HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - May 3, 1988I.
II.
III.
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
155 South Second Street
May 3, 1988
AGENDA
Meeting called to order
Roll call
Approval of minutes
Next Resolution No. 136
IV; Correspondence and pub'1ic appearances
V. Business
Page ~)
1 A. Public Meeting - Review and approval of findings of fact'for a
conditional use permit for E & L Properties, Inc. for a seafood
processing and truck repair facility to be constructed at 890
South Front Street in a C-5 zone (37 2W 11CB, tax lot 800)
5 B. Public Meeting - Review and approval of findings of fact for a
variance for E & L Properties, Inc. for construction of a
building in a required side yard setback area at 890 South
Front Street in a C-5 zone (37 2W 11CB, tax lot 800)
7 C. .Proposed revisions to Central Point Municipal Code Title 16 -
Land Divisions, by Wes Reynolds, Rogue Valley Council of
Governments
19 D. Public Meeting - Review and recommendation to the City Council
regarding an annexation request of approximately 10.13 acres
bounded generally by Taylor Road and the Southern Pacific
Railroad right-of-way, and to withdraw same from Jackson County
Fire District #3 and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (37
2W 3DC, tax lots 3300, 3302, 3600, 3601, 3700, and 3800)
27 E. Public Meeting - Review and recommendation to the City Council
regarding a minor land partition request submitted by Dennis
C. W. Smith for a property located at 1642 Beall Lane (37 2W
lODA, tax lot 300)
38 F. Public Rearing - Conditional use application for an automobile
repair facility in a building to be constructed at 900 South
Front Street in a C-5 zone (37 2W 11CB, tax lot 800) submitted
by Mike Linder
47 G. Public Meeting - Site plan review for an automobile repair
facility in a building to be constructed at 900 South Front
Street in a C-5 zone (37 2W 11CB, tax lot 800) submitted by
Mike Linder
-1-
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA -NAY 3, 1988 Page 2
V. Business (cont.) _
Page ~F
52 H. Public Meeting - Review and recommendation to the City Council
of an annexation request of approximately .42 acre adjacent to
Edwina Avenue and Libby Street and to withdraw of same from
Jackson County Fire District #3 (Lot 1, Block 2, Homestead
Acres Subdivision) submitted by Gerald and Kathy Klocke
58 I. Consideration of a bingo parlor in a C-5 zone as a permitted
use
60 J. Review of a dwelling group as a conditional use in an R-2 zone
61 K. Siting of mini storage facilities
VI. Miscellaneous
VII. .Adjournment
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND APPROVING THE
CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY E & L PROFERTIES, INC.
WHEREAS, an application for a conditional use permit for a truck repair and
seafood processing facility in a C-5 zone has~been submitted by E & L Properties,
Inc., said businesses to be located at 890 South Front Street within the City; the
location more particularly described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's map page 37
2W'11CB, tax lot 800; and
WHEREAS, The Central Point Planning Commission has reviewed and approved the
application at a public hearing held on the third day of May, 1988; now, therefore,
_~-
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The relevant criteria applicable to the within application is as
follows:
(a} The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as thoroughfare commercial.
(b) The Zoning Ordinance designates the site as C-5.
(c) Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 17.76 describes the conditioa~ which
the Planning Commission must consider in order to grant a conditional use
permit.
Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds as follows. The proposal
meets the City's urbanization goal for commercial land uses found in the Comprehen-
sive.Plan because:
(a) The east side of Highway 99 (Front Street) is the primary thoroughfare
commercial district (C-5). This area is developed primarily for auto re-
lated businesses and services. The C-5 zoning recognizes these types of
uses and will strengthen this corridor while providing locations for these
uses that are often not compatible with commercial uses in other zones.
Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby finds as follows. The proposal
meets the requireme`~ts of the City's Zoning Ordinance for a C-5 zone because:
(a) Truck service and repair, as well as seafood light processing and sales,
are a conditional use.
(b) With the exception of the five-foot north side yard setback for which a
variance has been requested, the proposed use meets all height, yard and
lot coverage requirements.
(c) No evidence was submitted supporting a conclusion that odor would be
detectable beyond the subject property.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. - Page 1
(d) No evidence was submitted supporting a conclusion that unreasonable noise
would be detectable beyond the subject property.
Section 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds as follows. ,The proposal meets
the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit because:
(a) The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate .the proposed use,
and meets parking, setback, access, building height, and lot coverage
requirements..
(b) The site has access to a public highway,. Front Street (a major arterial),.
and has been satisfactorily reviewed by the Oregon Department of
Transportation (ODOT).
(c) All abutting properties are commercial or have light manufacturing charac-
teristics and have been developed to a similar density or are planned and
zoned for such development.
(d) No evidence was submitted. supporting a conclusion that the proposed devel-
-, _ opment would have a negative impact on residential property values.
(e) 1. In order to eliminate blowing dust, the Planning Commission requires
that all on-site parking, access and maneuvering areas shall be paved.
2. Outside storage or any materials, supplies or by-products shall be
prohibited.
3. A six-foot high compact hedge shall be installed and maintained along
the rear property line.
Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the record herein and the findings
therefrom support the conclusion that the proposal is in compliance with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and the applicable standards of the City's Zoning Code. °I'he
proposed conditional use is hereby approved subject to compliance with the relevant
requirements of the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, and the requirements
of the Public Works Department attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference
incorporated into the within resolution.
Passed by the Planning Commission on ,
19_, and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of
19
Planning Commission Chairman
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Secretary O
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. - Page 2
EXHIBIT "A"
CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
--- STAFF REPORT---
For: E & L Properties, Inc.
Property: 37 2W 11 CB, tax lot B00; 890 South Front Street
Businesses: Fronek's Seafood
M & M Truck Electric
Property Dimensions: 100' x 240' = 24,000 ft.2
Street Improvements
Existing Conditions:
Street:vf access - Highway 99 (major arterial)
Jurisdiction of street - Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)
Present accesses - None
Proposed accesses - Northwest and southwest
Property corners - Width 25' for each
Storm drainage - - Property drains to the southeast. There is an existing
drainage ditch (Mingus Creek) at this location.
Street lighting - None
On-street parking - None
Curbing and sidewalks -None
1. Accessing this property is at a street which could potentially see 20,000+ vehicle
trips per day by the year 1993. Accesses onto a major arterial generally should
not be allowed at distances less than 150' from the centerline of each access. In
this case only 65' exists from the centerline of each access. Also, the close
proximity to Cashway Plywood which has a driveway less than 25' north and Dan's
Muffler at approximately 125' south complicate ingress and egress for their devel-
opments. Given this information, it is necessary to place an exit-only restric-
tion at the northeast access and require joint access for tax lots 800 and 805.
2. Access width for an exit-only of 25' is adequate; however, a joint access should
be a minimum of 40' especially if trucks have an overall tractor/trailer length
exceeding 60'.
3. An access permit will be required from ODOT. The City has met with officials from
ODOT and the recommendations from the meeting are listed in #1 and #4.
4. Curbs and storm drainage connections will also be required for this development
along with landscaping in the utility strip in front of the building adjacent to
Highway 99 ..
5. At some time in the future whenever Highway 99 is improved, sidewalks and a: bikeway. :.
shall be installed by the property owners abutting Highway 99. In order to accom-
modate this project, a deferred improvement agreement will be required for these
. ~::rovements.
6. A street light shall be placed at the exit-only access in order to illuminate the
truck access. An additional light will be required when the property to the south
develops. This light shall be a 22,000 lumen high pressure sodium vapor cobrahead
style mounted on a 35' aluminum davit gcLle. - -
UJ
EXHIBIT "A"
Central Point Public Works Department
Staff Report - E & L Properties, Inc. Page 2
7. On-street parking - No parking allowed or. Highway 99. All parking and maneuvering
shall be accomplished on the property.
' 8. First Street improvements shall be completed only if the property owners wish to
pay for improvements through a local improvement district. First Street will not
be required to be developed by the City unless the .property owners make the
request.
9. All street signing for accesses shall be installed according to the Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices and is approved by the City.
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
1. A sanitary sewer main exists in the right-of-way of First Street; however, its
depth 'is~relatively shallow. The developer shall be required to extend this sani-
tary sewer to service this property.
Water Improvements
I. The Fire Department shall determine the necessity of an on-site fire hydrant. The
nearest fire hydrant is located at approximately 65' south of the northwest proper
ty corner.
2. Two water meters shall be installed, one for domestic use and the other for
irrigation use.
Storm Drainage Improvements
1. Mingus Creek crosses the .southeast corner of the property.. An adequately sized
pipe shall be installed to carry the calculated flow to Mingus Creek.
2. On-site storm drainage shall be calculated, designed and sized to carry, all the
storm water discharge from this site.
Other Requirements-
1. All construction within the public right-of-way or for utilities to become.
publicly maintained facilities shall be as specified in the Central Point
Municipal Code and the Public Works Standards..
LB/mah
PUBWKS SR/E&L
~ -
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND
APPROVING THE VARIANCE OF E & L PROPERTIES, INC.
WHEREAS, an application for a variance for construction within a five-foot
side yard setback area by E & L Properties, Iric., for a truck repair and seafood
processing facility located at 890 South Front Street within the City and more
particularly described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's map page 37 2W 11CB, tax
lot 800; and
WHEREAS, the Central Point Planning Commission has reviewed and approved the
application at a public meeting held on the third day of May, 1988; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT,
OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The relevant criteria applicable to the within application is
Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 17.80 which describes the conditions the
Planning Commission must consider in order to grant a variance.
Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds as follows. The request
meets or is not applicable to the criteria for granting a variance because:
1. The variance will provide advantages to the City because the new f~ili-
ties will give better services to Central Point residents.
2. The variance will provide beautification to the City with new facilities
and a landscaped area.
3. Not applicable.
4. Not applicable.
5. The variance will not have any adverse impact upon the neighborhood be-
cause the applicants will follow all requirements of the Uniform Building
Code and Uniform Fire Code.
6. Not applicable.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the record herein and the findings
therefrom support the conclusion that the proposal is in compliance with the appli-
cable standards of the City's Zoning Code. The proposed variance is hereby ap-
proved subject to compliance with the relevant requirements c~ the Uni£grm Building
Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
Passed by the Planning Commission on 19_, and signed
by me in authentication of its passage this day of
19_ ~~~
Planning Commission Resolution No. ~.--- Page'1
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Secretary
_~.
