Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolution 885 - Major modification to White Hawk Master Plan
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 885 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO THE WHITE HAWK MASTER PLAN (File No: MOD -20005) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 825 on November 3, 2015 approving the White Hawk Master Plan ("Master Plan") providing a framework for a 310 unit residential development on 18.91 acres on property identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 02 , Tax Lots 2700 and 2701, Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the project site is located in the Low Mix Residential (LMR) and Medium Mix Residential (MMR zoning districts within the Eastside Transit Oriented Development (ETOD) District; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application modifying the Phasing Plan to allow construction of the single family units first; the Site Plan to reduce the number of single family lots from 34 to 32 and to consolidate two alleys; and to amend the single family housing plan design from traditional to contemporary; and, WHEREAS, the proposed changes were determined to be Major based on the reconfiguration of lots and alleys in accordance with Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) Section 17.09.300, and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on January 19, 2021, at which time it reviewed the Staff Report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and, WHEREAS, after considering the proposed modifications to the Master Plan, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the application complies with all applicable standards and criteria for Major Modifications as demonstrated in the Staff Report dated January 19, 2021 (Exhibit 1) and the Planning Department Findings (Exhibit 2). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 885 does hereby approve the Tentative Plan application for White Hawk Phase 1 subject to the conditions in the Staff Report dated January 19, 2021 (Exhibit 1). PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 19" day of January 19, 2021. VJc R {,— Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: I G� 4iepresen#I v 5e Planning Commission Resolution No. 885 (1/19/2021) _Planning Department STAFF REPORT Tom Humphrey, AICP, A�k Community Development Director FNTRAL POINT January 19, 2021 Agenda Item: VIII -B Consideration of a Major Modification to the White Hawk Master Plan (File No. 14004) concerning the phasing plan and alley layout, architectural style, and housing type in Phase 1. The 18.91 acre project site is within the Low Mix Residential (LMR) and Medium Mix Residential (MMR) zones in the Eastside Transit Oriented Development District (ETOD) and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S 2W 02, Tax Lots 2700 and 2701. Applicant: White Hawk Properties, LLC; Agent: Urban Development Service, LLC (Mark Knox). File No. MOD -20005. Staff Source Stephanie Holtey, Principal Planner Background On November 3, 2015 the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 825 approving the White Hawk Master Plan ("Master Plan"). The Master Plan establishes a framework for a residential development, including 34 duplexes and townhomes, 276 apartments and a 4.12 acre public park to be built in three (3) phases. At the time the Master Plan was approved, the project site was bank owned. The property was recently purchased by White Hawk Properties, LLC. At this time, the Applicant is requesting approval of a Master Plan modification to accomplish the following: • Amend the phasing plan to allow construction of the duplexes/townhouses first; • Decrease the number of duplex/townhome lots from 34 to 32; • Add Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) as a new housing type; ■ Revise the proposed phase 1 housing type from 100% attached to 50% attached; • Change the architectural style from traditional to contemporary; and, • Consolidate two of the east/west alleys in proposed phase 1. In accordance with CPMC 17.09.300 modifications to approved plans are either major or minor. Although most of the changes proposed are minor, it has been processed as a major amendment due to the change in alley access and the housing design. The scope of review is limited to proposed changes. Project Description: The proposed Master Plan Modification amends the Phasing Plan, Site Plan for proposed Phase 1 and all exhibits in the Housing Plan. Each are described in the sections below. Phasing Plan The original phasing plan (Figure 1) addresses timing and implementation of traffic park construction and mitigation of traffic and environmental impacts of the White Hawk development. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, the proposed change to the phasing plan changes Phase 3 to Phase To comply with the original master plan requirements, the Applicant proposes to realign the intersection of Gebhard and Beebe Road to provide a safe turning radius. Proposed Phase 2 is the Park and Phase 3 includes the apartment development. Aside from timing, no changes are proposed to either Phase 2 or 3 at this time. Figure 1, Phasing Plan {approved 11-2015) Figure 2, Proposed Phasing Plan Revision (See also, Attachment "A-1") Site Plan MW$* 3 The site plan for proposed Phase 1 consolidates the two alleys intersect with Park Street and reduce the total lot count from 34 to 32 (Attachment "A-1" ). According to the Applicant's Findings (Attachment `B"), the purpose of the changes is to provide a more livable and sustainable housing development that is energy efficient, accommodates solar and provides increased private open space. The proposed changes have been reviewed by the City and agencies is found to comply with applicable requirements. Housine Plan The original Housing Plan provided a neo -traditional architectural design concept that included three (3) housing types: duplexes, townhomes, and apartments. The proposed modification provides for a contemporary architectural style that includes single family townhomes (i.e. attached row houses / "zero lot line duplexes") and accessory dwelling units (ADUs) in proposed phase 1. The proposed housing types are all permitted uses in the LMR and MMR zones. The proposal reduces townhomes from 34 to 32 but adds 16 ADUs for a total of 48 units in Phase 1. The minimum/maximum range for density for the overall project is 202 to 457 units. The proposed modification will result in 324 units consistent with the density requirements for the site. Issues There are three (3) issues/notes relative to this application as follows: Building Design. The proposed changes to the building design represent a departure from the original Master Plan approval, including reduction in building materials and architectural details. The change to contemporary design reflects a more minimalist facade. Based on review of the design prototypes, the proposal meets the residential fagade requirements for single family housing types by providing varied rooflines, vertical articulation, use of two (2) primary building materials (i.e. horizontal lap siding and panel siding) adequate window and door area and use of alley loaded garages. Recessed entrances are questionable in terms of creating a building entry that is "prominent, interesting and pedestrian accessible," as recommended per CPMC 17.67.070(C)(3)(c). Comment: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the proposed changes and approve the proposed housing plan with or without modification to provide a more prominent building entrance characteristic of TOD development. 2. Soil Mitigation. The approved Master Plan sets forth conditions approval relative to the timing of construction and mitigation of arsenic contamination in the soil. The prior owner of the property completed all soil mitigation actions per an approved mitigation plan. On August 14, 2019, the City the Department of Environmental Quality issued a No Further Action letter. Comment: The proposed modification requires no further action to remediate contaminated soils. 3. Shallow Well Mitigation. To avoid potential impacts of the development process on the water table and shallow wells, the prior property owner was required to survey and sample identified wells in the vicinity of the project site. This work was completed between December 2015 and April 2016 and a report was prepared including recommended mitigation actions for the design and construction of underground utilities. Per the Public Works Staff Report dated January 4, 2021, the Applicant is required to address the shallow well mitigation requirements prior to Civil Improvement Plan approval and the start of construction. Comment: Staff recommends that the Planning commission approve Condition No. 2 that the Applicant satisfy all Public Works conditions of approval in the Staff Report dated January 4, 2021 (Attachment "C") Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law The proposed modification has been reviewed in accordance with CPMC 17.09, Modifications to Approved Plans and Conditions of Approval, and found to comply as evidenced in the Planning Department Supplemental Findings (Attachment "E"). Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant shall comply with the conditions set forth in the Public Works Staff Report dated January 4, 2021 (Attachment "C") and Jackson County Roads conditions as applicable (Attachment "D"). 2. Prior to building permit issuance, the Applicant shall make any changes to the architecture needed to provide a more prominent building entrance consistent with the building design standards set forth in CPMC 17.67.070. Attachments: Attachment "A-1" — Revised Phasing Plan and Phase 1 Site Plan Attachment "A-2" — Housing Plan Exhibits dated 12/7/2020 (Sheets 1-8) Attachment "A-3" — Building Elevation Prototype, Lots 31 and 32 (1- and 2- story units with ADU) Attachment "A-4" — Building Elevation Prototype, Lots 3 and 4 (2 -story units with ADU) Attachment "A-5" — Building Elevation Prototype, Lots 27 and 28 (1- and 2 -story units with ADU) Attachment "A-6" — Building Elevation Prototype (single story units) Attachment `B" — Applicant's Findings Attachment "C" — Public Works Department Staff Report dated January 4, 2021 Attachment "D" — Jackson County Roads Staff Report dated January 4, 2021 Attachment "E" — Planning Department Supplemental Findings (to be provided) Attachment "F" — Draft Resolution No. 885 (to be provided) Action Consider the proposed Major Modification to the White Hawk Master Plan and 1) Approve; 2) Approve with Modifications or 3) Deny the application. Recommendation Approve the Major Modification request subject to the recommended conditions in the staff report dated January 19, 2021. I ST21R ORCHARD PHASE 1 G+Yoi7[ W,Hawk 3! zw OZ TAX tors 27M & 2M BEEBE ROAD CEMM MINT OREGON ��rrrr� n O z N C n O z N O 0 N n ---VACANT (1) SFR !; r�-rr�*'w—.—r�1G:9�P.71i�iHir�r�r.r� .ve•ea�r�i�,as• ..(n-- .NgRT"TREEI - r 1 ;j ° f N — 1 1 Y - f i `-- z1 m D i N 1 1 r - i Di 1 rn_ - �1 0-4 1 1 IMP 2 , BEEOE PARK DRIVE I *41 ; rD ,--1------.-- 1 ^1 1 NI I 1� 1 e 1 m �I E rn D 1 f D m 1 1 C) ..� 1 m ' 1 1 T 1 ni m X 1 r , r $ 1 Y � I ST21R ORCHARD PHASE 1 G+Yoi7[ W,Hawk 3! zw OZ TAX tors 27M & 2M BEEBE ROAD CEMM MINT OREGON ��rrrr� n O z N C n O z N O 0 N n !; ..(n-- I ST21R ORCHARD PHASE 1 G+Yoi7[ W,Hawk 3! zw OZ TAX tors 27M & 2M BEEBE ROAD CEMM MINT OREGON ��rrrr� n O z N C n O z N O 0 N n y -w w REQ wK w _ m� .� mm 3 Rte• HUK` m_eo�r_ o��4 \( %«__". ___• / . !. y -w w REQ wK w _ m� .� mm 3 Rte• HUK` m_eo�r_ o��4 \( %«__". ___• / �7 r C", 0 a•mn w. s1.• 'Es .0 _�� no3 w3„ FQom w_ wg� =Y_ Ttsl u'Z -- O J z°o 9H ag ` H WWITE HAWK WFI WKITE2 TAHRAN ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING LLC '� ,.