Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Packet - August 1, 1995~Y CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA .August 1, 1995- 7:00 p.m. Next Planning Commission Resolution No. 325 I. MEETING. CALLED TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Chuck Piland -Jan Dunlap, Herb Farber, Candy Fish, Randy Graves, Karolyne Johnson, and Valerie Rapp rr I1 - 2 III. CORRESPONDENCE IV. MINUTES A. Review and approval of July il, 1995 Planning Commission Minutes V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VI. BUSINESS s - 22 A. Review and recommendation of Proposed Annexation at 3436 Hanley Road generally located on the east side of Hanley Road and directly east of Phase I of Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision on Brandon Street. (Applications: Beard and Kula) 23 - z~ B. Review and recommendation of a draft Ordinance amending Title 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code to establish Padlot Developments as a permitted use., VII. MISCELLANEOUS VIII. ADJOURNMENT „~ ,.i CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes July 11, 1995 - Page One I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER at 7:03 p.m. II. ROLL CALL -Those present were: Chuck Piland, Herb Farber, Candy Fish, Randy Graves, Karolyne Johnson and Valerie Rapp. Jan Dunlap had notified Planning Commission that she would be on vacation. III. CORRESPONDENCE -None IV. MINUTES Commissioner Fish moved to approve the June 6, 1995 Planning Commission Minutes. Commissioner Farber seconded the Motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: Farber, yes; Fish, yes; Graves, yes; Johnson, abstain, and Rapp yes, and the Minutes were approved. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES -None VI. BUSINESS A. Review and Determination regarding Final Subdivision Plat for Forest Glen, Phase V. Chairman Piland opened the meeting. Herb Farber declared a conflict of interest as surveyor of the project and left his seat on the Commission and sat in the audience. There were no further conflicts of interest or ex-parte communication. The Planning Commission had been given the latest revised copy of the Final Plat. George Rubaloff, Planning Administrator, stated that the Final Plat conforms to the approved Tentative Plan. He also stated that the Developer will be changing the name of East Hampton to Hampton Drive. Mr. Rubaloff stated that the amount of required bonding to secure performance under the Development Agreement is $202,680, issued in two letters of credit, one letter of credit that could be returned when all conditions in Forest Glen V are met except for the box culvert and a second letter of credit which would secure the construction of a box culvert (with Greenpark Subdivision). CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Planning Commission Minutes July 11, 1995 -Page Two Commissioner Graves asked if there were any conditions concerning fencing along the subdivision facing I-5. Herb Farber, 908 E. Jackson, Medford, Oregon, surveyor for the project, came forward and stated that although it is not mentioned as a condition, the Developer has notified the City, early in the process, that the section of the subdivision that lies along I-5 will have a two foot berm, and a 6' concrete block wall built on top of that berm as a barrier. Farber also stated that all utilities had been contacted and a agreement had been formed for maintenance of the 20' wide strip of land between the fence and the freeway. George Rubaloff stated that the developer had also agreed as mentioned in Farber Surveying letter dated January 25, 1995, the utility easement lying between lots 154 and 177 would be fenced and paved. VII. MISCELLANEOUS -George Rubaloff stated that the new rules were being published concerning the set backs on corner lots. He also stated that in changing the rules it calls yards next to alleys, "side yards" which will be a 10 foot setback rather than the 20 foot setback. Rubaloff stated that the serial levy for revenue to .repair and maintain Central Point City streets will be on the Central Point election ballot on September 19,1995. An explanatory statement on the levy was distributed to the Commissioners. He also handed out a booklet on the new Oregon Statewide Goals. He also discussed various future land use developments that would be coming before the Planning Commission. The next scheduled Planning Commission Meeting will be on Tuesday, July 25, 1995 provided reports were complete. VIII. ADJOURNMENT -Commissioner Graves moved that the meeting adjourn, Commissioner Johnson seconded the Motion, and all said Aye, and the meeting was adjourned at 7:34 p.m. ,~ interoffice M E M O R A N D U M to: Central Point Planning Commission from: George Rubaloff, Planning Administrator subject: preliminary Report for Proposed Annexation on Hanley Road date: July 28, 1995 Annexation Annexation is the act of extending the boundaries of a city so that the property owners of a new territory can benefit from municipal services and facilitate urban development. Action Requested CPMC 1.24 requires the Planning Commission to review requests for annexation and make recommendations to the City Council. The Commission's recommendation can be in the form of aminute-motion. The City Council decides upon all annexation requests after conducting a public hearing. Description of Annexation Proposal The property owners have authorized W.G. Beard to submit the annexation request on their behalf. The proposed annexation is located on the east side of Hanley Road, generally west of Unit No. 1 of Jackson Creek Estates Subdivision. If approved, the annexation would add 6.16 acres of new territory to the City of Central Point. The 6.16 acres would include .41 acres of territory which consists of Hanley Road right-of--way to its centerline. The prominent natural feature of the property is Jackson Creek which traverses Tax Lot 5900 in a northerly direction from the approximate southeast corner to its northwest corner. One residential structure exists on the 5.75 acre site along with several accessory buildings. The property is located on Hanley Road which is classified as a major arterial. No significant physical features exist on the property except for the creek. Natural drainage occurs to the north and towazds the creek. As illustrated on the National Inventory of Wetlands, the property includes a Palustrine Forested Wetland (Seasonal Flooded). Any future development of the site may require a permit from the Division of State Lands and/or the Army Corp of Engineers. Access to the property is via Hanley Road. A one foot non-access strip sepazates the property from Btandon Street in the northeast comer of Tax Lot 5900. Brandon Street 3 Central Point Planning Conunission Page 2 July 28, 1995 would be a likely street access to any future development which may occur on this property in the future. The area proposed for annexation is designated on the Comprehensive Plan Map for Low Density Residential Use. In keeping with the Comprehensive Plan designation, the City Zoning Map classifies the area as R-1-10 (Residential Single-Family -Minimum 10,000 square foot lot size). After laying out streets with a portion of the acreage, the land could probably be subdivided into 12-18 residential lots. However, the creek and access issues may result in a design of more or less lots through some combination of subdividing and partitioning. The surrounding land use patterns of development and zoning designations are as follows: I34Sth Land Use: City-Maintained Park Strip and Existing Single Family Homes Zoning: R-1-8 Single Family Residential West Land Use: Hanley Road Right-of--Way and Large acre residences outside of City Limits Zoning: R-1-10 Single Family Residential South Land Use: Vacant Land Zoning: R-i-10 Single Family Residential Fast Land Use: Single Family Residential Subdivision (Jackson Creek Estates- Unit No. 1) Zoning: R-1-8 Single Family Residential Written Consents: In accordance with ORS 222, all owners of the land and not less than 50 percent of the electors residing in the territory must consent, in writing, to the proposed annexation. The application for annexation includes a written consent from property owner Louis and Jacquiline Kula. The residents living on the property proposed for annexation are 4 Central Point Planning Commission Page 3 July 28, 1995 not qualified electors. Therefore written consent from the residents is not necessary to comply with ORS 222. 2. Within UGB: Pursuant to Policy No. 3 (City-County Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement, September 1984), territory annexed into the city is required to be within the Central Point Urban Growth Area. The land of the proposed annexation is within the Central Point UGB and identified as subarea E in the City's Comprehensive Plan. ConriQUity: ORS 222 requires that annexed territory be contiguous to the city or separated from the city only by a public right of way, or a stream, lake or other body of water. As shown on the proposed annexation plat, the territory is contiguous to the existing city limits on its proposed north and east boundaries. 