Planning Commission Chairman
U
Planning Commission Resolution No. - Page 2
~~~n~il Hof ~a~ern~nents
March 31, 1988
T0: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Wes Reynolds, RVCOG
155 S. Second Street
P.O. Box 3275
Central Point, OR 97502
503-664-6674
Attached are proposed revisions for several sections in Title 16 of
the Central Point Municipal Code, now called "Subdivisions". The
revisions are for Chapter 16.12, 16.16 and 16.20 and deal with
streets and land dedication.
.The rev#s~ons presume a heavy reliance on the city's Public Works
Standards. Those standards were adopted some years ago but were not
integrated with the other titles of the code or the Comprehensive
Plan. I have been working closely with the Public Works Director who
is currently revising the Public Works Standards. The standards he
is compiling are probably something the .Planning Commission will want
to look at in conjunction with the proposed land division title
changes.
As before deletions from the text are in [brackets], and the proposed
additions underlined. A passage proposed to 'be {moved} has a
different type of bracket.
U
Preliminary Draft Revisions 3/31/88
Chapter 16.12
STREETS AND OTHER WAYS--DESIGN STANDARDS
Sections•
16.12.010 Creation of streets.
16.12.020 Creation of ways.
16.12.030 Design standards and principles of
acceptability.
16.12.040 Streets--Generally.
16.12.050 Streets--Rights-of-way and widths.
16.12.060 Streets--Reserve strips.
1§.12.070 [Streets--Alignment.
16.1 2.080] Streets--Extension.
[16.12.090 Streets--Intersection .angles.]
.16.12.[10.0]080 Existing streets.
16.12.,[110]090 Half streets
16.1.2.[120].100 Cul-de-sac.
30]110
16.12..[:1 .Streets--Names.
,
[16.12.140 Streets--Grades and curves.]
(16.12.150 Streets--Adjacent to railroad right-of-way.]
16.12.[160]120 Planting easements.
16.12.[170]130 Alleys.
16.12.[180]140 Sidewalks.
16.12.010 Creation of streets. Streets created for the -.
purpose of partitioning land shall conform with the same requirements
as those of streets in subdivisions; provided that upon reviewing
land partitions the planning commission may approve the creation of a
street to be established by deed without full compliance with the
regulations applicable to subdivisions if any of the following
conditions exist:
A. The establishment of the street is initiated by the city
council and is declared essential for the purpose of general traffic
circulation and the partitioning of land is an incidental effect
rather than the primary objective of the street.
B. The tract in which the street is to be dedicated is an
[isolated] individual ownership of one acre or less.
C. The tract in which the street is to be dedicated is an
[isolated] individual ownership of such size and [has such] with
special existing physical conditions as make it impractical to
develop more than three lots.
In those cases where approval of a street is to be without full
compliance with the regulations applicable to subdivisions, a copy of
the proposed deed shall be submitted. to the city [recorder]
administrator at least five days prior to the planning commission
meeting at which consideration is desired. The deed and such
information as may be submitted shall be reviewed by the planning
commission and, if not in conflict with the standards of this chapter
and Sections 16.16.010--16.16.070 shall be approved with such
conditions as are necessary to preserve these standards.
O
16.12.020 Creation of waVS. A[ny] private street or other
easement of way providing access to property [and which is] maY be
created in order to allow the partitioning of land for the purpose of
transfer of ownership or building development, whether immediate or
future.[shall be in the form of a street (in subdivision or) as]
Provided it meets one of the conditions ,in Section 16.12.010 of these
regulations,[except that] or a private easement of way [to be] m~
established by deed without full compliance with these regulations.
[shall be approved by] If the planning commission [provided] finds it
is the only reasonable method by which the rear portion of an
unusually deep lot large enough to warrant partitioning into two
parcels may be provided with access. In that case subiect anV
exception will not apply, if the existing lot i5 large enough so that
three or more-parcels meeting the lot size and setback [minimums]
requirements of this [title] code may be created, and two or more of
such parcels would not have frontage on an existing street.) A copy
of the proposed document to create the easement shall be submitted to
the city [recorder] administrator at least five days prior to the
planning commission meeting at which consideration is desired. The
document and such information as may be submitted shall be reviewed''
by the planning'cbmmission and,'if assurance bf adequate utility
access[as well as], vehicular access, and'comoliance with this
section is indicated, the application for a private way shall be
approved.
a~.ac. v.'v ycaa. as u a u
The land [sub]division shall be in conformity with the Comprehensive
Plan and any approved development plans and shall take into
consideration any preliminary plans or studies. The [sub] land =~
division shall conform with the requirements of state laws, the
citV~s Public Works Standards, and the standards established by this
[title] code insofar as 't hey are applicable.
..16.12.040' Streets--CenerallV. The location, width, and grade
of streets shall be considered in their relation to existing and
planned streets, to topographical conditions as they relate to
drainage and the operation of the water, and sewer systems, to public
convenience and safety and their appropriate relation to the. proposed
use of the land to'be served by such streets. Where location is not
shown in a development plan, the arrangement of streets in a
subdivision shall either:
A. Provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of
existing principal streets'in surrounding areas; or
B. Conform to the 'plan for the neighborhood approved or
adopted by the' planning commission to meet a particular situation
where topographical or other conditions make continuance or
conformance to existing streets impractical.
16.12.050 Streets--Rights-of-waX and widths. Unless otherwise
indicated on a development plan, the width of streets and roadways in
feet shall be as indicated~in the Central Point Comprehensive Plan
rubric wortcs t
ollowing table:
not be less than the minimums
-2-
O
ape of Street
Primary arterials
Secondary arterials,
business and industrial
streets
Minor streets
Radius for turn-around
at end of cul-de-sac
Alleys
...[Minimum Minimum
Right-of-Way Roadway
80 60
60 40
50 36
60 60
20 20.]
16.12.060 Streets-TReserve strips. Reserve strips or street
plugs controlling -the access to public ways will not be approved
unless such strips are necessary for the protection of the public
welfare or of property rights or both, and [(in no case)] unless the
control:and_disposal of the land composing such strips is, placed
definitely within the jurisdiction of the city under conditions
approved by the planning commission,
[16.12,070 Streets--Alignment. All streets other than minor.
streets or cul-de-sacs, shall, as far ;as practical, be in alignment
with existing streets by continuation of the centerlines thereof. Ln
no case shall the. staggering of-streets making.."T" intersections be
so designed that a jog is produced which is of such nature as to
render traffic control ineffective or unduly difficult at the offset
ihtersection. Jogs of less than one hundred feet on such streets,,
measured along the centerline of the intersected street, must be
adjusted by curves or diagonals so that the alignment, across the
street is continuous.]
16.12..07.0.. Streets Where a [sub] land division adjoins
[acreage] vacant land, streets .which in the opinion of the planning
commission should be continued in the event of the subdivision of the
[acreage] adiacent land will be required to be provided through to
the boundary. lines of the tract. Reserve strips and street plugs may
be required Lo preserve the objectives of street extensions.
[16,12.090. Streets--Intersection angles. Streets shall
intersect one ,another at an angle as near to a ninety degree angle as
practical, and no intersections of streets at angles of less than
thirty degrees will be approved unless necessitated by topographic
conditions.. When intersections of other than ninety degrees are
unavoidable, the right-of-way lines along the acute angle shall have
a minimum corner radius of twelve feet. All right-of-way lines at
intersections with arterial. streets shall have a corner radius of not
less than twelve feet.]
16.12.080 Existing streets. Whenever existing streets within
a tract are of inadequate width, additional right-of-way shall be
provided at the time of [sub]division..
/O
/ O
16.12.090. half street a.' Half streets [while generally] are
not acceptable. [, may be approved `where essential to the reasonable
development o'f the subdivision when in conformity with the 'other
requirements of these regulations and when the planning commission
finds it will be practical to require the dedication of the other
half when the adjoining property is subdivided. Whenever a half
street is adjateht fo a tract to be 'subdivided, the other half of the
street shall be platted within such tract. Reserve strips and street
plugs may be 'required to preserve the objectives of half 'streets.]
1_x.12.'100 Cut-de-sac. A cul-de-sac shall be [as short as
possible and shall in no-event be more than]'a minimum of 100 feet
long, and a maximum of four hundred feet long nor'serve no more than
twelve single family dwellings: All cut-de=sacs shall terminate with
a circular turn-around as defined in-the Public Works Standards.
16.12.110 Streets--Names. No street name shall be used which
will duplicate or be confused with the names of existing streets
except for extensions of existing streets. Street names and numbers
shall conform to the established pattern in the city and the
surrounding area and shall be subject to the approval of the planning
commission.
[16.12.140 Streets--Grades and curves;. Grades shall not
exceed six percent on primary or secondary arterials or twelve
percent on any other street. In flat areas allowances shall be made
for finished street grades having a minimum slope of one-half
percent. Centerline radii of curves shall not be less than three
hundred feet on primary arterials, two hundred feet on secondary
arterials or one hundred feet on other streets.]
[16.12.150 Streets--Adiacent to railroad right..-o£-way.
Wherever the proposed subdivision contains or is adjacent to a
railroad right-of-way, provisions shall be made for a street
approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a
distance suitable for the appropriate use of the land between such
streets and railroad. Such distance shall be determined with due
consideration at cross streets of the minimum distance required for
approach grades to a future grade separation.]
16.12.120 Planting easements. Where physical conditions
require approval of streets less than fifty feet in width, additional
easements for planting of street trees or shYUbs map be Yequirsd.
-4-
~/
16..1.2.13.0 Alleys. A. Location. A31eys jshall} maw,-be
provided in commercial and industrial districts. [unless ,other] In
any case, permanent provisions for. access to o,ff-street parking and
loading facilities and utilities easements are to be made as approved
by the planning commission.
B. Intersections. Alley intersections and sharp changes in
alignment [shall] should be avoided. The cor,ne,rs,of necessary alley
intersections shall have a radius-of not less than twelve .feet.. _
16.12.140 Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be constructed in
accordance with .[.such]. .the .Public Works Standards. ;[as may be by
motion adopted by the city council.] Sidewalk construction shall .be
completed on each individual lot grior to the-city building inspector
granting a certificate of completion or occupancy for any,,
construction upon said individual lot. [No application for a
building-. permit.. application for construction of sidewalks. under the,
standards'of the city as above set out.] A notation thereof shall be,
made upon the subdivision or partition plat .giving ,reasonable .notice
to any :purchaser of a lot therein of the provisions of this section.
