Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - July 7, 1992\~ i' CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA July 7, 1992 - 7:00 p.m. I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER /~ II. Roll Call -Garth Ellard -Rick Bettenburg, Candace Fish, Lloyd Governor, Randy, Graves, Karolyne Hugo-Johnson, and Chuck Piland III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. ` V. Pages 5-19 Pages 20-32 MINUTES Planning Commission Minutes of June 23, 1992 BUSINESS A. Public Meeting -Review and determination of site plan for a commercial storage building at the Grange Supply Yard on Ash and First Streets in the C-5 Zone (372W 11BB Tax Lots 7100 and 7400) (Applicant: James Hudson for Grange Co=op) B . Public Meeting -Review and determination of site plan for a commercial building on Laurel Street west of where Laurel and First Streets intersect in the C-5 zone (372W 2DD Tax Lot 2700) (Applicant: Laz Ayala) VI. MISCELLANEOUS A. Study Session on Land Use Process ADJOURNMENT CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 23, 7992 -Page One MEETING CALLED TO ORDER at 7: p.m. (This was the 2nd Planning Commission Meeting this Month) I1. ROLL CALL: Present were: Garth Ellard, Rick Bettenburg, Randy Graves, Karolyne Hugo-Johnson and Chuck Piland. Also present were Dave Kucera, -City Administrator, George Rubaloff City Administrative Assistant, Larry R. Blanchard, Public Works Director, Mark Servatius, Fire Chief/Building Official and Cecelia Gordon, Planning Commission Secretary. Candy Fish and Lloyd Governor had telephoned and asked to be excused. III. CORRESPONDENCE - Nohe' IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Piland moved to approve the Minutes of the June 2, 1992 Planning Commission Meeting as vvritten. Commissioner Bettenburg seconded the Motion. Roll Call-Vote:"Bettenburg, yes; Graves, yes; Hugo-Johnson, yes; Piland, yes; and the Motion passed unanimously. V. BUSINESS A. Pub/ic Meeting -Review and recommendation for tentative plan for Griffin Creek Estates Subdivision. George Rubaloff outlined his Staff Report of June 17, 1992, and referred to the following exhibits: Notice of Public Meeting to be held June 23, 1992, Maps, and Tentative Pian Application Materials which includes a .folded copy of tentative Plan, and Public Works Staff Report dated June 16, 1992. Rubaloff described the application and entered all the above items into'the record by reference. Rubaloff reviewed "Exhibit A" of the Public 'Works Staff Report, which is to be incorporated into the Resolution for recommending the tentative plan. There were no conflicts of interest or ex-parte communication on the part of any of the Commissioners. Chairman Ellard opened the Public Hearing. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 23, 1992 -Page Two Ted Branch, 280 Manzanita, Rogue River. and Herb Farber, 576 Glenn Way, Central Point, Oregon came forward in support of the application for the proposed Tentative Plan. Mr. Farber referred to Page 26 in the Packet, which was contained in the Public Works Staff Report as "Information Needed". He asked what did (IN) 4 entail.. Public Works Director,-Larry R. Blanchard answered that lot lines must be adjusted to make certain that each-lot has at least a 60' width for construction. Mr. Farber stated that when the construction plans are drawn, that they will show that the structures will be placed on the lots in such a manner as to meet the a 20' setback and the 60' width requirement. Mr. Farber also referred to Page 24 in the Packet, which was contained in the Public Works Staff Report dated June 16, 1992 as Exhibit "A" Public Works Land Use Action Conditions.. He referenced Condition 2, and. 7 .which relate to widening of W. Pine Street to provide for deceleration,. acceleration, transition for both Local street connections. (Nadine Wayl. Mr. Farber said that the developers can only improve on property that they own and that in many court cases, it has been ruled that the Developer does not have to make improvements off site. Larry Blanchard referred to the Off-Site improvements Ordinance, which states that the right turn pocket would be required because W. Pine is a secondary arterial. Mr. Rubaloff informed the Commission that this Ordinance, CPMC 16.10.090 ,gives the City specific authority to require off-site improvements in cases. where a development poses negative impacts to the public. Mr. Branch stated that he felt that it vvas not fair to expect the developer to pay for the box culvert improvement, and that the City should treat all developers the same. He mentioned that the City had helped other developers with box culverts, etc: in the past. Bob Bauman 1055: N. 5th Street Jacksonville, asked to be recognized in support of the application for Tentative Plan. Mr. Bauman felt that since this was a small 17 unit development, that the City should not require a small