The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 863 - 1909 Scenic Ave. Zone ChangePLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 863 A RESOLUTION FORWARDING A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE MINOR ZONE MAP AMENDMENT FROM RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY (R-1-8) TO CIVIC (CIVIC) ON 1.76 ACRES LOCATED AT 1909 SCENIC AVENUE. (37S 2W0 3AB Tax Lot 4400, 4500 & 4600) File No. ZC-18007 Applicant: Fire District 3; WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is proposed to re -designate the property identified by the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S 2W 03AB Tax Lots 4400, 4500 & 4600 as Civic; and WHEREAS, the proposed Civic zoning is a Civic zoning district consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and surrounding land uses; and WHEREAS, adequate public services and transportation networks are available to the site; and WHEREAS, the proposed zone change from R-1-8 to Civic has been determined to be consistent with the State Transportation Planning Rule. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. 863, does recommend that the City Council approve the change of zone on the property identified by the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S 2W 03AB Tax Lots 4400, 4500 & 4600. This decision is based on the Staff Report dated February 5, 2019 including Attachments A through D attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5th day of February, 2019. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: X&�-41/[ City Representative Planning Commission Resolution No. 863 (02/05/2019) FIRE DISTRICT #3/SCENIC AVENUE MINOR ZONE MAP AMENDMENT City of Central Point, Oregon 140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 .centralpointoregon,M C ENTML POINT Oregon STAFF REPORT February 5, 2019 AGENDA ITEM: VII -A File No. ZC-18007 Community Development Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Consideration of a Zone (map) Change application from R-1-8 (Residential Single Family) to Civic for three (3) properties approximately 1.76 acres in size located at 1909 Scenic Avenue. The properties are identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03AB, Tax Lots 4400, 4500 & 4600. Applicant: Fire District No. 3 Approval Criteria: CPMC 17.10.400, Zoning Map and Zoning Code Text Amendments. STAFF SOURCE: Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner II BACKGROUND: The proposed minor zone map amendment is to change the current zoning of the property from R-1-8 to Civic. The requested change will allow the applicant to prepare for construction of a new fire station. In considering the zone change, there are three (3) components that must be addressed pursuant to CPMC 17.10.400: Comprehensive Plan Compatibility. The current land use plan designation for the property was amended from Low Density Residential to Civic as part of the Land Use Element update in 2018. The Civic Comprehensive Plan designation allows for the proposed Civic zoning designation. Per the updated Land Use Element, the Civic zoning designation is consistent with the Civic Comprehensive Plan designation and abuts property to the south that is zoned the same. 2. Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning. The subject property for the proposed zone change is located along Scenic Avenue. The abutting property to the south is zoned Civic and is developed with the Scenic Middle School. The zoning of the properties to the east were recently amended to R-3 to accommodate future expansion of Scenic Heights, an affordable housing development owned and operate by the Housing Authority of Jackson County. The Housing Authority is in the preliminary stages of developing plans for the high density development, which is tentatively planned for construction in 5 -years. 3. Traffic Impacts. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required to address compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, the Municipal Code and the Oregon State Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). The TPR in OAR 660-012-0060 requires changes to land use plans and land use regulations (i.e. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and Zoning Map Amendments) to be consistent with the function and capacity of existing and planned transportation facilities. As shown in the Applicant's TIA, the traffic generated by the increased land use intensity will not alter the functional classification for any existing or planned infrastructure. As demonstrated in in the Planning Department Supplemental Findings (Attachment "D"), the proposed zone change can be accommodated by the transportation network and is consistent with the TPR. 10 ISSUES: There are no issues relative to this application for minor Zone (Map) Change. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: None. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" —Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps Attachment `B" — Traffic Impact Study, dated December 6, 2018 Attachment "C" — Applicant's Findings Attacl-anent "D" — Planning Department Supplemental Findings Attachment "E" — Resolution No. 863 ACTION: Open public hearing and consider the proposed amendment to the Zoning Map, alone public hearing and 1) recommend approval to the City Council; 2) recommend approval with revisions; or 3) deny the application. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of Resolution No. 863. Per the Staff Report dated Febru , 2019 and supported by Findings of Fact. 11 Figure 1. Current Comprehensive Plan Map Figure 2. Current Zoning Map F -- � Attachment "A" 12 A CSN curve na anry ►irq bi trlot 3 - So eNe ltwrnx (�a�n Legend C-2 Gel • C--... u.aem C4 rauda.Moa.e cG = rroraa(MlR car.e.w CE= nioEa w [anW�xepl Gn RYC .w M --,%V-. c—.w(T-D) 6C = G—M Camel (roo) 1yn • .Fy.aAr Ia..aaaMuCpwrn�{ttlY1 WE tnnwft l blrtGV- EFGO ME, M 1= bgnlhhl "�u= rau.aa[G.n xu vn Mr n. w..W rinll• FraG.eu• 05= Gpan S,.&Eads R3 = Maep. FemYp Ea.kentd E3= TxvFEiry Radatmd R.ra• 111yuaFaln�Ee R10• if FuMxael-and rt.1.I4 • IF 4.vtl11.1e1 IWO R.L- Ian W. yPAzk'emd MAPFOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSESONLY L CENTRAL Plan Current Comprehensive Land Use Designation 1909 9cenlc Avenue IBM i(ZC RG(nA {i l g Legend • - � iir�, - Ch•1c 1201 aw � Hlgh_Densfty_(HRas) i LOw_Densdy_(LResj M ealu m _D e n s lry_(M R es ) - Parks and Open Space (2010) y_ ' MAP POR ILLUSTRARON PURPOSES ONLY - . ..In lea r _— � � _ M.E Cream nr �+ ana.�m.wlro CommvMy Planrns E • — _— gale Anuxy iB. ]1118 Figure 2. Current Zoning Map F -- � Attachment "A" 12 A CSN curve na anry ►irq bi trlot 3 - So eNe ltwrnx (�a�n Legend C-2 Gel • C--... u.aem C4 rauda.Moa.e cG = rroraa(MlR car.e.w CE= nioEa w [anW�xepl Gn RYC .w M --,%V-. c—.w(T-D) 6C = G—M Camel (roo) 1yn • .Fy.aAr Ia..aaaMuCpwrn�{ttlY1 WE tnnwft l blrtGV- EFGO ME, M 1= bgnlhhl "�u= rau.aa[G.n xu vn Mr n. w..W rinll• FraG.eu• 05= Gpan S,.&Eads R3 = Maep. FemYp Ea.kentd E3= TxvFEiry Radatmd R.ra• 111yuaFaln�Ee R10• if FuMxael-and rt.1.I4 • IF 4.vtl11.1e1 IWO R.L- Ian W. yPAzk'emd MAPFOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSESONLY Figure 3. Proposed Zone Map Change 13 Ak CENTRAD POINT Proposed Zone Chunoe Fire 01striot 7 - Somdo Avenue R-i-i to CMo (ZC480q) Legend &CO• Bear Creek Greenway -1IG4@M)-Commudd-Med"DiA t 444. C-4 • TW dst and 01be F Cb= ThomuOhbre Carrvnereid % CN- NWOborh,od Cammemlal cmA ' ETOO Ciao• EC • E ploymem c--al (TO D) --? GG- General Cemmembl(TOD) MAR-IW N. Reld.n DCommerehd(TOD) LMR . Loo bfit ResidenAal(TOO) ETOD radW M-I - bidurtdd - M-2 • bd.-W O...l MMR • Madk m blit Realdenid (TO D) ETOD MMR• OS - Open Space/ Parks R3 • Mueple F—Hy Reeidemld R-2 - Too-Family ReAdmdd R-1-6• SF Res1deroU1-000 R-A YSF • 0X00 R-1-10 • SF Re W-W -10,000 R-L. Ino Denshy Res&MW MAP FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY Scenic Avenue R --I---8 to Civic Zone Change Traffic Impact Study December 61 2018 Prepared By: OUT-avi DicoN TamifPoQTQTIONLL( 53 OP OREGON Attachment "B" 14 r" TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........„»....»...„.„„.„,„.„ ... „„..„„........ „...... „..„ ...................„............„............5 11. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................».....6 jBackground .......... .............................................................................................................................................. 6 .............. Project Locationon .6 ProjectDescription...................................................................................................................................6 III. EXISTING CONDITIONS....................................................................................................................8 SiteCondition...........................................................................................................................................8 RoadwayCharacteristics..........................................................................................................................8 TrafficCounts..........................................................................................................................................8 BackgroundGrowth.................................................................................................................................8 Intersection Capacity and Level of Service............................................................................................1 I Year 2018 No -Build Intersection Operations.........................................................................................12 Year 2018 No -Build 95`h Percentile Queuing........................................................................................12 CrashHistory ..........................................................................................................................................13 IV. SITE TRAFFIC ... ................................ „....„»..,.....».............„..„............................»,.„.„ .„..,....„.....15 TripGeneration......................................................................................................................................15 TripDistribution and Assignment..........................................................................................................15 V. YEAR 2018 BUILD CONDITIONS......................................................................................................18 Year2018 Build Description..................................................................................................................18 Year 2018 Build Intersection Operations...,...........................................................................................18 Year2018 Build 95`h Percentile Queuing..............................................................................................18 Year2018 Build Turn Lanes..................................................................................................................19 VI. FUTURE YEAR 2038 NO -BUILD AND BUILD CONDITIONS.„,...„„„.......„..„.„............„.„.„..312 Future Year 2038 No -Build Description................................................................................................22 FutureYear 2038 Build Description......................................................................................................22 Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Intersection Operations....:........................... .............................22 Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build 95'h Percentile Queuing.............................................................23 VII. CONCLUSIONS._.. 15 LIST OF TABLES Table1: Roadway Classifications and Descriptions........................................................................................8 Table 2: HCM Level of Service Designations for Stop -Controlled Intersections.........................................1 1 Table 3: HCM Level of Service Designations for Signalized Intersections.................................:................1 1 Table 4: Year 2018 No -Build Intersection Operations, AM and PM Peak Hours. .................... ................. .. 12 Table 5: Year 2018 No -Build 95`h Percentile Queue Lengths, AWPM Peak Hours.....................................12 Table 6: Study Area Intersection Crash Rates, 2012-2016 ........ ....... .........:.............................. ............... ...... 13 Table 7: Crash History by Type, 2012-2016 ........ .............. ......................... .................................................. 13 Table8: Development Trip Generations.......................................................................................................15 Table 9: Year 2018 Build Intersection Operations, AM and Plvt Peak Hours ............................................... 18 Table 10: Year 2018 Build 95`h Percentile Queue Lengths, AM/PM Peak Hours., ....................................... 18 Table 11: Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build intersection Operations, AM and PM Peak Hours ........... 22 Table 12: Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build 95`h Percentile Queue Lengths, AM/PM Peak Hours .... _23 Figure L Figure 2a: Figure 2b: Figure 3a: Figure 3b: i Figure 4a: Figure 4b: Figure 5a: Figure 5b: Figure 6a: Figure 6b: FIGURES VicinityMap................................................................................................................................7 Traffic Count Data, Seasonal Adjustment Information Year 2018 No -Build Tragic Volumes, AM Peak Hour...............................................................9 ITE Trip Generation Data, Background Growth Year 2018 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour. .............. .............................................. 10 Development Trip Distributions, AM Peak Hour......................................................................16 Year 2018 No -Build and Build SimTraffic Output Development Trip Distributions, PM Peak Hour. ............. .................................. .............. ...... 17 Year 2018 Build Traffic Volumes, AM Peak Hour_ ........................................... ..................... 