Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 899 - (SPAR 22006)PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 899 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR PROJECT MUPHY, A WAREHOUSE AND GROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3791 TABLE ROCK ROAD (37S 2W 12B TAX LOTS 800, 900 AND 902) (File No: SPAR-22006) WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a site plan and architectural review application to develop an 87,750 square foot warehouse and ground distribution facility known as "Project Murphy on 13.5 acres (Proposed Parcel 1, PAR-2200 1 )within the M-1, Industrial zoning district; and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022, the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly -noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the Staff Report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to the M-1 Industrial Zone (CPMC 17.48), Site Plan and Architectural Review (CPMC 17.72) and Off -Street Parking and Loading (CPMC 17.64); and, WHEREAS, after duly considering the proposed site plan and architectural review, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the application complies with applicable standards and criteria as set forth in the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission by a duly seconded motion granted site plan and architectural review approval subject to conditions in the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022 (Exhibit A) and the annotated Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Exhibit B). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 899 hereby approves the site plan and architectural review, based on the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022 (Exhibit A) and the Applicant's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as amended and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 61n day of December 2022. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: } 1yf I dry/r City epresentative Planning Commission Resolution No. 899 (12/6/2022) PLANNING CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON Item Summary Revised Staff Report Project Murphy Site Plan & Architectural Review File No. SPAR-22006 December 6, 2022 Consideration of a Site Plan & Architectural Review application to develop an 87,750 square foot warehouse and ground distribution facility. The 13.5 acre site is located on Proposed Parcel 1 in a Tentative Partition (PAR-22001), which is located at 3791 Table Rock Road and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 12B, Tax Lots 800, 900 and 902. The project site is within the M-1, Industrial zone. Applicant/Agent: BH DevCo (Steve Backman); File No: SPAR-22006. Staff Source Stephanie Holtey, Planning Director Background The applicant is requesting Site Plan & Architectural Review approval to develop a warehouse and ground distribution facility. The 13.5 acre project site is located on Parcel 1 in a tentative plan to be considered by the Planning Commission concurrent with this application on December 6, 2022 (File No. PAR-22001). Project Description: The proposed development includes construction of an 87,750 square foot industrial warehouse, box truck parking and loading area, as well as the ground distribution fleet storage, queuing and loading areas (Attachment A-1"). The proposed use is permitted in the M-1 zoning district. The parking, loading and fleet storage areas are separated uses that have individual access from Federal Way and Airport Road, both local industrial streets. No access is proposed on Table Rock Road, a County arterial. In total, there are five (5) access driveways to the site. These have been reviewed by Public Works and found to comply with the access spacing standards on local streets. The landscape plan provides street frontage, parking lot perimeter and interior landscaping throughout the development. There are two dry detention basins proposed on the project site and another one off -site on Parcel 2 west of Federal Way proposed to treat stormwater run-off in accordance with the City's stormwater management requirements. Architecturally, the warehouse is a single -story concrete tilt -up structure with parapet walls to conceal rooftop equipment (Attachment "A-6"). The primary fagade and main building entrance face Table Rock Road to the east. This fagade provides 560 square feet of window and door area and an elongated fabric awning to identify the building entrance. The other wall faces are designed for functional uses, including loading and emergency egress points. The proposed building is consistent with all applicable development standards for the M-1 zone. Issues There are three (3) issues relative to this project: 1. Parking Plan. There are three components to the Applicant's parking plan: employee/visitor parking, box truck parking and loading, and fleet parking. The box truck parking and loading exceeds the minimum loading spaces required. Fleet storage parking is commensurate with the number of fleet vehicles associated with the use. However, the employee and visitor parking plan provides 170 spaces, which exceeds the maximum number of parking spaces allowed (1 space per 1,000 square feet of warehouse area or 87 spaces). Comment: The Applicant provided a Parking Demand Analysis dated November 10, 2022 that supplements the Parking Demand Analysis in the Applicant's Findings (Aitaci� men_ 'G" I. The analysis utilizes data from other facilities operated by the same company at three locations. The analysis shows that the parking demand ratio for this use ranges from approximately 1 space per 450 to 700 square feet. 2. Landscape Materials. The proposed landscaping plan includes installation of eleven (11) arborvitae trees adjacent to the proposed structure in three (3) locations. Arborvitae are highly flammable plants (Attachment "A-Y). Comment: Given the local wildfires that have occurred in the City's urban area within the past few years, the City and Fire District #3 discourage use of these plants to minimize risk of structural damage and life/safety concerns. Staff recommends condition No. 2(c) requiring submittal of revised Landscape Plan utilizing a more fire resistant landscape material. 3. Construction Timing. According to the Applicant's Findings (Attachment "B"), it's their intent to expedite the proposed site development by entering into a development agreement and bonding for infrastructure improvements associated with the tentative plan. This provides flexibility to obtain building permits and start building construction prior to completion of public improvements typically required before final plat approval. Comment: The Municipal Code in Section 16.12.070 allows applicants to enter into a development agreement and post a surety bond for all required improvements. This provides flexibility in construction timing in exchange for legal and financial assurance the public facilities and services will be coordinated with growth in the project area. Staff recommends Condition No. 1 requiring compliance with all conditions of approval set forth in the Public Works Staff Report dated November 21, 2022 (Attachment "C"), the Jackson County Roads letter dated November 15, 2022 (Attachment "D") and the Rogue Valley Sewer Services letter dated November 14, 2022 ("E"). Recommended condition No. 2 requires the Applicant to provide all documentation for to Planning prior to issuance of any building permits to assure that conditions are being met throughout the development process. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law The Project Murphy Site Plan and Architectural Review at 3791 Table Rock Road has been evaluated against the applicable Criteria set forth CPMC 17.48, 17.64, and 17.72 and found to comply as conditioned and as evidenced in the annotated Applicant's Findings of Fact (Attachment "B"). The annotations indicate that a revised Parking Demand Analysis was submitted on November 10 2022 Attachment "G" and a revised Traffic Memo was submitted on November 21, 2022 (Attachment "H"). The updated attachments replace the Applicant's Exhibits 12 and 14 in Attachment "B" , respectively. Additionally, all criteria conclusions and exhibits referencing the Tentative Plan (PAR-22001) have either been crossed out of deleted to clarify the record and basis of the decision is for the Site Plan and Architectural Review. Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions of approval set forth in the Public Works Staff Report dated November 21, 2022 (Attachment "C"). 2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit the following documents to the Planning Department: A revised Tentative Plan showing the location of Public Utility Easements as required by Public Works; b. A copy of the recorded final plat or a fully executed development agreement and surety bond per CPMC 16.12.070. The development agreement shall set forth the timing of all infrastructure and stormwater quality improvements. c. A revised landscape plan replacing the eleven (11) Arborvitae plants with a more fire resistant tree or shrub. 3. Prior to Public Works Final Inspection and Certificate of Occupancy for the warehouse, the Applicant shall satisfy all requirements of the development agreement and submit a copy of the recorded plat as required in CPMC 16.12. 4. The Site Plan and Architectural Review approval shall expire after one (1) year in accordance with CPMC 17.72.070 unless a timely written request is received and an extension is granted. Attachments Attachment "A-V — Site Plan & Architectural Review Cover Sheet Attachment "A-2" — Site Plan Attachment "A-Y — Landscape Plan (Includes Sheets L.00 through L.51) Attachment "A-4" - Irrigation Plan (Includes Sheets L2.00 through L2.51) Attachment "A-T - Photometrics Plan (Includes Sheets E1.00 through E1.70) Attachment "A-6) - Building Elevations Attachment "B" - Annotated Applicant's Findings Attachment "C" - Public Works Department Staff Report, dated 11/21/2022 Attachment "Y - Jackson County Roads Letter dated 11/15/2022 Attachment "E" - Rogue Valley Sewer Services Letter dated 11/14/2022 Attachment F - Resolution No. 899 (Draft to be provided at the 12/6/2022 meeting) Attachment -'G" - Revised Parking Demand Analysis dated November 10 2022 Attachment "H° - Revised Tri Generation Analysis dated November 21 2022 Action Consider the proposed Project Murphy Site Plan and Architectural Review application and 1) approve; 2) approve with revisions; or 3) deny the application. Recommendation Approve the Project Site Plan and Architectural Review application for the Project Murphy at 3791 Table Rock Road per the Revised.Staff Report dated-NGv-mbeF-29 December 6, 2022 including all attachments thereto herein incorporated by reference. Recommended Motion I move to approve Resolution No. 899 authorizing development of an 87,750 square foot warehouse and ground distribution facility at 3791 Table Rock Road per the !Staff Report dated :'9 December I-., 2022. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road *-- k- 4\ I 4 1 �* ---* -- I f- klovemeni EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14s 4 r fl� Vi tT. Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ! .00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow. veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 4 29 22 164 32 243 25 454 84 197 571 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 82 326 225 505 88 519 470 981 180 488 1214 11 Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 37 996 698 1175 270 1585 1781 2997 551 1781 3610 32 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 55 0 0 196 0 243 25 268 270 197 281 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1721 0 0 1445 0 1585 1781 1777 1771 1781 1777 1865 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 6.7 0.5 6.6 6.7 3.9 6.9 6.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12 0.0 0.0 5.5 00 67 0.5 66 6.7 39 6.9 6.9 Prop In Lane 0.07 0.40 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 633 0 0 593 0 519 470 582 580 488 598 627 V/C Ratio(X) 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.47 0.05 0,46 0.47 0.40 0.47 0.47 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 633 0 0 593 0 519 470 582 580 488 598 627 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.06 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.9 0.0 0.0 14.2 0.0 14.7 9.8 14.7 14.7 10.7 14.4 14.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 3.0 02 2.6 2.7 25 2.6 2.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/vile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 2.4 0.2 2.5 2.6 1.5 26 27 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Deiay(d),s/veh 13.1 00 0.0 15.7 0.0 17.7 10.0 17.3 17 4 131 17.0 16.9 LnGrp LOS B A A B A B B B B B B B Approach Vol, veh?h 55 439 563 773 Approach Delay, s/veh 13.1 16.8 17.0 16.0 Approach LOS B B B B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4. 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 22.5 22.5 95 23.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 55 18.0 18.0 5.0 18 5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 5.9 8.7 3.2 2.5 8.9 8.7 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 2.0 0.2 00 2.2 1.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16A HCM 6th LOS B Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Scenario 5 Timings 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road II Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT Wt3R NBL NBT 58L SBT Lane Configurations 4. ��° A Traffic Volume (vph) 4 28 156 30 231 24 431 187 542 542 Future Volume (vph) 4 28 156 30 231 24 431 187 NA Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 1 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 5 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 225 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 10.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40 9% 40.9% 17 3% 40 9% 18.2% 41.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 4.5 0.0 4.5 00 4.5 45 4.5 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead/Lag Yes Yes Yes Yes Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 23.0 18.0 24.0 18.5 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.42 0.33 0.44 0.34 048 vlc Ratio 0.09 0.45 0.36 0.06 0.46 0.47 Control Delay 9.5 18.5 4.1 7.4 15.1 120 161 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 18.5 0.0 4.1 0.0 7.4 0.0 15.1 0.0 12.0 0.0 16.1 Total Delay 9.5 B A A B B B LOS Approach Delay A 9.5 10.5 14.7 15.1 Approach LOS A B B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 55 Actuated Cycle Length: 55 Offset: 10 (18%), Referenced to phase 2-NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum vlc Ratio:048 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 its and Phases: 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road 02 4\ 05 1,4 06 - 004 e= Synchro 11 Report Existing Plus Project PM Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario 4 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road -P -It •- A- t 1' --. Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SK SBT SBR Lane Configurations T, 1 0 tT1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 4 29 22 164 32 243 25 454 84 197 571 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 095 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap. veh/h 204 125 95 438 40 307 440 1028 189 506 1490 13 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.34 0.34 0.10 0.41 0.41 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 987 749 1781 188 1426 1781 2997 551 1781 3610 32 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 4 0 51 164 0 275 25 268 270 197 281 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1781 0 1736 1781 0 1614 1781 1777 1771 1781 1777 1865 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 1.4 4.0 0.0 8.6 0.5 6.2 6.3 3.6 5.9 5.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 01 0.0 14 4.0 0.0 8.6 0.5 6.2 6.3 3 6 5.9 5.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 204 0 220 438 0 348 440 610 608 506 733 770 V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0.00 0.23 0.37 0.00 0.79 0.06 0.44 0.44 0.39 0.38 0.38 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 362 0 586 438 0 545 555 610 608 520 733 770 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.3 0.0 20.9 16.3 0.0 19.8 10.7 13.6 13.6 9.3 10.9 10.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 4.2 01 2.3 2 3 0 5 1.5 14 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %Ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.0 00 0.6 1.4 0.0 3.1 0.2 2.3 2.4 1.0 2.0 21 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.3 0.0 21.5 16.8 0.0 24.0 10.8 15.8 15.9 9.8 12.4 12.4 LnGrp LOS C A C B A C B B B A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 55 439 563 773 Approach Delay, s/veh 21.4 21.3 15.7 11.7 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned ft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.8 22.8 9.5 11.3 6.0 26.5 4.8 16.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 57 18.3 5.0 18.0 5.0 19.0 5.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll ), s 5.6 8.3 6.0 3.4 2.5 7.9 2.1 10.6 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 2.1 0.0 0 1 0.0 24 0.0 0.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.5 HCM 6th LOS B Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Timings -)cena o 4 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road .4\ I " i -► j- Lane Group E8L EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT S6L SBT Lane Configurations I 1� T TT' §1 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 4 28 156 30 24 431 187 542 Future Volume (vph) 4 28 156 30 24 431 187 542 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 1 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 225 9.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.8 10.2 23.5 Total Split (%) 14 6% 34.6% 14.6% 34 6% 14.6% 351% 15.7% 36.2% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 45 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 4.5 4-5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) 10.0 7.5 11.7 10.9 23.1 19.3 26.4 25.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.15 0.24 0.22 0.47 0.39 0.54 0.52 v/c Ratio 0.01 0 18 0.51 0.50 005 039 0.40 0.31 Control Delay 12.5 15.4 21.2 7.8 7.9 13.4 10.4 9.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12.5 15.4 21.2 7.8 7.9 13.4 10.4 9.8 LOS B B C A A B B A Approach Delay 15.2 12.8 13.2 9.9 Approach LOS B B B A Intersection SummArl Cycle Length 65 Actuated Cycle Length: 48.9 Natural Cycle 65 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio_ 0.51 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road � 02 41"03 --* i9 31 1 - 22_ 5 s 08 05 ■ 06 07 Synchrc 11 Report Existing Plus Project PM Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario 3 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T T f �K 01 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Future Volume (vehlh) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1 00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 4 29 22 164 32 243 25 454 84 197 571 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 095 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 340 323 245 546 61 467 470 981 180 488 1214 11 Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, vehlh 1104 987 749 1354 188 1426 1781 2997 551 1781 3610 32 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 4 0 51 164 0 275 25 268 270 197 281 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhAn 1104 0 1736 1354 0 1614 1781 1777 1771 1781 1777 1865 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 1.1 5.3 00 7.6 0.5 6.6 6.7 3.9 6.9 6.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 0.0 1.1 6.4 00 7.6 0.5 6.6 6.7 3.9 6.9 6.9 Prop In Lane 1,00 0.43 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 340 0 568 546 0 528 470 582 580 488 598 627 VIC Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.09 0.30 0.00 0.52 0.05 0.46 0.47 0.40 0.47 0.47 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 340 0 568 546 0 528 470 582 580 488 598 627 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter([) 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 100 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 18.1 0.0 12.8 15.0 0.0 15.0 9.8 14.7 14.7 10.7 14.4 14.4 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.4 00 3.6 02 26 27 25 26 2.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.6 0.0 2.8 0.2 2.5 2.6 1.5 26 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, slveh LnGrp Delay(d),s(veh 18.2 0.0 13.1 16.4 0.0 18.6 100 17 3 17A 13.1 17.0 16.9 LnGrp LOS B A B B A B B B B B B B Approach Vol, vehlh 55 439 563 773 Approach Delay, slveh 13.5 17.8 17.0 16.0 Approach LOS B B B B Timer - Assigned_Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 22.5 22.5 9.5 23.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 18.0 18.0 5.0 185 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.9 8.7 9.8 2.5 8.9 9.6 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 2.0 01 0.0 2.2 1.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.7 HCM 6th LOS B Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Scenario 3 Timings 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road 4- 4 } I I i __,, Lane Grou EBL EBT WBL WB1' NBL Ne"r SBL SBT Lane Configurations T* 28 156 $' 30 24 +T, 431 187 TT, 542 Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) 4 4 28 156 30 24 431 187 542 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 5 2 1 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 225 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 10.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40 9% 17.3% 40.9% 18.2% 41.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 1.0 All -Red Time (s) 10 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) 0.0 4,5 0.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 18,0 18.0 18.0 18.0 23.0 18.0 24.0 18.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.42 0.33 0.44 0.34 vlc Ratio 0.01 0.09 0.37 0,40 0.06 0.46 0.47 048 Control Delay 12.8 9.2 172 5.2 7.4 15.1 12.0 16.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.2 00 52 0.0 7.4 0.0 15.1 0.0 12.0 0 0 16.1 Total Delay 12.8 9.2 A B A A B B B LOS Approach Delay B 9.5 9.7 14.7 15.1 Approach LOS A A B B Intersection Summa _ - Cycle Length: 55 Actuated Cycle Length: 55 Offset: 10 (18%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Pretimed Maximu- vlc Ratio: 0.46 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Tits and Phases: 1: Tablet Road & Airport Road 14,0 1 02 1 4\ 05 if-5 I 4 -- ■ �16 rRa - _ MR Synchro 11 Report Existing Plus Project PM Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario 2 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road Movement EBL EBT Et3R WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL 5BT SBiR Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r fl 01 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' .00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 4 29 22 164 32 243 25 454 84 197 571 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 095 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 102 378 340 381 55 340 512 1174 216 580 1668 15 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.39 0.39 0.10 0.46 0.46 Sat Flow, veh/h 64 1762 1585 1108 255 1585 1781 2997 551 1781 3610 32 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 22 196 0 243 25 268 270 197 281 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehfhlln 1826 0 1585 1363 0 1585 1781 1777 1771 1781 1777 1865 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.5 5.6 0.0 6.5 0.4 5.0 5.0 2.8 4.6 4.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 0.0 05 6.2 0.0 6.5 04 5.0 5.0 2.8 46 4.6 Prop In Lane 0.12 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 479 0 340 436 0 340 512 696 694 580 821 862 V/C Ratio(X) 0.07 0.00 0.06 0.45 0.00 0.72 0.05 0.38 0.39 0.34 0.34 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 785 0 621 688 0 621 653 696 694 615 821 862 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.4 0.0 14.4 16.8 0.0 16.7 7.8 10.0 10.0 6.7 7.9 7.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 00 0.1 07 0.0 2.8 00 16 1.6 0.3 1.1 1 1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.3 0.0 0.2 1.6 0,0 2.2 0.1 1.6 1 7 0.7 1.4 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh Ln&p Delay(d),s/veh 14.5 0.0 14.5 17.5 0.0 19.6 7.9 11.6 11.7 7 1 9.0 9.0 LnGrp LOS B A B B A B A B B A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 55 439 563 773 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.5 18.6 11.5 8.5 Approach LOS B B B A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.1 22.5 143 5.9 25.7 14.