HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - May 16, 1995CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
April 18, 1995 -Page One
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
City Wing Commissioners:
City Planning Commissioner present were: Chuck Piland, Jan Dunlap, Herb Farber,
Candy Fish, Randy Graves, Karolyne Johnson and Valerie Rapp.
County Plannina Commissioners•
County Planning Commissioners present were: Genevieve Windsor, Francee
Bothwell, Edward Danehy, Leon Hofford, William Ferguson.
III. CORRESPONDENCE:GeorgeRubaloff,CityPlanningAdministrator,distributedcopies
of the Rogue Valley Council of Governments concerning the Transportation Meeting
scheduled for Tuesday April 25, at 7:00 p.m. at Central Point City Hall.
IV. PUBLIC APPEARANCES -None
V. BUSINESS FOR JOINT MEETING
A. PUBL/C HEARING -Review and Recommendations Regarding Proposed Goa/
Exceptions and Comprehensive P/an Amendments for Extension of Water/ine
to Erickson Air-Crane Company (Applicants: Southern Oregon Reglona/
Economic Development, /nc. and Oregon Economic DevelopmentDepartmentJ•
Ail members of both Planning Commissions were provided copies of the
Application packet (File #95-1-CPA/95-2-UGBA, which includes Goal
Exceptions and Amendments to the Comprehensive Plans for the City of
Central Point and Jackson County, including an Exhibit schedule containing 33
exhibits.
Copies of a letter dated April 18, 1995 from The Medford Water Commission
were distributed to Jackson County and Central Point Planning Commission
members.
Chairperson Piland opened the Public Hearing.
Laurel Prairie-Kuntz, Assistant Planning Director for Jackson County, reviewed
the description of the Application (including the Goal Exceptions and
Amendments.) Laurel referred to the 33 Exhibits listed in the Exhibit Schedule
into the record by reference, and asked that both bodies vote on including the
letter from Larry Rains, Medford Water Commission, dated April 18, 1995 as
Exhibit #34.
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
April 18, 1995 -Page Two
~~ --i
Debbie Timms, Jackson County Planner II, reviewed the Jackson County Planning
Department Notice of Public Meeting and Staff Report dated April 11, 1995 including
the decision criteria, proposed amendments and exceptions, and key issues to
consider. Debbie also stated that staff recommended adopting the applications,
acceptance of the General Findings of Fact and relevant substantive criteria listed in
the Legal Findings. She also reviewed the Compliance with Statewide Planning
Goals, Compliance with Central Point Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement,
Compliance with the Jackson County Comprehensive Pian, Compliance with the Land
Development Ordinance and Conclusion and Recommendation, wherein County
Planning staff recommended that Jackson County Planning Commission and City of
Central Point Planning Commission find that this application complies with the
requirements of, and is consistent with State Law, the Jacksdn County
Comprehensive Plan, the Jackson County Land Development Ordinance and the
1984 Central Point/Jackson County Urban Growth Boundary and Policy agreement.
City Planning Commission member Graves moved to accent the 33 exhibits for the
Application and the 4/18/95 letter from the Medford Water Commission as Exhibit
#34 into the record Commission Fish seconded the Motion. Roll Call Vote: Dunlap.
ves; Farber, abstains Fish ves• Graves ves• Johnson, ves: and Rana, yes. and the
motion carried.
Jackson County Commission member Danehy m4_ved to accept the 33 exhibits to the
Application and the 4/18/95 letter from Medford Water Commission as Exhibit #34
into the record Jackson County Commission member Hofford seconded the Motion
Rotl Call Vote Danehv ves• Bothwell ves• Ferguson ves• and Windsor yes and
the Motion carried unanimously.
Commissioner Farber declared a conflict of interest, as he has been employed by
Erickson Air-Crane as a surveyor and took a seat in the audience. There were no
further conflicts of interest, or ex-parte communication.
Craiy_Stone, 708 Cardley Avenue, Medford, Oregon, Agent representing Southern
Oregon Regional Economic Development, Inc. (SOREDq and Oregon Economic
Development Department (OEDD) came forward in support of the Application.
Tim Harper, Risk Manager for Erickson Air-Crane, 3100 Willow Springs Road, Central
Point, Oregon came forward in support of the application and to give some
background on Erickson's operations from 1975 to the present. Mr. Harper stated
that they had drilled approximately 12 wells during this time, and have abandoned
10 wells because of high salt content. Erickson is presently using one well with a
flow test of 3.5 gallons a minute, but the neither the quantity or quality is sufficient.
He stated that Erickson was hoping for a viable source of water.
Mike Nelson, SOREDI, came forward in favor of the application. He stated that
SOREDI function is to aid local companies to develop, stay in the valley, and expand.
