HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - June 2, 1987i
~ `~ n Y
Next Resolution No. 124
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
155 South Second Street
June 2, 1987 - 7:00 p.m.
AGENDA
I. Meeting called to order
II. Roll call
III. Approval of minutes
IV. Correspondence and Public Appearances
V. Business
Page 4k
1 A. Public Hearing for an Application for a Conditional Use Permit
submitted by Roger Richardson to allow the development of a
dwelling group consisting of up to five duplexes (ten units) at
the northeast corner of Bursell Road and Beall Lane in an R-2
zone; property further described as Jackson County Assessor's
map page 37 2W 11D, Tax Lot 2200.
24 B. Public Meeting for site plan review for a two-family dwelling
unit on the northeast corner of Bursell Road and Beall Lane in
an R-2 zone submitted by Roger Richardson; property further
described as Jackson County Assessor's map page 37 2W 11D, Tax
Lot 2200.
C. Discussion regarding Stonecreek III, Phase 2, preliminary plat
submitted by Whittle Construction to be forwarded to the July
7, 1.987 Planning Commission meeting.
VI. Miscellaneous
VII. Adjournment
`~ o
' --- S T A F F R E P O R T---
To: Planning Commission Date: May 29, 1987
From: Don Paul, Fire Chief/Building Official
Re: Public Hearing to make a decision on an Application for a Conditional
Use Permit for Roger Richardson to allow the development of a dwelling
group consisting of up to five duplexes (ten units) at the northeast
corner of Bursell Road and Beall Lane in an R-2 zone, property further
described as Jackson County Assessor's map page 37 2W 11D, Tax Lot 2200.
Roger Richardson has applied to develop his 1.4-acre tax lot into a dwelling
group consisting of up to five duplexes in addition to the existing single-
family residence. The use is identified in the Central Point Municipal Code
Section 17.24.030, G., as a conditional use.
The neighborhood, which was recently annexed into the City of Central Point,
consists of primarily single-family dwelling units with a few mobile homes
scattered in the general area. Newer building activity has not occurred in the
area in recent years, but now that City services are available, the initiation
of Mr. Richardson's project could spur renewed activity.
The purpose of the R-2 district is to promote and encourage a suitable environ-
ment for family life at a slightly higher density than that permitted in the
R-1 district, and also to provide opportunities for the development of lower-
cost duplexes and attached dwellings. Mr. Richardson's proposed duplex for the
initiation of his building activity would probably not be considered as a
lower-cost duplex, but seems to be consistent with the purpose of the district.
The total area of land available on this particular tax lot measures 60,984
square feet. To satisfy the provisions for minimum lot area for the proposed
construction, the site would only require 15,500 square feet. This minimum re-
quirement has been more than satisfied and ensures that as many existing trees
as possible may be preserved to enhance the environment.
The height requirement of the district is not an issue at this time until the
site plan is reviewed. Distances between principal buildings on the same lot
shall be a minimum of one half of the sum of the height of both buildings, and
in no case shall the distance be less than 12 feet. This also is not an issue
until site plans are reviewed prior to the issuance of building permits.
Bursell Road is identified in our comprehensive plan as a collector street
which requires 60 to 66 feet of right-of-way. The present 60 feet of right-of-
way seems adequate in that the present density on Bursell Road is near maximum.
Beall Lane is identified in the City's comprehensive plan as a secondary
arterial requiring 80. to 88 feet of right-of-way. Two considerations should be
given attention in determining the need for additional right-of-way adjacent to
the Richardson property on the Beall Lane side, First, the City's southern
urban growth boundary is Beall Lane and precludes the opportunity for addi-
tional right-of-way on the south side of that roadway without the cooperation
of either Jackson County or the City of Medford. Second, Beall T.ane is a
Staff Report
May 29, 1987
Page 2
County road and the County does not have a-long-range plan for widening that
particular roadway, This means that any future improvements to Beall Lane will
probably come by the, City's own .initiative. All of this, along with the recom-
mendation of our City Attorney, is simply to say that in an effort to assure
sufficient public property is available in the future, an additional ten feet
of dedicated right-of-way should be secured. now along with the recognized
setbacks being established to conform to Section 17.60.090, A., item 1. Staff
recommends that Mr. Richardson deed to the public a strip of land ten feet in
width along the southern border of his property adjacent to Beall Lane. Until
such time as the actual widening of Beall Lane becomes necessary, the right-of-
way may be used for low level landscaping.
The question of improvements on both Bursell Road and Beall Lane is philosophi-
cal in nature: Should the City require improvements to the street frontages
including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, etc.; or would a Deferred Improvement
° Agreement be sufficient for such improvements at a point in the future when
other development in the neighborhood occurs? The answer to this question
needs to be determined by the Planning Commission. A recommendation has been.
made by both Central Point's Public Works Director and Jackson County Public
Works Department to have the developer enter into a Deferred Improvement Agree-
ment for future improvements to both Bursell Road and Beall Lane.
The applicant has submitted findings of fact which should be considered .prior
to making a final decision concerning this conditional use application. Staff
has included several exhibits as follows:
Exhibit A - Application for Conditional Use Permit;
Exhibit B - Notice of Public Hearing;
Exhibit C - Certificate of Posting of Notice of Public Hearing;
Exhibit D - Applicant's findings of fact;
Exhibit E - Assessor's map page (with increased right-of-way shown);
Exhibit F - Aerial map page (with increased right-of-way shown);
Exhibit G - Copies of sections of the Comprehensive Plan on circula-
tion and transportation relating to Beall Lane and
Bursell Road;
Exhibit H - Development plan (original is a separate document);
Exhibit I - Letter and responses - Jackson County Public Works Dept.
Exhibit J - Memorandum from Fred Phillips, Public Works Director.
Also, for a matter of record, Bear Creek Valley Sanitation Authority has
requested the City to withhold issuance of building permits until they have re-
ceived deferred assessment payments which are due upon development of the
property. Staff will work with the developer and BCVSA to ensure that this
assessment is satisfied. If the Planning Commission can determine that the
withholding of building permits until such assessments are paid will protect
the public health, safety and general welfare, then that condition could be
placed upon the approval of this application.