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 4.8 7.0 2.6 2.4 6.6 8.5 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 2.2 0.1 0.0 2.4 1.3 lntersection Summary. HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.0 HCM 6th LOS B Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Scenario 2 Timings 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road + I Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VTR NBL NB's SBL SBT Vi Lane Configurations 4 r 21 156 4 30 in 231 24 0 431 187 542 Traffic Volume (vph) 4 4 28 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 187 542 Future Volume (vph) Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Turn Type 8 5 2 1 6 Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 5 2 1 6 D t t Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 e ec or Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (%) 40,9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T I L t Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 ota os Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vlc Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Imersection Summary Cycle Length: 55 Actuated Cycle Length: 48.1 Natural Cycle 55 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum We Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% Analysis Period (min) 15 None 12.2 0.25 0.07 13.8 00 13.8 B 8.3 A None None 12.2 0.25 0.04 0.2 0.0 0.2 A None 12.2 0.25 0.56 22.7 0.0 22.7 C 12.9 B None 12.2 0.25 042 49 0.0 4.9 A 5.0 9.5 9.5 17.3% 3.5 1.0 0.0 4.5 Lead Yes None 23.0 0.48 0.05 6.6 0.0 66 A Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service A plits and Phases: 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road 1 02 J i F �---1 �-L 22. 5s 05 # 06 03 5.0 22.5 22.5 40.9% 3.5 10 0.0 45 Lag Yes Max 19.2 0.40 0.38 12.2 0.0 12.2 B 12.0 B 5.0 5.0 9.5 22.5 10.0 23.0 18.2% 41.8% 3.5 3.5 1.0 10 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Yes Yes None Max 26.1 25.1 0.54 0.52 039 0.31 9.1 8.9 0.0 0.0 9.1 89 A A 8.9 A Synchro 11 Report Existing Plus Project PM Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario 1 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road s --I. --* 'r �*-- 4 T 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR W8U wBI MR NBL NST NBR SBL SBT St3R Lane Configurations * r 4 r +I +Ta Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flaw, veh/hlln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 4 29 22 164 32 243 25 454 84 197 571 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 104 560 519 494 86 519 470 981 180 488 1214 11 Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 93 1712 1585 1142 263 1585 1781 2997 551 1781 3610 32 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 22 196 0 243 25 268 270 197 281 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1806 0 1585 1406 0 1585 1781 1777 1771 1781 1777 1865 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.5 5.4 00 6.7 0.5 6.6 6.7 3.9 6.9 6.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_ c), s 0.7 0.0 0.5 6.1 0.0 67 0.5 6.6 6.7 3.9 6.9 6.9 Prop In Lane 0.12 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 664 0 519 580 0 519 470 582 580 488 598 627 V/C Ratio(X) 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.34 0.00 0.47 0.05 0.46 0.47 0.40 0.47 0.47 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 664 0 519 580 0 519 470 582 580 488 598 627 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 100 0.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.7 0.0 12.6 14.5 0.0 14.7 9.8 14.7 14.7 10.7 14.4 14.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 02 1.6 0.0 3.0 02 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.6 25 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/Jn 0.3 0.0 0 2 1.8 0.0 24 0.2 25 26 1.5 2.6 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, slveh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 12.8 0.0 128 16.1 0.0 17.7 100 17.3 174 13.1 17.0 16.9 LnGrp LOS B A B B A B B B B B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 55 439 563 773 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.8 17.0 17.0 16.0 Approach LOS B B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 22.5 22.5 9.5 23.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 5.9 8.7 2.7 2.5 8.9 8.7 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 2.0 0.1 0.0 2.2 1.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.4 HCM 6th LOS B Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Exhibit D - LOS Calculations + Timing Sheets Timings Scenario 1 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road -V 4--- 4\ t \0. 1 f, Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WI3t_ WST WBR NBL NBT S8L SBT Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r +T + IA Traffic Volume (vph) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 187 542 Future Volume (vph) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 187 542 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector PhacP 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 225 22.5 95 22.5 9.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 10.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 40.9%0 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40 9% 17.3% 40,9% 18 2% 41.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 10 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 23.0 18.0 24.0 18.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.42 0.33 0.44 0.34 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.04 044 036 006 0.46 0,47 0.48 Control Delay 13.1 0.1 18.3 4.1 7.4 15.1 120 16.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13 1 0.1 18.3 4.1 7.4 15.1 12.0 16.1 LOS B A B A A B B B Approach Delay 7.9 10.4 14.7 15.1 Approach LOS A B B B Intersection Summa Cycle Length: 55 _ Actuated Cycle Length: 55 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.48 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 53,0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road 1 t02 (R1 - A 22 5 s 05 06 & 08 ..fir.. _ LS -r.--- -i.-- Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 ctd ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location: 1 TABLE ROCK RD & AIRPORT RD PM Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM Peak 15-Minutes: 04:30 PM - 04:45 PM Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles (1,371) 729 0.97 663 (1,261) I1 rMILE ROCKRO uapjR' a N � U L qs (4) 0 . j �L 231 (742) 2 ..._ �-- 387 4.42 2 w 0.95 E 13B 0AA a �.► ""` f5i n *1 t r` 0 (520) a u F3 vrwoRran goo(po [ t (1,308) 699 0.69 513 (975) Peak Hour - Bicycles �0 0� off+,► * 0 «: ! t4 �` 0 0 0 0Jw E *.-0 0 0 o.� s r a 1 °-1nnff o 0 0 0 4-0 0 Peak Hour - Pedestrians Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles AIRPORT RD AIRPORT RD Interjal Eastbound Westbound Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right TABLE ROCK RD Northbound U-Turn Left Thru Ri ht TABLE ROCK RD Southbound U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Polling Hour Pedestrian Crossings West East South North 4:00PM 0 1 0 0 46 0 53 0 2 1"1 23 0 55 131 0 421 1 633 0 � 0 4 15 PM 0 1 1 ". 0 35 0 69 0 1.08 11 0 j5 133 a 404 1 60� C. 0 0 4,30 PM c 0 1 0 0 38 0 60 0 0 I2S 19 3 411 13& 430 ' 1 0 0 0 0 4:46 PM 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 49 0 0 87 27 0 38 140 a 3%b 1 500 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 34 0 70 0 0 102 18 0 38 127 0 390 1,460 1 0 1 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 40 0 0 104 18 1 50 111 1 373 2 0 2 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 55 0 0 94 16 0 39 115 0 359 1 0 0 0 5:45 PNI 0 0 0 0 0 27 1 40 0 0 90 20 1 52 107 0 338 0 0 0 0 Count -Total 0 2 2 1 0 305 1 436 0 2 821 152 2 366 1.002 1 3,093 4 2 3 0 Peak Hour 0 1 2 1 0 156 0 231 0 2 431 80 0 187 542 0 1,633 0 2 0 0 cftoj ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Exhibit C - Traffic Counts Location: 1 TABLE ROCK RD & AIRPORT RD AM Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 Peak Hour: 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM Peak 15-Minutes: 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles (710) 403 0.92 397 (729) 1 � � TABSEAOC7Iap M ti L +:4PsY1'Ap o i.`a `� o (7) J 1 L V (305) a� L17 4 � �202 r.r„ o � �2 0.25 w 0-92 E 0.76 t 0 S r -.# 284 (2) 1-1n "1 t r (484) H .tYSPORF,�p � o1w SRSI: ROC%1H1 � ■ (612) 356 0.89 435 (815) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles /--0 0 o 4J l NL UL. a t c 0 Jw £ 4-0 o 0 A � 0,$9 "i 1 r'C- 1 o o a a a 4-0 AIRPORT RD AIRPORT RD Interval Eastbound Westbound Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right 7.00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 8 7:15AM 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 7 7:30 AM 0 it 0 11 i ' 9 T45 AM 0 i1 fl 4 0 71 1 35 sloe AM 0 0 0 0 34 0 3• 8:15 AM 0 0 3 0 i 23 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 20 8:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 21 Count Total 0 0 0 2 0 130 2 113 Peak Hour 0 0 0 1 0 83 2 117 Peak Hour - Pedestrians 0 t N O W'XE o 1 s 1 0 4 —0 0 ••-► TABLE ROCK RD TABLE ROCK RD Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian_ Crossings U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 0 0 53 21 0 17 40 1 149 917 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 39 0 26 54 0 229 1,032 0 0 0 0 0 8' 38 0 26 78 0 255 1 041 0 0 0 1 70 G 31 73 0 284 988 0 0 0, 0 3 42 68 0 264 915 0 0 78 28 0 3i 53 0 238 0 D ] 0 1 60 19 0 28 59 0 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 24 0 26 55 1 211 0 0 0 0 0 3 556 256 0 228 480 2 1,832 0 0 0 0 0 2 280 153 0 131 272 0 1.041 0 0 0 0 Exhibit B - Client Provided Trip Generation Table TFne In Out Total 00.00 0 0 a 0030 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 01:30 46 0 46 02:00 0 110 02:30 0 a 0 03:00 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 04:00 0 Q a 04:30 0 0 0 as:00 0 a 0 05:30 14 0 14 06:00 0 0 0 06:30 0 0 0 07:00 0 ❑ 0 07:30 0 0 0 08:00 0 0 0 08:30 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 11:30 2 0 2 12:00 0 0 0 12:30 0 46 46 13:00 14 ❑ 14 13:30 10 0 10 14:00 a 0 0 14:30 0 1., 14 15:00 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 16:3a 0 a 0 17:00 0 a 0 17:30 0 0 0 18:00 0 10 10 18:30 0 0 0 19:00 0 a 0 19:30 a 0 0 20:00 0 a 0 20:30 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 21:30 0 0 0 22:00 0 Id 14 22:3a 0 2 2 23:00 0 p 0 23:30 a 0 11 TeIaI as 86 174 In Out Tow In Qut ToW In out Taut In out Tow In out TWi1 0 0 a 0 a ❑ a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 a O a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ a 9 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 L p a a Q 1 0 ❑ I l 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 a 47 0 0 a 0 1 0 0 47 1 0 0 0 I 0 ❑ p 1 0 Q ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 1 0 0 0 1 p 0 ❑ i a a I ❑ a O 0 00 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 D a 0 0 0 a 0 0 14 1 0 0 1 0 14 p S Q 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 a ❑ a ❑ 3 0 0 0 Q 0 1 0 0 0 p 1 S 0 p 0 0 S 1 0 tl a a 0 0 0 0 p 30 39 48 31 5 0 0 p p 0 0 0 O 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 39 48 31 5 0 0 p Q 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 D p a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 58 29 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 58 29 17 13 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 a 1 0 0 0 0 10 40 48 31 s 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 30 58 29 17 0 1 1 0 0 0 10 40 78 89 34 19 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 a a 0 D ❑ 0 0 0 D 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a q 0 p a 0 Q a o 0 ❑ 0 0 O 0 0 14 10 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 46 14 1c c ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 a 0 o 0 p 0 a 0 0 ❑ a ❑ 0 p 0 a ❑ 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 a a 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 p a D 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 23 0 0 D a ❑ p Q 0 12 11 ❑ 0 e a 0 23 t2 11 n 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 o 0 14 0 0 0 12 11 0 l0 14 c c 2_ 1. 1] if Q 0 a 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 9 6 16 si 0 8 16 53 ❑ 8 40 29 0 0 0 0 0 8 40 29 0 0 0 a D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 40 29 0 9 16 53 1 51 8: 1 0 01 I 1 1 0 a 26 23 26 28 14 20 0 0 44 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 10 26 29 7: 3'' a 0 a 0 p 0 0 a 2 a z 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 2 0 2 14 1 1 ❑ I 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 1 2 a 1 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 p 7 0 7 p 14 a 133 0 133 0 266 ❑ 133 0 133 0 166 ❑ 23 a 23 0 46 0 382 0 3B2 76• Kimley:' :_ Page 4 signal phasing options were analyzed. It should be noted that the cycle length and splits for the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road were optimized using Synchro 11 when calculating the LOS. The results of the LOS Analysis are summarized in Table 2. Table 2 —Peak Hour LOS Analysis Results Table Rock Road and Airport Road Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 "Note that AM scenarios are not analyzed in this report due to in the AM peak hour. 16.4 (B) 12.0 (B) 16.7 (B) 15.5 (B) 16.4 (B) low number of trips expected to be generated As shown in Table 2 the study intersection was calculated to operate at an acceptable LOS in all five (5) scenarios, but Scenario 2 resulted in the lowest calculated delay. PROPOSED LANE CONFIGURATION Based on the calculated LOS for each of the scenarios it is recommended that the west leg be constructed with one shared eastbound through/left lane, one exclusive right turn lane (providing at least 100 feet of storage), and one westbound receiving lane (configuration in Scenario 2). Additionally, it is recommended that the extension of Airport Road and Federal Way be constructed with one travel lane in each direction. If the signal is not already actuated, it is recommended that the county actuate the signal. It should be noted that all scenarios and configurations analyzed provide acceptable LOS and could be considered by the County. Please contact me at 702-553-4869 or Devin.Moore@kimiey-horn.com should you have any questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, Devin Moore—�E., PTOE, RSP2 Project Engineer Exhibit A — Site Plan Exhibit B — Client Provided Trip Generation Table Exhibit C — Traffic Counts Exhibit D — LOS Calculations and Signal Timing Sheets 1000 2" Avenue, Suite 3900, Seattle, WA 98104 206-607-2600 Ki! t ! ey >>) Horn Page 3 Road, and 3 trips would turn eastbound right onto Table Rock Road. It is anticipated that there will be 10 PM peak hour inbound trips, with 3 trips making a northbound left onto Airport Road/Federal Way, 6 trips traveling westbound through onto Airport Road/Federal Way, and 1 trip turning southbound right onto Airport Road/Federal Way. Analysis Methodology Although a level of service (LOS) analysis was not required by Jackson County or the City of Central Point an LOS analysis was performed to justify the proposed west leg lane configuration of the Table Rock Road and Airport Road intersection. An LOS intersection analysis was conducted for the 2022 existing plus project scenario to determine the necessary lane configuration for the west leg of the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road due to the project traffic that is expected for the proposed warehousing development. Due to the anticipated AM peak hour traffic generation being one (1) trip and the counted existing AM peak hour volumes being generally lower than the existing PM traffic volumes, only the PM peak hour was analyzed. The expected assignment of project generated traffic was added to the 2022 existing traffic volumes and the expected traffic from the Costco Fed Ex facilities to represent the estimated traffic conditions when the project was to be fully developed in 2022. As the west leg of Airport Road is expected to be constructed at the time the proposed warehouse is to be constructed, different lane configurations were tested using Synchro 11 to determine what lane configuration on the west leg resulted in acceptable LOS. In Scenario 1 an exclusive eastbound right turn lane was considered with a shared eastbound through/left lane. The signal in Scenario 1 was pretimed with permitted/protected northbound/southbound left turn phasing, with no actuation. In Scenario 2 an exclusive eastbound right turn lane was considered with a shared eastbound through/left lane. The signal in Scenario 2 was actuated with permitted/protected northbound/southbound left turn phasing. In Scenario 3 an exclusive eastbound and westbound left turn lane was considered with a shared eastbound through/right lane. The signal in Scenario 3 was pretimed with permitted/protected northbound/southbound left turn phasing, with no actuation. In Scenario 4 exclusive eastbound and westbound left turn lanes were considered with a shared eastbound through/right lane. In Scenario 4 permitted/protected phasing for all left turns was used with actuated signal timing. In Scenario 5 a shared eastbound left/through/right lane was considered. The signal in Scenario 5 was pretimed with permitted/protected north bound/southbound left turn phasing, with no actuation. Key Intersection Operational Analysis Calculations for the LOS at the study intersection are provided in Exhibit D. To ensure that the optimal lane configuration and control is recommended, multiple lane configurations and 1000 2" Avenue, Suite 3900, Seattle, WA 98104 206 00a-2600. Kimley>)Horn INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Page 2 Traffic Counts Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movement data was field counted in 2022 on Tuesday, October 18, 2022 for the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road. The count data sheets are provided in Exhibit C. Project Traffic The study area street network characteristics, including the existing traffic patterns, expected street network, and access to regional facilities were used to determine the distribution of site generated traffic. 35% of site generated traffic is expected to use Federal Way to access/exit the development while 65% of site generated traffic is expected to use Airport Road to access/exit the development. For inbound project traffic at the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road it is anticipated that 15% would make a southbound right, 35% would travel westbound through, and 15% would turn northbound left. For outbound project traffic it is anticipated that 15% of would turn eastbound left, 35% would travel eastbound through, and 15% would turn eastbound right. Assignment of project traffic was obtained by the developed trip distribution to the estimated total traffic generation in Table 1. The 2022 existing plus traffic volumes were obtained by adding the 2022 existing traffic volumes to the assignment of project traffic. Traffic from Nearby Developments A potion of traffic traveling to and from the Costco and Fed Ex facilities are expected to use the new roadway along Federal Way/Airport Road. Estimates for the Costco were based on the assumptions presented in the Central Point Costco Development Traffic Impact Study prepared by Kittelson and Associates in October of 2015. Based on the weekday PM peak hour traffic assignment we would expect that about 30 outbound trips would utilize the new link along Federal Way/Airport Road. Of those 30 trips, using the trip distribution presented in the Costco Traffic Impact Study, we would expect that 15 of the trips would continue eastbound through along Airport Road and 15 of the trips would make and eastbound right onto Table Rock Road. It is anticipated that there will be 30 PM peak hour inbound trips, with 15 trips making a northbound left onto Airport Road/Federal Way and 15 trips traveling westbound through onto Airport Road/Federal Way. Based on the circulation and access drive options we do not anticipate eastbound north movement from Costco at the intersection of Airport Road and Table Rock Road. For the Fed Ex Facility to the north of our proposed development we estimated the number of trips that are expected based on similar Fed Ex facilities that we have studied in the past. We anticipate that 10 outbound PM peak hour trips would utilize the new link along Federal Way/Airport Road. Of those 10 trips, we would anticipate that 1 of the trips would make and eastbound left onto Table Rock Road, 6 trips would continue eastbound through onto Airport kWev-horn.com 1000 2"' Avenue, Suite 3900, Seattle, WA 98104 206-607-2600 Kimley>),� hl,, r To: Mike Kuntz, P.E. County Engineer Jackson County, OR Matt Samitore Public Works Director Central Point, OR From: Devin Moore, P.E., PTOE, RSP2 Kimley-Horn Date: November 21, 2022 Subject: Trip Generation Analysis Proposed Warehouse — 3791 Table Rock Road ATTACHMENT "H" D 4At 12, T o�4, ter. hivY� l Per the pre -application conference for this project, the design team was asked to provide the anticipated trip generation for the proposed 85,000 square -foot (SF) warehouse and the proposed lane configuration for the future west leg of Airport Road. As shown in the site plan included in Exhibit A, the project site is located at the northwest corner of Table Rock Road and Airport Road in city of Central Point, Oregon. The site is currently undeveloped. Per client -provided trip generation estimates based on comparable facilities and anticipated operations, the proposed 85,000 SF warehouse is expected to generate 764 daily, 1 AM peak hour, and 35 PM peak hour trips (summarized in Table 1). The client provided trip generation table can be found in Exhibit B.The proposed tenant of this warehouse has shifted the start and end times of their employees and deliveries to be off the typical peak commute hours. As can be seen in Exhibit B, the property's peak hours are not expected to occur between the hours of 7-9 AM or 4-6 PM. Table 1 — Proposed Trip Generation 12 0i kirnley-hornxom 1000 211' Avenue, Suite 3900, Seattle, WA 98104 Kimley )) Horn MEMORANDUM To: Stephanie Holtey, Central Point, OR Planning Director Community Development City of Central Point From: Josh Enot, P.E. Kimley-Horn Date: November 10, 2022 Subject: Parking Demand Analysis Proposed Warehouse — 3791 Table Rock Road ATTACHMENT "G" Per the site plan application, the design team was asked to provide a parking demand analysis for the proposed 85,000 square -foot (SF) warehouse. The project site is located at the northwest corner of Table Rock Road and Airport Road in city of Central Point, Oregon. The site is currently undeveloped. PARKING DEMAND Per client -provided parking demands based on comparable facilities and anticipated operations, the proposed 85,000 SF warehouse is expected to need 170 employee spots, 218 fleet spots, and 12 box truck spots (summarized in Table 1). The client provided three additional similar sized facilities summarized in Table 1. As shown, the 85,000 square foot (SF) facility proposed in central point generates the proposed parking demand to meet the client's operational needs. Table 1 — Proposed Trip Generation BuildingSite Parking Parking Project Murphy 87,750 170 218 12 400 Site 1 88,698 131 226 14 371 Site 2 90,447 130 273 27 430 Site 3 76,125 174 209 9 392 Please contact me at 321-754-0413 or oshua.enot kjmle-horn.com_should you have any questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, Josh Enot, P.E Project Manager kimley-horn.com 1000 2"Avenue, Suite 3900, Seattle, WA 98104 ATTACHMENT PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 898 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TWO PARCEL PARTITION TENATIVE PLAN AND LOT CONSOLIDATION AT 3791 TABLE ROCK ROAD (37S 2W 12B TAX LOTS 800, 900 AND 902) (File No: PAR-22001) WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a tentative plan application to consolidate three (3) existing lots and partition the consolidated lot into two (2) parcels lot partition on 17.57 acres identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 128, Tax Lots 800, 900 and 902 in Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the project site is located in the M-1, Industrial zoning district; and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022, the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly -noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the Staff Report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to land divisions Title 16—Subdivisions, CPMC 17.48, and the M-1 Industrial Zone; and, WHEREAS, after duly considering the proposed tentative plan, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the application complies with applicable standards and criteria as set forth in the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022 ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission by a duly seconded motion granted tentative plan approval subject to conditions in the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022 (Exhibit A) and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Exhibit B). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 8989 hereby approves Tentative Partition Plan and Lot Consolidation, based on the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022 (Exhibit A) and the Applicant's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as amended and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 6` day of December 2022. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Planning Commission Resolution No. 898 (12/6/2022) ATTACHMENT "E" ti00ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVIC ES CLEAN WATER -HEALTHY COMMUNITIES November 14, 2022 City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: SPAR 22006 & PAR-22001, 3791 Table Rock Road, Map 37 2w 12B, Tax Lot 800, 900 & 902 There is an existing 8 inch sewer north of the property on Federal Way and an existing 8 inch to the east along Table Rock Road. Sewer service for the proposed development can be had via a sewer main extension as generally shown on the submitted site plan. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of this development be subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must submit sewer construction plans to RVSS for review and approval. 2. The applicant must submit architectural plumbing plans to RVSS for the calculation of SDC fees associated with sewer connection permits. 3. The applicant must obtain sewer connection permits from RVSS and pay all related fees. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, z Nicholas R Bakke, PE District Engineer �. (541) 664-6300 www.RVSS.US 138 W Vilas Rd, Central Point, OR 97502 V P.O. Box 3130, Central Point, OR 97502 a 328 November 15, 2022 Page 2 of 2 6. Roads requires the removal of any existing driveways not being used on Table Rock Road and replacing them with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. 7. ADA curb ramps must be located wherever there are curbs or other barriers to entry from a pedestrian walkway or sidewalk, including any intersection where it is legal for a pedestrian to cross the street, whether or not there is any designated crosswalk. 8. Jackson County Roads would like to review and comment on the hydraulic report including the calculations and drainage plan. Capacity improvements or on -site detention, if necessary, shall be installed at the expense of the applicant. Upon completion of the project, the developer's engineer shall certify that construction of the drainage system was constructed per plan and a copy of the certification shall be sent to Jackson County Roads. 9. Utility Permits are required from Roads for any utility work within the county road right- of-way. On longitudinal trenches within a travel lane 100' or greater in length, unless otherwise approved by the Engineer, the existing pavement shall be removed and replaced to full paving -machine width (normally 10'-12') for a travel lane restoration. Drag boxes or other pull -type asphalt spreaders will not be permitted for longitudinal trench pavement replacement. 10. Per Oregon Revised Statute 209.150, any survey monuments of record removed, disturbed or destroyed within the permit area must be referenced prior to construction and replaced after construction by a registered professional land surveyor. All costs associated with this surveying work are the responsibility of the permit holder. 11. Please note Table Rock Road is a County Urban Minor Arterial Road. The latest traffic count performed on the Airport Road to Biddle Road segment was done by the City of Medford in 2016 (Pre-Costco), with an Average Daily Traffic count of 11,500. A more recent count 750' north of Biddle Road was done on 6/16/2020 with an Average Daily Traffic count of 19,862. 12. We concur with any right-of-way dedicated. 13. Be Advised: other permits from local State or Federal Agencies' or Departments may be required prior to starting work. Sincerely, N`L Chuck DeJ,nvier, PE Construction Engineer I:1EngineeringlDevelopment\Central Point\PAR-22-001 & SPAR-22-0061PAR-22-001 & SPAR-22-OO6.doc 327 ATTACHMENT "D" Roads Engineering JACKSON COUNTY Roans November 15, 2022 Attention: Stephanie Holtey City of Central Point Planning 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 Chuck DeJanvier Conslrnclron Engineer 200 Antelope Road While Clty, OR 97503 Phone: (541) 774-6255 Fax: (541) 774-0295 i www jacksoncounty org RE: Tentative Partition plan to consolidate three parcels and divide into two and Site Plan and Architectural Review to construct an 85,000-sf storage warehouse off Table Rock Road — a county -maintained road & Federal Way — a city -maintained road Planning File: PAR-22-001 & SPAR-22-006; 37-2W-12B Tax Lots 800, 900 & 902 Dear Stephanie: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these two applications for Tentative Partition plan to consolidate the three parent project parcels and divide into two new lots. The land division includes extension of Federal Way to the Airport/Table Rock Road intersection and Site Plan and Architectural Review to construct as 85,000 square foot storage warehouse and ground distribution facility together with fleet parking and queuing areas, employee/visitor parking and site landscaping improvements. Project site is 17.87 acres and is adjacent to the intersection of Table Rock Road and un-constructed west leg of Airport Road. (37-2W-12B Tax Lots 800, 900 & 902). Jackson County Roads has the following comments: 1. We require that the applicant prepare a traffic study that addresses the design of the west leg of the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road. The study should include lane configuration and signal phasing and recommend mitigation if necessary and be reviewed and approved by Jackson County Roads. 2. All road work required for the new intersection leg will require a Minor Road Improvement permit. Please contact Roads and Parks for a pre -engineering meeting. 3. We would like to be notified of future development proposals, as county permits may be required. 4. The radius for road intersection along a collector road shall be a thirty-foot radius. The road approach shall be perpendicular to Table Rock Road and aligned directly across from a road approach on the other side of the road if possible, 5. Direct driveway approaches off Table Rock Road are discouraged. If applicant proposes a Table Rock Road driveway, analysis of the proposed driveway shall be included in the TIS. Left turns to or from Table Rock Road will not be allowed. 326 b. Jackson County [toads Permits. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from Jackson County Roads before construction of any road improvements. 2, Water Utility Extension — The applicant shall submit civil improvement plans to the Public Works Department to extend the existing 8-inch waterline in Federal Way to serve the proposed parcels. The water system will need to be looped as part of the Land Development Plan for Proposed Parcel 1. 3. Stormwater Management. a. NPDES Stormwater Management Plan - The applicant shall submit to Public Works for review and approval a stormwater management plan in accordance with the Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual, which requires stormwater quantity and quality treatment of all proposed impervious surfaces proposed as part of the partition. b. Civil Improvement Plan Review —The applicant shall submit civil improvement plans for Stormwater infrastructure construction, including but not limited to storm drain lines, detention facilities and the proposed outfall on Proposed Parcel 2. c. Erosion and Sediment Control — Construction of required improvements will disturb more than one acre. The applicant shall obtain an erosion and sediment control permit (NPDES 1200-C) from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and provide a copy to the Public Works Department. Prior to the Public Works Final Inspection and Final Plat, the applicant shall comply with the following conditions of approval: 1. Improvement Completion - The applicant shall fully build all improvements associated with extending the street, waterlines and public stormwater facilities and private utilities before the final plat is approved or must enter into a Development Agreement and Bond for the improvements in accordance with CPMC 16.12.070(A). 2. PW Standards and Specifications — Applicant shall demonstrate that all Public Works infrastructure construction is in compliance with the Standards Specifications and Uniform Details for Construction. 3. Stormwater Quality Operations & Maintenance— The Applicant shall record an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for all new stormwater quality features and provide a copy of the Public Works Department's recorded document. 4. Public Utility Easements — The proposed partition plat shall include public utility easements paralleling the proposed Federal Way Airport Road extension. 325 Public Works Department k - CENTRAL POINT ATTACHMENT "C" PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT November 21, 2022 Matt Samitore, Director AGENDA ITEM: Project Murphy Partition (PAR-22001) 2 Parcel Partition at 3791 Table Rock Road (37S 2W 12 B, Tax Lot 800, 900 & 902) Agent: Steve Backman Traffic: A Traffic Impact Analysis is not required for a partition. There is a separate application for Site Plan & Architectural Review (SPAR-22006) to construct an 87,750 square foot warehouse and ground distribution facility on Proposed Parcel 1 ("Land Development Application"). A specific traffic -related analysis has been completed for the Land Development Application. The results influence the required lane configuration at the intersection of Airport and Table Rock Road. Existing Infrastructure: Water: There is an 8-inch water line in Federal way. Streets: Federal Way is a standard industrial street. Stormwater: There are existing storm facilities in Federal Way. Background: The land division application is a tentative partition to consolidate existing lots comprising the site and to partition the consolidated lot into two parcels. Issues: The main issue with the partition is the development and extension of Federal Way/Airport Drive. The applicant shall complete the extension to Table Rock Road, including a revised three -lane configuration to match the existing movements to the East of that intersection. The applicant will also be required to extend public infrastructure to service both parcels, including water and stormwater. Conditions of Prior to permit issuance and the start of construction activities on the site, the following conditions shall be satisfied: Federal Way/Airport Drive Extension. a. Civil Improvement Plan Review - The applicant shall submit civil improvement plans to Public Works for the extension of Federal Way to the existing intersection of Airport/Table Rock Road. The plans shall provide utilize the Industrial Street Standard (ST-40) and provide a three lane configuration at the Airport/Table Rocks intersection including a dedicated left turn lane to match existing improvements to the east. 140 South 3rd Street Central Point, OR 97502 .541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 324 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 1202022 at 14:12:21 Page 83 372W12A600 372W12A200 372W 12A400 MEDFORD WAREHOUSE INVESTER LL EISNER LLC GORDON MEDFORD LLC HALPERIN TARED/MERITAGE GROUP 3634 TABLE ROCK RD ATTN MICHELE DAHLEN MEDFORD, OR 97SO4 277 STEWART RD SW 66 FIELD POINT RD PACIFIC, WA 98047 GREENWICH, CT 66930 372 W 12A501 372 W 128201 372 W 12B211 OREGON STATE ELKS ASSOCIATION MEDFORD WAREHOUSE INVESTER LI_ LTM INC STEVEN MALONE TRUSTEE HALPERIN TARED/MERITAGE GROUP PO BOX 114S 66 FIELD POINT RD MEDFORD, OR 97501 7741 GARDEN VALLEY RD GREENWICH, CT 66830 ROSEBURG, OR 97471 372 W 12B212 372W 12B213 372 W 129600 TOMCHI OREGON LLC C09CO WHOLESALE CORPORATION CITY OF CENTRAL POINT WALLACE SJ CHING PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 1297 FINANCE DIRECTOR 60295 RAINBOW BLVD 999 LAKE DR 140 STHIRD ST CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 LAS VEGAS, NV 89118 ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 372 W 128699 372W 126700 372W 128800 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT ROGUE RIVER IRRIGATION DIST TABLE ROCK BUSINESS PARK LLC 0 CONNOR LAW 3139 MERRIMAN RD PO BOX 43 670 G ST B CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 MEDFORD, OR 97501 IACKSONVILLE, OR 97530 372W 123900 372 W 12 B901 372W 120902 TABLE ROCK BUSINESS PARK LLC SAVAGE JEAN TRUSTEE ET AL TABLE ROCK BUSINESS PARK LLC PO BOX 43 4279 TABLE ROCK RD PO BOX 43 MEDFORD, OR 97501 CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 MEDFORD, OR 97501 372W128903 372W 12B1000 372W 1281100 CENTRAL POINT CITY LANE KENNETH C/GERI L SAVAGE YANCY REV LIV TRUST ET 140 53RD ST PO BOX 5137 3634TABLE ROCK RD CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 CENTRAL POINT, OR 97SO2 MEDFORD, OR 97504 3721IV12B1200 372W1261300 SAVAGE JEAN TRUSTEE MP FORESTRY INC 4279 TABLE ROCK RD 2941 CRATER LAKE AVE CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 MEDFORD, OR 97504 Nnta- Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created an 1215I2022 at 14:12:21 a F g Ei 3 f e 8 I - e�sesa rara or armor, ne Ccu�r.�e-:eckso�CR B'uree:: of Lead lReneyerrent S:e:a of�regcti S:e:e al Oicyon JCT,Src,e of Oregon "�'� Kl MelC Page 82 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 121512022 at 14:12:21 e81 WEST 102.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH WEST, 212.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09 03' WEST 102.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH WEST 102.00 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 899 47' EAST 212.50 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF TABLE ROCK ROAD; THENCE NORTH 09 03' EAST ALONG SAID WEST EAST 212.50 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF TABLE ROCK ROAD; THENCE NORTH 09 03' EAST ALONG SAID WEST EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, I4 QOFfETTOTHE TRUE POINT OFBEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL 3 PARCELS ALL THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO JACKSON COUNTY, APOLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF OREGON, RECORDED APRIL 06, 2017 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2017-011467. NOTE: THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS CREATED PRIOR TO JANUARY 1, 2008. Nntac Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSU RANCE COMPANY, 2ND REVISED PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT ORDER NO.: 7161-3998828, EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 5, 2022. REAL PROPERTY IN THE COUNTY OF JACKSON, STATE OF OREGON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCELI: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 56 IN TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WESTOF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE NORTH 899 53' WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID DONATION LAND CLAIM, 757.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2O0.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 439 30' EAST, 470.0 FEET; EAST, 470.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 499 30' EAST, 264.4 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE TITLE NO. 1040; EAST, 264.4 FEETTO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE TITLE NO. 1040; THENCE SOUTH 899 47' EAST, 598.2 FEET; THENCE NORTH 356.0 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 899 47' EAST, 252.2 FEET TO EAST, 598.2 FEET, THENCE NORTH 356,0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 899 47' EAST, 252.2 FEETTO EAST, 252.2 FEETTO THE CENTERLINE OF TABLE ROCK MARKET ROAD; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ROAD, 356,85 FEET TO THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF DONATION LAND CLAIM N0. 58; THENCE NORTH 899 53' WEST ALONG SAID NORTH WEST ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY OF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 58, A DISTANCE OF 618,35 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: COMMENCING ATTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO, 56, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE SOUTH 899 50' 10" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE 10" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 58, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, 578.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09 03, WEST, WEST, PARALLEL TO AND 10 FEET WEST OF THE WEST LINE OF TABLE ROCK ROAD, 356.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89247' WEST, 212.50FEET; THENCE SOUTH Og03'WEST, 102.OFEET TOTHE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE WEST, 102.0 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCECONTMUE SOUTH 0903'WEST(RECORD SOUTH) 76.OFEET T0THE SOUTHWEST CORNER 0F TRACT DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. WEST (RECORD SOUTH) 76.0 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 71-03949, OFFICIAL RECORDS, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE SOUTH 899 47' EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT, 212.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 09 03' EAST (RECORD NORTH) 76.0 FEET, THENCE NORTH 899 47' WEST, EAST (RECORD NORTH) 76.0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 899 47' WEST, WEST, 212.50 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3: COMMENCING ATTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 56 IN TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE SOUTH 892 50' 10" EAST ALONG THE NORTH 10' EASTALONG THE NORTH EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINEOF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 58, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, 578.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09 03' WEST, WEST, PARALLEL TO AND 10 FEET WEST OF THE WEST LINE OF TABLE ROCK ROAD, 356,81 FEET TOTHETRUEPOINTOF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89247' WEST, 212.50FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0903' Page 80 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> „•,;ttr_:r on 1215/2022 xt 14:1221 Exhibit D - LOS Calculations HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road __ s -., - t-, 3". ► 1 d -. LmgConLguraOoes I �41 7 3 158 �� 23, 6 431 ito w 547 .- 4 r-ofrc voluio. ehlI 3 7 3 156 _ 9 231 6 431 80 187 542 4 Fuluro Vodfma (a40) o a � � � o �' o •�6 - 0 a m4kal0i0bi,veh Po(l,B,MaA4pA_pbl) 1.00 .6_ 1.60 1.00 . 1.00 .Q 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 aerkinyaus.4d) i.o0 1.00 1.00 la 1,Qu To 1ca -.=1,A0 1.00 1.00 r.00 .1-4 Work Zone On Approach A41 Sal flaw. velvT* 1870 No 1810 WO itr6 No 100 101) • 190 No 1870 1810 117A No "I'D 1870 Adj PewRala, vehlh 3 0.99 7 0.95 3 0.95 164 0M 9 0.915 243 6,45 6 0:96 454 0.96 84 0.95 197 0,56 571 0:95 4 t0 PBa1 rinr Fadpor Percer,"avy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 cap, Yawl, 161 S36 123 573 28 V4 40 990 18$ 417 1195 8 Arch On Green 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.33 0.33 ft Ffow. yam}, NO 1024 3 1344 85 15s� 178a. 2997 551 1781 ]6.11 23 Grp Volvme(v), veh1h 13 0 0 0 6 173 t429 _ 0 0 243 1506 8 11&1 268 1 S11 270 17Y1 197 1781 280 1P17 295 1'86G W D Sal F1or4aj,vBmnJM [SServe(g sj,s 1844 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 6.6 0.1 6.5 6.6 3.9 6.8 6.8 iytEe 0 C^aea'19 cl; a 013 0.0 0.0 5;0 (L0 6,8. (JA 6.5 6.6 3-9 8:8 6.8. Prop In Lane 0.23 0.23 0 0.95 6111 0 1.00 924 1.00 467 587 0.31 586 1.60 471 T87 0.01 616 sane ap leant ratan Vic Rd6oiX) 624 0.02 0 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.46 0.01 0.46 0.46 0.41 0.48 0.48 Ay¢1.Canlc.al.venm 624 0 0 0; 0 524 401 567: 8l)5 4F? 581, 046 HC:MPlaloan R O 1.00 1,00 1.00 41.06. 1.00 6.00 1.00 1414 1.00 0.p9 1.00 1.Q1s too 1.00 1,00 1." 1.00 1.60 1.00 L60 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.0 kvmilrn:,lwop Urftm Daley (d), s+veh 12.3 0.0 0.0 13.9 0.0 14.4 9.6 14.4 14.4 10.7 14.5 14.5 lnn Delay id21, rive6 0.1 010 0,0 1.2 0,0 2.4 0,1 2.6 2.0 7.6 2.d 2.6 lydtol0Delay(d3)•sfveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24 0.0 0:0 0.0 2.5 0.0 2.5 0.0 1.5 0.0 2.6 0.0 2.1 y,Bg Barxplpj5q 61. rEnqu 0.1 0:0 0:0 1.5 0.0 umig. lAovemanl Ddq, shah LAGrpOeloyIC40ah 12.4 0:0 0:0 15.1 0.0 1-7.4 9.6 16:9 17.0 13.4 17.3 172 LnGEE LOS B A A B A B A B B 9 B B ADproacA Vd•-mNh 1S a16 16.4 S4J 16.9 '71 162 Approach Delay, alveh 12.4 r Approach LOS B $ 8 7.i(9ar AtaM ti6 t 2 5 3 L r{ta Duraboh fG4Y+Re), L 9.5 27.5 22 F 4.5 7:.ei 22 � Chaegn Padod (Y'ft),1 4.6 5;0 4.5 AD 4.5 18:0 4.5 6.0 4.5 r8.0 4.5 13,4 W. row seding (GMMQ, s Max Q CWmTmte Ig_cH1), s 5.9 B.6 2.3 2.1 Green En Time ip�c1. s 0.0 7 0 0;0 010 2.1 2 W�At 5r1n107rMY -. HL`li i 61h 01�>iay 1s 5 HCM 6th LOS B Existing Plus Project PM IV M c Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Page 79 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 Location: 1 TABLE ROCK RD & AIRPORT RD PM >A Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 Peak Hour. 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM (303) 27.8.2439 wwwalRraRicdata,net Peak 15-Minutes: 04:30 PM - 04:45 PM Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour- Blgdes Peak Hour - Pedestrians (1.371) 729 C.0 M (1,261) tq , ��-1 a 0 9J t L } f+ M ait —01 y w as r ca 094 ter '��n t r`° :� M Cfi F (1,305) 699 0.89 513 1975) Nola: Total sludy —Is waalned in paenthesea Trattle Counts - Motorized Vehlckse AIRPORT RD .A —I Syt'.mr .... adF au o ° r 7up � i 1 C45 PM u 0 5:00 PM 4 1 0 1 5:15 PM 0 0 0 - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 4 5:45 PM 0 0 0 1 Caunt Total 0 y 2 Peak Hour 0 1 2 Notes 00 O� r a,✓ i NL �`.0 f t e t °eyweybE;o 0 18 o w'RE 1 0-1A e1 r d I �+a 4-0 .AIRPORT RD TABLE RGGK RD TABLE ROCK RD 4%th and . . •. Soutlibwnd Rolling Pede hf GosSm U-Tura Th.:. .. ... " : U-Tum Left Th. 1-114 Tda Hour Weal East Saulh Nsdn 0 35 0 60 0 10 9 44 14 0 W 150T a s 0 1 29 r r 17 17 0 N it, 0 1* -it 0 0 34 U 70 0 0 102 IB 4 30 127 0 M 1.460 1 0 1 0 0 48 0 40 0 104 IB t 50 111 1 373 t p Z 0 0 M 0 55 0 v 94 IB 0 39 i15 0 359 1 9 4 1 0. 71 1 40 0 a 90 20 1 52 i07 0 33B $ 0 0 0 0 305 1 436 D I 821 152 i 356 i002 t 3,093 a I It 0 0 ^156 0 231 0 7 431 80 0 187 542 0 1,6M 11 1 0 •0 78 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 1VMG22 at 14:12:21 Page 77 Exhibit C - Traffic Counts ■ Location: 1 TABLE ROCK RD & AIRPORT RD AM Date: Tuesday, October 18. 2022 Peak Hour. 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM (303) 216-2439 wv .alltrafficdata,net Peak 1.-Minutes: 07:45 AM-08:00 AM Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles t7101 403 'J 42 397 (72- =an I n ,aw-ao 31.T J 1 !. II In z25 'ry t.r E63 n "/q L�1 q 9 t �� 0 (e94) J6121 3.S 0�3 •I'JS P'N Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour • Pedestrians Note: Total study mums contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles AIRPORT RO AIR ORT RC TABLE ROCK RD 1ABLE ROCK RC Interval Easthuund .W47ound ''�'�'"^p Start Time lJ-Tun! I ell Tnru Rfahl :•tom Le! •Ru R4W u _#L711itoenA rue l46 fio, WI Li Tjr u1I tm -Xv tow Um wou FiaFa7A Nam 700 AM _ — R --q ] 0 9 7 ----5 0 S1 21 -- 0 IT ql 1 159 air 4 11 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 d ,. 0 11 S 7 0 0 B9 39 0 26 54 0 229 1 032 0 0 0 0 ' 30 AM 0 4 4 - 0 11 1 19 V 0 Bl 3B , M 78 4 2H6 t 041 10 a '0 r 4 T, :9 l It 4 0 71 r 9 i 1 M 93 0 11 73 t 2d4 w � 0. .300 AM J P 0 w G 34 ? 34 / 0 51 35 6 42 60 a 25-: Ito o 0 0 0 k5.4A1 C 0 C 0 1% 0 29 $ 1 78 29 0 J2 M 0 236. d 0 4 0 B 36 AIV -1 0 0 0 1 15 4 20 0 1 c0 t'. 0 2y 59 2 202 0 0 11 7 A 45 AM 4 0 1 '0 4 0 21 0 0 74 24 0 & 55 1 211 0 0 0 ' .cunt Tout 0 2 8 130 _ 173 0 3 .556 256 0 22a 480 7 I;332 0 0 H s FenM'Hour Y '! a 1" _ It- 0 2 2611 1A - _ f`__7. "' '•;74 0 0 a 0 Notes Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 121512022 at 14:12:21 Exhibit B s Client Provided Trip Generation Table tiu :r.a Mp •If0 • ■ . 0 4 • ■ • \ • v : a � • a, • a r • { 1 1 • { • • • 1 r r { o» v • a a ■ Iwti 1 r { r 11 • ■ • � ' r r ,w 11 l v r 11 : • v 11 v : • • seal . • • !