He gave some comparison's of the type of jobs that have moved in the valley with
their low pay rate (retail) noting that the type of payroll needed in this area such
2
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
April 18, 1995 -Page Three
,i_~ ~~,
i.T. ~ ~,~
as manufacturing and industrial jobs which offer a better pay scale. He stated that
the gross income for Erickson employees averages in the neighborhood of 540,000
a year. Stone stated that if water is not provided to Erickson Air-Crane, Erickson will
have no problem finding a new home in a neighboring state.
Brace Laird, Regional Development Officer, OEDD, stated that their mission was
business development, retention and expansion. He stated that Erickson was a prime
industrial business, and good for this area. Laird also stated that if Erickson has to
relocate because of the water problem, that not only would Erickson's employees
and payroll be affected, but that directly and indirectly. Erickson also helps support
services and businesses in the area. Laird also stated that the only incentive would
be that OEDD would pull out some lottery dollars that are allocated to the Rogue
Valley, to try to hold on to a Rogue Valley Company. As far as he knew, Mr. Laird
stated that no one has waived any taxes, SDC fees or other fees that have been
waived, or other special incentives.
Bill Thorndike. Jr. Medford Chamber of Commerce and SOREDI, spoke on the
importance of Erickson Air-Crane staying on the present site and the benefit to the
surrounding communities.
Craig Stone. Agent gave some background on zoning and industrial use of the site.
Stone stated that the quality and quantity of water is a real problem. He stated that
Erickson had investigated alternatives for a new water source: 11) drill and treat the
water -which process is very expensive, and they would have to haul the residue
to a disposal in Grants Pass; (2) would be to extend an urban public facility through
rural lands to provide service to an urban use (the railroad route); (3) would be to
include Erickson in the City of Central Point's urban growth area, which would cause
objections from LCDC would require the whole corridor (intensive farm use) to
change; (4) would be to extend the public water line from the City of Central Point
down the highway public right-of-way to the Erickson site.
Bill Ferguson, Jackson County Planning Commissioner asked why LCDC might object
to the rail road corridor option. Craig Stone stated that LCDC would protect the high
quality farm land from being disturbed. Stone asked that for a chance for rebuttal if
needed.
Burr Tye. 2315 Lark Lane wanted to know why his neighbors at 2300 and 2301 Lark
Lane did not receive any notice of the Meeting.
Laurel Kuntz showed Mr. Tye the area that was involved in the mailing to property
owners, and how it did not necessarily follow down a street of addresses, but rather
to those property owners, within 500 - 1000 feet from project.
3
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
April 18, 1995 -Page Four
c ~p
~~ ~ ~' {r ~
~~ ~;
Wallace Skyrman 4588 N Pacific Hiway, came forward with some concerns about
the facts stated in the report. He asked about the number of on-site full time
employees at Erickson. He noted some typos and some misinformation. He also
inquired about other properties hooking on to the water line.
Crain Stone, stated that Erickson employs 300 full time on-site employees and
another 100 or so employees that are on-site part of the time and in the field the rest
of the time. He also stated that they are making a strong case for Erickson to get
this water line, and any other proposals would weaken the case. However, after
Erickson obtains the water line, there may be some substantial reasons for others to
hook onto the line, such as hazards to health under State Laws.
Tim Harper, Erickson Air-Crane, stated that the depth of 5' listed in the flow test on
the existing well in use report meant that the flow test probe would only go down
5 feet, however, that the well was approximately 62 feet deep.
No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the recommendation.
Chairperson Piland closed the Public Hearing.
CITY: Commissioner Fish moved to recommend the Proposed Goal Exceptions and
Comprehensive Plan Amendments for Extension of Waterline to Erickson Air-Crane
Company (Applicants: Southern Oregon Regional Economic Development, Inc. and
Oregon Economic Development Department, accepting all 34 exhibits and adopting
the General Findings of Fact and relevant substantive criteria listed in the Legal
Findings, Commissioner Dunlap seconded the Motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: Dunlap,
yes; Fish, yes; Graves, yes; Johnson, yes, and Rapp, yes, and the motion carried.
COUNTY: Commissioner Ferguson moved to recommend the Proposed Goal
Exceptions and Comprehensive Plan Amendments for Extension of Waterline to
Erickson Air-Crane Company (Applicants: Southern Oregon Regional Economic
Development, Inc. and Oregon Economic Development Department, accepting all 34
exhibits and adopting the General Findings of Fact and relevant substantive criteria
listed in the Legal Findings, Commissioner Hofford seconded the Motion. ROLL CALL
VOTE: Danehy, yes, Ferguson, yes; Hofford, yes, and Rothweil, yes, and Windsor,
yes and the Motion carried.
Countv dismissed their Commissioners and they left the meeting.