�t rrn� n�•r;t HA1371 KNAUS ROAD LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 No 'i'C✓1'7(503)5399902 F(503)9971995 aralphtahrwdlmmcmlel o� 2 L) m mx — .NONiH 11f11EE1fi1S a Y 4 L2 r P 0 WHITE HAWK y, • TAHRAN ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING LLC Nox J •d CENTRALOREGON ANT HAwk 1371 T503KNAUS ROAD LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 a � T()539 6902 F(5M)6971I385aialphlahran®camcasl of �F is S �a /^ eg WHITE HAWK WHITE TAHRAN ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING LLC CENTRAL POINT HAyy��( 1371 KNAUS ROAD LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 '6 OREGON T (5931 5393993 F (5031 fi971995 a raiphlahran®co....I eI o f 2 O 06 a7 is � ova n I WHITE MAWI{ WHITE y TAHRAN ARCHITECTURE 8 PLANNING LLC N� t 0£N1A&PNfli OA�VLAY HAWK 1371 KNAUS ROAD LAKE OSWEG0, OREGON 97034 y T (503) 5399802 F (503) 5971985 a ralphlahraa®com...1 el 4 Z m ped goo g¢e mea w3 FWm wgm 7 v srOIY W- nou ANI : s*oAv Ivo nou a= U 0� m e WHITE HAWK 00 VlIHIT E y TAHRAN ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING LLC >z i CRNTRAI POfR HAWK 1371 KNAUS ROAD LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 f ortEDUM T (503) 539 6902 F (503) 697 1985 a ralphlah,an®wmc,A et o f j 2 (r) Q 9 d WHITE HAWK CWHITE ��+' IiAWK� 3P, 6� w TAHRAN ARCHFTECTURE A ALANNNG LLC 1371 KRAUS ROAD LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 T16M3 }6WMW F19j66971995 wrmWvW-YrBG ast.el of c�i b _ WHITE HAWKW HITE s TAHRAN ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING LLC �o Iii r CCNlrtni POINT HAWK 1371 KNAUS ROAD LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 87034 3 t �`- N� T (503) 539 0902 F (50.3) 6971995 a ralphlahran®co ml M o f I 1 c�i 1 m I o WHITE HAWK I TE� TAHRAN ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING LLC CENTRAL POINT HAWK 1371 KNAUS ROAD LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 j OREGON T (503) 539 8602 F (503) 697 1965 a Iph(,h—C&w—t el o 3 � m El �I i p oQ WHITE HAWK N �; WHITE ti TAHRAN ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING LLC ^+� 4 c6kinA; P[rvkr HAWK 1371 KNAUS ROAD LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97034 T (503( 539 8802 F (503) 697 1995 1 ralphtahran®wmcasl. el No F "WHITE HAWK" A PROPOSAL FOR MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE APPROVED WHITE HAWK MASTER PLAN SUBDIVISION, LOCATED WITHIN THE EASTSIDE TRANSIT ORIENTED DISTRICT SUBMITTED TO CITY OF CENTRAL POINT FOR OUTLIER CONSTRUCTION & KDA HOMES, LLC DECEMBER 77", 2020 Project Information: Address: Map & Tax Lot: Property Owner: Applicants: ATTACHMENT "B' FINDINGS of FACT Consideration of minor modifications of the approved Master Plan for the White Hawk Subdivision 718 Beebe Road 372W02 – 2700 & 2701 White Hawk Properties, LLC 841 O'Hare Pkwy #100 Medford OR, 97504 Outlier Construction 841 O'Hare Pkwy #100 Medford OR, 97504 KDA Homes, LLC 604 Fair Oaks Court Ashland, OR 97520 Agent: Urban Development Services, LLC 604 Fair Oaks Court Ashland, OR 97520 Architect: Tahran Architecture & Planning, LLC 1371 Knaus Road Lake Oswego, OR 97034 Civil Engineer: Marquess & Associates 1120 E Jackson Street Medford, OR 97504 Request: Consideration of minor modifications of the approved Master Plan for the White Hawk Subdivision, File #14004, within the Eastside Transit Oriented Development. The project site is located east of Gebhard Road and north of Beebe Road, and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S 2W 02 Tax Lots 2700 and 2701. The project site is within the LMR—Low Mix Residential (-2.69 acres) and MMR—Medium Mix Residential (15.84 acres) zoning districts. Property Description: The subject properties are located at the intersection of Beebe Road and Gebhard Road. Per the adopted existing conditions an environmental plan from the White Hawk Master Plan approval, Tax 2700 is a vacant, 18.77 -acre parcel to the northeast of the intersection. Tax lot 2701 is southwest of the intersection, is .13 acres and is also vacant. Page 1 of 7 The site is Comprehensive Plan Designated as Low Density, and has two residential zoning designations, Low Mix Residential (LMR) and Medium Mix Residential (MMR), the property is within the East Side Transit Oriented District. The properties to the north are also zoned LMR and MMR. These large acre properties are occupied by primarily by residential structures and their outbuildings The properties to the east are also zoned LMR. The property adjacent to the southeast corner of the property is zoned ETOD Civic and is occupied by a church and its parking area. Across Gebhard Road to the west, are County zoned properties. The Bear Creek floodplain encroaches slightly onto Tax Lot 2701, but does not affect the development of Tax Lot 2700. Proposal: The request is for a minor modification to the Master Plan approval for the 18.77 -acre parcel in the ETOD District, for the White Hawk Subdivision Master Plan. The proposal includes a request to: 1) Amend the Phasing Plan by swapping Phase I and Phase III; 2) Decreasing the number of duplex/townhome lots within proposed Phase I from 34 to 32; 3) Revising the housing type within proposed Phase I from 100% attached to 50% attached; 4) Adding a new housing type within proposed Phase I to include accessory residential units; 5) Revising the housing design from traditional to more contemporary; 6) Elimination of one of three alleys in the proposed Phase I area. In accordance with CPMC 17.09.400, the proposed changes qualify as a Minor Modification. Detailed proposal: The original approved Master Plan included residential development with three housing types: 18 single- family attached rowhouses, 16 duplexes and 276 apartments for a total of 310 units. Included in the project was a 4.2 -acre public park, along with associated infrastructure and landscaping. The proposal herein does not significantly deviate from the originally approved White Hawk Master Plan, but does improve the plan based on current market demands as well as livability and sustainability goals of the applicants. The applicants contend the White Hawk Master Plan and its conditions of approval have been well thought out, but because of the project's size, types of units and their configuration, the applicants desire minor adjustments to refine the plan which include: 1 i Phasing Plan Amendment; The applicants propose to amend the Phasing Plan which consists of three phases. The initial phasing plan consisted of 276 apartments in Phase I, the 4.2 -acre park in Phase II and 18 single-family attached rowhouses and 16 duplexes in Phase III. The applicants propose to "swap" Phase I and Phase III and construct the proposed units within the revised Phase I first. The improvement of the park (Phase II) as well as the majority of street improvements along Gebhard and Beebe Roads will also be included in the project's initial construction, consistent with the original conditions of approval. The attached Phasing Plan illustrates the proposed phases in addition to other minor amendments as noted herein. Note: The Phase III area (previously Phase 1) has been labeled "Reserve Acreage" and left as white space on the plan, but will eventually develop consistent with the approved White Hawk Master Plan unless otherwise modified under approval. Page 2 of 7 2 Du lex/Townhome and Housing Type Modifications the below allem is to clari Items #24 above : The applicants propose to reduce the number of lots within proposed Phase I area from 34 to 32. The overall purpose of the modification is multifold in order to produce a housing project that is more livable and sustainable. The original approval identified the 18 attached townhome units along the Gebhard Road frontage having approximately 495' of continuous building frontage and 16 attached duplex units along the proposed Park Street frontage having continuous housing blocks of roughly 106', 118' and 106'. The applicant's proposed two -unit reduction will allow for 32 zero lot -line duplex units (each duplex joined at the shared property line) which will produce housing with significantly more natural light from a side yard, create a side yard for recreational opportunities, be less prone to substantial unit fire loss and create the opportunity for more diverse streetscape designs. Further, the proposed layout is more affordable as shared roofs with four or more units must pay into a monthly "reserve" Home Owner's Association account in order for its eventual replacement. This alone adds substantially to a homeowner's monthly housing costs, but is also not as livable. The proposed 32 zero lot line duplex units are also to include accessory residential units with one per duplex. The accessory residential unit will sit above the garage on one side of the duplex so as to minimize sound and vibration to the attached unit(s), but also provide for a more diverse and attractive building facade. The applicants also propose to include the accessory residential units within the Master Plan's overall density numbers and depending on market reaction, could propose more, via a modification, with other phases. Note: In addition to the applicant's livability and sustainability goals as outlined below, the inclusion of the accessory residential dwelling units is to also insure a more affordable housing type that is generally proven to be an efficient use of space, a source of affordable rental housing and an opportunity for the homeowner to subsidize their monthly housing expenses. Overall, the applicants contend the modifications are minor, but should produce an outcome where the tenants experience a more livable space and thus are more appreciative of their home and neighborhood. 3 Revising the housing design from traditional to more contemporary. Along with the housing type and setback revisions noted above, the applicants desire to modify the unit's conceptual design from a traditional architectural style to a more contemporary style that largely accommodates Net Zero solar goals, Earth Advantage goals, but also affordability in construction technique and maintenance. With an alternating view of the floor plan and elevations, one can see the front yard is activated as both a private and semi -private gathering space for outdoor recreational opportunity and also creating a sense of entry to the front door. 4) Elimination of an alley within proposed Phase I: The original application identified two north to south alleys intersecting with another alley running east to west and paralleling Gebhard Road within the proposed Phase I area. The applicants propose to eliminate one of the short north to south alleys and instead "combine" the two into one and centering it within the Park Street block between North Street and Beebe Park Drive. The general reason for the modification is the second alley provided little relief to the circulation pattern as the vast majority of trips are likely to be directed towards the primary streets of Page 3 of 7 Gebhard Road and out to Beebe Road or to Beebe Park Drive and out to Beebe Road, with little to zero necessity to access Park Drive (or vice versa), but also allowed for slightly wider parcels for added design flexibility, but also provided an opportunity to revise the alley's design to now include an abutting sidewalk for pedestrian mobility leading to and from the proposed park whereas the previous alley design did not. Further, in conversations with the project's original and current Architect, Tahran Architecture & Planning LLC, the second alley was only proposed to break-up the mass of the units fronting along Park Street and did not relate to any transportation remedies. However, considering the revisions to the unit designs and reduction of lots, the current design and lot dimension provide for a more relaxed streetscape with breaks between the duplex buildings while trying to retain the original planned density. Overall, the applicants contend the minor modifications proposed herein retains the circulation pattern, density and intent of the approved White Hawk Master Plan, but also provides for a number of added elements that are more in -keeping with Comprehensive Plan policies. Reserve Acreage: The area identified as "Reserve Acreage" is not proposed to be modified at this time. The original site plan illustrating this area's building, parking and circulation pattern remains as approved, but is noted herein as Reserve Acreage as the proposed minor changes to the proposed Phase I area do not effect this area. However, the applicants are aware the original Master Plan identified a range of units from 202 to 457 units for the entire 18.77 acres. The revised Phase I area is planned to include 32 single family homes and 16 Accessory Residential Units, leaving a density allotment of 154 to 409 units within the revised Phase III area. Previous application submittals illustrated site plans with a unit count of 140 attached to;vnhome and duplex style structures and 64 apartments for a total of 204 dwelling units. As such, the land use application for the proposed Phase III area will need to include a density proposal within the Phase III MMR area that includes 154 to 409 dwelling units, which may include single family, duplex, accessory units and/or apartments. Tentative Plat_- Proposed Phase I Area: The proposal herein includes a request for a 32 lot Tentative Plat approval for the proposed Phase I Area. The proposal is to implement the initial phase of the White Hawk Master Plan as revised per file No. MOD -20005. The proposed Tentative Plat has been designed in consideration of needed housing goals and transportation planning policies and complies with the City of Central Point's MMR zones minimum and maximum density provisions, lot dimension and setback standards. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Mark Knox KDA Homes, LLC Page 4of7 Findings of Fact 17.09.400 Minor Modifications A. Minor Modification. Any modification to a land use decision or approved development plan that is not within the description of a major modification as provided in Section 17.09.300(A). The proposal herein is a Minor Modification to a land use decision as the modifications proposed are not within the description of a Major Modification as provided in Section 17.09.300(A) which are noted below in bold italics, followed by the applicant's responses in standard font: CPMC 17.09.300 Major modifications 1. A change in land use; There is no change in land use proposed with this proposal. 2. An increase in density by more than ten percent, provided the resulting density does not exceed that allowed by the land use district, There is no increase in density by more than ten percent with this modification proposal. 3. A change in setbacks or lot coverage by more than ten percent, provided the resulting setback or lot coverage does not exceed that allowed by the land use district; There are no changes in setbacks or lot coverage by more than ten percent that exceed the zoning district. The minor modifications proposed herein include a modification that modifies the originally approved row house lots fronting along Gebhard Road from zero -lot line on both sides to zero lot -line on one side where it creates a zero lot -line duplex unit with an open side yard of 5' at the garage and 10' at the house. 4. A change in the type and/or location of accessways, drives or parking areas affecting off-site traffic; The proposal does include a minor modification by eliminating one of the two east -to -west alleys originally proposed off Park Street, but the change does not affect off-site traffic. 5. An increase in the floor area proposed for nonresidential use by more than fifteen percent where previously specified, Not applicable as only residential use is proposed. 6. A reduction of more than ten percent of the area reserved for common open space; or No changes are proposed to the common open space areas. Page 5 of 7 Z Change to a condition of approval, or a change similar to subsections (A)(1) through (6) of this section, that could have a detrimental impact on adjoining properties. The city planning official shall have discretion in determining detrimental impacts warranting a major modification. To the best of the applicant's knowledge and efforts, the modifications herein have no detrimental impact on adjoining properties. CPMC 17.09.400 Minor modifications As previously noted, the proposal herein is a Minor Modification to a land use decision and subject to the criteria provided in Section 17.09.400 which are noted below in bold italics, followed by the applicant's responses in standard font: B. Minor Modification Review Procedure. An application for approval of a minor modification shall be reviewed by the planning official using a Type I or a Type II review procedure under Section 17.05.200 or 17.05.300. The community development director is responsible for determining the appropriate review procedure based on the following criteria: 1. Minor modifications that involve only clear and objective code standards may be reviewed using a Type I procedure; The proposed modifications herein involve clear and objective code standards. 2. Minor modifications that involve one or more discretionary standards shall be reviewed through Type II procedure; and To the best of the applicant's knowledge, the proposed modifications are not discretionary and follow not only the intent of the original White Hawk Master Plan approvals, but also the City's density thresholds and dimensional standards. 3. When the code is unclear on whether the application should be a Type I or Type II review, a Type II procedure shall be used. The applicants are aware of this standard. C. Minor Modification Applications. An application for minor modification shall include an application form, filing fee and narrative, and a site plan using the same plan format as in the original approval. The community development director may require other relevant information, as necessary, to evaluate the request. Included with this narrative, the application for the minor modifications noted herein the application form, filing fee and site plan using the same plan format as in the original approval. D. Minor Modification Approval Criteria. The community development director shall approve, deny, or approve with conditions an application for minor modification based on written findings Page 6 of 7 that the modification is in compliance with all applicable requirements of the development code and conditions of approval on the original decision, and the modification is not a major modification as described in Section 17.09.300(A). The applicants are aware of this standard. Page 7 of 7 AX Public Works Department CENTRAL POINT ATTACHMENT "C" PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT January 4, 2021 Matt Samitore, Director AGENDA ITEM: White Hawk Master Plan and Subdivision (MOD -2005 and Sub - 20002) 37S 2W 02 Tax Lot 2700 and 2701 —Modification of Master Plan and 32 lot subdivision Applicant: KDA Homes Agent: KDA Homes Traffic/Street Details: A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was completed for the project in 2014. The TIA indicates that full build -out of the development will contribute 11 % towards Beebe Hamrick's intersection. Additionally, at build year, the intersection will degrade to a LOS F, which is below the City's minimum requirements. Per the TIA, the level of service decline will occur when trips generated by the development reach 107 PM Peak Hour Trips. To assure timely completion of the signal installation, the Planning Commission imposed a 96 PM Peak Hour Trip Cap. The proposed changes to Revised 1 will generate 40.64 PM Peak Hour trips, which is within the the Trip Cap. Since the development conditions have not changed in the Eastside Transit Oriented Development (ETOD) District since the Master Plan was approved and the proposed modifications are within scope of the original TIA, an updated TIA is not needed at this time. Street Details: Gehbard Road shall be developed to Public Works Standard ST -21R (12 foot center turn lane) Park Drive shall be developed to Public Works Standard ST -10. Beebe Park Drive shall be developed to Public Works Standard ST -20 (half street). North Street shall be developed to Public Works Standard ST -15 (half street). Existing Infrastructure: Water: There are 12 -inch water lines in servicing the site. Streets: All streets surrounding the site are collectors that are currently county roads. Stormwater: There is a 48 -inch storm drain line in Beebe Road. Additionally, the City is installing a new outfall to Bear Creek near the project site. Storm Water Quality: The applicant will need to address stormwater quality for the site. Background/Issues: The applicant is proposing a revision to the master plan switching the phasing so that the single-family portion can be built first. Public Works has the following issues/notes about the proposed modification and Phase 1 tenative plan. 140 South 3rd Street • Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 * Fax 541.664.6384 1. Any phase of development will need to include frontage improvements and amending the intersection of Beebe/Gebhard to align for a future bridge and allow for a safer turning radius. 2. The City will be installing a new signal at Hamrick/Beebe in the 21/23 FY budget. Additionally, the City is working on a new stormwater outfall near proposed North Street and Gebhard Road. 3. The City is working with Jackson County on a Jurisdictional Transfer for Gebhard and Beebe Roads. Once approved, all conditions for this development will be from the City. Conditions of Approval: Prior to Public Works Civil Improvement Plan approval and the start of construction of infrastructure improvements for Phase 1 as modified, the Appliant shall: 1. Utility Design — The applicant shall address the water table and well issues within the area on their construction plans to limit groundwater disturbances. The design shall address findings in the attached APEX Report dated November 16, 2016. 2. Stormwater Management Plan — The Applicant shall submit and receive approval for a stormwater management plan from the Public Works Department. The Stormwater Plan shall demonstrate compliance with the Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual for water quality and quantity treatment. Construction on site must be sequenced so that the permanent stormwater quality features are installed and operational when stormwater runoff enters. Erosion and Sediment Control — The proposed development will disturb more than one acre and requires an erosion and sediment control permit (NPDES 1200-C) from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C permit from DEQ and provide a copy to the Public Works Department. Stormwater Quality Operations & Maintenance— The Applicant shall record an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for all new stormwater quality features and provide a copy of the recorded document to the Public Works Department. 4. Landscape and Irrigation Plans — Applicant shall prepare and gain approval for a landscape and irrigation for all public landscape rows before any development occurs. Prior to the final plat for Phase 1, the applicant shall comply with the following conditions of approval: 1. Right of Way Dedication — Applicant shall dedicate the right of way shown on the tentative plat to meet collector standards for Gebhard Road and Beebe Park Drive. The right of way dedication and improvements are SDC credit eligible. 2. Frontage Improvements — Applicant shall develop half street improvements adjacent to Phase 1 of the modified master plan. Applicant shall also design and construct the proposed re-alighment of Beebe/Gebhard as part of the Phase 1 development. 011 APEX November 16, 2016 John Boyd People's Bank of Commerce 1311 East Barnett Rd. Medford, Oregon 97504 Re: White Hawk Development — Well Survey Results 718 Beebe Road Central Point, Oregon 2251-00 Dear Mr. Boyd: This letter provides the results of a well survey conducted in the vicinity of the proposed White Hawk Development and updates the evaluation of the potential for impacts to the water levels in wells near the development due to the installation of a proposed storm drain line along Gebhard Road. A preliminary evaluation was provided in a letter to you dated August 24, 2015. Subsequent to that letter, the City of Central Point requested that a survey be performed to identify domestic well owners in the vicinity of the development and, where possible, the construction of the wells (e.g., depth, use, screened interval if screened, etc.) to further evaluate the potential for negative impacts to water levels in wells located within the White Hawk transit oriented development (TOD) from the proposed construction of the storm drain line. The survey was completed between December 2015 and April 2016. The results of the survey and an updated evaluation on the potential impacts of the storm drain line on wells identified in the White Hawk TOD are provided below. WELL SURVEY A well survey form was sent to the residents located within the White Hawk TOD; Attachment A shows the boundaries and tax lots within the White Hawk TOD. Well surveys were sent to owners of the 31 tax lots within the White Hawk TOD. The well survey was sent at least two times to each tax lot owner; 11 completed surveys were returned to Apex. Attachment B includes copies of the completed surveys. Table 1 summarizes the results of the survey; two surveys were for property outside of the TOD and were not included on Table 1. Results of the well survey indicated the presence of six wells on five tax lots within the TOD. The location of these wells and the reported depth of the well is shown on Figure 1. Where information on the exact location of the well is not available, the location is approximated by placing it in the center of the tax lot for which the information was obtained. In addition, Apex reviewed Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD) online files to identify registered wells in the TOD. Ten well logs for wells located on 6 parcels within the TOD were identified. Attachment C contains the identified well logs and Table 2 summarizes the information on the identified wells, by parcel. Two of the parcels' with well logs registered by OWRD sent in completed well surveys; the other well logs provided additional information. Additionally, shown on Figure 1 are the locations of wells identified in a report prepared by Don Haggerty, PhD in February 20002. ' Dino Picollo, parcel 28 and Charlotte Holder, parcel 15; see Table 1. 