Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - June 20, 1989~ ~s Next Resolution No. 171 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 155 South Second Street 20 June 1989 AGENDA I. Meeting called to order I2. Ro11 call - Garth Ellard, David Gilmour, Dick Halley, Karolyne PAGE NUMBERS Hugo, Jerry Mattey, Bob Matthews, Chuck Piland 1 - 4 III. Approval of minutes IV. .Correspondence and public appearances -V. Business 5 - 10 A. Public Meeting - Minor Land Partition request for 3385 Snowy Butte Lane {37 2W 10, tax lot 3901) submitted by Daniel and Lauralee Patterson 11 - 29 B. Public Meeting - Review and recommendation of the preliminary development plans for the expansion of the Meadows P.U.D. located at 555 Freeman Road (37 2W 11A tax lots 200, 1000, 1101, and .1201) submitted by Neil Scheuneman 30 - 31 C. Approval of Resolution No. a Resolution adopting findings and conclusions and approving the conditional use application of Mike Sullivan V2. Miscellaneous VII. Adjournment City of Central Point ` Planning Commission Meeting June 6, 1989 - 7:00 p.m. Page 1 MEETING CALLED TO ORDER Chairman Ellard called the meeting to order at 7:11 p.m. ROLL CALL Present were Planning Commission Chairman Garth Ellard and Planning Commissioners David Gilmour, Dick Halley, and Chuck Piland. Absent were Commissioners Karolyne Hugo, Jerry Mattey, and Bob Matthews. Also present were Fire Chief/Building Official Mark Servatius and Secretary Maureen Hansen. Planning Director Randy , Kugler was on vacation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Halley made a motion to approve the minutes of the Planning Commis- sion meeting held May 2, 1989 as presented. Commissioner Gilmour seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Piland, yes. All of the Commissioners voted in favor of the motion and the motion carried. AND PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were none presented at this meeting. BUSINESS Public Hearing - Conditional use reauest to allow the placement of a hot dog cart at 780 South Front Street in a CC=5 zone (37 2W 11HC, tax lot 6200) submitted Mike Sullivan Mr. Servatius read Planning Director Kugler's staff report dated May 22, 1989 and listed the following exhibits for the record: Exhibit A - Notice of Public Hearing; Exhibit B - Certificate of Posting of Notice of Public Hearing; Exhibit C - Assessor's map; and Exhibit D - Aerial map/site plan. There were no conflicts of interest expressed by the Commissioners. Chairman Ellard opened the. public hearing. Mr. Sullivan was not present at the meeting. The Commissioners discussed the proposed placement of the hot dog cart within the right-of-way on the corner of Cupp Street and Highway 99. The Commissioners realize that Mr. Sullivan would like his cart and sandwich board sign as close to Highway 99 as possible for advertising purposes, but are concerned about the traffic visibility problems that could result. Mr. Servatius stated that the placement of the sandwich board sign would have to comply with the sign regula- tions in the Municipal Code. No one else was present to speak in favor of or in opposition to the request. Chairman Ellard closed the public hearing. City of Central Point Planning Commission Meeting June 6, 1989 - 7:00 p.m. Page 2 Commissioner Piland made a motion to approve the conditional use request to allow the placement of a hot dog cart in a C-5 zone at 780 South Front Street (37 2W 11BC, tax lot 6200) submitted by Mike Sullivan subject to the restrictions in Central Point Municipal Code Section 17.60.120 regarding clear vision. Commis- sioner Halley seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Piland, yes. All of the Commissioners voted in favor of the motion and the motion carried. Public Hearing - Minor land partition request for 3385 Snowy Butte Lane (37 2W 1~ tax lot 3901) submitted ~ Daniel and Lauralee Patterson Mr. Servatius read Public Work's Director Blanchard's staff report dated May 31, 1989 and listed the following exhibits for the record: Exhibit A - Application for Minor Land Partition; Exhibit B - Notice of Public Hearing; Exhibit C - Certificate of Posting of Notice of Public Hearing; Exhibit D - Applicants' map; Exhibit E - Assessor's map; Exhibit F - Aerial map; Exhibit G - Jackson Creek Neighborhood Development Plan (separate); and Exhibit H - Public Works Department Project Analysis dated May 31, 1989. There were no conflicts of interest expressed by the Commissioners. Chairman Ellard opened the public hearing. Dan Patterson, 5121 Seven Oaks, Central Point, came forward. He described the partition for the Commissioners and Mr. Servatius indicated how it relates to the Jackson Creek Neighborhood Development Plan. Mr. Patterson stated that the original property will consist of 'f our lots after the partitioning is completed. Commissioner Gilmour asked about Mr. Patterson's plans for drainage from parcel #1. Mr. Patterson stated that parcel #1 will drain into Griffin Creek which runs along the back of the property. Chairman Ellard asked if the access way would be paved. Mr. Patterson stated he was of the understanding that the City would only be requiring that it be dustless because only one house is being built at this time; therefore, he plans to put in shale with a rock cap. Commissioner Gilmour pointed out requirement $3 under the Street Requirements in the Public Works Department Project Analysis dated May 31, 1989 which states that the access way shall be paved with asphalt. Discussion followed. Chairman Ellard expressed his concern regarding fire apparatus access around the right angle turn on the 20-foot wide access road. Fire Chief Servatius stated that the