development to pay for widening roads and box culverts. •> ~ ~ V ~Gi CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Meeting Minutes - June 23, 1992 -Page Three No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the proposed ' Tentative-Plan. Chairman Ellard closed the Public Meeting. The Commission asked staff if the improvements on W. Pine were needed because wear and tear due to the added traffic flow in and out of the proposed subdivision. Blanchard replied that the Public Works Department follows the requirements in the ODOT manual for traffic criteria concerning acceleration and deceleration transition. These requiremehts are safety related, because of the ingress, egress into the proposed subdivision. Theseproposed'ingresslegress's off of W. Pine carry the potential of causing traffic accidents. The Commission wanted to know if they could amend the Conditions in Exhibit "A" which was incorporated into the Resolution. City Administrator, Kucera, stated that the Planning Commission can recommend only through a resolution to the City Council, but that the City Council is the body that has the authority to approve this land use application. B. Reso/ution No. 241 - A Resolution for a Tentative Plan for Griffin Creek Estates Subdivision. Commissioner Piland moved that the Commission recommend Resolution #241 for Tentative Plan for Griffin Creek Estates Subdivision, amending the incorporated Exhibit "A" by deleting the word "both" in the second line and deleting the entire lastsentehce of Condition #2. Commissioner Hugo-Johnson seconded the Motion. Roll call Vote: Bettenburg, yes; Hugo-Johnson, yes; Graves, yes; 'and Piland, yes; and the Motion carried unanimously. This amendment of "Exhibit A" essentially removed all off-site improvements (deceleration and acceleration lanes) at the west opening of the Subdivision. After the Resolution was passed, George Rubaloff stated that Section 2 needed to be amended to accurately reflect that off-site improvements were related to traffic safety not traffic volume. Commissioner Piland moved that the language in the Resolution Section 2 phrase ..."will add substantial traffic",:. be changed to read... "will pose a safety problem..." and that further refinements be made to the language and approved by the Commission Chairman prior to signing. Commissioner Hugo-Johnson seconded the Motion. Roll Call Vote: Bettenburg, yes; Graves, yes; Hugo-Johnson, yes; Piland, yes; and the Motion carried unanimously. ~~ CITY OF CENTRAL POINT , Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 23, 1992 -Page Four C. Recommendation relating to a request to correct a street name on recorded plat for Green Park Village, Unit No. 2. George Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant referred to his Memorandum of June 17, 1992 with the following attachments: Maps, letter from Hoffbuhr and Associates, Inc. dated June 15, 1992 and copy of ORS 227.120 and entered them into.the record by reference,. The. Commission did not have any.. questions. of staff.. Commissioner Bettenburg moved to recommend that the present street name "Glen Grove Court be corrected to "Glen Grove Avenue". , Roll Call. Vote: Bettenburg,yes; Fish, yes; Hugo Johnson yes; Governor, yes; Graves, and Piland, yes, and the motion carried unanimously.. V/. M/SCELLANEOUS -Land Use Training Session - continued: to another time when a// Commissioners can be present. C/TY OF CENTRAL PO/NT P/arming Commission Meeting Minutes June 23, 1992 -Page, Five V// ADJOURNMENT -Commissioner Graves moved that the Planning Commission adjourn their meeting. Commissioner Bettenburg seconded. ,the, Motion. The Motion to, adjourn was passed by voice yote. The meeting was .adjourned at 8:35 p.m. OU4 S T A F F R E P O R T TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: eorge Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant DATE: June 30, 1992 RE: Public Meeting - Review and determination of Site Plan for Grange Co-Op Warehouse located at 42 Ash Street (37 2W 11BB TL 7100 & 7400) Summary The Planning Commission is scheduled to conduct the Public Meeting on July 7, 1992 to review the proposed site plan for Grange Co-Op Warehouse. At the conclusion of the public meeting, the Planning Commission may decide upon the site plan application. Background Last year the Grange Co-Op submitted a site plan for a storage yard facility located at 42 Ash Street. The existing storage yard facility features landscaping, paved surface, obscured fencing and a proposed warehouse pad. The proposed warehouse is approximately 2800 square feet, measures 26 ft wide x 110 ft long, and features a canopy overhang along the east aide. The proposed building is positioned at 5 ft side yard setback from the west side. The project also features a buried kerosene tank and a buried gasoline tank at the northwest corner of the project site. The Grange Co-Op is also proposing 3 