HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/22/24 CC Agenda Packet
CITY OF CENTRAL
POINT
Oregon
City Council Meeting Agenda
Thursday, February 22, 2024
Mayor
Hank Williams
Ward I
Neil Olsen
Ward II
Kelley Johnson
Ward III
Melody Thueson
Ward IV
Taneea Browning
At Large
Rob Hernandez
At Large
Michael Parsons
At Large
Michael Parsons
I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public comment is for non-agenda items. If you are here to make comments on a specific agenda item, you must speak at
that time. Please limit your remarks to 3 minutes per individual, 5 minutes per group, with a maximum of 20 minutes per
meeting being allotted for public comments. The council may ask questions but may take no action during the public
comment section of the meeting, except to direct staff to prepare a report or place an item on a future agenda. Complaints against specific City employees should be resolved through the City’s Personnel Complaint procedure. The
right to address the Council does not exempt the speaker from any potential liability for defamation.
V. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of February 8, 2024 City Council Minutes
B. OLCC Application - West Wind Market Inc. (Central Market)
VI. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA
VII. PUBLIC HEARING
Public comments will be allowed on items under this part of the agenda following a brief staff report presenting the item
and action requested. The presiding officer may limit testimony.
A. Central Point Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan 2024 Update (Gindlesperger)
B. Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File No. CPA-23001 (Powers)
C. Minor Zone Map Amendment File No. ZC-23001 (Powers)
VIII. ORDINANCES, AND RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution Accepting the Lowest Responsible Bid from _____ for the Pfaff Park
Electrical Project and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract
(Samitore)
IX. BUSINESS
A. Central Point Little League Complex Recommendation (Samitore)
B. Discussion Arts Commission Membership (Dreyer)
C. Taser Replacement (Logue)
X. MAYOR'S REPORT
XI. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
XII. COUNCIL REPORTS
XIII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
XIV. EXECUTIVE SESSION ORS 192.660(2)(e) conduct deliberations with persons
designated by the governing body to negotiate real property transactions
The City Council will adjourn to executive session under the provisions of ORS 192.660. Under the provisions of the
Oregon Public Meetings Law, the proceedings of an executive session are not for publication or broadcast.
XV. ADJOURNMENT
Individuals needing special accommodations such as sign language, foreign language interpreters or equipment for the
hearing impaired must request such services at least 72 hours prior to the City Council meeting. To make your request,
please contact the City Recorder at 541-423-1015 (voice), or by e-mail to
Rachel.neuenschwander@centralpointoregon.gov.
Si necesita traductor en español o servicios de discapacidades (ADA) para asistir a una junta publica de la ciudad por
favor llame con 72 horas de anticipación al 541-664-3321 ext. 201
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Oregon
City Council Meeting Minutes
Thursday, February 8, 2024
I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Mayor Hank Williams
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Hank Williams Mayor Present
Neil Olsen Ward I Present
Kelley Johnson Ward II Remote
Melody Thueson Ward III Remote
Taneea Browning Ward IV Present
Rob Hernandez At Large Remote
Michael Parsons At Large Present
Staff present: City Manager Chris Clayton; City Attorney Dan O'Connor; Parks and
Public Works Director Matt Samitore; Police Chief Scott Logue; Planner III Justin
Gindlesperger; Parks and Public Works Supervisor Doug Norman; Recreation Manager
Nikki Petersen, and City Recorder Rachel Neuenschwander
IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
V. CONSENT AGENDA
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Taneea Browning, Ward IV
SECONDER: Michael Parsons, At Large
AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons
A. Approval of January 25, 2024 City Council Minutes
VI. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA
VII. ORDINANCES, AND RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution Accepting the Lowest Responsible Bid from _____ for the Cedar to
Bush to Railroad Tracks Water Improvement Project and Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute a Contract
Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore presented the Bid for the Cedar to
Bush St waterline project. The bid came in way over budget and had a couple of
errors in the process, and the bids were rejected. The project will be rescaled to a
smaller one and brought back in a future meeting.
5.A
Packet Pg. 3
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
F
e
b
8
,
2
0
2
4
7
:
0
0
P
M
(
C
O
N
S
E
N
T
A
G
E
N
D
A
)
City of Central Point
City Council Minutes
February 8, 2024
Page 2
RESULT: WITHDRAWN
B. A Resolution authorizing the City of Central Point to apply for a Local
Government Grant from the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department for
purchase and installation of an accessible play structure designed for 2 – 5
year olds at Robert Pfaff Park and delegating authority to the City Manager to
sign the application
Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore presented a resolution authorizing
the City to apply for an Oregon Parks and Recreation Department grant to replace
the toddler play structure at Robert Pfaff Park.
The total cost for the play structure is $205,973.25; the grant requires a 40% match
from the City. The grant application will be submitted in April, with the awards
announced in Fall 2024. If funded, the project would be included in the 2025-2027
biennial budget. The project would begin in Fall 2025 by removing the existing play
structure. The new structure would be in place by December 2025, precluding any
unexpected delays.
Mike Parsons moved to approve Resolution No. 1776, a Resolution authorizing
the City of Central Point to apply for a Local Government Grant from the
Oregon Parks and Recreation Department for the purchase and installation of
an accessible play structure designed for 2-5-year-old at Robert Pfaff Park and
delegating authority to the City Manager to sign the application.
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Michael Parsons, At Large
SECONDER: Neil Olsen, Ward I
AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez,
Parsons
VIII. BUSINESS
A. Central Point Little League Complex Project Update
Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore presented an update on the Central
Point Little League Complex project to the Council.
The City needs to decide how to proceed with the project; multiple options were
presented.
Option 1 is rehabilitating the existing complex using a combination of contractor and
city forces. Construction would still re-orient the site to the designed configuration,
but the site would not be viable for year-round play. The estimated cost for this
option is 2.1 million. Construction would start this summer and into late fall. All fields
would be redone for this cost, but the parking lot and lights are not included in this
option.
Option 2 is proceeding with the existing design and would be done over two years
and two phases, the first phase being one new field, utilities, entrance, and new
concessions and restrooms. Estimated at 2 million, and the possibility for one non-
turf field. Phase two would be two turf fields estimated at 2.5-3 million; this still leaves
the parking lot, lights, large field, and smaller t-ball field unfunded.
5.A
Packet Pg. 4
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
F
e
b
8
,
2
0
2
4
7
:
0
0
P
M
(
C
O
N
S
E
N
T
A
G
E
N
D
A
)
City of Central Point
City Council Minutes
February 8, 2024
Page 3
Option 3 delays the construction until 2025, allowing the City to actively fundraise
and create a complete financial package to present to the Council. Based on current
information, staff estimates the City could have around 5 million dollars. This would
still leave the parking lot, lights, large field, and smaller field unfunded.
Option 4 asks taxpayers for a $6 million-dollar bond, coupled with existing dollars,
which would be an $8-million-dollar project. This option would include all fields and
lighting. However, this option would require the community to support the bond.
Council had concerns over the communication with the Moore's input on this project
as they are a large contributor. They also questioned if the City approached the
School District for support and other larger businesses.
The staff did not get a chance to talk to the Moore's before this meeting, and a
decision needs to be made on which option the Council wants staff to move forward
with before they can reach out to other contributors.
The Council responded they liked Option 2 with a new field with new infrastructure;
once this phase is complete, the City could reach out to other possible contributors.
They also agreed with Option 1, giving the community three fields to start and
completing the project later.
Central Point Little League representatives spoke to the Council; they prefer to play
on the natural fields and like the hybrid model.
Staff will meet and get more input from the Central Point Little League and the
Moores and bring back more information.
City Attorney Dan O'Connor addressed the Council regarding the land use approval
process in Jackson County. It takes a lot of work, and it is recommended to start the
process soon to stay on target with the timing of completing the project.
B. Planning Commission Report
Planner III Justin Gindlesperger presented the Planning Commission report from the
February 6, 2024, meeting to the Council. Three items were on the agenda,
including discussing and considering the City's Hazard Mitigation Plan and two
quasi-judicial public hearings for a Minor Comprehensive Plan Map and Minor
Zoning Map Amendment to support housing production.
C. Environmental Management Element Update
Planner III Justin Gindlesperger presented the Environmental Management Element
Update to the Council. On October 26, 2023, the City Council considered the draft
Environmental Management Element relative to how the City will comply with
Statewide Planning Goal 5 concerning preserving significant wetland and riparian
corridor resources.
A detailed assessment of the potential impacts of the policy options on properties
and structures in the City with a focus on the areas impacted the most was
presented.
5.A
Packet Pg. 5
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
F
e
b
8
,
2
0
2
4
7
:
0
0
P
M
(
C
O
N
S
E
N
T
A
G
E
N
D
A
)
City of Central Point
City Council Minutes
February 8, 2024
Page 4
Council was concerned regarding what, if any, the impact would be on flood
insurance for residents in these areas. Staff responded that this would not impact
flood insurance.
The Council has directed staff to move forward with the Safe Harbor approach as it
would have the least effect on the number of properties in the City.
D. Emergency Communication of Southern Oregon (ECSO 911) Legislative Fund
Request
City Manager Chris Clayton presented the Emergency Communications of Southern
Oregon (ECSO 911) Legislative Fund Request to the Council. In 2014, ECSO 911
began a study and preliminary work on upgrading the outdated public safety radio
infrastructure to modernize the system and provide more robust coverage in our
geographically diverse region. After conducting the study and consultation with a
national radio consulting firm, ECSO 911 approached Jackson County voters with a
$28,000,000 measure in 2019 to approve general obligation bonds to improve the
public safety radio system. The measure passed with 58% voter approval.
Bonds were issued by Jackson County in 2020, and the project moved forward. As a
result of inflation, unexpected circumstances, and expenses beyond the control of
ECSO 911, the cost of completing the project has increased. ECSO 911's
conservative budget shortfall estimate is approximately $4.6 million.
The timeline is critical. Bond proceeds must be spent by March 2026. For the system
to go live, construction must be completed in 2024, and the new system must be up
and running simultaneously with the current one for approximately six months.
Services will then shift to the new system, which must be operated for a few months
before system acceptance. The final release of bond funds hinges upon final system
acceptance—clearly, every month counts.
The council agreed to the City signing the legislative funding request letter for the
Capital Construction Request - Emergency Communications of Southern Oregon
(ECSO 911).
IX. MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Hank Williams reported that:
• He attended the SOREDI Newly Elected Officials Event.
• He attended the Central Point Employee Award Breakfast at Twin Creeks.
X. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Chris Clayton reported that:
• The employee breakfast went well. The employee of the year was Nichole Petty in the
Finance Department, and the Manager of the Year was Police Lieutenant Brian Day.
• The lobbyists that are working for the City spoke with them regarding two infrastructure
projects that support housing that they are lobbying for on the City's behalf.
5.A
Packet Pg. 6
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
F
e
b
8
,
2
0
2
4
7
:
0
0
P
M
(
C
O
N
S
E
N
T
A
G
E
N
D
A
)
City of Central Point
City Council Minutes
February 8, 2024
Page 5
• He and Matt will meet with the Jackson County Library District regarding a potential
space lease at the community center. This would be in addition to the current library
location.
• He and Matt attended The Medford Water Commission meeting; they approved the
temporary irrigation meter on the greenway for watering the new plants in the riparian
area. They will be going out to bid for a new office facility on Industry Way. During their
study session, they talked about the water conservation program they have in place.
XI. COUNCIL REPORTS
Council Member Mike Parsons reported that he attended the Central Point Employee
Award breakfast.
Council Member Taneea Browning reported that:
• She attended a confirmation hearing in front of State Senate Rules Committee for
appointment to state sustainability board so that the voice of Southern Oregon is at the
table.
• She met with Rep Goodwin while in Salem.
• She attended the all city breakfast on Wednesday.
• She attended the Homeless Summit.
• She attended the Bear Creek Master Plan Ad Hoc committee meeting.
Council Member Neil Olsen reported that:
• He attended the Bear Creek Master Plan meeting.
• He attended the Planning Commission meeting.
Council Member Melody Thueson reported that she attended the School Board Meeting
and they are almost complete with all construction.
Council Member Rob Hernandez reported that he attended the SOREDI Elected
Officials Event.
XII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Police Chief Scott Logue reported that:
• He attended the awards breakfast.
• The newest hire just started with the Police Academy on January 29th.
Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore reported that:
5.A
Packet Pg. 7
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
F
e
b
8
,
2
0
2
4
7
:
0
0
P
M
(
C
O
N
S
E
N
T
A
G
E
N
D
A
)
City of Central Point
City Council Minutes
February 8, 2024
Page 6
• He sent revised drawings to Chris on the Community Center, Chris will send those out
tomorrow in his report.
• All permitting has been completed for the culvert replacement on Elk Creek.
Planner III Justin Gindlesperger reported that:
• The Planning Department is starting to see some interest on the East Side of town.
Sunnybrook Village - a 42 lot subdivision on approx. 7 acres along Hamrick, just north of
Mon Desir property. Going to PC in March. Interest in Gebhard Village property - located
just north of the Willow Bend (formerly White Hawk) subdivision
• A potential brewery along S. Front Street is nearing submittal for site plan review.
• Pheasant Creek Phase II located along Hanley Road at the intersection of Diego Court.
An 8 lot, infill, subdivision that will connect w/ Pheasant Creek Phase 1. No formal
application but nearing submittal.
XIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
Taneea Browning moved to adjourn. All said aye and the meeting was adjourned
at 8:38 PM
The foregoing minutes of the February 8, 2024, Council meeting were approved by the City
Council at its meeting of _________________, 2024.
Dated: _________________________
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Recorder
5.A
Packet Pg. 8
Mi
n
u
t
e
s
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
:
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
o
f
F
e
b
8
,
2
0
2
4
7
:
0
0
P
M
(
C
O
N
S
E
N
T
A
G
E
N
D
A
)
City of Central Point
Staff Report to Council
ISSUE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
DEPARTMENT:
Administration
FROM: Chris Clayton, City Manager
MEETING DATE: February 22, 2024
SUBJECT: OLCC Application - West Wind Market Inc. (Central Market)
ACTION REQUIRED:
Consent Agenda Item
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
The City has received an application for change of ownership for Central Market (West Wind
Market Inc.) located at 750 Hopkins Rd.
ORS requires new and change of ownership for OLCC applications to be approved by the City
Council. The Police Department has run their background check and found no information
pertinent to the request.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. OLCC Transfer Central Market to West Wind Market Inc.
5.B
Packet Pg. 9
LTQUOR LTCENSE APPLTCATTON
Page 2 of 4
APPTICANT INFORMATION
ldentify the applicants applying for the license. This is the entity (example: corporation or LLC)
or individual(s) applying for the license. Please add an additional page if more space is needed.
Name of entity or individual applicant #1:
h).sl LrJ,..A A^r\Aa€i l^c.
Name of entity or individual applicant #2
Name of entity or individual applicant f3:Name of entity or individual applicant #4:
PfemiSeS Stfeet addreSS (The physical location of the business and where the liquor license will be posted):
Business mailing address (where we will send any items
City:
ln
State
oR
Business phone number:
?50
Po ?L\3\
,MncllcL
Zip Code:
al6oa
County:
l"cKson
Zip Code:
q?503
BUSINESS INFORMATION
Trade Name of the Business (name customers will see)
usiness email:
Ct)crt arr,.J4lrqilc{s @ 1p-'.\ . Co*
by mailas described in oARt45-004-0065t11.):
L)e
Qo,n*
ress currently have an OLCC
liquor license?EYes Eruo
City
Does the business a
LJvr'.|c- c'.\
Does the business address currently have an OLCC
marijuana license? EYes Efuo
IICATION CONTACT INFORMATON - Provide the point of contact for this application. lf this individual is not
applicant or licensee, the Authorized Representative Form must be completed and submitted with this application.
a4
Email:
6o8 - za"- b?e>
-J.
r:
tlq.\
P one num
Application Contact Name:
Please note: liquor license applications are public records OLCC Liquor License Application (Rev. 10.25.23)
5.B.a
Packet Pg. 10
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
L
C
C
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
t
o
W
e
s
t
W
i
n
d
M
a
r
k
e
t
I
n
c
.
(
1
8
0
8
:
O
L
C
C
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
W
e
s
t
W
i
n
d
M
a
r
k
e
t
I
n
c
.
(
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
)
)
LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION
Page 4 of 4
Applicant Signature(s): Each individual listed in the applicant information box on page 2 (entity or
individuals applying for the license) must sign the application.
lf an applicant listed in the applicant information box on page 2 is an entity (such as a corporation or
limited liability company), at least one member or officer of the entity must sign the application.
o Each applicant listed in the "Application lnformation" section of this form has read and understands
OAR 845-006-0362 and attests that:
1-. Upon licensure, each licensee is responsible for the conduct of others on the licensed premises,
including in outdoor areas.
2. The licensed premises will be controlled to promote public safety and prevent problems and
violations, with particular emphasis on preventing minors from obtaining or consuming alcoholic
beverages, preventing over-service of alcoholic beverages, preventing open containers of alcoholic
beverages from leaving the licensed premises unless allowed by OLCC rules, and preventing noisy,
disorderly, and unlawful activity on the licensed premises.
I attest that all answers on allforms and documents, and all information provided to the OLCC as a part
of this application, are true and complete.
U:e/a/aoaq
Applicant name Signatu re Date
Applicant name Signature Date
Applilcant name Signature Date
Applicant name Signature Date
Applicant/Licensee Representative(s): lf you would like to designate a person/entity to act on your
behalf you must complete the Authorized Representative Form. You may submit the form with the
application or anytime thereafter. The form must be received by the OLCC before the representative
can receive or submit information for the applicant.
Pleqse note that applicantsflicensees are responsible lor all information provided,
even if on authorized representqtive submits additional lorms on beholf of the opplicant.
OLCC Liquor License Application (Rev. 10.25.23)
5.B.a
Packet Pg. 11
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
L
C
C
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
t
o
W
e
s
t
W
i
n
d
M
a
r
k
e
t
I
n
c
.
(
1
8
0
8
:
O
L
C
C
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
W
e
s
t
W
i
n
d
M
a
r
k
e
t
I
n
c
.
(
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
)
)
OREGON LIQUOR & CANNABIS COMMISSION
BUSINESS INFORMATION
Please Print or Type
Applicant Name Phone 6oA-ssq-sqEa
Trade Name (dba)L^J,\h a(K-€I rl.-l
Business Location Address: 45O l.lockte,s eJ
City:Cc,.{r-l Oo.nt ZIP Code qq509-
Business Hours OutdoorArea Hours
Sunday
Monday 6ap
I 6a-
1s lO e,^to to g.rt
-
lo to on
-
to uo ?,a
to to ?'^
to to oF
/lw
The outdoor area is used for:
tr Food service Hours: /'lk"
tr Alcohol service ,our",
-,o
-
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday to
toFriday
to
to
to
to
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday G o-Friday G a,p
tr Enclosed, how
The exterior area is adequately viewed and/or
supervised by Service Permittees.
(lnvestigator's lnitials)Saturday b ^* to lola Saturday _ to
Seasonal Variations: tr Yes El No lf yes, explain
tr
tr
tr
tr
trtr
rovalfrom the OLCGa
/uOne-
Live Music E xaraot<e
Recorded Music E Coin-op"rated Games
DJ Music E ViO"o Lottery Machines
Dancing E ruuo" Dancing E sociat Gaming
Live Entertainment E PootTables
Minor Entertainers E Otf,"r,
*Minor Entertainers in an area prohibited to minors need prior
outdoor: ,6 nunge, .6
other (expra iil id-
NlfrSunday _ toMonday _ to
Tuesday _ to
Wednesday _toThursday _ to
Friday
Saturday
to-
to
Restaurant: A
Banquet: T TotalSeating
SEATING COUNT
Check ALL that apply:ENTERTAINMENT DAYS & HOURS OF LIVE OR DJ MUSIC
OLCC USE ONLY
lnvestigator Verified Seating:_(Y) _(N)
lnvestigator lnifialc
I understand if my answers are not lete, the OLCC may deny my license application.
Applicant Signature:
and
wtr il.oregon.gov/olcc
Date:
Rev: 2.1.23
5.B.a
Packet Pg. 12
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
L
C
C
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
t
o
W
e
s
t
W
i
n
d
M
a
r
k
e
t
I
n
c
.
(
1
8
0
8
:
O
L
C
C
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
W
e
s
t
W
i
n
d
M
a
r
k
e
t
I
n
c
.
(
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
)
)
f"-- =r!r4. ,>t. c
1-a';;;'t-t'
CENTRAL
LI
POINT
155 South Second Street o Central Point, OR 97502 Scott Logue
Ph: (541) 664-5578 o Fax: (541)664-2705 o www.centralpointoregon.gov Chief
Date: 02112124
From: Chief Scott Logue
To: Honorable Mayor Williams
Subject: Request for OLCC License
RE: West Wind Markets Inc., Persons associated therewith: Lily Ann Johnson, Austin
Johnson.
Files of the Central Point Police Department contain no information pertinent to the
request.
Respectfully
Scott Logue
Central Point Police Department
'?u/,itoA/ fr S"rrbu, Connr'tto/ ft f*"//"oou "
5.B.a
Packet Pg. 13
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
L
C
C
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
t
o
W
e
s
t
W
i
n
d
M
a
r
k
e
t
I
n
c
.
(
1
8
0
8
:
O
L
C
C
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
W
e
s
t
W
i
n
d
M
a
r
k
e
t
I
n
c
.
(
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
)
)
City of Central Point
Staff Report to Council
ISSUE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
DEPARTMENT:
Community Development
FROM: Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner III
MEETING DATE: February 22, 2024
SUBJECT: Central Point Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan 2024 Update
ACTION REQUIRED:
Motion
Public Hearing
Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
Background
Central Point is participating in a county-wide hazard mitigation planning effort, led by Jackson
County and the Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience (OPDR), in order to update hazard
mitigation plans throughout Jackson County. The 2024 Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan updates
the City’s plan from 2020 and keeps the City on a consistent hazard planning schedule with
other communities in the Rogue Valley. The regional partnership provided an opportunity to
combine resources and include additional stakeholders for all communities involved, keeping
stakeholders informed and engaged in mitigation planning and implementation efforts.
The Central Point NHMP is a ‘city addendum’ to the Jackson County Plan, and is therefore
similar in form and function, creating a consistent model of hazard planning and mitigation
throughout the valley. The Central Point ‘city addendum’ uses the mission statement and goals
defined in the overall plan, but includes City specific mitigation action items. The update also
provides a list of mitigation successes since the previous plan was adopted, updated
management plans used to develop mitigation action items, and updated City profile and
community characteristics.
By keeping the NHMP current, the City of Central Point is eligible to receive non-emergency
related disaster funding sources through FEMA. Access to these resources can be critical in
leveraging limited resources to help protect people and property in Central Point. Additionally
NHMP planning implementation helps the City keep flood insurance premiums lower
community-wide through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating
System (CRS).
The NHMP will be incorporated into the Environmental Management Element in order to satisfy
requirements from Statewide Planning Goal 7 (Areas Subject to Natural Hazards). Although the
NHMP is not a policy document, it is reviewed and adopted through the Legislative Process.
The Citizen’s Advisory Committee (CAC) and Planning Commission reviewed the NHMP and
provided favorable recommendations to the Council.
At the February 22 meeting, staff will present the findings of the final draft to the NHMP.
7.A
Packet Pg. 14
Attached is a copy of the Central Point ‘City Addendum’ Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan, which
includes an introduction to natural hazard risks, risk assessments and the hazard profile for
Central Point. A webpage provides updates on the Hazard Mitigation Plan process and includes
the County-wide plan along with City and special district addendums
(www.centralpointoregon.gov/floodplain/page/hazard-mitigation-plan)
Issues
The primary issue in considering the Hazard Mitigation Plan is to identify local policies and
actions that can be implemented to reduce risk and future losses from hazards. The City of
Central Point is subject to a wide array of natural hazards. Although the occurrence and severity
of hazards has been historically limited, the City has experienced winter storms, floods and an
increasing incidence of wildfires. Hazard mitigation planning is important to understand the
characteristics of potential hazards, risks to people, buildings, infrastructure and property and
what actions can be taken to lessen exposure to the identified risks before a disaster events
occurs.
Attachments
Attachment “A” - City of Central Point Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Attachment “B” - Resolution No. ___
Action
Open a public hearing and consider the proposed Hazard Mitigation Plan and 1) approve; 2)
approve with revisions; or 3) deny the application.
Recommendation
Approve Resolution No. ___, a Resolution adopting the 2024 City of Central Point Addendum to
the Jackson County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Recommended Motion
I move to approve Resolution No.___, a Resolution by the City Council of Central Point adopting
the 2024 City of Central Point Addendum to the Jackson County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural
Hazard Mitigation Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Central Point Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
2. Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan_Resolution
7.A
Packet Pg. 15
Prepared for
City of Central Point
206 N 5th Street
Central Point, OR 97530
Prepared by
The University of Oregon
Institute for Policy Research & Engagement
School of Planning, Public Policy, and Management
Effective February XX, 2024 through February XX, 2029
City of Central Point Addendum
to the Jackson County NHMP
Photos courtesy of Oregon State Archives and the City of Central Point
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 16
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 1
Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................ 1
NHMP Process, Participation, and Adoption ........................................................................................................ 1
NHMP IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE ................................................................................................................... 3
Implementation through Existing Programs ........................................................................................................ 4 Existing Authorities ........................................................................................................................................................... 5
Personnel .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Capital Projects ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Capital Resources .............................................................................................................................................................. 9
Findings ........................................................................................................................................................................... 10 MITIGATION STRATEGY ................................................................................................................................................. 10
Mitigation Successes .......................................................................................................................................... 10
Actions Items ...................................................................................................................................................... 11
RISK ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................................................................ 18
Hazard Analysis .................................................................................................................................................. 19
Community Characteristics ................................................................................................................................ 19
Economy ......................................................................................................................................................................... 22
Community Assets .............................................................................................................................................. 24
Critical Facilities .............................................................................................................................................................. 26
Essential Facilities ........................................................................................................................................................... 26
Hazard Profiles ................................................................................................................................................... 27
Air Quality ....................................................................................................................................................................... 27
Drought ........................................................................................................................................................................... 27
Earthquake (Cascadia)..................................................................................................................................................... 28
Earthquake (Crustal) ....................................................................................................................................................... 31
Emerging Infectious Disease ........................................................................................................................................... 34
Flood ............................................................................................................................................................................... 34
Landslide ......................................................................................................................................................................... 40
Severe Weather .............................................................................................................................................................. 43
Extreme Heat Event ........................................................................................................................................................ 43
Windstorm ...................................................................................................................................................................... 44
Winter Storm (Snow/Ice) ................................................................................................................................................ 45
Volcanic Event ................................................................................................................................................................. 46
Wildfire ........................................................................................................................................................................... 46
APPENDIX A: PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 50
Website Posting ................................................................................................................................................. 51
Central Point Steering Committee ...................................................................................................................... 52
ATTACHMENT B: ACTION ITEM CHANGES ........................................................................................................... 56
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 17
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
List of Tables
TABLE CA-1 ACTION ITEMS ........................................................................................................................................... 12
TABLE CA-2 HAZARD ANALYSIS MATRIX .......................................................................................................................... 19
TABLE CA-3 COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS ..................................................................................................................... 23
TABLE CA-4 COMMUNITY LIFELINES ................................................................................................................................ 25
TABLE CA-5 RAPID VISUAL SURVEY SCORES ...................................................................................................................... 31
TABLE CA-6 CENTRAL POINT REPETITIVE LOSS PROPERTIES................................................................................................... 39
TABLE CA-7 STATUS OF ALL HAZARD MITIGATION ACTIONS IN THE PREVIOUS PLAN ................................................................. 56
List of Figures
FIGURE CA-1 UNDERSTANDING RISK ............................................................................................................................... 18
FIGURE CA-2 CENTRAL POINT LAND USE MAP (2022) ...................................................................................................... 21
FIGURE CA-3 COMMUNITY LIFELINES AND HISTORIC STRUCTURES ........................................................................................ 24
FIGURE CA-4 CASCADIA SUBDUCTION ZONE PERCEIVED SHAKING (COMMUNITY LIFELINES)....................................................... 29
FIGURE CA-5 CASCADIA SUBDUCTION ZONE PERCEIVED SHAKING (HISTORIC STRUCTURES) ....................................................... 30
FIGURE CA-6 LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY (COMMUNITY LIFELINES) .................................................................................. 32
FIGURE CA-7 LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY (HISTORIC STRUCTURES). .................................................................................. 33
FIGURE CA-8 FEMA FLOOD ZONES (COMMUNITY LIFELINES) .............................................................................................. 35
FIGURE CA-9 FEMA FLOOD ZONES (HISTORIC STRUCTURES) .............................................................................................. 36
FIGURE CA-10 EMIGRANT DAM INUNDATION ZONE .......................................................................................................... 37
FIGURE CA-11 CENTRAL POINT REPETITIVE LOSS PROPERTIES. .............................................................................................. 40
FIGURE CA-12 LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY EXPOSURE (COMMUNITY LIFELINES) ....................................................................... 41
FIGURE CA-13 LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY EXPOSURE (HISTORIC STRUCTURES) . ..................................................................... 42
FIGURE CA-14 BURN PROBABILITY (COMMUNITY LIFELINES) . ............................................................................................. 47
FIGURE CA-15 BURN PROBABILITY (HISTORIC STRUCTURES) ................................................................................................ 48
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 18
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-1
Introduction
Purpose
This is an update to the Central Point addendum to the Jackson County Multi-Jurisdictional
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (MNHMP, NHMP). This addendum supplements information
contained in Volume I (Basic Plan), which serves as the NHMP foundation, and Volume II
(Appendices), which provide additional information. This addendum meets the following
requirements:
• Multi-Jurisdictional Plan Adoption §201.6(c)(5),
• Multi-Jurisdictional Participation §201.6(a)(3),
• Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Strategy §201.6(c)(3)(iv) and
• Multi-Jurisdictional Risk Assessment §201.6(c)(2)(iii).
Updates to Central Point’s addendum are further discussed throughout the NHMP and within
Volume II, Appendix B, which provides an overview of alterations to the document that took
place during the update process.
Central Point adopted their addendum to the Jackson County Multi-jurisdictional NHMP on
[date], 2024. FEMA Region X approved the Jackson County NHMP on [date], 2024 and the City’s
addendum on [date], 2024. With approval of this NHMP, the City is now eligible for non-disaster
and disaster mitigation project grants through [date-1], 2029.
NHMP Process, Participation, and Adoption
This section of the NHMP addendum addresses 44 CFR 201.6(c)(5), Plan Adoption and 44 CFR
201.6(a)(3), Participation.
In addition to establishing a comprehensive, city-level mitigation strategy, the Disaster Mitigation
Act of 2000 (DMA2K) and the regulations contained in Title 44 CFR Part 201 require that
jurisdictions maintain an approved NHMP to receive federal funds for mitigation projects. Local
adoption and federal approval of this NHMP ensures that the city will remain eligible for non-
disaster and disaster mitigation project grants. Central Point adopted a stand-alone Natural
Hazards Mitigation Plan (2020) in January, 2021, but will now be included as an addendum to the
2024 Jackson County NHMP.
The Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience (OPDR) at the University of Oregon’s Institute for
Policy Research and Engagement (IPRE) partnered with the Oregon Department of Emergency
Management (OEM), Jackson County, and Central Point to update and incorporate Central
Point’s NHMP as an addendum to the County’s NHMP. This project is funded through the Federal
Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Competitive Grant Program.
Members of the Central Point NHMP steering committee also participated in the County NHMP
update process (Volume II, Appendix B).
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 19
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-2
By creating a NHMP, locally adopting it, and having it approved by FEMA, Central Point will
maintain eligibility for FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant program funds.
The Jackson County NHMP and Central Point addendum are the result of a collaborative effort
between residents, public agencies, non-profit organizations, the private sector, and regional
organizations. A project steering committee guided the process of developing the NHMP.
Convener and Committee
The Central Point Community Planner/Floodplain Administrator served as the designated
convener of the NHMP update and will take the lead in implementing, maintaining, and updating
the addendum to the Jackson County NHMP in collaboration with the designated convener of
the Jackson County NHMP (Emergency Manager).
Representatives from the City of Central Point steering committee met formally three times and
informally, to discuss updates to their addendum (Attachment A). The steering committee
reviewed and revised the City’s NHMP, with particular focus on the risk assessment and
mitigation strategy (action items). (See Appendix A for full public engagement plan.)
This addendum reflects decisions made at the designated meetings and during subsequent work
and communication with Jackson County Emergency Management and the OPDR.
The Central Point Steering Committee was comprised of the following representatives:
• Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner III/Floodplain Administrator, City of Central
Point
• Derek Zwagerman, Building Official, City of Central Point
• Mark Northrop, Deputy Fire Marshall, Jackson County Fire District No. 3
• Desiree Badizadegan, Police Office Manager, City of Central Point
• Dave Jacob, Parks Planner, City of Central Point
• Matt Samitore, Parks & Public Works Director, City of Central Point
• Derek Zwagerman, Building Official, City of Central Point
• Taneea Browning, City Council, Small Business Owner
• Larry Martin, Environmental Element Steering Committee
• Kora Mousseaux, Jackson County Soil & Water Conservation District
• Ryan Haynes, Housing Authority of Jackson County
Central Point Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Steering Committee included representatives from
City departments associated with preventive measures (Building Official), property protection
(Floodplain Manager), natural resource protection (Parks & Recreation Director, Environmental
Services), emergency services (Police Department and Fire District #3), structural flood control
(Public Works Director), and public information (City Council). The Central Point Steering
Committee also sent two representatives to the Jackson County NHMP Steering Committee
(Planner/Floodplain Manager and Fire District #3).
Steering committee members possessed familiarity with Central Point’s community and how it is
affected by natural hazard events. The steering committee was closely involved throughout the
development of the NHMP and served as the local oversight body for the NHMP’s development.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 20
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-3
The steering committee guided the Central Point update process through several steps including
hazard assessment, problem identification, goal confirmation and prioritization, action item
review and development, and information sharing, to update the NHMP and to make the NHMP
as comprehensive as possible.
Based on their involvement in hazard mitigation projects or planning, and/or their interest as a
neighboring jurisdiction, representatives from the following agencies were invited to participate
on the NHMP update. Some of these participated at Steering Committee meetings while others
reviewed drafts of the plan and provided feedback by email.
Other Government and Stakeholder Representatives:
• Avista Natural Gas
• Pacific Power and Light
• Rogue Valley Sewer Services
• Medford Water Commission
• Jackson County Housing Authority
• Jackson County Emergency Services
• Rogue Valley Soil and Water Conservation District
• Oregon Department of Transportation
• Rogue Valley Council of Governments
• US Army Corps of Engineers
• Department of Land Conservation and Development, NFIP Coordinator
• DOGAMI
Stakeholders were included in the planning process. Unlike the Steering Committee,
stakeholders for the update were not included in all stages of the planning process, but their
input was included to inform the Steering Committee and provide additional perspectives from
the community.
NHMP Implementation and Maintenance
The City Council will be responsible for adopting the Central Point addendum to the Jackson
County NHMP. This addendum designates a steering committee and a convener to oversee the
development and implementation of action items. Because the City addendum is part of the
County’s multi-jurisdictional NHMP, the City will look for opportunities to partner with the
County. The City’s steering committee will convene after re-adoption of the Central Point NHMP
addendum on an annual schedule. The County is meeting on a semi-annual basis and will provide
opportunities for the cities to report on NHMP implementation and maintenance during their
meetings. The City’s Planning Director will serve as the convener and will be responsible for
assembling the steering committee.
The steering committee will be responsible for:
• Reviewing existing action items to determine suitability of funding;
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 21
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-4
• Reviewing existing and new risk assessment data to identify issues that may not have
been identified at NHMP creation;
• Educating and training new steering committee members on the NHMP and mitigation
actions in general;
• Assisting in the development of funding proposals for priority action items;
• Discussing methods for continued public involvement;
• Evaluating effectiveness of the NHMP at achieving its purpose and goals (use Table 4-1,
Volume I, Section 4, as one tool to help measure effectiveness); and
• Documenting successes and lessons learned during the year.
The convener will also remain active in the County’s implementation and maintenance process
(Volume I, Section 4).
The steering committee will be responsible for activities outlined in Volume I, Section 4.
The City will utilize the same action item prioritization process as the County (Volume I, Section 4
and Volume II, Appendix D).
Implementation through Existing Programs
Many of the Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan’s recommendations are consistent with the goals
and objectives of the City’s existing plans and policies. Where possible, Central Point will
implement the NHMP’s recommended actions through existing plans and policies. Plans and
policies already in existence have support from residents, businesses, and policy makers. Many
land-use, comprehensive, and strategic plans get updated regularly, allowing them to adapt to
changing conditions and needs. Implementing the NHMP’s action items through such plans and
policies increases their likelihood of being supported and implemented.
Central Point’s acknowledged comprehensive plan is the City of Central Point Comprehensive
Plan (last updated in 2019). The Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission first
acknowledged this plan in 1980. The City implements the plan through the Community
Development Code.
Central Point currently has the following plans that relate to natural hazard mitigation. For a
complete list visit the City’s website:
• Comprehensive Plan
• Transportation System Plan (2008)
• Central Point Zoning Code (Title 17)
• Building Codes and Standards: Oregon Structural Specialty Code (Commercial) and
Oregon Residential Specialty Code.