This provision. shall be applicable only to subdivisions approved
after January 1, 1972.
-5-
~'
f~_.
Preliminary Draft Revisions. .3/31/88
Chapter 16.16
BLOCKS AND LOTS -- DESIGN STANDARDS
Sections•
16.16.010 Blocks--Length, width and shape.
[16.16.020 Bl ocks--Sizes.]
16.16.0[3]20 Blocks--Easements.
16.16.0[4]30 Size and shape.
16.16.0[5]40 Lots--Size and determination.
16.16.0[6]50 Through lots.
16.16.0[7]60 Lot side lines.
16.16.0[8]70 Large lot subdivision.
16.16.010 .Blocks--Length, width and shape. The lengths, widths
and shapes of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing
adequate building sites suitable to the special needs of [the type
and] planned uses [contemplated] need[s] for convenient access,..
circulation, control and safety of street traffici [and] limitations
and opportunities of topography, and the city~s Public Works
[16.16.020 Blocks--Sizes. Blocks shall not exceed .twelve
hundred feet in length except blocks adjacent to arterial streets or
unless the previous adjacent layout or topographical conditions
justify a variation. The recommended minimum distance between
intersections on arterial streets is three. hundred feet.]
16.16.020 Blocks--Easements. A. Utility Lines. Easements-for
electrical lines or other public utilities may be required.
Easements for utilities shall be a minimum of [ten] five feet [in
width and centered] on rear or side lot lines to allow a total width
of ten feet. [Tie-] Back easements [six feet wide by twenty feet
long] shall be determined by the utility reQUesting the easement
provided for utility poles at point of conversion from overhead to
underground.
B. Drainageways. [Watercourses.] Where a subdivision is
traversed by a water course, drainage way, channel or stream, there
shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-waq
conforming substantially with the lines of such watercourse, that
will provide for future drainage requirements as determined by the
merits as re
-1-
~?
C. Pedestrian Ways. In any block over seven hundred fifty feet
in length, a pedestrian way may be required by the commission. The
minimum width of the pedestrian right-of-way must be at least six
feet in width which shall be hard surfaced through the block and curb
to curb in order to provide easy access to schools, parks, shopping
centers, mass transportation stops or other community services. If
conditions require blocks longer than twelve hundred feet, two
pedestrian ways may be required for combination pedestrian way and
utility easement. When essential for public convenience, such ways
may be required to connect to cul-de-sacs. Long blocks parallel to
arterial streets may be approved without pedestrian ways if desirable
in the interests of traffic safety.
16.16.030 Lots--Size and shape. The lot size, widths [and]
shape and orientation shall be appropriate for the location of the
subdivision and for the type of development and use contemplated.
16.16.040 Lots--Size and determination. Lot sizes shall
conform with Title 17, [the] Zoning. In the case of irregular lots,
the width shall be measured along the front building line. In no
case shall the average depth be more than two and one-half times the
width. Corner lots for residential use shall have extra width to
permit appropriate building setback from and orientation to both
streets.
A. [In areas that cannot be connected to sewer. trunk lines,
minimum lot sizes shall be greater than the minimum herein specified
if necessary because the soil structure is adverse to sewage disposal
by septic tanks. Such lot sizes shall conform to the requirements of
the county health department unless provisions are made for sanitary
sewers.
B] Where property is zoned and planned for business or
industrial use, other widths and areas may be permitted at the
discretion of the planning commission. Depth and width of properties
reserved or laid out for commercial and industrial purposes shall be
adequate to provide for the off-street service and parking facilities
required by the type of use and. development contemplated.
16.16.050 Through lots. Through lots shall be avoided except
where essential to provide separation of residential development from
major traffic arteries or adjacent non-residential activities or to
overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. A
planting screen easement at least ten feet wide, and across which
there shall be no right of access, may be required along the line of
lots abutting such a traffic artery or an incompatible use.
16.16.060 Lot side lines. The side lines of lots shall run a
right angles to the street upon which the lots face, as far as
practicable, or on curved streets they shall be radial to the curve.
-2-
/~
16.16.070 Large lots subdivision]. In [sub]dividing tracts
into large lots-which at some future time are likely to be
[resubdivided] partitioned, the location of lot lines and other
details of the layout shall be such that [resubdivision] partitioning
may readily take place without violating the requirements of these
regulations and without interfering with the orderly development of
streets. Restriction of building locations in relationship to future
rights-of-way shall be recorded on the plat [made a matter of record]
if the planning commission considers it necessary. Replatting or
partitioning will still require City approval.
(C.P. 1~ORKING) CPT-1b16
-3-
>S
Preliminary Draft Revisions
Chapter 16.20
LAND DEDICATION
Sections•
16.20.010
16.20.020
16.20.030
16.20.040
16.20.050
16.20.055
16.20.060
16:20.070
3/31/88
Generally.
Dedication standards.
Fee in lieu of dedication--Method
Fee in lieu of dedication--Fund.
Choice of land or fee.
Sale of dedicated land.
Exemptions--Credits.
Appeal.
of establishing.
16.20.010 Generally. The public health, safety, convenience
and welfare of the residents of Central Point require that property
be devoted to recreational parks and facilities. Accordingly, every
subdivider and [other] developers of planned unit developments shall
either dedicate a portion of new subdivisions or such other
developments as required by ordinance, or pay a fee in lieu of
dedication of such land as set forth therein, for the purpose of
providing park sites or recreational facilities to serve the
residents of the city. Land or fees required under this chapter
shall be used only for the purpose of providing such park sites or
recreational facilities. Recreational facilities, as defined in =t his
ordinance, may include facilities for physical, social, cultural or
educational activities for persons of all ages.
16.20.020 Dedication standards. A. All new subdivisions and
planned unit developments shall dedicate for neighborhood park
purposes a single contiguous area of land that is equivalent to the
sum of seven hundred square feet per dwelling unit.
B. The total number of dwelling units in a proposed subdivision
shall, for purposes hereof, be determined by multiplying the number
of lots by the number of dwelling units permitted on each lot under
the zoning ordinance in effect at the time of filing the plat for
approval.
C. The total number of dwelling units in a proposed planned
unit development shall, for purposes hereof, be determined by the
developer's project plan and any authorized increases in units, as
may be permitted in accordance with Section 17.68.130.
16.20.030 Fee in lieu of dedication--Method of a§tablishinQ.
When a fee is to be required in lieu of land dedication, said fee
shall be six hundred fifty dollars per dwelling unit, applicable to
all single-family, two-family, multiple family and mobile home or
-1-1
~C ~
manufactured home subdivision dwelling units. In the case of mobile
home parks, the in lieu fee shall apply to each improved mobile home
site.
16.20.040 Fee in lieu of dedication--Fund. Past and future
fees paid in lieu of dedication shall be kept in a fund separate from
all other funds of the city and shall beyexpended only for the
purpose of acquiring and developing new or existing park sites or
recreational facilities within the Central Point urban growth
boundary. Property for such sites or facilities may be purchased and
taken in the name of the public entity responsible for developing,
maintaining the operating and site or facility under such agreements
as the city council may make with such entity.
16.20.050 Choice of land or fee. A. Basis for determination.
The city planning commission shall [recommend to the council] decide
whether:to require dedication or to require a fee in lieu thereof and
shall base its determination on that course which best serves the
public, giving due regard to the fair and equal treatment of
subdividers and developers and the economic feasibility of the
subdivision or planned unit development. In making the
determination, the planning commission shall take into consideration
the comprehensive plan of the city, topography, geology, access and
location of land in the subdivision available for said purpose, the
size and shape of the subdivision and its location in relationship to
other available neighborhood park sites. The recommendation of the
planning commission as to whether land shall be required or fee
charged in lieu thereof, or any combination thereof, shall be noted
on [submitted to the city council with] the preliminary plat or
preliminary development plan.
B. Procedure. The procedure for determining whether the
subdivider is to dedicate land, pay a fee or both shall be as
provided in this subsection. At the time of filing the preliminary
plat, the subdivider shall indicate whether he desires to dedicate
property or to pay a fee in lieu thereof. If he desires to dedicate
property, he shall designate the area on the preliminary plat. At
the time of preliminary plat approval, the planning commission shall
determine as a part of such approval whether to require [recommend]
dedication or payment of a fee in lieu thereof or any combination
thereof. The planning commission shall at the same time [make its
recommendation] determine the amount of land to be dedicated or the
amount of the fee in lieu thereof. Approval of the preliminary plat
[by the council] shall be binding upon the city if the final map is
submitted within six months and if there is, in the interim, no
change of zone for the affected area. Where dedication is required,
it shall be accomplished by appropriate conveyance at the time the
final plat is submitted for approval or by dedication on the final
plat itself. Where fees are required, they shall be deposited with
the city as a condition of approval of the final plat or, with
sufficient security, may be evidenced by an agreement for deferred
payment for a period not exceeding one year.
-2-
0
16..20.055. Sale of dedicated land. When land has been dedicated
to the city of Central Point for park purposes pursuant to this
chapter, and thereafter the city council determines that development
of a neighborhood park on such site is not feasible or that the value
of such land can more effectively be applied for park purposes. by the
sale of .such land at its reasonable market value and the application.
of such sale to the fund established by Section 16.20.040 of this
chapter, the city council may direct the city administrator to cause
the sale of said dedicated land. Any such sale shall be in
accordance with all applicable statutes and ordinances for the
disposition of surplus city real property, and the proceeds of such
sale. shall be applied to the fund established by Section 16.20.040 of
this chapter.
16.20.060 Exemptions--Credits. A. Nonresidential subdivisions
[and planned unit developments] shall be excluded. from the
requirgiuents hereof.
B. Where common open space for park purposes [for] is provided
for in a proposed subdivision or .planned unit development, to be
privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the
development, such areas may be credited against the requirements of
dedication for neighborhood park purposes and the payment of fees in
lieu thereof,: if the planning commission finds that it is in the
public interest to do so. In making its determination, the planning
commission shall consider the following:
1. There shall be adequate assurances that the privately
owned common open space and recreational facilities are permanently
restricted for park and recreation purposes by permanent covenants
which cannot be reduced or rescinded without 't he approval of the
city;
2. There shall be an adequate arrangement for the continued
maintenance of the area, that is secured by written agreement;
3. The area committed by the developer for park and
recreational purposes shall be physically and locationally suitable
for such purposes and so designed as to provide open areas and.
facilities available to the Qeneral public of a size or design
comparable to those normally included in a neighborhood park.