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
April 19, 1995 -Page Five
VI. BUSINESS FOR CITY MEETING.
A. Review and Approval of April 4, 1994 Planning Commission Minutes.
Commissioner Fish moved to approve the April 4, 1995 Planning Commission
Minutes. Commissioner Dunlap seconded the Motion. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Dunlap, yes; Farber, yes; Fish, yes; Graves, abstain; Johnson, yes, and Rapp,
yes and the Motion carried unanimously.
B. PUBLIC HEARING -Review and determination regarding Tentative Plan
Application for Land Partition at 3363 Marilee Street, at Northwest Corner of
Isaac Way and Marilee Street.
Chairperson Piland opened the Public Hearing.
George Rubaloff, Planning Administrator, referred to the Notice of Public
Hearing, dated March 28, 1995 and reviewed the. Nature of Hearings, Criteria
for Decision, Public Comment process and Summary of Procedure.
Herb Farber declared a conflict of interest as Surveyor for the Applicant.
There were no further declarations of conflicts of interest or ex-parte
communications.
George Rubaloff referred to his Memorandum of April 13, 1995 and reviewed
the Decision Process, Standards, Description of the Application, Land Use
History, Zoning Review ,Conclusion, and entered The Notice of Public
Hearing, Dated March 28, 1995, the Owners of Record located within 100
foot radius (by reference) Maps, Application and Public Works Department
Staff Report dated March 30, 1995 into the record by reference.
Paul Worth, Public Works Technician, referred to the Public Works Staff
Report dated March 30, 1995, and stated that the applicant needs to show
items listed in the Conditions on their construction Plans. He also stated that
the general conditions apply to most developments. He stated that the
Specific Conditions listed apply specifically to this project. He reviewed the
four specific conditions, as Condition 1(a)-street construction, 1(b)-
approximately 595 lineal feet of sidewalk, which is tied to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, Condition 2-connecting Parcel 1 sanitary sewer
laterals to the sanitary sewer main in Isaac Way. Existing residences and
future divisions shall connect to the 8" sanitary sewer mains located in Isaac
Way and Marilee Street; Condition 3-Storm Drainage requirements, and
Condition 4-stating requirements for adequate and positive drainage. Worth
also stated that the Applicant could meet the requirements for a portion of the
sidewalk (for Parcel #2) by the Applicant entering into a Deferred Improvement
Agreement. 5
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
April 18, 1995 -Page Six
Parcel #1 would require sidewalk before a Certificate of Occupancy could be
issued.
Herb Farber, 908 E. Jackson, Medford, .came forward as Agent to the
Applicant, stated the partition property was a trade of a piece of land for
improvements through those street frontages. Marilee was not required to be
connected by Developer's of Valley Point nor Forest Glen. Farber
recommended that the City enter into a Deferred Improvement Agreement for
the sidewalk on Parcel #2. Farber also stated that the mobiles on Parcel #2 are
income producing and it would not be practical to remove the mobiles to build
sidewalks at this time.
Noel Moore, W.L. Moore Construction, 3600 Westover, Central Point, Oregon
came forward with comments pertaining to the land partition at 3363 Marilee
Street. He stated that he wanted to see the street completed and negotiated
a deal with Mr. Sowell. Mr. Moore also stated he thought a two year limit for
starting to build after Final Plat Approval would be a good idea.
No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the proposed land
partition.
Chairperson Piland closed the Public Hearing.
Commis sioner Johns on m oved to approve Resol ution #318 for the Application for
Land Pa rtition at 33 63 M arilee Street at t he No rthwest Corner of Isaac Wav and
Marilee Street and t hat a Deferred Improv ement for the sidewalk improvements to
Parcel # 2 be r equire d with the appropriate chang es in the language of Condition 1
Commis sioner Fish s econd ed the Motion ROLL C ALL VOTE• Dunlap yes• Fish yes•
Graves ves• J ohnso n ves• and Rapp ves and the Motion carried unanimously.
VII. MISCELLANEOUS -Next Planning Commission Meeting, May 2, 1995.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT -Commissioner Graves moved to adjourn. Commissioner Rapp
seconded, all agreed by voice vote by signifying "Aye" and the Meeting adjourned
at 9:15 p.m.
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
~• Planning Commission Minutes
May 2, 1995 -Page One
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 p.m.
11. ROLL CALL:
Those present were: Chuck Piland, Jan Dunlap, Herb Farber, Candy Fish, Randy
Graves, and Karolyne Johnson.
Valerie Rapp had called saying she would not be able to attend.
III. CORRESPONDENCE: -None
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes were not available, therefore approval of the Minutes of the Combined
Meeting on April 18, 1995 was rescheduled for the May 16, 1995 Planning
Commission Meeting.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES -None
VI. BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing - Review and Determination regarding zoning variance for
setback of a proposed parking structure at 250 N. 5th Street, located 70 t feet
south of the southeast corner of Fifth and Maple Streets (37 2W 3DA TL
11901) (Agent: Ted Fletcher, Owner-John McCulloch).