Staff also recommends that the developer submit, as requested by Jackson County
Public Works Department, a drainage plan including the impact on the public
facilities downstream of this development.
DP/mat
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL. USE PER)~4IT
~As required in the Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.76
TO TAE CITY OF CINTRAL POINT
1. Name', address and phone number oP Applicant.
ROGER RICHARDSON, 683 Vista Park Drive, Eagle Point, OR 97524 (503) 826-6722
2. Is the Applicant the owner of the property or an agent of the owner?
OWNER
3. If the Applicant is not the owner of the property! list the owner's name and
address.
N/A
4. Address of .the property. N.E. Corner of Bursell Road/Beall Lane intersection.
5. Legal description or the assessor's parcel number of the property.
(If lengthy description, staple to back of application.
Township 3~', Range 2 West, Section 11D, Tax Lot 2200
6. Attach accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The draw-
ing of the' site must'be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine
the compliance of the proposal with the requirements of the ordinance. Address
any pertinent factors from the applicable ordinance.
7. Statement describing the nature of the use for which application is made.
Furnish information as detailed as possible.
The applicant is applying for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the development
of a "DWELLING GROUP" consisting of five new duplexes (ten units) and an older
existing home on a single 1.4 acre tax lot. .This application is in accordance
with the requirements of the City o$ Central Point, including the provisions of
Zoning Ordinance Section 17.76 (Conditional Use Permits) and with other City
land development requirements. Dwelling Groups are listed as a "Conditional Use"
in the R-2 zoning district, Section 17.24.020(G).
FILING FEE: X100.00
. Date Filed: C
~ i ~~L~ ~ .
Signature of Applicant~~//-~~//I /~
~~ ~ipJ~ll~~ ~"X
°~~.', 4
-~~ ..
6. ~_/' - „_ ..fie
r ~. ~~
-pR.EG~~ 155 S0. SECOND ST. P.O. BOX 357$ CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502
THE HEART OF THE
RC~UE_RA~ER VALLEY
.CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PHONE 664-3321
' Notice is hereby given that the Central Point Planning Commission will review
at a public hearing an application for a conditional use permit from Roger
Richardson to allow the development of a dwelling group consisting of five new
duplexes and an older existing home on a single 1.4-acre tax lot located at the
northeast corner of the Bursell Road/Beall Lane intersection, Central Point, in
(Z,'Z- a ~~zone. Said property is further described as Jackson County Assessor's
Map Page 37 2W 11D, Tax Lot 2200.
This public hearing will be held on Tuesday, June 2, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. in the
City of Central Point Council Chambers, 155 South Second Street, Central Point,
Oregon.
Don Paul
Building/Planning Department
City of Central Point
~,},i
Please publish in the Medford
Mail Tribune on May and 26',
1987 and provide affidavit of
publication.
Date: June 2, 1987
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Place: Council Chambers
155 South Second Street
P. 0. Box 3576
Central Point, OR 97502
THE HEART OF THE'
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
P.O. BQX3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
PHONE664-3321
I, /'/L/.LGLy" J7 //~/~~(~l`~-,C , .CERTIFY THAT ON
THE FOLL06tING DATE, ~~'G, /s'~/~3R7 I POSTED A_PUBLIC
NUTIC'c OF A ~~Q/"~12~n ~U/~'7/~2/~Sv~Ui'> ,
/L.`/~~v~~,~l,~iJn~CfSe.~'rmif-Gt~o~,ofi~~io,-, rL2 c
FOR~/2~000 ~I~"Bifr~~~~f1~L /r~ ¢z?r se~~"~~r~-~C`7Q'r~~Sor~_ AT OR
NEAR 1. ~~L, ~~.~~
r„~
/~ ,
SIGNATURE i
DATE ~S~S'~'
BEFORE THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
COUNTY OF JACKSON,.STATE OF OREGON
IN THE MATTER OF A REQUEST FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF A DWELLING &
GROUP IN THE R-2 ZONING DISTRICT. FINDINGS OF FACT
Roger.:Richardson, Applicant.
INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
As shown in the illustration below, the subject property is located
at the northeast corner of the intersection of Bursell Road and Beall
Lane in the City of Central Point.
The subject property consists of 1.41 acres
in an irregular shape,. but fronting on both
Bursell Road and Beall Lane. The property
is shown on the Comprehensive Plan Map of
Central Point as "Medium-density Residentia
and on the Official Zoning Map as "R-2,
Residential Two-family".
The property currently contains one single-
fatt~ily dwelling, which is proposed to
remain on the site. There are also a number
of attractive trees on the site, which the
applicant will attempt to preserve, although
some will be eliminated out of necessity.
The applicant has a two-phase long-range plan for the subject property,
the first phase of which is the subject of this application. He would
like to construct five new duplex residential structures, or ten dwelling
units, on the property. This would be done under the City's "dwelling
group" provisions. Those provisions allow dwelling groups, provided
there is at least 2,500 square feet of lot area for each unit. This
proposal would allow nearly 5,600 square feet per unit, including the
existing home. In other words, the proposal is less than one-half the
permitted density for this parcel.
The initial development would take place on the existing tax lot. However,
the applicant is also considering future options, and is designing the
project so that it might be subdivided at some time in the future, resulting
in new lots, street, and other improvements that are in accordance with the
City's development and subdivision requirements. A tentative design for
the future subdivision of this parcel is being included with this application
but only for informational purposes, not for approval at this time. This
request is simply for approval of the "Dwelling Group" as proposed.
--- 1 -
6EALL LANE
CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The following findings of fact are presented to show that this proposal is
consistent with the long-range intent and purpose of the Central Point
Comprehensive Plan.
1. The proposal calls for a total of 11 dwelling units on the 1.4
acre parcel, or an overall density of 7.9 dwelling units per acre.
The Comprehensive Plan's "Maximum Residential Density" for Medium
Density areas is established at 12 dwelling units per acre. This
proposal is well within that limitation.