16.20.070 Appeal. Any determination of the planning commission
under this section may be appealed to the city council in the manner
provided for. other appeals[under this title].
(CENTRAL PT. WORKING) CPT-1620
-3-
--- S T A F F R E P O R T---
To: Planning Commission '~ Date: April 29, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Planning Director
Re: Public meeting to review and make a recommendation to-the City Council the
annexation of approximately 10.13 acres adjacent to Taylor Road and the
Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way and to withdraw the same from Jackson
County Fire District #3 and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary-Authority (37 2W 3DC,
tax lots 3300, 3302, 3600, 3601, 3700, and 3800) submitted by Edward and
Robertson Collins, Clifford and Vera Bailey, and William blanker
The proposed ahnexation consists of 5.46 acres zoned M-1, Industrial-Limited, pres-
ently undeveloped and owned by the Collins; 5.78 acres zoned M-2, Sndustrial--
General, the site of Custom Panels and owned by Mr. blanker; and i.ll acres zoned
M-1, Industrial-Limited, presently a private residence owned by the Baileys...
The subject property. owners have initiated. this ahnexation and have submitted the
appropriate petitions and application information. Public Works Director Larry
Blanchard foresees. no problems with. sewer and. water service with the understanding
that the capsizing of those facilities will probably be necessary in the future as a
result of development demand.
The following exhibits are included:
Exhibit A - Certificate of Posting of Planning Commission agenda for
the meeting held May 3, 1988;
Exhibit B - Annexation petitions;
Exhibit C - Tax Assessor's map page;
Exhibit D - Resolution Reco[runending Approval of Annexation.
RK/mah
PCWORK SRTAYANX /~~
d \ y ~ 0•
~,•• ~t _
> _:''
~., ~.
~~-~' .. .~`i
P.O. 60X3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONc 664-3321
THE HEART OF THE
;OGUE RNER VALLEY
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING..:
I, /y~Q~~/' lL 9E~/1/IS~~ ,CERTIFY THAT ON
THE FOLL04lING DATE, A~~/'%/ ~~ 7°~?~ I POSTED AN AGENDA
FOR THE ~/~lll~nin~ ~mmis5l on /yJ~j o C~ /d ~'.U ~, /911
~.2 !-'i~bi~ = rr,,> ;i~.~ ~~ iv.~si a.~>''he Qii'/ie:~tit~~ o~ io.i,3 ~Li/c;='
NEAR
~.~;..PQG'~ic ,Pllri~cY1~ 2~U~ AT OP.'
~.
;~ /,. ~
SIGNATUP,E i'/ll.~~/1/i~1~~c.'1J~~%1~~~' -~%~
DATE '7'v6`D~
ANNEXATION PETITION
THE UNDERSIGNED hereby request and consent to the annexation
to the City of Central Point, Oregon, of the real property
contiguous thereto described in Exhibit, "A" attached hereto and
by this reference made a part of the within petition.
By their signature hereto,. the undersigned certify that they
are either "owners" of land in the territory proposed to be
annexed as described in Exhibit "A",'or are "electors" registered
in the territory proposed to be annexed as described in Exhibit
nAn•
This petition, containing the request and consent to said
annexation, must be filed with the Central Point City Council-on
or befo~Le the date of the public hearing to be held upon the
proposed annexation pursuant to ORS 222.120. •
"Owner" is defined by ORS 222.120 as meaning the legal owner
of record or where there is a recorded land contact which is in
force, the purchaser thereunder. If there is multiple ownership
in a parcel of land, each consenting owner-shall be counted as a
fraction to the same extent as the interest of the owner in the
land bears in relation to the interest of the other owners, and
the same fraction shall be applied to the parcel's land mass fore
purposes of the consent petition. If a corporation owns land in
a territory proposed to be annexed, the corporation shall be
considered to be the individual owner of that land.
"Elector" is defined in-said statute as an individual
qualified to vote under Article II, Section 2 of the Oregon
Constitution, which in turn requires that the individual be 18
years of age or older, a resident of the area in question, and
registered to vote as required by applicable state law.
Furthermore, ORS 222.170(2) requires that electors petitioning
for annexation be registered in the territory proposed~to be
annexed.
Elector or Property Owner:
(If Property Owner, insert
Robertson E. Collins
L°i~-
37 2W 3DC, TL 3300
<< t
!3/ /~r
~~~ 7
ANNEYATION PETITION -~~
(120887) ~ ~~•
ANNEXATION PETITION
THE UNDERSIGNED hereby .request and consent to the annexation
to the City of Central Point, Oregon, of the real property
contiguous thereto described in Exhibit "A" attached. hereto. and
by this reference made a part of the within petition.
By their signature hereto ,. the undersigned certify that they
are either "owners" of land in the territory proposed to be
annexed as described in Exhibit "A", or are'"electors".registered
in the territory proposed to be annexed as described in Exhibit
oAn~
This petition, containing the request and consent to said
annexation, must be filed with the Central Point City Council on
or befrrre the date of the public hearing to be held upon the
proposed annexation pursuant to ORS 222.120.
"Owner" is defined by ORS 222.120 as meaning the legal owner
of record. or, where there is a recorded land contract-which is in
force, the purchaser thereunder.. If there is multiple ownership
in a parcel of land, each consenting owner shall be counted as a
fraction to the same extent as the interest of the owner. in the
land bears in relation to the interest of the other owners, and
.the same 'fraction shall be applied to the parcel's land mass for
purposes of the consent petition. If a corporation owns land in
a territory proposed to be annexed, the corporation shall be
considered to be the individual owner of that land.
"Elector" is defined in said statute as an individual
qualified to vote under Article II, Section 2 of the Oregon
Constitution, which in turn requires that the individual be 18
years of age or older, a resident of the area in question, and
registered to vote as required by applicable state law.
Furthermore, ORS 222.170(2) requires that electors petitioning
for annexation be registered in the territory proposed_to be
annexed.
Elector or Property Owner:
(If Property Owner, insert
me: property description) Signature: Date r/~'~
Clifford D. Bailey. 37 2W 3DC, TL 3600 /.<~`~ ~ ~~~~~~
Vera Ti. Bailey
ANIEXATION PETITION ~J ~~
(lzoaa7)
ANNEXATION PETITION
THE UNDERSIGNED hereby request and consent to the annexation
to the City of Central Point, Oregon, of the real property
contiguous thereto described in Exhibit, "A" attached hereto and
by this reference made a part of the within petition.
By their signature hereto,. the undersigned certify that they
are either "owners" of land in the territory proposed to be
annexed as described in Exhibit "A", or are "electors" registered
in the territory proposed to be .annexed as described in Exhibit
nAn~
This petition, containing the request and consent to said
annexation, must be filed with the Central Point City Council on
or befoT.e the date of the public hearing to be held upon the
proposed annexation pursuant to ORS 222.120..
"Owner" is defined by ORS 222.120 as meaning the legal owner
of record or, where there is a recorded land contract which is in
force, the purchaser thereunder. If there is multiple ownership
in a parcel of land, each consenting owner shall be counted as a
fraction to the same extent as the interest of the owner in the
land bears in relation to the interest of the. other owners, and
the same fraction shall be applied to the parcel's land mass for
purposes of the consent petition. If a corporation owns land in
a territory proposed to be annexed, the corporation shall be
considered to be the individual owner of that land.
"Elector" is defined in said statute as an individual
qualified to vote under Article II, Section 2 of the Oregon
Constitution, which in turn requires that the individual be 18
years of age or older, a resident of the area in question, and
registered to vote as required by applicable state law.
Furthermore, ORS 222.170(2) requires that electors petitioning
for annexation be registered in the territory proposed°to be
.annexed.
Elector or Property Owner:
{If Property Owner, insert
Custom Panels, Inc. 37 2W 3DC, TL 3302
Custom Panels, Inc
Custom Panels, Inc
Custom Panels, Inc
37 2W 3DC, TL 3601
37 2W 3DC, TL 3700
37 2b] 3DC, TL 3800
ure: Da
AIVIQEXATION PETITION
(1 20887 ) ~~ ~~ .
~• \ ~j
~/ ~ ~, / +
r^ \ `
.. -~ \\ y/
/ ~` .r~ \ ~ 13 ~
\ ` t
S ~ / .~
~~\ \',:\~r ~~~ .•° by ~~ $ m
,e.\ +i/ Mir ~ /Y rwtl i •~i
,, ~ •... ~
~ ~ + ~. +r.
' N = ~~ z i
+ +' ~ ~ .~ ~
r ~ oc~ I
---....: ~ :, Grp o
N`'I
~,- ~~
;; ~~ ~ C~~
n ~ ~
1
..... t o3s ++t
~`'~
~r~ ~'~ ~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF RECOMidENDATION TO THE CENTRAL POINT CITY COUNCIL FOR
ANNEXATION'OF APPROY.IMATELY 10.13 ACRES OF CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY GENERALLY
BOUNDED BY TAYLOR ROAD AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT; TO_WITHDRAW SUCH PROPERTY FROM JACKSON COUNTY FIRE
DISTRICT #3 AND SEAR CREEK VALLEY SANITARY AUTHORITY; AND FURTHER RECOMMEND
THAT THE ZONING DESIGNATION INDICATED ON THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE
LAND USE ZONING MAP BE IN EFFECT UPON FINAI;,APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City of Central Point requesting
and consenting to the annexation of approximately 10.13 acres of real property
contiguous to the City of Central Point generally bounded by Taylor Road and the
Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way further described as within Jackson County
Tax Assessor's map page 37 2W 3DC, tax lots 3300, 3302, 3600, 3601, 3700, and 3800;
and
WHEREAS, if annexed, said property will be withdrawn from Jackson County Fire
District #3 and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority; and
WHEREAS, the agenda listing the public meeting held May 3, 1988 was posted in
four public places on April 28, 1988; and
WHEREAS, on May 3, 1988, a review of the proposed annexation was held before
the Central Point Planning Commission and opportunity for testimony from proponents
and opponents was provided at said public meeting; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION that the Planning
Commission of the City of Central Point, Oregon, recocrunends that the City Council
approve the annexation of approximately 10.13 acres of contiguous property general-
ly bounded by Taylor Road and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way to the
City of Central Point and to withdraw said property from Jackson County Fire Dis-
trict #3 and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Central Point Planning Commission recommends
that the zoning designation indicated on the City of Central Point Comprehensive
I:ar,d Use Map be in effect upon final approval of the prcposed annexation.
