HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - April 5, 1988/: .. ~
4
Next Resolution No. 136
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
155 South Second Street
April 5, 1988
AGENDA
I. Meeting called to order
II. Ro11 call
III. Approval of minutes
IV. Correspondence and public appearances
V. Business
Page ~~
1 A. Proposed revisions to Central Point Municipal Code Title 16,
Land Divisions, by Wes Reynolds, Rogue Valley Council of
Governments.
13 B. Public .Hearing - Conditional use application for a truck repair
and seafood processing facility to be constructed at 890 South
Front Street in a C-5 zone (37 2W 11CB, tax lot 800) submitted
by E & L Properties, Inc.
25 C. Public Hearing - Variance for construction of a building in a
required side yard setback area at 890 South Front Street in a
C-5 zone (37 2W 11CB, tax lot 800) submitted by E & L
Properties, Inc.
32 D. Public Meeting - Site plan review for a truck repair and sea-
food processing facility to be constructed at 890 South Front
Street in a C-5 zone (37 2W 11CB, tax lot 800) submitted by
E & L Properties, Inc.
35 E. Review of First Street and Highway 99 Master Plan - Larry
Blanchard, Public Works Director
43 F. Review of dwelling groups as a conditional use in an R-2 zone
44 G. Siting of-mini storage facilities
VI. Miscellaneous
VII. Adjournment
i ' ` ~~" " ~° °°-°~ ~~-~ ` r ' ~~~ `-~~ ~ -'"°•-~ °~ 155 S. Second Street
p~~ P.O. Box 3275
~UO~.lI1C1. l Ol VO~e~~~~n~J Central Point, OR 97502
6 6 a>_~ur,tIXt.`39.LS'dR~1VW b4 ~A('4 .t¢. '. ~.9.N'tr~. NIxxNWPX an" Ii+t\.YS.'...'v. .. .t\ .:.+: -.t e.i3 .+~e. ~_ .. e n t.t kt '.i":.sa Y. :Mds YF/ez?1G[YC 8}t llw. MV 4T( N G"....
503-664-6674
March 31, 1988
T0: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Wes Reynolds, RVCOG
Attached are proposed revisions for several sections in Title 16 of
the Central Point Municipal Code, now called "Subdivisions". The
revisions are for Chapter 16.12, 16.16 and 16.20 and deal with
streets and land dedication.
The revisions presume a heavy reliance on the city's Public Works
Standards. Those standards were adopted some years ago but were not
integrated with the other titles of the code or the Comprehensive
Plan. I have been working closely with the Public Works Director who
is currently revising the Public Works Standards. The standards he
is compiling are probably something the Planning Commission will want
to look at in conjunction with the proposed land division title
changes.
As before deletions from the text are in [brackets.), and the proposed
additions underlined. A passage proposed to be {moved) has a
different type of bracket.
Preliminary Draft Revisions 3/31/88
Chapter 16.12
STREETS AND OTHER WAYS--DESIGN STANDARDS
Sections•
16.12.010
16.12.020
16.12.030
16.12.040
16.12.050
16.12.060
16.12.070
16.12.080]
[16.12.090
16.12.[100]080
16.12.[110]090
16.12.[120]100
16.12.[130]110
[16.12.140
[16.12.150
16.12.[160]120
16.12.[170]130
16.12.[180]140
Creation of streets.
Creation of ways.
Design standards and principles of
acceptability.
Streets--Generally.
Streets--Rights-of-way and widths.
Streets--Reserve strips.
[Streets--Alignment.
Streets--Extension.
Streets--Intersection angles.]
Existing streets.
Half streets
Cul-de-sac.
Streets--Names.
Streets--Grades and curves.]
Streets--Adjacent to railroad right-of-way.]
Planting easements.
Alleys.
Sidewalks.
16.12.010 Creation of streets. Streets created for the
purpose of partitioning land shall conform with the same requirements
as those of streets in subdivisions; provided that upon reviewing
land partitions the planning commission may approve the creation of a
street to be established by deed without full compliance with the
regulations applicable to subdivisions if any of the following
conditions exist:
A. The establishment of the street is initiated by the city
council and is declared essential for the purpose of general traffic
circulation and the partitioning of land is an incidental effect
rather than the primary objective of the street.
B. The tract in which the street is to be dedicated is an
(isolated] individual ownership of one acre or less.
C. The tract in which the street is to be dedicated is an
[isolated] individual ownership of such size and [has such] with
special existing physical conditions as make it impractical to
develop more than three lots.
In those cases where approval of a street is to be without full
compliance with the regulations applicable to subdivisions, a copy of
the proposed deed shall be submitted to the city [recorder]
administrator at least five days prior to the planning commission
meeting at which consideration is desired. The deed and such
information as may be submitted shall be reviewed by the planning
commission and, if not in conflict with the standards of this chapter
and Sections 16.16.010--16.16.070 shall be approved with such
conditions as are necessary to preserve these standards.
16.12.020 Creation of ways. 'A[ny] private street or other
easement of way providing access to property [and which is] may be
created in order to allow the partitioning of land for the purpose of
transfer of ownership or building development, whether immediate or
future.[shall be in the form of a street (in subdivision or) as]
Provided it meets one of the conditiona~in Section 16.12.010 of these
regulations,[except that] or a private easement of way [to be] mgy
established by deed without full compliance with these regulations.
[shall be approved by] If the planning commission [provided] finds it
is the only reasonable method by which the rear portion of an
unusually deep lot large enough to warrant partitioning into two
parcels may be provided with access. In that case subiect anv
partitioning is subiect to flag lot rules in 16.44.050. {This
exception will not apply, if the existing lot is large enough so that
three or more parcels meeting the lot size and setback [minimums]
requirements of this [title] code may be created, and two or more of
such parcels would not have frontage on an existing street.} A copy
of the proposed document to create the easement shall be submitted to
the city [recorder] administrator at least five days prior to the
planning commission meeting at which consideration is desired. The
document and such information as may be submitted shall be reviewed
by the planning commission and, if assurance of adequate utility
access[as well as], vehicular access-, and compliance with this
section is indicated, the application for a private wav shall be
approved.
16.12.030 Design standards and principles of acceptability.
The land [sub]division shall be in conformity with the Comprehensive
Plan and any approved development plans and shall take into
consideration any preliminary plans or studies. The [sub] land
division shall conform with the requirements of state laws, the
city's Public Works Standards, and the standards established by this
[title] code insofar as they are applicable.
16.12.040 Streets--Generally. The location, width, and grade
of streets shall be considered in their relation to existing and
planned streets, to topographical conditions as they relate to
drainage and the operation of the water, and sewer systems, to public
convenience and safety and their appropriate relation to the proposed
use of the land to be served by such streets. Where location is not
shown in a development plan, the arrangement of streets in a
subdivision shall either:
A. Provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of
existing principal streets in surrounding areas; or
B. Conform to the plan for the neighborhood approved or
adopted by the planning commission to meet a particular situation
where topographical or other conditions make continuance or
conformance to existing streets impractical.
16.12.050 Streets--Rights-of-wav and widths. Unless otherwise
indicated on a development plan, the width of streets and roadways in
feet shall be as indicated in the Central Point Comprehensive Plan
and the city's Public works Standards.[not be less than the minimums
shown in the following table:]
_Z_ O
Type of Street
Primary arterials
Secondary arterials,
business and industrial
streets
Minor streets
Radius for turn-around
at end of cul-de-sac
Alleys
[Minimum Minimum
Right-of-Way Roadway
80 60
60 40
50 36
60 60
20 20.]
16.12.060 Streets--Reserve strips. Reserve strips or street
plugs controlling the access to public ways will not be approved
unless such strips are necessary for the protection of the public
welfare or of property rights or both, and [(in no case)] unless the
control and disposal of .the land composing such strips is placed
definitely within the jurisdiction of the city under conditions
approved by the planning commission.
