Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 898 (PAR 22001)PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 898 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TWO PARCEL PARTITION TENATIVE PLAN AND LOT CONSOLIDATION AT 3791 TABLE ROCK ROAD (37S 2W 12B TAX LOTS 800, 900 AND 902) (File No: PAR-22001) WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a tentative plan application to consolidate three (3) existing lots and partition the consolidated lot into two (2) parcels lot partition on 17.57 acres identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 1213, Tax Lots 800, 900 and 902 in Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the project site is located in the M-1, Industrial zoning district; and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022, the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly -noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the Staff Report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to land divisions Title 16—Subdivisions, CPMC 17.48, and the M-1 Industrial Zone; and, WHEREAS, after duly considering the proposed tentative plan, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the application complies with applicable standards and criteria as set forth in the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022 ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission by a duly seconded motion granted tentative plan approval subject to conditions in the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022 (Exhibit A) and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Exhibit B). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 8989 hereby approves Tentative Partition Plan and Lot Consolidation, based on the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022 (Exhibit A) and the Applicant's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as amended and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 6t1 day of December 2022. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City 'Representative ` Planning Commission Resolution No. 898 (12/6/2022) EXHIBIT "- It - Revised Staff Report PLANNING Project Murphy Tentative Partition File No. PAR-22001 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON December 6, 2022 Item Summary 11 Consideration of a Tentative Partition application to consolidate three lots and divide them into two (2) parcels. The 17.57 acre site is located at 3791 Table Rock Road and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 12B, Tax Lots 800, 900 and 902. The project site is within the M-1, Industrial zone. Applicant/Agent: BH DevCo (Steve Backman); File No: PAR - 22001. Staff Source Stephanie Holtey, Planning Director Background The applicant proposes to consolidate three (3) existing lots into one and partition the consolidated lot into two (2) parcels (Attachment "A-Y). The land division includes extension of Federal Way, a Standard Local Street to the intersection with Table Rock and Airport Road (Attachment "A-5"). The proposal includes completing the intersection improvements. It's the applicant's intent to develop Proposed Parcel 1 with an 87,750 square foot warehouse and ground distribution facility (File No. SPAR-22006). Proposed Parcel 2 will be used for stormwater conveyance and will remain vacant at this time. The proposed use and parcel dimensions are consistent with the M-1 zone. Issues There are two (2) issues relative to this project: 1. Intersection Configuration. The Federal Way extension to Table Rock/Airport Road requires configuration that addresses current and future traffic volumes. The east side of the Airport Road intersection provides a 3 lane configuration that includes a dedicated left turn lane. The tentative plan shows a two lane configuration. Comment: Per the Public Works Staff Report (Attachment "C"), the intersection will be required and the applicant has agreed to construct a 3 lane intersection configuration that matches improvements to the east. This accounts for increased traffic volumes due to the Costco development, as well as future volume associated with the proposed warehouse and ground distribution facility (SPAR-22006). Staff recommends the Planning Commission impose the Public Works conditions of approval set forth in the Public Works Staff Report dated November 21, 2022. 2. Adjacent Property Access, There are three (3) properties south of the project site that are developed with residential structures. At this time, all three properties take access from a private drive off Table Rock Road adjacent to the Table Rock/Airport Road intersection. Proximity of the private drive to the intersection is not consistent with access spacing standards on Arterial roadways in the County and City. Comment: The proposed Federal Way/Airport Road extension provides the opportunity relocate access for each of the properties. It will be necessary for the applicant to coordinate with the property owners and Public Works during the Civil Improvement plan review process for street construction to identify and construct new access driveways for each of the affected lots. 3 improvement Construction Timing. The applicant's Findings (Attachment "B") state that they may request building permits prior to final plat approval due to use specific needs on Proposed Parcel 1. comment: CPMC 16.12.070 allows for building permit issuance prior to final plat approval when the applicant enters into a development agreement with the City and bonds for the improvements. The objective of this standard is to provide flexibility to developers while providing assurance to the City and future property owners that all required services and utilities will be available to the site as required under state law. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission impose Public Works conditions of approval set forth in the Public Works Staff Report dated November 21, 2022. Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law The Tentative Partition at 3791 Table Rock Road has been evaluated against the applicable Partition Criteria set forth in CPMC16.10 and CPMC 16.36 and found to comply as conditioned and as evidenced in the annotated Applicant's Findings of Fact (Attachment "B"). i «e notations indicate that a new Traffic Memo was submitted on Navernber 21 2022 Rttachcnent "H" ar�d re laces the Applicant's Exhibit 14. Additionall all criteria conclusions and exhibits referencing the Site Plan and Architectural Review have either been crossed o rb or deleted to clarifv the record and basis of the decision is for the Tentative partition Flan.. The applicant shall comply with the conditions of approval set forth in the following agency documents: a. Public Works Staff Report dated November 21, 2022 (Attachment "C") b. Jackson County Roads Department letter dated November 15, 2022 (Attachment "D") c. Rogue Valley Sewer Services letter dated November 14, 2022 (Attachment "E") 2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit the following documents to the Planning Department: a. A revised Tentative Plan showing the location of Public Utility Easements as required by Public Works; b. A copy of the recorded final plat or a fully executed development agreement and surety bond per CPMC 16.12.070. Timing of infrastructure improvements set forth in Condition 1 shall be addressed in the development agreement as necessary to receive final plat approval. 3. Prior to Public Works Final Inspection and Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall satisfy all requirements of the development agreement and submit a copy of the recorded plat as required in CPMC 16.12. 4. The Tentative Plan shall expire after one (1) year in accordance with CPMC 16.10.080(A) unless a timely written request is received and an extension is granted pursuant to CPMC 16.100. Attachments Attachment "A-1" — Tentative Partition Plat Cover Sheet Attachment "A-2" — Existing Property Layout Attachment "A-Y — Tentative Partition Plan Attachment "A-4" — Proposed Property Layout Attachment "A-5" — Proposed Street Cross-section (Federal Way/Airport Road Extension) Attachment "B" — Aranotateg Applicant's Findings Attachment "C" — Public Works Department Staff Report, dated 11/21/2022 Attachment "Y — Jackson County Roads Letter dated 11/15/2022 Attachment "E" — Rogue Valley Sewer Services Letter dated 11/14/2022 Attachment "F" — City of Medford Email dated 11 /28/2022 Attachment "G" - Resolution No. 898 (Draft to be provided at the 12/6/2022 meeting) Attachment "H" — Trip Generation Analysis dated 11122/2022. Action Consider the proposed Tentative Partition Plan application and 1) approve; 2) approve with revisions; or 3) deny the application. Recommendation Approve the Tentative Partition Plan application for the Project Murphy at 3791 Table Rock Road per the Revised -Staff Report dated Nove December 6, 2022 including all attachments thereto herein incorporated by reference. Recommended Motion I move to approve Resolution No 898 approving a lot consolidation and two (2) parcel Tentative Partition located at 3791 Table Rock Road (37S2W12B Tax Lots 800, 900 and 902) based oil the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022. Z w u B 3 = LL CL 6 or- �0� U LJJ LLJ J w �'LL% r— z O r, UJ 1 1-6 I a� y c U) O 1 J (� (Y) Q LLI 0° co F- O o cn Z z ❑ f O O Lu z N Z N N N 0 N LLJ LLI O z A 0 z ui a_ z z 0 f- z O f- U W to L� =3 R v�a 21 31 o w 0 Zs x m of= sw P its, o fRp', �1 :cos lit) Ty o }}; CL CL V. Ld .4. aa2,e0o nr •n 1f0d'1NIOd 1y2A1NCJ 3w0nlL —:LOYN3Oa318b1 66E3 ' ? �" AilAdMidJUSIX(18�al��uJOfO<� �.1 3 F� r 1 W x 4 p O 9� o F K� Jayy Z 51 Z W I LIJ J I5 " a •,.I xio 'AVRN� it.'Ai •. •MSWr wW M1.t� Yrnv �.. m .In a cW .S . V'4iv. Yf 'pn 4ni iMYW Mrv.sS e11 % �Y .Y+.4� yl. nypv-A3Aniv ELOL V '• - � nY. wi 5 by / uaOH xeau�e.•,� <<Aa1wD1 ClS�4iR- .ar0ee •.. in0kv-1 IVId a3SOdOad W9-au ala000 -..a i11 2i0 '1NIOd WtUN30 I CD 9 L yy, 4 Y 6 x u G G � k S S oo w :gyp ? $ W Z ;s "s e, X< i W I L1.1e y�S Z �� s K]Sf W•p1StlA R1.Y-W i •�• 4,i1 Yp a: ]N SllW�r NNr MNON—A3lNM 2i0L 0UJORKAWIN 4093HO AIN109 1nO kvi ),lb3d08d NO '1NI0d 1H81N30 if*, 03SOdONd I •(3N NOON 318Vi 6UC 0 O cM F- wn w r.•YN I� UJOH <<(Aalwi)l +raen'--nasal ��6w. N0003S SSOIt10 OVMJ 03SOdOad r0o7No AMnoa mtkfi" NO '1NIOd IVHiN30 '021 NOOb 31OVI 66L£ �1 O U W ATTACHMENT "B" BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A TENTATIVE PARTITION PLAN AND SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 3791 TABLE ROCK ROAD, WHICH IS ON THE WEST SIDE OF TABLE ROCK ROAD ACROSS FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH AIRPORT ROAD. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT AND IS MORE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AS TAX LOTS 800, 900, AND 902 IN TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST (WM), SECTION 12B. Applicant: SH ❑evCo, LLC Owner: Table Rock Business Park, LLC PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW NATURE OF THE APPLICATION Applicants' Exhibit 2 Applicant, BH DevCo, LLC (hereinafter Applicant), seeks approval of a Tentative Partition Plan that will consolidate three existing lots into one and partition the consolidated lots into two parcels, and Site Plan and Architectural Review for a new industrial warehouse and distribution facility of approximately 87,750 square Feet. The proposed Tentative Plan will also include dedication of land for right-of-way to extend Airport Road to Federal Way, and the construction of the roadway therein as a Standard Local Street. The subject property is approximately 17.87 acres and is identified as Tax Lots 800, 900, and 902 on Jackson County Assessor's Map 37-2W-12B. Page 1 195 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC EVIDENCE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATIONS Applicant herewith submits the following evidence with its land use application: Exhibit 1. Completed Tentative Partition Plan and Site Plan & Architectural Review application forms Exhibit 2. Applicant's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (this document) Exhibit 3. Applicant's Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Exhibit 4. Jackson County Assessor Plat Map 37-2W-12B Exhibit 5. Vicinity Map on Aerial Exhibit 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map Exhibit 7. Zoning Map Exhibit 8. Hydrology Map Exhibit 9. Proposed Tentative Partition Plan Exhibit 10. Proposed Site Plan and Landscape Plan C1.0 Site Plan L1.00-2.51 Landscape Plans E1.00-1.06 Photometrics Plans Exhibit 11. Exterior Elevations Exhibit 12. Parking Demand Analysis Memo Exhibit 13. Title Report Exhibit 14. Traffic Generation Analysis Page 2 196 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC RELEVANT SUBSTANTIVE APPROVAL CRITERIA The following are the relevant substantive criteria prerequisite to approving Tentative Plan and Site Plan and Architectural Review applications: CITY OF CENTRAL POINT SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE Tentative Plan Criteria 16.36 Major and Minor Land Partitions 16.36.030 Requirements. A. All major and minor land partitions may, as a condition of approval, provide for improvements including curbs, gutters, asphalt streets, sidewalks, underground utilities and such other improvements as shall be deemed appropriate and necessary by the city council as a condition of approval, with all such improvements to meet the standards required for subdivisions under this title. B. In the case of major partitions, all streets or roads shall be improved to meet the standards required for subdivisions under this title, and shall be dedicated to the city in the same manner as subdivision roads and streets. C. Partition improvements shall be constructed prior to approval of the final partition plat unless, in the city's sole discretion, deferral is allowed. In all cases of deferral, the applicant shall either execute an agreement for improvements and comply with the bond requirements of Section 16.12.070 and 16.12.080 of this title, or shall execute a deferred improvement agreement, which shall be in a form and contain such terms as are specified by city and shall be recorded and be binding upon and run with the land and bind the applicant and all successors in interest. CITY OF CENTRAL POINT ZONING ORDINANCE Site Plan and Architectural Review Criteria 17.72 Site Plan and Architectural Review 17.72.020 Applicability. B. Major Projects. The following are "major projects" for the purposes of the site plan and architectural review process and are subject to Type 2 procedural requirements as set forth in Chapter 17.05, Applications and Types of Review Procedures: 1. New construction, including private and public projects, that: a. Includes a new building or building addition of five thousand square feet or more; b. Includes the construction of a parking lot of ten or more parking spaces; 17.72.040 Site plan and architectural standards. In approving, conditionally approving, or denying any site plan and architectural review application, the approving authority shall base its decision on compliance with the following standards: A. Applicable site plan, landscaping, and architectural design standards as set forth in Chapter 17.75, Design and Development Standards; B. City of Central Point Department of Public Works Department Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction; C. Accessibility and sufficiency of firefighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus. Page 3 197 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Site Flan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC IV FINDINGS OF FACT The following facts are established and found to be true with respect to this matter: 1. Property Description and Location: The subject property contains approximately 17.87 acres (per survey) and consists of three tax lots within the corporate limits of the City of Central Point described in the Jackson County Assessment records as Township 37 South, Range 2 West, Section 12B, Tax Lots 800, 900, and 902. The subject property is vacant land located on the west side of Table Rock Road and northwest of its intersection with Airport Road. See, Applicant's Exhibits 4 and 5. 2. Ownership: The subject property is owned in fee simple by Table Rock Business Park, LLC. 3. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation: The subject property is classified as Light Industrial (LI) on the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. See, Applicant's Exhibit 6. 4. Zoning: The subject property is zoned M-1 Industrial. See, Applicant's Exhibit 7. 5. Lot Legality: The parcel that is Tax Lot 800 was created March 19, 1946, by the Warranty Deed recorded at Vol. 294, Pg. 91. Tax Lots 900 and 902 were created in their current configuration on June 13, 1974, when Tax Lot 902 was divided from Tax Lot 900 by the Warranty Deed recorded at O.R. 74-07980. At the time of this conveyance in 1974 the subject property was zoned County F-5 which required a minimum parcel size of 5 acres. While Jackson County had not adopted procedural requirements for partitions at that time, the conveyance did not meet the zoning standards for the F-5 district and therefore the conveyance can be considered an illegal partition. That noted, and while records indicate that no permits have been issued for Tax Lot 902, it can also be argued that the 1974 split of Tax Lots 900 and 902 was authorized when the properties were annexed to the corporate limits of the City of Central Point and allowed to remain as two separate parcels. 6. Existing Development: Over the past few years the subject property has been used for the staging of construction materials and gravel processing, but prior to this the site was vacant for 30+ years. 7. Existing Frontage and Access: Federal Way currently terminates near the northwest corner of the site and is where the subject property has existing access. The subject property is also bounded on the east by Table Rock Road; however, there are no points of access along Table Rock Road which is classified in the City's Transportation System Plan (TSP) as a Principal Arterial street. Additionally, the City of Central Point owns a parcel adjacent to the subject property and Table Rock Road, where the Applicant proposes to construct a new City street. 8. Project Summary: The proposed project includes an application for a tentative partition plan to consolidate the existing parcels that comprise the site and partition the property into two new parcels, with resulting Parcel 1 being approximately 13.5 acres and developed Page 4 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC with the proposed warehouse use, while the westernmost resulting 2.78 acre Parcel 2 will be used for stormwater outfall and otherwise remain vacant land at this time. The partition also includes the dedication of land for the Federal Way/Airport Road right-of-way extension, and the construction of said street to Standard Local Street specifications. I The project also includes an application for Site Plan and Architectural Review of a new —87,750 square foot industrial warehouse and distribution facility. The proposed warehouse is a concrete tilt -up design that measures approximately 33 feet in height at the highest point of the parapet. The warehouse will havc its main entrance facing east towards Table Rock Road, while the north elevation will have five steel roll -up doors that will provide for the loading, of freight onto delivery vehicles. A future canopy will extend the full length of the north elevation to provide shelter from weather elements. The west elevation will contain 13 insulated sectional overhead doors with dock shelters to accommodate the delivery and unloading of goods into the warehouse. See, Applicant's exterior elevations and site plan at Exhibits 10 and 11. Parking for warehouse employees will be provided to the south and east of the building, while an area for company vehicle storage will contain 215 spaces on the northern half of the site. The company vehicles will travel in a clockwise direction from this vehicle storage area to the north side of the warehouse where they will be loaded before leaving the site via Federal Way. Landscaping will be provided around the perimeter of the site and within both the employee parking lots and the company vehicle storage area as shown on the landscape plans attached at Exhibit 10, and as further described in Applicant's Exhibit 3, Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards. Development of the warehouse property will require the extension of Federal Way to the south and east to connect with Airport Road and Table Rock Road near the southeast corner of the subject property. The necessary land for this street will be dedicated to the City and the new Federal Way/Airport Road segments will be constructed to the City's Standard Local Street specifications. 9. Land Uses on Abutting Properties and Surrounding Area: North: Federal Way is an improved Standard Local Street that currently terminates near the northwest corner of the subject property and the lands to the east and west of Federal Way up to Hamrick Road are zoned M-1, Directly abutting the subject property between Federal Way and Table Rock Road there is a FedEx Ground distribution facility and a Costeo warehouse store and gas station. On the west side of Federal Way are several small vacant parcels, an XPO Logistics facility, and Umpqua Dairy Products. To the west of these uses and northwest of the subject property is an M-2 zoning district primarily occupied by Knife River Materials. East: The subject property is bounded on the east by Table Rock Road which is classified as a Principal Arterial street that is under the jurisdiction of Jackson County Roads. The property directly across Table Rock Road is located within the City of Medford corporate limits and is zoned Light Industrial and developed with a Columbia Distributing facility (beverage distributor). I The same resulting parcel configuration and right-of-way dedication could also be achieved through a property line adjustment and dedication by deed for the right-of-way land. Page 5 199 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC West: The Bear Creek Greenway, a multi -use trail that stretches from Ashland through Central Point is located to the west/southwest of the subject property. South: Lands south of the subject property are zoned M-1 and developed with single- family residences. At the southeast corner of the subject property and abutting Table Rock Road is a 0.55 acre parcel zoned M-1 and occupied by AA Electric auto parts store. The City of Central Point owns a 0.28 acre parcel on the south side of the AA Electric property that will be used for the extension of Airport Road across Table Rock Road where it will connect to the Federal Way extension that will be part of the subject development project. 10. Topography: The subject property is relatively flat/level. 11. Water Facilities and Services: According to information provided by the City in a pre - application conference, there is a 12-inch waterline located in Federal Way that can and will be extended to the proposed warehouse development. 12. Sanitary Sewer Facilities and Services: According to comments received from Rogue Valley Sewer Services (RVSS) in a pre -application conference, there is an existing 8-inch sewer line north of the property in Federal Way from which service can be extended to the site. 13. Storm Drainage Facilities and Services: Stormwater detention facilities will be constructed as two dry ponds as shown on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10. Stormwater outfall from these ponds will be directed to the vacant parcel that will be located on the west of Federal Way. Said detention facilities will be designed to accommodate all stormwater runoff from the warehouse development. 