City is asking for the placement of an additional fire hydrant because it is 550 feet to the back of the property which is in excess of the City's 300-foot hydrant spacing standard. Mr. Patterson stated that he was not made aware of some of these requirements prior to this meeting. He asked if the hydrant would have to be in place prior the the commencement of construction on Parcel 3. He also asked if the Fire Department carries hose long enough to eliminate the need for the additional 2 City of Central Point Planning Commission Meeting June 6, 1989 - 7:00 p.m. Page 3 hydrant. Chief Servatius stated that the Department currently carries 400-foot hose but plans to obtain longer hose. Commissioner Halley asked where the eight-inch water main will be located. Mr. Patterson stated that the property is now tapped into the main line in Snowy Butte Lane. Mr. Patterson stated he plans to run a one-inch line to each lot. Discus- sion followed. A recess was called at 8:00 p.m. Chairman Ellard called the meeting back to order at 8:05 p.m. Mr. Patterson asked about #1 of the Miscellaneous Requirements in the Public Works Department's Project Analysis. Mr. Servatius explained that plans must be submit- ted prior to construction that include all that is listed. No one else came forward to speak in favor of or in opposition to the minor land partition request. Chairman Ellard closed the public hearing. It was the consensus of the Planning Commissioners that since Mr. Patterson is uncomfortable with some of the requirements of the Public Works Department, this matter is to be continued to the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for June 20, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. In the meantime, Mr. Patterson will have the opportunity to discuss the requirements with Public Works Director Blanchard. Mr. Patterson stated that he is unhappy with this delay and felt the matter should have been resolved at this meeting. He also stated that the delay could have been avoided had he been made aware of all of the requirements prior to this meeting. Annroval of Resolution No. 170 A Resolution of Classification of a Nonconforming Use Within the Citv of Central Point as Classes for the Oddfellows Lodge Commissioner Piland made a motion to pass Resolution No. 170, A Resolution of classification of a Nonconforming Use Within the City of Central Point as Class "A", for the Oddfellows Lodge. Commissioner Gilmour seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Piland, yes. All of the Commissioner voted in favor of the motion and the motion carried. Review of Deferred Improvement Agreement for a single-family dwelling at 1900 Scenic Avenue Chairman Ellard summarized staff report from Randy Kugler dated May 22, 1989 and gave a background on this matter. Commissioner Halley stated that there is a ditch in front of the property that could hamper the alignment of a future sidewalk. Chairman Ellard expressed his concern that for safety reasons, the construction of a sidewalk there not be postponed indefinitely. 3 City of Central Point Planning Commission Meeting June 6, 1989 - 7:00 p.m. Page 4 Commissioner Gilmour made a motion to enforce the current agreement regarding the construction of a sidewalk in front of the property at 1900 Scenic Avenue. The motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Halley made a motion to allow sidewalk construction at 1900 Scenic Avenue to be included within a Deferred Improvement Agreement as proposed in staff report dated May 22, 1989. Commissioner Piland seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Gilmour, no; Halley, yes; Piland, yes. The majority of the Commissioners voted in favor of the motion and the motion carried. MISCELLANEOUS Chairman Ellard reminded the Commissioners that there will be another Planning Commission meeting held on June 20, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Halley made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Piland seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Gilmour, yes; Halley, yes; Piland, yes. All of the Commissioners voted in favor of the motion and the motion carried. Chairman Ellard adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m. -- S T A F F R E PORT -- T0: The Planning Commission FROM: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant RE: Public Meeting - Minor Land Partition request for 3385 Snowy Butte Lane (37 2W 10, tax lot 3901) submitted by Daniel and Lauralee Patterson DATE: 16 June 1989 This item is a continuation from the June 6 meeting. Staff has met with Mr. Patterson and clarified the wording in the Public Works Department report at- tached, as Exhibit A of the Resolution recommending approval. The following exhibits are included for the Commission to review: Exhibit A - Certificate of Posting of Planning Commission Agenda for June 20, 1989 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Resolution recommending approval RK:dlf STRPPATT/PCWORK S 155 SO. SECOND ST. 64.'OC}9{~7CSi%~ CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE 664-3321 THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RNER VALLEY CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Randy Kugler , CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE.OF June 15, 1989 , I POSTED AN AGENDA FOR THE Planning Commission meeting FOR June 20, 1989 AT OR NEAR 1 City Hall 2. Citv Fire Stat 3 City Library - 4 City Post Office SIGNATURE ~~ DATE J~> 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO GRANT A MINOR LAND PARTITION WHEREAS, on May 26, 1989, Dan Patterson filed an application for a minor partition of land described as Jackson County map page 37 2W 