� ■ r 1 r ■ 1 ,..1 1 1 • • 0 • 1 I pcv ■„v .P■, ,� Nx Lim Bras s.b l � , . { 1 r � 1 1 � � r r . r 1` 1 . a r s r s 1 ■ i a ■ I 1 1 . o v I . • � r • r • • r n r • ■ a a r : . n v xr r 1 : e w u . . • v ■ :i •� v • ■ • • 1 r : a r ■ : v Ir r s n � is 1 r r >o e m 1Sy 11 rre R •i rl 1 H iY � . .j• ■1. � • ; 1 a • Y ■ R R • • e • • �: • 1 • v �0 • /1 4 Ix Ivfe � i�w � J ; I ■ : • : � l . I v a a I • r r • • . r a Y v a . ll . : ~ r r ■ .• a • u 11 : V rl a e 11 r p u Y • Y y r jj • . • r r Iv v r v vi s •- NntP.-, Page 76 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 Ki nfin C Page 75 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 121512022 at 14:12:21 Kimley * Horn Page 3 Table 2 —Peak Hour LOS Analysis Results Table Rock Road and Airport Road Signal'�zed 16.5 (B) 'Nora that AM scenarios are not anayeaW.. Wam f ro tha fawndrn6arottdpa expected to be generated in the AM peak hour. As shown in Table 2 the study intersection was calculated to operate at an acceptable LOS in the 2022 existing plus project scenario. pPOPUSE€7 LANF CONFIGURATION As the west leg of Airport Road is expected to be constructed at the time She proposed wafshouse is to be construoted. dgerent lane configurations were tested using 5ynehro t 1 to determine what lane configuration an the west 4 resulted in acceptable LOS- It is recommended that the west tag be constricted with one eastbound shared sighl/througW181t large, with one westbound receiving lane. Additionally. It is recommended that the extension of Atrport Road and Fade rat Way be constructed wlth one travel lane in each direction. Please contact me at 702-653-4869 or i"revin.Moare 10 rev 10M.carn should you have any questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, Davin Moore, P.E., PTOE, RSP2 Project Engineer Exhibit A — Site Plan Exhibit B — Client Provided Trip Generation Table Exhibit C — Traffic Counts Exhibit D — LOS Calculations AI n+oc Page 74 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:2' Kimley)),'H,0r 5 Page 2 IN7EPSECTION ANALYSIS Traffic Counts Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movement data was field counted in 2022 on Tuesday, October 18, 2022 for the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road. The count data sheets are provided in Exhibit C. Project Traffic The study area street network characteristics, including the existing traffic patterns, expected street network, and access to regional facilities were used to determine the distribution of site generated traffic. 35% of site generated traffic is expected to use Federal Way to accesslexit the development while 55% of site generated traffic is expected to use Airport Road to access/an" the development. For inbound project traffic at the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road it is anticipated that 15% would make a southbound right, 35% would travel westbound through, and 15% would turn northbound left. For outbound project traffic it is anticipated that 15% of would turn eastbound left, 35% would travel eastbound through, and 15% would turn eastbound right Assignment of project traffic was obtained by the developed trip distribution to the estimated total traffic generation in Table 1. The 2022 existing plus traffic volumes were obtained by adding the 2022 existing traffic volumes to the assignment of project traffic. Anatyals Methodology Although a level of service (LOS) analysis was not required by Jackson County or the City of Central Point an LOS analysis was performed to justify the proposed west leg lane conflguralion of the Table Rock Road and Airport Road intersection. An LOS intersection analysis was conducted for the 2022 existing plus project %ist ario to determine the necessary lane configuration for the west leg of the intersection of Table Rods Road and Akporl Road due to the project traffic that is expected for the proposed warehousing development. Due to the anticipated AM peak hour traffic generation being one (1) trip and the counted existing AM peak hour volumes being generally lower than the existing PM trafft volumes, only the PM peak hour was analyzed. The expected assignment of project generated traffic was added to the 2022 existing traffic volumes to represent the estimated traffic conditions when the project was to be fully developed in 2022. Key Intersection Operational Analysis Calculations forthe LOS at the study intersection are provided in Exhibit D. The 2022 existing plus project lane configuration and central Is based upon the proposed lane configuration for the west leg of Airport Road (discussed separately In this memorandum). It should W noted that the cycle length end splits for the intersectlon of Table Rock Road end Airport Road were optimized using Synchro 11 when calculating the LOS. The results or the LOS Analysis are summarized in Table 2. Nnfac Page 73 Comments summary on <Attachment B... Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 EXHIBIT 14 KimlepMorn MEMORANDUM To: Mike Kuntz, P.E. County Engineer Jackson County, OR Matt Samitore Public Works Director Central Point, OR From: Davin Moore, P.E., PTOE, RSPZ Kimley-Horn Date: October 31, 2022 Subject: Trip Generation Analysis Proposed Warehouse — 3791 Table Rock Road Per the pm-appiicabon conference for this project, the design team was asked to provide the anticipated trip generation for the proposed 85,00D squsre foot (SF) warehouse and the proposed lane configuration for the future west leg of Airport Road As shown in the site plan included In Exhibit A. the project site is located at the northwest comer of Table Rack Road and Airport Road in city of Central Point, Oregon. The site is currently undeveloped. TRIP GENERATION Per client -provided trip generation estimates based on comparable facilities and anticipated operations, the proposed 85,000 SF warehouse is expected to generate 764 daily, 1 AM peak hour, and 35 PM peak hour trips (summarized in Table 1), The client provided trip generation table can be found in Exhibit $.The proposed tenant of this warehouse has shifted The start and end times of thelr employees artd deliveries to be Off the typical peak commute hours. As can be seen in Exhibit B. the property's peak hours are not expected to occur between the hours of 7-9 AM or 4-6 PM. Table 1 — Proposed Trip Generation 12MWAVil Peak PM Peak Vehicle Class Daily Total Automobile 750 •0 0 1 0 1 35 1 23 12 — Trucks 14 1 0 1 0 0 0 KIrtfoc Page 72 Comments summary on <Attachment B—Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 .11 236 37 v� 128 47 {` l t r 17lli)uP15 roSLOCi1Ttlf PA..Kw Y N f) S Nou�eamo•i:vxm roay.nrroxs �'[ S Oi--[VRD �i Aim Cii IXY✓1Y mcOeM [, eetrtenrrc�Nttar t100 .. F-S E. COR, DLO 56 DLC 57 'I 49-�49 ;� 699 � u U97M1c �... r �' a 2, e�-7k cs6rr r 1000 n mm�r •.re ., �• o 1� ..n 4 9 1 V �1300 .. rr ... u..r osex. :d i4 iq _ �+. nInfac Page 71 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 a FirstAmezicanTitle" For Calif9mia ftesiGih If you are a California resident, you may have certain rights under Callfornia law, including but not limited to the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 ("CCPA'}. All phrases used In this section shall have the same meaning as those phrases are used under California law, including the CCPA. ffight to Knoyr. You have a right to request that we disclose the following information to you: (1) the categories of personal Infomlation we have collected about or from you; (2) the categories of sources from whlch the personal Information was eoWed; (3) the buslness or commercial purpose for such collection and/or dlsdoswe; (4) the categories of third pai-Jes with whom we have shared your personal Infrnmatlon; and (5) the spe6Ac pleces of your personal information we have collected. To submit a verified request for this Inrormatlom, go to our online privacy policy at ivww.firstam.cvmlpf vacY•Poo' to subrnit your request or ON toll -free at 1-M6-718-0097. You may also designate an authorized agent to submit a request on your behalf by going to our online privacy policy at www,Mrstam.camfPtivafy- policy to %bmlt your request 9r by calling toll -free at 1,M6-718.0097 R1aht of Qefetian. You also have a right to request that we delete the personal Information we have collected from and about you. 'Ms right is subject to certain exceptions available under the CCPA and other applicable law. To submit a verified request for deletion, go to our online privacy policy at vnvw.flrstam.corn/privacy-pdicy to submit your request or call tall -Free at 14966.718.0097. You may also designate an autt,arited agent to submit a request on your behalf by going to our online privacy policy at Ww w.ffrstam.eomlprivacy-poky to submit your request or by Calling toll•I'me at I-S66-7le- 0097. Verifto-dori EW&ss. For either a request to Know or delete, we will verify your Identity before responding to your request, To verify, your identity, we will generally match the identifying information provided In your request with the InhNmatlan we have W file about you. Depending on the sensltlWly, of the inforrnaUDn requested, we may also 011W more stringent verlfucation methods W verify your Identity, including but not limited to requesting additional. Information from you and/or requiring you to sign a dedaratlon under WalLY of perjury. Notice of Shoe. We do not sell California resident [nformation, nor have we sold California resident Information in the past 12 months, To the extent any RmA American affiliated entity has a different practice, it will be stated In the applicable privacy policy. We have no actual knowledge of selling the informaton of minors under the age of 16. Right of Hon-Rlscrlmittlt4d. You have a right to exercise your rights under Califomla law, Including under the CCPA, Without suffering discrimination. Accordingly, First American will not dlscrlminate against you in any way if you choose to exercise your rights under the CCPA. Nonce of Cgliediom. To Team more about the cate gm5es of personal Information we have collected about California residents over the last 12 months, please see "What lnfnrmati9n Do We Collect About Yau` In https:/IwwwArstam.com/prirracy-Policy. To Learn about the sources from which we have collected that information, the business and commercat purpose for its collection, and the categwles of third parties with wham we have shared that information, please see "How Do We Cooed Your Information`, "How Do We Use Your Information", and 'How Do We Sham Your Information" in httts9:1/www.flrstam.eom/privacy-policy. Notice of Sale. We have not sold the personal information of California residents In the past 12 months. oUce of Qi . To learn more about the categories of persmial Information wei may have disclosed about California residents In tote past 12 months, please see "How Do We Use Your Information" and "How Do We Share Your Information" in https://www.firstam.com/privacy-pollcy. ® 2022 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserrea. NYSE:FAF :orrn 10-PRIVACY22 (12-7-21) page 2 of 2 Privacy rwuce (iu z it A,nntmn fLlanoN CppPrallul� EnIGQ Notes Page 70 Comments summary on <Attachment 6—Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Page 69 Created on 121512022 at 14:12:21 FirsfAmerican rtfe'" I Privacy Notice Effective: October 1, 2019 Notice Last Updated: January 1, 2022 This Privacy Notice describes haw First American HnaWal Carporadon and Its Subsidiaries and affiliates (together referred to as'First American,' 'we," "us," or'oor") collect, use, Store, and Share your information with the exception that a subsidiary Or affiliate has their arm privacy policy, that policy govems. This Privacy Notice applies to information we receive from you onnline only, as well as from third Parties, when you Intefact with us and/or use and access our services and products rProducts). for mom infdrmairlon about our privacy practices, Including our online practices, please visit httnsdfwlvw.rtstam.tDm! r�ivdcy-volk-ly , The prad leer, described in this Pnvacy Notice are subject to applicable laws in the places in which we operate. What Tvoa Qf In Da We Co Ahaut You ? We collect a variety of categories of information about you. To learn more about the Categories of information we coWct, please visit httos:I�m.co rtii1p?Ivacv-poilal. Col r fo 7 We collect your information: (1) directly from you; (2) automatically when you interact with us; and (3) from third parties, including business parties and affiliates. NOW Do We Use Ya1u_In[gCrn_aV0j;? We may use your Informaitdon in a variety of ways, Including but not limited to providing die servkes you have mciuested, Nfiling your traramisons, comply with relevant taws and our polides, and handling a Claim. To Team more about how We may use your information, please visit htt ,• www.nrstam.c9m, :rivaC. oal1cv%. How Do We Shama Your Information? We tin not sell your personal Infarrnatkni. We only share your In%rmabon, Induding to subsidiaries, afnllates, and to unafflliated third parties: (1) with your consent; (2) In a business transfer; (3) to service providers; and (9) for legal process and protection. To team more about how we share your information, please visit w. m.cam I. H Do We and era Your Info atlon? The Security of your Information is important to us. That Is why we take oomn Bally reasonable steps to make sure your Information is protected. We use our hest efforts to maintain csurvneraally reasonabte technical, Organizational, and physical safeguards, consistent with applicable law, to protect your information. How Larlin Do We KNp Your Informatio ? We keep your information for as long as necessary in accordance with the purpose for which it Wag collected, our business needs, and our legal and regulatory obligations. Your Ctigls We provide you the ability to exercise certain controls and choices negardhig our collection, use, storage, and sharing of your information. You can learn more about your choices by visiting lilt; s:`www,Rrslam.com_ riva... - olp icvj. IrlLsimptional ]urn I s: Our Products are offered In the United States of America (US), and are subject. to US federal, state, and local law. If you are accessing Uie Products from another Wuntry, Please be advised that you may be transferring your information to us in the US, and you comment to That transfer and use of your information In accordance with this Privacy Notice. You also agree to abide by the applicable laws of applicable US federal, state, and local laws Concerrdng your use of the Products, arid your agreements with us. We may change this Privacy Notice from time to bone. Any and all Changes to this Pnvacy Notice will be reflected on this page, and where appropriate provided In person or by another electronic method. YOUR CONTINUED USE, ACCESS, OR INTERACTION WITH: OUR PRODUCTS OR YOUR CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS WITH US AFTER THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO YOU WILL REPRESENT THAT YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THIS PRIVACY NOTICE. Contact Us dataprivacy@frstam.com or toll free at 1-866-718-0097. © 2022 First American FlnaKlal Carporztion and jar its affiliates. All rights F -served• NYSE:FAF "' - p�iyt --. ., .--�117�i:115t Nu�mvn Fil�id0[CNppratlan� fOMI te•PAN7iL5'T7 112-1�717 - � - t NntPs Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 Preliminary Report Order No: 7161-3998828 Page 8 of 11 SCHEDULE OF STANDARD EXCEPTIONS 1, Taxes or assessments whlci are not shown as existing tlons by Cy records of any comg autlwdty that lesiss taus or asaamenb on real Property a by the puck records; Pr oceedhys by a public agency which may resuN In b,es or assPsvmtb, or notices of ssrh prcomdlrgs, whether or Prot shown by do records of such agenc' or by the pm records 2 Pad , rights, Interzts or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ashamed by an mspevim, of the land or by making mgulry of persons in posseadan thereof. 3 yaa� v chino of ar Lbee t7to by Ste orhrc wxWK rrdawC 4w—otu npi+is r In kb w0wWr4l me lssu>n[a N-W, eaec.glas. 6wm utat rcA- 4. 4s1,.hhna-&—hy W Wont; lmryvh*+*hv14 ball ee 1- I dwt"axo ask ntg i v d ctymp �r+rr.nhne.n laotrd aI aggkYy lyre orison ehe nubpott IWt a Ownb yhy :Mtbhy mu" a ally� 0� adeQNtg tPa Pik ew wools be dbdeyed bf yI ►arum a wl tsr O tC Lord 8NV4 d #ha fubycl lath. 5. !Pry tlee• a 05*4 m a Oat kY sta K WWr n*WtK savPowt WW or sxPttrs o(mlrtstgpn "Mhore n n.Mfon tw IWMd, ep—d br taw anti noc boob by %he pAilic mods NOTE: ASPCa etl COPY Q THE FMACY PIM M f{ssq YA,1 K It/MM MR alga Rev. 07-H-21 Ri tAmeryran Mie Notes Page 68 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 Page 67 Preliminary Report Order No,: 7161-3998828 Page 7 of 11 First American Tide Insurance Company SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE ALTA LOAN POLICY (07101/22) The fallowing matters are exrlded rmm the wverage of 1,4 policy, and the Company will not pay I- cr damage, mats, .homey,' fees, or expenses that rise try r.son gr: 1. any Ian, mdimmai morn, of govemmereal regulation (including those relating to budding and mm,g) that mstritls, regulates, Woh,bts, or reiales se the oxvrsrKy, use, a enjoyment of the land; thesubdl iomoflamJ;n err location of any ,mpmvementenactedm the Laid; W. thloormasronofland; or ronmenral remdiatdn or pmrecuon b. anygwemmental ftvfelture, ]t6tr. ftguW[ory, arwtiaol security power. the efleC of a y l'ion « enflKCenb% of any matter erdde uded older Exclusion 1 a «.b. 1 Exdusion 1 does not modify or 4M Dsr e,l 1.F Wo MI JCC CPfte,1 AM $ or 6. 2 Any pow, of eminent domain. FxO.W I don W teeddl d Ant Ind aekepl prodded under Covered RLtk 1. ] Any 61iiel I ft Oil ttebrl, rN~mail a. 1114.or nitoC4 xcmee, a +G� m br n. Emw W Owi wls: I. rpf ryapn m1M [atlpAh, ng[tsmeNrin led a±rw pa�nL It the Dale of Pall-1, but Known to the Inru1d t41eam and not d'srinsed in vrtiCoe m rfrrfLGnplrn' by car inylrvd CflrnlrA rx m Vie 01'R tlN frowned Claimant beam¢ an Insured under Illapaill resuftin' M rxl Iryp damage to the Insured Claimant; d. aberhmger ~A tub yuent to the Dale of Pollcy (Exclusion 3 d does not modify or limit the rmemge provided under Co—ed Rafe 11, 13, or te), W a rem1KN n Mwv BCre(e thae ws%X M Ill Dean elt.U.Wd•-VidlInii IiiM r.t m gaagfs' der Yn:»el nsrN N "CA Aa1 a bona fire pvdlsrerur rmo jv tWt pro fp"VNAYdN.p E Nr IN rite 0f 9day. A .A�nfrnetbllKa led l<n>thil Np.r{d lktfpeye Ltwne�lM i<MW7J'P'Al,Ii niter, ArWp6bowvPly nlplAry.'[opL•p., w—.IAn, w. 5 Itrry la er Game x hot tl Yie Nisd Me LUVred 4yrlppe tl1r rrruM dot aVM t91(►:IOP MCArxW try W lnpaert end y basil upon usury law W (gnsumer Protection Wn. S Any dalm, by reason of the opemlron of federal WnlcuWry, state imolvemry, or similar uditors'rghts law, that the transaction creating the liar of the Insured Mo..l rs a - a. fiauduerl wrveyonae or fraudulent hansfeT; b w'dable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Tramarndis -;or c preferential transfer. ro tha lerit the Insured Mtrtgege Is net a transfer made as a cay—Pari e— aorhaN1 W new value; « 1l fW-1 GluermNr.T r;l ll d'm LTrtrRd llfGr t].G 7 Any eliatdf.F+1Cl1Zul 1'Nrt-CXrM1nii does rot rreejM1y or&.4 IN—Ww fsrd'wCtCue sir clr w"I & Any UW mat ride fn M e12i,ifbniur tweurtra%5l'na-ed byav-en"trwl Ali Wo ttrabed a dtl/,lsing t Inn+ the aw .1lVlse, im'' the act¢ d eAg erl mm"l'Imme0 lV W Wn IIW "ll Rile dl.EUN—IdKs te[—&IWn Ink me hi—ne tYNrn.d onda C6.erad Il 2.b. err 11 b. A Any, discrer—ry, in the quantity of the area, square fata9e, W acreage of the Land a of Mf'rmlrlmousht t04N tail ALTA OWNER'S POLICY (07/01121) The following matters are excl from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, —, attorneys' fees, « eapenses that arise by reason of: I. a. any iaw, ardinanae, Wend, or go—one'nrol ryulaton (including those relating to bulldlog and zoning) that restricts, r yulates, Wohihits, or relates ro: the caw actor, use, si enjoyment of the land; the durader, dimensions, or bcalltx, of any Improverr,enl on the ta,d; IN eu6Ayde+d iNV;d I. mnmental remdlaton «pregMron. b. any 9—ormenel forfeiture,gqeNiee4 regulatory, or na[;rnal secuity pe— Ea. effect of a violation or er/pRtnNe of any matter excluded under Exclusion 1 a or Lb, xd islan 1 dcesrlo[ h'9�1 or Im+ty W.w1ge ptmdo] rrr 7lv Wa+ed ma s of 6. )_ A^Y pwwer of enW14 dpy�ln. Gerlsn 2 doer[ nq �Y a AIR 8'e tprvlge pralded under Covered Rtsk 7 I Any defect, N, encrlrnbrarxe, adverse claim, or other matter: o tluhw4 s:,Re1y, nwrNr a 4Md b fry lfue Insuml rbytare; b. rmiX— to ft C*-WN, rlgt—dW n the Pub4o Rea'r#6kAl the Date of Policy, but Known to the Fremed Claimant and net disclosed in writing io the Iol q"fry ft grtytl fi~II Gran 9 the dole VV "I Claimant became an Insured under this pellry; c. resulting In In tole M db ina tz b Cs 111,64 dd 04 n int; d. altathi , vawKW ii lia ,me 0Ile, Wlt 0 Ore¢ (E duslon 3d. 6M rat modify or limit the m+erew pill lwsda Covered tiring W I* « e. resulting in how W dftrhW MnWV nal fare Lids susta eed If t(erfder@en stiffrcient to qualify the bmur dn*,W rn Schedule AA&A W. Ade purchaser had teargiven f« the T1Ie at the DaN dWKy A Any claim, by ream, of the operatic, of federal banMggy, :rote inalvenry, « similar creditors' rights law, that the bansactlon vesting the Title as shown in Sch dole A Is a: fraudulent carve/anre or fraudulent transfer b voidable bamfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Pat; or C preferential transfer: I. to the extent he mstrument of transfer —ling the Title as sham in Schedule A is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange f« non wen: a o• lrry ctlrr TinnL a natS%3 *M flit mDV* 5. rV7 CLne2eA,f,tit•75ATrrrw frf]INIonS Oaei/4t trepyulrmi ll[frldrlragt pvrW srlkR �lrtsDt 1. 6 Art/Ion o+lfNTNefw rein aPMf frrNprwneelWalmlwxdOn ROR1[MatM dlprMrn'eKArwNndl dw Ibiecwrel doe Id N1961'f g1W PO ow d1�loinacAn'or6deelrotmodelmMwarvlee¢eGepwAq goilltrC*mtdPWt1b, 7. Afro AAJfpM In ftgWlI d art rots, jts M Mow%. W W"pd le lid ve Any lutl detu la lit Lind- R,t AmeAcat+ TWe Notes Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> (-.—tad nn 191512022 at 14,12,21 Preliminary Report Order Na: 7161-3998828 Page 6 of 11 Exhibit "A" Real property in the County of Jackson, State of Oregon, described as follows: PARCEL 1: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Donation Land Claim No. 56 In Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, Jackson County, Oregon; thence North 890 53' West along the South boundary of said Donation Land Calm, 757.4 feet; thence South 200.0 feet; thence South 430 30r East 470.4 feet; thence South 49130' East, 264.4 feet to the South line of property described in Certificate Tde No. 1040; thence South 890 47' East, 598.2 feet; thence North 356.0 feet; thence South 890 47' East, 252.2 feet to the centerline of Table Rock Market Road; thence North along the centerline of said road, 356.85 Feet to the North boundary of Donation Land Claim No. 58; thence North 890 53' West along said North boundary of Donation Land Claim No. 58, a distance of 618.35 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL 2: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Donation Land Claim No. 56, Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, Jackson County, Oregon; thence South 891 50' 10" East along the North line of Donation Land Cialm No. 58, said Township and Range, S78.10 feet; thence South 0e 03' West, parallel to and 10 feet West of the West line of Table Rock Read, 356.81 feet; thence North 99D 47' West, 21LSD feet; thence South 00, 03' West, 1D2.0 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continue South On 03' West (record South) 76.0 feet W the Southwest Cotner of tract descnbed in Document No. 71-D3949, Official Records, Jackson County, Oregon; thence South 896 47' East, along the South line of said [cacti 212.50 feet; thence North 09 43' East (record North) 76.0 feet; thence North Br 47' West, 212.50 feet, to the true point of beginning. PARCEL 3: Commencing at the Southeast comer of Donation Land Claim No. 56 in Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, Jackson County, Oregon; thence South 89° 50' 10" East along the North line of Donation Land Claim No. 58, said Township and Range, 578.10 feet; thence South 00 03' West, parallel to and 10 feet West of the West Hne oFTable Rock Road, 356.81 feet to the true paint of beginning; thence North 891; 47' West, 212.50 feet; Hence South 09 03' West 102.00 feet; thence South 890 47' East 212.50 Net to the West line of Tattle Rack Road; Vienoe North 00 03' East alwg said West line, 102.