Passed by the Planning commission and signed by me in authentication of its
passage this day of 1988.
.-- C~ ~
PLANNING COMt4ISSI0N RESOLUTION N0. - Page 1 c?v
Rlanning Commission Chairman
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Secretary
~~~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. - Page 2 ~~
-- S T A F F R E P O R T---
To: Planning Commission pate: April 28, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Planning Director
Re: Public meeting to review and make a recommendation to the .City Council con-
cerning an application submitted by Dennis C. W. .Smith for a minor land par-
. tition at 1642 Bea11 Lane further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's
map page 37 2W 10DA, tax lot 300
Mr. Smith proposes to partition an existing two-acre parcel into two parcels of ap-
proximately one acre each. The proposed partition will meet the minimum lot area,
width and depth requirements for an R-1-6 zone.
The applicant has agreed to a 30-foot wide dedication of land along the eastern
property line for the future location of Glenn Way ,and a ten-foot wide dedication
of land along the southern property line for the possible future widening of Beall
Lane. Both of these requirements are necessary to comply with the Jackson Creek
Neighborhood Development Plan.
The following exhibits are included in the packet:
Exhibit A - Application. for a Minor Land Partition;
Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting of Planning Commission meeting
agenda for May 3, 1988;
Exhibit C - Applicant's map;
Exhibit D - Tax Assessor's map page;
Exhibit E - Aerial map page;
Exhibit F - Jackson Creek Neighborhood Development Plan..
Exhibit G - Resolution Recommending Approval of Minor Land Partition.
RK/mah
PCWORK SRSMITH
~~
TU TT~ CITI' OF CE~TR.~1L PO I?: T, OREGO\
:1PFLIC,ITIO\ FOR.\L~JOR;~\1I\OR L~.\D P.aRTITIO\
Date d~~~L Zl , ~`~~j8
I, i-~NNIGj C...\\/. S/j~(T~"'{ , proponents request that the City of
Central Point initiate action to partition the property located at:
TL ~3-1-Z\\/- tabA1
street address or J.C. plat page parcel
located on the ~OKT1-i side of ~ ;
I., E, S, W street
including portions of , containing
streets
p.ZLI- acres, more or less.
The use or intended use of the parcel(s~ is: `Zy~~ /~1~--
Inhabited ~ Uninhabited V .
This partition is~is no accompanied b5 construction of TT~I_f~_
improvements.
X
signa e
signature
1~ ~~ I L~N~
mailing address
phone number
Required fee of X100.00 paid:
G(zL~ll~ ~IZ~I~ -- ,~~iT
~~ E~, ~
CRAIG A. STONE AND .ASSOCIATES
PLANNING,LAND U9E 6FAC~LT'3TUDIE6 • COMPREIiEN9VE PROJECT MANAGEMENT • EIRE DEBIGN
700 CAROLEV AVENUE, MEDFORD, OREGON 9130A•SD3• T/9-DBB9
April 21, 1988
CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
City of Central Point
Municipal Building
Central Point, OR 97502
RE: TRANSMITTAL OF MINOR PARTITIONING APPLICATION
Dennis C.W. and Gina Lee Smith: Applicants
Honorable Mayor, Council, and Commissioners:
This office represents Dennis C.W. and Gina Lee Smith,
owners of record of Tax Lot 300 on Jackson County Assessors
Plat 37-2W-1ODA. Applicants desire to create two parcels -from
the otiginal single parent parcel, consisting of approximately
two acres. Attached hereto is a copy of the plat map
illustrating. the manner in which property division is proposed.
Applicants seek to divide the property in nearly in half
in an north/south direction. The resulting two parcels.wirll
equal 0.96 and 1.04 acres respectively. The westerly parcel is
occupied by an existing single family residence and barn. The
easterly new parcel is vacant. In the near future, applicants
propose to construct a new single family dwelling on the rear
(northerly) portion of the now vacant parcel. The new dwelling
will be occupied by applicants parents.
The proposed partition complies in all respects with
relevant land division regulations expressed in Chapter 16.44,
and Section 17.20.050 of the Central Point !^iunicipal Code
(CPMC). Specifically, the submitted application is complete as
to the filing requirements for minor land partitions as
set forth in Chapter 16.44 CPMC. Additionally, the subject
partitioning meets or exceeds the requirements of minimum lot
area, minimum lot width, minimum lot depth, and minimum yard
requirements, all as set forth in Section 17.20.050 CPPlC.
These conclusions are supported by information contained on the
submitted partitioning map. Setbacks for the new proposed
dwelling will be observed.
As to future public works improvements, applicants are
advised the city rcay recuire dedication of 10 feet along the
Beall Lane frontage for possible future street widening, and a
30 feet wide dedication along the easterly property boundary to
accommodate the future extension of Glenn i^day, as anticipated
n
Y ~~~ .
MAYOR, COUNCIL, AND PLANNING CODSb1ISSI0I4
City of Central Point, Oregon
April 21, 1988
Page 2
by the Jackson Creek Neiahborhood Development Plan. One half
of Glenn Way will occur along the easterly boundary. of subject
property, with the other one-half provided on adjacent lands
further to the east. The partitioning map illustrates the
areas proposed for dedication. Applicant-is prepared to
execute the dedications as conditions of approval.
' Also indicated on the most recent version of the Jackson
Creek Neiahborhood Development Plan is a new unnamed street to
be extended approximately 100 feet north of and. parallel to
Beall Lane between Snowy Butte lane and Glenn Way. The street
runs east/west through the subject. property. Applicants are
advised by City Planner Bugler, however, that the Jackson
Creek Neiahborhood Development Plan was recently amended by
action on the Snowy Butte Development Master Plan. In any
event, the proposed minor partition complies in all respects
with the area-wide. development plan. It will be applicants
intention to later more fully develop the property in general
compliance with the area-wide development plan, and dedications
of right-of-way for the Glenn Way extension ensure future
compliance.. with the plan.
Also submitted along with the .partitioning map, is the
required filing fee for minor partitions in the amount of $100.
Please advise in the event additional materials or information.
are reouired to adequately consider the application.
Applicants and this office would greatly appreciate
advance notice of the date and time at ~ahich the application
will be given consideration by the planning, commission and city
council.
Respectfully submitted,
g Stone
ni g Consultant
CAS/m
Enclosures
cc. C. Y7./Gina Smith
File r, ~~ ~i
\ ~
~ . .~,~ 0
~•' ~~,~
~ ~ ~'~_
\ ~ /y .. ~a
t .% /
\~~_ ~ '~
THE HEART OF THE
tOGUE RFJER VALLEY
P.O. 80X3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 975D2 PHOt:E 664.3321
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
1, /?zD~rP~n.~ Jf~lGi?S~~Z ,CERTIFY THAT ON
THE FOLL04lING DATE, J~/.D/"iI ~c.Q~J~f~j~ T POSTED AN AGENDA
FOR
FOR R
tr'EAR 1. /if4~Gl/-l
4.
SIGNATURE ~~/~///~4L-;.'~,~//J`.~~t1~~/
DATE ~ ~ n~
~I ~.~.
' III i~ ~~ ~,~~1T I T I C~~N
i
Z~• C3
~%',~%
PQ~.... I
4i ~~ 1~.4~ F~=
~o.~~~ ~~
'~
'~-~'.~~
J= rr:~~.~ ~~i.
~; .- -
.
g'~ I~ • r~ ~-,~
.~~.
m
I~
I
~. .
L. ~.: .
II .
I
k.
~\
:p
Ili:; r-
r
~`;
~ ~.
(~
~'
~- - - ----• -r-----• ^~~~
i l11
I
i
C
~1 ~f..`~-.. ~ ~ •s
/-r I' '•--- ~~\i~:_`'~i~. ~ ~ !:~t~ rte`./.
A C-
20:
. \ vVl\ „!
Cc=~'
~ iti.9~
-:, 6200 , ,.1~'
:~ _:
f
. ....,» •
(P-878)
N
6 -2
be.ae
~ ~ \ xss fe
300\. \~
i ~ ~~
~,
+ is ~\
I^ 1 '" \
\\
' \~ \ \
i
i
I$
V
Q
lA
\~
.2 )6
N.T7 ~o. ep 3, : ~
6100
O Jv-~
Inc "' ., ,~
'~ _ _ .36.16 5 : ~~ ••°, 27J11
a 15600
;r ~ ~
~, 6 `, Z ~ _ zac.
. - _
~ ~.~.
I~:.-5500 4~.{ I ~
•~;
.' ~ ,
} »~
q />o of 7 ' o
~\, '•\,5400 ~ '°
O a II ~O v
1~ X58 )f. ~ 1`i
53p $
~ 'J 4 \^ 1~
~ ~~
_.~`~ o ~
i`
j9 ny 9~~
~~-c 5200 ~~.Z~
~~ • to M ~1
' 5100
~jrl~
tt. 4
11
. 5000 I
V
s7 z.
'•- 'o9.gy 13 M'
W a
0 1 j 4800 8
~~/ ~ 1
..~
~- ` _
v, , Y 14700 ^
U S E I i ~ w
e ~}~
~~~ ~ ,o>-.e9 15 ~~L
,,~ X4600 ~ j
_/` FI )pis 1
' ,~:.a~ 16 .I I
.1 ~ 4500 _ ~;
~'' l l e~ 1
..s re 17.°.I ~
\ i
a• w.. ~ ~ L . ''w~;°"".~YLh3aaLLi tTa~s~'s.*'~y',~°`~•'K'_-~.,M..n^_~`_~ `°~.c,..L.aT~^r+r~ : ~I ' ~ °_8;
~ ~
r I$
. ~ i ~
N
1~
N
N
s
~1~~
ICI
_~__-_
N
N
N
V
N -i-
`J s_ -_
~ J N
1 sr
~'~ ~ ~ ~~,
~- `w~ N
~,.,J N
~~~.~
!i r I~_--- __ ~
g Jackts~on TC~reLe~k T~
N~t~ i ~2~1`1i k~~l!