10, tax lot 3901; and WHEREAS, the agenda including the public meeting was posted at the Central Point Public Library, Central Point Post Office, Central Point Fire Station, and the Central Point City Ha11; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on June 6 and June 20, 1989 the Planning Commission held a review of the proposal, provided opportunity for testimony from proponents and opponents, and received a planning staff report; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the review and public hearing, the Planning Commis- Sion made a motion to provide. recommendation for approval to the City Council; now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission recom- mends to the City of Central Point City Council that the minor partition of land be approved subject to the requirements of the Public Works Department, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference is incorporated into the within reso- lution. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1 ~ PATTMLP/PORES (060989) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Passed by the Planning Commission this signed by me in authentication of its passage this ATTEST: Planning Commission Secretary Approved by me this day of June, 1989. Planning Commission Chairman day of February, 1989. Planning Commission Chairman day of June, 1989, and Planning Commission Resolution No. 2 ~ PATTMLP/PORES (060989) CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Project Analysis Type of Project: Minor Land Partition Property: Owner: Daniel E. Patterson Exhibit A DATE: 31 May 1989 T37S 2W Section 10 Tax Lot 3901 Jackson County Parcel I-.43 acres Parcel II-.45 acres Parcel III-.98 acres Current Zoning: R-1, Residential, Single Family District, Code Section 17.20 Existing Conditions: Transportation/Circulation Name of Designation Current Needed Existing 2005 Street Row Row Traffic Projected Traffic Bea11 Lane Secondary Arterial 60' 80-SS' 2082 ADT 6000 Snowy Butte Ln Local Street 20' 60' 100 ADT 300-900 Water Service - 12" Water Main Snowy Butte Lane Sewer Service - 8" Sewer Main Snowy Butte Lane FINDINGS Street Requirements 1. Accesses will be authorized at Snowy Butte Lane from: tax lot 3901, parcel I through III. This access shall be designated a public easement for utilities. since it serves more than one lot and has public utilities constructed in the access. 2. Improvements to the approach shall be completed whenever Snowy Butte Lane is improved to a Local Street Standard. 3. The approach shall be paved with asphalt. Water System Requirements 1. An existing 12" main exists in Snowy Butte Lane. 2. Afire hydrant is located .on Snowy Butte Lane which is approximately 550 lineal feet from the north end of parcel II. Afire hydrant shall be required between parcel I and parcel II, and shall be constructed from an 8" ductile iron line. PATTMLP/PUBWKS Exhibit A Sanitary Sewer Requirements 1. Each parcel shall be served by an individual service lateral. A 6" sewer may be extended to the accessory between parcel I and parcel II. The City will issue permits for this portion. The property owner may also elect to complete this improvement through the requirements of the Plumbing Code. Storm Drainage Requirements 1. A11 storm runoff from the roofs, pavement, or other hard surface shall be piped to an approved drainage system. MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS 1. Prior to construction a complete set of construction plans shall be devel- oped which will include the following: - Legal description for each parcel - Square footage of each separate lot - Complete a Systems Inventory Sheet for all Public Works type installation - Include other utilities and crossings for gas, telephone, power and cable TV _ A11 Public Works construction shall be completed as required in the Central Point Public Works Standards - A grading plan shall be provided which corresponds to the cut and full design to assure all lots drain - Water, street improvements, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, street lighting, and all other required improvements to public facilities 2. A $200 per unit Park Development Fee shall be paid prior to issuing building permits. 3. A11 cost associated with this development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant or owner. Any modification to the proposed plan will require a new review, any requirements set forth herein can be modified based on the change of plan. 4. No other parcels allowed for this property unless the conditions of the Sack- son Creek Neighborhood Plan-Snowy Butte Master Plan Segment are adhered to. cc: 02-006 PATTMLP/PUBWKS // / -- S T A F F R E P O R T -- T0: Planning Commission FROM: Randy Kugler, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: Public Meeting - Review and recommendation of the preliminary development plans for the expansion of the Meadows P.U.D, located at 555 Freeman Road (37 2W 11A tax lots 200, 1000, 1101, and 1201) submitted by Neil Scheuneman DATE: 16 June 1989 This request involves the addition of 69 lots to the existing Meadows manufac- tured home development located generally at 555 Freeman Road. The applicant has provided a detailed account of the development's background and how this request meets the applicable criteria of the Central Point Municipal Code. In addition, the Public Works Director has reviewed the request with recom- mendations attached to the Resolution recommending approval. The City Council will hold a public hearing and make a final decision on the request after receiving the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The following exhibits are included for the Commission to review: Exhibit A - Certificate of Posting of Planning Commission Agenda Exhibit B - Tax Assessor's Map Page Exhibit C - Applicant's findings Exhibit D - Resolution recommending approval of the preliminary development plan Exhibit E - Preliminary Plan (seperate document) RK:dlf attachments STRPPUD/PCWORK / / 155 SO. SECOND ST. @WC}B~CKiH~ CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 PHONE 664-3321 THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RNER VALLEY CERTIFICATE OF POSTING I, Randy Kugler CERTIFY THAT ON THE FOLLOWING DATE.OF June 15 1989 , I POSTED AN AGENDA FOR THE Planning Commission meeting FOR June 20, 1989 AT OR 1. City Hall 2. City Fire Station 3. Ci 4 City Post Office -; SIGNATURE :% DATE June 1 , 1989 /~ m N ti M O m 3 N ti M 200 z. 4. 