2. As stated in Chapter XII (Land Use Plan) of the Comprehensive Plan,
certain areas were designated for Medium-density development under
R-2 zoning because they were suitable for that level of development.
A number of factors contribute to that suitability, including existing
development in the area, access to transportation routes, public
facilities and services, etc. This particular site is included in
one of those areas that was designated for R-2 development.
3. The subject site is in a good location to accommodate the proposed
development for the following reasons:
(a) It is at the intersection of two important streets. Bursell
Road is designated as a Collector Street and Beall is a designated
Secondary Arterial, intended to shuttle traffic between Highway 99
to the west and Table Rock Road to the east and south. Therefore,
any traffic generated by the proposed development will have direct
access to an arterial street (Beall Lane) and will not impact any
neighborhood local streets in the area.
(b) The general area consists of a combination of newer and older
homes, a few mobile homes, and a variety of agricultural uses.
This development will provide new development in the area and
could have a positive impact in encouraging other similar new
development or redevelopment of other properties in the area.
It will enhance the residential image of the neighborhood, and
make it more attractive for further investment.
(c) Public water, sewer, electric and other utilities are already in
the. vicinity and the applicant intends to connect to those systems
as part of the project, and in accordance with City requirements.
4. The City of Central Point has begun the process of developing a master
plan for the overall long-range development of the Elk Creek Neighborhood,
which includes this parcel. That plan has not been completed. However,
since this parcel. is at the extreme southwestern corner of the large
neighborhood area, and because of its unusual shape and relationship
to other surrounding parcels, it would be difficult to incorporate this
lot into an overall master plan in any way other than proposed by the
applicant at this time. This proposal makes this property virtually
self-sufficient in terms of utilities and access without adversely
affecting future neighborhood development concepts. In fact, this
proposal could easily be incorporated into that master plan later on.
5. The proposal is consistent with the City's. growth projections and
Urbanization policies since it is already within the Urban Growth
Boundary and has been ahnexed to the City of Central Point and zoned
R-2 for multiple-family development.
6. According to the Housing Element of the Central Point Comprehensive
Plan, the Medium-density areas are intended to develop within a density
range of 6-12 dwelling units per acre. This proposal calls for approx-
imately 8 units per acre, which is consistent with the Plan.
7. According to the City's "Residential Inventory", conducted in March,
1980, the City had only 58 duplex units, which comprised only 2.5 percent
of the total housing stock. The Housing Element discusses the need to
provide for a balanced variety of housing types to meet local housing
needs, including the needs of renter households. This development will
help alleviate, to a very small. extent, the shortage of duplex units
in Central Point and increase housing opportunities for households that
are seeking moderately-priced rental housing.
8. Policy #1 under Conclusion #4 of the Housing Element states:
"Promote clustered housing and other development designs
that minimize the need for costly and unnecessary streets,
walks, and other municipal expenditures. Encourage the
use of cul-de-sac streets in residential neighborhoods
whenever possible in lieu of the "grid" pattern of streets."
The applicant's proposal is directly consistent with this policy in
'that-ten new residential dwellings are proposed without any additional
or immediate municipal costs for utilities or streets. These units
will be served by a central driveway and, if the applicant later decides
to subdivide the property, a central cul-de-sac private street will be
constructed to City standards to serve the development at the applicant's
cost ._ The cul-de-sac design promotes privacy and safety and also
limits direct street access to one point, rather than 11 individual
driveways.
9. The property is not within a floodplain or area that could be considered
an ecologically fragile area or wildlife habitat. This development will
have no impact on the natural environment.
CONSISTENCY WITH ZONING ORDINANCE
The following findings are intended to demonstrate that the proposed development
is consistent with the Central Point Zoning Ordinance, as well as with other
local development requirements.
1. As already stated, the proposed "Dwelling Group" is listed as a
,Conditional Use in Section 17.24.020(G) of the Central Point Zoning
Ordinance, under the R-2, Residential Two-family District.
2. The "Dwelling Group" provisions of the R-2 district require a minimum
of 2,500 square feet for each duplex dwelling. This proposal includes
more thdn twice that amount of land area per unit, and is well within
the 8-12 units per acre density limitation of the district, as stated
ih the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Lot area, width and yard. requirements specified in Section 17.24.050
of the Zoning Ordinance have been designed into the proposal. In fact,
the long-range possibilities include the ability to subdivide the
property in accordance with the City's subdivision requirements so that
each duplex would have its own tax lot and a new street (cul-de-sac)
would serve the development.
4. Lot coverage in the R-2 district is a maximum of 50 percent. The
proposed structures, including garages and driveways would cover only
about 22 percent of the property, well within the limitations.
5. Distances between principal buildings on the same lot can be no closer
than 12 feet. The current proposal would provide at least a ten foot
separation between buildings and would ensure that building setbacks
will conform to the district's requirement if the property is subdivided
in the future.
6. Section 17.24.080 of the Zoning Ordinance allows additional dwellings
on the same lot only if the proposal meets the following criteria:
(a) Lots meeting the requirements of this title can be created by
partition for each of the additional dwelling units proposed.
(The Long-range plan is to allow for the future subdivision of
the property and the duplex structures have been located to make
possible that subdivision and creation of individual lots of at
least 6,000 square feet in area, as required in the R-2 district.)
(b) Unoccupied and unobstructed access not less than fifteen feet wide
shall be provided from the street fronting the lot to the rear
dwelling or dwellings on the lot.
(The applicant intends to serve each of the proposed duplex units
with a central drive-way of at least fifteen feet in width with
a single access to Bea11 Lane. If subdivision occurs later, this
driveway will be widened and improved to street standards, in
accordance with City requirements at that time.)
(c) Primary access to each dwelling unit is not gained through an
alley for either pedestrians or vehicles.
(There are no alleys in this area. This is not a problem.)
COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL CRITERIA
Section 17.76.040 of Central Point's Zoning Ordinance lists the criteria for
granting approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The following is a summary
of that criteria and findings as to the applicant's compliance.