2 Haggerty 2000. Report on Groundwater in the Vicinity of Beebe Rd., Jackson County, Oregon. February 28, 2000. 3015 SW First Avenue, Portland, OR 97201 T 503.924 4704 F 503 943.6357 www.apexcos.com John Boyd, People's Bank of Commerce November 16, 2016 Well Survey Results, White Hawk Development Page 2 It is unknown how many of the wells identified in the OWRD database or in the Haggarty report are still in use as only two property owners3 with wells identified in the OWRD database and/or the Haggerty report sent back completed well surveys (parcel owners were sent water well surveys in December 2015, January 2016, and/or March 2017). Additionally, the Haggerty report indicated 3 wells to be present on parcel number 15, but the completed well survey for this parcel indicated just one 50 -foot deepwell. Figure 1 shows the updated information from the well survey. Based on the information obtained from the well searches • At least six wells are in use in the White Hawk TOD based on the well survey results; the well depths range from 12 to 50 feet, where known. • An additional 5 to 8 wells were identified from the OWRD w ell log database. Of these, all but two are sealed from ground surface to 20 feet or more. Additionally, the Himmelman well at parcel 30 appears to be 100 feet deep and sealed to 35 feet. • It is unclear whether the additional wells identified in the OWRD database are still in use. • The well logs in the OWRD database suggest that, in the vicinity of the development, the soil consists of clay to depths of 8 to 12 feet below grade, underlain be sand and gravel to at least 40 to 50 feet in most locations. Figure 1 shows that most of the wells are more than 100 feet from the proposed stormdrain line to be installed beneath Gebhard Road. However, wells are reported at parcels 3, 5, and 6 (see Figure 1) and the location of the wells are not known so the wells could be closer to the proposed utility. EVALUATION OF THE POTENTIAL FOR IMPACTS DURING STORM AND SANITARY LINE INSTALLATION Depth to first encountered water for shallow wells in the area appears to be about 9 feet below grade, but was historically reported as shallow as 4 feet below grade in some areas. Based on the OWRD well logs, it appears that most (if not all) of the wells are sealed to at least 9 feet below grade and are accessing water below that depth. The proposed storm and sanitary lines may be installed to depths of up to 10 to 12 feet and therefore, may intercept the water table in some areas. Based on this information, installation of the storm and/or sanitary lines could impact groundwater levels (and thereby impact the nearby water wells) from the following: • Dewatering during construction; • Infiltration into sewer lines; or Longitudinal flow in trench backfill. If dewatering is necessary during construction, the water table would be lowered and these effects could extend to nearby water wells. This effect would be temporary and conditions would be expected to return to normal within a short period after completion of the work. Long-term, if the storm or sanitary lines leak, infiltration into the lines could permanently lower the water table in the vicinity of the utilities to the base of the lines; however, this effect would likely extend only a few feet from the utility trench. This potential impact is addressed by quality control during construction to assure the utility lines are installed in alignment, seals are in place, intact and tested, proper pipe bedding is used, and trench backfill is properly compacted. These conditions assure the lines have a tight seal and meet the required performance standards prior to acceptance by the City. 3 Dino Picollo, parcel 28 and Charlotte Holder, parcel 15; see Table 1. 3015 SW First Avenue, Portland, OR 97201 T 503 924 4704 F 503 943.6357 www apexcos com John Boyd, People's Bank of Commerce Well Survey Results, White Hawk Development November 16, 2016 Page 3 If trench backfill is more permeable than native soil, water could flow longitudinally along the trench and discharge to surface water, permanently lowering the water table in the vicinity of the trench. Given the native soil conditions (clay soils in the upper 8 to 12 feet), it is possible that the trench backfill could be more permeable than the native soil in the areas where the native clay extends below the bottom depth of the utility bedding. Depending on the depth to which the trench penetrates the water table, longitudinal flow could occur; however, the influence on the shallow water table would likely extend only a few feet laterally from the utility trench. This localized depression in the water table caused by the trench could be addressed by installing low -permeability plugs at intervals in the trench backfill. Given that dewatering of local wells was reported after a drain trench was installed in Beebe Road in 1998, it is recommended that low permeability trench plugs be installed in future utility trenches dug for the project. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS EVALUATION AND MITIGATION OPTIONS The potential impact of the installation and presence of the proposed storm and sanitary lines was performed in 2015 and is updated herein based on the updated well information obtained from the wells survey: Up to 21 wells may be located in the vicinity of the proposed project; it is unclear how many of these wells are still in use, however, at least three wells that are likely in use appear to be located within 100 feet of the proposed installation along Gebhard Road. The proposed utility installation is not expected to impact two of these wells because the wells are 35 and 140 feet deep and access water well below the depth of utility installation. The third well, located on parcel 3 (Figure 1) is of unknown depth. It is also unlikely that the utility installation will impact this well because the utility installations will penetrate only a few feet into the water table, if at all, at this location. • A 12 -foot depth well is reportedly located on parcel 28 that may be within 100 feet of proposed storm and sewer lines to be installed along the eastern development boundary (Figure 1). There is the potential that this well could be impacted by the utility installation, if the line extends into the water table at this location. • Wells located further than 100 feet from the installation would not be anticipated to be impacted by the utility installation. • It is also noted that three wells have been deepened over a period of 16 years, indicating that there is a long-term reduction in water level in the area. The following presents mitigation options to address potential concerns: • Prior to construction of the storm drain line proposed to be placed along Gebhard Road, verify the depth of the well located on parcel 3 and, if the well is less than a total depth of 15 feet, monitor water levels in that well during construction. ■ Prior to construction of storm or sewer lines tie-ins to the existing storm or sewer lines beneath Beebe Road, verify the presence of wells located on parcel 10 identified in the Haggerty report that may be located within 100 feet of the tie-ins and are reported to be shallower than 15 feet in depth. If these wells are still present and in use, monitor the water levels during the construction. • If installation does penetrate the water table, low -permeability plugs can be used to inhibit flow along the trench line. Assuming crushed rock is used for trench backfill, adding 5 percent (dry weight) bentonite to the backfill is sufficient to reduce the permeability of the backfill. The plugs should be placed from the bottom of the trench to 1 foot above the water table the full width of the trench and have a minimum length of 5 feet. A plug should be placed at the low end of each main sewer line. • In areas where the lines are installed below the water table, particular care needs to be taken to ensure that the lines have a tight seal. 3015 SW First Avenue, Portland, OR 97201 T 503 924 4704 F 503 943.6357 www apexcos.com John Boyd, People's Bank of Commerce Well Survey Results, White Hawk Development If you have any questions or need further information, please contact us at your convenience. Sincerely, F Amanda Spencer, R.G. Principal Hydrogeologist ATTACHMENTS Table 1— Summary of Well Survey Results Table 2 — OWRD Well Survey Results Figure 1— Location of Wells in the White Hawk TOD Attachment A — White Hawk TOD Attachment B — Completed Surveys Attachment C — OWRD Well Logs for Wells Within the TOD cc: Matt Samitore, City of Central Point November 16, 2016 Paae 4 3015 SW First Avenue, Portland, OR 97201 T 503 924.4704 F 503.943.6357 www.apexcos corn TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF WELL SURVEY RESULTS Owner Address Parcel MAP TAN LOT Site Num Site St Owner Of different from site Date Survey sem Surrey WellT Well Depth Date Installed Notes Inde. Address Retumed7 6026 Palmero Cir 12/22/2015 1 372W02 400 No Address Cameron Party CA 95682 ;Survey sent 12/15 1/25/2016 N NA NA Undeveloped land 10 S Oakdale Ave 2 372W02 S00 NO Address Medford, OR 97501 5q,wey sent 7/3/1G 3/11/2016 N NA NA Undeveloped lied 3 172W02 2500 4757 Gehhard Norm and Randall Wales Sur sent 121 -LS i2 *205 V unknown unknown dwrl tic use and ord/prordrq 1355 Cora Lo 4 P2W02 600 No Address Auburn. CA 95603 Survey sent 3IN16 3/11(2016 N NA NA Undeveloped land (domestic use and 5 372W02 2601 4617 Gebhard David &Julie Webb Survey sent 12/15 12/30/2015 V 35 feet b s 1930? ar deni orchard 'Survey not completed but 0.1)well 'Survey sent 12/15 Ingfound dated 5/4/2012 for a 140 foot 6 372W02 2600 4613 Gehhud S - &M@9 (Resent 3/16 N well ;Survey sent 12115 7 372W02 2604 4603 Gebhard 'William Jtshke (Resent 3/3116 N PO Bo. 996 ;Survey sent 12/15 8 372W021) 50] No Address Medford, OR 97501 (Resent 313/16 3/11/2016 N Undeveloped land ,Survey sent 12/15 Completed Survey not received but 3 10 372W02D 300 567 BecLe Ken Beebe? (Resent 3/3116 N 'OWRD well los identified - See Tablet Completed Survey not received but 3 11 372W02D 200 511 Beebe Min us Survey sent.3/3116 N OWRD well I. sidenti0ed-See Tablet :Survey sent 12/15 12 372WOlC 2500 503 Beebe Terry& Harley Callahan (Resent 313/16 N Survey sent 12115 13 372WO1C 2400 495 (Beebe lames and Michelle Nistler (Resent 3/3/16 N 'Survey sent 12/15 14 372WOlC 2300 477 Beebe Michelle Nis0er (Resent 3/3/16 N 'Survey sent 12115 lawn, gardening, watering orchard, fire 15 372WOlC 2301 445 (Beebe Charlotte Holder 'Resent 3/3/16 1/11/2016 V '50 feet 1998 abatement 'Survey sent 12/15 16 372WOlC 2200 443 !Beebe Rita Deann Tyner Resent 3/3/16 N 'Survey sent 12/15 17 372WOlC 1700 45111Hamrick lames Sutton Resent 3/3/16 N 'Survey sent 12/15 18 372WOlC 1.800 4497 :Hamrick (Vick Kenneth Lee Resent 3/3116 N Survey sent 12/15 19 372WO1CB 1100 4475 'Hamrick Gladys Muse Resent 3/3/16 N ;Survey sen[ 12/15 20 372WO1CB 1000 4461 Hamrick Richard Smith Resent 3/3/16 N Survey sent 12/15 21 -372WOlCB 900 4439 Hamrick HUMpbmpyLWlndsor LLC (Resent 3/3/16 N 22 372W01BC 10100 446 Beebe Survey sent 313/16 N 23 372WOSBC 10200 444 Beebe Survey sent 3J3/16 N Survey sent 12/15 24 372WOlBC 10000 4615 Hamrick Edic Silva Resent 3/3/16 N Survey sent 12/15 25 372WOIBC 98011 4630 Hamrick .CA GaWn Resent 3/3116 N Survey sent 12/15 26 .372WO1BC 9900 456 Beebe IPicollo LLC Resent 3/3/16 N 'Shepherd of the Valley Survey sent 12/15 Completed Survey not received but 27 372W02 3100 600 lBeebe Catholic Church Resent 3/3/16 1 N IDWRD well log identified -See Tablet one well at hack of lot used for irrigation; second well shared with 523 Beebe for domestic and Irrigation 1 - 12 feet 1 - Unknown OWRD well log from 2/17/1983 for a 60 28 372W02 30MI 628 Beebe Dino Picollo ;Survey sent 12/15 12/23/2015 2 welly 7 34 feet 2 1940ish foot well - see Table 2 hand dug well domestic use/irrigation/stack watering •OWRD well log found from 10/11/1994 !neve & Carolyn for a 100 foot well 30 372W02 200 48461Sebhard liimmelman Surve sent l;/15 1/5/2016 V 15 feet unknown 31 372YMZk& 2800 4920 r5ebhard Surve sent 313/16 N TABLE 2: OWRD SURVEY RESULTS Indent ' MAP TAX LOT site Num slte St Owner Wall Log R well Depth Date Installed Notes 1 572W02 400 NO Address None NA NA 2 372W02 S00 No Address None NA NA 3 372W02 2500 4757'Gelhard None unknown unknown domestic use and yard/gardening well onsite Ibased on Well Suw y(see Table 1) 4 372W02 600 No Address None NA NA 5 1372WO2 2601 4617 'Gebhard None 35 feet b s 1 19317 .domestic use and yard/gardening/orchard well amit. bated on Wcjl SurvCry Ilse Table 3) 6 :372W02 2600 4613'Gebhard Sergio Melia JACK61181 140 feet 5/4/2012 sealed from 0 to 50 feet below grade; screened Ifrom 50 to 140 feet below grade 7 372W02 2602 4603 'Gebhard Williamleshke None 8 .372W02D 501 NO Address None 10 372 W02D 300 587 IBeebe Ken Beebe? JACK12262 12 feet JACK12264 66,5 feet JACK 12261 j 13 feet 1965 and 1966 !sealed 0 to 9 feet 'sealed 0 to 20 feet lseal.d 0 to 9 feet 11 872W021) 200 511 IBeebe Mingus JACKS2926 204 feet JACKSS868 56 feet JACK52660 59 feet 1999 2003 1998 sealed 0 to 59? 