. Webster's also defines code as: 1. A systematic statement of a body of law, one gives statutory force. 2. A system of principals or rules. I bring these definitions to you in an effort to analyze this variance in relationship to the intent of the code. According to Chapter 15.20.07 variance: A. General: A variance MAY be granted, as provided in this chapter, where strict application of the provisions of this chapter would result in unnecessary hardship. To grant a variance, a determination must be made that the property in question by not allowing a 6' fence is given an unnecessary hardship. Also in granting a variance, a specific list of findings must be generated to allow an act which is contrary to the usual rule. In these findings, a comparison must be made with other situations where a fence variance might be considered, and determine if these situations warrant an unnecessary hardship to allow an act which is contrary to the usual rule. Codes are written to provide a system of principals or rules for which citizens of the community use. City officials and legislative bodies review these codes in the operation of the City, and allowing an exception must be closely monitored and justified in order to reduce our liability. Conclusions: 1. It is the Public Works Department's opinion that not allowing a 6' fence would not cause an unnecessary hardship to the owner. The property owner would be allowed a 42" fence which would provide for the beautification and safety for the property. 2. There are numerous properties located within a five block radius of the high school, each of these property owners could request the same variance for the same reason. 3. Traffic volumes on Cherry Street are normal for a typical residential street. N. 3rd Street does receive more vehicular traffic including trucks, however, the overall noise level would not be reduced substantially by installing a 6' fence vs a 3 ~' fence. Recommendation: 1. Deny the variance for the reasons stated above. 2. The property owner could approach the City to vacate a portion of the existing right of way from the present 80' width to 50'. This would provide for an additional 15' of set back which would place the fence 5' back from the location proposed by the owner. A street vacation would require all property owners on Cherry Street from 2nd Street to 3rd Street to petition for the vacation. Also the City would require the street to be improved in return for the vacation. This would provide all the necessary requirements outlined in Mr. River's variance request: a. Safety; b. Beautification; c. Increase the market value of the given neighbor. cc: Plan Reviews - 02-006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant DATE: June 29, 1990 SUBJECT: Review and determination of a fence variance request for 815 Freeman Road (Applicant: David Mittiany) R11CKC:RnilNil The applicants property is located on the northeast corner of Freeman Road and Rose Valley Drive. The zoning in this area is R-1-8, single family residential. The city standards pertaining to fence installation are as follows: 1. CMPC 15.20.020 specifies that fences within the front and side yards of a corner lot shall not exceed 42 inches in height. 2. CPMC 17.60.120 specifies that clear vision areas shall be maintained on corner intersections within residential neighborhoods with 25 foot clear vision triangles. City Code (CPMC 15.20 070) provides for a variance procedure where strict applica- tions of the standards would result in unnecessary hardship. The Planning Commis- sion >na grant a variance if the applicant makes satisfactory findings relevant to the criteria as listed below: 1. The variance will provide advantages to the neighborhood or the city; 2. The variance will provide beautification to the neighborhood or the city; 3. The variance will provide safety to the neighborhood or the city; 4. The variance will provide protection to the neighborhood or the city; 5. The variance will not have any adverse impacts upon the neighborhood; 6. The variance will utilize property with in the intent and purpose of the zone district. 