• City of Central Point Stormwater Management Plan (2021)
• Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
• Central Point TMDL Implementation Plan (2020)
• Emergency Operations Plan
• Storm Drain Protection Municipal Code Chapter 8.05
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 22
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-5
• Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual
• Strategic Plan Forward, A City-Wide Strategic Plan
• City of Central Point Evacuation Zones Map
Existing Authorities
Hazard mitigation can be executed at a local scale through three (3) methods: integrating hazard
mitigation actions into other local planning documents (i.e., plan integration), adopting building
codes that account for best practices in structural hardening, and codifying land use regulations
and zoning designations that prescribe mitigation into development requirements. The extent to
which a municipality or multi-jurisdictional effort leverages these approaches is an indicator of
that community’s capabilities.
The following provides a brief synopsis of some of the more important coordinating plans and
policies of Central Point in the integration of hazard mitigation and long-range planning:
Strategic Plan Forward, A City Wide Strategic Plan
The City of Central Point maintains a strategic plan in order to “… guide future decision-making
as the community grows and changes.”1 The guiding value of Resilience from the Strategic Plan is
carried forward in the Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan by providing a foundation for the City and
its residents to prepare for, adapt and respond to changes and sudden impacts.
Central Point Comprehensive Plan
The Central Point Comprehensive Plan is the guiding policy document for land use and growth-
related planning for the City. In order to properly identify the community’s risks, the Natural
Hazard Mitigation Plan relies heavily on the Population Element, Land Use Element,
Transportation Element, and Regional Plan Element to identify the community’s changing
demographics, future population growth, and the physical direction of future growth.
Oregon’s Statewide Planning Goal 7 requires comprehensive planning within every jurisdiction
that is designed to reduce risks to people and property from natural hazards. Natural Hazards
are covered in the Environmental Management element of the Comprehensive Plan. Its aim is to
develop a clear description of existing environmental resources, history, natural hazards, and
other environmental concerns and from this description, develop a comprehensive program for
the management of the environment that is in balance with growth and development. This
section was last updated in March 1983.
In 2019, Central Point updated three elements of its Comprehensive Plan (Housing, Parks, and
Urbanization) to address an expanded urban growth boundary. Planned updates to the
jurisdiction’s Goal 7 element or its broader comprehensive plan will reflect the data and findings
within this NHMP and integrate analyses of future climate and natural hazard impacts into the
community’s long-range plans.
1 Central Point Strategic Plan 2040, September 8, 2020, Resolution No. 1639.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 23
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-6
Land Use Regulations
Existing land use policies that define zoning and address hazardous conditions provide another
source of mitigation capability. Central Point’s municipal code was last updated in July, 2023.
• Title 8 – Health and Safety, including 8.05 Storm Drain Protection and 8.24 Flood Damage
Prevention (last updated by Ordinance 2079 in 2021).
• Title 15 – Buildings and Construction, including uniform standards for public works
construction projects.
• Title 16 -- Subdivision Regulations, including requirements for sewage disposal, storm
water drainage and flood control, landslide risk assessment, and expansive soils reviews.
• Title 17 – Zoning, the purpose of which is to encourage the most appropriate use of land;
to conserve and stabilize the value of property; to facilitate fire and police protection; to
provide adequate open space for light and air; to minimize congestion of streets; to
promote orderly growth of the city; to prevent undue concentrations of population; to
facilitate adequate provision of community facilities; and in general to promote in other
ways public health, safety, convenience and general welfare. As such, it addresses
numerous hazards identified within the NHMP, including fire, earthquake, drought,
extreme heat, flooding, and winter storm resilience.
The Central Point Community Development Department is the oversight entity for all matters
related to current and long-range land use planning in the city. It is responsible for the
administration of state, county, and local land use policies and regulations as they relate to the
preservation and quality development of property lying within the city limits and urban growth
boundary (UGB). The Planning Department periodically updates development codes and long-
range plans to ensure adequate public facilities are available to serve new development,
preserve community livability, and enhance the resilience of Central Point. They work closely
with the County and neighboring jurisdictions to ensure plans are aligned.
Central Point has begun a Title 17 Zoning Code Rewrite Project, which will include multiple
phases, between 2023-2025.
Structural Building Codes
The Oregon Legislature recently adopted updated building codes for both residential (2023
Oregon Residential Specialty Code) and commercial structures (2022) since the last update of
this Plan. These building codes are based on the 2021 version of the International Building Code,
International Fire Code, and International Existing Building Code. As a result, both new
residential and commercial structures will be required to build according to the latest seismic
and wind hardening standards in addition to requiring fire resistant building materials.
The Central Point Building Division administers the 2023 edition of the Oregon Residential
Specialty Code.
Emergency Operations Plan
The City’s Emergency Operations Plan establishes guidance for how the City will respond to a
major emergency or disaster. The guidance describes the roles and responsibilities of the City
departments and personnel when an incident occurs. The emphasis of the plan is on incident
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 24
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-7
management instead of a hazard-specific response. It provides a framework for a coordinated,
City-wide response to a natural hazard event.
Storm Drainage Master Plan
The Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) establishes a capital improvement program to address
stormwater capacity and water quality issues. The SWMP identifies areas within the City that
lack capacity and may be subject to widespread flooding. Major recommendations include
replacing under-sized components, incorporating water quality designs into upgrades, and
installing retrofits on structural components.
MS4 Permit
In 2019, Central Point received a stand-alone Phase II Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System
(MS4) permit for non-point source stormwater from Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality (DEQ). The permit program has six areas of focus that are consistent with EPA's Federal
Clean Water Act: public education, public involvement, illicit discharge detection and
elimination, construction, post-construction, and municipal operations. The Stormwater
Management Program (SWMP) Document, 2019-2024, describes the storm system
improvements that will occur each year during the 5-year planning cycle to reduce the potential
for flooding.
See Mitigation Successes for examples projects that have occurred since the adoption of the
latest NHMP.
Urban Growth Boundary Amendment (2019-2022)
In 2022, Central Point expanded its urban growth boundary to include 394 acres of land in
response to identified needs for housing, employment land, and parks.
Community Wildfire Protection Plan
The Jackson County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) will be incorporated into this
Plan as a functioning annex. The NHMP will also be integrated into the City’s Capital
Improvement Plan, to be adopted by March, 2024.
National Flood Insurance Program/FEMA Flood Insurance Study
The Community Development Director is responsible for administering the day-to-day activities
of the city’s floodplain program. They are assisted by the Building Official, the Engineering
Department within Public Works, and by the City Administrator.
Specifically, the Planning Director:
• maintains and administers Central Point’s floodplain regulations;
• reviews and issues floodplain development permits;
• maintains elevation certificates for all new and substantially improved structures (and
maintains an extensive database of historic elevation certificates);
• ensures that encroachments do not occur within the regulated floodway;
• implements measures to ensure that new and substantially improved structures are
protected from flood losses;
• maintains floodplain studies and maps and makes this information available to the public;
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 25
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-8
• maintains a flood information website with digital flood insurance rate map (DFIRM)
data;
• conducts site visits to assess conditions and provide technical assistance to the public;
• maintains a library of historical flood related information;
• informs the public of flood insurance requirements; and
• conducts outreach and training about flood hazards and development within the
floodplain.
In 2021, the Central Point City Council adopted Ordinance 2079, which introduced a new version
of Chapter 8.24 Flood Hazard Prevention. This code continues to rely upon the Flood Insurance
Study (FIS) for Jackson County, Oregon and Incorporated Areas, dated May 3, 2011, with
accompanying flood insurance rate maps (FIRM) and digital flood insurance rate maps
(DFIRM). Their code section is based on the Oregon Model Flood Hazard Prevention code, which
includes provisions addressing substantial improvement/substantial damage.
Central Point participates in the NFIP’s Community Rating System (CRS) program. The CRS is a
sub-program within the NFIP created to recognize and encourage floodplain management
practices that exceed the minimum NFIP standards. Central Point has a CRS rating of “Class 6.”
Class 6 community members receive a 20 percent (20%) discount on flood insurance premiums
for homes in the SFHA.
Public Information Activities
The City publishes timely articles in the City newsletter on flood-related topics (insurance,
improvements/maintenance, flood season, etc..). Yearly mailing to owners w/in SFHA, Pre-FIRM
owners, rep loss properties, and lenders & agents on resources.
Public Works
The City of Central Point Public Works Department is responsible for streets, water, sewer,
stormwater, parks, and public facilities. Much of their work is associated with the reduction of
hazards to the community and the implementation of resilience measures.
The Public Works Department maintains all urban storm water lines, ditches, and other storm
management facilities that help control and direct stormwater in the community. This includes
administration and enforcement of the Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control standards on
all new development, as part of implementation of the NPDES MS4 Phase II General Permit. The
City has contracted with Rogue Valley Council of Governments (RVCOG) to collaborate on
activities where city monies can be joined with other jurisdictions to leverage more
opportunities in meeting stormwater management program objectives.
City Administration
The City Council of Central Point has the responsibility of developing and adopting the annual
city budget. Integrating hazard mitigation goals and projects into the annual budget is key to
implementing the plan. The City Council tries to broadly address resilience planning needs while
it determines city and departmental priorities and looks for multiple-impact projects wherever
possible. They also work with staff to apply for federal and state grant funding to pursue larger
projects that are outside of general fund capacity.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 26
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-9
Personnel
The following Central Point personnel have assignments related to natural hazard mitigation
planning and implementation:
Emergency Management: Jackson County Emergency Management
Public Information Officer: Josh Abbott & Desiree Badizadgan, Police Department
Floodplain Manager: Justin Gindlesperger, Community Development Department
Grant writing (for Public Works or emergency management): Dave Jacob, Parks & Parks
Department
Capital improvement planning: Public Works
Capital improvement execution: Public Works
Central Point does not have any employees solely designated to Emergency Management or
Mitigation. These personnel integrate hazards and resilience planning into their greater work
programs to the best of their abilities. However, there is limited capacity to expand upon their
capabilities or work loads.
Capital Projects
Central Point has implemented recommendations from the last NHMP into its capital
improvement projects over the last 5 years, including:
• Gebhard Stormwater Outfall (2022-2023) -- This project will install a new stormwater
outfall, into Bear Creek, and also install new storm drainpipe to Gebhard Road.
• Jewett Drive Stormwater and Waterline Improvements (2022-2023) -- This project
consists of creek restoration, storm drainage improvements, water distribution system
improvements, and associated modifications along North 10th Street and Jewett Drive
from the intersection of East Pine Street and North 10th Street to and within Mingus
Creek.
Capital Resources
Central Point maintains several capital resources that have important roles to play in the
implementation of the natural hazard mitigation plan, including:
• Communication towers at 1228 Plaza Blvd; 250 Peninger Rd, 1510 E. Pine Street; 411 Oak
Street; 888 Twin Creeks Crossing
• Critical facilities with power generators for use during emergency blackouts (City Hall,
Oregon State Police, Fire District #3 Stations)
• Critical facilities with fueling storage capabilities for city-owned vehicles (Public Works
Operation Center, 235 S. Haskell, Fire District #3 Stations)
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 27
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-10
Findings
Several important findings from this capability assessment informed the design of the Plan’s
mitigation strategy and aided in prioritizing action items.
Staffing Limitations and Capacity
Central Point staff are assigned hazard mitigation responsibilities as a (small) part of their larger
job responsibilities. Limited capacity reduces the breadth of the programming the community
can undertake in any year. The city relies upon its relationships with the County and other cities
within its region to expand its operations.
Reliance upon outside funding streams and local match requirements
Central Point operates on a limited budget with a small staff. This leaves few opportunities for
using local financial resources to implement hazard mitigation work. They lean heavily upon
state and federal grant funds as the primary means for securing mitigation funding. Hazard
mitigation grants such as HMGP and BRIC require 10-25% local funding match, as well as extra
staff capacity and expertise to navigate the application process and manage the funding.
Leveraging Partnerships with Public and Nonprofit Entities
Regional planning displayed in the development of the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan
demonstrates the City’s ability to effectively share information, identify priority needs, and work
towards solutions.
Mitigation Strategy
This section of the NHMP addendum addresses 44 CFR 201.6(c)(3(iv), Mitigation Strategy.
The City’s mitigation strategy (action items) was developed during the 2020 NHMP planning
process and reviewed and updated during the 2023 update. The steering committee assessed
the City’s risk, identified potential issues, and developed a mitigation strategy (action items). The
City developed actions specific to their community after first reviewing a list of recommended
actions developed by the County or recommended by OPDR.
Mitigation Successes
The City of Central Point has several examples of hazard mitigation including the following
projects funded through FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance and the Oregon Infrastructure
Finance Authority’s Seismic Rehabilitation Grant Program.2
FEMA Funded Mitigation Successes
• None identified.
Seismic Rehabilitation Grant Program Mitigation Successes
• 2020: Crater High School Gymnasium ($2,452,715)
2 The Seismic Rehabilitation Grant Program (SRGP) is a state of Oregon competitive grant program that provides funding for the
seismic rehabilitation of critical public buildings, particularly public schools, and emergency services facilities.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 28
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-11
• 2018: Richardson Elementary School ($1,498,275)
• 2017: Central Point Fire Station ($717,963)
Other Mitigation Successes
• Gebhard Stormwater Outfall (2022-2023) -- This project will install a new stormwater
outfall, into Bear Creek, and install new storm drainpipe to Gebhard Road.
• Jewett Drive Stormwater and Waterline Improvements (2022-2023) -- This project
consists of creek restoration, storm drainage improvements, water distribution system
improvements, and associated modifications along North 10th Street and Jewett Drive
from the intersection of East Pine Street and North 10th Street to and within Mingus
Creek.
• new Stormwater management plan
• new Flood Code
Actions Items
Table CA-1 Action Items documents the title of each action along with the lead organization,
partners, timeline, cost, and potential funding resources.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 29
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-12
Table CA-1 Action Items
Action
Item # Mitigation Actions
Potential
Funding
Resources
Lead Partners Timeline Cost
Multi-Hazard
1.1
Encourage public and private property owners
and owners of infrastructure, particularly local
businesses, through written and online
communications to undertake risk assessments
for their facilities and implement mitigation
measures when necessary.
Local Funding
Sources City Administration Utility Billing, Public
Works S L
1.2
Increase public awareness of natural hazards by
enhancing education and outreach activities
through online and written communications and
in-person events, including dissemination of
hazard maps, FEMA pamphlets, and promoting the Jackson County Disaster Registry.
Local Funding
Sources City Administration
Jackson County,
Utility Billing, Public
Works
O L
1.3
Integrate the Mitigation Plan findings into
updates to the Environmental section of the
city's Comprehensive Plan, Stormwater Master
Plan, and other planning and regulatory
documents, as appropriate.
DLCD, Local
Funding Sources Planning Administration,
Public Works M L
1.4 Collaborate with neighboring cities, Fire District
#3, and other partners on efforts in addressing
NHMP priorities.
FEMA, OEM,
Local Funding
Sources
Planning
Jackson County,
Neighboring
Jurisdictions,
JCFD#3
S L-M
1.5
Conduct an analysis to determine inequitable
barriers and/or effective incentives to advance
resiliency of all hazard classes upon vulnerable
populations.
FEMA, Local
Funding Sources Planning Community
Development S L
Air Quality
2.0 See multi-hazard actions for applicable mitigation strategies.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 30
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-13
Action
Item # Mitigation Actions
Potential
Funding
Resources
Lead Partners Timeline Cost
Drought
3.1 Improve water supply monitoring and regularly
check for leaks to minimize water supply
losses.
FEMA, USDA,
Local Funding
Sources
Public Works Planning, Medford
Water Commission O L
3.2
Support local agencies on water conservation
measures and drought management practices
and ensure long-range water resources
development and adaption strategies.
FEMA, USDA,
Local Funding
Sources
Public Works
Planning, Jackson
County, Medford
Water Commission
O L
Earthquake
4.1
Evaluate the seismic vulnerability of important
components of the Central Point water and
wastewater systems and establish priorities to
retrofit or replace vulnerable components, as
established in the Water System Master Plan. Pursue funding opportunities to address
highest-priority vulnerabilities.
FEMA, USDA Building
Planning, Medford
Water Commission,
Rogue Valley
Sewer Services
M H
4.2
Use FEMA's Rapid Visual Screenings (RVS) to
conduct a sidewalk survey of residential,
commercial, and industrial to identify
vulnerable buildings (e.g., unreinforced
masonry buildings or concrete/steel buildings with unreinforced masonry infill), raise
awareness, and encourage mitigation actions.
Local Funding
Sources Building Planning M L
4.3
Educate homeowners and business owners
about structural and non-structural retrofitting
options and benefits for vulnerable buildings,
identified in Rapid Visual Screenings, through
online and written communications.
Local Funding
Sources Building
Utility Billing,
Planning, Public
Works
O L
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 31
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-14
Action
Item # Mitigation Actions
Potential
Funding
Resources
Lead Partners Timeline Cost
Emerging Infectious Disease
5.0 See multi-hazard actions for applicable mitigation strategies.
Flood
6.1
Upgrade West Pine Street crossing and include
property owners from Mae Richardson School to Housing Authority property to improve
stream flows and alleviate floodway and
stream bank erosion impacts.
FEMA, Local Funding Sources Public Works Property Owners M H
6.2
Seek funding to mitigate low-income West Pine
Housing Authority, Building A & B, through
flow improvements and other flood-proofing
mitigation efforts to reduce flood risk, comply with flood protection standards, and improve
insurance rating.
FEMA, HUD,
Local Funding
Sources
Public Works Tenants M H
6.3
Maintain outreach program in accordance with
Community Rating System (CRS) procedures to
ensure that public involvement and education
efforts are effective.
Local Funding
Sources
Planning/Floodplain
Management
Administration,
Public Works O L
6.4
Seek funding for the Griffin Creek Flood
Mitigation Project, including the following:
stakeholder buy-in, public involvement,
easement acquisition, utility relocation,
engineered construction plans, restoration
plans, environmental permits, grade control
structure removal, channel modifications,
stream restoration, LOMR acquisition.
FEMA, USDA,
Local Funding
Sources
Planning/Floodplain
Management
Administration,
Public Works L H
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 32
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-15
Action
Item # Mitigation Actions
Potential
Funding
Resources
Lead Partners Timeline Cost
6.5
Seek funding to elevate or acquire highly flood-
prone structures not mitigated by the Griffin
Creek Mitigation Project.
FEMA, USDA,
Local Funding
Sources
Planning/Floodplain
Management
Administration,
Public Works L H
6.6
Conduct stormwater drainage improvements
pursuant to the Stormwater Master Plan
recommendations.
FEMA, USDA,
Local Funding
Sources
Public Works Planning/Floodplain
Management L M-H
6.7
Complete a Benchmark Master Plan that
outlines standards for setting and maintaining
benchmarks in the city, including the
establishment of 3 to 5 National Spatial
Reference System benchmarks that are 1st or
2nd order with a stability rating of A or B and
that are within 1.0 mile of a regulatory
floodplain.
FEMA, DLCD,
Local Funding
Sources
Planning/Floodplain
Management Public Works L M
6.8
Review and update flood warning and
emergency action plans as new information
about Emigrant Dam failure becomes available.
FEMA, DLCD,
Local Funding
Sources
Planning/Floodplain
Management
Administration,
Public Works O L
6.9
Continue to implement/enforce regulatory
standards for structures built within regulatory
floodplains that exceed minimum NFIP
requirements.
Local Funding
Sources
Planning/Floodplain
Management Public Works O L
Landslide
7.1
Develop vegetation management program for
areas susceptible to landslides along
streambanks.
FEMA, DLCD,
Local Funding
Sources
Planning Public Works M M
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 33
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-16
Action
Item # Mitigation Actions
Potential
Funding
Resources
Lead Partners Timeline Cost
Severe Weather (Extreme Heat, Windstorm, Winter Storm)
8.1
Promote awareness of tree selection, planting,
and care to minimize hazards while promoting
community forest goals.
Local Funding
Sources Public Works Planning O L
8.2
Ensure that all critical facilities in Central Point
have backup power and emergency operations
plans to deal with power outage.
FEMA, OEM,
Local Funding
Sources
Public Works Building, Utility
Partners M M
8.3
Upgrade lines and poles to improve wind/ice
loading and add interconnect switches to allow
alternate feed paths and disconnect switches to
minimize outage areas.
FEMA, OEM,
Local Funding
Sources
Public Works Utility Partners L L
Volcanic Event
9.1 Coordinate with partner agencies to determine
risk of ash fallout.
Local Funding
Sources Planning
Jackson County,
Neighboring
Jurisdictions,
JCFD#3
M L
Wildfire
10.1 Coordinate the establishment and publication
of evacuation routes in Rogue Valley with
Jackson County and other cities.
FEMA, Local
Funding Sources Planning
Jackson County,
Neighboring
Jurisdictions M L
10.2
Create corridor management plans, including a
Greenway Master Plan, that address specific
wildfire management, including the removal of
noxious weeds, creation of fire breaks, balance
riparian vegetation requirements and removal
of fire hazards.
FEMA, ODF,
USFS, DLCD Planning Public Works M M
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 34
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-17
Action
Item # Mitigation Actions
Potential
Funding
Resources
Lead Partners Timeline Cost
10.3 Coordinate fire mitigation action items through
the Rogue Valley Integrated Community
Wildfire Protection Plan.
General Fund,
ODF, Fire Service
grants
Emergency
Management
Fire Plan
Committee and
Participating
Agencies
O L
10.4
Consider the need for ingress and egress for
evacuations during the land use process
through enforcement of current Code and
referrals from the Fire District and adjacent
jurisdictions.
FEMA, Local
Funding Sources Planning JCFD#3 O L
10.5
Reduce wildfire fuels in high-risk areas.
Undertake neighborhood meetings to educate
property owners to decrease fire hazards to
their homes/property through written and
online communications.
FEMA, ODF,
USFS, Local
Funding Sources
Planning, Public
Works JCFD#3 O L
10.6
Consider a city-specific Community Wildfire
Protection Program that evaluates the wildfire
hazard area, accounts for varying structural and
landscape conditions, includes new data related
to ember impacts and home ignition zones.
FEMA, ODF,
USFS, Local
Funding Sources
Planning JCFD#3 M M
Source: Central Point NHMP Steering Committee, 2023
Cost: L – Low (less than $50,000), M - Medium ($50,000-$100,000), H - High (more than $100,000)
Timing: O-Ongoing (continuous), S-Short (1-2 years), M-Medium (3-5 years), L-Long (5 or more years)
Priority Actions: Identified with bold text and orange highlight
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 35
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-18
Risk Assessment
This section of the NHMP addendum addresses 44 CFR 201.6(b)(2) - Risk Assessment. In
addition, this chapter can serve as the factual basis for addressing Oregon Statewide
Planning Goal 7 – Areas Subject to Natural Hazards.
Assessing natural hazard risk has three phases:
• Phase 1: Identify hazards that can impact the jurisdiction. This includes an evaluation
of potential hazard impacts – type, location, extent, etc.
• Phase 2: Identify important community assets and system vulnerabilities. Example
vulnerabilities include people, businesses, homes, roads, historic places, and drinking
water sources.
• Phase 3: Evaluate the extent to which the identified hazards overlap with, or have an
impact on, the important assets identified by the community.
The local level rationale for the identified mitigation strategies (action items) is presented
herein and within Volume I, Sections 2 and 3. The risk assessment process is graphically
depicted in Figure CA-1 below. Ultimately, the goal of hazard mitigation is to reduce the area
of risk, where hazards overlap vulnerable systems.
Figure CA-1 Understanding Risk
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 36
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-19
Hazard Analysis
The Central Point steering committee developed their hazard vulnerability assessment (HVA),
using the County’s HVA (Volume II, Appendix C) as a reference. Changes from the County’s
HVA were made where appropriate to reflect distinctions in vulnerability and risk from
natural hazards unique to Central Point, which are discussed throughout this addendum.
Table CA-2 shows the HVA matrix for Central Point, listing each hazard in order of rank from
high to low. For local governments, conducting the hazard analysis is a useful step in planning
for hazard mitigation, response, and recovery. The method provides the jurisdiction with a
sense of hazard priorities but does not predict the occurrence of a particular hazard.
One catastrophic hazard (Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake) and four chronic hazards
(emerging infectious disease, extreme heat, flood, and wildfire) rank as the top hazard
threats to the City (Top Tier). Air quality, winter storm, and windstorm comprise the next
highest ranked hazards (Middle Tier), while drought, crustal earthquake, landslide, and
volcano comprise the lowest ranked hazards (Bottom Tier).
Table CA-2 Hazard Analysis Matrix
Source: Central Point NHMP Steering Committee, 2023.
Community Characteristics
Table CA-3 and the following section provide information on City specific demographics and
characteristics. For additional information on the characteristics of Central Point, in terms of
geography, environment, population, demographics, employment, and economics, as well as
housing and transportation, see Volume III, Appendix C. Many of these community
characteristics can affect how natural hazards impact communities and how communities
choose to plan for natural hazard mitigation. Considering the City specific assets during the
planning process can assist in identifying appropriate measures for natural hazard mitigation.
Central Point is in Jackson County in southwestern Oregon. Located in the central region of
the county, Central Point shares its southern border with Medford and is part of the Medford
metropolitan area. The City and most of Jackson County are within the Rogue watershed.
Hazard History Vulnerability
Maximum
Threat Probability Total Threat
Score
Hazard
Rank
Hazard
Tiers
Emerging Infectious Disease 16 40 100 49 205 #1
Earthquake - Cascadia 2 50 100 49 201 #2
Extreme Heat Event 20 25 70 70 185 #3
Flood - Riverine 20 25 70 70 185 #3
Wildfire (WUI)10 25 80 70 185 #3
Air Quality 18 40 60 63 181 #6
Winter Storm 20 20 60 70 170 #7
Windstorm 20 20 50 70 160 #8
Drought 20 5 10 63 98 #9
Earthquake - Crustal 2 25 50 7 84 #10
Volcano 2 5 50 7 64 #11
Landslide 2 5 20 7 34 #12
Middle
Tier
Top
Tier
Bottom
Tier
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 37
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-20
Central Point experiences a relatively mild climate with four distinct seasons that comes from
its position on the west coast of North America and within the mountains of the region. The
town is at the northeastern edge of the Siskiyou Mountains at approximately 1,272 feet
above sea level. Because of its location, Central Point has a climate somewhat intermediate
to central California and northern Oregon. The average daily high temperature in the city is
46-degrees Fahrenheit (F) in the winter and 91-degrees Fahrenheit (F) in the summer.
Central Point averages only 28 inches of rain per year due to being inland from the coast and
in the rain shadow of the nearby mountains. Most of that rain, 24 inches, occurs between
October-May.
Population and Income
The City has grown steadily since the establishment of a post office there under the name of
Central Point in 1872. It now has a population of 19,702 people, over an area of 3.90 square
miles (3,100 acres). Between 2016 and 2023, the City grew by 2,117 people (12%) and
median household income increased by about 33% (see Table CA-3 below). According to the
State’s official coordinated population forecast, between 2021 and 2040 the City’s
population is forecasted to increase by 19%.
Most of the population is White/Caucasian (90%) and about 16% of the population is
Hispanic or Latino. The poverty rate is 10% (16% for children), 7% do not have health
insurance, and 51% of renters pay more than 30% of their household income on rent (30%
for owners). The City has a well-educated population, with 87% of residents with high school
degrees or higher, and 19% with bachelor's degrees or higher. Approximately 11% of the
population lives with a disability. Almost half the population (48%) are either below 18 (30%)
or over 65 (18%) years of age. About 14% of the population are 65 or older and living alone,
while 11% are single parents.
Transportation, Housing, and Infrastructure
In the City of Central Point, transportation has played a major role in shaping the community.
The City has the advantage of being located directly on Interstate 5 (I-5), Highway 99 (U.S.
Route 99), and the Central Oregon and Pacific Railroad, and is adjacent to the Rogue Valley
International Airport. Immediately to the south of Central Point is the City of Medford, which
is the seat of Jackson County and the largest city in Southern Oregon. This provides Central
Point residents with easy access to major shopping centers, employment, and governmental
activities.
Today, the City of Central Point includes a diversity of land uses but is zoned primarily
residential (48%). Eight percent (8%) of land is zoned commercial; 10% is industrial. The City
of Central Point expanded its Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) in 2022 to provide land for
housing, non-industrial employment, parks, and open space. This UGB expansion added 305
acres for residential uses, 54 acres for park land, and 35 acres for non-industrial
employment. (See Figure CA-2 Central Point Land Use Map (2022).)
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 38
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-21
Figure CA-2 Central Point Land Use Map (2022)
Source: City of Central Point website (August 2023)
Well over three-quarters of current residents live in single family homes (84%); mobile
homes make up 5% of the housing stock. Nineteen percent (18%) of residences were built
before 1970. Sixty-eight percent (68%) of housing units are homeowner occupied, with
rental properties making up 30% of housing. Two percent (2%) of housing units are vacant.
New development has complied with the standards of the Oregon Building Code and the
city’s development code including their floodplain ordinance.
By far, motor vehicles represent the dominant mode of travel through and within Central
Point. Eighty percent (80%) of workers drive alone to work. Eight percent (8%) carpool. Most
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 39
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-22
of the remainder (7%) work from home. Seventy-two percent (72%) of homeowners own 2
or more vehicles; 53% of renters also have two or more cars.
The existing transportation system is complemented by the established Rogue Valley
Transportation District (RVTD) and the transit stops along line #40 within Central Point. The
Bear Creek Greenway, an 18-mile paved, multi-use trail, connects Phoenix, Medford, and
Central Point.
The City purchases water from Medford Water Commission and redistributes it to the
residents. The City has three water reservoirs with a total of 5.5 million gallons of storage
capacity for emergency and firefighting needs. The water distribution system for the City of
Central Point is comprised of 546,609 feet of water mains, 6,789 service connections, 947
fire hydrants and 2,573 valves, etc. Parts of the system have been in place since the early
1900s.
Economy
A diverse range of businesses have located in Central Point. Central Point’s proximity to
Medford and Interstate 5 gives it market access that is more favorable than usual for a rural
town. Central Point has a high population growth rate and is expected to grow to 23,500
people by 2040. This means that Central Point will match the City of Ashland’s population
and capture almost 7% of the new jobs in the region over the next 20 years. The gains will be
concentrated in service, health care, construction, professional, and the business industries.
Central Point’s target industries include specialty foods, trucking and warehousing, and
retail.3
About 55% of the resident population 16 and over is in the labor force (10,483 people) and
are employed in a variety of occupations including professional and related (16%),
management, business, and financial (14%), office and administrative (16%), food
preparation and serving (8%), and sales and related (11%) occupations.
The City adopted an Urban Revitalization Plan for the Downtown and East Pine Street
Corridor in 2011. Its projects are anticipated to take 25 years to complete and include street
improvements, streetscaping, lighting, intersection improvements, parking facilities,
undergrounding of utilities, infrastructure improvements, development of a community
center, a fire safety project, and an economic development incentive program.
3 City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Economic Element, 2019.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 40
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-23
Table CA-3 Community Characteristics
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates; Portland State University, Population
Research Center, "Annual Population Estimates, Table 4", 2016 and 2021; and"Population Forecasts, Summary Tab", 2022.
Note 1: * = Population forecast within UGB
Note 2: ACS 5-year estimates represent average characteristics from 2017-2021. Sampling error may result in low reliability
of data. This information or data is provided with the understanding that conclusions drawn from such information are the
responsibility of the user. Refer to the original source documentation to better understand the data sources, results,
methodologies and limitations of each dataset presented.
Population Characteristics Household Characteristics
2016 Population Estimate Housing Units
2021 Population Estimate Single-Family (includes duplexes)6,131 84%
2040 Population Forecast*Multi-Family 807 11%
Race Mobile Homes (includes RV, Van, etc.)326 5%
American Indian and Alaska Native 1%Household Type
Asian 1%Family Household 4,738 67%
Black/ African American 0%Married couple (w/ children)1,687 24%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 2%Single (w/ children)783 11%
White 90%Living Alone 65+1,012 14%
Some Other Race 2%Year Structure Built
Two or More Races 5% Pre-1970 1,276 18%
Hispanic or Latino/a (of any race)16% 1970-1989 1,478 20%
Limited or No English Spoken 109 0 1990-2009 3,871 62%
Vulnerable Age Groups 2010 or later 639 9%
Less than 5 Years 1,243 7%Housing Tenure and Vacancy
Less than 18 Years 4,433 23%Owner-occupied 4,935 68%
65 Years and Older 2,958 16%Renter-occupied 2,161 30%
85 Years and Older 453 2%Seasonal 0 0%
Age Dependency Ratio 64.0 Vacant 168 2%
Disability Status (Percent age cohort)Vehicles Available (Occupied Units)
Total Disabled Population 2,118 11%No Vehicle (owner occupied)179 4%
Children (Under 18)223 5%Two+ vehicles (owner occupied)3,562 72%
Working Age (18 to 64)1,050 9%No Vehicle (renter occupied)253 12%
Seniors (65 and older)845 29%Two+ vehicles (renter occupied)1,136 53%
Income Characteristics Employment Characteristics
Households by Income Category Labor Force (Population 16+)
Less than $15,000 403 6%In labor Force (% Total Population)10,483 55%
$15,000-$29,999 867 12%Unemployed (% Labor Force)549 5%
$30,000-$44,999 703 10%Occupation (Top 5) (Employed 16+)
$45,000-$59,999 955 13%Office & Administrative 1,611 16%
$60,000-$74,999 681 10%Professional & Related 1,575 16%
$75,000-$99,999 1,340 19%Management, Business, & Financial 1,361 14%
$100,000-$199,999 1,636 23%Sales & Related 1,083 11%
$200,000 or more 511 7%Food Preparation & Serving 794 8%
Median Household Income Health InsuranceGini Index of Income Inequality 0.43 No Health Insurance 1,243 7%
Poverty Rates (Percent age cohort)Public Health Insurance 8,061 43%
Total Population 1,809 10%Private Health Insurance 12,750 67%
Children (Under 18)675 16%Transportation to Work (Workers 16+)
Working Age (18 to 64)856 7%Drove Alone 7,901 80%
Seniors (65 and older)278 9%Carpooled 781 8%
Housing Cost Burden (Cost > 30% of household income)Public Transit 23 < 1%
Owners with a Mortgage 1,276 26%Motorcycle 249 3%
Owners without a Mortgage 197 4%Bicycle/Walk 100 1%
Renters 1,103 51%Work at Home 675 7%
$73,534
17,585
19,702
23,512
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 41
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-24
Community Assets
This section outlines the resources, facilities, and infrastructure that, if damaged, could
significantly impact the public safety, economic conditions, and environmental integrity of
Central Point. Community lifelines and historic structures in Central Point are shown in Figure
CA-3 and Table CA-4. Community Lifelines are fundamental services that enable all other
aspects of society to function. FEMA developed the Community Lifelines construct for
objective-based response to prioritize the rapid stabilization of these facilities after a
disaster. Mitigating these facilities will increase the community’s resilience.
Figure CA-3 Community Lifelines and Historic Structures
Source: Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries.
Note: To view detail click this link to access Oregon HazVu
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 42
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-25
Table CA-4 Community Lifelines
Source: Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Central Point NHMP Steering Committee
Facility Name Community Lifeline
Category Lifeline Type
Earthquake-
Liquefaction
Hazard
Flood Hazard Landslide
Hazard Wildfire Hazard
Grange Co-op safety and security community center low minimal low low
Jackson County Fire District 3 - Central Point safety and security fire station low minimal low low
Jackson County Fire District 3 - Scenic Station safety and security fire station low minimal low low
Costco food, water, and shelter food provider low minimal low low
Albertsons #595 food, water, and shelter food provider low minimal low low
Providence Medical Group Central Point health and medical medical facility low 500-Year low low
Central Point Police Department safety and security police station low minimal low low
State Police Department safety and security police station low 500-Year low low
Central Point Public Works Facility transportation public works low minimal low low
Community Bible Church food, water, and shelter red cross shelter low minimal low low
Shepherd of the Valley Church food, water, and shelter religious center low minimal low moderate
Central Point Elementary School safety and security school low minimal low low
Crater High School safety and security school low minimal low moderate
Jewett Elementary School safety and security school low minimal low low
New Heights Christian School safety and security school low minimal moderate low
Richardson Elementary School safety and security school low 500-Year low low
Rogue Primary School safety and security school low minimal low low
Scenic Middle School safety and security school low minimal low low
Jackson County Expo safety and security expo grounds low minimal low low
PPL Substation energy electric substation low 500-Year low low
Astro hazardous materials Gas Station low minimal low low
Chevron USA Inc. SS 98337 hazardous materials Gas Station low minimal low low
Pilot Travel Center #391 hazardous materials Gas Station low minimal low low
Shell hazardous materials Gas Station low minimal low low
Bus Barn hazardous materials hazardous waste producer low minimal low low
ODOT Hwy. Div. Central Point hazardous materials hazardous waste producer low minimal low low
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 43
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-26
Critical Facilities
Facilities that are critical to government response and recovery activities (i.e., life, safety,
property, and environmental protection) include: 911 Centers, Emergency Operations
Centers, Police and Fire Stations, Public Works facilities, sewer and water facilities, hospitals,
bridges, roads, shelters, and more. Facilities that, if damaged, could cause serious secondary
impacts may also be considered “critical.” A hazardous material facility is one example of this
type of critical facility.