1. The site for the proposed use must be adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the use and all yards, spaces, walls and fences, parking,
loading, landscaping and other features, to adjust said use with land
and uses in the neichhorhood.
(a) The site is 1.4 acres is size. The proposed development of ten
duplex units (five structures), plus the existing single-family
dwelling, is easily consistent with the density allowed by this
zoning district.
(b) Although the shape of the subject property is unusual, it is not
impossible to deal with. The dwelling group concept lends itself
well to the problems of an irregular site and the proposed develop-
ment can easily be accommodated on the site.
(c) Site development parameters, such as setbacks, walls, fences, land-
scaping, off-street parking, etc., have been taken into consideration
in the design of this development. In this case, the development is
of a residential nature that will be compatible with other residential
development that already exists or that may be permitted. There will
be no need for unusual buffering or other special treatment.
2. The site relates to streets and highways that are adequate in width
and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated.
(a) As previously stated, this site is at the intersection of a
collector street and a secondary arterial, both capable of
handling the additional traffic that might be generated by
these additional ten dwelling units.
3. The proposed use will have no adverse effects on abutting property.
(a) All abutting properties are also residential and have already
' been developed to a similar density, or are planned and zoned
for such development. The proposed development wi21 be com-
patible with the surrounding neighborhood and will have no
adverse impacts.
4. Conditions may be required by the Planning Commission if necessary to
protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Those specific
types of conditions are listed in Section 17.76.040(D).
(a) Because no adverse effects of this development are anticipated,
and because all provisions of the City's development codes are
being strictly adhered to, the applicant sees no reason to expect
any additional conditions of approval at this time.
5 ---
JACKSON COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAP
1300
.~ (v
1400 ,` ~J0•
X150 \ ~ ~ J
i. Q
ccc~T. T
1600 2501
l/
. ~ ~_ .' .. Yn OUP: !"-..
66
E P~~
~P
~P~'a6
o~~~ J~ F6
0 b
~~~~•o~l i yon.
'o
I Sec ,
~.. .
..71~
1.
. 7 r
I ~• 1400
;~
i 'o 154 OO~ "
16
\ ~ ~
Q
' I7Oa 474.6'
~
n
O
•
1600 474.6'
• C~ 49 u)
• 1901 E 474.6'
• 9G,,
(P-zs)
• ~ 1900
12
• - 23D.17'
1
er I
~~"~!•~ Iso
f'• ~Zloo
(v•o
275.
2300
iC1.' '. K>.i
(~ ``lti
v
~J0
~~-~`~
~ 2500
~~ cP ,:
9
z4a1
°° 7'~°
SR~2.`
c
F 332
2aoo Z~,
..~ ~ -
1 'SC.._ n
'
~
s
w N
~ ~.
SF Co.
a
F IOC DF.DICATIOIJ OF I
C O~
o' O~
S I
ADDiTtONAI. i
A
~
CS
B y
R141.4T of w
4 ;.~ <s1.6' ~ q.6'
,
F+{C ~ .Yi'_y`- - ~ jYC•'u'S 1 L... '~T- l ~• +: - _
.-.~. ~'Avb'°..r5a>I3 -f w-'.FL4 t - a~ri~ °'-FP ~~i
Yo flK3 . c
1t` ~ 7$ ~~ 17.T.7$' 6 0 111.2 S 1
I ~..vJ ii ~ ~YJ ot00 b:+00 6400 630.0 6200 6100
6000 5900
I I I
I . I ~ ~
- •
•
a ~o
1
I II o
o
f
o H
d
~
~ ~ .n
o
1 ,+
_ I
.
. ~ O O O IP
. ..
;..._...
3 %~,:
I I ter .
710
7191 ,.
7200
7300
7400
7500 17600
7700
~ '• S R~l
N
I :
I ~=
1 ~
~
ao
0 1
0 0
0
9- ~.
I 2025' 1 3 111.25'
ELLEN
~ __
~ AVENUE ~ee - (~ ~~
ELLEN
°•~
_
~
• -
• 5720 ~n 1 ' W
~ .S713 56W °50~ 940G
I
i 10500 UN.I,BLKh a
a UNIT I
O
H 5LK
2 H H
N 0 97~ z ~ .
I o o ~ at +s
o
~ "~
J~'~`
`
c
- , ~
'Q :. ~ 18
S7 7
S'16
9'09
' /
~.+lY
T
C/
i w•.C<12'
- - ..`
j 0722 ~ 1
;I. 2!
~:
~ ~•! E
K
2
~
C.052.73 • ~ _
.
,
.I w.'~Sj
~~ ~ ~ ~ HERIAAN
~97231~ a• .f9 p9) ' .
;,=
~. ~~
I
,a
_ r ~ x--~-
~zese
x
~ x
r
J~
-_
.(.,~, \.~ /~ ~ ~ 1285.9
~` ~ _f ;
"` I _-...~..-~ ~ `~
~ `~ = ~
\~ ~ 0~~;
< --
%
1 ~ ~~I _~
%
o~
i `~, ~~ I o `_.___-
~C
~~
rl~
~l
J ~29i2 x '~"~
~
c
rv~ M^~
C
i
`1 `'
~_
_92
v'
c ~ ,~ li
lam// rs
./ ^,
X293 < Y
~ ,-`, ..
~'~`•
uP u ,
% Ol•-•~,
X293.3 ~ \-'-' x
-% I!^~
~~i
C.
I
1
0
O
C
P
< 230
% Ip,3u
~, u~~~; x
~~5,.~ %~ U' f
%.
_ i
~~
j h-.J} i /
~ ( ~ PR.o~SE~D C.i~ ~~ f2EtAnfl~,
r, '• ~~-i'Y UtitE
` 1 _ r PT{7~Rr~.or~Pr~cSED PROPE2~T-'Yv U~.JB
.~_ v ...: I '"" i~ f r<.c~~T PROP, 7 ~.7~[
`~ ;;:
C~ r_ •A
~~ ;; ,.
f I~ `/ ',
x ~i~~~~
~ it ~ 1
f ~ }, r
"~ ~..i
~1~
I (l~ rM~
1 "~ irk ^ I. y-
fV; ( X253.6
rte-. ->
~D,, ~ ~_ _
-- r.