14. Wetlands, Streams and Floodplain: There are no wetlands identified on local or national wetland inventories. As shown on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10 and the Hydrology Map at Exhibit 8, the FEMA floodway from Bear Creek extends slightly into the west and southwest portions of the subject property. No structures will be located within the floodway or floodplain, 15. Transportation and Access: A. Access and Circulation: Access to the site will be from Federal Way and Airport Road, and there will be a total of five driveways along the property frontage as shown on the site plan at Applicant's Exhibit 10. B. Transportation Impacts from Proposed Development: Pursuant to pre -application conference comments and follow-up communications between the Applicant, the City, and Jackson County Roads, a trip generation analysis was required to evaluate and determine the intersection configuration for Table Rock Road/Airport Road. The analysis is attached at Applicant's Exhibit 14. The Applicant's traffic engineer calculated trip generation for the project. The Applicant's traffic engineer also analyzed level of service (LOS) and lane configurations at the intersection of Airport Road and Table Rock Road. The analysis shows acceptable levels of service at the studied intersection and recommends the proposed lane configuration of one receiving lane, and one left -through -right eastbound approach. Page 6 200 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC d ,th' nd served by Fire 16. Fire and Police Protection: The subject property is locate w1 1n a District No. 3. Police service is provided by the City of Central Point Police Department. JI CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The following conclusions of law and ultimate conclusions are reached under each of the relevant substantive criteria which are recited verbatim and addressed below. The conclusions of law are supported by the Applicant's evidentiary exhibits at Section II — including Applicant's review of applicable development standards (Exhibit 3) and the findings of fact as set forth in Section 1V herein above. TENTATIVE PLAN CRITERIA Chapter 16.36 MAJOR AND MINOR LAND PARTITIONS 16.36.030 Requirements, A. All major and minor land partitions may, as a condition of approval, provide for improvements including Curbs, gutters, asphalt streets, sidewalks, underground utilities and such other improvements as shall be deemed appropriate and necessary by the city council as a condition of approval, with all such improvements to meet the standards required for subdivisions under this title. Conclusions of Law: The Planning Commission herewith incorporates and adopts the Demonstration of Compliance with applicable Development Standards in Applicant's Exhibit 3 and concludes thereupon that the proposed extension of Federal Way/Airport Road will create the needed improvements to serve the project. Time is of the essence for this project and Applicant proposes the following condition structure with respect to public improvement timing: • Prior to building permit for vertical construction, Applicant shall provide and the City shall review and approve the Public Improvement Plans For the partition (the City will coordinate review and approval by external agencies like Medford Water Commission and RVSS). • Prior to building permit for vertical construction, Applicant may post a bond for the public improvements acceptable to the City based upon the approved Public Improvement Plans. r Prior to occupancy of the building, the Applicant steall complete the Public Improvements in accordance with the approved Public improvement Plans, have the improvements accepted by the applicable agencies, and dedicate the new -right-of-way per the tentative plat and record the final plat. B. In the case of major partitions, all streets or roads shall be improved to meet the standards required for subdivisions under this title, and shall be dedicated to the city in the same manner as subdivision roads and streets. Conclusions of Law: The Planning Commission concludes that the proposed major partition includes dedication of the necessary land for, and the construction of the extension of Federal Page 7 201 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC Way/Airport Road to serve the project, and that these requirements will be met through the imposition of conditions of approval. C. Partition improvements shall be constructed prior to approval of the final partition plat unless, in the city's sole discretion, deferral is allowed. In all cases of deferral, the applicant shall either execute an agreement for improvements and comply with the bond requirements of Section 16.12.070 and 16.12.080 of this title, or shall execute a deferred improvement agreement, which shall be in a form and contain such terms as are specified by city and shall be recorded and be binding upon and run with the land and bind the applicant and all successors in interest. Conclusions of Law: The Planning Commission concludes that all required improvements will either be constructed prior to approval of the final plat or bonded for in accordance with these provisions and subject to a development agreement with the City. SITE PLAN & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CRITERIA Chapter 17.72 SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 17.72.020 Applicability. B. Major Projects. The following are "major projects" for the purposes of the site plan and architectural review process and are subject to Type 2 procedural requirements as set forth in Chapter 17.05, Applications and Types of Review Procedures: 1. New construction, including private and public projects, that: a. Includes a new building or building addition of five thousand square feet or more; b. Includes the construction of a parking lot of ten or more parking spaces; Conclusions of Law: The Planning Commission concludes the proposed building is new and at approximately 87,750 square feet it therefore requires site plan and architectural review. 17.72 Site Plan and Architectural Review 17.72.040 Site plan and architectural standards. In approving, conditionally approving, or denying any site plan and architectural review application, the approving authority shall base its decision on compliance with the following standards: A. Applicable site plan, landscaping, and architectural design standards as set forth in Chapter 17.75, Design and Development Standards; Conclusions of Law: The Planning Commission herewith incorporates and adopts Applicant's Exhibit 3: Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards, and based thereupon, concludes the application is in compliance with all applicable site plan, landscaping, and architectural design standards in Chapter 17.75. B. City of Central Point Department of Public Works Department Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction; Conclusions of Law: The City concludes that the proposed project will be located on a discrete parcel that is newly created with most public improvements necessary for the development already in place but that any additional new public improvements, such as Page 8 202 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC additional storm drainage facilities, can feasibly and will be constructed in accordance with the Central Point Department of Public Works Standard and Specifications and the Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction. C. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus. Conclusions of Law: The City concludes that the design of the project provides for adequate fire access. The proposed warehouse building has vehicle parking and maneuvering areas on all four sides from which fire apparatus can conduction firefighting operations, and at 33 feet in height, aerial apparatus access is not required per comments received by the Applicant at a pre -application conference with City staff. Finally, all driveways and vehicular drive aisles exceed 20 feet in width and can provide for fire apparatus access. (S� Page 9 203 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 DEMONSTRATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TITLE 16 SUBDIVISIONS CHAPTER 16.04 GENERAL PROVISIONS 16.04.010 Scope of regulations. The provisions of this title shall apply to all subdivisions, partitions and planned unit developments, and all streets or other ways created thereby, unless otherwise specifically provided. Ei tkk CHAPTER 16.20 STREETS AND OTHER WAYS — DESIGN STANDARDS 16.20.010 Creation of Streets. A. Streets created by subdivisions and partitions shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the requirements of the city's comprehensive plan, this code, the city's public works standards, and all conditions established by the city. B. The construction of streets shall include subgrade, base, asphaltic concrete surfacing, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drainage, street signs, street lighting, and underground utilities. C. All streets, including the entire right-of-way necessary for the installation of the items mentioned in the preceding paragraph, shall be dedicated to the city. Compliance with Standards: The proposed project will result in the construction of the connecting segment of Federal Way/Airport Road. See, Applicant's proposed tentative plan and site plan at Exhibits 9 and 10. The necessary right-of-way will be dedicated to the City by final plat recording. The street and all appurtenant public facilities will be built to City local street specifications. Project complies. 16.20.020 Streets — Generally. The location, width, and grade of streets shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographical conditions as they relate to drainage and the operation of the water, sewer systems, to public convenience and safety and their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets. Where location is not shown in a development plan, the arrangement of streets in a subdivision shall either: A. Provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing streets in surrounding areas; or B. Conform to the plan for the neighborhood approved or adopted by the city to meet a particular situation where topographical or other conditions make continuance or conformance to existing streets impractical. Compliance with Standards: The proposed road extension will connect Federal Way and Airport Road at Table Rock Road and will ensure appropriate circulation and connectivity for the area. Project complies. 16.20.130 Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with such standards as are adopted by the city. Sidewalk construction shall be completed on each individual lot prior to the city building inspector granting a certificate of occupancy for any construction upon said individual lot. No application for a building permit shall be granted without a requirement in the building permit for construction of sidewalks to city's standards. Compliance with Standards: As shown on Applicant's proposed site plan at Exhibit 10, sidewalks are proposed to be constructed along both sides of the Federal Way/Airport Road extension and will be consistent with the City standards. Project complies. Page 1 204 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC CHAPTER 16.24 BLOCKS AND LOTS — DESIGN STANDARDS 16.24.010 Blocks — Length, width and shape. The lengths, widths and shapes of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites suitable to the special needs of the type and use contemplated, needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and limitations and opportunities of topography. Compliance with Standards: As demonstrated on Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10, the proposed parcels are of an adequate size and will provide convenient access and circulation for an industrial warehouse use and the associated stormwater Facilities. Project complies. 16.24.020 Blocks — Sizes. Blocks shall not exceed twelve hundred feet in length except blocks adjacent to arterial streets or unless the previous adjacent layout or topographical conditions justify a variation. The recommended minimum distance between intersections on arterial streets is three hundred feet. Compliance with Standards: The starting points of the Federal `Nay/Airport Road extension are set by the existing streets that are being connected. The resulting block length between Federal Way and Table Rock Road (a Principal Arterial street) will be approximately 1,000 feet. No new intersections are proposed or required along Table Rock Road. Project complies. 16.24.030 Blocks — Easements. A. Utility Lines. Easements for electric lines or other non -city -awned public utilities may be required, and shall be a minimum of ten feet in width located on the exterior portion of a single property. Easements for city utilities (i.e., water, storm drain and sanitary sewer mains) shall be a minimum of fifteen feet in width located on the exterior portion of a single property Tie -back easements six feet wide by twenty feet long shall be provided for utility poles along lot lines at change of direction points of easements. Structures Located within a City Utility Easement. a. Except for public utilities and for signs when developed in accordance with Chapter 15.24 (Sign Code). no person shall locate, construct, or continue to locate a structure (as defined in Chapter 16,08) within a city utility easement (as defined in Chapter 16.08), except as provided in subsections (A)(1)(b) and (A)(2) of this section. b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the city may approve fencing, concrete block walls/fencing, retaining walls, and similar fencinglwall structures that are otherwise in compliance with the building code, and with the clearance provisions noted herein, over an easement subject to the following requirements: i. Said fencing or wall structures that interfere with the installation, maintenance, access, or operation of a public utility or city utility may be removed by the utility provider or the city at the sole cost of owner. ii. Any replacement or relocation of the fencing or wall structures shall be at the sole cost of the property owner or occupant. iii. Owners and occupants of property shall not be entitled to compensation for damages related to removal of the fencing or wall structures. Compliance with Standards: The necessary 10-foot public utility easements can and will be provided along the north turning to east right-of-way line of the Federal Way extension and along the west right- of-way adjacent to Parcel 2. PUEs along the south right-of-way boundary will be provided by future development of parcels to the south. No structures are proposed within any existing City utility easement areas. Project complies. Grass, Asphalt, and Concrete Installed within a City Utility Easement. a. Subject to the limitations of the building code, lawful owners and occupants of property may install grass, asphalt and concrete within a city utility easement. Page 2 205 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC b. In the course of installing, accessing, maintaining, or operating its facilities in a city utility easement, a public utility or the city, as the case may be, may move or remove any asphalt, concrete, or vegetation located within said easement. After the same are moved or removed and after completion of the necessary work, the grass, asphalt or concrete shall be repaired and replaced in a reasonable manner at the sole cost of the public utility or city. c. Owners and occupants of property shall not be entitled to compensation related to damages to grass, asphalt, or concrete so long as the repairs and replacement are done in a reasonable manner and in a reasonable time frame. Compliance with Standards: The proposed project is likely to result in some grass, concrete and/or asphalt being installed within City utility easements, and Applicant acknowledges the City's ability to install, access, maintain, and operate its utilities in accordance with the provisions and limitations of this subsection. B. Watercourses. Where a subdivision is traversed by a watercourse, drainage way, channel or stream, there may be required a stormwater easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of such watercourse, and such further width as will be adequate for the purpose. Streets, parkways or access roads parallel to major watercourses may be required. Compliance with Standards: The subject property is proposed to be consolidated and partitioned into two parcels. There are no watercourses that traverse either of the proposed parcels. C. Pedestrian Ways. In any block over seven hundred fifty feet in length a pedestrian way may be required. The minimum width of the pedestrian right-of-way must be at least six feet in width which shall be hard surfaced through the block and curb to curb in order to provide easy access to schools, parks, shopping centers, mass transportation stops or other community services. If conditions require blocks longer than twelve hundred feet, two pedestrian ways may be required for combination pedestrian way and utility easement. When essential for public convenience, such ways may be required to connect to cul-de-sacs. Long blocks parallel to arterial streets may be approved without pedestrian ways if desirable in the interests of traffic safety. Compliance with Standards: The subject property is located within an industrial zone in which a pedestrian way through the subject property to the existing development to the north (Costco and FedEx) and south (zoned M-1, currently developed with residential) is unnecessary and impractical given the types of uses in the area. Sidewalks exist along Table Rock Road, Hamrick Way, and Federal Way, and will be constructed along the subject property's frontage as part of the Federal Way/Airport Road extension. These sidewalks will provide adequate means of pedestrian travel. 16.24.040 Lots — Uses. A. The city may, in its discretion, deny approval for the creation of any lot by any manner if the effect of such creation of lot would be to facilitate perpetuation of a nonconforming use. B_ No lot shall be created unless it is in compliance with all applicable provisions of this code. Compliance with Standards: The subject property is proposed to be partitioned into two parcels, one of which will be developed as industrial warehouse and distribution center, a use which is permitted within the underlying M-1 zoning district. The two proposed parcels are in compliance with all applicable provisions of this code as outlined hereinunder, with said findings adopted as demonstrating compliance with this standard. 16.24.050 Lots — Size and determination. Lot sizes shall conform with the zoning ordinance and shall be appropriate for the location of the subdivision and for the type of development and use contemplated. In the case of irregular lots, the width shall be measured along the front building line. In no case shall the average depth be more than two and one-half times the width. Corner lots for residential use shall have sufficient width to permit appropriate building setback from and orientation to both streets. Page 3 1: APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC A, In areas that cannot be connected to sewer lines, minimum lot sizes shall be sufficient to permit sewage disposal by an engineered system in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality, Jackson County environmental quality section, and public works standards. Such lot sizes shall conform to the requirements of the Jackson County environmental quality section. B. Where property Is zoned and planned for business or industrial use, other widths and areas may be required, at the discretion of the city. Depth and width of properties reserved or laid out for commercial and industrial purposes shall be adequate to provide for the off-street service and parking facilities required by the type of use and development contemplated. Compliance with Standards: The subject property is located within the M-1 zoning district in which there are no site area requirements except as necessary to provide for required parking, loading, and yard spaces. As demonstrated on the Applicant's proposed tentative plan and site plan at Exhibits 9 and 10, the parcels are appropriate for the proposed industrial warehouse use and development, and their depths are less than two and one-half times the widths. Project complies. 16.24.060 Through lots. Through lots shall be avoided except where essential to reduce access to primary or secondary arterial streets or streets of equivalent traffic volume, reduce access to adjacent nonresidential activities, or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. A planting screen easement of at least ten feet may be required along the line of lots abutting such adjacent street. There shall be no right of access across such planting screen easements. Compliance with Standards: No through lots are proposed. Access to both parcels will be from Federal Way/Airport Road. In the alternative, if the proposed Parcel 1 were to be considered a through lot, no vehicular access to Table Rock Road from the subject property is being proposed. 16.24.070 Lot side lines. The side lines of lots shall run at right angles to the street upon which the lots face, as far as practicable, or on curbed streets they shall be radial to the curve. Compliance with Standards: As demonstrated on the Applicant's tentative plan at Exhibit 9, the proposed lot side lines for each of the proposed parcels run at right angles to the streets that each lot faces, those being Federal Way and Airport Road. Project complies. TITLE 17 ZONING CHAPTER 17.05 APPLICATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REVIEW PROCEDURES 17.05.900 Traffic Impact Analysis. The purpose of this section of the code is to assist in determining which road authorities participate in land use decisions, and to implement Section 660-012-0045(2)(e) of the State Transportation Planning Rule that requires the city to adopt a process to apply conditions to development proposals in order to minimize impacts and protect transportation facilities. This chapter establishes the standards for when a development proposal must be reviewed for potential traffic impacts; when a traffic impact analysis must be submitted with a development application in order to determine whether conditions are needed to minimize impacts to and protect transportation facilities: what must be in a traffic impact analysis; and who is qualified to prepare the study. A. When a Traffic Impact Analysis Is Required. The city shall require a traffic impact analysis (TIA) as part of an application for development, a change in use, or a change in access in the following situations: Page 4 2U APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC 2. If the application does not include residential development, a TIA shall be required when a land use application involves one or more of the following actions: a. A change in zoning or a plan amendment designation; b. Any proposed development or land use action that a road authority, including the city, Jackson County or ODOT, states may have operational or safety concerns along its facility(ies); c. An increase in site traffic volume generation by two hundred fifty average daily trips (ADT) or more; d. An increase in peak hour volume of a particular movement to and from the state highway by twenty percent or more; e. An increase in use of adjacent streets by vehicles exceeding twenty thousand pounds gross vehicle weight by ten vehicles or more per day; f. The location of the access driveway does not meet minimum sight distance requirements, as determined by the city engineer, or is located where vehicles entering or leaving the property are restricted, or such vehicles queue or hesitate on the state highway, creating a safety hazard in the discretion of the community development director; or g. A change in internal traffic patterns that, in the discretion of the community development director, may cause safety problems, such as backup onto a street or greater potential for traffic accidents. B. Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation. A traffic impact analysis shall be prepared by a traffic engineer or civil engineer licensed to practice in the state of Oregon with special training and experience in traffic engineering. The TIA shall be prepared in accordance with the public works department's document entitled "Traffic Impact Analysis." If the road authority is the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), consult ODOT's regional development review planner and OAR 734-051-180. Compliance with Standards: Applicant's traffic engineer has provided a traffic impact analysis consistent with City requirements and guidance from Jackson County Roads and City of Central Point Public Works. See, Applicant's Exhibit 14. CHAPTER 17.48 M-1, INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT 17.48.020 Permitted uses. The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted in an M-1 district, subject to the limitations imposed in Section 17.48.030 A. Warehousing; B. Storage and wholesaling of prepared or packaged merchandise; 17,48.030 Standards for permitted uses. All uses within the M-1 district shall be subject to the following conditions and standards: A All raw materials, finished products, machinery and equipment, with the exception of automobiles and trucks normally used in the business, shall be stored within an entirely enclosed building or sight -obscuring, nonpierced fence not less than six feet in height; B. The facility shall be in compliance with all applicable state and federal environmental, health and safety regulations; C. In any M-1 district directly across a street from any residential (R) district, all outdoor parking, loading or display areas shall be set back at least ten feet from the public right-of-way and this setback area shall be planted with trees appropriate for the neighborhood, ground cover or other landscaping materials that are consistent with the general existing character of the area, or that will establish a landscape theme for other developments to follow. This setback and landscaping requirement shall also apply to M-1 lots fronting on any street designated in the comprehensive plan as a major arterial - Compliance with Standards: The proposed use for the subject property is a warehouse and distribution facility, which is a permitted use in the M-1 zoning district. All materials and products, Page 5 M, APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC with the exception of automobiles and trucks associated with the use, will be stored indoors. The facility will be operated in accordance with all applicable state and federal environmental, health and safety regulations, and there are no residential districts located adjacent to the subject property. Project can and will comply. 17.48.050 Height regulations. Maximum height of any building or structure in an M-1 district shall be sixty feet. Compliance with Standards: The proposed warehouse building will be approximately 33 feet in height at the highest point of the building parapet. Project complies. 17.48.060 Site area requirements. There are no minimum site area requirements in the M-1 district, except as necessary to provide for required parking, loading and yard spaces. Compliance with Standards: As demonstrated on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10, the subject property has adequate space to provide for the required parking, loading and yard spaces. Project complies. 17.48.070 Yard requirements. The following measurements indicate minimum yard requirements in an M-1 district: A. Front Yard. The front yard shall be a minimum of twenty feet. (Also see Section 17.48.030(C)). B. Side Yard. The side yard shall be a minimum of ten feet except when the side lot line is abutting a lot in any residential (R) district and then the side yard shall be a minimum of twenty feet and shall be increased by one-half foot for each foot by which the building height exceeds twenty feet. C. Rear Yard. The rear yard shall be a minimum of ten feet except when the rear lot line is abutting a lot in any residential (R) district and then the rear yard shall be a minimum of twenty feet and shall be increased by one-half foot for each foot by which the building height exceeds twenty feet. D. Lot Coverage. No requirements. Compliance with Standards: As shown on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10, the "front" of the proposed warehouse building will be setback approximately 290 feet from the Table Rock Road right- of-way line, and approximately the same distance from the west property boundary, and therefore exceeds both the minimum front and rear yard requirements. From the interior side yard property line (north), the building will be setback approximately 350 feet, and from the street side yard property line (south) the building will be setback approximately 90 feet and thus the project complies with all minimum yard requirements for the M-1 district. 17.48.080 Signs. Signs within the M-1 district shall be limited to the following: A. 1. Permitted signs shall contain not more than one hundred square feet of surface area on any one side, or an aggregate of two hundred square feet of surface on all sides which can be utilized for display purposes; 2. Lighted signs shall be indirectly illuminated and nonflashing; 3. Identification signs shall be permitted within any required setback areas provided it does not extend into or overhang any parking area, sidewalk or other public right-of-way; Signs located within vision clearance areas at intersections of streets shall conform to Section 17.60.110. �1 Page 6 209 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC B. Signs advertising the property "for rent" or "for sale" shall not exceed four square feet of area on any one side and one such sign shall be permitted for each street frontage. C. Signs in the M-1 district shall be permitted and designed according to provisions of Chapter 15.24. Compliance with Standards: No signage is proposed as part of the subject applications. Applicant acknowledges these sign standards and any necessary permits for signage will be obtained from the City when new signs are proposed. 17.48.090 Off-street parking. All uses in an M-1 district shall provide off-street parking and loading facilities as required by Chapter 17.64, except when located within a special district organized to provide common public parking areas. Compliance with Standards: The proposed use meets the required off-street parking and loading facility requirements as outlined herein below. CHAPTER 17.64 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING 17.64.030 Off-street loading. A. In all districts for each use for which a building is to be erected or structurally altered to the extent of increasing the floor area to equal the minimum floor area required to provide loading space and which will require the receipt or distribution of materials or merchandise by truck or similar vehicle. there shall be provided off-street loading space in accordance with the standards set forth in Table 17.64.01, Off -Street Loading Requirements. rf,al I?5. il'' 1t r _? P_ L i L-0-A�I.f:l; R -v' 't;%1F",i3 Off -Street loading Berth Requirement (fractions rounded Use Categories up to the closest whole number) I^If�US-�FrIA! :iti:1?EHQ,i N�L?'e' Q 5y 4f 'f aoJ, A" a V.-, _ �...;rl nFj R �:nc� u.�:•.furJ �du° i A n B. A loading berth shall not be less than ten feet wide, thirty-five feet long and have a height clearance of twelve feet. Where the vehicles generally used for loading and unloading exceed these dimensions, the required length of these berths shall be increased. C. If loading space has been provided in connection with an existing use or is added to an existing use, the loading space shall not be eliminated if elimination would result in less space than is required to adequately meet the needs of the use. D. Off-street parking areas used to fulfill the requirements of this title shall not be counted as required loading spaces and shall not be used for loading and unloading operations, except during periods of the day when not required to meet parking needs. E. In no case shall any partion of a street or alley be counted as a part of the required parking or loading space, and such spaces shall be designed and located as to avoid undue interference with the public use of streets or alleys, Compliance with Standards: The proposed industrial warehouse use will be located within a new building of approximately 87,750 square feet that requires a minimum of 6 loading berths per Table 17.64.01. As depicted on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10, there are 26 loading berths located at the west end of the warehouse, which exceeds the minimum requirement. Project complies. Page 7 210 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC 17,64.040 Off-street parking requirements. All uses shall comply with the number of off-street parking requirements identified in Table 17.64.02A, Residential tiff -Street Parking Requirements, and Table 17.64.02S, Non -Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements. For residential uses, the off-street parking requirements are stated in terms of the minimum off-street parking required. For non-residential uses, the off-street parking requirements are presented in terms of both minimum and maximum off-street parking required. The number of off-street parking spaces in Table 17.64.02B, Non -Reside ntlal Off -Street Parking, may be reduced in accordance with subsection B of this section, Adjustments to Non -Residential Off -Street Vehicle Parking. The requirement for any use not specifically listed shall be determined by the community development director on the basis of requirements for similar uses, and on the basis of evidence of actual demand created by similar uses in the city and elsewhere, and such other traffic engineering or planning data as may be available and appropriate to the establishment of a minimum requirement. fA®LE I LOLL 920 NON-RESIDENTIAL OFF STREU PARKING REQUIREMENTS INDUSTRIAL and MANUFACTURING �;Ji ._, a, :..a:n .' •?nq,:��,__s •�r t11n: �.Il �, SI di11aC9n1 eai'� LOUD irei of gross flok i S4.,i I ot_,W 3Jd "ro r-1.g- .11-J lrl!c4•=i •5 r�-11•.�t f' I .:hd[�'i)8r •-•�hl:�l,pme4 the r.Nfz�in'i; Ius n"I: ane _Nr!) k*kk* B. Adjustments to Non -Residential Off -Street Vehicle Parking_ The off-street parking requirements in Table 17.64.0213, Non -Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements, may be reduced, or increased 1n any commerciat (C) or industrial (M) district as follows: 1. Reductions. The maximum off-street parking requirements may be reduced by no more than twenty percent. 2, Increases. The off-street parking requirements may be increased based on a parking demand analysis prepared by the applicant as part of the site plan and architectural review process. The parking demand analysis shall demonstrate and documents justification for the proposed increase. Compliance with Standards: The proposed warehouse use will occupy a new building of approximately 87,750 square feet, which would require 88 parking spaces under the gross floor area alternative in Table 17.64.02B for the warehouse use. The proposed use also includes distribution, and therefore, requires additional parking for the distribution aspect of the use which is not accounted for in the City's off-street parking ratio tables. The proposed site plan provides 170 parking spaces for employee use to the south and east of the of the warehouse, and as outlined in the parking demand memo at Applicant's Exhibit 12, the 170 proposed spaces is a reasonable number given the fact that the warehouse use also includes the distribution of products once they are received at the warehouse and to allow for seasonal fluctuations in needed employees. C. Accessible Parking Requirements. Where parking is provided accessory to a building, accessible parking shall be provided, constructed, striped, signed and maintained as required by ORS 447.233, and Section 1106 of the latest Oregon Structural Specialty Code as set forth in this section. 1. The minimum number of accessible parking spaces shall be provided for all uses in accordance with the standards in Oregon Structural Specialty Code, Minimum Number of Accessible Parking Spaces. Accessible parking spaces shall be counted toward meeting off-street parking requirements In Tables 17.64.02A and 17.64,025, Residential and Non- C� Page 8 211 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC Residential Off -Street Parking Requirements. The accessible parking requirements are minimum requirements and are not subject to reductions per subsection (B)(1) of this section. Compliance with Standards: As shown on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10, there are six accessible parking spaces provided at the east end of the new warehouse building, which meets the minimum number of spaces required under ORS 447.233 for parking lots with 151 to 200 parking spaces. All accessible parking spaces can and will be constructed, striped, signed and maintained as required herein. Project complies. ...A. Bicycle Parking. Bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with Table 17.64.04, Bicycle Parking Requirements. '4:and Use iiinlmum Required Industrial Yvarchouse Z spare; x O.l sp:r.e per 1000 ;q. fr. v:r,d,L,(:F Compliance with Standards: The proposed warehouse building is approximately 87,750 square feet and thus requires 9 bicycle parking spaces under Table 17.64.04. As shown on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10, the required bicycle parking is proposed to be provided near the main entrance on the east elevation. Project complies. CHAPTER 17.72 SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW 17.72.040 Site plan and architectural standards. In approving, conotionmily approving, or denying any site plan and architectural review application, the approving authority shall base its decision on compliance with the following standards: A. Applicable site plan, landscaping, and architectural design standards as set forth in Chapter 17.75, Design and Development Standards; B. City of Central Point Department of Public Works Department Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction; C. Accessibility and sufficiency of fire Fighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus. Compliance with Standards: As outlined below, the proposed warehouse development project meets the applicable design and development standards in Chapter 17.75, and both can and will meet the Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction, as well as being accessible for firefighting apparatus and operations. Project complies. CHAPTER 17.75 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 17.75.031 General connectivity, circulation and access standards. The purpose of this section is to assure that the connectivity and transportation policies of the city's Transportation System Plan are implemented. In achieving the obleclive of maintaining and enhancing the city's small town environment it is the city's goal to base its development pattern on a general circulation grid using a walkable block system. Blocks may be comprised of publiclprivate street right-of-way, or accesswlays, Page 9 212 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC A. Streets and Utilities. The public street and utility standards set forth in the City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction shall apply to all development within the city. B. Block Standards. The following block standards apply to all development: 1. Block perimeters shall not exceed two thousand feet measured along the public street right-of-way, or outside edges of accessways, or other acknowledged block boundary as described in subsection (B)(4) of this section. 2. Block lengths shall not exceed six hundred feet between through streets or pedestrian accessways, measured along street right-of-way, or the pedestrian accessway. Block dimensions are measured from right-of-way to right-of-way along street frontages. A block's perimeter is the sum of all sides. 3. Accessways or privatelretail streets may be used to meet the block length or perimeter standards of this section, provided they are designed in accordance with this section and are open to the public at all times. 4. The standards for block perimeters and lengths may be modified to the minimum extent necessary based an written findings that compliance with the standards are not reasonably practicable or appropriate due to: a. Topographic constraints; b. Existing development patterns on abutting property which preclude the logical connection of streets or accessways; c. Major public facilities abutting the property such as railroads and freeways; d. Traffic safety concerns; e. Functional and operational needs to create large commercial building(s); or f. Protection of significant natural resources. Compliance with Standards: The subject property is located at the south end of a partially developed block that contains a Costco Warehouse and gas station, and a FedEx Ground distribution facility. The proposed warehouse development will complete the development of this block by connecting Federal Way to Airport Road at its intersection with Table Rock Road. The width (east -west) of the existing and the future completed block is approximately 1,000 feet, and the existing length (north -south) of approximately 1,200 feet will be extended by approximately 575 feet with the construction of the proposed project and Federal Way/Airport Road street connection, This will result in block lengths and a perimeter that exceeds the maximums in Section 17.75.031. There are no existing through streets or accessways between the Costco Warehouse and FedEx properties, and there are none included in the proposed warehouse development for the following reasons: With respect to 17.75.03 1 (B)(4)(b), the existing development patterns on the abutting properties (i.e., the FedEx warehouse building and the Costco gas station facilities) preclude the creation of any additional through north -south streets and/or accessways that would shorten the block lengths this direction. The proposed use will be located within this block (two warehouse/distribution facilities and a large warehouse retailer with gas station) are such that direct street connections between and through the properties are not necessary as the uses do not create a synergy that would generate a need for general vehicular travel between the sites. With respect to 17.75.03 1 (B)(4)(c and d), the proposed warehouse development will construct the extension of Federal Way to connect with Airport Road at Table Rock [toad, which will provide the logical and safest means of vehicular circulation for the area. Moreover, Table Page 10 213 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC Rock Road is a principal arterial that is one of the largest and most heavily travelled north -south routes in Jackson County; accordingly Jackson County does not want additional access and connections to Table Rock Road where they are not necessary. Additionally, the proposed project will result in a complete sidewalk system around the entire perimeter of the subject block, which will provide for safe pedestrian travel between the sites. With respect to 17.75.031(B)(4)(e), the proposed warehouse and distribution facility is occupying the entire site from north to south. This large 87ksf commercial building's functional and operational needs preclude construction of an additional street east -west that would shorten the block lengths. Given these observations, modifications to the standards for block perimeters and lengths can thus be found to be appropriate. C. Driveway and Property Access Standards. Vehicular access to properties shall be located and constructed in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction, Section 320,10,30, Driveway and Property Access. Compliance with Standards: As shown on the Applicant's site plan at Exhibit 10, vehicular access to the proposed warehouse development will be directly from the new segment of Federal Way/Airport Road that will be constructed as part of the project. All driveways/access points can and will be constructed to the specified City standards. Project complies. D. Pedestrian Circulation. Attractive access routes for pedestrian travel shall be provided through the public sidewalk system, and where necessary supplemented through the use of pedestrian accessways as required to accomplish the following: 1. Reducing distances between destinations or activity areas such as public sidewalks and building entrances; 2. Bridging across barriers and obstacles such as fragmented pathway systems, wide streets, heavy vehicular traffic, and changes in level by connecting pedestrian pathways with clearly marked crossings and inviting sidewalk design; 3. Integrating signage and lighting system which offers interest and safety for pedestrians; 4. Connecting parking areas and destinations with retail streets or pedestrian accessways identified through use of distinctive paving materials, pavement striping, grade separation, or landscaping. Compliance with Standards: The proposed warehouse development will include construction of the final segments of Federal Way and Airport Road. When built, pedestrian travel will be available via sidewalks around the entirety of the completed block that will be formed by the subject project and the Costco Warehouse and FedEx properties to the north. There are no existing pedestrian connections between the Costco and FedEx properties and none are proposed as part of the subject warehouse development as it can be found that the uses are not anticipated to have interrelated pedestrian activity areas. E. Accessways, Pedestrian. Pedestrian accessways may be used to meet the block requirements of subsection 8 of this section. When used pedestrian accessways shall be developed as illustrated in Figure 17,75,01. All landscaped areas next to pedestrian accessways shall be maintained, or plant materials chosen, to rnainlain a clear sight zone between three and eight feet from the ground level. Page 11 214 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC Compliance with Standards: As noted above under the discussion related to block lengths and perimeters, pedestrian accessways between the subject and abutting properties are impractical and unnecessary given the nature of the uses and the sizes of the properties within the subject block. 17.75.039 Off-street parking design and development standards. All off-street vehicular parking spaces shall be improved to the following standards: A. Connectivity. Parking lots for new development shall be designed to provide vehicular and pedestrian connections to adjacent sites unless as a result of any of the following such connections are not possible: 1. Topographic constraints; 2. Existing development patterns on abutting property which preclude a logical connection; 3. Traffic safety concerns; or 4. Protection of significant natural resources. Compliance with Standards: The lands to the north of the subject property are developed with a Costco Warehouse and gas station, and FedEx distribution facility. These properties do not have connected parking lots and the proposed new warehouse development also does not include parking lot connectivity with these adjacent sites. The FedEx parcel has perimeter fencing that prohibits pedestrian cross -access. The proposed warehouse use features a significant number of delivery vehicles that will be parked on the northern half of the subject property and the circulation pattern and volume of these vehicles makes connected parking lots a safety concern for both vehicles and pedestrians. In addition, and as noted previously above, there are no obvious practical reasons for traveling between the adjacent properties given the uses on each. Should someone want to travel between any of the three sites, there will be convenient and safe routes for both vehicular and pedestrian travel via Federal Way. B. Parking Stall Minimum Dimensions. Standard parking spaces shall conform to the following standards and the dimenslons in Figure 17.75.03 and Table 17.75.02; provided, that compact parking spaces permitted in accordance with Section 17.64.040(G) shall have the following minimum dimensions: 1. Width --Shall be as provided in column B in Table 17.75.02; 2. Length --Shall reduce column C in Table 17.75.02 by no more than three feet. Compliance with Standards: The proposed parking spaces are 9 feet in width by 19 feet in length (18 feet where curbing serves as the wheel stop). Project complies. See, Applicant's site plan at Exhibit to. C. Access. There shall be adequate provision for ingress and egress to all parking spaces. Compliance with Standards: The employee parking areas have two-way, 24 foot wide drive aisles where there are back -to -hack parking rows, and there are two points of ingress/egress to Federal Way/Airport Road. Project complies. nt, including the curb cut. The D. construction Dof driveways shall riveay width lbe as set forth n the Standard Specificationl be measured at the driveway's narrowest s and design Public Works DepartmentStandards and Specifications. Page 12 215 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC Compliance with Standards: As shown on the Applicant's proposed site plan at Exhibit 10, there are five proposed driveways along the subject property's street frontage. The two driveways serving the delivery vehicle parking/storage area are 27 feet wide while the two driveways serving the employee parking lots are 21 feet in width. The fifth driveway located at the southwest corner of the warehouse site is 47 feet in width to accommodate larger freight delivery vehicles that will be unloaded at the west end of the warehouse. The proposed driveway widths are in conformance with the Public Works Department's uniform standards for driveways and alley approaches for commercial development (Drawing A-6A). E. Improvement of Parking Spaces. 