Fire Stations:
• Jackson County Fire District 3 –
Central Point Station
• Jackson County Fire District 3 –
Scenic Avenue Station
Law Enforcement:
• Central Point Police Department
• Oregon State Police
Public Works:
• Central Point Public Works Facility
Government:
• City Hall
Bridges:
• Upton Road Overpass
• E. Pine Street/Biddle Road
Overpass
Essential Facilities
Facilities that are essential to the continued delivery of key government services and/or that
may significantly impact the public’s ability to recover from the emergency may include City
buildings such as the Public Services Building, the City Hall, and other public facilities such as
schools.
Hospitals/Immediate Medical Care
Facilities:
• Providence Medical Plaza
• Providence Urgent Care
• Scenic Middle School
City/County/Other:
• Central Point Library (County)
Schools:
• Central Point Elementary School
• Jewett Elementary School
• Richardson Elementary School
• Rogue Primary School
• Crater High School
• New Heights Christian School
Potential Shelter Sites:
• Jackson County Expo
• Scenic Middle School
• Mae Richardson Elementary School
• Jewett Elementary School
• Shepherd of the Valley
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 44
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-27
Hazard Profiles
The following sections briefly describe relevant information for each profiled hazard. More
information on Jackson County hazards can be found in Volume 1, Section 2 Risk Assessment and
in the Risk Assessment for Region 4, Southwest Oregon, Oregon SNHMP (2020).
Air Quality
The steering committee determined that the City’s probability for poor air quality is high (which
is the same as the County’s Rating) and that their vulnerability to poor air quality is also high
(which is the same as the County’s Rating). The City did not assess the air quality hazard in the
previous version of their NHMP.
Volume I, Section 2 describes the characteristics of air quality hazards, their history, and how
they relate to future climate projections (see OCCRI report), as well as the location, extent, and
probability of a potential event. Increases in wildfire conditions have shown an increasing
potential for air quality hazards.
Future Projections:
According to the Oregon Climate Change Research Institute “Future Climate Projections, Jackson
County,”4 climate change is expected to reduce outdoor air quality. Warmer temperatures may
increase ground-level ozone concentrations, while increases in the number and size of wildfires
may increase concentrations of smoke and fine particulate matter. Moreover, increases in pollen
abundance and the duration of the pollen season may increase aeroallergens. Such poor air
quality is expected to exacerbate allergy and asthma conditions and increase the incidence of
respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses and death. In Jackson County, the number of smoke
wave days is projected to decrease by 20%, but the intensity of smoke on those days is projected
to increase by 81%.
Increasingly poor outdoor air quality will have exponentially high impacts upon those living in
older homes, manufactured housing, RVs, and campgrounds, or the unhoused. The need to
install new or upgraded air conditioning systems or HVAC filtration systems will impact the cost
of housing.
Additional information on poor air quality can be found in Volume I, Section 2.
Drought
The steering committee determined that the City’s probability for drought is high (which is the
same as the County’s rating) and that their vulnerability to drought is low (which is the lower
than the County’s rating). These ratings have not changed since the previous version of the
NHMP.
Volume I, Section 2 describes the characteristics of drought hazards, history, how they relate to
future climate projections (see OCCRI report), as well as the location, extent, and probability of a
4 Oregon Climate Change Research Institute, Future Climate Projections, Jackson County, Oregon. February 2023.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 45
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-28
potential event. Due to the climate of Jackson County, past and present weather conditions have
shown an increasing potential for drought.
The City of Central Point purchases water from the Medford Water Commission. Water supply
for Central Point, and other Medford Water Commission customers, is not highly vulnerable and
rationing due to drought has not been implemented. For more information on the future of
Central Point’s water supply visit their website.
Future Projections:
According to the Oregon Climate Change Research Institute “Future Climate Projections, Jackson
County,”5 drought, as represented by low summer soil moisture, low spring snowpack, low
summer runoff, and low summer precipitation, is projected to become more frequent in Jackson
County by the 2050s.
Increasingly frequent droughts will have economic and social impacts upon those who depend
upon predictable growing periods (ranches, farms, vineyards, gardeners) as well as upon the
price and availability of fresh vegetables. It may also stress local jurisdiction’s ability to provide
water for irrigation or commercial and household use.
Please review Volume I, Section 2 for additional information on this hazard.
Earthquake (Cascadia)
The steering committee determined that the City’s probability for a Cascadia Subduction Zone
(CSZ) earthquake is moderate (which is the same as the County’s rating) and that their
vulnerability to a CSZ earthquake is high (which is the same as the County’s rating). The City
decreased its probability for this hazard from high to moderate.
Volume I, Section 2 describes the characteristics of earthquake hazards and their history, as well
as the location, extent, and probability of a potential event. Generally, an event that affects the
County is likely to affect Central Point as well. The causes and characteristics of an earthquake
event are appropriately described within Volume I, Section 2, as well as are the location and
extent of potential hazards. Previous occurrences are well documented within Volume I, Section
2. The community impacts described for the County would generally be the same for Central
Point. Figure CA-4 and Figure CA-5 display perceived shaking hazards from a Cascadia Subduction
Zone earthquake event (darker areas represent greater concern).
5 Oregon Climate Change Research Institute, Future Climate Projections, Jackson County, Oregon. February 2023.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 46
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-29
Figure CA-4 Cascadia Subduction Zone Perceived Shaking (Community Lifelines)
Source: Oregon HazVu: Statewide Geohazards Viewer (DOGAMI)
Note: To view detail click this link to access Oregon HazVu.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 47
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-30
Figure CA-5 Cascadia Subduction Zone Perceived Shaking (Historic Structures)
Source: Oregon HazVu: Statewide Geohazards Viewer (DOGAMI)
Note: To view detail click this link to access Oregon HazVu.
The local faults, the county’s proximity to the Cascadia Subduction Zone, potential slope
instability, and the prevalence of certain soils subject to liquefaction and amplification combine
to give the county a high-risk profile. Due to the expected pattern of damage resulting from a
CSZ event, the Oregon Resilience Plan divides the State into four distinct zones and places
Jackson County predominately within the “Valley Zone” (Valley Zone, from the summit of the
Coast Range to the summit of the Cascades). Within the Southwest Oregon region, damage and
shaking is expected to be strong and widespread - an event will be disruptive to daily life and
commerce and the main priority is expected to be restoring services to business and residents.
As noted in the community profile, approximately 38% of residential buildings in Central Point
were built prior to 1990. Prior to the seismic standards, structures are likely inadequate to
withstand the impacts of an earthquake. Information on specific public buildings’ (schools and
public safety) estimated seismic resistance, determined by DOGAMI in 2007, is shown in Table
CA-5; each “X” represents one building within that ranking category. Of the facilities evaluated
by DOGAMI using a Rapid Visual Survey (RVS), one building has a very high (100% chance)
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 48
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-31
collapse potential; however, eight (8) buildings have a high (greater than 10% chance) collapse
potential. See Mitigation Successes for a list of facilities that have seismic retrofits.
Table CA-5 Rapid Visual Survey Scores
Source: DOGAMI 2007. Open File Report 0-07-02. Statewide Seismic Needs Assessment Using Rapid Visual Assessment. “*” –
Site ID is referenced on the RVS Jackson County Map, Central Point NHMP Plan 2020.
In addition to building damages, utility (electric power, water, wastewater, natural gas) and
transportation systems (bridges, pipelines) are also likely to experience significant damage.
There is a low probability that a major earthquake will result in failure of upstream dams.
Utility systems will be significantly damaged, including damaged buildings and damage to utility
infrastructure, including water and wastewater treatment plants and equipment at high voltage
substations (especially 230 kV or higher which are more vulnerable than lower voltage
substations). Buried pipe systems will suffer extensive damage with approximately one break per
mile in soft soil areas. There would be a much lower rate of pipe breaks in other areas.
Restoration of utility services will require substantial mutual aid from utilities outside of the
affected area.
Please review Volume I, Section 2 for additional information on this hazard.
Earthquake (Crustal)
The steering committee determined that the City’s probability for a crustal earthquake is low
(which is the same as the County’s rating) and that their vulnerability to crustal earthquake is
moderate (which is higher than the County’s rating). These ratings did not change from the
previous version of the plan.
Schools
Central Point Elementary School (Central Point SD 6)
(450 South 4th St)Jack_sch08 X
Jewett Elementary School (Central Point SD 6)
(1001 Manzanita St)Jack_sch09 X X,X
Richardson Elementary School (Central Point SD 6)
(200 West Pine St) - see Mitigation Successes Jack_sch11 X
Scenic Middle School (Central Point SD 6)
(1955 Scenic Ave) - see Mitigation Successes Jack_sch14 X,X X
Crater High School (Central Point SD 6)
(4410 Rogue Valley Blvd) - see Mitigation Successes Jack_sch15 X,X X,X,X,
X,X,X
Public Safety
Central Point Police Department (City Hall)
(155 South 2nd St)Jack_pol09 X
Oregon State Police (EOC)
(4500 Rogue Valley Hwy)Jack_pol03 X
Jackson County Fire District #3 - Central Point Station
(600 S Front St) - see Mitigation Successes Jack_fir09 X
Facility Site ID*
Level of Collapse Potential
Low
(< 1%)
Moderate
(>1%)
High
(>10%)
Very High
(100%)
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 49
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-32
Volume I, Section 2 describes the characteristics of earthquake hazards and their history, as well
as the location, extent, and probability of a potential event. Generally, an event that affects the
county is likely to affect Central Point as well. The causes and characteristics of an earthquake
event are appropriately described within Volume I, Section 2, as well as the location and extent
of potential hazards. Previous occurrences are well-documented within Volume I, Section 2 and
the community impacts described by the County would generally be the same for Central Point.
Figure CA-6 and Figure CA-7 show the liquefaction risk to the community lifelines that are
identified in more detail in Table CA-4 and historic structures. As shown in the figures, the area
of greatest concern near the City of Central Point (darker areas) is in the center of the City
adjacent to old river beds.
Figure CA-6 Liquefaction Susceptibility (Community Lifelines)
Source: Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries.
Note: To view detail click this link to access Oregon HazVu.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 50
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-33
Figure CA-7 Liquefaction Susceptibility (Historic Structures)
Source: Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries.
Note: To view detail click this link to access Oregon HazVu.
Earthquake-induced damages are difficult to predict and depend on the size, type, and location
of the earthquake, as well as site-specific building and soil characteristics. Presently, it is not
possible to accurately forecast the location or size of earthquakes, but it is possible to predict the
behavior of soil at any site. In many major earthquakes, damages have primarily been caused by
the behavior of the soil.
Vulnerability Assessment
Due to insufficient data and resources, Central Point is currently unable to perform a
quantitative risk assessment for this hazard; however, an exposure assessment was conducted.
Identified community lifelines that are exposed to this hazard are shown in Table CA-4. Note that
even if a facility has exposure, it does not mean there is a high risk (vulnerability). No
development changes affected the jurisdiction’s overall vulnerability to this hazard.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 51
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-34
Future Projections
Future development (residential, commercial, or industrial) within Jackson County will be at risk
to earthquake impacts, although this risk can be mitigated by the adoption and enforcement of
high development and building standards. Reducing risks to vulnerable populations should be
considered during the redevelopment of existing properties.
Please review Volume I, Section 2 for additional information on this hazard.
Emerging Infectious Disease
The steering committee determined that the City’s probability for emerging infectious disease is
moderate (which is the same as the County’s rating) and that their vulnerability is high (which is
the same as than the County’s rating). This rating was not in the previous version of the NHMP.
Emerging infectious diseases are those that have recently appeared in a population or those
whose incidence or geographic range is rapidly increasing or threatens to increase. Emerging
infections may be caused by biological pathogens (e.g., virus, parasite, fungus, or bacterium) and
may be: previously unknown or undetected biological pathogens; biological pathogens that have
spread to new geographic areas or populations; previously known biological pathogens whose
role in specific diseases was previously undetected; and biological pathogens whose incidence of
disease was previously declining but whose incidence of disease has reappeared (re-emerging
infectious disease).6
Volume I, Section 2 describes the characteristics of emerging infectious disease and their history,
as well as the location, extent, and probability of a potential event within the region. Generally,
an event that affects the County is likely to affect the City similarly.
Future Projection
Vulnerable populations within Jackson County, including children, elderly, those living with
disabilities, and unhoused individuals, will be a greater risk to emerging infectious diseases in the
future.
Please review Volume I, Section 2 for additional information on this hazard.
Flood
The steering committee determined that the City’s probability for flood is high (which is the
same as the County’s rating) and that their vulnerability to flood is moderate (which is the same
as the County’s rating). These ratings did not change from the previous version of the City’s
NHMP.
Volume I, Section 2 describes the characteristics of flood hazards, history, and how they relate to
future climate projections (see OCCRI report), as well as the location, extent, and probability of a
potential event. Portions of Central Point have mapped FEMA flood zones (Figure CA-8 and
6 Baylor College of Medicine, Emerging Infectious Disease, URL: https://www.bcm.edu/departments/molecular-virology-and-
microbiology/emerging-infections-and-biodefense/emerging-infectious-diseases, accessed September 17, 2017.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 52
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-35
Figure CA-9). The City of Central Point has seven (7) streams that are identified as flood sources,
according to the Jackson County Flood Insurance Study (2018), including:
• Bear Creek, which flows along the eastern part of the City;
• Griffin Creek, Jackson Creek, Mingus Creek and Elk Creek, which flow through the City;
and
• Daisy Creek and Horn Creek, which are tributaries to Griffin Creek and Jackson Creek,
respectively.
Figure CA-8 FEMA Flood Zones (Community Lifelines)
Source: Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience. Oregon HazVu: Statewide Geohazards Viewer (DOGAMI) Note: To view detail
click this link to access Oregon HazVu.
Flooding along the creeks is most frequent from October through April during periods of heavy
rain and/or snowmelt. Because the drainage areas of these creeks are small, flash floods may
occur where the extent of flooding is influenced by runoff over a short period of time.
Other portions of Central Point, outside of the mapped floodplains, are also subject to flooding
from local storm water drainage. The extent of urban flooding is difficult to predict, but the City
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 53
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-36
has identified areas within the downtown that lack facilities that may be more prone to urban
flooding.
Figure CA-9 FEMA Flood Zones (Historic Structures)
Source: Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience. Oregon HazVu: Statewide Geohazards Viewer (DOGAMI).
Note: To view detail click this link to access Oregon HazVu.
Emigrant Dam is upstream of the City and could impact Central Point with flood waters along
Bear Creek in the event of a dam failure. The extent of flooding from Emigrant Dam would
depend on several factors at the time of the dam failure, including the water levels in Bear Creek
and the amount of water stored in Emigrant Lake behind the dam. Figure CA-10 is an inundation
map that shows the areas along Bear Creek that could be impacted by a dam failure.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 54
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-37
Figure CA-10 Emigrant Dam Inundation Zone
Source: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (2010)
Vulnerability Assessment
Due to insufficient data and resources, Central Point is currently unable to perform a
quantitative risk assessment for this hazard, however an exposure assessment was conducted.
Identified Community Lifelines that are exposed to this hazard are shown in Table CA-4. Note
that even if a facility has exposure, it does not mean there is a high risk (vulnerability). No
development changes affected the jurisdiction’s overall vulnerability to this hazard.
The City is at risk from three types of flooding: riverine, urban, and dam failure. Riverine flooding
occurs when streams overflow their banks and inundate low-lying areas. This is a natural process
that adds sediment and nutrients to fertile floodplain areas. It usually results from prolonged
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 55
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-38
periods of precipitation over a wide geographic area. Low velocity sheets of water generally
flood most areas that are prone to flooding. Urban flooding occurs as land is converted to
impervious surfaces and hydrologic systems are changed. Precipitation is collected and
transmitted to streams at a much faster rate, causing floodwaters that rise rapidly and peak with
violent force. During urban flooding, storm drains can back up and cause localized flooding of
streets and basements.
Dam failures can also pose a risk to property owners downstream. According to the Bureau of
Reclamation, Emigrant Dam has a very low risk of failure. The inundation information presented
in Figure CA-10 shows Interstate 5 completely inundated along with a significant portion of the
City that parallels Bear Creek, including residential, commercial, industrial, civic and open space
land uses. The dam failure inundation area does not show on the City’s FIRM’s because the risk
exceeds the one (1) percent annual chance mapped by FEMA.
Floods can have a devastating impact on almost every aspect of the community, including
private property damage, public infrastructure damage, and economic loss from business
interruption. It is important for the City to be aware of flooding impacts and assess its level of
risk. The City has been proactive in mitigating flood hazards by purchasing floodplain property.
The economic losses due to business closures often total more than the initial property losses
that result from flood events. Flood events significantly impact business owners and their
employees. Direct damages from flooding are the most common impacts, but indirect damages,
such as diminished clientele, can be just as debilitating to a business. No critical or essential
facilities are in the floodplain. Currently, there is no financial impact data available of this
infrastructure.
If major flooding affected all of the main transportation routes in Central Point, traffic flow in
and out of the City would be significantly affected, but all avenues would not be cut off. The
amount of property in the floodplain is not a large area but damage could be significant as it
would affect residential, commercial, and public property. Floodwaters can affect building
foundations, seep into basements or cause damage to the interior, exterior, and contents of
buildings, dependent upon the velocity and depth of the water and by the presence of floating
debris. The City sewer system can overflow during flood events and cause further property
damage. For Central Point, urban flooding due to storm water drainage problems have been
minor. The storm water systems are designed to handle more common small- to medium-sized
runoff events and allow minor street flooding to carry off stormwater that exceeds the system
capacity.
The Jackson County Flood Insurance Study (January 19, 2018) has a brief history of flooding in
Jackson County (Volume I, Section 2). Figure CA-3 shows the location of Critical Facilities
throughout Central Point. There are currently three (3) critical facilities in flood risk areas. The
Oregon State Patrol barracks and Pacific Power substation on Highway 99 are within the 0.2
percent annual chance floodplain and a portion of the properties are within the one (1) percent
annual chance floodplain area. The Mae Richardson Elementary School, which serves as a Red
Cross Shelter, is located within the 0.2 percent annual chance floodplain. A portion of the school
property also extends into the one (1) percent annual chance floodplain.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 56
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-39
For mitigation planning purposes, it is important to recognize that flood risk for a community is
not limited only to areas of mapped floodplains. Other portions of Central Point outside of the
mapped floodplains may also be at relatively high risk from over bank flooding from streams too
small to be mapped by FEMA or from local storm water drainage.
Future Projections
According to the Oregon Climate Change Research Institute (OCCRI report) “Future Climate
Projections, Jackson County,”7 winter flood risk at mid-elevations in Jackson County, where
temperatures are near freezing during winter and precipitation is a mix of rain and snow, is
projected to increase as winter temperatures increase. The temperature increase will lead to an
increase in the percentage of precipitation falling as rain rather than snow. The projected
increases in total precipitation, and in rain relative to snow, likely will increase flood magnitudes
in the region. Vulnerable populations adjacent to floodways (including the unhoused,
manufactured home communities, and campground occupants) will be more at risk as the winter
flood risk increases.
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
FEMA updated the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) in 2018
(effective January 19, 2018). The City complies with the NFIP through enforcement of their flood
damage prevention ordinance and their floodplain management program. The City participates
in FEMA’s Community Rating System, and maintains a rating of 6.
The Community Repetitive Loss record for Central Point identifies one (1) Repetitive Loss
Properties 8 (a 2-4-family residence) and zero (0) Severe Repetitive Loss Properties.9 Table CA-6
gives details for these properties. Figure CA-11 gives the general location of this property. For
details on the repetitive loss properties see Volume I, Section 2.
Table CA-6 Central Point repetitive loss properties
Source: FEMA Region X, Regional Flood Insurance Liaison, email February 13, 2023.
The NFIP Insurance Report shows 198 flood insurance policies active in Central Point, 114 of
which are A-zone. The total coverage of these policies is $53,432,000. There have been 30 claims
since 1978, paying out $149,792.10
7 Oregon Climate Change Research Institute, Future Climate Projections, Jackson County, Oregon. February 2023.
8 A Repetitive Loss (RL) property is any insurable building for which two or more claims of more than $1,000 were paid by the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) within any rolling ten-year period, since 1978. A RL property may or may not be currently
insured by the NFIP.
9 A Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL) property is a single family property (consisting of 1 to 4 residences) that is covered under flood
insurance by the NFIP and has incurred flood-related damage for which 4 or more separate claims payments have been paid
under flood insurance coverage, with the amount of each claim payment exceeding $5,000 and with cumulative amount of such
claims payments exceeding $20,000; or for which at least 2 separate claims payments have been made with the cumulative
amount of such claims exceeding the reported value of the property.
10 DLCD, Deanna Wright, National Flood Insurance Program Coordinator, email February 10, 2023.
RL or SRL
Property Jurisdiction Name Insured?Flood Zone Occupancy Total Paid
Claims
Total Paid
Amount
RL Central Point NO X 2-4 Family 2 $17,441.69
Total 2 $17,441.69
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 57
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-40
Figure CA-11 Central Point repetitive loss properties
Source: FEMA Region X, Regional Flood Insurance Liaison, email February 13, 2023.
Please review Volume I, Section 2 for additional information on this hazard.
Landslide
The steering committee determined that the City’s probability for landslide is low (which is the
lower than the County’s rating) and that their vulnerability to landslide is low (which is the same
as the County’s rating). These ratings have remained the same since the previous version of the
NHMP.
Volume I, Section 2 describes the characteristics of landslide hazards, their history within Jackson
County, and how they relate to future climate projections (see OCCRI report), as well as the
location, extent, and probability of a potential event within the region.
Landslide susceptibility exposure for Central Point is shown in Figure CA-12 and Figure CA-13.
Central Point demonstrates a mix of low and moderate susceptibility to landslide exposure, with
corridors of moderate susceptibility concentrated around the stream banks within the City. The
topography of Central Point is predominantly flat with minimal slopes. The potential for landslide
in Central Point is almost negligible except for very small areas immediately adjacent to stream
channels that are deeply incised.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 58
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-41
Figure CA-12 Landslide Susceptibility Exposure (Community Lifelines)
Source: Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries.
Note: To view detail click this link to access Oregon HazVu.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 59
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-42
Figure CA-13 Landslide Susceptibility Exposure (Historic Structures)
Source: Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience. Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. Oregon HazVu:
Statewide Geohazards Viewer (HazVu), Statewide Landslide Information Layer for Oregon (SLIDO)
Note: To view detail click the link above to access Oregon HazVu and SLIDO.
Vulnerability Assessment
Due to insufficient data and resources, Central Point is currently unable to perform a
quantitative risk assessment for this hazard, however an exposure assessment was conducted.
Identified community lifelines that are exposed to this hazard are shown in Table CA-4. Note that
even if an area has a high percentage of land in a high or very high landslide exposure
susceptibility zone, this does not mean there is a high risk (vulnerability), because risk is the
intersection of a hazard and assets.
No development changes affected the jurisdiction’s overall vulnerability to this hazard.
Potential landslide-related impacts are adequately described within Volume I, Section 2 and
include infrastructural damages, economic impacts (due to isolation and/or arterial road
closures), property damages, and obstruction to evacuation routes. Rain-induced landslides and
debris flows can potentially occur during any winter in Jackson County and thoroughfares
beyond City limits are susceptible to obstruction as well.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 60
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-43
The most common type of landslides in Jackson County are slides caused by erosion. Slides move
in contact with the underlying surface, are generally slow moving and can be deep. Rainfall-
initiated landslides tend to be smaller; while earthquake induced landslides may be quite large.
All soil types can be affected by natural landslide triggering conditions.
Central Point’s vulnerability to landslides is limited to a few stream banks that are deeply incised.
Possible landslides in these locations would be accurately described as bank failures, which
would be very localized and not occur along the length of a stream channel. The threat of loss to
life or property and damage to structures, including critical facilities, is minimal. The City’s flood
protection requirements establish setbacks along the stream corridors and prevent the location
of structures within the areas at risk of bank failure.
Future Projections
Landslides are often triggered by rainfall when the soil becomes saturated. As a surrogate
measure of landslide risk, the Oregon Climate Change Research Institute (OCCRI report) report
presents a threshold based on recent precipitation (cumulative precipitation over the previous 3
days) and antecedent precipitation (cumulative precipitation on the 15 days prior to the previous
3 days). By the 2050s under the higher emissions scenario, the average number of days per year
in Jackson County on which the landslide risk threshold is exceeded is projected to remain about
the same, with an increase of 0.2 days. However, landslide risk depends on multiple factors, and
this metric, which is based on precipitation, does not reflect all aspects of the hazard. Additional
triggers, such as earthquakes, wildfires, or development, can increase risks of landslides. Future
development along slopes or adjacent to riverbanks will be a greater risk of impact from this
hazard.
Please review Volume I, Section 2 for additional information on this hazard.
Severe Weather
Severe weather can account for a variety of intense and potentially damaging weather events.
These events include windstorms and winter storms. The following section describes the unique
probability and vulnerability of each identified weather hazard. Other more abrupt or irregular
events such as hail are also described in this section.
Extreme Heat Event
The steering committee determined that the City’s probability for extreme heat event is high
(which is the same as the County’s Rating) and that their vulnerability to an extreme heat event
is moderate (which is the same as the County’s Rating). The City did not assess the extreme heat
event hazard in the previous version of their NHMP.
Jackson County’s NHMP Volume I, Section 2, adequately describes the causes and characteristics
of extreme heat, as well as the history, location, extent, and probability of a potential event and
how it relates to future climate projections (see OCCRI report). Generally, an event that affects
the County is likely to affect the City as well. A severe heat episode or "heat wave" occurs about
every two to three years, and typically lasts two to three days but can last as many as five days. A
severe heat episode can be defined as consecutive days of temperatures in the high 90s and
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 61
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-44
above 100. Severe heat hazard in Southern Oregon can be described as the average number of
days with temperatures greater than or equal to 90-degrees Fahrenheit.11
Extreme heat events can and have occurred in the city. While they typically do not cause loss of
life, they are becoming more frequent and have the potential to impact economic activity as well
as quality of life and have caused threat to life in some cases.
Future Projections
According to the Oregon Climate Change Research Institute (OCCRI report) “Future Climate
Projections, Jackson County,”12 average temperature is expected to continue increasing during
the twenty-first century if global emissions of greenhouse gases continue. The number, duration,
and intensity of extreme heat events will increase as temperatures continue to warm. In Jackson
County, the number of extremely hot days (days on which the temperature is 90°F or higher) and
the temperature on the hottest day of the year are projected to increase by the 2020s and
2050s. The number of days per year with temperatures 90°F or higher is projected to increase by
an average of 28 days (range 12–38 days) by the 2050s, relative to the 1971–2000 historical
baselines. The temperature on the hottest day of the year is projected to increase by an average
of about 7°F (range 3–8°F) by the 2050s. Higher temperatures and longer/more extreme heat
events will have negative impacts upon vulnerable populations such as those over 65+, children,
those living in older or temporary housing, and field workers.
See the Risk Assessment (Volume I, Section 2) for additional information on this hazard.
Windstorm
The steering committee determined that the City’s probability for windstorms is high (which is
the same as the County’s rating) and that their vulnerability to windstorms is moderate (which is
the same as the County’s rating). The probability rating has remained the same since the previous
version of the plan. The vulnerability rating has been raised from low to moderate.
Volume I, Section 2 describes the characteristics of windstorm hazards, history, and how they
relate to future climate projections (see OCCRI report), as well as the location, extent, and
probability of a potential event within the region. Because windstorms typically occur during
winter months, they are sometimes accompanied by ice, freezing rain, flooding, and very rarely,
snow. Other severe weather events that may accompany windstorms, including thunderstorms,
hail, lightning strikes, and tornadoes are generally negligible for Central Point.
Volume I, Section 2 describes the impacts caused by windstorms, including power outages,
downed trees, heavy precipitation, building damages, and storm-related debris. Additionally,
transportation and economic disruptions result as well. Microbursts also occur in Central Point
creating strong winds, particularly from the northeast.
Damage from high winds generally has resulted in downed utility lines and trees. Electrical
power can be out anywhere from a few hours to several days. Outdoor signs have also suffered
11 DLCD. Oregon State Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan. 2020.
12 Oregon Climate Change Research Institute, Future Climate Projections, Jackson County, Oregon. February 2023.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 62
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-45
damage. If the high winds are accompanied by rain (which they often are), blowing leaves and
debris clog drainage-ways, which in turn causes localized urban flooding.
Central Point’s location within the central part of the Rogue Valley, away from heavily forested
areas, and the lack of direct impacts from past wind events, limits the impact of windstorms.
Future Projections
Limited research suggests little if any change in the frequency and intensity of windstorms in the
Northwest as a result of climate change. Those impacted by windstorms at present, including
older residential or commercial developments with above-ground utilities, poor insulation or
older construction, heavy tree canopies, or poor storm drainage, will continue to be impacted by
windstorms in the future.
Please review Volume I, Section 2 for additional information on this hazard.
Winter Storm (Snow/Ice)
The steering committee determined that the City’s probability for winter storm is high (which is
the same as the County’s rating) and that their vulnerability to winter storm is moderate (which
is the same as the County’s rating). The probability rating has remained the same since the
previous version of the plan. The vulnerability rating has been lowered in this version of the plan.
Volume I, Section 2 describes the characteristics of winter storm hazards, history, and how they
relate to future climate projections (see OCCRI report), as well as the location, extent, and
probability of a potential event within the region. Severe winter storms can consist of rain,
freezing rain, ice, snow, cold temperatures, and wind. They originate from troughs of low
pressure offshore that ride along the jet stream during fall, winter, and early spring months.
Severe winter storms affecting the City typically originate in the Gulf of Alaska or in the central
Pacific Ocean. These storms are most common from November through March.
Major winter storms can and have occurred in the Central Point area and while they typically do
not cause significant damage, they are frequent and have the potential to impact economic
activity. The most likely impacts to Central Point from winter storms are road closures limiting
access to/from some areas, especially roads to higher elevations, power outages from downed
transmission lines, and damages to structures from tree falls. The damaging effects of winter
storms extend beyond the limits of Central Point and have impacts for the entire region. The
closure or delays along the I-5 corridor can adversely impact the economy locally, regionally, and
statewide.
Future Projections
According to the Oregon Climate Change Research Institute (OCCRI report) “Future Climate
Projections, Jackson County,”13 cold extremes will become less frequent and intense as the
climate warms. In Jackson County, the number of cold days (maximum temperature 32°F or
lower) per year is projected to decrease by an average of 3 days (range -2– -5 days) by the
2050s, relative to the 1971–2000 historical baselines, under the higher emissions scenario. The
temperature on the coldest night of the year is projected to increase by an average of 6°F (range
13 Oregon Climate Change Research Institute, Future Climate Projections, Jackson County, Oregon. February 2023.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 63
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-46
3–9°F) by the 2050s. The intensity of extreme precipitation is expected to increase as the
atmosphere warms and holds more water vapor. In Jackson County, the number of days per year
with at least 0.75 inches of precipitation is not projected to change substantially. However, by
the 2050s, the amount of precipitation on the wettest day and wettest consecutive five days per
year is projected to increase by an average of 15% (range -3–32%) and 11% (range -3–34%),
respectively. If these precipitation events occur in the winter, heavier winter storms with larger
impacts upon transportation routes, vulnerable populations, and economic activity can be
expected.
Please review Volume I, Section 2 for additional information on this hazard.
Volcanic Event
The steering committee determined that the City’s probability for a volcanic event is low (which
is the same as the County’s rating) and that their vulnerability to a volcanic event is low (which is
the same as the County’s rating). These ratings did not change since the previous NHMP.
Volume I, Section 2 describes the characteristics of volcanic hazards and their history, as well as
the location, extent, and probability of a potential event within the region. Generally, an event
that affects the County is likely to affect Central Point as well. Central Point is very unlikely to
experience anything more than volcanic ash during a volcanic event. Though unlikely, the
impacts could be significant to the local water supply, create health problems, and collapse roofs
of vulnerable structures. There is currently no analysis to determine the numbers and types of
buildings, including critical facilities, in the City that would be vulnerable to a volcanic eruption.
Future Projections
Although the science of volcano predictions is improving, it remains challenging to predict a
potential volcanic event. Ash fall, which will be the greatest impact, will impact the entire
County. Impacts will be felt hardest by property managers (ranches, farmers, etc.) and by those
relying upon clean surface water (for drinking water production and irrigation).
Please review Volume I, Section 2 for additional information on this hazard.
Wildfire
The steering committee determined that the City’s probability for wildfire is high (which is the
same as the County’s rating) and that their vulnerability to wildfire is moderate (which is lower
than the County’s rating). These ratings did not change since the previous NHMP.
Volume I, Section 2 describes the characteristics of wildfire hazards, history, and how they relate
to future climate projections (see OCCRI report), as well as the location, extent, and probability
of a potential event within the region. The location and extent of a potential wildfire vary
depending on fuel, topography, and weather conditions. Weather and urbanization conditions
are primarily at cause for the hazard level. Wildfires near Central Point are common.
Figure CA-13 and Figure CA-14 show burn probability in Central Point for community lifelines and
historic buildings.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 64
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-47
Figure CA-14 Burn Probability (Community Lifelines)
Source: Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience. USFS Pacific Northwest Region Wildfire Risk Assessment (PNRA)
Note: To view detail click this link to access Oregon Explorer’s CWPP Planning Tool.
The potential community impacts and vulnerabilities described in Volume I, Section 2 are
generally accurate for the City as well. The Rogue Valley Integrated Fire Protection Plan (RVIFP,
updated 2017) assesses wildfire risk, maps wildland urban interface areas, and includes actions
to mitigate wildfire risk. The City is included in the RVIFP and will update the City’s wildfire risk
assessment if the fire plan presents better data during future updates (an action item is included
within Volume I, Section 4 to participate in updates to the integrated fire plan and to continue to
maintain and update their RVIFP). Central Point is within an area of high wildfire prone urban
landscape. The City hereby incorporates the RVIFP into this addendum by reference to provide
greater detail to sensitivity and exposure to the wildfire hazard. The City participates in Firewise
and has a defensible space (fuel break) ordinance per the Central Point Code.
Property can be damaged or destroyed with one fire as structures, vegetation, and other
flammables easily merge to become unpredictable and hard to manage. Other factors that affect
ability to effectively respond to a wildfire include access to the location and to water, response
time from the fire station, availability of personnel and equipment, and weather (e.g., heat, low
humidity, high winds, and drought).
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 65
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-48
Figure CA-15 Burn Probability (Historic Structures)
Source: Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience. USFS Pacific Northwest Region Wildfire Risk Assessment (PNRA)
Note: To view detail click this link to access Oregon Explorer’s CWPP Planning Tool.
Vulnerability Assessment
Due to insufficient data and resources, Central Point is currently unable to perform a complete
quantitative risk assessment, or exposure analysis, for this hazard. Identified community lifelines
that are exposed to this hazard are shown in Figure CA-3. Note that even if a facility has
exposure, it does not mean there is a high risk (vulnerability).
Ignition sources are generally concentrated along travel corridors and at the edges of urban
areas. Debris-burning, equipment use, and even arson contribute to wildlife ignition sources.
Central Point is bounded by rural areas on the west and north. There are several travel corridors
that connect the City to these areas, and north-south stream corridors, including the Bear Creek
Greenway (the origin of the 2018 Peninger Fire) that connect the City to the wildland-urban
interface and sources of wildland fires.14
14 City of Central Point Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2020.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 66
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-49
Metro areas within ¼-mile of wildlands are vulnerable to risks of wildfires. Areas of Central Point
within ¼-mile of wildlands include the Bear Creek Greenway and the “metro edge”. There are
approximately 1,170 residences within ¼-mile of the Bear Creek Greenway, 1,970 residences
within ¼-mile of the “metro edge” along the north and west sides of the City. There are several
critical facilities within the wildfire risk area, including the new Scenic Fire Station along Scenic
Avenue.
The expected increase in population necessitated the expansion of the City’s urban growth
boundary in 2022, and ultimately, will result in the extension of urban-type development and
densities into current rural areas. Areas proposed for growth, to the west and north of the
current City boundaries are also areas currently within a certain level of risk for wildfires. While
densities will increase in these areas, services, such as access routes, emergency response from
the new fire station, and water supplies, will increase commensurately. It is anticipated that the
level of risk to wildfires will stay the same in these areas.
Future Projections
According to the Oregon Climate Change Research Institute “Future Climate Projections, Jackson
County,”15 wildfire frequency, intensity, and area burned are projected to continue increasing in
the Northwest. Wildfire risk, expressed as the average number of days per year on which fire
danger is very high, is projected to increase in Jackson County by 13 days (range -6– 29) by the
2050s, relative to the historical baseline (1971–2000), under the higher emissions scenario.
Similarly, the average number of days per year on which vapor pressure deficit is extreme is
projected to increase by 29 days (range 12–42) by the 2050s. Communities at risk to wildfire
include those within the urban wildfire interface or along river or creek corridors, like Bear
Creek, where fire can travel quickly. Communities will need to address growing wildfire risks if
populations are not restricted from expanding further into higher risk areas.
15 Oregon Climate Change Research Institute, Future Climate Projections, Jackson County, Oregon. February 2023.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 67
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-50
Appendix A:
Public Involvement Summary
Members of the steering committee provided edits and updates to the NHMP prior to the public
review period as reflected in the final document. In addition, a survey was distributed that
included responses from 266 residents of Central Point (Volume II, Appendix F).
