HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - August 16, 1988Next Resolution No. 147
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
155 South Second Street
August 16, 1988 - 12:00 NOON
AGENDA
I. Meeting called to order
II. Roll call
III. Correspondence and public appearances
IV. Business
A. Approval of Resolution #147 regarding annexation of approx-
imately 115 acres bounded generally by East Pine Street,
Hamrick Road, Beebe Road, and Gebhard Road, and to with-
draw same from Jackson County Fire District No. 3 and
Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority.
V. Miscellaneous
VI. Adjournment
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
155 South Second Street
E'ebruary 2, 1988
AGENDA
Next Resolution No. 133
I. Meeting called to order
II. Roll call
III. Approval of minutes
IV. Correspondence and public appearances
V. Business
Page ~k
1 A. Site Plan Review for a commercial office addition at 60 North
Fourth Street submitted by Lee Niedermeyer.
~ B. Review of. proposed revisions to CPMC Title 16 - Land Divisions
by Wes Reynolds, Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
13 C. Review of CPMC Chapter 17.72 - Site Plan, Landscaping and
Construction Plan Approval.
14 D. Review of request for a modified carport structure.
VI. Miscellaneous
VII. Adjournment
---STAFF REPORT---
To: Planning Commission Date: January 26, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Building Official
Re: Site Plan Review - Commercial office addition at 60 North Fourth Street in
a C-2 zone (37 2W 2CC, Tax Lot 1500) submitted by Lee Niedermeyer, State
Farm Insurance Company
Lee Niedermeyer has submitted a site plan for a proposed addition to his coimner-
cial building at 60 North Fourth Street. Chapter 17.72 of the Central Point Munic-
ipal Code (CPMC) contains standards required for a site plan which the Commission
may refer to for. their review.
The proposed addition would extend to the east property line as permitted by CPMC
Section 17.36.050, F., and comprise approximately 456 square feet.
The site plan indicates five offstreet parking spaces. CPMC Section 17.64::040
requires that five spaces be provided. `~
In order to comply with Section 8.04.070, the applicant will need to design a roof
gutter system to deliver storm water runoff directly into the street gutter.
Public Works Director Larry Blanchard will be working with the applicant to pro-
vide this system and to incorporate this feature in the needed repair of two side-
walk sections. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that this work be
included in the final building plans.
The following exhibits are included for the Commission's review:
Exhibit A - Site Plan (separate document);
Exhibit B - Site Plan Application;
Exhibit C - Notice of Public Meeting;
Exhibit D - Certificate of Posting of Notice of Public Meeting;
Exhibit E - Assessor's map page;
Exhibit F - Aerial map page.
6
RK/mah
Attachments
PCWORK STRP60N4
~ ~ -a ~
e
,'.;;:~
• Date 1/25/68
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL
The undersigned hereby applies for site plan approval pursuant to Central Point
Municipal Code Chapter 17.72.
NAME: Niec~ern~yer Insuranci~` AaencV, Inc.
- ADDRESS: 60 N. 4th Street
PHONE NUMBER: (°C3) 664-3301
OWNER: Lee Niedermeyer
BUILDER: wa~7te Bennett
ARCHITECT: None
PROPOSED SITE:
ADDRESS: 60 N. 4th Street, Central Point, Or 97502
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: .3~ 2,W GC. TAX LOT N0. JSDO
c'
LOT DI4IENSIONS: (70~ X ,S,S, X X X X X (Attach plans)S~.X Gd
STATE FIRE MARSHAL APPROVAL ON DATE: IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORS 476.12 X
I, Lee Niedermeyer CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OR
AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER (IF AUTHORIZED AGENT, ATTACH WRITTEN AUTHORITY)
OF THE PRO;OSED SITE.
please designate which)
agent of owner,
PLAN CHECK FEE PAID $ ON DATE:
TO BE PRESENTED ON 2.2 • $ ~ TO THE CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION.