[16.12.070 Streets--Alignment. All streets other than minor
streets or cul-de-sacs, shall, as far as practical, be in alignment
with existing streets by continuation of the centerlines thereof. In
no case shall the staggering of streets making "T" intersections be
so designed that a jog is .produced which is of such nature as to
render traffic control ineffective or unduly difficult at the offset
intersection. Jogs of less than one hundred feet on such streets,
measured along the centerline of the intersected street, must be
adjusted by curves or diagonals so that the alignment across the
street is continuous.]
16.12.070 Streets Where a [sub] land division adjoins
[acreage] vacant land, streets which in the opinion of the planning
commission should be continued in the event of the subdivision of the
[acreage] adjacent land will be required to be provided through to
the boundary lines of the tract. Reserve strips and street plugs may
be required to preserve the objectives of street extensions.
[16.12.090___Stre_e_ts--Lntersection angles. Streets shall
intersect one another at an angle as near to a ninety degree angle as
practical, and no intersections of streets at angles of less than
thirty degrees will be approved unless necessitated by topographic
conditions. When intersections of other than ninety degrees are
unavoidable, the right-of-way lines along the acute angle shall have
a minimum corner radius of twelve feet. All right-of-way lines at
intersections with arterial streets shall have a corner radius of not
less than twelve feet.]
16.12.080 Existing streets. Whenever
a tract .are of inadequate width, additional
provided at the time of [sub]division.
existing' str'eets' within
right-of-way shall be
-3-
16.12.090 Half streets. Half streets [while generally] are
not acceptable. [, may be approved where essential to the reasonable
development of the subdivision when in conformity with the other
requirements of these regulations and when the planning commission
finds it will be practical to require the dedication of the other
half when the adjoining property is subdivided. Whenever a half
street is adjacent to a tract to be subdivided, the other half of the
street shall be platted within such tract. Reserve strips and street
plugs may be required to preserve the objectives of half streets.]
As alternatives to half streets the Citv shall require either: 1) A
at the edee of t
r
-street
16.12.100 Cul-de-sac. A cul-de-sac shall be [as short as
possible and shall in no event be more than] a minimum of 100 feet
long, and a maximum of four hundred feet long nor serve no more than
twelve single family dwellings. All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with
a circular turn-around as defined in the Public Works Standards.
16.12.110 Streets--Names. No street name shall be used which
will duplicate or be confused with the names of existing streets
except for extensions of existing streets. Street names and numbers
shall conform to the established pattern in the city and the
surrounding area and shall be subject to the approval of the planning
commission.
[16.12.140 Streets--Grades and curves. Grades shall not
exceed six percent on primary or secondary arterials or twelve
percent on any other street. In flat areas allowances shall be made
for finished street grades having a minimum slope of one-half
percent. Centerline radii of curves shall not be less than three
hundred feet on primary arterials, two hundred feet on secondary
arterials or one hundred feet on other streets.]
[16.12.1$0__._S_treets--Adjacent to railroad right-of-wav.
Wherever the proposed subdivision contains or is adjacent to a
railroad right-of-way, provisions shall be made for a street
approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a
distance suitable for the appropriate use of the land between such
streets and railroad. Such distance shall be determined with due
consideration at cross streets of the minimum distance required for
approach grades to a future grade separation.]
16.12.120 Planting easements. Where physical conditions
require approval of streets less than fifty feet. in width, additional
easements for planting of street trees or shrubs may be required.
-4-
16.12.130 Alleys. A. Location. Alleys [shall] maw be
provided in commercial and industrial districts. [unless other] In
any case, permanent provisions for access to off-street parking and
loading facilities and utilities easements are to be made as approved
by the planning commission.
B. Intersections. Alley intersections and sharp changes in
alignment [shall] should be avoided. The corners of necessary alley
intersections shall have a radius of not less than twelve feet.
16.12.140 Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be constructed in
accordance with [such] the Public Works Standards. [as may be by
motion adopted by the city council.] Sidewalk construction shall be
completed on each individual lot prior to the city building inspector
granting a certificate of completion or occupancy for any
construction upon said individual lot. [No application for a
building permit application for construction of sidewalks under the
standards of the city as above set out.] A notation thereof shall be
made upon the subdivision or partition plat giving reasonable notice
to any purchaser of a lot therein of the provisions of this section.
This provision shall be applicable only to subdivisions approved
after January 1, 1972.
_5_
Preliminary Draft Revisions 3/31/88
Chapter 16.16
BLOCKS AND LOTS -- DESIGN STANDARDS
Sections:
16.16.010 Blocks--Length, width and shape.
[16.16.020 Blocks--Sizes.]
16.16.0[3]20 Blocks--Easements.
16.16.0[4]30 Size and shape.
16.16.0[5]40 Lots--Size and determination.
16.16.0[6]50 Through lots.
16.16.0[7]60 Lot side lines.
16.16.0[8]70 Large lot subdivision.
16.16.010 Blocks--Length, width and shape. The lengths, widths
and shapes of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing
adequate building sites suitable to the special needs of [the type
and] planned uses [contemplated] need[s] for convenient access,
circulation, control and safety of street traffici [and] limitations
and opportunities of topography, and the city's Public Works
Standards as adopted pursuant to Section 15.80.
[16.16.020 Blocks--Sizes. Blocks shall not exceed twelve
hundred feet in length except blocks adjacent to arterial streets or
unless the previous adjacent layout or topographical conditions
justify a variation. The recommended minimum distance between
intersections on arterial streets is three hundred feet.]
16.16.020 Blocks--Easements. A. Utility Lines. Easements for
electrical lines or other public utilities may be required.
Easements for utilities shall be a minimum of [ten] five feet [in
width and centered] on rear or side lot lines to allow a total width
of ten feet. [Tie-] Back easements [six feet wide by twenty feet
long] shall be determined by the utility requesting the easement
provided for utility poles at point of conversion from overhead to
underground.
B. Drainageways. [Watercourses.] Where a subdivision is
traversed by a water course, drainage way, channel or stream, there
shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right-of-way
conforming substantially with the lines of such watercourse, that
will provide for future drainage requirements as determined by the
elonmen
-1-
C. Pedestrian Ways. In any block over seven hundred fifty feet
in length, a pedestrian way may be required by the commission. The
minimum width of the pedestrian right-of-way must be at least six
£eet in width which shall be hard surfaced through the block and•curb
to curb in order to provide easy access to schools, parks, shopping
centers, mass transportation stops or other community services. If
conditions require blocks longer than twelve hundred feet, two
pedestrian ways may be required for combination pedestrian way and
utility easement. When essential for public convenience, such ways
may be required to connect to cul-de-sacs. Long blocks parallel to
arterial streets may be approved without pedestrian ways if desirable
in the interests of traffic safety.
16.16.030 Lots--Size and shape. The lot size, widths [and]
shape and orientation shall be appropriate for the location of the
subdivision and for the type of development and use contemplated.
16.16.040 Lots--Size and determination. Lot sizes shall
conform with Title 17, [the] Zoning. In the case of irregular lots,
the width shall be measured along the front building line. In no
case shall the average depth be more than two and one-half times the
width. Corner lots for residential use shall have extra width to
permit appropriate building setback from and orientation to both
streets.
A. [In areas that cannot be connected to sewer trunk lines,
minimum lot sizes shall be greater than the minimum herein specified
if necessary because the soil structure is adverse to sewage disposal
by septic tanks. Such lot sizes shall conform to the requirements of
the county health department unless provisions are made for sanitary
sewers.
B] Where property is zoned and planned for business or
industrial use, other widths and areas may be permitted at the
discretion of the planning commission. Depth and width of properties
reserved or laid out for commercial and industrial purposes shall be
adequate to provide for the off-street service and parking facilities
required by the type of use and development contemplated.
16.16.050 Through lots. Through lots shall be avoided except
where essential to provide separation of residential development from
major traffic arteries or adjacent non-residential activities or to
overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. A
planting screen easement at least ten feet wide, and across which
there shall be no right of access, may be required along the line of
lots abutting such a traffic artery or an incompatible use.
