The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03.14.2024 CC Packet CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Oregon City Council Meeting Agenda Thursday, March 14, 2024 Mayor Hank Williams Ward I Neil Olsen Ward II Kelley Johnson Ward III Melody Thueson Ward IV Taneea Browning At Large Rob Hernandez At Large Michael Parsons At Large Michael Parsons I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS V. PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comment is for non-agenda items. If you are here to make comments on a specific agenda item, you must speak at that time. Please limit your remarks to 3 minutes per individual, 5 minutes per group, with a maximum of 20 minutes per meeting being allotted for public comments. The council may ask questions but may take no action during the public comment section of the meeting, except to direct staff to prepare a report or place an item on a future agenda. Complaints against specific City employees should be resolved through the City’s Personnel Complaint procedure. The right to address the Council does not exempt the speaker from any potential liability for defamation. VI. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of February 22, 2024 City Council Minutes B. Arbor Week Proclamation 2024 VII. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA VIII. PUBLIC HEARING Public comments will be allowed on items under this part of the agenda following a brief staff report presenting the item and action requested. The presiding officer may limit testimony. A. Ordinance Amending and Increasing Transient Lodging Tax (Dreyer) IX. ORDINANCES, AND RESOLUTIONS A. Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File No. CPA-23001 (Powers) B. Minor Zone Map Amendment File No. ZC-23001 (Powers) C. Ordinance Amending Ord. No. 2107- Arts Commission Membership (Dreyer) D. Resolution Approving IGA with RVSS - Building Official (Dreyer) E. Resolution Accepting the Lowest Qualified Bid from _____ for the Cedar to Bush to Railroad Tracks Water Improvement Project and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract (Samitore) X. BUSINESS A. Planning Commission Report (Powers) B. 2024 Community Survey Review (Clayton) C. Discussion of adding a Tier 3 Irrigation Rate. (Samitore) XI. MAYOR'S REPORT XII. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT XIII. COUNCIL REPORTS XIV. DEPARTMENT REPORTS XV. EXECUTIVE SESSION The City Council will adjourn to executive session under the provisions of ORS 192.660. Under the provisions of the Oregon Public Meetings Law, the proceedings of an executive session are not for publication or broadcast. XVI. ADJOURNMENT Individuals needing special accommodations such as sign language, foreign language interpreters or equipment for the hearing impaired must request such services at least 72 hours prior to the City Council meeting. To make your request, please contact the City Recorder at 541-423-1015 (voice), or by e-mail to Rachel.neuenschwander@centralpointoregon.gov. Si necesita traductor en español o servicios de discapacidades (ADA) para asistir a una junta publica de la ciudad por favor llame con 72 horas de anticipación al 541-664-3321 ext. 201 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Oregon City Council Meeting Minutes Thursday, February 22, 2024 I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Mayor Hank Williams II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Hank Williams Mayor Present Neil Olsen Ward I Present Kelley Johnson Ward II Remote Melody Thueson Ward III Present Taneea Browning Ward IV Remote Rob Hernandez At Large Present Michael Parsons At Large Present Staff Present: City Manager Chris Clayton; City Attorney Sydney Dreyer; Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore; Planning Director Stephanie Powers; Community Planner III Justin Gindlesperger; Police Chief Scott Logue; and City Recorder Rachel Neuenschwander IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS V. CONSENT AGENDA RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Rob Hernandez, At Large SECONDER: Michael Parsons, At Large AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons A. Approval of February 8, 2024 City Council Minutes B. OLCC Application - West Wind Market Inc. (Central Market) VI. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA VII. PUBLIC HEARING A. Central Point Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan 2024 Update City Attorney Sydnee Dreyer read the legislative pre-hearing statement-no conflicts of interest among the Council Members. 6.A Packet Pg. 3 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 2 2 , 2 0 2 4 7 : 0 0 P M ( C O N S E N T A G E N D A ) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 22, 2024 Page 2 Community Planner III Justin Gindlesperger presented the Central Point Natural Mitigation Plan 2024 Update to the Council. Central Point is participating in a county-wide hazard mitigation planning effort led by Jackson County and the Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience (OPDR) to update hazard mitigation plans throughout Jackson County. The 2024 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan updates the City’s plan from 2020 and keeps the City on a consistent hazard planning schedule with other communities in the Rogue Valley. The regional partnership provided an opportunity to combine resources and include additional community stakeholders, keeping stakeholders informed and engaged in mitigation planning and implementation efforts. The benefit of keeping the NHMP current is that the City of Central Point can receive non-emergency-related disaster funding sources through FEMA. Access to these resources can be critical in leveraging limited resources to help protect people and property in Central Point. Additionally, NHMP planning implementation helps the City keep flood insurance premiums lower community-wide through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS). Mayor Williams opened the Public Hearing, but no one came forward, and the public hearing was closed. Mike Parsons moved to approve Resolution No. 1777, a Resolution by the City Council of Central Point adopting the 2024 City of Central Point Addendum to the Jackson County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Michael Parsons, At Large SECONDER: Melody Thueson, Ward III AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons B. Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File No. CPA-23001 City Attorney Sydnee Dreyer read the quasi-judicial pre-hearing statement. No conflicts were declared; Council Member Neil Olsen declared an ex-parte contact as he rides by the Taylor Road Property twice daily, and Council Member Mike Parsons declared an ex-parte contact as he goes by the locations regularly. No bias was declared. Planning Director Stephanie Powers presented a Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File No to the Council. CPA-23001. On January 26, 2023, the City Council approved Resolution No. 1731, a resolution of intent to initiate Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendments to support housing production. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on February 6, 2024, received public testimony, and forwarded a recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed Minor 6.A Packet Pg. 4 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 2 2 , 2 0 2 4 7 : 0 0 P M ( C O N S E N T A G E N D A ) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 22, 2024 Page 3 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ("Amendment"). Testimony received expressed concern about the conversion of open space to housing, traffic impacts, and general concerns about development impacts on the City overall. The proposed Amendments include the following properties: 1) Taylor Road at North Haskell Street (37S 2W 03DC, Tax lots 3402, 3603, and 37S 2W 10AB Tax Lot 1300. The proposed amendment would change the zoning from Civic land use designation to High-Density Residential to Medium Mix Residential. This amendment would allow the developer to develop single- story, cottage-style multifamily units to support affordable age-in-place housing. 2) 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 03D, Tax Lot 100. The proposed amendment would change the overlay map, extending the Transient Oriented Development Overlay to include the property and changing the existing Employment Commercial land to High-Density Residential on a portion of the site. This change allows a combination of affordable and market-rate high- density housing while preserving opportunities for commercial use in stand- alone and mixed-use configurations. The Council questioned the impact of the 1777 East Pine Street amendments on the road going through Beebe Rd. Staff responded that, a connector street would run from East Pine Street to Willow Bend Way. Council questioned if the 1777 East Pine Street amendments would impact the planned footbridge from Beebe Rd to the Jackson County Expo. Staff responded that no, the footbridge would still be going in. The Council questioned if this complies with the Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities (CFEC). Staff responded that this is unrelated to CFEC; this property on East Pine Street is part of the recommended climate- friendly area, and the Transient Orient District and CFEC standards are very similar. Mayor Williams opened the Public Hearing, and the following individuals came forward: Killian Yates, an Old Stage Road resident, was concerned about the restrictions on the warranty deed put on 1777 East Pine Street and the City's liability. The City Attorney gave a general response that those restrictions would be a private matter, not something the City would be enforcing. Larry Martin, a Taylor Road resident, spoke to the Council on the Taylor Road and North Haskell Street property. Mr. Martin is in favor of what is being proposed for this property. Cheryl Young, a Taylor Road resident who lives across the street from the Taylor Road and North Haskell Street property, wants to know the plans for 6.A Packet Pg. 5 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 2 2 , 2 0 2 4 7 : 0 0 P M ( C O N S E N T A G E N D A ) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 22, 2024 Page 4 the existing trees on the property. Staff responded that this is the first stage of development, and that when the property comes in for further development preservation or removal of the trees would be addressed at that time. Brett Moore, the owner of the Taylor Road and North Haskell Street property, favors the amendments presented to the Council. He plans to make the housing as affordable as possible for residents 55 and over; he is also working with St. Vincent De Paul and Access to occupy the units. The trees will be removed, and new trees will be planted, as well as other interior landscaping. The public hearing was closed. Taneea Browning moved to forward the Ordinance Amending the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Map on properties located at the corner of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street (0.9 acres) and 1777 East Pine Street (12.9 acres) to increase housing production to a second reading. RESULT: 1ST READING [UNANIMOUS] Next: 3/14/2024 7:00 PM MOVER: Taneea Browning, Ward IV SECONDER: Michael Parsons, At Large AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons C. Minor Zone Map Amendment File No. ZC-23001 The City Attorney reminded everyone of the pre-hearing reading that the prehearing statement read previously is applicable to this hearing. Planning Director Stephanie Powers presented to the Council the Minor Zone Map Amendment File No. ZC-23001. On January 26, 2023, the City Council approved Resolution No 1731, declaring the City Council’s intent to initiate Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to support housing production. The proposed Minor Zoning Map Amendment (“Amendment”) must comply with the Comprehensive Plan General Land Use Plan (GLUP) and Overlay Maps. The proposed changes include the following: • Taylor Road at North Haskell Street (37S 2W 03DC, Tax Lots 3402, 3603 and 37S 2W 10AB, Tax Lot 1300. The proposed change to Medium Mix Residential to support multifamily housing production. • 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 03D, Tax Lot 100). The proposed change aligns with the GLUP and Overlay Maps to support a mix of affordable and market-rate housing while retaining opportunities for commercial uses. Mayor Williams opened the Public Hearing, but no one came forward, and the 6.A Packet Pg. 6 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 2 2 , 2 0 2 4 7 : 0 0 P M ( C O N S E N T A G E N D A ) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 22, 2024 Page 5 public hearing was closed. City Attorney Sydnee Dreyer asked for clarification of the motion; if the council proceeds with approving the amendment, was the recommendation from the planning commission to go with option two, do they need to state that in the motion, or is it clear in the findings? Staff responded that it is evident in the findings. Mike Parsons moved to forward the Ordinance Amending the Central Point Zoning Map on properties located at the corner of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street and 1777 East Pine Street to increase housing production to a second reading. RESULT: 1ST READING [UNANIMOUS] Next: 3/14/2024 7:00 PM MOVER: Michael Parsons, At Large SECONDER: Rob Hernandez, At Large AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons VIII. ORDINANCES, AND RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution Accepting the Lowest Responsible Bid from _____ for the Pfaff Park Electrical Project and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore presented to the Council a resolution accepting the lowest responsible bid for the Pfaff Park Electrical Project. The City received two qualified bids for this project, T3 Electric and Infinity Electric. The third bid on the sheet is DD Electric. They are not pre- qualified with ODOT or the City of Medford and did not get pre-qualification before the actual bid. T3 Electric was the lowest bid at $250,611.79; because of the availability of the product and timing, the City will negotiate with them to eliminate the street lights from the project. It would continue the ornamental TOD-style lighting. The City doesn’t have the funds available for this portion, plus they wouldn’t be installed before the 4th of July. City Manager Chris Clayton pointed out that the staff report has the incorrect budget cycle of 2023/2025. The Urban Renewal is an annual budget, and the project will be paid out of the 2023/2024 Budget. The Council questioned the reduced budget, seeking clarification of what was being removed from the project and paying for the mobilization of the project twice. Staff responded that street lights are what are removed, and city staff will be doing the installation after the 4th of July in the next budget cycle in the fall of 2024. Mike Parsons moved to approve Resolution No. 1778 a Resolution 6.A Packet Pg. 7 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 2 2 , 2 0 2 4 7 : 0 0 P M ( C O N S E N T A G E N D A ) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 22, 2024 Page 6 approving the lowest qualified bid from T3 Electrical for $250,611.79 for the construction of the Pfaff Park electrical upgrade improvement project and authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract. RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Michael Parsons, At Large SECONDER: Melody Thueson, Ward III AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons IX. BUSINESS A. Central Point Little League Complex Recommendation Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore presented the Central Point Little League Complex Recommendation to the Council at the last City Council meeting. Several options for constructing the Central Point Little League were discussed. The Council requested building the first three fields as standard fields with dirt infields and grass outfields. City staff has met with the Moore family and the Central Point Little League and concur with this option. After the February 8th Council meeting, staff met with the City Engineer to assemble a package for the clearing and demolishing of the site and building of all utilities. It was decided to do a bid alternative for constructing one field to see the overall price options. Construction would start as early as June of this year. The timeline of the proposed project is as follows: the bid package will be ready next week. This would include Phase 1, three fields, some pathways, and the restroom/concession. No lighting would be part of this package. The Parks and Recreation staff will work on a fundraising campaign. Construction will start June 1, 2024, on the first three fields with a combination of contract and city forces. The fourth field will be done in the summer of 2025. City staff will work on obtaining grants and donations for the completion of the large field and T-ball field, with the plan for these to be completed between 2027 and 2030. The lighting and the parking lot are not funded at this time. The Council agreed to move forward with the proposed plan. B. Discussion Arts Commission Membership City Attorney Sydnee Dreyer discussed the Arts Commission Membership with the Council; recently, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 2107, which amended CPMC 2.59.030 to expand the membership requirements for the Arts Commission. This amendment was recommended, given that historically, the City has needed help finding sufficient volunteers for this commission. Before adopting Ordinance No. 2107, at least five members had to be 6.A Packet Pg. 8 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 2 2 , 2 0 2 4 7 : 0 0 P M ( C O N S E N T A G E N D A ) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 22, 2024 Page 7 residents within City limits. The 6th and 7th members could be either residents of the City or reside within the UGB, own or operate a business within the City limits, or be teachers with School District No. 6 working within City limits. It was discussed expanding the requirements of three positions to an at-large position, with the requirements that they live in the Urban Renewal Area, own a business in the City, include a spouse or domestic partner, or have a proven interest in art. The Council agreed with these changes; the recommended changes will be brought back to the Council in an Ordinance at a future meeting. C. Taser Replacement Police Chief Scott Logue spoke to the council regarding replacing the Tasers. The current Taser being used has been discontinued and will no longer be supported or serviceable, and we cannot get replacement batteries. The vendor, Axon, has a subscription program to spread the payments over time. With this plan, the first payment will be absorbed into the current biennial budget without needing to request a supplemental budget. The subsequent annual fees will be included in future biennial budgets. The council questioned how many times the Taser was used. Chief Logue responded that it varies from year to year. The council supported the purchase of new Tasers. X. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Hank Williams reported that: • He attended the Medford Chamber Forum. • He attended the Fair Board Meeting. XI. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Chris Clayton reported that: • Monday at 5:30, in lieu of a Study Session, we will be on the tour of Rogue X. • He was interviewed yesterday by the HR consultant for his input on the next city manager for the City of Medford. • He will be sending out January Financial statements in his weekly update. • Measure 110 has been talked about this week in the legislative short session. • The lobbyists have informed him that they have passed legislation reinstituting Recreational immunity until 2026. 6.A Packet Pg. 9 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 2 2 , 2 0 2 4 7 : 0 0 P M ( C O N S E N T A G E N D A ) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 22, 2024 Page 8 • He spoke with Executive Director Carl Tappert with RVSS; there is a component of their operation: they have to have a Building Official, and their Building Official has departed. They will be putting together an IGA for them to use our Building Official, Derek Zwagerman, to meet their needs. • He thanked Stephanie Hendrickson Central Point Chamber for the Denim & Diamonds event. • Today is his 25th Anniversary with the City of Central Point. XII. COUNCIL REPORTS Rob Hernandez reported that: • He attended the Denim & Diamonds event. • He participated in the Fire District 3 board meeting • This past Monday was his 28th cancer scan, and everything was still clear. Mike Parsons reported that: • He attended the Central Point Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting. • He attended the Chamber Denim & Diamonds event. • He attended the Rogue Valley Sewer Service Board of Directors meeting. • He has had five Police Volunteer training sessions, in which three volunteers are now trained and certified to join teams involving volunteer duties. Melody Thueson reported that: • She attended the Denim & Diamonds event, bid on the classroom tour, and was outbid by Eden Foster, who then gave it to her for her classroom. • She attended the School Board Meeting. XIII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Chief Scott Logue reported that he attended the ECSO Board Meeting. Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore reported that: • They are hoping that on April 20th, they will have a signed development estimate for the Community Center • The Fair Board is appointing Ron Holbrook as the Interim Director. • The Parks Commission Meeting passed the Bear Creek Master Plan and will come to the Council at the next meeting. 6.A Packet Pg. 10 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 2 2 , 2 0 2 4 7 : 0 0 P M ( C O N S E N T A G E N D A ) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 22, 2024 Page 9 Planning Director Stephanie Powers reported that: • They have a Planning Commission meeting scheduled for March 5th. There will be two items on the agenda; they have discovered some issues with reviewing the Sunnybrook Village Master Plan community on the East Side of town. The public hearing will be opened and continued to the April 2nd meeting. • She had lunch with the Medford Planning Director and asked him about the Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities lawsuit: they concluded the oral arguments in August and are still waiting for the court of appeals to decide. XIV. EXECUTIVE SESSION ORS 192.660(2)(e) conduct deliberations with persons designated by the governing body to negotiate real property transactions Neil Olsen moved to adjourn to Executive Session under ORS 192.660 (2)(e) to conduct deliberations with persons designated to negotiate real property transactions at 8:57 p.m with a 5 minute break. Mike Parsons seconded. All said aye and the meeting was adjourned to executive session. Executive session was called to order at 9:05 p.m. Council returned to regular session at 9:10 p.m. No further action was taken after executive session. XV. ADJOURNMENT Mike Parson moved to adjourn. All said aye and the meeting was adjourned at 9:11 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the February 22, 2024, Council meeting were approved by the City Council at its meeting of _________________, 2024. Dated: _________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: __________________________ City Recorder 6.A Packet Pg. 11 Mi n u t e s A c c e p t a n c e : M i n u t e s o f F e b 2 2 , 2 0 2 4 7 : 0 0 P M ( C O N S E N T A G E N D A ) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation FROM: Dave Jacob, Park Planner MEETING DATE: March 14, 2024 SUBJECT: Arbor Week Proclamation 2024 ACTION REQUIRED: Consent Agenda Item RECOMMENDATION: Approval BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Oregon’s Arbor Week - as designated by the Oregon State legislature - is the first full week of April which for 2024 falls on April 7 – 13. Arbor Week is a way to recognized the beauty and benefits of trees in our community and this proclamation confirms the importance of trees in our city. Central Point has been designated as a Tree City USA for twelve years and has also received the Tree City USA Growth Award for the past three years. The Growth Award recognizes those cities that demonstrate high levels of tree care and community engagement throughout the year. The Arbor Week proclamation is also important to the City in that it will assist in securing recertification of the Tree City USA designation for the thirteenth year in 2025. To qualify as a Tree City USA community, a city must meet the standards established by The Arbor Day Foundation and the National Association of State Foresters. The standards help to ensure that every qualifying community, no matter the size, has a viable tree management plan which includes the celebration of Arbor Week. In addition to accomplishing Tree City USA goals, establishing an Arbor Week celebration helps to raise awareness of the importance of trees in Central Point, expands the tree canopy by planting additional trees, and enhances our parks and open spaces where the trees are planted. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: No direct financial impact although the program does provide opportunities for access to grant funds. LEGAL ANALYSIS: COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: GOAL 2 - Be a city filled with happy, healthy people who are thriving. STRATEGY 5 – Plan, design, build, and maintain a comprehensive system of sustainable facilities, trails, and park spaces, (setting the highest standards) to provide attractive places people will use and enjoy. Acquire additional lands for active and passive recreation use based on current deficiencies and public demands created by increasing population or the 6.B Packet Pg. 12 environmental and recreational significance of the area. (Be mindful of the budget and plan trail locations) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proclamation. RECOMMENDED MOTION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. ARBOR WEEK PROCLAMATION 2024 6.B Packet Pg. 13 ARBOR WEEK PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture in 1872 that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees; and WHEREAS, Arbor Day was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska; and WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world; and WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of topsoil by wind and water, reduce heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce oxygen, strengthen stream bank integrity, provide flood mitigation, and provide a habitat for wildlife; and WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource that provides paper, wood, fuel for our fires, and countless other wood products; and WHEREAS, trees in our city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community; and WHEREAS, trees, wherever they are planted, are a source of joy and spiritual renewal, NOW, THEREFORE, I __________________________________ Mayor of the city of Central Point, do hereby proclaim April 7th – 13th, 2024 as Arbor Week in the City of Central Point, and I urge all citizen to celebrate Arbor Week and to support efforts to protect our trees and woodland and Futher, I urge all citizens to plant and care for trees to gladden the heart and promote the well-being of this and future generations. Date this ______________ Day of ___________________ in the Year __________________ Mayor _______________________________________ 6.B.a Packet Pg. 14 At t a c h m e n t : A R B O R W E E K P R O C L A M A T I O N 2 0 2 4 ( 1 8 1 0 : A r b o r W e e k P r o c l a m a t i o n 2 0 2 4 ) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: City Attorney FROM: Sydnee Dreyer, City Attorney MEETING DATE: March 14, 2024 SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending and Increasing Transient Lodging Tax ACTION REQUIRED: Motion Public Hearing Ordinance 1st Reading RECOMMENDATION: Approval BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Currently CPMC 3.24 imposes a transient lodging tax of 9%. This tax is charged to the occupant of the transient lodging. Transient lodging includes hotel, motel, inn, condominium, house, cabin, apartment, public or private dormitory, fraternity, sorority, public or private club, space in a mobile home or trailer park, and tent camping locations, or similar structures or dwelling units that are used for temporary overnight human occupancy; or portions of any of these dwelling units, that are used for temporary human occupancy. City staff has proposed increasing the tax by 2% to a total of 11% to further promote tourism in city limits; in particular increasing revenues for the general fund to promote the community center and little league fields which the city believes will promote tourism. Currently, city code provides that the transient lodging tax is deposited into the general fund and allocated as follows: 25% to tourism promotion; 75% to other city services. ORS 320.350(5) – (6) provides that for any increase to the transient lodging tax, at least 70% of the revenue generated from the new tax must be used for tourism promotion, tourism related facilities or to finance or refinance the debt of tourism-related facilities. As such, the code retains the allocation of transient lodging tax for the 9% tax, but the increased 2% allocation would be subject to the 70/30 share. Two additional substantive revisions were made. A new Section 3.24.045 is included which states that transient lodging providers, as well as transient lodging intermediaries such as VRBO or AirBnB are jointly and severally liable for payment of the tax. Additionally, the code makes clear that short term rentals of RV spaces are also included in the definition of transient lodging as the future community center will likely contain short-term RV rental spaces. The remainder of the revisions are intended to make the code clearer, and to clarify the calculation of days to avoid disputes as to timing. 8.A Packet Pg. 15 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: For the 2024-25 fiscal year, the City has allocated $653,780 from transient lodging tax revenues, calculated at a 9% rate. Increasing this tax rate to 11% is expected to bring in an extra $145,280. Moreover, constructing a new hotel in Central Point, akin to the 84-room Holiday Inn Express, would result in an additional revenue of $270,730 at the 11% tax rate. Similarly, a hotel comparable to the 66-room La Quinta would contribute an extra $169,230 in revenue at the same 11% tax rate (note: additional hotel calculations were based on the receipts from the fiscal year 2022-23). LEGAL ANALYSIS: While the ORS does not expressly state how the allocation applies to increased transient lodging taxes, most jurisdictions and the League of Oregon cities have interpreted this language to allow local governments to grandfather the allocation of existing taxes and apply the new 70/30 allocation only to the increased amount. COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT: GOAL 3 - Provide opportunities for youth education, recreation, and support. (Kids are the future. Happy, well-adjusted kids are the canary in the coal mine for true community/ family wellbeing). STRATEGY 4 – Expand on existing recreation programming to reach a broader and more diverse audience. Research successful recreation programs to ensure that we are offering activities that will best meet the current and future needs of our citizens. STRATEGY 5 – Develop more indoor Winter activities utilizing existing public spaces in addition to building and use of a new Central Point Community Center. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Open public hearing. At close of public hearing make a motion to forward the Ordinance with or without modifications to a second reading. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to forward the Ordinance Amending CPMC Chapter 3.24 Increasing Tax Imposed, Establishing Joint and Several Liability for Lodging Tax Collectors, and Updating Rights and Remedies to a second reading. ATTACHMENTS: 1. ORD - Amending Ch. 3.24 TLT 8.A Packet Pg. 16 1 – Ordinance No. _____________ (Council Meeting __/__/24) ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CPMC CHAPTER 3.24 INCREASING TAX IMPOSED, ESTABLISHING JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY FOR LODGING TAX COLLECTORS, AND UPDATING RIGHTS AND REMEDIES FINDINGS: A. Pursuant to CPMC, Chapter 1.01.040, the City Council, may from time to time make revisions to its municipal code which shall become part of the overall document and citation. B. CPMC Chapter 3.24 created and implemented a local transient lodging tax in accordance with ORS 320.300 to 320.350. C. Transient lodging includes hotel, motel, inn, condominium, house, cabin, apartment, public or private dormitory, fraternity, sorority, public or private club, space in a mobile home or trailer park, RV park spaces and tent camping locations, or similar structures or dwelling units that are used for temporary overnight human occupancy; or portions of any of these dwelling units, that are used for temporary human occupancy. D. The current transient lodging tax is nine percent (9%). E. The city of Central Point desires to increase the transient lodging tax by two percent (2%) to a total of eleven percent (11%). F. Pursuant to ORS 320.350(5)-(6), at least 70% of the revenue from the increased portion of the tax shall be used for tourism promotion, tourism-related facilities or to finance or refinance the debt of tourism-related facilities and reasonable administrative costs, if allowed by state law. G. The intended purpose of 70% of the 2% increase will be used to enhance tourism in accordance with ORS 320.300 to 320.350, specifically tourists staying overnight in city limits or traveling distances greater than 50 miles to the City of Central Point. H. Words lined through are to be deleted and words in bold are added. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Sections: 3.24.010 Definitions. 3.24.020 Tax imposed. 3.24.030 Collection of tax by lodging tax collector--Rules for collection. 3.24.040 Lodging tax collector’s duties. 3.24.045 Liability for Tax 8.A.a Packet Pg. 17 At t a c h m e n t : O R D - A m e n d i n g C h . 3 . 2 4 T L T ( 1 8 1 4 : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g a n d I n c r e a s i n g T r a n s i e n t L o d g i n g T a x ) 2 – Ordinance No. _____________ (Council Meeting __/__/24) 3.24.050 Exemptions. 3.24.060 Registration certificate of authority. 3.24.070 Collections, returns and payments. 3.24.080 Penalties and interest. 3.24.090 Deficiency Determination - Fraud, evasion, and lodging tax collector delay. 3.24.100 Redeterminations. 3.24.130 Security for collection of tax. 3.24.140 Liens. 3.24.150 Refunds issued by city. 3.24.170 Refunds by lodging tax collector to occupant. 3.24.180 Records. 3.24.190 Confidentiality--Disclosure unlawful. 3.24.200 Disposition of transient room tax. 3.24.210 Appeals. 3.24.215 Appeals to council. 3.24.220 Violations. 3.24.230 Severability. SECTION 1. Central Point Municipal Code 3.24.010 is amended in part to read: For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions apply: “Transient lodging facility” or “lodging facility” means any structure, or any portion of any structure, which is occupied or intended or designed for short-term occupancy for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes and includes any hotel, motel, inn, condominium, house, cabin, apartment, public or private dormitory, fraternity, sorority, public or private club, space in a mobile home or trailer park, spaces used for overnight parking of recreational vehicles or placement of tents camping locations, or similar structures or spaces or portions thereof so occupied; provided such occupancy is for less than a thirty-day period. SECTION 2. Central Point Municipal Code 3.24.020 is amended in part to read: 3.24.020 Tax imposed. Effective ________ 1, 2024, for For the privilege of occupancy in any transient lodging, each occupant shall pay a tax of nine eleven percent of the total retail price, including all charges other than taxes, paid by a person for occupancy of the transient lodging. The total retail price paid by a person for occupancy of transient lodging that is part of a travel package may be determined by reasonable and verifiable standards from books and records kept in the ordinary course of the lodging tax collector’s business. The tax imposed by this chapter is in addition to and not in lieu of any state transient lodging tax. The tax constitutes a debt owed by the occupant to the city, which is extinguished only by payment to the lodging tax collector. The occupant shall pay the tax to the lodging tax collector at the time rent is paid. The 8.A.a Packet Pg. 18 At t a c h m e n t : O R D - A m e n d i n g C h . 3 . 2 4 T L T ( 1 8 1 4 : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g a n d I n c r e a s i n g T r a n s i e n t L o d g i n g T a x ) 3 – Ordinance No. _____________ (Council Meeting __/__/24) lodging tax collector shall enter the tax into the record when rent is collected if the lodging tax collector keeps records on the cash accounting basis and when earned if the lodging tax collector keeps records on the accrual accounting basis. If the rent is paid in installments, a proportionate share of the tax shall be paid by the occupant to the lodging tax collector with each installment. The unpaid tax is due upon the occupant’s ceasing to occupy space in the transient lodging. (Ord. 2070 §1, 2020; Ord. 2025 §1(part), 2016; Ord. 1996 §1(part), 2014; Ord. 1859 §1, 2005; Ord. 1707 §1(part), 1994). SECTION 3. Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 3.24 is amended to add section 3.24.045 Liability for Tax: 3.24.045 Liability for Tax Transient lodging providers who receive any portion of the rent for transient lodging and transient lodging intermediaries that provide booking service are both transient lodging tax collectors and are jointly and severally liable for the tax. SECTION 4. Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 3.24 is amended in its entirety to read: 3.24.090 Deficiency Determination - Fraud, evasion, and lodging tax collector delay. A. Deficiency Determination. If the director determines that the returns are incorrect, she or he may compute and determine the amount required to be paid upon the basis of the facts contained in the return or returns, or upon the basis of any information within her or his possession or that may come into her or his possession. One or more deficiency determinations may be made of the amount due for one or more than one period; and the amount so determined shall be due and payable immediately upon service of notice, as provided in this chapter; after which, the amount determined is delinquent. Penalties on deficiencies shall be applied as set forth in Section 3.24.080. 1. In making a determination, the director may offset overpayments, if any, which may have been previously made for a period or periods, against any underpayment for a subsequent period or periods, or against penalties and interest on the underpayments. The interest on underpayments shall be computed in the manner set forth in Section 3.24.080. 2. The director shall give to the lodging tax collector a written notice of her or his determination. The notice may be served personally or by mail; if by mail, the notice shall be addressed to the lodging tax collector at her or his address as it appears in the records of the director. In case of service by mail of any notice required by this chapter, the service is complete at the time of deposit in the United States post office. 3. Except in the case of fraud, intent to evade the provisions of this chapter or authorized rules and regulations, every deficiency determination shall be made and notice thereof 8.A.a Packet Pg. 19 At t a c h m e n t : O R D - A m e n d i n g C h . 3 . 2 4 T L T ( 1 8 1 4 : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g a n d I n c r e a s i n g T r a n s i e n t L o d g i n g T a x ) 4 – Ordinance No. _____________ (Council Meeting __/__/24) mailed within three years after the last day of the month following the close of the monthly period for which the amount is proposed to be determined, or within three years after the return is filed, whichever period expires the later. 4. Any determination shall become due and payable immediately upon receipt of notice, and shall become final within ten days after the director has given notice thereof; provided, however, the lodging tax collector may petition redemption and refund if the petition is filed before the determination becomes final, as provided in this chapter. B. Fraud--Refusal to Collect--Evasion. If any lodging tax collector shall fail or refuse to collect said tax or to make, within the time provided in this chapter, any report and remittance of said tax or any portion of the tax required by this chapter, or makes a fraudulent return or otherwise willfully attempts to evade the provisions of this chapter, the director shall proceed in such manner as she or he may deem best to obtain facts and information on which to base an estimate of the tax due. 1. As soon as the director has determined the tax due that is imposed by this chapter, from any lodging tax collector who has failed or refused to collect the same and to report and remit said tax, she or he shall proceed to determine and assess against such lodging tax collector the tax, interest, and penalties provided in this chapter. In case such determination is made, the director shall give a notice in the manner aforesaid of the amount so assessed. Such determination and notice shall be made and mailed within three years after discovery by the director of any fraud, intent to evade or failure or refusal to collect said tax, or failure to file return. 2. Any determination shall become due and payable immediately upon receipt of notice and shall become final within ten days after the director has given notice thereof; provided, however, the lodging tax collector may petition redemption and refund, if the petition is filed before the determination becomes final, as provided in this chapter. C. Lodging Tax Collector Delay. If the director believes that the collection of any tax or any amount of tax required to be collected and paid to the city will be jeopardized by delay, or if any determination will be jeopardized by delay, the director shall thereupon make a determination of the tax or amount of tax required to be collected, noting the fact upon the determination. 1. The amount so determined, as provided in this chapter, shall be immediately due and payable; and the lodging tax collector shall immediately pay same determination to the director after service of notice thereof. Provided, however, the lodging tax collector may petition, after payment has been made, for redemption and refund of such determination, if the petition is filed within ten days from the date of service of notice by the director. (Ord. 2070 §1, 2020; Ord. 2025 §1(part), 2016; Ord. 1996 §1(part), 2014; Ord. 1707 §1(part), 1994). 8.A.a Packet Pg. 20 At t a c h m e n t : O R D - A m e n d i n g C h . 3 . 2 4 T L T ( 1 8 1 4 : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g a n d I n c r e a s i n g T r a n s i e n t L o d g i n g T a x ) 5 – Ordinance No. _____________ (Council Meeting __/__/24) A. Deficiency Determination. The director may review tax returns and adjust the amount due based on the information in the return, on information obtained during a review or audit of records, or on the basis of other evidence. In the event of a deficiency, the director shall provide notice of the deficiency to the transient lodging tax collector, who shall remit deficiencies within 10 business days of the deficiency notice. Notice may be by personal delivery or certified or registered mail. (1) In reviewing and adjusting tax returns, the director shall offset any amount received in excess of the remittances due against any shortages in remittances. (2) Except in the case of fraud or intent to evade the lodging tax, notice of deficiency determinations shall be issued within three years of the period for which the deficiency determination is made. (3) The time to remit deficient payment amounts under this section shall be extended if the lodging tax collector timely requests a redetermination. B. Fraud – Refusal to Collect – Evasion. If any lodging tax collector fails to collect, report or remit the tax as required, submits a fraudulent return, or otherwise violates or attempts to violate this chapter, the director shall estimate the tax due, and calculate the amount owing from the lodging tax collector for tax remittance, interest and penalties and provide notice to the lodging tax collector of the assessment. The determination and notice shall be made and mailed within three years of the discovery by the director of the violation. The determination is due and payable upon receipt of notice and shall become final 10 business days after the date notice was delivered if no petition for redetermination is filed. SECTION 5. Central Point Municipal Code 3.24.100 is amended in its entirety to read: 3.24.100 Redeterminations. A. Any person against whom a determination is made under Section 3.24.090, or any person directly interested, may petition for a redetermination and redemption and refund within the time required in Section 3.24.090. If a petition for redetermination and refund is not filed within the time required in Section 3.24.090, the determination becomes final at the expiration of the allowable time. B. If a petition for redetermination and refund is filed within the allowable period, the director shall reconsider the determination; and, if the person has so requested in her or his petition, shall grant the person an oral hearing and shall give her or him ten days’ notice of the time and place of the hearing. The director may continue the hearing from time to time as may be necessary. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 21 At t a c h m e n t : O R D - A m e n d i n g C h . 3 . 2 4 T L T ( 1 8 1 4 : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g a n d I n c r e a s i n g T r a n s i e n t L o d g i n g T a x ) 6 – Ordinance No. _____________ (Council Meeting __/__/24) C. The director may decrease or increase the amount of the determination as a result of the hearing; and, if an increase is determined, such increase shall be payable immediately after the hearing. D. The order or decision of the director upon a petition for redetermination of redemption and refund becomes final ten days after service upon the petitioner of notice thereof, unless appeal of such order or decision is filed with the City Manager within the ten days after service of such notice. E. No petition for redetermination of redemption and refund or appeal therefrom shall be effective for any purpose unless the lodging tax collector has first complied with the payment provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 2070 §1, 2020). A. Any person affected by a deficiency determination may file a petition for redetermination with the director within 10 business days of service of notice of the tax deficiency. A determination becomes final if a petition for redetermination is not timely filed. B. If a petition for redetermination is filed within the allowable period, the director shall reconsider the determination and grant an oral hearing if requested. The petitioner shall be allowed at least 15 business days to prepare for the hearing. C. After considering the petition and all available information, the director shall issue a redetermination decision and mail the decision to the petitioner. During the redetermination process, the director may agree to a compromise of the amount due if there is a good faith dispute over the amount owing. D. The decision of the director on redetermination becomes final and payment is due 10 business days after the decision is mailed unless the petitioner files an appeal to the city council within that time. The appeal shall be filed with the director. The city council’s decision shall be final when reduced to writing and mailed to the petitioner and all amounts due must be paid within 10 business days of mailing of the city council decision. SECTION 6. Central Point Municipal Code 3.24.130 is amended in part to read: 3.24.130 Security and Collections for collection of tax. If the finance director believes that the collection of any tax or any amount of tax required to be collected and paid to the city will be jeopardized by delay, the director may make a determination of the tax required to be collected, and may require a lodging tax collector to deposit security in the form of cash, bond or other security. The amount of security shall be fixed by the director and shall not be greater than twice the lodging tax collector’s estimated average quarterly liability for the period for which the lodging tax collector files returns. The lodging tax collector has the right to appeal to the city manager any decision of the finance director made under this provision as provided in Section 3.24.210. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 22 At t a c h m e n t : O R D - A m e n d i n g C h . 3 . 2 4 T L T ( 1 8 1 4 : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g a n d I n c r e a s i n g T r a n s i e n t L o d g i n g T a x ) 7 – Ordinance No. _____________ (Council Meeting __/__/24) Within three years after the tax becomes payable or within three years after a determination becomes final, the director may bring an action in the name of the city in the courts of this or another state of the United States to collect the amount delinquent and penalties and interest and reasonable attorney fees incurred in any legal action brought to collect on the amount owed to the city under this chapter. (Ord. 2070 §1, 2020; Ord. 2025 §1(part), 2016; Ord. 1996 §1(part), 2014; Ord. 1707 §1(part), 1994). SECTION 7. Central Point Municipal Code 3.24.190 is amended in part to read: 3.24.190 Confidentiality--Disclosure unlawful. A. It shall be unlawful for the director or any person having an administrative or clerical duty under the provisions of this chapter to make known in any manner whatever the business affairs, operations, or information obtained by an investigation of records and equipment of any person required to obtain a lodging tax certificate of authority or pay a lodging tax, or any other person visited or examined in the discharge of official duty; or the amount or source of income, profits, losses, expenditures, or any particular thereof, set forth in any statement or application; or to permit any statement or application, or copy of either, or any book containing any abstract or particulars thereof to be seen or examined by any person; provided, that nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent: 1. The disclosure to, or the examination of, records and equipment by another city official, employee, or agent for collection of taxes for the sole purpose of administering or enforcing any provisions of this chapter; or collecting taxes imposed under this chapter. 2. The disclosure, after the filing of a written request to that effect, to the taxpayer herself or himself, receivers, trustees, executors, administrators, assignees, and guarantors, if directly interested, of information as to any paid tax, any unpaid tax or amount of tax required to be collected, or interest and penalties; further provided, however, that the city attorney approves each such disclosure, and that the director may refuse to make any disclosure referred to in this subsection when, in her or his opinion, the public interest would suffer thereby. 3. The disclosure of the names and addresses of any persons to whom lodging tax registration certificates have been issued. 4. The disclosure of general statistics regarding taxes collected or business done in the city. 5. Disclosures required by ORS Chapter 192. 6. Disclosures required by ORS Chapter 297. (Ord. 2070 §1, 2020; Ord. 2025 §1(part), 2016; Ord. 1996 §1(part), 2014; Ord. 1707 §1(part), 1994). SECTION 8. Central Point Municipal Code 3.24.200 is amended in part to read: 8.A.a Packet Pg. 23 At t a c h m e n t : O R D - A m e n d i n g C h . 3 . 2 4 T L T ( 1 8 1 4 : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g a n d I n c r e a s i n g T r a n s i e n t L o d g i n g T a x ) 8 – Ordinance No. _____________ (Council Meeting __/__/24) 3.24.200 Disposition of transient room tax. A. All revenues received by the city from the tax shall be deposited in the general fund. B. Twenty-five percent of the revenue from the first nine percent balance of the proceeds shall be used directly or indirectly for the purpose of promoting recreational, cultural, convention and tourist related activities and services for the city of Central Point. Seventy-five percent of the revenue of the tax rate of nine percent shall be used for city services. Seventy percent of the revenue generated by the remaining two percent of the tax shall be used for any tourism purpose consistent with state law. Thirty percent of the revenue generated by the remaining two percent shall be used by the city for funding city services. (Ord. 2070 §1, 2020; Ord. 2025 §1(part), 2016; Ord. 1996 §1(part), 2014; Ord. 1707 §1(part), 1994). SECTION 9. Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 3.24 is amended in part to repeal section 3.24.210-Appeals in its entirety. SECTION 10. Central Point Municipal Code Section 3.24.215 is amended in part to read: Any person aggrieved by any decision of the city manager may appeal to council of the city by filing a notice of appeal with the director within ten business days of the serving or mailing of the notice of the decision given by the city manager. The director shall transmit said notice of appeal, together with the file of said appealed matter, to council, who shall fix a time and place for hearing such appeal from the decision of the city manager. Council shall give the appellant not less than ten business days’ written notice of the time and place of hearing of said appealed matter. Action by council on appeals shall be decided by a majority of the members of council present at the meeting where such appeal is considered. (Ord. 2070 §1, 2020). SECTION 11. Codification. Provisions of this Ordinance shall be incorporated in the City Code and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "code", "article", "section", "chapter" or another word, and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered, or re-lettered, provided however that any Whereas clauses and boilerplate provisions (i.e. Recitals A-C) need not be codified and the City Recorder is authorized to correct any cross-references and any typographical errors. SECTION 12. Effective Date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance enacted by the Council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading. PASSED by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this ____ day of _________________ 2024. 8.A.a Packet Pg. 24 At t a c h m e n t : O R D - A m e n d i n g C h . 3 . 2 4 T L T ( 1 8 1 4 : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g a n d I n c r e a s i n g T r a n s i e n t L o d g i n g T a x ) 9 – Ordinance No. _____________ (Council Meeting __/__/24) ___________________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: __________________________________ City Recorder 8.A.a Packet Pg. 25 At t a c h m e n t : O R D - A m e n d i n g C h . 3 . 2 4 T L T ( 1 8 1 4 : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g a n d I n c r e a s i n g T r a n s i e n t L o d g i n g T a x ) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Community Development FROM: Stephanie Powers, Planning Director MEETING DATE: March 14, 2024 SUBJECT: Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File No. CPA-23001 ACTION REQUIRED: Ordinance 2nd Reading RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On January 26, 2023, the City Council approved Resolution No. 1731, a resolution of intent to initiate Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendments to support housing production. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on February 6, 2024, received public testimony and forwarded a recommendation to City Council to approve the proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (“Amendment”). Testimony received expressed concern about the conversion of open space to housing, traffic impacts and general concerns about development impacts on the City overall. The proposed Amendments to the General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Map and Overlay Map in the Land Use Element, include the following: 1. Taylor Road at North Haskell Street (37S 2W 03DC, Tax Lots 3402, 3603 (0.73 acres) and 37S 2W 10AB, Tax Lot 1300 (0.18 acres). The proposed amendment would change the existing Civic land use designation to High Density Residential (HRes). A local land developer has acquired the property and has prepared a preliminary plan to develop single-story, cottage-style multifamily units to support affordable age-in-place housing. The proposed map amendment is necessary to apply a zoning designation that would permit housing construction. Per the Land Use Element, the Medium Mix Residential (MMR) or High Mix Residential (HMR) zone could be applied. Staff is recommending MMR in the concurrent Minor Zone Map Amendment application (ZC-23001). 2. 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 03D, Tax Lot 100 (21.13 acres). The proposed amendment would change the Overlay Map extending the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay to include the property; and, change the existing Employment Commercial land use designation on the GLUP Map to HRes on a portion of the site. The purpose of the proposed changes is to allow a combination of affordable and market rate high density housing while preserving opportunities for commercial use in stand- alone and/or mixed-use configurations. The property is owned by the Housing Authority of Jackson County. They approached 9.A Packet Pg. 26 the City in October 2021 prior to purchasing the site to evaluate options that would allow construction of affordable housing on roughly 5.5 acres of the property. Their stated intent was to sell the remaining portion of the site for market rate housing (7.4 acres) and commercial use (8.2 acres). The current land use and zoning designations do not allow housing. By extending the TOD Overlay and amending the land use and zoning map, the property owner has the opportunity to accomplish their objectives and the City is able to require master planning that will support a livable, mixed-use environment. Since discussions began with the Housing Authority, the State passed House Bill 2984, which allows development of qualified affordable housing in commercial zones without requiring a zone change or conditional use permit. This would allow the Housing Authority to construct qualified affordable housing on the site without consideration of minimum/maximum density or other clear and objective standards that would otherwise apply in an area planned and zoned for residential use. During the public hearing, the Planning Commission considered two scenarios: • Scenario 1 - Maximize preservation of Employment Commercial lands thereby granting maximum flexibility to the Housing Authority to develop affordable housing on the City’s commercial lands. • Scenario 2 – Designate the site area contemplated for affordable and market rate housing as HRes to support residential zoning that would establish clear and objective criteria for future residential land development. The Planning Commission recommended Scenario 2 be approved because it provides a clear process and criteria for housing development while balancing the need for retaining commercial use opportunities. At the February 22, 2024 City Council meeting, staff presented the existing land use and proposed amendments for a second duly noticed public hearing and 1st reading of the ordinance. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: There are no costs aside from in-kind contributions associated with the proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. LEGAL ANALYSIS: The proposed Amendment applies existing policies in the Land Use Element to lands within the City Limits. To approve the Amendment, the City Council must find that the change is consistent with CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments. This includes demonstrated compliance with the Statewide Planning Goals, applicable policies of the Central Point Comprehensive Plan and the State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012- 0060). Staff has prepared the application and provided written Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Attachment 2). These findings of fact demonstrate that the proposed Amendment provides needed housing in balance with employment needs and is consistent with the approval criteria summarized above. Of note, a Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted and found that the proposed change would decrease traffic impacts and consequently no significant impact is found to the City’s transportation system. COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: Strategic Priority: Community Investment, Goal 6 – Meet the housing needs of Central Point 9.A Packet Pg. 27 residents and businesses. . Strategy 1 – Rely on the findings, policies and implementation of the City’s Comprehensive Plan Population, Housing and Economic Elements. Strategy 2 – Support and Capitalize on opportunities to collaborate on projects with agencies who specialize in providing affordable housing. Strategy 3 – Pursue grant and/or Urban Renewal assistance in making housing affordable and accessible to residents. Comment: The proposed Amendment implements the City’s Housing and Economic Elements by providing land use designations supportive of both residential and employment needs. The City recognizes it has a housing shortage of approximately 2,800 housing units and affordability for all segments of the population is challenging. The proposed Amendment leverages partnerships with local land developers who have prepared preliminary plans to provide affordable, accessible housing in Central Point in the near-term. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance No. ______ an Ordinance Amending the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Map on properties located at the corner of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street (0.9 acres) and 1777 East Pine Street (12.9 acres) to increase housing production. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance (CPA-23001) 2. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 9.A Packet Pg. 28 Ordinance No. _______; Council Meeting ___/___/2024 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP ON PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF TAYLOR ROAD AND NORTH HASKELL STREET (0.91 ACRES) AND 1777 EAST PINE STREET (12.9 ACRES) TO INCREASE HOUSING PRODUCTION. Recitals: A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning Goals. B. The City Council by Resolution No. 1731 initiated a Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to consider changes to the General Land Use Plan Map to support housing production. C. The Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment includes the following changes: a. Amend the land use designation on 0.9 acres located at the intersection of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street from Civic to High Density Residential as shown in Exhibit A. The properties are identified on the Jackson County Assessor’s Map as 37S 2W 03DC, TL 3404, 3603 (0.73 acres) and 37S 2W 10AB, TL 1300 (0.18 acres). b. Amend the land use designation on 12.9 acres located along the north portion of 1777 East Pine Street from Employment Commercial to High Density Residential as shown in Exhibit B. The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor’s Map as 37S 2W 03D, Tax Lot 100. c. Extend the Transit Oriented Development Overlay to include 21.13 acres located at 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 03D, Tax lot 100) as shown in Exhibit C. D. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals and compatibility with City Comprehensive Plans. E. Pursuant to authority granted by the City Charter and the ORS, the City may amend the Central Point Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map which was originally adopted on August 29, 1980 and has been amended at various times since. 9.A.a Packet Pg. 29 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e ( C P A - 2 3 0 0 1 ) [ R e v i s i o n 2 ] ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Ordinance No. _______; Council Meeting ___/___/2024 F. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.96.100 Comprehensive Plan Map and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments – Purpose and Chapter 17.05.010, Applications and Development Permit Review Procedures, the City has accepted an application and conducted the following duly advertised public hearings to consider the proposed amendment: a. Planning Commission hearing on February 6, 2024 b. City Council hearing on February 22, 2024. G. At the February 22, 2024 public hearing, the Council considered the staff report and all testimony and evidence in the record. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Based upon all the information received in the record, the City Council adopts the City staff report dated February 22, 2024, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Sections 1, 2, 6, 8 and 9, and Planning Commission Resolution No. 916 including all exhibits thereto, herein incorporated by reference; and determines that changing community conditions, needs and desires justify the amendments and hereby adopts the proposed amendments in their entirely. Section 2. The City Comprehensive General Land Use Plan Map is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibits A and B, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. The City Transit Oriented Development Overlay Map is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit C, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 4. The City Manager is directed to conduct post acknowledgement procedures defined in ORS 197.610 et seq. upon adoption of the changes to the zoning and Comprehensive Plan maps. Section 5. Effective date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance enacted by the council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _____________________, 2024. __________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: 9.A.a Packet Pg. 30 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e ( C P A - 2 3 0 0 1 ) [ R e v i s i o n 2 ] ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Ordinance No. _______; Council Meeting ___/___/2024 _____________________________ City Recorder 9.A.a Packet Pg. 31 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e ( C P A - 2 3 0 0 1 ) [ R e v i s i o n 2 ] ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Ordinance No. _______; Council Meeting ___/___/2024 EXHIBIT A 9.A.a Packet Pg. 32 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e ( C P A - 2 3 0 0 1 ) [ R e v i s i o n 2 ] ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Ordinance No. _______; Council Meeting ___/___/2024 EXHIBIT B 9.A.a Packet Pg. 33 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e ( C P A - 2 3 0 0 1 ) [ R e v i s i o n 2 ] ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Ordinance No. _______; Council Meeting ___/___/2024 EXHIBIT C 9.A.a Packet Pg. 34 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e ( C P A - 2 3 0 0 1 ) [ R e v i s i o n 2 ] ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File No. CPA-23001 & ZC-23001 Applicant: City of Central Point ) Findings of Fact 140 South Third Street ) and Central Point, OR 97502 ) Conclusions of Law 1 Introduction On January 26, 2023, the City of Central Point City Council approved Resolution No.1731, a Resolution Declaring the City Council’s intent to initiate Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment applications to correct mapping errors, support housing production and address land use and transportation compatibility challenges. At this time, the City is presenting a Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPA-23001) and a Minor Zoning Map Amendment (ZC- 23001) to support production of needed housing at two (2) locations in the City. In accordance with CPMC 17.05.100, CPMC 17.96.300 and CPMC 17.10.300(B), the proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map and Zone Map Amendments are being processed using Type III procedures set forth in CPMC 17.05.400. The Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law present the proposed applications and their conformance with applicable criteria as set forth below: Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Minor Zone Map Amendment • CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments o Statewide Planning Goals o Comprehensive Plan o State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060) o Availability of public facilities and services (existing or planned) • CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and Zoning Text Amendments o Comprehensive Plan o State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060) o Availability of public facilities and services (existing or planned) The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are presented in four (4) parts as follows: 1. Introduction 2. Background Narrative 3. Statewide Planning Goals 4. State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060) 5. Central Point Comprehensive Plan 6. CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan Amendment 7. CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map Amendment 8. Summary Conclusion 9. Exhibits 9.A.b Packet Pg. 35 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 2 Background Narrative The City has been approached by two (2) developers that would like to produce a combination of market rate and affordable housing at two (2) locations in the city. Both properties are currently planned and zoned for uses that prohibit housing. As provided below, the City is proposing to amend the land use and zoning as necessary to remove barriers to housing production. 2.1 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment The City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element maps and manages the City’s land use classifications. The General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Map shows the distribution land use designations throughout the city. The Land Use Overlay Map illustrates the location of the City’s five overlay districts. The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment includes two (2) changes to the Central Point GLUP (Figures 1-5) and one amendment to the Land Use Overlay Map (Figure 6-7) as described below: • GLUP Map Amendment #1 - Taylor Road Infill/Housing Production (37S 2W 03DC, Tax Lot 3402, 3603). Change the General Land Use Plan (GLUP) designation from Civic to High Density Residential (HRes) (Figures 1 and 2). The subject properties are located near the intersection of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street. A local land developer has acquired the property and would like to develop cottage style multifamily units to support affordable, age-in-place housing. • GLUP Map Amendment #2 – 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 100). The proposal would re-designate a portion of the site from Employment Commercial to High Density Residential. The subject property is owned by the Housing Authority of Jackson County. During a Pre-Application Conference in 2022, the HAJC presented a preliminary plan to subdivide the property to provide a combination of affordable and market rate high density housing on approximately 12.9 acres and retain opportunities for commercial development on the 8.4 remaining acres. The current land use designations are not supportive of zoning the site for residential and commercial mixed-use. However recent legislative changes would allow qualified affordable housing to be built on commercial land contrary to limitations imposed by the current zoning. Given the City’s limited commercial land supply, City staff advised the HAJC in the Pre-Application Conference and written report changes to the land use and zoning on this property would be necessary to support housing production and maintain the City’s limited commercial land supply. The proposed change to the GLUP map would allow the City to plan for housing in combination with commercial uses on the site and either 1) establish land use designations and zoning that provide clear and objective criteria for future development; or, 2) provide maximum flexibility to the HAJC to develop qualified affordable housing without clear and objective standards for minimum/maximum density, design, etc.. Two (2) scenarios have been evaluated based on these options and are presented for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council: 9.A.b Packet Pg. 36 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) o Scenario 1: Change 7.4 acres from Employment Commercial to High Density Residential to support market rate housing. Pre-Application Conference held on October 25, 2021, HAJC discussed their intent to construction affordable housing on 5.5 acres and to market the remaining acreage for market rate housing and commercial development. Scenario 1 limits the land use amendment to the market rate housing property only, which maintains the commercial land supply until such time the HAJC develops the 5.5 acres with qualified affordable housing in accordance with House Bill 2984. o Scenario 2: Change 12.9 acres from Employment Commercial to High Density Residential to support both the market rate housing on a 7.4 acre portion of the site and the 5.5 acre area envisioned for future affordable housing. The rationale behind including Scenario 2 is to provide greater predictability and regulation of the affordable housing portion with regarding to minimum density standards and design standards. This scenario would eliminate the opportunity to develop a stand-alone commercial use but would allow a mix of commercial and housing. • Land Use Overlay Map Amendment – 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 100). The proposed amendment would extend the Transit Oriented Development Overlay to include this property, which is roughly 22 acres in size. If the property is included in the TOD Overlay, future site development will be subject to design and development standards that emphasize facilitating multi-modal transportation options and livability. This modification is supportive of facilitating the City’s compliance with Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities rules, as this site has been identified as a priority area for Climate Friendly Area (CFA) designation. The CFA has similar characteristics to the TOD Overlay. If approved, the proposed modification will reduce the likelihood that new development at this location will become legally nonconforming following the CFA designation process. At the Planning Commission and City Council meetings, the proposed amendments will be considered at approved with Scenario 1 or Scenario 2 or denied. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 37 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 1 - Existing GLUP Map: Taylor Road 9.A.b Packet Pg. 38 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 2 - Proposed GLUP Map: Taylor Road at North Haskell Street 9.A.b Packet Pg. 39 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 3 - Existing GLUP: 1777 East Pine Street 9.A.b Packet Pg. 40 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 4 - Proposed GLUP: 1777 East Pine Street, Scenario 1 9.A.b Packet Pg. 41 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 5 - Proposed GLUP: 1777 East Pine Street, Scenario 2 9.A.b Packet Pg. 42 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 6 - Proposed TOD Overlay Extension 9.A.b Packet Pg. 43 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 44 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 2.2 Zone Map Amendment. Zoning Districts specify the land use and development regulations that apply to development in the City. The City’s Zoning Map identifies the spatial distribution of the City’s zoning districts based on the land use designations shown on the GLUP Map. There are three changes proposed to the Zoning Map, which are illustrated on Figures 10-16 and described below: • Extend the TOD Overlay to include the HAJC property (37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 100). This would match the change to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Overlay Map. • Re-zone the Taylor Road Infill Site (37S 2W 03DC, Tax Lot 3402, 3603) to Medium Mix Residential (MMR). This zoning classification aligns with the High Density Residential Land Use Designation and would support multifamily residential housing production. In this case, the proposal would help increase the supply of affordable housing in the City. • Re-zone a portion of the HAJC property from Employment Commercial to High Mix Residential (HMR) or a combination of HMR and MMR. This change would align with the GLUP Map Amendment Scenario #1 or #2 and support high density housing with established minimum/maximum density ranges and development standards for both affordable and market rate housing projects while preserving opportunities for mixed-use (residential/commercial) development. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 45 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) [Insert Figures 5-8] Figure 7 - Existing Zoning, Taylor Road at North Haskell Street 9.A.b Packet Pg. 46 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 8 - Proposed Zoning, Taylor Road at North Haskell Street 9.A.b Packet Pg. 47 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 9 - Existing Zoning, 1777 East Pine Street 9.A.b Packet Pg. 48 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 10 - Proposed Zoning, Scenario 1 (1777 East Pine Street) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 49 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 11 - Proposed Zoning, Scenario 2 (1777 East Pine Street) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 50 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 3 Statewide Planning Goals In accordance with CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and Text Amendments and CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments, the Statewide Planning Goals apply to Comprehensive Plan amendments. The Statewide Planning Goals 1-14 are addressed below for File No. CPA-23001. Goals 15-19 involve coastal lands and areas in the Willamette Valley, which do not apply to the City of Central Point. 3.1 Goal 1 – Citizen Involvement To develop a citizen’s involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process. Finding, Goal 1: Finding, Goal 1: The City’s Citizen Involvement Program is set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and CPMC 17.05. This program specifies that a broad spectrum of affected citizens be involved throughout preparation, implementation, monitoring and amendment of plans, including but not limited to a Citizen’s Advisory Committee. Procedures in CPMC 17.05 establish notification and involvement requirements relative to each application type (i.e. Type I, II, III, IV). The City took this matter to the City Council in a public meeting on January 26, 2023 to consider whether the initiate the proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to support housing. Additionally, the Proposed Amendments have been processed in accordance with Type III procedures, including mailed and posted notices of the public hearings scheduled for the Planning Commission on February 6, 2024 and the City Council on February 22, 2024. Additionally, the City posted notice of the proposed amendments on the DLCD Post Acknowledgement Plan Amendment (PAPA) portal on December 5, 2023 and revised this notice on December 14, 2023. Conclusion, Goal 1: Consistent. 3.2 Goal 2 – Land Use Planning To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual basis for such decisions and actions. Finding, Goal 2: The City’s land use planning process and policy framework is provided in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and Central Point Municipal Code in Title 17. The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendment applies existing land use and zoning designations to the properties on Taylor Road and East Pine Street. Approval of the proposed amendments is subject to the criteria for Comprehensive Plan Amendments in CPMC 17.96 and Zoning Amendments in CPMC 17.10. Conclusion, Goal 2: The City has applied its land use planning process and policy framework to the proposed map amendments. 3.3 Goal 3 – Agricultural Lands To preserve and maintain agricultural lands. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 51 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Finding, Goal 3: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments are to lands within the city limits do not involve or otherwise affect agricultural lands. Conclusion, Goal 3: Not applicable. 3.4 Goal 4 – Forest Lands To conserve forest lands by maintaining the forest land base and to protect the state’s forest economy by making possible economically efficient forest practices that assure the continuous growing and harvesting of forest tree species as a leading use on forest land consistent with sound management of soil, air, water, and fish and wildlife resources and to provide for recreational opportunities and agriculture. Finding, Goal 4: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments are to lands within the city limits do not involve or otherwise affect forest lands. Conclusion, Goal 4: Not applicable. 3.5 Goal 5 – Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces To protect natural resources and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces. Finding, Goal 5: Pursuant to Goal 5, the City is required to adopt programs and regulations that protect natural resources and conserve scenic, historic and open space resources. Goal 5 resources that must be inventoried include: wetlands, riparian corridors, wildlife habitat, federal wild and scenic rivers, state scenic waterways, groundwater resources, approved Oregon recreational trails, natural areas, wilderness areas, mineral and aggregate resources, energy sources, and cultural areas. Local governments are also encouraged to inventory historic resources, open space and scenic view and sites. The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments involving 1777 East Pine Street include land that is within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and riparian corridor for Bear Creek. At this time, the City is updating its Environmental Element of the Comprehensive Plan including a local wetland and riparian inventory. The lands with identified natural resources will be managed as a function of the land development process consistent with local implementing regulations for natural resources including floodplain, riparian areas and wetlands, as well as state and federal requirements. Conclusion, Goal 5: Consistent. 3.6 Goal 6 – Air, Water and Land Resources Quality To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state. Finding, Goal 6: Goal 6 requires that all waste and process discharges from existing and future development will not threaten to violate or violate applicable state or federal environmental quality statutes, rules and standards. There is no interpretive rule for Goal 6. The City finds that air, water and land resource quality will be addressed by the City’s land use, transportation and environmental programs that minimize, mitigate or avoid conflicts with Goal 6 associated with land development: In this case, the proposed 9.A.b Packet Pg. 52 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) actions to modify the land use designation, TOD overlay boundary and zoning districts on property located on Taylor Road and East Pine Street will allow for housing development. Future land development proposals will be subject to the City’s land use, transportation and environmental programs that minimize, mitigate or avoid conflicts with Goal 6, including: • Land Use and Transportation Planning. The land use and development regulations that apply to the properties that are the subject of this amendment, will be in the TOD Overlay. The TOD Overlay promotes multi-modal transportation in neighborhoods with mixed-use opportunities and human-scale design. This supports the ability of residents to have needs met within walking distance and thereby reduces vehicle miles traveled, which is associated with air and water pollution. • Stormwater Management. The City of Central Point manages all land development in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Phase II Program. This includes erosion and sediment control, as well as post-construction runoff treatment to protect water quality from pollutants and increased volume associated with increased impervious surface area and land development. The proposed Amendments do not cause land development; however, future land development will be subject to the City’s stormwater management program to protect water quality. • Floodplain Management. The City’s Floodplain Management regulations are set forth in CPMC 8.24 and address risk reduction, as well as higher standards that buffer floodways and preserve riparian corridors. Future land development proposals for the subject properties will be subject to the City’s Floodplain Program, including preservation of open space within the floodway and floodway buffer. • Urban Forestry. Central Point is a Tree City USA and implements regulations (CPMC 12.36, CPMC 17.75, and CPMC 17.67) and programs to increase the urban forest canopy in the City. Trees are shown to promote cleaner air and water (photosynthesis, through fall, evapotranspiration), cooler ambient air temperatures (shade from increased canopy) and increased soil quality (by increasing soil infiltration and beneficial soil organisms). The City will continue its program of requiring street trees, along street frontages and within parking areas development buffers. This will apply to the properties that are the subject of the Minor Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendments at such time they are developed. Conclusion, Goal 6: Consistent. 3.7 Goal 7 – Areas Subject to Natural Hazards To protect people and property from natural hazards. Finding, Goal 7: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments have been evaluated for natural hazard impacts, as shown in Figures 12 9.A.b Packet Pg. 53 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) and 13. The Taylor Road property is partially impacted by the low-to-moderate risk floodplain (-shaded flood zone) and is not subject to CPMC 8.24. The property at 1777 East Pine Street is partially impacted by the high risk floodplain along the west property boundary. Future land development proposals on this site will require conformance with CPMC 8.24, Flood Damage Prevention. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 54 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 12 - Environmental Resource Map, Taylor Road at North Haskell Properties 9.A.b Packet Pg. 55 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 13 - Environmental Resource Map, 1777 East Pine Street 9.A.b Packet Pg. 56 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Conclusion, Goal 7: Protection of people and property from flood hazards will be managed consistent with CPMC 8.24 at the time of land development application consistent with Goal 7. 3.8 Goal 8 – Recreational Needs To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors and, where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destination resorts. Finding, Goal 8: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments respond to the need for housing and the opportunity to support it. Recreation needs are managed through the City’s Parks Element, which does not identify any needs for Neighborhood or Community Parks on either of the two proposed map amendment areas. Notwithstanding, the proposed amendment to include 1777 East Pine Street in the TOD Overlay will support neighborhood recreation through the master planning process (required for all properties greater than 2 acres) and provision of open space in conjunction with new housing development. The Taylor Road property is already part of the TOD Overlay and is proximate to existing parks and open space lands that were developed as part of the Twin Creeks TOD Master Plan. Conclusion, Goal 8: The proposed map amendments, through the future land development process, are supportive and consistent with the need to provide for the recreational needs of the community. 3.9 Goal 9 – Economic Development To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety of economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon’s citizens. Finding, Goal 9: The proposed Map Amendments apply land use and zoning designations, including the TOD Overlay, High Density Residential (Hares), Employment Commercial land use designations; and, MMR, HMR and EC zones. These land use designations and corresponding zoning districts provide the dual function of allowing increased housing production while retaining flexibility to provide commercial uses in horizontal and vertical mixed-use configurations based on market demands. The City finds that the proposed amendments are consistent with the need to provide economic opportunities in balance with housing needs. Conclusion, Goal 9: Consistent. 3.10 Goal 10 – Housing To provide for the housing needs of the state. Finding, Goal 10: The City added lands the to the UGB in 2020 to provide land that can support 2,887 needed housing units. Lands within the newly added UGB are currently ineligible for annexation due to requirements to complete environmental and public facility planning, which is likely to conclude later this year. Meanwhile, the City has very limited residential buildable lands available. The proposed Map Amendments recognize that the State has set a housing production goal of 36,000 units per year to combat the state’s housing shortage (Executive Order 23-04) and that the City can contribute to increased housing production by working collaboratively with public and private partners who are willing and able to increase the City’s housing supply. In this case, the City has met with 9.A.b Packet Pg. 57 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) the landowners for the properties that are included in the Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments. Both have shared preliminary plans to develop a combination of affordable and market rate housing. The preliminary development plan shown in Figure 14 was the subject of a Pre-Application Conference held on October 19, 2021 for 1777 East Pine Street. As shown in the Map Amendment applications, the City’s proposal aligns with the preliminary development plan to support increased housing. However, in recognition of the need for higher density housing, the City is proposing that the northeast portion of the site be designated as HMR and not MMR, which increases the minimum housing density by 11 units per acre. Figure 14 - Preliminary Development Plan, 1777 East Pine Street Two informal preliminary development meetings have held with the property owner for the Taylor Road properties. We discussed the preliminary concept to provide cottage-style multifamily units that are small and affordable for older adults who are seeking age-in- place housing. The most recent preliminary plan is shown in Figure 15. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 58 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Figure 15 - Preliminary Housing Plan (Taylor Road at North Haskell Street) Based on these meetings, the City staff presented and the City Council initiated proposed Minor comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to support housing production while maintaining opportunities for employment uses in the TOD Overlay and associated zoning. As shown in Tables 1 and 2, below, the proposed amendments would increase housing production by a minimum of 198 or 275 units depending on whether the Council adopts Scenario 1 (Figures 4 and 9) or Scenario 2 (Figures 5 and 10). At this time, housing is prohibited on the properties that are part of this application. Table 1 - Proposed Map Amendment Housing Production Summary, Scenario 1 Property Location Acreage Proposed Zone Min. Density Max. Density Min. No. Units Max. No. Units Taylor Road 0.9 MMR 14 32 13 29 East Pine Street 7.4 HMR 25 N/A 185 13.7 EC N/A N/A N/A N/A Totals: 22 - - - 198 - 9.A.b Packet Pg. 59 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Table 2 - Proposed Map Amendment Housing Production Summary, Scenario 2 Property Location Acreage Proposed Zone Min. Density Max. Density Min. No. Units Max. No. Units Taylor Road 0.9 MMR 14 32 13 29 East Pine Street 7.4 HMR 25 N/A 185 5.5 MMR 14 32 77 176 8.2 EC N/A N/A N/A N/A Totals: 22 - - - 275 - Conclusion, Goal 10: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments are consistent with providing needed housing consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 10, Executive Order 23-04 and the Housing Element. 3.11 Goal 11 – Public Facilities and Services To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. Finding, Goal 11: The proposed Map Amendments are served by existing and planned public facilities and services per the Public Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the Transportation System Plan, Water System Master Plan and Stormwater Management Plan. Construction of extended facilities and services will occur as a function of land development. Conclusion, Goal 11: Consistent. 3.12 Goal 12 – Transportation To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. Finding, Goal 12: The proposed Map Amendments are in areas with existing and planned transportation facilities. Extension of facilities and services, such as roads, sidewalks, bike lanes and transit stations will be a function of land development. Additionally, inclusion of the properties in the TOD Overlay emphasizes compact land development patterns and provision of multi-modal transportation facilities and services that are necessary to support highly livable neighborhoods for all segments of the population, including those who do not own a car. Accordingly, the City finds that proposed Map Amendments are supportive of the State’s Transportation Goals. Conclusion, Goal 12: Consistent. 3.13 Goal 13 – Energy Utilization To conserve energy. Finding, Goal 13: The proposed Map Amendments do not impact energy utilization in and of themselves; however, future land development within high density, mixed-use neighborhoods reduces energy consumption by promoting multi-modal transportation options and locating jobs within walking distance of housing. This may have the added benefit of reducing the need for automobile ownership as the area develops. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 60 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Conclusion, Goal 13: Consistent. 3.14 Goal 14 – Urbanization To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities. Finding, Goal 14: The proposed Map Amendments are within the UGB and apply land use designations that transition density within the context of surrounding land use/zoning designations and adjacent road classifications. This provides for an orderly and efficient transition to urban use. Conclusion, Goal 14: Consistent. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 61 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 4 State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060) This section addresses OAR 660-012-0060 regarding Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments. (1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility, then the local government must put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule, unless the amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10) of this rule. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would: (a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); (b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or (c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection. If a local government is evaluating a performance standard based on projected levels of motor vehicle traffic, then the results must be based on projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP. As part of evaluating projected conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be generated within the area of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes an enforceable, ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not limited to, transportation demand management. This reduction may diminish or completely eliminate the significant effect of the amendment. (A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility; (B) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or (C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(1): The Proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map Amendments were evaluated for traffic impacts by southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC. Taylor Road The Traffic Impact Analysis for Taylor Road dated August 21, 2023, found that the proposed Amendment from Civic to High Density Residential/MMR zone, decreases traffic impacts. Specifically, the TIA found that the proposed modification in the land use and zoning designations decreases the traffic by 98 Average Daily Trips (ADT) and 33 9.A.b Packet Pg. 62 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) AM and PM Peak Hour Trips. Additionally, there is no significant increase in vehicles exceeding 20,000 pounds. 1777 East Pine Street The TIA for 1777 East Pine Street dated July 6, 2023 evaluated traffic impacts for the site based on two scenarios that will be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council. As demonstrated in the TIA, both scenarios show an overall decrease in trips to the transportation system based on the highest and best uses for existing and proposed zoning. • Scenario 1: o Decreases trips by 3,713 ADT when compared to full commercial zoning; o Decreases PM Peak Hour Trips by 336 trips. • Scenario 2: o Decreases trips by 2,204 ADT when compared to full commercial zoning; and, o Decreases PM Peak Hour Trips by 198 trips. Under both scenarios, the traffic analysis showed that there are no trips directly to or from the state highway system and that there will be no increase in heavy vehicles over 20,000 pounds gross vehicle weight. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(1): As demonstrated in the TIA for Taylor Road and 1777 East Pine Street, there is no significant impact to the transportation system that will result from the proposed Map Amendments. (2) If a local government determines that there would be a significant effect, then the local government must ensure that allowed land uses are consistent with the performance standards of the facility measured or projected at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP through one or a combination of the remedies listed in subsections (a) through (e) below, unless the amendment meets the balancing test in subsection (e) or qualifies for partial mitigation in section (11) of this rule. A local government using subsection (e), section (3), section (10) or section (11) to approve an amendment recognizes that additional motor vehicle traffic congestion may result and that other facility providers would not be expected to provide additional capacity for motor vehicles in response to this congestion. (a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land uses are consistent with the performance standards of the transportation facility. (b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive plan to provide transportation facilities, improvements, or services adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent with the requirements of this division. Such amendments shall include a funding plan or mechanism consistent with section (4) or include an amendment to the transportation finance plan so that the facility, improvement, or service will be provided by the end of the planning period. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 63 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) (c) Amending the TSP to modify the performance standards of the transportation facility. (d) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a development agreement or similar funding method, including, but not limited to, transportation system management measures or minor transportation improvements. Local governments shall, as part of the amendment, specify when measures or improvements provided pursuant to this subsection will be provided. (e) Providing improvements that would benefit modes other than the significantly affected mode, improvements to facilities other than the significantly affected facility, or improvements at other locations, if: (A) The provider of the significantly affected facility provides a written statement that the system-wide benefits are sufficient to balance the significant effect, even though the improvements would not result in consistency for all performance standards; (B) The providers of facilities being improved at other locations provide written statements of approval; and (C) The local jurisdictions where facilities are being improved provide written statements of approval. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(2): See Finding OAR 660-012-0060(1). Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (2): Not applicable. (3) Notwithstanding sections (1) and (2) of this rule, a local government may approve an amendment that would significantly affect an existing transportation facility without ensuring that the allowed land uses are consistent with the performance standards of the facility where: (a) In the absence of the amendment, planned transportation facilities, improvements, and services as set forth in section (4) of this rule would not be adequate to achieve consistency with the performance standard for that facility by the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP; (b) Development resulting from the amendment will, at a minimum, mitigate the impacts of the amendment in a manner that avoids further degradation to the performance of the facility by the time of the development through one or a combination of transportation improvements or measures; (c) The amendment does not involve property located in an interchange area as defined in paragraph (4)(d)(C); and (d) For affected state highways, ODOT provides a written statement that the proposed funding and timing for the identified mitigation improvements or 9.A.b Packet Pg. 64 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) measures are, at a minimum, sufficient to avoid further degradation to the performance of the affected state highway. However, if a local government provides the appropriate ODOT regional office with written notice of a proposed amendment in a manner that provides ODOT reasonable opportunity to submit a written statement into the record of the local government proceeding, and ODOT does not provide a written statement, then the local government may proceed with applying subsections (a) through (c) of this section. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(3): See Finding OAR 660-012-0060(1). Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (3): Not applicable. (4) Determinations under sections (1)–(3) of this rule shall be coordinated with affected transportation facility and service providers and other affected local governments. (a) In determining whether an amendment has a significant effect on an existing or planned transportation facility under subsection (1)(c) of this rule, local governments shall rely on existing transportation facilities and services and on the planned transportation facilities, improvements and services set forth in subsections (b) and (c) below. (b) Outside of interstate interchange areas, the following are considered planned facilities, improvements, and services: (A) Transportation facilities, improvements or services that are funded for construction or implementation in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program or a locally or regionally adopted transportation improvement program or capital improvement plan or program of a transportation service provider. (B) Transportation facilities, improvements or services that are authorized in a local transportation system plan and for which a funding plan or mechanism is in place or approved. These include, but are not limited to, transportation facilities, improvements, or services for which: transportation systems development charge revenues are being collected; a local improvement district or reimbursement district has been established or will be established prior to development; a development agreement has been adopted; or conditions of approval to fund the improvement have been adopted. (C) Transportation facilities, improvements, or services in a metropolitan planning organization (MPO) area that are part of the area’s federally- approved, financially constrained regional transportation system plan. (D) Improvements to state highways that are included as planned improvements in a regional or local transportation system plan or comprehensive plan when ODOT provides a written statement that the 9.A.b Packet Pg. 65 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) improvements are reasonably likely to be provided by the end of the planning period. (E) Improvements to regional and local roads, streets or other transportation facilities or services that are included as planned improvements in a regional or local transportation system plan or comprehensive plan when the local government(s) or transportation service provider(s) responsible for the facility, improvement or service provides a written statement that the facility, improvement, or service is reasonably likely to be provided by the end of the planning period. (c) Within interstate interchange areas, the improvements included in paragraphs (b)(A)–(C) are considered planned facilities, improvements, and services, except where: (A) ODOT provides a written statement that the proposed funding and timing of mitigation measures are sufficient to avoid a significant adverse impact on the Interstate Highway system, then local governments may also rely on the improvements identified in paragraphs (b)(D) and (E) of this section; or (B) There is an adopted interchange area management plan, then local governments may also rely on the improvements identified in that plan and which are also identified in paragraphs (b)(D) and (E) of this section. (d) As used in this section and section (3): (A) Planned interchange means new interchanges and relocation of existing interchanges that are authorized in an adopted transportation system plan or comprehensive plan; (B) Interstate highway means Interstates 5, 82, 84, 105, 205, and 405; and (C) Interstate interchange area means: (i) Property within one-quarter mile of the ramp terminal intersection of an existing or planned interchange on an Interstate Highway; or (ii) The interchange area as defined in the Interchange Area Management Plan adopted as an amendment to the Oregon Highway Plan. (e) For purposes of this section, a written statement provided pursuant to paragraphs (b)(D), (b)(E) or (c)(A) provided by ODOT, a local government or transportation facility provider, as appropriate, shall be conclusive in determining whether a transportation facility, improvement, or service is a planned transportation facility, improvement, or service. In the absence of a written 9.A.b Packet Pg. 66 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) statement, a local government can only rely upon planned transportation facilities, improvements, and services identified in paragraphs (b)(A)-(C) to determine whether there is a significant effect that requires application of the remedies in section (2). Finding OAR 660-012-0060(4): The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map Amendment on properties located at the intersection of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street are adjacent to City owned and operated facilities and are not within and Interchange Area Management Plan or area of influence (1/2 mile). The Proposed Amendments and TIA scoping at this location were coordinated with the City Public Works Department consistent with this rule. The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map Amendments located at 1777 East Pine Street are within the ½ mile of the I-5 and Exit 33 Interchange. Per the 2015 Interchange Area Management Plan for Exit 33 (IAMP), there are improvements that will identified in the vicinity of the site to improve traffic flow and function of the interchange. Intersection improvements at East Pine/Hamrick Road were recently completed (Project 11/TSP Project #216). Other improvements will be implemented as a function of development, including signal timing (IAMP Project 5) and Peninger Road/East Pine Street Improvements (IAMP Project 10/TSP Project 236). As stated in the TIA, the interchange traffic was analyzed and there are no trips to or from Interstate 5 that will be generated by the proposal. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (4): As demonstrated in the TIA for both property areas that are the subject of the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, the analysis of traffic impacts was coordinated with affected agencies, including Public Works and ODOT. (5) The presence of a transportation facility or improvement shall not be a basis for an exception to allow residential, commercial, institutional, or industrial development on rural lands under this division or OAR 660-004-0022 and 660-004-0028. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(5): The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map Amendments are on lands within the city limits and do not include rural lands. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (5): Not applicable. (6) If a local government is determining whether proposed land uses would affect or be consistent with planned transportation facilities as provided in sections (1) and (2) using a performance standard based on projected levels of motor vehicle traffic, then the local government shall give full credit for potential reduction in vehicle trips for uses located in mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly centers, and neighborhoods as provided in subsections (a)–(d); (a) Absent adopted local standards or detailed information about the vehicle trip reduction benefits of mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly development, local governments shall assume that uses located within a mixed-use, pedestrian- 9.A.b Packet Pg. 67 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) friendly center, or neighborhood, will generate 10 percent fewer daily and peak hour trips than are specified in available published estimates, such as those provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual that do not specifically account for the effects of mixed-use, pedestrian- friendly development. The 10 percent reduction allowed for by this subsection shall be available only if uses that rely solely on auto trips, such as gas stations, car washes, storage facilities, and motels are prohibited; (b) Local governments shall use detailed or local information about the trip reduction benefits of mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly development where such information is available and presented to the local government. Local governments may, based on such information, allow reductions greater than the 10 percent reduction required in subsection (a); (c) Where a local government assumes or estimates lower vehicle trip generation as provided in subsection (a) or (b), it shall ensure through conditions of approval, site plans, or approval standards that subsequent development approvals support the development of a mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly center or neighborhood and provide for on-site bike and pedestrian connectivity and access to transit as provided for in OAR 660-012-0045(3) and (4). The provision of on-site bike and pedestrian connectivity and access to transit may be accomplished through application of acknowledged ordinance provisions which comply with OAR 660-012-0045(3) and (4) or through conditions of approval or findings adopted with the plan amendment that ensure compliance with these rule requirements at the time of development approval; and (d) The purpose of this section is to provide an incentive for the designation and implementation of pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use centers and neighborhoods by lowering the regulatory barriers to plan amendments that accomplish this type of development. The actual trip reduction benefits of mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly development will vary from case to case and may be somewhat higher or lower than presumed pursuant to subsection (a). The commission concludes that this assumption is warranted given general information about the expected effects of mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly development and its intent to encourage changes to plans and development patterns. Nothing in this section is intended to affect the application of provisions in local plans or ordinances that provide for the calculation or assessment of systems development charges or in preparing conformity determinations required under the federal Clean Air Act. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(6): The proposed Map Amendments on Taylor Road is within the TOD Overlay, a Mixed-use pedestrian friendly area. The proposed Map Amendments at 1777 East Pine Street are to include this property in the TOD Overlay. The TIAs prepared for both locations did not discount the traffic impacts based on the location being in or proposed to be in a mixed-use/pedestrian friendly area. Even so both TIAs found reductions in estimated future traffic impacts. The City does not have localized information about the benefits of development in these areas with regard to VMT reduction beyond the recommended 10% reduction in this rule. Notwithstanding, 9.A.b Packet Pg. 68 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) the City’s objective is to include 1777 East Pine Street in the TOD Overlay and to further the goal of creating highly livable, complete mixed-use/pedestrian friendly neighborhoods in the City. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (6): Consistent. (7) Amendments to acknowledged comprehensive plans and land use regulations that meet all of the criteria listed in subsections (a)–(c) shall include an amendment to the comprehensive plan, transportation system plan, the adoption of a local street plan, access management plan, future street plan, or other binding local transportation plan to provide for on-site alignment of streets or accessways with existing and planned arterial, collector, and local streets surrounding the site as necessary to implement the requirements in OAR 660-012-0020(2)(b) and 660-012-0045(3): (a) The plan or land use regulation amendment results in designation of two or more acres of land for commercial use; (b) The local government has not adopted a TSP or local street plan that complies with OAR 660-012-0020(2)(b) or, in the Portland Metropolitan Area, has not complied with Metro’s requirement for street connectivity as contained in Title 1, Section 3.08.110 of the Regional Transportation Functional Plan; and (c) The proposed amendment would significantly affect a transportation facility as provided in section (1). Finding OAR 660-012-0060(7): The proposed amendment does not increase the commercial land use designations in the City and does not result in a significant affect to any transportation facility as demonstrated in the TIA for the Taylor Road at North Haskell Street amendment and the 1777 East Pine Street Amendment. Additionally, the City has an acknowledged TSP. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (7): Not applicable. (8) A “mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly center or neighborhood” for the purposes of this rule, means: (a) Any one of the following: (A) An existing central business district or downtown; (B) An area designated as a central city, regional center, town center, or main street in the Portland Metro 2040 Regional Growth Concept; (C) An area designated in an acknowledged comprehensive plan as a transit- oriented development or a pedestrian district; or 9.A.b Packet Pg. 69 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) (D) An area designated as a special transportation area as provided for in the Oregon Highway Plan. (b) An area other than those listed in subsection (a) which includes or is planned to include the following characteristics: (A) A concentration of a variety of land uses in a well-defined area, including the following: (i) Medium to high density residential development (12 or more units per acre); (ii) Offices or office buildings; (iii) Retail stores and services; (iv) Restaurants; and (v) Public open space or private open space that is available for public use, such as a park or plaza. (B) Generally, include civic or cultural uses; (C) A core commercial area where multi-story buildings are permitted; (D) Buildings and building entrances oriented to streets; (E) Street connections and crossings that make the center safe and conveniently accessible from adjacent areas; (F) A network of streets and, where appropriate, accessways and major driveways that make it attractive and highly convenient for people to walk between uses within the center or neighborhood, including streets and major driveways within the center with wide sidewalks and other features, including pedestrian-oriented street crossings, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting and on-street parking; (G) One or more transit stops (in urban areas with fixed route transit service); and (H) Limit or do not allow low-intensity or land extensive uses, such as most industrial uses, automobile sales and services, and drive-through services. (9) Notwithstanding section (1) of this rule, a local government may find that an amendment to a zoning map does not significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility if all of the following requirements are met. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 70 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) (a) The proposed zoning is consistent with the existing comprehensive plan map designation and the amendment does not change the comprehensive plan map; (b) The local government has an acknowledged TSP and the proposed zoning is consistent with the TSP; and (c) The area subject to the zoning map amendment was not exempted from this rule at the time of an urban growth boundary amendment as permitted in OAR 660- 024-0020(1)(d), or the area was exempted from this rule but the local government has a subsequently acknowledged TSP amendment that accounted for urbanization of the area. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(9): The proposed Zoning Map Amendment does not significantly affect existing or planned facilities per the TIA prepared for the Taylor Road properties and 1777 East Pine Street. Additionally, the proposed zone map amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan (as amended by CPA-23001), complies with the TSP per the TIA and was not exempt from this rule when the property was included in the UGB. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (9): Consistent. (10) Notwithstanding sections (1) and (2) of this rule, a local government may amend a functional plan, a comprehensive plan, or a land use regulation without applying performance standards related to motor vehicle traffic congestion (e.g. volume to capacity ratio or V/C), delay, or travel time if the amendment meets the requirements of subsection (a) of this section. This section does not exempt a proposed amendment from other transportation performance standards or policies that may apply including, but not limited to, safety for all modes, network connectivity for all modes (e.g. sidewalks, bicycle lanes) and accessibility for freight vehicles of a size and frequency required by the development. (a) A proposed amendment qualifies for this section if it: (A) Is a map or text amendment affecting only land entirely within a multimodal mixed-use area (MMA); and (B) Is consistent with the definition of an MMA and consistent with the function of the MMA as described in the findings designating the MMA. (b) For the purpose of this rule, “multimodal mixed-use area” or “MMA” means an area: (A) With a boundary adopted by a local government as provided in subsection (d) or (e) of this section and that has been acknowledged; (B) Entirely within an urban growth boundary; 9.A.b Packet Pg. 71 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) (C) With adopted plans and development regulations that allow the uses listed in paragraphs (8)(b)(A) through (C) of this rule and that require new development to be consistent with the characteristics listed in paragraphs (8)(b)(D) through (H) of this rule; (D) With land use regulations that do not require the provision of off-street parking, or regulations that require lower levels of off-street parking than required in other areas and allow flexibility to meet the parking requirements (e.g. count on-street parking, allow long-term leases, allow shared parking); and (E) Located in one or more of the categories below: (i) At least one-quarter mile from any ramp terminal intersection of existing or planned interchanges; (ii) Within the area of an adopted Interchange Area Management Plan (IAMP) and consistent with the IAMP; or (iii) Within one-quarter mile of a ramp terminal intersection of an existing or planned interchange if the mainline facility provider has provided written concurrence with the MMA designation as provided in subsection (c) of this section. (c) When a mainline facility provider reviews an MMA designation as provided in subparagraph (b)(E)(iii) of this section, the provider must consider the factors listed in paragraph (A) of this subsection. (A) The potential for operational or safety effects to the interchange area and the mainline highway, specifically considering: (i) Whether the interchange area has a crash rate that is higher than the statewide crash rate for similar facilities; (ii) Whether the interchange area is in the top ten percent of locations identified by the safety priority index system (SPIS) developed by ODOT; and (iii) Whether existing or potential future traffic queues on the interchange exit ramps extend onto the mainline highway or the portion of the ramp needed to safely accommodate deceleration. (B) If there are operational or safety effects as described in paragraph (A) of this subsection, the effects may be addressed by an agreement between the local government and the facility provider regarding traffic management plans favoring traffic movements away from the interchange, particularly those facilitating clearing traffic queues on the 9.A.b Packet Pg. 72 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) interchange exit ramps. (d) A local government may designate an MMA by adopting an amendment to the comprehensive plan or land use regulations to delineate the boundary following an existing zone, multiple existing zones, an urban renewal area, other existing boundary, or establishing a new boundary. The designation must be accompanied by findings showing how the area meets the definition of an MMA. Designation of an MMA is not subject to the requirements in sections (1) and (2) of this rule. (e) A local government may designate an MMA on an area where comprehensive plan map designations or land use regulations do not meet the definition, if all of the other elements meet the definition, by concurrently adopting comprehensive plan or land use regulation amendments necessary to meet the definition. Such amendments are not subject to performance standards related to motor vehicle traffic congestion, delay, or travel time. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(10): The proposed amendments are not within an MMA. Traffic analysis was prepared in accordance with this rule as demonstrated in the TIA prepared by Southern Oregon Transportation Engineers, LLC on July 6, 2023 and August 21, 2023. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (10): Not applicable. (11) A local government may approve an amendment with partial mitigation as provided in section (2) of this rule if the amendment complies with subsection (a) of this section, the amendment meets the balancing test in subsection (b) of this section, and the local government coordinates as provided in subsection (c) of this section. (a) The amendment must meet paragraphs (A) and (B) of this subsection. (A) Create direct benefits in terms of industrial or traded-sector jobs created or retained by limiting uses to industrial or traded-sector industries. (B) Not allow retail uses, except limited retail incidental to industrial or traded sector development, not to exceed five percent of the net developable area. (C) For the purpose of this section: (i) “Industrial” means employment activities generating income from the production, handling, or distribution of goods including, but not limited to, manufacturing, assembly, fabrication, processing, storage, logistics, warehousing, importation, distribution and transshipment, and research and development. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 73 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) (ii) “Traded-sector” means industries in which member firms sell their goods or services into markets for which national or international competition exists. (b) A local government may accept partial mitigation only if the local government determines that the benefits outweigh the negative effects on local transportation facilities and the local government receives from the provider of any transportation facility that would be significantly affected written concurrence that the benefits outweigh the negative effects on their transportation facilities. If the amendment significantly affects a state highway, then ODOT must coordinate with the Oregon Business Development Department regarding the economic and job creation benefits of the proposed amendment as defined in subsection (a) of this section. The requirement to obtain concurrence from a provider is satisfied if the local government provides notice as required by subsection (c) of this section and the provider does not respond in writing (either concurring or non-concurring) within 45 days. (c) A local government that proposes to use this section must coordinate with Oregon Business Development Department, Department of Land Conservation and Development, area commission on transportation, metropolitan planning organization, and transportation providers and local governments directly impacted by the proposal to allow opportunities for comments on whether the proposed amendment meets the definition of economic development, how it would affect transportation facilities and the adequacy of proposed mitigation. Informal consultation is encouraged throughout the process starting with pre- application meetings. Coordination has the meaning given in ORS 197.015 and Goal 2 and must include notice at least 45 days before the first evidentiary hearing. Notice must include the following: (A) Proposed amendment. (B) Proposed mitigating actions from section (2) of this rule. (C) Analysis and projections of the extent to which the proposed amendment in combination with proposed mitigating actions would fall short of being consistent with the performance standards of transportation facilities. (D) Findings showing how the proposed amendment meets the requirements of subsection (a) of this section. (E) Findings showing that the benefits of the proposed amendment outweigh the negative effects on transportation facilities. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(2): Since mitigation in whole or part was not recommended based on results of the TIA dated July 6, 2023 and the TIA dated August 21, 2023, the provisions in this section of the rule do not apply. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 74 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (2): Not applicable. 5 City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan A review of the Central Point Comprehensive Plan finds that the Land Use and Housing and Economic Elements apply to the proposed Land Use and Zone Map Amendments. In accordance with CPMC 17.10 and CPMC 17.96, the Comprehensive Plan applies to the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPA-23001) and the Zoning Map Amendment (ZC- 23001) The goals and policies for the applicable Elements are set forth and addressed below. Housing Element The Housing Element aims to assure that the City’s land use policies support a variety of housing types at densities and locations that provide and encourage opportunities of for the provision of adequate numbers of needed housing units at price ranges and rent levels commensurate with the financial capabilities of the City’s households. It also aims to open and maintain communication between private industry and local public officials in seeking an improved housing environment within the Greater Bear Creek Valley Region. It contains seven (7) goals and twenty-seven (27) policies. Housing Goal 1. To provide an adequate supply of housing to meet the diverse needs of the City’s current and projected households. Housing Policy 1.1. Continue to support new residential development at the new minimum residential densities. Finding, Housing Policy 1.1: At the time of land development, the City will implement its minimum residential densities set forth in the land development code. Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.1: Complies. Housing Policy 1.2. Develop a Housing Implementation Plan that is regularly updated based current market conditions. Finding, Housing Policy 1.2: The City adopted the Housing Implementation Plan (HIP) on December 13, 2018 (City Council Resolution No. 1560). The HIP sets forth a housing strategy for a 5-year period, 2019-2024. The proposed UGB Amendment implements Action No. 3.2.4 in the HIP, to include sufficient buildable residential lands in the UGB to accommodate the City’s housing needs and to plan in accordance with the approved Conceptual Land Use plans. Adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments further the goals of the HIP and does not interfere or otherwise conflict with the City’s policy to regularly update it based on current market conditions. Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.2: Consistent. Housing Policy 1.3. Provide an efficient and consistent development review process. Finding, Housing Policy 1.3: The City’s proposed Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps do not conflict or interfere with provision of an efficient and consistent development review process. Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.3: Not applicable. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 75 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Housing Policy 1.4. Work with regional partners to develop and implement measure that reduce upfront housing development costs. Finding, Housing Policy 1.4: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments aim to provide needed housing in accordance with the Housing Element and Executive Order 23-04. At present, there is a low supply of housing available that contributes to high cost. Although the proposed Map Amendments do not directly affect upfront cost, provide land use and zoning designations that respond to market demands for housing on the affected properties. These applications are an example of public- private partnership to increase land supply for housing. This does not affect other efforts to work with regional partners to implement measures that directly reduce upfront housing development cost. Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.4: Consistent. Housing Policy 1.5. Support UGB expansions and annexations that can be efficiently provided with urban services and that will in a timely manner meet the City’s housing needs. Finding, Housing Policy 1.5: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not require or otherwise involve a UGB Amendment or Annexation application. Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.5: Not applicable. Housing Policy 1.6. When properly mitigated to preserve the integrity of existing neighborhoods support higher density residential development within the Downtown and older surrounding residential areas, capitalizing on availability of existing infrastructure and supporting revitalization efforts. Finding, Housing Policy 1.6: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not interfere or otherwise conflict with higher density infill developments within the downtown or older surrounding residential areas. The subject properties are located away from the downtown. Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.6: Not applicable. Housing Goal 2. To encourage the development and preservation of fair and affordable housing. Housing Policy 2.1. Through a Housing Implementation Plan explore and promote federal, state, and regional programs and incentives that support new affordable housing. Finding, Housing Policy 2.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments aim to support affordable housing projects that are market-rate affordable and publicly subsidized. These applications both support the HIP objectives using local resources. The applications do not interfere or conflict with other efforts to explore federal, state and regional programs and incentives. Conclusion, Housing Policy 2.1: Not applicable. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 76 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Housing Policy 2.2. Support and participate in the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan’s program addressing regional housing strategies, particularly as they apply to affordable housing. Finding, Housing Policy 2.2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not interfere or otherwise conflict with the City’s ability to support and participate in the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan’s program addressing regional housing strategies, including affordable housing. Conclusion, Housing Policy 2.2: Not applicable. Housing Policy 2.3. Support regional efforts addressing homelessness, medical and social services for special need households. Finding, Housing Policy 2.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not affect the City’s support for regional efforts to address homelessness or services for special needs households. Conclusion, Housing Policy 2.3: Not applicable. Housing Goal 3. To maintain a timely supply of vacant residential acres sufficient to accommodate development of new housing to serve the City’s projected population. Housing Policy 3.1. Provide a sufficient inventory of residential planned and zoned vacant land to meet projected demand in terms of density, tenure, unit size, accessibility, and cost. Finding, Housing Policy 3.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments modify the land use and zoning designations to support high density housing. Although the City recently added land to its UGB for housing and has a its required 20-year land supply, most of the available land is not in housing production due to annexation requirements, lack of landowner willingness. The proposed amendments respond to the need for housing where there is demonstration of landowner willingness and capability to produce housing. Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.1: Consistent. Housing Policy 3.2. Throughout the 2019-2039 planning period the City’s new vacant residential land use mix shall support an average density of not less than 6.9 dwelling units per gross. Finding, Housing Policy 3.2: The current land supply in the city limits and UGB support attainment of 6.9 units/gross acre. The added high-density residential land within the city limits is consistent with and supportive of attaining higher densities within the urban area. Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.2: Consistent. Housing Policy 3.3. Update the Housing Element’s vacant acreage needs every four- years consistent with the PSU Population Research Centers update of population. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 77 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Finding, Housing Policy 3.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not affect the City’s schedule for updating the Housing Element. Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.3: Not applicable. Housing Policy 3.4. To avoid speculation the City shall, when expanding the UGB establish procedures that give priority to lands that will be developed in a timely manner and with a residential mix and density consistent with the Housing Element. Finding, Housing Policy 3.4: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not include expansion of the UGB. Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.4: Not applicable. Housing Policy 3.5. Monitor residential in-fill development activity and develop and enact programs that encourage the expanded use of in-fill as a component to the City’s residential land use inventory. Finding, Housing Policy 3.5: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments are intended to encourage and expand residential infill. Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.5: Consistent. Housing Goal 4. To ensure that a variety of housing will be provided in the City in terms of location, type, price and tenure, according to the projected needs of the population. Housing Policy 4.1. Residential land use designations on the General Land Use Plan and the Zoning Map shall be compliant with the residential land use needs and housing types identified in the Housing Element. Finding, Housing Policy 4.1: The proposed land use and zoning designations for the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments align with the land use and housing needs identified in the Housing Element, as well as state directed emphasis to increase housing production per Executive Order 23-04. Pending approval Conclusion, Housing Policy 4.1: Consistent. Housing Policy 4.2. Based on the findings of the Housing Implementation Plan incentivize housing types that are needed but not being provided in adequate numbers by the private sector market forces. Finding, Housing Policy 4.2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment does not affect the City’s ability to enact findings of the Housing Implementation Plan, including but not limited to incentives for underrepresented but needed housing types. In this case, both properties included in the application were initiated based on the landowner’s demonstrated interest in building a combination of market rate, market rate affordable and publicly funded affordable housing. Conclusion, Housing Policy 4.2: Consistent. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 78 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Housing Policy 4.3. In larger residential developments (in excess of 5 acres) encourage a mix of densities and housing types to accommodate a variety of households based on age and income levels. Finding, Housing Policy 4.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment on Taylor Road affects only 0.9 acres. However, the proposed Amendments at 1777 East Pine Street includes over 21 acres. The land development regulations in the TOD Overlay require master plan approval for land development proposals on sites greater than 2 acres. As part of master plan approval, proposals must demonstrate compliance with CPMC 17.65, TOD Overlay and CPMC 17.67, Design and Development Standards—TOD Overlay including but not limited to providing a mix of housing Conclusion, Housing Policy 4.3: Consistent. Housing Policy 4.4. Support programs that encourage the ability of older residents to age in place by making existing housing more age friendly and accessible. Finding, Housing Policy 4.4: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment on property located at Taylor Road and North Haskell Street is supportive of a multifamily, cottage style development for older residents to age in place. Conclusion, Housing Policy 4.4: Consistent. Housing Goal 5. To ensure that municipal development procedures and standards are not unreasonable impediments to the provision of affordable housing. Housing Policy 5.1. As part of a Housing Implementation Plan periodically evaluate development procedures and standards for compliance with the goals of this Housing Element and modify as appropriate. Finding, Housing Policy 5.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not affect or otherwise preclude the City’s ability to review and amend development procedures and standards for compliance with the Housing Element. Conclusion, Housing Policy 5.1: Not applicable. Housing Goal 6. To develop and maintain a Housing Implementation Plan that includes programs that monitor and address the housing affordability needs of the City’s low- and moderate-income households. Housing Policy 6.1. Support collaborative partnerships with non-profit organizations, affordable housing builders, and for-profit developers to gain greater access to various sources of affordable housing funds. Finding, Housing Policy 6.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments demonstrate the City’s ability act as a collaborative partner with non-profit and private stakeholders to support affordable and market rate housing production. Conclusion, Housing Policy 6.1: Consistent. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 79 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Housing Policy 6.2. Support and participate in the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan’s program addressing regional housing strategies. Finding, Housing Policy 6.2: The City participated in and continues to support the regional housing strategies program as evidenced by approval and implementation of the Housing Implementation Plan. The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment applications do not preclude or otherwise conflict with the City’s continued participation in the regional Plan’s program addressing affordable housing. Conclusion, Housing Policy 6.2: Not applicable. Housing Policy 6.3. Address the special housing needs of seniors through the provision of affordable housing and housing related services. Finding, Housing Policy 6.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not affect the City’s ability to address the special housing needs of seniors. In fact, the modifications to land use and zoning designation on properties located at the intersection of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street are aimed at supporting completion of a housing infill project that provides market-rate affordable, age-in-place housing for seniors. Conclusion, Housing Policy 6.3: Consistent. Housing Goal 7. To assure that residential development standards encourage and support attractive and healthy neighborhoods. Housing Policy 7.1. Encourage quality design throughout the City that acknowledges neighborhood character, provides balanced connectivity (multi-modal), and integrates recreational and open space opportunities. Finding, Housing Policy 7.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not affect design in and of themselves except that, through extension of the TOD Overlay to include 1777 East Pine Street, future land development will be subject to design and development standards that promote multimodal transportation options, inclusion of recreation and open spaces to support housing and high quality, pedestrian scale design. Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.1: Consistent. Housing Policy 7.2. Provide flexible development standards for projects that exceed minimum standards for natural resource protection, open space, public gathering places, and energy efficiency. Finding, Housing Policy 7.2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment applications do not affect or otherwise preclude the City’s ability to provide flexible development standards. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 80 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.2: Not applicable. Housing Policy 7.3. Where appropriate encourage mixed uses at the neighborhood level that enhance the character and function of the neighborhood and reduce impacts on the City’s transportation system. Finding, Housing Policy 7.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments provide opportunities for mixed use development at the neighborhood level through extension of the TOD Overlay to include 1777 East Pine Street. The properties on Taylor Road at North Haskell Street area already within the TOD Overlay. All zoning districts applied provide opportunities for mixed-use. Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.3: Consistent. Housing Policy 7.4. Support minimum parking standards for multiple family development served by public transit. Finding, Housing Policy 7.4: The City of Central Point no longer requires minimum parking for any development in accordance with Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities rules adopted as part of OAR-660-012. Notwithstanding, the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments are within are proposed to be within the TOD Overlay, which aims to support public transit. Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.4: Not applicable. Housing Policy 7.5. Maintain and enforce Chapter 17.71 Agricultural Mitigation ensuring that all new residential development along the periphery of the Urban Growth Boundary includes an adequate buffer between the urban uses and abutting agricultural uses on lands zoned Exclusive Farm Use (EFU). Finding, Housing Policy 7.5: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not include or affect agricultural lands or otherwise preclude the City’s ability to maintain and enforce the regulations for Agricultural Mitigation in CPMC 17.71. Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.5: Not applicable. Economic Element The Economic Element provide s a framework for meeting the City’s economic goal to diversity its economic base. Economic Element Goals: 1. To actively promote a strong, diversified and sustainable local economy that reinforces Central Point’s “small town feel” and family orientation while preserving or enhancing the quality of life in the community as a place to live, work and play. Because this Economic Element concludes that there will be economic uncertainty in the short-term, it is important that Central Point work to diversify and strengthen its 9.A.b Packet Pg. 81 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) economy. By continuing to analyze economic trends, Central Point will be able to continue growing strong throughout the 2019-2039 period. 2. To create meaningful incentives to encourage and support economic development. Central Point has historically been a bedroom community where people live but work elsewhere. In order to maintain a strong tax base and to ensure continued economic prosperity, Central Point must take an active role in encouraging economic development. 3. To encourage and promote the development, redevelopment, and enhancement of retail and office areas to achieve a vibrant shopping entertainment, living and working experience in the downtown area. This goal is important because Central Point needs a vibrant downtown in order to ensure future economic prosperity. Further, based on the current BLI and the project land use needs, Central Point is going to need targeted redevelopment strategies to encourage these types of activities in the future. 4. To encourage active communication and cooperation between the City, local and state agencies, and local businesses concerning economic development, education and workforce development. The city cannot reach its goals without the assistance of others. As a result, the City needs to be receptive to suggestions and aid from others and also needs to be active in communicating its needs and plans. 5. To encourage and support growth, particularly in the targeted industries (specialty food manufacturing, and trucking and warehousing sectors). These targeted industries are where the City could make strikes. It is important that the City help maintain and grow these industries now and in the future. 6. To maintain at all times an adequate supply of suitable short-term (five-year) employment lands. Central Point does not have an adequate short-term supply of lands for institutional/government and other employment types. As a result, the City should plan to add to the land supply in the near future. 7. To prepare and maintain a City of Central Point Economic Development Manual identifying and monitoring economic development strategies and programs available to the City. 8. Create a positive environment for industrial, commercial and institutional job growth and development by maintaining an adequate land supply; providing a local development 9.A.b Packet Pg. 82 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) review process that is predicable, responsive, and efficient; and delivering high quality public facilities and services. 