Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - July 11, 1995CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 1995 - Page One 1. MEETING'CALLED TO ORDER at 7:00 p.m. IL ROLL CALL -Those present were: Chuck Piland, Jan Dunlap, Herb Farber, Candy Fish, Randy Graves and Valerie Rapp. Karolyne Johnson had informed the Commission that she would' be gone for the June 6 and June 20th Meetings. III. CORRESPONDENCE -None IV. MINUTES Commissioner Fish moved to approve the May 16, 1995 Planning Commission Minutes. Commissioner Dunlap seconded the Motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: Dunlap, yes; Farber, yes; Fish, yes; Graves, yes; and Rapp yes, and the Minutes were approved as written, V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES -None VI. BUSINESS ' A. Public Hearing - Review and Determination regarding the Site Plan for Commercial Office Building on southeast corner of Pine and Seventh Streets. (Applicant: Karolyne Johhson) 37 2W 2CC Tax Lot 7200. Chairman Piland opened the Public Hearing. George Rubaloff, Planning Administrator, rediewed the Planning Department's Notice of Public Nearing dated May 17,1995 including the Nature of Hearings, Criteria for Decision, Public Comments, and Summary of Procedure. 1 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 1995 -Page Two Commissioner Fish declared a conflict of interest, as real estate agent for the project and took a seat in the audience. There were no other conflicts of interest or ex-parte communication. George Rubaloff reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report dated June 2, 1.995, including the Background, Review Highlights, and .Conclusion. He entered the following exhibits into the record by reference:. (A)Notice of Public Hearing,. (B)Mailing List for Notice ;100 foot radius (ClAssorted Maps, (D) Application, (E) Public Works Department review dated June 1, 1995, (F)Public Safety Review dated June 2, 1995, and (G)Public Works Standards relating to spacing between driveway access and intersections. The following handouts were also entered into the record by reference: (H)Letter from Central Point Chamber of Commerce, dated June 3, 1995, expressing support for the project, (p Letter from Karolyne Johnson, dated June 5, 1995 asking for an exception, and (J)Letter from Karolyne Johnson, dated June 3, 1995, expressing her reasons for not going with an alternative plan. Chairman Piland declared a fevv minutes break in order. to ..give the Commissioners the opportunity to revievv the Exhibits (H, Land J) just handed .out. After reviewing the new exhibits, Commissioner Graves asked staff where the authority for the requirements for the driveway access distance from the intersection came from. Susan Wilson Broadus, Public Works Director, stated that in general, Central Point's safety and engineering principles are based on the American Public Works Association Standards. George Rubaloff illustrated. the shape of the lot and the, AppiicanYs proposed driveway access on the blackboard, stating the proposal did not conform with the Public Works Standard which requires the driveway to be the farthest distance away from the street intersection. Susan Wilson Broadus stated that any. number. of plans could address the farthest distance from intersection, with the intent of promoting safety. -- 2 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 1995 -Page Three Tom Malot, agent for the Applicant, 150 Manzanita Street, Central Point, came forward in support of the Site Plan. Mr. Malot cited other commercial driveway accesses in Central Point that he `felt did not conform to the Public Works Standards. He drew an illustration of the lot on the blackboard, showing the ' building in the back of the lot and the parking lot and driveway access in the front portion of the lot: ' Malot stated that the small lots available on E. Pine in Central Point are small (55' x 140' lots) and don't leave much room for a commercial building and a driveway access placed at the?arthest point away from the intersection. Mr. Malot stated that the City vvas promoting a plan that would not work for the Applicant. George Rubaloff stated that he would like to correct the record, 'that the City vvas not promoting a "plan" of their own, but that staff had suggested that the Applicant redesign the site plan to come into compliance: Commissioner Farber asked Mr. Malot if there were any time constraints placed on the Applicant. Mr: Malot answered that the Applicant needed to have the building completed by September, 1995 to meet requirements for the tax deferment. Commissioner Rapp asked if the Applicant had design criteria placed on her by the Insurance Company. Mr. Malot stated that parent insurance company did require certain placement of