4. Order y Provision of Public Facilities: OAR 660-01-310 states that annexation of lands is subject to the City's acknowledged Comprehensive Plan. The Central Point Comprehensive Plan was formally acknowledged by the Land Conservation and Development Commission on December 13, 1984. The comprehensive plan specifies that the phasing of development and annexations shall be consistent with the City's ability to provide facilities and services. The Public Works Staff Report (Item C) provides an inventory of existing public facilities (streets, water, sanitary and storm sewer). The report concludes that those critical facilities are available to the 5.75 acres (6.16 acres to centerline) proposed for annexation provided future developers are able and willing to construct necessary off-site improvements. Future enhancements and additions to the existing public facilities necessary for future development would be required of the developer as those land use applications are processed by the City. The city follows a regulated process for land use decisions. We anticipate that implementation of that land use decision process would result in an orderly provision of public facilities to the temtory proposed for annexation. rJ Central Point Planning Commission Page 4 July 28, 1995 Belated Issue A statute (ORS 450.987) was established in 1989 which changed how the city withdraws from special districts. The City may annex territory situated within the boundary of a special district, however, the city shall not remove any service provision capability from that special district unless specific findings aze made by the County Boazd of Commissioners. One of the more significant of those determinations which must be made in order for withdrawal from a special district to occur is that a district cannot provide adequate service to an annexed territory within a reasonable time. The City's acknowledged comprehensive plan is the controlling document for land use within the Urban Growth Area covered by the plan. The Plan and Statewide Goals require an orderly, economic provision for public facilities and services for lands within the UGB which are converted from coral to urban uses. It follows that the city, as the logical provider of urban services within its urban growth area, can provide efficient service to city customers and can facilitate managed economic development by being the provider of its full range of urban services. During previous meetings, the commission has discussed the question of how the City will deal with withdrawal of a new territory from special districts or authorities. The City Council has decided to postpone any final decisions on annexation proposals until such time that this issue has been resolved. City Council is currently working towazds resolution of this issue. Conclusion Staff concludes that this particular request meets the fundamental requirements for annexing territory into the city. However, until such time that the policy question relating to withdrawing territory from special districts is resolved, the city is not in a posifion to conclude that there would be an orderly provision of public facilities with respect to the proposed annexation. 11?0 low uo The Planning Commission's recommendation regarding the proposed annexation will be included in the public record at the time City Council conducts a review and hearing on this proposal. Prior to any public hearings, the city will send notifications to agencies which could be 6 Central Point Planning Commission Page 5 July 28, 1995 affected by the proposed annexation. The agencies on the mailing list include Jackson County, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority, utility companies, School District No. 6, Central Point Police Department and Central Point Fne Department. Agencies receiving notification will have an opportunity to submit comments about the annexation prior to any future public hearings. Item A -Annexation Application Item B -Maps (Zoning, Assessor, Topographical, Wetlands) Item C -Report from Public Works Department 7 ITEM . APPLICATION FOR hNNEXATIOfV~~~~l~~~ CITYOFCENTRALPOINTPLANNINGDEPARTMENT t,1A~29ig95' i. APPLICANT INFORMATION CIMMTY~~ Of~~gCF.N'rRAI. POIN Name' T~~+~ u,.ta, mr, erne, iannyiilii!e Kula. Trustee andr(~LTG $~ar~"'"'"~'"'~^- AddfBSS: ~1L5 Ki g R X, (`hy; Mad ford, Stale: Or Zip Code: 97501 Telephone: Business: lla-snst (Rearal Residence• 772-8364 (Beard) 2. AGENT INFORMATION Address: ts~n Angel nreer nrive City: w df a Stale: Or 21p Code: 97504 Telephone: Business: ~~o-snst Residence: 772-8364; 3. OWNER OF RECORD (Attach Separate Sheet it More Than One) Name: *^••'° K^te ^nd Taem,itine Knla. Trusteesof the Louis Kula Trust Address: X145 Ki new HvY- Clly: Medford. S(a(e: Ot ZlpCOde: 97501 Telephone: Buslness: Residence:- rLa-274e 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Type of Planned Development: None olanned at this time Township: 37 Range• 2W Section : IOCA Tax Lot(s): 5900 Address: 3436 Ranlev Road. Central PoinC, Or. Township: Range• Sectbn : _ Taz Lot(s): Address: Township: Range• Sectbn : _ Tax Lot(s): Address: Planned Zaning Dislrki: single family dwellings Total Acreage: 5 75 Total NumberofEzisling Dwelling Units: 5. REQUIRED SUBMITTALS f~ This Applicalbn Form f~ AppllcatlonFee (5200) L( Wdaen Aulhadly from Property Owner if Agent in Applbation Process ~ Annexation Petilton fl Preliminary Plat f~ Legal Description of extension boundary of proposed annexed territory 6. I HEREBY STATE THAT THE FACTS RELATED IN THE ABOVE APPLICATION AND THE PLANS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH ARE TRUE, CORRECT AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I cenily that I am the: ~ Property Owner or ^ Authodzed Agent of the O+vner of the pro ed pro~rsil~~v .J Signature .