11T GCTTSRTnN Upon reviewing the variance application, it appears that the proposed fence will provide beautification to the neighborhood. While the applicant contends that the proposed fence will provide a greater degree of security to his family, staff does not agree that safety will be maintained for the motoring public or the neighbor- hood because site distance will be impaired. The applicant has noted in his appli- cation that his neighbors concur with his proposed fence. While there appears to be favorable neighborhood support, the City is in a position of responsibility of MEM10601.90/GRCORR implementing rules which are designed to preserve safety and welfare of citizens on a broader level. The applicant would continue to utilize the property for a single family dwelling which is consistent with the R-1-8 zone. The fact that a 2 x 3 foot bathroom window exists on the street side of the applicant's dwelling, could be a unique circumstance within the R-1-8. Staff has not surveyed other dwellings to confirm or disprove the applicant's findings. The applicant stated that the City imposed the circumstance pertaining to the bathroom window since the City issued a construction permit to build the home. The City's official role in processing building permits is to ensure that builders conform to uniform building codes. The City does not dictate the floor plan or design of a residential structure, unless it is necessary, in order to ensure uniform building zoning code compliance. The applicant chose and purchased the home with the existing floor plan. Therefore, staff contends that the condition for which the variance is being requested was self imposed through the applicant's own action. The applicant has not met all the required findings to be eligible for a fence variance. Local governments and the courts have come to insist that a variance be granted only if all variance criteria can be met. ALTERNATIVES 1. Planning Commission can grant the variance based upon a different interpretation of the findings. 2. Planning Commission can deny the variance request. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the variance request. Applicant can also opt to build a 42" fence according to City rules. Such a struc- ture would still define property lines, ensure a degree of .security and privacy, define space, enhance the property and thus benefit the applicant. ATTACHMENTS The following are provided for the Commissions review and for entering into the official record: Item A - Certificate o€ Posting Item B - Vicinity Map Item C - Fence variance application Item D - Staff report from Public Works Director MEM10601.90/GRCORR ENTR ~~/~U\~/''0mi / 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 ~HE~ THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, George Rubaloff , CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF Thursday, June 5, 1990 I POSTED AN AGENDA NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON JULY 10, 1990 DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW AND DECIDE IN THE MATTER OF A FENCE VARIANE REQUEST FOR 815 FREEMAN ROAD. AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD ~~/ CZ1~1F TU 3-~ ~~~ o DATE POSTING.CER/NOTICES Application Filing Deadline CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application for Variance Name I) t~' / l 1 ~l-~'Y AtJ~'~ /~ D N A- /111--(Pd1 Address~(~ ~-Yt°1LIYIRP) 2~ • CP,n+~al A,i~~- ~~ •IR~S~a- Phone Numb/er/n~n~"ty`/74 UJ~~(p73-SS~$~ (~A-t';c/~ G1~C7~`77`111~-~ (~~N~~ Proposed Site Location Address ~~S ~~r•e21ti'I PeN 2~ C2N{Yr~ ~iN~ !