striped parking spaces,. one of which will be signed and stenciled for handicap parking. Review The Planning and Zoning Department has reviewed the proposed plan with respect to the following and finds that said plan generally conforms with the City's regulations: 1. Site Plan approved on June 4, 1991 for Phase I of the storage yard and record thereof 2. CPMC 17.46 (Thoroughfare. Commercial District) 3. CPMC 17.60 (General Regulations) GRANGE. STF/PCWORK (117 5 4. CPMC 17.64 (Off-Street Parking and Loading) 5. CPMC 17.72 (Site Plan Approval) Attachments Exhibit A -Maps Exhibit B -Certificate of Posting Exhibit C -Site Plan Application Exhibit D -Public Works Staff Report dated June 29, 1992 Exhibit E -June 29, 1992 Memo from Fire Chief/Building Official GRANGE. STFIPCWORK uo ~/\~J~ ~ / A." l~ ~~ ~~~t ~~~ ;,~z,, A.an_. ~~ Q~ ~P , ~~0,~ 'y .../ T SHEET a -2 ~. _` ~~ ~,``O 'PROJECT SITE ~~ y :_~.._~ ~ ~ B ~~ D ~a ~ ~ o. , ~, . ~ .~ <~6 V y \`/\ . I ~ ~ I, . ~ J ~'~. * ~ X 6` °; -~ ~" -~~ ~:, \~ H ~,.. ~_ J ~, ~. Q•, ~ ~~ sti ~m 00 ~y~ ~?~ ~~~ VICINITY PLAN MAP 37 2W 1188 ~~8 o, ~ ~; ;.~ //m ~ \'O o~ ., ~, ~ ., ~? F:YHITiIT __~...... . CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA July 7, 1992 - 7:00 p.m. I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. Roll Call -Garth Ellard -Rick Bettenburg, Candace Fish, Lloyd Governor, Randy Graves, Karolyne Hugo-Johnson, and Chuck Piland III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES Planning Commission Minutes of June 23; 1992 V. BUSINESS A. Public Meeting -Review and determination of site plan for a commercial storage building at the Grange Supply Yard on Ash and First Streets in the C-5 Zone (372W 11BB Tax Lots 7100 and 7400) (Applicant: James Hudson for Grange Co-op) B . Public Meeting -Review and determination of site plan for a commercial building on Laurel Street west of where Laurel and First Streets intersect in the C-5 zone (372W 2DD Tax Lot 2700) (Applicant: Laz Ayala) VI. MISCELLANEOUS A. Study Session on Land Use Process VII. ADJOURNMENT THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I, GEORGE RUBALOFF, POSTED THIS NOTICE IN THE FOUR (4) PLACES DESIGNATED THE CITY'S CODE.. 7/4/92 U09 Application Filing Deadline CITY OF CENTRAL POINT _. E~~.HIIII1' ~.5~..,,. Application for Site P1an,Approval Name Grange Co-Op ; Address 89 Alder Street, Central Point Phone Number 664-1261 Proposed Site Location Address 42 Ash Street. Central Point Assessor's Map Page Location 37 2W 11BB Tax Lot(s) 7100 & 7400 Required Information: A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed copies may be obtained at the Jackson County Assessor's Office Accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The drawing of the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine the compli- ance of the proposal with the requirements of the attached Central Point Municipal Code Section 17.72.030. Name of Builder N/A Phone Number N/A I~ James E. Hudson ~th,,~orized agent of the owner ""F1Ften authority) ~ or certify that I am the owner or site (If authorized agent, attach Date June 10, 1992 agent of owner, please indicate which) Application Fee: $0 N/A * A filing fee for recording a Deferred Improvement Agreement with the County Clerk may also be required' LUAP/ADMINI ~ ~ V 1 21 BRUCE Vl~. RfCHEY, ARCHlrECr, ~.~.,~. 1941 WESTERLUND DRIVE MEDFORD, OREGON 97504 (503j 773-4025 June 12, 1992 Planning Commission City of Central Point `' 155 South Second Street Central Point, OR 97502' RE: Grange CO-OP Proposed :New Warehouse Ladles and Gentlemen: Enclosed herein we are pleased to submit our Application for Site Plan Approval packet for your consideration. The purpose of this application is to complete the Improvements previously described to the Planning Commission on the Grange CO-OP's storage yard site locafed at 42 Ash Street. The work will include - =- the construction of an approximately 3000 s.f. warehouse, which was planned for this site when the storage yard improvements were completed last year. __ .. Since this building was in the Grange master plan for this sfte, all utiifties have been previously extended to the building pad area shown on the Site Plan. This building will relieve a portion of the customer traffic flow now experienced at the retail store complex north of Ash Street. Wfth the completion of this phase of the project, a less congested and therefore safer movement of automobiles and trucks should be realized in and around the Grange CO.OP retail complex. We appreciate the assistance of the City's staff In working with us on the development of this protect. Sincerely, a%~~G Bruce W. Richey, AIA BWR:MDS Enclosures cc: Jim Hudson ~~~ ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN ENERGY CONSULTATION A PROPOSED NEW WAREHOUSE FOR: CENTRAL POINT'GRANGE CO-OP 42 ASH STREET CENTRAL POINT, OREGON Lots 1 and 2, BIoc1:18, of the original Town of Central