The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning Commission Packet - July 7, 19871 u Next Resolution No. 125 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 155 South Second Street July 7, 1987 - 7:00 p.m. AGENDA I. Meeting called to order II. Roll call III. Approval of minutes IV. Correspondence and Public Appearances t V, Business A. Site Plan Review - Storage building to be located at Jewett Elementary School, 1001 Manzanita Street, in R-3 (Residential Multiple Family) zone, further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's Map Page 37 2W 2CA, Tax Lot 100, and submitted by School District No. 6 VI. Miscellaneous VII. Adjournment ---STAFF REPORT--- To: Planning Commission From: Don Paul, Fire Chief/Building Official Re: Site Plan Review - Storage building to be School, 1001 Manzanita Street, in an R-3 zone, further described as Jackson County 2CA, Tax Lot 100, and submitted by School Date: July 6, 1987 located at Jewett Elementary (Residential Multiple Family) Tax Assessor's Map Page 37 2W District No. 6 School District No. 6 has requested a site plan review for the construction of a storage building to belocated in the southeast-area of Jewett Elementary School.- The intended use is for the storage of paper and food products for the distribution to the many facilities within the district. Schools are listed as permitted uses in an R-3 zone. Inquiry as to what is included in the scope of schools was reviewed with other agency planning staffs. Those opinions were of a mind that if the secessory building was pri- marily used for storage, it would be an acceptable use within the zone. Areas of question would become relevant if the use_wa&._for certain maintenance acti- vities creating noise, odors, or unsightly outdoor storage not compatible to surrounding uses. The nearest use would be the Texaco service station on Pine Street which is within a C-4 (Tourist and Office Professional) zone. The area, width, and yard requirements as dictated in Municipal Code Section 17.18.050 have all been met as shown on the site plan. The area for siting is presently unlandscaped and should help to screen the remaining unlandscaped area to the immediate east. Municipal Code Section 17.72.040 sets the standards for site plans and should be considered for approval of this application. Those standards include land- scaping, parking,'ingress and egress, signage, accessibility for firefighting purposes, compliance with City and State requirements, and design standards necessary to the compatibility with surrounding properties. Included in the Commission`s packet are the following exhibits: Exhibit A - Notice of Public Meeting; Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting of Notice Exhibit C - Site plan (original is separate); Exhibit D - Tax assessor's map page; Exhibit E - Aerial map page. DP/mat of Public Meeting; ~/L. ~. 1 '~ O/ _ _; ~~;x _ ~. .e ;,,V _ - , 155 SO. SECOND ST THF. HE;iRT OF THE ROGUE RrilER VALLEY P.O. BOX 3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE 664-3321 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING The City of Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a public meeting to review a site plan submitted by School District ~6 for a warehouse to be located at Jewett Elementary School, 1001 Manzanita Street, Central Point. The property is zoned R-3, Residential Multiple Family District, and further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor s Map Page 37 2W 2CA, Tax Lot 100. __: This ,public meeting will be held July 7, 1987 at 7:00 P,M. in the.City.. Council Chambers at City Hall, 155 South Secggd Street., Central-Point,. Don Paul Building/Planning Department City of Central Point Date: July 7, 1987 Time: 7:00 P.M. Medford Mail Tribune: please publish 2 tmes- Friday, June 26, 1987 and Sunday, July 5, 1987 and provide affidavit of publication. Place:. City Council Chambers 155 South Second Street P. A. Sox .3576 Cehtral Point, OR. 97502 k7k /~c a~ C. , . P.O. BOX 3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE664-3321 THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, snot Pratt ,.CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOblING DATE, 18 June 1987 I POSTED A.PUBLIC NGTIC'c OF A Public Meeting for School District 1i6 Site Plan Review FOR Jewett School Warehouse proposal AT OR NEAR 1. The Central Point Post Office ~ The Central Point Fire Station 3. The Central Point Library 4, and Citv Hall Buildine ~~ \~\\~ \ `- SIGNATURE DATE 18 June 1987 O Cc~-/f3/7- /3 TENTH ST.. ~- ~\ ~ . x _R x N I ~_ i I ~ _. n t 0 ~+~ , ` ~y i ~ ~) ~ ` Q ~, ,., ,.. •~:~ -.v ~ ~, O i~..~ ,~ r D ~~C~ z ''~' :, \~~ goo s ~, ~ \ / \ ~\ ~ ti.___. ~~ \ sy. ti -_ .~ ° ~ `_ ~~ o ' BLEACHERS O PLAY PLAY AREA o GROUND PAVED X J(0 4J , O 1253.5 x ``~ . _, - _ ~ X PAVED! ~PI AY AREA /1 a O `~J C. ~ x 1256.3 X 1256.6 Y PARKING ~ ~ ~ C _ r ST. X 6 ~EWET7 PARKING / DURB O .~- ~ y, Y- M~/ {/ ~_ ~_ V \\ X 1265.4 X jX.2 ~ O~ M H. 6. C N.H. x 1258.4 ~ CURB X o ~y ~` O X ~l M.H.' p /^~ '.. v ~ _~ m \S~/~ 1262.3 •S. ~~ ~x j C. m 0 C. x 1260.7 C S'J. ~ n )., ~ ~ ~ ~ O S~. ~ X1259.0 CURD .____. 2 PARKING I'^""""' ~ 1264.9 C.6. ~ m. PAVED x ~ LJ 1258.9 PARKING C.B. x 126 ~ PVD. X X X PARKING 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Next Resolution No. 125 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 155 South Second Street August 4, 1987 - 7:00 p.m. AGENDA I. Meeting called to order II. Roll call III. Approval of minutes IV. Correspondence and Public Appearances V. Business Page ~F 1 A. Site Plan Review submitted by the Grange Co-op for an automo- bile and truck service station to be located on the northwest corner of North Front and West Pine Streets in an M-1, Limited Industrial District, and further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's Map Page 37 2W lOAA, Tax Lot 7400. 6 B. Public Hearing to review and make a recommendation to the City Council concerning a petition to vacate a portion of Snowy Butte Road, said portion being that which lies within the pro- posed preliminary plat for Stonecreek III, Phase 2, submitted by Gary Whittle. 17 C. Public Hearing to review and make a recommendation to the City Council concerning the preliminary subdivision plat for Stonecreek III, Phase 2, submitted by Gary Whittle. 