To provide the public information regarding the draft NHMP addendum, and provide an
opportunity for comment, an announcement (see below) was provided from November 16 and
through the FEMA review period on the City’s website. The plan was also posted and announced
on the County’s website. There were XX [to be updated following public comment period]
comments provided. Additional opportunities for stakeholders and the public to be involved in
the planning process are addressed in Volume II, Appendix B.
The Central Point NHMP Steering Committee held three public meetings during the
development of the plan. The third meeting was co-hosted by the Central Point Citizen Advisory
Committee (CAC), which is a volunteer board of Central Point residents that provides feedback
and opinions on planning matters. It was open to the public and provided a forum to explain the
NHMP planning process and encourage input from the general public and active community
stakeholders on draft mitigation actions. The CAC includes representatives from City Council as
well as residents, business owners, property owners, and non-profit organizations concerned
with the environment, housing, etc. This meeting was advertised in the City’s newsletter, on
their website, and via email to stakeholders.
Stakeholder participation was encouraged through one-on-one briefings and interviews.
Stakeholder agencies not directly represented on the CAC or NHMP Steering Committee were
also included in all meeting follow-ups to provide opportunities to provide comments on draft
goals, hazard assessments, mitigation actions, and plan products.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 68
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-51
Website Posting
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 69
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-52
Central Point Steering Committee
Central Point convened a Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Steering Committee, which included
representatives from City departments associated with preventive measures (Building Official),
property protection (Floodplain Manager), natural resource protection (Parks & Recreation
Director, Environmental Services), emergency services (Police Department and Fire District #3),
structural flood control (Public Works Director), and public information (City Council). The
Central Point Steering Committee also sent two representatives to the Jackson County NHMP
Steering Committee (Planner/Floodplain Manager and Fire District #3).
Steering committee members possessed familiarity with Central Point’s community and how it is
affected by natural hazard events. The steering committee guided the Central Point update
process through several steps including hazard assessment, problem identification, goal
confirmation and prioritization, action item review and development, and information sharing,
to update the NHMP and to make the NHMP as comprehensive as possible.
Based on their involvement in hazard mitigation projects or planning, and/or their interest as a
neighboring jurisdiction, representatives from the following agencies were invited to participate
on the NHMP update. Some of these participated at Steering Committee meetings while others
reviewed drafts of the plan and provided feedback by email.
Other Government and Stakeholder Representatives:
• Avista Natural Gas
• Pacific Power and Light
• Rogue Valley Sewer Services
• Medford Water Commission
• Jackson County Housing Authority
• Jackson County Emergency Services
• Rogue Valley Soil and Water Conservation District
• Oregon Department of Transportation
• Rogue Valley Council of Governments
Stakeholders were included in the planning process. Unlike the Steering Committee,
stakeholders for the update were not included in all stages of the planning process, but their
input was included to inform the Steering Committee and provide additional perspectives from
the community.
The steering committee met formally on the following dates:
Meeting #1: Central Point steering committee, February 23, 2023 (via Zoom)
During this meeting, a representative from the steering committee reviewed the previous
NHMP, and was provided updates on hazard mitigation planning, the NHMP update process, and
project timeline. The steering committee:
• Updated recent history of hazard events in the city.
• Reviewed and confirmed the County NHMP’s mission and goals.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 70
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-53
• Discussed the NHMP public outreach strategy.
• Reviewed and provided feedback on the draft risk assessment update including
community vulnerabilities and hazard information.
• Reviewed and updated their existing mitigation strategy (actions).
• Reviewed and updated their implementation and maintenance program.
Meeting Attendees:
• Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner III, City of Central Point
• Derek Zwagerman, Building Official, City of Central Point
• Desiree Badizadegan, Crime Analyst, City of Central Point
• Mark Northrop, Deputy Fire Marshall, Jackson County Fire District No. 3
Meeting 2: Central Point steering committee, October 19, 2023 (via Zoom and In-Person)
During this meeting, the steering committee discussed CRS requirements for the NHMP to
function as a floodplain management plan, reviewed existing goals (city vs. county) and approved
goals for 2023-2028, reviewed and updated the jurisdiction’s mitigation strategy, and discussed
upcoming BRIC grant opportunities. The steering committee:
• Reviewed CRS requirements.
• Reviewed and approved Central Point NHMP goals.
• Discussed capabilities of community to meet goals.
• Reviewed and updated Central Point’s action items.
• Set a follow-up date for obtaining citizen involvement in the development of action items
at the Citizen Advisory Committee meeting in November.
Meeting Attendees:
• Matt Samitore, Parks & Public Works Director
• Derek Zwagerman, Building Official
• Mike Ono, Environmental Services/GIS Coordinator
• Dave Jacob, Parks Planner
• Desiree Badizadegan, Police Office Manager
• Taneea Browning, City Council, Small Business Owner
• Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner III/Floodplain Administrator
Meeting 3: Central Point steering committee, November 13, 2023 (via Zoom and In-Person
During this meeting, which was a combined meeting of the Central Point NHMP Steering
Committee and the City’s Citizen Advisory Committee, the public was provided an opportunity to
respond to draft mitigation actions after learning about the mitigation planning process and the
work to date. The attendees were also provided an overview of Federal funding available for
hazard mitigation by the Oregon Department of Emergency Management. The joint CAC and
Steering Committee:
• Gained an overview of hazard mitigation planning.
• Reviewed draft mitigation actions.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 71
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-54
• Reviewed HMA funding opportunities.
Meeting Attendees:
• Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner III/Floodplain Administrator
• Desiree Badizadegan, Police Office Manager
• Dave Jacob, Parks Planner
• Matt Samitore, Parks & Public Works Director
• Derek Zwagerman, Building Official
• Taneea Browning, City Council, Small Business Owner
• Larry Martin, Environmental Element Steering Committee
• Kora Mousseaux, Jackson County Soil & Water Conservation District
• Ryan Haynes, Housing Authority of Jackson County
• Holly Powers, Jackson County Emergency Management
• Janine Mayer, ODEM
• Ana Feigum, State Hazard Mitigation Officer, ODEM
• Jon Wiebe, Deputy State Hazard Mitigation Officer, ODEM
Invited/included in follow-up:
• Roge River Keeper
• Pacific Corp
• Rogue Valley Sewer Services
• Rogue Valley Council of Governments
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 72
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-55
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 73
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-56
Attachment B:
Action Item Changes
Table CA-7 is an accounting of the status (complete or not complete) and major changes to
actions since the previous NHMP. All actions were renumbered in this update to be consistent
with other jurisdictions that are participating in the multi-jurisdictional NHMP. Actions identified
as still relevant are included in the updated action plan (Table CA-1).
Previous NHMP Actions that are Not Complete and No Longer Relevant:
Multi-Hazard, Long Term #1, “Obtain funding and resources to implement high priority mitigation
actions items.” No longer relevant. This action is considered part of the implementation of the
NHMP and determined not to be mitigation.
Table CA-7 Status of All Hazard Mitigation Actions in the Previous Plan
2020 Action Item
2024
Action
Item
Status Still Relevant?
(Yes/No)
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Items
Short Term#1 1.1 Not Complete Yes
Short Term #2 1.1 Not Complete Yes
Short Term #3 1.3 Not Complete Yes
Long Term #1 - Not Complete No
- 1.4 New Yes
- 1.5 New Yes
Earthquake Mitigation Items
Short Term #1 4.3 Not Complete Yes
Short Term #2 4.1 Not Complete, combined into 4.1 Yes
Long Term #1 4.2 Not Complete Yes
Long Term #2 4.1 Not Complete, combined into 4.1 Yes
Flood Mitigation Items
Within FEMA-Mapped Floodplains
Short Term #1 6.3 Not Complete Yes
Short Term #2 6.1 Not Complete Yes
Short Term #3 6.2 Not Complete Yes
Long Term #1 6.4 Not Complete Yes
Long Term #2 6.5 Not Complete Yes
Outside FEMA-Mapped Floodplains
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 74
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
| Jackson County NHMP 2024: Central Point Addendum Page | CA-57
2020 Action Item
2024
Action
Item
Status Still Relevant?
(Yes/No)
Short Term #1 6.6 Not Complete Yes
Long Term #2 6.7 Not Complete Yes
Long Term #3 6.8 Not Complete Yes
- 6.9 New Yes
Severe Weather Mitigation Items
Short Term #1 8.1 Not Complete Yes
Short Term #2 8.2 Not Complete Yes
Long Term #1 8.3 Not Complete Yes
Wildfire Mitigation Items
Short Term #1 10.4 Not Complete Yes
Short Term #2 10.1 Not Complete Yes
Wildfire, Long Term #1 10.5 Not Complete Yes
Wildfire, Long Term #2 10.2 Not Complete Yes
Wildfire, Long Term #3 10.6 Not Complete Yes
- 10.3 New Yes
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 75
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
City Council Resolution No. __ (02/22/2024)
RESOLUTION NO. ___
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTRAL POINT
ADOPTING THE 2024 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT ADDENDUM TO THE JACKSON
COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL NATURAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council of Central Point, Oregon finds and recites the following facts related to the
adoption of the City of Central Point Addendum in the Jackson County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural
Hazards Mitigation Plan:
A. The City of Central Point recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property
within the community;
B. Implementing hazard mitigation actions will reduce the potential for harm to people and property
from future hazard events;
C. An adopted, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) – approved hazard mitigation
plan is a pre-requisite for mitigation project funding eligibility under FEMA pre- and post-
disaster mitigation grant programs;
D. The City of Central Point fully participated in the FEMA-prescribed mitigation planning process
to prepare the Jackson County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan, which has
established a comprehensive, coordinated planning process to eliminate or minimize these
vulnerabilities; and
E. The Oregon Department of Emergency Management and FEMA Region X officials have
reviewed the Jackson County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan and approved
it contingent upon this official adoption of the participating governing body; and
F. The Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan is comprised of three volumes: Volume I -Basic
Plan, Volume II – Appendices, and Volume III – Jurisdictional Addenda, collectively
referred to herein as the NHMP.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point by Resolution No. __
does hereby resolve:
Section 1: The “Jackson County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan” is
adopted as the official plan for the City.
Section 2: The City of Central Point will submit this resolution to the Oregon Department of
Emergency Management and FEMA Region X officials to facilitate final approval of this
plan.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 76
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
_
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
City Council Resolution No. __ (02/22/2024)
PASSED by the City Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 22nd day of
February, 2024.
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Representative
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 77
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
_
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
(
1
8
0
2
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
)
City of Central Point
Staff Report to Council
ISSUE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
DEPARTMENT:
Community Development
FROM: Stephanie Powers, Planning Director
MEETING DATE: February 22, 2024
SUBJECT: Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment File No. CPA-23001
ACTION REQUIRED:
Public Hearing
Ordinance 1st Reading
RECOMMENDATION:
Not Applicable
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
On January 26, 2023, the City Council approved Resolution No. 1731, a resolution of intent to
initiate Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendments to support housing production.
The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on February 6, 2024,
received public testimony and forwarded a recommendation to City Council to approve the
proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (“Amendment”). Testimony received
expressed concern about the conversion of open space to housing, traffic impacts and general
concerns about development impacts on the City overall.
The proposed Amendments to the General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Map and Overlay Map in the
Land Use Element, include the following:
1. Taylor Road at North Haskell Street (37S 2W 03DC, Tax Lots 3402, 3603 (0.73 acres)
and 37S 2W 10AB, Tax Lot 1300 (0.18 acres). The proposed amendment would change
the existing Civic land use designation to High Density Residential (HRes). A local land
developer has acquired the property and has prepared a preliminary plan to develop
single-story, cottage-style multifamily units to support affordable age-in-place housing.
The proposed map amendment is necessary to apply a zoning designation that would
permit housing construction. Per the Land Use Element, the Medium Mix Residential
(MMR) or High Mix Residential (HMR) zone could be applied. Staff is recommending
MMR in the concurrent Minor Zone Map Amendment application (ZC-23001).
2. 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 03D, Tax Lot 100 (21.13 acres). The proposed
amendment would change the Overlay Map extending the Transit Oriented Development
(TOD) Overlay to include the property; and, change the existing Employment
Commercial land use designation on the GLUP Map to HRes on a portion of the site.
The purpose of the proposed changes is to allow a combination of affordable and market
rate high density housing while preserving opportunities for commercial use in stand-
alone and/or mixed-use configurations.
The property is owned by the Housing Authority of Jackson County. They approached
7.B
Packet Pg. 78
the City in October 2021 prior to purchasing the site to evaluate options that would allow
construction of affordable housing on roughly 5.5 acres of the property. Their stated
intent was to sell the remaining portion of the site for market rate housing (7.4 acres) and
commercial use (8.2 acres). The current land use and zoning designations do not allow
housing. By extending the TOD Overlay and amending the land use and zoning map,
the property owner has the opportunity to accomplish their objectives and the City is able
to require master planning that will support a livable, mixed-use environment.
Since discussions began with the Housing Authority, the State passed House Bill 2984,
which allows development of qualified affordable housing in commercial zones without
requiring a zone change or conditional use permit. This would allow the Housing
Authority to construct qualified affordable housing on the site without consideration of
minimum/maximum density or other clear and objective standards that would otherwise
apply in an area planned and zoned for residential use. During the public hearing, the
Planning Commission considered two scenarios:
• Scenario 1 - Maximize preservation of Employment Commercial lands thereby
granting maximum flexibility to the Housing Authority to develop affordable
housing on the City’s commercial lands.
• Scenario 2 – Designate the site area contemplated for affordable and market rate
housing as HRes to support residential zoning that would establish clear and
objective criteria for future residential land development.
The Planning Commission recommended Scenario 2 be approved because it
provides a clear process and criteria for housing development while balancing the
need for retaining commercial use opportunities.
At the February 22, 2024 City Council meeting, staff will present the existing land use and
proposed amendments for a second duly noticed public hearing and 1st reading of the
ordinance.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:
There are no costs aside from in-kind contributions associated with the proposed Minor
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment.
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
The proposed Amendment applies existing policies in the Land Use Element to lands within the
City Limits. To approve the Amendment, the City Council must find that the change is consistent
with CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments. This
includes demonstrated compliance with the Statewide Planning Goals, applicable policies of the
Central Point Comprehensive Plan and the State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-
0060). Staff has prepared the application and provided written Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law (Attachment 2). These findings of fact demonstrate that the proposed Amendment
provides needed housing in balance with employment needs and is consistent with the approval
criteria summarized above. Of note, a Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted and found that the
proposed change would decrease traffic impacts and consequently no significant impact is
found to the City’s transportation system.
COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS:
Strategic Priority: Community Investment, Goal 6 – Meet the housing needs of Central Point
7.B
Packet Pg. 79
residents and businesses. .
Strategy 1 – Rely on the findings, policies and implementation of the City’s Comprehensive Plan
Population, Housing and Economic Elements.
Strategy 2 – Support and Capitalize on opportunities to collaborate on projects with agencies
who specialize in providing affordable housing.
Strategy 3 – Pursue grant and/or Urban Renewal assistance in making housing affordable and
accessible to residents.
Comment: The proposed Amendment implements the City’s Housing and Economic Elements
by providing land use designations supportive of both residential and employment needs. The
City recognizes it has a housing shortage of approximately 2,800 housing units and affordability
for all segments of the population is challenging. The proposed Amendment leverages
partnerships with local land developers who have prepared preliminary plans to provide
affordable, accessible housing in Central Point in the near-term.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Open the public hearing to receive testimony on the proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment and: 1) Forward the Ordinance to a 2nd Reading with or without changes; or 2)
Deny the Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to forward the Ordinance Amending the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Map on
properties located at the corner of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street (0.9 acres) and 1777
East Pine Street (12.9 acres) to increase housing production to a second reading.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance (CPA-23001)
2. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
7.B
Packet Pg. 80
Ordinance No. _______; Council Meeting ___/___/2024
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
ON PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF TAYLOR ROAD AND NORTH
HASKELL STREET (0.91 ACRES) AND 1777 EAST PINE STREET (12.9 ACRES) TO
INCREASE HOUSING PRODUCTION.
Recitals:
A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statutes
(ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and
implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning
Goals.
B. The City Council by Resolution No. 1731 initiated a Minor Comprehensive Plan
Map Amendment to consider changes to the General Land Use Plan Map to
support housing production.
C. The Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment includes the following
changes:
a. Amend the land use designation on 0.9 acres located at the intersection of
Taylor Road and North Haskell Street from Civic to High Density Residential as
shown in Exhibit A. The properties are identified on the Jackson County
Assessor’s Map as 37S 2W 03DC, TL 3404, 3603 (0.73 acres) and 37S 2W
10AB, TL 1300 (0.18 acres).
b. Amend the land use designation on 12.9 acres located along the north
portion of 1777 East Pine Street from Employment Commercial to High Density
Residential as shown in Exhibit B. The property is identified on the Jackson
County Assessor’s Map as 37S 2W 03D, Tax Lot 100.
c. Extend the Transit Oriented Development Overlay to include 21.13 acres
located at 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 03D, Tax lot 100) as shown in Exhibit
C.
D. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with
ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals and
compatibility with City Comprehensive Plans.
E. Pursuant to authority granted by the City Charter and the ORS, the City may
amend the Central Point Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map which was
originally adopted on August 29, 1980 and has been amended at various times
since.
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 81
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
C
P
A
-
2
3
0
0
1
)
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
2
]
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Ordinance No. _______; Council Meeting ___/___/2024
F. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.96.100
Comprehensive Plan Map and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments – Purpose
and Chapter 17.05.010, Applications and Development Permit Review
Procedures, the City has accepted an application and conducted the following
duly advertised public hearings to consider the proposed amendment:
a. Planning Commission hearing on February 6, 2024
b. City Council hearing on February 22, 2024.
G. At the February 22, 2024 public hearing, the Council considered the staff report
and all testimony and evidence in the record.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon all the information received in the record, the City Council
adopts the City staff report dated February 22, 2024, Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law Sections 1, 2, 6, 8 and 9, and Planning Commission Resolution No. 916 including
all exhibits thereto, herein incorporated by reference; and determines that changing
community conditions, needs and desires justify the amendments and hereby adopts the
proposed amendments in their entirely.
Section 2. The City Comprehensive General Land Use Plan Map is hereby
amended as set forth in Exhibits A and B, which are attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference.
Section 3. The City Transit Oriented Development Overlay Map is hereby
amended as set forth in Exhibit C, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference.
Section 4. The City Manager is directed to conduct post acknowledgement
procedures defined in ORS 197.610 et seq. upon adoption of the changes to the zoning
and Comprehensive Plan maps.
Section 5. Effective date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance
enacted by the council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The
effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
_____ day of _____________________, 2024.
__________________________
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 82
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
C
P
A
-
2
3
0
0
1
)
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
2
]
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Ordinance No. _______; Council Meeting ___/___/2024
_____________________________
City Recorder
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 83
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
C
P
A
-
2
3
0
0
1
)
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
2
]
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Ordinance No. _______; Council Meeting ___/___/2024
EXHIBIT A
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 84
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
C
P
A
-
2
3
0
0
1
)
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
2
]
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Ordinance No. _______; Council Meeting ___/___/2024
EXHIBIT B
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 85
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
C
P
A
-
2
3
0
0
1
)
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
2
]
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Ordinance No. _______; Council Meeting ___/___/2024
EXHIBIT C
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 86
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
C
P
A
-
2
3
0
0
1
)
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
2
]
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
File No. CPA-23001 & ZC-23001
Applicant:
City of Central Point ) Findings of Fact
140 South Third Street ) and
Central Point, OR 97502 ) Conclusions of Law
1 Introduction
On January 26, 2023, the City of Central Point City Council approved Resolution No.1731, a
Resolution Declaring the City Council’s intent to initiate Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendment applications to correct mapping errors, support housing production and address
land use and transportation compatibility challenges. At this time, the City is presenting a Minor
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPA-23001) and a Minor Zoning Map Amendment (ZC-
23001) to support production of needed housing at two (2) locations in the City.
In accordance with CPMC 17.05.100, CPMC 17.96.300 and CPMC 17.10.300(B), the proposed
Minor Comprehensive Plan Map and Zone Map Amendments are being processed using Type
III procedures set forth in CPMC 17.05.400.
The Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law present the proposed applications and their
conformance with applicable criteria as set forth below:
Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Minor Zone Map Amendment
• CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan
and Urban Growth Boundary
Amendments
o Statewide Planning Goals
o Comprehensive Plan
o State Transportation Planning
Rule (OAR 660-012-0060)
o Availability of public facilities and
services (existing or planned)
• CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and
Zoning Text Amendments
o Comprehensive Plan
o State Transportation Planning
Rule (OAR 660-012-0060)
o Availability of public facilities
and services (existing or
planned)
The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are presented in four (4) parts as follows:
1. Introduction
2. Background Narrative
3. Statewide Planning Goals
4. State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060)
5. Central Point Comprehensive Plan
6. CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan Amendment
7. CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map Amendment
8. Summary Conclusion
9. Exhibits
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 87
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
2 Background Narrative
The City has been approached by two (2) developers that would like to produce a combination
of market rate and affordable housing at two (2) locations in the city. Both properties are
currently planned and zoned for uses that prohibit housing. As provided below, the City is
proposing to amend the land use and zoning as necessary to remove barriers to housing
production.
2.1 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
The City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element maps and manages the City’s
land use classifications. The General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Map shows the distribution land
use designations throughout the city. The Land Use Overlay Map illustrates the location of the
City’s five overlay districts. The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment includes
two (2) changes to the Central Point GLUP (Figures 1-5) and one amendment to the Land Use
Overlay Map (Figure 6-7) as described below:
• GLUP Map Amendment #1 - Taylor Road Infill/Housing Production (37S 2W 03DC, Tax
Lot 3402, 3603). Change the General Land Use Plan (GLUP) designation from Civic to
High Density Residential (HRes) (Figures 1 and 2). The subject properties are located
near the intersection of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street. A local land developer
has acquired the property and would like to develop cottage style multifamily units to
support affordable, age-in-place housing.
• GLUP Map Amendment #2 – 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 100). The
proposal would re-designate a portion of the site from Employment Commercial to High
Density Residential. The subject property is owned by the Housing Authority of Jackson
County. During a Pre-Application Conference in 2022, the HAJC presented a preliminary
plan to subdivide the property to provide a combination of affordable and market rate
high density housing on approximately 12.9 acres and retain opportunities for
commercial development on the 8.4 remaining acres.
The current land use designations are not supportive of zoning the site for residential
and commercial mixed-use. However recent legislative changes would allow qualified
affordable housing to be built on commercial land contrary to limitations imposed by the
current zoning. Given the City’s limited commercial land supply, City staff advised the
HAJC in the Pre-Application Conference and written report changes to the land use and
zoning on this property would be necessary to support housing production and maintain
the City’s limited commercial land supply.
The proposed change to the GLUP map would allow the City to plan for housing in
combination with commercial uses on the site and either 1) establish land use
designations and zoning that provide clear and objective criteria for future development;
or, 2) provide maximum flexibility to the HAJC to develop qualified affordable housing
without clear and objective standards for minimum/maximum density, design, etc.. Two
(2) scenarios have been evaluated based on these options and are presented for
consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council:
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 88
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
o Scenario 1: Change 7.4 acres from Employment Commercial to High Density
Residential to support market rate housing. Pre-Application Conference held on
October 25, 2021, HAJC discussed their intent to construction affordable housing
on 5.5 acres and to market the remaining acreage for market rate housing and
commercial development. Scenario 1 limits the land use amendment to the
market rate housing property only, which maintains the commercial land supply
until such time the HAJC develops the 5.5 acres with qualified affordable housing
in accordance with House Bill 2984.
o Scenario 2: Change 12.9 acres from Employment Commercial to High Density
Residential to support both the market rate housing on a 7.4 acre portion of the
site and the 5.5 acre area envisioned for future affordable housing. The rationale
behind including Scenario 2 is to provide greater predictability and regulation of
the affordable housing portion with regarding to minimum density standards and
design standards. This scenario would eliminate the opportunity to develop a
stand-alone commercial use but would allow a mix of commercial and housing.
• Land Use Overlay Map Amendment – 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot
100). The proposed amendment would extend the Transit Oriented Development
Overlay to include this property, which is roughly 22 acres in size. If the property is
included in the TOD Overlay, future site development will be subject to design and
development standards that emphasize facilitating multi-modal transportation options
and livability. This modification is supportive of facilitating the City’s compliance with
Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities rules, as this site has been identified as a
priority area for Climate Friendly Area (CFA) designation. The CFA has similar
characteristics to the TOD Overlay. If approved, the proposed modification will reduce
the likelihood that new development at this location will become legally nonconforming
following the CFA designation process.
At the Planning Commission and City Council meetings, the proposed amendments will be
considered at approved with Scenario 1 or Scenario 2 or denied.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 89
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 1 - Existing GLUP Map: Taylor Road
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 90
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 2 - Proposed GLUP Map: Taylor Road at North Haskell Street
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 91
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 3 - Existing GLUP: 1777 East Pine Street
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 92
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 4 - Proposed GLUP: 1777 East Pine Street, Scenario 1
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 93
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 5 - Proposed GLUP: 1777 East Pine Street, Scenario 2
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 94
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 6 - Proposed TOD Overlay Extension
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 95
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 96
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
2.2 Zone Map Amendment.
Zoning Districts specify the land use and development regulations that apply to development in
the City. The City’s Zoning Map identifies the spatial distribution of the City’s zoning districts
based on the land use designations shown on the GLUP Map. There are three changes
proposed to the Zoning Map, which are illustrated on Figures 10-16 and described below:
• Extend the TOD Overlay to include the HAJC property (37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 100). This
would match the change to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Overlay Map.
• Re-zone the Taylor Road Infill Site (37S 2W 03DC, Tax Lot 3402, 3603) to Medium Mix
Residential (MMR). This zoning classification aligns with the High Density Residential
Land Use Designation and would support multifamily residential housing production. In
this case, the proposal would help increase the supply of affordable housing in the City.
• Re-zone a portion of the HAJC property from Employment Commercial to High Mix
Residential (HMR) or a combination of HMR and MMR. This change would align with the
GLUP Map Amendment Scenario #1 or #2 and support high density housing with
established minimum/maximum density ranges and development standards for both
affordable and market rate housing projects while preserving opportunities for mixed-use
(residential/commercial) development.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 97
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
[Insert Figures 5-8]
Figure 7 - Existing Zoning, Taylor Road at North Haskell Street
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 98
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 8 - Proposed Zoning, Taylor Road at North Haskell Street
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 99
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 9 - Existing Zoning, 1777 East Pine Street
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 100
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 10 - Proposed Zoning, Scenario 1 (1777 East Pine Street)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 101
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 11 - Proposed Zoning, Scenario 2 (1777 East Pine Street)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 102
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
3 Statewide Planning Goals
In accordance with CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and Text Amendments and CPMC 17.96,
Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments, the Statewide Planning Goals
apply to Comprehensive Plan amendments. The Statewide Planning Goals 1-14 are addressed
below for File No. CPA-23001. Goals 15-19 involve coastal lands and areas in the Willamette
Valley, which do not apply to the City of Central Point.
3.1 Goal 1 – Citizen Involvement
To develop a citizen’s involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be
involved in all phases of the planning process.
Finding, Goal 1: Finding, Goal 1: The City’s Citizen Involvement Program is set forth in
the Comprehensive Plan and CPMC 17.05. This program specifies that a broad
spectrum of affected citizens be involved throughout preparation, implementation,
monitoring and amendment of plans, including but not limited to a Citizen’s Advisory
Committee. Procedures in CPMC 17.05 establish notification and involvement
requirements relative to each application type (i.e. Type I, II, III, IV).
The City took this matter to the City Council in a public meeting on January 26, 2023 to
consider whether the initiate the proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments to support housing. Additionally, the Proposed Amendments have been
processed in accordance with Type III procedures, including mailed and posted notices
of the public hearings scheduled for the Planning Commission on February 6, 2024 and
the City Council on February 22, 2024. Additionally, the City posted notice of the
proposed amendments on the DLCD Post Acknowledgement Plan Amendment (PAPA)
portal on December 5, 2023 and revised this notice on December 14, 2023.
Conclusion, Goal 1: Consistent.
3.2 Goal 2 – Land Use Planning
To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and
actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual basis for such decisions and
actions.
Finding, Goal 2: The City’s land use planning process and policy framework is provided
in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan and Central Point Municipal Code
in Title 17. The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendment
applies existing land use and zoning designations to the properties on Taylor Road and
East Pine Street. Approval of the proposed amendments is subject to the criteria for
Comprehensive Plan Amendments in CPMC 17.96 and Zoning Amendments in CPMC
17.10.
Conclusion, Goal 2: The City has applied its land use planning process and policy
framework to the proposed map amendments.
3.3 Goal 3 – Agricultural Lands
To preserve and maintain agricultural lands.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 103
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Finding, Goal 3: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments are to lands within the city limits do not involve or otherwise affect
agricultural lands.
Conclusion, Goal 3: Not applicable.
3.4 Goal 4 – Forest Lands
To conserve forest lands by maintaining the forest land base and to protect the state’s forest
economy by making possible economically efficient forest practices that assure the continuous
growing and harvesting of forest tree species as a leading use on forest land consistent with
sound management of soil, air, water, and fish and wildlife resources and to provide for
recreational opportunities and agriculture.
Finding, Goal 4: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments are to lands within the city limits do not involve or otherwise affect forest
lands.
Conclusion, Goal 4: Not applicable.
3.5 Goal 5 – Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces
To protect natural resources and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces.
Finding, Goal 5: Pursuant to Goal 5, the City is required to adopt programs and
regulations that protect natural resources and conserve scenic, historic and open space
resources. Goal 5 resources that must be inventoried include: wetlands, riparian
corridors, wildlife habitat, federal wild and scenic rivers, state scenic waterways,
groundwater resources, approved Oregon recreational trails, natural areas, wilderness
areas, mineral and aggregate resources, energy sources, and cultural areas. Local
governments are also encouraged to inventory historic resources, open space and
scenic view and sites.
The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments involving 1777
East Pine Street include land that is within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and
riparian corridor for Bear Creek. At this time, the City is updating its Environmental
Element of the Comprehensive Plan including a local wetland and riparian inventory.
The lands with identified natural resources will be managed as a function of the land
development process consistent with local implementing regulations for natural
resources including floodplain, riparian areas and wetlands, as well as state and federal
requirements.
Conclusion, Goal 5: Consistent.
3.6 Goal 6 – Air, Water and Land Resources Quality
To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state.
Finding, Goal 6: Goal 6 requires that all waste and process discharges from existing
and future development will not threaten to violate or violate applicable state or federal
environmental quality statutes, rules and standards. There is no interpretive rule for Goal
6. The City finds that air, water and land resource quality will be addressed by the City’s
land use, transportation and environmental programs that minimize, mitigate or avoid
conflicts with Goal 6 associated with land development: In this case, the proposed
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 104
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
actions to modify the land use designation, TOD overlay boundary and zoning districts
on property located on Taylor Road and East Pine Street will allow for housing
development. Future land development proposals will be subject to the City’s land use,
transportation and environmental programs that minimize, mitigate or avoid conflicts with
Goal 6, including:
• Land Use and Transportation Planning. The land use and development
regulations that apply to the properties that are the subject of this amendment,
will be in the TOD Overlay. The TOD Overlay promotes multi-modal
transportation in neighborhoods with mixed-use opportunities and human-scale
design. This supports the ability of residents to have needs met within walking
distance and thereby reduces vehicle miles traveled, which is associated with air
and water pollution.
• Stormwater Management. The City of Central Point manages all land
development in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System Phase II Program. This includes erosion and sediment control, as well
as post-construction runoff treatment to protect water quality from pollutants and
increased volume associated with increased impervious surface area and land
development. The proposed Amendments do not cause land development;
however, future land development will be subject to the City’s stormwater
management program to protect water quality.
• Floodplain Management. The City’s Floodplain Management regulations are set
forth in CPMC 8.24 and address risk reduction, as well as higher standards that
buffer floodways and preserve riparian corridors. Future land development
proposals for the subject properties will be subject to the City’s Floodplain
Program, including preservation of open space within the floodway and floodway
buffer.
• Urban Forestry. Central Point is a Tree City USA and implements regulations
(CPMC 12.36, CPMC 17.75, and CPMC 17.67) and programs to increase the
urban forest canopy in the City. Trees are shown to promote cleaner air and
water (photosynthesis, through fall, evapotranspiration), cooler ambient air
temperatures (shade from increased canopy) and increased soil quality (by
increasing soil infiltration and beneficial soil organisms). The City will continue its
program of requiring street trees, along street frontages and within parking areas
development buffers. This will apply to the properties that are the subject of the
Minor Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendments at such time
they are developed.
Conclusion, Goal 6: Consistent.
3.7 Goal 7 – Areas Subject to Natural Hazards
To protect people and property from natural hazards.
Finding, Goal 7: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments have been evaluated for natural hazard impacts, as shown in Figures 12
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 105
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
and 13. The Taylor Road property is partially impacted by the low-to-moderate risk
floodplain (-shaded flood zone) and is not subject to CPMC 8.24. The property at 1777
East Pine Street is partially impacted by the high risk floodplain along the west property
boundary. Future land development proposals on this site will require conformance with
CPMC 8.24, Flood Damage Prevention.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 106
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 12 - Environmental Resource Map, Taylor Road at North Haskell Properties
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 107
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 13 - Environmental Resource Map, 1777 East Pine Street
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 108
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Conclusion, Goal 7: Protection of people and property from flood hazards will be
managed consistent with CPMC 8.24 at the time of land development application
consistent with Goal 7.
3.8 Goal 8 – Recreational Needs
To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors and, where appropriate,
to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destination resorts.
Finding, Goal 8: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments respond to the need for housing and the opportunity to support it.
Recreation needs are managed through the City’s Parks Element, which does not identify
any needs for Neighborhood or Community Parks on either of the two proposed map
amendment areas. Notwithstanding, the proposed amendment to include 1777 East Pine
Street in the TOD Overlay will support neighborhood recreation through the master
planning process (required for all properties greater than 2 acres) and provision of open
space in conjunction with new housing development. The Taylor Road property is already
part of the TOD Overlay and is proximate to existing parks and open space lands that
were developed as part of the Twin Creeks TOD Master Plan.
Conclusion, Goal 8: The proposed map amendments, through the future land
development process, are supportive and consistent with the need to provide for the
recreational needs of the community.
3.9 Goal 9 – Economic Development
To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety of economic activities vital
to the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon’s citizens.
Finding, Goal 9: The proposed Map Amendments apply land use and zoning
designations, including the TOD Overlay, High Density Residential (Hares), Employment
Commercial land use designations; and, MMR, HMR and EC zones. These land use
designations and corresponding zoning districts provide the dual function of allowing
increased housing production while retaining flexibility to provide commercial uses in
horizontal and vertical mixed-use configurations based on market demands. The City finds
that the proposed amendments are consistent with the need to provide economic
opportunities in balance with housing needs.
Conclusion, Goal 9: Consistent.
3.10 Goal 10 – Housing
To provide for the housing needs of the state.
Finding, Goal 10: The City added lands the to the UGB in 2020 to provide land that can
support 2,887 needed housing units. Lands within the newly added UGB are currently
ineligible for annexation due to requirements to complete environmental and public facility
planning, which is likely to conclude later this year. Meanwhile, the City has very limited
residential buildable lands available. The proposed Map Amendments recognize that the
State has set a housing production goal of 36,000 units per year to combat the state’s
housing shortage (Executive Order 23-04) and that the City can contribute to increased
housing production by working collaboratively with public and private partners who are
willing and able to increase the City’s housing supply. In this case, the City has met with
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 109
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
the landowners for the properties that are included in the Minor Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Map Amendments. Both have shared preliminary plans to develop a combination
of affordable and market rate housing. The preliminary development plan shown in Figure
14 was the subject of a Pre-Application Conference held on October 19, 2021 for 1777
East Pine Street. As shown in the Map Amendment applications, the City’s proposal
aligns with the preliminary development plan to support increased housing. However, in
recognition of the need for higher density housing, the City is proposing that the northeast
portion of the site be designated as HMR and not MMR, which increases the minimum
housing density by 11 units per acre.
Figure 14 - Preliminary Development Plan, 1777 East Pine Street
Two informal preliminary development meetings have held with the property owner for the
Taylor Road properties. We discussed the preliminary concept to provide cottage-style
multifamily units that are small and affordable for older adults who are seeking age-in-
place housing. The most recent preliminary plan is shown in Figure 15.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 110
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Figure 15 - Preliminary Housing Plan (Taylor Road at North Haskell Street)
Based on these meetings, the City staff presented and the City Council initiated proposed
Minor comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to support housing production
while maintaining opportunities for employment uses in the TOD Overlay and associated
zoning.
As shown in Tables 1 and 2, below, the proposed amendments would increase housing
production by a minimum of 198 or 275 units depending on whether the Council adopts
Scenario 1 (Figures 4 and 9) or Scenario 2 (Figures 5 and 10). At this time, housing is
prohibited on the properties that are part of this application.
Table 1 - Proposed Map Amendment Housing Production Summary, Scenario 1
Property
Location
Acreage Proposed
Zone
Min.
Density
Max.
Density
Min. No.
Units
Max.
No.
Units
Taylor Road 0.9 MMR 14 32 13 29
East Pine Street 7.4 HMR 25 N/A 185
13.7 EC N/A N/A N/A N/A
Totals: 22 - - - 198 -
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 111
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Table 2 - Proposed Map Amendment Housing Production Summary, Scenario 2
Property
Location
Acreage Proposed
Zone
Min.
Density
Max.