1. When a concrete curb is used as a wheel stop, it may be placed within the parking space up to two feet from the front of a space. In such cases, the area between the wheel stop and landscaping need not be paved, provided it is maintained with appropriate ground cover, or walkway. In no event shall the placement of wheel stops reduce the minimum landscape or walkway width requirements. 2. All areas utilized for off-street parking, access and maneuvering of vehicles shall be paved and striped to the standards of the city of Central Point for all-weather use and shall be adequately drained, including prevention of the flow of runoff water across sidewalks or other pedestrian areas. Required parking areas shall be designed with painted striping or other approved method of delineating the individual spaces, with the exception of lots containing single-family or two-family dwellings. 3. Parking spaces shall be designed so that no backing movements or other maneuvering within a street or other public right-of-way shall be necessary, except for ovie- and two-family dwellings with frontage on a local street per the city of Central Point street ctassifscation map. 4. Any lighting used to illuminate off-street parking or loading areas shall be so arranged as to direct the light away from adjacent streets or properties. 5, Service drives shall have a minimum vision clearance area formed by the intersection of the driveway centerline, the street right-of-way line, and a straight line joining the lines through points twenty feet from their intersection. 6. Parking spaces located along the outer boundaries of a parking lot shall be contained by a.curb or a bumper rail so placed to prevent a motor vehicle from extending over an adjacent properly line, a public street, public sidewalk, or a required landscaping area. 7. Parking, loading, or vehicle maneuvering areas shall not be located within the front yard area or side yard area of a corner lot abutting a street in any residential (R) district, nor within any portion of a street setback area that is required to be landscaped in any commercial (C) or industrial (M) district. 8. Except as provided in subsection (E)(3) of this section, all uses, including one- and two-family dwellings on arterial and collector streets, shall provide adequate vehicles turnaround and maneuvering area through the use of aisle extensions and/or turnaround spaces as illustrated in Figure 17.75,04 and 17.75.05. Functionally equivalent turnaround and maneuvering designs may be permitted by the approving authority through the site plan and architectural review process. Compliance with Standards: As evidenced on the site plan at Applicant's Exhibit 10, wheel stops are not proposed to be used within the parking spaces, and all other parking space improvement standards can and will be met. F. Limitation on Use of Parking Areas. Required parking areas shall be used exclusively for vehicle parking in conjunction with a permitted use and shall not be reduced or encroached upon in any manner. The parking facilities shall be so designed and maintained as not to constitute a nuisance at any time, and shall be used in such a manner that no hazard to persons or property, or unreasonable impediment to traffic, will result. Page 13 216 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: 1311 DevCo, LLC Compliance with Standards: The proposed use is for an industrial warehouse and distribution facility which is permitted in the M-1 district, and these limitations on the use of parking areas are acknowledged and will be complied with. G. Parking/Loading Facility Landscaping and Screening. Parking lot landscaping shall be used to reinforce pedestrian and vehicular circulation, including parking lot entries, pedestrian accessways, and parking aisles. To achieve this objective the following minimum standards shall apply; however, additional landscaping may be recommended during the site plan and architectural review process (Chapter 17.72). All parking lots shall be landscaped in accordance with the following standards: r A a l L I...5 of L IP1)''.�:4_I� i T 0 r E li!!.IF TER l.N U C� I; I120•l ill ���:•'�I]ivt P IN a S FAVD112(iI Street Frontage I Min. Planting Arta Plants Required per tog lineal Ft, of Street yydtp Frontage th - — -- -- - ---�f A 20 Ufc Parlmetu (AhuWng) land Plnno Required per 50o LMgel N. et Use I Abutting Property 7 20 5 h 2 IO 1. Perimeter and Street Frontage Landscaping requirements. The perimeter and street frontage For ail parking facilities shall be landscaped according to the standards set forth in Table 17.75,03. Compliance with Standards: The subject property will have approximately 1,200 feet of frontage on Federal Way/Airport Road (Standard Local Street), and approximately 540 feet of frontage on Table Rock Road (Principal Arterial). Pursuant to Table 17.75.03, this equates to street frontage landscaping requirements of 36 trees and 180 shrubs along the Federal Way/Airport Road frontage, and 22 trees and 108 shrubs along the Table Rock Road frontage. As shown on the landscape plans at Applicant's Exhibits 10, a 10 to 15 foot wide planter area will be installed behind the sidewalk on the Federal Way/Airport Road street frontage, and a 15 foot wide planter will be installed behind the sidewalk along the Table Rock Road frontage. The subject property also has approximately 970 feet of shared property line with the two light industrial properties to the north (FedEx Ground and Costco), and a 10 foot wide planter is proposed along this shared property boundary. Pursuant to Table 17.75,03, this shared boundary planter will require a minimum of nineteen trees and 97 Shrubs. The preliminary landscape plans demonstrate that the shared property boundary and both street frontage landscape planter areas can accommodate and will have the required numbers of trees and shrubs. Final landscape plan can be conditioned to comply with all applicable requirements. 2. Terminal and Interior Islands. For parking lots in excess of ten spaces all rows of parking spaces must provide terminal a minimum of six feet in width to protect parked vehicles, provide visibility, confine traffic to aisles and driveways, and provide a minimum of five feet of space for landscaping. In addition, when ten or more vehicles would be parked side -by -side in an abutting configuration, interior landscaped islands a minimum of eight feet wide must be located within the parking row. For parking lots greater than fifty parking spaces, the location of interior landscape island shall be allowed to be consolidated for planting of large stands of trees to break up the scale of the parking lot. The number of trees required in the interior landscape area shall be dependent upon the location of the parking lot in relation to the building and public right-of-way: a, Where the parking lot is located between the building and the public right-of-way, one tree for every four spaces; Page 14 21 `7 APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC b. Where the parking lot is located to the side of the building and partially abuts the public right-of-way, one tree for every six spaces; c. Where the parking lot is located behind the building and is not visible from the public right-of-way, one tree for every eight spaces. Compliance with Standards: The proposed employee parking lots contain a total of 170 spaces which require a minimum of 43 trees within the employee parking lot landscape areas. The Applicant's preliminary landscape plans at Exhibit 10 demonstrate that the minimum number of required trees within the parking lot landscape areas can and will be met. There are no parking rows containing 10 or more vehicle spaces side -by -side, and with terminal landscape planters having 8 feet or more of space for landscaping, the proposed plan exceeds the minimum standard. In addition, there are numerous additional landscape planters throughout the parking lot that will further break up the scale of the parking lots. The proposed site plan also includes a large vehicle storage lot on the north half of the warehouse site, which is also proposed to be landscaped although it is not required within vehicle storage areas. This area has wide planters spread throughout that will contain numerous trees and shrubs. Project complies. 3. Bioswales. The use of bioswales within parking lots is encouraged and may be located within landscape areas subject to site plan and architectural review. The tree planting standards may be reduced in areas dedicated to bioswales subject to site plan and architectural review. Compliance with Standards: All stormwater from the proposed warehouse development will be detained in two dry ponds on both sides of the driveway near the southwest corner of the site. Bioswales are not proposed within the parking lots. If final engineering determines additional storm drainage detention is required, there is additional room for storm drainage detention on the proposed Parcel 2. H. Bicycle Parking. The amount of bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 17.64.040 and constructed in accordance with the following standards: 1. Location of Bicycle Parking. Required bicycle parking facilities shall be located on -site in well lighted, secure locations Bicycle parking may also be provided inside a building in suitable, secure and accessible locations. Bicycle parking for multiple uses (such as in a commercial center) may be clustered in one or several locations. 2. Bicycle Parking Design Standards. All bicycle parking and maneuvering areas shall be constructed to the following minimum design standards: a. Surfacing. Outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced in the same manner as a motor vehicle parking area or with a minimum of a three-inch thickness of hard surfacing (i.e., asphalt, concrete, pavers or similar material). This surface will be maintained in a smooth, durable and well -drained condition. b. Parking Space Dimension Standard. Bicycle parking spaces shall be at least six feet long and two feet wide with minimum overhead clearance of seven feet. c. Lighting. Lighting shall be provided in a bicycle parking area so that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks or motor vehicle parking lots during all hours of use. d. Aisles. A five-foot aisle for bicycle maneuvering shall be provided and maintained beside or between each row of bicycle parking. e. Signs. Where bicycle parking facilities are not directly visible from the public rights -of -way, entry and directional signs shall be provided to direct bicycles from the public rights -of -way to the bicycle parking facility. Page 15 Or. APPLICANT'S EXHIBIT 3 Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable Development Standards Tentative Plan & Site Plan and Architectural Review Applicant: BH DevCo, LLC Compliance with Standards: The proposed warchouse use requires 9 bicycle parking spaces as previously outlined under the standards for Section 17.64.040. These spaces will be provided near the northwest corner of the warehouse building as shown on the site plan at Exhibit 10. Page 16 219 e; u 8 = CY) �d 00 g r 10! --ft-41:Wd gt a:L 0=01M viva TO 0 N N 74"W1 MM114 1: 4 Oa tt� rf — P� � ill. fff 11. � .� �Hllill!•. faj� � �. � . _::lam il�iFF • ll � ` U OWL �rll ��i3i37fE :sued �►u f r�wlw �a ""�• ` y • • r a'li k tr tram E• r1 r � �[ ILV t.. r• � � ��� R� r - ra� saw•r� rr � � a .w.• a rr x w it rim Lit All PW . � � a�� � j��l .,=w•�� � #���Z • . � .r �� �¢ tea, #' r z:�-�,�_ I nr ., f' � i)�y �il�iEf .a' �'� R �-► ,--•-'f � � 16 1 ouI lot .!t E3 i �; brit wars • y \ liia t sit rr xsw ����+'� ��16 ■ ? •> r[,;IK- S 222 EXHIBIT 7 �A M R I •C K 67 I ��I �w i BCD r -, N�1* rw - E -1 ��� 110,1VA ■ Zoning District _ _I Subject Property I} BCG City Limits i ^ I M-1 Tax Lots M-2 `j os R-1-6 R-2 Date'.10/26/2022 J m Q Zoning Neap BH Devco, LLC Tentative Plan I Site Plan & Architectural Review 37-2W-1213-800, 900, 902 0 250 500 1,000 Feet HE fr N 223 2.2 -'I a. Z o= � o F- W aLLLU CL �wo U O a w W Q 'C-- z a' J z z w O } � W N O V) 0 L U w W U) 0 W J D0 0 0 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 a� m L V) Z J (7 Q M O it Cl) O Q Za)z O U O wZ_ Y � Z O aN n N N O N w w O Z t � 9 !��'j i ii 1 �j• �� 3RS ��R 2d i Z! OHM gi e f t 3` ill 3 H Ulfl a 1 es ($R1Rlf�3�srs`1� �',� �91f2i�� �� R N N {1] iNorNn ��• p;tt NUG1gA. K.Y.gx-.IN.N• naa•O .4003N0 A14000 .losf3 i i5 ro•G- 0. +lull. i wIN „,, inoAV1 aO '1NIOd IYHIN30 EEEE 'xi tv..xss. a. xuox-.�wa acz • � UJOH«<Aalwi� =gall Ub7ldObd 9NIISlx3 'OldNOOU 3113Vi 6US ono a+c�ie�x sysIRS z� ;, ; z Ji f If L o JA- 1 I'y � � �•1 � l 0 ��- uro .+mcwn - a'•' M,n .a �u.smr nYo xwxuu�Y,un - "- --"".- KY.Y 1t'0f1�6P � tllr• 'MYRY Rlr,w 1 In 21] J Oa>w UJOHO«Aalwil Z w w I m�9 w� aooa XtA" 3ievi �� Ino.kyi lVld 43SOdOad ■J a !may x� 8r •vo�aao Ai,vnoo uDs35n a0 'INIOd IVZ3a N 'UN )OM 318d1 MC N N 9114I !•. �gYIA xN t,Y1-AYxT pN IE��i�•!Or pr(i�l urK u'¢Wr]p atl. a rc a+dr. awO t !o! 'vxi 11L�ooS r O�v xrEx-a'nPx uaoH ((<Aajwi)j NOD --No AAI,02 � 4lxCl4 ino)% -1 A1bI3d02id 110 '1NIOd IVUIN30 M � 43S0d0Hd a21 008 3l9`dl L6L£ 8 cn wlP2 o F- is Z , I I I w" W, Z w I f I I Lu 00 N N fPM .r• wton wr �-e71w w1 a -am -fa a+nla 1 it �' N �. RK •R•ryr uww � �ii � p"�M W.0034`I� CM•UYW NNO uaoH wAamm Vpasl4,f [rtY�l f L11VW M� r�'kjo ALNfW 'C:Y-N01103S SSOaO '1NIOd 1VH-LN3O I avoN 03SOd011d I 'OII NOON 318V-L me fi � 5 W N }�O = 0 LLI N N Z a Y z W W !-- p N N i I l; O } 1 CL J0 ED a ZI W LUJJ Ov � g- ~aQ z� fn H O w z o r Z V Q d, CW.i a N ch - - W �d5f1� IaQd Steil Fi t€S�[�kY=�=} ilxj;fiig{iiii� ��!s'�3fi 7 tit tl LU �i�6F�iIM Ili l s 15rs} �F��4 „rlls9�i 1 0 v � 9o�tt rx iY�Yµw whew-+]wsr, Yi •,. Mditinvq Ntfld 311S 1o3md U UJOH ' rn•o•a ar7urr� v ,�' a ------ 1 .-- ^a�� 1Tv;Gt1_11JON91•1•rt Y�1 _ ti • rLr�.'tii+.i �'{...�ra;r�R• +tea-:.lrj•�:: :;,�h�,..� • = T.r _ — — .,.. j1 '•4'r 1p rk 1p vj �.:_ _>< ,r . v r,.'��i, • ,' is —; ; I` 4 it 4 +j `1 11I �j 1 .' I � � �rw I� 1 3'.' S1 r.�l1s^i.'.: ftisf ri � �f':S T � i:' : i � ��� ��i •qfr l�f gay a 1 1IA t • � � E Y � • � r �`�'S j � ll - • uI1 .. . _rI'�S lk it o IF1 R •R� � r' �-'•�... 11 p VV i _ _ -�.' :� 1� :I x n � �l.i• r �I UJOH(((AajWl)j NV -id 3dVOSCINYI 11"3AO AHdunvy io,woUd It iwl - , 101, tzp"%Zjr- t,-, to t:.r - ------ GY .?. QD 0 t I I %qp.O%v, dmn •y IAet •5 euWtf I.nwCn•e FM • M 3Wxee� uJOH<<(AajWl)j NVId 3dVOSaNVI 83 a 33 i 2a i 'oil cgs �5g�g gg� Ile3, y 2Qe�EEgg a U w .lHd,dnw b 103ro2ld � JIT`���,1' 1 '�• rl., � Irr r , I N� I yJ � b 1 I a^ g I 1 � .4, Y .�1 . i 1x �:• 4 -; •9 •. at: �•- a .ilj it 1 i_.-i VP � 1 t f I I i I I I. I; I' I I I i 1 I I I 4� I I I f I I I I � • I I I I 1 I � t • I r l I 1 I L 9 t C� N iOGrt N ta+rtVi'Obf Y.R l.W.�'MW v �i a. 'w.anu oa w•••r nu. M u .f[m ...+... v TM 60H Aajw!)l «( 1n6- N'dld 3dt/OSaNlflAHdunw ln3f021d --------------�-' I I I I I I I 1 I I 6 I I I I l i I 1 I I I Nye, UJOHO<Aa1w. i I "R T l I. Y I i a L P i r 3 I z 7 '00cb�)-d.%- 'MOIRE d9dVDSGNV'1 AH&im 103rO8d ujoH<<<Aajwi)j NV-1d 3dVOS(INV-1 HIM 1,11'' Q 11 fi 1 13 mm" a 0 a 0 M. Ul 1 Alit" • I- --- — — — — — — — — Mdum 1 I 10YOUd 1:1 kHdNnN Ntfld 3dH�SdNb'l 103f'Oad ee Q 1 1 W wca v aomiu ��� urs 1ra..anw s e.� uaoH�<<i(ajwi� rdrr�e�+f.1 I i •.�p ... _ i • '�k I Vic.---"-s i' y �1 i� ,� t... '' ��•: J ii 11 �i i li 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 4 I I � I �1 � r 1 I I l 1 NY1d 3dVOSONY1 um7en wm" r ww okHdum o ioaro8d 1 UJOH(<<N Slld134 3dVOSdNTI — pes Al N'16'� Ml`iTJv�' Md,dnn ! r 9 k ' V a 1 a0�0 £ �c R s 4�se i F i it 0 0 00 0o c»c ,� t tlRtl Ee y Y N 1 'OL ns �F � ���• � � � � � S[� s � �8 Y� � 1 {f Y� ` ��lij" y ���� SF���C � ,1'S I F OP I F 1 i t �tj S i1 Eaf �i ii� Jim � { � �.�� tl� # i1� €i��� � �� as � tl; n�� �4 � � � �"tl� �'.. ,tl�• ,S` a. . "i. � Ifr.° .. l pit. {. Sz. wow •i. -a!11 �iM� � lY''8�'`; �$J'`_ '1p 3 i� �Ifl f{ yIJ �� r �I•'`- r � iF'1 fill ✓`{ I; oil a�y a it sp : lip. 1. p �C} p 00 OOQ i ;rr 61 M N v°�R a AS g1N-,zvnvM - w�° ALNeO] .�+• ^w S31ON 3dVOSONV1 1'J3fQLld uaoH<<<Aajwi� =r a�.o�" E?7Eii11+11,4,0"0 _ JAI i � y €� g S r! s ��§q°I ��rrggE3r • e ^€ a }Hlit �C ypE eq�� p t 9r e g S i � v Jill JillB E�9 i �6�RC HIM ; 7= �J�€�ip�pj i 9 A9i gg 33 55 FF6 a l= � 3e r �' a �;-e �Hill Imm I gal i• �°�°6 � i�e��;�� ' � �q Ji Hm i¢ ke "'k �ja=g@HdgS pp6� RgR � q , e ppyyy , h � 1� 77H $ 111 :�a�3E � I�p�e5Y3 7 ; S ie 1 � e b e 1 � �pi=7 g3nqn7 S 'R g9_ - r r P u CD N , c =x .wmw ro, w.ax-.nre,ww yM ,.-nr NVId uaoN �dalww �� - :-i w`r Nolrr�iaal ��va3no q }:ti1[ ,` g IT l ` CV I ,,.i" �' Mdanw 1 o 103rMhA t � i 9}�a§� 1 Id 3 1 1 e e S 5 c 1♦ - - g All 91 u .� of ncrra •ems u -1 < e. UJOHOAaIWIN Wtl1H0 KINMD NV-1d NOldJIN81 kHdHniN 103ro8d i � I 1 ` 1 1 .r.71�Mo=oc7-�6. w.4k'� .mom t•Cr I I 1 1 1 1 I i t 4 1 1 1 I I rl� t / f i i T T f � f l I f I I I I t f �• I 1 I 1 I �{ I I mtt N'. MON-.Nawx uaoHo(Aajw1)1 Ila � de1T N 13 ,i�lI iHIRBPI JI011!i1;1m, 11116 1gglfg 14P1 18 3 01 otl�� o r ee eaImW- o? ea C4 8 � � ® 0i El c (D C. r�ia Ir IsF I° �! I E to y1 , NV11d NOILVOl di fiEia�r le I I+ I + --- 1�1---- -— — — — — — — — — — — --- ---_--- AHdanw 133POUd I 1 , I I 1 1 I I I 1 I e I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 a I I 1 I 1 I I I I` 1- M N .1 4W lyryi/�4a s,r • • • a nUe � IW77e0 11N11a? +vS�a•!r pr, ..��. aosww•.rwe, we ,y .� ore-rm awe, '• - Nflld NOldJla2il UJOH O<Ag 1�3f021d wig - - =Ip lrar P7GCi Ca et V le J c=i 114i 3i$ 3:;$ iiQ.i 4?I?SAS 3R�r �z 3 93 i:�a i Y's e 5 � 0 I� III I , I � l7 0 � A � i i i I I I :I ({.��`w'py,'�l7'-TI �`IT"."�'. �'^li,"�' .�:�_�.T•^'"�`ryrl+..'. �•T,r f` ' I' � ... ¢-.._m'_.e.:.2�_..4�.rmw+.t•��9TQ.r.C?''.t�t. b .e,.-�---c`a,�r ^i'�;, I I �I`}r I�}�I, {s f F IS•, � i _� II r t� iR a , 7 ', � i l ; I I : i ,l;i �• �Iry,��,��JJI II 'ip n + I p s a I p ib 1 V•' � 1 ;,6 1 III 1 ---------_- wKw,w.,:-_--____. - , r---_---�--�--_- --- --; N • tir,.nen a. •�.•+,•� an s .,a.n rr ,.,. 103rmi d g UJOH#(Aajwj)j L.d nN R IN �i 3`]f's !3$: 334 33iF 9 i]65f! !:RP As 3= 39 ]t9 F5 E9 W �I �]a] o 06 qD � �JR.AI w-A IrdiF 1Pl�J • i- L#•K • ■_�• y'�:w1.1 =�� , l.l I. .i' Y14,«' �1'n� h`' y�1•'[�1 't!� �. I. 1'I`�1 y I 1 i i � I � •�� 1,���. I .Ji:6,. I •..�rl ;i, .ill 1 . I ;e `—Dc' - '�-I '•� � 1; ��. J. a �, << 'li''i, Est 41 r { 1 --------------------------- Ln N 0 uaduM -- M -- ... •�., qA�AHAm 11JOH<«I�ajWI�Ntnd Nold�laal 1�3f02td a �i A{1 !d ! gg s= HINIli 10 i I�9 {i}n 3 ii' w` @l silts$ @§I:g .� S$$:a 0a §r #fs3l� §•_��.{e �� §- 9§� §:1��} a � i� 1� 5',a a 11 i I 0 11 1 i n �(o o e (p D.�lar ____.. __ ... __________—________� 7-____—_--_ ii ��I______ �__-- I � I till .d'j•I s I fl�l � t;.� ,� E4• I, I ry �r,J I "II.'s. I � fix.. • � ` >0s E I .III'i'I i '� � i �•T,1 f I� I E � r r ', a tl'r�; +r• •I i 1 1 E E m ., 1 '41 ,L 7 dip. r��r �i '� r• �l..:F Y.:P_II �X:' o_. _.4�{1F Y9" I�D:L4',,'j.-.__ .,.w...r•,r�." •-----•-_ ..-------------------- s9 . uaoH <o Aajw1)j Yw rru prgY(Wi � � # It'll 1 4 gill',! 1 4 Il 1 I ,kHdHnIN NVId N0111JRi2il iogrOad �r N .w. � rlooleo Aiwno� nusH�rr t,.. Sllt/130 NOlb'JI2l211 ! ll,f0�-jotaltuu a«�� ,. 103M' ld `J / el- �n Al INS x �s B fi E ou g All, O oe OO O rail 9< H IN �'i I lifra� �5 3da a 99 tt a ii !jy § yq 'Iy6e� � gF ! C Y q �B i � � 1 = ? Y r .-. •—.� Z` I 'a �' � � 6q � � . •. �� is cc cf N �F]�i1 SL,lYYA1 V�nN IM1�41w tf�lN �UJOHOXAWIN SaION NO.LVO NI W l03rO3road 1 i � �1 i ny}1 1 4? a fill, 4 = Lit .I•fAY v x uu>'m� ro�mr nxi"w�� m, ww NVId �,�>,'�s„Lx�•,�,"ems®, x, ..�. SOIIJ131NOIOHd ± UJOHo(AaIWI)I ��e ,lY IIVUBAO • ll vCf eF 717QkF H'Y41' �� � T' ��• �L.•_ _ .____ . _____. LO r LLJ LLI ki ■ I • Mdunn o 103rOUd w Wd UIOH�C<I�al��� ice'" „ 43OWN3 ux«ge.e `. •' � .. _ .. .. • � ., .-. .. n n .. � ., n H ., c � � .. ., a .. .: i 00.00M,.cJZ,S�.AO�l� 7, i Ln N •y• i.� fMnAM IOiR w1 AL:soN 1q,YOX-u.mlwMY •TRW ^�• Soil Nhlt4 � uNfga NVld kHdmniN 113W010Hd 133ro8d 3J2flf1N3 it -- ' I•. { I l� I 11 •. 'I .• - � � } . ,- v , n I f t. "!• • l � .; .� } .Ili ..{• .. _ .. .. .- I _ I, j -. rl+-----,------- �� ~ " �°`° 4• ^- NYld Mdunn S3Ia13WOlOHd lO3fOad uaoH0KADIWDI --- 43E)HYlN3 ,� Li Obt .! :� ,�� �� • •_ �f 1. ', � �� r .. r) Ln N yn - Haane° ��� wia .w,reoroi w.aau-no.r... — r p.n.n -^ rmasa u�ixo �4ixarr NVld ,lHdaflUV U�OHK<I�a�WI� S�a30bYIN9 d ioaroad W �.9 OOW[;617 S' _.-.__ --_ - __ - '•-.. ....-.i : - � � R�?� •�lli]r1fL�-x�gf�.li.�ri , V.;� �- U1, MCI- �F` cf: 1, j Ad ,kHdanw 13grONd LO N iwYas a,..mmr wa.uwr.a.wrw lave L 9unaY �mol Yre 9�r anp 9 rY ,s, n nofrH ' � 9R 91YrJos<Y OX MYH� RG 0 yM� 4Y !.• UJON (KOWN Ntfld S0IH13WOlOHd d3Ja1fIN3 AHdaflW 103rO2! d • r fig: .. 