~/Z. g7S~ ~-- ~ a W t I l~ m PrP 37 ~1 S Assessor's Map Page LocationCoc(Q (O~a3 /~~.C-~~t"cao~/~`~-y Tax Lot(s) ~~ Rectuired Information: A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed copies maX be.obtained~at.the Jackson County Assesso 's Office (,~..~- E19k+~X) IN filock{3)•i~rui 0 , VA-Ii-~ ~$'~l-'AF¢S (.IN;-f NO•(f~-j-~ -+ti.2 e~kya~ ``trR( Poi n7 j- INSACiU~N CONN1~YrOr2.i A-cc.:rdtn9 -#.s ~-E~.e. a~r~,al pIA--I' 'Thereosri Nom.. Accurate"s"bale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli- ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal Code Section 17.80:010. Sep %~-I-~AC~nike.~S A statement as to how the request will meet each of the following objectives: SaZ A-k'kAc-In (r1eN-S_ A. The variance will provide ded advantages to the neighborhood or the Cityy,, i such as beautification or safe '11`Z yaa~l~y °F"~' p`°Pose.! a-e.~~2 w•II ev(<euc.e °~Z 13e.,~„S~} o -FR¢Pruptr @ jT.e S~e~Y -{o MY~Am'.lY IS -µ2 /IIAi..1 i^,,,J¢C~FivL+ ~ ND Urs; 5~ 1.'(~( w:N b2 impA;re.l 1N Oror.L{~ B. 4P~e ariance will not have any signifi ant adverse impacts t}~on the n ighbor- h od; AID M~ /V2~'rjkb.^,FS hRue.. ~E¢rJ A'•Y/oro,Pos-z9 pl»~v Hr~d ~1e~.e. S'iy~<I m4 P~e+t~ron~ y•o-•n,3 MQ .~nQ,:r /~e-r hi rssro~v~ 17JN ~Pr.~i hN F~(,-Ci 4 Cduucf l M¢r~+bsr tt,~¢s IN -~FI+,J' ~uld?SO-z. i hai ,k-~So ciu E,v h1~. his perMYJ.oN ~r+dl.3 SQZ: No h4r b 1-1'x. C. The varidnce will u~ihze pro er y within the intent and pu se of the zon district. S¢a -k~.e proo~ae.1 :}en'ce P~i+s+S' A--f-tocf.eA 'tFz crk~( Wo~W~~x•r~:+ ,rr~ My ~e:e I,v .~,~ pllr~ C~4k (.u I N (R P~ ajAl U Eu h c~S" (NC1, '.~eNC2 . ~ aw,. rP1 cr.7J k; M (p }{' 3`'+"~ ~< 1 ('¢/}Swv~ I-.f¢yy~*:p:t w d c~l.:«Ir¢N U~T`oFm ail .~PraEecf MM ^Rnll.( FWS ie$r3v -tlyzvisab;l:~ybRfiy Qp{hro-./n u:wdows, >~ Circumstances affect ~i~e property th~t generally do not apply to other progex- ty in the same zoning district. ~ Itm.t uuF ~owr+d i Gbrue./ (o} ,! N ~krrL pcr N'f -{An k Na"'~ ~zQ' ` (S~{L{~r,~a reS WSU owl ~in~-~6~t SEr et{~ W; (~ No pr°Etc~4la~ ~ror~ iNkr.,scr~' LI k4 T.~ f40/h2 p/eAat c~ ~`Z E. The conditions for which the variance is requested were not self-imposed through the applicant's own actions, nor the actions of the applicant' ag nts, e~[lp loyee~~s.,// or f~am~ 1y members. 'lFtCi~C~r-ti~ecP?L`M Malo~ ~NZ't•,.ki~tu,v o~~{..s_~a+~c iN'~" ~ /r1~°~ `YlflWi '}ht /3~(h NOM Wcu~awS. i3 gA(I. rQCh wSNU.u+>r N.w~ NU PrGtc c-Flan L'ra ~•. 1N ~J»SeYS ui~A+S~. I, JA'V ~~~ J . m i ~Cv¢Yc Ay Nil cS A*+ ISai..t¢.i s~Y~tt°~+• ~l-u'I+NY certif that I am the owner or authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach wr/i/f~t~en y~uthority) ~ hJU~W/ J.'///~fn~ Date ~O~y/~~ (Signature of owner or a thorized agent of owner, please indicate which) ]Zcca~j"'N'a. Application Fee: $100 Received on d/r¢/9c viq 3'B~S * A filing fee for recording a Deferred Improvement Ag e ent w th the County Clerk may also be Yequired LUAP/ADMINI 19 ~':I j.-. ,Iii: ,.. '_`~ ili_ ~! i; i~i~,i 'iS ,.; '~~~ L. ~i;lj:; .;:! i ~. i.,. . '~i ili 7J :I I I 1~~ ~ iI'. 1~_I ~~ I _~'I !lil t! I .I fiJ ~~, !r~-!, ~ i„ ~, ~ ~ i , ~i ~,; ~ l ,~ ,; . , ,,; ~ ~i i ~ C~ ~i '~~ ~ ~' ~ ~~ I,,' -~- ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ,~ ~I ~ I~,i',, r; ~~ .. .. .,r~~ ~.rn >,~aQ 7rnZ I~}.ad ~~~. _.. .. ... +tiWaT9{+~ ^~ I ~ I I V ~ I I PAN ~r ~a 9 ... ~.. CiY, ~N ~. ~t' . I 'T l~ ~JY - .. ter: v~c`M1 .n< F i r¢ ~ /I ,. q 1~_r..- ,w.-~ ~ tq/~,r, ~ph~ ~ SI`d2 -Goya ~a ~Y04SZ W~h~K ~r°. of-~~S ~~~~ ^i ~ ~r ° S Mj~= Y I ~''1 ` ~ ' J f J ~ 1 ~ /V C . -~ ' . 1'~ T"1`~ ~ :- ~ f . V ~. w ~ arb F. .: 3" ~ ' ( ~ t f IY. ~%1 K h ~(} o Y 1.. 17x zl~ ,..~I/_~n~ ~ I ~..f _ 1 ~ // ~C i , o. i n. ~~. n ; ry H,.._s ~: Irv y~y '- ~ •c.r~~V ~~ v a 1a- tt .w ~~y ~~ v~.ti ~ ~ ~~. - ~, ,_ s ~ ~ ~ ~ s rt ~ t ~~ la.