Density
Min. No.
Units
Max.
No.
Units
Taylor Road 0.9 MMR 14 32 13 29
East Pine Street 7.4 HMR 25 N/A 185
5.5 MMR 14 32 77 176
8.2 EC N/A N/A N/A N/A
Totals: 22 - - - 275 -
Conclusion, Goal 10: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments are consistent with providing needed housing consistent with Statewide
Planning Goal 10, Executive Order 23-04 and the Housing Element.
3.11 Goal 11 – Public Facilities and Services
To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services
to serve as a framework for urban and rural development.
Finding, Goal 11: The proposed Map Amendments are served by existing and planned
public facilities and services per the Public Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan,
the Transportation System Plan, Water System Master Plan and Stormwater Management
Plan. Construction of extended facilities and services will occur as a function of land
development.
Conclusion, Goal 11: Consistent.
3.12 Goal 12 – Transportation
To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system.
Finding, Goal 12: The proposed Map Amendments are in areas with existing and
planned transportation facilities. Extension of facilities and services, such as roads,
sidewalks, bike lanes and transit stations will be a function of land development.
Additionally, inclusion of the properties in the TOD Overlay emphasizes compact land
development patterns and provision of multi-modal transportation facilities and services
that are necessary to support highly livable neighborhoods for all segments of the
population, including those who do not own a car. Accordingly, the City finds that
proposed Map Amendments are supportive of the State’s Transportation Goals.
Conclusion, Goal 12: Consistent.
3.13 Goal 13 – Energy Utilization
To conserve energy.
Finding, Goal 13: The proposed Map Amendments do not impact energy utilization in
and of themselves; however, future land development within high density, mixed-use
neighborhoods reduces energy consumption by promoting multi-modal transportation
options and locating jobs within walking distance of housing. This may have the added
benefit of reducing the need for automobile ownership as the area develops.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 112
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Conclusion, Goal 13: Consistent.
3.14 Goal 14 – Urbanization
To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to
accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries,
to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities.
Finding, Goal 14: The proposed Map Amendments are within the UGB and apply land
use designations that transition density within the context of surrounding land use/zoning
designations and adjacent road classifications. This provides for an orderly and efficient
transition to urban use.
Conclusion, Goal 14: Consistent.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 113
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
4 State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060)
This section addresses OAR 660-012-0060 regarding Plan and Land Use Regulation
Amendments.
(1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land
use regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned
transportation facility, then the local government must put in place measures as provided
in section (2) of this rule, unless the amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10)
of this rule. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a
transportation facility if it would:
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan);
(b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or
(c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this
subsection. If a local government is evaluating a performance standard based on
projected levels of motor vehicle traffic, then the results must be based on
projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified in the
adopted TSP. As part of evaluating projected conditions, the amount of traffic
projected to be generated within the area of the amendment may be reduced if
the amendment includes an enforceable, ongoing requirement that would
demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not limited to, transportation
demand management. This reduction may diminish or completely eliminate the
significant effect of the amendment.
(A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional
classification of an existing or planned transportation facility;
(B) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility
such that it would not meet the performance standards identified in the
TSP or comprehensive plan; or
(C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility
that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards
identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
Finding OAR 660-012-0060(1): The Proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map
Amendments were evaluated for traffic impacts by southern Oregon Transportation
Engineering, LLC.
Taylor Road
The Traffic Impact Analysis for Taylor Road dated August 21, 2023, found that the
proposed Amendment from Civic to High Density Residential/MMR zone, decreases
traffic impacts. Specifically, the TIA found that the proposed modification in the land use
and zoning designations decreases the traffic by 98 Average Daily Trips (ADT) and 33
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 114
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
AM and PM Peak Hour Trips. Additionally, there is no significant increase in vehicles
exceeding 20,000 pounds.
1777 East Pine Street
The TIA for 1777 East Pine Street dated July 6, 2023 evaluated traffic impacts for the
site based on two scenarios that will be considered by the Planning Commission and
City Council. As demonstrated in the TIA, both scenarios show an overall decrease in
trips to the transportation system based on the highest and best uses for existing and
proposed zoning.
• Scenario 1:
o Decreases trips by 3,713 ADT when compared to full commercial zoning;
o Decreases PM Peak Hour Trips by 336 trips.
• Scenario 2:
o Decreases trips by 2,204 ADT when compared to full commercial zoning;
and,
o Decreases PM Peak Hour Trips by 198 trips.
Under both scenarios, the traffic analysis showed that there are no trips directly to or
from the state highway system and that there will be no increase in heavy vehicles over
20,000 pounds gross vehicle weight.
Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(1): As demonstrated in the TIA for Taylor Road and
1777 East Pine Street, there is no significant impact to the transportation system that will
result from the proposed Map Amendments.
(2) If a local government determines that there would be a significant effect, then the local
government must ensure that allowed land uses are consistent with the performance
standards of the facility measured or projected at the end of the planning period
identified in the adopted TSP through one or a combination of the remedies listed in
subsections (a) through (e) below, unless the amendment meets the balancing test in
subsection (e) or qualifies for partial mitigation in section (11) of this rule. A local
government using subsection (e), section (3), section (10) or section (11) to approve an
amendment recognizes that additional motor vehicle traffic congestion may result and
that other facility providers would not be expected to provide additional capacity for
motor vehicles in response to this congestion.
(a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land uses are consistent with the
performance standards of the transportation facility.
(b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive plan to provide transportation facilities,
improvements, or services adequate to support the proposed land uses
consistent with the requirements of this division. Such amendments shall include
a funding plan or mechanism consistent with section (4) or include an
amendment to the transportation finance plan so that the facility, improvement, or
service will be provided by the end of the planning period.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 115
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(c) Amending the TSP to modify the performance standards of the transportation
facility.
(d) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a
development agreement or similar funding method, including, but not limited to,
transportation system management measures or minor transportation
improvements. Local governments shall, as part of the amendment, specify when
measures or improvements provided pursuant to this subsection will be provided.
(e) Providing improvements that would benefit modes other than the significantly
affected mode, improvements to facilities other than the significantly affected
facility, or improvements at other locations, if:
(A) The provider of the significantly affected facility provides a written
statement that the system-wide benefits are sufficient to balance the
significant effect, even though the improvements would not result in
consistency for all performance standards;
(B) The providers of facilities being improved at other locations provide
written statements of approval; and
(C) The local jurisdictions where facilities are being improved provide written
statements of approval.
Finding OAR 660-012-0060(2): See Finding OAR 660-012-0060(1).
Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (2): Not applicable.
(3) Notwithstanding sections (1) and (2) of this rule, a local government may approve an
amendment that would significantly affect an existing transportation facility without
ensuring that the allowed land uses are consistent with the performance standards of the
facility where:
(a) In the absence of the amendment, planned transportation facilities,
improvements, and services as set forth in section (4) of this rule would not be
adequate to achieve consistency with the performance standard for that facility
by the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP;
(b) Development resulting from the amendment will, at a minimum, mitigate the
impacts of the amendment in a manner that avoids further degradation to the
performance of the facility by the time of the development through one or a
combination of transportation improvements or measures;
(c) The amendment does not involve property located in an interchange area as
defined in paragraph (4)(d)(C); and
(d) For affected state highways, ODOT provides a written statement that the
proposed funding and timing for the identified mitigation improvements or
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 116
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
measures are, at a minimum, sufficient to avoid further degradation to the
performance of the affected state highway. However, if a local government
provides the appropriate ODOT regional office with written notice of a proposed
amendment in a manner that provides ODOT reasonable opportunity to submit a
written statement into the record of the local government proceeding, and ODOT
does not provide a written statement, then the local government may proceed
with applying subsections (a) through (c) of this section.
Finding OAR 660-012-0060(3): See Finding OAR 660-012-0060(1).
Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (3): Not applicable.
(4) Determinations under sections (1)–(3) of this rule shall be coordinated with affected
transportation facility and service providers and other affected local governments.
(a) In determining whether an amendment has a significant effect on an existing or
planned transportation facility under subsection (1)(c) of this rule, local
governments shall rely on existing transportation facilities and services and on
the planned transportation facilities, improvements and services set forth in
subsections (b) and (c) below.
(b) Outside of interstate interchange areas, the following are considered planned
facilities, improvements, and services:
(A) Transportation facilities, improvements or services that are funded for
construction or implementation in the Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program or a locally or regionally adopted transportation
improvement program or capital improvement plan or program of a
transportation service provider.
(B) Transportation facilities, improvements or services that are authorized in
a local transportation system plan and for which a funding plan or
mechanism is in place or approved. These include, but are not limited to,
transportation facilities, improvements, or services for which:
transportation systems development charge revenues are being
collected; a local improvement district or reimbursement district has been
established or will be established prior to development; a development
agreement has been adopted; or conditions of approval to fund the
improvement have been adopted.
(C) Transportation facilities, improvements, or services in a metropolitan
planning organization (MPO) area that are part of the area’s federally-
approved, financially constrained regional transportation system plan.
(D) Improvements to state highways that are included as planned
improvements in a regional or local transportation system plan or
comprehensive plan when ODOT provides a written statement that the
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 117
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
improvements are reasonably likely to be provided by the end of the
planning period.
(E) Improvements to regional and local roads, streets or other transportation
facilities or services that are included as planned improvements in a
regional or local transportation system plan or comprehensive plan when
the local government(s) or transportation service provider(s) responsible
for the facility, improvement or service provides a written statement that
the facility, improvement, or service is reasonably likely to be provided by
the end of the planning period.
(c) Within interstate interchange areas, the improvements included in paragraphs
(b)(A)–(C) are considered planned facilities, improvements, and services, except
where:
(A) ODOT provides a written statement that the proposed funding and timing
of mitigation measures are sufficient to avoid a significant adverse impact
on the Interstate Highway system, then local governments may also rely
on the improvements identified in paragraphs (b)(D) and (E) of this
section; or
(B) There is an adopted interchange area management plan, then local
governments may also rely on the improvements identified in that plan
and which are also identified in paragraphs (b)(D) and (E) of this section.
(d) As used in this section and section (3):
(A) Planned interchange means new interchanges and relocation of existing
interchanges that are authorized in an adopted transportation system plan
or comprehensive plan;
(B) Interstate highway means Interstates 5, 82, 84, 105, 205, and 405; and
(C) Interstate interchange area means:
(i) Property within one-quarter mile of the ramp terminal intersection
of an existing or planned interchange on an Interstate Highway; or
(ii) The interchange area as defined in the Interchange Area
Management Plan adopted as an amendment to the Oregon
Highway Plan.
(e) For purposes of this section, a written statement provided pursuant to
paragraphs (b)(D), (b)(E) or (c)(A) provided by ODOT, a local government or
transportation facility provider, as appropriate, shall be conclusive in determining
whether a transportation facility, improvement, or service is a planned
transportation facility, improvement, or service. In the absence of a written
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 118
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
statement, a local government can only rely upon planned transportation
facilities, improvements, and services identified in paragraphs (b)(A)-(C) to
determine whether there is a significant effect that requires application of the
remedies in section (2).
Finding OAR 660-012-0060(4): The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map
Amendment on properties located at the intersection of Taylor Road and North Haskell
Street are adjacent to City owned and operated facilities and are not within and
Interchange Area Management Plan or area of influence (1/2 mile). The Proposed
Amendments and TIA scoping at this location were coordinated with the City Public
Works Department consistent with this rule.
The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map Amendments located at 1777 East
Pine Street are within the ½ mile of the I-5 and Exit 33 Interchange. Per the 2015
Interchange Area Management Plan for Exit 33 (IAMP), there are improvements that will
identified in the vicinity of the site to improve traffic flow and function of the interchange.
Intersection improvements at East Pine/Hamrick Road were recently completed (Project
11/TSP Project #216). Other improvements will be implemented as a function of
development, including signal timing (IAMP Project 5) and Peninger Road/East Pine
Street Improvements (IAMP Project 10/TSP Project 236). As stated in the TIA, the
interchange traffic was analyzed and there are no trips to or from Interstate 5 that will be
generated by the proposal.
Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (4): As demonstrated in the TIA for both property areas
that are the subject of the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments,
the analysis of traffic impacts was coordinated with affected agencies, including Public
Works and ODOT.
(5) The presence of a transportation facility or improvement shall not be a basis for an
exception to allow residential, commercial, institutional, or industrial development on
rural lands under this division or OAR 660-004-0022 and 660-004-0028.
Finding OAR 660-012-0060(5): The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map
Amendments are on lands within the city limits and do not include rural lands.
Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (5): Not applicable.
(6) If a local government is determining whether proposed land uses would affect or be
consistent with planned transportation facilities as provided in sections (1) and (2) using
a performance standard based on projected levels of motor vehicle traffic, then the local
government shall give full credit for potential reduction in vehicle trips for uses located in
mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly centers, and neighborhoods as provided in subsections
(a)–(d);
(a) Absent adopted local standards or detailed information about the vehicle trip
reduction benefits of mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly development, local
governments shall assume that uses located within a mixed-use, pedestrian-
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 119
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
friendly center, or neighborhood, will generate 10 percent fewer daily and peak
hour trips than are specified in available published estimates, such as those
provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
Manual that do not specifically account for the effects of mixed-use, pedestrian-
friendly development. The 10 percent reduction allowed for by this subsection
shall be available only if uses that rely solely on auto trips, such as gas stations,
car washes, storage facilities, and motels are prohibited;
(b) Local governments shall use detailed or local information about the trip reduction
benefits of mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly development where such information is
available and presented to the local government. Local governments may, based
on such information, allow reductions greater than the 10 percent reduction
required in subsection (a);
(c) Where a local government assumes or estimates lower vehicle trip generation as
provided in subsection (a) or (b), it shall ensure through conditions of approval,
site plans, or approval standards that subsequent development approvals
support the development of a mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly center or
neighborhood and provide for on-site bike and pedestrian connectivity and
access to transit as provided for in OAR 660-012-0045(3) and (4). The provision
of on-site bike and pedestrian connectivity and access to transit may be
accomplished through application of acknowledged ordinance provisions which
comply with OAR 660-012-0045(3) and (4) or through conditions of approval or
findings adopted with the plan amendment that ensure compliance with these
rule requirements at the time of development approval; and
(d) The purpose of this section is to provide an incentive for the designation and
implementation of pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use centers and neighborhoods by
lowering the regulatory barriers to plan amendments that accomplish this type of
development. The actual trip reduction benefits of mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly
development will vary from case to case and may be somewhat higher or lower
than presumed pursuant to subsection (a). The commission concludes that this
assumption is warranted given general information about the expected effects of
mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly development and its intent to encourage changes
to plans and development patterns. Nothing in this section is intended to affect
the application of provisions in local plans or ordinances that provide for the
calculation or assessment of systems development charges or in preparing
conformity determinations required under the federal Clean Air Act.
Finding OAR 660-012-0060(6): The proposed Map Amendments on Taylor Road is
within the TOD Overlay, a Mixed-use pedestrian friendly area. The proposed Map
Amendments at 1777 East Pine Street are to include this property in the TOD Overlay.
The TIAs prepared for both locations did not discount the traffic impacts based on the
location being in or proposed to be in a mixed-use/pedestrian friendly area. Even so both
TIAs found reductions in estimated future traffic impacts. The City does not have
localized information about the benefits of development in these areas with regard to
VMT reduction beyond the recommended 10% reduction in this rule. Notwithstanding,
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 120
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
the City’s objective is to include 1777 East Pine Street in the TOD Overlay and to further
the goal of creating highly livable, complete mixed-use/pedestrian friendly
neighborhoods in the City.
Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (6): Consistent.
(7) Amendments to acknowledged comprehensive plans and land use regulations that meet
all of the criteria listed in subsections (a)–(c) shall include an amendment to the
comprehensive plan, transportation system plan, the adoption of a local street plan,
access management plan, future street plan, or other binding local transportation plan to
provide for on-site alignment of streets or accessways with existing and planned arterial,
collector, and local streets surrounding the site as necessary to implement the
requirements in OAR 660-012-0020(2)(b) and 660-012-0045(3):
(a) The plan or land use regulation amendment results in designation of two or more
acres of land for commercial use;
(b) The local government has not adopted a TSP or local street plan that complies
with OAR 660-012-0020(2)(b) or, in the Portland Metropolitan Area, has not
complied with Metro’s requirement for street connectivity as contained in Title 1,
Section 3.08.110 of the Regional Transportation Functional Plan; and
(c) The proposed amendment would significantly affect a transportation facility as
provided in section (1).
Finding OAR 660-012-0060(7): The proposed amendment does not increase the
commercial land use designations in the City and does not result in a significant affect to
any transportation facility as demonstrated in the TIA for the Taylor Road at North
Haskell Street amendment and the 1777 East Pine Street Amendment. Additionally, the
City has an acknowledged TSP.
Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (7): Not applicable.
(8) A “mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly center or neighborhood” for the purposes of this rule,
means:
(a) Any one of the following:
(A) An existing central business district or downtown;
(B) An area designated as a central city, regional center, town center, or main
street in the Portland Metro 2040 Regional Growth Concept;
(C) An area designated in an acknowledged comprehensive plan as a transit-
oriented development or a pedestrian district; or
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 121
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(D) An area designated as a special transportation area as provided for in the
Oregon Highway Plan.
(b) An area other than those listed in subsection (a) which includes or is planned to
include the following characteristics:
(A) A concentration of a variety of land uses in a well-defined area, including
the following:
(i) Medium to high density residential development (12 or more units
per acre);
(ii) Offices or office buildings;
(iii) Retail stores and services;
(iv) Restaurants; and
(v) Public open space or private open space that is available for
public use, such as a park or plaza.
(B) Generally, include civic or cultural uses;
(C) A core commercial area where multi-story buildings are permitted;
(D) Buildings and building entrances oriented to streets;
(E) Street connections and crossings that make the center safe and
conveniently accessible from adjacent areas;
(F) A network of streets and, where appropriate, accessways and major
driveways that make it attractive and highly convenient for people to walk
between uses within the center or neighborhood, including streets and
major driveways within the center with wide sidewalks and other features,
including pedestrian-oriented street crossings, street trees, pedestrian-
scale lighting and on-street parking;
(G) One or more transit stops (in urban areas with fixed route transit service);
and
(H) Limit or do not allow low-intensity or land extensive uses, such as most
industrial uses, automobile sales and services, and drive-through
services.
(9) Notwithstanding section (1) of this rule, a local government may find that an amendment
to a zoning map does not significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility
if all of the following requirements are met.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 122
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(a) The proposed zoning is consistent with the existing comprehensive plan map
designation and the amendment does not change the comprehensive plan map;
(b) The local government has an acknowledged TSP and the proposed zoning is
consistent with the TSP; and
(c) The area subject to the zoning map amendment was not exempted from this rule
at the time of an urban growth boundary amendment as permitted in OAR 660-
024-0020(1)(d), or the area was exempted from this rule but the local
government has a subsequently acknowledged TSP amendment that accounted
for urbanization of the area.
Finding OAR 660-012-0060(9): The proposed Zoning Map Amendment does not
significantly affect existing or planned facilities per the TIA prepared for the Taylor Road
properties and 1777 East Pine Street. Additionally, the proposed zone map amendment
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan (as amended by CPA-23001), complies with
the TSP per the TIA and was not exempt from this rule when the property was included
in the UGB.
Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (9): Consistent.
(10) Notwithstanding sections (1) and (2) of this rule, a local government may amend a
functional plan, a comprehensive plan, or a land use regulation without applying
performance standards related to motor vehicle traffic congestion (e.g. volume to
capacity ratio or V/C), delay, or travel time if the amendment meets the requirements of
subsection (a) of this section. This section does not exempt a proposed amendment
from other transportation performance standards or policies that may apply including, but
not limited to, safety for all modes, network connectivity for all modes (e.g. sidewalks,
bicycle lanes) and accessibility for freight vehicles of a size and frequency required by
the development.
(a) A proposed amendment qualifies for this section if it:
(A) Is a map or text amendment affecting only land entirely within a
multimodal mixed-use area (MMA); and
(B) Is consistent with the definition of an MMA and consistent with the
function of the MMA as described in the findings designating the MMA.
(b) For the purpose of this rule, “multimodal mixed-use area” or “MMA” means an
area:
(A) With a boundary adopted by a local government as provided in
subsection (d) or (e) of this section and that has been acknowledged;
(B) Entirely within an urban growth boundary;
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 123
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(C) With adopted plans and development regulations that allow the uses
listed in paragraphs (8)(b)(A) through (C) of this rule and that require new
development to be consistent with the characteristics listed in paragraphs
(8)(b)(D) through (H) of this rule;
(D) With land use regulations that do not require the provision of off-street
parking, or regulations that require lower levels of off-street parking than
required in other areas and allow flexibility to meet the parking
requirements (e.g. count on-street parking, allow long-term leases, allow
shared parking); and
(E) Located in one or more of the categories below:
(i) At least one-quarter mile from any ramp terminal intersection of
existing or planned interchanges;
(ii) Within the area of an adopted Interchange Area Management
Plan (IAMP) and consistent with the IAMP; or
(iii) Within one-quarter mile of a ramp terminal intersection of an
existing or planned interchange if the mainline facility provider has
provided written concurrence with the MMA designation as
provided in subsection (c) of this section.
(c) When a mainline facility provider reviews an MMA designation as provided in
subparagraph (b)(E)(iii) of this section, the provider must consider the factors
listed in paragraph (A) of this subsection.
(A) The potential for operational or safety effects to the interchange area and
the mainline highway, specifically considering:
(i) Whether the interchange area has a crash rate that is higher than
the statewide crash rate for similar facilities;
(ii) Whether the interchange area is in the top ten percent of locations
identified by the safety priority index system (SPIS) developed by
ODOT; and
(iii) Whether existing or potential future traffic queues on the
interchange exit ramps extend onto the mainline highway or the
portion of the ramp needed to safely accommodate deceleration.
(B) If there are operational or safety effects as described in paragraph (A) of
this subsection, the effects may be addressed by an agreement between
the local government and the facility provider regarding traffic
management plans favoring traffic movements away from the
interchange, particularly those facilitating clearing traffic queues on the
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 124
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
interchange exit ramps.
(d) A local government may designate an MMA by adopting an amendment to the
comprehensive plan or land use regulations to delineate the boundary following
an existing zone, multiple existing zones, an urban renewal area, other existing
boundary, or establishing a new boundary. The designation must be
accompanied by findings showing how the area meets the definition of an MMA.
Designation of an MMA is not subject to the requirements in sections (1) and (2)
of this rule.
(e) A local government may designate an MMA on an area where comprehensive
plan map designations or land use regulations do not meet the definition, if all of
the other elements meet the definition, by concurrently adopting comprehensive
plan or land use regulation amendments necessary to meet the definition. Such
amendments are not subject to performance standards related to motor vehicle
traffic congestion, delay, or travel time.
Finding OAR 660-012-0060(10): The proposed amendments are not within an MMA.
Traffic analysis was prepared in accordance with this rule as demonstrated in the TIA
prepared by Southern Oregon Transportation Engineers, LLC on July 6, 2023 and
August 21, 2023.
Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (10): Not applicable.
(11) A local government may approve an amendment with partial mitigation as provided in
section (2) of this rule if the amendment complies with subsection (a) of this section, the
amendment meets the balancing test in subsection (b) of this section, and the local
government coordinates as provided in subsection (c) of this section.
(a) The amendment must meet paragraphs (A) and (B) of this subsection.
(A) Create direct benefits in terms of industrial or traded-sector jobs created
or retained by limiting uses to industrial or traded-sector industries.
(B) Not allow retail uses, except limited retail incidental to industrial or traded
sector development, not to exceed five percent of the net developable
area.
(C) For the purpose of this section:
(i) “Industrial” means employment activities generating income from
the production, handling, or distribution of goods including, but not
limited to, manufacturing, assembly, fabrication, processing,
storage, logistics, warehousing, importation, distribution and
transshipment, and research and development.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 125
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(ii) “Traded-sector” means industries in which member firms sell their
goods or services into markets for which national or international
competition exists.
(b) A local government may accept partial mitigation only if the local government
determines that the benefits outweigh the negative effects on local transportation
facilities and the local government receives from the provider of any
transportation facility that would be significantly affected written concurrence that
the benefits outweigh the negative effects on their transportation facilities. If the
amendment significantly affects a state highway, then ODOT must coordinate
with the Oregon Business Development Department regarding the economic and
job creation benefits of the proposed amendment as defined in subsection (a) of
this section. The requirement to obtain concurrence from a provider is satisfied if
the local government provides notice as required by subsection (c) of this section
and the provider does not respond in writing (either concurring or non-concurring)
within 45 days.
(c) A local government that proposes to use this section must coordinate with
Oregon Business Development Department, Department of Land Conservation
and Development, area commission on transportation, metropolitan planning
organization, and transportation providers and local governments directly
impacted by the proposal to allow opportunities for comments on whether the
proposed amendment meets the definition of economic development, how it
would affect transportation facilities and the adequacy of proposed mitigation.
Informal consultation is encouraged throughout the process starting with pre-
application meetings. Coordination has the meaning given in ORS 197.015 and
Goal 2 and must include notice at least 45 days before the first evidentiary
hearing. Notice must include the following:
(A) Proposed amendment.
(B) Proposed mitigating actions from section (2) of this rule.
(C) Analysis and projections of the extent to which the proposed amendment
in combination with proposed mitigating actions would fall short of being
consistent with the performance standards of transportation facilities.
(D) Findings showing how the proposed amendment meets the requirements
of subsection (a) of this section.
(E) Findings showing that the benefits of the proposed amendment outweigh
the negative effects on transportation facilities.
Finding OAR 660-012-0060(2): Since mitigation in whole or part was not recommended
based on results of the TIA dated July 6, 2023 and the TIA dated August 21, 2023, the
provisions in this section of the rule do not apply.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 126
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060 (2): Not applicable.
5 City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan
A review of the Central Point Comprehensive Plan finds that the Land Use and Housing and
Economic Elements apply to the proposed Land Use and Zone Map Amendments. In
accordance with CPMC 17.10 and CPMC 17.96, the Comprehensive Plan applies to the
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPA-23001) and the Zoning Map Amendment (ZC-
23001) The goals and policies for the applicable Elements are set forth and addressed below.
Housing Element
The Housing Element aims to assure that the City’s land use policies support a variety of
housing types at densities and locations that provide and encourage opportunities of for the
provision of adequate numbers of needed housing units at price ranges and rent levels
commensurate with the financial capabilities of the City’s households. It also aims to open and
maintain communication between private industry and local public officials in seeking an
improved housing environment within the Greater Bear Creek Valley Region. It contains seven
(7) goals and twenty-seven (27) policies.
Housing Goal 1. To provide an adequate supply of housing to meet the diverse needs of
the City’s current and projected households.
Housing Policy 1.1. Continue to support new residential development at the new
minimum residential densities.
Finding, Housing Policy 1.1: At the time of land development, the City will implement
its minimum residential densities set forth in the land development code.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.1: Complies.
Housing Policy 1.2. Develop a Housing Implementation Plan that is regularly updated
based current market conditions.
Finding, Housing Policy 1.2: The City adopted the Housing Implementation Plan (HIP)
on December 13, 2018 (City Council Resolution No. 1560). The HIP sets forth a housing
strategy for a 5-year period, 2019-2024. The proposed UGB Amendment implements
Action No. 3.2.4 in the HIP, to include sufficient buildable residential lands in the UGB to
accommodate the City’s housing needs and to plan in accordance with the approved
Conceptual Land Use plans. Adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Map Amendments further the goals of the HIP and does not interfere or otherwise
conflict with the City’s policy to regularly update it based on current market conditions.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.2: Consistent.
Housing Policy 1.3. Provide an efficient and consistent development review process.
Finding, Housing Policy 1.3: The City’s proposed Amendments to the Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Maps do not conflict or interfere with provision of an efficient and
consistent development review process.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.3: Not applicable.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 127
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Housing Policy 1.4. Work with regional partners to develop and implement measure
that reduce upfront housing development costs.
Finding, Housing Policy 1.4: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments aim to provide needed housing in accordance with the Housing Element
and Executive Order 23-04. At present, there is a low supply of housing available that
contributes to high cost. Although the proposed Map Amendments do not directly affect
upfront cost, provide land use and zoning designations that respond to market demands
for housing on the affected properties. These applications are an example of public-
private partnership to increase land supply for housing. This does not affect other efforts
to work with regional partners to implement measures that directly reduce upfront
housing development cost.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.4: Consistent.
Housing Policy 1.5. Support UGB expansions and annexations that can be efficiently
provided with urban services and that will in a timely manner meet the City’s housing
needs.
Finding, Housing Policy 1.5: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not require or otherwise involve a UGB Amendment or Annexation
application.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.5: Not applicable.
Housing Policy 1.6. When properly mitigated to preserve the integrity of existing
neighborhoods support higher density residential development within the Downtown and
older surrounding residential areas, capitalizing on availability of existing infrastructure
and supporting revitalization efforts.
Finding, Housing Policy 1.6: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not interfere or otherwise conflict with higher density infill developments
within the downtown or older surrounding residential areas. The subject properties are
located away from the downtown.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 1.6: Not applicable.
Housing Goal 2. To encourage the development and preservation of fair and affordable
housing.
Housing Policy 2.1. Through a Housing Implementation Plan explore and promote
federal, state, and regional programs and incentives that support new affordable
housing.
Finding, Housing Policy 2.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments aim to support affordable housing projects that are market-rate affordable
and publicly subsidized. These applications both support the HIP objectives using local
resources. The applications do not interfere or conflict with other efforts to explore
federal, state and regional programs and incentives.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 2.1: Not applicable.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 128
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Housing Policy 2.2. Support and participate in the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional
Plan’s program addressing regional housing strategies, particularly as they apply to
affordable housing.
Finding, Housing Policy 2.2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not interfere or otherwise conflict with the City’s ability to support and
participate in the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan’s program addressing
regional housing strategies, including affordable housing.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 2.2: Not applicable.
Housing Policy 2.3. Support regional efforts addressing homelessness, medical and
social services for special need households.
Finding, Housing Policy 2.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not affect the City’s support for regional efforts to address
homelessness or services for special needs households.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 2.3: Not applicable.
Housing Goal 3. To maintain a timely supply of vacant residential acres sufficient to
accommodate development of new housing to serve the City’s projected population.
Housing Policy 3.1. Provide a sufficient inventory of residential planned and zoned
vacant land to meet projected demand in terms of density, tenure, unit size, accessibility,
and cost.
Finding, Housing Policy 3.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments modify the land use and zoning designations to support high density
housing. Although the City recently added land to its UGB for housing and has a its
required 20-year land supply, most of the available land is not in housing production due
to annexation requirements, lack of landowner willingness. The proposed amendments
respond to the need for housing where there is demonstration of landowner willingness
and capability to produce housing.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.1: Consistent.
Housing Policy 3.2. Throughout the 2019-2039 planning period the City’s new vacant
residential land use mix shall support an average density of not less than 6.9 dwelling
units per gross.
Finding, Housing Policy 3.2: The current land supply in the city limits and UGB support
attainment of 6.9 units/gross acre. The added high-density residential land within the city
limits is consistent with and supportive of attaining higher densities within the urban
area.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.2: Consistent.
Housing Policy 3.3. Update the Housing Element’s vacant acreage needs every four-
years consistent with the PSU Population Research Centers update of population.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 129
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Finding, Housing Policy 3.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not affect the City’s schedule for updating the Housing Element.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.3: Not applicable.
Housing Policy 3.4. To avoid speculation the City shall, when expanding the UGB
establish procedures that give priority to lands that will be developed in a timely manner
and with a residential mix and density consistent with the Housing Element.
Finding, Housing Policy 3.4: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not include expansion of the UGB.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.4: Not applicable.
Housing Policy 3.5. Monitor residential in-fill development activity and develop and
enact programs that encourage the expanded use of in-fill as a component to the City’s
residential land use inventory.
Finding, Housing Policy 3.5: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments are intended to encourage and expand residential infill.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 3.5: Consistent.
Housing Goal 4. To ensure that a variety of housing will be provided in the City in terms of
location, type, price and tenure, according to the projected needs of the population.
Housing Policy 4.1. Residential land use designations on the General Land Use Plan
and the Zoning Map shall be compliant with the residential land use needs and housing
types identified in the Housing Element.
Finding, Housing Policy 4.1: The proposed land use and zoning designations for the
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments align with the land use and housing
needs identified in the Housing Element, as well as state directed emphasis to increase
housing production per Executive Order 23-04. Pending approval
Conclusion, Housing Policy 4.1: Consistent.
Housing Policy 4.2. Based on the findings of the Housing Implementation Plan
incentivize housing types that are needed but not being provided in adequate numbers
by the private sector market forces.
Finding, Housing Policy 4.2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendment does not affect the City’s ability to enact findings of the Housing
Implementation Plan, including but not limited to incentives for underrepresented but
needed housing types. In this case, both properties included in the application were
initiated based on the landowner’s demonstrated interest in building a combination of
market rate, market rate affordable and publicly funded affordable housing.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 4.2: Consistent.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 130
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Housing Policy 4.3. In larger residential developments (in excess of 5 acres)
encourage a mix of densities and housing types to accommodate a variety of
households based on age and income levels.
Finding, Housing Policy 4.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendment on Taylor Road affects only 0.9 acres. However, the proposed
Amendments at 1777 East Pine Street includes over 21 acres. The land development
regulations in the TOD Overlay require master plan approval for land development
proposals on sites greater than 2 acres. As part of master plan approval, proposals must
demonstrate compliance with CPMC 17.65, TOD Overlay and CPMC 17.67, Design and
Development Standards—TOD Overlay including but not limited to providing a mix of
housing
Conclusion, Housing Policy 4.3: Consistent.
Housing Policy 4.4. Support programs that encourage the ability of older residents to
age in place by making existing housing more age friendly and accessible.
Finding, Housing Policy 4.4: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendment on property located at Taylor Road and North Haskell Street is supportive of
a multifamily, cottage style development for older residents to age in place.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 4.4: Consistent.
Housing Goal 5. To ensure that municipal development procedures and standards are not
unreasonable impediments to the provision of affordable housing.
Housing Policy 5.1. As part of a Housing Implementation Plan periodically evaluate
development procedures and standards for compliance with the goals of this Housing
Element and modify as appropriate.
Finding, Housing Policy 5.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not affect or otherwise preclude the City’s ability to review and amend
development procedures and standards for compliance with the Housing Element.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 5.1: Not applicable.
Housing Goal 6. To develop and maintain a Housing Implementation Plan that includes
programs that monitor and address the housing affordability needs of the City’s low- and
moderate-income households.
Housing Policy 6.1. Support collaborative partnerships with non-profit organizations,
affordable housing builders, and for-profit developers to gain greater access to various
sources of affordable housing funds.
Finding, Housing Policy 6.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments demonstrate the City’s ability act as a collaborative partner with non-profit
and private stakeholders to support affordable and market rate housing production.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 6.1: Consistent.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 131
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Housing Policy 6.2. Support and participate in the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional
Plan’s program addressing regional housing strategies.
Finding, Housing Policy 6.2: The City participated in and continues to support the
regional housing strategies program as evidenced by approval and implementation of
the Housing Implementation Plan. The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendment applications do not preclude or otherwise conflict with the City’s continued
participation in the regional Plan’s program addressing affordable housing.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 6.2: Not applicable.
Housing Policy 6.3. Address the special housing needs of seniors through the provision
of affordable housing and housing related services.
Finding, Housing Policy 6.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not affect the City’s ability to address the special housing needs of
seniors. In fact, the modifications to land use and zoning designation on properties
located at the intersection of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street are aimed at
supporting completion of a housing infill project that provides market-rate affordable,
age-in-place housing for seniors.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 6.3: Consistent.
Housing Goal 7. To assure that residential development standards encourage and support
attractive and healthy neighborhoods.
Housing Policy 7.1. Encourage quality design throughout the City that acknowledges
neighborhood character, provides balanced connectivity (multi-modal), and integrates
recreational and open space opportunities.
Finding, Housing Policy 7.1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not affect design in and of themselves except that, through extension of
the TOD Overlay to include 1777 East Pine Street, future land development will be
subject to design and development standards that promote multimodal transportation
options, inclusion of recreation and open spaces to support housing and high quality,
pedestrian scale design.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.1: Consistent.
Housing Policy 7.2. Provide flexible development standards for projects that exceed
minimum standards for natural resource protection, open space, public gathering places,
and energy efficiency.
Finding, Housing Policy 7.2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendment applications do not affect or otherwise preclude the City’s ability to provide
flexible development standards.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 132
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.2: Not applicable.
Housing Policy 7.3. Where appropriate encourage mixed uses at the neighborhood
level that enhance the character and function of the neighborhood and reduce impacts
on the City’s transportation system.
Finding, Housing Policy 7.3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments provide opportunities for mixed use development at the neighborhood level
through extension of the TOD Overlay to include 1777 East Pine Street. The properties
on Taylor Road at North Haskell Street area already within the TOD Overlay. All zoning
districts applied provide opportunities for mixed-use.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.3: Consistent.
Housing Policy 7.4. Support minimum parking standards for multiple family
development served by public transit.
Finding, Housing Policy 7.4: The City of Central Point no longer requires minimum
parking for any development in accordance with Climate Friendly and Equitable
Communities rules adopted as part of OAR-660-012. Notwithstanding, the proposed
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments are within are proposed to be within
the TOD Overlay, which aims to support public transit.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.4: Not applicable.