Point, Iackson County, Oregon. Lots 8 and 9, Block 18, of the original Town of Central Point, Jacl-son County, Oregon. ALSO; Begitttung at the Southerly comer of Lot 8, Block 18, Plat of the Town of Central Point, Jackson County, Oregon; thence North 54° 30' Fast, 100 feet to the Easterly comer of Lot 9, which is also a point of curvatrue with the Southwesterly right of way of Fast Street; thence along the arc of a 10.t)4'foot rariins cauve the long chord of which bears South 09' 30' west, 14.14 feet to a point of tangency; thence South 54° 30' west 80 feet, more or less, to a point of curvature; thence along the arc of a 10.00 foot radius otrve to the right the long chord, of which bears North 80° 30' west, 14.X4 feet to the point of begimting. ~ Code 6-02 A,ccoant 114616-0 Map 37 2W 11BB Tax Lot 7100 Code 6-02 Account 1-14619-4 Map 37 2w 11BB Tax. Lot 7400 VACATED ALLEY ORDINANCE 1655 ~Begitming at the Southeasterly corner of Lot 7., .Block 18, .the City of Central Point, Jackson County, Oregon, of the Central Point Town Plat,. as recorded its Volume 13, Pages 582-585, of the Deed Records, Jackson County, Oregon; thence Southwesterly along ,the Southerly line of Lots l and 2 of said 81oc7c, 100 feet to the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 2; thence South- easterly 20 feet to the Northwesterly corner of Lot 8 of said Blocks thence Northeasterly, along the Northerly line o£ Lots 8 and 9 of said~Block, loo feet to the Northeasterly corner of said 7~ot 9;' thence Northwesterly, 20 £eet to the point oP beginning.. ~~.~ P ~ \ O o h+ C~ s30 ~ O f0 ,~~ s'"',,, U 4b ~~ r~ ~~ O / n Q_ i~ W Z Q oo~~-~ •a ~ Q F: ag ~e k ~ U 6~ f Y ~ _ ~ ~. g 1NIOd IIOIN S ~J W ~ V • ~ ~ - B. N 3 Z. d' Q 3 ~ ~ O r ~ n~ ~ ~~ a w w °°`~~ F Gi K~ C o Z ~ z vl C. C: s I ~' "~ Q W a 5 < N a ~ 3 o ~-- w / ~~ a W ~ as ~u - ~ ~ ~IIwM Y1lIN 91V1Y _~ ~~ OIII MS pNVq'u19 ~4V O ~A p¢~ ~~.(~q >~ ~B 1 u I 5 8I Q~ a o c. ~ tS y w W ~~ ~ ~I ~ g ~ J 6 f ~ i S I n ,Q °e W 1 Ox a" '~ o i~a ~. 6~ ~ o ~~~ d e -- -- -- -- MI~ MYNM ky O ypll'lilA I 133kl1S HS4~ ,,,~4I~_ _ _ _ _ _ _- ~1~ 'SFF-Q a ~.>x3tsi~ D -- ~~~~ O~ C~C~~~G°3Q~ G°'Oo 0~1~ pUI o QOC~ [r~ilOG°~lK~~ DC~p~1 G°3 i~~i l~ll~il l? ~l~Q~l~ G°dL~pOG°d U DATE: June 29, `1992 PROJECT: GRANGE CO-OP WAREHOUSE PROJECT OWNER: GRANGE CO-OP P O Box 3637 Central Point, OR 97502 (503) 664-1261 OWNER REPRESENTATIVE: James E. Hudson LOCATION: T37S R2W WM Section 1166, Tax Lot 7100, 7400 ZONE C-5 TYPE OF LAND USE ACTION: Site Plarr Review APPLICABLE CODES: CPMC 17.60, 17.64, 17.71, 8.24, 8.28, 12.02,' 12.04, 12.08, , 13..04, 13.20, 14 and 15.40 Public Works Standards.. ' /. STREET /MPROVEMENTS Includes: Street Subgrade, Street Base, Street Paving, Street. Lighting, Traffic Control/Delineation Improvements, ,Curbs/Gutters, Safety Improvements, Ingress/Egress Improvements, Offstreet Parking, Sidewalks, and Bike' Ways. ~~~ Grange CO-OP Staff Report June 29, 1992 -Page Two A., Existing Conditions: 1. Street No. CS 04, Street Name - E. Ash Street, Street Classification-Collector/Commercial, Street Jurisdiction -Central Point, Existing ROW - 80 Ft., Future ROW - 80 ft: Existing Street Width - 40 ft., Future Street Width - 40 ft. Curbs/Gutter - Existing, Existing Sidewalk -Completed this property. Street Lights -Highway 99 arid South 1st Street. SW Corner, Existing Traffic Volume - no information available, Traffic from Development - No Information available. ' Z' Street No: lS 72, Street Name - S. 1st Street, Street Classification -Local Street, Street Jurisdiction -City of Central Point. Existing ROW - 60 ft., Future ROW - 60 ft. Existing Street Width' - '40 ft., Future Street. Width - 40 ft. Curbs/Gutter - Existing, Existing Sidewalks -completed this property. Street Lights -Ash Street (SW Corner) and Cedar Street (N.W. Corner), Existing Traffic Volume - No Information Available, Traffic from this Project - No Information Available. 3. Street No. LS 98 - Street Name - Cedar Street, Street Classification, Local Street, Street Jurisdiction - Centrai Point, Existing ROW - 60 ft., Future ROW - 60 ft., Existing Street Width - 40 ft., Future Street Width - 40 ft., Curbs/Gutters -Existing, Existing Sidewalks -completed this property.-Street Lights - (NW Corner), Existing Traffic Volume - No Information Available, Traffic Volume This Project - No Information Available. //. WATER /MPROVEMENTS Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service, and Backflow Protection. A. Existing Conditions: 1. 8" Waterline is located on the south side of Ash Street. 2. 4" Waterline is located on the south side of Cedar Street. 3. There is a fire hydrant (#32) located on the SE corner of S. 1st Street and Cedar Street and the SE corner of Highvvay 99 and Ash Street. X15 b Grange CO-OP Staff Report June 29, 1992 -Page Three -, ///. SAN/TARP SEWER Includes: Mainline,. Property Service. Regional System. Development Charge,. LocaLSDC, Industrial Wastewater.Permit..., ., A. Existing Conditions: 1. An 8" Sanitary Sevver Main is located in the northern portion of Ash: Street. 