~ - ~W V ~"~v~3 ~ c I.i t~ ^ Yt ~ . y _ ~ 1 1 ? .~31~~ ! t~ ~~r'. t i ~ ~a ~~ y.~ S . ._,.. - . ~ .: '. ~ i ~ , ~ f . y ~4: , n 1 3+ ` • ~ 1 S L ~.~ ;~ ~ ./1 ~ ~ I ~ b ~~yt.r. ~t 4 K.. Y~3' F . N° a ' q. ~.F ~ K~< ~~ i.. D ~ mil ~ ~ V ~I- { y t ~ ~ ~j ' ~" ~ k~, ~ ' r ~a h.~i}~ ~~ ~ N ZWL MP U OW `f Y1 S'2.+,-F i.r M.J K e P _ . :. a <` " ,. R yt..,;~ x .c.< .. . . . h ;.::: ~ w. "' ~Ml ( ~ . ~ nn.d Y I...np'tiy 1 y ~ ~~ ~ / V i .~ ~iY vM ~ ~. 'i ~ 3 ~ t~ l ~'.. "~ y,l~ 2" . _ . . `I~~„^ ti ~I ~- ' .m.A. ~. 4, 3 0 ,. y Zr ~i _r ~_s- -_l., ~~} ~ ~ W WYI vl N 000 4 a a 0 J W LL t y N M µM~ A O HHH U U YY> W a ala I ~~ ~ w~ n r tt~•o "~ ~~ i ,~ :~ _~ ~'vY V`' .'t~ :'• lW i _y --MEMORANDUM----- TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff Administrative Assistant DATE: July 2, 1990 TOPIC: Public Meeting - Review and recommendation to the City Council re- garding Final Subdivision Plat approval for Stonecreek No. 3, Phase III Gary T. Whittle has submitted an application to the City for final subdivision plat approval for Phase III of Stonecreek No. 3. Public Works Director Larry Blanchard ha reviewed the subdivision agreement and has identified those items that will need to be completed prior to final City Council approval of the final plat. Staff has also ensured that the final plat is technically correct and that it is consistent with the preliminary plat which was granted tentative Council approval on January 3, 1990. The subdivision layout is currently in progress. Staff will monitor the project activities up until Tuesday. evening's Planning Commission meeting and will present a Director's Status Report at that time. The following exhibits are provided for the City record and for the Commissioner's review: Exhibit A - Certificate of Posting Public Meeting Notice Exhibit B - Public Works Director's Status Report (will be available at the meeting) Exhibit C - Proposed Resolution recommending approval of Final Plat Exhibit D - Vicinity Maps Exhibit E - Final Plat Map (reduced photocopy) Exhibit F - Application for Final Plat MEM20702.90/GRCORR 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I George Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE OF Thursday, July 5~~ 1990 I POSTED A NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON July 10 , 1990, DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION [BILL REVIE4T A FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR STONECREEK N0. 3 PHASE III, SUBMITTED BY GARY WHITTLE (37 2W lODB TL 100) AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD IGNAT E 7~~/~jo DA E THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR''S STATUS REPORT FOR THIS AGENDA ITEM WILL BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION DURING THE JULY 10, 1990 MEETING. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR PHASE III OF STONECREEK NO. 3 WHEREAS, Gary T. Whittle filed an application with the City for preliminary subdivision plat approval for Phase V of Stonecreek No. 3 on November 27, 1989, and, WHEREAS, on January 3, 1990 the Central Point City Council adopted Resolution No. 533 granting tentative approval of said preliminary subdivision plat, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point conducted a public meeting on July 10, 1990 during which the Commission reviewed the City staff report, and being fully advised, now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Central Point Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of the final subdivision plat for Phase III of Stonecreek No. 3 subject to applicant's completion of bond requirements to the satisfaction of the City Council and as required by Municipal Code Section 16.28.080. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentification of its passage this day of 1990. Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: Planning Commission Secretary Approved by me this day of ___ ______ 1990. Planning Commission Chairman RESOLUTION NO. MPL10702.90/RESO ~~_ - .~...~... ri .. ,. --. .•~ ~~ a _..1 1 ' C1-y_,~-.~: ~R-1-8; A'2~ M'1 ;'i.G~ ~' ~~ ~' ~. ~. - 1C ... \' I - ~II ~ ~ i :: ~' ~._ • ~ ~ 1-1 p~y ill 1 ' -~- / ~V %.i LLB--~.- ~~} j ~~~~--,,~~--~Jf STONECREEK No. 3, PHASE I~ Ytk(: A replat of loT'L' ,Snowy Butte Orchards, Located in the "' ~.,~, , Southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, City of Central Point, ' Jackson County, Cregon. ~. °'^~° .... LoT Z4 ,,a~~ ~• i N '>_ ~ m ~yF 9'1~ •~ y Yt$ LOT ] - S9FP1 .. LOT 2] +1'~ ~4 4 "N, ~ ~Ti , ' PR f4 9m ti~ sm . --- ~' LOT 82 ~,(~b ~• Glann~W%-~ ' `. J - nebag n' ~a ~LOT4 'd~. q LoT xz ~ °poO ~aa em ~oM1t ' N q~ 'ST 4 °tj 4 4 ° e;a, ° to -- -... $ --- N'agof w - LOT 41 II 2 ~ LOT 21 s 6TZ9 p.lt. ~ ....... ... ... ~,.:'i $ N 8]°29'00"W 12 °~ Bwla 0} beorlnq: Sfoneeraek 3, Phose o Faurq 5/e"Iron pin Q Fomd braaa dbc street monL3nen • Sat 5/B"s 24" Xon ph Mm yellor '•, Sel S/S°x 30~~ Irm ph WI61 ]olio. Q Set 5/R"x 30" Imn pin vAlh I V2 O• Sat 2n x Fd' Imn pipe wlttl 2 V2` - DoM, Stameelf 3, FT9aa ]IC, l Scclel I° ° 50' D01e: °O -- - - m LOT I Tq° . 105.09 ° BTQO c Yili rv LOT40 IS NB9, OO~e1 PEOIeTLPEP .. LDT 20 $ 1°u 8000 a0.11. - I] !6.03• ~ ~ PROFESSIONAL __ q3 H ~i LAND SURVEYOR Fj` aalm a' N N09°20'20"W 16 2 'd 7~~-- ~ '4' (.P -- 1 y -- lm 94.90 am LOT I9 LOT2 F~ ^.}. 91]e ll p 0 ON ~ ~(`~, ~ 1` "; ' 14 , ~A , ro ' e " EA0.eER HERIFRi A y` Q ~ ~ , LOT ]9 ~ ~~ 1 T 1^ ; ip ~ . LOT 19 ',~3 mo 90POro.it. J m 1%!`' `S!' ms / o ' _ g m m 9 e6'29'2Y E ~~ - a N (19'4]'24' X - ~ R - - z 91.80 y Y ,. .n u 99.]0 m r LOT3~ o~ ~- LOT IT ~• ' m ~ LOT ]6 '. T._.` $ °• _ o m 9931 ry.11.' .. , 61, N ~ LOt IB o 91TL q.ll. . ~ °~ °a $ .- ~ ~ °,p 4l _ o ~ ~ " L • $ T ' s l i ~ a ' N 68VT 24' X m N 90'00'00' E m fOfi.65 - m ' Y 409.9] ~ 4 ~. L - OTe LOT 26 r ~ • LOT ]T - c . a~ ~ LOT}9 ~ ~ ° BTB] pdf. `- i py Y N o TI]I pJt o om• m z"~ i; N 09'46'53' X m N 90'00'00' E 6 -_ 1f3.et m z !28.83 LOT e ~ ~ '~• m ° '? ~ - °. LOT 38 - °~ m °. Lone °~ m N99 IL Iero N60°30~OdE IS.00) y LGT PT m O . T218 ro.1t im o ae• N ~-~~ ! ¢ Y m -'- N B9'dB'63' X m Y ,~ N 90'00'00' E m - m w .120.68 m m z 10].38 c ~ w ~ LOT 6 a ° n LOT 28 - r °~ LOT 38 ->. ~` • LOT M o ~ c m m ~•' m ~ • m ~ ~ M ~$ TB]]aa.14 -!. ~~ 98P] NIL r •o c r o ' w u m •, o $ N 89'd0'03' X - m lo~ z~ • N 90'00'00' E z o A0~1 ~,0•P ~ ~ _ m 12].71 m 9 z f56.2T 9 W O e O - LOT 1 \ z LOT P9 r~ - LOT ]I m o o e~ q LOT I] ..•N m O - O1 P N W \y d V y $ / %:: 6099 aR•It ', . 9eaf p•IL ¢ O ~ ~.•: o u W • •, r ,; ,s m ' ' ' 1 m z Y °81 9 f ,-~ S B9 n8 S3 E - N 90'00'00' E f i Xp 91.0] \ I 13<.]] N N 9].69 \ LOT9 92001 ' f~ 1 LOTb ~ LOT 33 f LOTR N m c~ LOT 10 .. _, ° ' " m i° N ° W IWO4Tgpe1 SI" (Rae X99 ae 6e W 131,TT1 . . 61.041 m m D - L91 Lot Oabll ~ Application Filing Deadline CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Name J'~'O/~ ~'. C,!"~. ~ /Vo ~ ~h~rre -3-Q Address {~ O ~~ ~ ~ ~ 88 /~ ~ '~"~'' ~°` Phone Number 77z'- 976 Proaosed Site Location Address Assessor's Map Page Location .3 7~ Z C.U ~~ 1-~Q Tax Lot(s) /O ~ Required Information: A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli- ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal Code Section 16.44.030 and completion of a Statement of-Water Rights (form at- tached) I `/ -~ (/C// (~GL'C~`-"' certify that I am the owner or authorized age of the owner the p oposed site (If authorized agent, attach written u or ) _ Date 4~~`_0~ _ / ~~ (Signature of er or authorized agent of owner, please indicate which) ' ,va. Application Fee: $100 R~cm'v~ ~~~ r 6ia5" 6/28/°>a * A filing fee for recording a e erred Improvement Agreement with the County Clerk may also be required