D~~-I~]L~PP~~NT
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL
TO GRANT A MINOR PARTITION OF LAND
WHEREAS, on April 21, 1988, Dennis C: W. Smith filed an application for a
minor partition. of land. located at 1642 Bea11 Lane further described as Jackson
County map page 37 2W lODA, tax lot 300; and
WHEREAS, the agenda including the public meeting was posted at the Central
Point Library, Central Point Post Office, Central Point Fire Station, and Central
Point City Ha11; and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 3, 1988 the Planning Commission held
a review of the proposal, provided opportunity for testimony from proponents and
opponents, and received a planning staff report; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the review and public hearing, the Planning Commission
made a motion to provide recommendation for approval to the City Council; now,
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission recommends
~-
to the City of Central Point City Council that the minor partition of land be ap-
proved with the condition that the applicant comply with the requirements of the
Public Works Department staff report attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this refer-
ence incorporated into the within resolution.
Passed by the Planning Commission this third day of May, 1988, and signed by me
in authentication of its passage this
day of 1988.
Planning Commission Chairman.
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Secretary ~~
Ci k-~
~~~:
PLANNING COAit9ISSI0N RESOLUTION N0.
EXHIBIT A
CENTRAL POINT PU3LIC WORK DEPARTMENT
--- S T A F F` R E P O R T --
Date: April 29, 1988
For: Minor Land Partition - Dennis C. W. Smith
37 2W 10DA, tax lot 300
2.00 acres (Parcel 1 - .96 acre; Parcel 2 - 1.04 acres)
Access: Present access for Parcel 1 and 2 is Bea11 Lane directly. Future access
for Parcel 2 will be Glenn Way whenever this street is constructed.
Street Improvements:
No street improvements are required at this time; however, Parcel 2 will be re-
quired to dedicate 30" of the-eastern portion of its property. 'Parcels 1 and 2
will be required to dedicate 10' of the southern portion of its property. Street
improvements are required when the remainder of Glenn Way is to be constructed.
This will include storm drainage, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, streetlights, and
street improvements. The property 'owners shall sign a deferred'improvement agree-
ment which requires installation of these improvements when the City requests them
to be made. Said agreement shall be recorded with the deed 'and run with the land
for both parcels.
Utility Improvements:
Water system, sanitary sewer system, and other utilities which ihclude telephone;
power, gas, and cable T.V. are available to this property. At his own expense,'the
property owner shall provide the parcels with adequate service as authorized ahd
approved by the City under separate permit. The utility improvements included in
Glenn Way shall be provided in a deferred improvement agreement to be completed
upon. request to the owner by the City.
Other Comments:
1. Any building improvements, street or utility installations shall be reviewed and
permitted separately from this minor land partition.
2. All construction within the public right-of-way shall be constructed as required
by the Public Works Standards, Central Point Municipal Code, and other rules,
regulations, and requirements of the City, County, State, or other government
agencies.
LRB/rnah
PUBR'KS SRSI~'II~LP _
Y~. Sri
--- S T A F F R E P O R T---
To: Planning Commission Date: April 29, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Planning Director
Re: Conditional use application for an automobile repair facility to be con-
. structed at 900 .South Front Street in a C-5 zone (37 2W 11CB, tax lot 805)
submitted ,by Mike Linder
Central Point Municipal Code Section 17.46.030, A., identifies. this. activity as a
conditional use in a C-5 zone. The proposed structure would contain approximately
6,000 square feet with a retail, area of approximately 1,000 square .feet for recre-
ational vehicle accessories. _
16 on-site parking spaces are provided per CPMC Section 17.64.
The area behind the structure will contain a sight-:obscuring fenced storage area.:
No vehicle storage or maneuvering is planned; therefore, the surface will not. be
paved.
CPMC Section 17.76.040 outlines the requirements for consideration by the Planning
Commission while-reviewing the ¢onditional use application.. Staff has prepared a
resolution adopting findings for this conditional use should°the Commission desire
to approve ..this project..
The following exhibits are included. for .the Commission to review:
Exhibit A - Notice of Public Hearing;
Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting of Notice of Public Hearing;
Exhibit C - Tax Assessor's map;
Exhibit D - Aerial map;
Exhibit E - Resolution approving the conditional use findings;.
Exhibit F - Site plan (separate document).
RK/mah
PCP7ORK SRCUPLIN
~~~
LE kT Rq~
°~ ~ ~ ~AO
/a.i4`y'~'.. ~+~.
{U ,_. __ __...
i `, ,, t i
•~C`~~~ 155 SO: SECOND ST
TY.E -E.~RT OF THE
ROGL:= FIVER VALLE]'
P.O. BOX 3576 CENTRAL pO~r'T, ORcGON 97502 P~~OI.E ggi• ~_-
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
NOTICE OF PIIBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Central, Point Planning Commission will review'at a
public hearing an application-for a conditional use permit from'Mi.ke Linder to
allow for a automobile repair facility in a building to be constructed at 900 South
Front Street, Central Point, Oregon, in a C-5 zone. Said .property is 'further. de- '
scribed as Jackson County Tax Assessor's map page 37 2W 11CB, tax lot 805.
This public hearing will be held on Tuesday, May 3,..1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the City
of Central Point Council Chambers, 155 South Second Street, Central-Point, Oregon.
Randy Kugler
Planning Department
City of Central Point
Date: N,ay 3, 1988
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Place: Council Chambers
i55 South Second Street
P. 0. Box 3576
Central Point, OR 97502
Please publish in the Medford
Mail Tribune on April 28 and
May 1, 1988 and provide affidavit
of publication.
e• r A
i !yt 1~
v~ ~_'1
~~ j:y ~ o
i pR G ~. a P.O. 60X3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE664-3321
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
CERTIFICA-T/E/OF POSTING
I , /~?//l"~?~( ~lLn~ Y~ CERTI Fl' THAT ON
THE FOLLOWING DATE, r~i',~rll~~-,?~, /~tf)s~ I POSTED A PUBLIC
P;OT I'' c OF A o~~7/?/~/nom C' ~ , .. ~C~~,,~r~ '~.'C/ /~ ^ ~ .;? /Y I?//
~~J%.CLit~:7/2~1.( G'SG~ ' mi~'-~Lyo~/(LGL~': ur, f^r/.Z/1 .~c."'i?~o //G I'ePc2el
FOR~';~C_ I~/L~~"i.2~?d•~n~i->t.S/.~blr~ir/=%~~, /I?i.~r: /r~l'a;~ NT OP,
NEAR 1 ,/~Ix ~c/Q/.~
3. /~Lri ~ ~rE' ~~ivr,
4 L'r.,f~~. /~hnz/2,
_- J _.
/ --~
SIGNATURE ~ ~%%/.//,~(~,:~!/~~~/i/'~G.~//i/L~
DATE /li.'% Gl~ ii"i /`~~~~~
~:
~~ . ~
~ '
~,
/ ~B5 i
~q~ ~ ,6.6
\~~
j -,~ ..500
~ ~~
P~~ I ,.
G` ~~ /
V ~i D
.~~m~~~
~i
' .2 , BLK soo
o. a,
$'Jo 700
ti •`~ ~`
. ~~L I I ~ ~'~ '.='
I I' AL
\ c7 G~S~ -1294) ~
a
U
3
N
N
M
y
800 ~~~
~~\ ~ ~ ~ -~
~~ 10/ 805 a
\ I ~
• /~ '
~r ... ~V `• ~ ~ '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ;~ ~ 804
/ \ I ° ~ ~ i ° p3'
' '
O ~,~ ~ ._
~\
Q i8
%~b
~~
~` ~ 'a
\ ~" ~ ' G ~9
\ ~, 9~
\. ~. i
\ ~~ E
r
' \ ~/
•.1
~~ '•~ \~~
:, ,\~
;.
..
4P-1460) Cyr 802\
e
~i s`
o;,~ ~
Eu-. C-
5 ~ eo_
/L~.h~.~. ~,.
,~. ~., ~
a
N
G
N 1/
~. ~ 1
W a
w
~ / z~~
W x U
l~ ~ x
m
N
X
T~ ~/
~/
O ~i/~
~+ // / /
//.
i~
/ ~ V
~` ~ \~ /
r ~~
/ /% \~~ ~
i
m ~ °'
Q, j o x
~ j P
x / ' ~~\ N
/ ~ '(
~ ~~L
/ 5'C
t ~/ ~ /~ N
T
/ O
~--=~ ' x
Iz
~l~~i •• .
O
O
f
~~ ~~~_NVW332id
N /^I (I'mo'
/ 11 ~
i"~ L-
x ~ ~ r~ `-' O C
/~x U 1 /~ ~ v CQx
~7 * O / _;
x /
~~ ~ v +~~~
~ o
Q~ [j//~\\\\ ~ a //~ j.
~_ U
r~~~;-/,~ n 1
a
N
.,
/~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOP'PING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AtiD APPROVING
THE .CONDITIONAL .USE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY 2•'II:E CINDER
WHEREAS, an application for a conditional use permit for an automobile repair
facility in a C-5 zone has been submitted by Mike Linder, said business to be locat-
ed at 900 South Front Street within the City; the location more particularly de-
scribed as Jackson County Tax Assessor's map page 37 2W 11CB, tax lot 805; and
WHEREAS, The Central Point Planning Commission has reviewed and approved the
application at a public hearing held on the third day of May, 1988; now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON,
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The relevant criteria applicable to the within application is as
follows:
(a) The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as thoroughfare commercial.
(b) The Zoning Ordinance designates the site as C-5.
' (c) Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 17.76 describes the conditions which
the Planning Commission must consider in ..order to grant a conditional use
permit.
Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds as follows. The proposal
meets the City's urbanization goal for commercial land uses found in the Comprehen-
sive Plan because:
(a) The east side of Highway 99 (Front Street) is the primary thoroughfare
commnercial district (C-5). This area is developed primarily for auto re-
lated businesses and services. The C-5 zoning recognizes these types of
uses and will strengthen this corridor while providing locations for these
uses that are often not compatible with commercial uses in other zones.
Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby finds as follows. The proposal
meets the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance for a C-5 zone because:.
(a) Automobile service and repair is a conditional use.
(b) The proposed use meets all height, yard and lot coverage requirements.
