Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes - July 2, 2002City of Central Point Planning Commission July 2, 2002 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL: Chuck Piland, Candy Fish, Don Foster and Wayne Riggs were present. John LeGros, Rick Perry and Paul Lunte were absent. Also in attendance were Tom Humphrey Planning Director; Matt Samitore Community Planner, and Dave Arkens Planning Technician. III. CORRESPONDENCE There was correspondence for item A. IV. MINUTES Commissioner Fish made a motion to approve the minutes from the June 18, 2002 meeting as presented. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Foster, yes and Riggs, yes. Motion passed unanimously. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS A. Public hearing to review an application fora 10 lot subdivision known as Birchwood Village Planned Unit Development (PUD). The subject property is located near the the intersection of Circlewood Drive and Beall Lane in the R-2, Residential Two-Family zoning district on Map 37 2W 12CC, Tax Lot 6300. Tom Humphrey Planning Director, gave an overview of the Comprehensive Plan and the different zone classifications, along with the tables for maximum residential density in each zone. He also stated that there are a number of single family dwellings built within R-2 and R-3 districts which encourages sprawl. The State will begin to ask how the City has used all zones, which could effect future requests for UGB expansion. Cicy of Ccncral Poinc Planning Connnission ~fim¢cs J~~iy z, zooz Page 2 The City was approached several months ago regarding the development of the mentioned property. The PUD alternative, increases the number of units per acre, which would allow better use of land, satisfy the density issues with single family lots,and be amore appealing design style without detracting from the existing homes in the surrounding area. The common area (Lot 10), will be the responsibility of individual home owners through CC & R's, and a homeowners association. Public Works, BCVSA, and Fire District # 3 have all been involved from the onset to make their recommendations. An application forAdministrativevariance (Exhibit "C") was approved, to allow for the lot size being .90 acres, instead of the minimum one acre, for PUD's. Additional PUD criteria is outlined in the Staff Report. This proposed PUD will reduce the cost of utilities and services. It will also reduce the number of flag lots. Paul Grout, agent for the OwnerlApplicant, stated that his intention is to build charming, upscale, open single family dwellings with a courtyard area. He does not want to put in duplexes. He believes that on a scale of 1-10, this development would be an 8. Some homes will be attached, some will be detached. Lots 6 & 7 will be attached and share a driveway. The lean-to on the existing house will be eliminated to keep with design. The new design also incorporates the reccommendations of Fire District # 3. Don Bilberry, of 151 Woodridge Drive, expressed concerns with parking, whether or not the garages were single car, and whether there would be an adequate play area for the children. It was explained that the homes will have single vehicle car ports, in addition to single car garages. Tom Humphrey explained that conditions can be made to provide some play area in the open space. Mr. Bilberry also wondered if this project will interfere with the widening of Beall Lane. There will be a total of 72 feet, with 2 travel lanes, curb, gutter and a turn lane. It was mentioned that the existing paved area of Beall Lane is currently only 24 feet. Erv Tipping, of 157 Woodridge Drive, objected that it had even become a PUD. He stated that looking at it realistically, with the width and height of the proposed homes, there would not be room to plant trees as a buffer. He feels that the designs distributed by Paul Grout were deceiving, because there appears to be approximately 3 feet to plant the trees, unlike the drawing. He also shared the concerns about vehicles having the room to maneuver. Mr. Tipping does not like the design at all, and doesn't believe the development is compatible with surrounding homes. City of Cenral Point Planning Commission Mimttcs July z, zooz Page 3 Don Malloy, of 1355 Circlewood, is an adjoining property owner. He wanted to know the price range of these homes. Though Mr. Grout has not conducted a fair market analysis, he estimates these home will be in the $139,000 - $145,000 price range. Mr. Malloy is concerned about 60 feet of building being 5 feet from his home. He also wanted to know about on street parking. Mr. Malloy said that this is already a very busy, dangerous corner and it is very difficult to turn from Circlewood onto Beall Lane towards Medford. Melvin Coffin,is the owner of a 1 acre parcel at 520 Beall Lane, and a''/2 acre parcel at 508 Beall Lane. His property borders the West side of proposed development. Mr. Coffin , is concerned about traffic issues, does not like the parking idea. He also believes that when Beall Lane is widened, it will bring traffic even closer to homes. He feels that the design is too confining, and does not go well with their area. However, Mr. Coffin does not object to duplexes. The possiblity of children getting into his pond is also of concern to him. He disagrees with cramming people in, and feels that more thought could go into this. Chuck Piland, asked Mr. Coffin if he was aware that his property is also zoned R-2. Mr. Coffin stated that he would never build like this, and that he wants to see something fit better into their area. Daren McKendree, of 158 Woodridge Drive, expressed a concern for a different income level moving into the area, he will be surprised if these proposed homes sell for over $115,000, or if the homeowners will take care of their yards. Mandi Hopkins, of 1380 Circlewood, stated how concerned she iswith the additional traffic and what she will be seeing for a view from her house. Mrs. Hopkins does not want to look at covered parking, a flashing light or stop sign. She wanted to know why they have to abide by their CC & R's only to have more people move in with their own CC & R's to follow. Mrs. Hopkins said that the fees paid to build her house paid for Forest Glen Park down the street, and it's for their use. She sees nothing but a trailer park or row houses when she looks at this project. Tom Humphrey, explained the SDC fee's, and how they contribute to community parks, also that home values city- wide have increased in 2 years. Mrs. Hopkins responded that the value of their homes has increased due to the homeowners in her area and their efforts. Kathy Bilbery, of 151 Woodridge, is also concerned about the kids walking to Howard School, and how dangerous it is. Mrs. Bilbery stated that a sidewalk should be part of the builders proposal. Jessica Prins, of 1106 Circlewood Ct, stated that her main concern is maintenance. She would like the proposal to include a maintenance agreement to match their own. City of Central Poin[ Planning Commission Minutes July 2, 2002 Page 5 Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt Resolution 551, approving the 10 Lot subdivision known as Birchwood Village PUD, subject to staffs recommended conditions of approval, and 1). Common fencing be used throughout the PUD; 2). Special concrete "grass-pave" be used on lots 1,2,3 and 8; 3). a tot lot be added and fenced; 4). Lots 6 & 7 share a common drive; 5). The driveway on lot 10 to be 24' wide; and 6). The applicant will build units at or better than the elevations he has shown. Commissioner Fish made a motion to adopt the resolution. Commissioner Riggs seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Fish, yes; Foster, no; Riggs, yes; motion passed. VII. MISCELLANEOUS Tom Humphrey Planning Director, addressed the Planning Commission, and asked them if there is any thing they would like to see Planning research and bring back to them. He explained that the Planning Department is trying to take a proactive approach. There will be a fence variance coming up for August, but will try to resolve administratively. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Fish made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Foster seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Motion passed unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 9:33 P.M.