LUAP/ADMINI 1 ----- M E M O R A N D U M- TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff Administrative Assistant DATE: July 2, 1990 TOPIC: Public Meeting - Review and recommendation to the City Council re- garding Final Subdivision Plat approval for Phase II of Jackson Creek Estates Tom Malot has submitted an application to the City for final subdivision plat approval for Phase II of Jackson Creek Estates. Staff has ensured that the final plat is technically correct and that it is consistent with the preliminary plat which was granted tentative Council approval on June 21, 1990. The subdivision is essentially complete with the exception of those improvements fronting two lots on Brandon Street. In accordance with the subdivision agree- ment, the developer will be completing the remaining work soon after the adjacent field crops are harvested in late August. The developer is bonding for this work in accordance with Municipal Code Section 16.28.080. The following exhibits are provided for the City record and for the Commissioner's review: Exhibit A - Certificate of Posting .Public Meeting Notice Exhibit B - Public Works Director's Status Report Exhibit C - Proposed Resolution recommending approval of Final Plat Exhibit D - Vicinity Maps Exhibit E - Final Plat Map (reduced photocopy) Exhibit F - Application for Final Plat MEM40530.90/GRCORR /ENTRq~ sti`} o l//O` " A ~ ' a wp-- q '~ ~l,0 - OR Gp~ THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY 155 SO. SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 664-3321 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, George Rubaloff CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE. OF Thursday, July 5, 1990 , I POSTED A NOTICE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED ON July 10 , 1990, DURING WHICH THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION WILL REVIEW A FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR PHASE II OF JACKSON CREEK ESTATES, SUBMITTED BY TOM MALOT (37 2FI 10 TL 3100)) AT OR NEAR 1. CENTRAL POINT POST OFFICE ~ 2. CENTRAL POINT BRANCH LIBRARY 3. CENTRAL POINT CITY FIRE STATION 4. CITY HALL BULLETIN BOARD ATUR^ DATE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR PHASE II OF JACKSON CREEK ESTATES WHEREAS, Tom Malot filed an application with the City for preliminary subdivision plat approval for Phase II of Jackson Creek Estates on December 15, 1989, and, WHEREAS, on January 23, 1990 the Central Point City Council adopted Resolution No. 535 granting tentative approval of said preliminary subdivision plat, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point conducted a public meeting on June 10, 1990 during which the Commission reviewed the City staff report, and being fully advised, now therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Central Point Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of the final subdivision plat for Phase II of Jackson Creek Estates subject to applicant's completion of bond requirements to the satisfaction of the City Council and as required by Municipal Code Section 16.28.080. Passed by authentification 1990. ATTEST: Planning Commission Chairman Planning Commission Secretary Approved by me this the Planning Commission and signed by me in of its passage this day of day of 1990. Planning Commission Chairman RESOLUTION NO. MPLO7.90/RESO JACKSON CREEK ESTATES, UNIT #2 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Application Filing Deadline Application for Final Subdivision Plat Name Thomas E. hlalot Address 40 No. Front St. Unit #1 C'entra] Paint, Phone Number Proposed Site Location Assessor's Map Page Tax Lot(s) Required Information: Requested information as contained in the attached Central Point Municipal Code Sections 16.28.030 and 16.28.040. I, Thomas E. ~1alot & Sandra L.