computers, eta in the design of the building. Herb Farber stated that at' the request rof the Developer, in a past Planning Commission meeting, the placement of the street light for the Malot Office Building had been changed to the north side of E. Pine Street. Tom Malot stated that he will be resubmitting a site plan for the Malot Office Building and will show installing a street light on the Malot Property on the south side of E. Pine Street. He also added that it would make sense to' also place the Applicant's proposed street light on the south side of E. Pine Street. Susan Wilson Broadus stated that according to the standards, the proposed street light should be spaced no more than 200'-from the nearest street light. 3 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 1995 -Page Four George Gilman, 452 Beall Lane, Central Point, came forward to support the Applicant's site plan. Lee Edwards, 209 Windsor Way -works with the Chamber of Commerce, came forward to support the Applicant's site plan.. :Rusty McGrath, Mayor, .came forward in support of the present site plan. He stated that he-would like to see mistakes taken care of before the process gets so far along.. , Me stated that staff should be working to help commercial development take place. Candy Fish, real estate agent for the Applicant, stated that she felt the present site plan was the ,only way the building would work, and that putting the parking lot in front of .the building. would be better than a back parking area, where vehicles. could be broken into, etc. because they, were next to the alley and out of view of people in the building. Gladys Edwards, 209 Windsor Way, also works for the Chamber of Commerce stated she supported the present site plan.. Chairman Piland asked when the Public Works Standards were put into effect. George Rubaloff stated that the standards have been evolving since the 1970's andhave been updated by City Council several times over the past 6 years. Susan Wilson Broadus added that the current Public Works Standards were adopted. by the City of Central Point Council in January 1993. Commissioner .Rapp stated that she thought the City could change standards so that these small.. existing .lots on Pike Street could be developed commercially.- Commissioner Farber stated that the Public Works Standards are written subjectively to,maximize,safety, not intended to inhibit development. He also stated that the site plan applicationbefore the Planning Commission was the one to be decided upon, that development on other small lots on Pine Street should be addressed at a later date. ~~ 4 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 1995 -Page Five No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the application. Chairman Pilahd closed the Public Hearing fApplicant• Karolvne Johnson) according to conditions in the staff reports with a modification of Condition No 8 relating to street liahting and excepting Condition No. 14 relating to snacirig between driveway access and intersections Commissioner Dunlao seconded the Motion ROLL CALL VOTE• Dunlap ves• Farber Ves• Graves abstain• Raop yes and the Motion carried. Commissioner Fish returned to her seat on the Planning Commission. B. Public Hearing - Review and''Determination regarding Site Plan-for zoning variance for reduction of setback at 537 Laurel located-between Fifth and Sixth Streets (Applicant: Shannon Lenz1. Chairman Piland opened the Public Hearing. George Rubaloff reviewed the Planning Department Notice of Public Hearing, dated May 17, 1995, including the Nature of Hearings, Criteria for Decision, Public Comments, and Summary of Procedure. - There were ho conflicts of interest or ex-parte communication. George Rubaloff reviewed the Planning Department Staff Report dated June 2, 1995, including the Description of Application, History, Review Discussion and Conclusion, and entered the following exhibits into the record by reference: Notice of'Public Hearing, Maps, and Application for Zoning Variance. Rubaloff further stated that staff's conclusion was that the proposal conformed to safety requirements. Scott Lenz, Applicant, 537 Laurel Street described his application for a detached accessory building, and a proposed fence on the property line. No one else came forward in support of or in opposition to the application. Chairman Piland closed the Public Hearing. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 1995 -Page Six Commissioner Rapp moved for approval of Resolution 323 for Zoning Variance for p~g~gr1Y located at 537 Laurel Street Relating to Setback Requirements jA~plicant/Property Owners Shannon Lenz and Scott R. Lenzl (372W 3DATL 12300.1. G Review and Recommendation. relating to Zoning Text. Amendment to various .sections. of CPMC pertaining to side and front setbacks on corner lots. George Rubaloff referred to his Memorandum of June 2,-1995 including General City Policy, Background, .and Discussion. The following: exhibits were entered into the. record by reference: Planning Commission Resolution No. 320, Request and Findings Submitted by Developers,.. Notice of Public Hearing (Council.) for June 15, 1995, Draft Ordinance, CPMC 17.60.090 Special Setback Requirements (Arterial Streets), and Pave xii of Public Works Standards (Site Triangle and Site Distance). Rubaloff stated staff from Building, Fire, Public Works and Planning Departments had studied the proposed rule change and determined that. specific rules should be preserved: arterial setback, site distance, vision clearance, and location of driveway approaches. Commissioner Fish moved to recommend the Zoning Text Amendment to Jarious sections of CPMC pertaining to side and front setbacks on corner lots. as represented Rapp ves and the Motion carried unanimously VII. MISCELLANEOUS -Commissioner Dunlap stated that she. will be gone from June 19 until July 16. The Commission is to consider the dates of the Planning Commission Meetings in July since Tuesday July 4, 1995 is a legal holiday. The dates will be discussed at the June 20, 1995 Planning Commission Meeting.. _ VIII. ADJOURNMENT - Commissioner Fish ,moved that the meeting adjourn, Commissioner Dunlap seconded the Motion, and all said Aye, and the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. s MEMORANDUM TO: Central Point Planning Commission July 7, 1995 FROM: `George Rubaloff -Planning Administrator TOPIC: ~V Review and Determination of Final Plat Application for. Phase V of Forest .Glen Subdivision (Applicant: Gary Whittle) Preface The Planning Commission is scheduled to review and make a determination on the final plat application for ]?hase V of Forest Glen Subdivision. Decision Criteria Final Plat approval is based upon the plat conforming with the tentative plan and the completion of any conditions which are required under the approval of the Tentative Plan. , - Background On July 19, 1994 the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 298 approving the Tentative Plan for Forest Glen Phase V. Review The City has determined that the proposed final plat for Phase V of Forest Glen Subdivision is in substantial conformance with the approved Tentative Plan. A portion of required subdivision improvements are not complete at this time. The applicant is intending to .enter into a bonding arrangement with the city for completion of the outstanding requirements. Judging from past practice we expect that the applicant would secure his performance under a development agreement with a letter of credit. The amount of that letter of credit would be $395,416. The letter of credit will need to be delivered to the Ciry and reviewed by the City Attorney prior: to executing the 'Development Agreement. Attachments Item A -Location Maps Item B -Application for Final Plat Item C -Copy of Approved Tentative Plan for Unit No. 5 Item D -Letter Transmitting Resolution No. 298 Approving Tentative Plan Item E -Memo from Public. Works Department (dated 717/95) ---t--- .__. `. \~ 9 t 't.. PROPOSED LAYOUT FOREST GLEN VALLEY POINT APRIL HAF i994 ~ n~ .~ 1 !~ 1 ,~ _._. . ~ h yY ~ ~tR~ use ~V~ ~~ FINAL PLAT APPLICATION 9~~9 LAND DIVISIONS CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING DEPARTMENT.. 1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Nema: ~ (Cow A~ W E-8 i f7 E V E Lc~ P nit E.U'I-S Address: 9Og ~ • 5 r4-G ~S o AJ Cm,. _ Wt ED Fa~~ State: B ~ 7S0 77 2- 9 7g'y zip code: Telephone: Business: Residence: 2. AGENT INFORMATION Name:.~~6 r~4~13~.P ~f3k €~4-2(~~/Z Sc-t_R..U.G~/aJG... Address; Oe ~. S/l-Gt~so.V cnya _wtt/'n Fo 2p ~1ate:-D 2 zip code: ~~~ Y Telephone: Business: ~ ~ G " OB `f (> Residence: -- G 6 y STJ 3~/ 3. OWNER OF RECORD (Attach Separate Sheet If More Than One) Name: S~')"'"'r 1-` ~ v1-PPC_./ G.foU Address: Cky: - Stata: ~_ Zip Code: Telephone: Business: Residence: 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION` Type of Land Divlsbn: Subdivisbn 0~ Partkion ^ Township: ~ ~ fiange:~Section : /~!`(' Tax Lot(s): ~Bo O Township: 37 Renge~Sec(bn:1Li?TaxLOt(s): ~oO Township: ~_Rahge• L w Segbn : I ZC Tax lot(s): 33 00 Township; Range• Seotbn : ~ Tax Lot(s): Zoning Distrbti - B-Z '~ 2 - (-F, Total Acreage: ~ 3 ~ Z. 9 5. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS This Applbatbn Fonn ^' One copy of 81/2 x 11 reduced plat i Q ,Applbation Fee ($10.00) par bt with minimum C~Subdlvision guarantee dated no later than 15 tee of $25 days Irom date of submittal l~ Wdtten AuthoAty Irom Property Owner H Agent ^ In ApplbaHOn Process- ^ ~ FlnatPlat(10copfes) ^,_ 6. I HEREBY STATE THAT THE FACTS RELATED IN THE ABOVE APPLICATION AND: THE PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH ARE TRUE, CORRECT AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, ~~ I certky that I am Ihe: ^ Properly Owner or 0~AUlhodzed Agenl of the Owner of the proposed protect ske. Signature ~~'~ t~ r. ,-~ S Date __ r-----~-----------------=------------------=---- I If eny wetlands exist on the site, it Is the applicant's responstbllity to apply for a perm)t to ~ Division of State Lends before any site work begins. I ~ c~~ ~ ~~FOR f'fL'ANNIN~i DEPARTNIEN "USE ONLY . 't(~~~j$d ~ ~• Y y ~.Y j ~ rt~nd UsB: C'.-t~ F ~ >4"l 9C11~/ Y.~i .C~ ~ i, " ~ f.n.+~.~\ d .~ a ... ',. .'~ ~ ~ a .y: _~.,a^ -. ~.y .. UPON FORMALLYACCEPTINO YOUR APPLICATION~THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WILL MAIL A COPY OFTHIS FORM TO YOU..J ~~ Farber 8L Sons, Ina FARBER SURVEYING FORESTRY CONSULTANT -OREGON LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR -WATER RIGHTS EXAMINER PROPERTYBOUNDERY EXPERT -PLANNING REPORTS -CONSTRUCTION STAKING NOTICE OF' AUTI-iOR= ZATI ON THIS IS NOTICE THAT: ~-2-QC~.,cQbl4 ~B~Z .St~l2UGX~lU~- HAS BEEN RETAINED TO ACT AS AGENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF FI AN APPLICATION- FOR A S~-L3t7t U (S ID ~ ~cress'{- FOR PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE RECORDS OF JACKSON COUNTY AS: TOWNSHIP 37 ,RANGE Zw ,SECTION ~~~- TAX LOT IBDC~ TOWNSHIP 3 7 , RANGE Z ~ ,SECTION II D TAX LOT 10 ~ TOWNSHIP 3 ~ ,RANGE, SECTION (Z GTAX LOT 330 ~ APPLLCANT: :SLGNATURE: V~J -(( ~~ ~~ DATE:~~ PRINTED NAMnE• \ +,- W T~~L. ADDRESS : -1 ~ ~ ~l~' S~C'1\SO w CITY/STATE/ZIP f IF.hFbRNi ~ Q'1So~ PHONE: rl'lZ-~7CoX PROPERTY OWNER • cR']"/L-~ SIGNATURE:~'CJC~tlWNGUEST PiRop DATE. ~ ~/-c/s PRINTED NAME: ADDRESS: '~~ ,~BOUL -CITY/STATE/ZIP` `' PHONE: `~ AGENT: SIGNATURE:../ //,^. ,~, ~ Z DATEn: y_ ~_~S PRINTED NAME: ~'~G6G'-2~% ~ ~`I` ADDRESS: ~TdS ~-. ~d1-C~Cc.ScaCJ -CITY/STATE/-ZIP ~a ` PHONE:... ~j 7S~'/ ~.~ 7~6'o8y(~ i A HERB FARBER P.O. BOX 5286. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502. (503) 776-0846 (office) . (503) 664-5034 (home) Property Description Crown West Developments Forest Glen, Phase V Beginning at a 5/8 inch iron pin marking the northeast corner of Parcel 3 of Partition Plat No. P-77-1993 of the Records of Jackson County, Oregon,. Index Volume 4, Page 77, County Surveyor's File No. 13653; thence North 42°03'08" Weat, along the southwesterly right of way line of Interstate Five as described in Volume 469, Page 350 of the Deed Records of-said County, 27.16 feet; thence.South 47°56'27" West 139.99 feet; thence South 42°03'34" Eaet, along the northerly right of way line of Glengrove Avenue, 27.16 feet; thence South 47°56'27" West, along the south line of Forest Glen, Phase I recorded sa Volume 19, Page 12 of the Plat records of said County, 330.80 feet; thence North 89°54'22" West, along said south line, 339.53 feet; thence South 0°04'00" East, along the east line of Forest Glen, Phase III recorded as Volume 19, Page 30 of said Plat Records, 402.98 feet; thence South 21°45'20" West 53.80 feet; thence South 0°04'00" East 70.00 feet; thence South 89°55'00" East 696.15 feet; thence North 88°15'16" EasC 50.44 feet; thence South 82°58'54" East 124.13 feet; thence North 7°00'00" East 356.40 feet to a 5/8'Ynch iron pin; thence North 56°02'24" Eaet 12.16 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pin; thence North 16°23'29" West, 164.28 feet, to a , 5/8 inch iron pin on said southwesterly right of way line of Interstate Five; thence North 33°31'38" West, along said southwesterly line, 202.24 feat to a 5/8 inch iron pin; thence North 42°03'30" Weat, along said southwesterly line, 223.15 feet to the Point of Beginning. Prepared by: Herb Farber Farber & Sons, Inc. Farber Surveying 908 East Jackson Medford, Oregon 97504 (503) 776-0846 Date: May 27, 1994 Revised: March 28, 1995 13 ~~` ~~`~'S~ ~ ~ ,,,_, 305.69 ~-- _ _1082.5 `~ `~ ~vj ) Ng8'66'25'E NB9'S3'44.W ------------~~ .` BSS ~ (F) .~ .\ 00 _ POINT ` '~ e .~ ~ o. ~. 5A '1Q Jo . 2 cres I.OS ~o m 339.53/ ...... ~y~ ~/ ti~~q 0~ , 2~ 4 ~~ O .~ I ~ ~ h~ a~ sy~ `9 ' `. ti ,1 O , s. 9 Kati r ~`rS• ~5•, ~o \S)w. ~ R/N .. F ;:` PARCEL No. 3 29.15 Acres t,rc. ~5 EAST 2 r 20 1136.20 213.84 EAST m °m ° z SURVEYED SY: FARBER & SONS, INC. FARBER SURVEYING CENTRAIO.XPOTNT, OREGON 97502 COMPUTED SY: FAF, HAF SCALE: 1 loch 200 feet GATE: 8 - Z7 - q 3 14 ..... ., _~; Pee S%Nn13167 ' .,a W 0 p ; .r o o i Iroreby certify that this is 4 an exact copy of the original. 7~-~~ "lT~ ~~--- OFF 908 MEO PHO ROTAT'Ii OR3GIN: J08 Na } ~1 4 c S .. -a~ N w 0 tL .. e Y A u .. w .. c U 8 CiRAR3RR8~CCt7R883RR'~,CS=BR,iR.:::®39#R#R#A. Cti•a=BYR:i,CIC3~781611KAfIlB`RR10;9M'AR~RRRl010RRF 8 WWW~WWWWWWWWr,,,l„W....Y....r..Wrr.......W..,.