20 Year 2018 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour....................................................................21 Agency Requirements Future Year 2038 No -Build Traffic Volumes, AM Peak Hour..................................................24 Future Year 2038 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour..................................................25 Future Year 2038 Build Traffic Volumes, AM Peak Hour........................................................26 Future Year 2038 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour........................................................27 APPENDICES Appendix A: Traffic Count Data, Seasonal Adjustment Information Appendix B: ITE Trip Generation Data, Background Growth Appendix C: Year 2018 No -Build and Build Synchro Output Appendix D: Year 2018 No -Build and Build SimTraffic Output Appendix F: Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Synchro Output Appendix F: Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build SimTraffic Output Appendix G: Agency Requirements 16 1 -HIS PAGF LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 17 I, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Summary Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC prepared a traffic impact analysis for a proposed zone change from Low Density Residential (R-1-8) to Civic on Township 37S Range 2W Section 3AB, tax lots 4400, 4500, and 4600 in Central Point, Oregon. The subject property is tocated along the south side of Scenic Avenue, west of Rock Way. Access is proposed from a planned extension of Rock Way. A traffic impact analysis is required by the City of Central Point to address issues of compliance with the Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Code, and Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). Potential development impacts were based on 1.76 acres of Civic zoning under existing year 2018 and fixture year 2038 conditions. Development impacts were analyzed within the study area during both the a.m, and p.m. peak hours because of the close proximity to Scenic Middle School. Three study area intersections were identified as key intersections for the analysis. These included: 1. Upton Road & Scenic Avenue 2. Rock Way & Scenic Avenue 3. Scenic Middle School & Scenic Avenue Conclusions The findings of the traffic impact analysis conclude that the proposed zone change from R-1-8 to Civic on 37S2W03AB tax lots 4400, 4500, and 4600 is not shown to degrade the performance of any study area intersection such that it would cause an intersection to fail that was not otherwise failing or make an intersection worse that was already failing under existing or future conditions. Intersection operations, roadway classifications, and safety conditions were evaluated to address potential impacts to the transportation system. Results of the analysis show the following: The intersection of Upton Road and Scenic Avenue is shown to exceed the City's level of service (LOS) "D" performance standard and operate at a LOS "F" under existing year 2018 no -build conditions. The intersection continues to operate at LOS "F" under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions, and will require mitigation. The type of mitigation will be evaluated and recommended at the time of development, however, when actual development is known and true impacts can be addressed. This analysis was undertaken to address issues of compliance with the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Code, and Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) in Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) Chapter 660, Division 012, Based upon our analysis, it is concluded that streets and intersections that serve the subject property will accommodate projected a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes for permitted uses under Civic zoning without requiring a change in the functional classification of any existing or planned facility, or degrade the performance of an existing or planned facility that is otherwise pro}ected to not meet the performance standards identified in the City's Transportation System Plan (TSP) or Comprehensive Plan. H TRA71(POk71)11un W j Dec 6, 2018 1Z-1-8 to Civic ZC i rraff)c Iinpacl Analysis. 