~1alot, certify that 2 am the owner or authorized agent of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach writte authority) ~?~%~'- Date June 20, 1990 (Signature of owne or authorized agent of owner, please indicate which) Application Fee: No. of Lots Amount of Fee 10 or less 10 to 25 25 to 50 SO to 100 over 100 $ 45 100 210 320 540 plus $2.00 for each lot over 100 ~t~C.1~J 6 20 ~o LUAP/ADhIINl s ~ ~, L= ~. ~~'. $-L ~ -- .. _ _ .~ _ V - ~ K .. 6GG ~ _ ~.. _ - I \y~ l' -1 •• `171-`~ .I ~ N iCl t. =, ~~ ; M~1 --- - ~ ~ - --~ ---- E - ; tb =~ -3 i . • x IR•1.81 R-`Z ~1 M-1 I.,~~. ay' v :~~L ~.... J~ ~ ~ r C ~ ! j c ~~'\ ICY ~~•~~~~~o'i~--~_...` ~ ~ 4 - i . _ M-1 , ! a (CENTRAL VALLEY SUBDIVISION) (UNIT No, 3) (BLOCK 4) (19) <14) C12) C13) 100 ]2 SB9'32 E ' Se9 0'E C ~ -~ -~ ]o.ao _ - :o.oo _ ~ :BaB A- ~- 11°=00 - 9nzB ~ = ~, ~, ~ m ~. ~ 1 g~ e . I $ io.ao- ]a.ao - J ~ ]a-°o t , -]aao // m z9o ao _]~ ._ `l - ~ _589.3 '10'E _ VI NCENT AVENUE ~ D - _ - 100.05 - O Q 99_93 _~ ~ z !~ CGS) o (n ~ ~ I ~ ~ k r_ y 10' PUE u G «~ 2 ~ 589.52'10'E Z S99'S2'10'E Q 9 y 120.00 m I 120.00 O Z ~ I b O f ~ O ° P o ~ f•i S99.32'10'E I ~ rj I SB9'S2'10'E ti ~ 120.00 (_ ~ 120.00 1m <31) I A I y o D ~Z ~ ~ V ~~ ~~ ~ _ ~~ ~ ,_. m zs• zs• v y 589'S2'10'E ~ S89'32'10'E 9.68 n I ~ Il9b 1 C 1 C32) ~ N ~ ~ ~ 1 y S6). Z BUSOt .L95 \ ~ )~ ~~t9•f C33) w 2 ,~~, ~ N y .n " ` P 1 ~~ _ 90.00 15B.aa 589.50.OB'E 80.00 /) J0.00 ]0.00 )0.00 100.00 90 O~ C42) g .p W a .>. a A $ a N ' a .a 0~ a N~ 'Oo.~ o s , , ~ %u ~B ,q c .p ~ V S ?o 7i b O' ]0.00 ]0.00 56.J< a ~ q~ tib _ .~~~~ 1)210 C' ~ ~® OD _ -~ ° - 599'SO^JB'E _ ~~ B N ~ pti ~ ~ u o aa RA DON ® o ao ~z ao ~ti \ s Y i . ~ . _ _ . <~ ~ ~ ~ F~yry j N N ~ T . a. ° c c i 2 e N ~ N ~, N N ~F s p ~]q ~ B.oo ooo B.oo 2 Y FT \ y2 cs e o, a" \ q~ yro~ ° ,,gyp ~ e..~$e ?15w .. A -----MEMORANDUM ----- T0: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: George Rubaloff Administrative Assistant DATE: July 2, 1990 TOPIC: Public Meeting - Review and recommendation to the City Council re- garding Final Subdivision Plat approval for Stonecreek No. 3, Phase III Gary T. Whittle has submitted an application to the City for final subdivision plat approval for Phase III of Stonecreek No. 3. Public Works Director Larry Blanchard ha reviewed the subdivision agreement and has identified those items that will need to be completed prior to final City Council approval of the final plat. Staff has also ensured that the final plat is technically correct and that it is consistent with the preliminary plat which was granted tentative Council approval on January 3, 1990. The subdivision layout is currently in progress. Staff will monitor the project activities up until Tuesday evening's Planning Cononission meeting and will present a Director's Status Report at that time. The following exhibits are provided for the City record and for the Commissioner's review: Exhibit A - Certificate of Posting Public Meeting Notice Exhibit B - Public Works Director's Status Report (will be available at the meeting) Exhibit C - Proposed Resolution recommending approval of Final Plat Exhibit D - Vicinity Maps Exhibit E - Final Plat Map (reduced photocopy) Exhibit F - Application for Final Plat MEM20702.90/GRCORR M E M O F2 A N D U M DATE: July 6, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director ~"~ RE: Final Plat Approval - Jackson Creek Estates Unit No. 2 A11 construction has been completed for this subdivision, except for the items listed below: 1. Completion of curb/gutters, rocking and paving of the last two (2) lots 49 and 50 on Brandon Street. These items will be provided through a $7,500 bond from Tom Ma1ot Construction Co. 2. Centerline monumentation must also be completed prior to final plat approval, and is included as a part of the $7,500 bond. 3. Inspection fees in the