- _. ;_,
i_-~ ..,,z~ -,
-- - ~`~
9
%-~z9z e BEALL
c
~1 ; ;
h1 ( 1/ '
^ y
x r ~
Ik i l
-= ~ _
""" SECONDARY ARTERIALS
Secondary arterials are streets that are located and designed to
collect and distribute traffic from the major arterials to less
intensively used streets and also to the various traffic destinations
such as schools, shopping centers, recreational areas and employment
centers. They also serve to link neighborhoods and, in some cases,
act as a peripheral edge for homogenous land uses, communities, or
neighborhoods. Physically, secondary streets are similar to major
arterials in that they both have at-grade intersections, use traffic
signals at intersections, and restrict parking in some areas where
necessary or desirable. However, the basic differences are the
physical size and traffic volumes.
The following are generally-accepted standards for Secondary
Arterial streets:
Right-of-way width ----------------- 80 to 88 feet
Curb-to-curb width ----------------- 60 to 64 feet
Moving Lanes ----------------------- 2 to 4
Parking Lanes ---------------------- 0 to 2
Daily Traffic Volumes -------------- 5 - 10,000 ADT
The following streets in the Central Point area are shown on the
Comprehensive Plan map as secondary arterials:
BEALL LANE -- From Merriman Road/Hopkins Road (extension)
west to Grant Road and beyond.
GRANT ROAD -- Beall Lane north to Taylor Road.
TAYLOR ROAD -- Grant Road east to Highway 99.
HASKELL STREET -- Taylor Road south to Pine Street.
HOPKINS ROAD -- From Highway 99 east, extended south to
Derriman Road.
FREEDIAN ROAD -- Hopkins Road .north to Pine Street.
TENTH STREET -- Pine Street north to Upton Road.
THIRD STREET -- Pine Street north to Tenth Street..
SCENIC AVENUE -- Upton Road west to Highway 99.
UPTON ROAD -~ Scenic Avenue northeast beyond UGB.
MANZANITA STREET --Highway 99 east to Tenth Street.
BEEBE ROAD -- West of Hamrick Road to Gebhard Road.
GEBHARD ROAD -- North of Beebe Road to t4ilson Road beyond UGB.
f~ ~~ ~.~~~~J~ , ~,
XI-7
COLLECTOR STREETS
Collector streets, although lower in classification and physical
size than the arterials, perform the equally important function
of collecting neighborhood traffic from the local streets and
transferring it to larger arterial streets or to the more local
activity areas such as schools, neighborhood shopping centers,
parks and employment centers.
In order to minimize congestion and possible safety hazards, the
use of "T" intersections are suggested wherever collectors meet
arterials, especially since most of these are not traffic-controlled
intersections. Also, since the collector streets serve to provide
access into neighborhoods, these streets should not form a continuous
system through the City. This would make them available to through
traffic or traffic seeking a "short-cut". This would diminish their
° "collecting" function.
The following are generally-accepted standards _f or Collector Streets:
Right-of-way width ---------------- 60 to 66 feet
Curb-to-curb width ---------------- 40 feet
Moving Lanes ---------------------- 2
Parking Lanes --------------------- 0 to 2
Daily Traffic Volumes ------------- 2,500 to 5,000 ADT
The following streets in the Central Point area are shown on the
Comprehensive Plan map as Collector streets:
HASKELL STREET -- From Pine Street south to Chickory Lane.
CHICKORY LANE --- From Beall Lane north to meet the extension
of Haskell Street.
BRAD N'AY/SAXBURY DRIVD -- From Taylor Road south to Pine Street.
HAZEL STREET ---- Tenth Street west to Third Street.
MAPLE STREET ---- Tenth Street west to Highway 99.
ASH STREET ------ Freeman Road west to Highway 99.
FOURTH STREET -- - Pine ,Street south to Hopkins Road.
BURSELL ROAD --- - Hopkins Road south to Bea 11 Lane.
*LARK LANE --•---- - North of Hig hway 99 into new neighborhood.
PENINGER ROAD -- - Head Road no rth to Upton Road (paralleling
'the freeway) to provide Expo Park access.
PROPOSED STREET - From Highway 99 in the vicinity of the high
school, west ward to Grant Road.
*This general area north of Scenic Avenue has been removed from the
present UGB and any improvements to Lark Lane will be beyondp>y~e~ar 2000. ~
'',i
y,...l..
~ SCaLf i'e 20'
I
i
Nc lwt
r
,l
S
.;, Irn w if re
~
I I ! ~
~y
Q I I "r
GeLm[ v
I DUVt4
1
+,
~ •.
.Y ~' ,
' t i
~
~~'r-
DUIIIY
~ ~
i o... w 4ea.4L
I
i I ~ G•±
~ li ~ C~w• Cn •eL
I ~ I
'• Ga0.e4f ~ .''~"h
J, C DVOLCr
v
J ~ _
/ y
Vf ll`.4 e.
. n
,
I'. i
I I
5:~ I~- ouvttx D.Lat -
~' ~ I ~ :. '
~ '
j
j IY SCI wV • Ir t WMGL .~~~',
1:
frto D.a R.
IJ <e ec . "..
Du/a4 ~ ~
., Y
Dueth ae ~
i
Ili ~~
1~~
• / .i S)
I
i
o;
' IIY8
'. I
1'
•~. ~. 1,
.! F ~ ~'
;;/
~~~~~ ~~
GV/tIR
IS
DulxEv
`.~,.
T
4~
.,
h1'F.
~:. Wut.[
V
I
Duv1[y
~C
k 4yaN
i
~/~: •i
1 WA/.6F ~
DuvtLy ,
'
KI
•~~~r.
I Lr~'Tw4
.
:.`Y ~I : ~ . ..
~~ La4aLL
~~jj..
'~;.1•K 11
/
~ ~v -
t ~ onow
....^ Duac \
l
3.h
~fi'.