5 18 U. INTRODUCTION Background Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC prepared a traffic impact analysis for a proposed zone change from Low Density Residential (R-1-8) to Civic on Township 37S Range 2W Section 3AB, tax lots 4400, 4500, and 4600 in Central Point, Oregon. The subject property is located along the south side of Scenic Avenue, west of Rock Way. Access is proposed from a planned extension of Rock Way. A traffic impact analysis is required by the City of Central Point to address issues of compliance with the Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Code, and Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). Potential development impacts were based on 1.76 acres of Civic zoning under existing year 2018 and future year 2038 conditions. Development impacts were analyzed within the study area during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours because of the close proximity to Scenic Middle School. Three study area intersections were identified as key intersections for the analysis. These included: 1. Upton Road & Scenic Avenue 2. Rock Way & Scenic Avenue 3. Scenic Middle School & Scenic Avenue f Under Civic zoning, the site allows community services, religious assembly, parks & open spaces, and elementary and middle schools as outright permitted uses. The proposed use for the site is a future fire station, but this will be evaluated specifically at the time of site development because it is a conditional use within Civic Zoning, For purposes of the zone change analysis, potential traffic generations are based on a middle school use because it produces the highest number of trips for permitted uses. The largest middle school for a site this size was estimated to have tip to 107 students and generate 228 average daily trips (ADT) with 62 occurring during the a.m. and 37 during the p.m. peak hour. Study area intersections were evaluated under existing year 2018 and future year 2038 no -build and build conditions to determine what impacts the proposed zone change will have on the transportation system. ' Project Location The subject parcel is located along the south side of Scenic Avenue, west of Rock Way on Township 37S Range 2W Section 3AB, tax lots 4400, 4500, and 4600 in Central Point, Oregon. Refer to Figure 1 for a vicinity map. Project Description The subject property is currently zoned Low Density Residential (R-1-8) and is proposed as Civic Zoning (C). The change in land use is estimated to generate 228 ADT to the transportation system with _ 62 trips _()ecurring_during_the. a.m. peak_hour.and .37. during -the p.m...peak_hour—Access to-the_.site.is_ proposed through an extension of Rock Way, �, �. !'RRtlJPOR7 grlON NGITfL6RflYG, WDec 6, 2018 I R-1-8 t0 Civic IC. 'lYaffic hnpact Aruilysis { 6 19 { �s Figure i : Vicinity Map ' s k ik ■■1T L %) rL- 41p r; { 'i NOT TO 4. SCALE •,'' �! r '' i1 sauTu�n a��on Scenic Avenue Zone Change T-UHMNATInH .;H6I"TT-R1H6, Iff (R-1-8 to Civic) Medford, Oregon 97504 Traffic Impact Analysis ph 541.608.9.923 fax 541.535.6B73 email: kim,parducci(ryrgmail.com Central Point, Oregon I III. EXISTING CONDITIONS Site Conditions The proposed site is located on Township 37S Range 2W Section 3AB, tax lots 4400, 4500, and 4600. The parcel is 1.76 acres in size and is currently vacant. Roadway Characteristics Table 1 provides a summary of existing roadway classifications and descriptions in the study area. Table 1- Roadway Classifications and Descriptions Roadway Jurisdiction Functional Lanes City Operational posted Speed Classification Standard Scenic Avenue City of Central Point Minor Arterial 2-3 LOS D 20-30 mph toil' Street City of Central Point Minor Arterial 2-3 I,OS D 30 mph Upton Road City of Central Point Minor Arterial 2 LOS D 45 mph Rock Way City of Central Point Local 2 LOS D 25 mph Traffic Counts Manual traffic counts were collected from 7:00-9:00 a.m. and 3:00-6:00 p.m. at key intersections in early October of 2018. Counts were seasonally adjusted and balanced to reflect peak conditions. The a.m. peak hour was shown to occur from 7:45-8:45 a,m. and the p.m, peak hour from 3:30-4:30 p.m. in the surrounding area. Refer to Appendix A for count data. Refer to Figures 2a and 2b for year 2018 no -build traffic volumes during the a.m. and p,m, peak hours. Background Growth Background growth was derived using growth rates from the Interchange Area Management Plan (LAMP) for Exit 33 and volume comparisons between counts in 2010 and 2018 for I 01 Street. The LAMP estimated 0.7% of growth per year on 10"` Street between 2010 and future year 2034. We rounded that up to I% to be conservative and applied it to all streets within the study area. f.i).TRnmPORTIM11HTN61HU-Rilift,LLfjDec6.2018 R-1-8 to Civic ZClrraiLicImpact Analysis;8 J� I 21 j Figure 2a : Year 2018 No -Build Traffic Volumes, AM Peak Hour SOURIa" HUM TUNSPOATTITION 1N4IKaM, LL( Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim, parducci[a gmail. com Scenic Avenue Zone Change (R-1-8 to Civic) Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon Figure 2b : Year 2018 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour SOURI-t N DAU40H T-A-1HSPOATIATI0H ZHGIHZ"1HG, LL( Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim. parducciPgmaii. com Scenic Avenue Zone Change (R-1-8 to Civic Traffic impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon Intersection Capacity and Level of Service Intersection capacity calculations were conducted utilizing the methodologies presented in the Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Capacity and level of service calculations for signalized and iunsignalized intersections were prepared using "SYNCHRO" timing software. Level of service quantifies the degree of comfort afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or along a roadway section. The level of service methodology was developed to quantify ithe quality of set -vice of transportation facilities. Level of service is based on total delay, defined as the total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. Level of service ranges from "A" to "F", with "A" indicating the most desirable I condition and "F" indicating an unsatisfactory condition. The HCM LOS designations for stop - controlled intersections are provided in Table 2. The HCM LOS designations for signalized intersections are provided in Table 3. Table 2 — HCM Level of Service Designations for Stop -Controlled Intersections Level of Service Delay Range A <I B >10-15 I C >15-25 D >25 — 35 E >35 — 50 Table 3 — HCM Level of Service Designations for Signalized Intersections I Level of Service Delay Range A � <10 B >10-.20 C >20 — 35 D >35 - 55 >55 — 80 444 r. > 80 Key intersections are under City of Central Point jurisdiction. The City of Central Point requires all study area intersections to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS). The minimum acceptable level of service for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersection movements is LOS "D" Mitigation is required if proposed development is shown to degrade an intersection to a level of service worse than under no -build conditions. S. 0. T.RA1lfno4trn vti _Incitt[rnnr%, C f f ; Dec 6. 2018 j R-1-8 to Civic ZC l Trai•fic Impact Analysis ; 11 24 Year 2018 No -Build Intersection Operations Key intersections were evaluated under year 2018 no -build conditions during the a.m, and p.m. peak hours. Results are summarized in Table 4. Table 4 - Year 2018 No -Build Intersection Operations, AM and PM Peak Hours Available Link Intersection Performance Traffic Control No -Build year 2018 No-Bui — AM PM Scenic Avenue / Rock Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Ul)ton Road 'Scenic Avenue LOS D TWSC F, (SB) F, (SB) Rock Way / Scenic Avenue LOS D TWSC C, (SB) B, (SB) Scenic Middle School / Scenic Avenue None "TWSC C. (N B) C, (NB) LOS=Level of Service, TWSC-'l wo-way stop controlled. NB=northbound; S13=southbound Note. Exceeded performance standards are shown o bold, italic Results of the analysis show the intersection of Upton Road / Scenic Avenue operating at a level of service (LOS) "F" under existing year 2018 no -build conditions, which exceeds the LOS "D" standard. The critical movement is the southbound left turn movement, which drives the failing LOS. All other key intersections are shown to operate acceptably. Refer to Appendix C for synchro output sheets. Year 2018 No -Build 95t" Percentile Queuing Queuing is the stacking up of vehicles for a given lane movement, and it can have a significant effect on roadway safety and the overall operation of a transportation system. Long queue lengths in through lanes can block access to tum lanes, driveways, and minor street approaches, as well as spill back into upstream intersections. As a result of this, the estimation of queue lengths is an important aspect of the analysis process for determining how a transportation corridor operates. Queue lengths are reported as the average, maximum, or 95°i percentile queue length. The 951h percentile queue length is used for design purposes and is the queue length reported in this analysis. Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTrafflc to determine 95`h percentile queue lengths at study area intersections under existing conditions. Queue lengths were then rounded up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length) and reported in Table 5 for the p.m, peak hour unless the a.m. peak hour was higher. 'fable 5 — Year 2018 No -Hudd 95th Percentile Queue I,en¢ths, AM/PM Peak Hours Intersection I Available Link 95N' Percentile E=ceeded or Movement Distance (Ft) Queue lengths Blocked Roadway — AM PM Scenic Avenue / Rock Way Eastbound Left Through 425 25 25 Westbound Through/Right 350 25 25 - Southbound LeRfRight 650 50 50 - Scenic NIS / Scenic Avenue Eastbound Through/Right 500 25 25 Westbound Left/Through 425 75 50 Northbound Left/Right ht 360 125 75 - f. fl. TRArIfPOPT4lNOH [n6/fif4llPlr,, LL( ! Dec 6; 2018 1 R-1-8 to Civic ZC i'Trarfic Impact Analysis 1 12 25 Table 5 Continued — Year 2018 ;Vo -Build 95"'Percentile Queue Len hs, AM/PM Peak'Hours Total Crash 90 Percentile Exceeded or Interxeetinn 1 Available Link Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway Nuventeni Distance (Ft) AM PM tipton Road/ Seenic Avenuc 0.212 0,408' 9 Percom a Crash Rate from Pxhibp 4-1 in 01)01-s Anaivsis Protelures Manuel v2 Eastbound Left 150 50 75 - Eastbound Through/Right 350 25 25 - Westbound Left 425 25 25 ' Westbound Through/Right 450 25 50 - Northbound Lefi 100 25 25 - Northbound Through/Right 200 25 50 - Southbound left 225 125 125 - Southbound ThroUWRiai. 