Chairperson Piland opened the Public Hearing.
George Rubaloff, Planning Administrator, referred to the Notice of Public
Hearing dated April 11, 1995 and reviewed the Nature of Hearings, Criteria for
Decision, Public Comments and Summary of Procedure and the paragraph to
the attention of the Mortgagee, Lienholder, Vendor or Seller referencing this
land use proposal
7
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
May 2, 1995 -Page Two
There were no conflicts of interest or ex-parte communication.
George Rubaloff, reviewed his Staff Report of April 24, 1995, including the
Authority, Description of Application, History, Review Discussion and
Conclusion and entered Exhibit "A"-Notice of Public Hearing, Exhibit "B"-Maps,
and Exhibit "C"-the Application for Zoning Variance into the record by
reference.
Ted Fletcher ,491 Murphy Road, Medford Oregon, Agent for the Applicant,
came forward in support of the application. He referred to the map in the
packet, showing the position of the proposed carport structure on the site.
There were no questions from the Planning Commission.
No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the application.
CHAIRPERSON PILAND CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
COMMISSIONER JOHNSON MOVED THAT THEY APPROVE RESOLUTION #379 APPROVING
AND ZONING VARIANCE FOR SETBACK OFA PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE AT 250 N. 5TH
yTREETS 1.S/ ZW SUH 1 L 1 15V1 / AlSeiyl I CV rLCI ~.ncn - vrnro~ vvni~ nwvv..wvn.
COMMISSION DUNLAP SECONDED THE MOTION ROLL CALL VOTE: DUNLAP. YES: FARBER.
YES' FISH YES' GRAVES YES' AND JOHNSON YES. AND THE MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
B. Public Meeting- Review and Recommendation regarding a minor text
amendment of CPMC 17.46.020 to include sit-down restaurants (including
alcohol).
Chairperson Piland opened the Public Hearing.
George Rubaloff reviewed his Memorandum of April 25, 1995, stating the
requirement for the Planning Commission was to review amendments to zoning
text. He referred to the fact that Poncho and Lefty's restaurant had sold and the
new restaurant EI Albinil had applied for an OLCC license to serve beer, wine
and liquor.
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Planning Commission Minutes
May 2, 1995 -Page Three
Commissioner Graves requested that staff check on the OLCC foot rule
concerning this application.
Chairman Piland closed the Public Meeting.
Commissioner Fish moved that they recommend aporovino the minor text
amendment of CPMC 17 46 020 to include sit-down restaurants including
~~~~hol iC 5 Zonel Commissioner Farber seconded the Motion• ROLL CALL
VOTE• Dunlap ves• Farber ves• Fish ves• Graves yes• and Johnson Yes and
the Motion amassed unanimously.
C. Review and Determination regarding withdrawal from Fire District No. 3
for property located at 3124 Merriman Road.
George Rubaloff reviewed his Memorandum of April 25, 1995 stating the
requirements far Planning Commission was to review and make
recommendations on withdrawals from Districts. He also stated that City
Council had passed Resolution No. 718 approving annexation, and that the City
is processing a withdrawal from Fire District No. 3.
[•ommissioner Fish mov d to recommend withdrawal from Fire District #3 for
p~QnPms located at 3124 Merriman Road 137 2W 12 Tax Lot 7001
Commissioner Johnson seconded the Motion ROLL CALL VOTE• Duntao yes•
Farber y~~ Fish ves• Graves ves and Johnson ves and the Motion passed
unanimously.
VII. MISCELLANEOUS - It was announced that there would be another City/C.O.G.
Transportation Meeting in the Council Chambers, 7:00 p.m., Tuesday, May 9,
1995.
There was some general discussion concerning the' City requiring the
Developer's to do off-site improvements, system development charges, and
street repair priorities.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT -Commissioner Farber moved that the Meeting Adjourn,
Commissioner Fish seconded the Motion, all agreed by voice vote and the
Meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
9
MEMORANDUM
TO: Central Point Planning Commission DATE: 5/12/95
FROM: ~/~George Rubaloff, Planning Administrator
SUBJECT: Revrew and Determination on Final Plat Application
for Land Partition located on the northwest comer of
Isaac Way and Marilee Street (Sowell)
Discussion
In April 1994, Planning Commission approved the Tentative Plan referenced. above. --
The proposed final plat conforms to the approved Tentative Plan. The only condition
which remains unmet at this time is the required sewer connections and payment of
sewer system development fees in the amount of $3563.