(c) No evidence was submitted supporting a conclusion that the proposed use
would generate conditions that would adversely impact surrounding
properties.
(d) A buffer will be installed along the new property line to lessen the
visual on the neighboring residential properties.
~~ ~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. - Page 1
Section 4. The Planning Commission hereby-finds as 'follows: The proposal meets
the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit because:
(a) The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use,
and meets parking, setback, access, building height, and lot coverage
requirements.
(b) The site has access to a public highway, Front Street (a major arterial),
and has been satisfactorily reviewed by the Oregon Department of
Transportation (ODOT).
(c) All abutting properties are commercial or have light manufacturing charac-
teristics and have been developed to a similar density or are planned and
zoned for such development.
(d) No evidence was submitted supporting a conclusion that the proposed devel-
opment would have a negative impact on residential property values.
Section S. The Planning. Commission finds that the record herein and .the findings
therefrom-.support the conclusion that the proposal is in compliance with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and the applicable standards of the City's Zoning Code. The
proposed conditional use is hereby approved subject to compliance with the relevant
requirements of the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, and the requirements
of the Public Works Department attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference
incorporated into the within resolution.
Passed by the Planning Commission on
19_, and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of
19_
Planning Coir¢nission Chairman
ATTEST:
Planning Cormnission Secretary
~~~
~ x-:
PLANNING COtR9ISSI0N RESOLUTION NO. - Page 2
EXHIBIT A
CENTRAL-POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
--- STAFF REPORT---
Dater April 29, 1988
For: Linder Development
900 South Front Street
25,000 square feet - 100' x 250'
Street Improvements
Existing Conditions:
Street access - Highway 99 (major arterial)
Jurisdiction of street - Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)
Present:access - None; however, E & L Properties, Inc. is required to develop joint
access at the northwest corner of this property.
Proposed access width - Northwest 40' (20' each side of centerline of property),
southwest 40' (20' each side of property).
Storm drainage - Property drains to the southeast. There is an existing drainage
ditch (Mingus Creek) along the eastern portion of the property.
Streetlighting - E & L Properties, Inc. will install one at the northwest corner of
their property. This is approximately 150' away from the center of this property.
along Highway 99.
On-street parking - None
Curbs and sidewalks - None
1. Accessing this property (ingress and egress) is from a major arterial street
which would potentially reach 20,000+ vehicle trips per day by the year 1993.
Access from a major arterial should not be allowed at distances less than 150'
from the centerline of each access.
In its planning approval for a seafood wholesale operation and truck service
facility, E & L Properties, Inc. was required to create joint ingress/egress at
its southwest access. This condition would hold true with the Linder develop-
ment for joint access for this property's northwest access. The joint access
would be 20' on each side of the property line.
The Linder development also requests joint access for its southwest ingress/
egress, which access would be shared with Dan's Muffler. The curb cut for
Dan's Muffler would be cut out and replaced with the proper curbing. This
joint access shall be 40' wide.
2. An access permit will be required from ODOT. The City has met with officials
fromODOT and the recommendations from the meeting are listed in #1 and #3 of
this section.
3. Curbs and a storm drainage system shall be installed as required by ODOT along
with landscaping in the utility strip in front of the building adjacent to
Highway 99. ~~'
~~ ~ ~~, C-
C~Xtt1151'1' A
CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
Linder Development Page 2
4. At some time in the future whenever Highway 99 is improved, sidewalks and a
bikeway shall be installed by the property owners abutting Highway 99. •In
order to accommodate this project, a deferred improvement agreement will be
required for these improvements.
5. A streetlight shall be placed at the southwest joint access to provide adequate
illumination along Highway 99. The light shall be a 22,000 lumen high pressure
sodium vapor cobrahead style mounted on a 35' aluminum davit pole. If a power
pole is available with adequate height, the light can be mounted to it instead.
6. On-street parking - No parking allowed on Highway 99. All parking and maneuver-
.- ing shall be accomplished on the property.
7. First Street improvements shall be completed only in the property owners wish
to pay for improvements through a local improvement district. First Street
will not be required to be developed by the City unless the property owners
make the request.
8. A11 street signing for accesses shall be installed according to the Munual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices and is approved by the City.
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
1. A sanitary sewer main exists in the right-of-way of First Street; however, its
depth is relatively. shallow. The developer shall be required to extend this
sanitary sewer to service this property.
Water Improvements
1. The Fire Department shall determine the necessity of an on-site fire hydrant.
The nearest fire hydrant is located at approximately 35' north of the northwest
property corner.
2. Two water meters shall be installed, one for domestic use and the other for
irrigation use.
Storm Drainage Improvements
1. Mingus Creek crosses the eastern portion of the property. An adequately sized
pipe shall be installed to carry the calculated flow to Mingus Creek. This pipe
shall match the pipe being installed by E & L Properties, Inc.
2. On-site storm drainage shall be calculated, designed, and sized to carry all the
storm water discharge from this site.
Other Requirements
1. All construction within .the public right-of-way or for utilities to become
o~zblicly rnaincained facilities shall be as specified in ±he Central Point
Municipal Code and the Public Works Standards.
LRB/mah /
PUBV7KS SRLINDER 1~X ~~ `~.
--- S T A F F R E P O R T---
To: Planning Commission Date: April 29, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Planning Director
Re: Site Plan Review for an automobile repair facility to be constructed at 900
South Front Street in a C-5 zone (37 2W 11CB, tax lot 805) submitted by Mike
Linder
This proposal calls for the construction of a 6,000 square-foot automobile repair
facility that would also include approximately 1,000 square feet of retail area for
recreational vehicle accessories. Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 17.72 con-
tains standards required for a site plan to which the Planning Commission may refer
for their Teview.
Approximately 700 square feet of landscaping is shown in two separate planter
areas. The proposed building construction would be of a wood and metal style simi-
lar to the adjoining Dan's Muffler shop. A signing plan should be available for
the hearing.
All major use and design issue should be resolved by the time the site plan review
is considered; however, the Commission may attach as conditions of approval .any of
those standards contained in Section 17.72.040. -
The following exhibits are included:
Exhibit A - Notice of Public Meeting;
Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting of Notice of Public Meeting;
Exhibit C - Tax Assessor's map;
Exhibit D - Aerial map;
Exhibit E - Site plan (separate document).
RK/mah
PCWORK SRLINDSP ~/ ~
~ /
155 SO. SECOND ST. P.O. BOX 3576 CENTRAL POINT. OREGON 97502 PHONE 664-3321
THE HEAF.T OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
Notice .is_hereby given that the City of Central Point Planning Commission will
conduct a public meeting to review and consider for recommendation to the City
Council a request from Gerald and Kathy Klocke to annex a .42-acre parcel contigu-
ous to the City of Central Point and adjacent to Edwina Avenue and Libby Street,
and to withdraw the same from Jackson County Fire District No. 3. Land for said
annexation is described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's map page 37 2W 11C, tax
lot 101.
Said public meeting will be held in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 155 South
Second Street, Central Point, Oregon, on May 3, 1988, at 7:00 p.m.
Any person, whether property owner or otherwise, and any affected governmental unit
may appear in person or submit written testimony at said meeting.
Randy Kugler.
Planning Department
City of Central Point
Date: May 3, 1988
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Place: City Hall Council Chambers
155 South Second Street
P. 0. Box 3576
Central Point, OR 97502
~.
/V
?S C~
. C'f kRr A( .QO
o '
.f
_ °~(~ _
OREGp~
THE HEART OF THE
' ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, /~/~~,/~r~c?J?_`~`J~/~J~1-~ CER7IF1' THAT ON
THE FOLLOI~IING DATE, ~J~' //~ ~~/ ~~i~9~~ I POSTED A' PUELIC
F;UTICE~ OF A ~/Orll%//'rs~. C-O/n/77/SS/6Yl ~),GI //!~ /~~c~ 1262/
~5'/.re p/a~2.reYr~'~ for ~,x,~/~orr /a.~~ rr~ ~ ~
FOR /~~ 9~~ s • ~r,~iz/` /~~ {?7~/cP Girr,~ / AT ,
NEAR
~/',
SIGNATURE : /~~///'1lli b 1~.~~1J~C~
DATE l~ ~ ~~
~/ E~ L3
P.O. BOX 3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGOtJ 97502 PHONE664-3321
`~
/ ''S, ~
i 40( `t
/ ~B5 I ~' '
/ ~Ac i '
,6-6
F~~~ A j
'Sp ~- ~ O ~
: fC7 I 500 3
O i..' N
t P ^~ ti
,., ~.. goo,
y 12 / BLK soo
~ °. _'
y ,4. ~~
~~~ 700
G78 G~5'P-1294) ~ -
800 ~~,
k
~ ~ ~ ~ .•• -
~~
10 ~ 805
R , ~ OA. s~
~~,
,t g9 ° e6 ~ ~~
~ ~ ~8 803
.e
~ ~i R
'9
' / .. ~~
~. ~ 7 J ~ ~
i • \ ~ ~ +.
E s ', `
0~~ •. '~
\ ~.y ~ '..
R ~ '/ //
i,
,• ~~ L.~
i /
P / \~ \ ~'~
~``~ ~~ ~ 5 ~ 90C.
~: v
N
6
_~\ n_
~\
~_.
W
W c
Z N ~
W x ()
N
d
m
N
» -.
~O J~
O
U
I : ~ ~~. ~--^-_
~ m%
T
^'^I N
U
O~
L' O
O
1 %
N
JP~~~y~
f
~O ~~/
// / Z
^NtlW33ad
O
v ///~
\~+ /~ / +/
'f x`111111 \ ~
~ N J
----~
~ \ ~~
~~
~~
~~ ~ m
m ~ o
m /~~ a' x
N / / ~
/~ ~~<,
1 ~ '~ ~'C.
'~ ~~ /
F`~/- ~%
~ \/~ ~I i
/ N ~i
~i
`_
1.. .~ ~ O
J j
ii
v
P
N
--- S T A F F R E P O R T---
To: Planning Commission Date: April 29, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Planning Director
Re: Public meeting to review and recommend to the City Council annexation of a
.42-acre parcel adjacent to Edwina Avenue and Libby Street (Lot 1, Block 2 of
Homestead Acres Subdivision} and to withdraw the same from Jackson County
Fire District #3 submitted by Gerald and Kathy Klocke
The applicants have submitted an annexation petition so that they may connect to
the City's sanitary sewer system. Their present septic system is failing and may
not remain functional through the winter months.