1 1 1: �1 e I 1 k I I 1 I t 1 l 1 I 1 i I � lir 1 I 1 r- LO N • o- mdanw oa o _ i, A jj � nt Ill � m s� 1 4 P .11u I CC1 b s � JA I - ® 99yy LL ^® I S S� co EXHIBIT 12 rr, I L Technical Memorandum GSA Planning. Ltd 4497 Browmrldge, Suite 101 To: Steven Backman, BH Devco Medford, OR 97604 Telephone 541.779.0569 Date: October 31, 2022 Fax 541.779.0114 Subject: Parking Demand for Project Murphy JeyI@CSAplenning.com PARKING DEMAND DISCUSSION CSA Planning Ltd. was asked to provide evidence concerning parking demand for the proposed "Project Murphy" warehouse and distribution facility in Central Point, Oregon. The Central Point Municipa[ Code (CPMC) Section 17.64 sets Out the City's Off -Street Parking requirements. Non-residential off-street parking requirements are provided in Table 17.64.02(B). That table contains a standard for Warehousing and Storage, but there is no parking rate for a warehousing, storage, and distribution facility. The distribution aspect Of the proposed project makes a big difference. Warehousing and Storage uses require off-street parking for office workers, fork-lift operators And dock workers. This type of use is typically being visited by the trucking uses delivering to the facility. After they deliver their load, the trucks move to the next warehouse or storage use. The CPMC uses a rate of 1 parking space per thousand feet of gross floor ores for warehouse and storage uses. This equates to a requirement for 88 parking spaces for the warehouse and storage aspects of the proposed use. The distribution aspect of the proposed use is not captured by the CPMC. The proposed site plan has 170 parking spaces, so the use proposes an additional 82 parking spaces to be needed to serve the distribution aspect of the project. The distribution aspect of the proposed use will require off-street parking for some portion of the distribution van drivers to park their personal vehicles at the facility. CPMC 17.64.040(S) allows adjustments to the non-residential off-street vehicle parking requirements. The Site Plan also depicts vehicle storage area for 216 distribution vans. Some vans will be loaded while others are out for delivery. Uses like this have been and will continue to become more and more automated over time. PARKING DEMAND CONCLUSION When considering the base warehouse and storage off-street parking requirement for 87 auto spaces, the proposed additional 82 auto parking spaces Is a reasonable and appropriate amount to meet the needs of the additional distribution aspects of the use pursuant to CPMC 17.84.040(B). CSA also observes that the nature of the proposed street configuration is such that most of the new street extension fronts on property owned by the Applicant on bath sides of the street, and therefore, significant on -street parking will also be available in the area and may be utilized during potential seasonal employment fluctuations. CSA Planning, Ltd. 4• f la Harland President 259 EXHIBIT 13 � "' j� Furst American '. Order No.: 7161-3998828 October 05, 2022 FlistAmerican Tide Insurance Company 1225 Crater Lake Avenue, Suite 101 Medford, OR 97504 Phn-(541)779-7250 Fax - (866)400-2250 FOR OU_EFHSaVL REGARDING YOUR CLOSING: IPLEAkk CONiAC-r: LORI BILLINGS, Escrow Officer/Closer Phone: (541)779-7250 - Fax: (866)839-7125- Emall:ibillings@firstam.com First American Title Insurance Company 1225 Crater Lake Avenue, Suite 101, Medford, OR 97504 FOR ALL QUESTIONS REGARDIN v THIS PRELIMIN,AM UPORT, PLEASE C Ni CT: Mark Fliegel, Title Officer Phone: (541)779-7250 - Email: mfliegel@firstam.com 2nd Revised Preliminary Title Report This report Is for the exclusive use of the parties herein shown and is prelkninary to the issuance of a title Insurance policy and shall become void unless a policy is Issued, and the full premium paid. Please be advised that any provision contained in this document, or in a document that is attached, linked or referenced In this document, that under applicable law illegally discriminates against a class of individuals based upon personal characteristics such as race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, familial status, disability, national origin, or any other legally protected class, is illegal and unenforceable by law. Situs Address as disclosed on Jackson County Tax Roll: 3791 Table Rock Road, Medford, OR 97504 2021 ALTA Owners Standard Coverage Liability $ Premium $ 2021 ALTA Owners Extended Coverage Liability $ 5,436,174,17 Premium $ 14,348.00 2021 ALTA Lenders standard Coverage Liability $ Premium $ 2021 ALTA Lenders Extended Coverage Liability $ Premium $ Endorsement Premium $ Govt Service Charge Cost $ 270.00 Other cost $ We are prepared to issue Title Insurance Policy or Policies of First American Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska Corporation in the form and amount shown above, Insuring title to the following described land: The land referred to in this report is described In Exhibit A attached hereto. and as of September 28, 2022 at 8:00 a.m., title to the fee simple estate is vested in: Table Rock Business Park, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company Subject to the exceptions, exclusions, and stipulations which are ordinarily part of such Policy form and the following: 260 Preliminary Report Order No.: 7161-3999828 Page 2 of 11 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons In possession thereof. 3. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the public records; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Any encroachment (of existing improvements located on the subject land onto adjoining land or of existing improvements located on adjoining land onto the subject land), encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the subject land. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material, equipment rental or workers compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished, Imposed by law and not shown by the public records. The exceptions to coverage 1-5 inclusive as set forth above will remain on any subsequently issued Standard Coverage Title Insurance Policy. In order to remove these exceptions to coverage in the issuance of an Extended Coverage Policy the following items are required to be furnished to the Company; additional exceptions to coverage may be added upon review of such information: A. Survey or alternative acceptable to the company B. Affidavit regarding possession C. Proof that there Is no new construction or remodeling of any improvement located on the premises. In the event of new construction or remodeling the following is required: I. Satisfactory evidence that no construction liens will be filed; or If. Adequate security to protect against actual or potential construction liens; III. Payment of additional premiums as required by the Industry Rate Filing approved by the Insurance Division of the State of Oregon 6. Water rights, claims to water or title to water, whether or not such rlghts are a matter of public record. 7. Taxes for the fiscal year 2022-2023 a lien due, but not yet payable 8. The herein described property has been disqualified from special assessment as farm use land and is currently assessed at true cash (market) value. ORS 308A.083 et seq. provides that if the property Is converted to a use inconsistent with its return to farm purposes, potential tax in the amount of $3,919.69 will become due and payable. (Affects Parcel 1) 9. City liens, if any, of the City of Central Point. 10. The premises herein described are within and subject to the statutory powers of the Rogue Valley Sewer Services. FhatAmerlcan Me 261 Preliminary Report order No.: 7161-3998026 Page 3 of 11 11. These premises are situated in the Rogue River Valley Irrigation District, and subject to the levies and assessments thereof, water and irrigation rights, easements for ditches and canals and regulations concerning the same. 12, The rights of the public in and to that portion of the premises herein described lying within the limits of streets, roads and highways. 13. Intentionally deleted 14. Intentionally deleted 15. Any conveyance or encumbrance by Table Rock Business Park, LLC should be executed pursuant to their Operating Agreement, a copy of which should be submitted to this office for inspection. 16. Unrecorded leases or periodic tenancies, If any. 17. Extended Owner's policy has been requested per the Sale and Purchase Agreement provided for this transaction, therefore we will need to be provided an ALTA/NSPS Land Survey and the seller sign our Extended Owner's Affidavit required for our review prior to dose of escrow, so that we may revise our report accordingly. 18. This report has been submitted to our underwriter for review and approval. We will inform you of any further exceptions and/or requirements. - END OF ExCEPTIONS - Note: Revised to update report and remove previous exception 13. NOTE: We find no matters of public record against BHD Land Development, LLC that will take priority over any trust deed, mortgage or other security instrument given to purchase the subject real property as established by ORS 18.165. NOTE: Taxes for the year 2021-2022 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $2,123.27 Map No.: 372W12B 800 Property ID: 1-046233-9 Tax Code No.: 49-49 NOTE: Taxes for the year 2021-2022 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $649.74 Map No.: 372W12B 900 Property ID: 1-046234-7 Tax Code No.: 49-49 NOTE: Taxes for the year 2021-2022 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $654.59 Map No.: 372W12B 902 Property ID: 1-046236-1 Tax Code No.: 49-49 NOTE: This Preliminary Title Report does not include a search for Financing Statements filed in the Office of the Secretary of State, or in a county other than the county wherein the premises are situated, and no liability is assumed if a Financing Statement is flied in the Office of the County Clerk covering Fixtures on the premises wherein the lands are described other than by metes and bounds or under the rectangular survey system or by recorded lot and block. First American Title 262 Prellminary Report order No.: 7161-39ON28 Page 4 of 11 NOTE. According to the public record, the following deed(s) affecting the property herein described have been recorded within ?4 months of the effective date of this report: NONE NOTE: We find no outstanding voluntary liens of record affecting subject property. An inquiry should be made concerning the existence of any unrecorded lien or other indebtedness which could give rise to any security interest In the subject property. THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING FIRST AMERICAN TITLE! WE KNOW YOU HAVE A CHOICE! yrs[AmeNcan Mle 263 Prellminary Report Order No.: 7161-3998828 Page 5 of 11 MARK FLIEGEL TITLE OFFICER mfliegel@Flrstam.com RECORDING INFORMATION As of March 23, 2020 Jackson County recording fees are as follows: Fees: $ 102.00 All Deeds 1st page $ 5.00 All Deeds for each additional page $ 119.00 All Other Document Types $ 5.00 All Other Document Types for each additional page Fees will be imposed by the County Clerk of a document presented for recording fails to meet the its established by ORS Chapter 205._ . - --_ _ _,_-_ T_f. -- _._. ___.. _. -.___.j cc: John Hamlin, Hamlin Real Estate 1118 East Main Street, Medford, OR 97504 cc: Stark and Hammack PC 100 East Main Street, Suite M, Medford, OR 97501 Flat American Tide 264 Preliminary Report order No.: 7161-3998928 Page 6 of 11 Exhibit "A" Real property in the County of Jackson, State of Oregon, described as follows: PARCELI: Beginning at the Southeast corner of Donation Land Claim No. 56 in Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, Jackson County, Oregon; thence north 890 53' West along the South boundary of said Donation Land Claim, 757.4 feet; thence South 200.0 feet; thence South 430 30' East, 470.0 Feet; thence South 4911 30' East, 264.4 feet to the South line of property described in Cartificate Title No. 1040; thence South 891147' East, 598.2 feet:; thence North 356.0 feet; thence South 890 47' East, 252.2 feet to the centerline of Table Rock Market Road; thence North along the centerline of said road, 356.85 feet to the North boundary of Donation Land Claim No. 58; thence North 890 53' West along said North boundary of Donation Land Claim No. 58, a distance of 618.35 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL 2: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Donation Land Cialm No. 56, Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, 3ackson County, Oregon; thence South 89° 50' 10" East along the North line of Donation Land Claim No. 58, said Township and Range, 578.10 feet; thence South 00 03' West, parallel to and 10 feet west of tt)e West fine of Table Rock Road, 356.81 feet; thence North 890 47, west, 212.50 feet; thence South 00 03' West, 102.0 Feet to the true point of beginning; thence continue South 00 03' West (record South) 76.0 feet to the Southwest comer of tract described in Document No. 71-03949, official Records, Jackson County, Oregon; thence South 890 47' East, along the South line of said tract, 212.50 feet; thence North 00 03' East (retard North) 76.0 feet; thence North 890 47' West, 212.50 feet, to the true point of beginning. PARCEL 3: Comrnemcing at the Southeast corner of Donation Land Claim No. 56 In Township 37 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, Jackson County, Oregon; thence South 890 50' 10" East along the North line of Donation Land Claim No. 58, said Township and Range, 578.10 feet; thence south 00 03' West, parallel to and 10 feet West of the West line of Table Rock Road, 356.81 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 890 47' West, 212.50 feet; thence South 00 03' West 102.00 feet; thence South 690 47' East 212.50 feet to the West line of Table Rock Road; thence North 00 03' East along said West line, 102.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Excepting therefrom all 3 parcels all that portion of the property conveyed to Jackson County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, recorded April 06, 2017 as Document No. 2017-011467. NOTE: This legal description was created prior to January 1, 2008. Firs[ American Title 265 Preliminary Report Order No.: 7161-3998828 Page 7 of 11 First American Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE ALTA LOAN POLICY (07/01/21) The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attomeys' fees, or expenses that arise try reason of: 1. a. any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (Including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: I. the occupancy, use, or enjoyrr am of the Land; 5. the character, dimensions, or location of any Improvement erected on the Land; Ili. the subdivision of land; or Iv, environmental remedlatlon or protection. b, any governmental forfeiture, pollee, regulatory, or natiomi security power. C. the effect of a vtoiation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion l.a. or l.b. ExrJuslon 1 does not modify or llmrt the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5 or 6. 2. Any power of eminent domain. Exclusion 1 does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7. 1 Any defect, lien, eacombrar05, adverse claim, or otter matter: a. created, sufferer, assumed, nr agreed W by the Insured Claimant; b. out IGxown to the Company, stat r"yded In the Pubttc itiK" at die Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Clakhrant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Clalmant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; e. resulting in no loss or damage to the .1owred Clalmant; d. attaching or created subsequent to the Date of Polley (kw"ion JA does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13, or M); or e. resulting m loss or damage that xenuld not have been sumined 9 considerat+on sufflcrent to qualify the insured named in Schedule A as a bwra fide pumhihser or encumbrancer had been given for din insured tslprsyaga at bee Date Of Policy. 4. tJnenforteabihty, of the lkn 0 the lnsza eci Mortgage because of the IntlbiilLV or !allure of an Insured to comply with applicable d0ing•busines law. 5, Tnrallrllty of urhertrorceau;Iity of the lien of the fnsured fvgrtgage that raises out of the transaction evidw.rkd by the. Insured nhorlgage and is based upon usury law or Consumer Ptolectloo law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the om!rhtion of federal bankruptcy, slate Insolvency, or similar creditors' rights law, that the transaction creating the hen of the Insured Mortgage is a: a. fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactons Act; or c, preferential transfer: i, to the extent the Insured Mortgage is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange Rw new value; Or d. for any other reason riot seated in CaveiW Risk 11b, 7. Any c8im of a PAV1-PSA Trust, Etdusfon 7 dues nut rrwdlfy or limit use Coverage provrded under Covered Risk a. S. Any lien on die iufe for real estate taxes or 6$SCitmaats Imposed by a gorweirirme ital aui4oTity and created or attiching between the We 0 PolIW and the data of tmort g of the inured Mortgage in the Public Records. Er_ki5fon B does rml modify of WIL the coverage provided under Covered itisk 2.b. or ll.b. 9. Arry discrepancy In the quantity of the area, square footage, or acreage of the Land or of any improvement to the land ALTA OWNEEt S POLICY (07/01/21) The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. a any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (Including those relating to building and zoning) that restricts, regulates, prohibits, or relates to: 1. the occupancy, use, or enp—Iment cf Uie Land; ii. the character, dimensions, cx acaf a, of any Improvement an the Land; it. the subdivision of land; or iv. environmental remedlatlon or protection. b. any governmental forfeiture, police, reguiaLary, or national security puwet. c, dse effect of a violation or enforcement of any matter excluded under Exclusion La. or Lb. Exduslon 1 does not modify or Ilmu the coverage provldild under Gavered Risk 5 or 6. 2. Any power, of eminent domain. 5xiuskxt 2 does not modify or lirnk the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7. 3 Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or otter Maittrr: a. treated, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; th riot (Grown to the Company, not receded in the Public Records at the Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed In writing to the Comimny by the Insured Clalmonr prier to the date the Insured Claimant became an insured under this policy; c. resulting In no loss or damage to the Insured Clalmant, d, attaching or vetted sub wquent to the We of Policy (E.xdusivn 34. does not modify or Ilmit the coverage provided under Covered IWk 9 or 10); Or e, resulting in W or damage that would not have been sustalrhed it consideration sufficrent to qualtfy the insured named m schedule A as a hang Tide purdtaser had been given for the Title at the We of Palley. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of Federal bcnkruptey. st,ste nsolvency, or slmllar creditors' rights law, that the transaction vesfing the Title as shown In Schedule A is a: a, fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; b. voidable transfer under the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act; or c. preferential transfer: r, 1v the. extent the instrument of transfer vesting the Title as shown In Schedule A Is not a transfer made as a contemporaneous exchange for new wduo; or d. For any other reason not stated rr+ Covoced Rusk 9.0. 5. Any Balm of a PACA-PSA Trust. kxcNslon S does not aWry or llrrhit the average Provided under i,b PMd Risk Ill. 6. Any lien on Itm Tmie far real estate taxes Of assessrnm%5 Imposed ar collected by a governmental authority mat tXrcames due and payable after the Date of Peliry. Excfusidr 6 does not modify or limit the cwErage provided under Covered Risk 2.b, 7. Any dLqueotncv In the aiwttty of the area, squaru footage, of aueage of the tdml or of any ImprthvCmenL to the Land. F#st American ride MAN Preliminary Report Order No.: 7161-3998828 Page 8 of 11 SCHEDULE OF STANDARD EXCEPTIONS I. Taxes Or assassments which are not shown as existing (fens"the records of any taxing authority that Iavlts taxes or 359Ps5m.ents on real property or by the pubrk records; proceedings N a px,blic agency whit; may result in laxoS Or aSut%ments, Or rIckes of such proceedings, wmu)er ar not shown by tie risDXds Or such agency or by the puhtk rCCarr15. 2. Fact% rights, interem or claims which are not shown by the public. records but whk}r rnuld be mired by an inspection Or the land ar by rnaking Inquiry of perms In pozesslon thereof. 3. Easenhe» hs, or CtaintS Of easement, not shown by the public retards: reservattans ar exceptlons In patents or In Ac,6 euthorkino the lsswnce #hereof; water r4hts, dabs or title to water. 4. My encroachment (of extsting improvements loraoed on the subject land onto adjoining lard or of exi5tlrt9 irnpravemrnts rotated on adiofnlrtq land onto the subject IaAd), enaumbranre, violation, variation, or adverse ciramstanse aR'ectIrig the tide that would be dlsctosed by an accwate and Comp±eae land burvey of Uhe suer)ect Ian#. 5. Any Ilen" or right to a lien, for sarvites, labor, matmial, equipment rental or workers uompensadon lie boron or t•.ereafter fum4hed, Iniji%ed by law and not shown by the pubic records. NOTE; A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS) WILL BE FURNISHED UPON REQUEST Rev. 07-01-21 F/rst Amencan Tide 267 FustAmerican Tide'" Privacy Notice Effective: October 1, 2019 Notice Last Updated: January 1, 2022 This Privacy Notice describes how First American Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates (together referred to as "First American," "we," "us," or "our'/ collect, use, store, and share your information with the exception that a subsidiary or affiliate has their own privacy policy, that policy governs. This Privacy Notice applies to information we receive from you offiine only, as well as from third parties, when you Interact with us and/or use and access our services and products (" Products'o. For more Information about our privacy practices, Including our online practices, please visit [iqp5://www.firs-tam.f;oni/i3i-iviLcy-i)olicyL. The practices described in this Privacy Notice are subject to applicable laws in the places in which we operate. whet Type Of information Do We Catlett About Yoe? We collect a variety of categories of information about you. To learn more about the categories of Information we collect, please visit https.11www.Tirstan7.�Lqmiofivacv-pQ 2L HHo Do We Collect Your 1nfgUn11#an? We collect your information: (1) directly from you; (2) automatically when you Interact with us; and (3) from third parties, including business parties and affiliates. How Do We use )Loprinformotipirt? We may use your information in a variety of ways, including but not limited to providing the services you have requested, fulfilling your transactions, comply with relevant laws and our policies, and handling a claim. To learn more about how we may use your information, please visit Fs�t� sa; www.flrskarrl.cnf�z,r; rivet. olic . Holly Do We Share Yn r Information? We do not sell your personal Information. We only share your information, including to subsidiaries, affillates, and to unaffiliated third parties: (1) with your consent; (2) In a business transfer; (3) to service providers; and (4) for legal process and protection. To learn more about how we share your information, please visit r s: wwwjirstam.coiii rivagy-pollQvl. Hover Do We S re and Protect_YoUr Intormatlian The security of your information is Important to us. That is why we take commercially reasonable steps to make sure your information is protected. We use our best efforts to maintain commercially reasonable technical, organizational, and physical safeguards, consistent with applicable law, to protect your information. ow Lon We We I(eea Your YrtfarmAtion7 We keep your information for as long as necessary in accordance with the purpose for which it was collected, our business needs, and our legal and regulatory obligations. Your Choices We provide you the ability to exercise certain controls and choices regarding our collection, use, storage, and sharing of your information. You can learn more about your choices by visiting htths;!, www,Firstam,.carrl; rig vaca- olic International ]urlsdictiions: Our Products are offered in the United States of America (US), and are subject to US federal, state, and local law. If you are accessing the Products from another country, please be advised that you may be transferring your information to us in the US, and you consent to that transfer and use of your information In accordance with this Privacy Notice. You also agree to abide by the applicable laws of applicable US federal, state, and local laws concerning your use of the Products, and your agreements with us. We may change this Privacy Notice from time to time. Any and all changes to this Privacy Notice will be reflected on this page, and where appropriate provided in person or by another electronic method. YOUR CONTINUED USE, ACCESS, OR INTERACTION WITH OUR PRODUCTS OR YOUR CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS WITH US AFTER THIS NOTICE HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO YOU WILL REPRESENT THAT YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THIS PRIVACY NOTICE. Contact Us dataprivacy0flrstam.com or toll free at 1-866-718-0097. © 2022 First American Financial Corporation and/or Its affIllates. All rights reserved. NYSE:FAF Tim 10-PRrVACY22 (12-7-21) 'Page 1 of 2 Privacy Notice (2022 First American Financial Corporal _ . En0ii9 FrstAmerican ride For California Residgnts If you are a California resident, you may have certain rights under California law, including but not limited to the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 ("CCPA'J. All phrases used in this section shall have the same meaning as those phrases are used under California law, including the CCPA. Right to Know. You have a right to request that we disclose the following information to you: (1) the categories of personal information we have collected about or from you; (2) the categories of sources from which the personal information was collected; (3) the business or commercial purpose for such collection and/or