'Sealed 0 to 27 feet sealed 0 to 20 feet 12 372WOlC 2500 5071Beebe Terry &Harley Callahan None 13 472W11C 2400 495 IBeebe lames and Michelle Nistler None 14 1372WOlC 2300 471 Beebe Michelle Nistler None 15 372W0lC 2301 445 IBeebe -Charlotte Halder None 50 feet 1998 lawn, gardening, watering orchard, fire abatement 'well onsite based on Well Survey (see Table 1) 16 372WO1C 2200 443 Beebe Rita DeannTyner None 17 .J72WO1C 17001 4511 IHamrick I James Sutton tare 1g 372WO1C 1800 4497 Hamrick Nick Kenneth Lee None 19 372WO1CB 1100 4475 Hamrick Gladys Muse None 20 .372WOlCB 1000 4463 IHamrick Richard Smith None 21 372WO1CB 900 4439 Hamrick lWephrr AWfnfti, LLL None 22 372W0111C 10100 446 Beebe t7one 23 372WOIBC 10200 444 Beebe None 24 372WO1BC 10000 4615 Hamnck Edic STN. None 25 372WO1BC 9800 4630 Hamrick -CA GalpM None 26 372"A701BC 1 99001 456 IBeebe Picollo LLC None 27 372W02 3100 500 Beebe Shepherd of the Valley (Catholic Church JACK30394 90 feet 1990 Deepening of an existing well from 68 to 90 feet 28 372W02 3000 626 Beebe Dino PlcollP JACK12241 60 feet 1983 f0eepening of an existing well from 35 feet to 60 feet. Sealed from 0 to 35 feet. 30 371W02 200 4848 Gebhard Stvee ftMJmeltn3n lACK33759 100 feet 1994 sealed 0 to 35 feet 31 372W02AA 2800 4920 •Gebhard None 4 +[[7 29 " 25 s II 28 .r .I�,n�. 32 5I f 82 24 7 27 m' 26 °1 d..wi es s1 1uc9�31 IB1 ytVp E 22 '; Ills SD Yt 14 Legend: 41 Water Well (Based on Returned Survey ZocaA1w AMovlmptef ® Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD) Database Well Location B1.9 Water Well (Based on February 2000 Haggerty Report and/or OWRD Database; Existence HolCcnFmltEl 1351 Depth or Well (UNK= Unknown Depot) Base neap preparetl porn a Well Nolioficalion Area figure by CESN'N I1J'0121051 0 500 1,000 Approximate Scale in Feel Location of Wds within White Hawk TOD W II Sur.•cy and Ewluabon Lc11cr Whn, Ha.F D—/.pram/ Ce.a.xl poral, oresen S` AN« cunppnlm. LLC^ x251 -0o r s- 315SWFiinA— ^ APC>: pail/.nit Ogon 9i 3u1 Nu�cmhu 2016 f Attachment A White Hawk TOD 00 L FT L 3:6 =w w'o 1 u-�i11J.1_J 1S ^iF 2 31 v]o 00 30 U oe � a z 0 m 4 L9 29 25 4 28 9 32 6 24 7 27 26 a zz a s � S 10 20 z 21 � 1 s 1 Attachment B Completed Surveys f-- eec ?iv{'r VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY 1. Please provide your address .Atex -F7(;+ Address: 1 �r City, State, Zip: _ �9�1 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well We shared with one neighbor Gentraf PaintUtili y Vices-- Other (pled-iescrr be); If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used we apprKilate responses to the following uestions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6, Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY 1. Please provide your address Address: ' .ti 9&� 0 City, State, Zip: _ 6FA-,, 4 Pomlri Qoe 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? ndi�ared Welh one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used. we appreciate responses to the followina questions; 3. What is the well water used for: LInome domestic use n and arden watering a,ureICropslDrc ar Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 00,extew nvj 5. What is the depth of the well? U,Ulr�vowi l 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? V A14Vou x) — 1;c j W1!?.4y VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY 1. Please provide your address Address: _4" 6 I C;� L- (31-1 A 2 D 2 0 A b City, State, Zip: N 2 P o,4. OR. 9-7-5'0Z 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual weV Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used, we appreciate responses to the following questions: 3. What is the well water used for: I home domestic use LE n an arden wa enng Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Other (please describe) Z O + I ku , i T rLC-g5 4-0 't' v ; 1 tvz TR & 9S \/E24 L(aRC-% C^A2Alh1�-,2APEj� RA�PrjG2Rfe> ETC. 4. When was the well installed? I X13 5. What is the depth of the well? 3S "61 6 Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY 1. Please provide your address Address: City, Stat Receivvff Apex+'orClan(; 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? 0 ividual Well shared with one neighbor Central Point E � y ervices Other (please describe)-.F If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used we appreciate responses to the following questions: 3. What is the well water used for: estic use ar en watering Pasture/ raps rc of Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well instal d? -7:V / t1 v\ �_"ocvv�, *:� Z u_2i�5 +fi r Hoa5l�L 5. What is the depth of the well? -q:r$�,� 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY Apex-i'orthr, 1. Please provide your address Address: 6o-76 City, State, Zip: R(k � ., CA . '15-1, 'y z �� 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): —Pei 0" TJYa�' If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used we aporeciate responses to the following uestions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY 1. Please provide your address Address: City, State, Zip: _ 7�7, C� 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well e s ared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used, we appreciate responses to the foIlowinq questions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lasure and garden watering rop rd-- Iter k waterin (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? GtVkM 0Wb( 5. What is the depth of the well? 15r 4wx 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? !✓U — Woo D`�� Apex-Portlanc VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY 1. Please provide your address Address: City, Stag ,���X-Portlan 2, What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well Well shared with one neighbor _ Central Point Utility Services O!h+ ,r (please describe): If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used, we appreciate responses to the followingup estions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering PasturW6rops/0r_c_ Bard Stock watering Other (please describe) _ 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? y�j VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER WSE SURVEY 1. Please provide your address 11 Address: G }7 City, State, Zip: 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): 4 t Fe r lA, If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used, we appreciate responses to the followln-q questions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY 1, Please provide your address,- Address: ddress,-Address: �e26, City, State, Zip: Cu w?_.a 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services -Other (please describe): �GyPA-&!z,u,�r_�,6-1Ie ..L"b'dC:�r,cn geceiver Apex-! o �ic..re If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used, we appreciate responses to the following questions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY�cIV 1. Please provide your address rt; yca� r Address: City, Stag 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used, we appreciate responses to the following Questions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Qther (please describ G 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? n0-� v-ncwn Vl: t VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE S0Wft P""" 1. Please provide your address Address: le S C /c d City, State, Zip: cf 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? zf /'q.- Individual well Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): . r i J�.T _ L 1 r I If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. !f water from a well is used, we appreciate responses to the following questions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? Attachment C OWRD Well Logs for Wells Within the TOD STATE OF OREGON WATER SUPPLY WELL REPOV (as mgalred by ORS 537.765 Instructions for eompteting Ihis report are r iwT i �u 1.D • # —�� (START CARD) N on the last nese of this (1) OWNER: Well Number 10q —9 Nare Address Ci t Q State zip CD4' (2) TYPE OF W ORK Idew Wcll [JDee =ing ❑ Alteration (mpsirlreeonditi(xn)❑ Abandonment (3) DRILL METHOD: ®Rotary Air [:]RotaryMad ❑Cable ❑Auger ❑other (4) PROPOSED USE: CgDomesuc []Community ❑Industrial ❑Irrigation ❑ Thermal []injection Q Livestock ❑ Qther C(5) BOREHOLE CONSTRUCTION: Special Construction approval ❑ Yes CKNo Depth of Completed Well �i�7 oft, Explosives used ❑Yes Cro Type Amount HOLE SEAL Diameter From nTo Material From To Sacks or pounds 0 P� d 144��1 Ic 9 - How was seal placed: Method ❑A ❑B ❑C 0 ❑E 10 Other'V0 m.tir ,%1 '1'29-1 Backfill placed frau ft. to ft. Material Gravel placed from ft, to ft. Size of gravel (6) CASINC-ILINER- Diame 1 r From To Gauge Steel Plank Welded d Threade �ecinfy o a 11 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Liner: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Ei ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Final location of shoe(s) 131-1 (7) PERFORATrO-NS/SCREENS: erforations Method \CJ k Q1 r LT FcreensType Material sla Telelplpe From To size Number Diameter size Ceaing Liner o $ Ll VQ Lo IN ❑ 0 El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time Is 1 hour Flowing ❑Pump ❑ Bailer 5Air ❑ Artesian _ Yield a0min Drawdown drill stem at 71me 1 hr. Temperature of water Depth Artesian Flow Found Was a water analysis done? ❑ Yes By whom Did any strata contain water not suitable for intended use? ❑ Too little []Salty ❑Muddy ❑ Odor []Colored ❑ Other Depth of strata: (9) LOCATION OF WELL by legal description: Carty -SorAt,& o ttJ Latitude Longitude Township�'�,'`} N or S Range E or W. WM. Section O`yt: �Jla 1/4 51r 1/4 Tax Lot "oto (7 Lot Block Subdivision Street Address of Well (or nearest address) rJ 1 1 d (18) STATIC WATER LEVEL: "'1 I ft. below laud surface. Date )b -9-'7-C1'% Artesian pressure lb. per square inch. Date (11) WATER BEARING ZONES: Depth at which water was first found From To Estimated Flow Rate SWL (12) WELL LOG: Ground Elevation (unbond ed) Water Well Constructor Certification: I certifyy that the work I performed on the construction, alteration, or abandonment of this we 13 is in cornplisnet with Oregon water supply well con sum ction atsttdards. Materials used and information reported above are true to the beat of my knowledge and belief. W WC Nurnber 6'7?' Signed Date (bond } ester Wert Const ruveor Cerditatlon: I accept responsibility for the construction, alteration, or sbandartment work performed on this well during the construction dates reported above. All work performed during this time is to com cc with Oregon water eupply well constructispe"Vids. This report is to the list of my lutowiedge&M belief. IoPi- NOTICE TO WATER WELLT of thiaireport are stIe; 6 TER WELL REPORT flied with the STATE OF OREGON STATE ENGINEER, SAI.EMIQ, DRIiGC! � - „(Please type or print) witliin 90 days Pram tha'dake rw = -- = of well eampletlon. c- r' - (1) OWNER- ,1f r7 Name Z) R Address _ r 2 (2) LOCATION OF WELL: County It S' 0 Driller's well number ;4 jk Section T. R. 14/ W.M. Bear!ng and distance from section or subdivtslon corner (3) TYPE OF WORK (check): Welllx Deepening ❑ Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑ andonment, describe material and procedure In Item 12. (4) PROPOSED USE (check): (5) TYPE OF WELL: Domestic ❑ Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Rotary ❑ Driven ❑ Cable ❑ Jetted ❑ Irrigation X Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Dug ❑ Bored (6) CASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded ❑ ...� � Diam. from ,69- 5 ft. to .....l.3 -.- ft. Gage CO A rR0 _._. "_Alam. from ._.-_,,., tato e_ .., . ,_ ft.