The subject property owners have initiated this annexation and have submitted the
appropriate petition and application information. Public Works Director Larry
Blanchard foresees no problems with connecting to the City sanitary sewer. The
Klockes wish to remain in the Elk City Water District.
The following exhibits are included:
Exhibit A - Certificate of Posting of agenda of Planning Commission'
meeting held May 3, 1988;
.Exhibit B - Annexation petition;
Exhibit C - Jackson County Tax Assessor's map page;
Exhibit D - Resolution Recommending Approval of Annexation.
RK/mah
PCWORK SREDANX Sr~
O ~ j~~~~i
` ~ y~l
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
P.O. BOX 3576 'CENTRAL POINT, OnEGON 97502 PHONc 664-3321
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I , ~9// ~YL ~~~/9.~°l'1 _ ,CERTIFY THAT ON
THE FOLL04lING DATE, ~~OY/~ ~~, /~J~'~ I POSTED AN AGENDA
FOR
FOR
NEAR 1. ~~/~c~ /~ll~
2
L~
SIGNATUP,E ~~fj/,'D~//.,L) ,%? '/~l
DATE ~~~
s~ C~, ~
ANNEXATION PETITION
THE UNDERSIGNED hereby request and consent to the annexation
to the City of Central Point, Oregon, of the real property
contiguous thereto described in Exhibit,"A" attached hereto and
by this reference made a part of the within petition.
By their signature hereto ,. the undersigned certify that they
are either "owners" of land in the territory proposed to be
annexed as described in Exhibit "A", or are "electors" registered
in the territory proposed to be annexed as described in Exhibit
nAn~
This petition, containing the request and consent to said
annexation, must be filed with the Central Point City Council on
or before the date of the public hearing. to be held upon .the
proposed annexation pursuant to ORS 222.120.
"Owner" is defined by ORS 222.120 as meaning the legal owner
of record or, where there is a recorded land contract which is in
force, the purchaser thereunder. If there is multiple ownership
in a parcel of land, each consenting owner shall be counted as a
fraction to the same extent as the interest of the owner in the
land bears in relation to the interest of the other owners, and
the same fraction shall be applied to the parcel's. land mass for
purposes of the consent petition. If a corporation owns land in
a territory proposed to be annexed, the corporation shall be
considered to be the individual owner of that land.
"Elector" is defined in said statute as an individual
qualified to vote under Article II, Section 2 of the Oregon
Constitution, which in turn requires that the individual be 18
years of age or older, a resident of the area in question, and
registered to vote as required by applicable state law.
Furthermore, ORS 222.170(2) requires that electors petitioning
for annexation be registered in the territory proposed to be
.annexed.
Elector or Property Owner:
(If Property Owner, insert
Signature•
-~~ ~^.~ /~j~=` /JCL
-.~.r
,._ ,•%
S"3 ~~
ANNEXATION PETITION ~ ~~
(120887) `
- - O ~ ,.,
- O o o O r` - Q v
O O O N os
_ ti
V J o ~ h
OI, ~I: ~ l0 tD ~ ~ - ~ t>~
.' _~ r .
., .. '~y~-i3a3
° r .,, , _ , a , ~, ~ ... a ~ I v
~ M N O _
- - m p O O I 3
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~
~• Y ~ Q
,~ - - ~ .3A dNiMa3 ~~ o o~
A O., r u, ~ ~v O v
3' J
(~ O :~ d 20
"' ~ v _
O ~ O Y O H O O
O J
M O O m ~ ~ : O
Y'1 IN In tJ l C ... ..
~~ - -
II I ~ ` • s d ~ w >
~ ~ ~~
s ...°
~QO• a
• I i l
\ ~~.F'y~ o? ~ ~ /i iii
~~
~~
d •
•/
:f ~ e
. ;
e / /~,jti;
f • /J~
~~'~ ~
. i~
i
t
L
7 i;' J
~, ~, .,
~s
r
~~
'~
i _
E ~ [~;
zt.
i I .r;
` ~~ j
i e..
Ems, ~ !;
1
I
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE CENTRAL POINT CITY COUNCIL FOR ANNEXATION
OF APPROXIMATELY .42 ACRE OF CONTIGUOUS PROPERTY GENERALLY BOUNDED BY EDWINA
AVENUE AND LIBBY STREET TO THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT; TO WITHDRAW SUCH PROPERTY
FROM JACKSON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #3; AND FURTHER RECOMMEND THAT THE ZONING
DESIGNATION INDICATED -0N THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE
ZONING MAP BE IN EFFECT UPON FINAL APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, a petition has been filed with the City of Central Point requesting
and consenting to the annexation of approximately .42 acres of real property contig-
uous to the City of Central Point generally bounded by Edwina Avenue and Libby
Street further described as lot 1, block 2 of Homestead Acres Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, if annexed,'said property will be withdrawn from Jackson County Fire
District #3; and
WHEREAS, the agenda listing the public meeting held May 3, 1988 was posted in
four public places on April 28, 1988; and
WHEREAS, on May 3, 1988, a review of the proposed annexation was held-before
the Central Point Planning Commission and opportunity for testimony from proponents
and opponents was provided at said public meeting;. now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CENTRAL: POINT PLANNING COMMISSION that the Planning
Coa¢nission of the City of Central Point, Oregon, recommends that the City Council
approve the annexation of approximately .42 acres of contiguous property generally
bounded by Edwina Avenue and Libby Street to the City of Central Point and withdraw
said property from Jackson County Fire District #3; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Central Point Planning Commission recormnends
that the zoning designation indicated on the City of Central Point Comprehensive
Land Use Map be in effect upon final approval of the proposed annexation.
Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its
passage this day of May, 1988.
Planning Commission Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. - Page 1 C~
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Secretary
SJ
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. - Page 2
~~
--- S T A F F R E P O R T---
To: Planning Commission Date: April 29, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Planning Director
Re: Location of a bingo parlor in a C-5 zone as a permitted use
Southern Oregon Veterans' Outreach Center, Inc. would like to locate their facility
in the Central Point Shopping Center on South Front Street. This use is not specif-
ically listed as either a permitted or conditional use in a C-5 zone.
A number of social game activities are presently permitted (i.e. bowling alleys,
roller skating rinks, pool halls, etc.). Amusement centers (pinball games, etc.)
are listed as a conditional use.
The proponents of this use will be in attendance at the Planning Commission meeting
and are requesting that the Planning Commission consider this activity as a similar
permitted use.
RKjmah
PCWORK SRBINGO
~~
~1~ ~°~^
(A STRESS AND
TRAUMA TREATMENT
FACILITY)
223 W. MAIN, #202
MEDFORD,OREGON
97501
(503) 770.5374
GOVERNING
BOARD
Jerry Hoffman
Hugh Ellis
Tom Helman
Tom Harasin
F. Klutsenbeker
EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR
Kathy Ingram, Ph.D.
STAFF
Larry Slessler, M.A.
John Whitten, B.A.
27 April 1988
To Whom It May Concern:
Southern Oregon Veterans Outreach Center: is an Oregon
not-for-profit corporation, which enjoys tax exempt status
under LR.S. 501(c)`(3) classifications, and which has as its
primary mission the provision of readjustment counseling and
employment services to veterans of the United States armed
services.
We currently hold a class C bingo license, issued'by
the State 'of Oregon, Department of Justice, and we desire
to operate our bingo concession within the pity limits of
Central .Point, in a facility. which has been expressly,
leased for that.. purpose..
Our audience of .bingo patrons consists primarily of
senior citizens, who enjoy playing bingo for recreational
purposes. All of the profitable income from our bingo
concession is used to support the scientific, educatio)aal,
'and charitable services of Southern Oregon Veterans out-
reach Center, and every dollar so-generated remains
within Jackson County, and provides direct services to
Jackson County residents. Our bingo patrons have shared
with us that they are pleased that the proceeds from the
games go toward a worthwhile, local, charitable endeavor.
Our attendance at bingo games ranges from 40 to 60
players, and we Estimate that our audience may grow to
100 players by fall of 1988. ~~re park approximatel~~ 30 to
40 cars per bingo event, and have arranged for completely
off-road parking for our players. We currently operate
bingo games during the day-time hours on Tuesdays and
Thursdays, and have plans to make our facility to other
agencies, situated within Jackson County, who may also
wish to operate licensed games. Community Health Center,
Inc. , will be operating bingo games an Wednesdays. We
have no plans, whatsoever, to operate games of any kind
on Sundays.
If we can provide any further information to you re-
garding our bingo concessions, charitable programs, or
plans for the future, please feel free to contact me. I
remain, /'~ql
--- S T A F F' 'R F P O R T---
To: Planning Commission Date: March 29, 1988
From: Randy Kugler,: Administrative Assistant.& Acting Planning Director
Re: Dwelling Group as a Conditional Use in an R-2 Zone
The recent application for a single-family dwelling group bn Tenth and Scenic
presented a number of complications for both staff and the Commission during the
review process. I have not been able to determine how this-development option
came to be included in the zoning ordinance and question its usefulness for future
application in its present form.
The City has provided through its P.U.D. option a means for developers to obtain'a
density bonus for residential developments. The P.U.D. option provides clear
guidelines for both staff and the applicant. This needed direction is obviously
lacking under the present dwelling group criteria: - -
Staff would suggest that the dwelling group option be either removed from the R-2
district as a_conditional use or have .Wes Reynolds completely review and'recQmmend
improvements should the Commission feel this, is worth retaining. -
RK/mah'
PCWORK DitiGRPCUP
- - ~ ~~
--- S T A F F R E P O R T---
To: Planning Commission Date: March 29, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Planning Director
Re: Siting of Mini Storage Facilities
This issue continues to be a popular item with staff receiving regular inqui-
ries from developers and real estate agents. At present, recreational vehicle
storage lots are listed as a permitted use in our C-5 zone.
The Commission should consider whether this use should be permitted or condi-
tional within a C-5 zone or whether it may be more appropriate in an M-1 zone
as warehousing or storage activity.
Based upon the Commission's direction, I would suggest that this matter be
included by Wes Reynolds in the next round of proposed zoning text amendments.
RK/mah
,, PC'ttiORi? I+;I`7ISTG
~~