~~t 7w„T Dale.7?3,~~~ ~ If any wetlands exist on the site, (t is the applicant's responsibility to apply for a permit to ~ Division of State Lands before any site work begins. , UPON FORMALLY ACCEPTING YOUR APPLICATION, THE PLAtiNING DEPARTMENT W ILL MAIL A DOPY OP 7HI5 FORM TO YC ANNEXATION PETITION 'THE UNDERSIGNED hereby request and consent to the annexation to the City of Central Point, Oregon, of the real property contiguous thereto described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a-part of the within petition. By their signature hereto,_the undersigned certify that they are either "owners" of land in the territory proposed .to be• annexed as described in Exhibit "A", or are "electors" registered in the territory proposed to be annexed as described in Exhibit uAn~ This petition, containing the request and consent to said annexation, must be filed with the Central Point City Council on or before the date of the public hearing to be held upon the proposed annexation pursuant to ORS 222.120. "Owner" is defined:by ORS 222.120 as meaning the legal owner of record or, where there is a recorded land contract which is in force, the purchaser thereunder. If there is multiple ownership in a parcel of land, each consenting owner shall be counted as a fraction to the same extent as the interest of the owner in the land bears in relation to the interest of the other owners,. and the same 'fraction shall be applied to the parcel's land mass for purposes of the consent petition. If a corporation owns land in a territory proposed to be annexed, the corporation shall be considered to be the individual owner of that land. "Elector" is defined in said statute as an individual qualified to vote under Article II, Section 2 of the Oregon Constitution, which in turn requires that the individual be 18 years of age or older, a resident of the area in question, and registered to vote as required by applicable state law. Furthermore, ORS 222.170(2) requires that electors petitioning for annexation be registered in the territory proposed to be annexed. Elector or Property Owner: (If Property Owner, insert Name: property description) Signature: Date: ANNEXATION PETITION (120887) • 9 .-, ..~ z ~: 04INERS continued Louis Kula and Jacquiline Kula, Trustees of the Jacquiline Kula Trust 2145 Kings Hwy. Medford, Or. 97501 Home phone: 779-2749 4dG Beard 1570 Angelcrest Drive 14edford, Or. 97504 Bus. phone: 779-5051 Home phone: 772-8364 i0 ~~, LE-61499 EXHIBIT A Commencing at a stone located at the northwest corner of Donation Land Claim No. 66 in Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian in Jackson County, Oregon, thence North 904.4 feet, thence East 3.3 feet to a 1 1/2" x 24" G.P. on the easterly boundary of the County Road, thence North 3°49'10" East along the easterly boundary of said County Road (record North 3°47' East) 125.0 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe for the true .point of beginning; thence continue North 3°49'10" East 309.0 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe; thence South 89°50'10" East 350.0 feet; thence South 3°49'10" West parallel to the County Road, a distance of 309.0 feet to the north line of tract described in Volume 403 page 467 of the Deed Records of Jackson County, Oregon; thence North 89°50'10" West along said north line, a distance of 350.0 feet to the true point of beginning. ALSO, commencing at the northwest corner of Donation Land Claim No. 66 in Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian in Jackson County, Oregon, thence North 904.4 Eeet, thence East 3.3 feet to a 1 1/2" x 24" G.P. on the easterly boundary of the County Road, thence North 3°49'10" East along the easterly line of the County Road (deed record North 3°47' East) 434 feet to a 3/4" iron pipe being the point of beginning; thence continuing North 3°49'10" East 406.63 feet to a point from which the northwest corner of said Deed recorded in Volume 214 page 99 of the Deed Records of Jackson County, Oregon, bears North 3°49'10" East 60.12 feet; thence South 89°52'10" East 350 feet to a 5/8" iron pin; thence South 3°49'10 West 406.83 feet; thence North 89°50'10" West 350 feet to the point of beginning. (Code 6-28, Account #1-20151-4, Map #372W10CA, Tax Lot #5900) f1 ITEM ~----~ L N i"= ioD 12 PKOPOS~A 300 800. 