disclosure; (4) the categories of third panties with whom we have shared your personal information; and (5) the specific pieces of your personal Information we have collected. To submit a verified request for this information, go to our online privacy policy at www,firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or call toll -free at 1-866-718-0097. You may also designate an authorized agent to submit a request on your behalf by going to our online privacy policy at www.firstam.com/privacy- policy to submit your request or by calling toll -free at 1-866-718-0097 Right of Deletion. You also have a right to request that we delete the personal information we have collected from and about you. This right is subject to certain exceptions available under the CCPA and other applicable law. To submit a verified request for deletion, go to our online privacy policy at www.fiirstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or call toll -free at 1-866-718-0097. You may also designate an authorized agent to submit a request on your behalf by going to our online privacy policy at www.firstam.com/privacy-policy to submit your request or by calling toll -free at 1-866-718- 0097. e tlon Process. For either a request to know or delete, we will verify your identity before responding to your request. To verify your identity, we will generally match the identifying information provided in your request with the information we have on file about you. Depending on the sensitivity of the Information requested, we may also utilize more stringent verification methods to verify your identity, Including but not limited to requesting additional information from you and/or requiring you to sign a declaration under penalty of perjury. Notice of Sale. We do not sell California resident information, nor have we sold California resident Information in the past 12 months. To the extent any First American affiliated entity has a different practice, it will be stated In the applicable privacy policy. We have no actual knowledge of selling the information of minors under the age of 16. Rivltit of Rion-Djgs lrnlrtatiori. You have a right to exercise your rights under California law, including under the CCPA, without suffering discrimination. Accordingly, First American will not discriminate against you In any way if you choose to exercise your rights under the CCPA. Notice of Callection. To learn more about the categories of personal information we have collected about California residents over the last 12 months, please see "What Information Do We Collect About You" in https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy. To learn about the sources from which we have collected that information, the business and commercial purpose for its collection, and the categories of third parties with whom we have shared that information, please see "How Do We Collect Your Information", "How Do We Use Your Information", and "How Do We Share Your Information" in https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy. Notice of Sale. We have not sold the personal information of California residents in the past 12 months. Notice of Disclosure. To learn more about the categories of personal information we may have disclosed about California residents In the past 12 months, please see "How Do We Use Your Information" and "How Do We Share Your Information" in https://www.firstam.com/privacy-policy. © 2022 First American Financial Corporation and/or Its affiliates. All rights reserved. NVSE:FAF orm 10-PRIVACY22 (12-7-21) Page 2 of 2 u Privacy Notice (2022 First American Financal Corporation �n fl 269 37 2W 128 owtom By SUM OILCOUKN WOW I � HAU►CAXiYi7LSSGF[L.At(71ST/I,s�'IpNS V" AfBMAN7RU Ic M7.if tss, �� lq DLC 57 I I l 49-49 I,9 V . IF fl IL1 l L +.1urn r za-e • K 943 ,I DOD —1100 0 dd Ae �' 1 1200 W,.,u;- (- I 444 - CS183 6 mrc I 11,49-15 �_ /,/� .a.� Imo_, F 1400 904 49 ...... 1500 -14:1.1 r I n IRi41, .•• .'� 270 EXHIBIT 14 Kimley>>)Horn MEMORANDUM To: Mike Kuntz, P.E. County Engineer Jackson County, OR Matt Samitore Public Works Director Central Point, OR From: Devin Moore, P.E., PTOE, RSP2 Kimley-Horn Date: October 31, 2022 Subject: Trip Generation Analysis Proposed Warehouse — 3791 Table Rock Road Per the pre -application conference for this project, the design team was asked to provide the anticipated trip generation for the proposed 85,000 square -foot (SF) warehouse and the proposed lane configuration for the future west leg of Airport Road. As shown in the site plan included in Exhibit A, the project site is located at the northwest comer of Table Rock Road and Airport Road in city of Central Point, Oregon. The site is currently undeveloped. Per client -provided trip generation estimates based on comparable facilities and anticipated operations, the proposed 85,000 SF warehouse is expected to generate 764 daily, 1 AM peak hour, and 35 PM peak hour trips (summarized in Table 1). The client provided trip generation table can be found in Exhibit B.The proposed tenant of this warehouse has shifted the start and end times of their employees and deliveries to be off the typical peak commute hours. As can be seen in Exhibit 13, the property's peak hours are not expected to occur between the hours of 7-9 AM or 4-6 PM. Table 1— Proposed Trip Generation kunley-hom,aum 1000 2"" Avenue, Suite 3900, Seattle, WA 90104 271 Kimley>>.�) Horn Page 2 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Traffic Counts Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movement data was field counted in 2022 on Tuesday, October 18, 2022 for the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road. The count data sheets are provided in Exhibit C. Project Traffic The study area street network characteristics, including the existing traffic patterns, expected street network, and access to regional facilities were used to determine the distribution of site generated traffic. 35% of site generated traffic is expected to use Federal Way to access/exit the development while 65% of site generated traffic is expected to use Airport Road to access/exit the development. For inbound project traffic at the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road it is anticipated that 15% would make a southbound right, 35% would travel westbound through, and 15% would turn northbound left. For outbound project traffic it is anticipated that 15% of would turn eastbound left, 35% would travel eastbound through, and 15% would turn eastbound right. Assignment of project traffic was obtained by the developed trip distribution to the estimated total traffic generation in Table 1. The 2022 existing plus traffic volumes were obtained by adding the 2022 existing traffic volumes to the assignment of project traffic. Analysis Methodology Although a level of service (LOS) analysis was not required by Jackson County or the City of Central Point an LOS analysis was performed to justify the proposed west leg lane configuration of the Table Rock Road and Airport Road intersection. An LOS intersection analysis was conducted for the 2022 existing plus project scenario to determine the necessary lane configuration for the west leg of the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road due to the project traffic that is expected for the proposed warehousing development. Due to the anticipated AM peak hour traffic generation being one (1) trip and the counted existing AM peak hour volumes being, generally lower than the existing PM traffic volumes, only the PM peak hour was analyzed. The expected assignment of project generated traffic was added to the 2022 existing traffic volumes to represent the estimated traffic conditions when the project was to be fully developed in 2022. Key Intersection Operational Analysis Calculations for the LOS at the study intersection are provided in Exhibit D. The 2022 existing plus project lane configuration and control is based upon the proposed lane configuration for the west leg of Airport Road (discussed separately in this memorandum). It should be noted that the cycle length and splits for the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road were optimized using Synchro 11 when calculating the LOS. The results of the LOS Analysis are summarized in Table 2. 272 Kimle o l-lore Page 3 Table 2 —Peak Hour LOS Analysis Results Table Rock Road and Airport Road Signalized J 16.5 (B) ` 'Note that AM scenados are not anatyxad fi this report due to the tow ntanberof trips expected to be generated in the AM peak hour. As shown in Table 2 the study intersection was calculated to operate at an acceptable LOS in the 2022 existing plus project scenario. PROPOSED LANE CONFIGURATION As the west leg of Airport Road is expected to be constructed at the time the proposed warehouse is to be constructed, different lane configurations were tested using Synchro 11 to determine what lane configuration on the west leg resulted in acceptable LOS. it is recommended that the west leg be constructed with one eastbound shared righuthroughtleft lane, with one westbound receiving lane. Additionally, it is recommended that the extension of Airport Road and Federal Way be constructed with one travel lane in each direction. Please contact me at 702-553-4869 or Lk:vii;.Ne ocra kimle -hoi n _cun J should you have any questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, Davin Moore, P.E., PTOE, RSP2 Project Engineer Exhibit A — Site Plan Exhibit 13 — Client Provided Trip Generation Table Exhibit C — Traffic Counts Exhibit D — LOS Calculations taj 11raz 0oN ��;�1V -,a g !Z� 0 27 3 n PROJECT �''- eI o MURPHY SITE PLAN ■rvw is a w.a�.v�aaSn �eea a..m R mw yrw w ei wwuv�owlw iomr w an nun w ax us 274 7E:xhibit B - Client Provided Trip Generation Table rime In OuT OW N ON Ya441 I 10 4101 Ya I 10 Out 7otat In 0u1 fOW In Out 0 P TOiA o OOtiO 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 00:30 0 b 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 01:00 01:30 0 46 ° 0 0 46 1 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 1 41 1 0200 0 O 0 O 1 1 I` 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 02:30 0300 U 0 0 0 ° 0 O a 0 0 a P I 0 tl 0 0 0 0 ° 0 ° 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 a 0 a tl 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 + 0 1 0400 04:30 a 0 0 0 0 0 1 O 3 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0. 0 0 0 0600 0 P 0 0 b D a b 0 0 0 D a 0 b 0 a 0 0 0 0 D 14 0 14 05:30 N O 14 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 06:00 063D O 0 p 0 0 I 0 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 q 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 + OY00 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 a730 0600 0 0 0 a 0 ° a 0 4 a D 0 0 D ° 0 a 0 D 0 a P D a o OB:30 0900 4 0 0 10 0 0 O o Q D Q ]0 O 10 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 10 40 0 0 10 40 0930 0 0 D 1 0 a 1 1 1 39 46 D 0 39 48 a 0 ° IB b 29 tl 0 0 0 48 30 TS 3000 10:30 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 31 0 31 0 S0 SB 0 0 0 0 0 31 9 SB 29 B9 34 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 ° 29 t7 19 17 0 0 ° ° 2 10 10 11:30 2 tl 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12W 0 Q 0 R 0 0 n 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 46 12:30 13:00 0 14 46 0 46 14 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 14 10 0 0 t4 10 1330 14:00 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 '*a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 14 0 14 1430 ° 1A 14 0 0 0 I` 0 P ° 0 0 0 0 D D n D o ° 15:00 D a o a 0 a 0 p p 0 10. 1530 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 23 23 0 13 1600 D 0 0 0 ° a 0 e 0 o a 12 12 0 12 12 16:30 0 0 D b 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 It D 11 I0 17. 0 P 0 0 0 q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1730 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 Q D b 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 SB00 0 1D 10 0 0 0 D D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 ISM b 0 0 D a a 0 B 0 0 0 0 9 17 1900 0 0 0 0 1 1 O 0 B 0 0 0 40 0 0 ° 40 16 S6 1930 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 I6 16 40 0 ° 0 29 53 B2 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lw 53 29 0 29 0 0 0 45 26 71 2030 0 0 ° i 0 l 0 26 44 O 44 0 0 0 12 2� 34 21.00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1B 10 2 0 0 10 2 0 0 0 2130 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 2 0 ° 34 14 22:00 ° ld 14 b 0 0 0 0 2210 0 7 2 1 0 1 00jo 0 D 121 2300 0 0 0 a 1 7 0 0 0 0 306 2180 13_ 46 i07 902 764 !6 .. _o_1ToLI 0<17.1 7 7 14 L3 260 137 131 _ 275 Exhibit C - Traffic Courts Utd, (303) 216-2439 www.al Itrafficdata. net Location: 1 TABLE ROCK RD & AIRPORT RD AM Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 Peak Hour. 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM Peak 15-Minutes: 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM Peak Hour - Motorized Vehloles (710) 403 0.92 397 (729) ARM, RR M a , *-1 1 1. lit n7 iaLal 40M N +i2 0.-- 20,,r 0I5 i} i w 0.92 t 0.76 I- G w � r Gyl ftAEfu71'✓. YFl (612) 356 D.89 435 (815) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians AIRPORT RD AIRPORT RD TABLE ROCK RD TABLE ROCK RD Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Soulhbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U-Turn Left Thru 14 gh( U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru R:ghl U•Turn tell Thru Right Total Hour WeM East South North 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 8 0 0 53 21 0 17 40 1 149 917 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 7 0 0 89 39 0 26 54 0 229 1,032 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 11 1 19 0 0 81 38 0 26 78 0 265 1,041 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 t 7D 52 0 +1 73 0 244 088 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 34 0 0 61 36 0 42 68 0 264 9% 0 0 0 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 D 17 0 29 0 1 78 28 0 32 53 0 238 0 D 0 0 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 20 0 1 60 19 0 28 59 0 202 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 21 0 0 74 24 0 26 55 1 211 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 0 0 2 0 130 2 173 0 3 586 256 0 228 480 2 1,832 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour 0 0 0 1 0 83 2 117 0 2 280 153 0 131 272 0 1,041 0 0 0 0 276 awt. ;tJ ALL cWTA Uwtn (303) 21&2439 www.a111rafFcdata.n©t Location: 1 TABLE ROCK RD & AIRPORT RD PM Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM Peak 1 mutes: 04:30 PM - 04:45 PM Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles (1,371) 729 0.97 063 (1,261) 1 f 441'11'KFo Ell 2 1 N w 0.42 ""% W 0.85 E oo W A �+! x .+� S i ^w 2g8 ---�y�il I i f c 0 (sae) vN �, $ r 'ZTir 4[S1. H�1 1 ¢ r (1,308) 699 0.69 513 (975) Now Total study counts contained in pareniheses, Peak Hour-12111"cles Q� t u aJ i w4 Lt� a t 0 0.JW E0 0 0-* 1r o o a,h 0 1 n 1 r v v v v Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles AIRPORT RD AIRPORT RD TABLE ROCK RD TABLE ROCK RD Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Interval Start Time U-Turn Eastbound Let Thru Right U-Turn Westbound Left Right U_Tum Northbound Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 p Q 0 0 4s _Thru 0 59 0 2 111 23 0 55 131 0 421 1,633 0 2 Q 0 0 1 1 1 0 35 0 69 0 0 108 11 0 45 133 0 404 1,602 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM a pm Q 0 1 0 0 38 0 60 0 0 145 tU 0 49 138 u 45D n 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 49 0 0 87 27 0 38 140 0 378 1,500 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 34 0 70 0 0 102 16 0 38 127 0 390 1.460 1 0 1 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 40 0 0 104 18 1 50 111 1 373 2 0 2 0 5-30 PM 0 0 Q 0 0 40 0 55 0 0 94 16 0 39 115 0 359 1 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 27 1 40 0 0 90 20 1 52 107 0 338 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 2 2 1 0 305 1 436 0 2 821 152 2 366 1,002 1 3,093 4 2 3 0 Peak Hour 0 1 2 1 0 156 0 231 0 2 431 80 0 187 542 0 1,633 0 2 0 0 277 Fxhihit D LOS Calculations HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Table Rock Road & Aftort Road Pr;4uarrielll -!rSL---�5I3i (-.BR VML WBT V99R NOL NOT I•J R SRL MT SBP Lane Configurations �i - f_ - a - - '� �► Traffic Volume (veh/h) 3 7 3 156 9 231 6 431 80 187 642 4 Future Volume (veh/h) 3 7 3 156 9 231 6 431 80 187 542 4 Initial 0 (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A-pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Ad! 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/tdln 1870 1870 1670 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 3 7 3 164 9 243 6 454 84 197 571 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 161 338 125 573 28 524 467 990 182 477 1195 8 Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.33 0,33 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.33 0.33 Sat Flow, veh/h 240 1024 379 1344 85 1585 1781 2.997 551 1781 3617 25 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 13 0 0 173 0 243� 6 268 _ 270 197 280 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hAn 1644 0 0 1429 0 1585 1781 1777 1771 1781 1777 1866 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 6.6 0.1 6.5 6.6 3.9 6.8 6.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.3 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 6.6 0.1 6.5 6.6 3.9 6.8 6.A Prop In Lane 0.23 0.23 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.01 Lane Grp Cap((;), veh/b 624 0 0 601 0 524 467 587 585 477 587 616 V/C Ratio(X) 0.02 0,00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.46 0.01 0.46 0.46 0.41 0.48 0A8 Avail Cap(c a), veh/h 624 0 0 601 0 524 467 587 585 477 587 616 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter([) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1A0 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 12.3 0.0 0.0 13.9 0A 14.4 9.6 14.4 14.4 10.7 14.5 14.5 Incr Delay (d2), sfveh 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.9 0.1 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 %ile BackOfQ(500k),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 2.4 0.0 2.5 2.5 1.6 2.6 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 12A 0.0 0.0 15.1 0.0 17.4 9.6 16.9 17.0 13.4 17.3 17.2 LnGrp LOS B A A B A B A B B B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 13 416 644 - - 772 Approach Delay, slveh 12.4 16.4 16.9 16.2 Approach LOS 8 B B B i ullt:r h,: si0iircl !'I?- ; 2 ' 6- Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 22.5 - - 225 _ 9.5 22.5 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5,0 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.0 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 5.9 8.6 2.3 2.1 8.8 8.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.2 bile{58GIipR `jilnll4lc}!'f -_ � _ �_-- • - HCM 6th CIO Delay 16.5 HCM 6th LOS B Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 278 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, 2ND REVISED PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT ORDER NO.: 7161-3998828, EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 5, 2022. REAL PROPERTY IN THE COUNTY OF JACKSON, STATE OF OREGON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: BEGINNING ATTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 56 IN TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE NORTH 899 53' WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID DONATION LAND CLAIM, 757A FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2O0.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 432 30' EAST, 470.0 FEET; EAST, 470.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 492 30' EAST, 264.4 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE TITLE NO. 1040; EAST, 264.4 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE TITLE NO. 1040; THENCE SOUTH 899 47' EAST, 598.2 FEET; THENCE NORTH 356.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 47' EAST, 252.2 FEETTO EAST, 598.2 FEET; THENCE NORTH 356.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 899 47' EAST, 252.2 FEET TO EAST, 252.2 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF TABLE ROCK MARKET ROAD; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ROAD, 356.85 FEETTO THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 58; THENCE NORTH 899 53' WEST ALONG SAID NORTH WEST ALONG SAID NORTH BOUNDARY OF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 58, A DISTANCE OF 618.35 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 56, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE SOUTH 892 SO' 10" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE 10" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO, 58, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, 578.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09 03' WEST, WEST, PARALLEL TO AND 10 FEET WEST OF THE WEST LINE OF TABLE ROCK ROAD, 356.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 899 47' WEST, 212.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09 03' WEST, 102.0 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE WEST, 102.0 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 09 03' WEST (RECORD SOUTH) 76.0 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT N0, WEST (RECORD SOUTH) 76.0 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NO. 71-03949, OFFICIAL RECORDS, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE SOUTH 892 47' EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT, 212.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 09 03' EAST (RECORD NORTH) 76.0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 899 47' WEST, EAST (RECORD NORTH) 76.0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 899 47' WEST, WEST, 212.50 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO, 56 IN TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE SOUTH 899 50' 10" EAST ALONG THE NORTH 10" EAST ALONG THE NORTH EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 58, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, 578.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09 03' WEST, WEST, PARALLEL TO AND 10 FEET WEST OF THE WEST LINE OF TABLE ROCK ROAD, 356.81 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 892 47' WEST, 212.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09 03' 279 WEST 102.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH WEST, 212,50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02 03' WEST 102.