16.16.060 Lot side lines. The side lines of lots shall run a
right angles to the street upon which the lots face,. as far as
practicable, or on curved streets they shall be radial to the curve.
-2-
16.16.070 Large lots(subdivisfon]. In [sub]dividing tracts
into large lots which at some future time are likely to be
[resubdivided] partitioned, the location of lot lines and other
details of the layout shall be Bach that [resubdivision] partitioning
may readily take place without violating the requirements of these
regulations and without interfering with the orderly development of
streets. Restriction of building locations in relationship to future
rights-of-way shall be recorded on the plat [.made a matter of record]
if the planning commission considers it necessary. Replatting or
partitioning will still require City approval.
(C.P. ~dORKING) CPT-1616 0
_3_
Preliminary Draft Revisions 3/31/88
Chapter 16.20
LAND DEDICATION
Sections•
16.20.010 Generally.
16.20.020 Dedication standards.
16.20.030 Fee in lieu of dedication--Method of establishing.
16.20.040 Fee in lieu of dedication--Fund.
16.20.050 Choice of land or fee.
16.20.055 Sale of dedicated land.
16.20.060 Exemptions--Credits.
16.20.070 Appeal.
16.20.010 Generally. The public health, safety, convenience
and welfare of the residents of Central Point require that property
be devoted to recreational parks and facilities. Accordingly, every
subdivider and [other] developers of planned unit developments shall
either dedicate a portion of new subdivisions or such other
developments as required by ordinance, or pay a fee in lieu of
dedication of such land as set forth therein, for the purpose of
providing park sites or recreational facilities to serve the
residents of the city. Land or fees required under this chapter
shall be used only for the purpose of providing such park sites or
recreational facilities. Recreational facilities, as defined in this
ordinance, may include facilities for physical, social, cultural or
educational activities for persons of all ages.
16.20.020 Dedication standards. A. All new subdivisions and
planned unit developments shall dedicate for neighborhood park
purposes a single contiguous area of land that is equivalent to the
sum of seven hundred square feet per dwelling unit,
B. The total number of dwelling units in a proposed subdivision
shall, for purposes hereof, be determined by multiplying the number
of lots by the number of dwelling units permitted on each lot under
the zoning ordinance in effect at the time of filing the plat for
approval.
C. The total number of dwelling units in a proposed planned
unit development shall, for purposes hereof, be determined by the
developer's project plan and any authorized increases in units, as
may be permitted in accordance with Section 17.68.130.
16.20.030 Fee in lieu of dedication--Method of establishing,
When a fee is to be required in lieu of land dedication, said fee
shall be six hundred fifty dollars per dwelling unit, applicable to
all single-family, two-family, multiple family and mobile home or
-1-
~v
manufactured home subdivision dwelling units. In the case of mobile
home parks, the in lieu fee shall apply to each improved mobile home
site.
16.20.040 Fee in lieu of dedication--Fund. Past and future
fees paid in lieu of dedication shall bq kept in a fund separate from
all other funds of the city and shall be expended only for the
purpose of acquiring and developing new or existing park sites or
recreational facilities within the Central Point urban growth
boundary. Property for such sites or facilities may be purchased and
taken in the name of the public entity responsible for developing,
maintaining the operating and site or facility under such agreements
as the city council may make with such entity.
16.20.050 Choice of land or fee. A. Basis for determination.
The city planning commission shall [recommend to the council] decide
whether to require dedication or to require a fee in lieu thereof and
shall base its determination on that course which best serves the
public, giving .due regard to the fair and equal treatment of
subdividers and developers and the economic feasibility of the
subdivision or planned unit development. In making the
determination, the planning commission shall take into consideration
the comprehensive plan of the city, topography, geology, access and
location of land in the subdivision available for said purpose, the
size and shape of the subdivision and its location in relationship to
other available neighborhood park sites. The recommendation of the
planning commission as to whether land shall be required or fee
charged in lieu thereof, or any combination thereof, shall be noted
on [submitted to the city council with] the preliminary plat or
preliminary development plan.
B. Procedure. The procedure for determining whether the
subdivider is to dedicate land, pay a fee or both shall be as
provided in this subsection. At the time of filing the preliminary
plat, the subdivider shall indicate whether he desires to dedicate
property or to pay a fee in lieu thereof. If he desires to dedicate
property, he shall designate the area on the preliminary plat. At
the time of preliminary plat approval, the planning commission shall
determine as a part of such approval whether to require [recommend]
dedication or payment of a fee in lieu thereof or any combination
thereof. The planning commission shall at the same time [make its
recommendation] determine the amount of land to be dedicated or the
amount of the fee in lieu thereof. Approval of the preliminary plat
[by the council] shall be binding upon the city if the final map is
submitted within six months and if there is, in the interim, no
change of zone for the affected area. Where dedication is required,
it shall be accomplished by appropriate conveyance at the time the
final plat is submitted for approval or by dedication on the final
plat itself. Where fees are required, they shall be deposited with
the city as a condition of approval of the final plat or, with
sufficient security, may be evidenced by an agreement for deferred
payment for a period not exceeding one year.
-2-
~l
16.20.055 Sale of dedicated land. When land has been dedicated
to the city of Central Point for park purposes pursuant to this
chapter, and thereafter the city council determines that development
of a neighborhood park on such site is not feasible or that the value
of such land can more effectively be applied for park purposes by the
sale of such land at its reasonable market value and the application
of such sale to the fund established by Section 16.20.040 of this
chapter, the city council may direct the city administrator to cause
the sale of said dedicated land. Any such sale shall be in
accordance with all applicable statutes and ordinances for the
disposition of surplus city real property, and the proceeds of such
sale shall be applied to the fund established by Section 16.20.040 of
this chapter.
16.20.060 Exemptions--Credits. A. Nonresidential subdivisions
[and planned unit developments] shall be excluded from the
requirements hereof.
B. Where common open space for park purposes [for] is provided
for in a proposed subdivision or planned unit development, to be
privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the
development, such areas may be credited against the requirements of
dedication for neighborhood park purposes and the payment of fees in
lieu thereof, if the planning commission finds that it is in the
public interest to do so. In making its determination, the planning
commission shall consider the following:
1. There shall be adequate assurances that the privately
owned common open space and recreational facilities are permanently
restricted for park and recreation purposes by permanent covenants
which cannot be reduced or rescinded without the approval of the
city;
2. There shall be an adequate arrangement for the continued
maintenance of the area, that is secured by written agreement;
3. The area committed by the developer for park and
recreational purposes shall be physically and locationally suitable
for such purposes and so designed as to provide open areas and
facilities available to the general public of a size or design
comparable to those normally included in a neighborhood park.
16.20.070 Appeal. Any determination of the planning commission
under this section may be appealed to the city council in the manner
provided for other appeals[under this title].
(CENTRAL PT. WORRING) CPT-1620
-3-
lt~
---STAFF REPORT---
To: Planning Commission Date: April 1, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Planning Director
Re: Conditional Use Application - Truck repair and seafood processing facility
to be constructed at 890 South Front Street in a C-5 zone (37 2W 11CB, tax
lot 800) submitted by E & L Properties, Inc.
CPMC Section 17.46.030, A. and K., identify these respective activities as condi-
tional uses in a C-5 zone. Both of these uses presently share a facility on North
Front Street and are seeking a new location to accommodate their expanding busi-
ness activity.
The proposed structure would contain 9,600 square feet (approximately 1,400 square
feet for M & M Truck Electric and approximately 8,200 square feet for Fronek's
Seafood). In addition to the Public Works Directors report, I have identified the
following items that the Commission should address in considering this request.
Off-street parking requirements for an operation such as Fronek's are not clearly
defined in CPMC Chapter 17.76. 15 spaces are provided and both the applicant and
staff are satisfied that this number will meet the needs of both businesses. Sec-
tion 17.76.040, E., 3., provides for the Planning to make necessary adjustments to
off-street parking requirements where unique use characteristics are involved.