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Excepting therefrom all 3 parcels all that portion of the property conveyed to Jackson County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, moorded April 06, 2017 as Document No. 2017.011467. NOTE: This legal description was created prior to January 1, 2008 First American Title (Votes Page 66 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 Preliminary Report Order No,: 716P 3996e `8 9 MARK FLIEGEL TITLE OFFICER mfllegel@flrstam.com RECORDING INFORMATION As of March 23, 2020 Jackson County recording fees are as follows: Retarding Fees: $ 102.00 All Deeds 1st page $ 5.00 All Deeds for each additional page $ 119.00 All Other Document Types $ 5.00 All Other Document Types For each additional page gdditlorrai Fees will be imposed by the County Clerk of a document presented for recording fails to meet the cements esrabllshed t ORS Chapter 205. cc: John Hamlin, Hamlin Real Estate 1118 East Main Street, Medford, OR 97504 cc: Stark and Hammack PC 100 East Main Street, Suite M, Medford, OR 97501 Rl t Amen— We Nr,itGC Page 65 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 Prelhnlnary Report Order No,: 7161-3996626 Page 4 of 11 NOTE: According to the public record, the following deed(s) affecting the property herein described have been recorded within 24 months of the effective date of this report: NONE NOTE: We find no outstanding voluntary liens of record affecting subject property. An Inquiry should be made concerning the existence of any unrecorded lien or other indebtedness which could give rise to any security interest In the subject property. THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING FIRST AMERICAN TITLE] WE KNOW YOU HAVE A CHOICE! fast Amen®n Tide Notes Page 64 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 121512022 at 14:12:21 e 63 Preliminary Report Order No.: 7161-3996628 Page 3 of 11 it. These premises are situated in the Rogue River Valley Irrigation District, and subject to the levies and assessments thereof, water and Irrkjdtlon rights, easements for ditches and canals and regulations concerning the same. 12. The rights of the public in and to that portion of the premises herein described lying within the limits of streets, roads and highways. 13. Intentionally deleted 14. Intentionally deleted 15. Any conveyanrx or encumbrance by Table Rock Business Park, LLC should be executed pursuant to their Operating Agreement, a copy of which should be submitted to this office for Inspection. 16. Unrecorded leases or periodic tenancies, if any. 17. Extended owner's policy has been requested per the Sate and Purchase Agreement privAded rorthis transaction, therefore we will need to be provided an ALTAINSPS Land Survey and the seller sign our Extended Owner's Affidavit required for our revi" prior to dose of escrow, so that we may revise our report accordingly. 18. This report has been submitted to our underwriter for review and approval. We will inform you of any further exceptions and/or requirements. - END OF EXCEPTIONS - Note: Revised to update report and remove previous exception 13. NOTE: We find no matters of public record against BHD Land Development, LLC that will take priority over any trust deed, mortgage or other security Instrument given to purchase the subject real property as established by ORS 18.165. NOTE: Taxes for the year 2021-2022 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $2,123.27 MdpNo.: 372W12B 800 Property ID: 1-046233-9 Tax Cade No.: 49-49 NOTE: Taxes for the year 2021-2022 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $649.74 Map No.: 37ZW12B 900 Property ID: 1-046234-7 Tax Code No.: 49-49 NOTE: Taxes for the year 2021-2022 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $654.59 Map No.: 372W12B 902 Property ID: 1-046236-1 Tax Code No.: 49-49 NOT=: This preliminary Title Report does riot [n[hxfe a search for Financing Statements filed In the Office of the Secretary of State, or In a county other than the county vrhereirl the premises are situated, and no Ilabllity Is assumed if a Flra'ufc N Statement Is filed In the Office of the County perk covering Rxtures on the premises wherein the lands are descrbed other than by metes and bounds or under the reE%ngular surrey system or by w"M lot and bkxk. 17n,tamerfon rrUe nI of in Q Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 Preliminary Report Order No : 7161-3999628 Page 2 of 11 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on rear property Or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assesrrnents, or notioes of such prOcwlngs, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an Inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the public records; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the Issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Any encroachment (of exlsbng Improvements located on the subject land onto adjoining land or of ex gRV Improvements located on adjoining land onto the subject land), encumbrance, vtolatlon, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the subject land. S. Any lien, or right to a lien, rnr services, labor, material, equipment rental or workers compensation heretofore or hereafter fumLshed, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. The exceptions to coverage 1-5 inclusive as set forth above will remain on any subsequently Issued Standard Coverage Title Insurance Policy. in order to remove these exceptions to coverage in the Issuance of an Extended Coverage Policy the following item-- are required to be furnished to the Company; additional exceptions to coverage may be added upon review of such information: Survey or alternative acceptable to the company Afficlivit regwding possession Proof that there is no new construction or remodeling of any improvement located on the premises. In the event of new construction or remodeling the following is required: i. Satisfactory evidence that no construction liens will be filed; or II. Adequate security to protect against actual or potential construction lien; III. Payment of additional premiums as required by the Industry Rate Filing approved by the Insurance Division of the State of Oregon 6. Water rights, claims to water or title to water, whether or not such rights are a matter of public record. 7. Taxes for the fiscal year 2022-2023 a lien due, but not yet payable 8. The herein described property has been dlsquallfied from special assessment as farm use land and is currently assessed at true cash (market) value. ORS 3OM-083 et seq. provides that If the property is converted to a use inconsistent with Its return to farm purposes, potential tax in the amount of $3,919.69 will become due and payable. (Affects Parcel 1) 9. City liens, if any, of the City of Central Point 10. The premises herein described are within and subject to the statutory powers of the Rogue Valley Sewer Services. First American T7Ne Notes Page 62 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 1215/2022 at 14:12:21 _ Page 61 EXHIBIT 13 • d A— 1@ FrstAmeriam Tide fasumnee Company First Amcric 3225 Crater Lake Avenue, Suite 101 Medford, OR 97504 Phn - (541)779-7250 Fax - (066)400-2250 Order No.: 7161-3998828 October 05, 2022 FOR OUESTIOPIB R9 AROING YQUR CLOSING, PLEASE CONTACT: LORI BILLINGS, Escrow Officer/Closer Phone: (541)779-7250 - Fax: (866)839-7125- Email:lbillings@firstam.com First American Title Insurance Company 1225 Crater Lake Avenue, Suite 101, Medford, OR 97504 FOR ALL QUESTIO.NS REGA"ING THU PRECIP41MMY REPORT, LCPY ACT; Mark Fliegel, Title Officer Phone: (541)779-7250 - Email: mfiiegel@frstam.com 2nd Revised Preliminary Title Report This report IS for the exclusive use of the parties herein shown and is preliminary to the issuance of a title insurance policy and shall become void unless a policy is issued, and the full premium paid. Please be advised that any provision contained in this document, or in a document that is attached, linked or referenced in this document, that under applicable law illegally discriminates against a class of Individuals based upon personal dmratterlstcs such as race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, familial status, disability, national origin, or any other legally protected class, is illegal and unenforceable by law. Situs Address as disclosed on Jackson County Tax Roll: 3791 Table Rock Road, Medford, OR 97504 2021 ALTA Owners Standard Coverage Oabllity ; Premium ; 202L ALTA owners Extended Coverage Lobiity; 5,436,174.17 Premium ; 14,34a oo 2021 ALTA Lenders Standard Coverage Oabrlty ; Premium S 2021 ALTA Lenders Extended Coverage Liability ; Premium 3 Endorsement Premium ; Govt Service Charge Cost ; 270,00 Other COT ; We are prepared to issue Title Insurance Policy or Policies of First American Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska Corporation in the form and amount shown above, Insuring title to the following described land: The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit A attached hereto. and as of September 28, 2022 at 8:00 a.m., title to the fee simple estate Is vested in: Table Rock Business Park, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company Subject to the exceptions, exclusions, and stipulations which are ordinarily part of such Policy form and the following: Notes Comments summary on <Attachment B. Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 1215/2022 at 14:12:21 EXHIBIT 12 Technical Memorandum CSA Planning, Ltd 4497 arownddg Suite 101 To: Steven Backman, SH Devco nnadro,d, os 9_s Telephone 541.779.0569 Date: October 31. 2022 Fax 541.778.0114 Subject: Parking Demand for Project Murphy 1.,@GSAo—rnp.cwn PARKING DEMAND DISCUSSION CSA Planning Ltd. was asked to provide evidence concerning parking demand for the proposed "Project Murphy' warehouse and distribution facility in Central Point, Oregon, The Cantral Paint Munimpal Cade ICPMCj SQcticn 17,64 sets OUT the Ci[y'a Off -Straws Parking requirements. Non-realdentigl efizstrset parking requlremants are providad Irt Table 17.84.GWS). That table contains a standard for Warehousing and Storage, but Thera is no parking rase for a warehouaing, storage, and dissritcution facility. The dissribtrtion aspect of the proposed proect makes a big diffarenco, Warer%u ning and Stoe go uses require off-str m parking for afllco wO0101's� Operators ant! dock workers. Thie type of use la typically being visited W n tl g uses delivering %g the faciii ty. Ah or they dailvar th air fond. the trucks move to rho next warehouse or storage u, The CPMC uses a rain of 1 parkinp 3pa,ze per thousand feet of gross floc' area for warehouse and storage uses. This aquiii to a requirement for S$ caking apeegs for the warehouse and storage aspects Of the proposed usO- The distribution aspect of the prpposed use la notcaptured by the CPMC• The proposed site plan has 170 parking epac05, 10 The use proposes an additional 82 perking spaces To ba needed to senor the distribution eapact of the project. The dlalrlbution OSPOct Of rho proposed use will raqurre off-street parking for some ponfon of The distribution van drivers to park the it personal vah icloa at the facility. CPMC 17.84,f (BI allows adjustments to dla non-residential off-street vahtoto parking raquimmansa. The Site plan also depicts vehicle storage area for 216 distribution vans. Some vans will be loaded while others are out for delivery- Uses like this have been and will continue to become more and more automated over time. PARKING DEMAND CONCLUSION Wfsan considering she base warehouse and storage off-straeT parking requirement for $7 a010 apacati, iHa pfoposad additional $2 auto parking appose is a reacon6Wa and approprlate amoun t co meat the needs Of the additional di a rribution aspects of the use our su ain't to CPMC 1 7.84,040(Bl. CSA el no obscavea that the nature of the propo bed atr®et Conflgura dOn {s such that most of the now struts aenerraion eron is on propeny Owned by She Ap pileant on bokh stdea of Th. strual. and Ihvrafwe, significant On -street parking yriil also be available in the area and may be utilized during potential seasonal employmant flvctuatione. CSA Planning, Ltd- Ja)'7and President Kin4oc Page 60 A c 0 a c �o LL c U fl Q O Q m C Iy U co Q V !_ co E 7 cn Iv E E O U $ Y,1Er•p16�C169 I 444 FH rr, IEB 111\\\ F QY6M1Etl0'lNIOdIotl 11JOtl 3I9V14LEilul endann immd C'r•=. T- f OD LO a) rn m a LL co U Q a Q (U (6 O C C i . EA- ti LO A n V1 C C LL U C (6 U_ n 0- Q N O c Ql m C N E L U Q V r, m G E 7 N Ln C N E E 0 0 1 Wd S01211 WOlOHd 03�J'a N3 AHdilflW o 103rO8d w �a -------------------------- ---- -r-.--»_. __ f i • 1 {I 71 . I - I ' 1- 1 • l_ r i i i i i i i 1 1 ' i I .• li s I 1 1 RIA cfl In a� ca d A Q U) C C LL U •a cl Q 0 c c ai m a) s U Q C O CE C 3 U) �C CC G O 0 NV'ld SORi13W01OHd hHdilflW o uIoy(«Aajwi� `� w 0AE)dYIN3 lO3fOiid w ------------------------------------ 1 -- ---------- ci ----- -' - - 1. _� _• �� � �' 1IIII��� f� • j 1 1 • ! 1 -----------------`- -------'_� __�.. -..�-- �- -• r ^------------- cn y-+ O 4- 0 Q u) i� LL Y) c c� U Q Q Q 2 m O C C Q m c a� L U fII a O cu E E n cn a� E E O 0 _ NVId 1Hdi3nW } =• SOIN13wg1OHd - 1110H(#AawDl -- aaMMgm x w use =�- wA-� iC.�a=,�.v ••-• � .sr� i, •.••'."� 77 a w 3.- r*s r r , --------------------------- -. -.-_,. �1.•- --- -- . . ---- ;�__ , PAI A Q ch 0) 0 L.L U_ a n Q m 0 Q, m C N L U Q V C 0. D cn W C a) cC C O U UJOH#« AajwrA NVId I AH&MV4 SO1N13WO-LOHd 1O3roUd O3JaVIN3 —� -- -- -:jar—;F� _ �•»~ _ _ _ � .- --_—'-- �� — • 111 � 1 �: • I .- � j r is _ ....... `.•:: �°� ::-:: ::�' : is :: :: • � Iv: _�.... ..-_-.may..-______ .. ,..,. a„�.,. .. _....�—..__�.�..—•__-•_� G M LO NA I. au ww� T.,..,.,,.... N`dld � } UJO� ((l���UI� SON13WOlOHd XHd2if1W % o fry< I ,' 030a] 1N3 103rMJd w 1 6- :a:....:._. of IJ i _ - t f C N LO A a cn cm C C U— tn C f>3 U a a Q a� co O c c al m C� C L U (0 Q V C O', f>3 c c r N E E O U D V: N r-+ O iI LO m m co 0— A 0 a C 0 O LL c U Q Q Q N co O C C C N E L U m NYId SORJ13W01OHd -- UJOH<<(Aaji.ui� t „VU3A0 ,• Q_ I�_ ..J•r. AHd,dnvi lO3rOad I ^U) W O O Ln N (6 n n. �i LL c m U Q rz 2 m 0 .• E` E� N O N 0 G C LL _0 0 < C: (D E 0 v C: 0- EE =3 c in (n c a) E E 0 01 H&im A Sliv-00 NOiVM:W1 103rO*dd uJowiLul U, N AL I F F 0000 aso 1)0:: n IY iiZ2 po RIA 21 GA Q N 0) LL N U Q O_ Q N (6 O C C ¢I [0 c a> E L U m AHdanw Nbld N01VOW81 lOArOTdd -- m ---------_.a__ f_-__--- 1 J f 9 T _ q 1 i 1 I , i i f ' r 1 � a' I 1 I 1 I l I 1 1 1 1% i 1 1 I FrA ti UJOH<0Aa1w1)1 N ji M N I C: a) E NVId N01VOWHI ),H&jnvq I 103FMId lot- r4 c� d >; co E c ) E 0 U j ; Pam r 1 s �1 lq e� i, t i ----------------------------- no LO It rev E E :3 (n a) E E 0 0 WOHO(Aalw!)l NV -id NOiVONM I 'H""' -LoArmld F L ftt ---------- -------- - ------------------- ---- PFA I E m v m E E co m N U) 0 Q In !0- E 00 E 2 0 ca u H�<JjUIN le is 3�1a1 sr — — — - - — - - - - - — — — — — — - -- -------------1. -- ----- -------------- PIA M m CL A a Fn I1� LL C: (0 U a a 0 c c a� E U (6 Q V C ON N LC � E Em N � N fn N_ () a) C E` E Q O u U� Nb"ld NOiVOWdI i 1,HdilflW 103fOad ► 1 �1 it .� �: E �3 •�`'� � ids' � � }lf � � .5 t �• i I � 1 LL I ' Il I .• -aj[. v 'p� r�0__ a-4.. 0 .lf..O �.R-f� __ I -I I I e..,o�� o: __s�.,°s_. .a :_e°�a-, e`I��e 'o a =o.: AA �s° a •a".'e_�e-._e_-�9 _i� i I I I I i I IJ N d' A in 0) c 0 U- C N U Q cl O C C QI m c L U (�6 Q V C O L � m E N E E O U U9j�{(C<I�i'LU9� @ >@r � C7) r l� -I �� ^• ^ 1 • I E- -• i r I �1 _ Ilk iJ T- m 0— I AHddnw io3ro�jd r t:tn SE31ON 3dVOSGNV-1 PFA 9 0 Lu�o"Aalw-rA -------- 5 ),Hddnv4 S siivig(l 3dVOSCIM9 IIVIAG 3dVOSONVI 109roHd U h as a a &D I E -C 0 co v c 0 C13 E EE -00 0 L) C) op A$ MA -ld 3dVOSCINVI UlOH<AalwD NV I AH&InVi iogrMAd I 00 CY) N Q m 0- a C c LL Y) (0 U IZ Cl- 0 C C QI Co c a� L U Q V E E 7 U C E E O U -- UaOH0<Aalw!N ''' 2—g N71d 3dVOSONHI �.e AH&M N 133M0 ld _ .. 3k YN = 1 1 i i ; F i tj} i� ip �f L---------------------------- ________•�y _------ _ _----- -- , I I .. I I _ I � 1 'F I I Iy - I I i ,• I • '� ksj- J ''Sty i 1 sr'" •� ---------------- PAI A C� U) 0) C LL �n CL CL _0 0 < c Q) E 0 v UJOHOKAal NV-ld 3dVOS(INV-1 AH&mn iogroHd §75 MUM IM o o 0 ... ... .. ... 4OW-0 21 ------------ ---------- ------- U) 0 PAI FrF—j,7- —mI AHdHnn NV -Id �IdVOSONVI UJOH<(<A9IwI R. 103road I E k I T 4 ,Maio®® E IMENIZE91M E i; I FIA I. v c 0 E E ca 7C, U) c E 't E c o ANV -ld 3dVOS(]Nv-i UJOWOA811 1 ji IN ]J h 11 RI H 110 H Ig h 69 L'O'p, -------------- ------------ --------- M) k V-0 ft" rI In ),Hd,dnvq I o 103roacj it ::i rA m LOA A Q cn c C LL c co U a Q- Q 2 co 0 c c al 0O c a) E U (Q Q V L, N co E� E N N to c C E ° EG, U7 O M U ci u1®I-l<KRaIWI)l -- NV-1d 3dV0SaNVI "' AHddnv4 103rmid j ; •_— --�-------------------�; jp I F� T. r z ; r k �s 'r i � v iJ A C� U) 0) LL CL 0. _0 0 c c EMI O C) -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LO cc) j 0 ---------- .�O-tro4o MIA (N C`') N m d PIA Ol n 0 a c 70 C LL C U Q Q N O C c - Fo i d l ol.18184 J r } 0 O 2 O — a�Wa , J J CD (L OLLJ LL U Z � J W N N 0 ) N O F}- z o m U LU > O W z O O a N - - 3 - r C Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 EXHIBIT 8 n.1ne IC1f,Rp_� . ■ subject Property City Limits Tax Lots FEMA Floodplains im-Year Determined BFE 100-Year Determined BFE - Floodway 10 Date: 10127/2022 Notes Will Hydrology Map BH Devco, LLC Tentative Plan / Site Plan & Architectural Review 37-2W- 1 2B-800, 900, 902 0 250 500 1,0 0 N Page 30 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 1215/2022 at 14:12.21 —_ T .•- -� '% EXHIBIT 7 -- { iF W } 3 Ip. Zoning District F_ _I Subject Property BCG City Limits I. M-1 Tax Lots M-2 R-1-6 R-2 Date: 1=812022 Notes R Zoning Map BH Devco, LLC Tentative Plan / Site Plan & Architectural Review 37-2W-12B-800, 900, 902 0 no 500 1,000 Feet N Page 29 comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 NntPS Page 28 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:21 Page 27 Notes A Q V) 0E 0c LL to c 1u U a Cl Q O c C I u pnH e� C U a 3� !J �'38sa� J 1 mwn LO to 00 ref !J YJ' { e3 r 1. CD mco E t m 9 uaCiueul Vld 5L LL2 tl1VO�510 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Page 25 Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:23 Notes Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:25 APPLICANT'S EKHMIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentalive Plan S Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC In. Where the parking lot is located to the side of the building and partially abuts the public right-of-way, one tree for every six spaces; c Where the parking lot is located behind the building and is not visible from the public right-ol-way, one tree for every eight spaces. Compliance with Standards: The proposed employee parking lot; contain a total of 170 spaces which rogisire a minimum of 43 trees within the employee parking lot landscapc areas, The, Applicant's preliminary landscape plans at ExhibiL 10 demonstrate that the minimum number of required trees within the parking lot landscape areas can and will be met. There are no parking rows containing 10 or more vehicle spaces side -by -side, and with terminal landscape planters having 8 feet or more of space for Iandscaping, the proposed plan exceeds the minimutn standard. In addition, there are numerous additional landscape planters throughout the parking lot that will tifrther break up the scale of the parking lous. The proposed site plan also tncludcs a large vehicle storage lot on the north hair of the warehouse site, which is also proposed to be landscaped although tt is not required within vehicle storage areas- This area has wide planters spread throughout that will contain numerous trees and shrubs. Project complies. 3. Bioswares The use of bkMKHles 400— Rmicng k&% m nKc raged and may be located within landscape areas mb,", bo see plan and architaehxel review The Ilea pearling lnndards maybe reduciW in areas dtlJicaled to bloawates subject to, wie plan had ardrgectural rewew. Compliance with Standards: All ssormwatcr From the proposed warehouse devclopmem will be detained in two dry ponds on both sides of the driveway near the southwest comcrof the site. Bioswales are not proposed within the parking lass. if final engineering determines additional storm drainage detention is required, there is additional room for storm drainage detention on the proposed Parcel 2. H. f Kyde Parking. The anxxsd of bkyc* Par" sbA be provided n accord once Wth Smikirl 17.64.0d6 and cOmtruc#ed in accordance wnh the kAowtng stairidwift I Location of Bicycle pattnng Regr9sad tn67pCiB pw" -4dbue5 shalt be Located vn•site In was Ilghterl, seturu id9adons 8wyua p4rkrn9 ^'ay atso be vu dad r We a budding in suitable, &wOu And accessible loc"or§L grcyrse paturg for nIUM In uses t7-reh aE% in a'prrvrrKadal caner} rtiey be dUStered in We or s+t "lucUMM 2. Bicycle Parkmg Desgn Standards Ad tcycle PeAwq and matwuvehng areas shall he tonslructw to die fallowing minimum design standards: a sudacng. Ouwow bicycle c&%r5 fad shaft be surfaced to the same manner as a major vaNcTe PoriMg area W wnh a m nimum of a vvee Knd1 thIckriess of hard aufacng tl,e.. asphaltconrwine. pavma or simitar "larredal I. rhis surrece wpm be mawawmjo in a vnuoth, durable and we"talnrrd condi ri, b, Parking Spaces pimensia+ Surrdaed. Bkyde parking spaces shall be at least six feel long and two feet wide with minimum ov� dearaPoe of seven lord_ c. Lighting. Lighting stall be prodded n a biq d parking area so that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sdmraiks ix rnotar vehicle panung lots during all boors of use. d Aisles A rive -foot aisle li rWicle maneuvering shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking e signs. 4Mere dcyde par" larJLties am nol rl"wacdy wsihlo from the public rights olJway, entry and directional signs shall be pruvidod to direct bcyrclos From tho public nglHs-of,way to IHo bicycle frar keg facility low AMI Page 15 Nntac Page 24 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:28 Page 23 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC Compliance with Standards: The proposed use is foram industrial warehouse and distribution facility which is permitted in the M-I district, and these limitations on the use of parking areas are acknowledged and will be complied with. G P"inglLoading Facility Landscaping and SCreMmg Psrmng rot lwxts apkrg W;o ba used to felnforce pedeatrlen and vablcular ckrutallgn, 1mJuding patUng lal Bnlrfag. podegpigll adde56wayS, and parking u sles, To achieve this objective the Following minimum standards shall apply: howuvw, addaonal landscaping m%y be "Xin n"rXied during the site plan and archrtachrral fevjety process (Chapter 17.72), •Ag padding lots ehaill La taNscaped In accordnnce wilh the foliwnng islandwels- I w.w x•wro,e. are.. vr...� w.:�wn.vw�.c� I. Pgrirneluf and Sltgal Frontage Landscaping Requinxne w The perknotar ■rod s"m hontege rw all parking laeililiss shall be Ixndseared accdrding In the stawlards eat rorth ie TW* 17-75-9a Compliance with Standards: The subject property will have approximately 1,200 feet offrontage rm Erederal Way/Airpon Road (Standard Locat Street), and approximately 540 fcu of frontage on Table Ruck Road (Principlfl Arterial), Pursuant to Table 17.75.03, this equates to street frontage landscaping requircments of 36 totes and 190 shrubs along the Federal WaylAirport Road frontage, and 22 acts and 108 shrubs along the Table Rock Road frontage. As shown on the landscape plans at Applicant's Exhibits 10, a 10 to 15 foot wide planter area will be installed behind the sidewalk on the Federal Way/Airport Road street frontage, and a 15 foot wide planter will be installed behind the sidewalk along the Table Rock Road frontage. The subject property also has approximately 970 feet of shared property line with the two light industrial properties to the north (FcdEx Ground and Costco), and a 10 foot wide planter is proposed along this shared property boundary. Pursuant to Table 17.75.03, this shared boundary planter will require a minimum or nineteen (fees and 97 shruW. The preliminary landscape plans demonstrate that the shared property boundary and both street Frontage landscape plan ter amm cull aceummodateand will have [tie required mum bets 9Ftrccsand shrubs. Final landscape plan can be conditioned to comply with all applicable requiretttents. 