The applicant has informed the city that he will pay the system development charges and
obtain the permits for sewer connections within the next few days. In any event, this
requirement would be met prior to the final plat being signed by the Planning
Commission Chairman.
Attachments
Item A -Location Map
Item B -Approved, unsigned copy of Resolution No. 318
Item C -Copy of Approved Tentative Plan
Item D -Final Plat Application
Item E -Public Works Report dated May 3, 1995
~d
-3
~ ,
. __.
R-1-
5P'~
0
Yroe ~Ya
~-1
v
5 ca~E
1"<boo~
~ l~
R-
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL
FOR A LAND PARTITION
(Applicants: Michael and Janet Sowell)
(37 2W 11D Tax Lot 2401)
Recitals
1. Applicants have submitted an application for tentative
plan approval for a land partition on a two-acre parcel, located
on the northwest corner of Isaac Way and Marilee Street in the
City of Central Point, Oregon.
2. On April 18, 1995, the Central Point Planning Commission
conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at
which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony
and comments on the application.
Now, therefore;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CENTRAL POZNT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 Annroval Criteria. The requirements for
approval of land partitions and tentative plans are set forth in
CPMC Title 16 and Title 17, relating to it[formational
requirements, zoning, lot dimension, access, and similar
requirements.:
Section 2 Findings and Conclusions. The Planning
Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. Tentative Plan R~uirements. The application and
tentative plan are in the correct form and contain all of the
information required by CPMC Chapter 16.10.
B. Area and Width of Lot. This partitioning in an R-2 zone
would create the following parcels:
Parcel 1: Approximately 14,225 square feet;
Parcel 2: Approximately 72,479 square feet.
Parcels 1 and 2 meet the minimum area (6,000 square feet for
interior lots and 7,000 square feet for corner lots) and width
(60 feet for interior lots and 70 feet for corner lots)
requirements for lots in the R-2 zone as set forth in CPMC
17.24.050., and such parcels meet the general requirements for
lots contained in CPMC 16.24.050.
1 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. (041995)
1 t~
Section 3 Conditional Approval. The application for
tentative plan for land partition herein is hereby approved,
subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibit "A", attached
hereto and by reference incorporated herein, imposed under
authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36.
Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in
authentication of its passage this day of
1995.
Planning Commission Chairman
ATTEST:
City Representative
Approved by me this day of
1995.
Planning Commission Chairman
2 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. (041995)
~n
PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS
GENERAL: SOWELL LAND PARTITION
o ORS Chapter 468.740 requires that all developments which will disturb 5 ACRES OR
MORE of land adjacent to a stream which discharges to surface waters of the State of
Oregon shall as a part of the construction permitting process submit an "Erosion Control
Plan."
The "Erosion Control Plan" shall require a PERMIT from DEQ. No construction on any
Tentative Plan storm drainage system can occur until authorization to do so has been
granted.by DEQ.
o Developer shall provide ladder rungs approved by the Central Point Public Works
Department for each sanitary sewer manhole with a depth greater than 3.0 feet to the
flow line of the manhole. Developer shall pay the cost for the City to install the ladder
rungs.
o Developer's engineer shall design the water system to provide a minimum flow of 1000
gpm at each fire hydrant.
o Developer shall construct all utilities, streets, and other structures discussed herein,
within Rights-of-way owned, or to be owned by the City of Central Point, in accordance
with all rules, regulations, ordinances, resolutions and other applicable requirements of
the City of Central Point for the construction of this development.
o This review for the Tentative Plan submitted by the applicant was done so in
accordance. with al(the rules, regulations and ordin2~nces in effect as of the date of this
review. Any modifications by Developer of this project after City Planning Commission
approval, could require re-submittal of an application, and approval by the City Planning
Commission based on the recommendation of staff responsible for this review.
o All costs associated with this Development and the conditions placed on this
Development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/owner.
o No construction will begin on this project or any building, until such time as plans and
specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and
other required divisions of the City and a Construction Permit has been issued far each
portion of the project requiring a permit.
o The Final Plat of this Partition shall not be approved by the Planning Commission until
all conditions as herein stipulated and approved for this project have been met.
o The City shall approve street stationing prior to Oeveloper's engineer designing the
improvements for this Tentative Pian.
14
SOWELL LAND PARTITION
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TENTATIVE PLAN CONDITIONS
SPECIFIC:
1(a) The construction of this development shall include the street, traffic control and
delineation improvements, curb/gutter, safety improvements, ingress/egress
improvements, sidewalks, and utility crossings to Isaac Way.
1(b) Developer shall be required to construct sidewalk from the south west property corner
of Parcel #2, Lot 2500 to the northeast property corner of parcel #2, common to the
southeast corner of Lot #97, Forest Glen #3 (approximately 595 lineal feet) in
accordance with City Standards and Specifications.