amount of $6,635.55, must be paid. This fee must be paid before the final plat is signed. Recommendation 1. Approve Jackson Creek Estates - Unit No. 2 for Final Plat approval, provided the conditions of the attached agreement have been met. cc: 02-001 AGREEMENT (Security for Performance) THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, ah Oregon municipal corporation, hereinafter called City, and Tom Malot Construction, hereinafter called "Subdivider". WI TINESSETH: ~ T1 WHEREAS: Subdivider has heretofore entered into a Subdivision Agreement with City, dated February 6, 1990, requiring construction of public facilities described therein, and said public facilities have not yet been totally completed, and WHEREAS: Subdivider has applied to City for final plat approval of Jackson Creek Estates Unit No. 2 Subdivision, and as a condition thereof, City has required a cash deposit in a sum sufficient to secure compliance with said Subdivision Agreement and sufficient to complete construction thereof in the event of Subdivider's failure to do so, and the sum established and agreed between the parties as being necessary for said purpose is the sum of $7,500, now, therefore, in consideration of the covenants herein exchanged. IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE P;4RTIES AS FOLLOWS: City hereby acknowledges receipt of the deposit by Subdivider of the sum of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500) to secure Subdivider's performance of the Subdivision Agreement between the parties dated February 16, 1990, and in consideration thereof agrees to grant final plat approval to Jackson Creek Estates Unit No. 2 Subdivision to Subdivider. City agrees that in the event said public facilities are completed within the time specified in said agreement and in accordance with the specifications and descriptions contained in said agreement, said deposit shall be fully refunded to Subdivider upon acceptance of said improvements by City. Subdivider agrees that in the event that the public facilities described in said Subdivision Agreement of February 16, 1990 are not fully completed within the time specified in said agreement and/or in accordance with the specifications and descriptions contained therein, City shall have the unlimited right, in its own discretion, to utilize said deposit for the completion of said improvements by City, or a person or firm with whom City shall contract for such completion on such terms and for such amounts as City shall, it its so a discretion, determine, and that following completion of said improvements, City shall have the further right to further deduct from said deposit all sums and costs incurred by City in he completion of said improvements, • including administrative co ts, whereupon any remaining balances shall be refunded to Subdiv der. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, th$ parties hereto have set their hands to this instrument as of the ay ar~l year first hereinabove written. ~ ; CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON By: ~ s+a~g ~ Don Jones, Mayor SUBDIVIDER, Tom Malot Construction BY: Title: President `!'' STATE OF OREGON ) ss County of Jackson ) Personally appeared Don Jones before me on this day -+ of 1990, and acknowledged that the foregoing instrument was _ signed by him as Mayor of the City of Central Point, Oregon, and that the foregoing instrument was his voluntary act and deed. <;1 Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: STATE OF OREGON ) ss County of Jackson ) Personally appeared Tom Malot, President of Tom Malot Construction, before me this day of 1990, and acknowledged that the foregoing instrument was signed by him and that the foregoing instrument was his voluntary act and deed. Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: AGRJCK.2