40 D. Discussion on revisions of zoning and subdivision regulations, and updating the comprehensive plan - Wes Reynolds, Planner, Rogue Valley Council of Governments. VI. Miscellaneous VII. Adjournment --- STAFF REPORT--- x To: Planning Commission Date: July 28, 1987 From: Don Paul, Fire Chief/Building Official Re: Site Plan Review submitted by the Grange Co-op for an automobile and truck service station to be located on the northwest corner of North Front and West Pine Streets in an M-1, Limited Industrial District, and further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's Map Page 37 2W lOAA, Tax Lot 7400 Jim Hudson, representing the Grange Co-op, has submitted a site plan for a card controlled service station primarily for commercial accounts at the northwest corner of North Front and West Pine Streets. This facility will include two islands providing gasoline and diesel fuel. The developer has provided setbacks to concur with future right-of-way needs as described by the City's comprehensive plan. The developer has talked with the Oregon State Highway Division concerning curb cuts and they will be involved in that permit process. Sidewalks are not planned for this development; but rather, asphalt will extend to the back of the Front and Pine Street curbs. In addition to the pump island canopies, the remaining structures will consist o£ a freestanding sign and a control building. The control building will house the billing equipment in addition to small amounts of maintenance and cleaning supplies for the site. The facility will be an unmanned operation that will routinely receive a daily maintenance check. The unique thing about this development is the landscaping and parking plan. Due to the size of the property and potential corner visibility problems re- lated to shrubbery, the developer desires to enter into a joint agreement with the City for the development of landscaping and parking on the adjacent Liberty Park property. Staff has worked with the developer to prepare a design that seems to meet the landscaping needs of the developer and the offstreet parking needs of the City's park. The developer has agreed to install raised curbs for the landscaping shown on the site plan. Also provided will be the trees, shrubs, irrigation, and continued maintenance of the same. The developer also desires to install four parking spaces, one of which will be identified for handicapped only. These four spaces will be designated with a sign restricting use to park patrons only. This type of agreement requires Council approval; therefore, if the Planning Commission finds the site plan acceptable, their approval will be subject to the Council's approval of the landscaping and parking agreement. If the agreement is not acceptable to the Council, the developer knows that he must return to the Planning Commission with a revised site plan including landscap- ing within its own property. Staff also recommends that a motion for approval include a requirement for the property owner to enter into a deferred improvement agreement. This agreement i, ~, i i Staff Report Site Plan Review - Grange Co-op is necessary for conformance with Central Point Municipal Code Section 12,04.015 as it relates to sidewalks. Included in the Planning Commission's packet are the following exhibits: Exhibit A - Notice of Public Meeting; Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting of Notice of Public Meeting; Exhibit C - Site plan (reduction in packet, original and elevations structures available at meeting). DP/mafi _.__ _ _ Page 2 O 155 SO. SECOND ST. P.O. BOX 3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE 664-3321 THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RNER VALLEY CITY OF CENTRAL POINT NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING The City of Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a public meeting to review a site plan submitted by the Grange Co-op for a automobile and truck service station to be located at the northwest corner of North Front and West Pine Streets, Central Point. The property is zoned M-1, Industrial Limited District, and further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's Map Page 37 2W lOAA, Tax Lot 7400. This public meeting will be held August 4, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at City $all, 155 South Second Street, Central Point. Don Paul Building/Planning Department City of Central Point Date: August 4, 1987 Time: 7:00 p.m. Place: City Council Chambers 155 South Second Street P. 0. Box 3576 Central Point, 0R 97502 ~~~~/3/T ~R ~~ P.O. BQX3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE564-3321 THE HEART OF THE' RC~[JE RIVER VALLEY CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, ~IQGGY'P1~12.. ~F~Qrl~12. , .CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE, 7 ~ 7 I POSTED A PUBLIC NOTICE OF A in /yI /?J~. ~'i ~e,,oo/CLic. r~ rv r~liz llu-~~1'~ruG~.S~rvr~C S ~~~ FOR ~~ 1'he,~i~ n~ C'v y~ ..f)/.~~ ~/7),~~LU~ ~~G ~~ ~IZV?fAT OR. NEAR 1. ~/~l~ ,~~~ _~' 2. ~/f. ~rP_ ns~i3~i.~.-~ SIGNATURE // ~~~Gt~~iv / DATE ~/,/~i_ 0?7 /9~~ ~k4~il/~3 ~T /.~ PROPOSED LAIJDSCAPING 9 3. ~ a r I ,I - - Z WrtH IR0.16ATION -~\ - e d .~ LL.~ ~ • > ~ o . x ~ o. ' s ~ ~ a a o,~- ao i. J ', ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. G Q r 0. N tG W n) U) I F- = i5 ~ ~~ CITY PARk x N f~~ Q .-•--~ V, .GONG. CURB ~! ~ ~ ~ ~~ -I ~~ \ ~ ~~• I ! i' I. w. g I I- ~. ~ t7. •. ~ E i fig; ~ ~•~ • • ~ ~ coNC. cuRd .~~\. ~ S• e ~ N ~ l.~.a. a/l1- ' r -' N5428'00'E 741.83' - ~ u ~ w ` ~ J ~ i ,J ~ V EMERGEUGT. a1°•l ~ ~ ~~ `~ ~ 2 CONTROL 10 REINFORCED 3 ~ $ ~ ~..;_ SgUT°FP CONCRETE 51A6 ~ / ~ iO ~ m v' T STORAGE °w ' .t O o` ~-~I;•~OVER UNDERGROUND. ~ ~ ro ~ a m ! BUi6DiNG ~ 21 % ` ~, ~ ~~ /: , m STORAGE TANKS - o o- ' 1r. Z J I i3 ~~••\ r2 O 1 h ° z: 1 aZ~ v~ K; ~ Qom' ~ _ _ .r ~ _ .~ ~ 2 ul d I I . w I //. r - ' W~ Y ... 3< W ~ C I ~ C I J - 15 V ~ ~ W i 3 i h o - ~: / ° _ I ~•.. ~_ a • 1 i ~ 42'xGG~ CA}.IOPY AND 1' . _ ~5~ ~ ~ ~ 10" REINFORCED ~ ~ ~ ~ ' W U r-'-'~ 'CONCRETE SLAB __ 3_A~ _ ' `o ~++ ..SETBACK N ~ I 401E~~FOR ~ ~ in ~. _ _ ~ „) ~ FREESTANDING-~O N N~ ~- a ~. m. 51GN~ I • W 7 K _ Q I ci - _ _ Y .. .. a _ . ~ I 3 'd ~ ry~~3 ~ odG 3 N ~ ~ try ..~_ I N54'2852 E 128.00 y1~ ' R.R.51GNAL~ j I -r •.-" - -~~~ ~~-EXISTING CURB CUT SHOWN _ _. _. _ ~~ 1 .y -.. ~~~+ CURB - ~%_~ _ g EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT ~ ' ~_ _ .. _ _ _ _. - - - - \r./ - .. ~X~////2/T ~'i PINE STREET. ' ' g ~ J - i ---STAFF REPORT--- To: Planning Commission Date: July 28, 1987 From: Don Paul, Fire Chief/Building Official Re: Public Hearing to review and make a recommendation to the City Council concerning a petition to vacate a portion of Snowy Butte Road, said por- tion being that which lies within the proposed preliminary plat for Stonecreek III, Phase 2, submitted by Gary Whittle Gary Whittle of Whittle Construction has petitioned to vacate a portion of Snowy Butte Road. It does not appear that the vacation of the 20' wide portion would be inconsistent with the Jackson Creek Neighborhood Development Plan. With the proposed development of Stonecreek_.III, Phase 2, circulation would still be available east and west by way of Scott Drive. There are not any known. utilities within the proposed vacation;. therefore, easements do not appear necessary. Earlier master plans for Stonecreek did show storm drainage proposed for this section of right-of-way. Renewed study indicates that need can occur within Scott Drive and Joseph Street. To provide for the additional notification re- quirements, the Council's public hearing on this petition is tentatively scheduled for September 17, 1987. Due to the timing and scheduling of public hearings, the Planning Commission's recommendation by resolution will need to consider the decision of plat approval to be sub3ect to this street vacation. Included in the Planning Commission's packet are the following exhibits: Exhibit A - Notice of Public Hearing; Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting of Notice of Public Hearing; Exhibit C - Petition and appendix to petition to vacate; Exhibit D - General description (legal to be available at hearing); Exhibit E - Tax maps of area; Exhibit F - Jackson Creek Neighborhood Development Plan. DP/mah / 155 SO. SECOND ST. P.O. BOX 3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE 664-3321 T.HE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY CITY. OF CENTRAL POINT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given-that the Central Point Planning Commission will hold s public hearing to review and make a recommendation concerning a petition by Gary Whittle for a street vacation which was filed within the offices of Central Point City Hall on July 27, 1987. The proposed street to be vacated is that portion of Snowy Butte Road lying east of Joseph Street and west of Snowy Butte Lane, a distance of approximately 251.04 feet, N. 89°46'38" W„ being 20 feet in width,•located ih the City of Central Point, Oregon. This public hearing will be held on Tuesday, August 4, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. in the City of Central Point Council Chambers, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Don Paul Building/Planning Department City of Central Point Date: August 4, 1987 Time: 7:00 p.m. Place: Council Chambers 155 South Second Street P. 0. Box 3576 Central Point, OR 97502 Please publish in the Medford Mail Tribune on July 30 and August 2, 1987 and provide affidavit of publication. P.O. BOX3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RNER VALLEY CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, ///G/,l,Li"~f'/2. XJC/I,Se~'L. , .CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE, ~.G~G, a~ /98 7 I POSTED A.PUBLIC /-~- ' NUTIC'c OF A r~/Q/7!~/l?sL ~/rl/~ISS/Jy~ ~1.C~~/L 1(7P/.1'/Y/7Q /Z'b/c'.av Arecorrrrie 'ro,~ S~icc~i UQLQtrvh /~8 r ~or~ ~ h~ AT NEAR SIGNATURE /~,/,/~/j/~~~ 1G,~~ ~i1~~ DATE ~ r~~ /9~'7 ® Ciro-~V //J /~ /.7 PETITION FOR V~.C=T.ON OF STREET, ALLEY OR OT ?R PUBLIC PLACE TY.E UNDERSIGNED APPLICANT hereby oetitions the CityCOUncil of. the City of Central Point, Oreoon, for the vacation of the street, alley. or other public place designated below. This request is for: ?. ORS 271.080 (petition by property owners)* X ORS 271.130 (vacation on Council's own motion) 2, The legal description of the property proposed to be vacated is as follows (also attach a map showing the property proposed to be vacated): See Attached Legal Description 3. The purpose for which the property is proposed to be used is as follows: Inclusion into proposed subdivision, due to re-routed access. 4. The reason for the proposed vacation is as follows: Existing right-of-way does not conform to overall neighborhood an nor to proposed subdivision 5. If the proposed vacation is pursuant to ORS 271.130 (vaca- tion on Council's own motion), the names and addresses of all persons owning or claiming any interest in the property abutting the property to be vacated are as follows (attach title report, lot book report or other verification of identity of ownership of abutting property owners): See Attached 6. The undersigned warrant and represent that they are the owners of record or contract purchasers of property abutting the foregoing proposed alley vacation, that the same will not adversely substantially affect the market value of such abutting property, or in the event of a PETITION FOR. VACATION OF STREET, ALLEY (Ifindividual) cmATP OF,OREGON ) ss. County of Jackson ) _ D.4 TED: July 23 1987 -Perso~ially appeared the above named Gary T. Whittle and acknowledged the foregoing Consent to be his or her voluntary act and deed:'" ([ ~~ BEFORE ME: ~''-1,/ -+~~~ ~ ~~~~ Pu is for Oregon ~My Cyssion Expires: February 1988 (If Corporation) STATE OF-OREGON ) ss. County of Jackson ) DATED: Personally appeared and who, being duly sworn, each ~£or himself and not for the other, did say that the former is the President and that the latter is the Secretary of a corporation, and that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrumentis the corporate seal of said corporation and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by-authority..of its Board of Directors, and each of them-acknowledged the foregoing Consent to be its voluntary act and deed. .-.BEFORE ME: Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: ~~ APPENDIX TO PETITION FOR VACATION OF - Cx~ir~~r STREET, ALLEY OR OTHER PUBLIC PLACE - 2 (070187) APPENDIX TO PETITION FOR VACATION OF STREET, ALLEY OR OTHER PUBLIC PLACE (Conseni .,_ Owners) Description of proposed vacation of street, alley or other public place: That portion of Snowy Butte Road lvina within the orooosed Stonecreek Subdivision, Phase III (See Attached Legal Descri tion) STATUTORY RE4UIREMENTS: ORS 271.080(2) requires that any petition for vacation shall have appended thereto as a part thereof and as a basis for granting the safie "the consent of the owners of all abutting property and of not less than two-thirds (2/3) in area of the real property affected thereby". The real property affected thereby shall be deemed to be the land lying on either side of the street or portion thereof proposed to be vacated andextending laterally to the next street ~thatserves as a parallel street, but in any case not to exceed two hundred (200) feet, and the land for a like lateral distance on either side of the street for four hundred (400) feet along its course beyond each terminus of the part proposed to be vacated. where a street is proposed to be vacated to its termini, the land embraced in an extension of the street for a distance of four hundred (900)feet beyond each terminus shall also be counted. In the vacation of any plat or part thereof, the consent of the owner or owners of two-thirds (2/3) in area of the property embraced within such plat or part thereof proposed to be vacated shall be sufficient, except where such vacation embraces street area, when, as to such street area, the above requirements shall also apply. Consent of the owners of the required amount of property shall be in writing and duly acknowledged before an officer authorized to take such ack- nowledgment of deeds. CONSENT: The undersigned represents and warrants that he or she is the owner of record or contract purchaser of real property affected by the vacation proposal described hereinabove, said affected property being described as follows: S.E€ AttAcNSp , and further represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to consent to such vacation, and does hereby consent thereto. DATED this ~_ day of July , 19 ~~ // C~it.3ir ~ APPENDIX TO PETITION FOR VACATION OF cmnFFm TT T FV !1R (1TAFA RI`R T.T (' RT.A('F. - 1 substantial adverse affect thereupon, that they nonethe- less consent to the proposes vacation. i. Teasere6 wi'.. ~, applica_:~ is a non-re°undable fee of <_525.00. The unde_sianec apoicant heresy agrees to pay, in addition to said fee, ail costs incurred by the City in processing the within application, including, but not limited to, gross personnel costs, materials, attorney fees, recording costs, publication costs and all other costs reasonably related to the processing of the within application and verification of information. Said costs shall be paid prior to final Council action upon the within application. DATED this 23 day of July , 19 ~- I (If indivi9ual) STATE OF OREGON ) ss. p3 July 1987 County of Jackson ) DATED: Personally appearedthe above named Gary T. Whittle and acknowledged the foregoing Consent to be his or her voluntary act and deed. BEFORE ME: if .M.