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH WEST 102,00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 892 47' EAST 212.50 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF TABLE ROCK ROAD; THENCE NORTH 09 03' EAST ALONG SAID WEST EAST 212.50 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF TABLE ROCK ROAD; THENCE NORTH 09 03' EAST ALONG SAID WEST EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 102.00 FEETTO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL 3 PARCELS ALL THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO JACKSON COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF OREGON, RECORDED APRIL 06, 2017 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2017-011467. NOTE: THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS CREATED PRIOR TO JANUARY 1, 2008. njrnra:a rta Park Dr CC urr.y of ACkaon, OR, Bureau of Laid Managernent; State of Orego.q, State of Oregon DOT, State of Oregon I� 372 W 12A600 EISNER LLC 3634 TABLE ROCK RD MEDFORD, OR 97504 372 W 12A501 MEDFORD WAREHOUSE INVESTER LL HALPERIN JARED/MERITAGE GROUP 66 FIELD POINT RD GREENWICH, CT 66830 372W12B212 TOMCHI OREGON LLC WALLACE SJ CHING 6029 S RAINBOW BLVD LAS VEGAS, NV 89118 372W12B699 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 0 CONNOR LAW 670GSTB JACKSONVILLE, OR 97530 372W12B900 TABLE ROCK BUSINESS PARK LLC PO BOX 43 MEDFORD, OR 97501 372W126903 CENTRAL POINT CITY 14053RDST CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 372W 1281200 SAVAGE JEAN TRUSTEE 4279 TABLE ROCK RD CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 372W12A200 372W 12A400 GORDON MEDFORD LLC MEDFORD WAREHOUSE INVESTER LL ATTN MICHELE DAHLEN HALPERIN JARED/MERITAGE GROUP 277 STEWART RD SW 66 FIELD POINT RD PACIFIC, WA 98047 GREENWICH, CT 66830 372W 12B201 372W 12B211 LTM INC OREGON STATE ELKS ASSOCIATION PO BOX 1145 STEVEN MALONE TRUSTEE MEDFORD, OR 97501 7741 GARDEN VALLEY RD ROSEBURG, OR 97471 372W 128213 372W1211600 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 1287 FINANCE DIRECTOR 999 LAKE DR 140 S THIRD ST ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 372W 126700 372W 12B800 ROGUE RIVER IRRIGATION DIST TABLE ROCK BUSINESS PARK LLC 3139 MERRIMAN RD PO BOX 43 CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 MEDFORD, OR 97501 372W1213901 372W 12B902 SAVAGE JEAN TRUSTEE ET AL TABLE ROCK BUSINESS PARK LLC 4279 TABLE ROCK RD PO BOX 43 CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 MEDFORD, OR 97501 372W1261000 372W1261100 LANE KENNETH C/GERI L SAVAGE YANCY REV LIV TRUST ET PO BOX 5137 3634 TABLE ROCK RD CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 MEDFORD, OR 97504 372W 12B1300 MP FORESTRY INC 2941 CRATER LAKE AVE MEDFORD, OR 97504 ATTACHMENT "C" e. Public Works Department ii66, CENTRALMatt Samitore, Director POINT c)1 ec" m PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT November 21, 2022 AGENDA ITEM: Project Murphy Partition (PA R-22001) 2 Parcel Partition at 3791 Table Rock Road (37S 2W 12 B, Tax Lot 800, 900 & 902) Agent: Steve Backman Traffic: A Traffic Impact Analysis is not required for a partition. There is a separate application for Site Plan & Architectural Review (SPAR-22006) to construct an 87,750 square foot warehouse and ground distribution facility on Proposed Parcel 1 ("Land Development Application"). A specific traffic -related analysis has been completed for the Land Development Application. The results influence the required lane configuration at the intersection of Airport and Table Rock Road. Existing Infrastructure: Water: There is an 8-inch water line in Federal way. Streets: Federal Way is a standard industrial street. Stormwater: There are existing storm facilities in Federal Way. Background: The land division application is a tentative partition to consolidate existing lots comprising the site and to partition the consolidated lot into two parcels. Issues: The main issue with the partition is the development and extension of Federal Way/Airport Drive. The applicant shall complete the extension to Table Rock Road, including a revised three -lane configuration to match the existing movements to the East of that intersection. The applicant will also be required to extend public infrastructure to service both parcels, including water and stormwater. Conditions of Approval: Prior to permit issuance and the start of construction activities on the site, the following conditions shall be satisfied: 1. Federal Way/Airport Drive Extension. a. Civil Irn rovement Plan Review - The applicant shall submit civil improvement plans to Public Works for the extension of Federal Way to the existing intersection of Airport/Table Rock Road. The plans shall provide utilize the Industrial Street Standard (ST-40) and provide a three lane configuration at the Airport/Table Rocks intersection including a dedicated left turn lane to match existing improvements to the east. 140 South 3'd Street ., Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 283 b. Jackson Count Roads Pennits. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from Jackson County Roads before construction of any road improvements. 2. Water Utility Extension - The applicant shall submit civil improvement plans to the Public Works Department to extend the existing 8-inch waterline in Federal Way to serve the proposed parcels. The water system will need to be looped as part of the Land Development Plan for Proposed Parcel 1. Stormwater Management. a. NPl3ES Stormwater Mara cment Plan - The applicant shall submit to Public Works for review and approval a stormwater management plan in accordance with the Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual, which requires stormwater quantity and quality treatment of all proposed impervious surfaces proposed as part of the partition. b. Civil Improvement Plan Review —The applicant shall submit civil improvement plans for stormwater infrastructure construction, including but not limited to storm drain lines, detention facilities and the proposed outfall on Proposed Parcel 2. C. Erosion and Sediment Control — Construction of required improvements will disturb more than one acre. The applicant shall obtain an erosion and sediment control permit (NPDES 1200-C) from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and provide a copy to the Public Works Department. Prior to the Public Works Final inspection and Final Plat, the applicant shall comply with the following conditions of approval: 1. Improvement Completion - The applicant shall fully build all improvements associated with extending the street, waterlines and public stormwater facilities and private utilities before the final plat is approved or must enter into a Development Agreement and Bond for the improvements in accordance with CPMC 16.12.070(A). 2. PW Standards and Specifications -- Applicant shall demonstrate that all Public Works infrastructure construction is in compliance with the Standards Specifications and Uniform Details for Construction. 3. Stormwater Quality Operations & Maintenance— The Applicant shall record an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for all new stormwater quality features and provide a copy of the Public Works Department's recorded document. 4. Public Utility Easements - The proposed partition plat shall include public utility easements paralleling the proposed Federal Way Airport Road extension. 284 ATTACHMENT " Roads Engineering Chuck Dclanvkr �C K S O N COUNTY 200AnConstrelope Engineer J 200 Antelope Road White City, OR 97503 R ,l Phone: (541)5 V Fax: (541)774-6295 4-6295 17� J,)1w(,a�til,IA Ati0.1'<:_"Wz oq www jacksoncounty org November 15, 2022 Attention: Stephanie Holtey City of Central Point Planning 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Tentative Partition plan to consolidate three parcels and divide into two and Site Plan and Architectural Review to construct an 85,000-sf storage warehouse off Table Rock Road — a county -maintained road & Federal Way — a city -maintained road Planning File: PAR-22-001 & SPAR-22-006; 37-2W-12B Tax Lots 800, 900 & 902 Dear Stephanie: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on these two applications for Tentative Partition plan to consolidate the three parent project parcels and divide into two new lots. The land division includes extension of Federal Way to the AirportJTable Rock Road intersection and Site Plan and Architectural Review to construct as 85,000 square foot storage warehouse and ground distribution facility together with fleet parking and queuing areas, employee/visitor parking and site landscaping improvements. Project site is 17.87 acres and is adjacent to the intersection of Table Rock Road and un-constructed west leg of Airport Road. (37-2W-12B Tax Lots 800, 900 & 902). Jackson County Roads has the following comments: 1. We require that the applicant prepare a traffic study that addresses the design of the west leg of the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road. The study should include lane configuration and signal phasing and recommend mitigation if necessary and be reviewed and approved by Jackson County Roads. 2. All road work required for the new intersection leg will require a Minor Road Improvement permit. Please contact Roads and Parks for a pre -engineering meeting. 3. We would like to be notified of future development proposals, as county permits may be required. 4. The radius for road intersection along a collector road shall be a thirty-foot radius. The road approach shall be perpendicular to Table Rock Road and aligned directly across from a road approach on the other side of the road if possible. 5. Direct driveway approaches off Table Rock Road are discouraged- if applicant proposes a Table Rock Road driveway, analysis of the proposed driveway snail be included in the TIS. Left turns to or from Table Rock Road will not be allowed. 285 r; November 15, 2022 Page 2 of 2 6. Roads requires the removal of any existing driveways not being used on Table Rock Road and replacing them with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. 7. ADA curb ramps must be located wherever there are curbs or other barriers to entry from a pedestrian walkway or sidewalk, including any intersection where it is legal for a pedestrian to cross the street, whether or not there is any designated crosswalk. 8. Jackson County Roads would like to review and comment on the hydraulic report including the calculations and drainage plan. Capacity improvements or on -site detention, if necessary, shall be installed at the expense of the applicant. Upon completion of the project, the developer's engineer shall certify that construction of the drainage system was constructed per plan and a copy of the certification shall be sent to Jackson County Roads. 9. Utility Permits are required from Roads for any utility work within the county road right- of-way. On longitudinal trenches within a travel lane 100' or greater in length, unless otherwise approved by the Engineer, the existing pavement shall be removed and replaced to full paving -machine width (normally 10'-12') for a travel lane restoration. Drag boxes or other pull -type asphalt spreaders will not be permitted for longitudinal trench pavement replacement. 10, Per Oregon Revised Statute 209.150, any survey monuments of record removed, disturbed or destroyed within the permit area must be referenced prior to construction and replaced after construction by a registered professional land surveyor. All costs associated with this surveying work are the responsibility of the permit holder. 11. Please note Table Rock Road is a County Urban Minor Arterial Road. The latest traffic count performed on the Airport Road to Biddle Road segment was done by the City of Medford in 2016 (Pre-Costco), with an Average Daily Traffic count of 11,500. A more recent count 750' north of Biddle Road was done on 6/16/2020 with an Average Daily Traffic count of 19,862. 12. We concur with any right-of-way dedicated. 13. Be Advised: other permits from local State or Federal Agencies' or Departments may be required prior to starting work. Sincerely, Chuck DeJanvier, PE Construction Engineer 1:1Engineering\Development\Cenlral PointlPAR-22-001 & SPAR-22-0061PAR-22-001 & SPAR-22-OO6.doc :: ATTACHMENT "F" Ste hanie Holte From: Douglas E. Burroughs <Douglas.Burroughs@cityofinedford.org> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 9:24 AM To: Stephanie Holtey Cc: Kelly A. Akin; Carla G. Paladino; Karl H. MacNair; Jodi K. Cope Subject: RE: Action Needed: Request for Agency Comments on Land Use Application Attachments: 11142022 Request for Agency Comments.pdf [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Stephanie, Here are our comments regarding the attached application: The (,ity ol' Medl0rd recommend.,; that the City of Central Point consider street light requirements on the project's Table Rock Road frontage. -rhe city of Mzdibrd has required Major Arterial street lighting along the Table Rock Road frontage ol'projects north and sA)utlt of this project witilin the City of Medford. Consistent levels of street lighting provide for driver, pedestrian, and bicyctz: safety outside of daylight (tours. I'ite 01y of Mcd1ord has no drivew,ry or traffic impact continents, The applicant's traffic analysis shows 16 development trips will impact the intersection of Table bock Road and Riddle Road in the PM peak hour, which is less than the code standaftl 25 trips that is Considerml a substantial impact. No ether City intersections are shown to be substantially impacted by the development. The site's frontage is either under the jurisdiction of Jackson County or the City of Central Point. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Doug Burroughs I Development Services Manager City of Medford, Oregon I Public Works 200 S. Ivy St., Medford, OR 97501 Direct Ph: 541- 774-21 10 1 Main Ph: 541-774-2100 Website j F'acebook I Twitter m ATTACHMENT ROGUE VALLEY S E W E R S E R V I C E S \-00 CLEAN WATER - HEALTHY COMMUNITIES November 14, 2022 City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: SPAR 22006 & PAR-22001, 3791 Table Rock Road, Map 37 2w 12B, Tax Lot 800, 900 & 902 There is an existing 8 inch sewer north of the property on Federal Way and an existing 8 inch to the east along Table Rock Road. Sewer service for the proposed development can be had via a sewer main extension as generally shown on the submitted site plan. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of this development be subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must submit sewer construction plans to RVSS for review and approval. 2. The applicant must submit architectural plumbing plans to RVSS for the calculation of SDC fees associated with sewer connection permits. 3. The applicant must obtain sewer connection permits from RVSS and pay all related fees. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Nicholas R Bakke, PE District Engineer �. (541) 664-6300 RIPfor' www.RVSS.US 138 W Vilas Rd, Central Point, OR 97502 V P.O. Box 3130, Central Point, OR 97502 a 287 ATTACHMENT PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 898 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TWO PARCEL PARTITION TENATIVE PLAN AND LOT CONSOLIDATION AT 3791 TABLE ROCK ROAD (37S 2W 12B TAX LOTS 800, 900 AND 902) (File No: PAR-22001) WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a tentative plan application to consolidate three (3) existing lots and partition the consolidated lot into two (2) parcels lot partition on 17.57 acres identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 12B, Tax Lots 800, 900 and 902 in Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the project site is located in the M-1, Industrial zoning district; and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022, the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly -noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the Staff Report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to land divisions Title 16—Subdivisions, CPMC 17.48, and the M-1 Industrial Zone; and, WHEREAS, after duly considering the proposed tentative plan, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the application complies with applicable standards and criteria as set forth in the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022 ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission by a duly seconded motion granted tentative plan approval subject to conditions in the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022 (Exhibit A) and the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Exhibit B). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 8989 hereby approves Tentative Partition Plan and Lot Consolidation, based on the Revised Staff Report dated December 6, 2022 (Exhibit A) and the Applicant's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as amended and incorporated herein by reference. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 6th day of December 2022. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Planning Commission Resolution No. 898 (12/6/2022) ATTACHMENT "H" K i m l ey * MEMORANDUM To: Mike Kuntz, P.E. County Engineer Jackson County, OR Matt Samitore Public Works Director Central Point, OR From: Devin Moore, P.E., PTOE, RSP2 Kimley-Horn Date: November 21, 2022 Subject: Trip Generation Analysis Proposed Warehouse — 3791 Table Rock Road Per the pre -application conference for this project, the design team was asked to provide the anticipated trip generation for the proposed 85,000 square -foot (SF) warehouse and the proposed lane configuration for the future west leg of Airport Road. As shown in the site plan included in Exhibit A, the project site is located at the northwest corner of Table Rock Road and Airport Road in city of Central Point, Oregon. The site is currently undeveloped. TRIP GENERATION Per client -provided trip generation estimates based on comparable facilities and anticipated operations, the proposed 85,000 SF warehouse is expected to generate 764 daily, 1 AM peak hour, and 35 PM peak hour trips (summarized in Table 1). The client provided trip generation table can be found in Exhibit B.The proposed tenant of this warehouse has shifted the start and end times of their employees and deliveries to be off the typical peak commute hours. As can be seen in Exhibit B, the property's peak hours are not expected to occur between the hours of 7-9 AM or 4-6 PM. Table 1 — Proposed Trip Generation Kimley)>) Horn INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Page 2 Traffic Counts Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movement data was field counted in 2022 on Tuesday, October 18, 2022 for the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road. The count data sheets are provided in Exhibit C. Project Traffic The study area street network characteristics, including the existing traffic patterns, expected street network, and access to regional facilities were used to determine the distribution of site generated traffic. 35% of site generated traffic is expected to use Federal Way to access/exit the development while 65% of site generated traffic is expected to use Airport Road to access/exit the development. For inbound project traffic at the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road it is anticipated that 15% would make a southbound right, 35% would travel westbound through, and 15% would turn northbound left. For outbound project traffic it is anticipated that 15% of would turn eastbound left, 35% would travel eastbound through, and 15% would turn eastbound right. Assignment of project traffic was obtained by the developed trip distribution to the estimated total traffic generation in Table 1. The 2022 existing plus traffic volumes were obtained by adding the 2022 existing traffic volumes to the assignment of project traffic. Traffic from Nearby Developments A potion of traffic traveling to and from the Costco and Fed Ex facilities are expected to use the new roadway along Federal Way/Airport Road. Estimates for the Costco were based on the assumptions presented in the Central Point Costco Development Traffic Impact Study prepared by Kittelson and Associates in October of 2015. Based on the weekday PM peak hour traffic assignment we would expect that about 30 outbound trips would utilize the new link along Federal Way/Airport Road. Of those 30 trips, using the trip distribution presented in the Costco Traffic Impact Study, we would expect that 15 of the trips would continue eastbound through along Airport Road and 15 of the trips would make and eastbound right onto Table Rock Road. It is anticipated that there will be 30 PM peak hour inbound trips, with 15 trips making a northbound left onto Airport Road/Federal Way and 15 trips traveling westbound through onto Airport Road/Federal Way. Based on the circulation and access drive options we do not anticipate eastbound north movement from Costco at the intersection of Airport Road and Table Rock Road. For the Fed Ex Facility to the north of our proposed development we estimated the number of trips that are expected based on similar Fed Ex facilities that we have studied in the past. We anticipate that 10 outbound PM peak hour trips would utilize the new link along Federal Way/Airport Road. Of those 10 trips, we would anticipate that 1 of the trips would make and eastbound left onto Table Rock Road, 6 trips would continue eastbound through onto Airport KimJey-h r .com 1000 2r," Avenue, Suite 3900, Seattle, WA 98104 206-607-2600 Kimley) 4 o ' Page 3 Road, and 3 trips would turn eastbound right onto Table Rock Road. It is anticipated that there will be 10 PM peak hour inbound trips, with 3 trips making a northbound left onto Airport Road/Federal Way, 6 trips traveling westbound through onto Airport Road/Federal Way, and 1 trip turning southbound right onto Airport Road/Federal Way. Analysis Methodology Although a level of service (LOS) analysis was not required by Jackson County or the City of Central Point an LOS analysis was performed to justify the proposed west leg lane configuration of the Table Rock Road and Airport Road intersection. An LOS intersection analysis was conducted for the 2022 existing plus project scenario to determine the necessary lane configuration for the west leg of the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road due to the project traffic that is expected for the proposed warehousing development. Due to the anticipated AM peak hour traffic generation being one (1) trip and the counted existing AM peak hour volumes being generally lower than the existing PM traffic volumes, only the PM peak hour was analyzed. The expected assignment of project generated traffic was added to the 2022 existing traffic volumes and the expected traffic from the Costco Fed Ex facilities to represent the estimated traffic conditions when the project was to be fully developed in 2022. As the west leg of Airport Road is expected to be constructed at the time the proposed warehouse is to be constructed, different lane configurations were tested using Synchro 11 to determine what lane configuration on the west leg resulted in acceptable LOS. In Scenario 1 an exclusive eastbound right turn lane was considered with a shared eastbound through/left lane. The signal in Scenario 1 was pretimed with permitted/protected northbound/southbound left turn phasing, with no actuation. In Scenario 2 an exclusive eastbound right turn lane was considered with a shared eastbound through/left lane. The signal in Scenario 2 was actuated with permitted/protected northbound/southbound left turn phasing. In Scenario 3 an exclusive eastbound and westbound left turn lane was considered with a shared eastbound through/right lane. The signal in Scenario 3 was pretimed with permitted/protected northbound/southbound left turn phasing, with no actuation. In Scenario 4 exclusive eastbound and westbound left turn lanes were considered with a shared eastbound through/right lane. In Scenario 4 permitted/protected phasing for all left turns was used with actuated signal timing. In Scenario 5 a shared eastbound left/through/right lane was considered. The signal in Scenario 5 was pretimed with permitted/protected north bound/southbound left turn phasing, with no actuation. Key Intersection Operational Analysis Calculations for the LOS at the study intersection are provided in Exhibit D. To ensure that the optimal lane configuration and control is recommended, multiple lane configurations and kimley-horn.corn 1000 2110 Avenue. Suite 3900, Seattle, WA 98104 Q ( i le y -,• a, c � Ii-4i Page 4 signal phasing options were analyzed. It should be noted that the cycle length and splits for the intersection of Table Rock Road and Airport Road were optimized using Synchro 11 when calculating the LOS. The results of the LOS Analysis are summarized in Table 2. Table 2 —Peak Hour LOS Analysis Results *Note that AM scenarios are not analyzed in this report due to the low number of trips expected to be generated in the AM peak hour. As shown in Table 2 the study intersection was calculated to operate at an acceptable LOS in all five (5) scenarios, but Scenario 2 resulted in the lowest calculated delay. PROPOSED LANE CONFIGURATION Based on the calculated LOS for each of the scenarios it is recommended that the west leg be constructed with one shared eastbound through/left lane, one exclusive right turn lane (providing at least 100 feet of storage), and one westbound receiving lane (configuration in Scenario 2). Additionally, it is recommended that the extension of Airport Road and Federal Way be constructed with one travel lane in each direction. If the signal is not already actuated, it is recommended that the county actuate the signal. It should be noted that all scenarios and configurations analyzed provide acceptable LOS and could be considered by the County. Please contact me at 702-553-4869 or Devin.Moore (gkimley-horn.com should you have any questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, f / Devin Moore; P.E., PTOE, RSP2 Project Engineer Exhibit A — Site Plan Exhibit B — Client Provided Trip Generation Table Exhibit C — Traffic Counts Exhibit D — LOS Calculations and Signal Timing Sheets kA1e_ y-horn.com Exhibit B - Client Provided Trip Generation Table 00:00 a0:30 01:00 01:31 02:00 02:30 03:a0 03:30 04:00 04:30 05:00 05:3a 06:00 06:30 07:00 07:30 08:00 OB:30 09:00 09:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:Oa 14:30 15:Oa 15:30 16:00 16:30 17:00 17:30 18:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 2a:30 21:00 21:30 22:a 22:3 23:a 23:3 In Out Total In Opt Tonl In Out Tcu 1n Out Totem In out 74t11 in Out Tctatl 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 S1 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 a 0 n 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 46 0 46 I O 1 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 Q 0 47 0 47 0 0 0 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v a 0 a 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 a 0 0 a n a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i A 1 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 a 0 0 0 i 1 a 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ❑ 0 a 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 a Q 0 0 0 0 a 0 a a 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S A i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 ❑ a 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a rs n ❑ a 0 0 n 0 a a a ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 1a 0 10 a a 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 1 39 0 39 0 0 0 0 A 0 40 0 4a a 0 0 0 1 1 48 0 48 0 29 29 0 0 0 48 30 78 0 a a 0 0 0 31 0 31 0 58 58 0 0 0 31 58 89 a 0 0 11 0 0 5 0 5 a 29 29 0 0 0 5 29 34 2 0 2 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 I7 17 0 A 0 2 17 19 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 Q ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 46 a q 0 a 0 0 n 0 a 0 O tl 0 46 46 14 0 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 10 0 10 0 0 li 0 0 0 0 Q a 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 14 14 Q a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 14 14 0 0 0 Q a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 73 23 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 12 32 0 12 12 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 11 11 0 11 11 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 1 ❑ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 l 1 0 8 8 8 0 8 0 0 0 8 9 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 d0 ❑ 40 0 0 a 40 16 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 53 29 0 29 0 O 0 29 53 82 a 0 0 1 !1 1 0 26 26 44 0 44 0 0 0 45 26 71 0 0 0 A 1 1 0 28 28 10 0 10 0 0 Q 10 29 39 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 2 a 2 0 0 0 2 2 4 p a 14 14 ❑ 0 a 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 0 0 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 k 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 14 133 133 266 133 133 266 23 23 4fi 3!2 382 764 Exhibit C - Traffic Counts C+toj ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location: 1 TABLE ROCK RD & AIRPORT RD AM Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 Peak Hour: 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM Peak 15-Minutes: 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles (710) 403 0.92 397 (729) TABLE ROCK RD N .AIRPORT RD c� It 4 (7 � o � t— III 0 1 N 0-2 0.25 u w 0.92 E 83 0.76 1 w� S Jr �► 284 (2) ' t r` 0 (484) � N N� w AIRPORT RD 0 TABLE ROCK RD 1 t (612) 356 089 435 (815) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles "-0 0--* t 0 bJ lNL 6`0 t 0 o 0Jw E 0-1� Gjb !ro ! 0,n "1 1 rC o 1 o 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour - Pedestrians �4-0 0-0L 1 ■ 0 0 o W E o 4-0 0 � AIRPORT RD AIRPORT RD TABLE ROCK RD TABLE ROCK RD Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian C.rosaings Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 8 0 0 53 21 0 17 40 1 149 917 0 0 0 0 7:15AM 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 7 0 0 89 39 0 26 54 0 229 1,032 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 11 1 19 0 0 81 38 0 26 78 0 255 1,041 0 0 0 0 r:45.AV 0 I} 6 0 2i 35 0 7r v- 0 31 73, a 'j- -9a B 0 a U 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 34 0 0 51 35 0 42 68 0 264 915 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 29 0 1 78 28 0 32 53 0 238 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0: 0 15 0 20 0 1 60 19 0 28 59 0 202 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 21 0 0 74 24 0 26 55 1 211 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 0 0 2 0 130 2 173 0 3 556 256 0 228 480 2 1,832 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour 0 0 0 1 0 83 2 117 a 2 280 153 0 131 272 0 1,041 0 0 0 0 atAjl ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES (303) 216-2439 www. a l Itraff i c d ata. net Location: 1 TABLE ROCK RD & AIRPORT RD PM Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM Peak 15-Minutes: 04:30 PM - 04:45 PM Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles (1,371) 729 0.97 663 (1,261) 1 t TABLE FINX m AIRPORT RO O L VL 231 (742) 2 N n 4-- 387 0.42 2 W 0.95 E 156 0.94 4 ~ s i -.0 269 IU w mo r TABLE ROCK RD 1 1 (1.308) 699 0.89 513 (975) Peak Hour - Bicycles 0 -� i Nl. [it- 0 t o IN E 0-0 a o 0y —0 1 ntitr 1 o a b LF ♦_0 0--* Peak Hour - Pedestrians Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles AIRPORT RD AIRPORT RD TABLE ROCK RD TABLE ROCK RD Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 46 0 53 0 2 111 23 0 55 131 0 421 1,633 0 2 0 0 4:15 PM 0 1 1 1 0 35 0 69 0 0 108 11 0 45 133 0 404 1,602 0 0 0 0 0. 0 38 0 60 0 3 125 1.9 t t Su a' IJ 440114 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 49 0 0 i7 27 0 38 140 0 378 1,500 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 34 0 70 0 0 102 18 0 38 127 0 390 1 A60 1 0 1 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 40 0 0 104 18 1 50 111 1 373 2 0 2 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 55 0 0 94 16 0 39 115 0 359 1 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 27 1 40 0 0 90 20 1 52 107 0 338 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 2 2 1 0 305 1 436 0 2 821 152 2 366 1,002 1 3,093 4 2 3 C Peak Hour 0 1 2 1 0 156 0 231 0 2 431 80 0 187 542 0 1,633 0 2 0 C Exhibit D - LOS Calculations+ Tinning Sheets Timings Scenario 1 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road --,v f- .- *-- 4\ t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WSL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 187 542 Future Volume (vph) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 187 542 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 10.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 17.3% 40.9% 18.2% 41.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 23.0 18.0 24.0 18.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.42 0.33 0.44 0.34 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.04 044 036 0.06 0.46 0.47 0.48 Control Delay 13.1 0.1 18.3 4 1 7.4 15.1 12.0 16 1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13 1 0.1 18.3 41 7.4 15.1 12.0 16.1 LOS B A B A A B B B Approach Delay 7.9 10.4 14.7 15.1 Approach LOS A B B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 55 Actuated Cycle Length: 55 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.48 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road � 01 I O 2 �L34 4\ 05 06 R) 08 Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario 1 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road + I Movement EBL EB1' EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR S8L SST S8R Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r t�' t Tl Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 4 29 22 164 32 243 25 454 84 197 571 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 104 560 519 494 86 519 470 981 180 488 1214 11 Arrive On Green 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 93 1712 1585 1142 263 1585 1781 2997 551 1781 3610 32 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 22 196 0 243 25 268 270 197 281 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1806 0 1585 1406 0 1585 1781 1777 1771 1781 1777 1865 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 00 0.5 5.4 00 6.7 0.5 6.6 6.7 3.9 6.9 6.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 00 0.5 6.1 0.0 6.7 0.5 6.6 6.7 3.9 6.9 6.9 Prop In Lane 0.12 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 664 0 519 580 0 519 470 582 580 488 598 627 V/C Ratio(X) 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.34 0.00 0.47 0.05 0.46 0.47 0.40 0.47 0.47 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 664 0 519 580 0 519 470 582 580 488 598 627 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.7 0.0 12.6 14.5 0.0 14.7 9.8 14.7 14.7 10.7 14.4 14.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.6 0.0 3.0 0.2 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.6 2.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 °/vile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.3 0.0 0.2 1.8 0.0 24 0.2 2.5 2.6 1.5 2.6 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 12.8 0.0 12.8 16.1 0.0 177 10.0 17.3 17.4 13.1 17.0 16.9 LnGrp LOS B A B B A B B B B B B B Approach Vol, veh/h 55 439 563 773 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.8 17.0 17.0 16.0 Approach LOS B B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 22.5 22.5 9.5 23.0 22.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll ), s 5.9 8.7 2.7 2.5 8.9 8.7 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 2.0 0.1 0.0 2.2 1.3 Intersection Summary_ HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.4 HCM 6th LOS B Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Timings Scenario 2 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road -,t 4--- *-- t --► Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W'BR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations 4 r 4 r 0 1 tT# Traffic Volume (vph) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 187 542 Future Volume (vph) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 187 542 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phasp 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (%) 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vlc Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Surnmary Cycle Length: 55 Actuated Cycle Length: 48.1 Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% Analysis Period (min) 15 None None None None None 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.07 0.04 0.56 0.42 13.8 02 22.7 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.8 02 22.7 4.9 B A C A 8.3 12.9 A B CnG}a nnrl Phacpc• 1 • Tahlp Rnck Rnad & Airnort Road 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 10.0 23.0 17,3% 40.9% 18.2% 41.8% 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Yes Yes Yes Yes None Max None Max 23.0 19.2 26.1 25.1 0.48 0.40 0.54 0.52 0.05 0.38 0.39 0.31 6.6 12.2 9.1 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 12.2 9.1 8.9 A B A A 12.0 8.9 B A Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service A Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario 2 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road � � � 4- 4\ I * I # Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations *' r 4 r ti 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 28 21 156 30 231 24 431 80 187 542 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 4 29 22 164 32 243 25 454 84 197 571 5 Peak Hour Factor 095 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 102 378 340 381 55 340 512 1174 216 580 1668 15 Arrive On Green 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.39 0.39 0.10 0.46 0.46 Sat Flow, veh/h 64 1762 1585 1108 255 1585 1781 2997 551 1781 3610 32 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 22 196 0 243 25 268 270 197 281 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1826 0 1585 1363 0 1585 1781 1777 1771 1781 1777 1865 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.5 5.6 0.0 6.5 0.4 5.0 5.0 2.8 4.6 4.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 00 0.5 6.2 00 6.5 0.4 5.0 5.0 2.8 4.6 4.6 Prop In Lane 0.12 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 479 0 340 436 0 340 512 696 694 580 821 862 V/C Ratio(X) 0.07 0.00 0.06 0.45 0.00 0.72 0.05 0.38 0.39 0.34 0.34 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 785 0 621 688 0 621 653 696 694 615 821 862 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(1) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.4 0.0 14.4 16.8 0.0 16.7 7.8 10.0 10.0 6.7 7.9 7.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.0 28 00 1.6 1.6 03 1.1 11 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.3 0.0 0.2 1.6 0.0 2.2 0.1 1.6 1.7 0.7 1.4 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.5 0.0 14.5 17.5 0.0 19.6 7.9 11.6 11.7 7.1 9.0 9.0 LnGrp LOS B A B B A B A B B A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 55 439 563 773 Approach Delay, s/veh 14.5 18.6 11.5 8.5 Approach LOS B B B A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 91 22.5 14.3 5.9 25.7 14.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5,5 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 4.8 7.0 2.6 2.4 6.6 8.5 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.0 2.2 0.1 0.0 2.4 1.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.0 HCM 6th LOS B Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Timings Scenario 3 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road �,# --,. 4--- 4.,� t l Lane Group EBL EBT W8L WBT NBL NBT SBL SST Lane Configurations T+ vi T tT fl� Traffic Volume (vph) 4 28 156 30 24 431 187 542 Future Volume (vph) 4 28 156 30 24 431 187 542 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 95 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 10.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 17.3% 40.9% 18.2% 41.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1'0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 23.0 18.0 24.0 18.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.42 0.33 0.44 0.34 vlc Ratio 0.01 0.09 0.37 0.40 0.06 0.46 0.47 048 Control Delay 12.8 9.2 17.2 5.2 7.4 15.1 12.0 16.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12.8 9.2 17.2 5.2 7A 15 1 12.0 16.1 LOS B A B A A B B B Approach Delay 9.5 9.7 14.7 15.1 Approach LOS A A B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 55 Actuated Cycle Length: 55 Offset: 10 (18%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.48 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 splits and Phases: 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road 01 t 02 V. 0 72g_ II f- 05 T 06 (R) 08 Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario 3 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road Movemeni Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vehlh) Future Volume (veh/h) Initial Q (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus Adj EBL. 4 4 0 1.00 1.00 EBT T+ 28 28 0 1.00 EBR 21 21 0 1.00 1.00 WBL 156 156 0 1.00 1.00 WBT 1 30 30 0 1.00 WBR 231 231 0 1.00 1.00 NBL 24 24 0 1.00 1.00 NBT tT> 431 431 0 1.00 NBR 80 80 0 1.00 1.00 SBL 187 187 0 1.00 1.00 SBT 0 542 542 0 1.00 SSR 5 5 0 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach Adj Sat Flow, veh/hlln Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, vehlh Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), vehlh Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh1h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), slveh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS Approach Vol, vehlh Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Timer - Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s Green Ext Time (p-c), s Intersection Summa HCM 6th Ctrl Delay HCM 6th LOS No No No No 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 4 29 22 164 32 243 25 454 84 197 571 5 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0 95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 340 323 245 546 61 467 470 981 180 488 1214 11 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.34 0.34 1104 987 749 1354 188 1426 1781 2997 551 1781 3610 32 4 0 51 164 0 275 25 268 270 197 281 295 1104 0 1736 1354 0 1614 1781 1777 1771 1781 1777 1865 0.2 00 1.1 5.3 0.0 7.6 0.5 6.6 6.7 3.9 6.9 6.9 7.8 00 1.1 6A 0.0 76 0.5 6.6 6.7 3.9 6.9 6.9 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.02 340 0 568 546 0 528 470 582 580 488 598 627 0.01 0.00 0.09 0.30 0.00 0.52 0.05 0.46 0.47 0.40 0.47 0.47 340 0 568 546 0 528 470 582 580 488 598 627 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 18.1 0.0 12.8 15.0 0.0 15.0 9.8 14.7 14.7 10.7 14.4 14.4 0.1 0.0 0.3 1.4 0.0 3.6 02 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.6 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.6 0.0 2.8 0.2 2.5 2.6 1 5 2.6 2.7 18.2 0.0 13.1 16.4 0.0 18.6 10.0 17.3 17.4 13.1 17.0 16.9 B A B B A B B B B B B B 55 439 563 773 13.5 17.8 17.0 16.0 B B B B 1 2 4 5 6 8 10.0 22.5 22.5 9.5 23.0 22.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.5 18.0 5.9 8.7 9.8 2.5 8.9 9.6 0.0 2.0 0.1 0.0 2.2 1.4 16.7 B Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Timings Scenario 4 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road -.4 -. *- *� t �► Lane Group EBL EET WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations Vi $ "j 1� `� tT4 Vi tT Traffic Volume (vph) 4 28 156 30 24 431 187 542 Future Volume (vph) 4 28 156 30 24 431 187 542 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.8 10.2 23.5 Total Split (%) 14.6% 34.6% 14.6% 34.6% 14.6% 35.1% 15.7% 36.2% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) 10.0 7.5 11.7 10.9 23.1 19.3 26.4 25.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.15 0.24 0.22 0.47 0.39 0.54 0.52 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.18 0.51 0.50 0.05 0.39 0.40 0.31 Control Delay 12.5 15.4 21.2 78 7.9 13.4 10.4 9.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12.5 15.4 21.2 7.8 7.9 13.4 10.4 9.8 LOS B B C A A B B A Approach Delay 15.2 12.8 13.2 9.9 Approach LOS B B B A Intersection Summa Cycle Length: 65 Actuated Cycle Length: 48.9 Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.51 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 C.,GIe onri Phocnc• 1 • Tohlo Rnrk Rnari R Airnnrt Rn:;H r1`0 01 IO2 f�'03 -404 _ I 05 ■ 06 07 F 08 9.5] .5_5 i G 77 5c. - Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario 4 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) Initial Q (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus Adj EBL 4 4 0 1.00 1.00 EBT 'T 28 28 0 1.00 EBR 21 21 0 1.00 1.00 WBL 156 156 0 1.00 1.00 WBT 30 30 0 1.00 WBR 231 231 0 1.00 1.00 NBL 24 24 0 1.00 1.00 NBT 431 431 0 1.00 NBR 80 80 0 1.00 1,00 SBL 187 187 0 1.00 1.00 SST tT' 542 542 0 1.00 SBR 5 5 0 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/In Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Timer • Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l l ), s Green Ext Time (p-c), s Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay HCM 6th LOS No No No No 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 4 29 22 164 32 243 25 454 84 197 571 5 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 204 125 95 438 40 307 440 1028 189 506 1490 13 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.34 0.34 0.10 0.41 0.41 1781 987 749 1781 188 1426 1781 2997 551 1781 3610 32 4 0 51 164 0 275 25 268 270 197 281 295 1781 0 1736 1781 0 1614 1781 1777 1771 1781 1777 1865 0.1 0.0 1.4 4.0 0.0 8.6 0.5 6.2 6.3 3.6 5.9 5.9 0.1 0.0 1.4 4.0 0.0 8.6 0.5 6.2 6.3 3.6 5.9 5.9 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.02 204 0 220 438 0 348 440 610 608 506 733 770 0.02 0.00 0.23 0.37 0.00 0.79 0.06 0.44 0.44 0.39 0.38 0.38 362 0 586 438 0 545 555 610 608 520 733 770 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 20.3 0.0 20.9 16.3 0.0 19.8 10.7 13.6 13.6 9.3 10.9 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 42 0.1 2.3 2.3 0.5 1.5 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.4 00 3.1 0.2 23 24 1.0 2.0 2.1 20.3 0.0 21.5 16.8 0.0 24.0 10.8 15.8 15.9 9.8 12.4 12.4 C A C B A C B B B A B B 55 439 563 773 21.4 21.3 15.7 11.7 C C B B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9.8 22.8 9.5 11.3 6.0 26.5 4.8 16.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.7 18.3 5.0 18.0 5.0 19.0 5.0 18.0 5.6 8.3 6.0 3.4 2.5 7.9 2.1 10.6 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.9 15.5 B Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 2 Timings Scenario 5 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road -,-* --* 'e- ,- t Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Configurations 41� *' r' Vi 0 t'� Traffic Volume (vph) 4 28 156 30 231 24 431 187 542 Future Volume (vph) 4 28 156 30 231 24 431 187 542 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 10.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 40.9% 17.3% 40.9% 18.2% 41.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 23.0 18.0 24.0 18.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.42 0.33 0.44 0.34 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.45 0.36 0.06 0.46 0.47 0.48 Control Delay 9.5 18.5 4.1 7.4 15.1 12.0 16.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.5 18.5 4.1 74 15.1 12.0 16.1 LOS A B A A B B B Approach Delay 9.5 10.5 14.7 15.1 Approach LOS A B B B Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 55 Actuated Cycle Length: 55 Offset: 10 (18%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Pretimed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.48 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 itc and Phases• 1- Tnhle Rock Road & Airoort Road Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario 5 1: Table Rock Road & Airport Road -,* - 4 4--- k- 4\ t Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) Future Volume (veh/h) Initial Q (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus Adj EBL 4 4 0 1.00 1.00 EBT +T+ 28 28 0 1.00 EBR 21 21 0 1.00 1.00 WBL 156 156 0 1.00 1.00 WBT 4T 30 30 0 1.00 WBR r 231 231 0 1.00 1.00 NBL 24 24 0 1.00 1.00 NBT +1 431 431 0 1.00 NBR 80 80 0 1.00 1.00 5BL 187 187 0 1.00 1.00 SST 0 542 542 0 1.00 SBR 5 5 0 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In Adj Flow Rate, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Percent Heavy Veh, % Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh LnGrp LOS Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Timer - Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s Green Ext Time (p-c), s Intersection Summa HCM 6th Ctrl Delay HCM 6th LOS No No No No 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 4 29 22 164 32 243 25 454 84 197 571 5 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 82 326 225 505 88 519 470 981 180 488 1214 11 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.34 0.34 37 996 688 1175 270 1585 1781 2997 551 1781 3610 32 55 0 0 196 0 243 25 268 270 197 281 295 1721 0 0 1445 0 1585 1781 1777 1771 1781 1777 1865 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 6.7 0.5 6.6 6.7 3.9 6.9 6.9 1.2 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 6.7 0,5 6.6 6.7 3.9 6.9 6.9 0.07 0.40 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.02 633 0 0 593 0 519 470 582 580 488 598 627 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.47 0.05 0.46 0.47 0.40 0.47 0.47 633 0 0 593 0 519 470 582 580 488 598 627 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 12.9 0.0 0.0 14.2 0.0 14.7 9.8 14.7 14.7 10.7 14.4 14.4 03 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 3.0 0.2 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.6 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 2.4 0.2 25 2.6 1.5 2.6 2.7 13.1 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.0 17.7 10.0 17.3 17A 131 17.0 16.9 B A A B A B B B B B B B 55 439 563 773 13.1 16.8 17.0 16.0 B B B B 1 2 { 5 6 8 10.0 22.5 22.5 9.5 23.0 22.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 18.0 18.0 5.0 18.5 18.0 5.9 8.7 3.2 2.5 8.9 8.7 0.0 2.0 0.2 0.0 2.2 1.3 16.4 B Existing Plus Project PM Synchro 11 Report Page 2