^
w
.j:ly ~~i^ tia
$i ~
':4!p
1 l
L f
;
11
\ r J .l W111L
` ~Yu r
..t~i. c ip'
`1'~ b
()~j
rC.: , rj:•.j(
.(4I
..
A'.~w _
~I~.w
.u u1.~r
'
.~ ~ 'a.~.._ . l i
~v'-. i•
"'' "` BEALL LANE "
~
f
~ .__•
LEt7T ,q~\~,
' u ~,.
~ Q:... ~ "r h~~~.
r- ~ a _~
~., .. ~e%
.\ ~ ~ ~
~`~AEG~~
DCN PAUL
FIFE CHIEFrBU,LDirvG OFFICIAL
May 13, 1987
riii~ 1 QU{LD{PvG Di~PT.
i'.iUTN 2rvU ~ P lV oCX -:-$
TEL' 6o7~66n-1157
Mr. Darrel D. Wallace
Project Manager
Jackson County Public Works Department
200 Antelope Road
White City, OR 97503
Darrel:
~~~~ -..
~ !'.
„f f :} `,
-t.l r ~~ ,r j,
r~/ i
Please review the enclosed site plan for the property located on
Beall Lane and Bursell Road. While this property is in the City of
Central Point, it is bordered by county roads on two sides.
If all all possible, your comments should reach me by 5:00 p.m. on
Friday, May 22, 1987. If you have any questions, please contact me
at my office.
Sincerely,
A./ 4~'r~'._~~
Don Paul
Fire Chief/Building Official
City of Central Point
DP/mat
Enclosure
,. /7 ~~ ~1/.B/ T`
JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON
200 ANTELOPE R0. WHITE CITY, OREGON 97503
May 19, 1987
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
P.O. Box 3576
Central Point, OR 97502
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
JOSEPH L. STRAHL, DIRECTOR
(503) 826.3122
ATTENTION: Mr: Don Paul,
Fire Chief/Building Official
Dear Don:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the site plan for the development
at the northeast corner of Bursell Road and Beall Lane. A Road Approach Permit
must be obtained from our office for the new driveway (fee is $30.00). Utility
permits are required from our office if there is any utility work within the
right-of-way (no fee). No other work such as landscaping may occur within the
right-of-way without a permit.
Please require the applicant to submit a drainage plan including the
impact on the public facilities downstream of this development.
We concur that Deferred Improvement Agreements should be required for
improvements to Bursell Road and Beall Lane.
Additionally, if unforeseen problems such as traffic hazards or road
damage are created upon the County roads as a result of this development, the
applicant shall be required to resolve them to the satisfaction of Public Works.
Please call if you require additional information.
Sincerely,
William J. Gaddis, P.E.
County Engineer
By: Darrel D. Wallace
Project Inspector
sdw
r
JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON OSEPHnLESTRAHIUDIRECTORKS
200.ANTELOPE RD. • WHITE CITY, OREGON 97503 (503) 8263122
May 26, 1987
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
P.O. Box 3576
Central Point, OR 97502
ATTENTION: Don Paul,
Fire Chief/Building Official
Dear Don:
This letter will confirm our phone conversation the.morn•ing of
May 21, 1987 regarding the proposed development at Beall Lane and
Bursell Road.
Our office has not developed a road standard for future improvements
tp either Beall Lane or Bursell Road. Neither of these roads have yet
been identified as priority roads deserving of reconstruction or widening.
Our normal policy when city development occurs adjacent to County
roads is to defer to the City's requirements for road standard as long as
they appear reasonable to us.
We may be able to offer more input on this matter in the future as
we anticipate a consultant being contracted in the near future to address
these very concerns regarding which roads to require deferred improvement
agreements on and the appropriate standard.
Please call if I can provide additional information
'` Sincerely,
William J. Gaddis, P.E.
County Engineer
'~~ ~ ~~~
By: Darrel D. Wallace
Project Lnspector
sdw
---MEMORANDUM---
To: Don Paul Date: May 29, 1987
Fire Chief/Building Official
From: Fred Phillips
Public Works Director
Re: Application for Conditional Use Permit submitted by Roger
Richardson for a dwelling group at Bursell Road and Beall
Lane
I have no other recommendations besides concurrence with the re-
quirement of a Deferred Improvement Agreement for future road
improvements as we discussed.
FP/mat
e
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
ALLOW A DWELLING GROUP OF DUPLEXES IN AN R-2 ZONE
WHEREAS, Roger Richardson-filed an application far a conditional use per-
mit to allow a dwelling group of duplexes in an R-2 zone at the northeast
corner of Bursell Road and Beall Lane, Central Point, Oregon, further described
as Jackson County Tax Assessor's Map Page 37 2W 11D, Tax Lot 2200; and
WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing held June 2, 1987 was published in the
Medford Mail Tribune on May 20 and 26, 1987; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing testimony from proponents and opponents
was heard or given opportunity to be heard; now, therefore,
BE ZT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Central Point,
Oregon, adopts the findings of fact as presented by the applicant and approves
a conditional use permit to allow a dwelling group of up to five duplexes (ten
dwelling units) consistent with the development plan identified as Exhibit H,
attached hereto in reduced form, in an R-2 zone at the northeast corner of
Bursell Road and Beall Lane, Central Point, Oregon, further described as
Jackson County Tax Assessor's map page 37
2W 11D, Tax Lot 2200, with the following conditions attached:
1. The developer, Roger Richardson, shall enter into a Deferred Improve-
ment Agreement that the City will have recorded to run with the land. Said
agreement will require that the owner or any future owner shall not remonstrate
from being a party to a local improvement district to provide water, sanitary
sewer, storm sewer, street, curb, gutter, sidewalk, or other improvements de-
termined to benefit said property.
~~ 2. The developer, Roger Richardson, shall deed to the public a strip of
land ten feet in width and running east and west the full length of lot 2200
adjacent to Beall Lane. Said dedication shall be recorded with Jackson County
prior to the issuance, of building permits.