Housing Policy 7.5. Maintain and enforce Chapter 17.71 Agricultural Mitigation
ensuring that all new residential development along the periphery of the Urban Growth
Boundary includes an adequate buffer between the urban uses and abutting agricultural
uses on lands zoned Exclusive Farm Use (EFU).
Finding, Housing Policy 7.5: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not include or affect agricultural lands or otherwise preclude the City’s
ability to maintain and enforce the regulations for Agricultural Mitigation in CPMC 17.71.
Conclusion, Housing Policy 7.5: Not applicable.
Economic Element
The Economic Element provide s a framework for meeting the City’s economic goal to diversity
its economic base.
Economic Element Goals:
1. To actively promote a strong, diversified and sustainable local economy that reinforces
Central Point’s “small town feel” and family orientation while preserving or enhancing the
quality of life in the community as a place to live, work and play.
Because this Economic Element concludes that there will be economic uncertainty in the
short-term, it is important that Central Point work to diversify and strengthen its
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 133
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
economy. By continuing to analyze economic trends, Central Point will be able to
continue growing strong throughout the 2019-2039 period.
2. To create meaningful incentives to encourage and support economic development.
Central Point has historically been a bedroom community where people live but work
elsewhere. In order to maintain a strong tax base and to ensure continued economic
prosperity, Central Point must take an active role in encouraging economic development.
3. To encourage and promote the development, redevelopment, and enhancement of retail
and office areas to achieve a vibrant shopping entertainment, living and working
experience in the downtown area.
This goal is important because Central Point needs a vibrant downtown in order to
ensure future economic prosperity. Further, based on the current BLI and the project
land use needs, Central Point is going to need targeted redevelopment strategies to
encourage these types of activities in the future.
4. To encourage active communication and cooperation between the City, local and state
agencies, and local businesses concerning economic development, education and
workforce development.
The city cannot reach its goals without the assistance of others. As a result, the City
needs to be receptive to suggestions and aid from others and also needs to be active in
communicating its needs and plans.
5. To encourage and support growth, particularly in the targeted industries (specialty food
manufacturing, and trucking and warehousing sectors).
These targeted industries are where the City could make strikes. It is important that the
City help maintain and grow these industries now and in the future.
6. To maintain at all times an adequate supply of suitable short-term (five-year)
employment lands.
Central Point does not have an adequate short-term supply of lands for
institutional/government and other employment types. As a result, the City should plan to
add to the land supply in the near future.
7. To prepare and maintain a City of Central Point Economic Development Manual
identifying and monitoring economic development strategies and programs available to
the City.
8. Create a positive environment for industrial, commercial and institutional job growth and
development by maintaining an adequate land supply; providing a local development
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 134
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
review process that is predicable, responsive, and efficient; and delivering high quality
public facilities and services.
9. Assure, through the UGB process, that adequate commercial lands are planned and
designated for the development of pedestrian oriented neighborhood commercial
centers to serve the City’s new residential neighborhoods.
The Economic Element Goals are implemented through the following ten (10) policies:
Economic Policy 1, Participation. The City shall participate on the regional and state level in
the development and programming of alternative financial incentives and initiatives for economic
development, including education and workforce development that are consistent with the City’s
economic development goals.
Finding, Economic Policy 1: The City’s proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not preclude or otherwise conflict with the City’s participation on the
regional or state level in development and programming for financial incentives and initiative
for economic development.
Conclusion Economic Policy 1: Not applicable.
Economic Policy 2, Refine Policies. The City shall continue to monitor and refine its land
development and fiscal policies as they relate to economic development to ensure that the
City’s economic development programming can be effectively implemented.
Finding, Economic Policy 2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not interfere with or otherwise conflict with the City’s ability to monitor and
refine policies relative to economic development.
Conclusion Economic Policy 2: Not applicable.
Economic Policy 3, Monitor Long-Term Consequences. Consider economic development
incentives as an inducement to development only when it can be demonstrated that the short-
term consequences are understood and found to be acceptable and the long-term
consequences are determined to be beneficial to the City.
Finding, Economic Policy 3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not interfere with or otherwise conflict with the City’s ability to consider or
implement incentives for beneficial economic development.
Conclusion Economic Policy 3: Not applicable.
Economic Policy 4, Small Business. Central Point concludes that the City has experienced
the loss of cottage industry and expanding small businesses due to a lack of vacant available
employment related buildings (flex-space1) and the City cannot attract small businesses from
elsewhere for the same reason.
1 An industrial or commercial/office building designed to provide the flexibility to utilize the floor space in a
variety of configurations. Usually provides a configuration allowing a flexible amount of office or
showroom space in combination with manufacturing, laboratory, warehouse distribution, etc.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 135
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Finding, Economic Policy 4: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments Amendment retains the existing commercial land supply through the
opportunity for a mix of residential and commercial uses. Although the land use and zoning
designations (current and proposed) do not result in the immediate construction of needed
building space, the Amendments support these activities as necessary to address the loss
of cottage industry and expanding small businesses.
Conclusion Economic Policy 4: Consistent.
Economic Policy 5, Business Innovation. Encourage innovation, research, development, and
commercialization of new technologies, products and services through responsive regulations
and public sector approaches.
Finding, Economic Policy 5: Business innovation activities by the City are not affected or
impeded by the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments.
Conclusion Economic Policy 5: Not applicable.
Economic Policy 6, Tolo Area. The City shall in collaboration with Jackson County continue
planning the Exit 35 area—also called “Area CP-1B (Tolo)”—in the Regional Plan Element to
capitalize on economic opportunities, especially for transportation-based economic activity and
truck/rail freight support services. This area also contains the aeronautics manufacturing
company Erickson Air Crane and serves aggregate uses; these uses have many specific and
unique dimensions that should be carefully considered. Plans and land use regulations
applicable to this area need to account for the site requirements of firms in these sectors.
Because the area is currently constrained as a result of a lack of access to water, the City
should begin planning how to make water more readily available so as to make these lands
available for more economic development.
Finding, Economic Policy 6: The CP-1B Tolo area is not included in either the
Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Map Amendments. The proposed Amendments do not affect
the City’s ability to develop and implement plans in this area.
Conclusion Economic Policy 6: Not applicable.
Economic Policy 7, Monitor Regulations. The City shall periodically evaluate its regulations
for employment related development, particularly as it relates to targeted industries, as well as
compatibility with adjacent non-employment lands to ensure that regulations are consistent with
applicable best practices. Regulations found to no longer be appropriate should be amended as
soon as practicable thereafter.
Finding, Economic Policy 7: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not interfere with other otherwise conflict with the City’s ability to evaluate
and update its land development regulations relative to employment uses.
Conclusion Economic Policy 7: Not applicable.
Economic Policy 8, Adequate Short-Term Supply. The City shall assure that, through its
Capital Improvement Program, public facilities and transportation facilities are available and
adequate in capacity to maintain a supply of competitive short-term buildable lands sufficient to
meet employment needs within a 5-year period, particularly for the retail, specialty foods,
professional health care and trucking sectors.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 136
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Finding, Economic Policy 8: The City’s public facility plans for transportation, water and
stormwater have all been updated. There are adequate facilities planned and available to
serve development on the two sites that are the subject of the proposed Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Map Amendments.
Conclusion Economic Policy 8: Consistent .
Economic Policy 9, Prepare for Long-Term Needs. The City shall maintain a supply of
competitive short-term employment lands in the medium and large site categories equivalent to
the twenty-year demand for those categories. The supply of short-term employment land shall
be reviewed and updated annually. When it is determined that the supply of land as measured
in terms of the number of sites and/or acreage in the medium and large site categories is
inadequate to serve the twenty-year land needs, then the City shall amend the UGB to include
additional short-term (5-year) employment lands.
Finding, Economic Policy 9: The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment retains
employment lands via mixed-use zoning. This is consistent with the short-term supply for
large and mediums sites.
Conclusion Economic Policy 9: Consistent.
Economic Policy 10, Pedestrian Oriented Neighborhood Commercial Centers. As the City
expands the UGB it will include in the land use mix adequate commercial lands for the
development of Pedestrian Oriented Commercial Centers designed to complement the physical
character and encourage neighborhood pedestrian use. Adequacy of the acreage needed for
Pedestrian Oriented Commercial Centers will be guided by the Regional Plan land use
allocation.
Finding, Economic Policy 10: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not involve a UGB Amendment. Notwithstanding, the proposed
Amendments at 1777 East Pine Street expand an existing Mixed-use/Pedestrian Friendly
Activity Center.
Conclusion Economic Policy 10: Consistent.
Land Use Element
The Land Use Element is responsible for managing and mapping the land use needs of the City
as described in other Comprehensive Plan elements. The Land Use Element sets forth goals
and policies for Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Civic, Parks and Recreation and Circulation
land uses. Since this UGB Amendment does not include industrial lands, the policies for
industrial lands are not addressed in these findings.
Residential Land Use Policy 1: To continue to ensure that long-range planning and zoning
reflects the need to locate the highest densities and greatest numbers of residents in closest
possible proximity to existing and future activity centers.
Finding, Residential Land Use Policy 1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Map Amendments include properties on Taylor Road at North Haskell Street that are within
an existing Activity Center. The property at 1777 East Pine Street is proposed to be included
in the TOD Overlay, a Mixed-Use/Pedestrian Friendly Activity Center. Proposed land use
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 137
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
and zoning designations are consistent with this policy to increases the number of people
living within these Mixed-use/Pedestrian Friendly Areas.
Conclusion, Residential Land Use Policy 1: Consistent.
Residential Land Use Policy 2: To continue to update the Zoning Ordinance, as necessary to
take advantage of planning innovation, best practices, and technological improvements that
could have applications in Central Point to the benefit of the community.
Finding, Residential Land Use Policy 2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Map Amendments do not preclude or otherwise affect the City’s ability to monitor and
update its Zoning Ordinance.
Conclusion, Residential Land Use Policy 2: Not applicable.
Residential Land Use Policy 3: In areas where residential neighborhoods abut commercial or
industrial areas, orient the residential structures and local streets away from these land uses to
avoid any undesirable views and to strengthen neighborhood solidarity.
Finding, Residential Land Use Policy 3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Map Amendments are in areas planned and zone for medium and high-density housing and
mixed-use opportunities. The street system is planned and designed to support attractive
neighborhoods with multimodal transportation facilities consistent with the land use pattern
typical of the TOD Overlay areas.
Conclusion, Residential Land Use Policy 3: Consistent.
Residential Land Use Policy 4: In any area where development of one or more parcels may
create obstacles to development of others, the initial developer shall develop a specific plan that
would provide for the future development of the entire area, including provision of adequate
access to potentially landlocked properties.
Finding, Residential Land Use Policy 4: By extending the TOD Overlay to include 1777
East Pine Street, the entire property will be subject to the Master Plan requirement thereby
assuring that there are written and illustrated instructions for future development throughout
the 21.13-acre site and not just a portion of it. The properties on Taylor Road are oddly
shaped and the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments at this
location facilitate housing infill on a site that has been vacant for years.
Conclusion, Residential Land Use Policy 4: Consistent.
Commercial Land Use Policy 1: Maintain the zoning of all commercial areas of Central Point
as necessary to comply with the Economic Element.
Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Map Amendments maintain allowance of commercial uses through application of mixed-use
residential/commercial zones and therefore does not affect the commercial land supply
inside the urban area and does not prevent or otherwise interfere with the City’s
maintenance of commercially zoned land.
Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 1: Consistent.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 138
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Commercial Land Use Policy 2: Undertake an in-depth study of the downtown business
district and develop a comprehensive improvement plan that would include such considerations
as traffic circulation and off-street parking, pedestrian and bicycle facilities and access,
structural design guidelines, and guidelines for landscaping and signing.
Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 2: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Map Amendments do not affect the City’s plans to study the Central Business District.
Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 2: Not applicable.
Commercial Land Use Policy 3: Encourage the development of shared commercial parking
areas in the downtown area to be carried out by the local businesses with City assistance.
Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 3: The City no longer requires minimum parking
standards and continues to encourage shared parking where parking provided, including but
not limited to the downtown area.
Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 3: Consistent.
Commercial Land Use Policy 4: Promote the planned integration of abutting commercial
development for the purpose of more efficient customer parking, better design and landscaping,
coordinated signing, and increased retail sales.
Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 4: The Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not affect the City’s development regulations as they relate to commercial
development.
Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 4: Not applicable.
Commercial Land Use Policy 5: For that section of Highway 99 between Beall Lane and the
High School, implement the 99 Corridor Plan to improve the corridor, traffic circulation, and the
overall visual and aesthetic character of the area.
Finding, Commercial Land Use Policy 5: The proposed Amendments do not affect or
otherwise preclude the City’s ability to implement the Highway 99 Corridor Plan.
Conclusion, Commercial Land Use Policy 5: Not applicable.
Civic Land Use Policy 1: Ensure that any major public or quasi-public facility that is proposed
to be located within a residential neighborhood is located along a collector or Arterial Street, is
compatible with surrounding land uses, and does not contribute unreasonably to traffic volumes
within the neighborhood.
Finding, Civic Land Use Policy 1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendments do not include siting any public or quasi-public facility.
Conclusion, Civic Land Use Policy 1: Not applicable.
Civic Land Use Policy 2: Work with officials of School District #6 to develop and implement a
school site acquisition program that is consistent with the long-range comprehensive plans of
the City and the District.
Finding, Civic Land Use Policy 2: School District 6 has a land bank for future school sites.
No sites are proposed as part of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 139
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Consequently, this application does not affect or otherwise preclude the City and School
District #6 from continuing to work together on long-range planning and school site
acquisition.
Conclusion, Civic Land Use Policy 2: Not applicable.
Civic Land Use Policy 3: Continue to emphasize the need for pedestrian and bicycle access to
all public facilities and areas frequented by local residents.
Finding, Civic Land Use Policy 3: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendment proposals are within (i.e. Taylor Road) or include extension of existing Mixed-
use/Pedestrian Friendly Activity Centers (i.e. 1777 East Pine Street)that are by their nature
designed to encourage safe, convenient and comfortable walking and bicycling facilities as
part of the street network.
Conclusion, Civic Land Use Policy 3: Consistent.
Parks and Recreation Land Use Policy 1: Whenever possible, encourage the location of
public park sites adjacent to public school sites to establish neighborhood
educational/recreational “centers” that can benefit by joint utilization of both types of facilities.
Finding, Parks and Recreation Land Use Policy 1: The proposed Comprehensive Plan
and Zoning Map Amendments do not include public parks, as the areas are infill sites within
the city limits. Public parks designation has already occurred consistent with the Parks
Element.
Conclusion, Parks and Recreation Land Use Policy 1: Not applicable.
Circulation Land Use Policy 1: Prior to inclusion of lands from the URAs into the UGB a traffic
impact analysis shall be completed to determine level of service at time of development.
Finding, Circulation Land Use Policy 1: The Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map
Amendment proposals do not include moving land from the URAs to the UGB.
Conclusion, Circulation Land Use Policy : Not applicable.
6 CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and UGB Amendments
The findings and conclusions for CPMC 17.96 are set forth below.
17.96.100 Amendments--Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide procedures for amendments to the city’s comprehensive
plan, including amendments to the urban growth boundary, that may be necessary from time to time
as the public necessity and convenience and general welfare requires. Amendments may be made
to the comprehensive plan by following the procedural requirements set forth in
Section 17.05.500 and this chapter. (Ord. 1989 §1(part), 2014; Ord. 1436 §2(part), 1981. Formerly
17.96.010).
Finding CPMC 17.96.100: The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (File No.
CPA-23001) has been prepared and processed in accordance with this procedure set forth in this
Chapter as necessary to support increased housing production in the City.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 140
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Conclusion CPMC 17.96.100: Consistent.
17.96.200 Initiation of amendments.
A proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan or urban growth boundary may be initiated by
either:
A. A resolution by the planning commission to the city council;
B. A resolution of intent by the city council; or
C. An application by one or more property owners, or their agents, of property affected by the
proposed amendment.
Finding CPMC 17.96.200: The City Council initiated the proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment per Council Resolution No. 1731.
Conclusion CPMC 17.96.200: Consistent.
17.96.300 Major revisions and minor changes.
Proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan, including urban growth boundary amendments,
are categorized as either major or minor amendments as defined in Section 17.10.300. Proposals for
major revisions shall be processed as a Type IV procedure per Section 17.05.500. Proposals for
minor changes shall be processed as a Type III procedure per Section 17.05.400.
Finding CPMC 17.96.300: In accordance with Finding CPMC 17.10.300(B), the proposed map
amendment on Taylor Road at Haskell and 1777 East Pine Street apply existing policy to defined
locations in the City and is therefore a Minor Amendment. The application has been scheduled for
two duly noticed public hearings by the Planning Commission and City Council on February 4, 2024
and February 22, 2024, respectively. Written notice was provided to DLCD on December 5, 2023
and amended on December 14, 2023. All notices are available in the file for viewing upon request at
City Hall located at 140 South Third Street in Central Point, Oregon.
Conclusion CPMC 17.96.300: Consistent.
17.96.400 Submittal timing of proposals.
Applications for an amendment to the comprehensive plan, or urban growth boundary, may be
submitted at any time. Once accepted proposals shall be scheduled by the city council by resolution
of intent. The applications and review thereof shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.05 and
all applicable laws of the state.
Finding CPMC 17.96.400: The City Council approved Resolution No. 1731 on January 26, 2023
allowing the City staff to hire a traffic engineer to study the proposed amendments and their impact
on the transportation system, prepare the written findings and schedule the public hearings.
Conclusion CPMC 17.96.400: Consistent.
17.96.500 Approval criteria.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 141
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A recommendation or a decision to approve or to deny an application for an amendment to the
comprehensive plan, or urban growth boundary shall be based on written findings and conclusions
that address the following criteria:
A. Approval of the request is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals;
Finding CPMC 17.96.500(A): See Findings in Section 3, Statewide Planning Goals.
Conclusion CPMC 17.96.500(A): Consistent.
B. Approval of the request is consistent with the Central Point comprehensive plan;
Finding CPMC 17.96.500(B): See the Findings in Section 4, Comprehensive Plan.
Conclusion CPMC 17.96.500(B): Consistent.
C. For urban growth boundary amendments findings demonstrate that adequate public services and
transportation networks to serve the property are either available, or identified for construction in the
city’s public facilities master plans (major and minor amendments); and
Finding CPMC 17.96.500(C): The proposed change is to the Comprehensive GLUP Map, which
does not involve an amendment to the UGB.
Conclusion CPMC 17.96.500(C): Not applicable.
D. The amendment complies with OAR 660-012-0060 of the Transportation Planning Rule.
Finding CPMC 17.96.500(D): See the Findings in Section 4, State Transportation Planning Rule
(OAR 660-012-0060).
Conclusion CPMC 17.96.500(D): Consistent.
7 CPMC 17.10, Zoning Text and Map Amendments
CPMC 17.10.100 Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to provide standards and procedures for major and minor
amendments to this code or the Central Point city zoning map (zoning map), herein referred to
as “map or text amendments.”
Finding CPMC 17.10.100: The proposed application is a Minor Zoning Map Amendment (File
No. ZC-23001) that aims to support housing production in the City consistent with the proposed
Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment (File No. CPA-23001).
Conclusion CPMC 17.10.100: Consistent.
CPMC 17.10.200 Initiation of Amendments
A proposed amendment to the code or zoning map may be initiated by either:
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 142
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
A. A resolution by the planning commission to the city council;
B. A resolution of intent by the city council; or for zoning map amendments;
C. An application by one or more property owners (zoning map amendments only), or their
agents, of property affected by the proposed amendment. The amendment shall be
accompanied by a legal description of the property or properties affected; proposed
findings of facts supporting the proposed amendment, justifying the same and
addressing the substantive standards for such an amendment as required by this
chapter and by the Land Conservation and Development Commission of the state.
Finding CPMC 17.10.200: The City Council initiated the proposed Zoning Map Amendment
by City Council Resolution No. 1731 on January 26, 2023.
Conclusion CPMC 17.10.200: Consistent.
CPMC 17.10.300 Major and Minor Amendments
There are two types of map and text amendments:
A. Major Amendments. Major amendments are legislative policy decisions that establish by
law general policies and regulations for future land use decisions, such as revisions to
the zoning and land division ordinance that have widespread and significant impact
beyond the immediate area. Major amendments are reviewed using the Type IV
procedure in Section 17.05.500.
B. Minor Amendments. Minor amendments are those that involve the application of
adopted policy to a specific development application, and not the adoption of new policy
(i.e., major amendments). Minor amendments shall follow the Type III procedure, as set
forth in Section 17.05.400. The approval authority shall be the city council after review
and recommendation by the planning commission.
Finding CPMC 17.10.300: The proposed map Zoning Map Amendment on Taylor Road at
Haskell and 1777 East Pine Street applies existing policy to defined locations in the City and
is therefore a Minor Amendment. The application has been scheduled for two duly noticed
quasi-judicial public hearings by the Planning Commission and City Council per CPMC
17.05.400 on February 4, 2024 and February 22, 2024, respectively. Written notice was
provided to DLCD on December 5, 2023 and amended on December 14, 2023. All notices
are available in the file for viewing upon request at City Hall located at 140 South Third
Street in Central Point, Oregon.
Conclusion CPMC 17.10.300: Consistent.
CPMC 17.10.400 Approval Criteria
A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application
for a text or map amendment shall be based on written findings and conclusions that address
the following criteria:
A. Approval of the request is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals (major
amendments only);
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 143
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Finding CPMC 17.10.400(A): The proposed Zoning Map Amendment is a Minor Map
Amendment as demonstrated in Finding CPMC 17.10.300.
Conclusion CPMC 17.10.400(A): Not applicable
B. Approval of the request is consistent with the Central Point comprehensive plan (major
and minor amendments);
Finding CPMC 17.10.400(B): See the Findings in Section 4, Comprehensive Plan.
Conclusion CPMC 17.10.400(B): Consistent.
C. If a zoning map amendment, findings demonstrating that adequate public services and
transportation networks to serve the property are either available, or identified for
construction in the city’s public facilities master plans (major and minor amendments);
and
Finding CPMC 17.10.400(C): The proposed Zoning Map Amendment is located on
properties within the City limits. As demonstrated in the Transportation System Plan,
Water System Master Plan and Stormwater Management Plan, there are adequate
public facilities available and planned to the Site as follows:
Taylor Road at North Haskell. The properties at this location front on Taylor and North
Haskell Street, City-owned Collector Streets. North Haskell is fully improved to City
standards. The street frontage on Taylor Road has curb and gutter; however, planned
sidewalk landscape rows and streetlighting are required as part of future land
development to complete this facility. According to the Water System Master Plan, there
is an 8” waterline in Taylor Road that extends through the subject site and a 16”
waterline in North Haskell Street. According to the Stormwater Master Plan, there are
storm drain facilities on the site that provide connection to approved outfalls on Griffin
Creek. Depending on the land development proposal and finished grades, stormwater
may be directed to the nearest outfall on Janscourt or to the storm drain line on North
Haskell Street. All stormwater is required to be treated for water quality and quantity per
the Rogue Valley Stormwater Design Manual.
1777 East Pine Street.
This property abuts East Pine Street (Primary Arterial) and Hamrick Road (Secondary
Arterial). Per the Transportation System Plan, Gebhard Road is planned to be extended
through the site from Beebe Road to East Pine Street (Project No. 258-260). Per the
Water System Master Plan, there is a 12” waterline in East Pine Street and a 16”
waterline in Hamrick Road that is available to the site. The Stormwater Master Plan,
there are stormwater lines in Hamrick Road and East Pine Street, respectively. There is
limited capacity in the City line, so a portion of the site will need to drain to east Pine
Street. There is also possibility of a new outfall on Bear Creek.
Conclusion CPMC 17.10.400(C): As shown in the findings above, there are adequate
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 144
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
public facilities available and planned to serve the site.
D. The amendment complies with OAR 660-012-0060 of the Transportation Planning Rule.
Finding CPMC 17.10.400(D): See the Findings in Section 4, State Transportation
Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060)
Conclusion CPMC 17.10.400(D): Consistent.
8 Summary Conclusion
The proposed Minor Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPA-23001) has been prepared
and reviewed for conformance with CPMC 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth
Boundary Amendments and found to comply as demonstrated in 1Section , 2 and 6 of these
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
The proposed Minor Zoning Map Amendment (ZC-23001) has been prepared and reviewed for
conformance with CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and Text Amendments and found to comply as
demonstrated in Section 1, 2 and 7 of these Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law.
9 Exhibits
Exhibit 1 – Traffic Analysis dated August 21, 2023 (Taylor Road at North Haskell)
Exhibit 2 – Traffic Analysis dated July 6 2023 (1777 East Pine Street)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 145
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC
319 Eastwood Drive | Medford, OR 97504 | Ph 541.941.4148 | Kim.parducci@gmail.com
August 21, 2023
Stephanie Holtey, Planning Director
City of Central Point
Community Development
140 South Third Street
Central Point, Oregon 97502
RE: City Initiated Taylor Road Infill Zone Change Findings (37S2W03DC TL 3402 & 3603)
Dear Stephanie,
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC evaluated trip generations for a proposed zone
change from Civic to Medium Density Residential / MMR (Medium Mix Residential) on 0.73 acres at
Township 37S Range 2W Section 03DC tax lots 3402 and 3603. The subject parcels are located on the
southwest corner of N Haskell Street and Taylor Road in Central Point.
Background
The two triangular properties are currently zoned Civic. The Civic zoning designation is intended to
allow for necessary civic uses in the community. These include schools, post offices, city and county
offices, religious institutions, public utility yards and similar uses, which are considered to be
compatible uses with the residential neighborhoods that generally surround them. Institutions such as
colleges, hospitals, rehabilitation centers, churches and fraternal meeting halls are subject to conditional
use review. For the purpose of comparing highest and best uses in this analysis, the outright permitted
use with the highest trip generation within the Civic zoning designation is considered a government
office.
Proposed zoning is Medium Mix Residential (within the Medium Density Residential GLUP
designation). This zoning district allows a minimum of 14 and a maximum of 32 units per acre as set
forth in CPMC 17.65.050, Table 5. The medium mix residential zoning district allows single family
residential and a variety of multifamily residences. Single family residential detached dwelling units
generate the highest number of trips per unit.
Trip Generation
The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition was used to
generate trips for existing and proposed zoning districts. The highest traffic generator (outright
permitted) within the Civic zoning district is considered a government office. The highest traffic
generator within the Medium Mix Residential (MMR) zoning district is a single family residential
(SFR) dwelling unit. ITE Land Uses 730 – Government Office and 210 – Single Family Residential
were considered the best matches. The largest government office was considered to be 15,900 square
feet based on 50% lot coverage. The maximum number of SFR dwelling units under MMR is 23 units.
Trip generations for existing and proposed zones are summarized in Table 1. All trips were considered
new trips on the transportation system. ITE graphs and land use descriptions are provided in the
attachments.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 146
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
S.O.T.E, LLC | Civic to MMR Zone Change 372W03DC TL 3402/3603 | August 21, 2023 | 2
SF = square feet
1. ITE trip generations for Land Use 210 based on fitted curve equations
Trip generations in Table 1 show a net decrease in trips on the transportation as a result of the proposed
zone change from Civic to MMR (Medium Mix Residential).
Analysis
A traffic impact analysis (TIA) is required as part of an application for a change in zoning or plan
amendment per the CPMC 17.05.900. A TIA is required to evaluate potential traffic impacts and
address Section 660-012-0045(2)(e) of the State Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). This analysis
serves as the TIA for the proposed zone change based on the down-zoning of the subject property.
A TIA in Section 17.05.900 of the CPMC is required when the development application involves one or
more of the following:
a. A change in zoning or plan amendment.
A GLUP / zone change is proposed from Civic to Medium Density Residential / MMR but is
considered down-zoning based on a net decrease in estimated trip generations using highest
and best uses in existing and proposed zoning districts. No significant impact is shown to
occur.
b. An increase in site traffic volume generation by two hundred fifty average daily trips (ADT) or
more
Proposed MMR zoning is estimated to generate 261 ADT, which is a net decrease of 98 ADT,
when compared to Civic zoning. No significant impact is shown to occur.
c. An increase in peak hour volume of a particular movement to and from the state highway by
twenty percent or more
Proposed MMR zoning is estimated to generate 20 a.m. and 25 p.m. peak hour trips, which is a
net decrease of 33 a.m. peak hour trips and 2 p.m. peak hour trips, when compared to Civic
zoning. None of the development trips will be directly to or from the state highway. No
significant impact is shown to occur.
d. An increase in use of adjacent streets by vehicles exceeding the twenty thousand pounds gross
vehicle weights by ten vehicles or more per day
Table 1 – Proposed Taylor Road Civic to MMR Zone Change Trip Generations
Land Use Unit Size Daily
Trips
Weekday
AM Peak Hour
Weekday
PM Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out
Existing Civic Zoning District
730 – Government Office 1000 SF 15.9 359 53 40 13 27 7 20
Total Existing Potential Trips 359 53 27
Proposed MMR Zoning District
210 – Single Family Residential1 Dwelling 23 261 20 5 15 25 16 9
Total Proposed Potential Trips 261 20 25
Net Trip Difference (-)98 (-)33 (-)2
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 147
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
S.O.T.E, LLC | Civic to MMR Zone Change 372W03DC TL 3402/3603 | August 21, 2023 | 3
The proposed zone change will not increase the number of vehicles exceeding twenty thousand
pounds gross vehicle weight. No significant impact is shown to occur.
Planning for transportation requires coordination between cities and counties, and the Oregon
Department of Transportation. Goal 12 requires cities, counties, and the State to create a transportation
system plan that takes into account all relevant modes of transportation. The Transportation Planning
Rules (TPR) implements and specifies what must be included in local planning efforts for
transportation, and what must be addressed and included in the transportation system plan. Oregon
Administrative Rule 660-012-0060 must be addressed for plan and land use regulation amendments.
Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012-0060 Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments
A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would:
a. Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility
No change in functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility will
occur as a result of the proposed zone change.
b. Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or
The proposed zone change will not change standards implementing a functional classification
system.
c. Result in any of the effects listed in (A) through (C)
A. Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of
an existing or planned transportation facility;
The proposed zone change will not result in types or levels of travel or access that are
inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility.
B. Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would
not meet the performance standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or
The proposed zone change will not degrade the performance of any existing or planned
transportation facility.
C. Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise
projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive
plan.
The proposed zone change will not degrade the performance of an existing or planned
transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards
identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
Conclusions
The proposed zone change from Civic to Medium Mix Residential (MMR) is shown to produce a net
decrease in trips on the transportation system or down-zone the property. This is concluded to have no
significant impact on the transportation system in accordance with the Central Point Municipal Code
Section 17.05.900 and Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012-0060, which identify when significant
impacts occur as a result of a plan or land use regulation amendment.
This concludes our analysis. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or concerns.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 148
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
S.O.T.E, LLC | Civic to MMR Zone Change 372W03DC TL 3402/3603 | August 21, 2023 | 4
Sincerely,
Kimberly Parducci PE, PTOE
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC
Attachments: ITE Graphs / Descriptions
Tax Lot Maps
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 149
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
________________________
________________________
ATTACHMENTS
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 150
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 151
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 152
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 153
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 154
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
789
Land Use: 730
Government Office Building
Description
A government office building is an individual building containing either the entire function or
simply one agency of a city, county, state, federal, or other governmental unit.
Additional Data
Each study site in the current database serves a municipal or county agency.
The technical appendices provide supporting information on time-of-day distributions for this
land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip
generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip-
and-parking-generation/).
The sites were surveyed in the 2000s and the 2010s in Oregon and Texas.
Source Numbers
579, 889
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400–799)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 155
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Government Office Building(730)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq.Ft.GFA
On a:Weekday
Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies:7
Avg.1000 Sq.Ft.GFA:11
Directional Distribution:50%entering,50%exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq.Ft.GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
22.59 0.71 -59.66 17.03
Data Plot and Equation
0 10 20 300
200
400
600
Average RateStudySite
Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given R²=***
X =1000 Sq.Ft.GFA
T
=
T
r
i
p
s
E
n
d
s
790 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 156
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Government Office Building(730)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq.Ft.GFA
On a:Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies:7
Avg.1000 Sq.Ft.GFA:11
Directional Distribution:75%entering,25%exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq.Ft.GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
3.34 0.45 -7.38 2.18
Data Plot and Equation
0 10 20 300
20
40
60
80
Average RateStudySite
Fitted Curve Equation:Not Given R²=***
X =1000 Sq.Ft.GFA
T
=
T
r
i
p
s
E
n
d
s
791General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 400–799)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 157
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Government Office Building(730)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs:1000 Sq.Ft.GFA
On a:Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Setting/Location:General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies:8
Avg.1000 Sq.Ft.GFA:22
Directional Distribution:25%entering,75%exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq.Ft.GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
1.71 1.09 -6.19 1.24
Data Plot and Equation
0 20 40 60 800
20
40
60
80
100
Average RateStudySiteFittedCurve
Fitted Curve Equation:Ln(T)=0.97 Ln(X)+0.62 R²=0.73
X =1000 Sq.Ft.GFA
T
=
T
r
i
p
s
E
n
d
s
792 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 4
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 158
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 159
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC
319 Eastwood Drive | Medford, OR 97504 | Ph 541.941.4148 | Kim.parducci@gmail.com
July 6, 2023
Stephanie Holtey, Planning Director
City of Central Point
Community Development
140 South Third Street
Central Point, Oregon 97502
RE: City Initiated Zone Change Findings (37S2W02D TL 100)
Dear Stephanie,
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC evaluated trip generations for a proposed GLUP
amendment/zone change from Employment Commercial (EC)/Tourist and Office Professional
Commercial (C-4) to EC and High Density Residential / C-4 and HMR/MMR on 21.8 acres at Township
37S Range 2W Section 02D, tax lot 100. The subject property is located on the northwest corner of E.
Pine Street and Hamrick Road in Central Point.
Background
The subject property currently has a GLUP map designation of Employment Commercial and zoning
district of Tourist and Office Professional Commercial (C-4). This analysis evaluates a proposed GLUP
amendment and zone change to EC/C-4 and High Density Residential/MMR/HMR for the purpose of
allowing a mix of commercial/retail and high-density residential uses. Two scenarios are considered
based on MMR (medium mix residential) and HMR (high mix residential) zones. These are summarized
in Tables 1 and 2:
Table 1 – Scenario 1
GLUP Designation / Zone Acreage Use No. Units Square Footage
High Density Residential / MMR 5.5 Low Rise Apartments 80 NA
High Density Residential / HMR 7.44 Mid Rise Apartments 185 NA
Employment Commercial / EC 8.9 Hotel 100 NA
Shopping Center NA 33,000
Totals 21.8 365 33,000
Table 2 - Scenario 2
GLUP Designation / Zone Acreage Use No. Units Square Footage
High Density Residential / HMR 7.44 Mid Rise Apartments 185 NA
Employment Commercial / EC 14.4 Hotel 100 NA
Shopping Center NA 53,000
Totals 21.8 285 53,000
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 160
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
S.O.T.E, LLC | City Initiated Zone Change 372W02D TL 100 | July 6, 2023 | 2
EC/C-4 under existing zoning is estimated to support up to 237,500 square feet of commercial/retail uses
using an industry standard of 25% lot coverage. Scenarios 1 and 2 represent reasonable worst-case
conditions under mixed zoning combinations, per the City. The type of housing assumed in both MMR
and HMR zones is multifamily residential, specifically low-rise and mid-rise apartment complexes.
Trip Generation
The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition was used to
generate trips for existing and proposed zoning districts. Land Use 820 – Shopping Center was used for
existing zoning based on development of a 237,500 square foot (SF) shopping center. Land Use 310 –
Hotel, 821 – Shopping Plaza, 822 – Strip Retail Plaza, 220 – Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise), and 221
– Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) were used to generate trips for proposed Scenarios 1 and 2. Pass-by
rates were used for shopping center land uses, in accordance with ITE methodology. Mixed use discounts
were used where applicable. Trip generations for existing and proposed zones are summarized in Tables
3 and 4. ITE graphs, land use descriptions, pass-by, and mixed-use sheets are provided in the attachments.
SF = square feet
Scenario 1, which proposes commercial, high mix residential, and medium mix residential uses, shows a
net decrease in trips to the transportation system. Scenario 2 results are provided in Table 4 on the next
page.
Table 3 – Scenario 1 EC to EC/MMR/HMR Zone Change Trip Generations
Land Use Unit Size Daily
Trips
Weekday
AM Peak Hour
Weekday
PM Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out
Existing C-4 Zoning
820 – Shopping Center 1000
SF 237.5 8,790 274 124 76 808 388 420
Pass-by 29% -2,549 -79 -36 -22 -234 -112 -122
Existing Primary Trips 6,241 195 574
Proposed C-4/MMR/HMR Zoning
220 – Multifamily (Low-Rise) Units 80 539 32 8 24 41 26 15
221 – Multifamily (Mid-Rise) Units 185 836 70 16 54 72 44 28
310 – Hotel Rooms 100 799 43 24 19 46 23 23
822 – Strip Retail Plaza 1000
SF 33.0 1,622 78 47 31 217 108 109
Total Gross Trips 3,796 223 376
Mixed-use discount (ITE Calc) 24% -911 -54 -90
Pass-by 29% -357 -17 -48
Proposed Primary Trips 2,528 152 238
Net Trip Difference -3,713 -43 -336
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 161
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
S.O.T.E, LLC | City Initiated Zone Change 372W02D TL 100 | July 6, 2023 | 3
SF = square feet
Scenario 2, which proposes commercial and high mix residential uses, shows a net decrease in trips to
the transportation system with the exception of the a.m. peak hour, which shows one trip increase. Trip
generations for Land Use 821 – Shopping Plaza (40-150k) assumed a worst-case scenario that included
the possibility of a supermarket as part of development.