(Date)
PLANNING COMMISSION:
APPROVAL:
DISAPPROVAL:
REMARKS:
155 SO. SECOND ST. P.O. BOX 3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE 664-3321
THE HEART OF THE
ROGUE RNER VALLEY
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
Notice is hereby given that the City of Central Point Planning Commission will
conduct a public meeting to review a site plan submitted by Lee Niedermeyer for a
commercial office addition to be located at 60 North Fourth Street, Central
Point. The property is zoned C-2, Limited Coimnercial Professional District, and
further described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's Map Page 37 2W 2CC, Tax Lot
1500.
This public meeting will be held on February 2, 1988 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall
Council Chambers, 155 South Second Street, Central Point.
Randy Kugler
Building/Planning Department
City of Central Point
Date: February 2, 1988
Time: 7:00 p.m.
Place: City Hall Council Chambers
155 South Second Street
P. 0. Box 3576
Central Point, OR 97502
s
P.O. BOX 3576 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE864-3321
THE HEART OF THE
ROGU£ RYVER VALLEY
NGTTi
FOR
NEAR
z-
SIGNATURE` ~~!//~1~G11i/e~-L~~!~?-21~,..
DATE ~ a~'lCi~
~~~r~17^
~ ~~
OM.H.
1275.1
x /.
A
9L
~O
w ~
L
y + Q/~
~ x 1289.1 \~ 1
M.H.
X
1266.7
.>•
J
PVO.
1RKING~ i
x
„a ,
T ~~
T
~y
e
GOP C.B.
PAVED
PARKING
.B. OM.H.
x
,p 1272.5
126fi
I x
i• /
PAVED x
1268.8
PARKING ,~
C p
PARKING G G9
'„ ~ ~ PAVED \
M.H. .~ PARKING
- 1274) ~Q.1
C //~ C.B.
PARKING i'
oG~T j ~~ ~~ s~
ti / /+
PAVED ~ / / i~
PARKING
s. O v
~P0 0
G P ~ O
OC.B. OOP S O
OP0 NG ~' \V lJ
~~
~ F pP ~~4f R +
O
PJPO h
P h ~~ c.
. oOPe Ma c,°~ ~ Izss.6
~,~ O x \ i.4
PAVED M.H• /J,. C
g~ l/
3 •.
NyH.
~J x
1267.1
PAVED
pq RKING
~N// ~~
d~~V ~/~ Vj al..A.~ a 155 S. Second Street
• P.O. Box 3275
Council o overnments Central Point, OR 97502
503-664-6674
January 28, 1988
T0: Central Point Planning Commission
FROM: Wes Reynolds, RVCOG
Attached are proposed revisions for several sections in Title 16 of
the. Central Point Municipal Code. The revisions begin with changing
the name of the title to "Land Divisions" from "Subdivisions" since
the title also covers partitioning and it is suggested that it also
address lot line adjustments. The revisions to Chapter 16.04,
General Provisions are attached along with a revised variance
section, proposed new sections on staff approval of some minor land
partitions, and a formal procedure for lot line adjustments.
Upon meeting with the Public Works Director it became apparent that
most of the existing subdivision title (which dates from 1963) needs
to be extensively updated. The standards cited in places have been
superceded by new techniques or are contradicted by standards adopted
in other titles. It is also suggested that Central Point no longer
require city council approval of partitions or subdivisions, except
on appeal. I suspect this code provision dates back to before the
time when the city had a planning commission. Central Point is one
of the few cities that has not already delegated this function to the
planning commission. Revised sections incorporating these and other
changes should be ready for the March planning commission meeting.
As before deletions from the text are in (brackets], and the proposed
additions underlined.