900 1200 1/4 YIIE Cl~ f .Adopted by C.P. City R=L . -RESI R-1-6 -RESI N R-1-8 -RES] R-1-10 -RESI R~2 -RES] R-3 -RES] C-1 -NEIL C-2 - COM 13 °°~ C-2(M) - COM C-3 - DOW r-~ - T(1TT N 1 "- io V 0 3 N M W J a r 7375 .e2 ~!. !/4'I s,~c7,oo/ /OC.9 ~ e Tf1-x Go'7- Sqo 0 LOu/S ,Gl,!'+H~~ cT,g-Qut6/N~ ,CUGy 7Q In- 2J¢•• .s7i7lw'J O N 7'O ClsiK/l~ tC' l 7~Jx 4or b>mo~ ~~ry mP eew>!wc_R+.,,..)~ ~`-- 5.75Ac ~~ ~P-1200) ~~. (P-2164) 0 ProPOS~A n' ~ ~ A~NNcxaT-ion w ' Si~ •.U '~~ 0 .L ,~ P W ' ~F ....._. __ ___ -33°1: ~, ._ ___ _. (P-17461 . 6-28. ~` I `~ i `\ . 6000 :OOAc SR ~ 2.5 N 904.4, E i3 ' OF NVi COR DLC 66 - SW COR V. 219, P. y9 OOR V Y09, P 520 NE WR' V. 209, a 320 14 ~ ^" YS7~/ 7 71 2W IOBD ,149 `, ~ 1600 ,/ N R e ^g `, •O' "5800 1700 ' J 20Ac ~ ,. 0.19Ac ~ ~° ~ a . /r ~ ° ~~ 5 y,, 5700 , ~2oac ~ ~ 1800 ~~/ $ .; ~ ~ 0.2L'c . 2' ~ g Z ,./ ,•, -- .~ ~- 5600 0.16Ac ~ ~~ .:° 3 l ~~ 300 ^:t ,~ 4 i 5400 0.19Ac a io ~~ izo 5 5300 0.19tk . .--= 5200 o.~ac 3~p .. .s, ~ 5100 0.19Ac ~,~` ~ . 9V i e 5000 "°~ o~ L 19Ac 370 9 . at~i ~ 4900 3~tk ~~ ~..~ o.25Ac 4800 o°' 0.19Ac M1,. '.~18 5` 2700 O 20Ac5 -t~~T -~= 1 X2800 0.21Ac ~3 2900 i ' 023Ac .3,45 ~~ I ~ I \ °~ 3E, i 'H.ee i`" •"' 4E 4700 c r 0.20Ac c N gy'1 ~ ~/ACKSON KAI HFt I'IV `, o.44Ac' + 4100 v LLVV 5 COURT ti o.22Ac y s o.3oAc ~, ~ A ~ o ~ ~ 0 5 3 kti' `L, t a,~ ' a ;m / ~ ?.4L". 2300 1 DD "•~, s e w. 4200 ~ o.27ac '. 4600 4900 •, a ~ 4 0.18Ac .. 031Ac 5s ~* 0.23Ac } ~' ~ o ~ 3 0 • 9~ X03 2 a~ °ss ~ 6 ', ~ 'a ~a6.S ~ 3 ' 7 s 2500 9e ~1w.iG ~ ~~ ~ '+o oe so.u .. 4300 e " a~ 0.23Ae 1 4700 4600 4500 4400 H 0.29Ac "''p es ~P 0.18Ac O.IBAc O.IBAe'- 0.23Ac ~ ~ I ~ 2400 ° ~ ' o I ~r' o ~ ' (7 g 023Ac 0 Q 7p <v0 SD ~ ~O ~ ,- „~ ~ J 2 I s.' ~', 70 4 ~ 3 70 2 s~.: .fsac d 6400 '° •..< x,.11 DONNA WAY ~ ~,+•'`• oa9Ac11 ~.•`'~ ,-~, , 0100 ~t~ ~ 6300 ~ .•` r. •IU 'vo rx,r rs•^ k~ 0.19Ae ~ I ~ ` [t4 . 5700 5800 5900 6000 / 6200 / 'k 9000 + 18Ac O.IBAc 0.18Ac 0.24A~, ~j ~ 0.30Ac ~ `~ a!_ T700 r 0.22Ac e ~ r / e .~ 2 2 ~` .0.22Ac QZ / y o ~F7 ~ Q ,~t ~ ~7 ~ cP Irna) ~ BLK I ~/ ..7600 '+•. ~ ,~° 5 ~ 1 Q`t' 3 - ~.M K 020Ae ~• I4 9 ~ 6 yx.s1 ^y, ~ ~. 8900 S V .. ~ .~`, w i ~ \ A~ ~ 0.22Ae •w.a wi/ ~ti 13 : /O ~ VGA ~~/ 7 0 2 ~ Ir.N ~~ + fR ~W M '•~ SS S~ Iy' Y 5°~ '. ,, 0_I c .rrs. 7800 1 ~' 8800 6-28 ~ ~ '°~ 4 c~ r C c 0.21Ae 0.22Ae (~ I SS( Q J.7 I : 12 .. .. .vu.os ~ K5 .. ' ~ 50 ~ 7900 ~:e ~#. 6500 0`IW A Zy,i (~ fi 0.14ACI~ . 8700 040Ae 1 2 ~ ~ O 11 0.22Ae •oo ''^^ S :It'r~ 7300 VJ ~~ w /~Cl n14Ac Q J SR-2 5 ~ ~Z~ 3 27 . z- 0380 , ~ ~ ~ N ., 3 ~ .o0 10 8600 \ ^ .l0 l ` ,~ 6700 Z - 8100 o.22Ac 7200 0.14A° p/ (/G O ~ jP-354) € c~ 1r¢e ° t. 030AC 2 4 °, ; 0.16Ac ~(~ A ~ ~ /2' 1 a D 6 J ~`.' Q V 5 b7.9J 4 r .~ .ei.r 9 .zo l^`vr` ~ Q N NG. ]F M1'r ///. a Jw.f -~ /.I{i tiH 8?.00 8500 0.20AC , 0.22Ac / ^~ 3 ~ (~l ~ ~ O~AOc `3O ~ 0.1~5Ac xa.n I ~~Ct~+ W~ ~ 6 .o~~'x PLW ~1' + 8 1 ~~ ~ ~ .i V ((~_AAJJ ~a o.a Ac o.~~o,~a ,a ~, i ~,, ~ >osoo 23 l ` eo z°o°c APaa x l.~.f6fAR rV oP cawrrntRY~+T~.~G_~y 1'2700 ~ 1' !~/ c r ?''' ...4-__ • '~A (P-1746) 000 \ ~ ~ x~j I ,~ (P-2184) OSG~ 0 2Ac ~~ ~ s,~''P Yr°~~A a'1 °" JA KSON 'CREE/f ESTA ~ "~ ..~. ~~ SUED/V/S/ON UN/T NG S r (P-11430) . 15 37 ` 1.7 IIV v Gtr ~ vii ~ f OF T~FiE INTERIOR ,. ~nvcn~ry M~,p `06 ~" 'U/ / :iSQvL'O+FEEi SOH ~ ~„(r& ..' ~ _ ~ ~S id~{.x _'~; `~\ .. •;,, x, . ~ ~'cl,~ _._ ~ PEMCx , . ~ 61.x' ,PAB~I; UBFx ~ :-~ ti~`•'~..~ ~' ~~,~.,~\•,~~,. ~Y?`t ~~ ~~; +'° ; j`/27 ~ i /,z73Ar ~\PEhil N =~ ~ ~ :1~~~~ ill. ~t-:c __y :~ ... _ .. s--'\. "\ ~ ~, • . ^' '.~ _ 1 ~i: 1 u , ~ •'-tp '~~ a .`P -- F - `.. t~ `\ ~ qo _~~ . ;~ ------'~ ... ,a . ~ ~. .l ~Q ~ ~ t ~~ l •-•,Q~ .. 1 • ~ •~ .. L J Lnc , \~\_.~._ :._ ,~°"•asrrr.~+:~: 'ail ` "`~I: +w f , , . .. :: ~.~ ~I t Vii(- 1 ^ `}y ^ \,•• •~I•`• a ', I•• .: Y:,, ~•'. _ .. c ~ ... .. ;;\ ~ ...~ ':.~ fit: •f• ~` l ,C ~ .' i~ ~ I 1~ ~ST`. v ~ ~~Ji:A. 1 I `1 ~ .. .urser'y. ~ ~ .. .. N ~ v t . ~~ -- ~\Q M5~9~~ n , f ~: id:. i ~ .• _ ~ r • - -- _ ~_. t - - ___ '~ ,. ,, ! ` , ~~ -' I scra/c R4SBCx i __',=y a~\ ~'~'QC ~~. __. _, . ., \ l•~ I T •• •. '~ .//'- i \ J ' ~ __ ~ G \` \ ~ X~I ~ `../ pro pos-e~ . R-nncxq~lon ~~ I ~ S.fc. I ~ ~ ~l I iy~ x 1284.2 ~~ ~~~ N ~i / 00 1290.7 x x ~ ~o~ V . x i26B.5 N r--I i~ o XI i I .290 4 I } J W ~1-I .~\ i= ~ X a x X 12907 X RB6.5 CENTRAL VALLEY SUBDIVISION - UNIT N0. 4 sound 5/8"iron pin S69°3fi07"W 0.17' o op030~E Found brass disc-, a- - - -589 52'10"E ig00 0,06 in concrete ///// //// //~/i////.3a8.82~/////////_///// ~// ~• / ,-. /-, /~ . . ~' i ..-i ~ . 115.00 ..