~ yy BAfS~'.tYa«?o7m3=A28=1011,N1tR3FREC0:S171fE,'nRARRRR d 7CQxeaBSC7RC7Bd~:%9000Ct8CIEtA:ABIE888R888R ..............................'n' :~ .. `S:RBR~:iC8829R#'-O'8,%RSS~R~R9x98C:.%CRC71 F DSE'X38:R4iiL.A~7&:RRRAR'RRaAi90R'-..'IEfIF+:.:i: 717L7~Ri16SC1EH8StCY$9I53::MaY:.:=wCA7=L',871858888 A. 38RC'i#K838i88A~A#RRA.~R9RR 76:8: .. ; ~^# ~' R-O'"~Y9~""""iRR^.~,..39Rli6i6 NNW J ; 88888888888888888888888888888888888888888 F F ~'KFR~99Rg8R7~$$~WR~~R10RRRRBRRRR W jj ~a '"' t~~ W fi Ef* O skH^^yFy.. j 8~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ W ~~ ~~_ 3 Z . 3 O U O L£!€ 4T b '~ r~ I ~ I 0 w 4 A °u S ~~` ~~ s ~ x . ~ ~ e ~~ F a ~ ~ ~{{~ - ~3 ~~ ~ ~~ ~3 tt ~I ~ xI •I 5~ ~[. S .. 8 ~5~~ x S (• ~~. ~b~ 4 x 89~ ~^ _ 44 ~ { 5 Fv a L =~ ~ ~p~~ ~ i{{{ W ~i A8{6,,S,, =AL .. ~6E ~~. .+a r 's.~ b ~ ~,.y _ ( :~ y e °(. h ~ 1 ~b +~~A ~ `~ R E ~ ~+ _ ` ± ~ 'w c r';' ' ~*~ , „ l { ~ ~~ 9 1 . 0 + +ll C 'f4 . X 3 ~ { , 1 6 r ak''.~f ~,t # Y ~ 4 ~ ~ f y ., ~? :. 1 s ~ ~ 1 I~ M ~ g 6 ~~ ~ ~ !I i , i . s ~~~ 1 F ( ~ S ~ i F l a ' 3 2 33 ~ 2 ~ ~ d ~ ~ { a { ~ jj yy 3 8 Y _ i a f l:. 3 ~ 6 1 Ef >° ; ~ j `` S gg .-.,.. L. `i ~S~ _ 15 ._ ~).~.v _ •..y~. . r 8 ka ! 4 wt~S ,,~" rr''~ ~ e ;i ;i " fifi rCz $# ~Yr,o •s" ~ ~ ~~ a s-p2sp2 ~ ELI ~° ~ ;!`'~ i ~ 55 p V ~ ~ ~~~ <l4Qy e ~ ~s!~ ~ I l~ tf ~sc~ ~ ' F eln•r °r'a Lro.a.w C .3gg f YzP ti a,~ O' ' ~ , ~ `P. ~ E6 , 86 • Q' ~ r r n r ___ ' d [[k t a8 01 P '~ ., f , ``~ , ' •~+~ ~l1 S " r.r r.r ' 4 [ R,F lr. 7~ E if 8R ~8 d '~~ t •, } ;8615 S e ~, ~t~j ~ ~y R.7 if ~$ Rf F ~~ a^ R~ RS cis! 4' ~ • R-~~ ~ • ?o, .,g ~~ ~Q ~ ~~ !~ ~~ ~ :~ IHM u• .r p ' •, ..,. •- _ ro «I a f ~+ b. ~ f w S10 ~] 0 ~ R o $~ ~[f L Q to . \ ^ gip'. `d , •~, II a 3AItl0NO1dNYH 1SY3^ ? : fl «.w8 Z a ~ _ .~ -------_" w ~ aop p : _M.M_......__~ ~ nu___.___, r. s j...__.._ ~ ~ f 7 8 f t t ea p i Lc y oo S~ A ~w~ Q~~f of ~= k tAYB ^Z~ Q , S, : la . le ro ~ f 9 O ~ ~ p r•In nnl ~, ~S . . 1..1 a tg 4 T.M j ~ .rror ; ~ ~~ error 3~ le ; # r __.___.._ a~ul rml n~ul F r Z p LiJ ~ ~ j$va~x ". ~ ~ fit= a ac 7 ~ ^ ~ ~, 8 ~ l11 Q ~` 4§a~gg ~E R~ a ~~ of ii7 : ~ ~~ • R rror- ~ arrow eleror a ~S ^I. . J ~ ~ n~al ~ 1•~al a'ul R 6p .. , . 3 w ~f 8' ~~~~ror a ~ '7R ~nroir 7R ~nrolr ~M3ar 6 SSY~19 I ' O 8 8 ~tt Ret 8 < 8GG' ~ 8 01 I~~. p Z LL ~Y7R ~ LLR7~ 8 is sa 3 __x_s_- 3 error R .leroa ~ 1e av .w a'an ~ C ~ mall a~<,1 8 ~ F a d 4xi' ~ s,' tOt : s ~ Qyi 7 c g s a p e ~s~J.. w.:~ ~ r r Q7~ .•'<II $ ~R a'lll --$ r Q i[~~ ^ U r ,. . - r m. w w~ '~ . s,r,ro,a 7. i ;~8~ III 3SYHd'N3'191S3tlOdl ell1Q1 [y'" ke~~ der( uro ~F"a. iC. J:. a s ~ s , ~0 ~~' • •~... = y1~' .l d'~ - 4. ~., ¢ yq ~ i 4 ~~~P y d ~ ~ F 1 Q '~~ 9 `~ $o& i ;7E aqJ ~ 'N ~8 .°a Fi ~~? ~ r a~B eki~~ a y.. 4 ¢" a . Si ~o> i- C' i~ a F Y ~ k~ t ;a~i f J ;k „ ~ u ~ ~ y rg ~ ' ~ ! i N { q { l YZE ~~Y'~VT i~~ a ~ " ~i } ~~:6 ~~§ : 9 ~-~ 7froZ t _ t H33kIJHl3 fora ~wi @ 99 n•« ~ @ 8~a «.,, ~- •e P~ -'e. o R C .. / 7 a y Sr .r ~ ~. °d ~;~ °~ JS x S° F ~ aR y a.• e' a¢ 0 4; •v _ PJ~aO p.• ^ ~ a ..•hf.i 3AIt10 13 » « « « a' `'~ 1 .'~ ~ ~0 S d •0'R. ««f dYHJ 31IHM a ~~ 1. b ~' jA',?° se ~ ..w ;d' n= i fP.GI ff.« IYN ~iP \ 4 ~~ p8 J i'~ ~ i r•N A .~~ s~ B i ~' x.0,4, T s ~~` s ~n a =i $~ a n ~i i ° o ., co a• dj ~ ~i ~~ :,_ ~4~ ±~ ~ .. r "i 8 xi 8 pp i w i i ~ ~ R d e !S 9~$ 9 ~ ~" Y . 'b «.n «.«-. '. r.a «.n w.r ~ R A I- t "' A 3AItl0 NO1dY1YH 15Y3 ° > ! 'i z a 1f $ i ~r.u n.n «.« pas I=Iq W ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ R= a s= ~ 3 W g~.2~ . ~ ad. a ,,..» a s= ° z s i ° C' a i; • R F r ~ fn.w ~ fn.u a ii Q.. ; ~ «~ ~ a - x i= S= yf `2~~i: W cwt ,n,n ~ a ~~ fn.r ~~ fn.v ~. Q~ Z aE-Y;-~~ i W; °~I, y~ i ce= i i~~ a - s a ° ~' i ~ W i~?c£Fe W Wb ~ i ~~ a r 9~ i 9~ a ° pi s 0. W bisfi d^ ~ u>•n ur,.f nnu 3X - 0. •- J Y~SZ:~ ~- ~q$ d ~gc a o -~ $° Q ~ j5R St (1J .; i.-i i ~ { i a i t = w.» 1 o w r y~i i i w AYM a~ik== W ~ ..~ fn,n 0 4 'R fn.« ~~ ~n.n j w.« ° Cn ~~c~1n 3 a p~ i i a t= a ~~ a ~. OH «»° W si~i:i z i~ ssi i f` i§~ a `9~ i iY[Sk.. 3 gR fn..f fn.r fu.o ° L U ~ ° ° ° ~ ~ n>.« ~ ~ nr.n r ~ R r 9'/-J' gnoZ If1 3ima Ml~ 1l3110i ~.-j :. 155 South Second Stree Central Point, OR 9750 (5031 664-332 Ceorge Rubalof Planning Administrator THE HEART OF THE ROGUE RIVER VALLEY September 21, 1994 Crown West Developments c/o Gary Whittle .908 E. Jackson Medford, OR 9750.4 Re: Tentative Plan -Forest Glen Subdivision -Phase V Sandy Lomme Administrative Planning Secretan ...Dear. Gary On July 19, 1994, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 298 approving the Tentative Plan referenced above: On July 21, 1994, the City Council accepted the Commission's decision on this land use matter. Attached you'will find a copy of Resolution No. 298 for your records. City. regulations provide you with 12 months from the date your Tentative Plan was approved in which to file your final plat to the City. Enclosed for your convenience, you will find a Final Plat Application packet. During, this time period, please submit your constmction plans to the Public Works .Department and coordinate the construction permit process through Public Works Director Larry Blanchard. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at City offices. Sincerely, `/ ^ e ge balo g Administrator Enclosure: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 298 2. Approved Plan ce: Herb Farber, Surveyor Larry Blanchard le ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. `~8. A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE PLAN FOR PHASE V OF FOREST GLEN SUBDIVISION (Applicant: Crown West Developments) (37 2W'11A Tax Lot 1800) (37 2W 11D'Tax Lot 100) (37 2W 12C Tax Lot 3300) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT AS FOLLOWS: Secti_ on 1 uar„re of Application. for approval of a tentative plan for an R-2 and R-1-6 district of Central Point, Commission reviewed the 'application and public hearing on July 19, 1994. Section 2 Approval Criteria this application are found in CPMC tentative plans and subdivisions, zoning and lot sizes. This is an application 54-lot subdivision in an Oregon. The Blanning tentative plan at a The criteria for approval Chapter 16, relating to and in Chapter 17, relating The Planning determines as follows: of to A. Tentative Plan Recuirem~• The application and tentative plan herein are in the correct form and contain all of the information required for the same under CPMC Chapter 16.10. B. Area and Width of Lots. The subdivision lots range in size from 7,016 square feet to 12,867 gquare feet and all meagre the R-2 and R-1-6 district lot size re uirements of 6,000 sq feet for interior lots and 7,000 for corner lots. The minimum width requirements are also met, with interior lots at least 60 feet wide and corner lots at least 70 feet wide. C. Blocks and Streets. The layout and dimensions of streets the requirements of CPMC Chapter Chapter 16.24 regarding blocks. • the with CPMC Section 4 Conditional Approval. The application for tentative plan approval for Forest Glen Subdivision Phase V is hereby approved, subject to the conditions listed on Exhibit °A" hereto, imposed under authority of CPMC 16.10.090. 1 - PLANNING COMMISSION. RESOI;UTION'NO. o'!R (072694) tentative plan proposal fo: and blocks is in compliance 16.20 regarding streets and -- 19 .. Passed by the`Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this _~_ day of ~ii~ ln~" ~ 1994. Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: City Re se tative Approved by me this ~_ day of _~ _, 1994. Plann~.ng Commission Chairman 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. (072694) ~0 EXH/B/T A" PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT '' TENTATIVE PLAN COND/T/ONS FOREST GLEN, PHASE V 1. Ail structures shall have roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces with positive drainage avvay from the structure and drain lines connected to a curb drain, or an approved storm sewer: The developer shall provide the necessary storm drainage 'improvements and lot grading to assure that all streets, lots, and ail properties will drain properly. The developer shall submit a grading plan with the construction drawings and perform such grading and drainage improvements which satisfies this drainage condition leaving only minor grading required for each lot during. house construction. 2. The City's Engineer shall, at the cost of the developer, evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the street section design in accordance with the Public Works Department Design Standards. The streets shall use the following design criteria: Street Name 8v~raoe Daily Traffic' % Trucks Glengrove Avenue 2,500 VT/0 5% Ali other Streets 1,000 VT/D 2% '3. The construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Ughting Plan and a Traffic Control Pian in accordance vvlth the requirements of the City of Central Point Public Works Department. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to meet the City's Public Works Standards. The developer shall pay for all costs associated with the design and installation of the improvements specified on these plans. 4. Indicate on the Final Plata 1 foot access control strip at the ends of Looking Glass Way, East Hampton Drive, White Chapel Drive, Glengrove Avenue. 5. The construction drawings shall indicate type, size and location of water mains and fire hydrants in accordance with the City's Public Works Standards and the recommendation of the City's Fire Chief. 6. The developers engineer shall design the sewer system to serve the development of this tract and all future development which will be tributary to this development. 