+'..,..._..... N~~Y Pu~$lic for Oregon y Commission Expires: February 1988 (If Corporation) STATE OF OREGON ) ss. County of Jackson ) DATED: Personally appeared and who, being duly sworn, each for himself and not for the other, did say that the former is the President and-that the latter is the Secretary of a corporation, and that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporationand that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and each of them acknowledged the foregoing Consent to be its voluntary act and deed. BEFORE ME: ' Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: * If this procedure is chosen, please attach a completed petition on forms provided by the City. FOR CITY USE ONLY Date filed with City ~ ~q Received''``b''y// 4 ~ i GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE VACATED: That portion of Snowy Butte Road lying east of Joseph Street and west of Snowy Butte Lane, a distance of approximately 251.04 feet, N. 89°46'38"W, being 20 feet in width, located in the City of Central Point, Jackson County, Oregon. /.~ ~~//.3/T ~ 0 C. ~, ~._. `- `~'~'''~ AREA PROPOSED-T(~-BE VACATED Initial f~®irtf, co~~ ~/meto, dsc ', Na~rth 2417.11 feet and West 446.62 feet from thdNcuthwest Comerof D.L~ No.65 being a 5/8".Iron pin 589°5P04"E !6630' Set PKnall ~~ 9(°,283 9o.p~ ~ lncbncrofe M o ~~ is aaa 8496 o . Z J O r~ 2 ~~~ Iq,.soo /~ ~~" ~b q~ 9z9~' ~ ~ fl D 3 b~ a`y _ °n~h ~ h . p 12yog h , .r e` ~~ ~"~ 9309° •~• ~/' seLD ~ ~ '~ / d 1 (( ~~0/_9. B~~\i!~ /O \=j9~ 21~ Z„f. s ` D I 65109 ~ S p1 J~ 31 , so o I ` . Ilo.oo I GGoo° ~ o 0 ? ~ 0 v Ip d 3.So0 ~~0.00 A ' o `coo° Soo 7 ~3 I ~ , I Ito. 7700 8 0~ I So ~.D 8 ~ N89' -----_ ~_ ~~~`' ~~ ~o N65„n2~/ ~_ ~~/o'' o~•~. ,~ 10 /~ 96(6°~ _f3,Soa x/.91 10 .y ~._ I N 6GB~°~ 3,:So ~ 8 114.; 0 ti 68GS°~ ~ So L,D s~ ~~~ ~~_ 8~ ~~ Np~ V Yq ,l ~~~ O C= ~ yp ~ ,~~i ~ A Z br700 N~- ss5°so'od'w ' 65.01' n ~'~ ~~> / 2~ ~~~~ C, y r~ O ~ p W o ,^ O h o ~ o ~ Ri < ~ Ilti.so9 ° 71 sO ° °• ~s~~-` 68T6 Block d i oy 9 F ° .i` .: 4 4 e=~e°az'rr' j L= 72.79 Boy 1 /7 , . ~ ,~ ' 440:13' ~SnOWy ' UffE' 0p .,,s~, °ry. ^^. ~'P It~BA ~ SEE MAP IOA`B'- SE~E< •.MAP9r,~l0AA`~\~~ ~ ~> \ ~ / EL COR.: v, l~ ,-mss ' ~~ I OLC 5 3 ~p~ < ~ so i 1 i" G ".~ `~. E.N.E. COR. ~ \Z~ \ ' EQ ~ ` ~\ ~ ~ I h\ ~ ( ( \ \ /~p~ R \ BUSH 41'. /~ / N ~~ .y / 1 \\C\ ~ , `\/ ~ i s4 y\ \\ \ SSW. C0~ q.D~~LC ~ \9^ ;~ sz . ~ P N W LO 5NOW7 - \ ~ ~p~' ~ i ~ \ RUTTE LFCH SE_E`'NIAP IOA\D ~' , ~/ I I •. moo.,,; ,. ,. /P Chi ~ I \ : \ 1 V' I ICI k a. It, J \ N°!4 ~kO\ \ I ~i r \ , ~ V I I DLC. SOR ~~~ O • may/ I , "' \ '; V (~j/~~~()] SEE-{-{ MAP IdB.D _ e~Y , I~IJ //J/ O ~' trk~ \ I'I ~ _~ V 1` ~ I ,,-. I I ~ ~ ~ ~: Ali ~ CENT AL ~VAL LEY DR ~ /1( o ~' _~~ __~_ _~_ --t,.'... ~~ C22 ky,.s ~.r~ ~~ N.E. COk._/ ~~ ~ /-:21.PE b FN'bl f i4 LOT K 39DD ~ N.W COh $h :wv i i ~', H iii- a~oo ~ `' , ~ ~ ; ~, a6oo J •- aeo _ ,> ... --~~ ~` cT ~s( 5100 - 9a [.~~%r'~ .. +..a n. :I ~F"..,417~ ~\ ` I'~y ~L~R.L T. ..~_ ; ,' ~. ~! k.` 1. ,t Y ST ..-. ^'...,. ~_ ~ ~ H - S.w.COR.LCT H\.~t "'390L~/n. _`ra_.: _ -..- •~ OR CHARDSTTE ~ RC/1', f. I DO7 ~~ { ~ 7^ 1 ' ~ ,i C~ -c ga I .; ., i • M1, ICI 1 •. \ la iQ' •A ,; 1 ~,I, i~-503.c iLLl .m •I. a ~- ~ n~., SEE MAP IODA , ' ~~' ' <i •... ' .~ '~ __. .5, N.E. COR. i ` NW. COR. ~ ~ N.E.COR-' NEIGHBOKHOOD DEVELOPMENT IMiY~N d FH 0 I 2 3 4 5 C-~~~/.3~r /~=- f ---STAFF REPORT--- To: Planning Commission Date: July 31, 1987 From: Don Paul, Fire Chief/Building Official Re: Public Hearing to review and make a recommendation to the City Council concerning the preliminary subdivision plat for Stonecreek III, Phase 2, submitted by Gary Whittle Gary Whittle of Whittle Construction has submitted a preliminary plat for Stonecreek III, Phase 2. The property is located south of Phase 1 on Joseph Street and interconnects with Snowy Butte Lane by way of proposed Scott Drive. The property is zoned R-1 requiring a minimum of 6,000 square-foot lots within blocks and 7,000 square-foot corner lots. The procedure for processing the preliminary plat for a new subdivision is listed in Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 16.24 of the subdivision ordinance. Prior to the Planning Commission public hearing, staff reviewed the plans for consistency with development codes. Public Works Director Fred Phillips has included in this packet his findings dated July 23, 1987 concern- ing the engineering elements of this subdivision. Those findings include statements regarding right-of-way, street widths, and curve radius. To assure that specific requirements are completed in the proposed subdivi- sion, an agreement will be prepared that addresses conditions and requirements that are listed in the resolution as well as below. 1. Developer is to provide a 100-year frequency storm water drainage basin report based on the City's comprehensive plan and design all facilities and housing in the subdivision to comply with the requirements of both the Federal Flood Insurance Program and the City engineer. Such study shall give preference to Griffin Creek for storm drainage purposes. 2. Subdivider shall provide curb heights at or above the 100-year flood ele- vation for-each lot. 3. All dwellings shall have elevations for lowest floor level of at least 12 inches above the 100-year flood elevation. 4. Depth of all sanitary sewers must be sufficient as determined by the City to allow future extensions. 5. All construction of public facilities must be done to City standards and specifications and at developer's expense. 6. Street signs and traffic control signs to be installed by the City at developer's expense. 7. The installation of street lights shall be in accordance with Pacific Power and Light Company's recommendations. The cost of installation shall be the responsibility of the developer. f7 STAFF REPORT Re: Preliminary Plat - Stonecreek III, Phase 2 Page 2 8. Final location, design and sizing of public facilities to be determined by the City engineer at the time of approving the developer's construc- tion drawings. 9. This approval is to the applicant, Gary Whittle, and is not transferable. A change in ownership of the development shall require Planning Commis- sion approval, at which time the Planning Commission may review and may require additional conditions or requirements to the preliminary plat, and Planning Commission shall have the option to review the land sale document. L0. Fees in lieu of land dedication for recreational park purposes shall be $200 "per dwelling unit" due and payable prior to filing of the final plat. 11. All utilities to be in relation to street centerline as indicated in the City's standards and specifications. 12. Plat design shall include connections of sidewalks and street construc- tlon with the Glenn Way intersection at Snowy Butte Lane. 13. Sanitary sewer - Provide information on routing of proposed sanitary sewer design considering the proposed vacation of the portion of Snowy Butte and the former design presented a few years earlier. 14. .Provide for a sewer connect to accommodate the property at the west end of Snowy Butte Road.