2. Arr 8" Sanitary Sewer .Main is located in the northern portion of .Cedar Street. /V. STORM DRA/NAGS A. Existing Conditions: 9. A 12" 'Storm Drain is located in the northern portion of Cedar Street with a manhole.. 2. Two 12) catchbasins are located at the same location listed above. GRANGEWR.HSE (~i6 EXH/B/T "A " LAND USE ACT/ON COND/T/ONS GRANGE CO-OP WAREHOUSE 7. Water System Backf/ow - The Deve%per sha// provide the necessary information regardinginterna/p/umbing, so the City can determine ifaBackf/ow 'device wi// be required. 2. Sanitary Sewer Property Service -The Deve%per sha// provide acomp/ete set of onsite p/umbing plans and design. ca/cu/anon to assure proper service sizing and potential industrial waste connections to the sewer system. The above design sha// be part of the construction p/an for the Bui/ding Permit and the Pub/ic Works Permit. 3. Regional Sewer Deve/opment Charge -The Deve/opersha// pay an SDC for connection of th/s fact/ity to the Regiona/System. The cost of this connection sha// be as defined in the Sewer System Deve/opment Charge Report. This shall be paid as a part of taking out any City permit(s1 for this project. 4. /ndustrla/ Waste Permit -The deve%per sha//comp/ete an app/icat/on for sewer use and submit it as a part of the Bui/ding permit process. This app/ication will determine if standards wi// be established for industrial discharge to the Sanitary Sewer through a permit issued by the Wastewater Treatment P/ant Superintendent. 5. Catchbas/n Locations - A//roof drains, area drains, and craw/spaces shal/have positive drainage away from the structure, and sha// be connected to a curb drain or an approved storm sewer. Deve%per sha// provide the building's finished floor and property topographical a%vations to determine that a// structures wi// drain proper/y. 6. Deve%per sha// insta//, or cause to be installed, conduits for uti/ides at intersections,or/ocationsdeterminedbyuti/itycompanies. Deve%persha//also provide conduit crossings for uti/itycompanies who wi// not insta// theirservices unti/after the fact/ity is constructed. The Deve%per sha// be responsib/e for a// costs associated with the instal/anon of these conduit crossings. 7. A/l construction for uti/ides, streets, and otherstructures discussed herein with rights of way owned, or to be owned by the City of Centra/Point, sha//be done so according to a// rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions, and other applicab/e requirements of the City of Central Point for the construction of this deve/opment. Ul"r Exhibit "A" -Continued 8. This re vie w for the Site P/an Review submitted b y The Grange CO-OP was done so in accordance with the ru/es, regu/ations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review... Any modifications by the Developer of this deve/opment aRer City P/arming Commission and/or City Counci/ approvals, cou/d require resubmitta/ of an app/ication and approval by the City P/arming Commission and/or City Council. 9. A//costs associated with this deve/opment sha//be the so%responsibi/ity of the app/icant or owner. 70. No construction will begin on this project or any bui/ding, until such time as plans and specifications have been reviewed and appro ved b y the Pub/ic Works Department and other required divisions of the. City and a construction. permit has been issued far each portion of the project requiring a, permit. ~Ui8 ixr.-Ilzilr E T~1 E M O R A N D U P5 June 29, 1992 To: George Ru}~aloff, Planning Director Frorn: Mark Servatius, Fire Chief/building Official RE: Prelimanary Review, Site Plan for the Central Point Grange Co-op Warehouse. In reviewing the site plan as submitted I can find no apparent problems relating to Fire Equiptment Access. In respect to compliance with State Building/Fire & Life Safety Codes, an assessment can not be performed at this time without the submission of actual construction drawings and knowledge of the types and quantities of materials to be stored within this facility_ U1U ~a T A F F R E P O R T TO: Ce ral Point Planning Commission FROM: eorge Rubaloff, Administrative Assistant DATE: June 30, 1992 RE: Public Meeting -Review and determination of site plan for commercial building on Laurel Street submitted by Laz Ayala (37 2W 2DD TL 2700) Summary The Planning Commission is scheduled to conduct a review of the proposed site plan for a general commercial building (Rose Building) located on Laurel Street, west of where Laurel and First Street intersect.. Background Developer Laz Ayala has submitted a site plan fora 1500+ square foot commercial building. The developer intends to construct a wood frame, metal roofed building which would be used as an appliance outlet, an auto repair, or a cabinet repair shop in the C-5 zone. The