Analysis
A traffic impact analysis (TIA) is required as part of an application for a change in zoning or plan
amendment per the CPMC 17.05.900. A TIA is required to evaluate potential traffic impacts and address
Section 660-012-0045(2)(e) of the State Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). This analysis serves as the
TIA for the proposed zone change, which evaluated trips for two scenarios.
A TIA in Section 17.05.900 of the CPMC is required when the development application involves one or
more of the following:
a. A change in zoning or plan amendment.
A GLUP / zone change is proposed from EC/C-4 to a mix of EC/C-4 and High Density
Residential/HMR and MMR. Two scenarios were considered. Scenario 1 included commercial,
high mix residential, and medium mix residential. Scenario 2 considered commercial and high
mix residential. Both scenarios showed an overall net decrease in trips to the transportation
system using highest and best uses in existing and proposed zoning districts. No significant
impact is shown to occur.
Table 4 – Scenario 2 EC to EC/HMR Zone Change Trip Generations
Land Use Unit Size Daily
Trips
Weekday
AM Peak Hour
Weekday
PM Peak Hour
Total In Out Total In Out
Existing C-4 Zoning
820 – Shopping Center 1000
SF 237.5 8,790 274 124 76 808 388 420
Pass-by 29% -2,549 -79 -36 -22 -234 -112 -122
Existing Primary Trips 6,241 195 574
Proposed C-4/HMR Zoning
221 – Multifamily (Mid-Rise) Units 185 836 70 16 54 72 44 28
310 – Hotel Rooms 100 799 43 24 19 46 23 23
821 – Shopping Plaza (40-150k) 1000
SF 53.0 5,008 187 116 71 525 252 273
Total Gross Trips 6,643 300 643
Mixed-use discount (ITE Calc) 13% -863 -39 -84
Pass-by 40% -1,743 -65 -183
Proposed Primary Trips 4,037 196 376
Net Trip Difference -2,204 +1 -198
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 162
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
S.O.T.E, LLC | City Initiated Zone Change 372W02D TL 100 | July 6, 2023 | 4
b. An increase in site traffic volume generation by two hundred fifty average daily trips (ADT) or
more
Proposed zoning in Scenario 1 is estimated to generate 2,528 ADT, which is a net decrease of
3,713 ADT when compared to full commercial zoning. Proposed zoning in Scenario 2 is
estimated to generate 4,037 ADT, which is a net decrease of 2,204 ADT when compared to full
commercial zoning. No significant impact is shown to occur.
c. An increase in peak hour volume of a particular movement to and from the state highway by
twenty percent or more
Proposed Scenario 1 zoning is estimated to generate 238 p.m. peak hour trips, which is a net
decrease of 336 p.m. peak hour trips when compared to full commercial zoning. Proposed
Scenario 2 zoning is estimated to generate 376 p.m. peak hour trips, which is a net decrease of
198 p.m. peak hour trips when compared to full commercial zoning. Additionally, none of the
development trips will be directly to or from the state highway. No significant impact is shown
to occur.
d. An increase in use of adjacent streets by vehicles exceeding the twenty thousand pounds gross
vehicle weights by ten vehicles or more per day
The proposed zone change will not increase the number of vehicles exceeding twenty thousand
pounds gross vehicle weight. No significant impact is shown to occur.
Planning for transportation requires coordination between cities and counties, and the Oregon Department
of Transportation. Goal 12 requires cities, counties, and the State to create a transportation system plan
that takes into account all relevant modes of transportation. The Transportation Planning Rules (TPR)
implements and specifies what must be included in local planning efforts for transportation, and what
must be addressed and included in the transportation system plan. Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012-
0060 must be addressed for plan and land use regulation amendments.
Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012-0060 Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments
A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would:
a. Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility
No change in functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility will occur
as a result of the proposed zone change.
b. Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or
The proposed zone change will not change standards implementing a functional classification
system.
c. Result in any of the effects listed in (A) through (C)
A. Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of
an existing or planned transportation facility;
The proposed zone change will not result in types or levels of travel or access that are
inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility.
B. Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would
not meet the performance standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 163
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
S.O.T.E, LLC | City Initiated Zone Change 372W02D TL 100 | July 6, 2023 | 5
The proposed zone change will not degrade the performance of any existing or planned
transportation facility.
C. Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise
projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
The proposed zone change will not degrade the performance of an existing or planned
transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards
identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
Conclusions
The proposed zone change from EC/C-4 to a mix of EC/C-4 and High Density Residential/HMR and
MMR is shown to produce a net decrease in trips overall on the transportation system. This is concluded
to have no significant impact on the transportation system in accordance with the Central Point Municipal
Code Section 17.05.900 and Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012-0060, which identify when significant
impacts occur as a result of a plan or land use regulation amendment.
This concludes our analysis. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,
Kimberly Parducci PE, PTOE
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC
Attachments: ITE Graphs / Descriptions
Tax Lot Maps
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 164
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
________________________
________________________
ATTACHMENTS
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 165
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
175
Land Use: 820
Shopping Center (>150k)
Description
A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned,
developed, owned, and managed as a unit. Each study site in this land use has at least 150,000
square feet of gross leasable area (GLA). It often has more than one anchor store. Various names
can be assigned to a shopping center within this size range, depending on its specific size and
tenants, such as community center, regional center, superregional center, fashion center, and
power center.
A shopping center of this size typically contains more than retail merchandising facilities. Office
space, a movie theater, restaurants, a post office, banks, a health club, and recreational facilities
are common tenants.
A shopping center of this size can be enclosed or open-air. The vehicle trips generated at a
shopping center are based upon the total GLA of the center. In the case of a smaller center
without an enclosed mall or peripheral buildings, the GLA is the same as the gross floor area of
the building.
The 150,000 square feet GLA threshold value between community/regional shopping center and
plaza that is smaller than the threshold value, the presence or absence of a supermarket within
the plaza has a measurable effect on site trip generation. For a shopping center that is larger
than the threshold value, the trips generated by its other major tenants mask any effects of the
presence or absence of an on-site supermarket.
Shopping plaza (40-150k) (Land Use 821), strip retail plaza (<40k) (Land Use 822), and factory
outlet center (Land Use 823) are related uses.
Additional Data
Many shopping centers—in addition to the integrated unit of shops in one building or enclosed
around a mall—include outparcels (peripheral buildings or pads located on the perimeter of the
center adjacent to the streets and major access points). These buildings are typically drive-in
banks, retail stores, restaurants, or small offices. Although the data herein do not indicate which
of the centers studied include peripheral buildings, it can be assumed that some of the data
show their effect.
The technical appendices provide supporting information on time-of-day distributions for this
land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip
generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip-
and-parking-generation/).
The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN),
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky,
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 166
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Wisconsin.
Source Numbers
77, 110, 154, 156, 159, 190, 199, 202, 204, 213, 251, 269, 294, 295, 299, 304, 305, 307, 308, 309,
311, 314, 315, 316, 317, 319, 365, 385, 404, 414, 423, 442, 446, 562, 629, 702, 715, 728, 868, 871,
880, 899, 912, 926, 946, 962, 973, 974, 978, 1034, 1040, 1067
176 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 167
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Shopping Center (>150k)
(820)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA
On a: Weekday
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 108
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 538
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
37.01 17.27 - 81.53 12.79
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 20000
20000
40000
60000
Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 26.11(X) + 5863.73 R²= 0.60
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA
177General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 168
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Shopping Center (>150k)
(820)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 44
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 546
Directional Distribution: 62% entering, 38% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
0.84 0.30 - 3.11 0.42
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 20000
1000
2000
Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.59(X) + 133.55 R²= 0.56
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA
178 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 169
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Shopping Center (>150k)
(820)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 126
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA: 581
Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
3.40 1.57 - 7.58 1.26
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 2000 30000
2000
4000
6000
8000
Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.72 Ln(X) + 3.02 R²= 0.70
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA
179General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 170
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 171
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 172
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 173
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 174
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 175
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 176
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 177
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 178
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 179
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Land Use: 220
Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise)
Description
Low-rise multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within
the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have two or three floors (levels).
Various configurations fit this description, including walkup apartment, mansion apartment, and
stacked townhouse.
• A walkup apartment typically is two or three floors in height with dwelling units that are accessed
by a single or multiple entrances with stairways and hallways.
• A mansion apartment is a single structure that contains several apartments within what appears
to be a single-family dwelling unit.
•
second floors. Access to the individual units is typically internal to the structure and provided
through a central entry and stairway.
•
a townhouse dwelling unit that only shares walls with an adjoining unit, the stacked townhouse
units share both floors and walls. Access to the individual units is typically internal to the
structure and provided through a central entry and stairway.
Multifamily housing (mid-rise) (Land Use 221), multifamily housing (high-rise) (Land Use 222),
affordable housing (Land Use 223), and off-campus student apartment (low-rise) (Land Use 225)
are related land uses.
Land Use Subcategory
Data are presented for two subcategories for this land use: (1) not close to rail transit and (2)
close to rail transit. A site is considered close to rail transit if the walking distance between the
residential site entrance and the closest rail transit station entrance is ½ mile or less.
Additional Data
For the three sites for which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling
units were available, there were an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit.
For the two sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units
were available, an average of 96.2 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied.
The technical appendices provide supporting information on time-of-day distributions for this
land use. The appendices can be accessed through either the ITETripGen web app or the trip
252 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 180
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
generation resource page on the ITE website (https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip-
and-parking-generation/).
For the three sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents,
there was an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit.
It is expected that the number of bedrooms and number of residents are likely correlated to the
trips generated by a residential site. To assist in future analysis, trip generation studies of all
multifamily housing should attempt to obtain information on occupancy rate and on the mix of
residential unit sizes (i.e., number of units by number of bedrooms at the site complex).
The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, the 2010s, and the 2020s in British
Columbia (CAN), California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ontario (CAN), Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina,
Source Numbers
188, 204, 237, 300, 305, 306, 320, 321, 357, 390, 412, 525, 530, 579, 583, 638, 864, 866, 896, 901,
903, 904, 936, 939, 944, 946, 947, 948, 963, 964, 966, 967, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1036, 1047, 1056,
1071, 1076
253General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000–399)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 181
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise)
Not Close to Rail Transit (220)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 22
Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 229
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
6.74 2.46 - 12.50 1.79
Data Plot and Equation
0 100 200 300 400 500
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 6.41(X) + 75.31 R²= 0.86
X = Number of Dwelling Units
254 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 182
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise)
Not Close to Rail Transit (220)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 49
Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 249
Directional Distribution: 24% entering, 76% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
0.40 0.13 - 0.73 0.12
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 20000
100
200
300
Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.31(X) + 22.85 R²= 0.79
X = Number of Dwelling Units
255General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 000–399)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 183
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise)
Not Close to Rail Transit (220)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 59
Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 241
Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
0.51 0.08 - 1.04 0.15
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 20000
100
200
300
400
500
Average RateStudy Site Fitted Curve
Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.43(X) + 20.55 R²= 0.84
X = Number of Dwelling Units
256 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 3
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 184
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 185
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 186
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 187
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 188
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 189
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 190
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 191
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 192
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
La
n
d
U
s
e
C
o
d
e
La
n
d
U
s
e
Se
t
t
i
n
g
Ti
m
e
P
e
r
i
o
d
#
D
a
t
a
S
i
t
e
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e
P
a
s
s
-
B
y
R
a
t
e
GL
A
(
0
0
0
)
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
(
%
)
D
i
v
e
r
t
e
d
(
%
)
T
o
t
a
l
(
%
)
S
o
u
r
c
e
21
3
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
1
9
9
0
3
1
2
2
8
3
1
4
1
7
2
—
3
3
22
5
I
l
l
i
n
o
i
s
1
9
9
4
2
6
4
3
5
3
2
3
3
6
5
1
9
7
0
2
4
22
7
.
9
K
e
n
t
u
c
k
y
1
9
9
3
—
3
4
3
5
3
1
6
6
—
3
4
23
5
K
e
n
t
u
c
k
y
1
9
9
3
2
1
1
3
5
2
9
3
6
6
5
2
5
9
3
2
25
5
I
o
w
a
1
9
9
4
2
2
2
2
3
3
8
3
9
7
7
3
7
0
6
2
4
25
6
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
c
u
t
1
9
9
4
2
0
8
2
7
5
1
2
2
7
3
3
4
2
2
2
4
29
3
I
l
l
i
n
o
i
s
1
9
9
4
2
8
2
2
4
7
0
6
7
6
4
6
0
6
1
3
29
4
P
e
n
n
s
y
l
v
a
n
i
a
1
9
9
4
2
1
3
2
4
4
8
1
8
7
6
4
0
5
5
2
4
35
0
M
a
s
s
a
c
h
u
s
e
t
t
s
1
9
9
4
2
2
4
1
8
4
5
3
7
8
2
2
1
1
2
2
4
36
1
V
i
r
g
i
n
i
a
1
9
9
4
3
1
5
1
7
5
4
2
9
8
3
2
0
3
4
2
4
37
5
N
o
r
t
h
C
a
r
o
l
i
n
a
1
9
9
4
2
1
4
2
9
4
8
2
3
7
1
2
0
5
3
2
4
41
3
T
e
x
a
s
1
9
9
4
2
2
8
2
8
5
1
2
1
7
2
5
8
9
2
4
41
8
M
a
r
y
l
a
n
d
1
9
9
4
2
8
1
2
0
5
0
3
0
8
0
5
6
1
0
2
4
45
0
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
1
9
9
4
3
2
1
2
3
4
9
2
8
7
7
2
7
8
7
2
4
47
6
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
1
9
9
4
2
3
4
2
5
5
3
2
2
7
5
3
4
2
7
2
4
48
8
T
e
x
a
s
1
9
9
4
2
5
7
1
2
7
5
1
3
8
8
1
0
9
4
1
3
56
0
V
i
r
g
i
n
i
a
1
9
9
4
4
3
7
1
9
4
9
3
2
8
1
3
0
5
1
2
4
58
1
C
o
l
o
r
a
d
o
1
9
9
4
2
9
6
1
8
5
3
2
9
8
2
2
9
3
9
2
4
59
8
C
o
l
o
r
a
d
o
1
9
9
4
2
0
5
1
7
5
5
2
8
8
3
3
8
4
0
2
4
63
3
T
e
x
a
s
1
9
9
4
2
5
7
1
0
6
4
2
6
9
0
—
2
4
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
U
r
b
a
n
/
S
u
b
u
r
b
a
n
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
P
a
s
s
-
B
y
R
a
t
e
s
b
y
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
So
u
r
c
e
:
I
T
E
Tr
i
p
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
u
a
l,
1
1
t
h
E
d
i
t
i
o
n
82
0
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
C
e
n
t
e
r
(
>
1
5
0
k
)
We
e
k
d
a
y
P
M
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
Pa
s
s
-
B
y
C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
f
o
r
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
S
i
t
e
s
St
a
t
e
o
r
P
r
o
v
i
n
c
e
Su
r
v
e
y
Ye
a
r
#
I
n
t
e
r
v
i
e
w
s
Pa
s
s
-
B
y
Tr
i
p
(
%
)
No
n
-
P
a
s
s
-
B
y
T
r
i
p
s
A
d
j
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
e
a
k
Ho
u
r
V
o
l
u
m
e
8
S
i
t
e
s
w
i
t
h
G
L
A
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
1
5
0
a
n
d
3
0
0
k
29
%
f
o
r
S
i
t
e
s
w
i
t
h
G
L
A
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
1
5
0
a
n
d
3
0
0
k
16
S
i
t
e
s
w
i
t
h
G
L
A
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
3
0
0
a
n
d
9
0
0
k
19
%
f
o
r
S
i
t
e
s
w
i
t
h
G
L
A
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
3
0
0
a
n
d
9
0
0
k
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 193
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
66
7
I
l
l
i
n
o
i
s
1
9
9
4
2
0
0
1
6
5
3
3
1
8
4
2
7
7
0
2
4
73
8
N
e
w
J
e
r
s
e
y
1
9
9
4
2
8
3
1
3
7
5
1
2
8
7
8
0
5
9
2
4
80
0
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
1
9
9
4
2
0
5
2
1
5
1
2
8
7
9
7
4
7
4
2
4
80
8
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
1
9
9
4
2
4
0
1
3
7
3
1
4
8
7
4
0
3
5
2
4
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 194
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
La
n
d
U
s
e
C
o
d
e
La
n
d
U
s
e
Se
t
t
i
n
g
Ti
m
e
P
e
r
i
o
d
#
D
a
t
a
S
i
t
e
s
Av
e
r
a
g
e
P
a
s
s
-
B
y
R
a
t
e
GL
A
(
0
0
0
)
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
(
%
)
D
i
v
e
r
t
e
d
(
%
)
T
o
t
a
l
(
%
)
S
o
u
r
c
e
45
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
1
9
9
2
8
4
4
5
6
2
4
2
0
4
4
—
3
0
50
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
1
9
9
2
5
5
5
4
1
4
1
1
8
5
9
—
3
0
52
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
1
9
9
5
6
6
5
4
2
3
3
2
5
5
8
—
3
0
53
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
1
9
9
3
1
6
2
5
9
—
—
4
1
—
3
0
57
.
2
3
K
e
n
t
u
c
k
y
1
9
9
3
2
4
7
3
1
5
3
1
6
6
9
2
6
5
9
3
4
60
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
1
9
9
5
1
5
8
3
4
0
3
8
2
2
6
0
—
3
0
69
.
4
K
e
n
t
u
c
k
y
1
9
9
3
1
0
9
2
5
4
2
3
3
7
5
1
5
5
9
3
4
77
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
1
9
9
2
3
6
5
4
6
—
—
5
4
—
3
0
78
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
1
9
9
1
7
0
2
5
5
2
3
2
2
4
5
—
3
0
82
F
l
o
r
i
d
a
1
9
9
2
3
3
6
3
4
—
—
6
6
—
3
0
92
.
8
5
7
K
e
n
t
u
c
k
y
1
9
9
3
1
3
3
2
2
5
0
2
8
7
8
3
5
5
5
3
4
10
0
.
8
8
8
K
e
n
t
u
c
k
y
1
9
9
3
2
8
1
2
8
5
0
2
2
7
2
2
1
1
1
3
4
12
1
.
5
4
K
e
n
t
u
c
k
y
1
9
9
3
2
1
0
5
3
3
0
1
7
4
7
2
6
3
6
3
4
14
4
N
e
w
J
e
r
s
e
y
1
9
9
0
1
7
6
3
2
4
4
2
4
6
8
—
2
4
14
6
.
8
K
e
n
t
u
c
k
y
1
9
9
3
—
3
6
3
9
2
5
6
4
—
3
4
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
U
r
b
a
n
/
S
u
b
u
r
b
a
n
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
P
a
s
s
-
B
y
R
a
t
e
s
b
y
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
So
u
r
c
e
:
I
T
E
Tr
i
p
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
u
a
l
,
1
1
t
h
E
d
i
t
i
o
n
82
1
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
P
l
a
z
a
(
4
0
-
1
5
0
k
)
We
e
k
d
a
y
P
M
P
e
a
k
P
e
r
i
o
d
15
40
%
Pa
s
s
-
B
y
C
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
f
o
r
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
S
i
t
e
s
St
a
t
e
o
r
P
r
o
v
i
n
c
e
Su
r
v
e
y
Ye
a
r
#
I
n
t
e
r
v
i
e
w
s
Pa
s
s
-
B
y
Tr
i
p
(
%
)
No
n
-
P
a
s
s
-
B
y
T
r
i
p
s
A
d
j
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
e
a
k
Ho
u
r
V
o
l
u
m
e
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 195
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Project Name: Organization:
Project Location: Performed By:
Scenario Description:Date:
Analysis Year: Checked By:
Analysis Period:Date:
ITE LUCs1 Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting
Office 0
Retail 820 33,000 Square Feet 217 108 109
Restaurant 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0
Residential 220/221 265 Units 113 70 43
Hotel 310 100 Rooms 46 23 23
All Other Land Uses2 0
376 201 175
Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized
Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
All Other Land Uses2
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 0 0 0 0
Retail 0 0 28 4
Restaurant 0 0 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 0 11 0 1
Hotel 0 2 0 0
Total Entering Exiting Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips
All Person-Trips 376 201 175 Office N/A N/A
Internal Capture Percentage 24% 23% 26% Retail 12% 29%
Restaurant N/A N/A
External Vehicle-Trips5 284 155 129 Cinema/Entertainment N/A N/A
External Transit-Trips6 0 0 0 Residential 40% 28%
External Non-Motorized Trips6 0 0 0 Hotel 22% 9%
*Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number.
Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute - Version 2013.1
Scenario 1 7/6/2023
2023
PM Street Peak Hour
Table 1-P: Base Vehicle-Trip Generation Estimates (Single-Use Site Estimate)
Land Use Development Data (For Information Only)Estimated Vehicle-Trips3
Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates
Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips
NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool
HAJC ZC Southern Oregon Trans. Eng.
Central Point, OR Kim Parducci
Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance)
Origin (From)Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
Table 4-P: Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix*
Origin (From)Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
0
0
0
0
0
Table 5-P: Computations Summary Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use
4Enter vehicle occupancy assumed in Table 1-P vehicle trips. If vehicle occupancy changes for proposed mixed-use project, manual adjustments must be made to
Tables 5-P 9-P (O and D) Enter transit non-motorized percentages that will result with proposed mixed-use project complete
6Person-Trips
1Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Manual, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers.
2Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator.
3Enter trips assuming no transit or non-motorized trips (as assumed in ITE Trip Generation Manual ).
5Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 196
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Project Name: Organization:
Project Location: Performed By:
Scenario Description:Date:
Analysis Year: Checked By:
Analysis Period:Date:
ITE LUCs1 Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting
Office 0
Retail 820 53,000 Square Feet 525 252 273
Restaurant 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0
Residential 220/221 185 Units 72 44 28
Hotel 310 100 Rooms 46 23 23
All Other Land Uses2 0
643 319 324
Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized
Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
All Other Land Uses2
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 0 0 0 0
Retail 0 0 20 4
Restaurant 0 0 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 0 12 0 1
Hotel 0 4 0 0
Total Entering Exiting Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips
All Person-Trips 643 319 324 Office N/A N/A
Internal Capture Percentage 13% 13% 13% Retail 6% 9%
Restaurant N/A N/A
External Vehicle-Trips5 561 278 283 Cinema/Entertainment N/A N/A
External Transit-Trips6 0 0 0 Residential 45% 46%
External Non-Motorized Trips6 0 0 0 Hotel 22% 17%
*Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number.
Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute - Version 2013.1
Scenario 2 7/6/2023
2023
PM Street Peak Hour
Table 1-P: Base Vehicle-Trip Generation Estimates (Single-Use Site Estimate)
Land Use Development Data (For Information Only)Estimated Vehicle-Trips3
Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates
Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips
NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool
HAJC ZC Southern Oregon Trans. Eng.
Central Point, OR Kim Parducci
Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance)
Origin (From)Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
Table 4-P: Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix*
Origin (From)Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
0
0
0
0
0
Table 5-P: Computations Summary Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use
4Enter vehicle occupancy assumed in Table 1-P vehicle trips. If vehicle occupancy changes for proposed mixed-use project, manual adjustments must be made to
Tables 5-P 9-P (O and D) Enter transit non-motorized percentages that will result with proposed mixed-use project complete
6Person-Trips
1Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Manual, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers.
2Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator.
3Enter trips assuming no transit or non-motorized trips (as assumed in ITE Trip Generation Manual ).
5Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 197
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
BEEBE RD
E. PINE ST
HAMRICK RD
BIDDLE ROAD
MISTLETOE CT
LIVE OAK LOOP
VILLAGE AVE
PRINSLOW DR
PARKVIEW CT
PARKWOOD VILLAGE LN
HAMRICK RD
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
Legend
Residential
Residential Low Density Residential (VLRes)
Low Density Residential (LRes)
Medium Density Residential (MRes)
High Density Residential (HRes)
Commercial
Community Commercial (CC)
Employment Commercial (EC)
General Commercial (GC)
Industrial
Light Industrial (LI)
General Industrial (GI)
Parks and Open Space (OS)
Civic (C)
UGB ¯
1 in = 0 miles
1777 East Pine Street37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 100)File No. CPA-23001
1777 East Pine Street - 21.8 acres + adjacent ROWExisting GLUP: Employment Commercial (EC)TOD Overlay: No
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 198
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
Legend
Residential
Residential Low Density Residential (VLRes)
Low Density Residential (LRes)
Medium Density Residential (MRes)
High Density Residential (HRes)
Commercial
Community Commercial (CC)
Employment Commercial (EC)
General Commercial (GC)
Industrial
Light Industrial (LI)
General Industrial (GI)
Parks and Open Space (OS)
Civic (C)
UGB ¯
1 in = 0 miles
Scenario 11777 East Pine Street37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 100)File No. CPA-23001
1777 East Pine Street - 7.4 acresScenario 1Proposed GLUP: High Density Residential (HRes)TOD Overlay: Yes
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 199
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
Legend
Residential
Residential Low Density Residential (VLRes)
Low Density Residential (LRes)
Medium Density Residential (MRes)
High Density Residential (HRes)
Commercial
Community Commercial (CC)
Employment Commercial (EC)
General Commercial (GC)
Industrial
Light Industrial (LI)
General Industrial (GI)
Parks and Open Space (OS)
Civic (C)
UGB ¯
1 in = 0 miles
Scenario 21777 East Pine Street37S 2W 02D, Tax Lot 100)File No. CPA-23001
1777 East Pine Street - 21.8 acres (8.9 acres to HRes)Scenario 2Proposed GLUP: Employment Commercial/High Density Residential Proposed Zoning: Emmployment Commercial (EC)/High Mix Residential (HMR)/MMRTOD Overlay: Yes
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 200
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
F
a
c
t
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
L
a
w
(
1
8
0
6
:
M
i
n
o
r
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
City of Central Point
Staff Report to Council
ISSUE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
DEPARTMENT:
Community Development
FROM: Stephanie Powers, Planning Director
MEETING DATE: February 22, 2024
SUBJECT: Minor Zone Map Amendment File No. ZC-23001
ACTION REQUIRED:
Public Hearing
Ordinance 1st Reading
RECOMMENDATION:
None Forwarded
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
On January 26, 2023, the City Council approved Resolution No 1731 declaring the City
Council’s intent to initiate Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to support
housing production. The proposed Minor Zoning Map Amendment (“Amendment”) must comply
with the Comprehensive Plan General Land Use Plan (GLUP) and Overlay Maps. The proposed
changes include the following:
1. Taylor Road at North Haskell Street (37S 2W 03DC, Tax Lots 3402, 3603 (0.73 acres)
and 37S 2W 10AB, Tax Lot 1300 (0.18 acres). Change the zoning designation to
Medium Mix Residential (MMR) to support multifamily housing production. The subject
properties are located at the intersection of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street. The
proposed change supports the property owner’s objective to develop single-story,
cottage-style multifamily units for older adults to age-in-place.
2. 1777 East Pine Street (37S 2W 03D, Tax Lot 100 (21.13 acres). Change the Zoning
Map to align with the GLUP and Overlay Maps to support a mix of affordable and
market-rate housing while retaining opportunities for commercial uses. Proposed
changes include:
a. Extend the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay to include all 21.13
acres and a portion of the adjoining right-of-way.
b. Change the existing Tourist and Office Professional (C-4) Zone to Employment
Commercial (EC) based on one of the options below:
• Scenario 1 – Change 7.4 acres to High Mix Residential (HMR) for market-
rate housing and 13.73 acres to EC.
• Scenario 2 – Change 7.4 acres to HMR for market rate housing, 5.5 acres
to MMR to support affordable housing and 8.23 acres to EC.
The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing for the above changes, at
7.C
Packet Pg. 201
which time it heard testimony expressing concerns about loss of open space, increased traffic
and general impacts of growth. The Planning Commission unanimously forwarded a favorable
recommendation to the City Council approve the Amendment based on Scenario 2.
At the February 22, 2024 meeting, staff will present the existing and proposed zoning for public
hearing and first reading of the ordinance.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:
There are no costs aside from in-kind contributions associated with the proposed Minor
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment.
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
The proposed Amendment applies existing policies in the Land Use Element to lands within the
City Limits. To approve the Amendment, the City Council must find that the change is consistent
with CPMC 17.10, Zoning Map and Text Amendments. This includes demonstrated compliance
with the Statewide Planning Goals, applicable policies of the Central Point Comprehensive Plan,
the State Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060) and sufficiency of available or
planned public facilities and services. Staff has prepared the application and provided written
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. These findings of fact demonstrate that the proposed
Amendment provides needed housing in balance with employment needs and is consistent with
the approval criteria summarized above. A Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted and found
that the proposed change would decrease traffic impacts and consequently no significant impact
is found to the City’s transportation system. Additionally, there are public facilities (i.e. water,
sewer and stormwater) available and planned to the both sites that are the subject of this
application.
Note: The Findings for the Zone Map Amendment are consolidated with the Findings for the
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPA-23001). However, the specific findings that
support the zone map amendment are specifically identified by staff.
COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS:
Strategic Priority: Community Investment, Goal 6 – Meet the housing needs of Central Point
residents and businesses. .
Strategy 1 – Rely on the findings, policies and implementation of the City’s Comprehensive Plan
Population, Housing and Economic Elements.
Strategy 2 – Support and Capitalize on opportunities to collaborate on projects with agencies
who specialize in providing affordable housing.
Strategy 3 – Pursue grant and/or Urban Renewal assistance in making housing affordable and
accessible to residents.
Comment: The proposed Amendment is targeted toward implementing the City’s Housing and
Economic Elements to provide both residential and employment uses. The City recognizes it
has a housing shortage of approximately 2,800 housing units and affordability for all segments
of the population is challenging. The proposed Amendment leverages partnerships with local
land developers who have prepared preliminary plans to provide affordable, accessible housing
in Central Point in the near-term.
7.C
Packet Pg. 202
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Open the public hearing to receive testimony on the proposed Minor Zoning Map Amendment
and: 1) Forward the Ordinance to a 2nd Reading with or without changes; or 2) Deny the
Amendment.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to forward the Ordinance Amending the Central Point Zoning Map on properties located
at the intersection of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street and 1777 East Pine Street to
support increased housing production to a second reading.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance (ZC-23001)
7.C
Packet Pg. 203
Ordinance No. _________; Council Meeting (___/___/2024)
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CENTRAL POINT ZONING MAP ON
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF TAYLOR ROAD AND NORTH
HASKELL STREET AND 1777 EAST PINE STREET TO SUPPORT INCREASED
HOUSING PRODUCTION.
Recitals:
A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statutes
(ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and
implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning
Goals.
B. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with
ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals and
compatibility with City Comprehensive Plans.
C. Pursuant to authority granted by the City Charter and the ORS, the City may
amend the Central Point Zoning Map which was originally adopted on August 29,
1980 and has been amended at various times since.
D. The Minor Zoning Map Amendment includes the following changes:
a. Change the Civic zoning designation to Medium Mix Residential (MMR) on
0.9 acres at the corner of Taylor Road and North Haskell Street as shown in
Exhibit A, including property identified on the Jackson County Assessor’s Map as
37S 2W 03DC, Tax Lots 3402, 3603 (0.73 acres) and 37S 2W 10ab, Tax Lot
1300 (0.18 acres).
b. Change the Tourist and Office Professional (C-4) zone at 1777 East Pine
Street (37S 2W 03D, Tax Lot 100) to the following and as shown in Exhibit B:
i. 7.9 acres to High Mix Residential (HMR)
ii. 5.5 acres to Medium Mix Residential (MMR)
iii. 8.23 acres to Employment Commercial (EC)
c. Extend the TOD Overlay boundary to include the property at 1777 East
Pine Street (37S 2W 03D, Tax Lot 100 and a portion of the adjoining right-of-way
as shown in Exhibit B.
E. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.10.100 Zoning Map
and Zoning Code Text Amendments – Purpose and Chapter 17.05.010,
Applications and Development Permit Review Procedures, the City has accepted
an application and conducted the following duly advertised public hearings to
consider the proposed amendment:
7.C.a
Packet Pg. 204
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
C
-
2
3
0
0
1
)
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
]
(
1
8
0
7
:
M
i
n
o
r
Z
o
n
e
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Ordinance No. _________; Council Meeting (___/___/2024)
a. Planning Commission hearing on February 6, 2024
b. City Council hearing on February 22, 2024.
F. At the February 22, 2024 public hearing, the Council considered the staff report
and all testimony and evidence in the record.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Based upon all the information received in the record, the City Council
adopts the City staff report dated February 22, 2024; the Findings of Fact and Conclusions
of Law Sections 1, 2, 7, 8 and 9; and Planning Commission Resolution No. 917 including
all exhibits thereto, and herein incorporated by reference; and determines that changing
community conditions, needs and desires justify the amendments and hereby adopts the
changes entirely.
Section 2. The City zoning map is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit A and B
which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
Section 3. The City Manager is directed to conduct post acknowledgement
procedures defined in ORS 197.610 et seq. upon adoption of the changes to the zoning
and Comprehensive Plan maps.
Section 4. Effective date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance
enacted by the council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The
effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
_____ day of _____________________, 2024.
__________________________
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Recorder
7.C.a
Packet Pg. 205
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
C
-
2
3
0
0
1
)
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
]
(
1
8
0
7
:
M
i
n
o
r
Z
o
n
e
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Ordinance No. _________; Council Meeting (___/___/2024)
EXHIBIT A
MMR
7.C.a
Packet Pg. 206
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
C
-
2
3
0
0
1
)
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
]
(
1
8
0
7
:
M
i
n
o
r
Z
o
n
e
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
Ordinance No. _________; Council Meeting (___/___/2024)
EXHIBIT B
MMR HMR
EC
7.C.a
Packet Pg. 207
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
(
Z
C
-
2
3
0
0
1
)
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
]
(
1
8
0
7
:
M
i
n
o
r
Z
o
n
e
M
a
p
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
City of Central Point
Staff Report to Council
ISSUE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
FROM: Matt Samitore, Parks and Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: February 22, 2024
SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting the Lowest Responsible Bid from _____ for the
Pfaff Park Electrical Project and Authorizing the City Manager to
Execute a Contract
ACTION REQUIRED:
Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The City conducted a bid-letting procedure for the Pfaff Park Electrical Upgrade. The
engineer’s estimate for the project was $200,000-250,000. Bids will be opened on February
20. Staff will present the low bidders to the Council at the meeting.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:
Pfaff Park Electrical Upgrade project was budgeted in the 2023/25 budget. The project is
funded out of Urban Renewal and the Parks Fund. The main purpose is to upgrade the
electrical needs for the various events that occur at the facility. Additional phases will include
new lighting on the perimeter of the park as well as new pathway lighting.
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
The City of Central Point public contracts/bidding is governed by Oregon Revised Statute
(ORS) Chapter 279 and Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) Chapter 2.40.
COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS:
Community Investment; Goal 5 – Plan, design, and construct modern and efficient
infrastructure in all areas and systems. Strategies 3 and 4.
8.A
Packet Pg. 208
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Make a motion to approve the Resolution.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to approve Resolution No. _______ a Resolution Approving the Lowest Qualified Bid
from _______________ for the Construction of the Pfaff Park Electrical Upgrade Improvement
Project and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Pfaff Park Electrical and Lighting Improvements - Plans - Signed
2. 745673565
3. resol_pfaffelectrical
8.A
Packet Pg. 209
DEMOLITION LEGEND
OBJECT TO BE REMOVED
CONCRETE
POWER PEDESTAL
GRASS SEEDING
POLE MOUNTED LUMINAIRE SL-7
FLAGPOLE LIGHTING
POLE MOUNTED LUMINAIRE SL-6
SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DWG NO
Jan. 19, 2024
PARK-P-COV.DWG
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PFAFF PARK LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PFAFF PARK LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS
SPRING 2024
CENTRAL
POINT
91486
OREGON
EXPIRES:12/31/2025
T
Y
L
E
R MARKUS D U N C A N
REGIS T E R ED PROFES
SIO
N
A
LENGINEE
R
S
EPT 13 , 2 0 1 6
CONTACT AGENCY PHONE
GREG GRAVES CITY OF CENTRAL POINT (541) 664-3321 x225
TYLER DUNCAN, P.E. RH2 ENGINEERING (541) 326-4448
NICK BAKKE RVSS (541) 665-6300
ERIC CHASE CHARTER (541) 210-0827
RYAN WOOD PACIFIC POWER (541) 858-3204
ELI HABERMAN AVISTA (541) 690-0901
LANCE HARVEY LUMEN (503) 416-1541
MICAH SINCLAIR HUNTER COMMUNICATIONS (541) 414-1423
CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG
ONE CALL 811
ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY
NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR
952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER AT 503-232-1978
ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES THAT SPILLS BE REPORTED TO THE FOLLOWING ENTITIES:
OREGON EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEM:1-800-452-0311
THE NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER:1-800-424-8802
REPORT SPILLS
DRAWING INDEX
CONTACT PERSONNELSURVEY NOTES
PROJECT LOCATION MAPPROJECT VICINITY MAP
PROJECT LOCATION
JACKSON
COUNTY
SURVEY REFERENCE NOTES
Field and office equipment/software utilized: Trimble R10 GNSS equipment; Trimble S7 Robotic instrument; Trimble TSC7 data collector with Trimble Access
software; Trimble Business Center and Trimble Terramodel software.