• 15. Developer shall provide a storm drainage system that addresses the con- veyance of irrigation water and surface runoff. Storm drainage shall also provide for as much westerly flow as possible to avoid additional loading on the Glenn Way system. Further management of overland flow affected by this development shall be addressed. The foregoing items are expected to be addressed in the improvement drawings to be reviewed by staff and approved by the Council prior to the commencement of development. Mr. Phillips' report will be used as a guide to assure that end. One of the most significant questions that arose while reviewing this plat was whether or not abridge over Griffin Creek was needed. Staff's research and a study by Gary Shaff, Transportation Planner with Rogue Valley Council of Governments, have concluded that a bridge is not recommended. Therefore, the proposed traffic circulation of Phase 2 will provide some degree of consis- tency with the Jackson Creek Neighborhood. Development Plan considering the physical barriers presently in place; i.e., waterway and houses in line with furtheY southern extension of Joseph Street. Staff's report includes the following exhibits: Exhibit A - Notice of Public Hearing (forwarded by minute action to August 4, 1987); ~' STAFF REPORT Re: Preliminary Plat - Stonecreek III, Phase 2 Page 3 Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting of Notice of Public Hearing; Exhibit C - Preliminary plat (original presented separately); Exhibit D - Jackson Creek Neighborhood Development Plan; Exhibit E - Memorandum from Fred Phillips, Public Worka Director; Exhibit F - Report from Gary Shaff, Rogue Valley Council of Governments; Exhibit G - Assessor's map page; Exhibit H - Aerial map page. DP/mah i\{~. w `vw.... s r_oQ cr.0~ \0 155.S0. SECOND ST. ~P.O. BOX 3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE 664.3321 THE HEARS OF THE ROGUE.RNER VALLEY NQTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Central Point Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to review and make a recommendation to the City Council concern- ing the preliminary subdivision plat for Stonecreek III, Phase 2, said subdivi- sion to include 31 lots. The general locatlon of the proposed subdivision is the southerly extensions of Joseph Street and Snowy Butte Lane as they extend `from Glenn -Way. The public hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 2, 1987, in the Central Point Council Chambers, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, .Oregon. Don Paul Fire Chief/Building Official City of Central Point Date: June 2, 1987 Time: 7:00 p.m. U" Please publish in the ~Se~dford Mail Tribune on May yJ" and 26, 1987 and provide affidavit of publication. Place: Council Chambers 155 South Second Street P. 0. Box 3576 Central Point, OR 97502 a~ P.O. 80X3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE884-3321 THE HEART OF THE ROGtTE RNER VALLEY CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, 12~/~/Gi"P.B12-- 7/~`JD,~~ , .CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE, ~~i~ /S /q~'7 I POSTED A.PUBLIC ~.,'~' NOTICE OF A I~~l/~/7//?Q ~amrn/5~5/yr~ P'GG~J~/cam ~i~L°LC/YIG1 ~~ieu~ of tnc~ /~mii~ry Pam o~^ Sio~.,creec. FOR ~'ti~15e ~. ~Si~hd/i/is~~,-, NT OR. NEAR 1. 3 4. ~G ~/~l2?rr. .. SIGNATURE DATE c~ /S-X~ i4 1 1 :: t I I ~~. ~° ~ 8A / __~ ___ , f ~ / 4 , % 12go . ...~ . __ ___ 1 s ' I , rj\ ~ \ \ ' 1 : m I 13YN S< ~' ~ ~~ ~ I ' / I _ L?S _ ._~. .. . j4 _ 1 o r} nN r~8 ' ii 25 I .lc S"_~~ __.~. __ _ 124 ~ N y r ~ ~ bI l'f 50 ~ .~ 1 ~ _~~ _ T45ob J20.1 .~ !+ 1I I ~ ( .~^1~ . I U ~6i Js 1 r ~~ ~ ~. I 1 1~ \ ~ I ,~ I I _-~ + -~ ~ I dl Tsm6 : ~ ,~ d 7206 ~ I I .I I 4250 TC 14 t Y I T j.p ,, b ~ ~ I e; ~~. ~ ~: ,. ~. / 1 F- ~S ~ ~ OIG ,D' b nae OI Vl, ~ '1 ZOB j 10 a ,0 ~ i • I ~~ ~ x{00 S< F w ~ -a- ; I ~ ~ °~ iSeo6 'p '12o6d I ~ ~ J I cwo s< .L I i ,D ¢e 1 12S 12~ _,~ I 11 Ii ... ,\ N ' ~ ~ . ?c~s:rtl+v w+~ .~ e6 SO° O I I9 LGOa s< IDC ~ A +~s•~~ ° ~ 95L i ~ I nG \?8 TG1 6 P ` O \ l i I I N B 5 fa \ Jai' 30 ~Jt 100. \ 1 ~ i ~ H s `~` \ SCOTT / 4 I~ JI LLLO S'• ,/ Li~4'J = °~ "c ~~ \ ~ f I w ' ~ i ~.~~1~ I 10 CU. G. . in. J' LiSo f< `~ y 1G,BL56 ~ ^ 1 ,i ~ .I - I I ' N ~ri5< m csoo' . _o. 60ao ~ b 1 0 "'''~ ~ ,~) ~? ~/ I~ ~ ' /Y~g7 ~ / I ~ I d ' I I ~ 90Gr S< -~~~ _ I ``-~> ~ S: i 5J _. Ieo 9l 1 Li lis 1 119.5 o ~ ISO ~ ~ aI ! 91 toa ~ 1 I ' i 1 , I ! 9I / I da '(8006 j. <j~ \ ~. Ii ' I; I I; ,, ; 1~ ° '4°° ~~ 1,190 I I d ~ I ~1 T9~° ~ I)) ' I h a ~' ~ _~ Famswonh ~Dr. ' ~ ~, ---MEMO RAN D UM--- To: Don Paul, Fire Chief/Building Official Date: July 23, 1987 From: Fred Phillips, Public Works Director Re: Review of Preliminary Plat for Stonecreek III, Phase 2 1. An analysis of traffic flow in this neighborhood did not indicate a need for a bridge crossing Griffin Creek. (See report dated June 26, 1987 by Gary Shaff.) 2. It is noted that Scott Drive is shown with a centerline radius of 100'. 3, Provide for a barricade and one foot reserve strip at the south end of Snowy Butte Lane. 4. Plat design shall include connections of sidewalks and street construction with the Glenn Way intersection at Snowy Butte Lane. 5. Provide street lights as per City standards. 6. Sanitary sewer - Provide information on routing of proposed sanitary sewer design considering the proposed vacation of the portion of Snowy Butte and the former design prdsented a few years earlier. 7. Provisions for sewer service for the property west of your subdivision should be addressed to avoid unnecessary delays to tap a main line in a newly developed street. 8. Prepare to address the redesign of storm drainage systems without the benefit of the east/west portion of Snowy Butte proposed for vacation, and how it will effect the conveyance of irrigation waters and surface runoff. 9. Storm drainage should provide for as much westerly flow as possible to avoid additional loading on the Glenn Way system. 10. Design of plat should provide for management of overland flow that is affected by this development. 11. Provide alternate means to .provide flow or elimination of the irrigation district ditch affected by the development of your subdivision. Coordi- nate same with responsible irrigation district. Storm drainage system shall collect overland flow into a piped system which will extend to Griffin Creek. 12. Provide 8" waterline between Snowy Butte and connection to southerly portion of Joseph Street within Joseph Street right-of-way. ~. Memorandum Re: Review of Preliminary Plat for Stonecreek III, Phase 2 Page 2 13. Plat design must comply with the Federal Emergency Management Agency's flood regulations. 