9. Assure, through the UGB process, that adequate commercial lands are planned and designated for the development of pedestrian oriented neighborhood commercial centers to serve the City’s new residential neighborhoods. The Economic Element Goals are implemented through the following ten (10) policies: Economic Policy 1, Participation. The City shall participate on the regional and state level in the development and programming of alternative financial incentives and initiatives for economic development, including education and workforce development that are consistent with the City’s economic development goals. Finding, Economic Policy 1: The City’s proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not preclude or otherwise conflict with the City’s participation on the regional or state level in development and programming for financial incentives and initiative for economic development. Conclusion Economic Policy 1: Not applicable. Economic Policy 2, Refine Policies. The City shall continue to monitor and refine its land development and fiscal policies as they relate to economic development to ensure that the City’s economic development programming can be effectively implemented. Finding, Economic Policy 2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not interfere with or otherwise conflict with the City’s ability to monitor and refine policies relative to economic development. Conclusion Economic Policy 2: Not applicable. Economic Policy 3, Monitor Long-Term Consequences. Consider economic development incentives as an inducement to development only when it can be demonstrated that the short- term consequences are understood and found to be acceptable and the long-term consequences are determined to be beneficial to the City. Finding, Economic Policy 3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not interfere with or otherwise conflict with the City’s ability to consider or implement incentives for beneficial economic development. Conclusion Economic Policy 3: Not applicable. Economic Policy 4, Small Business. Central Point concludes that the City has experienced the loss of cottage industry and expanding small businesses due to a lack of vacant available employment related buildings (flex-space1) and the City cannot attract small businesses from elsewhere for the same reason. 1 An industrial or commercial/office building designed to provide the flexibility to utilize the floor space in a variety of configurations. Usually provides a configuration allowing a flexible amount of office or showroom space in combination with manufacturing, laboratory, warehouse distribution, etc. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 83 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Finding, Economic Policy 4: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments Amendment retains the existing commercial land supply through the opportunity for a mix of residential and commercial uses. Although the land use and zoning designations (current and proposed) do not result in the immediate construction of needed building space, the Amendments support these activities as necessary to address the loss of cottage industry and expanding small businesses. Conclusion Economic Policy 4: Consistent. Economic Policy 5, Business Innovation. Encourage innovation, research, development, and commercialization of new technologies, products and services through responsive regulations and public sector approaches. Finding, Economic Policy 5: Business innovation activities by the City are not affected or impeded by the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments. Conclusion Economic Policy 5: Not applicable. Economic Policy 6, Tolo Area. The City shall in collaboration with Jackson County continue planning the Exit 35 area—also called “Area CP-1B (Tolo)”—in the Regional Plan Element to capitalize on economic opportunities, especially for transportation-based economic activity and truck/rail freight support services. This area also contains the aeronautics manufacturing company Erickson Air Crane and serves aggregate uses; these uses have many specific and unique dimensions that should be carefully considered. Plans and land use regulations applicable to this area need to account for the site requirements of firms in these sectors. Because the area is currently constrained as a result of a lack of access to water, the City should begin planning how to make water more readily available so as to make these lands available for more economic development. Finding, Economic Policy 6: The CP-1B Tolo area is not included in either the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Map Amendments. The proposed Amendments do not affect the City’s ability to develop and implement plans in this area. Conclusion Economic Policy 6: Not applicable. Economic Policy 7, Monitor Regulations. The City shall periodically evaluate its regulations for employment related development, particularly as it relates to targeted industries, as well as compatibility with adjacent non-employment lands to ensure that regulations are consistent with applicable best practices. Regulations found to no longer be appropriate should be amended as soon as practicable thereafter. Finding, Economic Policy 7: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not interfere with other otherwise conflict with the City’s ability to evaluate and update its land development regulations relative to employment uses. Conclusion Economic Policy 7: Not applicable. Economic Policy 8, Adequate Short-Term Supply. The City shall assure that, through its Capital Improvement Program, public facilities and transportation facilities are available and adequate in capacity to maintain a supply of competitive short-term buildable lands sufficient to meet employment needs within a 5-year period, particularly for the retail, specialty foods, professional health care and trucking sectors. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 84 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Finding, Economic Policy 8: The City’s public facility plans for transportation, water and stormwater have all been updated. There are adequate facilities planned and available to serve development on the two sites that are the subject of the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments. Conclusion Economic Policy 8: Consistent . Economic Policy 9, Prepare for Long-Term Needs. The City shall maintain a supply of competitive short-term employment lands in the medium and large site categories equivalent to the twenty-year demand for those categories. The supply of short-term employment land shall be reviewed and updated annually. When it is determined that the supply of land as measured in terms of the number of sites and/or acreage in the medium and large site categories is inadequate to serve the twenty-year land needs, then the City shall amend the UGB to include additional short-term (5-year) employment lands. Finding, Economic Policy 9: The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment retains employment lands via mixed-use zoning. This is consistent with the short-term supply for large and mediums sites. Conclusion Economic Policy 9: Consistent. Economic Policy 10, Pedestrian Oriented Neighborhood Commercial Centers. As the City expands the UGB it will include in the land use mix adequate commercial lands for the development of Pedestrian Oriented Commercial Centers designed to complement the physical character and encourage neighborhood pedestrian use. Adequacy of the acreage needed for Pedestrian Oriented Commercial Centers will be guided by the Regional Plan land use allocation. Finding, Economic Policy 10: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not involve a UGB Amendment. Notwithstanding, the proposed Amendments at 1777 East Pine Street expand an existing Mixed-use/Pedestrian Friendly Activity Center. Conclusion Economic Policy 10: Consistent. Land Use Element The Land Use Element is responsible for managing and mapping the land use needs of the City as described in other Comprehensive Plan elements. The Land Use Element sets forth goals and policies for Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Civic, Parks and Recreation and Circulation land uses. Since this UGB Amendment does not include industrial lands, the policies for industrial lands are not addressed in these findings. Residential Land Use Policy 1: To continue to ensure that long-range planning and zoning reflects the need to locate the highest densities and greatest numbers of residents in closest possible proximity to existing and future activity centers. Finding, Residential Land Use Policy 1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments include properties on Taylor Road at North Haskell Street that are within an existing Activity Center. The property at 1777 East Pine Street is proposed to be included in the TOD Overlay, a Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Activity Center. Proposed land use 9.A.b Packet Pg. 85 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) and zoning designations are consistent with this policy to increases the number of people living within these Mixed-use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas. Conclusion, Residential Land Use Policy 1: Consistent. Residential Land Use Policy 2: To continue to update the Zoning Ordinance, as necessary to take advantage of planning innovation, best practices, and technological improvements that could have applications in Central Point to the benefit of the community. Finding, Residential Land Use Policy 2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not preclude or otherwise affect the City’s ability to monitor and update its Zoning Ordinance. Conclusion, Residential Land Use Policy 2: Not applicable. Residential Land Use Policy 3: In areas where residential neighborhoods abut commercial or industrial areas, orient the residential structures and local streets away from these land uses to avoid any undesirable views and to strengthen neighborhood solidarity. Finding, Residential Land Use Policy 3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments are in areas planned and zone for medium and high-density housing and mixed-use opportunities. The street system is planned and designed to support attractive neighborhoods with multimodal transportation facilities consistent with the land use pattern typical of the TOD Overlay areas. Conclusion, Residential Land Use Policy 3: Consistent. Residential Land Use Policy 4: In any area where development of one or more parcels may create obstacles to development of others, the initial developer shall develop a specific plan that would provide for the future development of the entire area, including provision of adequate access to potentially landlocked properties. Finding, Residential Land Use Policy 4: By extending the TOD Overlay to include 1777 East Pine Street, the entire property will be subject to the Master Plan requirement thereby assuring that there are written and illustrated instructions for future development throughout the 21.13-acre site and not just a portion of it. The properties on Taylor Road are oddly shaped and the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments at this location facilitate housing infill on a site that has been vacant for years. Conclusion, Residential Land Use Policy 4: Consistent. Commercial Land Use Policy 1: Maintain the zoning of all commercial areas of Central Point as necessary to comply with the Economic Element. Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments maintain allowance of commercial uses through application of mixed-use residential/commercial zones and therefore does not affect the commercial land supply inside the urban area and does not prevent or otherwise interfere with the City’s maintenance of commercially zoned land. Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 1: Consistent. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 86 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Commercial Land Use Policy 2: Undertake an in-depth study of the downtown business district and develop a comprehensive improvement plan that would include such considerations as traffic circulation and off-street parking, pedestrian and bicycle facilities and access, structural design guidelines, and guidelines for landscaping and signing. Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not affect the City’s plans to study the Central Business District. Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 2: Not applicable. Commercial Land Use Policy 3: Encourage the development of shared commercial parking areas in the downtown area to be carried out by the local businesses with City assistance. Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 3: The City no longer requires minimum parking standards and continues to encourage shared parking where parking provided, including but not limited to the downtown area. Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 3: Consistent. Commercial Land Use Policy 4: Promote the planned integration of abutting commercial development for the purpose of more efficient customer parking, better design and landscaping, coordinated signing, and increased retail sales. Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 4: The Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not affect the City’s development regulations as they relate to commercial development. Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 4: Not applicable. Commercial Land Use Policy 5: For that section of Highway 99 between Beall Lane and the High School, implement the 99 Corridor Plan to improve the corridor, traffic circulation, and the overall visual and aesthetic character of the area. Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 5: The proposed Amendments do not affect or otherwise preclude the City’s ability to implement the Highway 99 Corridor Plan. Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 5: Not applicable. Civic Land Use Policy 1: Ensure that any major public or quasi-public facility that is proposed to be located within a residential neighborhood is located along a collector or Arterial Street, is compatible with surrounding land uses, and does not contribute unreasonably to traffic volumes within the neighborhood. Finding, Civic Land Use Policy 1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not include siting any public or quasi-public facility. Conclusion, Civic Land Use Policy 1: Not applicable. Civic Land Use Policy 2: Work with officials of School District #6 to develop and implement a school site acquisition program that is consistent with the long-range comprehensive plans of the City and the District. Finding, Civic Land Use Policy 2: School District 6 has a land bank for future school sites. No sites are proposed as part of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 87 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Consequently, this application does not affect or otherwise preclude the City and School District #6 from continuing to work together on long-range planning and school site acquisition. Conclusion, Civic Land Use Policy 2: Not applicable. Civic Land Use Policy 3: Continue to emphasize the need for pedestrian and bicycle access to all public facilities and areas frequented by local residents. Finding, Civic Land Use Policy 3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment proposals are within (i.e. Taylor Road) or include extension of existing Mixed- use/Pedestrian Friendly Activity Centers (i.e. 1777 East Pine Street)that are by their nature designed to encourage safe, convenient and comfortable walking and bicycling facilities as part of the street network. Conclusion, Civic Land Use Policy 3: Consistent. Parks and Recreation Land Use Policy 1: Whenever possible, encourage the location of public park sites adjacent to public school sites to establish neighborhood educational/recreational “centers” that can benefit by joint utilization of both types of facilities. Finding, Parks and Recreation Land Use Policy 1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments do not include public parks, as the areas are infill sites within the city limits. Public parks designation has already occurred consistent with the Parks Element. Conclusion, Parks and Recreation Land Use Policy 1: Not applicable. Circulation Land Use Policy 1: Prior to inclusion of lands from the URAs into the UGB a traffic impact analysis shall be completed to determine level of service at time of development. Finding, Circulation Land Use Policy 1: The Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment proposals do not include moving land from the URAs to the UGB. Conclusion, Circulation Land Use Policy : Not applicable. 6 CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and UGB Amendments The findings and conclusions for CPMC 17.96 are set forth below. 17.96.100 Amendments--Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide procedures for amendments to the city’s comprehensive plan, including amendments to the urban growth boundary, that may be necessary from time to time as the public necessity and convenience and general welfare requires. Amendments may be made to the comprehensive plan by following the procedural requirements set forth in Section 17.05.500 and this chapter. (Ord. 1989 §1(part), 2014; Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1981. Formerly 17.96.010). Finding CPMC 17.96.100: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (File No. CPA-23001) has been prepared and processed in accordance with this procedure set forth in this Chapter as necessary to support increased housing production in the City. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 88 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Conclusion CPMC 17.96.100: Consistent. 17.96.200 Initiation of amendments. A proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan or urban growth boundary may be initiated by either: A. A resolution by the planning commission to the city council; B. A resolution of intent by the city council; or C. An application by one or more property owners, or their agents, of property affected by the proposed amendment. Finding CPMC 17.96.200: The City Council initiated the proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment per Council Resolution No. 1731. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.200: Consistent. 17.96.300 Major revisions and minor changes. Proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan, including urban growth boundary amendments, are categorized as either major or minor amendments as defined in Section 17.10.300. Proposals for major revisions shall be processed as a Type IV procedure per Section 17.05.500. Proposals for minor changes shall be processed as a Type III procedure per Section 17.05.400. Finding CPMC 17.96.300: In accordance with Finding CPMC 17.10.300(B), the proposed map amendment on Taylor Road at Haskell and 1777 East Pine Street apply existing policy to defined locations in the City and is therefore a Minor Amendment. The application has been scheduled for two duly noticed public hearings by the Planning Commission and City Council on February 4, 2024 and February 22, 2024, respectively. Written notice was provided to DLCD on December 5, 2023 and amended on December 14, 2023. All notices are available in the file for viewing upon request at City Hall located at 140 South Third Street in Central Point, Oregon. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.300: Consistent. 17.96.400 Submittal timing of proposals. Applications for an amendment to the comprehensive plan, or urban growth boundary, may be submitted at any time. Once accepted proposals shall be scheduled by the city council by resolution of intent. The applications and review thereof shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.05 and all applicable laws of the state. Finding CPMC 17.96.400: The City Council approved Resolution No. 1731 on January 26, 2023 allowing the City staff to hire a traffic engineer to study the proposed amendments and their impact on the transportation system, prepare the written findings and schedule the public hearings. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.400: Consistent. 17.96.500 Approval criteria. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 89 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) A recommendation or a decision to approve or to deny an application for an amendment to the comprehensive plan, or urban growth boundary shall be based on written findings and conclusions that address the following criteria: A. Approval of the request is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals; Finding CPMC 17.96.500(A): See Findings in Section 3, Statewide Planning Goals. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.500(A): Consistent. B. Approval of the request is consistent with the Central Point comprehensive plan; Finding CPMC 17.96.500(B): See the Findings in Section 4, Comprehensive Plan. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.500(B): Consistent. C. For urban growth boundary amendments findings demonstrate that adequate public services and transportation networks to serve the property are either available, or identified for construction in the city’s public facilities master plans (major and minor amendments); and Finding CPMC 17.96.500(C): The proposed change is to the Comprehensive GLUP Map, which does not involve an amendment to the UGB. Conclusion CPMC 17.96.500(C): Not applicable. D. The amendment complies with OAR 660-012-0060 of the Transportation Planning Rule. Finding CPMC 17.96.500(D): See the Findings in Section 4, State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060). Conclusion CPMC 17.96.500(D): Consistent. 7 CPMC 17.10, Zoning Text and Map Amendments CPMC 17.10.100 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures for major and minor amendments to this code or the Central Point city zoning map (zoning map), herein referred to as “map or text amendments.” Finding CPMC 17.10.100: The proposed application is a Minor Zoning Map Amendment (File No. ZC-23001) that aims to support housing production in the City consistent with the proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment (File No. CPA-23001). Conclusion CPMC 17.10.100: Consistent. CPMC 17.10.200 Initiation of Amendments A proposed amendment to the code or zoning map may be initiated by either: 9.A.b Packet Pg. 90 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) A. A resolution by the planning commission to the city council; B. A resolution of intent by the city council; or for zoning map amendments; C. An application by one or more property owners (zoning map amendments only), or their agents, of property affected by the proposed amendment. The amendment shall be accompanied by a legal description of the property or properties affected; proposed findings of facts supporting the proposed amendment, justifying the same and addressing the substantive standards for such an amendment as required by this chapter and by the Land Conservation and Development Commission of the state. Finding CPMC 17.10.200: The City Council initiated the proposed Zoning Map Amendment by City Council Resolution No. 1731 on January 26, 2023. Conclusion CPMC 17.10.200: Consistent. CPMC 17.10.300 Major and Minor Amendments There are two types of map and text amendments: A. Major Amendments. Major amendments are legislative policy decisions that establish by law general policies and regulations for future land use decisions, such as revisions to the zoning and land division ordinance that have widespread and significant impact beyond the immediate area. Major amendments are reviewed using the Type IV procedure in Section 17.05.500. B. Minor Amendments. Minor amendments are those that involve the application of adopted policy to a specific development application, and not the adoption of new policy (i.e., major amendments). Minor amendments shall follow the Type III procedure, as set forth in Section 17.05.400. The approval authority shall be the city council after review and recommendation by the planning commission. Finding CPMC 17.10.300: The proposed map Zoning Map Amendment on Taylor Road at Haskell and 1777 East Pine Street applies existing policy to defined locations in the City and is therefore a Minor Amendment. The application has been scheduled for two duly noticed quasi-judicial public hearings by the Planning Commission and City Council per CPMC 17.05.400 on February 4, 2024 and February 22, 2024, respectively. Written notice was provided to DLCD on December 5, 2023 and amended on December 14, 2023. All notices are available in the file for viewing upon request at City Hall located at 140 South Third Street in Central Point, Oregon. Conclusion CPMC 17.10.300: Consistent. CPMC 17.10.400 Approval Criteria A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a text or map amendment shall be based on written findings and conclusions that address the following criteria: A. Approval of the request is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals (major amendments only); 9.A.b Packet Pg. 91 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Finding CPMC 17.10.400(A): The proposed Zoning Map Amendment is a Minor Map Amendment as demonstrated in Finding CPMC 17.10.300. Conclusion CPMC 17.10.400(A): Not applicable B. Approval of the request is consistent with the Central Point comprehensive plan (major and minor amendments); Finding CPMC 17.10.400(B): See the Findings in Section 4, Comprehensive Plan. Conclusion CPMC 17.10.400(B): Consistent. C. If a zoning map amendment, findings demonstrating that adequate public services and transportation networks to serve the property are either available, or identified for construction in the city’s public facilities master plans (major and minor amendments); and Finding CPMC 17.10.400(C): The proposed Zoning Map Amendment is located on properties within the City limits. As demonstrated in the Transportation System Plan, Water System Master Plan and Stormwater Management Plan, there are adequate public facilities available and planned to the Site as follows: Taylor Road at North Haskell. The properties at this location front on Taylor and North Haskell Street, City-owned Collector Streets. North Haskell is fully improved to City standards. The street frontage on Taylor Road has curb and gutter; however, planned sidewalk landscape rows and streetlighting are required as part of future land development to complete this facility. According to the Water System Master Plan, there is an 8” waterline in Taylor Road that extends through the subject site and a 16” waterline in North Haskell Street. According to the Stormwater Master Plan, there are storm drain facilities on the site that provide connection to approved outfalls on Griffin Creek. Depending on the land development proposal and finished grades, stormwater may be directed to the nearest outfall on Janscourt or to the storm drain line on North Haskell Street. All stormwater is required to be treated for water quality and quantity per the Rogue Valley Stormwater Design Manual. 1777 East Pine Street. This property abuts East Pine Street (Primary Arterial) and Hamrick Road (Secondary Arterial). Per the Transportation System Plan, Gebhard Road is planned to be extended through the site from Beebe Road to East Pine Street (Project No. 258-260). Per the Water System Master Plan, there is a 12” waterline in East Pine Street and a 16” waterline in Hamrick Road that is available to the site. The Stormwater Master Plan, there are stormwater lines in Hamrick Road and East Pine Street, respectively. There is limited capacity in the City line, so a portion of the site will need to drain to east Pine Street. There is also possibility of a new outfall on Bear Creek. Conclusion CPMC 17.10.400(C): As shown in the findings above, there are adequate 9.A.b Packet Pg. 92 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) public facilities available and planned to serve the site. D. The amendment complies with OAR 660-012-0060 of the Transportation Planning Rule. Finding CPMC 17.10.400(D): See the Findings in Section 4, State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060) Conclusion CPMC 17.10.400(D): Consistent. 8 Summary Conclusion The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPA-23001) has been prepared and reviewed for conformance with CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments and found to comply as demonstrated in 1Section , 2 and 6 of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law The proposed Minor Zoning Map Amendment (ZC-23001) has been prepared and reviewed for conformance with CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and Text Amendments and found to comply as demonstrated in Section 1, 2 and 7 of these Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law. 9 Exhibits Exhibit 1 – Traffic Analysis dated August 21, 2023 (Taylor Road at North Haskell) Exhibit 2 – Traffic Analysis dated July 6 2023 (1777 East Pine Street) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 93 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 319 Eastwood Drive | Medford, OR 97504 | Ph 541.941.4148 | Kim.parducci@gmail.com August 21, 2023 Stephanie Holtey, Planning Director City of Central Point Community Development 140 South Third Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 RE: City Initiated Taylor Road Infill Zone Change Findings (37S2W03DC TL 3402 & 3603) Dear Stephanie, Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC evaluated trip generations for a proposed zone change from Civic to Medium Density Residential / MMR (Medium Mix Residential) on 0.73 acres at Township 37S Range 2W Section 03DC tax lots 3402 and 3603. The subject parcels are located on the southwest corner of N Haskell Street and Taylor Road in Central Point. Background The two triangular properties are currently zoned Civic. The Civic zoning designation is intended to allow for necessary civic uses in the community. These include schools, post offices, city and county offices, religious institutions, public utility yards and similar uses, which are considered to be compatible uses with the residential neighborhoods that generally surround them. Institutions such as colleges, hospitals, rehabilitation centers, churches and fraternal meeting halls are subject to conditional use review. For the purpose of comparing highest and best uses in this analysis, the outright permitted use with the highest trip generation within the Civic zoning designation is considered a government office. Proposed zoning is Medium Mix Residential (within the Medium Density Residential GLUP designation). This zoning district allows a minimum of 14 and a maximum of 32 units per acre as set forth in CPMC 17.65.050, Table 5. The medium mix residential zoning district allows single family residential and a variety of multifamily residences. Single family residential detached dwelling units generate the highest number of trips per unit. Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition was used to generate trips for existing and proposed zoning districts. The highest traffic generator (outright permitted) within the Civic zoning district is considered a government office. The highest traffic generator within the Medium Mix Residential (MMR) zoning district is a single family residential (SFR) dwelling unit. ITE Land Uses 730 – Government Office and 210 – Single Family Residential were considered the best matches. The largest government office was considered to be 15,900 square feet based on 50% lot coverage. The maximum number of SFR dwelling units under MMR is 23 units. Trip generations for existing and proposed zones are summarized in Table 1. All trips were considered new trips on the transportation system. ITE graphs and land use descriptions are provided in the attachments. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 94 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) S.O.T.E, LLC | Civic to MMR Zone Change 372W03DC TL 3402/3603 | August 21, 2023 | 2 SF = square feet 1. ITE trip generations for Land Use 210 based on fitted curve equations Trip generations in Table 1 show a net decrease in trips on the transportation as a result of the proposed zone change from Civic to MMR (Medium Mix Residential). Analysis A traffic impact analysis (TIA) is required as part of an application for a change in zoning or plan amendment per the CPMC 17.05.900. A TIA is required to evaluate potential traffic impacts and address Section 660-012-0045(2)(e) of the State Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). This analysis serves as the TIA for the proposed zone change based on the down-zoning of the subject property. A TIA in Section 17.05.900 of the CPMC is required when the development application involves one or more of the following: a. A change in zoning or plan amendment. A GLUP / zone change is proposed from Civic to Medium Density Residential / MMR but is considered down-zoning based on a net decrease in estimated trip generations using highest and best uses in existing and proposed zoning districts. No significant impact is shown to occur. b. An increase in site traffic volume generation by two hundred fifty average daily trips (ADT) or more Proposed MMR zoning is estimated to generate 261 ADT, which is a net decrease of 98 ADT, when compared to Civic zoning. No significant impact is shown to occur. c. An increase in peak hour volume of a particular movement to and from the state highway by twenty percent or more Proposed MMR zoning is estimated to generate 20 a.m. and 25 p.m. peak hour trips, which is a net decrease of 33 a.m. peak hour trips and 2 p.m. peak hour trips, when compared to Civic zoning. None of the development trips will be directly to or from the state highway. No significant impact is shown to occur. d. An increase in use of adjacent streets by vehicles exceeding the twenty thousand pounds gross vehicle weights by ten vehicles or more per day Table 1 – Proposed Taylor Road Civic to MMR Zone Change Trip Generations Land Use Unit Size Daily Trips Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Existing Civic Zoning District 730 – Government Office 1000 SF 15.9 359 53 40 13 27 7 20 Total Existing Potential Trips 359 53 27 Proposed MMR Zoning District 210 – Single Family Residential1 Dwelling 23 261 20 5 15 25 16 9 Total Proposed Potential Trips 261 20 25 Net Trip Difference (-)98 (-)33 (-)2 9.A.b Packet Pg. 95 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) S.O.T.E, LLC | Civic to MMR Zone Change 372W03DC TL 3402/3603 | August 21, 2023 | 3 The proposed zone change will not increase the number of vehicles exceeding twenty thousand pounds gross vehicle weight. No significant impact is shown to occur. Planning for transportation requires coordination between cities and counties, and the Oregon Department of Transportation. Goal 12 requires cities, counties, and the State to create a transportation system plan that takes into account all relevant modes of transportation. The Transportation Planning Rules (TPR) implements and specifies what must be included in local planning efforts for transportation, and what must be addressed and included in the transportation system plan. Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012-0060 must be addressed for plan and land use regulation amendments. Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012-0060 Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would: a. Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility No change in functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility will occur as a result of the proposed zone change. b. Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or The proposed zone change will not change standards implementing a functional classification system. c. Result in any of the effects listed in (A) through (C) A. Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility; The proposed zone change will not result in types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility. B. Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would not meet the performance standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or The proposed zone change will not degrade the performance of any existing or planned transportation facility. C. Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. The proposed zone change will not degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. Conclusions The proposed zone change from Civic to Medium Mix Residential (MMR) is shown to produce a net decrease in trips on the transportation system or down-zone the property. This is concluded to have no significant impact on the transportation system in accordance with the Central Point Municipal Code Section 17.05.900 and Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012-0060, which identify when significant impacts occur as a result of a plan or land use regulation amendment. This concludes our analysis. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or concerns. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 96 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) S.O.T.E, LLC | Civic to MMR Zone Change 372W03DC TL 3402/3603 | August 21, 2023 | 4 Sincerely, Kimberly Parducci PE, PTOE Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Attachments: ITE Graphs / Descriptions Tax Lot Maps 9.A.b Packet Pg. 97 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) ________________________ ________________________ ATTACHMENTS 9.A.b Packet Pg. 98 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 99 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 100 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 101 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 102 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 789 Land Use: 730 Government Office Building Description A government office building is an individual building containing either the entire function or simply one agency of a city, county, state, federal, or other governmental unit. Additional Data Each study site in the current database serves a municipal or county agency. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time-of-day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip- and-parking-generation/). The sites were surveyed in the 2000s and the 2010s in Oregon and Texas. Source Numbers 579, 889 General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400–799) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 103 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Government Office Building(730) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq.Ft.GFA On a:Weekday Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:7 Avg.1000 Sq.Ft.GFA:11 Directional Distribution:50%entering,50%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq.Ft.GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 22.59 0.71 -59.66 17.03 Data Plot and Equation 0 10 20 300 200 400 600 Average RateStudySite Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given R²=*** X =1000 Sq.Ft.GFA T = T r i p s E n d s 790 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4 9.A.b Packet Pg. 104 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Government Office Building(730) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq.Ft.GFA On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:7 Avg.1000 Sq.Ft.GFA:11 Directional Distribution:75%entering,25%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq.Ft.GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.34 0.45 -7.38 2.18 Data Plot and Equation 0 10 20 300 20 40 60 80 Average RateStudySite Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given R²=*** X =1000 Sq.Ft.GFA T = T r i p s E n d s 791General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400–799) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 105 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Government Office Building(730) Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq.Ft.GFA On a:Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies:8 Avg.1000 Sq.Ft.GFA:22 Directional Distribution:25%entering,75%exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq.Ft.GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.71 1.09 -6.19 1.24 Data Plot and Equation 0 20 40 60 800 20 40 60 80 100 Average RateStudySiteFittedCurve Fitted Curve Equation:Ln(T)=0.97 Ln(X)+0.62 R²=0.73 X =1000 Sq.Ft.GFA T = T r i p s E n d s 792 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4 9.A.b Packet Pg. 106 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 107 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 319 Eastwood Drive | Medford, OR 97504 | Ph 541.941.4148 | Kim.parducci@gmail.com July 6, 2023 Stephanie Holtey, Planning Director City of Central Point Community Development 140 South Third Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 RE: City Initiated Zone Change Findings (37S2W02D TL 100) Dear Stephanie, Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC evaluated trip generations for a proposed GLUP amendment/zone change from Employment Commercial (EC)/Tourist and Office Professional Commercial (C-4) to EC and High Density Residential / C-4 and HMR/MMR on 21.8 acres at Township 37S Range 2W Section 02D, tax lot 100. The subject property is located on the northwest corner of E. Pine Street and Hamrick Road in Central Point. Background The subject property currently has a GLUP map designation of Employment Commercial and zoning district of Tourist and Office Professional Commercial (C-4). This analysis evaluates a proposed GLUP amendment and zone change to EC/C-4 and High Density Residential/MMR/HMR for the purpose of allowing a mix of commercial/retail and high-density residential uses. Two scenarios are considered based on MMR (medium mix residential) and HMR (high mix residential) zones. These are summarized in Tables 1 and 2: Table 1 – Scenario 1 GLUP Designation / Zone Acreage Use No. Units Square Footage High Density Residential / MMR 5.5 Low Rise Apartments 80 NA High Density Residential / HMR 7.44 Mid Rise Apartments 185 NA Employment Commercial / EC 8.9 Hotel 100 NA Shopping Center NA 33,000 Totals 21.8 365 33,000 Table 2 - Scenario 2 GLUP Designation / Zone Acreage Use No. Units Square Footage High Density Residential / HMR 7.44 Mid Rise Apartments 185 NA Employment Commercial / EC 14.4 Hotel 100 NA Shopping Center NA 53,000 Totals 21.8 285 53,000 9.A.b Packet Pg. 108 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) S.O.T.E, LLC | City Initiated Zone Change 372W02D TL 100 | July 6, 2023 | 2 EC/C-4 under existing zoning is estimated to support up to 237,500 square feet of commercial/retail uses using an industry standard of 25% lot coverage. Scenarios 1 and 2 represent reasonable worst-case conditions under mixed zoning combinations, per the City. The type of housing assumed in both MMR and HMR zones is multifamily residential, specifically low-rise and mid-rise apartment complexes. Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition was used to generate trips for existing and proposed zoning districts. Land Use 820 – Shopping Center was used for existing zoning based on development of a 237,500 square foot (SF) shopping center. Land Use 310 – Hotel, 821 – Shopping Plaza, 822 – Strip Retail Plaza, 220 – Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise), and 221 – Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) were used to generate trips for proposed Scenarios 1 and 2. Pass-by rates were used for shopping center land uses, in accordance with ITE methodology. Mixed use discounts were used where applicable. Trip generations for existing and proposed zones are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. ITE graphs, land use descriptions, pass-by, and mixed-use sheets are provided in the attachments. SF = square feet Scenario 1, which proposes commercial, high mix residential, and medium mix residential uses, shows a net decrease in trips to the transportation system. Scenario 2 results are provided in Table 4 on the next page. Table 3 – Scenario 1 EC to EC/MMR/HMR Zone Change Trip Generations Land Use Unit Size Daily Trips Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Existing C-4 Zoning 820 – Shopping Center 1000 SF 237.5 8,790 274 124 76 808 388 420 Pass-by 29% -2,549 -79 -36 -22 -234 -112 -122 Existing Primary Trips 6,241 195 574 Proposed C-4/MMR/HMR Zoning 220 – Multifamily (Low-Rise) Units 80 539 32 8 24 41 26 15 221 – Multifamily (Mid-Rise) Units 185 836 70 16 54 72 44 28 310 – Hotel Rooms 100 799 43 24 19 46 23 23 822 – Strip Retail Plaza 1000 SF 33.0 1,622 78 47 31 217 108 109 Total Gross Trips 3,796 223 376 Mixed-use discount (ITE Calc) 24% -911 -54 -90 Pass-by 29% -357 -17 -48 Proposed Primary Trips 2,528 152 238 Net Trip Difference -3,713 -43 -336 9.A.b Packet Pg. 109 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) S.O.T.E, LLC | City Initiated Zone Change 372W02D TL 100 | July 6, 2023 | 3 SF = square feet Scenario 2, which proposes commercial and high mix residential uses, shows a net decrease in trips to the transportation system with the exception of the a.m. peak hour, which shows one trip increase. Trip generations for Land Use 821 – Shopping Plaza (40-150k) assumed a worst-case scenario that included the possibility of a supermarket as part of development. Analysis A traffic impact analysis (TIA) is required as part of an application for a change in zoning or plan amendment per the CPMC 17.05.900. A TIA is required to evaluate potential traffic impacts and address Section 660-012-0045(2)(e) of the State Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). This analysis serves as the TIA for the proposed zone change, which evaluated trips for two scenarios. A TIA in Section 17.05.900 of the CPMC is required when the development application involves one or more of the following: a. A change in zoning or plan amendment. A GLUP / zone change is proposed from EC/C-4 to a mix of EC/C-4 and High Density Residential/HMR and MMR. Two scenarios were considered. Scenario 1 included commercial, high mix residential, and medium mix residential. Scenario 2 considered commercial and high mix residential. Both scenarios showed an overall net decrease in trips to the transportation system using highest and best uses in existing and proposed zoning districts. No significant impact is shown to occur. Table 4 – Scenario 2 EC to EC/HMR Zone Change Trip Generations Land Use Unit Size Daily Trips Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Existing C-4 Zoning 820 – Shopping Center 1000 SF 237.5 8,790 274 124 76 808 388 420 Pass-by 29% -2,549 -79 -36 -22 -234 -112 -122 Existing Primary Trips 6,241 195 574 Proposed C-4/HMR Zoning 221 – Multifamily (Mid-Rise) Units 185 836 70 16 54 72 44 28 310 – Hotel Rooms 100 799 43 24 19 46 23 23 821 – Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 1000 SF 53.0 5,008 187 116 71 525 252 273 Total Gross Trips 6,643 300 643 Mixed-use discount (ITE Calc) 13% -863 -39 -84 Pass-by 40% -1,743 -65 -183 Proposed Primary Trips 4,037 196 376 Net Trip Difference -2,204 +1 -198 9.A.b Packet Pg. 110 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) S.O.T.E, LLC | City Initiated Zone Change 372W02D TL 100 | July 6, 2023 | 4 b. An increase in site traffic volume generation by two hundred fifty average daily trips (ADT) or more Proposed zoning in Scenario 1 is estimated to generate 2,528 ADT, which is a net decrease of 3,713 ADT when compared to full commercial zoning. Proposed zoning in Scenario 2 is estimated to generate 4,037 ADT, which is a net decrease of 2,204 ADT when compared to full commercial zoning. No significant impact is shown to occur. c. An increase in peak hour volume of a particular movement to and from the state highway by twenty percent or more Proposed Scenario 1 zoning is estimated to generate 238 p.m. peak hour trips, which is a net decrease of 336 p.m. peak hour trips when compared to full commercial zoning. Proposed Scenario 2 zoning is estimated to generate 376 p.m. peak hour trips, which is a net decrease of 198 p.m. peak hour trips when compared to full commercial zoning. Additionally, none of the development trips will be directly to or from the state highway. No significant impact is shown to occur. d. An increase in use of adjacent streets by vehicles exceeding the twenty thousand pounds gross vehicle weights by ten vehicles or more per day The proposed zone change will not increase the number of vehicles exceeding twenty thousand pounds gross vehicle weight. No significant impact is shown to occur. Planning for transportation requires coordination between cities and counties, and the Oregon Department of Transportation. Goal 12 requires cities, counties, and the State to create a transportation system plan that takes into account all relevant modes of transportation. The Transportation Planning Rules (TPR) implements and specifies what must be included in local planning efforts for transportation, and what must be addressed and included in the transportation system plan. Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012- 0060 must be addressed for plan and land use regulation amendments. Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012-0060 Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would: a. Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility No change in functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility will occur as a result of the proposed zone change. b. Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or The proposed zone change will not change standards implementing a functional classification system. c. Result in any of the effects listed in (A) through (C) A. Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility; The proposed zone change will not result in types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility. B. Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would not meet the performance standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or 9.A.b Packet Pg. 111 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) S.O.T.E, LLC | City Initiated Zone Change 372W02D TL 100 | July 6, 2023 | 5 The proposed zone change will not degrade the performance of any existing or planned transportation facility. C. Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. The proposed zone change will not degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. Conclusions The proposed zone change from EC/C-4 to a mix of EC/C-4 and High Density Residential/HMR and MMR is shown to produce a net decrease in trips overall on the transportation system. This is concluded to have no significant impact on the transportation system in accordance with the Central Point Municipal Code Section 17.05.900 and Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012-0060, which identify when significant impacts occur as a result of a plan or land use regulation amendment. This concludes our analysis. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Kimberly Parducci PE, PTOE Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Attachments: ITE Graphs / Descriptions Tax Lot Maps 9.A.b Packet Pg. 112 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) ________________________ ________________________ ATTACHMENTS 9.A.b Packet Pg. 113 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 175 Land Use: 820 Shopping Center (>150k) Description A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned, developed, owned, and managed as a unit. Each study site in this land use has at least 150,000 square feet of gross leasable area (GLA). It often has more than one anchor store. Various names can be assigned to a shopping center within this size range, depending on its specific size and tenants, such as community center, regional center, superregional center, fashion center, and power center. A shopping center of this size typically contains more than retail merchandising facilities. Office space, a movie theater, restaurants, a post office, banks, a health club, and recreational facilities are common tenants. A shopping center of this size can be enclosed or open-air. The vehicle trips generated at a shopping center are based upon the total GLA of the center. In the case of a smaller center without an enclosed mall or peripheral buildings, the GLA is the same as the gross floor area of the building. The 150,000 square feet GLA threshold value between community/regional shopping center and plaza that is smaller than the threshold value, the presence or absence of a supermarket within the plaza has a measurable effect on site trip generation. For a shopping center that is larger than the threshold value, the trips generated by its other major tenants mask any effects of the presence or absence of an on-site supermarket. Shopping plaza (40-150k) (Land Use 821), strip retail plaza (<40k) (Land Use 822), and factory outlet center (Land Use 823) are related uses. Additional Data Many shopping centers—in addition to the integrated unit of shops in one building or enclosed around a mall—include outparcels (peripheral buildings or pads located on the perimeter of the center adjacent to the streets and major access points). These buildings are typically drive-in banks, retail stores, restaurants, or small offices. Although the data herein do not indicate which of the centers studied include peripheral buildings, it can be assumed that some of the data show their effect. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time-of-day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip- and-parking-generation/). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 114 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Wisconsin. Source Numbers 77, 110, 154, 156, 159, 190, 199, 202, 204, 213, 251, 269, 294, 295, 299, 304, 305, 307, 308, 309, 311, 314, 315, 316, 317, 319, 365, 385, 404, 414, 423, 442, 446, 562, 629, 702, 715, 728, 868, 871, 880, 899, 912, 926, 946, 962, 973, 974, 978, 1034, 1040, 1067 176 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5 9.A.b Packet Pg. 115 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Shopping Center (>150k) (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 108 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 538 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 37.01 17.27 - 81.53 12.79 Data Plot and Equation 0 1000 20000 20000 40000 60000 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 26.11(X) + 5863.73 R²= 0.60 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 177General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 116 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Shopping Center (>150k) (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 44 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 546 Directional Distribution: 62% entering, 38% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.84 0.30 - 3.11 0.42 Data Plot and Equation 0 1000 20000 1000 2000 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.59(X) + 133.55 R²= 0.56 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 178 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5 9.A.b Packet Pg. 117 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Shopping Center (>150k) (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 126 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 581 Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3.40 1.57 - 7.58 1.26 Data Plot and Equation 0 1000 2000 30000 2000 4000 6000 8000 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.72 Ln(X) + 3.02 R²= 0.70 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA 179General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 118 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 119 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 120 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 121 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 122 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 123 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 124 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 125 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 126 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 127 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Land Use: 220 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) Description Low-rise multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have two or three floors (levels). Various configurations fit this description, including walkup apartment, mansion apartment, and stacked townhouse. • A walkup apartment typically is two or three floors in height with dwelling units that are accessed by a single or multiple entrances with stairways and hallways. • A mansion apartment is a single structure that contains several apartments within what appears to be a single-family dwelling unit. • second floors. Access to the individual units is typically internal to the structure and provided through a central entry and stairway. • a townhouse dwelling unit that only shares walls with an adjoining unit, the stacked townhouse units share both floors and walls. Access to the individual units is typically internal to the structure and provided through a central entry and stairway. Multifamily housing (mid-rise) (Land Use 221), multifamily housing (high-rise) (Land Use 222), affordable housing (Land Use 223), and off-campus student apartment (low-rise) (Land Use 225) are related land uses. Land Use Subcategory Data are presented for two subcategories for this land use: (1) not close to rail transit and (2) close to rail transit. A site is considered close to rail transit if the walking distance between the residential site entrance and the closest rail transit station entrance is ½ mile or less. Additional Data For the three sites for which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling units were available, there were an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. For the two sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units were available, an average of 96.2 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied. The technical appendices provide supporting information on time-of-day distributions for this land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip 252 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 9.A.b Packet Pg. 128 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip- and-parking-generation/). For the three sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents, there was an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. It is expected that the number of bedrooms and number of residents are likely correlated to the trips generated by a residential site. To assist in future analysis, trip generation studies of all multifamily housing should attempt to obtain information on occupancy rate and on the mix of residential unit sizes (i.e., number of units by number of bedrooms at the site complex). The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, the 2010s, and the 2020s in British Columbia (CAN), California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ontario (CAN), Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Source Numbers 188, 204, 237, 300, 305, 306, 320, 321, 357, 390, 412, 525, 530, 579, 583, 638, 864, 866, 896, 901, 903, 904, 936, 939, 944, 946, 947, 948, 963, 964, 966, 967, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1036, 1047, 1056, 1071, 1076 253General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000–399) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 129 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 22 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 229 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 6.74 2.46 - 12.50 1.79 Data Plot and Equation 0 100 200 300 400 500 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 6.41(X) + 75.31 R²= 0.86 X = Number of Dwelling Units 254 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 9.A.b Packet Pg. 130 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 49 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 249 Directional Distribution: 24% entering, 76% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.40 0.13 - 0.73 0.12 Data Plot and Equation 0 1000 20000 100 200 300 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.31(X) + 22.85 R²= 0.79 X = Number of Dwelling Units 255General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000–399) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 131 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 59 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 241 Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.51 0.08 - 1.04 0.15 Data Plot and Equation 0 1000 20000 100 200 300 400 500 Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.43(X) + 20.55 R²= 0.84 X = Number of Dwelling Units 256 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3 9.A.b Packet Pg. 132 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 133 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 134 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 135 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 136 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 137 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 138 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 139 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 9.A.b Packet Pg. 140 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) La n d U s e C o d e La n d U s e Se t t i n g Ti m e P e r i o d # D a t a S i t e s Av e r a g e P a s s - B y R a t e GL A ( 0 0 0 ) P r i m a r y ( % ) D i v e r t e d ( % ) T o t a l ( % ) S o u r c e 21 3 F l o r i d a 1 9 9 0 3 1 2 2 8 3 1 4 1 7 2 — 3 3 22 5 I l l i n o i s 1 9 9 4 2 6 4 3 5 3 2 3 3 6 5 1 9 7 0 2 4 22 7 . 9 K e n t u c k y 1 9 9 3 — 3 4 3 5 3 1 6 6 — 3 4 23 5 K e n t u c k y 1 9 9 3 2 1 1 3 5 2 9 3 6 6 5 2 5 9 3 2 25 5 I o w a 1 9 9 4 2 2 2 2 3 3 8 3 9 7 7 3 7 0 6 2 4 25 6 C o n n e c t i c u t 1 9 9 4 2 0 8 2 7 5 1 2 2 7 3 3 4 2 2 2 4 29 3 I l l i n o i s 1 9 9 4 2 8 2 2 4 7 0 6 7 6 4 6 0 6 1 3 29 4 P e n n s y l v a n i a 1 9 9 4 2 1 3 2 4 4 8 1 8 7 6 4 0 5 5 2 4 35 0 M a s s a c h u s e t t s 1 9 9 4 2 2 4 1 8 4 5 3 7 8 2 2 1 1 2 2 4 36 1 V i r g i n i a 1 9 9 4 3 1 5 1 7 5 4 2 9 8 3 2 0 3 4 2 4 37 5 N o r t h C a r o l i n a 1 9 9 4 2 1 4 2 9 4 8 2 3 7 1 2 0 5 3 2 4 41 3 T e x a s 1 9 9 4 2 2 8 2 8 5 1 2 1 7 2 5 8 9 2 4 41 8 M a r y l a n d 1 9 9 4 2 8 1 2 0 5 0 3 0 8 0 5 6 1 0 2 4 45 0 C a l i f o r n i a 1 9 9 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 9 2 8 7 7 2 7 8 7 2 4 47 6 W a s h i n g t o n 1 9 9 4 2 3 4 2 5 5 3 2 2 7 5 3 4 2 7 2 4 48 8 T e x a s 1 9 9 4 2 5 7 1 2 7 5 1 3 8 8 1 0 9 4 1 3 56 0 V i r g i n i a 1 9 9 4 4 3 7 1 9 4 9 3 2 8 1 3 0 5 1 2 4 58 1 C o l o r a d o 1 9 9 4 2 9 6 1 8 5 3 2 9 8 2 2 9 3 9 2 4 59 8 C o l o r a d o 1 9 9 4 2 0 5 1 7 5 5 2 8 8 3 3 8 4 0 2 4 63 3 T e x a s 1 9 9 4 2 5 7 1 0 6 4 2 6 9 0 — 2 4 Ge n e r a l U r b a n / S u b u r b a n Ve h i c l e P a s s - B y R a t e s b y L a n d U s e So u r c e : I T E Tr i p G e n e r a t i o n M a n u a l, 1 1 t h E d i t i o n 82 0 Sh o p p i n g C e n t e r ( > 1 5 0 k ) We e k d a y P M P e a k P e r i o d Pa s s - B y C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s f o r I n d i v i d u a l S i t e s St a t e o r P r o v i n c e Su r v e y Ye a r # I n t e r v i e w s Pa s s - B y Tr i p ( % ) No n - P a s s - B y T r i p s A d j S t r e e t P e a k Ho u r V o l u m e 8 S i t e s w i t h G L A b e t w e e n 1 5 0 a n d 3 0 0 k 29 % f o r S i t e s w i t h G L A b e t w e e n 1 5 0 a n d 3 0 0 k 16 S i t e s w i t h G L A b e t w e e n 3 0 0 a n d 9 0 0 k 19 % f o r S i t e s w i t h G L A b e t w e e n 3 0 0 a n d 9 0 0 k 9.A.b Packet Pg. 141 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) 66 7 I l l i n o i s 1 9 9 4 2 0 0 1 6 5 3 3 1 8 4 2 7 7 0 2 4 73 8 N e w J e r s e y 1 9 9 4 2 8 3 1 3 7 5 1 2 8 7 8 0 5 9 2 4 80 0 C a l i f o r n i a 1 9 9 4 2 0 5 2 1 5 1 2 8 7 9 7 4 7 4 2 4 80 8 C a l i f o r n i a 1 9 9 4 2 4 0 1 3 7 3 1 4 8 7 4 0 3 5 2 4 9.A.b Packet Pg. 142 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) La n d U s e C o d e La n d U s e Se t t i n g Ti m e P e r i o d # D a t a S i t e s Av e r a g e P a s s - B y R a t e GL A ( 0 0 0 ) P r i m a r y ( % ) D i v e r t e d ( % ) T o t a l ( % ) S o u r c e 45 F l o r i d a 1 9 9 2 8 4 4 5 6 2 4 2 0 4 4 — 3 0 50 F l o r i d a 1 9 9 2 5 5 5 4 1 4 1 1 8 5 9 — 3 0 52 F l o r i d a 1 9 9 5 6 6 5 4 2 3 3 2 5 5 8 — 3 0 53 F l o r i d a 1 9 9 3 1 6 2 5 9 — — 4 1 — 3 0 57 . 2 3 K e n t u c k y 1 9 9 3 2 4 7 3 1 5 3 1 6 6 9 2 6 5 9 3 4 60 F l o r i d a 1 9 9 5 1 5 8 3 4 0 3 8 2 2 6 0 — 3 0 69 . 4 K e n t u c k y 1 9 9 3 1 0 9 2 5 4 2 3 3 7 5 1 5 5 9 3 4 77 F l o r i d a 1 9 9 2 3 6 5 4 6 — — 5 4 — 3 0 78 F l o r i d a 1 9 9 1 7 0 2 5 5 2 3 2 2 4 5 — 3 0 82 F l o r i d a 1 9 9 2 3 3 6 3 4 — — 6 6 — 3 0 92 . 8 5 7 K e n t u c k y 1 9 9 3 1 3 3 2 2 5 0 2 8 7 8 3 5 5 5 3 4 10 0 . 8 8 8 K e n t u c k y 1 9 9 3 2 8 1 2 8 5 0 2 2 7 2 2 1 1 1 3 4 12 1 . 5 4 K e n t u c k y 1 9 9 3 2 1 0 5 3 3 0 1 7 4 7 2 6 3 6 3 4 14 4 N e w J e r s e y 1 9 9 0 1 7 6 3 2 4 4 2 4 6 8 — 2 4 14 6 . 8 K e n t u c k y 1 9 9 3 — 3 6 3 9 2 5 6 4 — 3 4 Ge n e r a l U r b a n / S u b u r b a n Ve h i c l e P a s s - B y R a t e s b y L a n d U s e So u r c e : I T E Tr i p G e n e r a t i o n M a n u a l , 1 1 t h E d i t i o n 82 1 Sh o p p i n g P l a z a ( 4 0 - 1 5 0 k ) We e k d a y P M P e a k P e r i o d 15 40 % Pa s s - B y C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s f o r I n d i v i d u a l S i t e s St a t e o r P r o v i n c e Su r v e y Ye a r # I n t e r v i e w s Pa s s - B y Tr i p ( % ) No n - P a s s - B y T r i p s A d j S t r e e t P e a k Ho u r V o l u m e 9.A.b Packet Pg. 143 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Project Name: Organization: Project Location: Performed By: Scenario Description:Date: Analysis Year: Checked By: Analysis Period:Date: ITE LUCs1 Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting Office 0 Retail 820 33,000 Square Feet 217 108 109 Restaurant 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 Residential 220/221 265 Units 113 70 43 Hotel 310 100 Rooms 46 23 23 All Other Land Uses2 0 376 201 175 Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel All Other Land Uses2 Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel Office 0 0 0 0 Retail 0 0 28 4 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 0 11 0 1 Hotel 0 2 0 0 Total Entering Exiting Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips All Person-Trips 376 201 175 Office N/A N/A Internal Capture Percentage 24% 23% 26% Retail 12% 29% Restaurant N/A N/A External Vehicle-Trips5 284 155 129 Cinema/Entertainment N/A N/A External Transit-Trips6 0 0 0 Residential 40% 28% External Non-Motorized Trips6 0 0 0 Hotel 22% 9% *Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute - Version 2013.1 Scenario 1 7/6/2023 2023 PM Street Peak Hour Table 1-P: Base Vehicle-Trip Generation Estimates (Single-Use Site Estimate) Land Use Development Data (For Information Only)Estimated Vehicle-Trips3 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool HAJC ZC Southern Oregon Trans. Eng. Central Point, OR Kim Parducci Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Origin (From)Destination (To) Cinema/Entertainment Table 4-P: Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix* Origin (From)Destination (To) Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Table 5-P: Computations Summary Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use 4Enter vehicle occupancy assumed in Table 1-P vehicle trips. If vehicle occupancy changes for proposed mixed-use project, manual adjustments must be made to Tables 5-P 9-P (O and D) Enter transit non-motorized percentages that will result with proposed mixed-use project complete 6Person-Trips 1Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Manual, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator. 3Enter trips assuming no transit or non-motorized trips (as assumed in ITE Trip Generation Manual ). 5Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 144 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Project Name: Organization: Project Location: Performed By: Scenario Description:Date: Analysis Year: Checked By: Analysis Period:Date: ITE LUCs1 Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting Office 0 Retail 820 53,000 Square Feet 525 252 273 Restaurant 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 Residential 220/221 185 Units 72 44 28 Hotel 310 100 Rooms 46 23 23 All Other Land Uses2 0 643 319 324 Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel All Other Land Uses2 Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel Office Retail Restaurant Cinema/Entertainment Residential Hotel Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel Office 0 0 0 0 Retail 0 0 20 4 Restaurant 0 0 0 0 Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Residential 0 12 0 1 Hotel 0 4 0 0 Total Entering Exiting Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips All Person-Trips 643 319 324 Office N/A N/A Internal Capture Percentage 13% 13% 13% Retail 6% 9% Restaurant N/A N/A External Vehicle-Trips5 561 278 283 Cinema/Entertainment N/A N/A External Transit-Trips6 0 0 0 Residential 45% 46% External Non-Motorized Trips6 0 0 0 Hotel 22% 17% *Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute - Version 2013.1 Scenario 2 7/6/2023 2023 PM Street Peak Hour Table 1-P: Base Vehicle-Trip Generation Estimates (Single-Use Site Estimate) Land Use Development Data (For Information Only)Estimated Vehicle-Trips3 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool HAJC ZC Southern Oregon Trans. Eng. Central Point, OR Kim Parducci Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Origin (From)Destination (To) Cinema/Entertainment Table 4-P: Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix* Origin (From)Destination (To) Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Table 5-P: Computations Summary Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use 4Enter vehicle occupancy assumed in Table 1-P vehicle trips. If vehicle occupancy changes for proposed mixed-use project, manual adjustments must be made to Tables 5-P 9-P (O and D) Enter transit non-motorized percentages that will result with proposed mixed-use project complete 6Person-Trips 1Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Manual, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator. 3Enter trips assuming no transit or non-motorized trips (as assumed in ITE Trip Generation Manual ). 5Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P. 9.A.b Packet Pg. 145 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) BEEBE RD E. PINE ST HAMRICK RD BIDDLE ROAD MISTLETOE CT LIVE OAK LOOP VILLAGE AVE PRINSLOW DR PARKVIEW CT PARKWOOD VILLAGE LN HAMRICK RD Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Legend Residential Residential Low Density Residential (VLRes) Low Density Residential (LRes) Medium Density Residential (MRes) High Density Residential (HRes) Commercial Community Commercial (CC) Employment Commercial (EC) General Commercial (GC) Industrial Light Industrial (LI) General Industrial (GI) Parks and Open Space (OS) Civic (C) UGB ¯ 1 in = 0 miles 1777 East Pine Street37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 100)File No. CPA-23001 1777 East Pine Street - 21.8 acres + adjacent ROWExisting GLUP: Employment Commercial (EC)TOD Overlay: No 9.A.b Packet Pg. 146 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Legend Residential Residential Low Density Residential (VLRes) Low Density Residential (LRes) Medium Density Residential (MRes) High Density Residential (HRes) Commercial Community Commercial (CC) Employment Commercial (EC) General Commercial (GC) Industrial Light Industrial (LI) General Industrial (GI) Parks and Open Space (OS) Civic (C) UGB ¯ 1 in = 0 miles Scenario 11777 East Pine Street37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 100)File No. CPA-23001 1777 East Pine Street - 7.4 acresScenario 1Proposed GLUP: High Density Residential (HRes)TOD Overlay: Yes 9.A.b Packet Pg. 147 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Legend Residential Residential Low Density Residential (VLRes) Low Density Residential (LRes) Medium Density Residential (MRes) High Density Residential (HRes) Commercial Community Commercial (CC) Employment Commercial (EC) General Commercial (GC) Industrial Light Industrial (LI) General Industrial (GI) Parks and Open Space (OS) Civic (C) UGB ¯ 1 in = 0 miles Scenario 21777 East Pine Street37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 100)File No. CPA-23001 1777 East Pine Street - 21.8 acres (8.9 acres to HRes)Scenario 2Proposed GLUP: Employment Commercial/High Density Residential Proposed Zoning: Emmployment Commercial (EC)/High Mix Residential (HMR)/MMRTOD Overlay: Yes 9.A.b Packet Pg. 148 At t a c h m e n t : F i n d i n g s o f F a c t a n d C o n c l u s i o n s o f L a w ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 4 : M i n o r C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n M a p A m e n d m e n t ) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Community Development FROM: Stephanie Powers, Planning Director MEETING DATE: March 14, 2024 SUBJECT: Minor Zone Map Amendment File No. ZC-23001 ACTION REQUIRED: Ordinance 2nd Reading RECOMMENDATION: None Forwarded BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On January 26, 2023, the City Council approved Resolution No 1731 declaring the City Council’s intent to initiate Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to support housing production. The proposed Minor Zoning Map Amendment (“Amendment”) must comply with the Comprehensive Plan General Land Use Plan (GLUP) and Overlay Maps. The proposed changes include the following: 1. Taylor Road at North Haskell Street (37S 2W 03DC, Tax Lots 3402, 3603 (0.73 acres) and 37S 2W 10AB, Tax Lot 1300 (0.18 acres). Change the zoning designation to Medium Mix Residential (MMR) to support multifamily housing production. The subject properties are located at the intersection of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street. The proposed change supports the property owner’s objective to develop single-story, cottage-style multifamily units for older adults to age-in-place. 2. 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 03D, Tax Lot 100 (21.13 acres). Change the Zoning Map to align with the GLUP and Overlay Maps to support a mix of affordable and market-rate housing while retaining opportunities for commercial uses. Proposed changes include: a. Extend the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay to include all 21.13 acres and a portion of the adjoining right-of-way. b. Change the existing Tourist and Office Professional (C-4) Zone to Employment Commercial (EC) based on one of the options below: • Scenario 1 – Change 7.4 acres to High Mix Residential (HMR) for market- rate housing and 13.73 acres to EC. • Scenario 2 – Change 7.4 acres to HMR for market rate housing, 5.5 acres to MMR to support affordable housing and 8.23 acres to EC. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing for the above changes, at 9.B Packet Pg. 149 which time it heard testimony expressing concerns about loss of open space, increased traffic and general impacts of growth. The Planning Commission unanimously forwarded a favorable recommendation to the City Council approve the Amendment based on Scenario 2. At the February 22, 2024 meeting, staff presented the existing and proposed zoning for public hearing and first reading of the ordinance. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: There are no costs aside from in-kind contributions associated with the proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. LEGAL ANALYSIS: The proposed Amendment applies existing policies in the Land Use Element to lands within the City Limits. To approve the Amendment, the City Council must find that the change is consistent with CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and Text Amendments. This includes demonstrated compliance with the Statewide Planning Goals, applicable policies of the Central Point Comprehensive Plan, the State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060) and sufficiency of available or planned public facilities and services. Staff has prepared the application and provided written Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. These findings of fact demonstrate that the proposed Amendment provides needed housing in balance with employment needs and is consistent with the approval criteria summarized above. A Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted and found that the proposed change would decrease traffic impacts and consequently no significant impact is found to the City’s transportation system. Additionally, there are public facilities (i.e. water, sewer and stormwater) available and planned to the both sites that are the subject of this application. Note: The Findings for the Zone Map Amendment are consolidated with the Findings for the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPA-23001). However, the specific findings that support the zone map amendment are specifically identified by staff. COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: Strategic Priority: Community Investment, Goal 6 – Meet the housing needs of Central Point residents and businesses. . Strategy 1 – Rely on the findings, policies and implementation of the City’s Comprehensive Plan Population, Housing and Economic Elements. Strategy 2 – Support and Capitalize on opportunities to collaborate on projects with agencies who specialize in providing affordable housing. Strategy 3 – Pursue grant and/or Urban Renewal assistance in making housing affordable and accessible to residents. Comment: The proposed Amendment is targeted toward implementing the City’s Housing and Economic Elements to provide both residential and employment uses. The City recognizes it has a housing shortage of approximately 2,800 housing units and affordability for all segments of the population is challenging. The proposed Amendment leverages partnerships with local land developers who have prepared preliminary plans to provide affordable, accessible housing in Central Point in the near-term. 9.B Packet Pg. 150 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance No. _____ an Ordinance Amending the Central Point Zoning Map on properties located at the intersection of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street and 1777 East Pine Street to support increased housing production. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance (ZC-23001) 9.B Packet Pg. 151 Ordinance No. _________; Council Meeting (___/___/2024) ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CENTRAL POINT ZONING MAP ON PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF TAYLOR ROAD AND NORTH HASKELL STREET AND 1777 EAST PINE STREET TO SUPPORT INCREASED HOUSING PRODUCTION. Recitals: A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning Goals. B. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals and compatibility with City Comprehensive Plans. C. Pursuant to authority granted by the City Charter and the ORS, the City may amend the Central Point Zoning Map which was originally adopted on August 29, 1980 and has been amended at various times since. D. The Minor Zoning Map Amendment includes the following changes: a. Change the Civic zoning designation to Medium Mix Residential (MMR) on 0.9 acres at the corner of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street as shown in Exhibit A, including property identified on the Jackson County Assessor’s Map as 37S 2W 03DC, Tax Lots 3402, 3603 (0.73 acres) and 37S 2W 10ab, Tax Lot 1300 (0.18 acres). b. Change the Tourist and Office Professional (C-4) zone at 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 03D, Tax Lot 100) to the following and as shown in Exhibit B: i. 7.9 acres to High Mix Residential (HMR) ii. 5.5 acres to Medium Mix Residential (MMR) iii. 8.23 acres to Employment Commercial (EC) c. Extend the TOD Overlay boundary to include the property at 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 03D, Tax Lot 100 and a portion of the adjoining right-of-way as shown in Exhibit B. E. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.10.100 Zoning Map and Zoning Code Text Amendments – Purpose and Chapter 17.05.010, Applications and Development Permit Review Procedures, the City has accepted an application and conducted the following duly advertised public hearings to consider the proposed amendment: 9.B.a Packet Pg. 152 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e ( Z C - 2 3 0 0 1 ) [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 5 : M i n o r Z o n e M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Ordinance No. _________; Council Meeting (___/___/2024) a. Planning Commission hearing on February 6, 2024 b. City Council hearing on February 22, 2024. F. At the February 22, 2024 public hearing, the Council considered the staff report and all testimony and evidence in the record. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Based upon all the information received in the record, the City Council adopts the City staff report dated February 22, 2024; the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Sections 1, 2, 7, 8 and 9; and Planning Commission Resolution No. 917 including all exhibits thereto, and herein incorporated by reference; and determines that changing community conditions, needs and desires justify the amendments and hereby adopts the changes entirely. Section 2. The City zoning map is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit A and B which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 3. The City Manager is directed to conduct post acknowledgement procedures defined in ORS 197.610 et seq. upon adoption of the changes to the zoning and Comprehensive Plan maps. Section 4. Effective date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance enacted by the council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _____________________, 2024. __________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: _____________________________ City Recorder 9.B.a Packet Pg. 153 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e ( Z C - 2 3 0 0 1 ) [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 5 : M i n o r Z o n e M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Ordinance No. _________; Council Meeting (___/___/2024) EXHIBIT A MMR 9.B.a Packet Pg. 154 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e ( Z C - 2 3 0 0 1 ) [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 5 : M i n o r Z o n e M a p A m e n d m e n t ) Ordinance No. _________; Council Meeting (___/___/2024) EXHIBIT B MMR HMR EC 9.B.a Packet Pg. 155 At t a c h m e n t : O r d i n a n c e ( Z C - 2 3 0 0 1 ) [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( 2 0 2 4 - 1 5 : M i n o r Z o n e M a p A m e n d m e n t ) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: City Attorney FROM: Sydnee Dreyer, City Attorney MEETING DATE: March 14, 2024 SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending Ord. No. 2107- Arts Commission Membership ACTION REQUIRED: Motion Ordinance 1st Reading RECOMMENDATION: None Forwarded BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Recently the Council adopted Ordinance No. 2107 which amended CPMC 2.59.030, to expand the membership requirements for the Arts Commission. This amendment was recommended, given that historically the City has had difficulty finding a sufficient number of volunteers for this commission. Prior to adoption of Ordinance No. 2107, at least 5 members had to be residents within City limits, and the 6th and 7th members could be either a resident of the City or reside within the UGB, own or operate a business within the City limits, or be a teacher with School District No. 6 working within City limits. The 2023 revision modified the membership requirements such that a minimum of 4 members must reside within City limits and the remaining 3 could establish membership as provided above. Recently City staff was approached by an individual seeking to become a member of the Arts Commission. The individual has a Central Point address, but does not live within City limits or the UGB, and has family members with longstanding businesses in City limits with which she is involved, but is not an owner. The individual has requested that the City consider further expanding the requirements for membership, in order to allow individuals such as herself with longstanding interest in Central Point, an opportunity to serve on the commission. At the February 22, 2024 Council meeting the question of whether to amend the ordinance to further expand the membership qualifications for the Arts Commission was discussed with Council and a variety of options were presented. Per that discussion, Council directed staff to bring back an ordinance allowing the 5th, 6th, and 7th positions to be available to anyone with an interest in the arts in Central Point, and to expand the definition of “owning a business” to include a potential member who has a close family member with a business in city limits. The proposed Ordinance retains the requirement that 4 of the 7 positions must be held by residents within the City limits. The remaining 3 positions could be held by persons that live 9.C Packet Pg. 156 within the UGB; own, or have a close family member that owns a business within city limits; is a teacher for School District No. 6 working in city limits; or, demonstrates an interest in the arts in Central Point. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: None. LEGAL ANALYSIS: None. COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: Expanding the ability of members to serve on the Arts Commission is consistent with the following Council goals: 7. Strive for successful public/private partnerships with the business community, the school district, the library, and other regional governments; 8. Create a unique identity for Central Point; STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Council can approve, modify or reject the proposed ordinance. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to forward the Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2107 - Arts Commission Membership to a second reading. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ord Amending Ch 2.59.030 Arts Commission Membership At Large Positions 9.C Packet Pg. 157 1 – Ordinance No. __________; (Council Meeting __/__/2024) ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2107 - ARTS COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP Recitals: A. Pursuant to CPMC, Chapter 1.01.040, the City Council, may from time to time make revisions to its municipal code which shall become part of the overall document and citation. B. The City has historically had difficulties finding a sufficient number of volunteers to maintain an Arts Commission. Recently the Council adopted Ordinance No. 2107 which modified the membership requirements from a minimum of five city residents, to four city residents, with an additional three members to establish membership through City business ownership/operations, residing within the UGB, or serving as a teacher in School District No. 6. C. Staff has been approached by individuals seeking to expand membership requirements further to allow more flexibility in finding suitable volunteers for the Commission. D. The Council finds it is in the public interest to modify the membership requirements to allow greater flexibility in filling the volunteer positions. E. Words lined through are to be deleted and words in bold are added. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Central Point Municipal Code § 2.59.030 is amended in part to read: 2.59.030 Membership. A. The arts commission shall consist of seven members who shall be selected through an open public process and formally appointed by the mayor with approval of the city council. At least five four members shall be residents within the city limits, and the fifth, sixth and seventh member may either be a resident of the city limits or shall meet at least one of the following requirements: (1) reside within the urban growth boundary of the city as established in the city’s comprehensive plan, (2) own and operate a business within the city limits, or have a close family member who owns and operates a business within city limits, or (3) be a teacher for School District No. 6 working in the city limits, or (4) demonstrate an interest in the arts in the city of Central Point. B. Members must maintain their membership requirements during the course of their terms to continue to hold office. 9.C.a Packet Pg. 158 At t a c h m e n t : O r d A m e n d i n g C h 2 . 5 9 . 0 3 0 A r t s C o m m i s s i o n M e m b e r s h i p A t L a r g e P o s i t i o n s ( 1 8 1 3 : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g O r d . N o . 2 1 0 7 - A r t s 2 – Ordinance No. __________; (Council Meeting __/__/2024) C. Members will be appointed for terms of three years. Three of the initial members shall be appointed for two-year terms to assure that all appointments do not expire at the same time. Terms will expire December 31st of each year. D. The mayor may appoint one member of the city council to attend the arts commission and act as liaison to the city council. E. For purposes of Section A above, a “close family member” means a spouse, registered or unregistered domestic partner, parent, step-parent, or child or step-child of the applicant. F. For purposes of Section A above, a demonstrated interest in the arts in Central Point includes but is not limited to experience or interest with the arts such as professional artists or educators in the arts, prior volunteer work in the arts, and an expressed interest in the arts programs of the city of Central Point. (Ord. 2107 §1, 2023; Ord. 1933 §1, 2010; Ord. 1930 §1(part), 2009). SECTION 2. Codification. Provisions of this Ordinance shall be incorporated in the City Code and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "code", "article", "section", "chapter" or another word, and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered, or re-lettered, provided however that any Whereas clauses and boilerplate provisions (i.e. Recitals A-C) need not be codified and the City Recorder is authorized to correct any cross-references and any typographical errors. SECTION 3. Effective Date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance enacted by the Council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading. PASSED by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this ____ day of _________________ 2024. ___________________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: __________________________________ City Recorder 9.C.a Packet Pg. 159 At t a c h m e n t : O r d A m e n d i n g C h 2 . 5 9 . 0 3 0 A r t s C o m m i s s i o n M e m b e r s h i p A t L a r g e P o s i t i o n s ( 1 8 1 3 : O r d i n a n c e A m e n d i n g O r d . N o . 2 1 0 7 - A r t s City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: City Attorney FROM: Sydnee Dreyer, City Attorney MEETING DATE: March 14, 2024 SUBJECT: Resolution Approving IGA with RVSS - Building Official ACTION REQUIRED: Motion Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Approval BACKGROUND INFORMATION: RVSS approached the City about entering into a contract to allow Derek Zwagerman, PE, to serve as the RVSS Building Official. RVSS operates a Building Inspection Program as described in ORS 455.153 and OAR 918-020-0090. The Building Inspection Program must be overseen by a Building Official licensed in the State of Oregon. RVSS’ Building Inspection Program is limited to sanitary sewer service laterals. The scope of Derek’s duties under the contract would be fairly limited to annual review of the Building Inspection Program Operating Plan, submittal of required forms to the Oregon Building Codes Division, and provision of code interpretations when needed. Reimbursement for these services would be billed on an hourly basis FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: LEGAL ANALYSIS: The City is empowered by Oregon Revised Statute Chapter 190 to enter into intergovernmental agreements for the purpose of furthering the economy and efficiency of local governments. COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: Responsible Governance STRATEGY 2 – Work with partner agencies and stakeholders to eliminate redundancy and maximize efficiency in all areas. 9.D Packet Pg. 160 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Make a motion to approve the resolution. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. ____ a Resolution approving that Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Central Point and Rogue Valley Sewer Services for Building Official Services and authorizing the City Manager to execute same. ATTACHMENTS: 1. IGA - RVSS - Building Official 2. Reso - IGA RVSS Building Official 9.D Packet Pg. 161 1 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT AND ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL SERVICES This agreement is made and entered this day of , 2024 by and between the following parties City of Central Point “City” Rogue Valley Sewer Services “RVSS” 140 South 3rd St 138 West Vilas Road Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 RECITALS 1. The Parties are empowered by Oregon Revised Statute Chapter 190 to enter into intergovernmental agreements for the purpose of furthering the economy and efficiency of local governments. 2. RVSS operates a Building Inspection Program as described in ORS 455.153 and OAR 918-020-0090. 3. RVSS’ Building Inspection Program is limited to sanitary sewer service laterals. 4. The Building Inspection Program must be overseen by a Building Official licensed in the State of Oregon. 5. Derek Zwagerman, PE is an employee of the City and a licensed Building Official who serves as the City’s Building Official. 6. RVSS is desirous of having the City’s Building Official also serve as the Building official for RVSS. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective _________, 2024. 3. Services. Derek Zwagerman, PE, as an employee of the City of Central Point, will serve as the Building Official for RVSS. The duties of the Building Official include, but are not limited to the following: a. Annual review of RVSS’ Building Inspection Program Operating Plan to ensure that the plan remains in compliance with Oregon Building Codes Division regulations. b. Submittal of required renewal forms and program updates to the Oregon Building Codes Division. c. Provision of code interpretations upon request. 4. Compensation. RVSS shall reimburse City for the actual expenses incurred for the services provided. For purposes of this Agreement, actual cost shall be considered a flat rate cost in the amount of $100.00 per hour. 9.D.a Packet Pg. 162 At t a c h m e n t : I G A - R V S S - B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l ( 1 8 1 5 : R e s o l u t i o n A p p r o v i n g I G A w i t h R V S S - B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l ) 2 5. Billing. City shall invoice RVSS quarterly for services provided. RVSS shall pay such invoices within 15-business days of the date of such invoice. 6. Personnel. No employees will be formally transferred pursuant to this Agreement. City and RVSS will continue to pay their own employees and shall keep accurate records of hours worked pursuant to this Agreement. City and RVSS are subject employers under ORS Chapter 656, and shall procure and maintain current valid workers’ compensation insurance coverage for all subject workers throughout the period of this Agreement. This Agreement does not change the status of any employee, contractor or officer of City or RVSS. 7. Term. The term of this Agreement will extend for four (4) years from the Effective Date; subsequently, it shall automatically renew for successive one (1) year terms. Either party may terminate this agreement at any time upon provision of at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other party of its intent to terminate this Agreement. Termination of this Agreement shall not affect any obligations or liabilities accrued to the parties prior to such termination. 8. Insurance Coverage. RVSS shall obtain and maintain insurance coverage as follows: a. Workers’ Compensation insurance in compliance with ORS Chapter 656, if RVSS employs “subject workers”. b. Comprehensive General Liability insurance applicable to the services provided to the City, with a combined single limit, or the equivalent, of not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence for Bodily Injury, Personal Injury, and Property Damage, including contractual liability coverage applicable to the indemnity provided under this Agreement. c. Automobile Liability insurance applicable to the operation of RVSS’ trucks or automobiles with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 each accident for Bodily Injury and Property Damage, including coverage for owned, non-owned, and hired vehicles, as applicable. d. Notice of Cancellation or Change. There shall be no cancellation, material change, reduction of limits without 30 days prior written notice from RVSS or its insurer(s) to the City. e. Certificates of Insurance. As evidence of the insurance coverages required by this Agreement, RVSS shall provide acceptable insurance certificates to the City as soon as practicable upon the City’s written request. If requested, complete copies of insurance policies, shall be provided to the City. 9. Limitations on Liability. All parties agree that each party shall not be subject to claim, action or liability arising in any manner whatsoever out of any act or omission, interruption, or cessation of services by the other party under this Agreement. Neither party shall be liable or responsible for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages sustained by the other party to this Agreement, including but not limited to delay, or interruption of business activities that may result in any manner whatsoever from any act or omission, interruption or cessation of services. 9.D.a Packet Pg. 163 At t a c h m e n t : I G A - R V S S - B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l ( 1 8 1 5 : R e s o l u t i o n A p p r o v i n g I G A w i t h R V S S - B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l ) 3 10. Indemnity. Subject to the limitations and conditions of the Oregon Tort Claims Act, ORS 30.260-300, the Oregon Constitution, Article XI, Section 7 and the terms of any applicable policies of insurance, the parties agree to save, hold harmless, and indemnify each other, including their officers, agents and employees, from any loss, damage, injury, claim, or demand by a third party against either party to this agreement arising from the activities of the other party in connection with this Agreement. Neither party shall be liable for any loss, damage, injury, claim, or demand against each other arising from their respective activities in connection with this agreement, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein. 11. Non-Discrimination. Each party agrees that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, creed, national origin, sex marital status, or age, suffer discrimination in the performance of this Agreement when employed by either party. Each party agrees to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, with Section V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and with all applicable requirement of federal and state civil rights and rehabilitation statutes, rules and regulations. Each party shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, ORS 659A.142, and all regulations and administrative rules established pursuant to those laws. 12. Dispute Resolution. If the terms of this agreement are breached and the parties cannot reach agreement, both parties agree to proceed with binding arbitration regardless of the claim amount. The attorney for each party shall select a neutral third party to arbitrate. Arbitration costs and attorney fees shall be allocated by the arbitrator. 13. Miscellaneous 13.1 Jurisdiction and Venue. This Agreement has been made, and shall be construed, in accordance with the laws of the State of Oregon. The City and the RVSS agree that any suit or action pertaining to the enforcement of the terms of this Lease shall be filed or brought in Jackson County, Oregon. 13.2 Successors. This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the benefit of any successor or assign of the City and/or any successor or assign of the RVSS. 13.3 Headings. The section and subsection headings contained herein are for convenience in reference and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Agreement. 13.4 Attorney Fees. In any action or arbitration brought by the other party under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover interest, costs, and reasonable attorney fees, as set by the court or arbitrator, or if on appeal, by the appellate court. 13.5 Force Majeure. Neither party to this Agreement shall hold the other responsible for damages or delay in performance caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts, accidents, pandemic, or other events beyond the control of the other or the other’s officers, employees or agents. 9.D.a Packet Pg. 164 At t a c h m e n t : I G A - R V S S - B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l ( 1 8 1 5 : R e s o l u t i o n A p p r o v i n g I G A w i t h R V S S - B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l ) 4 13.6 Partial Invalidity. If any term, covenant, condition, or provision of this Lease is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effective and shall in no way be affected, impaired, or invalidated thereby. 13.7 Non-Waiver. The failure of either party to insist upon strict performance of any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy that either party may have, and shall not be deemed a waiver of the right to require strict performance of all the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Agreement thereafter, nor a waiver of any remedy for the subsequent breach or default of any term, covenant or condition of the Agreement. Any waiver, in order to be effective, must be signed by the party whose right or remedy is being waived. 13.8 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original but all of which shall constitute one instrument. 13.9 Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties and shall supersede all previous communications, representations, or agreements, whether verbal or written, between the parties hereto. Any modifications, changes, additions, or deletions to this Agreement must be approved by the parties in writing and attached and incorporated by reference into this Agreement. DATED this ________ day of ________________________, 2024. City of Central Point By: _________________________________ ____________________________________ Its __________________________________ STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss County of Jackson ) On this ___________day of __________________, 2024, before me personally appeared _________________________________________, _____________________________ of the City of Central Point, and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of the City of Central Point. ______________________________ Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: ________ 9.D.a Packet Pg. 165 At t a c h m e n t : I G A - R V S S - B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l ( 1 8 1 5 : R e s o l u t i o n A p p r o v i n g I G A w i t h R V S S - B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l ) 5 ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES Countersigned By: _________________________________ By: ______________________________ Kay Harrison, Chair Carl Tappert P.E., Manager Board of Directors STATE OF OREGON ) ) ss County of Jackson ) On this ____ day of _______________, 2024, before me personally appeared Kay Harrison, Chair of the Board, and Carl Tappert, Manager of the Rogue Valley Sewer Services and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of the Rogue Valley Sewer Services. _____________________________ Notary Public for Oregon My Commission Expires: ________ 9.D.a Packet Pg. 166 At t a c h m e n t : I G A - R V S S - B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l ( 1 8 1 5 : R e s o l u t i o n A p p r o v i n g I G A w i t h R V S S - B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l ) Res. No.___________; March 14, 2024 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. ______________ A RESOLUTION APPROVING THAT INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT AND ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAME Recitals: A. The City and the District have authority to enter into intergovernmental agreements pursuant to ORS Chapter 190. B. RVSS operates a Building Inspection Program as described in ORS 455.153 and OAR 918-020-0090. C. The Building Inspection Program must be overseen by a Building Official licensed in the State of Oregon. D. The City employs a licensed Building Official who serves as the City’s Building Official. E. RVSS is desirous of having the City’s Building Official also serve as the Building official for RVSS. F. The City finds it is in the public interest to contract for provision of these services. The City of Central Point resolves as follows: Section 1. The Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Central Point and Rogue Valley Sewer Services for Building Official Services, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute said agreement. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this _____ day of March, 2024. _______________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: ______________________________ City Recorder 9.D.b Packet Pg. 167 At t a c h m e n t : R e s o - I G A R V S S B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l ( 1 8 1 5 : R e s o l u t i o n A p p r o v i n g I G A w i t h R V S S - B u i l d i n g O f f i c i a l ) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Public Works FROM: Matt Samitore, Parks and Public Works Director MEETING DATE: March 14, 2024 SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting the Lowest Qualified Bid from _____ for the Cedar to Bush to Railroad Tracks Water Improvement Project and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract ACTION REQUIRED: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Approval BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City conducted a bid-letting procedure for the Waterline Improvement Project - Cedar to Bush - to the railroad tracks. The engineer’s estimate for the project was $200,000. Bids will be opened on March 12, 2024. Staff will present the low bidders to the Council at the meeting. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: The Cedar to Bush to the railroad tracks project was budgeted in the 2023/25 Water Budget and the Development Commission budget under the titles of South Haskell Street and Miscellaneous Public Works Projects. The project is needed to stabilize east-west pressure and move an older asbestos concrete waterline for economic development. LEGAL ANALYSIS: The City of Central Point public contracts/bidding is governed by Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) Chapter 279 and Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) Chapter 2.40. COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: Community Investment; Goal 5 – Plan, design, and construct modern and efficient infrastructure in all areas and systems. Strategies 3 and 4. 9.E Packet Pg. 168 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a resolution awarding the Cedar to Bush to the railroad waterline improvement project to _______. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. _____ a Resolution Accepting the Lowest Qualified Bid from _______________ for the Construction of the Cedar to Bush to Railroad Tracks Waterline Improvement Project and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Cedar St to Bush Water Main Relocation 2023-12-14 2. resol_cedarbush_march2024 3. DJC 2nd advert 9.E Packet Pg. 169 Dec. 14, 2023 CBWM-P-COV.DWG CITY OF CENTRAL POINT CEDAR STREET TO BUSH STREET WATERMAIN RELOCATION CB CATCH BASIN CONC CONCRETE CL CENTERLINE CPEP CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE CSBC CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE CSTC CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE DIAM DIAMETER DI DUCTILE IRON DWG DRAWING E EASTING ELEV ELEVATION EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT EX EXISTING HMA HOT MIXED ASPHALT L LEFT LT LEFT LF LINEAR FEET N NORTHING PE POLYETHYLENE PROP PROPOSED PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE R RIGHT RT RIGHT ROW RIGHT-OF-WAY SPEC SPECIFICATIONS SS SANITARY SEWER SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ST STORM STA STATION LINE STD STANDARD SY SQUARE YARDS TCP TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN TYP TYPICAL W WATER WINTER 2023 CONTACT AGENCY PHONE GREG GRAVES CITY OF CENTRAL POINT (541) 664-3321 x225 TYLER DUNCAN, P.E. RH2 ENGINEERING (541) 326-4448 NICK BAKKE RVSS (541) 665-6300 ERIC CHASE CHARTER (541) 210-0827 RYLAN WOOD PACIFIC POWER (541) 858-3204 ELI HABERMAN AVISTA (541) 690-0901 CAMERON DIBETTA LUMEN (541) 324-0549 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ONE CALL 811 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER AT 503-232-1978 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES THAT SPILLS BE REPORTED TO THE FOLLOWING ENTITIES: OREGON EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEM:1-800-452-0311 THE NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER:1-800-424-8802 REPORT SPILLS X X SECTION AND DETAIL REFERENCES THE FOLLOWING CONVENTIONS HAVE BEEN USED WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS TO REFER THE READER BETWEEN THE SECTION/DETAIL AND THE PLAN FROM WHICH IT IS REFERENCED. REFERENCE BUBBLES PLAN REFERENCE BUBBLE - REFERS READER BACK TO THE PLAN FROM WHICH THE DETAIL OR SECTION ORIGINATED. DETAIL/SECTION REFERENCE BUBBLE - REFERS READER TO THE DRAWING ON WHICH THE DETAIL OR SECTION IS LOCATED. WHERE,X = SECTION/DETAIL REFERENCE ID* = DRAWING NUMBER ON WHICH DETAIL ORIGINATED OR RESIDES. *SECTION/DETAIL REFERENCE ID CONVENTIONS: SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOULD HAVE A LETTER REFERENCE ID (A - ZZ) AND DETAILS SHOULD HAVE A NUMERICAL REFERENCE ID (0 - 999) DRAWING INDEX CONTACT PERSONNEL SURVEY NOTES PROJECT LOCATION MAPPROJECT VICINITY MAP PROJECT LOCATION JACKSON COUNTY CENTRAL POINT 91486 OREGON EXPIRES:12/31/2023 T Y L E R MARKUS D U N C A N REGIS T E R ED PROFES S IO N A LENGINEE R S EPT 13, 2 0 16 ABBREVIATIONS SURVEY REFERENCE NOTES: FIELD AND OFFICE EQUIPMENT/SOFTWARE UTILIZED: TRIMBLE S7 ROBOTIC TOTAL STATIONS, TRIMBLE R10 GNSS EQUIPMENT, TRIMBLE TSC7 DATA COLLECTORS WITH TRIMBLE ACCESS SOFTWARE, TRIMBLE BUSINESS CENTER SOFTWARE AND TRIMBLE TERRAMODEL SOFTWARE. LINEAR UNIT (HORIZONTAL): INTERNATIONAL FOOT (IFT). LINEAR UNIT (VERTICAL): U.S. SURVEY FOOT (USFT). VERTICAL DATUM: NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) GEODETIC INFORMATION: DATUM: NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (NAD) OF 1983 (2011) EPOCH 2010.00 SYSTEM: OREGON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM ZONE: SOUTH ZONE 3602 PROJECTION: LAMBERT CONIC CONFORMAL LATITUDE OF GRID ORIGIN: 41°40'00" N LONGITUDE OF CENTRAL MERIDIAN: 120°30'00" W NORTHING AT GRID ORIGIN: 0.000 M EASTING AT CENTRAL MERIDIAN: 1,500,000 M (4,921,259.843 IFT) ** COORDINATE SYSTEM PROJECTED TO GROUND AT 0,0 (ELEV = 1275 USFT) ** THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS GEODETIC NORTH. NOTE THAT THE GRID BEARINGS SHOWN OR IMPLIED HEREON DO NOT EQUAL GEODETIC NORTH DUE TO MERIDIAN CONVERGENCE. THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED UTILIZING THE GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM (GNSS) REFERENCED TO THE NATIONAL SPATIAL REFERENCE SYSTEM (NSRS). NSRS COORDINATE VALUES WERE ESTABLISHED VIA TRIMBLE R10 GPS EQUIPMENT, A TRIMBLE TSC7 DATA COLLECTOR WITH TRIMBLE ACCESS SOFTWARE, AND RTK METHODS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ORGN (OREGON REAL-TIME GPS NETWORK). THENCE PROJECTED SAID NSRS COORDINATES ONTO SAID OREGON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE 3602. ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS (ELEVATIONS) ARE REFERENCED TO THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88). UTILIZING SAID R10 GNSS EQUIPMENT AND REAL-TIME KINEMATIC (RTK) METHODS TO ESTABLISH PRIMARY CONTROL. UTILZING SAID TRIMBLE S7 ROBOTIC INSTRUMENTS AND CLASSIC TERRESTRIAL METHODS, ESTABLISHED SECONDARY AND TERTIARY CONTROL AND CAPTURED TOPOGRAPHIC DATA. GENERAL SURVEY NOTES: THE PROPERTY AND RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES DEPICTED HEREON, ARE BASED ON LIMITED TIES TO FOUND MONUMENTS AND RECORD SUBDIVISION PLATS. SAID LINES ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS ONLY AND ARE NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR UTILIZED FOR THEIR TRUE LOCATIONS. CONTOURS: 0.5-FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL; 1-FOOT INDEX CONTOUR INTERVAL. ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, AS DEPICTED HEREON, WERE LOCATED WITH REASONABLE ACCURACY, AS MARKED ON THE GROUND BY AFFECTED AGENCIES AND UTILITY COMPANIES. OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CHAPTER 952, DIVISION 1, DEFINITIONS, 952-001-0010 (21), STATES: "REASONABLE ACCURACY" MEANS LOCATION, WITHIN 24 INCHES, OF THE OUTSIDE LATERAL DIMENSIONS OF BOTH SIDES OF AN UNDERGROUND FACILITY. PROJECT AREA W PIN E S T CEDA R S T S H A S K E L L S T S F R O N T S T H W Y 9 9 BEALL LN BUSH S T S H A S K E L L S T SHEET NO.SHEET TITLE DWG NO. 9.E.a Packet Pg. 170 At t a c h m e n t : C e d a r S t t o B u s h W a t e r M a i n R e l o c a t i o n 2 0 2 3 - 1 2 - 1 4 ( 1 8 1 8 : C e d a r - B u s h W a t e r l i n e - B i d O p e n i n g ) RESTRAINED JOINT WATERMAIN WATERMAIN FIRE HYDRANT WATER METER THRUST BLOCK WATER VALVE RESTRAINED JOINT FITTING DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY ABANDONMENT LIMITS DCVA CI T Y O F C E N T R A L P O I N T CE D A R S T R E E T T O B U S H S T R E E T WA T E R L I N E R E L O C A T I O N PROPOSED LEGENDEXISTING LEGEND JL C TM D De c 1 3 , 2 0 2 3 De c 1 4 , 2 0 2 3 CP T 22 - 0 0 1 5 CB W M - P - C O V . D W G SHOWN G01 02 06 DWG NO.: DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N RE V I S I O N S BY RE V I E W EN G I N E E R : SA V E D A T E : RE V I E W E D : PL O T D A T E : CL I E N T : FI L E N A M E : SHEET NO.: JO B N O . : NO . 0"1"2" DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN BAR MEASURES 2" SCALE: GE N E R A L N O T E S CE N T R A L PO I N T 91486 OREGON EXPIRES:12/31/2023 T Y L ER MARKUS D U N C AN REGIS T E R E D PROFES S IO N A LENGINEE R S EPT 13 , 2 0 1 6 SURVEY NOTES PROJECT INFORMATION CRITERIA REFERENCES GENERAL CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES (CONTINUED) SITE UTILITIES UTILITIES (CONTINUED) WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION NOTES DEMOLITION NOTES TRAFFIC CONTROL GENERAL TESC WATER MAIN ABANDONMENT NOTES GENERAL NOTES LEGEND 9.E.a Packet Pg. 171 At t a c h m e n t : C e d a r S t t o B u s h W a t e r M a i n R e l o c a t i o n 2 0 2 3 - 1 2 - 1 4 ( 1 8 1 8 : C e d a r - B u s h W a t e r l i n e - B i d O p e n i n g ) 144' A 0' A 100' A 274' B 0' B 100' B 20 0 ' B YADAV LAXMI YADAV SUNIL TAX LOT 7300 37 2W 11BB DEVELOPMENT LC BRIAN HIGH TAX LOT 4100 37 2W 11BC DEVELOPMENT LC BRIAN HIGH TAX LOT 4200 37 2W 11BC DEVELOPMENT LC BRIAN HIGH TAX LOT 4400 37 2W 11BC DEBO TIMOTHY L DEBO DAWN M TAX LOT 4401 37 2W 11BC ENTERPRISES LLC GEIGER TAX LOT 101 37 2W 10AD ALVAREZ, KRISTINA ALVAREZ, TIMOTHY TAX LOT 4500 37 2W 11BC BU S H S T R E E T C E D A R S T R E E T S. FRONT STREET DCVA NEW 15' WATER LINE EASEMENT 15' EX WATERLINE EASEMENT TO BE ELIMINATED ALIGNMENT A PROFILE 1270' 1280' 1290' 1270' 1280' 1290' -10 LF 0 LF 100 LF 150 LF ALIGNMENT B PROFILE 1270' 1280' 1290' 1270' 1280' 1290' -10 LF 0 LF 100 LF 200 LF 280 LF PR O P . C O N N E C T I O N TO E X I S T I N G PR O P . C O N N E C T I O N TO E X I S T I N G PR O P . C O N N E C T I O N TO E X I S T I N G PR O P . TE E PR O P . C O N N E C T I O N TO E X I S T I N G PR O P . 90 ° B E N D PR O P . 90 ° B E N D PR O P . 45 ° B E N D PR O P . 45 ° B E N D PR O P . 45 ° B E N D PR O P . 45 ° B E N D 1.0' 2.3' PR O P . VA L V E PR O P . 4 5 ° VE R T . B E N D PR O P . 4 5 ° VE R T . B E N D PR O P . 4 5 ° VE R T . B E N D PR O P . 4 5 ° VE R T . B E N D PR O P . HY D R A N T T E E LAY PIPE CONTINUOUSLY RISIN G TO AVOID LOCAL HIGH/LOW PO I N T S APPROX. STA 0+01.0A, 0.0' R, PROVIDE: (1) - CONNECTION TO EXISTING (1) - 8" DI LONG BODY SLEEVE (2) - 8" DI SPOOL (PExPE) (1) - 8" GATE VALVE (RJxRJ) (1) - 12" x 8" DI REDUCER (RJxRJ) (2) - 12" DI SPOOL (PExPE) (2) - 12" DI 45° BEND (RJxRJ) WITH CONCRETE BLOCKING APPROX. STA 1+26.8A, 0.0' R, PROVIDE: (2) - 12" DI 45° BEND (RJxRJ) WITH CONCRETE BLOCKING (1) - APPROX 11 LF OF 12" RJ DI PIPE (1) - 12" DI SPOOL (PExPE) (1) - 12" HYMAX COUPLING (1) - CONNECTION TO EXISTING APPROX. STA 0+02.0B, 0.0' L, PROVIDE: (1) - CONNECTION TO EXISTING (1) - 12" DI LONG BODY SLEEVE (2) - 12" DI SPOOL (PExPE) (1) - 12" DI 90° BEND (RJxRJ) (1) - 12" GATE VALVE (RJxRJ) APPROX. STA 1+01.4B, 0.0' R, PROVIDE: (1) - 12" DI 90° BEND (RJxRJ) WITH CONCRETE BLOCKING 1 PROVIDE APPROX 70 LF OF 12" RJ DI PIPE APPROX. STA 1+96.9B, 0.0' L, PROVIDE: (1) - 12" x 6" DI TEE (RJxRJ) WITH CONCRETE BLOCKING (3) - 6" DI SPOOL (PExPE) (2) - 12" DI 45° BEND VERTICAL (RJxRJ), SURROUND IN CLSM (1) - 6" RJ DI PIPE, LENGTH TO FIT (1) - 6" GATE VALVE (RJxRJ) (1) - FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY , DEPTH: 3'-6" ALIGNMENT A ALIGNMENT B APPROX. STA 0+92.5A, 12.7' L, PROVIDE: CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER METER APPROX. STA 0+38.6A, 10.8' L, PROVIDE: CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER METER APPROX. STA 0+43.6A, 73.8' R, PROVIDE: (1) - 1-1/2" WATER METER APPROX. STA 0+45.5A, 73.9' , PROVIDE: (1) - 1" WATER METER WATER MAIN NOTES WATER SERVICE NOTES APPROX. STA 1+71.5B, 0.0' L, PROVIDE: (2) - 12" DI 45° BEND VERTICAL (RJxRJ), SURROUND IN CLSM (1) - PROVIDE 12" RJ DI PIPE, LENGTH TO FIT 2 3 4 W-3 PROVIDE APPROX 110 LF of 12" RJ DI PIPE PROVIDE APPROX 42 LF OF 12" RJ DI PIPE APPROX. STA 2+39.1B, 0.0' L, PROVIDE: (2) - 12" DI 45° BEND VERTICAL (RJxRJ), SURROUND IN CLSM (1) - PROVIDE 12" RJ DI PIPE, LENGTH TO FIT APPROX. STA 2+63.0B, 0.0' L, PROVIDE: (2) - 12" GATE VALVE (RJxRJ) (5) - 12" DI SPOOL (PExPE) (1) - 12" DI LONG BODY SLEEVE (1) - 12" DI TEE (RJxRJ) WITH CONCRETE BLOCKING (2) - 12" HYMAX COUPLING (2) - CONNECTION TO EXISTING APPROX. STA 1+68.6B, 3.8' R, PROVIDE: (1) - 2" COMBINATION AIR RELEASE & VACUUM VALVE ASSEMBLY PROVIDE APPROX 90 LF OF 12" RJ DI PIPE PROVIDE APPROX 20 LF OF 12" RJ DI PIPE PROVIDE APPROX 19 LF OF 12" RJ DI PIPE 1.REFER TO CITY OF CENTRAL POINT STANDARD DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INSTALLATION, TESTING, DISINFECTION, AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. 2.DEFLECT PIPE TO ACHIEVE ALIGNMENT AS SHOWN. DEFLECTION SHALL BE LIMITED TO 80% OF THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 3.CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE EXISTING UTILITY CROSSINGS AND TIE-IN LOCATIONS TO DETERMINE DEPTH, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER IF CONFLICT ARISES WITH CURRENT DESIGN SHOWN. 4.LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES ARE FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF DESIGN. EXACT LOCATION AND COMPLETENESS ARE NOT GUARANTEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY AND UNDERGROUND SERVICES ALERT 811 A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION, AND SHALL POTHOLE FOR EXACT UTILITY LOCATIONS. 5.INSTALL TRACER WIRE OVER SERVICE CONNECTIONS. ALL TRACER WIRE SHALL BE #12 GA. BLUE COATED SOLID WIRE. REFER TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. 6.REPLACE ALL DISTURBED CURB, SIDEWALK, AND/OR DRIVEWAYS IN-KIND. GENERAL NOTES CUT EX AC PIPE AS NECESSARY FOR USE AS CASING FOR WATER SERVICES TO MINIMIZE TRENCHING WITHIN ROADWAY. EXISTING WATER SERVICES TO BE ABANDONED PER ABANDONMENT NOTES ON SHEET G01. DO NOT DISTURB RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, TYPICAL. CONSTRUCTION NOTES SET NEW WATER METER BOXES TO BE WITHIN FUTURE PLANTER STRIP, REFER TO EXISTING SIDEWALK AND PLANTER STRIP IN FRONT OF THE NEARBY CAR WASH FOR REFERENCE. CI T Y O F C E N T R A L P O I N T CE D A R S T R E E T T O B U S H S T R E E T WA T E R L I N E R E L O C A T I O N JL C TM D De c 1 4 , 2 0 2 3 De c 1 4 , 2 0 2 3 CP T 22 - 0 0 1 5 CB W M - P - W A T E R P . D W G SHOWN W01 03 06 DWG NO.: DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N RE V I S I O N S BY RE V I E W EN G I N E E R : SA V E D A T E : RE V I E W E D : PL O T D A T E : CL I E N T : FI L E N A M E : SHEET NO.: JO B N O . : NO . 0"1"2" DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN BAR MEASURES 2" SCALE: WA T E R L I N E P L A N A N D P R O F I L E 0 1 CE N T R A L PO I N T 91486 OREGON EXPIRES:12/31/2023 T Y L ER MARKUS D U N C AN REGIS T E R E D PROFES S IO N A LENGINEE R S EPT 13 , 2 0 1 6 PLAN VIEW VICINITY MAP S F R O N T S T S H A S K E L L S T BUSH S T CEDA R S T 9.E.a Packet Pg. 172 At t a c h m e n t : C e d a r S t t o B u s h W a t e r M a i n R e l o c a t i o n 2 0 2 3 - 1 2 - 1 4 ( 1 8 1 8 : C e d a r - B u s h W a t e r l i n e - B i d O p e n i n g ) CI T Y O F C E N T R A L P O I N T CE D A R S T R E E T T O B U S H S T R E E T WA T E R L I N E R E L O C A T I O N JL C TM D De c 1 3 , 2 0 2 3 De c 1 4 , 2 0 2 3 CP T 22 - 0 0 1 5 CB W M - D - D E T . D W G SHOWN D01 04 06 DWG NO.: DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N RE V I S I O N S BY RE V I E W EN G I N E E R : SA V E D A T E : RE V I E W E D : PL O T D A T E : CL I E N T : FI L E N A M E : SHEET NO.: JO B N O . : NO . 0"1"2" DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN BAR MEASURES 2" SCALE: DE T A I L S 0 1 CE N T R A L PO I N T 91486 OREGON EXPIRES:12/31/2023 T Y L ER MARKUS D U N C AN REGIS T E R E D PROFES S IO N A LENGINEE R S EPT 13 , 2 0 1 6 PRELIMINARY 9.E.a Packet Pg. 173 At t a c h m e n t : C e d a r S t t o B u s h W a t e r M a i n R e l o c a t i o n 2 0 2 3 - 1 2 - 1 4 ( 1 8 1 8 : C e d a r - B u s h W a t e r l i n e - B i d O p e n i n g ) 2" DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY1 CONNECT TO WATER SOURCE 2" HOSE 2" DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY 2" GATE VALVE WITH SCREWED FITTING FOR HOSE ATTACHMENT 2" HOSE CONNECT TO PROPOSED WATER MAIN 2" GATE VALVE WITH SCREWED FITTING FOR HOSE ATTACHMENT 2" TEE WITH PRESSURE VALVE. SCREWED FITTING FOR HOSE ATTACHMENT CI T Y O F C E N T R A L P O I N T CE D A R S T R E E T T O B U S H S T R E E T WA T E R L I N E R E L O C A T I O N JL C TM D De c 1 3 , 2 0 2 3 De c 1 4 , 2 0 2 3 CP T 22 - 0 0 1 5 CB W M - D - D E T . D W G SHOWN D02 05 06 DWG NO.: DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N RE V I S I O N S BY RE V I E W EN G I N E E R : SA V E D A T E : RE V I E W E D : PL O T D A T E : CL I E N T : FI L E N A M E : SHEET NO.: JO B N O . : NO . 0"1"2" DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN BAR MEASURES 2" SCALE: DE T A I L S 0 2 CE N T R A L PO I N T 91486 OREGON EXPIRES:12/31/2023 T Y L ER MARKUS D U N C AN REGIS T E R E D PROFES S IO N A LENGINEE R S EPT 13 , 2 0 1 6 PRELIMINARY 9.E.a Packet Pg. 174 At t a c h m e n t : C e d a r S t t o B u s h W a t e r M a i n R e l o c a t i o n 2 0 2 3 - 1 2 - 1 4 ( 1 8 1 8 : C e d a r - B u s h W a t e r l i n e - B i d O p e n i n g ) CI T Y O F C E N T R A L P O I N T CE D A R S T R E E T T O B U S H S T R E E T WA T E R L I N E R E L O C A T I O N JL C TM D De c 1 3 , 2 0 2 3 De c 1 4 , 2 0 2 3 CP T 22 - 0 0 1 5 CB W M - D - D E T . D W G SHOWN D03 06 06 DWG NO.: DA T E DE S C R I P T I O N RE V I S I O N S BY RE V I E W EN G I N E E R : SA V E D A T E : RE V I E W E D : PL O T D A T E : CL I E N T : FI L E N A M E : SHEET NO.: JO B N O . : NO . 0"1"2" DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN BAR MEASURES 2" SCALE: CO N N E C T I O N D E T A I L S 1 CE N T R A L PO I N T 91486 OREGON EXPIRES:12/31/2023 T Y L ER MARKUS D U N C AN REGIS T E R E D PROFES S IO N A LENGINEE R S EPT 13 , 2 0 1 6 CONNECTION AT BUSH STREET FINAL CONFIGURATION TESTING CONFIGURATION 12" DI CAP EX. 12" AC WATER MAIN TO BE REMOVED 12" DI TEE (RJ) W/ CONC BLOCKING WIDE-RANGE COUPLING, HYMAX 2 OR APPROVED EQUAL 12" DI SPOOL (RJxRJ) 12" DI WATER MAIN PER PLAN 4 12" GATE VALVE (RJxRJ) 12" DI LONG BODY SLEEVE (RJxRJ) (2) 12" DI SPOOL (RJxRJ) 12" DI SPOOL (RJxRJ) DISINFECTION TREE ASSEMBLY, SEE STANDARD DETAIL W-17 ON DWG. NO. D02. EX. 12" AC WATER MAIN EX. 12" AC WATER MAIN CONNECTION AT START OF B FINAL CONFIGURATION TESTING CONFIGURATION 3 12" DI CAP EX. 12" DI WATER MAIN TO BE REMOVED EX. 12" DI WATER MAIN 12" GATE VALVE (RJxRJ) 12" GATE VALVE (RJxRJ) 12" DI WATER MAIN PER PLAN PLUG AND ABANDON EX. 8" DI WATER MAIN PER ABANDONMENT NOTES ON SHEET G01 12" DI SPOOL (RJxRJ) 12" GATE VALVE (RJxRJ) 12" DI WATER MAIN PER PLAN 12" DI 90° BEND (RJxRJ) 12" DI LONG BODY SLEEVE (RJxRJ) EX. 12" DI WATER MAIN CONNECTION AT END OF A FINAL CONFIGURATIONTESTING CONFIGURATION 2 CONNECTION AT CEDAR STREET FINAL CONFIGURATION TESTING CONFIGURATION 1 CONNECTION DETAIL NOTES: ·CONC. BLOCKING IS NOT SHOWN IN DETAILS FOR CLARITY. ·CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ANY AND ALL TEMPORARY BLOCKING AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE CONSTRUCTION MEANS AND INTERMEDIATE CONDITIONS. PLUG AND ABANDON EX. 8" DI WATER MAIN PER ABANDONMENT NOTES ON SHEET G01 EX. 8" DI WATER MAIN TO BE REMOVED 12" DI 45° BEND (RJxRJ) ASSUMED CONFIGURATION OF EX. 8" DI WATER MAIN EX. 8" DI WATER MAIN 12" DI WATER MAIN PER PLAN 12" DI WATER MAIN PER PLAN 12" DI SPOOL (RJxRJ) 12" DI 45° BEND (RJxRJ) 12" DI WATER MAIN PER PLAN 12" DI 45° BEND (RJxRJ) 12" DI SPOOL (RJxRJ)8" DI SPOOL (RJxRJ) 8" DI SPOOL (RJxRJ) 8" GATE VALVE (RJxRJ) 12" x 8" DI REDUCER (RJxRJ)8" DI LONG BODY SLEEVE (RJxRJ) EX. 8" DI WATER MAIN PLUG AND ABANDON EX. 8" DI WATER MAIN PER ABANDONMENT NOTES ON SHEET G01 EX. 12" DI WATER MAIN TO BE REMOVED DISINFECTION TREE ASSEMBLY, SEE STANDARD DETAIL W-17 ON DWG. NO. D02. EX. 12" DI WATER MAIN 12" DI WATER MAIN PER PLAN 12" DI 45° BEND (RJxRJ) W/ CONC BLOCKING EX. 12" DI WATER MAIN 12" DI SPOOL (RJxRJ) 12" DI WATER MAIN PER PLAN 12" DI 45° BEND (RJxRJ) W/ CONC BLOCKING 12" DI LONG BODY SLEEVE (RJxRJ) EX. 12" DI WATER MAIN 2" DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL #1 ON DWG. NO. D02 CHLORINE INJECTION POINT 12" DI CAP 12" DI CAP 2" DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY PER DETAIL #1 ON DWG. NO. D02 CHLORINE INJECTION POINT 12" GATE VALVE (RJxRJ) 12" DI SPOOL (RJxRJ) 9.E.a Packet Pg. 175 At t a c h m e n t : C e d a r S t t o B u s h W a t e r M a i n R e l o c a t i o n 2 0 2 3 - 1 2 - 1 4 ( 1 8 1 8 : C e d a r - B u s h W a t e r l i n e - B i d O p e n i n g ) 1 - Resolution No. _________ 3/14/2024 Council meeting) RESOLUTION NO. _______ A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOWEST QUALIFIED BID FROM ______________ FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CEDAR TO BUSH TO RAILROAD TRACKS WATERLINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT RECITALS: A. WHEREAS, the City recently published a solicitation for lowest bids for the construction of the Cedar to Bush to Railroad Tracks Waterline Improvement Project. B. WHEREAS, the City received one qualified bid. C. WHEREAS, the lowest qualified bid was submitted by _____________ for $________________. The City of Central Point resolves as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby accepts the lowest qualified bid from ___________in the amount of $_______________for the construction of the Cedar to Bush to Railroad Tracks Waterline Improvement Project. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a contract and any related documents necessary to effectuate the acceptance of this award in a form substantially the same as that included in the specifications. Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and approval. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _____________________, 2024. __________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: _____________________________ City Recorder 9.E.b Packet Pg. 176 At t a c h m e n t : r e s o l _ c e d a r b u s h _ m a r c h 2 0 2 4 [ R e v i s i o n 1 ] ( 1 8 1 8 : C e d a r - B u s h W a t e r l i n e - B i d O p e n i n g ) Invoice # Invoice Date Customer 745677666 02/26/2024 Payment Terms Due Date City of Central Point, ID: 03/27/2024 A Division of BridgeTower Media P.O Box 745929 Atlanta, GA 30374-5929 BILLING ADDRESS ADVERTISER Cyndi Weeks City of Central Point Central Point OR 975022216 City of Central Point, ID: 54301 Net 30 140 S 3Rd St140 S 3rd St Central Point OR 975022216 INVOICE REF AD SIZEEDITIONDATEMEDIAPOQTY 1007263585 Legal - BidsLegal - Bids02/16/24Daily Journal of Commerce - OR - Public 1 1007264469 Legal - BidsLegal - Bids02/23/24Daily Journal of Commerce - OR - Public 1 $394.68 $0.00 Subtotal Credits $394.68 BALANCE DUE $0.00Tax Thank you for your business! IOID: 2582481 Index: Bids - Other Category: Construction Affidavit Reference: CEDAR STREET TO BUSH STREET WATER MAIN RELOCATION Customer ID Date Amount Enclosed: 745677666 Daily Journal of Commerce - OR - Public Notice Invoice #03/27/2024 ID: 54301, City of Central Point REMITTANCE STUB TO BridgeTower Media Acceptable Payment Methods PREFERRED METHOD OTHER METHODS To Pay by ACH Transfer: Bank: Bank of America Send ACH remittance email to ar@bridgetowermedia.com Account Number: 237025443017 Routing: 053000196 To Pay by Check use the following address:To Pay by Credit Card:To Pay by Wire Transfer: Please include invoice number on check BridgeTower OpCo, LLC P.O Box 745929 Atlanta, GA 30374-5929 Use the Click to Pay Online link located on the email you received or Contact Accounts Receivable: 866-802-8214 Please have your Invoice Number and Credit Card Number Ready Name: BridgeTower OpCo, LLC Bank: Bank of America Swift Code: BOFAUS3N Bank Address: 100 North Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28255 Account Number: 237025443017 Routing: 053000196 9.E.c Packet Pg. 177 At t a c h m e n t : D J C 2 n d a d v e r t ( 1 8 1 8 : C e d a r - B u s h W a t e r l i n e - B i d O p e n i n g ) Daily Journal of Commerce 1618 SW First Ave., Suite 400 Portland, OR, 97201 Phone: 503-226-1311 Fax: 503-222-5358 Affidavit of Publication To:City of Central Point - Cyndi Weeks 140 S 3rd St Central Point, OR, 975022216 Re:Legal Notice 2582481, CEDAR STREET TO BUSH STREET WATER MAIN RELOCATION State of OR } }SS: County of Multnomah } I, Michelle A. Ropp, being duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Principal Clerk of the Daily Journal of Commerce, a newspaper of general circulation in the counties of CLACKAMAS, MULTNOMAH, and WASHINGTON as defined by ORS 193.101 and 193.020, published in Portland in the aforesaid County and State; that I know from my personal knowledge that the notice described as: CEDAR STREET TO BUSH STREET WATER MAIN RELOCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: CEDAR STREET TO BUSH STREET WATER MAIN RELOCATION Bids Due 2:00 pm, March 12, 2024 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS QUESTCDN 8978645 a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper 2 time(s) in the following issues: 02/16/2024 and 02/23/2024. SEE EXHIBIT A State of Oregon County of Multnomah SIGNED OR ATTESTED BEFORE ME ON 26th day of February 2024 Page 1 of 2 Nicholas Bjork Notary Public, State of OR No. 1044188 My commission expires on January 10, 2028 By: Michelle A. Ropp By: 9.E.c Packet Pg. 178 At t a c h m e n t : D J C 2 n d a d v e r t ( 1 8 1 8 : C e d a r - B u s h W a t e r l i n e - B i d O p e n i n g ) EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 2 9.E.c Packet Pg. 179 At t a c h m e n t : D J C 2 n d a d v e r t ( 1 8 1 8 : C e d a r - B u s h W a t e r l i n e - B i d O p e n i n g ) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Community Development FROM: Stephanie Powers, Planning Director MEETING DATE: March 14, 2024 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Report ACTION REQUIRED: Information/Direction RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable The Central Point Planning Commission met at their regular meeting on March 5, 2024. There were two (2) items on the agenda including two (2) quasi-judicial public hearings for a Master Plan and Tentative Subdivision Plan for property within the Eastside Transit Oriented Development (ETOD) Overlay area. Sunnybrook Village TOD Master Plan The Planning Commission opened the public hearing to consider a Master Plan to govern the development of 7.57 acres in the ETOD. Staff presented an introduction to the proposed 42-unit residential land development, including the location, surrounding uses, proposed neighborhood circulation plan and site plan/tentative subdivision layout. During the review process, issues were identified concerning shallow wells, adjacent agriculture uses and general master plan content. The Commission asked general questions about the ETOD development over time, specifically how the street network would be configured. No public testimony was received. The Planning Commission continued the public hearing until the April 2, 2024 Planning Commission as necessary to allow the applicant time to address the issues. Sunnybrook Village Tentative Subdivision Plan The Planning Commission opened the public hearing to consider a Tentative Subdivision Plan for Sunnybrook Village. One the criteria for tentative plan approval in the TOD Overlay is conformance with an approved Master Plan. No public testimony was received. In light of the fact the Planning Commission continued the Sunnybrook Village Master Plan public hearing, they unanimously voted to continue the Tentative Plan public hearing to the April 2, 2024 meeting. Miscellaneous A brief update was provided to the Planning Commission notifying them of forthcoming Pre- Application Conferences for preliminary development plans on the Mon Desir property and one property in the UGB, and the State’s recent approval of Senate Bill 1537 concerning Housing and Infrastructure. The meeting adjourned at approximately 6:35 p.m. 10.A Packet Pg. 180 10.A Packet Pg. 181 City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: City Manager FROM: Chris Clayton, City Manager MEETING DATE: March 14, 2024 SUBJECT: 2024 Community Survey Review ACTION REQUIRED: Consent Agenda Item RECOMMENDATION: None Forwarded BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City Management Team has developed the preliminary version of the 2024 community survey. While the council has been acquainted with earlier drafts, we seek to provide the City Council with one last chance to review, propose changes, or make edits as required. Furthermore, by incorporating the survey into the City Council agenda packet, we're ensuring it's available for public scrutiny. Should it receive approval, the 2024 City Survey will be distributed instead of the City Newsletter towards the end of May. Members of the public will be given the choice to respond either online or face-to-face. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: Previous surveys conducted among citizens and the community have involved hiring a professional consultant, typically incurring costs ranging from $25,000 to $35,000 for the whole project. In contrast, the cost for the 2024 survey is expected to be under $5,000, as the bulk of the work will be carried out by our staff. Traditionally, these surveys have primarily been administered through telephone interviews, which provide statistically valid results. However, this method might not fully capture the breadth of public opinion. LEGAL ANALYSIS: 10.B Packet Pg. 182 Not applicable. COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: Community Engagement Quality communication between government and its citizens and the business community is essential to proactive and responsive governance. GOAL 1 - Build strong relationships between government and its citizens. GOAL 2 - Promote community and city government through volunteerism. STRATEGY 1 – Regularly survey the needs and preferences of Central Point residents. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council review and approve as part of the March 14th City Council consent agenda. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Not Applicable. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2024 Community Survey - Draft 3/5/24 10.B Packet Pg. 183 2024 Community Survey This questionnaire aims to understand expectations and satisfaction of citizens within the City of Central Point incorporated area. It should be completed by an adult, preferably the homeowner or head of household. The information you provide will inform the leaders of the City of Central Point of your priorities for the development and implementation of policies through the budget process over the following two years. The survey should take approximately ?? minutes to complete. We appreciate your time and input. Options to complete the survey: • Printed version – complete and return to the City of Central Point’s City Hall attn: City Recorder • Online version – Scan the QR code to be directed to the survey • Online version – Visit the City of Central Point website and click on the Community Survey button All surveys need to be completed and/or turned in by May 31, 2024 General Community 1. What do you enjoy most about living in Central Point? (Choose all that apply) Quiet neighborhoods Safety Scenery & Environment Schools Small town feel Parks & Open Spaces Recreation & Special Events Other: _____________ 2. How satisfied are you with the City of Central Point regarding the following qualities and conditions in Central Point? 4=Excellent 3=Good 2=Satisfactory 1=Poor 0=Does not apply 4 3 2 1 0 Overall appearance of the City Traffic Flow on Major Streets Ease of Walking in Town Cleanliness of public spaces (i.e. streets, parks, etc.) As a place to live As a place to raise children As a place to work As a place to shop As a place for dining and entertainment As a place to connect and interact with your neighbors 10.B.a Packet Pg. 184 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 4 C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y - D r a f t 3 / 5 / 2 4 ( 1 8 1 7 : 2 0 2 4 C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y R e v i e w ) 3. How well does the City of Central Point meet your needs regarding delivery of the following services? 4=Excellent 3=Good 2=Satisfactory 1=Poor 0=Does not apply 4 3 2 1 0 City’s level of communication with its citizens Accessibility to Council members Quality of customer service received from City employees Enforcement of City Codes and Ordinances Maintenance of City Streets Quality of programs offered through the Recreation Guide Quality of community special events, (i.e. Community Christmas and the 4th of July Parade, etc.) 4. Which items Influence your Perception of the City of Central Point the most? 4=Excellent 3=Good 2=Satisfactory 1=Poor 0=Does not apply 4 3 2 1 0 Quality of Services Provided by the City Value that you receive for your Tax Dollars and Fees Image of the City How well the City is Supporting Growth and Development General Feeling of Safety in the City Quality of New Development 5. In your opinion, what should be the top spending priorities for Central Point’s local government programs? Please rank items by most important (1) to least important (5). Parks facilities Road Maintenance Recreation programs Police Services Economic Development Transportation/Infrastructure 6. Which areas of the transportation and infrastructure do you want to receive the most emphasis over the following two years? (Choose two) Maintenance of major City streets Maintenance of streets in your neighborhood Adequacy of city street lighting in your neighborhood Condition of sidewalks in your neighborhood On-street bicycle infrastructure (bike lanes/signs/arrows) Accessibility of public transportation options Availability of safe pedestrian ways on major streets and routes Availability of safe pedestrian ways in your neighborhood Quality of sidewalks for people with mobility challenges Alternative means of transportation such as transit, bicycling, walking Traffic calming measures in your neighborhood, such as traffic circles, speed humps, or radar speed signs 10.B.a Packet Pg. 185 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 4 C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y - D r a f t 3 / 5 / 2 4 ( 1 8 1 7 : 2 0 2 4 C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y R e v i e w ) Public Safety/Police 7. Please rate your satisfaction with the following police and public safety services in Central Point? 4=Excellent 3=Good 2=Satisfactory 1=Poor 0=Does not apply 4 3 2 1 0 The Visibility of Police in the Community The City’s Overall Efforts to Prevent Crime The Enforcement of Local Traffic Laws Code Enforcement Services How Quickly Police Respond to Emergencies The Response to Drug Control The Response to Property Crime The Level of Community Outreach The Response to Issues with Transients 8. Which areas of code enforcement should receive the Most Emphasis? (Choose two) Enforcement of cleanup of litter and debris on private property Enforcing the mowing/trimming of grass and weeds on private property Enforcing codes designed to protect public safety and health Enforcing sign regulation Planning & Community Development 9. As the City grows, what do you think is most important in maintaining the City’s Small Town Feel? Please rank items by most important (1) to least important (4 or 5) Quality building design Diversity in building design Streetscape design and layout Parks and open spaces are walkable for neighborhood enjoyment Other (Please explain) 10. Please rate your interest in community and land use planning issues including: 3 = Very Interested 2 = Somewhat Interested 1 = Not Interested 3 2 1 planning for the next 20-years of growth revising land development code requirements participating in local land use decisions, such as residential subdivisions, commercial developments, etc. 11. Which of the following topics regarding Community Planning and Development would you like to be featured in the City Newsletter or on Social Media? (Select ALL those that apply) Oregon Land Use Program basics Quarterly updates on land use applications and developments happening around the City How to effectively participate in a public hearing Pending state legislation or rule-making and potential impacts on Central Point How to apply for a permit to build an ADU or remodel your house Other topics of interest (Please describe). _________________________________________ 10.B.a Packet Pg. 186 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 4 C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y - D r a f t 3 / 5 / 2 4 ( 1 8 1 7 : 2 0 2 4 C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y R e v i e w ) Parks & Recreation 12. Have you attended any of the following City Events? Easter Eggstravaganza YES NO Don’t know about this event Made In Southern Oregon YES NO Don’t know about this event 4th of July YES NO Don’t know about this event Movies in the Park YES NO Don’t know about this event Hispanic Heritage Celebration YES NO Don’t know about this event Battle of the Food Trucks YES NO Don’t know about this event Community Christmas YES NO Don’t know about this event 13. What park do you visit the most? (Choose 3) Don Jones Memorial Park Robert Pfaff Park Twin Creeks Park Don and Flo Bohnert Farm Park Flanagan Park Van Horn Park William Mott Memorial Park & Wetland Area 14.The Central Point Little League Baseball Complex Project, originally projected to cost less, now necessitates a total investment of $8 million. A generous private donation of $1.5 million, matched equally by the City, has kickstarted the funding. In the project's initial phase, city personnel will focus on refurbishing several fields and overseeing a substantial portion of site development. Future phases of the project (300’ field, 250’ field, parking facility & lights), however, hinge on the approval of a $4 million general obligation bond by voters. This bond would lead to an increase in property taxes, estimated at an additional $0.25 per $1,000 of assessed property value. To put this into perspective, a property assessed at $450,000 would see an annual increase of $112.50 in property taxes. Given this information, would you support the approval of the general obligation bond to fund future phases of the Central Point Little League Baseball Complex Project? Yes, I support the approval of the general obligation bond. No, I do not support the approval of the general obligation bond. I need more information before making a decision. I have no opinion on this matter. Communication 15. How frequently would you like to receive information from the City? Monthly Quarterly 16. Choose your top three preferred sources to receive News and Information about City Programs, Services, and Events? Monthly Newsletter City Website Public Meetings Newspaper Friends TV Local News Radio Social Media Recreation Guide 10.B.a Packet Pg. 187 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 4 C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y - D r a f t 3 / 5 / 2 4 ( 1 8 1 7 : 2 0 2 4 C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y R e v i e w ) 17. Which of the following topics would you like the City of Central Point to include in the City Newsletter or other outreach platforms? The City Council’s goals Public Safety (Police) Public Works (Infrastructure and Transportation Updates) Special Events Community Development Information Parks and Recreation programs and events Other: _______________________ 18. In terms of communication from the City of Central Point, which two areas listed below could use the most improvement? (Choose two) The availability of information about City programs and services The overall quality of the City's website The quality of content on the City of Central Point Social Media pages Access to bilingual material Demographics 19. Approximately how many years have you lived in Central Point? 0-5 years 5-10 years 10-15 years over 15 years 20. What is the preferred language spoken in your home? English Spanish ASL Other ______________ 21. What is your age? 18-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 over 55 22. Do you work outside of Central Point? YES NO 23. How many children under age 18 live in your household? None 1 2 3 4 or more 24. What is your gender? Male Female Other Prefer not to answer 10.B.a Packet Pg. 188 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 4 C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y - D r a f t 3 / 5 / 2 4 ( 1 8 1 7 : 2 0 2 4 C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y R e v i e w ) 25. Would you say your total annual household income is. Under $50,000 $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,000 $150,000 to $199,999 $200,000 or more Prefer not to answer 26. To validate your response, please provide the following information. Address:______________________________________________ Zip Code: __________ 27. If you have suggestions for improving the quality of City programs, facilities, or services, please enter your suggestions in the space below. 10.B.a Packet Pg. 189 At t a c h m e n t : 2 0 2 4 C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y - D r a f t 3 / 5 / 2 4 ( 1 8 1 7 : 2 0 2 4 C o m m u n i t y S u r v e y R e v i e w ) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Public Works FROM: Matt Samitore, Parks and Public Works Director MEETING DATE: March 14, 2024 SUBJECT: Discussion of adding a Tier 3 Irrigation Rate. ACTION REQUIRED: Information/Direction RECOMMENDATION: None Forwarded BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In January, the City Council approved new water rates that went into effect this past month. At the time of the initial meeting, staff had prepared an option to look at irrigation meters. Staff analysis showed that most high water consumers were Home Owners Associations (HOA). Staff proposes that the City offer irrigation audits and up to 1,000-2,000 per association, potentially $10,000, to implement conservation measures. Conservation measures will be developed for each HOA based on the irrigation audit. Additionally, the staff is suggesting a different rate for the Tier 3 Irrigation. The new rate is 150% of the current rate and would be only for those who use over 100 CCF of water. Additionally, staff proposes that the new rate not go into effect until October of 2024 to allow the audits to occur and be presented to each of the HOAs. This would also allow them to make any proposed changes/fixes before the 2025 irrigation season begins. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: Staff is proposing a new third-tier irrigation rate of 150% of its current rate. The rate would only kick in for those users over 100 ccf of monthly water consumption. The current rate is over 22 ccf, which is 3.42 per ccf. Current and Proposed Irrigation Rates: 10.C Packet Pg. 190 LEGAL ANALYSIS: N/A COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: City of Central Point 2040 Strategic Plan – Strategic Priority – Responsible Governance GOAL 1 - Maintain a strong financial position that balances the need for adequate service levels and capital requirements against the affordability that is desired by our citizens. STRATEGY 1 – Continually update the City’s long-term financial plan/strategy. STRATEGY 2 – Work with partner agencies and stakeholders to eliminate redundancy and maximize efficiency in all areas. STRATEGY 3 – Solicit support from partner agencies in our effort to maintain a robust financial position. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is looking for discussion on the proposed Tier 3 Irrigation Rate. RECOMMENDED MOTION: No recommendation at this point. 10.C Packet Pg. 191