Linear unit (horizontal): International Foot (ift).
Lineal unit (vertical): U.S. Survey Foot (usft).
Vertical datum: North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88)
Geodetic Information:
Datum: North American Datum (NAD) of 1983 (2011) epoch 2010.00
System: Oregon Coordinate Reference System
Zone: Grants Pass-Ashland
Projection: Transverse Mercator
Latitude of grid origin: 41%%17645'00" N
Longitude of central meridian: 123%%17620'00" W
Northing at grid origin: 0.000 m
Easting at central meridian: 50,000.000 m (164,041.995 ift)
Scale factor on central meridian: 1.000 043 (exact)
All bearings and distances shown hereon are projected (grid) values based on the projection definition herein and above. This projection was utilized in order to
minimize the difference between projected (grid) distances and horizontal (ground) distances at the topographic surface within the design area of this coordinate
system.
The basis of bearings for this survey is Geodetic North. Note that the grid bearings shown or implied hereon do not equal Geodetic North due to meridian
convergence.
Orthometric heights (elevations) are referenced to the NAVD88 datum and were attained via solution sets obtained from the NGS OPUS website for static GPS
occupations utilizing said Trimble R10,
This survey was conducted utilizing the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) referenced to the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS). NSRS coordinate
values are based on solution sets obtained from the NGS OPUS website for GPS static occupations utilizing a Trimble R10 at a set base station and a second R10,
Trimble TSC7 with Trimble Access software and RTK methods.
Established primary control and ties to found monuments utilizing said RTK methods and Trimble R10 equipment. From which, utilized classical terrestrial methods
and said Trimble S7 robotic instrument with said Trimble TSC7 data collector to establish all remaining control, monument ties and topographic locations.
GENERAL SURVEY NOTES
The property and right-of-way lines depicted hereon, are based on limited ties to found monuments and record subdivision plats. Said lines are approximate locations
only and are not to be construed or utilized for their true locations.
Contours: 0.5-foot contour interval; 1-foot index contour interval.
All existing underground utilities, as depicted hereon, were located within the tolerance zone, as marked on the ground by affected agencies and utility companies.
Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 952, Division 1, Definitions, 952-001-0010 (25), states: "tolerance zone" means the area within 24 inches surrounding the
outside dimensions of all sides of an underground facility.
LA
U
R
E
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
MA
N
Z
A
N
I
T
A
S
T
R
E
E
T
NORTH SIXTH STREET
NORTH SEVENTH STREET
DEMOLITION LEGENDEXISTING LEGEND
PROPOSED LEGEND
LEGEND
ROBERT J. PFAFF PARK
86610
OREGON
EXPIRES:12/31/2024
C
H
RIS
T
OPHER M. R O B ERTS
REGIS T E R ED PROFES
SIO
N
A
LENGINEE
R
M
A
RCH 13 , 2 012
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 210
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
P
l
a
n
s
-
S
i
g
n
e
d
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
CI
T
Y
O
F
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
O
I
N
T
PF
A
F
F
P
A
R
K
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
&
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
TM
D
JA
B
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
CP
T
23
-
0
0
9
4
PA
R
K
-
P
-
C
O
V
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
G01 02 09
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
GE
N
E
R
A
L
N
O
T
E
S
CE
N
T
R
A
L
PO
I
N
T
91486
OREGON
EXPIRES:12/31/2025
T
Y
L
ER MARKUS D U N C AN
REGIS T E R E D PROFES
S
IO
N
A
LENGINEE
R
S
EPT 13 , 2 0 1
PROJECT INFORMATION
CRITERIA
REFERENCES
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION
GENERAL NOTES
SITE
UTILITIES
DEMOLITION NOTES
TRAFFIC CONTROL
GENERAL TESC
GENERAL NOTES
BP BEGINNING POINT
CONC CONCRETE
CL CENTERLINE
DIAM DIAMETER
DI DUCTILE IRON
DWG DRAWING
E EASTING
ELEV ELEVATION
EP ENDING POINT
EX EXISTING
IE INVERT ELEVATION
L LENGTH
LF LINEAR FEET
MIN MINIMUM
MAX MAXIMUM
N NORTHING
PI POINT OF INTERSECTION
PROP PROPOSED
PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE
R RADIUS
RJ RESTRAINED JOINT
SPEC SPECIFICATIONS
ST STORM
STA STATION
STD STANDARD
STL STEEL
TYP TYPICAL
W WATER
ABBREVIATIONS
X
X
SECTION AND DETAIL REFERENCES
THE FOLLOWING CONVENTIONS HAVE BEEN USED WITHIN THESE DRAWINGS TO REFER THE
READER BETWEEN THE SECTION/DETAIL AND THE PLAN FROM WHICH IT IS REFERENCED.
REFERENCE BUBBLES
PLAN REFERENCE BUBBLE - REFERS READER BACK TO THE PLAN FROM
WHICH THE DETAIL OR SECTION ORIGINATED.
DETAIL/SECTION REFERENCE BUBBLE - REFERS READER TO THE
DRAWING ON WHICH THE DETAIL OR SECTION IS LOCATED.
WHERE,X = SECTION/DETAIL REFERENCE ID*
= DRAWING NUMBER ON WHICH DETAIL ORIGINATED OR RESIDES.
*SECTION/DETAIL REFERENCE ID CONVENTIONS:
SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOULD HAVE A LETTER REFERENCE ID
(A - ZZ) AND DETAILS SHOULD HAVE A NUMERICAL REFERENCE ID (0 - 999)
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 211
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
P
l
a
n
s
-
S
i
g
n
e
d
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
MA
N
Z
A
N
I
T
A
S
T
R
E
E
T
LA
U
R
E
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
ROBERT J. PFAFF PARK
CENTRAL POINT
CITY OF
TAX LOT 300
37 2W 02CC
NORTH SIXTH STREET
NORTH SEVENTH STREET
DEMOLITION NOTES
REMOVE EX LIGHT POLE AND ABANDON EX POWER LINE IN
PLACE.
REMOVE EXISTING FLAGPOLE, FOUNDATION, AND
FLAGPOLE LIGHTING. ABANDON EX POWER LINE IN-PLACE.
1)ALL TREES, STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, EQUIPMENT, AND ALL
OTHER ITEMS NOT INDICATED TO BE DISCONNECTED AND/OR
REMOVED SHALL REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO TREE PROTECTION NOTES ON
THE GENERAL NOTES SHEET AND DIVISION 2 OF THE
SPECIFICATIONS.
2)CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL COMPONENTS SHOWN TO
BE DEMOLISHED IN THEIR ENTIRETY, AND SHALL PROPERLY
DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVED ITEMS.
GENERAL NOTES
MANZ
A
N
I
T
A
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
7
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
LAUR
E
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
6
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
VICINITY MAP
TM
D
JA
B
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
CP
T
23
-
0
0
9
4
PA
R
K
-
P
-
P
R
E
P
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
C01 03 09
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
&
D
E
M
O
L
I
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
CE
N
T
R
A
L
PO
I
N
T
91486
OREGON
EXPIRES:12/31/2025
T
Y
L
ER MARKUS D U N C AN
REGIS T E R E D PROFES
S
IO
N
A
LENGINEE
R
S
EPT 13 , 2 0 1 6
CI
T
Y
O
F
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
O
I
N
T
PF
A
F
F
P
A
R
K
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
&
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
PLAN VIEW
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 212
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
P
l
a
n
s
-
S
i
g
n
e
d
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
MA
N
Z
A
N
I
T
A
S
T
R
E
E
T
LA
U
R
E
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
NORTH SIXTH STREET
NORTH SEVENTH STREET
1)LOCATION OF EX UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES ARE FROM
INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF DESIGN. EXACT
LOCATION AND COMPLETENESS ARE NOT GUARANTEED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY AND UNDERGROUND
SERVICES ALERT 811 A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY
EXCAVATION, AND SHALL POTHOLE FOR EXACT UTILITY
LOCATIONS. REFER TO TREE PROTECTION NOTES ON THE
GENERAL NOTES SHEET AND DIVISION 2 OF THE
SPECIFICATIONS.
2)AT LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LIGHTS, SOD ALL BARE-EARTH
SURFACES WITHIN THE PROJECT FOOTPRINT OR OTHERWISE
DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION WITH SPECIES TO
MATCH ADJACENT VEGETATIVE COVER.
GENERAL NOTES
KEY NOTES
1RELOCATED FLAG POLE, REFER TO DETAIL
MANZ
A
N
I
T
A
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
7
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
LAUR
E
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
N
6
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
TM
D
JA
B
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
CP
T
23
-
0
0
9
4
PA
R
K
-
P
-
C
I
V
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
C02 04 09
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
CE
N
T
R
A
L
PO
I
N
T
91486
OREGON
EXPIRES:12/31/2025
T
Y
L
ER MARKUS D U N C AN
REGIS T E R E D PROFES
S
IO
N
A
LENGINEE
R
S
EPT 13 , 2 0 1 6
VICINITY MAP
CI
T
Y
O
F
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
O
I
N
T
PF
A
F
F
P
A
R
K
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
&
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
PLAN VIEW
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 213
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
P
l
a
n
s
-
S
i
g
n
e
d
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
TM
D
JA
B
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
CP
T
23
-
0
0
9
4
PA
R
K
-
D
-
D
E
T
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
D01 05 09
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
DE
T
A
I
L
S
CE
N
T
R
A
L
PO
I
N
T
91486
OREGON
EXPIRES:12/31/2025
T
Y
L
ER MARKUS D U N C AN
REGIS T E R E D PROFES
S
IO
N
A
LENGINEE
R
S
EPT 13 , 2 0 1 6
CI
T
Y
O
F
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
O
I
N
T
PF
A
F
F
P
A
R
K
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
&
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
ALUMINUM FLAGPOLE
LED FLAGPOLE LIGHT, REFER
TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
TOP DIAMETER: 3 12"
HALYARD, STAINLESS
STEEL AIRCRAFT CABLE
TWO SNAPHOOKS, SWIVEL,
CHROME PLATED BRONZE
WITH NEOPRENE COVERS.
FLUSH ACCESS DOOR WITH
COMPRESSION LOCK,
CONTINUOUS PIANO HINGE,
AND A MANUALLY
OPERATED WINCH HAVING
A REMOVABLE HANDLE AND
POSITIVE LOCKING AT ANY
POSITION.
TAPERED ALUMINUM TUBE "G"
BASE WALL, ALLOY 6063-T6
6" BUTT DIAMETER
STANDARD SPUN ALUMINUM
COLLAR (CAULK PERIMETER)
CEMENT OR WATERPROOF
COMPOUND (BY INSTALLER)
GROUND SLEEVE ASSEMBLY - 16
GAUGE GALVANIZED STEEL TUBE
DRY SAND (BY INSTALLER)
3
16" THICK STEEL PLATE WELDED TO SLEEVE
316" STEEL SUPPORT PLATE
LIGHTING SPIKE - 3
4" DIAMETER STEEL ROD
24"
12"
6"3'-0"
SET DEPTH
36"
4'-6"
30'-0"
(EXPOSED HEIGHT)
33'-0"
(TOTAL LENGTH)
13'-9"
(TAPER LENGTH)
GENERAL NOTES:
1.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY
ENGINEER OF RECORD WITH ANY DISCREPANCIES.
2.ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH 2019 EDITION OF CBC AND 2018 EDITION OF
IBC.
3.ENGINEER IS RESPONSIBLE ONLY FOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THIS
PROJECT. ANY ALTERATION WILL VOID THESE PLANS.
CONCRETE:
1.CONCRETE TO HAVE MIN. ULTIMATE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI @
28 DAYS AND SHALL BE POURED AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL. (NO FORMS)
2.AGGREGATE FOR HARD-ROCK CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C-33
WITH MAX. SIZE OF 34" COARSE AGGREGATE.
3.CONCRETE MIXING SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C-94.
4.REINFORCING STEEL SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM A-615, GRADE 60,
DEFORMED.
FOUNDATION:
1.ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE, 1500. PSF ASSUMED.
2.SOIL TYPE, ASSUMED SAND, SILTY SAND, CLAYEY SAND, SILTY GRAVEL &
CLAYEY GRAVEL, ALLOWABLE LATERAL BEARING PRESSURE, 150 LBS/S.F./FT.
STRUCTURAL STEEL
1.STRUCTURAL PLATES AND SHAPES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A36.
2.ALL BOLTS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A307, U.N.O.
3.FABRICATION, ERECTION AND PAINTING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL
CONFORM TO AISC 360 MANUAL, FOURTEENTH EDITION.
4.ALL STEEL LESS THAN t' THICK SHALL BE HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED.
5.ALL STEEL SECTIONS EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE SHALL BE UNPAINTED.
WELDING:
1.WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO "AISC" , "IBC", AND "AWS" SPECIFICATIONS.
2.WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY CERTIFIED WELDERS PER "AWS" D1.1.
3.WELDING ELECTRODES SHALL BE E70-XX PER "AWS".
4.SHOP WELDS BY APPROVED FABRICATOR.
5.CONTINUOUS INSPECTION REQUIRED FOR ALL FIELD WELDING.
6.MINIMUM SIZE OF FILLET WELDS WHEN NOT SPECIFIED SHALL BE PER TABLE
J2.4 OF "AISC" SPECIFICATION.
STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM:
1.STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM SHALL BE 6063-T6, Fb=18000 PSI.
2.OXYGEN CUTTING OF ALUMINUM ALLOYS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED.
3."FASTENERS": BOLTS AND OTHER FASTENERS SHALL BE ALUMINUM,
STAINLESS STEEL OR ALUMINIZED, HOT-DIP GALVANIZED OR
ELECTRO-GALVANIZED STEEL. DOUBLE CADMIUM-PLATED "AN" STEEL BOLTS
MAY ALSO BE USED.
4."DISSIMILAR MATERIALS": WHERE ALUMINUM ALLOY PARTS ARE IN CONTACT
WITH DISSIMILAR METALS, OTHER THAN STAINLESS, ALUMINIZED OR
GALVANIZED STEEL, THE FAYING SURFACES SHALL BE PAINTED OR
OTHERWISE SEPARATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIVISION II.
5."WELDING": ALUMINUM PARTS SHALL BE WELDED WITH AN INERT GAS
SHIELDED ARC OR RESISTANCE WELDING PROCESS. NO WELDING PROCESS
THAT REQUIRES A WELDING FLUX SHALL BE USED.
6.WELDING OF ALUMINUM SHALL BE PERFORMED BY WELDERS QUALIFIED FOR
ALUMINUM WELDING.
DESIGN WIND LOAD:
1.DESIGN ULTIMATE WIND SPEED: 110 MPH
2.WIND LOAD ON FLAG PER "NAAMM/FP" STANDARD.
1
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 214
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
P
l
a
n
s
-
S
i
g
n
e
d
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
ONE-LINE DIAGRAM INFORMATION
GENERAL NOTES
LADDER LOGIC SYMBOL LEGEND
INSTRUMENT METERINDICATE TYPE BY
LETTER
VALVE SYMBOLS
ABBREVIATIONSONE-LINE DIAGRAM SYMBOLS LIGHTING FIXTURES/DEVICESPANELBOARDS, SWITCHES, AND EQUIPMENT
GROUNDING SYSTEM SYMBOLS
ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SYMBOLS
RECEPTACLES AND JUNCTION BOX SYMBOLS
FIRE SYSTEM SYMBOLS
ADDITIONAL SYMBOLS
RACEWAY LEGEND
SITE PLAN LEGEND
BUILDING OR FACILITY PLAN LEGEND
SWITCH OUTLETS
MB
D
MW
B
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
CP
T
23
-
0
0
9
4
PA
R
K
-
P
-
E
L
E
C
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
E01 06 09
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
L
E
G
E
N
D
CE
N
T
R
A
L
PO
I
N
T
CI
T
Y
O
F
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
O
I
N
T
PF
A
F
F
P
A
R
K
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
&
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
86610
OREGON
EXPIRES:12/31/2024
C
H
R
IS
T
OPHER M. R O B ERTS
REGIS T E R E D PROFES
S
IO
N
A
LENGINEE
R
M
A
RCH 13 , 20 12
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 215
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
P
l
a
n
s
-
S
i
g
n
e
d
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
MA
N
Z
A
N
I
T
A
S
T
R
E
E
T
LA
U
R
E
L
S
T
R
E
E
T
NORTH SIXTH STREET
NORTH SEVENTH STREET
MB
D
MW
B
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
CP
T
23
-
0
0
9
4
PA
R
K
-
P
-
E
L
E
C
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
E02 07 09
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
CE
N
T
R
A
L
PO
I
N
T
CI
T
Y
O
F
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
O
I
N
T
PF
A
F
F
P
A
R
K
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
&
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN
86610
OREGON
EXPIRES:12/31/2024
C
H
R
IS
T
OPHER M. R O B ERTS
REGIS T E R E D PROFES
S
IO
N
A
LENGINEE
R
M
A
RCH 13 , 20 12
ELECTRICAL
HAND HOLE, TYP.
SITE LIGHT 3
1. EXISTING ELECTRICAL SERVICE DROP AND EXISTING PANEL C. EXISTING
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF BY
CONTRACTOR AND REPLACED WITH PROPOSED PAD MOUNT TRANSFORMER
AND PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE METER ENCLOSURE, "BMC-2". SEE
DWG NO. D01 FOR ELECTRICAL SERVICE METER ENCLOSURE DETAILS E-1,
E-2, AND E-3. ALL EXISTING CIRCUITS IN EXISTING PANEL C TO BE RELOCATED
TO PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE METER ENCLOSURE, "BMC-2".
2. SEE DWG NO. E03 FOR CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE.
3. SEE DWG NO. E03 FOR LIGHTING SCHEDULE.
ELECTRICAL NOTES
A#
PROPOSED STAGE CIRCUIT
BREAKER PANEL. PANEL TO
INCLUDE (1) 20 AMP, 1-POLE
CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR
PROPOSED FLAGPOLE LIGHTING
AND (1) 20 AMP, 1-POLE CIRCUIT
BREAKER FOR (2) PROPOSED
RECEPTACLES.
(1) ADDITIONAL LIGHT HEAD TO BE ADDED TO EACH
EXISTING TENNIS COURT LIGHT, FOR A TOTAL OF (4)
PROPOSED LIGHT HEADS. MATCH PROPOSED LIGHT
HEADS TO EXISTING LIGHT HEADS
A2
A2
A2
A2
A2
A2
A2
A2
FLAGPOLE
A3
A1A1
A1
A1
A1
A1
A1 A1A1
7TH ST POWER PEDESTAL 17TH ST POWER PEDESTAL 27TH ST POWER PEDESTAL 3
LAUREL ST POWER PEDESTAL 1
6TH ST POWER PEDESTAL 1
6TH ST POWER PEDESTAL 26TH ST POWER PEDESTAL 3
LAUREL ST POWER PEDESTAL 3
LAUREL ST POWER PEDESTAL 2
SITE
LIGHT 1 SITE LIGHT 2
SITE LIGHT 4
SITE
LIGHT 5
SITE LIGHT 6
SITE LIGHT 7
SITE LIGHT 8
PROPOSED PAD-MOUNT TRANSFORMER PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY ELECTRICAL
UTILITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
VAULT PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EXCAVATION,
BACKFILL, COMPACTION, AND RESTORATION PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS
CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL (2) RECEPTACLES
AT STAGE. LOCATE RECEPTACLE 2' ABOVE
FINISHED FLOOR. RECEPTACLE SHALL BE ON
THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF STAGE.
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY SERVICE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH UNDERGROUND
SERVICE TO PROPOSED PAD-MOUNT TRANSFORMER. ELECTRICAL UTILITY TO TERMINATE
CONDUCTORS ON BOTH PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SIDE OF TRANSFORMER. CONTRACTOR
SHALL PROVIDE TRENCHING, COMPACTION, RESTORATION, AND RACEWAY PER UTILITY
STANDARDS. PROVIDE HANDHOLES AS NECESSARY PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK NOT PERFORMED BY PACIFIC POWER.
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 216
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
P
l
a
n
s
-
S
i
g
n
e
d
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
MB
D
MW
B
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
CP
T
23
-
0
0
9
4
PA
R
K
-
P
-
E
L
E
C
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
E03 08 09
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
S
&
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
CE
N
T
R
A
L
PO
I
N
T
CI
T
Y
O
F
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
O
I
N
T
PF
A
F
F
P
A
R
K
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
&
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
86610
OREGON
EXPIRES:12/31/2024
C
H
R
IS
T
OPHER M. R O B ERTS
REGIS T E R E D PROFES
S
IO
N
A
LENGINEE
R
M
A
RCH 13 , 20 12
POWER CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE
COPPER CONDUCTOR
CADWELD TYPE TA.
CADWELD CABLE TO CABLE
TEE CONNECTION.COPPER CONDUCTOR
CADWELD TYPE RR.
CADWELD END CABLE TO
UPPER REBAR CONNECTION.
REBAR
COPPER CONDUCTOR
CADWELD TYPE GR
5/8" X 8' COPPER GROUND
ROD.COPPER CONDUCTOR
(TYPICAL)
CADWELD TYPE XA.
CADWELD CABLE TO CABLE
CROSS CONNECTION.CADWELD CABLE TO
GROUND ROD CONNECTION.
GROUNDING CROSS DETAILGROUND TEE DETAIL
GROUND TEE DETAIL GROUND REBAR DETAIL
GRADE
8-0"
GROUND ROD DETAIL
PROPOSED GROUND ROD
BOX WITH COVER. SEE
SPECIFICATIONS.
3"
3"
3"
FINISH SURFACE PER PLAN
RED ELECTRICAL WARNING
TAPE CENTERED OVER EACH
CONDUIT IN TRENCH (TYP)
36
"
M
I
N
-
4
8
"
M
A
X
F
O
R
PR
I
M
A
R
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
CO
N
D
U
I
T
S
MINIMUM DEPTH BELOW
BOTTOM OF DEEPEST
CONDUIT INSTALLED IN
TRENCH
24
"
M
I
N
(
<
6
0
0
V
)
NATIVE MATERIAL COMPACTED
TO 95% PER ASTM D1557 OR AS
REQUIRED PER PLAN
6"
9"
COVER OVER
HIGHEST CONDUIT
IN TRENCH
NOTE: BURY DEPTH OF CONDUIT AND HORIZONTAL SPACING SHALL
BE CONFIRMED WITH SERVING UTILITY BEFORE CONSTRUCTION.
TYPICAL ELECTRICAL TRENCH DETAIL
ELECTRICAL CONDUIT NUMBER AND
SIZE VARY AS PER SITE PLAN. MAINTAIN
12" SPACING BETWEEN TELEMETRY
CONDUITS AND OTHER CONDUITS.
SAND BEDDING
MATERIAL
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION SCHEDULE
LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE
*
5/8"X8' LONG COPPER
GROUND ROD
PANEL SCHEDULE BMC-2
ɸ
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 217
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
P
l
a
n
s
-
S
i
g
n
e
d
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
TM
D
JA
B
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
Ja
n
1
9
,
2
0
2
4
CP
T
23
-
0
0
9
4
PA
R
K
-
P
-
E
L
E
C
.
D
W
G
SHOWN
E04 09 09
DWG NO.:
DA
T
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
BY
RE
V
I
E
W
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
:
SA
V
E
D
A
T
E
:
RE
V
I
E
W
E
D
:
PL
O
T
D
A
T
E
:
CL
I
E
N
T
:
FI
L
E
N
A
M
E
:
SHEET NO.:
JO
B
N
O
.
:
NO
.
0"1"2"
DRAWING IS FULL SCALE WHEN
BAR MEASURES 2"
SCALE:
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
CE
N
T
R
A
L
PO
I
N
T
CI
T
Y
O
F
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
O
I
N
T
PF
A
F
F
P
A
R
K
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
&
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
IM
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
86610
OREGON
EXPIRES:12/31/2024
C
H
R
IS
T
OPHER M. R O B ERTS
REGIS T E R E D PROFES
S
IO
N
A
LENGINEE
R
M
A
RCH 13 , 20 12
CONSTRUCT PER CIRCUIT BREAKER
SIZES. SEE SCHEDULE, DWG NO. E03
400 AMP, 600V RATED PER
UTILITY STANDARDS
400
PROVIDE 6" THICK LAYER OF 3/4" AGGREGATE
BASE ROCK UNDER EXISTING PAD COMPACTED
TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR.
#4 REBAR @ 12" ON-CENTER EACH
WAY, CENTER OF SLAB. MAINTAIN 2"
MIN CLEARANCE SPACE BETWEEN
REBAR AND CONCRETE.
CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE
EQUIPMENT PAD, 6" THICK, SIZE
PAD AREA SUCH THAT EDGES ARE
6" FROM EDGE OF EQUIPMENT.
COMPACT NATIVE SOIL TO FORM
A FIRM AND UNYIELDING SURFACE
NATIVE OR STRUCTURAL
FILL COMPACTED TO 90%
STANDARD PROCTOR.
TOP OF PAD TO BE 2" MIN
ABOVE FINISHED GRADE
EQUIPMENT PAD DETAIL, TYP
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 218
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
P
l
a
n
s
-
S
i
g
n
e
d
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
Invoice #
Invoice Date
Customer
745673565
02/05/2024
Payment Terms
Due Date
City of Central Point, ID:
03/06/2024
A Division of BridgeTower Media
P.O Box 745929
Atlanta, GA 30374-5929
BILLING ADDRESS ADVERTISER
Cyndi Weeks
City of Central Point
Central Point OR 975022216
City of Central Point, ID: 54301
Net 30
140 S 3Rd St140 S 3rd St
Central Point OR 975022216
INVOICE REF AD SIZEEDITIONDATEMEDIAPOQTY
1007246498 Legal - BidsLegal - Bids01/26/24Daily Journal of Commerce - OR - Public 1
1007253227 Legal - BidsLegal - Bids02/02/24Daily Journal of Commerce - OR - Public 1
$431.04
$0.00
Subtotal
Credits
$431.04 BALANCE DUE
$0.00Tax
Thank you for your business!
IOID: 2576035
Index: Bids - Other
Category: Construction
Affidavit Reference: PFAFF PARK LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL
IMPROVEMENTS
Customer ID Date
Amount Enclosed:
745673565 Daily Journal of Commerce - OR -
Public Notice Invoice #03/06/2024 ID: 54301, City of Central Point
REMITTANCE STUB TO BridgeTower Media
Acceptable Payment Methods
PREFERRED METHOD OTHER METHODS
To Pay by ACH Transfer:
Bank: Bank of America
Send ACH remittance email to
ar@bridgetowermedia.com
Account Number: 237025443017
Routing: 053000196
To Pay by Check use the following address:To Pay by Credit Card:To Pay by Wire Transfer:
Please include invoice number on check
BridgeTower OpCo, LLC
P.O Box 745929
Atlanta, GA 30374-5929
Use the Click to Pay Online link located
on the email you received or Contact
Accounts Receivable: 866-802-8214
Please have your Invoice Number
and Credit Card Number Ready
Name: BridgeTower OpCo, LLC
Bank: Bank of America
Swift Code: BOFAUS3N
Bank Address: 100 North Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28255
Account Number: 237025443017
Routing: 053000196
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 219
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
4
5
6
7
3
5
6
5
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
Daily Journal of Commerce
1618 SW First Ave., Suite 400
Portland, OR, 97201
Phone: 503-226-1311 Fax: 503-222-5358
Affidavit of Publication
To:City of Central Point - Cyndi Weeks
140 S 3rd St
Central Point, OR, 975022216
Re:Legal Notice 2576035, PFAFF PARK LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS
State of OR }
}SS:
County of Multnomah }
I, Michelle A. Ropp, being duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Principal Clerk of the Daily Journal of Commerce, a
newspaper of general circulation in the counties of CLACKAMAS, MULTNOMAH, and WASHINGTON as defined by ORS
193.101 and 193.020, published in Portland in the aforesaid County and State; that I know from my personal knowledge that
the notice described as:
PFAFF PARK LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT: PFAFF PARK LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL
IMPROVEMENTS Bids Due 2:00 pm, February 20, 2024 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS PROJECT
#8942486
a printed copy of which is hereto annexed, was published in the entire issue of said newspaper 2 time(s) in the following
issues:
01/26/2024 and 02/02/2024.
SEE EXHIBIT A
State of Oregon
County of Multnomah
SIGNED OR ATTESTED BEFORE ME ON 8th day of February 2024
Page 1 of 2
By:
Michelle A. Ropp
By:
Nicholas Bjork
Notary Public, State of OR
No. 1044188
My commission expires on January 10, 2028
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 220
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
4
5
6
7
3
5
6
5
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
EXHIBIT A
Page 2 of 2
8.A.b
Packet Pg. 221
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
7
4
5
6
7
3
5
6
5
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
1 - Resolution No. _________ 2/22/2024 Council meeting)
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LOWEST QUALIFIED BID FROM
___________________ FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PFAFF PARK
ELECTRICAL UPGRADE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT
RECITALS:
A. WHEREAS, the City recently published a solicitation for lowest bids for
the construction of the Pfaff Park Electrical Upgrade Improvement Project.
B. WHEREAS, the City received ____ qualified bid(s).
C. WHEREAS, the lowest bid was submitted by ________________ for
$_________________.
The City of Central Point resolves as follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby accepts the lowest bid from
___________for the construction of the Pfaff Park Electrical Improvement Project
in the amount of $_____________..
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a contract and
any related documents necessary to effectuate the acceptance of this award in a
form substantially the same as that included in the specifications.
Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its
passage and approval.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage
this _____ day of _____________________, 2024.
__________________________
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Recorder
8.A.c
Packet Pg. 222
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
r
e
s
o
l
_
p
f
a
f
f
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
[
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
]
(
1
8
0
4
:
P
f
a
f
f
P
a
r
k
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
)
City of Central Point
Staff Report to Council
ISSUE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
FROM: Matt Samitore, Parks and Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: February 22, 2024
SUBJECT: Central Point Little League Complex Recommendation
ACTION REQUIRED:
Information/Direction
RECOMMENDATION:
Not Applicable
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
At the last City Council meeting, several options regarding construction of the Central
Point Little League were discussed. At the meeting staff presented the budget
limitations of 2.350 million dollars and options on how to proceed. The Council asked
for a hybrid option of utilizing the design configuration of a “pin-wheel” to re-orient the
fields and utilize contractor and City operations staff to complete as much of the project
as possible. Additionally, Council requested building the first three fields as standard
fields with dirt infields and grass outfields. Staff has met with the Moore Family and the
Central Point Little League and they concur with this option.
After the meeting staff met with our City Engineer to put a package together for all the
clearing and demolition of the site as well as building all of the utilities. It was decided
to do a bid alternative for the construction of one field to see the overall price options
available. Construction would start as early as June of this year.
The cost of expenditures in 2024 for Phase 1 will determine the scope of Phase 2 of the
project, including potential turf infields and additional amenities. If Council concurs with
the staff recommendations, fund raising would start immediately. Phase 1 would
include three fields, some pathways and the restroom/concession. No lighting would be
9.A
Packet Pg. 223
part of this package.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:
The City of Central Point has spent approximately 1.1 million on the project as of this
point. Leaving the City approximately $500,000 for the project. Noel and Bret Moore
have contributed $600,000 of a possible 1.5 million dollar contribution. The City could
contribute an additional $850,000 out of ARPA, Recreation Fee and General Fund
Dollars.
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Not Applicable.
COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS:
GOAL 2 - Be a city filled with happy, healthy people who are thriving.
STRATEGY 1 – Develop and maintain positive partnerships with public and private
entities and the community to understand community needs, and leverage resources to
develop and deliver opportunities for personal, professional, and/or vocational
development. (Recreation Programs, Maker Space, Artisan Corridor, Volunteerism,
Community Events, etc.) (Nurturing individuals skills and personal growth is an essential
element to Central Point’s vitality. While this is an organic process that must be desired
by individuals in the population, the City can make investments that consider and further
the goal of providing an environment that is supportive of this objective).
STRATEGY 5 – Plan, design, build, and maintain a comprehensive system of
sustainable facilities, trails, and park spaces, (setting the highest standards) to provide
attractive places people will use and enjoy. Acquire additional lands for active and
passive recreation use based on current deficiencies and public demands created by
increasing population or the environmental and recreational significance of the area. (Be
mindful of the budget and plan trail locations).
9.A
Packet Pg. 224
GOAL 3 - Provide opportunities for youth education, recreation, and support. (Kids are
the future. Happy, well-adjusted kids are the canary in the coal mine for true community/
family wellbeing).
STRATEGY 3 – Provide opportunities for social connection. Identify underrepresented
groups and help them participate and feel connected. Increase engagement in
physically active recreation, and enjoyment of parks and trails to foster active, healthy
lifestyles. Reduce barriers for accessing programs, services, places, spaces, and
information.
STRATEGY 4 – Expand on existing recreation programming to reach a broader and
more diverse audience. Research successful recreation programs to ensure that we are
offering activities that will best meet the current and future needs of our citizens.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending the hybrid option.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Not Applicable
ATTACHMENTS:
1. final field configuration
9.A
Packet Pg. 225
9.A.a
Packet Pg. 226
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
f
i
n
a
l
f
i
e
l
d
c
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
1
8
0
3
:
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
o
i
n
t
L
i
t
t
l
e
L
e
a
g
u
e
City of Central Point
Staff Report to Council
ISSUE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
DEPARTMENT:
City Attorney
FROM: Sydnee Dreyer, City Attorney
MEETING DATE: February 22, 2024
SUBJECT: Discussion Arts Commission Membership
ACTION REQUIRED:
Information/Direction
RECOMMENDATION:
None Forwarded
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Recently the Council adopted Ordinance No. 2107 which amended CPMC 2.59.030, to expand
the membership requirements for the Arts Commission. This amendment was recommended,
given that historically the City has had difficulty finding a sufficient number of volunteers for this
commission.
Prior to adoption of Ordinance No. 2107, at least 5 members had to be residents within City
limits, and the 6th and 7th members could be either a resident of the City or reside within the
UGB, own or operate a business within the City limits, or be a teacher with School District No. 6
working within City limits.
The 2023 revision modified the membership requirements such that a minimum of 4 members
must reside within City limits and the remaining 3 could establish membership as provided
above.
Recently City staff was approached by an individual seeking to become a member of the Arts
Commission. The individual has a Central Point address, but does not live within City limits or
the UGB, and has family members with longstanding businesses in City limits with which she is
involved, but is not an owner. The individual has requested that the City consider further
expanding the requirements for membership, in order to allow individuals such as herself with
longstanding interest in Central Point, an opportunity to serve on the commission.
To that end, the question for Council to consider is whether it seeks to build in additional
flexibility to the membership requirements. Such flexibility could include some, or all of the
following:
• Allow residents in the City’s URA to be included for purposes of positions 5-7, in addition
to residents of the UGB;
• Allow an owner of a City business, or an individual with a close family member who has
a business in City limits to serve. In such event close family member would need to be
defined; for example spouse, domestic partner, child, parent….. At present, if a spouse
9.B
Packet Pg. 227
owns a business, the other spouse cannot serve on the commission unless he or she is
also a business owner.
• Or clarify that only a titled business owner can serve on the Commission to avoid
confusion in the future (note this code change is not necessary but could help resolve
confusion on the part of the public).
Or the Council can direct staff to leave the language as-is.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS:
Strategic Priority – Community Culture
GOAL 3 - Develop urban agriculture opportunities to connect farm to market in Central Point.
STRATEGY 5 – Create and support public art that celebrates our community. Continue to
collaborate with local businesses and schools to develop public art projects such as the mosaic
project. Showcase local artists whenever possible. Use art to celebrate community diversity and
multiculturalism.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff whether to bring back future ordinance changes.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
Motion not required.
9.B
Packet Pg. 228
City of Central Point
Staff Report to Council
ISSUE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
DEPARTMENT:
Police Department
FROM: Scott Logue, Police Captain
MEETING DATE: February 22, 2024
SUBJECT: Taser Replacement
ACTION REQUIRED:
Information/Direction
RECOMMENDATION:
Not Applicable
In August of 2023, it was brought to our attention that Axon, the parent company of Taser, has
discontinued our current Taser model. This means that our current Tasers will no longer be
supported or serviceable, including having replacement batteries or cartridges available.
Axon has two options available, of which, we believe the Taser 10 best suits our needs. This
comes at a significant cost, however; Axon has made available a five year subscription-type
plan that will spread the payments over time. We have been able to push our timeline out for
this changeover, so that we begin the plan after July 1, 2024. As such, that should allow for me
to absorb the first payment into our current biennial budget, rather than having to request a
supplemental budget. Likewise, I will attempt to plan for the subsequent annual payments to be
within the confines of later biennial budgets.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Taser Memo
2. Taser Quote
9.C
Packet Pg. 229
9.C.a
Packet Pg. 230
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
T
a
s
e
r
M
e
m
o
(
1
8
0
9
:
T
a
s
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)
9.C.a
Packet Pg. 231
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
T
a
s
e
r
M
e
m
o
(
1
8
0
9
:
T
a
s
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)
9.C.b
Packet Pg. 232
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
T
a
s
e
r
Q
u
o
t
e
(
1
8
0
9
:
T
a
s
e
r
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
)