2- Tsrm(hni and Intnnor 10w du Fier varkmg rods in ex"m . of bvr traces all ru s cr parking spaces row& provide lerminal a minimum of six feet in width lu protect parked vohirJps_ ;name vi%6any. mnkns Yaffe to alskts and driveways. and provide a minimum of five foot of spare For fand;catkng, in adckt OM, wtMt lCn of more vehrclas would tie parked sides by -silo In an abutrmg eonAguralim, rraenor landsr sped! rJands a —rumum oT night reel vnde musl be rrcal8d wilFan lhP parking fow. For in"ino lot& greaten vnan 5Ry patkurp spyce& are loranon of inlenM landscape Mand gall be al owed to bu wnsolidated for platting of targn stands of oem to break up tho scalo of the parking lol The nufnbsF et trees requnad m the inlerlur landscape area shelf be dtperident upon the kr m#m of the parking lot kl rolahm to rho twildimj and public nghl-of-way: a Where the parking lot is located between the building and the public right-of-way: one tree for every four spaces; MPage 14 Notes Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Page 22 Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12,30 APPVGANr 5 EXHl8f7' 3 Demonsiratiun of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan 3 Sde Fort and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLG Compliance with Standards: As shown on the Applicant's ptnposcd site plan at Exhibit 10, there are rive proposed driveways along the subject property's street frontage- The two driveways serving the deliycry vehicle parkinglswrage area arc 27 feet wide white the two driveways serving the employee parking lots are 21 feet in width. The Ii fih driveway located at the southwest comer of the warehouse site is 47 feet in width to ftoeommodatd larger frcighL delivery vehicles that will be unloaded at the west end or the warehouse. The proposed driveway widths are in conformance with the Public Works Department's trtirorm standards for driveways and alley approaches For commeteial devcloprncnt (Drawing A-6A). E Improvement of Parking Spaces. 1 Wtrpn a cgfw"ld Rub 1; used as a wheel stop- it may bu MM40 withln the ptseking space up to two feet form the front or a space. Ir<sueh caGm, the area bowman The wheel stop dad 4rrutsr,*"9 nimd not be pavod rinrrklnd it Is maintakspd vrilh approlxfate ground cover IN walkwily In inlet event shna the fdaC-erneni of whoa! s1W5 reduce the minimum landscape of walkway wrdO PA[tLlirernant$ 2 All afdas trLlaed ter off-slreal parking. access wld maneuvering oT vaWdas 5" eP ��nd stripedkitri 10 [ e standards at She dry or Central Poled Tof all-weatliaf use and "be udequua" dr areas nctu be riesignod with al ate rbw of furwa water across sklmwamcs or other pedestrian artws �a F.9rir painted ,toping or other approved method of dehnealarfg the nn5viduad sr"m& vs the exception of Sots canrauomg srngte•lamoy or ring -family dwalhogs 3. parkarg Vacas shall be desigrrad srf that no brciunp movemerile or aw" saner nn5 vri lwl a stray or orhur public riphtai-way shall ile nreessflry_ except for one- and hva-himily 0rmga3's Nisi kvntaga on a k>cd :trees per the city Of Central Point sweet wasocalidn map. a. Any Aghllng used To muminale ofl-shunl parking or kwding areas strait to su OTMn e f as to doers the 1*4 away from adrailanl eke81s or properties. 5 Service dovfes situp have a ndmmum vislon cFdarartce area formed by the entlr5PCMXt � d'way � v* the sirwi dqw ol,way tint, and a suatght line Joining One Ones Ihmugh pow fi. Pardrtg spaces located along Ih® dulef boundaries of A parking Inl:hall tin by 20 apmprlper�f fa' rafk.ar SO Placed to prevent a motor vehicle from africndkrg ovpf an adjecent Property a required landscaping area 7. Per". toaong, or vafdcle rria rmunrawq nream Shall not be located vdlhyn Old taro yard ama of side yard area of a cegmr nt Ihu" a 5keat m any msidentlot tRl dislor.t. rrx vrdM any ftarkn or a afrtet sathaek area that is regdrad to be lorxiscaped to any eorrrmRIcial {C} of mdusinai IM) distnd 8. Except as Frovlded in suh_,ection {El(3} of this. secUo, nil us",'ir"ing one- a� nd tlmvity *Avaep on aft* -Fla l and wilectnr wrests, 01811 prnvlda 06"uat6 vel idr, Turnanwnd end row nivedrxg areaEwu9h Ufa ulx Of aisle 9xImajon5 auLVM tummound spacas as illustrated in FKW* 1175.04 and 57.75,05 Funcewraay egmvbEwt Turnaround and maneuvering designs may im Permitted by the 3PPRrfjg audxndy ftwough Ota sY.* plan and architectural review process Compliance with Standards: As evidenced on the site plan at Applicant's Exhibit 10, wheel stops are not proposed to be used within the parking spaces, and all other parking space improvement standards can and will be met. IF Limllnapri on Use of Parking Areas Retruked Phfkfrg aroas Strati be used cxdtV4vl3y Ihr *wde pads" in am"nd3nn wkh a pamritled use and shall nol be reduced of encrosdaid Alien in any marrow The paricing rara:lies shall be so dmigned sad maintained as not to wnstfule a nuisance at any time, and shaas be used m such a reamer Mat nu hazard to pemans or p[aa". or unreaecnable impedomm to Iraf . wtli —11 1�lrra•w Page 13 KIM+ c Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:33 Page 21 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC Compliance with Standards: As noted above under the discussion related to block lengths and perimeters, pedestrian accessways between the subject and abutting properties are impractical and unnecessary given the nature of the uses and the sizes of the properties within the subject block. 17.75.039 OR -street parking design and development standards. All off-street vehicular parking spaces shall he improved to the following standards: A Connectivity Parking lots for new development shall be designed to provide vehicular and pedestrian connections to adjacent sites unless as a result of any of the following such connections are not possible: 1. Topographic constraints; 2 Existing development patterns on abutting property which preclude a logical connection; 3 Traffic safety concerns: or 4_ Protection of significant natural resources. Compliance with Standards: The lands to the north of the subject property are developed with a Costco Warehouse and gas station, and FcdEx distribution facility. These properties do not have connected parking lots and the proposed new warehouse development also does not include parking lot connectivity with these adjacent sites. The FedEx parcel has perimeter fencing that prohibits pedestrian cross -access. The proposed warehouse use features a significant number of delivery vehicles that will be parked on the northern half of the subject property and the circulation pattern and volume of these vehicles makes connected parking lots a safety concern for both vehicles and pedestrians, In addition, and as noted previously above, there are no obvious practical reasons for traveling between the adjacent properties given the uses on each. Should someone want to travel between any of the three sites, there will be convenient and safe routes for both vehicular and pedestrian travel via Federal Way. a Parking Slaa tytrvrrrrn U nwt+ ioris Slandaio parong %iaees shall a iiorm to the Iollowrrg %andards ono are dnnensnnns m f`[gire 17.75 o3and TaWc 17 15 02_ provided, that compact pedcing spares pannitted in acco daum rdlh Section 17 64.040(G) shalt have the following minimum dimensions: t hYid[h--ShaY be as prodded it ookumr 8 in Table 17 75.02: 2 Lmogdi-Shad reduce inn C in Table 17.75.02 by no more than three feet. Compliance with Standards: The proposed parking spaces are 9 feet in width by 19 feet in length (18 feet where curbing serves as the wheel stop). Project complies. See, Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10 C. Access. There shai be adequate provision for ingress and egress to all parking spaces. Compliance with Standards: The employee parking areas have two-way, 24 foot wide drive aisles where there are back-to-back parking rows, and there are two points of ingress/egress to Federal Way/Airport Road. Project complies. ❑ Ik"& ;tYg C.r1w1w. ywidth "I be 7nuasuref al Ore dnvoway's nartowe5l pnlnr, including the cufh cul. The desrqu Qnd rnrLsh"lim r4 dnwnvays �I be as snl rnnn m the Slandvd Sperif cahons and Pub[rc Works Department Standards and Specifications 0 Notes Page 12 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> fYmtsd on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:35 APPUCANT'Sl XH191i3 Damorurralion at Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC Rack Road is a principal arterial that is one a(the largest and most heavily travelled north -south routes in Jackson County; accordingly Jackson county does not want additional access and connections to Table Rock Road where they arc not necessary- Additionally, the proposed pmjcct will result in a complete sidewalk system around the entire perimeter of the subject block, which wi}l provide For safe pedestrian travel between the sites. • With respect to 17.75.031(A)(4)(c}, the proposed warehouse and distribution facility is occupying the entire site From north to south. 'This large 87ksf commercial building's functional and operational needs preclude construction ofan additional street east -wens that would shorlcn the block lengths. Given these observations, modifications to the standards For block perimeters and lengths can thus be found to be appropriate. C Dnvewny and paperryAcciligsStatidiuds Vehicular access to properties shall be locatod snd wristrueted in accordance wrill$ the stbWards so ford, in. the city of cwtirat Pohl Deparimtint of public Works Standani Spadhcatims and ilr%fpmr 5lar,dard ❑claats for pubic wDFes construction, Section 320. 10 M. Driveway and Property Access. Compliance with Standards: As shown on the Applicant's site plan w Exhibit 10, vehicular access to the proposed warehouse development will be directly from the new segment of Federal Way/Airport Road that will be constructed as part or the project. Ail drwewayslaccess points can and will be constructed to the specified City standards. Project complies, D. Padas7ian Omjiatira, Aadcr+e "'O"s routes for pedeAlmut travel shall be provided tl ugh IN: puhdc adffAvik ;yytan end what" nerressLwV suopipmeniod through the use of pWestrlin aceessways as requifud iv aecotnpiis;h the following: 1 Reducing distar^ces ontwaen destinations or activity areas such as public sidewalks and building entrances: 2. 0n4g+ng aug" tarries and obstacles sud+as Iragmuntod pathway syalams, wlrla streets. heavy vehlwlw tmf - and chdryrnm ir: rd by wrmct�*,9 pactasuiar, padrways vAth ctewly marked crossings and invlf,ng sidswailt desdgri 3 Integrating cVuVa and %ghfing system which offers interest and safety for pedestrians: a. Connediog pariong areas and desimtions with retaW Streets or Pedestrian acansways identified through use of disunctrvo paving uatmnft pamew swpm9. grade s0pnrafloel, or fandmaping. Compliance with Standards: The proposed warehouse development will include construction of the final segmonts of Federal Way and Airport Road. When built, pedestrian travel will be available via sidewalks around the entirety of the completed block that will be formed by the subject project and the Coslco Warehouse and FedEx properties to the nanh. There arc no existing pedestrian cdnnecuons between the CUMO and FcdEx pruperncs and ttonc are proposed as part of the subject warehouse development as it earl be found that the uses are nor anticipated to have interrelated pedestrian activity areas. E Accasswzys, Pedestrian, Pedestrian azemways miry be useri to meet the block requuipnanls of stltlaCC{ivn B 01 this sit tkxq When used pedestian accessways st,alt he devalo{wtl as illustraled ,n Figure+ 17. 75.01 WI landscaped areas nexl [a podo5tfien arAeSsways SttaA be rnainiamed. of punt nia"alS cho"n, to maintain a clear Sight zur1e bOtwoen ftm& and eight feet from the ground level Mal Page 11 Page 20 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:38 Page 19 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC A Sheets anrr Lllifitres The public streni and uldily standards set forth in gre City Or Canaal Point Daparlmonl of F'ttblic Works Standard Speciacalrona and UnlImm Standard OtWIS (Or Public Works COFMruetion shall apply to all development within the city B Block Standards. The following block standards apply to all development: t Block perrmotnrs *ball rwt oxceed two ortuawnd bail nmasured along the Mblic *treat righl•ai•way, or outside edges of ncceasweys at other acknrpvledgmi block boundary as described in subsection (B)ta) of thrs section 2. Black lenolns *hall poi a tcaad wx hundred feet bulweert ilwough At, eats Or 116d*01lan aecesswaya, measured along street rlghE-away. m the pedestdan awassway Block dimensions are measured from right-0-way to rot-Vf•way along slreel frontogm A block s peflmatw r5 the sum of an }Ides. 3 Accassweys elf private), stall stmels nraY he used to rues! the blpCk *Nth or pennn0lef standards of this sbrlion. provided they are d"rerl in moordance woo this seutkr n aril Are open to the public al all times. 4, the standards fir bklox p'ulmeEem and lengths may ba mat lfied to Ilse nwn,nnrm extent necessary Oman On written rmdings Ihal coropllanae vAth the standards are not roasonably praeLreble ar awopnate due to; a. Topographic constraints: b £g1slbsg developmeM pellerrn6 an abu" provarty *i4ch S1rKAIde the lot cal connection of strpat, or accessways, c Major public facilities abutting the property such as railroads and keewwV�: d Traffic safety concerns; e Functional and operational needs to create large co nr,arcial boirbng(s): or I Protection of significant natural resources - Gomplionce with Slands rds: The subject property is located at the south end of a partially dcvciopcd block that contains a Costco WarchoW c and gas station, and a Fed Ex Ground distribution facility. The proposed warehousc development wilt complete the dcvelopmeln of this blue by connecting Federal Way to AITOrl Road at its intersection with Table Rock Road. The width (east -west) or the existing and the future completed block is approximately 1,MO feet, and the existing length (north -south) of approximately 1,200 feet will be cxtended by approximately 675 feet with the construction of the proposed project and Fcdcral Way/Airport Road simet connection. This will rc ult in block lengths and a perimeter that exceeds the maximums in Section 17.75.031. There arc no existing through streals or accessways between the Costco Warehouse and FWE-A properties, and there are none included in the proposed warehouse development for the following reasons: • W ith mspect to IT75.031(B)(4)(b), the existing development patterns on the abutting propctties (i.e., the FodEx warehouse building and the Costco gas station facilities) preclude the creation of any additional through north south streets arnUor acces&ways that would shorten the block lengths this direction. The proposed use will be located within this block (two warehouseldistribution facilities and a large warehouse rclailcr with gas station) are such that direct street connections between and through the properties are not necessary as the uses do not create a synergy that would generate a need for general vehicular travel between the sites. • With respcct to 17.75.031(H)0)(c and d), the proposed warehouse development will construct the extension of Federal Way to connect with Airport Road at Table Rock Road, which will provide the logical and safest means of vchlcular circulation Car the area. IYlorcover, Table Page 10 Notes Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> r: Uw d nn 1215/2022 at 14:12:41 APPUCANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Damonatration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards TottEaWo Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC Page 18 Rsstdendal OH -Street Parkhlg R"Oran roil. Thu acees`YOrto parking r"uudmants are +ninimum regalremanta and are not subyeel to reducrinns par subsection (B)i E ] of lhhs sectlon Compliance with Standards: As shown on the Applicturt's site plan at Exhibit 10, there arc six accessible parking spaces provided at the cast end of Lite new warehouse building, which meets the minimum number of spaces required under ORS 447:233 for parking lots with 151 to 200 parking spaces. All accessible parking spaces can and will be constructed, striped, signed and maintained as required herein. Project complies, I. Bicycle Parking, Bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with Table 17 64 04. Bicycle Parking Requirements - Compliance with Standards: The proposed warehouse btti'tlding is approximately 87,750 square feet and thus requites 9 bicycle parking spaces under Table 17.64.04. As shown on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10, lite requited bicyele parking is proposed to be provided near Ilse main entrance on the east elevation. Project compltes. CHAPTER 17.72 SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 17 72.040 Site plan and architectural standards - In apyravlrxl, cu.dlwaally approving or danymg any situ plan and a xdr roview aPPbceuw'- the aglrevutg aurh0n1y shall base Its decision on comp&ance will die fo04mrL9 5r8n44rds A Applicable site plan, landscaping. and architectural desug. sVxsa'•Ss as set forth in Chapter 1775, Design and Development Standards: B Ctly of Ccalral Point Depm marl of PubUt Work,, 0epwVTwn, St&-4-a't Sp - and Undam Standard Details for Public Works Construction: G Accass bthty and cuff ae ncy of firs fglwng l` aAoOs to 5 'l a �k � M fob �� y ings an k le Ilrrib and properly- Imfuding- bui not EWntnd to. avitablu the premises are accessible to fire apparatus - Compliance wilb Standards: As Outlined below, the proposed warehottsc development project meets the applicable design and dl:velopmcal standards in Chapter 17-75, and both can and will meet Cite Standard SpcciCrcaliousand Uni€'onn Standard Details for Public Works Construction, as well as being accessible for Cirefighling apparatus and uperAtions. Project complies. CHAPTER 17.75 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 17-75.031 General connectivity, circulation and access standards Thu purpwse of this section uG to sasuro lhel the owwmcMy and vanspo,,rabon policies or Oro city's rransportttdun System Plan are Impignaniod. in achievIni) the pbiecpvo or maintaining and Tharxirrg 1he ctttfs Sm011 lawn anvirunmdnt it is the city s goat to bass its dmreidpmynl Aefiem on a'Ju"u al oirouldtiprt grid using a walkaifls block system 8I0ck4 may be cnmpd0ad of puhkdprivale airset hght•af"way- of acce;%Ways. Page 9 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Page 17 continued (2 Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:46 9 ` It] Sub eel Author Datelfime _ Comment Sticky Note stephanieh 12/05/2022 14:10:151 The revised Parking Demand Analysis Memorandum (Revised Staff Report Attachment "G") supplements this finding by comparing the proposed warehouse to three other warehouses of similar size by the same end user. This analysis finds that Project Murphy's proposed parking plan is within the range of parking ratios typical for this use Based on analysis of other users for this unique use, staff recommends that the proposed parking plan is justified in providing the additional parking spaces. Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Draated on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:44 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC 17,64.040 Off-street parking requirements. All uses Shall wrnply with the mrmbot of off-etr9121 padumg rrltluirefrienis idanBllad In Table 17.64-02A, R65*01 ll Oit•SMMI Parking Requirements, and Table 17.54.020. Non•Rasldenlial off -Street Parking Requlnumenta. For re4danital uses. Ina off•Sbg@I parking ,equwSurkentO era Slated in (arms of the minimum utf•etreet perking required For nvrr'raslrk meal uses- ihp oll stresl parking requirements are preaerxad in tamrs of blxh minlm4m aril rilaxlrnum off -sheet palkfng reWrad. Thu number at off-SV"l perking apaoes in Table 17.64 02B. Non•Residenw7l Off- Sir"I parking, maybe reduced M1 acGorddnfA with Subsection 8 of this section. Adiusimems to Non•Rewdantial 00Strsat vehicle Parking rtre mquuwaeart for any use not specirca% listed % hall be determined by the oommunny develUprn¢nt director on the basis of requlroments Idr similar uses and on the basis of evdence of actual demand crgaulrf by similar uses in the city and etsmMrcae, and SUtdt alher tmlar, ongrncering or planning d91a as may be available -arid appropriate lu the establishment of a minimum requirement / TABLE IP 6102E NON RES, DE`1T'AL OF1.31:AEET 92 R'{I M Rb�DI R-Pd-, lTi :LE�r a�l;zcen: e _ 8„'Adlu9arhraria td NonRrsdentisl D@-Street V`iicrle Parking. The nff•stfert padiing lagwtrmmis in TWid t164 02% N1 Rsyderdlill OR-Slreel parking R"kilr Imam¢, may be reduced, or lraeased In anY commbcial (C) K -:kkSo-1 IMI drsfner au roeoxs. t Reductions. The maximum off4treet parking requirements may be reduced by no more than twenty peic a t. 2 lricrea The off-street park" requiremoms may be Increased based qrr a parking demand enafy%x1-P Vilred b'f try 404G , as part. V dw bite plan mid arrhilnck" r view pmcess The pafku g demand wwilysis sY+alr dtmonsttate and documerhts ldstlacation far use proposed inrre.m Compliance with'Standards; The pruposxd warehouse use will occupy a new building or approximately 87;150 square feet, which would require 88 parking spaces under the grass #lour area alturnativc in;fable 17.54.02E For the warehouse use- The proposed use also includes distribution, and therefore, gttgaires additional parking for the distribution aspect or the use which is not =ountcd rot in the Citf's off-street parking ratio tables. Titp proposed site plan provides 170 parking spaces for employee use to the south and east of the of the tjvarehouse, and as outlined in dbc parking demand memo at Applicant's Exhibit 12, the 170 proposed paces is a reasonable number given the fact that the warchou3c use also includes the disiributiort of products wcc they are reccivefl at the warehouse and to allow for seasonal RuuWations in needed employees. C Accessibleperking Requirements Where parking is provided accrsxscxY Id a building, accessible park shaft be provdaA. constuuctad. striped, signed and mainlawwd as requa'ed by ORS 447.233. and 5e4111on 1106 of the tBISM Oregon Sbu Umal Specially Code as Set forth 61 lhis "Clio". t The mnimum moober or acea59ihle paddlhg ,pacw shall l>s provided for ON Vsas in accoroanca Willi the starrderds m Oregon Sjn,, tat Simcially "e. Minimum Number of Aocossibte Parking Spacos Accosslble pariOng ;pares shall be counted kward meeting on -street parking r"wamen is in Tables I ya4.02A and 17 64A28. Residmdal and Non• Im Page B Nntpc Page 17 The revised Parking Demand Analysis Memorandum (Revised Staff Report Attachment "G") supplements this finding by comparing the proposed warehouse to three other warehouses of similar size by the same end user. This analysis finds that Project Murphy's proposed parking plan is within the range of parking ratios typical for this use. Based on analysis of other users ... Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 121512022 at 14:12:49 Page 16 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC B. Signs advertising the properly -for rent' or 'for sale' shall not exceed four square feel of area on any one side and one such sign shall be permitted for each street frontage. C. Signs in the M-1 district shall be permitted and designed according to provisions of Chapter 15.24. Compliance with Standards: No signage is proposed as pail of the subject applications. Applicant acknowledges these sign standards and any neeessary permits for signage will be obtained from the City when new signs are proposed 17.48.090 Off-street parking. All uses in an M-1 district shall provide off -sleet parking and loading facilities as required by Chapter 17 64. except when located within a special district organized to provide common public parking areas. Compliance with Standards: The proposed use meets the required off-street parking and loading facility requirements as outlined herein below. CHAPTER 17.64 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING 17,64.030 Off-street loading. A. [mall dielnets for each une for which a fndd rig is to be elected or sbuctumlly altufeil Ie IM eAlenl of incrcamig die floor area to equal the rrimvnum door area required to 9rvvrde wading 3paca and vrhlch will ANlurm the recelpt of d islubulm, Of matgfials or mmthandl50 by budi w SMaN v&Rje. Oran shall Im prodded uff•sifuei loading Spree m accordance with the standards set forth in Table 17.64.01, Off -Street Loading Requirements s­er,rn ! zeaI, R_.. ear; B A loading beM shah not heless tfrerrfua Aees+ridrCty�rehat krla:[d ttave a height clearance of twelve feet Where tho vehldos genemily usefl fw 10ar}ri m unkA l essawdNifto tRriwAslons. the required length of these berths shall be increased. C lI loading space mac been fmrMvrxc ed in caDc n rnlh an tds*ig vsa or is eddad to arc amillmg use. the loading ;pace shop nut be ehmrriated if elvrieralian va resat m fdss ngarm than is required tp adequately meat the needs or the use. ffskun D. ❑li eut parg weal c,VM to kOA the raquwatneo" d Ows bde shaft not be rowtad! as required loading spaces and ehao mt be used (or loarhng and nrfoadeig uperalwns. except during parmds of the day when rngt required to rent parking needs. E In no Mae aball any pOioun of a strear or aeey be carrrfed as a part of the reglllrvd parking w toad4ug apace, W such spacoF shalt brr dpmgp erl 4md located a%to iPivld undue inhmlerence with the public use at strants or allays. Compliance with Standards: The proposed industrial warehouse use will be located within a new building of approximately 81,750 square feet that s' qutres a minimum or 6 loading berths per Table 17:6411. As depicts d on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10. them arc 26 loading berths located at the west end of the warehouse, which exceeds the ininimurn requirerricnl. project complies. Page 7 rf1[[eeY Exuding 6errh Requirement (frnc[ions rounded Notes Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> created on 12&2022 at 14:12:62. APPLICANT'S Exniafr3 tlomonstratlon of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tenlalive Plan & Site Ptah and Architectural Review Applicant: SH DevCo, LLC with the exception of automobiles and IruCks associated with the use, will be stored indoors. The facility will be operated in accordance with all applicable state and federal environmental, health and safety regulations, and there are no residential districts located adjacent to the subject property. Project can and will comply. 