Outside storage of any materials, supplies or by-products should be prohibited in
order to ensure compatibility with adjoining residential areas.
Mr. Fronek would prefer not to asphalt the rear 80' x 60' area until First Street
is improved. Until such time that large trucks can enter M & M Truck Electric
from First Street, Mr. Fronek feels a maintenance problem will develop with tight
turning movements on an asphalt surface.- Section 17.64.100, E., 1., addresses
improvement of parking areas. This requirement is partially designed to control
dust blowing on adjacent properties.
At this time staff is negotiating on a joint access involving the adjoining south
property. The State Highway Department has indicated that this is their preferred
design to minimize access points on Highway 99. Staff hopes to have additional
information on this matter by time of the hearing.
Staff would suggest that the Commission consider all testimony and reports and
upon reaching a decision, direct staff to draft the appropriate findings and reso-
lution for review and approval at the next regular Planning Commission meeting.
Findings would incorporate all recommendations and conditions of approval of staff
and the Planning Commission.
The following exhibits are included for Commission's review:
Exhibit A - Notice of Public Hearing;
Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting of Notice of Public Hearing;
Exhibit C - Application for Conditional Use Permit;
Exhibit D - Site Plan;
Exhibit E - Public Works Director's staff report;
Exhibit F - Tax Assessor's map;
Exhibit G - Aerial map.
RK/mah /~
Attachments
/ ,"~~\
s'~,
7.
o __ _
~~-, i~ r
~~ ~ ~ ` // 15~ SO. S^COND ST. P.O. BOX 3516
r-cCl i
C IJTPAL °O~^.T~ C? aC!d 9i5^2 r'-Ot•:E ~~-'--3?2"
THE ;'.E:1RT OF THE
ROGUE R}~~ER VALLEY
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Central Point Planning Commission will review at a
public hearing an application for a conditional use permit from E & L Properties,
Inc. to allow for a combination truck repair and seafood. processing facility in a
building to be constructed at 890 South Front Street, Central Point, Oregon, in a
C-5 zone. Said property is further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's map
page 37 2W 11CB, tax lot 8.00.
This public hearing will be held on Tuesday, April 5, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the
City of Central Point Council Chambers, 155 South Second Street, Central Point,
Oregon.
Randy Kugler
Planning Department
City of Central Point
Date: April 5, 1988
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Please publish in the Medford
Mail Tribune on Piarch 31 and
April 3, 1988 and provide
affidavit of publication.
Place: Council Chambers
155 South Second Street
P. O. Box 3576
Central Point, OR 97502
/~
~~cdl /6 /7~ ~
p~EG ~1 P.O.BOX3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE 864-3321
THE HEART OF THE
ROGU£ RIVER VALLEY
CERTIFICATE O//nnP POSTING
`I, ~/~,/L1'C'~12~~L~/7S~I'L_ , .CERTIFY THAT ON
THE FOLLOWING DATE, ~iY~/I~!/", as, / /rP~ I .APO/ST.,ED A PUBLIC
NOTICE OF A ~~Qi~1J/i2s2 C-'VfI7lYl/5S/U~ rl~/lam T~~uril~
~i>/~lt/D ll,5e Q~ , rGl Curnbi/7~.tidit~ t!-Ur.~Y' r ~QFo /~ioC-.
FOR-f~irl~t~. err a LLSZvr~e~}-~Rvd.,~ro.~x~-E~'~Pr~..~ncJ+T OR
NEAR 1.
SIGNATURE///~~~~~~,~~~'~~C~
DATE ~~S -~1`~
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(As required in the Zoning Ordinance, Section 17.76
TO THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
1. Name, address and phone number of Applicant. E & L PROPERTIES, INC.
(See Exhibit A)
2. Is the Applicant the owner of the property or an agent of the owner? YES
3. If the Applicant is not the owner of the property, list the owner's name and
address.
(See Exhibit A
4. Address of the property. 890 South Front Street. Central P®int. Oregon
5. Legal description or the assessor's parcel number of the property.
(If lengthy description, staple to back of application.)
Lot9, in Block 4 of Homestead Acres Extension no.1, in
the City of Central Point, Jackson county. Oregon.
6. Attach accurate scale drawing of the site and improvements proposed. The draw-
ing of the site must be adequate to enable the Planning Commission to determine
the compliance of the proposal with the requirements of the ordinance. Address
any pertinent factors from the applicable ordinance. (See Exhibit B)
7. Statement describing the nature of the use for which application is made.
(Furnish information as detailed as possible.
(See exhibit C)
~;~,~L.F ~lZ~laG1~ti~:~~~
FILLNG FEE: $100.00 Mathewso
Date Filed: March 22, 1988
0 1 ronek
Signature of Applicant
March 22, 1988
EXHIBIT A
E & L PROPERTIES, INC., is a new corporation which has been
registered with the State of Oregon on March 21, 1988. So at this
time, the name, E & L PROPERTIES, INC., is pending ,state approval.
The coproration is real, only the name is in question. The principle
parties of said Corporation are;
# Earl B. Mathewson
1335 Foots Creek Road
Gold Hill, Oregon 97525
Phones 503-855-1925
# Lowell C. Fronek
3478 New Ray Road
Central Point, Oregon 97502
Phone: 503-664-3708
The property (Lot g, in Block 4 of Homestead Acres, Extension
No. 1, in the City of Central Point, Jackson County, Oregon) will
be purchased, pending notification of conditional use permit and
bank financing. Earnest money has been placed in escrow on said
property with owner approval.
EXHIBIT B
All necessary details as required for conditional use permit,
are on drawing enclosed in Conditional Use Permit application.
r;:'here are a few questionable areas that we do not have answers for
at this time; but they should not interfere with the Planning
Commissions decision. The following areas, at this point in time,
have not been stated as absolute : ~-°~ ~~ ~~--
1. Ingress and Egress , of vehicle movement at it pertains
to street at the rear of property. This street could
be a reality in the near future, which would enhance
our Ingress and Egress. If and when, this street is
available for use, w/7 ould pave back portion to
street. This wouldrove both Ingress and Egress
of vehicular traffic for us, and add additional
Nc~6c r.
parking spaces.
As it stands now, all Ingress and Egress will
take place off of Highway gg.
2. Highway Access, as indicated
two (2) access points coming
access would be 25 foot wide
curbing and landscaping. Al
be approved by State Highway
plans can be completed.
on drawing. We plan to have
off of highway 99. Each
aprons with the necessary
L of these points, must
Department before final
3. The Drainage Ditch at the rear of the property could
be enclosed in covert pipe with inlet and outlet structures.
This situation has been addressed, but no decision has
been determined.
4. Building Location as respect to property lines,
has not been confirmed as to set back, front and back,
and side to side. We proposed building on property
line on North side, with 20 feet set back on South side.
Front set back will be 50 foot set back leaving 100
feet set back from building to East side of property.
We will work with building department on this issue,
and abide by nescessary code and ruling.
EXHIBIT C
E & L PROPERTIES, INC. will house both M & M TRUCK
ELECTRIC and FRONEK SEAFOOD, INC., which are now located on highway
99 (Front Stx•eet) and Manzanita Street, Central Point, Oregon.
Both M & IDit'T'ruck Electric and Fronek Seafood, Inc., plan to move
their existing business to new location as shown. Fronek Seafood,
1"nc., now has a ^onditional Use Permit for existing location, and
M & M Truck Electric is operating with no permit. Both companies
are in need of additional room to continue a profitable business.
c~l~I7~
- page j
Truck traffic has caused the City of Central Point, many problems
in the present and past> The new location would eliminate these
problems as to traffic and truck parkingo M & M Truck Electric
is involved in Truck and Auto electrical repairs, Fronek Seafood,
Ince, is a seafood wholesale operations
..
ti
~~
11' , _-
\\\~; - -
\~~
`
~ S
S
\\ ;
~ \ ~
~+~
~
'~
\
~~ , j
,
~ i
. ,~
,..., _y
\
~ CDNC-.~-R.~ACJ. I I I i
Q\\
~M
\ Vnt~MJNIs W~%~Nt~
3
~ ~ i
\
\
~
~ /~
\ t~ \\
\ COMOFiCtot
~ ~ / ~ '
S
. '
\~~. I 1
a~-43SIN(~
\;
J~~ ~ ~ I
~~.'