proposed plan features a 48 ft wide 'parking section which provides for five 9 x 20 ft parking spaces, along with a 28 ft.ll .inch maneuvering isle. The developer also .provides for landscaping and is requesting that the Planning Commission allow a reduction of the front landscape strip from 10 ft to 6 ft since parking is located in the front yard area. Zoning Review The Planning Department staff has reviewed the proposed site plan in accordance with Chapter 17.46 which relates to the C=5 zone, 17.60 which relates to general requirements, 17.64 which relates to off-street parking and 17.72 which relates to site plan applications. The Planning Department finds that the proposed plan meets those standards outlined in the code chapters referenced above. The following list is a notification to the developer of the more significant requirements that need to be met if given approval for the proposed site plan: SITEPLAN.LAZ/PCWORK U~Q t . The applicant' has designed a building which could be used for a variety of commercial uses. Two of those uses which have been called out on -the site plan would require a conditional use permit. The applicant should be aware that prior to occupancy, a conditional use permit will need to be obtained from the City. 2. The driveway shall have minimum clear vision area formed by the intersection of the driveway centerline and the street right-of-way and a straight line adjoining said line points 20 feet from their intersection as prescribed in CPMC 17.64 (e)(5) 3. The applicant's site plan conforms with the parking design requirements as outlined in CPMC 17.64.100 with the following exceptions a. All areas utilized for off-street parking, access maneuvering:. shall be adequately drained to prevent the flow of runoff water. across sidewalks and other pedestrian areas b. Required parking area shall be designed with painted striping to designate the individual parking spaces c. Any lighting used to illuminate off-street parking or loading area shall be so arranged so as to reflect the light away from adjacent streets or properties. d. Parking spaces located along the west boundary of the property shall be contained by a curb or bumper rail to prevent vehicles from extending over the adjacent property line or into the adjacent alley 4. The prostrate juniper (J. squatmata - "Blue Carpet") groundcover, which is, in part, planned for the right-of-way, shall be maintained so that it does not exceed 10 inches where it is planted between the sidewalk and the property line. (Chapter 12 of Central Point Municipal Code" relating to Obstruction of Right-of-Way) 5. .The plan needs to show the installation and sidewalk to the west of the concrete' driveway apron Attachments Exhibit A -Maps Exhibit B -Certificate of Posting, Exhibit C -Site Plan Application Exhibit D -Public Works Staff Report dated June 29, 1992 Exhibit E -June 29, 1992 Memo from Fire Chief/Building Official SIT EPLAN . LP,Z / P C WORK ;Ci ~. ,, ~l .. ,. . ~; ~~ . • i 1' ~ t '~ ~ ;,. ~ ~ ~ ~ I ---- ~ EXHIBIT A _. VAZAMA T .I,,'•,~ ~~~ ~' ~~~ ~,=r~ ~ ~~ J~` ~~ \\ /,'t~ Q~ ~~./ ~ \Y..~ Of'~ -~' ~ ~ il 3 N ~~ 1 boo ~` ~ l!'I~'~ ens o. ~ ~ ~- S5 ~~/ ~/ a - ~ ~~ ss ~ ti ~'e s~ ~ a a .Z~ r,5 $ \ P sue. o ~ 2 ~ ~~ ~ ~ a ~, 2 ` 60 , ,La ~ '~ \ ~ e -i, Zc~~ s ~ ~ '.~ -~2~ o ~.. ~ , ` ~ ~P 570) ~ h . V 9~ °-Z~o° o. ;s P 21.e6 9 ` ~\•` J V mow` 0> ~ I \ _ i~ '~ a~ 1+ '~2~ .t \ • / ^ 0 ~~~ moo, \ ~.,. ~ ` o / • •~-~ \ :.,~ ~ e~ "4;, ~ / • 5 ` -.f ~ / Oe Y• G~ `e~U y~ ~ ,~ Q,~ .py .. _ ~... r~ ~°° 3 _ _ ~ 4 ~ a9°~a,/~ TAYI AR ROAD 9_ ~ ~ ~%/ O~/ ~ i ~ / Y~ v O 2 ~ ~ L ~~ f. ~~ \ i. - - ~ ~ \ ~'1 \\ v ~\ O \\ 1 7 ~ ~~+ .f O ~ 1263.2 fy~ (~ c ~~ ~ ~- \ ~ C. ~~ 'H 1261.2 ~ 4 ` \ * ~_ * \K\J O O ~ - ~ \ -~02 ©~/ / '' ~ ~i- +O s ~ / / o M.H. \ '~ / 9 x Q X (~ q,f f (1 ~ ~_ 1266.1 / / 2c L/ 1. ~ QM.H. • \ q9 tn~ \ 4 \~ 1267.5 C. OM.O P ~ ~ ~ ~ \ !/ G ~ ( ~V K ~ ~\O~ / ~ ~PJFL M.H. O S~ 2 ° \\ ~~ ~~ Q c. M.H. + O Q ~ \ \ ~ ~ 1265.9 9f // . O ,- A G ryc \ c.e. / O PAVED '~fl / // ~C PARKING ~ \ C.B. ^ \ ~ s S6. ~ ~ ~ ~ ^~ a % ' Q \ ~ ~~j~ .../// O SC.. Q M.H. Q ~~ /) 1 ~ ~~ 1266.6 ~\!\/~(V^\/O` O PAVED V N"~ \ PARKING ~ D' A 4 9 9L O +~ a *2 0 c / ~ D. ~ ~P .- l x Iz6es C. \ M.H. S. • PO Qx JNG ~ S. ~ GV 1267,6 S K 1271.7 J QP~F~w AVED µ~ PARKING PP C. ~~ \ C. QM.H. C. ,- 1X67.7 0 (~ C.R. KIN~~~ \--X Q ~ M.H ~ l J~ ~ _ G.B. O /! .----- l~ MH. Q 4 / / ~ O ~V 1266.5 i / ~ EX1iT$IT ..~... CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA July 7, 1992 - 7100 p.m. I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. Roll Call -Garth Ellard -Rick Bettenburg, Candace Fish, Lloyd Governor, Randy Graves, Karolyne Hugo-Johnson, and Chuck Piland III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES Planning Commission Minutes of June 23, 1992 V. BUSINESS A. Public Meeting -Review and determination of site plan fora commercial .storage building at the Grange Supply Yard on Ash and First Streets in the C-5 Zone'(372W 11BB Tax Lots 7100 and 7400) (Applicant: James Hudson for Grange Co-op) B . Public Meeting -Review and determination of site plan for a commercial building on Laurel Street west of where Laurel and First Streets intersect in the C-5 zone (372W 2DD Tax Lot 2700) (Applicant: Laz Ayala) VI. MISCELLANEOUS A. Study Session on Land Use Process VII. ADJOURNMENT THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I, GEORGE RUBALOFF, POSTED THIS .,NOTICE IN THE FOUR (4) PLACES DESIGNATED THE CITY'S CODE. 7/4/92 V~~ ~. ~ ~ o- S;XI-IIBTT CITY OF CENTRAT" POINT Application for Site Plan Review Name L_R Z f/~/c~ ~ Address ~ OSo2 ~/v U i~ a r /-1• /%l2d D ~- R 7So Phone Number OFD •<P -7'"7~~ ~ ~o"~ ~ Nr+~• '>3 `'~ ~ Or?.3 7 Proposed Site Location Address ~ ~, ,~ 70 0 i-~~, Gc re / 5 i Assessor's Map Page Location 37-o`Z~v- _3 ~~ Tax Lot(s) ~-; 70 O' Required Information: 1. A legal description as it appears on the deed (metes and bounds or subdivision lot and block number) Deed copies may be obtatned at the Jackson County Assessor's Office / 2. Nameof Builder {~ G! ~r,~/ _ ~ SQ /1 h y Address ~y3/ ~S• ~liCi~i~ H t,Jy ~ /11 ~ ~n,Y• OIP. 97SOI Phone Number S3s-- 3. A site plan which shows the site anr~ proposed improvements and shall includes the following: [~] Projeet name, applicant name, site address', tax lot number and Assessor Map Page [ f Zoning of site [/J Scale of drawing(s) (~ North Arrow (!~{j%' Tax Lot(s) Overlaid onto Site Plan [i ~-- Construction Plans and other drawings which illustrate the architecture of all proposed buildings and improvements SITE PLAN.APP/ADMIN t~26 [ /~ All outside improvements [ '~ Provisions for on-site circulation of pedestrians [ ) //Off-street parking [~]" Provisions for on-site circulation of vehicles [~ Setbacks NI[P.] Lot Coverage [~ Square Footage for all buildings ~~] Accessary Buildings N ~] Open Storage Areas w---~ [ ] i Outdoor lighting [ Clear Vision N[~~] Buffering [lIv]'~ Proposed use of improvements [~Speeific landscape improvements (name plant and tree species, show sprinkler and/or drip lines) (~1 Fencing _ - ['J Signs [~- Fire Lanes,:.Fire Fighting Apparatus [,~]~ Adjoining Land Uses [.~ Egsements (Utility or Access) [ ~ How the. site is served by public/private facilities, utilities [~ "Access to Public Streets I~ ~q Z, ~/~ ~ certify that I am the owner or authorized a¢e$t of the owner of the proposed site (If authorized agent, attach OG~ n~e /2 Date Gr ^a a - 9a a ura owner or u o as agars a owner.. ads indics a whlot}) Applies 'on Fee: $0 SITE PLAN.APP/ADMIN 02"7 .,17-i i7:~1; .. D PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE.- June 29, 1992 PROJECT.- ROSE BU/LD/NG Commercia/ Bui/ding OWNER: Laz Aya/a 2052 Young Medford, OR 97501 779-2121 OWNER'S REPRESENTAT/VEi Laz Aya/a LOCAT/ON.• T37S R2W WM SECT/ON 3D TAX LOT 2700 ZON/NG: C-5 Thoroughfare Commercia/ TYPE OF LAND USE ACT/ON.• S/TE PLAN REV/EW APPL/CABLE CODES: CPMC 17.44, 17.60, 17.64, 17.71, 8.24, 8.28, 12.04, 12.08, 13.04, 14 AND 15.40 Pub/ic Works Standard /. STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Includes: Street subgrade, street base, street paving, street lighting, traffic control/delineation improvements, curbs/gutters, safety improvements, ingress/egress improvement, off-street parking, delivery truck access, traffic requirements, sidewalk, and bikeways. A. Existing Conditions: 1. Street No. CS 15, Street Name -Laurel Street, stationing 0+00 E to 2+94E. Street Classification-Gollector,Street, Existing ROW 80 Ft., Future ROW - No change, Street Width-40', Future Street Width - no change, Curbs/Gutters-Existing, Street Lights-Existing at intersection, Sidewalks-None. 02~ Rose Building Staff Report June 29, 1992 -Page Two 2. Street No. CS 13, Street Name -Laurel Street, stationing 7+63N to 11 +46N, Street Classification -Collector Street. Existing ROW 60 ft., Future ROW - 60 ft., Existing Street Width - 40', Future Street Width - 40', Curbs/Gutters -Existing. Street Lights - Existing at intersection, future street light - no change. IL .WATER IMPROVEMENTS: Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service and Backflow Protection. A. Existing Conditions: 1. A 4" waterline is located on the north side of Laurel Street. 2. Fire Hydrant #210 is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Highway 99 and Laurel Street, and Fire Hydrant #412 is located at the southwest side of the corner of Laurel Street and N. 1st Street. III. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional System Development Charge, Local SDC, Industrial Wastewater Permit. A. Existino Conditions: 1. An 12" Sanitary. Sewer Main is located in the northern portion of Laurel Street. IV. STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT: Includes: Discharge Basin,, Wetlands Requirements, pretreatment requirements, mainlines, services, catchbasins, and erosion protection. A. Existina Conditions: 1. A 8" storm drainage pipe exists at the entrance to the alley that abuts this property. ROSEBLDG.RPT ~2~ ~ i .l EXH/B/T "A " LAND USE COND/T/ONS ROSE BU/LD/NG 1. CPMC 12.02, 17.72 Street Improvements a. Ingress/Egress onto Laurel Street shall be 20' wide at the easterly portion of this lot. 2. CPMC 12.02, 17.60 Safety Improvements. a. Provide for proper sight distance and vision clearance as stipulated in CPMC 17.60 for ingress/egress from Laurel Street. 3. CPMC 17.64 -Parking a. Offstreet and parking construction shall be according to the rules established in CPMC 17.64. 4. CPMC 12.04, 15.40 -Sidewalk Improvements. a. Install a 5' concrete sidewalK as required by the Central Point Public Works Department along property abutting Laurel Street. 5, Sewer Property Service -The Developer shall pay for the cost of providing a 4" service to this property. 6. Regional Sewer Development Charge -The. Developer shall pay a SDC for connection of this facility to the Regional System. Cost of this connection shall be as defined in the Sewer System Development Charge Report. This shall be paid as a part of taking out any City permitls) for this project. 7. Local SDC - as required by CPMC Title 14. 8. Industrial Waste Permit -The Developer shall complete an application for sewer use and submit it as a part of the building permit process. This application will determine if standards will be established for industrial discharge to the Sanitary Sewer through a permit issued by the Wastewater Treatment Plant Superintendent. 9. Storm Drainage Mainlines -Make the proper connection based on the type of pipe from the property service to the mainline. 10. Storm Drainage Property Service -The Developer shall provide a complete set of design calculations for both roof drainage and lot drainage to assure proper sizing for the connection point to the storm drainage system. U3U ,. ~, Exhibit "A" -Page Two 1 1. Catchbasin Locations -All roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces shall haves positive drainage away from the structure and shall be connected to a curb drain or an approved storm sewer. Developer shall provide the building's finished floor and property topographical elevations to determine that all structures will drain properly. 12. Developer shall install or cause to be installed, conduits for utilities at intersections, or locations determined by utility companies. Developer shall also provide conduit crossings for utility companies who will not install their services until after the facility is constructed. The Developer will be responsible for all costs associated with the installation of these conduit crossings. 13. All construction for utilities, streets, and other structures discussed herein, within rights of way owned, or to be owned by the City of Central Point, shall be done so according to all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions and other applicable requirements of the City of Central Point for the construction of this development. 14. This review for the Site Plan Review, submitted by Laz Ayala was done so in accordance with all the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by the Developer of this project after City Planning Commission and/or City Council approvals, could require resubmittal of an application and approval by the City Planning Commission and/or City Council 15. All costs associated with this Development and the conditions placed on this Development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/owner. 16. No construction vvill begin on this project or any building, until such time as plans and specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and other required divisions of the City and a Construction Permit has been issued for each portion of the project requiring a permit. 17. The alleyway shall be paved adjacent to this property prior to the City issuing a Certificate of Occupancy. 18. Water System Property Service -Developer shall provide design calculations in order to determine the size of meteris) required for this development. 19. Backflow -The Developer shall provide the. necessary information regarding internal plumbing so the City can determine if a Backflow device will be required. 031 \' , " ..: 1'sXi1113IT ....~ M E M 0'R A P: D U P5 June 29, 1992 To: George Rubaloff, Planning I)ia^ector From: Mark Servatius, ~, Fire Chief/Building Official RE: Prelimanary Review, Site Plan for Laurel St_ Building submitted by Laz Ayala. ` ~;' In 'reviewing the site plan as submitted I can find no apparent problems relating to Fire Equiptment Access. In respect to compliance with State Building/Fire & Life Safety Codes, an assessment can not be performed at thas time without the submission of actual construction drawings and more detailed information relating to the exact nature of work being performed by the proposed tenants. 032.