14. All designs shall conform to .the Central Point Municipal Code and standard specifications. FW/mat Attachment as ~~~1~ /T ~ Tom. ~°30o Cc~L~1~ ~IGa~~~~ Council of Governments 155 S. Second St. / P.O. Box #3275 Central Polnt, OR 97502 ~~~3) 664-6674/779-6785 06/26/1987 Fred Phillips Central Point City Hall Central Point, OR. 97502 Dear-Fred, Attached is a brief report on the bridge and its importance. You'll note that I don't actually make a recommendation regarding the desirability of construction. That is because of the land use implications of isolating one neighborhood from another. I realize that the City intends to provide for foot and bike, paths across Griffin Creek. However, the land use implications of not connecting the east and western portions of the area with streets and roads still must be scrutinized. however, it appears obvious that the bridge cannot be justified unless there will be a connecting link to Highway 99. But then, the bulk of the traffic will•be diverted from the northerly portion of the development off and around Glen Way and not from the lands that lay west of Griffin Creek (as I might have expected). It just oecurred to me that; if traffic volumes grow to those projected in the build-out scenario, a signal would probably be warranted at the intersection of 99 and the 99 connector. I guess we really don't need to worry about that for a few dozen years. I hope this information answers your .questions about the desirability of requiring developers to help construct a bridge across Griffin Creek in the Jackson Creek Development. Keep in mind that the QRS II analysis tool is available. Now that all the data entry work has been done, it is a simple matter to analyze another area or issue. At the rear of the report is the cover page of a pamphlet, The Impact of Traffic on Residential Areas, that is in the COG's transportation planning library. You'd be welcome to borrow it, if you care to. Sincerely, ~l~v+ G ry haff a ortation Planner JACKSON CREEK DEVELOPMENT REVIEW. Background The conceptual design for the Jackson Creek Development Plan approved by the Planning Commission on April 2, 1985 included an east-west bridge approximately midway through the development. The submission of a development proposal within. the area prompted a review of the desirability of constructing the bridge. It is estimated that the bridge could cost approximately $80,000. Purpose This paper addresses the travel demand generated existing and future residents of this neighborhood. Future forecasts were developed for 2005 and "build-out." TechniQUes The basic data used in developing this analysis were existing (1982/83) dwelling units and employment within Central Point and forecasts of the same information for the year 2005. The 2005 data was developed in 1984 and is based upon comprehensive plan policies of the City but integrates the growth trends experienced by the community since 1980. This data, coupled with inventories of the streets and travel speeds, allowed forecasts of average daily weekday traffic (ADWT) using QRS II, a computerized transportation modeling software. The resulting projections are shown on the attached maps. Conclusions There is little east-west travel demand forecast for this area. However, if the stubbed out street north of Timothy Street between Malabar and Farnsworth were extended to Highway 99, tfae opposite would be ,t rue. But even still, the bulk of the traffic shifts-that occur are a result of diversion of traffic off of the northerly portion of Glen-Way to-the Highway 99 connection. That is, the presence of the bridge and its 'connection to lands west of Griffin Creek contribute little to the ADWT forecast for the Highway 99 connection. Typically streets are classified by the characteristics of traffic that they carry. They are generally divided into the following three elasses: residential (or neighborhood), collector, and arterial. The table below illustrates the differences between these classifications: STREET CLASSIFICATION Number of Traffic Lanes Roadway Type Arterial 4 - 5 Collector Residential 2 2 Daily Traffic Capacity (Two-way ADT 1) Design2 Maximum3 24,000-28,000 30,000-36,0 0 a~ 10,000 2,000 ~,L~/,C3 /T ~ STREET CLASSIFICATION Traffic Speed Roadway Type Arterial Collector Residential < 25 mph 25-45 mph Traffic Control Signals on arterial cross streets. Stop signs on other cross streets. 1 Average daily traffic (vehicles) 2 Capacity at level of service C 3 Capacity at level of service E 20-30 mph Stop signs on cross streets Stop/Yield signs. After reviewing the projections for traffic-from this neighborhood, it appears that the two mayor north - south streets, Glen Way and Vincent should be developed at collector street standards. There is little doubt that travel demands approaching the 10,000 average daily traffic levels will occur on these streets.- That is, unless the east-west link to Highway 99 is developed.. Under these circumstances, Glen Way may more appropriately be constructed to residential standards: However, Vincent will still need to be constructed at collector street standards as would the Highway 99 connector. It is difficult to describe the differences between 5,000 average daily traffic and 10,000 ADT. For that reason, attached is a listing of traffic counts taken in the City between 1977 and 1982, 1 ~ ~ U .ry 4- 4- ID _. ~ I--- >+ Z c0 -o ~ - U a~ Q7 -J 3 Q ~ J, F- .--I U •ti ~[ crl r, ~ a.l - ~- o~ N N a0 S.~ Off- 4.I ~-- > v ~h +` ~ C ^I ~~11 U 3`a ~ O N +-~ Y-~ ~ U Ol C a--+ ~ C C C ., y ~ o v V ~ N a~ •.~ ~ ~ N r-1 ..y •.--I ..-I (O O O .ti C 1r f-i (fl O~ C C O~ N d N ..y C U V In ~ ~ ~ O: ~ O a~ ui .--1 c0 II V N r y ~~ ~y •~~'• 7_ .~'.. _ . ~.~ ' f~ ~~_ l _ -~.~1 M .~~ ~. _ -- - _ -----~--_--- 66 ~r~w ~._. ~ . ------~- Ali ~~ ~M : ~F. .__ ~: ~r r ~"+._ j ~,'/•#~ ~~ .* ~J ~, ... -, .r ~~ f +. •• .*. ,~ 'i `,i ~~ a~ C~~i~~ ~7-- r ;,• ,~ ~~ U 4- 4- c0 Y.~ I- W C"7 ~-, o ~o a ~ ~ [n a~ Q 3 3 ~, ..-~ o° o CN Ql (O - a.> - .. p >~ ~; .~ c ~ o ~'_' ~ a~ V ~ N n~ •~ ~ ~ N .--1 .ti .ry ..-I (O O O .-i C S-I Y-I f9 OI y.~ ~ C +-i C C pl N OJ OJ •^i C U V V1 ~ C ~ ~ O; ~__ •a # a ^' a•••1..•y 0 a~ u~ .-1 (O II V /~ •--- ~ •~'.._ _ MF "~i -t-------_• ~. 1------ '. ~'~ . ~p~k, OOFI -'~` ~ ~6 o ~d'•ti ro •;;• ~~ -`"._ ,~ J ..__._." " ~ ~` ' r~~ ~. r~, f Q~ "~y~ ~ ~~ °o ~q~ ~~~ ~~ L._ .,,_t f __ti '`i- :~ ~~~~T ~ ~~ i' ~ i' U N ~ Q ' U N C O C C ..--I ~ O Q1 U ~ N N •'-1 D ~ N H .ry .ry ..-I fD O O ,.y ~ ~ 7y (n 01 C O ~ ~ OJ N '•-~ C U U ~ O ~O•, ~ ~ U .ti w ~-- }y w ~, ~._~ Q ~ ~ v m .a~ 3 ~~+ >s •-~ ul +-1 ®. o N a. m a> O N ul r-1 ~ II U N '- •Z~.. •1 r .~ ••~..~ ~ - ^.•• -_ _ ~f ~ '~ • .l ~~•--*- ~~ • ~!- • -'~••~ f ~ ,r rr- 3 ~~- yy "T Mi . ~i 1~ 'M. • ~r_.8 F..-____~~ ~~ (•1 ~~ u l~~• J ~• - ~.•~' ' 0 oaf ------iw '••o• -••* /• ~~' r .~ ~l C~/~ r o -. ~'- U V --~ W 4- Z 4- 2 co O Y-~ U f- rn ~, rn m D 3 a~~ 2 N 3 ~, W '"I .~ ® o m v ~, > o O v N >~ a., p ~, ~. u ~ ~ a~ ~.. •-~ C C C .ry D O Q! U D N Q1 .ti D 'D N ~'~'7 ,,.,y .ti .'y .ry cD O O ,.~ .[. C i-a >~ cD 01 ,"i ,.-~ C .--I C C O~ N a~ a+ ..y C U U N O C ~ ~ O; ...... ....~"._.. ~. a mr.ee ___ m ~.~m .. - m~..~.,..~,..,. ~..,,a.aova~ O ul QJ ul .--1 c0 II U to c _..._, _ *_ ~ry.,~~ ~--_ --,. -- ~` ' ,* f,/ r i--- Mi :~ --- ~-__.'~ _v -r-- ~----- ~ 66 Ar~w ~- . ~... o j~`~` ~r ~~ S~ ~. .t ~ .y. ^ r~ _ -- r ~ ~ Qy r'O~ ~~ 1~ .~. ~~~~ '7` ~~ ~. "( ii i U +-1 4- O I1J >~ ~ ~- 0 ti T ~ cp m 'p .Y \ QJ 3 a~ 3 ~ ~, ~ '-I I =ti a o ~ a~ m Ot co v Q \i f9. ~._ •o ~M . •_ o AIM ~'••.. ._ U ~ ~ O ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~-' a~ c v ~, ..., c ~ o ~-' ~ v U ~ N D 'O Q) N .,y .--i O O ,y C ~ ~ f0 01 +"~ y..~ C „„ i C C OI N 6.1 OJ +y C u v w ~ ~ ~a 0 Q1 ul .--~ c0 II U N k,~ ~ ~ ~ M 1 ~~.~ r~ ~M ~- x'•11 r 1 ~._ .~ --- - -J- r---- ~ 66 >,r~w I@. ': ~r ~~~--iIF ~ ~1pOrF. J~ .~. ~ /~ ^ 1~. ~~ •} f~ __.. -.. __~ rJQ~~' ~~ ~~k •, _ f#~ - ._...+w .f. r r' r' rr .*~ O C-~Ct~//~~T- /~-- 1'~•' ,i~ i 0 ~- .