2. The sanitary sewer laterals serving parcel 1 shall be connected to the existing 8"
sanitary sewer main located in Isaac Way. Existing residences and future divisions shall
be required to connect to the 8" sanitary sewer mains located in Isaac Way and Marilee
Street, as is required by CPMC 15.12•.120. Ali work shall be at Developer's expense
including applicable fees and charges. All service laterals shall be sized in accordance
with the Oregon Plumbing Code and Public Works Standards.
3. Developer shall construct an adequately sized storm drainage system to provide for
runoff onto and away from the subject properly and from each lot. As a part of the
construction of the improvements for this Tentative Pian, Developer's engineer shall
provide a complete set of drainage calculations for sizing the storm drainage system for
this development. Developer shall submit this information to the Public Works
Department at the time construction drawings for the project are submitted to the
Public Works Department for permits for construction of the storm drainage
improvements. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtain from the Public
Works Department for hydrology calculations.
4. Ali structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces with positive
drainage away from the structure and drain lines connected to a curb drain, or an
approved storm sewer. Developer shall provide the necessary storm drainage
improvements and lot grading to assure that all streets, lots, and all properties will drain
properly. Developer shall submit a grading plan with the construction drawings and
perform such grading and drainage improvements which satisfies this drainage condition
leaving only minor grading required for each lot during house construction.
1~
0
N
N
J
F
M
n
0
m
h
i
N
6
C
C
N
w
H
Z
W
J
C7
N
N
W
O
LL
G ~e~°a
~z
~ y
e
p
~
-
< uf
OY
Ctl
MP
CM
.. ... .:a.b
°a
e
nY~Oa~tl~Yw=
~ ~„..c
.. w~ nb$
1 ~ ^wb°~a iel~~°o
~N;~FOY;Nw
'\
I `~
~~ y-tl 6u[uoZ
1 z
w 1-1 ~
~ "' = 133tl
1 In pl joa ¢ .• ~~ \i5-•'Si 5-SSr""iL-T.5-r 5-~S
TWQ bw C ,^ ~ __~_
Y.Z Rp
Qa N~ C I ~• ~
1 ~iM O \
IL N 1 • 1 ~ ~_~•~ ~~
739.78 1 1 1 ~(a
I Q i i ` " i\F
-' ° '
.Ifi1f iJ Of tfb9 ~ °. x ~ ~ ~~ 1 F 4
1 7/ Of L906 g ~4Yp
m ~ .~ ~ 1 ~ ~$~ ~ tlv
l29.7!
q ~i
90 Ot it E o~ ~ ~ ~ P.P
J ~ _.
k
~1--'---°_''_ 1 ~--'-
1 •qH iI Of f299
- ]I [L[ Z{6 ~ i ~g
4-®
I 11 aiisES ® ~i
J O Q
I W LL7 g~.( N
it Of t996 # N a7X ~
I 611 ~
1 N 1J- AM 3AI00 03M7011
I W
~ u
71 ac ono? R ~ $ ~~
7n7 ~ ,.~ ~
I ~I
4 ~ ~ 1
it Of 7CL0[
~O ~ w
1 1 ttt t n
788.21
1
_ '~
1 °o •~il,~Of uza^~•
~ " °9.70E301 ~ t • oN ~3~tid ~
1
50'0~•73'E 190.00
1
00.0[ 'o
I t9 1 o,os .. Q
Sy -~ N~ .•1 .
C^w M P N
1 O CJ W
n
1
m N
C~
T ,
~~
W d
tea"
- ? IS
SZI~
1
I
1 ~ m
~ m
'
~ -- -
1
Y
V
f
n
~
)
e
i7
}
Q
~ .
I
3 : I17
~
e
1
1 n m
1 __ __
t\
m
\
1
of w
^i $ m
r ~ m
1 ~ n
a
1
Q e
Q O
1 In °n Q
FINAL PLAT APPLICATIOf~tEC~iVt:~
LAND DIVISIONS
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING DEPARTMEt}lEg Q 3 )995•
cny: ~-~'^--ti'r ~ ~'~ ~ ~^-'t State: ~ 2 zip Code: ~ 75a Z
Telephone: Business: ~7-i-- Z8k 3 Residence:
2. AGENT INFORMATION
Name:-/~E28F.R--r /~ F.4~iF~L. 'DS/I ~2.gER. S c.~.2.v~}'iN(r
Address: -~GF ~ So..c.lc..c m ~ '
cny: ~"~ ~-~-~ ---~ State: p ~- Zlp Code: 9 7.m Y
Telephone: Business: 7 7G -n8 y6 Residence: G 6 y- S~ j~f
3. OWNER OF RECORD ((Attach Separate Sheet II More Than One)
Name: (''L' c.~+..,c~ f!-' rr.....,~ Sa.v.-L
Address: 3 36 ~ lM q4./ LEG
CeS- ~o~._x. y'7SO Z.
cny: state: a zp code:
Telephone: Business: 779-77~~ Resklence:-66~f-yep `~
4.