-. Gage ..._..,._..� ,. " Diam._from ...........,-.— ft, t4_..-.,—_ ft._ 'Page .e. ....... (7) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? 3K Yes 0 No Type of perforator used Size of Perforations in. bi in. .f.�............... perforations from .__ ... it to .......Y .............. ft. Perforations. from ......— ft. to ................................ fL _... ...._ perforations from ..........�� �...... ft. to ........ _ ._ .._. ft ..................... perforations from ft.. to ..--___-.----_ ft. _ perforations from .._... ,._... ft. to ............ ..-._..._ it. (8) SCREENS: Well screen installed 0 Yes X No Manufacturer's Name ---- -. - _.. _ ....__.._ ..............., w---r—Model No. ....... - ---- t. ........_--.... Slot size .r.._.__ _ Set from ......... _ T ft. to ....... ......___ fL Diam............... Slot maze- ....... __,- =S..etm -.--.- .---.................. ft. (9) CONSTRUCTION: i �Q Well seal—Materlal used in seal ......J.� N ..'5 .. ... Depth of seal ......g...._.. _ ft., .packer used? _._.. �} Diameter of well bore to bottom gf, •� •• in, Were any loose strata cemented off? ©YeR g No DepthWas-a drive shoe used? ❑ Yes V No Was well gravel packed? / [I Yes No_hies of gravel:.__..» Gravel placed from ._.If..�!L�4r _........... it _Did any strata contain unusable wat fi]Yes IN No Type of water? D th o! strata Method of seallax strata oft . State Well No......l.t!r !. .!... State Permit No. (11) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level la lowered below static level Was a pump test made? jd Yes ❑ No if yes. by whom? Yield: ■ L3— gal./min. with film' ft. drawdown after hrs. ,# ., ., „ Bailer test gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hre. Artesian flow g.p m. Date Temperature of water T q Was a chemical analysis made? ❑ YZ=k No (12) WELL G: Diameter of well below casing J1 .._ Depth drilIed jZ ft. Depth of completed well ft. Pormation: Deseribe by color, character, size of mater(aE and structure, and show thiakneaa of aqu era and the kind and nature of the material in each stratum psrEetrated, w tip at least arse entry for eacle change Of formation. MATERIAL I FROM I TO Work started J - 13— 106 Completed Date well drilling machine moved off of Weil .J Z 3 ISIC& (13) PUMP: Manufacturer's Name .{� ...,........_......_........,..._.............. _. ..._.»......._.... Type: ... .....—._....w.�....... I Water Well Contractor's Certiffeation: This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report Is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. 40 NAME ....... ... ..... .... ............ _..__ ...---.,. . (Person, firm or corporation) (Type or print) Address %6...a.I....—14z ..Ta.1�,........... ko........................ Drilling Machine perator's License No. .... _..... _'x„+'� . a (10) WATER LEVELS: _ hface 37atew�—�3 �fsi [Signed] �lwatar wall Contractor) Static Ievel ft. el Sand sur Artesian pressure _- lbs. uarD&YC' r Contractors Menge No. � _ e inch ,. ........r�,�..... Date ..�._.__._._........._..., 18.Si�? MME ADDITIONAL B=TS M lvl?.=SanRY) JACK 55868 STATE OF OREGON WATER SUPPLY WELL REPORT ( �required by ORS 537.765) insvucNons for completing this report are on the last page of this form (1J OWNER: Well Number: L>i26Z3... Name Earnest Mingus Address - city State QR-_ Zip 97502 .. (2) TYPE OF WORK: [ j New Well Ll Deepening L]Abration (repair/recondition) [,Abandonment (3) DRILL METHOD: L_i Rotary Air [_) Rotary Mud _] Cable 7Auger rl Other (4) PROPOSED USE: [X.1 Domestic El Community El Industrial ':71 irrigation L;Thermal f ]thjftwrf 7. Liv"tock []Other (5) BORE HOLE CONSTRUCTION: Specral c&ii+uofion d0*voI LJYes AtNo D'epfliof Comp(efed W®II ft: Explosives used Yes [X No Type Amount _ HOLE SEAL Amount Diameter From To Material From To , sacks or pounds _ 0 55 o I Q —27 - 50. Sacks. _ 16 Sand 27 40.2D.sack� 1 o x 20 Sand 1 40 _ 54 , 20. Sacks Sand Gravel 54 55 How was seal placed: Method EIA [] B [ J C ID LIE XjOther Anumd Dry Backfill placed from ft, to ft Material Gravel placed from ft. to ft Size of gravel (6) CASING/LINER: Diameter From To Gauge Steel Plastic Welded Threaded Gaz ng 6 + r J; 10 t --- Liner: __•_ _ i L_ IJ Final location of sh'oe(s) (7) PERFORATIONS/SCREENS: ❑Perforations Method [] Screens Type 020 MaterialStainless Slot Tolelpipe From To size Number Diameter size Casing Liner JAM& (8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is 1 hour Pump ❑ Baiter X, Air ❑ Flowing Artesian Yield gel/min Drawdown Drill stem at Time 3 GPM 55 1 - Temperature of Water 5 Depth Artesian Flow found -^ Was a water analysis done? ❑ Yes By whom Did any strata contain water not suitable for intended use? T71 Too little [,Salty ❑Muddy []Odor ]Colored I_f Other ` Depth of strata: WELL ID * L L62623 _ (START CARD)# 153911 (9) LOCATION OF WELL by legal description: County JaGQn Latitude�_ Longitude Township __37$___N or S. Range _W E or W. of WM. »I _2� - qW __ 114 _Sf _ 114 Tax lot Lot Block Subdivision Street Address of Weil (or nearest address)-5.1-1-Bftbg_.Rd__ --_. (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL: -- — it. below land surface Date � QQ Artesian pressure Ib per square inch. Date (11) WATER BEARING ZONES: Depth at which water was first found 8 From To _Estimated Flew Rata SUL 3 GPS— -- (12) WELL LOG: Ground elevation ,._.—._ From To SWI. - 0 2 - - - 2- -- -ALLAMMCAJ south f�8i - - -- --7aleni` �ff ` . �- -- Date started 121212002 Completed 12C4M_Q2_ (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification: I certify that the work I performed on the construction, alteration, or abandonment of this well is in compliance with Oregon water su y well construction standards. Materials used and intvWation reported a true to my best knowledge and belief *WC. Number Signed ./ Date 1/612003 Ashland Drillll Inc. (bonded) Water Well Constructor Certification: I accept responsibility for the construction, alteration, or abandonment work performed on this well during the construction dates reported above All work performed during this time is in compliance with Oregon water supply well construction at;V2. ;sport isofto best of my knowledge and belief. WWC NumberSignedDate 1/6/2003 shland Grilling lino: ORIGINAL -WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FIRST COPY - CONSTRUCTOR SECOND COPY - CUSTOMER STATE OF OREGON WATER SupPLY WELL (ss roqu iced by RECEIVED FEB 16 1999 11 tR RESCURC£S_DEPT. 5�9� START CARD It o a (1) OWNER- Well Number ,►n C 40-,x (2) r!'1 e 3 (Z) 'PY FZ Ur yr quo } Abient New %H I f C] �m (r°pa&h°°°t>d' ❑ g°agAir ❑Rotarylyfud []Cable C] Auger Uthrt (d PRU S Commwtity Domestic bndushial [3116911600❑ ❑ Tb=W 1"jeotion Livestoxlr Ditrer Special Conwttim approval ❑ Y°' N° Depth of C°a4leted wellfl Explosives used ❑ Yea gWo Type Amount HOLE SEAL Dir Psww MMWWFromIb S tr .anis iTfr a 7' 6 r;w Bow was seal planed Method ❑ A ❑ B ❑ C -]D ❑ E ❑ other & Material BwKill placed from fl. to Gravel placed from ft. to ft. Size of gravel A Adl-*06) To Qaap9Md Plastk tiesYsd lrrsaid ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑Lite:❑ ❑ ❑ ❑Final l (9) LOCATION OF WELL by legal description: Laagitude count e A Latitude F or(OWK dti Townj' °ii�- 114 sacsion_� Sc.�l Irate_ Tax Lot 21:�-<DL.a $locyc Subdivision Sheet Address 00 1611 (or rare+t %Mm") 41Y1� ;D1 Dole �� T —±Z— ft below land suriarle. Artesian pressure lit. por "age inch• Date J11) WATER 9 Depth at whish Willer was fins found [ }Tj'�E�FORATInlVar�[:ttijr.t.a: ®perforations Method — �� material— Screens Type � I Ski _ g� 'h do ��K ph.r.r etas a ❑ 126a 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ D (9) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time Is 1 boor Flowing OPIUM BAir ❑Artesian LrrM nous ■t Tim'° YWW dmfs L?raw4ewa 3 I br, Temperature of water_5 4j_ Depth Artesian now Found Was a water analysis done? ❑ Yes By whom Did any atrata contain water not suitable for intended use? ❑ Too little ❑ Shy ❑ Muddy ❑ Odor ❑ Colored ❑ Omer ------- Depth of strata: (12) WELL LOG: Ground Elevation I rniiFy that rho oak l performed on construction,alll Erna rrGiron � l of this wall is in nowpli+utce with Cktg°n Y wkdgc Materials used and iuforrnshon reported abvva ass true to the bod of my km and belief. WWC Number Date Signed (bonded) Water Well Coast 'Am Ccrllflcztlon: l aeoept msp{i°sitfility forttw caostruaioc6 alWatio°, or abandonment wort: per _9 ! on $vs well during the canstrttcit°n dies reported above. A11 work por[prmed during dtis tune U in eomplimce with Oregon water supppply well stmndsrds. This report a true to the beat of my knowledge nod belief. WWC Number Lj&� �J Huta —L -72&-t ORIGINAL & FIRST COPY -WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SECOND T19RD COPY-CL)VOMER NOTICE TO WATER M L CO �Cg; F' 4 The original and first cop of this report are to be `� A Flied with•the STATE DNCfTMER. SALEM lii,_[JR OC X within 34 days from the o�s33ee 1 of well Completion. C. t , t�' R WELL REPORT STATE OF OREGON E N G! N E P se type or print) (1) OWNER: Name , W. R.9 Address 4'9*7 Q a r, t~ r% T -r -PA L ,f>A :IV r 6R& (2) LOCATION Off` WELL: Driller's well number iy 'A Sectlon T. 327 .5 A, A K/ W.M. Searing and distance f-pli section or subdivision corner . (3) TYPE OF WORK (check): well Y'+ Deepening ❑ Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑ andonment, describe. material and procedure In Item 12. (4) PROPOSED USE (check): (5) TYPE OF WELL: Domestic ❑ Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Rotary ❑ Driven ❑ Irrigation * Test Well I Other ❑ Dile ❑❑ Jetted (6J) ed CASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded El ,l.. .-.-., Diam, from � SIt. to ._.� -5... ft. Gage lr.dl C.l i ...................." Diam. from ft, to -- _ ft. Gage ..,................ _......._..... �" Diam. from ... ... ft. to ...... 7._ .............. ft. Gage ....,. ....._... (7) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? V[ Yea ❑ No Ki he of Derforator used _ Size of perforations 1 11 ^A In. by-_ / /IVt A. I- I X I -C �. . ....... perforations from ....... .......��_ ft. to ...._..... „.„ ft. perforations from .............. ft to ............ St. i perforations from ........... _.e._...._........ ft to ft. perforations fromft. to _..._...._ ... ft. perforations from ...... ..._.............»..... it. to _ .._.........._-_-- ft. (8) SCREENS: Wellscreen-installed ❑ Yes X No Manufacturer's Name _ .-.. _ ..„ ..... _. Model No. :.............. Slot size . Set from ........_..� ft. to ..................— ft. Diam...........:..... Slot sized .._._. set frornjf j •� ft to AF (9) CONSTRUCTIQN: C Well seal -Material used,ia seal ..... ._t} Depth of seal 2..... ..... _ . .� ft was d. Wicker used? ........!R.. _W_ . _ Diameter of well bore tel bottom of sea%._•••_..-• !n:__ Were any loose strata ceribented off? ❑ Yes No Depth ....... _ Was a drive shoe used? © Yes 14 No Was well gravel packed?I ❑ Yea �No Size of gravel: Gravel placed from ..... .I&A F,..._ ft to -.... it. Dld any strata contain uttuaable vat Yes No Type of water? p. of strata Method of sealing strata off _ (10) WATER LEVELS - static level ft. below_land surface Dates Artesian pressure lbs. er uare inch Date State Well No..�f_.2.. _ State Permit No......... ........ .......� (11) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is lowered below static leve' was a pump test made? Was ❑ No if yes, by whom? o {,{SAI r Yield: ID gal./min. with ft. drawdown after I bra. Hailer test gal./min. with it. drawdown after hre. Artesian flow a.n.m. Date Temperature of voter f49 Was a chemical analysis _made7 ❑Yes t$ Na (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing Depth drilled Z4 ft. Depth of completed well _ ft. 'Formation- Describe bV color, character, size of material and structure, and ehotu thickness of aqu are and the kind and nature or the material to each atratufn pQnstrafed, th at least one entry for each change of formation. MATERIAL I FROM I TO _Work atarted _ r 1VO4 Co_mMet_e_d !)f 19 Date well drilling machine moved oft of well 19/- try (13) PUMP: Manufacturer's Name ...._... _ ..-_ Type: .- . 7-----------.-'--- H.P. Water Well Contractor's Certification: This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. NAME A d-_ LQ........d_�_. 1_.�F_ �L. .. ....._...._. _ !Person, fir�ml or corporation) (Type or print) Address ./-d,;22 --t ......... ..._............__. Drilling Mac Operator's License No. ....... _..�- �............. _... [Signed].. -. ._.?i...t., �_.�}1................ [Water Well Can star) /� Coritragtor's License No.. ..__ Date ..��=_�.SEl._., 191a.6 (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS DP NECESSARY) i NOTICE TO WATER W CO �. i.