7. The developer shall construct an adequately sized storm drainage system to provide for runoff onto the subdivision property and from each lot. As a part of the construction of the improvements for this Tentative Plan, the developer's engineer shall provide a complete set of drainage calculations for sizing the storm drainage system for this development. The developer shall submit this information to the Public. Works Department at the time construction drawings for the subdivision are submitted to the Public Works Department for permits for construction of the storm drainage improvements. The engineer shall use the rainfall/intensity curve obtained from th Public Works Department for hydrology calculations. EXHIBIT "A" -Page Two 8, The developer's shall prepare and/or provide the Clty's PubNc Works Department with a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of "Elk Creek." .The analysis shall include plan and profile delineations of the 100 year flood plain and fioodway determined in conformance with FEMA's Flood Insurance Study guidelines. Also include topographjcal information at 2 foot contours for Elk Creek adjacent to property in the subdivision. g, Accesses to Lots 155, 176, 181, 204, 185, 199, 198, 197, 196, 195, 189, 188,.170, and 172 shall be located the farthest distance an the lot away from.. any. intersection. ' 10. Fai~etd iC rcle in this subdivision shall be changed to Fairfield 6~II5!_@• 11. A 12" ductile iron `water main shall be constructed In Glengrove Avenue and White Chapei Drive. 12. The developer. shall jointly (with the developer of Green Park Unit #5) construct a box culvert across Elk Creek'at Glengrove Avenue, sized to carry a 100 year .storm as stipulated in CPMC 8.24. 22 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 7, 1995 TO: George Rubaloff-Planning Administrator FROM: Paul W. Worth-Public:WorksTechnician RE: Forest Glen Phase 5, Final Plat Determination PW 94027 The Final Plat of Forest Glen Subdivision, Phase 5 has been reviewed according to CPMC 16.12.050, Staff Approval. The location of the property is: T37S, R2W, Section 11 A-Tax Lot 1800; Section 11 D-Tax Lot 100 and Section 12C-Tax Lot 3300. The following items have been verified by the Public Works Department Staff. 1. Although the Final Plat as shown is substantially the same as it appeared on the approved Tentative Plan, adopted by Planning Commission Resolution 298, the folh~ ping ranuiremPntc have not haPn mPt• a. ' Show a 20 foot storm drain easement for Lot 195 and a 16 foot easement for Lots 164, 165, and 194 for 48" storm drain and other utilities. (as required by Public Works Staff Report/Inform- atioh needed, dated July 14, 1994. and letter to Herb Farber, Agent, dated July 25; 1994).. Agent .has indicated than an oral arrangement was. made to reduce the 20 foot easement to 16 feet. City has no documentation on file. 2. Developer has not completed all conditions of the Tentative: Plan based on progress as of June 14, 1995. These conditions are as follows: Streets {subgrade, base, paving, curbs, gutters*(a) Signs and delineation *If) Storm Sewer (catch ihlets, cleaningl*'(b) Sanitary Sewer (manhole steps, grade rings, cleaning, TV inspection/spandrel) Water System (valve actuation, chlorination, testing) Street lighting *(dl Sidewalks *(c) 5224,960 S 1,000 5 5,400 S 4,280 S 250 5 13,000 S 47,080 - 23 Page Two -Memorandum Forest Glen 5 -July 7, 1995 Water usage 5 530 Soil Testing Laboratory Costs S 2,300 City Engineer Fees S 2,500 Pay Public Works fees for review and inspection for subdivision S 2,750 City vehicle charges _ S 299 Submit as-built construction drawings for subdivision S 3,000 Pay Planning Department services fees including. legal costs S 500 Construct Box Culvert at Elk Creek *(g) S ~~-~~~ Subtotal 5343,840 Project Management (10%) S 34,384. Contingencies (5%) S 17.19 TOTAL 5395,416 *( 1-Items noted on Construction Engineering.Consultants Memo dated June 21, 1995 3. Submit a letter to the City bearing the Developer's signature. stating that any water meter boxes and curb stops which have been moved or disturbed will be reset by'the developer at his expense according to City requirements. 4. The Final Plat is in compliance -with .all ordinances and State laws, provided hovvever, survey adequacy required by ORS 91.100 shall be approved by the. Jackson County Surveyor. 5. Construct driveways to each lot with access located farthest distance away from any street intersection as required by Condition #9, Public Works Staff Report.. 