17.46.050 Height regulations. Maximum height of any building or structure in an M-1 district shall be sixty feet. Compliance with Standards: The proposed warehouse building will be approximately 33 feet in height at the highest point of the building parapet. Project complies. 17.48.060 Site area requirements. There are no minimum site area requirements in the M-1 district, except as necessary to provide for required parking, loading and yard spaces. Compliance with Standards: As demonstrated on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10, the subject property has adequate space to provide for the required parking, loading and yard spaces. Project complies. 17.46.070 Yard requirements. The following measurements indicate minirramr yard raquiremems in an M-1 district: A Front Yard. The front yard shall be a mia m m of twenty feet- (Also see Section 17 48 030(C)) 8, Side Yard. Tha skin yard she, be a frarwran of Igfl loot ameept whan the sldo lot liras rs abutting a W er any rmudemal lit) disticl wind than the silo yard 0-0 be a mrrrr rm at trrenry feet and shall be Increased by orie•half loot for each foot by which the buddnp helrpin wvOuds raer+ty rice[. C. Root ynrd. The rear Yard shall be a rinrmran of an Ma axceAa -Mean the rear lot line m auutting a lot in any f®sMhnlldl (Al district and Iben the roar yard Shah be a —rYrl of Twenty keet and shall be rherea"ed by Ono -hall fool for each foot by whidi the building haighl eneeeds fwenly fa -I D. Lot Coverage. No requirements. Compliance with Standnrds: As shown on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10, the "froth" of the proposed warehouse building will be setback approximately 290 feet from the Table Hauk Road light - of -way line, and approximately the same distance from the. west property boundary, and therefore exceeds both the minimum front and rear yard requirements. From the interior side: yard plYlperty line (north), the building will be setback approximately 350 feet, and from the street side yard property line (south) the building will he setback approximately 90 feet and thus the project complies with all minimum yard requirements for the t'rl• 1 district. 17.48.080 Signs. Signs within the M-1 district shall be limited to the todonreg= A I Pernulled signs shell urrlltin nrrt mole than one rrMriud square 10*1 of surface arcs on any wing side, of an aggregate of Iwo hundred square Iee1 0l etAace oe all sides wnch -� be utifaed Jar &"play purposes. 2 Lighted signs shall be indir fly illuminated and r YdLisi", 3. tdanhitralldn S" Shalt be p wrnilled wiah amy requrod Wtoack areas provided It does riot exlerA into or Nretheng 114Y parking area sida. or o0iar pubbc rigblal rear 4. Signs located within vision clearance areas at intersections of streets shall conform to Section 17 60 110 IM Page 6 NntPS Page 15 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 121512022 at 14:12:54 Page 14 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan 8 Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC 2. [1 Ilia spokcalion dorm not include residontial devolopmod- a T]A shaft be Mquilecl vdlon a laral use eppbcalton I! Involves One or more of the Idlowmg aching: l a. A change in zoning or a pan amcndmanl designatJon. b Any pmpoeed dev61OOment or land use action Ml a rope aulhonty, mCIL409 the clty, JaCksan County Or 000T, states may have operational or sbkoty noncoms along rn radlily(iesj. C. An o7vease In slip V410c volume generation by two hundred ally average daily trips (ADT) or more; d Arc Increase in peak hour volume of a par[iWlW movemont to and Prom the stale halhway by fvrenty percent or more; j e An Ineteme in use of adjacent streets by ychkies excandhg liven ly Ilwusanl pounds gross vehic3n weight by .+ tan vghlc es or more per day: ' I The tacador, of the access driveway dues orrl meet minlmunl sight distance requirements. as determined by ' the city englnm, IX is located *harp vehicles entsdag or lesvhrcy the property are resbictnd, or such YeNdes queue or haptala on the stale highway. cmabog a safely hazard trn the Nscruiion of are eonnrh,nity development 1 duosriar: or g. A rhargo In mWmal traffic parlernn Thal, in Ins disrsetlon O! the ODmmunily devoMiameni dlra tor. may cause barey problems such as backup onto a sueut or greater pcAardi l for trams; ecdddnls ! 8 Trafrre Impact Aratysis Preparauon. A trial t rrnpacl anetySis shah be Dreowed by a trait erlgiredr or rivet ONIMar + llt"Wa to practice h, the state tut Cream vrlh special training and experionce in bill 6 or,glneerkrrj. The TIA shall be prepared in accordance will, the aubik works dfWa nm F`3 dOCLIMenl entitled 'Trani impact Afuaym -' If the road I authority is the Oregon Department of ir8ngMK4lkw (00011. WnVOt ODOT'a regional devdtopMernt revue` ptann"a I and OAR 734-051,IW. r Complianee with Standards: Applicant's traffic engineer has provided a traiiic impact analysis i consis(cnt with City requirements and guidance from Jackson County Roads and City arCentral Point+ Public Works. See, Applicant's Exhibit 14- Exhibit Ill is rsphired by ATfadrmcrrl G'in the Revised I Stag Report dated December 8, 2022. ry+ CHAPTER 17.96 M-i, INDUSTRIAL 0161'RICi L�J 17.48.020 Pemsitted uses. The fallowing uses and their accessory uses are permuted in an M 1 dsbicL mrbW to ev Ugk0ane aaposad In Section 17.48.030: A Warahousxrp: 6 Storage and whdusO ng a1 prep.wed at pacitaged metharWlse' 17.96.a711 Standards for pemdttad uses. Ail uses within the M-1 district shag be subject to She following conditlans and sand rely A. Aa raw matr!nate ffnnshed products, machinery and euprrlunnrnl, oath the excerrtrn d s:arrnobies and hocks normally uwd In fin business, atn241 be Stored vrttm an anbrely onUased buildksg or noraermd !onto ,mt toss than six feet In heighl- S. The Fruity 1311a.0 be in mrapllance oath AN applkable Stale and Federal a Arnomer". hears!, aDO Safety reWWkws; C 1n any M-t district dlroCtiy Across a stf"t !funk soy residential (ft) dirMncL all outdoor parking karRng rr disptay ateas shag be set bac'R at least ton rent from the pULfir nghl-OLway arid des seil)adr area shell be planted With tnro. appimpnata far the naghborhoorl. ground ewer or other landscaping ma"'als that are consistent xndt the general axlsltng chancier of the area, or that wail w4mbkah a landscape WORM for other "vOioyxnenis In kRnvr- This vgbadt and landscapng requvemenl shag also apply to M- t fell fronting on any svofq deswaled in the cdmprehensye flan m a major arlrmat. Compliance with Standards: The proposed use for the subject property is a warehouse and distribution facility, which is a permitted use in the ivi-1 runistg.district. All matcrists and products, IMPage 5 Notes 1 I StephanjLh 1210512022 t4:Q9.39 Exhibit 14 is replaced by Attachment "G" in the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022. Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:12:58 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCO, LLC A_AnareasthaFearmotbeeenneeted-tesewerto pennitsewage-disposal-by-an engineerf.d ay9lam n aeooldw%oo, will-DeparlmanFal EnVifonmBn+al QUaly, detdWM County emmnnmeritef TIUMi y seeker,-and_-publie-works--standards-Suehrel-sizes-shell-eeRferm-to-11+G requnemenla aF-the-deeksen-County environmental-quality-seetiorr 9�hgtereA+opertq la•caMd-end 010nned Wr•Mnirresa oppndi alnai•uw. oftre widlhs-W4 rMew may W ractmed,01It" diawetion Of the-Cty Depth ead wukh M-propenles cawr eed orlaid• out -for Gomm few andindusn:01 purposes OF." he adequate to provide w-d+e elf-meet-xnlererx► pmkft, NeViea-regwred by tM f" 01 rmo- end -development WAIamldated. C-nrnp{ianLr with Sim adar0a-The•subj"4-propertyis lueawl-within•Hit- Mf-kzoningdisrtricH-in-whieh there-tire-no-site-aren le -provide f't+rregairod-perk�ft�-kwing,•and, yardslmeesi- Ai, Appiiealxs-propoyes;`-tonte We-plan-en1-9Ne pin n-at-E-:ihibits Q• and -IU.- -for tlee`proposed-indusFrial--wnrehMtse••etse-ant-develeMrani-and theiand'unc-hat FtinteRIhc widths-Prejeet eonll4m, 46.24.060-Tt mugh4otS. ThrOugh lot5-sha0-tre avoided except wtrereeMentlal ID redujov access WPM—ry a sooandmy srfrmei ahnelS w-*eeets di egvn•aWM traffic volume. -reduce occm m edjaeertt ar W rrrerr specik draedvantagas si tepupraphy and onaMWlion A -planting screen easemem *1 al W94904 xr fee nay be fe"wted Woo #w §" of.ivES attuning such adownt-s&eat Thete-shalt W nO nghl of aeom scr'aealuunh plwvlWV -a*FA es7enrnnls Eourplisnee-with Standards: rr lhraugh tots nrr prDlxr9�' A+�ees� rtr bath•patteifwill be fntrsy Federal WaylAtrportRoad; fft lheulternrltive, ifli+e prvposet4 Rmeef �werr`to-brL rrtiderc�tFu lltro-Hr�h lok nit vahicul>lractw gs to Table Rock[Load-fronv,the-sehjeo property45•1x 3ng prlrErrrset� 1 G34A17o-Let-side-lines The s fines_eHefsshaltrunatrighEangleate khesVeetupon-whiehil+e-lots-raeN�G+?lsPreeticsaeo- s+on-earhecl-streets ffwTsh&beiadiallo-ihe-euwe- GernpliRnre with -SWndt►rds:-As-delnorrstrufr&Oat- proposed lot-sidrliiwsr-fer-eoeh-or the-propowd-parcels-MR,ai right -angles to lhesimeefs tMVtV I-kx Faee�thimebeing Fedeml-Way-and•AirWrt Road,-Projfv-cortrpkL-_;t.. TITLE 17 ZONING CHAPTER 17.05 APPLICATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REVIEW PROCEDURES 17-05.900 Traffic Impact Analysis. the pufpo of "s 6ecUon of the code is to assin i ut dntemm�ung Wtum'5 rand audwnnas P&fbc; --e vt land erne dec>,y 5 and to impkmem Section 660.012.9045(M I of the State Tt-an5pwtalwe Planrang Fkk that re-wre5 the oty 10 adopt a pmceos to apply cnrrdllror . to de'+Waptnant W*Po5a15 in wdur to matlmiza MODEL% scat protect tranapormtion f8c"B5 ThlS choplip eMabflsha$ 91e 5randanls for when a devOlnpmorK proposal m0.i be re iewad law pntsnW traffic rripacts: when a traffic impact orWysls must be sutmlttud with a development aWrAmn In Wrier W dctenrmOt whedsm conditions are needed W mrinurtlyo impede to and prule0t 1r8nspntstl0a 1`30111IM5, what awnsl be st a trarfc impw3 arrahr�-t,, and who is qualified to prepare the study A When a Trafflc Impact Anafysts.15 Required The city shall requtrea Vanr[ rmpacl arwlysis IT At ae pats of an nppliralJon for development, a rhtingo In use, or a Change in acQM 0 the fclkn•1in9 sntuatirns Page 4 Notes Page 13 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/512022 at 14:13:1 Page 12 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC b In the C Ivw ofiMMtatiog: accessing, "interning, or-uperehng 46 teltiliheb io a cdy Will, easemera, a PuWlo utility or tlreafly, es•Ihe Care may be, msy move or rumors any,asphall, o&nemia, a vepl loon locoW wilhin said wtncrmwal:-A}ler-Nre lama aro moved or removed• endeker-onmplatio rof-iho necaaswry wails. the grass: asphah or *wwMe shall he repeired.@nd repleaed in -a masonehle manner at the wle cost of the pow, ulilily or-W. o: O*Plafr Wirt oe[uparun ul Prpparty 5WE,Nthl-enUUed to eompenaMmn mWed•lo dammJe5 io grass; asphalt. orcw"tC4" se. "as Ste nepBM7 mW raplamirrimlaredonein a, esaoAable manner and rn a fefto wblatime trams Compliartce wkh SrandarJyt 13�prepoled roirer is•kikrlylo resttlF }n same gres�ewterele mrdlnr asphnh-being-iniwlled. within-Eity-tit ilityrnsemenls-anal-Applicant-aeknowledges t+le Gity s ability -to itrrlall.--oftess-rrmintain-, rand-apem1e-i+s viiIitie9-ill-tiecordance•wtthAte- preyisiony•und 4Fnitatin218-of thi"tibseetion, I'.-Wale�arses=4Plhere-a- iM rs liaveaed-by-a-wateF6Ourse,-drainage-way; channel oFsfreanr thewaii" bo sequned "onRymw lBastulOnt or drainage nol-or•way WnFwmiw subsWfiewy, with -Me $rift at 7uch weteroobese: am.F sudh-NOOM width as-wd- be- sdaatuale-for-Me prxPox:SdeaiO, Parkwpy9 *¢-Bateau-faedo-parallel to -Maier walereeuf5es-mevbe "vued. Cramp+isnrc with 81sllt+ards:-•Fhe stibioa. property-is-prem.propea)-is-prem. ed le tle c+nfsnliei¢tec4 andpnr+iFirmed irate two parcels- rhe, h Fkre-n* wetereoursts-Ihnt-imrverse-eithervnf t1a -proposed parcels- C. pede4Ytan Ways 4n -2oy igadr fr+er sowcrr rnrnWed mty Beat m•onnlb a pedesViBn wAY awy h6 regwed-The- mw irrnxn wtdfh of.the pade5nart"04.oLverry must be at hart six reel-M wlAlh which strati to hbN sudwmd Ihf000 the bftK and curb b curia:, order-lo lamA o- y-acam ID schools, PH*%shoPWn?Wnlerr. mass VanapsAalWn steps or odrer coamumty-serv;Les: Mcw+dl fegkwe bocks loraler than twelve-Nno ed•lm I:-lwa pedestdan wayty may required W aemhtnifian aedcV+an Val Wk4 A"-asemerw WheoeseenlrallbFPa? oarMerApol dkich wuyA retry be requaed Ip*xw.-rl MILary btc[i gafu;W4o eF9treeasmsY-0e-9pprWedwNhblrFpadesatenways Il e in 9tcffi' �of vdNc sa" ComptimreB vvirh Stalydnrds: Tile-stlbjeet-pFoperly-is logefed-wifhilf efr+ntitfstr+err3arrr inavhieh e pedrs+rian way-thfniteh thr sub)eel-pmpeny•lo Ihe-esistirtg•devedopment-ttr-the-novas(CtAtcro anti FedFs) anti-voolh ti xOW&M-�-. ehrrahnlyiy tlnrlftessnry-mud i111PM to eiventhe-f".ofttses-in Filefhfela- Sidewalksexist-aksngTRW- Rm4-Rof d-. Hmnrick.Wtty; and Fedefttl Way. anc++vilI be eorntrueted along -the adbjectprolxrty s ftem ge-xy-pert-of the-Federal-Wa"irpttrl Roadoxtensitm- Tiaseside+vs3kswill prnride at#fxluttte meanrvlpadesfrimrtrftvet: A- The city may, VrW O* +k6andeny apWWm * #W VICc babmp of airy fol bPanymanner It theaftect ol3whe"W" auet w ukVbe-1,.hNgti C � d a rta� use S iiv lot Shell- be veal±•) � 4 v,..Wt4.Nsu! ,e with all of this node mrrp}+ance witk Staedards: Thestrhja-t-prgxroy ispropose&to be-panihon"WI-into tw"reels: one of which..wjH-be-de++elope&.w i+ttiaslrferwnrehaeese ami a+islribaiion-centff. a ttse-tvbieh-ispemlitted %vifhin the• ttrlderlyin9- M-r-1oni1194Mriel: -The-two-prlYpased parcels tlr, in enrnplilmr�wifh-Istl applieahlepro+ isions oFlhis•code as owki ed-hereiltooder-frith said frrtfling9 ac+t>pled xst+etnorr�trating sotnpliance w4r1hi 0anttarfl 16:24-OS4 Lai* -& eie arrd dOtMnw.atia,- Lot srxas strrsll owlmm wan OV m," ordiri x andihall be aWlroltrwln fel Ihaincaticn 01 fheaubdiVISkm and rot Nro-yp& d tleveWparenl and toe ccd tenrpra93A to the vie of kregolaf-loll-ilia, W4h -_Jhak be me0sured elonq-#w"m-buddirg 6 -- In sip wse S"Ji. fhe be mare Itain two and onnholf knas the wrdlh. C mr lohrfor-residonW tw shaA have serrfi nt width to pe mit appPoprrase tviEdmg s-tbaek hnn+ and orientation le blob streels. Page 3 Notes Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/512022 at 14:13:4 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC CHAPTER 76-249LtlGIfS-AN&LOTS---DES' N-&TAMDARDS 16:24.a 10 8hackn —Length; whtlh amt a hape, The tengtha. o(liths and shapes of blocks shall be de"ned with due eagmd•10 Urovldeng adegvote Iwrldireg srtes�dable to d+"po049i-neede94 the type. aad use 4ontemplalad; neoda'for convenienl-aepf95: uWeuWwri. control a-nd y Foty of -sirens lfaffie-and-limitations-and-epperW rxAesef{opegreph�'. "mpl;ante-wirtr InneF>;rds As dcfrtorla[snteci an Applieent'T si e-p ft-OvEx"li{-Ff e-Prfspose<1 pa=6 urrvr are , degttate-sire afrd--"--pfo-,ide-eenvef fe.,r aeees*-and-eifeula•fier rr,�� a;'r;; a.,�rII�t.,r.: wurehause nsettnd-the assceints�-st[xtnwefer-l'aeiFitirS:--Plv�ject eamplies: Bbeksshag rat aneeedtwelve hundred- Fee Wengthexeeobleeks-a4a H"Aerialslreets nlessthe ¢revlen8udjaMxtl Iayoutoutopegrapht at oortfi5 jus* o rant en -The-reeemmended-minimam-disfarree�etweerirlersoudars art er�+sal streets 2e-hundred-FeeL ewmpliaucc with SFendnrds- WayR4ifpen•Rtxtti-exittnimrarevt by the existing strws I inti-nie bei rigtemneeiled—Theresulting-No&-lesfglh•boween-Fedml-Wfty•nnd- Table-Reek-ROR 4 ia•Pfilwipal-Mlerial s}reetd will-be-approx•imalely-1 Of - feei: No -new •inter,3Mions are -pro". ed ot,-required lakntg-Table R�o&-Roatd:-Frajwt•enatplies, A U*Ty LNlea; Emarne,45 kw efieeaiak esO+-09ler-non-ay-owmal Kai UWItim tray be,equked, and %halFbe, a � e1 iCrt keOn wrdrh kr aled an *h emterter pofliim of a-ngfa- mp". Easetrarff of olry UNdi" (r. V.. Watar,•stomr drain and yaniiarys ty.w..-m;Ktg}shaf beaninirxan-offiaeen-feetirrwidth4aaaled-ewth"xterierjrrtien ofa-single-propefty. Tm-ba[+ ezkWftms 59.41161 rude by nreMy teen" shell be provided lot uttlily PWk 01" lot krcr ett dm^9e Of dverato pm its of eaae~% -�incated,wateta Gh UQty Easement of E*cW Jar Fes= uHRes one for sign wf em developed in momdence wllh Ch"Inf-15Q4 Ifr. Godel; " pe.sen 9W 400ita. w buct vrcenlewa krbcata a Struok" (es defined it Chapm 1fi.05lwtthin a cdyu ty naaamer!(e� dek-W r C %uw 160a}• axre W." pfovided in sabsgcbons lA)(1}(b} ared(A 1(2) a1 thm twn b: 0oft /oon1&V/R the oty may approve Fanc+etg: rmxrcle Mack wallwkrwting. rota"waltr, and eatKAi #hat are of}rerwi5e 01 omTgf GMe wish are buildkeg 1100. and "th the cSearemere pfogt§M risaoted hete'n. -an e'�mOffl5abiocl In the totlowing toga mman ntse I Said fi c .q a. r.f7 StUO fO5 CNO nTterigre wtlh the xegtaiMegn: I ON lantenW, 90M% or-opeialion of a pi,dabc Aioy c oil may+'maybe-farnoved by thelretkyjW&Aderofthe city al -the 5e69 CCSI gtcwree li—Any matt-nenl or miaeaeon eF-ihe-Feneing-of waltstweFUres-shalF-E IN-the`sele east -of the pmpaft owrt�5r ocm giiNt R--Ow"en.end amoo nts.0 Mot" l dAa eo pentLion-fa demeges rdefed to remou W of fbe ienrit>fjatvetlr straetvres CampIkmLe with-Stanrhwdse-The neettssary. lid-foot-publie otilityeasiments earirand-ivi II hr pmvided alone II1, tloreas(-right-of-war Iineokhe Federal tray exteastorran&along-tile %Vesrright- ol war tn4jnerm 1c Partet �. Pkd6s alortg-lho-Swath rigltl-ol'Kvay-bdvndtrry will be- provided by f aUre developmtetit or paneels-1e-the-satilthr-No'- nzeEtrrrr Itnrpruptas-Withim-asty-eMti"--City Iitility easemet areas-Pmjeet-t ompkes: ,2-C,rmla-A5p1vrtl: And Eenenrts MemNed wilhin a GHy Okty Edsamen! a:-Skftpe# to ttvs WRt akp n- of the briilding coda. lawful owners and oeculkln3s-of-peepraty may rcst:ttl grans. 850h.-4tan,Y wn01eiu 5011vn+t e1y Irirkly rtOsernant Page 2 Notes Page 11 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:13:7 Page 10 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TITLE 16 SUDDlYWAO 9 sHAF=TE4"r:e4&ENERA"44GVGKWS 16-44,014-Seepe•ol teguiafien9- Tira provis!Ma of INN bae snail•aft" 10,;3il stlbdNrlior*- (jBfw "w6wW plenned vrht d"alopmenle, end all sboets nr-o liw w Y'' 9rz'at6Yt lhcyehY; U 4kf55 O4heN'iW sPeriRcaHy urweded. CHAPTER. W.211ST E TS-Ml) 0 HERAVAYS—DES1GH-STANDARDS 46.24-040-6reatm n9f slFeets. h-Sl�eetsereelMtrl su6dmwxi a•ani pwp wm slmri ae dcsrSr+cW-ard wnsrnmfrd m w(1fuf M aM with 0W4j Qulremenla ef-Ipeeity's-eompfehepsKv pan; thka code Hie ei9Ye VMhlieHnv►salardareM. An4 dWeerdiliens-established -hy-the-eity. B- �'Hte enre4ualion•aF�lrea4sehNl-ine[�tSewbpmdeee5aasPl+Naa carp^ale Nuina+W: surbr*Ntt[v�. 5iduwatka. s5am draiMWe ifeeF4gs- nsbeeHighlipg, and Ul'A"MWKIkiffil&s C: ADstfeatS; indud"•YwOro L 11MC-r'f1'^ 'w=i- ter a`a Y wdftv&l Of 1'e-Her i mentioned M nM turetred'ag paragrvo,-sMrA be dediralnd to IhacisY.. G-ornplianee-wit"fandards:—T#ec-prallo" !-wjll- a u#}-ittiheeer:aslnsLKeurreel'-t#:reon new ing segnnont-of-Fidi rel 1Vny%Atrpor4-Rtraa�Se"pplkeEAt-s•pmOosedtentalive ktlan and wits plan at Exibitg ancF M.— The nece3sary-ri$hl-al Avav•wili-be-dedic'atte #d kart#te 6++y by k+rxsFpint rct�r(liltg: Thiskru%I-and-aH•appartenartt Pnblie-iaeiIities %V01-ebuilt wCAY weal sercek spiv i#iratir�rlw,•�rojrek eomphe4 ;•&20�2g-Sheets--6enerely: The k aalim}- wwd1b. and grade at -strauta eVw be Canydere'S r'reue 3)e- s ar�yl� �p�lea�nned streels� � Fnpographifm1 ooWDaim an they reWff la drairrage-erhy the Opaiwaw at the w9Mf- 94/pl5'(x'�'1n5 -e0 i canretnerwa and wlelY wad ekoa r apptep wo relation w lho prod t35- of tea tw*'- tube se,,-d t-'3 %yeets where lonason n ml grwvra nt a derelpptnanl plan the airarrgamenF Or elreens in a sutxdrnaa+sisas �rftc A. • Predde inrFlrr tan4nueiron d aAPfoptiala wote[Eat of e�-7brr7 sae�.n 5's�'ew+du><Sa�em; tx 6: •Cufltwrn to -Tar -Plan lei the aerghborhnrid-rporrovrd er-wwood br +,a t1Y to n'eet-e-parbewnr vtwian where tepegmphie [F otheF- ditiens+nake-eenlentanesarapll&lfrw^ 4n �teshr-g�stre ir"wwbeBV GoInplia nee -wits 5kandar6r:---Fhr-propu5e+-rwtd cxtrrwiun-wiiFeeiHh-,-t-Fetieral-Wny-find •rlirintn Road ai Fable Ruck Read and mill znstne-appropriate t,,irclrle¢i0*fin ! rvnmttetFvity iitr khe arele-Preyjecl eetttP+ies %-2043USldewalks. Sidewalksshall-be eenstraeleed-in-aewr iwwe-wrg,7uch sw"Janlsas-%P 06VhW by thO01Y;S Talk-eenslraeliorrshelFbe wi-m-�clrW4WKkW k34 W w-W * 19Y bAd" —per' 91a^b"9$ eefhScatcaFaorvP---Fur- any carebualrnn uparr.sald kirks dual•let-N* aWivaliwr Fates budding perm'i sh,l bq ip 'Aed wgwtg a rqur'em f4 in Yre btWdmg permit. for eonsFwelien-ef-slAewelksiaeiYy's sFat�3ards Complidace wide Sttentittrels^ Rs shown rm ApplSilt;-pifn"VNxhibit••l{l: skk1witliks are Imipoed tulle oamtrueted along-bn "des-oF the -Fide I-ll+ay4.AiTen Rood-exten lion-and-wiil be eottsistentyriththa Ctdywtflntlrtrds-P rujett-��ampl des: Page 1 (Votes Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:13:8 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC additional storm drainage facilities, can feasibly and will be constructed in accordance with the Central Point Dement of Public Works Standard and Specifications and the Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction. C. Accessrhilily and suiteiency of fife rrghiing taeifilles to such a standard a5 to ptavlde frx the reasonable Safely Of Ilia, limb and propeny, including, bul not limited to, suitabla gates, access made and fire lanes so Thal al buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus Conclusions of Law: The City concludes that the design of the project provides for adequate fire access. The proposed warehouse building has vehicle parking and mancuvering areas on all four sides from which fire apparatus can conduction firefighting opcmtions, and at 33 feet in height, aerial apparatus access is not required per comments received by the Applicant at a pre -application confcrcnce with City staff. Finally, all driveways and vehicular drive aisles exceed 20 feet in width and can provide for fire apparatus access. Cs l Notes Page 9 Page 9 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Page 8 Created on 1215f21722 at 14:13:110 Findings of Fact and CondivIlans of Law Tentative Plan & Sile Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC 11rRy�,hirpnk Rued to salve the projeet.- Eli d that -these N-Lluiremcnts wit} tt+et-t;tl�suglr I{te ttsleesihon of eondih,&ns-ofVplmbaF. G.-parrilion anprovemenje=shak be constructed prior- to apprewwf offhe MOO POrfiNornplatunless,-in ft aity3-sole eirsenawaz doferrat H afiovrW-In-Ott cafes ol-daferral,-the-.aopheam-sh,+either-meaute anagreet-1. for rmpruvementetatd aomply wdh the bond nequhemerda of 15"Oon 16:12.071) era• 16.42:0WOR" Illle; of shell e 0mity a elekw0d inipnbVerrtentagfa8menl-whirJt shah tie 00 fa ftwO o7nlekr Cueh WOCWed by-rityand shell -he meomifed #FW-be btrrdirig Wen and nxl with ., -the-land-ea��t ahe�pplieanFa fl sueoessers-iwinleresL Cbnelusions-of haw: The-Planning•Ctrminrssion-eanaludesth:tE lt4i recillired iffl-1mvemerr1s will eitlier heeonytruttetl peter to�ppmval of Ih�Frnai pint e>�isa+tld+d-Par in acevrdtmce with lheseprovisions-anal subjeet•to1.developin nd-agfeetl m with -the City - SITE PLAN & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CRITERIA Chapter 17.72 SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 17 72.020 Applicabil'sy. a Moro, Proimlx The k Apwnsg are major prof" for alp ptalxrres of ow site pl all Mod af[`AP94 ttrliir rewsw pn ww are sublet! Illrype 2 pr-edural mitnromad6 as "t firth tic Chapter t 7.fl 5, Appli0atior*s and Types of Review Procedures 1. Nevi cr nsbucfionn, including private and public projects, that: a Inchedes anew building or budding addition of five thousand square feet or more: b_ In judes the construction of a parking lot often or more parking spaces: Conclusions of Law: The Planning Commission concludes the proposed building is new and at approximately 87,750 square feet it therefore requires site plan and architectural review. 