.~
\
S+eu~
~
9 ~ , ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I t i i .,
~ \ N ~ 3R4 N~ I I ~ ( I !,
\
\ ~ '~Ca.2.7AIL ~ I : I ~ i
,Si1W A`(
\ t
qw
a:~a
.~
ow
'
,
1
I
~
~~YWOa'~
~
~~ \
-tvovr.
y
ate '
~
I
~
'.U S.'FsD-ONT ~~ ~ ~ ! ~ i 1
i !
~ATC ~ a4Y: SNDI 1~6~ I ;
or-~~~ ~NT I ~ ~
I N~ .B L.---= - -~
I .
_~ ~
d
h,.
i ds_ ~'_~+
'
M~rT~ LIN"~z, 7~,;
7ti0.W.lc. , ~ 9d~ 5. .~7.D.dT
} ~~
~
~+
( ~i~
I/~t,~/AXX¢- GX~//~iT ~
`"'~-~ a--l l vii _ ~. ~ ~ ,
'~..' -.., ~..~'., cr--
CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
--- S T A F F R E P O R T---
For: E & L Properties, Inc.
Property: 37 2W 11CB, tax lot 800; 890 South Front Street
Businesses: Fronek's Seafood
M & M Truck Electric
Property Dimensions: 100' x 240' = 24,000 ft.2
Street Improvements
Existing Conditions:
Street of access - Highway 99 (major arterial)
Jurisdiction of street - Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)
Present accesses - None
Proposed accesses - Northwest and southwest
Property corners - Width 25' for each
Storm drainage - Property drains to the southeast. There is an existing
drainage ditch (Mingus Creek) at this location.
Street lighting - None
On-street parking - None
Curbing and sidewalks -None
1. Accessing this property is at a street which could potentially see 20,000+ vehicle
trips per day by the year 1993. Accesses onto a major arterial generally should
not be allowed at distances less than 150' from the centerline of each access. In
this case only 65' exists from the centerline of each access. Also, the close
proximity to Cashway Plywood which has a driveway less than 25' north and Dan's
Muffler at approximately 125' south complicate ingress and egress for their devel-
opments. Given this information, it is necessary to place an exit-only restric-
tion at the northeast access and require joint access for tax lots 800 and 805.
2. Access width for an exit-only of 25` is adequate; however, a joint access should
be a minimum of 40' especially if trucks have an overall tractor/trailer length
exceeding 60'.
3. An access permit will be required from ODOT. The City has met with officials from
ODOT and the recommendations from the meeting are listed in #1 and #4.
4. Curbs and storm drainage connections wi21 also be required for this development
along with landscaping in the utility strip in front of the building adjacent to
Highway 99.
5. At some time in the future whenever Highway 99 is improved, sidewalks and a bikeway
shall be installed by the property owners abutting Highway 99. In order to accom-
modate this project, a deferred improvement agreement will be required for these
improvements.
6. A street light shall be placed at the exit-only access in order to illuminate the
truck access. An additional light will be required when the property to the south
develops. This light shall be a 22,000 lumen high pressure sodium vapor cobrahead
style mounted on a 35' aluminum davit pole.
Central Point Public Works Department
Staff Report - E & L Properties, Inc.
Page 2
7. On-street parking - No parking allowed on Highway 99. All parking and mapeuvering
shall be accomplished on the property.
B. First Street improvements shall be completed only if the property owners wish to
pay for improvements through a local improvement district. First Street will not
be required to be developed by the City unless the property owners make the
request.
9. All street signing for accesses shall be installed according to the Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices and is approved by the City.
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
1. A sanitary sewer main exists in the right-of-way of First Street; however, its
depth is relatively shallow. The developer shall be required to extend this sani-
tary sewer to service this property.
Water Improvements
1. The Fire Department shall determine the necessity of an on-site fire hydrant. The
nearest fire hydrant is located at approximately 65' south of the northwest proper
ty corner.
2. Two water meters shall be installed, one for domestic use and the other for
irrigation use.
Storm Drainage Improvements
1. Mingus Creek crosses the southeast corner of the property. An adequately sized
pipe shall be installed to carry the calculated flow to Mingus Creek.
2. On-site storm drainage shall be calculated, designed and sized to carry all the
storm water discharge from this site.
Other Requirements
1. All construction within the public right-of-way or for utilities to become
publicly maintained facilities shall be as specified in the Central Point
Municipal Code and the Public Works Standards.
LB/mah
PUBWKS SR/E&L
~ ~~~~
a •~~ ~~ (,V 1 I L. ll
t ,.
~~
n F• ~;.„.
]r R ` ~` Q
• U
~ ~ ^ y
i ~ I 500 ,y3 ~4\'cyt^~
Ov ~ 0 '.fN l~ ,P~ N `~
~j~.P i fr a ~ ~~t ~ <o z. ~.,
,,
i ;~_ .~
n~
C o ~, '~~.
,, "gyp j i' 70 0 ~' a k ~Tn'.,
_v I I ' f ~ •. ~~ ~P
~'
\ / (P-;294) ~ $ ~ '~ i `
'; (, dQ~ ,
\ Cyji'~ a.~ ~
t•
+• )(
h ;\
10 \
\ ~ \
\,\ ~4 ~ •~ ~ ~ \ ,
`.~ \
~® / \ \~ ; .e IP-14801 /\,
'~ ~ ~
~ ~v t~ ~~~~~~_~ li go31o ~ ~~`
. ,. ~>
~ ~.
~ ~
Y ,' 6 ~Ql/0 ~
' ~ ~
\\ \ ~ 4
;~\ \ 5 boa/o ~
k.~ \ \\ ~V\ ~ x
\ \ ` ~S
k j
S --~l~~~or ~
~ 372wItC \® ~~ ~ S-
r ~
/l^. ~ ~
•' ~ y
~"
n/ ~v
``O
~~`\ \\
~ /~,/.
O %!.
//
J ,<
_ //
E O
U O ~~/
/~/ /
6
N
X
N /
~ / ¢'
• \ /
/.~ ~ /
V /
J~ ~ r
~ i' i
,~~~ %'
_ ~
"~
,> ; ~, ,
r
,:N
~.
% /
~,
/~
A
I
I '. 'Ii ~ I.
f~ ~~,~
~/~
//
___
1
~i l
/P
;:
/ N
I
% %
I ~ /~
/~
~'~ ~ ~~
;~ ' 1
i .
N
~~
~,
X
J ~\~. 1 i r
• dV/`~/V/R/'
~~~/.~/
~~_
--- S TAFF'RE PORT---
To: Planning Commission Date: April 1, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Planning Director
Re: Variance for the construction of a building in a required side yard setback
area at 890 South Front Street in a C-5 zone (37 2W 11CB, tax lot 800) sub-
mitted by E & L Properties, Inc.
CPMC Section 17.46.050, E., requires a five-foot side yard setback in a C-5 zone.
The applicants propose to use all five feet to the north property line for build-
ing construction.
Section 17.80.010 specifies the conditions which must be met in order for the
Planning Commission to grant a variance.
Fire Chief/Building Official Mark Servatius has reviewed the proposal and ad-
dressed fire, building and access issues. His report is included as Exhibit E.
Staff suggests that the Planning Commission consider all testimony and reports and
upon reaching a decision, direct. staff to draft the appropriate findings and reso-
lution for review and approval at the next regular Planning Commission meeting.