3. The developer, Roger Richardson, shall submit a drainage plan includ-
ing the impact on the public facilities downstream from this development. Said
plan shall be submitted and approve~p(r~yipo~ to the issuance of building permits.
RESOLUTION N0. - 1 ~1^"~V~!
4. The developer,. Roger Richardson, shall pay to Bear Creek 4alley Sani-
tary Authority his deferred assessment to that agency in the amount of $824.42.
Said assessment 3s due and payable in accordance with the "Notice of Final
Assessment," a BCVSA document, prior to issuance of building permits.
Passed by the Planning Commission on .the second day of June, 1987, and
signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of June, 1987.
Planning Commission Chairman
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Secretary
RESOLUTION N0. - 2
N
,.-•
1.
Y
~f...f ..
I SCRyF J's 20'
I
LYC I.N 1
/4;. n.
y 1~.~
,
,
1
I
' I ~ -~ 1
t . I •.•"
L.R4Y(
~ DuIL4
' "L'
~
.K +~
~
.. s
~
'
~(~
DurLlt
i I 1
~
~ 1 o :.« .ra
W.4[
~J
I
~ ~
. I Q ~ ~ I C'~
°
~
~::~ rL
•
~ I
Sr+ •.
1 D
I I
1 .~r G.0.R4[
J 1 ~, DYPLCY
.
a
I
~ I
~
~ ~ •,.•t
i
~ DUPL[Y 4.;.6/
~ . .
'
! :1. :. o
IL
. I
. ~
l.~ ..L
I( .*Y
II• DuCL[•
. I 1
1
srta. D.< •s.1y I U.. ~
I
1
DVIUR
DVPLL~
I ,
~ lh
~:II
~.'}
i I 1
j 18
'. 1
.~. ~.-n:
1 w.c[ I
DUVILn
4LL.K
WRR4L
DUPE(:
1i< ~ 1~f
~~..'~;.
1~~.
tn~ ~ C,,:
^~~M .1 ~ • 4.0..4(
JN~/K /r _
.. .. `7 •.YVi . a~
~il
i'
~ e.a ~ / r~ ~. ~t.n. .
.\.. ..
~e 1
yy
r.l..F L.
.gip n1~l•'~`'~I j
nu(iu
." MWf(
..
^
1
~L'.E-~ ~i !L'4 ~
,;1.5~.,
' t
~
`'
t. f~ n i~. /
.S
° ~
!
~~t
~ 4e ~(q,
)~L~.N..
a
~
~~
J
.
~ y
-~
ry
\ `
~~ .. WtLK `6
•
~ y4 ~/
.'C.1~~ ~` r•~R
. r y..~
R•
.. .. .. ~n
~
` BEALL LANE ~
• _
_ _
._~ r
w -
- -
~~
~~ •~
•
-
~~ ~~
--- S T A F F R E P O R T---
To: Planning Commission Date: May 29, 1987
From: Don Paul, Fire Chief/Building Official
Re: Site Plan Review - Two-family dwelling unit to be located on the north-
east corner of Bursell Road and Beall Lane in an R-2 zone, further des-
cribed as Jackson County Tax Assessor's map page 37 2W 11D, Tax Lot
2200, submitted by Roger Richardson.
Mr. Richardson has submitted his site plan for a duplex subject to approval of
a request to build a dwelling group. The plan for the first duplex consists of
2,383 square feet of living space or 1,191 per unit plus 275 square feet of
garage space per unit.
On the applicant's original development plan the largest width of any duplex
shown was 50 feet. This plan indicates a width of nearly 61 feet. If located
in the front portion of the lot nearest to Beall Lane, the development plan
showing a group of three will probably only accommodate two duplexes in that
area. With the existing landscaping including trees, the need to address land-
scaping is probably minimal. Staff would recommend a lighting scheme to help
identify addressing and provide security.
Parking should not be a mayor concern as long as the minimum rear yard setbacks
are maintained. This would allow for tandem parking of two vehicles in each
driveway as long as 40 feet can be provided.
Fire protection will be provided by both the City of Central Point and Jackson
County Fire District /13 through an automatic aid agreement. Hydrant supply is
diagonally across Beall Lane and shows a supply of 1,300 gallons per minute for
a need of approximately 1,000 gallons per minute per duplex. Due to the acces-
sibility and poor turning ability for fire apparatus, a time delay could occur
resulting in damage not normally expected with most fire situations in residen-
tial construction. To lessen this potential, staff recommends that the party
wall separating the two units be of firewall construction of 5/8-inch type "X"
drywall on both sides extending from the floor to the roof line. An alterna-
tive to this approach would be to provide a 60-foot radius turnaround in the
location shown for the proposed turnaround or widen the driveway from the pro-
posed 20 feet to 30 feet. Staff is willing to work with the developer on this.
We believe the firewall would be the least expensive solution and would satisfy
the Fire Department's concerns.
For the Planning Commission's review, the following exhibits are included:
Exhibit A - Notice of Public Meeting;
Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting of Notice of Public Meeting;
Exhibit C - Assessor's map page;
Exhibit D - Aerial map page;
Exhibit E - Development plan (reduced copy, original is a separate
document);
Exhibit F - Construction plan (separate document).
DP/mat
a~
155 SO. SECOND S7
THE HEARS OF THE
ROGUE RNER VALLEY
.O. DOX 3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
PHONE 664-3321
The City of Central Point Planning Commission will conduct a public meeting to
'review a site plan submitted by Roger Richardson for a two-family dwelling unit
to be located on the northeast corner of Bursell Road and Beall Lane, Central
Point. The property is zoned R-2, Residential Two-Family District, and further
described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's Map Page 37 2W 11D, Tax Lot 2200.
This public meeting will be held June 2, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point.
Don Paul
Building/Planning Department
City of Central Point
Date: June 2, 1987
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Place; City Council Chambers
°- -_ 155 South Second Street
P. 0. Box 3576
Central Point, OR 97502
<<,'~ y,.