{ The ori�"nal and; rfiret eW NOV 15 1965IVE ER WELL REPORT of this report are to b filed with the STATE "n 30 of w �. N G I Psi EltTE OF OREGON ease type or print) (1) OWNER: Name D.R. Adams Address 587 Beebe Rd. (2) LOCATION OV WELL: i County Jackson Driller's well number !A }• Section 2 T. 3T SR. 2T WM- Hearing and distance trem section or subdivision career I (3) TYPE OF WORK (check): Weil p] - Deepening ❑ Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑ vandonment, describe material and procedure in Item 12. (4) PROPOSED USE (check): I Domestic J30Udustrlal❑ Municipal Irrigation 0 Test Wel1 k ❑ Other (5) TYPE OF WELL: ❑ Rotary ❑ Driven ❑ ❑ Cable 0-1' Jetted ❑ Dug ❑ Bored ❑ (6) CASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded89-- .�`Z2 %e.S.A _y�...... " Diam, from.' .,.... ft. to ft. Gage ' .. ........... Diam. from ..._ It. to ...__._._ -. ft. Gage ... - d .. _'-Dlam. from �............ it. to -__-,ft. Gage ......... (7) PERFORATIONS: Perforated?jj�.Mes ❑ No I ' Tye of perforator used. Size o£ erferatlana i f in. b in. perfora ons from .-....... ft. to __. ft. .. perforations from...._ -•-- - ft. to _ _........__. », ft. perforations from _ ,_._ ft. to ft - ....... t. ........... . perforations from --- ......._._---------- ..._it, to perforations. from ._p - --- ft. to ft. (8) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑ Yes bio Manufacturer's Name Model No. -- Slot size ... ........ - Set from ....... .......... __ it. to it. Dian .... .... ....._ Slot si-I ...... _ setlom ...._._ . __ ft. to .. it (9) CONSTRUCTION: Well seal-Materiia uusL in seal r J•/� � �' r� Depth of seal......RnLl.e....•••.•. ft. Was a packer used? .�....._._. Diameter of well bore to bottom of seal •-••�• Were any loose strata (cemented off? ❑ Yes ZWo Depth .._. _..-._. - i Was a drive shoe used4J+"s ONO Was well Gravel packed? [3 Yes a4ve- Size of gravel :................ ... » Gravel placed from.... s ft Did any strata contain unusable water? sa No Te of water?,��jp1�/6 _de�iof strata _�J`rj Method of sealing strata off (10) WATER LEVELS: �� State Well No. ....•• w State Permit No. --- (11) WELL TESTS: lowered bel is w static leveler level is Wall a pump teat made? Q Yes 710" If yes by whom? Yield: I./min. withft. drawdown after hre. Bailer teat gai.lmin, with ft. drawdown after hrs. Artesian now m. hate Temperature of water Was a chemical an sig made? ❑ Yes a (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing ....... .•-•••»- -- Depth drilled ft. Depth of completed well ft. Fa, and ormatlon Describe color, charact and nature o1 the and at material trc each Show thickness of aquBeers and the kiad Stratum pertetrated, with at least one entry for each change of formation. MATERIAL VC61 Work started 1 w$ IB 69 Com feted 11.10 19 Date well drilling machine moved off of well 11-10 19 65 (13) PUMP: k4anufaeturer's Name .....................M.„.. _ w.---..,.............. Type: ........ _ _. ..-._.. _ ..—....__._........ H.P. Water Well Contractor's Certification: This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. NAME CRATERWELL DRILLING, INC, ...................... (Person4 firm or corporation) (Type or print) Address ..1061„ Crster Lake pve...�i(.gaFq�.Q.�.s...... Drilling Machii 0 tor's Be N 71 ............. [Signed] Water Wai] Contractor) Static level ft. beloW land surface Date Artesian ressure s. er uare inch Date Contractor's License No...83........ Date ....1110 .................. 19.-6r� - (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS 1F NECESSARY) j _ - STATE OF OREGON - WATER WELL REPORT (ae required by ORS 537.786) (1) OWNER: Well Number: Name<SHEPPARD OF THE VALLEY ARCHDIOCESE PORTLAND Addre6OO BEEBE ROAD city CENTRAL POINT State OR zip9 502 (2) TYPE OF WORK: ❑ New Well Deepen ❑ Recondition ❑ 'Abandon (3) DRILL METHOD (RotaryAir ❑ Rotary Mud ❑ Cable ❑ Other (4) PROPOSED USE: XKDomeatic ❑ Community ❑ Industrial ❑ Irrigation 11—Thermal ❑ Nection ❑ Other (5) BOREHOLE CONSTRUCTION: Special Construction approval el Depth of Completed Well 90 It. Yes No Explosives used ❑ Type Amount HOLE SEAL Amount • Diameter From To Material From To sacksorpounds 6 68 901 DEEPENIN How was seal placed: Method ❑ A ❑ B ❑ C ❑ D ❑ E ❑ Other Backfill placed from ft. to Gravel placed from ft, to R. Material ft. Size of gravel (6) CASING/LINER: Diameter From To Gauge Casing:._ d/ 1. i 1 Liner. t' Steel Plastic Welded Threaded ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ •Final location of shoe(s) (7) PERFORATIONS/SCREENS: E Perforations Method ❑ Screens Type Material Slot Tele/pipe is From To stze umber Diameter size Casing Liner ❑ ❑ 1X843 6 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is 1 hour Flowing ❑ Pump ❑ Bailer _ Air ❑ Artesian Yield gal/min Drawdown Drill stem at Time 1 hr. Temperature of water 54 AW Depth Artesian Flow Found Was a water analysis done? ❑ Yes#ywbom Did any strata contain water not suitablefat intended use? ❑ Too little ❑ Salty ❑ Muddy ❑ Odor ❑ Colored ❑ Other Depth of strata: (START CARD) # 21199 (8) LOCATION OF WELL by legal description: County JACKSON Latitude " Longitude ' Township 37S N or S, Range 2W E or W, WM. Section 2 u % Tax Lot 3100 Lot Block Subdivision Street Address of Well (or nearest address) SAME AS #1 (10) 17 ATIC WATER LEVEL: [t. below land surface. Date 9-14-90 Artesian pressure lb. per square inch. Date (11) WATER BEARING ZONES: Depth at which water was first found 17SWL From To Estimated Flow Rate SWL (12) WELL LOG: Ground elevation (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification: I certify that the work I performed on the construction, alteration, or abandonment of this well is in compliance with Oregon well construction standards. Materials used and information reported above are true to my best knowledgd belief, N�WWC Number Signed& Date (bgIId ��Q]nptr fteation: I accept r $g1 t or analteration, or abandonment work performed w t o� ion dates reported above. all work performed during this t in compliance with Oregon well construction standards, This report is true tobeat of my knowledge and belief. Cy WWCNWbpr 1�07 Siena - 1141s.1 y n..4... -7--0^ ORIGINAL d: FIRST COPY - WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SECOND THIRD COPY - CUSTOMER 9swc alga STATE OF OREGON WATER WELL REPORT (as required by ORS 637.766) (1) OWNER: Well -Number: Estimated Flow Rate Name MARGARET NIXON 60 90 12GPM Address 718 DEEBEROAD City CENTRAL—ZOIXT State OR 2497502 (2) TYPE OF WORK: New Well ❑ Deepen ❑ Recondition ❑ 'Abandon (3) DRILL METHOD Rotary Air ❑ Rotary Mud, ❑ Cable ❑ Other (4) PROPOSED USE: 12 Domestic ❑ Community ❑ Industrial ❑ Irrigation ❑ Thermal ❑ Nection ❑ Other (6) BOREHOLE CONSTRUCTION: Special Construction approval Yes NoDepth of Completed Well 10 0 ft. Yes No El 130 Explosives used ❑ ® Type Amount HOLE SEAL Amount Diameter From To Material From To sacks or pounds n 6" 50 10 How was seal placed: Method ❑ A ❑ B C ❑ D ❑ E ❑ Other Backfill placed from ft. to ft. Material Gravel placed from ft. to ft. Size of gravel (6) CASINGILINER: Diameter From To Gauge Steel Plastic Welded Threaded ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ Liner: 4 "11 ❑ )a U Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Final location ofshoe(s) 59 (7) PERFORATIONS/SCREENS: XRPerforations Method _ S AM ❑ Screens Type Material Slot Tele/pipe From To size Number Diameter size Casing Liner J7 6 0 IX8X3 60 ❑ Q L"�' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is 1 hour ❑Pump ❑ Bailer w f kAir Flowing ❑ Artesian Yield gal/min Drawdown Drill stem at Time 12 GPM 72 10o Ihr. ar Temperature of water _ Depth Artesian Flow Found Was a water analysis done? ❑ Yep,,, By whom Did any strata contain water not suitab6. fpr intended use? ❑ Too little ❑ salty ❑ Muddy ❑ Odor ❑ Colored ❑ Other Depth of strata: VOL) ., 2 JUL 2 7 1089 10374 (START CARD) N =IVVELL by legal description: ountyatitude ' Longitude Township 3 7 N Nor S, Range ---2 W E or W, WM. Section — ng LA y4 Tax Lot ?_7, 00 Lot Block . SLL1Xi1vls;() l Street Address of Well (or nearest address) SAME -A.$ (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL: 2 R ft. below land surface. Date 7-6-82 Artesian pressure lb. per square inch. Date (11) WATER BEARING ZONES: Depth at which water was fust found From To Estimated Flow Rate SWL 60 90 12GPM 28 (12) WELL LOG: Ground elevation (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification: I certify that the work I performed on the construction, alteration, or abandonment of this well is in compliance with Oregon well construction standards. Materials used and information reported above are true to my best knowledge and belief. WWC Number SignedAMINA Date (bonded) Wat9M- @l � iige �{ ticatlon: �++�r f]�jsi qr t nstlteration, or abandonment work perIifr}f=�If ihis�ciri $1rc ct�n dates reported above. all work performed IWEM 684ii `MAin compliance with 0 belief. Signed ORIGINAL & FIRSTCOPY - WATER RESOURCESpEPARTINI;NI SECOND ti;ut UiVuTl�8CT0ii THIRD COPY - CUSTOMER. regon well his report is true to the beat of my knowledge and WWCNumber 1207 Date 7-9-89 game area WATER WELL REPORT RECEIVED� FEB7(� +� STA'T'E OF OREGON 6 B 0 r' 1983 Stale We11 No . ............ .................... Vy WATER RESOURCES DEPtate Parr No . ....................................... SALEM, OREGON (1) OWNER: Name Gus Pieollo Address 628 Bee Be goad CityCenirad Poin regoz — (2) TYPE OF WORK (check): New Well ❑ Deepening a Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑ If abandonment, describe material and procedure in Rem 12. (S) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): RotaryAir X Driven ❑ Domestic iia Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Rotary Mud ❑ Dug ❑ Irrigation ❑ 'het well ❑ Other ❑ ft ❑ Bored ❑ 'Thermal: Withdrawal ❑ _ Reinjection �0 INSTALLED: (VPERRAITONS: steel ❑ Plastic ❑ .................... ..........._...- Threaded ❑ —Welded m......... _-- ft. to ......... ...... ft. Gauge ....................... ..... m........_... ft. to ............—ft. Gauge .................... ........ STALLED: m ............... it. to ............... ft. Gau(ATIONS: Perforated? ❑ Yea ❑sed ..... Model No.Diam. Size of perforatio in by 1 - .......... ..... I ............. .....................perforations from.... ........ . ft. to ............... ft. .................... ..........._...- perforations from ......._. .... ft. to ...... _........ ft. --------- ....- . ........- arations from ...... ....... ft. to. ............ _ ft. (7) SCREENS:\weareen installed? ❑ -❑ No Manufacturer's Name ........ .. ............................. TYPe .......-----------------.........�............. ..... Model No.Diam. .................................. Set £ m ...............IL to ....._.._.... ft. Mam. .......................-........... Set .............. ft. to ............... ft. a amount water level ie lowered (8) WELL TESTS: \�awd r levelMAW a test mads? ❑ Yea 1 b whom? it ]Jaiiti It. dmwd.,. fter hre. Air tee! in. H i drill stem at ft. bre. Sailer test i./min. wi fL drawdown after ins. San flow m• paraturs of water Death n flow encountered ............ IL (9) CON5'1'7us-ed Spe©sl Yea ❑ No Q Well seal—Mater... Well sealed from o ..............� _ .. ._.... ............. ............... ILDiameter of well m of seal ..... ..... .... in.Diameter of well al .............Number ofBacks d in well seal sacks How wan cement ..............__._..,...-. ---------. ---- .......... ...................................... _............ .. — .,�,• ,.�.-4... ...... .... Was pump Sled? ......................... Type ..;�....... HP ........_.. Dopth ........... ft. War a drI shoe used? ❑Yee ❑ No OUP ............ Size: location .. ........ ft. Did any to contain unusable waw? CFZ_ Q No Type 9! water7 de tEo£ etmta M.tJ(1dofs1.HM strata off WX well Gravel Hacked? ❑ Yea r1 Nn Sizeof areveL ---------------- - (10) LOCATION OF WELL: County Jackson Drillees well numbier 83-3 X14 Sfi Section T. R. Tax Lot #_ J"� Irn 111k Subdivision Address at wall location: bZ�Bee Be Road Central o n regon (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed well. Depth at whim water was first found see below Static level fk below landsurface. Date Arteaian- ssure ]be. er uara inch. Date (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing De h drilled ft. DepthofooMeleted well �L5 ft. Formation: Describe color, texture, grain size and structure of materials; and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated, with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change in position of Static Water Level and indicate principal water -bearing strata. Drilling Machine Operator's Certification: This well was constructed under nv direct supervision. Materials used and inf t' n repo bo e e to nw beat knowledge and helief. [signedo]�Cl�... .......... Hata .