The following exhibits are included for the Commission's review:
Exhibit A - Notice of Public Hearing;
Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting and Mailing of Notice of Public
Hearing;
Exhibit C - Application for a Variance;
Exhibit D - Site plan;
Exhibit E - Fire Chief/Building Official's staff report;
Exhibit F - Tax Accessor's map;
Exhibit G - Aerial map.
RK/mah
Attachments
PCWORK SR/E&LVA
i~ .. ~"\
o e.~ ~
r'. •_
c..~ n
i c
155 S0. SECOND ST. P.O. BO>: 3576 CEtJ?^:\~ ~'C'kT. C~ ~GOtd 97502 P'-CI:E 654-332
THE I:E:1RT OF THE
ROUE F.I1'ER \':?LLEY
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Central Point Planning Commission will review at a
public hearing an application for a variance from E & L Properties, Inc. for the
construction of a building in a required side yard setback area at 890 South Front
Street, Central Point, in a C-5 zone. Said property is further described as Jack-
son County Tax Assessor's map page 37 2{V 11CB, tax lot 800.
This public hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 5, 1988, in the
Central Point Council Chambers, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon.
Randy Kugler
Planning Department
City of Central Point
Date: April 5, 1988
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Place: Council Chambers
155 South Second Street
P. 0. Box 3576
Central Point, OR 97502
Please publish in the Medford
Mail Tribune on March 31 and
April 3, 1988 and provide
affidavit o€ publication.
P.O.80X3578 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE654-3321
I, ~~~2G~~ `~/l r~Se~- , .CERTIFY THAT ON
THE FOLLOWING DATE, /// Yl?~ aS. /9~~ I POSTED A PUBLIC
•
NOTICE of A ~/Qr~n~~~ COrr~m~ssi~y, ~/~b/rte 9F/P1~rrno;
YG~r~l1 rr cc ,o . (~G. ~1d Cv /i in_ ~ ~c~•f/.z~~GL Liam r vi-L~
FOR rUC~ r,Pr :~,SC'Cl~'or~/.t' ~12X~ Ql . ~ f ~ ~ • .Glo rc,.t AT OR.
NEAR 1 . ~'1.~ , ~'
z
AND MAILED SAME PUBLIC NOTICE TO THE OWNERS OF PROPERTY SITUATED WITHIN A
TWO-HUNDRED-FOOT RADIUS OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE S~UjBJECT PROPERTY.
SIGNATURE i~//~~/~/~G/1/~~L~~/yC~
DATE ~vfS~~
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
PLANNING .COMMISSION
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Application for Variance as required in the Zoning Ordinance No. 1464 ,. Municipal Code
Chapter 17.80.
1. Name and address of applicant.
E & L PROPERTIES, INC. - 890 South Front Street, Central Point,
Oregon. (Present location - 112 North Front Street, Central Point)
2. Statement that the applicant is the owner of the property or signature of the legal
owner stating the applicant is the authorized agent of the owner.
Property is in escrow pending Conditional Use Permit and Bank
financing approval.
3. Address and legal description or the Assessor's parcel number of the property.
(Legal description. must_be attached stating metes and bounds or property.)
'Lot 9, in Block 4 of Homestead Acres Extension No. 1, in the
. City of Central Point, Jackson Count y; Oregon.
4. Statement describing the nature of the Variance for which application is made.
(Furnish information as detailed as possible.)
Note: The zoning ordinances of the City of Central Point require the following
preconditions to the granting of a Variance; and the applicant should, therefore,
furnish information to-show the following:
A. General.
1. A Variance may be granted, as provided in this chapter, where the strict
application of the provisions of this chapter would result in unnecessary
hardship. .
2. This chapter may not be used to allow a use that is not in conformity with
the uses specified by this title for the district in which the land is
located. In granting a Variance, the City may impose conditions similar to
those provided for Conditional Uses to protect the best interests of the
surrounding property, the neighborhood, or the City as a whole.
B. Application and Review.
Applications and review of a Variance shall conform to the provisions of Chapter
1.24 and all applicable laws of the State. The application shall be accompanied
by a fee of one hundred dollars.'
C. Information Required.
An application shall be accompanied by a legal description of the property,
plans and elevations necessary to show the proposed development.
D. Consideration for Granting Variance.
A Variance may be granted if findings are made that the following considerations
will either result from a granting of the Variance or the following considera-
tions do not apply to the requested ap~ation:
~ ~~r~iT ~
City of Central Point
Application for Variance
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
5. Attach
The Variance will
The Variance will
The Variance will
The Variance will
The Variance will
The Variance will
zone district.
plans and elevatic
Filing Fee $100.00
Application Approved:
Application Disapproved:
Reasons for Disapproval:
Page 2
provide advantages to the neighborhood or the City;
provide beautification to the neighborhood or the City;
provide safety to the neighborhood or the City;
provide protection to the neighborhood or the City;
not have any adverse impacts upon the neighborhood;
utilize property within the intent and purpose of the
ns showing proposed Variance.
Date Filed
Date Paid
Date Signed
Date Signed
E & L PROPERTIES, INC., request a variance to the City of
Central Point building Codes. We propose to place the North
building line on or as close to, the property line as possible.
As the code now so states, building off-set requires a set back
from property line of 5'-0". If we were to abide by set code we
would have only 15'-0" drive through and loading and unloading
area on South building line. We must have 20'-0" on the South side
of the building to enable us to move trucks in and out of the
property.
Fire code would like to have 20'-0" feet access for fire
control. We understand, that building on or as near to the
property line on the North side, would require at least a one
(1) hour fire wall, which can be done.
1 B. mathewson
Lowell . Fronek
Date: March 22, 1988
--~ STAFF RE PORT ---
To: Planning Commission Date: March 29, 1988
From: Mark Servatius, Fire Chief/Building Official
Re: Variance request from E & L Properties, Inc. to locate proposed building
directly on property line in lieu of required five-foot setback at 890 South
Front Street
I met with Mr. Lowell Fronek on March 24, 1988 to discuss his proposed plans to
construct a building at 890 South Front Street. I explained the ramnifications
involved by locating a building directly upon the property line; more specifical-
ly, the need for fire rated construction, no openings, and parapet walls.
Due to the limited width of the lot and the nature of the business, I am in sup-
port of .the zero setback oh the north property line based on the following:
1. Adequate fire protection can be provided with fire walls and no openings.
2. From a fire suppression standpoint, it would be advantageous to have a 20-foot
access drive on the southern property line to gain access to the rear of the
property in the event of fire.
3. From afire exposure aspect, five feet versus zero feet does not provide enough
distance to prevent exposure involvement. Secondly, fire personnel and equip-
ment would not be committed within the confines of a five-foot access way.
Therefore, I would support approval of the variance request with the following
conditions:
1. A11 building and fire code requirements are complied with.
2. The southern 20 feet of the property be signed and designated as fire lane
eliminating any parking within that area paralleling the southern wall of the
proposed building and the southern property line.
MS/mah
PCWORK VAR/E&L
--- S T A F F R F. P O R T ---
To: Planning Commission Date: March 31, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Planning Director
Re: Site Plan Review -Truck repair/seafood processing facility submitted by
E & L Properties, Inc. at 890 South Front Street
This proposal calls for a 9,600 ft.2 joint use facility that will contain M & M
Truck Electric and Fronek's Seafood. CPMC Chapter 17.72 contains standards re-
quired for a site plan to which the Planning Commission may refer for their review.
Approximately 200 ft.2 of landscaping is shown in a planter area along South Front
Street. A final building design will not be completed until a decision is made on
the variance request. Also, a signing plan should be included for review by the
Commission.
All major use and design issues should be resolved by the time the site plan re-
view is considered; however, the Commission may attach as conditions of approval
any of those standards. contained in Section 17.72.040.
The following exhibits are included for the Commission's review:
Exhibit A - Notice of Public Meeting;
Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting of Notice of Public Meeting;
Exhibit C - Site Plan;
Exhibit D - Jackson County Tax Assessor's map;
Exhibit E - Aerial map.