5 Q 1101 ~ ~ n~ ~ ~ o• Q I 2a ~~ -~ V . - ~. --- - - - 313S3i' - ..-ea P 7403 cP-ioaoo) F?2 E~ I ~ ~ ~ABG ~` ~ ~o - - .e- - - = 3? Z ~~w . ~ N i». ~z5 38e•S'~ . u4•~7 I~01 I~ 13Ac\ I6i !~O aF 16C I10 0 G G~ O~. .~;;o lax 1~~ - - ~ 0.38AC N3QQ j. G 0 0 ~ 9 . I W Q J Q O ~ ~ Z _ Q• PRAIRIE w _ COURTI ~ I I I ~ / \ ~I P ~ ,~ ~ i U ~ W )_ ~ J `- / AVENUE HEMLOCK / ~~ Note: THIS PORTION SNOWY BUTTE ORCHARDS VACATED In • VOL. 446, PG. 246,47. - ~ ''~~ff ~ ' ROSE VALLEY \ /~ WURT w a 3 BEFORE THE PLANNING COMP:ISSIOAT :,ND CITY COUI:CIL FOR TIIE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT. OR: IN THE MATTER OF AN EXPANSION 0; Ai: ) EXISTING PLANNED UIdIT DEVELOPD;E::T ) (PUD) FOR A NiOfiILE HOIiE SUBDIVISIOi~ ) KNO'vVN AS "THE MEADOWS"; Neil ) Scheuneman, Applicant; J. i~ichael ) LaIQier, Agent ) GENERAL: FINDINGS OF FACT AND COPiCLUSIONS The attached findings are in support for a preliminary development .plan review '_ for an expansion of a previously approved Mobile Home Subdivision Planned Unit Development known as "The Dieado~•~s" and located at 555 Freeman Road, Central Point, Oregon. A complete metes and bounds description of the area is attached as an exhibit to these findings. "The L4eadows" currently consists of 196 developed lots that were specifically oriented to providing an adult com-nunity for mobile home living, and approved by the City of Central Point. The project was professionally developed to include (1) a recreation and meeting hall, a swirmning pool, sauna/therapy pool, tennis courts and other on-site amenities (Please refer to City of Central Point File ~ ). The project was to be developed in .four major phases, with the fourth phase being a 67-lot parcel located between the primary parcel and Hopkins Road. Phase Three involved creation of the tennis courts and the develop- ment of the P.ecreational Vehicle parking area adjacent to Interstate 5. During the early 1980's, the management and ownership of the project faltered, due to the death of one of the principals of the development team and the impact of a strained economy. The project was restructured under new management provided by the applicant, and is now well on its way to being the premium manufactured housing project in the Rogue Valley. /~ Meadows: P. 2 This application is for review of several changes that have been initiated by the applicant, and have received the full support of The Meadocas Homeowner's Association. These changes include the following: 1. Completion of the Recreational Vehicle Storage area. This project includes a redesign of the area to handle more vehicles (including boats, travel trailers and the like) and a caretaker's residence. The project is scheduled for completion by early fall, 1989. 2. Substitution of a 200-seat Arts and Crafts building to be located on the former site of the tennis courts. This change is geared primarily to reflect the needs of the Homeowner's association, and would include all necessary parking. Scheduled completion: June, 1990. 3. Completion of Phase 4 of the original project, with the addition of 13 additional lots, but restructuring of lot sizes (required for larger homes now on the market)to allow an increase of 68 additional lots, total. Scheduled completion: Sp~iaig 1990. CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 17.76 OF THE CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE: The Conditional Use Section of the Central Point Municipal Code (Section 17:76040) requires that. specific findings be made addressing the following: A. That the site-for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accornodate'said use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the. subject zoning district: As noted above, the proposed addition to the project oaas part of the original program for development, as submitted to the City in the early 1980's. The lot sizes have been adjusted to reflect the needs of the homeowners-(home sizes have increased approx- imately 4 feet in width since the project was first designed) and the design ,. size and shape of the proposed use is consistent with the original plan. The development of public facilities is consistent with the requirements of the City of Central Point, and the improvement meets all other requirements of the district. /S Meadows: P. 3 B. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accomodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use: The proposed improvements to the project will provide a full- service street that will connect the existing development with HopY.ins Road, and provide circulation within the proposed addition in conformance with the Central Point :lunicipal Code recuirements. This street improvement will not only provide adequate venting of the project onto Hopkins Road, but will also provide an alternative access for emergency vehicles to the balance of the project. The original findings submitted to the City of Central Point included traffic counts on both Freeman Road and Hopkins Road that indicate that the size and condition of the roadways is adequate to meet the needs generated by the development. Street width for the proposed addition is consistent with the existing street design within the existing project (40-foot ROLd, 36 feet of paving) and will use the rolled curb and sidwalk that is currently in use. Engineering review of the project indicates all streets are sized appropriately for the anticipated traffic flows, and will be of a condition to effectively accomodate the traffic that is expected to be generated. C. That the proposed use will have no adverse impact on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the Commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements on the site, vehiclular ingress, egress and in- ternal circulation, setbacks, building heights, walls, and fences, landscaping-outdoor lighting and signs. The attached. site plan indicates the orientation of the ingress and egress of the proposed addition to The Meadows, as well as the relationship o£-that ingress and egress caith the overall project. /~ Meadows: P. 4 Proposed improvements on the site include full width streets, rolled curb and gutter, sidewalks, minimum 60' wide lots, setbacks consistent with the recuirements established under the existing PUD application, maximum height of buildings to be erected of not more than 30 feet (noted for the proposed Arts and Crafts Building) and landscaping consistent with that approved by the Homeowner's Association and in place in the balance of the project. A sign similar in design and size to the existing entrance on Freeman Road (routed wood sign, approximately 4' by 6', is proposed for the Hopkins Road entrance. Street (outdoor) lighting is consistent with the existing lighting, which calls for a yard light near the curb for each lot. A murcury- sodium vapor. street light is proposed for the major intersections. Since the general area is zoned for residential use, the Planning Commisssion and City Council can find that the establishment of Phase II of .the Meadows Development Plan is consistent with the provisions of. the origninal development plan as submitted, and will have no adverse impact upon abutting property owners or uses permitted on abutting properties. D. That the establishment maintenance and operation of the use .applied for will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhood and will not be detrimental or injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the community based on the review of those facts listed in Sub. C above: Again, the requested expansion of The N,eadows is consistent with the overall use of the land for a Planned Unit, Mobile Home Sub- division. The Meadows Homeowner's Association, a consortium 'of neighbors living in the project, has voted unanimously to accept annexation of the proposed use to The Meadows, and to support the development of that site. The key in reviewing the proposed use with the Association was consistency with the existing development, /7 Meadows: P. 5 emphasizing the access, landscaping requirements contained in the original Declaration and ;sylaws, and development of the Arts and Crafts building. Maintaining and improving the open space i.e., jogging path, and various open space areas scattered through- out the park, and completion of the Recreational Vehicle parking area are also consistent with the original development plan, and with the desires of the Homeowner's Association. With the above in mind, the Planning Commission and City Council can find that the proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the area, or the neighborhood, and will be a benefit to the community in general. CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 17.68 (PLANY;LD UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PUD CRITERIA OF THE CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE: Section 17.68.010 of this section of the code outlines the scope and purpose of the PUD approval process, which is to "...gain more effective use of open space, realize advantages of large-scale site planning, mixing of building types or land uses, improved aesthetics and environmental preservation by allowing a variety of buildings, structures, open spaces, allowable heights, and setbacks of buildings and structures. A PUD should have a har- monious variety of uses, utilize the economy of shared services and facilities, and reduce r~tiunicipal costs of operating and main- taining-services while insuring substantial compliance with the district regulations and other provisions of this code." A review of the concept of The meadows (i.e., a mobile home community that provides for unique installation, t~ao car garages, and personally owned lots ,. shared services, recreational facilities, in a quality environment) indicates that the overall project is in keeping with the purpose of the PUD Ordinance. Section 17.68.020: Size of the PUD site: A review of the size and orientation of the tract of land under consideration indicates that the property is in conformance with this standard. /~ Meadows: P. 6 Section 17.68.040: Criteria to grant or deny a PUD: The Planning Commission, in order to grant a PUD, must find that the application is in conformance with the following criteria: A. That the development of a harmonious, integrated plan justifies exceptions to the normal requirements of this title. B. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and other applicable policies of the City. C. The location,. size, design, and operating character- istics of .the PUD caill have minimal adverse impact on the liveability, value or appropriate development of the. surrounding area. D. That the proponents of the PUD have demonstrated that they. have the financial capability to carry out the proposed project, that they intend to. start construction within six months of the final approval of the project and any necessary district changes,. and. intend to complete. such construction within a reasonable time as determined by the commission. E. That the-traffic congestion will not likely be created by the proposed development or will be obviated by.demon- strable provisions of the plan for proper entrances, exits, internal traffic circulatioh and parking. F. Commercial facilities: NOT APPLICABLE G. Industrial. PUD: NOT APPLICABLE H. .The PUD.-will preserve natural feature s. such as streams and. shorelines, wooded cover and rough terrain, if present. L. The PUD will be compatible with the surrounding area. J. The PUD will reduce need for public facilities and services relative to others permitted uses for the land. ~9 Meadows: Page 7 A review of the original development plan, as well as the site plan accompanying this application and findings, indicates that the project meets the criteria for approval of a Planned Unit Development as described in this chapter. Specifically, since the new ownership has taken control of the facility, the financial capability to control the growth and orientation of the project has been adequately demonstrated. The developer, iVeil Scheuneman, has had extensive experience in both land development and real estate sales, and has accelerated the development schedule for this project. The project has been, and is, in conformance with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the Housing Element, and is in conformance with the basic plan and Zoning designations for the property. The existence of the project adequately demonstrates that the traffic impacts from development of the project are less than originally proposed for the site, due to the character of the new market share being addressed by The Meadows staff. In 1988, the Homeowner's Association. voted unanimously to become an "adult" community, and the bylaws and appropriate HUD approvals have been changed to reflect that orientation. The primary .change betweer. the original development plan and the cuxrent request in~:terms of impact on public facilities is that the water and sewer. system proposed for the neca addition will be con- structed to City of '.Central Point Standards, and when approved, will be dedicated to the City. This is in contrast to the existing sectipns of the project, which were not dedicated to the City. The street, curb, gutter and drainage system will remain the respon- sibility of The Meadows, even in the new, proposed. section. ~~ Meadows: P. 8 Section 17.68.050: Preliminary Development Plan: The requirements of this section have been substantially addressed by the accorpanying site plan and improvement sketches, prepared by Fred Phillips, P.E., a consulting civil engineer. Since the application is a taobile home subdivision, and has been designed for individual ownership of lots, and common ownership of the common areas, the PliD does not indicate location of buildings, trees (i.e., landscape plan) or elevations of proposed structures, since these are as individual as the prospective owners. However, lot dimensions, street systems, parking, pedestrian ways and other common areas are designated on the accompanying plan. Since many of the homes in the project may want solar access, the design of the proposed addition is predominantly East-West, so that solar access can be obtained for most of the homes currently being sold in The Dleadows. Off-street parking is maintained by two-car garages and driveways, as required in the bylaws. The development schedule for the project is as follows: A. Completion of revised RV-Boat parking and storage area: Fall, 1989 B. Completion of phase II (original plan Phase IV) subdivision; creation of lots, streets, water, sewer and drainage systems: Spring, 1990 C. Completion of ,200-seat Arts and Crafts building, to be substituted for tennis courts presented on the original development plan: June, 1990. (See attached amendments to the bylaws) 2I Meadows: P. 9 Compliance with Sections 17.68.060-17.68-140: Again, a review of the existing project, the proposed a;nendazent and site plan, and other supplemental ir.'_ormation contained in these findings, the Planning Commission._nd the City Council can find that the application is in substant_al compliance with each of these sections. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant submits that the application for expansion of the existing PUD, The Meadows, a mobile home subdivision, is in con- formance with all applicable. sections of the Conditional Use and Planned Unit Development criteria, as established by the Central Point Municipal Code. The applicant has demonstrated that he has the financial capability to purchase the entire project and complete the first phases of the development plan as submitted to the City of ,Central Point. The application before you contains several incidental, modifications to better meet the needs of the current residents of the project, and to complete the project as originally conceived. We strongly urge your approval of this application. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, -7 ~ ~~ J. Michael LaNier Agent PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE MEADOWS P.U.D. WHEREAS, on May 24, 1989, Neil Scheuneman filed an application for the expansion of a planned unit development located at 555 Freeman Road presently known as the Meadows, said land further described as Jackson County Map Page 37 2W 11A, Tax Lots 1000,1101 and 1201; and WHEREAS, Notice of Public Meeting was posted at the Central Point Li- brary, Central Point Post Office, Central Point Fire Station, and Central Point City Ha11; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on June 20,.1989 the Planning Commis- Sion held a review of the proposal, provided opportunity for testimony from propo- nents and opponents and received a planning staff report; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the review and public hearing, the Planning Commis- Sion made a motion to provide recommendation for approval. to the City Council; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission recom- mends to the City of .Central Point City Council that the application for the expansion of the Meadows planned unit development submitted by Neil Scheuneman be approved subject to the requirements of the Public Works Department, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by this reference is incorporated into the within reso- lution. RESOLUTION N0. - Page 1 ~ ~{ MEADPUD/PORES Passed by the Planning Cortunission this 20th day of June 1989, and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of 1989. Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: Planning Commission Secretary RESOLUTION NO. - Page 2 ~~ MEADPUD/PORES EXHIBIT "A" C=TY OF= CENTRAL PO2NT PUBLSC WORKS DEPARTMENT " S T A F F R E P O R T" Project: The Meadows, PUD Phase IV Location: T37S R2W Section 11A, Tax Lots 200,1000,1101 & 1201 Acreage: TL 1101-8.56 Acres TL 1201-2.13 Acres Proposed Unit: 69 Owner: Neil Scheuneman "The Meadows" Zoning: R-3 Type of Application: Preliminary PUD Development Plan Review EXISTING FACILITIES STREETS Street No. 3traet Naas Exist Future Exiat Future Exist Future Class Row Row Pave Pave Tr ff'c Traffic SA 1 and SA 2 Freeman Rd. 60 Ft. 80 Ft. 24'E Cedar 40' 3540 4200 • ?amdar'y 36'E Entrance Arterial 3A 11 Hopkins Rd. 80 Ft. 60 Ft. 30' 40' 7500 1900 9e¢ndary Arterial SANITARY SEWER Sewer Main Flow Direction Inv Elevation Size Pioe Est Flow Cao aeity Hopkins East 11 Pt. 8" -- -- Mt. View East MH "C"-7' Stub 8" -- -- WATER SYSTEM: Water Main Size Fire Hydrant Est Cons Phase IV Cons Notea Hopkins 70" 300' Spacing 200,000 eP/mo 77,000 eP/mo This main servea served by 8" meter new phase this project Bush Cedar exclusively Freeman Rd. 72" Crand H/A N/A STFFRPT.LRB 1~ 2 3TORhf DRAINAGE Location Tvoe Property 97ooes Basin flotes Freeman Roatl Ditch NE 1271 to 1266 Proposed Improvements STREETS: Findings Mingus Property can he serviced Prom Mingus Creek i. On Page 3 of the applicant's Finding Document, the applicant states under Item B, the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accomodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use. - The City of Central Point completes a street analysis on an annual basis. As of March 1989, Freeman Road was rated in poor condition, and Hopkins Road was rated poor/very poor. Both streets are under County jurisdiction. The addition of approximately 1000 vehicle trips/day, reflecting approximately 30% increase,.will further increase deterioration. - Both Freeman Road and Hopkins Road are within County jurisdiction within the City of Central Point. 2. Streets that are built to City- standards are easily entered into the City's maintenance program, and provide access points to adequately access public facilities. 3. The access at Hopkins Road shall be constructed to provide turn lanes and acceleration lanes. Proper illumination shall be provided at this location. 4. Sidewalks shall be provided along Hopkins Road and Freeman Road in the area designated for improvements. 5. Adequate sight distance shall be provided at the accesses onto Hopkins Road and Freeman Road. 6. In order to avoid the hourglass effect for street improvements, Freeman Road shall be improved to Hopkins, and Hopkins shall be improved to Freeman according to our secondary arterial design. STFFRPT.LRB p SANITARY SEWER: 1. The Applicant shall provide all design calculations for sanitary sewer. This information will determine if the 6" sewer stub will adequately serve the drainage area for this improvement. 2. The sanitary sewer system which does not connect to "The Meadows" private sewer system from MH "C" and "D" shall be 8" in diameter. WATER SYSTEM: 1. The water system for "The Meadows" is serviced from a 12" main which is connected with an 8" ductile iron main which then connects to a 6" meter from which a 10" main feeds the development. The 6" main reduces the ability to deliver the maximum output of the system. This system is not a looped system. All water used on the site, including water used in the case of a fire, is billed to "The Meadows". 2. In order to provide a more reliable water supply, adequate volume and pressure, reduce the possibility of ISO rating modification, and allow the City to monitor possible cross connection concerns, a redesign of the service connection may be raequired. The applicant's engineer shall provide the necessary calculations to determine if the water meter can support this development. Computation shall include fire flows of 1000 g.p.m. 3. Phase IV water system shall be connected with a minimum 8" main and each unit shall be individually metered. This also allows the City to administer water conservation programs through smaller connector points. STORM DRAINAGE: 1. Phase IV originally had 45 lots. With the addition 24 lots, the drainage analysis shall be updated to determine additional discharge to Mingus Creek. Analyze downstream structures to assure that they have adequate capacity. 