~ U V W ry-i Z 4- z w o ro U ~ ~-- m O~ a ~' 'O 3 ~ ~, °ts 3 ~~, ~ c' ..--I p •.-I ~ ~ L~ p m ~ ~ 3 ~ f-- ~ ~ a~ O > I Q p v J >`. U p)' O ~ ~ f-a N ~--~ N OJ ~ C ..-{ C C C .^y D O U ~ Q! N ~ 'D Q1 N •.y ,,..y O O '--I .C.... C f-i 1•a .N ~ (D C 07 ,--I C C ~ N OI .,--I ~ C U U IA ~ + y O; y ~M ~ _ 'r ~~' '+F.. _ _ ~- H~ _ ~ _ ~* . •• r ~ ter- 1y~ 3 7I '- yy, "7 -_ ~~ ~ ,~ r ,~ O Lfl Q1 ll'\ r-I (O 11 U to ~-- #M X11... 0 '~. r~ r' ~~ Q ;' ;• :~ 3~ ~~~ l T ,~ - .. ~*- ~+ i. Central Point Area TRAFFIC COUNT DATA DATE KEY OF TRAFFIC° NUMBER LOCATION COUNT COUNT 1 50 ft. east of Rachel Drive on Pine Street June '82 3,985 2 Pine Street -- 100 yds. west of Highway 99 May, '62 8,011 3 Pine Street -- 50 ft. N.E. of Highway 99 Feb. '80 9,592 4 Pine Street -- 50 ft. S.W. of 6th Street Feb. '80 6,396 5 Pine Street -- 50 ft. N.E. of 6th Street Oct: '77 10,154 6 Pine Street -- 50 yds. W. of Freeman Road Feb. '80 11,366 7 Pine Street -- Between Freeman & I-5 Ramps June '82 13,530 8 Pine Street -- 150 yds. E. of I-5 EASTBOUND June '82 5,993 WESTBOUND June '82 6,054 9 Pine Street -- 100 yds. W. of Hamrick EASTBOUND June '82 6,045 • ~ WESTBOUND June '82 6,180 10 Pine Street -- Between Hamrick & Table Rock Road EASTBOUND June '82 3,155 • WESTBOUND June '82 3,079 11 Biddle Road -- East of Table Rock Rd. EASTBOUND June '82 3,541 WESTBOUND June '82 3,995 12 Table Rock Rd. -- N. of Airport Road Aug. '82 9,212 13 Table Rock Rd. -- S. of Hamrick Road June '82 3,745 14 Table Rock Rd. -- S. of Biddle Road June '82 3,676 15 Table Rock Rd. -- N, of Biddle Road June '82 7,860 16 Table Rock Rd. -- S. of Vilas Road Sept.'82 6,928 17 Table Rock Rd. -- N. of Vilas Road Sept.'82 8,729 18 Vilas Road -- E . of Table Rock Rd. Sept.'82 5,511 19 vilas Road -- W . of Table Rock Rd. Sept. '82 5,465 20 Hamrick .Road -- N. of Beebe Road June '82 5,808 21 Hamrick Road -- N, of Pine Street June '82 6,436 22 Beebe Road -- W . of Gebhard Road June '82 373 23 Hamrick Road -- S, of Pine Street June '82 815 24 Freeman Road -- S. of Pine Street June '82 2,785 25 Freeman Road -- S, of Ash Street June '82 2,650 26 Freeman Road -- N. of Hopkins Road June '82 2,056 27 Hopkins Road -- E. of Fourth Street Aug. '77 1,326 28 Hopkins Road -- W. of Freeman Road June '82 966 29 Hopkins Road -- E. of Freeman Road ~ June '82 1,508 30 Hopkins Road -- W, of Bursell Road June '82 1,189 r' ~ i i DATE KEY OF TRAFFZC* NUMBER LOCATION COUNT COUNT 31 Bursell Road -- S. of Hopkins Road June '82 1,206 32. Bursell Road -- N. of Pittview July '82 1,221 33 Bursell Road -- S, of Pittview July '82 1,378 34 Bursell Road -- N. of Beall Lane July '82 1,262 35 Beall Lane -- W. of Merriman Road Aug. '82 2,091 36 Beall Lane -- E. of Bursell Road July '82 1,790 37 Beall Lane -- W. of Bursell Road July '82 1,141 38 Beall Lane -- E, of Rogue Valley Hwy. July '82 1,674 39 Beall Lane -- W, of Rogue Valley Hwy. July '82 2,469 90 Beall Lane -- E. of Hanley Road June '82 2,082 91 Beall Lane -- W. of Hanley Road June '82 2.,637 42 Grant Road -- N, of Beall Lane May '82 498 43 Hanley Road -- S. of Beall Lane June '82 3,947 44 Hanley Road -- N. of Beall Lane June '82 3,448 45 Grant Road -- S. of Taylor Road May '82 391 46 Grant Road -- N. of Taylor Road May '82 468 47 .Taylor Road -- E. of Grant Road May '82 1,581 48 Taylor Road -- W. of Grant Road May '82 1,225 99 Grant Road -- S. of Scenic Avenue May '82 453 50 Scenic Avenue -- W. of Grant Road May '82 1,005 51 Scenic Avenue -- E. of Grant Road May '82 1,190 52 Scenic Avenue -- E. of Rogue Valley Hwy. May '82 1,826 53 Scenic Avenue -- W. of Upton Road May '82 3,084 54 Upton Road -- N. of Scenic Avenue May '82 2,919 55 Upton Road -- N.E. of Bear Creek Bridge June. '82 2,330 56 Third Street - - S. of Tenth/Scenic May '81 '2,269 57 Third Street - - Between Pine & Manzanita May '82 2,560 58 Fourth Street -- S. of Pine Street Jan. '75 1,534 59 Taylor/Haskell -- N. of W. Pine June '77 2,979 60 Blackwell Road -- N. of I-5 Interchange May '82 9,085 * With the exception of #8, #9, #10 and #11, all traffic counts are two-way counts and, in most cases, taken over a two-day period. rv The impact of Traffic O~ce oo ne(Seae(nry ®~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ Are ~`~ of Twnsportolion June, 1982 An Urban Consortium Information Bulletin ~I ~ ~ ~~ i / `(yz ~~ ;•, ~~~ \~ \ st /\ Esc/ DLC 52 ~ ~ ~ ~°~ ~ \ `~\ .;, ~~, , ~ n \ ~ , fir` ., ! ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ eusN st. I ~~~~tiSEE 1Y~AP IC?AC9. ,., PSr; ~ ',-4 I / 1" -; . ~\ SSW. C0+2 DLC X53 \ ~ \ °~` • ~~^~ I~' a~;E`~ek" SEE 'MAP IOA~D~` ~ s ~i I I I ~ ~ i „_ ~~ I :, I ~P~ ~ ~ Y . ;, I ~ ~ 1` W I II , ^ c\ I I \ •, v I j DLC 54 i ~y I . \O9t~ ~ i, ` ~• ~ I -X711.- :: - ~ ~ ~~ 1 II J \ MAP 10 B D o D~~```~~ i'~j ~ -~ V _ ,, Y_T AL ~VALIEY I I DR_ /~f _ ~~ ~y2 ~ ku~•-•I'i.ii ~~ N. E. COR.~~ +~• i ~~'b ` ri@i.b E. fi bb7bi. 7f !11 LOT K I 3900 t x L ~~ .,; ., \\ ~ ~ - BUTTE :RGw d! f 1~4 CVi'1 _ ~ . -- ~C' ~ ,;L f .~ 4A~ ~!I ~rrr /r~' \~ r' \ 4700 a';..., x , ; O yM\ ~ 1 ~ ~ ` li~ 100 \ ' \ 4600 ~ _ 60 a?~~) . , - . rn..::., , c.i ~.• ...\ =. ~ 4900 } :. ' ~ ' / } ~i ~ ~E S.LDT a"`~ 5100 ~, .~I 5_I ® /t l~ i.., .. >:-t ,r,, :j IF-:.i40) ,`•f, a. .. ~. T. pe 6 I8 - ,9, ..,.. _, 9 ~~ i~ ., Il `. ~ n ~, ' 46 5~t~ s.w.coR. LcT N `' r. r 007 ~ • SNOWY 6UTTE ~ ~,J 11 ' '~ IW¢~ ~ 1~ Y ORCHPRDS `~ ~ '~` II' ~ ` h' i ~~! 31T1 i!I ~ r ` 1 - !a ~ b la '. ~,~; ~~' 1;;-503'_ ~ I~ > ~ , ~~ 'R ~I~~ S T ~ , . ! •- \ I!!'" SEE . MI•A P 10 D A ~ ' ~' ' ,. !m 9e ~ _ _ j IJ.E. COR. i i ~ NW. COR. I i ~ N.E.CC4~ DLC 66 I DLC 65 ! DLC 65 I ~ ~ ]2O(e~ I ' \~~Z I ~ ` ~/~ C I ~//3 ~ I ~-r ' ( ,r `~ , 1 ~ I. 1 ~ ~ I ~o I : II ! ,8°• 1 1 x BR. 1 1 xize3.o ) i29a.3 x i ixe3.o x .~ ....-,.-..-.-..~ r-.-~-~• - -- - x i283.~ ,_, ,___, ~ viLE ~ I 1 I r ~ 1 ~ ~ / ~ ~~ I i v~LE ~ ~ ~ i. _> x 1285. ~ X t28a.3 ~...~ X 1266.2 .39 a Q ~_ 1287.3 x ~ II X r M.X.O v~/~`i J X X266.7 ~~l~r ~~ ~\ x 1280.2 ~~^+ "y`"~" ~~JA-•'~~ 155 S. Seoond Street • P.O. Box 3275 Council of Governments Central Point, OR 97502 503-664-6674 July 29, 1987 AN OPEN LETTER TO MEMBERS OF THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION The August 4 meeting will be my first opportunity to meet with you since Ron Hough's departure for Bremerton, WA in mid-April. As the attaehed scope of work and workplan indicates, we will be meeting regularly in the year ahead. We can start by discussing needed revisions of zoning and subdivision regulations and updating of the Comprehensive Plan. I would also like to confirm that I am indeed picking up where Ron left off. Attached are revised sections of the residential zoning districts to allow density changes, and apply the Residential Low Density zone more widely. I will also have a mock-up of a revised zoning map that incorporates the density changes and the Bear Creek Greenway zone at the meeting next Tuesday. I look forward to meeting all of you, Sincerely, i ~~~ `G~E~ Wes L, eyno s. AICP Comprehensive Planner attachments 0 / 155 SO. SECOND ST. P.O. BOX 3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE 664-3321 T THC }{CART OI' THE ROGUC RNCR VALLCY 23 June 1987 Wes Reynolds Comprehensive Planner Rogue Valley Council of Governments P.O. Box 3275 Central Point, OR 97502 Dear Wes: Please proceed with the work plan you proposed as soon as possible. Please let me-know how much of this work is grant eligible and whether we should make application for the grant. prior to starting the work? Sincerely, ;~ ~, !... Dave Kucera City Administrator DK:dlf cc: Don Paul ~// Attachment "A" City of Central Point Scope of Work -- Planning Services Fiscal year 87-88 The following tasks are listed in the approximate order in which they will be undertaken and completed by RVCOG, although there will be some overlaps among various tasks. Generally in priority order, these tasks are subject to revision at the direction of the City. 1, Review Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan for needed revisions and amendments. 