APPLICANTINFORMATIQN CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
~D ~ I (mod O 2 E TIME u'f1 ~at~ w._,~~
Nams:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Type of LaM Oivisbn: Subdivisbn ^ Partrilon
Townshlp:.~~_Range• Z(.c)cectbn: /~~TaxWt(s):. Z$'a0
Township: Rangs• ~edbn : -Tax Lot(s):
Township: Rangs• ~edbn:-TaxLoi(s):
Township: Rangs• °edbn:-Tax Lot(s):
Zoning Olslrkl: ~- Z'
TotalAaeage: ~•y `/
8.
REQUIRED SUBMITTALS
QJ(hts /lpplkalbn Form
AppflCaUon Feo (510.00) per bt with minimum
tee of 525
Written AUlfarity Irom Properly Owner n Agent
AppllraUOn Process
Final Plat (10 copies)
8 One copy a181/2 x 11 reduced plat
~SUbdiviSbn guarantee dated no later Ihan 15
daysJromdateofsubMttal y1Lrr/
^ , ~~''°°
6. I HEREBY STATE THAT THE FACTS RELATED IN THE ABOVE APPLICATION AND THE PLANS AND
DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH ARE TRUE, CORRECT AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE. ~~
1 Certny that I am the: O Property Owner or l~Aulhodzed Agent of the Owner
of the proposed pro q see. ~/~
Signature ~~~~~'~~ % ~/G ~ Date Z -~ Z- q~
~~~~y~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ Division of State Lands before any sttesWOrk bpeglinsnt's re~nstbility to apply for a permit to
,,.,.:
. , ~: .
~;'°'+~~'`,~°; ~;~'k' ^°+F.OR`FGANNING'DEP ' THE/N~U$E'ONGYc
A.: " u:m ... ~
» :,..... ~ ei~. /' .. +::Yi. ?. .. . .., .a.~.. _.GYA$ 2:dAX;:: ixw:..i ~ .. •.. •~ i
Farber 8L Sons, Ina
FARBER SURVEYING
FORESTRY CONSULTANT -OREGON LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR -WATER RIGHTS EXAMINER
PROPERTY BOUNDERY EXPERT -PLANNING REPORTS -CONSTRUCTION STAKING
NOTICE OF' AUTHORIZATION
THIS IS NOTICE THAT:~62-T ~-. F~-(3F-~,~ J73~ FrfRgE2 Su,e,~Far,
HAS BEEN RETAINED TO A AS AGENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF FILING
AN APPLICATION FOR A ~A'(LTITI p IV
FOR PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF JACKSON COUNTY AS:
TOWNSHIP_3 7 ,RANGE Z ~ ,SECTION~~ TAX LOT Zyd(
TOWNSHIP 31 ,RANGE, SECTION / l 7~ TAX LOT
TOWNSHIP ,RANGE ,SECTION TAX LOT
APPLICANT:
SIGNATURE. DATE: -.~/-F S~
PRINTED NAME:~RKK L3U2.eH~4LT~2
ADDRESS: (079 .S. SlitGt /Lp
CITY/STATE/ZIP /rygnFoer ~ G2 °r'>>a 1
PHONE: 771. -'173 ~
PROPERTY OWN
SIGNATURE:. }~i~ ~Q/ DATE: d S
PRINTED NAME: JV} IG1-k{4-GL 1{~. a~ sA-~IJE'T ivy. SO lRJ E L(~
ADDRESS : 3 ~/~ 3 ~'/~ A~ i L G~
CITY/STATE/ZIP. ~T{ZA-(~ Pb I ~T~ O 2 9 75~ Z
AGENT: - _
SIGNATURE: ~ DATE:l 3/-9S
PRINTED NAME: ~l5 ~„e l /4-. ~-~/ 6~~
ADDRESS:~(JFj E J~~PC-LGaLJ //
CITY/STATE/ZIP I .4-(._ Q>QIIJt~h2~7s07~
PHONE: 7'7(~ -p8 (7 ~ p
HERB FARBER P,O.80X 5286. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502. (503) 776-0846 (office) . (503) 664-5034 (home)
0
> m
H
°
s
Z m
0
(~
f- Z
W
Q
U..
m
N •
N ~"
N N
~, «
Z
N
O
C
d °
d O1
N d
.,o
L
l0
Sy,
m~
m"
m°
ma
.-,
m
C
m
U
~
V J mla. to
~.
.r~ `` ``,
Z Cs `o
Zh ~Og
`~ ~ ~~p
w T
o ~.