Title 16
LAND DIVISIONS
Cha~ters•
16.04
16.08
16.12
16.16
16,20
16.24
16.28
16.32
16.36
16.38
16.40
16.44
16.48
General Provisions
Definitions
Streets and Other Ways.-- Design Standards
Blocks and Lots -- Design Standards
Land Dedication
Preliminary Plata
Final Plats
Improvements
Variances
Conversion Plan Regulations
Appeal
Major and Minor Land Partitions
Lot Line Adjustments
Chgpter 16.04
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sections•
c'
16.04.010 Scope of regulations.
16.04.020 Applicable City Standards.
16.04.030 Penalties and Enforcement.
16.04.010 Scope of reQUlations. All subdivision plats and all
streets or ways created for the purpose of dividing [partitioning]
land shall be approved by the planning commission in accordance with
these regulations. Minor land partitions, minor variances, and lot
line adiustments may be approved by the city administrator in
accordance with these reQUlations. The ordinance codified in this
title is adopted pursuant to ORS 92.044 and applies [only] to [sub]
land divisions [and land partitions which is] subject to approval
under ORS 92.010 to 92.150.
0
-16.04.030 Penalties and Enforcement. [formerly 16.44.070"]
Failure to comply with any provisions of this title [chapter] shall,
upon conviction, be punished in accordance with Section 1.16.010 of
this code, said section being in the general penalty section. In
addition to such penalties, it is declared that any failure to comply
with any provision of this chapter by any person seeking to divide
land constitutes a public nuisance and that the city shall have the
right to abate the same upon suit for injunction, mandatory or
otherwise, as the circumstances may require, in the circuit court of
the state for Jackson County.
c'
Chapter 16.36
VARIANCES
16.3b.010 Variances. A. General. A variance-may be granted, as
prod ded in this chapter,-where the strict application of the
provisions of [chapter] Title 16 would result in unnecessary
hardship. In granting a variance, the city may impose conditions
similar to those provided for conditional uses under the Zoninp,,_Title
in order to protect the interests of the surrounding propert[y]ies,
the neighborhood, or the city as a whole.
B. Application and Review, Applications and review of a variance
shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 1.24 and all applicable
laws of the state. This application shall be accompanied by a fee of
one hundred dollars.
C. Information Required. An application shall be .accompanied by
a legal description of the property, plans and elevations necessary
to show the proposed development.
D. Consideration for Granting Variance. A variance may be ~"
granted if findings are made that the following considerations will
either result from a granting of -the. variance or the following
considerations do -not apply to the requested application:
1. The variance will provide added advantages to the
neighborhood or the city, such as beautification, or safety;
2. The variance will not have any significant adverse
impacts upon the neighborhood;
3. The variance will utilize property within the intent and
purpose of the land division title [zone district],
4. Circumstances affect the property that- generally do not
nor
~~
The following section would replace a redundant variance section now
numbered 16.44.060.
16.44.060 Review of Minor Land Partitions
0
All parcels front on a street improved to city standardst
No land in the partition will be dedicated to public use.
City a
E-
m
~~
CHAPTER 16.48
r
~~
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS
A~ The~roposed adiustment will not than&e the number of parcels.
--- STAFF REPORT ---
To: Planning Commission -. Date: January 28, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Building Official
Re: Site Plan Review Process
I have recently had an opportunity to examine the site plan review process with
other staff members and would like to share some of these observations with the
Planning Commission. I would like the .Commission to think about the role this.
particular review process plays in the City's planning program and if some changes
might be in order.
As presently structured, the process is basically a design review for new construc-
tion. Unless the application also involves a conditional use or variance request,
the Commission has limited legal authority to attach any conditions of approval to
the project.- The standards that the Commission does consider involve Public
Works, Uniform Building and Fire Codes which are not land use issues and, there-
fore, have not traditionally been subjects of review for Planning Commission:
I will attempt to describe several options in detail that the Commission may want
to consider at the meeting.
s
RK/mah
PCWORK SR/STPLN
/3
---. STAFF REPORT---
To: Planning Commission -. Date: January 28, 1988
From: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant & Acting Building Official
Re: Request for Modified Carport Structure
In early January, Rick Helmes of 518 Glenn Way enclosed his existing garage with-
out first contacting the City to obtain a building permit. I advised Mr. Helmes
that CPMC Section 17.64.040, A., 1., requires a two-car garage or carport for
residential dwellings and that in addition to working without a building permit,
he had created a zoning code violation.