(//O P. U.E. j/ /// ////////~i///////%//%//~// / T-~ /, 41 ~r I- - - - ~ - /// /i///i/iii. i. i.. i. // / ,-/0'P.UE.-_-~ // / //~ ~~ AREA DEEDED TO C/T Y //// / // // // / ~ 1~~ 42 O ~ I6.~////////// //i////// / ///%/ /~ /~ / .575°. ~ 8~y g75o\4QB'W lR~ 0 2 Ig ~ 7 ' S6 O ~ `Y1 --- N89°52'10"W 350.03 --- -' ' 35' \ g6o3399 i /' Non-access %--•~ -•• \ 5 \\1 s/rip \ / -© \ 20 ~$ S/N 2/B9 ~ 2\ ` \ ~ O ~ ' Pra/~a sed ~ p 21 m ~ Z °Q 03 nncXAf/on ~~.• \\ ~ \ g669~ s.~ ~ ~° \ I ~ \ CURVE TABLE © ~ \ O\ 22 N86°12'14"W \ 1 RADIUS LENGTH CHORD 108.92 ~ 25' 25 .2" 200.00' 51.44' 51.30' o O 1 0 9 E3" 200.00' 146.94' 143.66' ° 2 :9~" 200.00' 160.25' 156.00' ^ ~ i !4" 100.00' 163.43' 145.84' N86o12.14.,w m-~ ~ o I .0•" 140.00' 219.55' 197.74' I2o.0o i8" 20.00' 27.72' 25,56' I ~~ '9" 225.00' 65.87' 65.64' I ~ ~~ ` 1" 175.00' 77.60' 76.96' ~ 0 3 4i o°, o~ I ~ ~ o o~ 8" 175.00' 62.62' 62.29' .-. 4I^ W o 0 9" 20.00' 8.38' 8.32' ~ Nes°12'la"w o W IN 2" 20.00' 9.07' 8.99' v° Izo.oo ~ - ~ ~ 31 ~2" 50.00' 61.61' 57.79' N ~' o I cn 1" 50.00' 34.85' 34.15' w _"= 0 4 0 0" 50.00' 53.35' 50.86' ° a g ~° ~ 4" 50..00.' 19.16' 19.04' a d d ° I io I n , , o ~ 3 N86 12'14"µ~ 1 20.00 17.45 16.90' o `~ 120.00 ~ 0" 20.00' 31.42' 2g,28~ Z ~~°n '' ° ° I "' 39 0" 20.00' 31.42' 28.28' p " o° 0 4" 175.00' 96.68' 95.46' ~ 5 l0 3 ~ 6" 175.00' 31.83' 31,79 0 ~^ ~ o 7" 225.00' 50.34' 50.23' o N Nes°I2'la"w ~ v ~~ 1" 225.00' 78.68' 78.28' a 120.00 I o cp m 2" 225.00' 51.26' 51.15' o °I 2" 165.00' 61.83' 61.47' w ° ~ ~ 0 2" 165.00' 67.42' 66.95" v ^ ~o ' 3" 165.00' 55.41' 55.15' ~ 8 ^ ~ Z ~ 3", 165.00' 44.37' o N86°12'14"yy ~ o~ 44.23' M 120.00 ~ "' 0" 165.00' 29.73' ~o co. ° > mi (~01`~( ®f~ CfER151'ff~~ IP~01~11f PUBL/C WORKS DEPARTMENT PG9G~L~lII/~lOnMaG~4~ SPaFF ~E~IgT DATE: June 22, 1995 PROJECT.• Proposed Annexation Name of Project: Ku/a Property/Han/ey Road Project # ZONE: PW 95017 R-1-10 APPL/CANT.• Louis Ku/a, Trustee, Jacqui/ine Kula, Trustee, W.G. Beard 2145 Kings Highway Medford OR 97501 (5031 779-5051 (Beard) (5031772-8364 (Beardl SUBD/V/DER/ OWNER Louis KWa, Jacqui/ine Ku/a Trustees of Louis Ku/a Trust 2145 Kings Highway Medford OR 97501 AGENT/ SURVEYOR W.G. Beard 1570 Ange/crest Drive Medford OR 97504 ENG/NEER: Northwest Design David Frisse (5031 772-1841 LOCAT/ON.• T37S R2W WM Section 10CA TL 5900 Han/ey Road (Adjacent to Jackson Creek Estates #1/ PLANNED ZON/NG: Sing/e Fami/y D wel/ings TYPE OF LAND USE ACT/ON: Annexation REV/EWED BY.• Pau/ W. Worth -Pub/ic Works Technician ITEM C ---•"" 19 Proposed Annexation Kula Property/Hanley Road June 22, 1995 -Page Two /. STREET /MPROVEMENTS: Includes: Street Subgrade, Street Base, Street Paving, Street Lighting, Traffic Control/Delineation Improvements, Curbs/Gutters, Safety Improvements, Ingress/Egress Improvement, On-Street Parking and Off-Street Parking, Delivery Truck Access, Other Transportation Requirements, Sidewalk, and Bikeways. A. Existing Conditions: 1. Street No. MA 05, Street Name-Hanley Road, Street Classification - Major Arterial, Jurisdiction-Jackson County. Descri t Existina Conditions Future Reauirements -Right of Way -Street Width -Moving Lane -Parking Lanes -Traffic Volume -Sidewalk -Curb/Gutter -Street Lights -Bike Way 60' property to property 32' pavement to pavement' 2 None 4604 VT/D(1993) None None None None '~ City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan "'~ with 4' gravel shoulder B. Discussion 100-110' property to property • 84' curb to curb' 4 to 6" 0 to 2 *' 10,000-40,000 VT/D Required 5' wide Required 22,000 Lumen - 200' spacing Required`' 1. Development of this property will require widening improvements of Hanley Road to urban standards. 2. Subdivision of this property will require the construction of local streets within the development in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Standards Specifications for Public Works Construction. The City may require the developer to submit a street development plan which encompasses adjacent properties to ensure satisfying the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. /1. WATER /MPROVEMENTS Includes: Mainlines, Property Service, Fire Service, and Backflow Protection. A. Existing Conditions: 1. No water mains exist in Hanley Road beyond Jackson Creek Bridge. A 12" ductile iron waterline is proposed for the south side of West Pine Street ending at Station 1 +20 near the west end of the bridge at Jackson Creek. . 20 Proposed Annexation Kula Property/Hanley Road June 22, 1995 -Page Three 2. A 8" ductile iron waterline is located in the north side of West Pine Street thence turning south (6") at the intersection of Brandon Street. 