W H Oy~'OE,y
H 2
`~ 2
n°.
1
N
cr J
s.
,
_
CAH m asp
1
\~
~
33a1S
31IddW
°~~ ~W ~
r~ ,~
~°a
~ N
°O)
J~ o
X `
~~ ~
Q= H ~ m'°.i 3.05.6b.ON
Eb'EZT
,
w; LL
F N
~
m Oa
~
1 e.
9L'86
-
1
c ,
V- I~ m n ~ -
8L'6Zt 3.OO,bO.OS Q~•, mz° ~_________ _ _____ 1
1 ~
1
1
609 O-S b ~ °
°
° 1
c o
o
m 1
1 C
~
~ m
~ 3; bs GEVe 'xo ~ ;~ ~ N ~ ~ n7
29f ;off 1 L W I I ;
m A _ 1 e c a._.
~
V ~ ~
III b ;
1::• • 9
1m
019 o-Sb•0N 3 IN IN oo•os ~ W I
ml m ,
3.bT,60.OS ,N TI ~
31 bg 9Z08 m
~ I
~~ r• 1 ~
; (n
F9S 3o"I m -ri 1
~ ;
.
b .
(1 N I 1
6_.
00'ZYT
3.bi.b0.05 N ~
° J
10 W 1
Oln 1
1
O
Ql O ~
O Iti^ m I
mIN h W a l 1
to •
' Q ~" 41
y
O °
~ O
Z
+1
O m 1
1 m I1~ 1
~
J
N ~-
Q
1 pl
1
~I ~,IN ,
~ ~
Z
W
rl 1
1 1
OI
~°
U Q
N Z 0 1 ;
1
. o 1 ° I
o
~ .Q ~ W ' ~ ~"~ z
y
J d. ~+ ~ m I
1 H
1 N
_ L.
~,
Q
- 1
• I 1 1p
°-
,~~ : o
' `z' ~
m w =
.~ v m ~ , ~ o ; 07 J
/~
V J
m '
1
1
Q
1
L.
~ Q 1
' 1
n 1
N n
o
•'
O , 1
W
, ^' ^~ m
j 3.Et,bO.OS i ~ i
^'
i SZ'6BS ' m ~
•• ~ z r -'. •
.
a m
1 N / (~
10
' ~ ° 1
q ~ 1
ti ~
' oN ~3~bdd W 26' i
~ Q1
m ~
°
,_~
'~
°
Y
~ W 1
OF. 1
-
00'06
1 3.Ef,bO.OS 1
c, I i
„
c...~-m m
L_. ~
B
1 ~
I
N 1 L
_ 00'09 1 00'09 1 E6'Z9 ioi 1 U~ ~
U
1 ~0 •nl Q;
'
5 1 I
z
al o
~
o, ZN
••m °
'J
J J
~
b
o m
mme
19 -r-1
i
° "_°
y ~aln Q. X-••
.
z ,,
. I
m aQ
~ _ .+ } 1
DATE: May 3, 1995
TO: George Rubaloff -Planning Administrator
FROM: Paul W. Worth -Public Works ~lr/!J
RE: Final Plat -Sowell Partition
The final plat of the Sowell Partition has been reviewed according to CPMC 16.12.050,
Staff Approval. The land division is located in Lot 2500 of Section 11 D, TWP 37S,
RNG. 2 West, Will. Mer (Michael and Janet Sowell, 3363 Marilee St. Central Point, OR).
The following items have been verified by the Public Works Department staff.
The Final Plat of the land division is substantially the same as it appeared on
the approved Tentative Plan.
2. The final Plat of the Land Division is in compliance with all ordinances and State
laws, provided however, survey adequacy required by ORS 91.100 shall be
approved by the Jackson County Surveyor.
3 The Developer has not completed the all of the conditions of the tentative plan.
Those conditions are as follows:
Exhibit A. Conditions 1 through 4
(1) Complete a Deferred Improvement Agreement for items outlined in
Condition #1.
(2) Pay all required Systems Development Charges for water and sewer
connections as outlined in Condition #2. Note that applicant desires but is
io required to connect existing dwellings to water services.
The SDC's for parcel #2 total $11,561. The SDC's for parcel #1 must be
paid for prior to obtaining a building permit.
(3) As required by Conditions #3 and~#4, construct adequate storm
drainage systems to provide for runoff onto and away from the subject
property as well as providing positive drainage away from structures.
Conditions #3 and #4 may be addressed on the Construction Plan when
submitted for approval.
`~~
Options for Consideration:
Approve the Final Plat of Land Division for the herein described property.
2. Deny the Final Plat based on findings to be developed by the Planning
Commission.
3. Approve the Final Plat subject to modifications to the Final Plat being completed
prior to signing.
cc: PW #95010
~~
r