225 75 50 - Note- Exceeded perRumance standards are shown in bald, italic Results of the queuing analysis show no link distances at key intersections exceeded under year 2018 no -build conditions. The longest queues are the southbound left turn queue length on Upton Road at Scenic Avenue and the northbound left turn queue on the Scenic Middle School driveway at Scenic Avenue. Both are estimated to be 125 Leet or the equivalent of 5 vehicles. At Scenic Middle School this queue is longer when buses are trying to make left turns onto Scenic Avenue. Refer to Appendix D for a full queuing and blocking report. Crash History Crash data for the most recent five-year period was gathered from ODOT's crash analysis unit. Results were gathered for the period of January 1, 2012 through December 31", 2016. Crash data is gathered to identify mash patterns that could be attributable to geometric or operational deficiencies, or crash trends of a specific type that would indicate the need for further investigation at an intersection. Tables 6 and 7 provide intersection crash rates and types of collisions at study area intersections. Intersections with no reported crashes were not included. Full crash reports are provided in Appendix A. Table 6 - Study Area intersection Crash [tales, 2012-2016 Total Crash 4D(Y1 Intersection 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Crashes ADT Rate r sh Crash i Rock Way / Scenic Ave 0 0 0 0 1 1 5.950 0.092 0.293' Upton Rd/ Scenic Ave 1 0 0 0 2 3 7.780 0.212 0,408' 9 Percom a Crash Rate from Pxhibp 4-1 in 01)01-s Anaivsis Protelures Manuel v2 ADT=average daily traffic Table 7 - Crash History by Type, 2012-2016 Intersection Collision Type Severity Rear- `running/ Head- Pedestrian/ Fixed Non- Injury Fatal End Angle on Bicyclist Object Injury Rock Way l ScenicAvc 0 0 (f 1 0 0 1 0 Upton Rd / Scenic .Ave 0 2 0 1 0 I 2 0 4. 0, T ItNNIINII?1 rIT!(IN t-NI;INI [OtN, Dec 6, 2018 1 R-1-8 to Civic ZC 11'raffic [in pact Analysis 1 13 w 26 Ire Results of the crash analysis show the intersection with the highest crash frequency being Scenic Avenue at Upton Road with three crashes occurring within a five-year period. All three crashes were turning collisions, with one involving a bicyclist traveling westbound. Two resulted in non-fatal injuries and one property damage only. At the intersections of Rock Way 1 Scenic Avenue, there was one reported crash within a five-year period. The crash involved a pedestrian crossing Scenic Avenue and being struck by an eastbound traveling vehicle that had a blind spot due to the morning sun. All collisions along Scenic Avenue occurred between 6:00-8:00a.m. and 1:00-3:00 p.m., which is during the school a.m. and p.m. peak periods when congestion is highest. The type of collision (tuming) occurring along Scenic Avenue within the study area is common for stop -controlled intersections, where drivers from side streets are turning onto and off of the mainline based on the availability of adequate gaps in traffic. School traffic is an added factor that contributes to higher spikes in traffic with a greater mix of pedestrians and bicyclists during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods, but even considering this, the number of crashes reported within a five-year period is fairly low. Overall, the crash analysis does not raise any safety concerns regarding the number, type, or severity of collisions reported in the study area that would require further investigation. SA TJ1An(PUPTRIWh �nG1nCERrnG, LL ( I, Dec 6, 2018 j R-1-8 to Civic ZC I Traffic Impact Analysis 114 27 IV. SITE TRAFFIC Trip Generation Trip generation calculations for the proposed zone change to Civic Zoning (C) were prepared utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 10'x' Edition. An ITE rate was used for land use code 522 — Middle School ! Junior High. The Civic Zone is a new zone in the City of Central Point that allows community services, religious assembly, parks &open spaces, and elementary and middle schools as outright permitted uses. The actual use on this site is planned as a future fire station, but that will be evaluated at the time of site development and will be a conditional use within Civic Zoning. For purposes of the zone change analysis, potential traffic generations were based on the