RK/mah
Attachments
PCWORK SR/E&LSP
Jc~'
155 SO. SECOND ST. P.O. 80X.3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE 664-3321
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
Notice is hereby given that the Central Point Planning Commission will review a
site plan submitted by E & L Properties, Inc. for a proposed combination truck
repair and seafood processing facility to be located at 890 South Front Street in
a C-5 zone. Said property is further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's
map page 37 2W 11CB, tax_lbt 800.
This public meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 5, 1988, in the
Central Point Council Chambers, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon.
Randy Kugler
Planning Department
City of Central Point
Date: April 5, 1988
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Place: Central Point Council Chambers
155 South Second Street
P. O. Box 3576
Central Point, OR 97502
P.O. BOX 3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE 884.3321
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RIVER VALLEY
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I, , ~(%G!yF~°1""Z1~ ~/~.Se~ , .CERTIFY THAT ON
THE FOLLOWING DATE, m/~/"c~-1 c~S, /~G~S I POSTED A PUBLIC
SIGNATURE/~//~~//lOl~/ ;-G~-~IiC.~
DATE ,~-~S
~~ ~Xa~l1~1T
CENTRAL-POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
--- S T A F F R E P O R T---
Re: Highway 99 Master Plan (one block east and west)
Date: March 25, 1988
Existing Conditions:
Setback
Affected Properties Zone 99 First
37 2W 3B, tax lot 300 R-1 70' 25'
3'7 2W 3B, tax lot 400 R-1 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 500 R-1 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 600 R-2 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 700 R-2 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 800 R-2 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 900 R-2 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 1200 R-2 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 1300 R-2 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 1400 R-2 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 1500 R-2 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 1800 M-1 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 1601 M-1 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 1600 M-1 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 1501 M-1 70' 25'
37 2W 3B, tax lot 1502 M-1 70' 25'
37 2W 3C, tax lot 100 M-1 70' 2$'
37 2W 3C, tax lot 204 M-2 60' 25'
37 2W 3C, tax lot 205 M-2 60' 25'
37 2W 3DB, tax lot 100 R-1 70' 25'
37 2W 3DB, tax lot 200 R-1 70' 25'
37 2W 3DB, tax lot 300 R-1 70' 25'
37 2W 3DB, tax lot 400 R-1 70' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 3000 M-2 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 2900 M-2 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 2801 M-2 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 2800 M-2 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 2500 M-2 ~ 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 2400 M-2 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 1700 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 1800 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 1900 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 2000 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 2103 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 2100. C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 2101 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 2200 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DC, tax lot 2300 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD,. tax lot 9500 M-2 Park 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 9502 M-2 Park 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 9501 M-2 Park 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 6500 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 6600 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 6700 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 6800 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 6900 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 6901 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 9403 ~
~~ C-5 60' 25'
Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report
Highway 99 Master Plan
Existing Conditions (cont.)
Page 2
Setback
Affected Properties Zone 99 First
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 9401 ~ C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 9400 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 9600 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 3DD, tax lot 9407 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W lOAA, tax lot 1500 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W lOAA, tax lot 1600 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W lOAA, tax lot 1700 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W lOAA, tax lot 1800 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W lOAA, tax lot 1900 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W lOAA, tax lot 3700 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W lOAA, tax lot 3901 C-5 6D' 25'
37 2W lOAA, tax lot 3900 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W lOAA, tax lot 4900 M-1 60' 25'
37 2W lOAA, tax lot 4800 M-1 60' 25'
37 2W lOAA, tax lot 5000 M-1 60' 25'
37 2W lOAA, tax lot 4500 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W lOAD, tax lot 100 M-2 60' 25'
37 2W lOAD, tax lot 100-A1 M-2 60' 25'
37 2W lOAD, tax lot 900 (portion) M-2 60' 25'
37 2W 11BB, tax lot 7200 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11BB, tax lot 7201 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11BB, tax lot 7300 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11BC, tax lot 4100 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11BC, tax lot 4200 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11BC, tax lot 4400 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11BC, tax lot 4700 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11BC, tax lot 5500 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11BC, tax lot 5700 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W i1BC, tax lot 5900 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11BC, tax lot 6000 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11BC, tax lot 6100 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11BC, tax lot 6200 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 100 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot Z00 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 300 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 400 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 405 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 500 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 600 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 700 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 800 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 805 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 804 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax- lot 803 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 802 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 801 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 900 M-1 70' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 1000 M-1 70' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 1100 M-1 70' 25'
37 2W 11CB, tax lot 1200 M-1 70' 25'
37 2W 11C, tax lot 4400 C-5 60' 25'
37 2W 11C, tax lot 4500 !,j~ C-5 60' 25'
Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report
Highway 99 Master Plan
Page 3
Existing Conditions (cont.)
Setback
Affected Properties Zone 99 First
37 2W 11C, tax lot 8200
37 2W 10, tax lot 5100
Water Mains Highway 99
M-1 70' 25'
M-1 70' 25'
Existing - 8" water main from Pine Street south to Cedar
4" water main from Pine Street north to Cherry, Cherry to north end of First
Proposed - 12" water main from First and Cupp to Highway 99 south to warehouse and
storage
12" water main from Dan's Muffler to Beall Lane
12" water main from Taylor north to Hazel/Crater High
Sanitary Sewer Mains Serving property on Highway 99
Existing - Adequate sewer exists in the developed areas of Highway 99 to service future
developments; however, some service laterals will be required to be con-
structed by the individual developers for service to a particular property.
Proposed - Basin W13 15" across Highway 99 @ Scenic
Basin W12 10" extension Marys Way
Basin W14 10" extension west of Highway 99 east of Griffin Creek
Basin W2 8" extension service Boise Cascade property north of Beall Lane
Storm Drainage System
Existing - A storm sewer system has been designed along Highway 99 and each property
shall design its on-site storm system to accommodate this design; however,
sizing of these systems vs. runoff has not been calculated.
Proposed - The City intends to complete a storm drainage master plan in the next five
(5) years. This information will determine the required improvements to the
storm drainage system along Highway 99. Onti1 the master plan is complete,
developers will be required to provide calculations of runoff for all new
projects in this area and throughout the City.
Street Lighting System
Existing - 35' mount 22,000 lumen mercury vapor or high pressure sodium vapor exist at
the following intersection with Highway 99, Laurel, Oak, Alder, and Ash.
Proposed - Illumination should occur on a major arterial street at intersections with
other streets and at accesses with businesses or not less than 250'. Dis-
cretion can be used when it appears that street lights are adequate when
businesses have installed street lights which can provide illumination to
each access. Street lights should be installed at the following locations:
Cherry Street, Maple Streets, Cedar Street, Bush Street, Cupp Drive, and
from Cupp south every 250' to Beall Lane. Funding will be determined by a
street light policy in the future. In the meantime, the Planning Cormnission
should require developer of prope~yoto pay for street light installation.
~7
Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report
Highway 99 Master Plan
Street System Considerations
Page 4
Existing Proposed
Right-of-Way: Highway 99 80' - 100' N/C
Cherry 60' N/C
Maple 60' N/C
Laurel 60' N/C
Manzanita 80' N/C
Pine 80' N/C
Oak 60' N/C
Alder 60' N/C
Ash 60' N/C
Cedar 60' N/C
Bush 60' N/C
Cupp 60' N/C
Glades 60' N/C
Beall 60' 80'
First 60' N/C
(40' between Cedar & Bush)
First 80' To be determined
(Cupp Drive to Freeman)
Pavement Width
Curb to Curb: Highway 99 60' - 64'
Cherry 30' 36' - 40'
Maple 40' N/C
Laurel 40' N/C
Manzanita 40' N/C
Pine 56' N/C
Oak 40' N/C
Alder 40' N/C
Ash 40' N/C
Cedar 40' N/C
Bush ~ 40' N/C
Cupp 28' 40'
Glades Not in yet 40'
Beall 32' S6'
First 30' N/C
(Between Cedar and Bush)
1987 Projected 1992
Traffic Volumes:
Highway 99 peak day 12,000 vpd 27,000 vpd
Highway 99 peak hour-
5:00-6:00 p.m. 600 vph 1,300 vph
Traffic control Cherry stop sign Stop sign
right-left turn lanes
Maple stop sign Stop sign
right-left turn lanes
Laurel Stop sign Tee intersection signal
Manzanita Stop sign ~ Access will be determined
upon further analysis
Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report
Highway 99 Master Plan
Street System Considerations (cont.