2. Storm drainage for each lot shall discharge to the street for roofs and lot area drains. 3. The original phase IV plan for storm drainage must be modified for the new plan. STFFRPT.LRB 3 2 4. The existing storm drainage structure needs to be cleared of all debris which could cause a potential flooding situation. Also all debris stacked on the banks must be removed in order to avoid violation of Section 8.24 and 8.28 of the Central Point Municipal Code. MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS: 1. Prior to construction, a complete set of construction plans shall be developed which will include the following: - Square footage of each separate lot - List all PUE information on plans - Complete a Systems Inventory Sheet for all Public Works type installaltion. - Include other utilities and crossings for gas, telephone, power and cable TV -All public works construction shall be completed as required in the Central Point Public Works Standards. - A grading plan shall be provided which corresponds to the cut and fill design to assure all lots drain. - Water, Street Improvements, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, and all other required public works facilities. Street improvements shall include street lighting, signing, curb/gutters, and safety design of this system. 2. A $200 per unit Park Development Fee shall be paid prior to issuing building permits. 3. A11 costs associated with this development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant or owner. Any modification to the proposed plan will require a new review, any requirements set forth herein can be modified based on the changes made to this plan. 4. The review on this preliminary -plan, utilized rules and regulations in effect as of June 15, 1989. Construction permit, if this proposed project is approved, shall be issued based on the rules and regulations in effect at the time of approval. However, if permits are not issued within 6 months after this approval, additional conditions can be placed based on rules and regulation in effect at the end of said 6 month period. 5. The review of this preliminary plan assumed that all utilities and facilities are to remain privately maintained as in Phase 1, 2 & 3. Improvements to Hopkins and Freeman would be completed as Public Improvements, and inspected by the appropriate jurisdiction, including all other offsite improvements associated with this project. If the utilities and streets are to be constructed to City standards and dedicated to the City, an analysis will need to be completed to include this change assumption. STFFRPT.LRB 4 6. A development such as "The Meadows" has private water, sanitary sewer, streets and storm drainage facilities. Although the City does not maintain these utilities, it is highly possible that the maintenance standards established by "the Meadows" could affect the City's system. An example is infiltration/inflow standards for sanitary sewer. cc: 02-006 STFFRPT.LRB 5~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY MIKE SULLIVAN WHEREAS, an application for a conditional use permit for a mobile food vendor in a C-5 zone has been submitted by Mike Sullivan, said business 'to be located at 780 South Front Street within the City; the location more particularly described as Jackson County Tax Assessor's map page 37 2W 11BC, tax lot 6200; and WHEREAS, the Central Point Planning Commission has reviewed and approved the application at a public hearing held on the sixth day of June, 1989; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The relevant criteria applicable to the within application is as followed: (a) The Comprehensive Plan designates the site as thoroughfare commercial. (b) The Zoning Ordinance designates the site as C-5. (c) Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 17.76 describes the conditions which the Planning Commission must consider in order to grant a conditional use permit. Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds as follows:' The proposal meets the City's urbanization goal for commercial land uses found in the Comprehen- sive Plan because the east side of Highway 99 (Front Street) is the primary thor- oughfare commercial district (C-5). This area is developed primarily for auto related businesses and services. The C-5 zoning recognizes these types of uses which will strengthen this corridor while providing locations for these uses that are often not compatible with commercial uses in other zones. Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby finds as follows. The proposal meets the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance for a C-5 zone because: (a) Mobile food vendors are a conditional use. (b) The proposed use will not adversely impact required on-site parking requirements for Saxbury's Furniture. (c) No evidence was submitted supporting a conclusion that the proposed location would generate conditions that would adversely impact surrounding properties. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. - Page 1 SULLCUP/PORES W Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the record herein and the findings therefrom support the conclusion that the proposal is in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the applicable standards of the City's Zoning Code. The proposed conditional use is hereby approved subject to: (a) No obstruction exceeding 3 1/2 feet in height shall be placed within the required clear vision area. Passed by the Planning Commission on 19_, and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of , 19 Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: Planning Commission Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. - Page 2 SULLCUP/PORES ~~