.~-tg"
~ ~. t
*r
P.O. 80X3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502
PHONE664-3321
THE IiEART OF THE
ROGUE RNER VALLEY
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, /~GGi"P~./2_ /CZ'/J~IO~,~ , .CERTIFY THAT ON
THE fOLLOblING DATE, aZ7 ~4~7 I POSTED A PUBLIC
NOTICE OF A~~Q/7/'I/ ~~!'Ifyl/~.SIGL-~ ~L / ~~~
/L!i/e6~J U~,Q Si ,O~Ctfi ,3ubrn./ted y ~c~r2iG~L.2%' vn ~~'
FOR G? fi~,b-~/1~ni/~~ d/a.~//.r~ a G/~i~ ~,CJ • E. Corner y/' c~3i.C~el/ . NT OP,.
,~~~ .
NEAR 1.
SIGNATURE ~~ ~1~ ~
DATE ,5 os~ lS 7
..~
~~
C5
PP
OPGa6
l
~~°c t~ 6QA2
°~ 0J LsM
''~~ O~ ~1
yy°°. ,
I
~ ~
' i
p ~
'~ 1400
~.7
i ,°~I p'
~~ ~:
~~:
#. Isoo
•~.
~~
~ ~Jg
~ ~
Q
1 h
'~ 1700 474.6'
.
•
• 1$00 474.6'
•
~ C~-4972)
1
• E
1901 474.6'
1 w
• ^? 1900
n
23G.17' 2J5.
{~• 2000 ~':-~.m~' 2300
1
'
i
~e!
21O0 ~
0
m
4 •:
c
-28
2aoo
C~ :.
nF~ 2401 I
i °O 7'~• I
I
I
I
SR~2.`
°._:.~ 1 ~ n t i
o_
•' +3i.
2500 Zc~
~~
I 41-.. _
~
n
~
... o i
I
S(v
~~
r N ~
I
sF C°~ ., r
10~ DEplcnrloa of
_
~ i
COQ °~
s
I I
aDDt'r~o-satr
w
f 1
cs
e y
v
{ZIkF+T o 1
- < ~~ c s i.6' 3 0.6'
L ~:r.~~." rb -.v..f~.l. - ~ `L.:,. '=~.. k.. .:.... ::I.y~?i'.J4~+r.:.. ':-e:o-~.~..~,tir' t^. '. .t'~ .: .+.L
' ' ~LIf _ ~L
~
'
~
~ eE~75• :=. t~.?$' ..
1
..
60' 111.2 S. . ..
I U;::iJ ii i X10 b6v0 E.:ivO ~ 6407 6,i G.7 `6'[00 ' 6160 ~ 6000 ~ 5 O
~
I
~ b i ^ H _ I • I~ •1
~
I p ~ O d b r ifS p
. '
.1~3 ~ ~ 710 `
7191 ~ 7200 7300 7400 X 7500 7600 77pp
1. ~ S R~i
,- N
~
.
e
~ o
® .
o
207. 5' ~ ' 111.25'
ELLEN ,C°•' AVENUE ~ ELLEN
SINS2' STIJ((h'~~~ ' ~ ~S'~? 560J ~ S40G
I
' i 10500 UN.I,BLIC!I ?Q i H 5LK2 H O
N
97
2
i ,
„ O
,ri
^
~:L+JI
~ '•
Hh
o~ B
S71T
li 2S
!
~y
1
~L
~'~/,~~,~}
~A'~" ~4J~
_
0 1
.~ ;6
:"' 9'39 ~
r:•.Gai 2' - ~ .072 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2
e
K
2
_
.
-. ` _ `
+ .~.
^ ~
~ I I ,-.
~~ ~~
Y ~~
i ~~ "~ 4 ,
zee e .i9 I r---• i
Y ~ \ ~ j
x J
/ I „~ ~zs~.n
~ 0 ~\ Y
~' ' . ~ ~ ~~ i.J
i ~
i~ I 1 Y
D: - ~ ~ ,
~ ~ c. I
~ ~ Y '
I ' I ~ ! -~
~^. ~ (~
,.
~zs~z , ~._f \ ~ tom;
.-~ r-,
`~,1 ~\,„, jj
Y
\ ~ ~er t3ac.~ uu~ ,N
j , -~ c rtkunfl,
c ! ~ c r, ,, ~ _ , - PRoWSED PR-0t~ER.ry (~~
> } `~ ~ i
~.~.,/ ~ / ~-- PRoPosED
P~o~rY. uue
...
X293 < <
r'--~-,1_I--~ - - ~ _- ~-~292 E BEALL
,/!` ~~ ..
~~ ~i
~~~'. ~~
'^ ~ ~ =
Ij
' X253.6 ''~./ ~~ I I i
I r. /
i~
rD~ - _`~
1': A i
h~~
~ `
~ ai
.~ .~
<r <p DLt •I< Un
'Y
~
•~b
- ---r--- ~ --- -
N
~""
a
i.+ •( ..
SCA(F 1'.20'
tYt urv[
r:IS[
~< p4!l0
GtRA4[
j ~ DUOLU
<,
y ~' .r ^I ~ DVPtn
I <
~ ~
' 4~ ^ GA[A4[
" ~
I
I Q
~ I ~ ,
v`•.L
n
Q 1 tlY
I bra
W I'vP •~ ~- 'i
~ ~
~ ~
I
~ I _
N~
W
~.
~: DUPt(N
4AYA6(
i _
~ G..4f1
l C
Y ~
1 •Y Y
1 I DVYL[L
rP r
<
1 DUPL[A Gee
' 1' a i
%w
.i
I
. L«<~
I y
: li
I
;~.
1~
1 '^ ~<~
i ~^f x
~~
I
I I B
~I
.~. ~. ~~
i :{~~L%'
is
.~''~f n
~~ A
.A.~~. ,
G/PLIX
OU PLLV
I c.u4[ I
DUPL[Y
GAFAL(
WRALF
DUPLEL
1 <'r..e
JAY T C„ =
f i i
i LA4ALf
, nnnxc
~•,• Yeu[[ ~
I
N
~:,C
uR
.~- t Ln a _ ^
_ BEALL LANE _
-- "~'. --- ~ i