Mr. Helmes wishes to meet the covered parking requirement by providing an end-to-
end carport rather than the traditional side-by-side carport structure (please see
diagram). The reason for this arrangement is that the five-foot sideyard setback
cannot be met with the traditional structure.
As the code is silent on the design question and this situation will establish a
precedent, I am seeking the Commission's. input. The relevant criteria in need of
interpretation is CPMC Section 17.64.10, F., and to what extent, if any, this
design would constitute a nuisance or hazard.
I have advised Mr. Helmes to cease work on the garage pending review and decision
by the Planning Commission on the submitted carport design.
RK/mah
Attachments
PCWORK SR/CARPT ),/
/ `Y'
.. .
r-2?-88
COVERED RESIDENTIAL PARKING
,fors
at =
phone :
cost :
to begin :
to finish s
Rick N. Helmes
518 Glenn way
664-3064 ,
$1,300.00 approx..(cement, materials,labor,coffiplete)
as soon as permitted.
4 weeks after start.
cement to be contraeted,(fersmed,poured) flinches
thick plus footings as shown in yellow area
on page # 2, 9ft. by 40 ft. plus additional
ingress and egress to parking spaces.
On page 3 is the framing and construction of the
9 ft. by 40 ft.eovered parking area. .Basically
4 x4 posts on 4 ft. centers. Front has a 6'9•'
by 9' opening with a 4x6 header. The outside is
7'3"'tall with redwood lattice exterior. The
inside is 8" high connected to the existing wall
of the garage .by a 2x6 ledger bolted in place
to the existing stud wall, with 5/16 by 5-inch
lag bolts. As the inside wall is 40 ft. long,
and the existing inside wall is only 24 ft. long,
the additional 16 ft. on the backyard side is ~'
held in place by 4x4 posts attached at the top
by the ledger and inbetween at the double top-
plates supported on both sides by 2x4 studs.(all on pressure
treated 2x4)
The roof had 2x4 rafters 24" O.C. held in place
with joist hangers to the ledger. Covered by
1x4 strapping then with felt, followed by the
wood shingles to match the existing roof. Metal
flashing seperate~existing garage wall from
proposed roof shi gles. (6" up the wall
beneath the covering). Rain gutters and down
spouts to match the existing house and to run
to the existing trench underground to the
gutter streetside. 1x4 fascia trim, and paint
to be earthtones when complete.
~S
'j' '3 y' t T .J ~r a~~~~ ' -J__~
r ~
..._ ..
• r .'
GRASS DRIVEWAY •`~ a` ~
_.. 1 ~ ., - • ' GRASS ~ GRASS ~- ~ ~ -.-_~->
i _ y
r ~ '
...~ :_ .
...... _ ~ - i _ ~ -•
i /~ ~ +. r '
P
i yi ~ mi ~
t' ~ ~
~ ~ 1
°F ~'rYi~
~
w ~ NI ~
X
~
`
~ N
i
~ ~.
:~_~ _.
-
_~__~_-_F--
p C.. _- -._._
__
___-1-.
-
t~
f~
~'1 .~
0~ _ -..
3 o c
y I7 ~ r R
-- ~
~ _ _ _' _ _ .
' N 1 ' ~ ~= ~
~ 1
}
~.
i
~
:.
~
~ %
i
I
~
_- .. -._. _ .._
_.
1 ,
~
' _ ~ ~ ~
L
F
*
_
_
_
T
- x
~ _
~ ;;
,
i
1
--= ~
b .~~ ~, ~
_'
.
_ V I (
V
_
_ . _ ~~~
r-___._ _. ..__._.__~~_ ~ ~~ '__-~_.9~j -
b . . - .._. _ _- ~ .- ._. . ~ ._~.
b a y