1. Approve the Final Plat for the above subdivision, provided that the Subdivision Improvement and Security for Performance agreements are signed and the sum of 5395,416 is provided in a form acceptable to the City. 2. Deny the Final Plat based on findings to be developed by the. City. 3 Approve the Final Plat, subject to modifications to the Final, Plat. being completed by signing. Attachments: CEC Memo, Letter 7/25/94, letter 1 /25/95 cc: Susan Wilson Broadus cc: File PW 94027 24 'aNSTRUCrto C ENG1~ G S O`YSULTA~~ ixc Iy ~lyy /~ L P.O. BOX 1644 • MEDFORD, OR 97501 PH (503) 779-52G8 • Fp1C (503) 779-6314 June 21,.1995 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 155 S. SECOND SL CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 FOREST GLEN SUBDIVISION. PHASE V BONDING REQUIREMENTS A STREETS: STREET WIDTH LENGTH $/FOOT TOTAL FarftieldAve. 36'. 743' $80.00 $59,440.00 Whtte Chappel Drive 36' 43T $80.00 $34,960.00 PfltvlewAvenue 36' 724' $80.00 $57,920.00 Each Hampton Drive 36' 40T $80.00 $32,560.00 TOTAL STREETS $224,960.00 8. STORM GRAIN: ITEM QUANT UNIT $NNIT TOTAL Curb Inlet Tops 18 EA $300.00 $5.400.00 TOTAL STORM DRAIN $5.400.00 C. SIDEWALKS ITEM QUANT UNIT $IUNIT TOTAL Sidewalks 23540 SF $2.00 $47.080.00 TOTAL SIDEWALKS $47,Q80.00 D. STREET LIGHTS ITEM QUANT UNIT $NNIT TOTAL Street UghLs 13 EA $1,000.00 $13.000.00 TOTAL STREET LIGHTS $13,000.00 E. POST MOMUMENTATION '' ` '' - • ~ ": ITEM QUANT UNiT $NNIT TOTAL Morxxnentation 1 LS $3,000.00 $3.000.00 TOTAL MONUMENTATION $3.000.00 25 FOREST GLEN SUBDIVISION PHASE V BONDING REQUIREMENTS PAGE 2 '~ F. SIGNING ITEM QUANT UNIT $1UNIT TOTAL SI~~ ~ 1 W i7,~w.w •7 i.wu.w TOTAL SIGNING $~•~•~ G. BOX CULVERT (2-4x8) ITEM QUANT UNIT $/UNIT TOTAL Box Culvert 80 LF $450.00 $36.000.00 TOTAL BOX CULVERT ~.~•~ TOTAL BONDING REQUIRED $330.440.00 26 Farber 8L Sons. Inc. F,ARBER SURVEYING ~ ~J~AN 3 019f9~5' ~" "' FORESTRPROPERTY BOUNDERYEXPOERT ICPLANNING RE ORTS~' CON5TRl~~STAK N~G NER TIME January 25, 1995 George Rubaloff City of Central Point 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Forest Glen, Phase II Proposed lot line adjustment. Amended tentative for Phase V. Amended tentative for Phase VI. George,. The changes requested are a result of placing building designs on the lots in Phase II which have been created and on the future lots of Phase V and VI. Individual design had not been applied to lots. prior to the design of these Phases. Hence this redesign is plane before you. The lot line adjustment in Phase II adjusts the line between Lots 60 and 61, with lot 60-loosing 2 ;feet and•lot 61 gaining. Lot 63 gets two feet from Proposed lot 153 in Phase V. There is a proposed re-distribution of the dimensions in Phase VI. These changes result in a better distribution of the property to design packages the applicant wishes to build on the future lots. The changes to Phase V are also a re-distribution of the lot widths of the lots lying between.Glengrove and I-5. There is also a change to the access for the utility companies between lots 154 and 177 near the terminus of Fairfield Avenue. The tentative map approved by the Planning Commission showed an alley to be dedicated to the public. The current proposal is to provide an easement-for the utilities which will be paved and fenced to ensure unrestricted access for those who have a need. Respectfully"~SUbmi~tted, ~rbe'~arber- President 27 HERB FARBER P.O. BOX 5286 CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 (503) 776-0846 (office) . (503) 664-5034 (home) 755 SO SECOND ST. CENTRAL POINT, OREGON 97502 July 25, 1994 • (503).664-7602 -fAX (503).664-63& PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN' LARRY R. BLANCHARO P, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Herb Farber 908 E. Jackson Medford OR 97504 Re: Tentative Plan Forest Glen V. Dear .Herb: Enclosed is a copy of the "Information Needed" sheet for Forest Glen V, with item IN 2 now showing the Lots needing the 20' and` 16' easements. If you should have any questions, please give me a call. Sincere~liyL,l~~ ,Q ~~~' O Larry R. Blanchard Public Works Director cc: PW 94027 28 C:/ / Y Vt (a/V / /iHL YV//V / PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT TENTAT/VE PLAN /NFORMAT/ON NEEDED IN 1. Include on the Tentative Plan the name of the owners. /G~""^'~"~' °~ awr ~ ~r ~y~ga~ IN 2. Include on the Tentative Plan a minimum 20 foot storm drain easement for lot 195 and a 16' easement for lots 164, 165 and 194 for the 48" storm drain and all other utilities that are between lots, and PUE's in the front of all lots. IN 3. Provide topographical information on the Tentative Plan and include the creektop of bank both the east and west sides. Ss-6„~,N o,.i ~,,s~,~ noN O~.m, s IN 4. Locate wooded areas on Tentative Plan that are on Property in Phase V. NoN ~~"' IN 5. Provide information on how streets will serve the property to the south which will eventually connect to the proposed park property in Map Section 11 and 12C Tax Lot 3301, 3300 and 3404 and the remaining Forest Glen Development. The Master Plan may need to be updated. 29