1987
Traffic Volumes:
Pine Full signal
Oak Stop sign
Alder
Ash
Cedar
Bush
CuPP
Glades
Beall
Visible Clearance @
Intersection:
Cherry
Maple
Laurel
Manzanita
Pine
Oak
Alder
Ash
Cedar
Bush
CuPP
Beall
Stop sign
Stop sign
Stop sign
Stop sign
Stop sign
Not constructed
Stop sign
20' sight triangle N
55' sight triangle S
55' sight triangle N
55' sight triangle S
55' sight triangle N
45' sight triangle S
20' sight triangle N
30' sight triangle S
55' all corners
25' sight triangle N
55' sight triangle S
55' sight triangle N
55' sight triangle S
55' sight triangle N
55' sight triangle S
55' sight triangle N
55' sight triangle S
55' sight triangle N
55' sight triangle,S
55' sight triangle N
55` sight triangle S
10' sight triangle NE
55' sight triangle SE
55' sight triangle NW
55' sight triangle SW
Page 5
Projected 1992
Full signal
Access will be determined
upon further analysis
Tee intersection signal
Stop sign
right-left turn lane
Stop sign
right-left turn lane
See intersection signal
Stop sign
right-left turn lane
Possible signal
Full signal
55' sight triangle
55' sight triangle
55' sight triangle
55' sight triangle
55' sight triangle
55' sight triangle
Access will be determined
upon further analysis
Access will be determined
upon further analysis
55' all corners
Access will be determined
upon further analysis
Access will be determined
upon further analysis
55' access to Highway 99 N
55' access to Highway 99 S
55' access to Highway 99 N
55' access to Highway 99S
55' access to Highway 99 N
55' access to Highway 99 S
55' access to Highway 99 N
55' access.. to Highway 99 S
55' access to Highway 99 N
55' access to Highway 99 S
Full intersection signal
Full intersection signal
Full intersection signal
Full intersection signal
39
Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report
Highway 99 Master Plan
Page 6
Street System Considerations (cont.)
Parking Restrictions:
1987
Projected 1992
Highway 99
Cherry
Maple
Laurel
Manzanita
No parking allowed
No parking within 20' of
Highway 99 Intersection
No parking within 20' of
Highway 99 intersection
No parking within 20' of
Highway 99 intersection
No parking within 20' of
Highway 99 intersection
Pine 75' NE side of
intersection
25' SE side of
intersection
No parking allowed
Oak No parking within 20'
of intersection
Alder No parking within 20'
of intersection
Ash No parking within 20'
of intersection
Cedar No parking within 20'
of intersection
Bush No parking within 20'
of intersection
Cupp No parking within
20' of intersection
Beall No parking within 175' of
intersection both ways
No parking allowed
Final design of this
intersection will deter-
mine parking requirement
at the signal
Final design of this
intersection will deter-
mine parking requirement
at the signal
Final design of this
intersection will deter-
mine parking requirement
Final design of this
intersection will deter-
mine parking requirement
at the signal
175' NE side of
intersection
100' SE side of
intersection
West side of Pine Street
Final design of this
intersection will deter-
mine parking requirement
at the signal
Final design of this
intersection will deter-
mine parking requirement
at the signal
Final design of this
intersection will deter-
mine parking requirement
at the signal
Final design of this
intersection will deter-
mine parking requirement
at the signal
Final design of this
intersection will deter-
mine parking requirement
at the signal
No parking from Highway 99
to First
No parking at all on Beall
First Street Construction Options: ~~
First Street is a collector-commercial/industrial street where presently only the 80'
right-of-way exists. Development of this street is dependent on the needs of the
Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report
Highway 99 Master Plan Page 7
First Street Construction Options (cont.):
residents abutting First between Cupp Drive and Beall Lane, and the businesses abutting
First and Highway 99 from Cupp Drive to Beall Lane.
If the businesses and/or residents wish this street to be constructed, it will more than
likely be the product of a local improvement district. Since the remaining lots within
the area are beginning to request approval to develop, it is a good time to review the
overall positive and negative effect that construction of First Street may have.
In order for the Planning Commission to understand the overall implications of develop-
ing in this area, the following options are available to the use of First Street:
Option #1 - No Build
This option allows the City to either vacate or create a utility easement for this ar-
ea. Adjacent property owners would be allowed to use this area within certain guide-
lines established by the City.
Positive•
1. Put the property back on the tax rolls
2. Allows adjacent property owners to use
the property for. improvements to back-
yards which are not allowed due to the
existing 80' right-of-way
3. Minimal cost to adjacent property
owners
Negative:
1. Eliminate from future use as a street
this right-of-way
2. Could potentially become a maintenance
.problem
Option #2 - Construct First Street from Cupp to Freeman
Positive:
1. Will provide parking and access to
Highway 99 property for delivery
trucks, etc.
2. Reduces the truck access problem onto
Highway 99 by funneling traffic to
Beall or Cupp.
Negative•
1. Would cost approximately $312,000 to
construct. The cost would be approxi-
mately $3.84/ft.2 of property to be
assessed.
2. Truck traffic may be annoying to the
residents east of First along with
parking problems.
3. Traffic impact at Freeman and Beall
could potentially cause this intersec-
tion to function at below "D" level.
- Construct First from Cupp to proposed Glades Street with culdesac 400'
Positive•
1. Would not adversely affect Freeman/
Beall
2. Provides truck access onto and off
Highway 99 and keys intersection
traffic at Glades.
h traffic
Negative:
1. Would cost approximately $218,000 to
construct or $3.02/ft.2 of property to
be assessed.
of 2. The property owners east of First and
north of Dan's Muffler Shop may still
have a problem with truck parking.
~l
Central Point Public Works Department Staff Report
Highway 99 Master Plan
Page 8
Option #3 - Construct First from Cupp to proposed Glades Street with culdesac 400'
south of Glades - no through traffic (cont.)
Positive:
3. Would allow some property owners to
provide for improvement to backyards
without interfering with 80' right-of-
way.
Negative:
3. Some maintenance problem would still
.exist.
Recommendations:
The Planning Commission can do one of three things:
1. Take each development on an individual basis and review as information is provided.
2.. Develop a master plan from the information provided herein and request staff to pre-
pare the proper documents for said master plan.
3. Request staff to prepare a study session for development of a master plan with the
Planning Commission and the adjacent property owners in the master plan. The master
plan would be the direct. result of the need of the businesses, residents, and design
standards required for functional use and development of this area.
4. Send a questionnaire to property owners asking their preference to vacate First
Street.
LRB/mah
PUBWKS 99MSTPLN
`1
,,.,
--- S T A F F R E P O R T---
To: Planning Commission Date: March 29, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Planning Director
Re: Dwelling Group as a Conditional Use in an R-2 Zone
The recent application for a single-family dwelling group on Tenth and Scenic
presented a number of complications for both staff and the Commission during the
review process. 2 have not been able to determine how this development option
came to be included in the zoning ordinance and question its usefulness for future
application in its present form.
The City has provided through its P.U.D. option a means for developers to obtain a
density bonus for residential developments. The P.U.D. option provides clear
guidelines for both staff and the applicant. This needed direction is obviously
lacking under the present dwelling group criteria.
Staff would suggest that the dwelling group option be either removed from the R-2
district as a conditional use or have Wes Reynolds completely review and recommend
improvements should the Commission feel this is worth retaining.
RK/mah
PCWORK DWGRPCUP