17.72 Site Plan and Architectural Review 17.72040 Site plan and archdecruml standards. Rp epprovmg. pmdrhr ally approving, or dp" any Situ plan and arclriturlwal rmirrw apOicaluxi. the araprm•ng au4ronty shoo lba�. As decmw un compliance wd' the ratlo4dng slandx+ds. A Applicable siye plan, landscaping• and archdeclurdl deno standards ds Nel Inrlh rr Crklpt4r 17.75. ck—,q, and Deva opmeul Standards: Conclusions of Law: The Planning Commission herewith incorporates and: adopts Applicant's Exhibit3: DMIOrstration orCompliancewith Applicable Development Standards. and bascd thcrctlpnn, concludes the application is in compliance with all applicable site plan, landscaping, and architcoural design standards in Chapter 17.75. B city of conTrai porn Oe"truent of Public Works Department Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard oek�ls fof Put& Wort[! Construction: Conclusions of Law,. The City concludes that the proposed project will be located on a discrctc parcel that is newly created with most public improvements ncccssary for the dcvclopment already in place but that any additional new public improvements, such as IM Page 8 nl nficc Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:13:11 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: 6H DevCo, LLC 16. Fire and Police Protection: The subject property is located within and served by Fire District No. 3. Police service is provided by the City of Central Point Police Department. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The following conclusions of taw and ultimate conclusions are reached under each of the relevant substantive criteria which are recited verbatim and addressed below. The conclusions of law are supported by the Applicant's evidentiary .exhibits at Section 11 - including Applicant's review of applicable development standards (Exhibit 3) and the findings of fact as set forth in Section IV herein above. Choplof 16.36 MAd6R-AN"tNGR-b1WD-PAR-T41l9NS %,3Gow Fraquirementa- A AIFnugw and mlrpr .W.! penillorxi lnay, @5A apl%111HH1 Of appinval; p10Yid�rPr uaploveeicr>ts rndudxv3iusbs gdim+r--as" stfecis, 5KJewa*.A; vndergroundWilms and such odw-wpnwenient� M-shaFa bedcerned apfimprialeaad n0VM6 ry by the wily 00MOVI as a condilion 6t swoval, wish a&5rxir irrpKwewavds to mftr om slmf r fegdiml lef 5uhdlvigapdt9 undar aas Title: Cpneleslons l'ht III anIli ng-Coltnnsssalvn herewitlt im:o"mtw_/ :anti -nclVp the Dentormmt ion or ollipl ianmW ith appl ieablo pzvelopment Stamiarrts-in Applleaul`3-Exhibit 3 and enrxhade+ thetrwapvn tlx+t-Eietfcrepttse+i a tlensism of-Fexk�+l Way Airport Road -will erelstG ahrm:elleci-ilnpruvetnents-te scrv�►he-prejeeE im�i vl=tktaessenee t+FNyisprajeclars+lrlppkicentproposesthe-1'akfoMtrg-condition stnienere 1Vtt{l-n to pubs ic-improftmeWimi ng: • Peivr to�uildin permit #ter venical rc�nsntie4w7 APplieant snail provide nnd-the-c-ity shall-Feviesvan"ppteve•tlse•Pabite-lmprovenxent- Plans %s-the PRAiticm ttts*G"i11 eoordmelte nwie+v�axi appEnval {ty C tternabaxencies Vike hfec4Fcxd llfeerrEon"issitm end•kVS%. ■ prior. in•wilding-pemtlt Applicant-ntRy-post-u•bondi fvr-the public-•improveltients• �t:�p[ablc- ttr-thy-CitT�ea«upvR--the-8ppEcwed •�axblte Improvement- Phtns: • Ptior to, tneupauey--ol' the --building.-the-•Applieent-shaki-compleu the --Public Intpnsvernetuarin-altOOM1811Ce vttls the epprctved-Ptthlje.-Improvement--Plans: •htwe-the isnplr�vclnenlsnecepletiby-the appiicableagawie­­.anddtdientr=lh"-m'. eight oFway peF iheicnletive-plal•fiad-re erfFthe III no1-piat: $.art -me 6ax at-nvgor-p,,l tivnar.0 *,,aLs-of foads io meal lltastarr65rderequired for aubdhimkm ondef dus 7ilie-Bnd-sFfdN-be dodimled l6 the city In the Tian* fl*flr r as sibdnigion tomift end at**" Conclusions of baw. The Planning-ConimiavinfreoneIuckes that-4}tr pritilnrsed nlajtir-Partition inchides-dedicalion ol�-lhe- necessary-lendfor; and -the construction of tkte extetrsinn of Fadeout XM Page 7 Notes Page 7 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:13:12 Page 6 Findings of Fact and Cenetusfans of Law Tentative Plan & Sita Pfiat and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo. LLC West: The Bear Creek Greenway, a multi -use trail that stretches from Ashland through Central Point is located to the west/southwest of the subject property. South: Lairds south or the subject property are zoned M-I and developed with singlt- lainily residences. At the southeast comer of the subject property and abutting Table Rock Road is a 0.55 acre parcel zoned M- I and occupied by AA Electric auto parts store. The City of Central Point owns a 0,28 acre parcel on the south side of the AA Electric property that will be used far the extension Of Airport Road across Table Rock Road where it will connect to the Federal Way extension that will be pan of lire subject development project. 10. Topography: The subject property is relatively fladlevel. 11. Water Facilities and Services: According to Information provided by the City in a pre - application conrereaM there is a l2-inch waterline located in Federal Way that can and will be extended to the proposed warehouse development. 12. Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Services: According to comments received from Rogue Valley Sewer Services (RVSS) in a pre -application conrcrcuce, there is an existing 8-inch sewer line north of the property in Federal Way from which service can be extended to the site 13. Storm Drainage F'acilifles and Services: Stormwater detention facilities will be constructed as two dry ponds as shown on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10. Stormwatcr outfatl from these ponds will be directed to the vacant parcel that will be located on the west of Federal Way. Said detention facilities will be designed to accommodate all stormwater runoff from the warehouse development. 14. Wedands, Streams and Floodplain: There are no wetlands identified on local or national wetland inventories. As shown on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10 and the 1-lydroiogy Map at Exhibit 8, the FEA4A flnodway from Bear Creek extends slightly into the wLst and southwest portions of the subject property. No structures will be located within the floodway or noodplain. 15. Transportation and Access: A. Access and Circulation: Access to the site will be from Federal Way and Airport Road, and there will be a total of five driveways along the property frontage as shown on the site plan at Applicant's Exhibit 10. B, Transportation impact,, rrom Propased Development: Pursuant to pre -application conference comments and follow-up commuitications between the Applicant, the City, and Jackson County Roads, a trip gcneratiotr analysis was required to evaluate and determine the intersection configuration for Table Rock RoadlAirport Road. The analysis is attached at Applicant's Exhibit 14. The Applicant's traii-ic engineer calcolatcd trip generation fiat the project. The Applicant's traffic engineer also analyzed Icvct of scrvlet (LOS) and lane configurations at the intcr.%mtion of Airport Road and Table Rock Rerad. The analysis sbows acceptable levels of service at the studied intersection and recommends the proposed lane configuration of Otte tecciving lane, and one left -through -right eastbound approach. Page 6 Nnta� Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:13:13 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo. LLC with the proposed warehouse use, while the westemmost resulting 2.78 acre Parcel 2 will be used forstormwatm outfall and otherwise remain vacant land at this time. The partition also includes the dedication of land for the Federal WaylAirport Road right-of-way extension, and the construction of said street to Standard Local Street specifications.I Thu project also includes an application for Site Plan and Architectural Review Ufa new -87,750 sgWrc foot industrial warehouse and distribution facility. Tho proposed warehouse is a concrete tilt -up design that measures uppruximately 33 Feet in height at the highest point of the parapet, The warehouse will have its main entrance facing east towards Table hock Road, while the north elevation will[ have five stcct roll•tsp doors that will provide for the loading of freight onto del lvcry vehicles. A future canOpy will extend the rut[ length of the north elevation to provide shatter from weather elements. The west elevation wilt contain 13 insulated sectional overhead doors with dock shelters to uceommodate the delivery and unloading of goads into the, warehouse. See. Applicant's exterior elevations and site plan at Exhibits 10 and 11. Parking for warehouse employees will be provided to the south and cast of the building, while an area for company vehicle storage wilt contain 215 spaces on the northern hat r or the site. The coropa ny vch lcl es Will travel In aclttckw 1Sc direct ton from this veh i Cie storage area to the north side of the warchousc where they will be loaded before teavin& the site via Federal Way. Landscaping will be provided around the perimcterof the site and within both the eiuploycc parking lots and the company vehicle storage area as shown on the landscape plans attached at Exhihit t0, and as further described in Applicant's Exhibit 1: oemonstration or Compliance with Applicable NvcIopmcnt Standards. Development of the warehouse property wilt require the extension of Federal Way to the south and east to connect with Airport [toad and Table Rock Road near the southeast corner of the subject property. The necessary land ror this street will be dedicated to the City and the new Federal W-4ylAirporl Road segments will be constructed to the City'5 Standard Local Street specifications. Land Uses on Abutting Properties and Surrounding Area: Worth: Federal Way is an improved Standard Local Street that currently terminates near the northwest corner of the subject property and the lands to the cast and west of Fcdcral Way up to Flamnck Road are zoned iM - I. Directly abutting the subject property between Federal Way and Table Rock Road there is a FcdE% Ground distribution facility and a Cost- warehouse store and gas station. bn the west side of Federal Way arc several small vacant parcels, an XPO Logistics facility, and Umpqua Dairy Products. To the west of these uses and northwest of the subject property is an M-2 zoning district primarily occupied by Knife River Materials. Slist: The subject property is bounded on the cast by Table Rock Road which is classified as a Principal Attcrial s[rec[ that is under the jurisdiction ar Jackson County Roads. The property directly across Table Rock Road is located within the City of Medford corporate limits and is zonud Light Industrsl and dcvetopcd with a Columbia Distributing facility 0mverage distributor}. The Sumo reselling pawl configuration and rightW-way dedication could also be achieved through a property line adjustment and dedication by deed for the nght-of-w¢y land. Page 5 Notes Page 5 e4 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:13:15 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC IV FINDINGS OF FACT The following facts are established and found to be true with respect to this matter: 1. Property Description and Location: The subject property contains approximately 17.87 acres (per survey) and consists of three tax loss within the corporate limns of the City of Central Paint described in the Jackson County Assessment records as Township 37 South, Rangc 2 West, Section 128. Tax Lots 800, 900. and 902. The subject property is vacant land located on the west side of Table Rack Road and northwest of its intersection with Airport Road, See, Applicant's Exhibits 4 and 5, 2. Ownership: The subject property is owned in fee simple by Table Rock Business Park, LLC. 3. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation: The subject property is classified as Light Industrial (LI) on the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. See, Applicant's Exhibit 6. 4. Zoning: The subject property is zoned M-I Industrial. See, Applicant's Exhibit 7. S. Lot Legality: The paree:l that is Tax Lot 800 was created March 19, 1946, by The Warranty Deed recorded at Vol. 284, Pg. 91. Tax Lots 900 and 902 were created in their carom configuration on June 13, 1974. when Tax Lot 902 was divided from Tax Lot 900 by the Warranty peed recorded at O.R. 74-07980. Al the time of this conveyance in 1974 the subject property was zoned County 17-5 which requtred a minimum parcel size of 5 acres. While Jackson County had not adupted proccdurrl requirements for partitions ut that time, the conveyance did not meet the zoning standards for the F-5 district and therefore the conveyance can be considered an illegal partition. That noted, and white records indicate that no permits have been issued for Tax Lot 902, iL can also be argued that the 1974 split of Tax Lots 90O and 902 was authorized when the properties were annexed to the corporate limits of the City of Central Point and allowed to remain as two separate parcels. 6. Existing Development: Over the past few years the subject property has been used for the staging of construction materials and gravel processing, but prior to this the Site was vacant for 30+ years. 7. Existing Frontage and Access: Federal way currently terminates near the ri lweet comer of the site and is where. the subject property has existing acccss. The subject property is also bounded on the cast by Table hock Road; however, there are no points of access slungTablc Rock Road which is classified in the City's Transportation System Plan (TSP) as a Principal Arterial street. Additionally, the City of Central Point owns a parcel adjacent to the subject property and Table Rack Road, where the Applicant proposes to construct a new City street. 8. Project Summary: The proposed project includes an application for a tcmative partition plan to consolidate the existing parcels that comprise the sitc and partition the property into two new parcels, with resulting Parcel I being approximately 13.5 acres and developed Page 4 N nta. Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:13:16 Findings of Fact snd Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Srta Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCc, LLC III RELEVANT SUBSTANTIVE APPROVAL CRITERIA The following are the relevant substantive criteria prerequisite to approving Tentative Plan and Site Plan and Architectural Review applications: CITY OF CENTRAL POINT SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE Tentative Plan Criteria 16,36 Mnlor and Miner Land Park lions 16d6.030 Requirements. A At[ majer and mxtor land patliRw.s may; eaa condrtiort of approval, prowl- for mptoremems urctudmg curbo, guHers:asphalt *Heat5-sldcwaA9: underWoond ubsims e1d3uf`h other mrprovements tk& zrwu be deemed appropaikle andreCeSSOry by the city, avuf6l as a doadrtion of approvaf,r*0 all Nmh improvements to meet jiv .3olldard6 ecqukad for s0divrsion5 uadM this btda %.. in. Hte case- 01. major- parbbo w all slreerr, or -rondo shall be wwoved'w meet §%,s&wxh d5 requmtd for subolmsrxt% under Ih4 Wie. end -shag to dedicated to 0te oily n the, Sarno Mannar e>6 rHrei[rt reeds and Streets. 6 Pafbtiextrmifrovemettls-shale be cunslfucled Wrar to epprovat of tite Final parbbon pit-brtlMMOM"E+lp%a wie discretion- deferral is-allrlwod In Bit I:ksds of defenaf; ehe•applfoant-slMr: erttrar-mod for 1mpr0venre0l9 errd CM"* Willy fi to bond req IMMOm%Vwe115art1612970 arr�f612,010 dihis Ud, sha31 emcule.a deferred knprawmartt aVeement, wwO shalt be m a fate and eanlart such I "MAS Ste specrfred by cd1' and 5fto11 her recorded find be bindwg upon and fun wrlh the land and bind the-appioaat and all sucoessas in interest. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT ZONING ORDINANCE Site Plan and Architectural Review Criteria 17.72 Site Plan and Architectural Review 17.72.020 Applicability. 8 hta, a Projects the IOXuwing We 'ma}pr prg4ct5 fw mu purposes fir s4a clan and wchl4ectuml renew process and are sublact to rype 2 procedural wcjuiraments as sat forth in C,isapL+r 17 OS, Apphcebons Bid Types of Review Procedures: 1 New construction, including private and public projects, that a- Includes anew building or building addition of five thousand square 1ee4 or umrw, b. Includes the construction of a parking lot often or more parkng spaces: 17.72.040 Site plan and architectural standards. In approving, conditionasy appfnving. or denying arty site ptan and archflms at .gnaw appication• Mn apprownry outhurtty shaft base fls decision ort wrnyliance w is Ute followmg sterwdandn A. "rable rile Plan landscspitfg. and arcturecturdt dosgn standards as sat forth in Chapter 1 r. f5. Desigo and Development Standards; B- City of Central Point Department of Public Works Department Standard SI"r icabons and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction: C Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting Naldids td VKh a standard as tv No de (Or Tno reasonable safety a tire. fir"b mild property, including, but not ROO W. suitable gates. access roads and fire lanes so thaT all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus Page 3 Notes Page 3 Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:13:17 Pape 2 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & SM Plan and Afchitectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC EVIDENCE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATIONS Applicant herewith submits the following evidence with its land use application: Exhibit 1. Completed Tentative Partition Plan and Site Plan & Architectural Review application forms Exhibit 2. Applicant's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (this document) { Exhibit 3. Applicant's Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Exhibit 4. Jackson County Assessor Plat Map 37-2W-12B Exhibit 5. Vicinity Map on Aerial Exhibit 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map i { Exhibit 7. Zoning Map V Exhibit S. Hydrology Map l II Eahl6it-9:—Pr6poscd T>ent5ttive Nut itron Plan lj Exhibit 10. Proposed Site Plan and Landscape Plan li CLO Site Plan l L1.00-2.51 Landscape Plans j EL00-L06 Photomenics Plans ll Exhibit I1. Exterior Elevations l Exhibit 12. Parking Demand Analysis Memo Replleced by the Parking Demand Analysis Memo dated November 10, 2022 (Revised Staff Report Attachment 'G'1( Exhibit 13. Title Report ❑1 Exhibit 14. Traffic Generation Analysis Replaced by the Trip Generatrnn At)atysis Memo dated November 21, 2022 (Revised Staff Report Attachment 2 Page 2 NntPs 1 ste hanieh 12/05/2022 14:01-28 Replaced by the Parking Demand Analysis Memo dated November 10, 2022 (Revised Staff Report Attachment "G") Replaced by the Trip Generation Analysis Memo dated I November 21, 2022 (Revised Staff Report Attachment "H") Comments summary on <Attachment B_Annotated Applicant's Findings.pdf> Created on 12/5/2022 at 14:13:20 ATTACHMENT "B" 1 BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION 1 / FOR THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT f JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A TENTATIVE PARTITION PLAN AND SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 3791 TABLE ROCK ROAD, WHICH IS ON THE WEST SIDE OF TABLE ROCK ROAD ACROSS FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH AIRPORT ROAD. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT AND IS MORE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOTS 800, 900, AND 902 IN TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST (WM), SECTION 12B. Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC Owner: Table Rock Business Park, LLC PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF/LAW NATURE OF THE APPLICATION Applicants Exhibit 2 Revis•? Applicant, Hit DevCo. LLC (hereinafter Applicant), sctks approval of a Tentative Partition Flan that will consolidate three existing lots into one and partition the consolidated tuts into two parcels, and Site Plan and Architectural Review for a new industrial warehouse and distribution raciiity of approximately 87.750 square feet. The proposed "rentwivc Plan wit also include dedicatiun ❑f land for right -of --way to extend Airport Road to Federal Way, find the construction of the roadway therein as a Standard Local Street. 'rhe subject property is approximately 17.87 acres and is identified as Tax Lots 800, 900, and 902 on Jackson County Assessor's Map 37-2W-12B. Page 1 nlntoe Page 1 2 at hanieh 12/05/202213:59:24 Revised G%F()H M30H 319VI WIT AHdkinW i33ro?jd I �r� 1A L cal (N cn IIV13d JNUHJII AHdanw ioBroad NYId h�Id�If1W SOINAINMOHd ���rorid w GI�JZI1f INS I � sI iqiq1 � 1 ram• 1 I f.. f I rn m 00 n E- M NVId S31b13V101OHd IWI)l aa!DNV-IN3 UJOH (((L .kHdNniN CR 103rONci � i 01 m I Q0 Ln M `v UJOH O' AalwN NVId S01 11"3AO Hd AHd2if1W 103fONd I i 41 4D., 'M'O'tl 7n.n, I♦ 1 III 1 I 1 CD F Q [.1..1 , uj 1, E. Y , 1 f F I 1 1. r Q 1 � W i 1 1 • }a 1 A Y � 1 L r i � 1 1 1 f I 1 0666�..! iil�....//ii i pl I h I I � —1 f � 11 � i W , UJOW(Aalwl)i | � �;� / ( j{ ��|� ! / | i i i !| ; �� �\ }i |;!) t\�� / |� ��||| In �}.\ �� �| ! } ;�.�g�z !{ |;�|;; ' k���� '�� | � ,(;� � \ . �|\1 j j ;!! ; �!�\;� ||� ��9� / �}�i�� ��}�� �� ��� t|ik\\!!/ ,l�� - §'!'/!! |}f ,kHdi:invq n S310N WivOluml C� 13rONd I j uaOWAaIWIN 71, fs IIN lei I otg iq SIIVi3(1 N01VOIbbi it�l it 0 ("1 0 JOO 0 G 0 (D .kHd,dnvq 103rOlAd ss -- - AHdbnw UJOHO< Aalwi)l NVId NOiVONHI ioira 1d 33 lilt Ste iii= � g�3t"is g } lit RAF � }'•ai' 39;} i q v! r+:'i,; P ;:tit 3 g c7 . 3}li4 13 i i<}:i i3 .� !- e gz a; In �;43! ..91.R 9_9J,4-.Q _S. —4iA JA— —:w =-V• l"h1-- —_— —_—_—__ � � 0 B I i i � A B • O � 0 I I e � i I p / I I ,• i J• s / I al i I �• I t ; � r 1/ I I 1. 1 I I I t ! I I ! f t 1 1 L ! i I c'`"1 �U 0 alw J! HO(AIN. NVId N01VOIbU1 Alldllm iowONd 15-1-4,1 -J T A II 0 I 1 for ID INVId NOiVOIbUl UJOW(Aalwl)l I I I lit ul LU IC flaf 5 Lt A 01 p I Fun f rJ L 17 ilk� ------ ------- 7z MdHnim 133rO'dd I rn N`dld NOiV0181i1 AHdunvq o UJOH ((< /�al�i� 1O3f021d 1 } - a ill ai�il 3i{3a5`da� : { U 1 d�Jl� 2i a �;i-� iij�S �� 1•i.i. 1 i-�.T �6 �� ��] l.'��i i - .' i N Z 9 O yy 33 � ai I , 1 , I ' I I 1 e e ® e e� n �+ y °+ e e m e e e n jl� �• i' + q AI... I ° I , 1 1 Gr 1 , 1 e� o - ► o j —I ' I B i I i bj I s , o b I A � ° 19 ' le � � UJOH O I[a4wi}� NVId NOIVEMN�Al i i;�� � iFYi ��• �J}fS� o �[1� � �/1�� g 9�� � � F � a 3 �Eli�• ii s'e I} y :lti 4 2� f E 3 s ��s-�a 9i;•� q•.r� � �3 ifY � � !S; $ e imis i irr 3 i' is !:§i i ei §11A S I� to r � n Ib 0 'li P 1 ' III B ilk r •� — 'i - ° 1 I 9 I' P 1,: � v ° � b to o I lo3rOad I �1 I t I rP ' I e I e [ 'jr � s �e t �I t` O l"1 UJOH<<<AajwiN MV'}d N01VO N1 Md2dnw 133POad is . . r !Irk }tr off£ Id��ti; bi b All sl § 3 AT W, N I I �gm;F 1 {r. I 1 ID 1 D 9 0 d 9 e "e I I I I I 1 I I I I Ix I� I� I IL I 1 1 I r `r I i � r I � / � I I I , a I ff S 1 I l [ NV'1d NOiVE)Ibbl -IIV'd3A0 AVIdwvq 103COIld UJOH ((� AalwN Ln (D UJOH<(. 431LIJIN S310N 3dVOSONV-1 IH&mn 103rOlAd u m 44 ? U --If it bi jq H ij _F, Jill v 4 611 HIM 116 3 1 Z oa j1j t %9 14 ­ni J;IM iqi-v !Air 4 ys" ON R U 1H S11V1303dVOSGNV-1 UJOH<<,A,31W1)j co a q C)G a C) C-) a a 0 0 o jj. i. At 0 88 GO GO 60 W rx I I a 0 al 2 Mdtjm iO3f`O�Jd t4l� M CD (Y) UJOW461WIN NV1d 3dVOSCIN' N 1 A 9 a 1 9 ING o o o INUUMMINMEA, HIPOUL] L n AH&Inn 101PObd NVId 3dVOSCINVI AH&jm IJJOH(<,Aalw IN 103rObd 53 i q 11 t2 1 q q4 D 'Ar:� mou�iw�, w Rl 7,1 . jo bq, r-1 AHdbniN NVId �MVOSCINYI IoWobcl UJOH0<AalwDl ii ji h H i 3 ch t T 1 4 1 3 1 q 6 W. A O !lk 0 NV -ld 38VOS4NVI UJOH<(4',Aalwl)l ,kHd8lr1V4 CO, 103ro8d CY) 0-) cq W UJOW,Aal I)l NV_ld �IdVOSC — — ---------- i f it ­ If i ) it INYI IDArObd t L I 00 0') 14 kHd8nvi NVId 3dVOSONVI W 'i UJOHOAalwl)i UY L3 1c, AHd,6nvi NVId 3dVOISCINV-1 IIV2J3AO 103roim Jpw". CDO yd I - I I� I .f �I Q I Z ui 6 I Q ti a I AHdanw t. NV 3lis 133f0lid U UIOH<<(Aalwl)l m-o'a Orland - �, !y _ aVq)S -A:10%::I'INtlL 2 3 Ri .I�• - } � I I [.. J M1 �f3 � as � ' I u, 1r Ig f� _ t�_x._•. �_.-,L _ i l ate. ' .i �::1.�1.�- - � rsl i I tin, f a 1 Bpi �•' clo l NI Aw Womi {rr AY; "A Y • i� i ,1 i�I fir.: "M... Jul 14 tj I CL :Cc. ..,r Uj M m > M6 U-j 0 k ji 7