2, Revise minimum lot size requirements based upon results of recent study on residential densities. 3. Streamline zoning regulations with particular .attention to: a) Eliminate repairs from site plan review, b) Allow minor amendments to conditional use permits and PUDs at the staff level;: Develop explicit procedures for staff approval to assure due process. Define threshold between staff approvals and Planning Commission review, c) Simplify P,U:D. procedures. d) Revise ordinance to tighten rules on nonconforming uses, especially of concern are older mobile homes. e) Other revisions that may be needed, such as meeting the state requirement that city actions on applications (including appeals) be completed within 120 days of receipt of a completed application. 4. Develop clear and objective standards for review and approval of land use planning applications. 5. Develop standard application form and information sheets for land use applications. 6: Review Subdivision Code in order to reflect current policies and standards. In particular: a) Develop policy & code section on city street improvements for flag lots. Especially criteria for length of access road to be applied in land use decisions. b) Revise major/minor land partitioning process to provide that deed restrictions and improvement agreements are done before signing of the partitioning plat. c) Allow for lot line adjustments, perhaps with staff review,' 1 O F 1 1 Central Point 87-88 Scope of Work - Planning Services(continued) 7. Review the fee schedule for land use actions. Determine average costs and the amounts of needed fee increases. 8. Develop policy for road and street improvements to be required at time of approving land use actions (subdivisions, partitions, P.U.D., etc.). Resolve inconsistencies among the standards city and county have applied to roads in the city and urbanizable area. (Initiate discussions with county by September, 1987). 9. Develop policy on additional right-of-way or special setbacks on major streets. 10. Eatablish policy on bike paths within major developments or along major streets and designated bike routes. 11. Establish procedures for a Planning Commission docket to record requirements set as conditions of land use approvals, city liens on parcels, and deferred improvement agreements on specific properties. - 12. Investigate and report on alternatives for establishing a land use data base including mapping requirements, computer capabilities required, software availability and ease of use, and. compatibility with city, county, RVCOG and state systems. 13. Prepare workplan for meeting those periodic. review requirements that remain after the amendments to Comprehensive Plan and implementing ordinances in items 1 through 10 have been completed. /3 2 n ra u. City of Central Point RVCOG Workplan for Planning Services -- FY 87-88 Task s Staff work period P•C, meeting Citv Council 1 & 2. July 20 to 24 August 4 ______ 3• Auguat 24 to 28 Sept. 1 ______ 4 & 5. September 21 to 25 Oct. 6 ______ Package of Zoning Revisions, late Oct? Dec/Jan? • 6- October 19 to 23 Nov. 3 _____m 7• November 16 to 20 Dec. 1 Jan/Feb? 8,9, & 10. December 14 to 18 & January 18 to 22 Feb. 2 & March 1 11. February. 22 to 26 April 5 12• April 18 to 22 May 3 13. May 24 to 27 June 7 Apr/May7 3'/ ~T . i ~ ' :, ZONING REVISIONS ~ 17.12.020 Zones--Classification. For the purposes of this title, the following zones are established in the city: Abbreviation District [R-F R-L RR-1 R-2 R-3 C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 M-1 M-2 Residential-farm] Residential low-density Residential single-family Residential two-family Residential multiple family Neighborhood convenience shopping Limited commercial-professional Downtown business. district Tourist and office-professional Throughfare commercial Industrial limited Industrial general (Ord. 1436 S2 (part), 1981). 17.12.030 District--Location. The boundaries for each district listed in this title are the boundaries indicated for the district by the city zoning map of [1981] 1987, which is adopted by reference. The boundaries shall be modified in accordance with zoning map amendments, which amendments this section subsequently adopts by reference.. (Ord. 1436 S2 (part), 1981). 17.12.060 Zoning of annexed area. All future annexations are expected to include only lands within the city's urban growth boundary (UGB). The comprehensive plan of Central Point includes a plan for future land uses within the UGB area and [a] the zoning map_ described in Section 17.12.030 [that] is consistent with the comprehensive plan and which will determine the district into which a newly annexed area is placed. [In the event that an area is annexed to the city prior to final state approval of the city's urban growth boundary, the proposed UGB land use and zoning maps shall act as a zoning guide for city council approval.] The appropriate zoning district shall be applied to the area upon annexation. (Ord. 1436 S2 (part), 1981). Deletions are [bracketed] Additions are underlined ~s ,, ~ , , 4. 17.16.050 Area, width and. yard requirements. The following lot requirements shall be observed in the R-L district: A. Lot Area. The lot area shall be a minimum of fifteen thousand square feet. B. Lot Width. The lot width shall be a minimum of seventy-five feet. C. Front Yard. The front yard shall be a minimum of twenty feet [but not more than fifty feet]. D. Side Yard. Side yards shall be a minimum of ten feet; however, side yards abutting a street or a proposed or planned future street shall be a minimum of twenty feet. E. Rear Yard. The rear yard shall be a minimum of ten feet. (Ord. 1529 S1 (part), 1984: Ord. 1436 S2'(part), 1981). F. Not withstanding the yard requirements of C. D. and E. above, no dwelling shall be closer than seventy-five feet (including rights-of-way) to land zoned Exclusive Farm Use by Jackson County. 17..20.050 Area, width and yard requirements. The following lot requirements shall be observed:- A. Lot Area. The lot area shall be a minimum of six thousand square feet with corner lots being a minimum of seven thousand square feet. B. Lot Width. The minimum width of a lot in an R-1 district shall be sixty feet, with corner lots being a minimum of seventy feet in width. C. Lot Depth. No requirement. D. Front Yard. The front yard shall be a minimum of twenty feet. ' E. Side Yard. Side yards shall be a minimum of five feet per story. Side yards abutting a street shall be a minimum of twenty feet in width. F. Rear Yard. The rear yard shall be a minimum of fifteen feet. (Ord. 1436 52 (part), 1981). ~~