3. An 8" ductile iron waterline is located in Brandon Street (Jackson Creek Estates, Phase I). B. Discussion 1. Subdivision of this property will require the construction of waterlines within the development in conformance with the City's Water System Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and Standards for Public Works Construction. The City may require the developer to construct off-site improvements to provide water to the development or to provide for adequate flow. 2. Applicant is responsible for verifying actual locations prior to design and construction. ///. SAN?ARY SEWER /MPROVEMENTS Includes: Mainline, Property Service, Regional System Development Charge, Local SDC, Industrial Wastewater Permit. A. Existing Conditions 1. No sanitary sewer mains exist in Hanley Road along Applicant's property frontage. 2. An 8" Sanitary Sewer is located in Brandon Street in the Jackson Creek Estates #1 Subdivision which lies along the east boundary of Applicant's property. Sewer intersects at West Pine Street and continues east towards the City of Central Point. B. Discussion 1. According to the As-Built Plans for Jackson Creek Unit #1, the above mentioned sewers were constructed as designed. Applicant is responsible for verifying actual locations. The City may require developer to construct off-site improvements to provide sanitary sewer service to the development. 2. Subdivision of this property will require construction of Sanitary Sewer Lines in conformance with the City Sanitary Sewer Master `` Plan and Standards for Public Works construction. The City or Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority may require offsite ' improvements to provide sewer fagjl~ies to the development. Proposed Annexation Kula Property/Hanley Road June 22, 1995 -Page Four /V. STORM ORA/NAGS /MPROVEMENTS: Includes: Discharge Basin, Wetlands Requirements, TMDL Requirements. A. Existing Conditions 1. Jackson Creek bisects Tax Lot in a northerly direction. 2. A drainage ditch lies along the southern boundary of the property. 3. A 24" storm drain exiting at Jackson Creek is located on City Property, Tax Lot 6900, which lies along the north boundary of Applicant's property. 4. The Division of State Lands Wetlands inventory has identified the site as PFOC land adjacent to Jackson Creek. B. Discussion 1. Subdivision of this property will require the construction of storm drains adjacent to and within the development in conformance with the City's Standards for Public Works Construction. The City may require the developer to construct off-site improvements to provide adequate drainage for•the development.. 2. Developer may be required to perform additional measures with regard to Wetland Improvement/Preservation. Application must be made to the Division of State Lands prior to any site work. When the owner of the property being considered for annexation submits a Tentative Plan for a subdivision, additional requirements may be placed on this project. nc~ Fi interoffice M E M O R A N D U M to: Central Point Planning Commission from: George Rubaloff, Planning Administrator subject: Proposed Zoning Amendment - Padlot Development date: July 28, 1995 eneral The Whittle Construction Company has requested that the City amend its zoning regulations to allow padlot development. Padlots can take several different forms, but the basic concept goes like this: Picture a residential or commercial lot. Now visualize a structure upon that lot which is separated into two dwelling or office units by a common wall. Imagine dividing that parent lot into three lots: The ground beneath Unit A is one lot; The ground beneath Unit B is another lot; and the remaining property is a third lot which is commonly owned by the owners of Lot A and Lot B. Those property owners would also be obligated under a Homeowners Association Agreement established to manage Lot • C, the common area. Local Experience With Padlots Medford's code amendment, which was suggested by the Planning Commission and City Staff is about a year old. The city has seen a few attractive apartment projects, and has a commercial application pending. Medford has had no particular problems with padlots at this point. Ashland allows padlots under their performance standards and subject to site plan review. During site review they pay particular attention to whether the lots to be created will lock in a building design or orientation that would be less desirable. The units built in Ashland have been about 1200 square feet, and less costly than detached housing. There appears to be a market demand for this type of unit. Ashland uses its subdivision process to create padlots, and requires all improvements in the common area to be complete before signing off on the plat. Comprehensive Plan The proposal does not conflict with any plan policies, nor require any amendment of the plan. The padlot proposal is consistent with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and may even help to implement policies of the Plan such as encouraging greater distributions of housing opportunities, reducing overall housing vests and increasing land use efficiency. 