-17.., Ts.$3.. �rikWc Machine O}"wrl Drilling Machine Operator's License No. �Q.. Water Well Contractor's Certification: This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Name.....Stueiet7ak� ki@J1 Drilling. �................ Maraeu, Brio or oorpora rQ Address . 48 6 ghway d Ashl ands are�on 92�2q ...... .. [Type orc nfa [Signed] .. .. (Water Well Under) License No... }......Date _......... .. �� Z'� ......... 11M.. NOTi6E TO WAT&R WELL CONTRA -MR WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, - Th° adgiaal and nret copy of tha report BALEK OREGON 97310 vara to be filed with the within 30 d" from the date of well completio- SP" 128584390 A 14 STATE OF OREGON WATER WELL REPORT (as roquired by ORS 537.765) Inctrnetinnc rnrcamuletine this r ell are on the last naee of this V 26 o e 2/x— POT 131994 Drilling ic. (START CARD)# 65619 trm. WATER R" (1) OWNER: Well Number 1 Name 5tQY9 HiRi Address P D _ . __.. .. City JAgk§Qnville State pre .._ ... _ ilp 975 • (2) TYPE OF WORK ®blew Well Deepening ❑ Alteration (repair/recondition) ❑ Abandonment (3) DRILL METHOD: ® Rotary Air ❑ RotaryMud ❑Cable 6 [Auger _ ❑Otho - - (4) PROPOSED USE: 91Domestic ❑Community ❑Industrial 01Ir ga[lon OThermal ❑Injection Livestock oather •(5) BORE BOLE CONSTRUCTION: Special Construction approval ❑ Yes [KNo Depth of Completed Well 10 Q ft. Explosives used [-]Yes ®No Type Amount HOLE SEAL Diameter From To Material From To Sacks or pounds • tt 0 135 Bent n How was seal placed: Method ❑ A [] B ❑ C- [JD ❑ 13 ® Other Pouted Backfill placed from ft. to fi. Material Gravel placed From ft. to ft. 5iu of ravel (6) CASING/LINER: Diameter From To Gauge Steel Plastic Welded Tbreaded 611 ® ®_ ❑ Casing -❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El-- Liner: 411 A-Id,Q IN® El _.. Final location of shoe(s) 521 • (7) PERFORKHON515CREENS: ® Perforations Method F1 Screens Typo Material Sim pe From To $ire Number Diameter slxe Casing Liner n ❑ _� ❑ �-�t (8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time Is 1 hour Flowing ❑Pump ' ❑Bailer ®Air - ❑Artesian Yield eallmin Drawdown trill stem at Time I hr. Temperature of water 5 6 Depth Artesian Flow Found Was a water analysis done? ❑ Yes By whom Did any strata contain water not suitable for intended use? ❑ Too little []Salty []Muddy Odor. [,JC� a9ther��_ Depth of strata: Sp M Vi (9) I,CfCA�1�& OFl WELL by Legal description: County j a C} S Op Latitude Longitude Township3 7�. 1'I or S. Range ? W E or W. WM. Section 2 - 5 W_ 114___L&_ 114 Tax Lot 9 0 0 Lot Block Subdivision Street Address of Well (or nearest address) 484 1 �— GehLhamJ—RLL— eri t rat_ Qoj nt nra 975n9 (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL: 9? ft. below land surface. Date 1 n/ 5/ 9 4 Artesian pressure lb. persquare inch. Date (11) WATER BEARING ZONES Depth at which water was first found From To Estimated Flow Rate SWL A 30 99 (12) WELL LOG: Ground Elevation Date started in/5i94 Completed (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification: I eertify that the work I performed on the construction, alteration, or abandonment of this well is in compliance with Oregon water supply well construction standards. Materials used and information reported above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. WWC Number Signed Date (bonded) Water Well Constructor Certification: I accept responsibility for the construction, alteraiion, or abandonment work performed on [Itis well during the construction dates reporled above. All work performed during this time is in compliance with Oregon water supply well construction Stan This report is true to the b t of my knowledge � and belief. WWC Number "!as Signed Date r ORIGINAL 8t: FIRST COPY -WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SECOND THIRD COPY -CUSTOMER STATE OF OREGON JACK 61181 WATER SUPPLY WELL REPORT (ORS 537.765 & OAR 690-205-0210) Instructions for completing this report are on the last page of this form. (1) LANDOWNER Owner Well LD. First Name La me .Orrany dd11 TO X City pj..{_ State `T.ip (2) TYPE OF WORK P4M❑ Conversion ❑ Deepening ❑ Alteralion (complete Sections 2a & 10) ❑ Abandonment (complete Section 59 (2a) -ALT T RAT N: Wei I Depth ft. Seat Material Casing Type: ❑ Steel ❑ Plastic ❑ Other Casing Gauge Casing Dituneter (3) DRILL METHOD O*41kotary Air ❑ Rotary Mud ❑ Auger []Cable ❑ Cable Mud ❑ Reverse Rotary ❑ Other (4) PROPOSED USE O&Domestic ❑ Irrigation ❑ Community ❑ Industrial/Commercial ❑ Livestock ❑ Dewatering ❑ Injection ❑ Thermal ❑ Other (5) BORE HOLE CO TION Depth of Completed Well / ft. Special Standard: ❑ Yes (attach copy) BORE HOLE SEAT. Dia f From I To _ Material From I To I Amount I Scks/lbs How was sML placed: Meth e{1 ❑ A ❑ B ❑ C ❑ D ❑ E Backfill placed from _ ft. to ft. Material ilter pack from ft. to ft. Material Size --- (58) ABANDONMENT USING UNHYDRATED BENTONITE: Calculated Amount Proposed to be Used: sacks/lbs Actual Amount Used: sacksllbs (6) CASING/LINER Csn.e Lind Dia I * I From To Gauge 1 Steel Plastic [Weldedl Thrd 1 � Shoe ❑ InsidcL�0utside ❑ Other Location of shoe(s) _ Temporary casing ❑ Yes Diameter _, From To (7) PERFORATIONSISCREENS Perforations Method Screens Tvoe Material Screen :reen/Tele/ slot Slot # of pipe width I length I stois size (S) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is I hour ❑ Pump ❑ Bailer WAir ❑ Flowing Artesian Yield gailmin Drawdown Drill ste Pump depth f Duration (hr) %rt'emperature'!j'2 °F Lab analysis ❑ Yes By Water quality concerns? ❑ Yes (describe below) TDS ppm From I To I Description f Amount I Units WELL LABEL # L /q& START CARD # ORIGINAL LOG # (9) LOCATION OF WELL (legal descrip ton) County _ k Twp � N n S hang E or W W.M.. Scc IN of the 1/4 Tax I .ot Tax Map Number Lot Lat 40ark g DMS or DD Long °'"or� e71DMSorDD Street Ad ress of W (or n crest address la LJAIIA a) (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL Date SWL(psi) + SWL(fl) Existing We] VPrc-Alteration Completed Well Flowing Ancsian? Yes Dry Hole? Yc WATER BEARING ZONES Depth water was First found S L Date From To Est Flow SWL i *I SWL(ft) (11) WELL LOG Ground Elevation (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification I certify that the work I performed on the construction, deepening, alteration, or abandonment of this well is in compliance; with Oregon water supply well construction standards. Materials used and information reported above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. RECEIVIED License Number Date Signed JUN 0 4 2012 RMOURGES (bonded) Water Well Constructor CertificatioNVAI Ell PT I accept responsibility for the construction, deepeniGMEWOMGON abandonment work performed on this well during the construction dates reported above. All work performed during this time is in compliance with Oregon water supply well construction standards. This report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. J` / License Number ( V �I Date -!�i"/. l z— S ignedTanMC& 1 & IL -Q u i Contact Info. (optional) or ORIGINAL. - WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT ONE COPY FOR CONSTRUCTOR ONE COPY FOR CUSTOMER SUBMITTED TO THE WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF WORK 01/02/2009 JACKSON COUNTY Roads January 4, 2021 Attention: Stephanie Holtey City of Central Point Planning 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 ATTACHMENT "D" Roads Engineering Chuck DeJanvier Consiruceion Engineer 200 Antelope Road White City, OR 97503 Phone (541)774-6255 Fax: (541) 774-6295 DE,.,lariv{:A(d1pi C. =pA 0..r7l InN www jacksoncounty.org RE Major Modification to the White Hawk Master Plan and 32 -lot subdivision (White Hawk Phase 1) off Gebhard Road and Beebe Road — county -maintained roads. Planning File: MOD -20-005 & SUB -20-002; 37-2W-02CA Tax Lots 2700 and 2701. Dear Stephanie Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal amends the phasing plan to allow construction of the town homes/d u plexes first. Also includes the following changes in Phase I: housing type, removal of 2 lots, addition of 16 Accessory Dwelling Units, change of traditional architectural style to contemporary style, and eliminates one of three (3) alleys in Phase I and the thirty-two (32) lot subdivision to be known as White Hawk Phase I. Project site is 18.91 acres and is adjacent to the intersection of Gebhard Road and Beebe Road (37-2W-02 Tax lots 2700 & 2701). Jackson County Roads has the following comments: 1. The applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and obtain county permits if required. 2. We would like to be notified of future development proposals, as county permits may be required. 3. Jackson County's General Administration Policy #1-45 sets forth the County's position as it relates to the management of County roads located within existing or proposed city limits or Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB). The County has no current plans for improvements to Gebhard Road or Beebe Road. Jackson County Roads recommends that the city request road jurisdiction of the proposed new roads. 4. If frontage improvements are required along either Gephard Road or Beebe Road, they shall be permitted and inspected by Jackson County Roads. Sidewalk placement on either Gephard Road or Beebe Road frontage if required should be directly behind the curb. Jackson County Roads does not maintain planter strips. The developer shall obtain a Minor Road Improvement Permit prior to commencing work in the County right-of-way. 5. The applicant shall obtain a Road Approach permits from Roads for any new or improved road approaches to either Gephard Road or Beebe Road. 6. The radius for road intersection along a collector road shall be a thirty-foot radius. The road approach shall be perpendicular to Gebhard Road or Beebe Road and aligned directly across from a road approach on the other side of the road if possible. January 4, 2021 Page 2 of 2 7. There shall be no direct driveway approaches off Beebe Road or Gebhard Road, 8. Roads recommend the removal of any existing driveways not being used on Gebhard Road and Beebe Road and replacing them with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. 9. ADA curb ramps must be located wherever there are curbs or other barriers to entry from a pedestrian walkway or sidewalk, including any intersection where it is legal for a pedestrian to cross the street, whether or not there is any designated crosswalk. 10. If drainage is directed to either Gebhard Road or Beebe Road, Jackson County Roads would like to review and comment on the hydraulic report including the calculations and drainage plan Capacity improvements or on-site detention, if necessary, shall be installed at the expense of the applicant. Upon completion of the project, the developer's engineer shall certify that construction of the drainage system was constructed per plan and a copy of the certification shall be sent to Jackson County Roads. 11. Gebhard Road has a load limit restriction, the applicant needs to indicate to the County where the alternative construction access will be. 12. Utility Permits are required from Roads for any utility work within the county road right-of-way. On longitudinal trenches within a travel lane 100' or greater in length, unless otherwise approved by the Engineer, the existing pavement shall be removed and replaced to full paving - machine width (normally 10'-12') for a travel lane restoration. Drag boxes or other pull -type asphalt spreaders will not be permitted for longitudinal trench pavement replacement. 13. Per Oregon Revised Statute 209.150, any survey monuments of record removed, disturbed or destroyed within the permit area must be referenced prior to construction and replaced after construction by a registered professional land surveyor. All costs associated with this surveying work are the responsibility of the permit holder. 14. Please note Beebe Road is a County Urban Minor Collector Road with an Average Daily Traffic count of 1,244 as of 6/9/2020, 50' west of Hamrick. 15. Please note Gebhard Road is a County Urban Minor Collector Road with an Average Daily Traffic count of 730 as of 6/9/2020, 150' south of Wilson Road. 16. We concur with any right-of-way dedicated. 17. Be Advised: other permits from local State or Federal Agencies' or Departments may be required prior to starting work. Sincerely, Chuck DeJanvier, PE Construction Engineer I:\Engineering\Development\CITIES\CNTRLPTWIOD-20-005 & SUB-20-002.doc