23 Staff Review Department Managers from the Planning, Public Safety and Public Works Departments along with the City Attorney studied the concept of padlot development. Those study efforts are reflected in a draft ordinance which was prepared by Attorney Engle. The draft ordinance is an attachment of this report and describes a. process with which staff, Mr. Whittle and Mr. Whittle's agents are comfortable. While staff has examined various aspects of how the new padlot rule would be implemented, we also realize that, if the new rule is adopted, we may experience some minor adjustments in the overall process. Followun The proposed ordinance will be scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council. The Planning Commission's recommendation in this matter would be entered into the record of that hearing. Attachments • Draft Ordinance Amending Title 17 Establishing Padlot Development • Proposed Resolution of Intent to Amend Title 17 24 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING PADLOT DEVELOPMENTS AS A PERMITTED USE IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. There is hereby added to the Central Point Municipal Code a new section, 17.08.336, to read as follows: 17.08.336 Padlot. "Padlot" means a smaller-than-standard- sized lot, created within a Padlot Development, and subject to the requirements of Section 17.60.210 of this title. Section 2. There is hereby added to the Central Point Municipal Code a new section, 17.08.337, to read as follows: 17.08.337 Padlot Development. "Padlot Development" means the subdivision of a standard-sized parent lot into smaller-than- standard-sized padlots, together with a common area, as defined and regulated in this title. Section 3. There is hereby added to the Central Point Municipal Code a new section, 17.60.210, to read as follows: 17.60.210 Padlot Developments. Padlot developments shall be a permitted use in all zoning districts in the City, subject to the following: A. Padlot Development applications shall be presented to the City, and processed by the City, in the same manner as a partition or subdivision application: first, in the form of a tentative plan, and then in the form of a final plat. All provisions of Title 16 that apply to subdivisions and partitions shall also apply to Padlot Developments; provided that, the lot size provisions of Title 16 shall apply only to the parent lot and not to the padlot. B. The parent parcel, from which the padlots and common area are to be created, shall conform to the standard requirements for lots in the particular zone in which the parent parcel is located, including, but not limited to, requirements pertaining to lot area, lot width, lot depth, lot coverage, yard and setback requirements, height of buildings, density restrictions, parking requirements, and distances between buildings. C. The padlots within the parent parcel are exempt from the lot area, width and depth, yard and setback, and lot coverage requirements to which the parent lot is subject. 1 - ORDINANCE NO. (070795) °~ 25 -~ D. Structures on padlots must meet all applicable State of Oregon building code requirements, as well as all other applicable city, state and federal regulations. '~ E. No final plat for the creation of a padlot development shall be approved unless and until the developer has also previously submitted, received City approval for, and recorded the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions applicable to the common area, providing for the continual management and maintenance of the common area and any improvements thereon. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of , 1995. Mayor Rusty McGrath ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this day of 1995. -' Mayor Rusty McGrath 2 - ORDINANCE NO. (070795) ~' 2 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION DECLARING AN INTENT TO INITIATE AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING TEXT OF THE CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW THE CREATION OF PADLOT DEVELOPMENTS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, that an amendment to the zoning text the Central Point Municipal Code shall be, and hereby is, initiated by the Planning Commission, for the purpose of establishing Padlot Developments as a permitted use in all districts in the City. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this day of , 1995. ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this OF of zoning Planning Commission Chairman Planning Commission Chairman day of , 1995. RESOLUTION NO. (063095) 2'7