highest traffic generator of the permitted uses, which is a middle school, To determine the number of trips, we estimated a school on 1.76 acres would have approximately 107 students based on comparisons with the adjacent Scenic Middle School and their current enrollment. No pass -by or internal trip reductions were taken. All trips were considered new trips to the transportation system, Table 8 provides a summary of generations. ITE descriptions and graphs are provided in Appendix B. Table 8 — Development Trip Generations Land Use Unit Size Daily Rate Daily Trips Peak Hour Rates Pak Hour Trlpa AM PM AM PM Total In Out Total In Out 522—Middle School Strident 107 2.13 228 0.58 0.35 62 33 29 37 17 20 Total Trips 228 62 33 29 37 1" 29 DU _ dwelling unit Trip Distribution and Assignment Development trips were distributed based on existing traffic patterns at Scenic Middle School in the study area. They varied depending upon which peak hour was being evaluated. During the a.m. peak hour, traffic to the site was shown to be roughly a 50/50 split, but traffic leaving the site predominantly was shown to go to the east (65%). During the p.m. peak hour; most traffic was shown to come from (75%) and go to (61%) the east. Refer to Figures 3a and 3b for development distribution percentages and trip assignments. 5.O. ThI)wpoPHITIOd-[061ntII?Id6, Dec 6, 2018 I R-1-8 to Civic ZC 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 1 15 28 Figure 3a : Development Trip Distribution & Percentages, AM Peak Hour 35% -o-- 55% o--55% —� NOT TO SCALE 7 1~ 0 M to 0 c to �" 7 a !. 0 (Civic Potential Trips) 62 AM Trips 33 in, 29 out Ski' AURORA LN MUM"" D -h -C40" T-R-INSDO-ATATION-IMMUIM6. LL( Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim. parducciftmail. com h0 J moo 5J T a 14 9 0 2r% Ox 48 G VICTORIA WY r W PRINCESS WY WINDSOR WY KINGS WY Scenic Avenue Zone Change (R-1-8 to Civic) Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon Figure 3b : Development Trip Distribution & Percentages, PM Peak Hour 40% 0 N6T TO SCALE 20% 31% D D +} D 3 y f 13 4 mac_ p=�C sC�NrC'�I`E � 7 � n moo V � Z Site , 50% (Civic Potential Trips) 36 PM Trips 16 in, 20 out 40% AURORA LN ti G VICTORIA WV W I PRINCESS WY 3 0 U WINDSOR WY KINGS WY SOOT."ZAN 0"40N Scenic Avenue Zone Change TUNSDOATTITION LL( (R-1-8 to Civic) Medford, Oregon 97504 Traffic Impact Analysis ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6673 email: kim. parducciftmail. com Central Point, Oregon V. YEAR 2018 BUILD CONDITIONS Year 2018 Build Description Build conditions represent no -build conditions for a study area with the addition of proposed development trips considered. Build conditions are compared to no -build conditions to determine what impacts and/or mitigation measures will result from proposed development. Build conditions are evaluated in this analysis for the year 2018. Year 2018 build traffic volumes during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours are provided in Figures 4a and 4b. I Year 2018 Build Intersection Operations Year 2018 build traffic volumes were evaluated at key intersections under p.m. peak hour conditions. Results are summarized in Table 9. Table 9 - Year 2018 Build Intersection Operations, AM and PM Peak Hours PercentileQueue 1 en ths, AM/PM Peak Hours _ Intersection Performance Traffic Year 2018 Build Available Link Standard Control Movement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour l,'pton Road / Scenic Avenue LOS D TWSC F, (SB) F, (SB) Rock Way / Scenic Avenue LOS D 'TWSC C, (SB) C, (SB) Scenic Middle School i Scenic Avenue None TWSC D, (NB) C, (NB) LOS=Leve] of Service, TWSC=Two-vvay stop controlled, NQ—northbound, S13—southbound 425 Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic Westbound Lefurhrough/Right Results of the analysis show the intersection of Upton Road / Scenic Avenue continuing to have a failing level of service for the southbound left turn movement on Upton Road. No other intersection movements are shown to exceed the City's LOS "D" standard under year 2018 build conditions. ! Refer to Appendix C for synchro output sheets. Year 2018 Build 95t4 Percentile Queuing Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTraffic to determine 95th percentile queue lengths at study area intersections under year 2018 build conditions. Queue lengths were then rounded up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length) and reported in Table 10 for the p,m. peak hour unless shown in the a,m, to be higher, Table I0 — Year 2018 Build 95`6 PercentileQueue 1 en ths, AM/PM Peak Hours _ Intersection / Available Link 9r For ewltile l� XceedvaE ua Movement Distance (Ft) Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway AM PM Scenic Avenue / Rock Way Eastbound Leffi'Through/Right 425 25 25 Westbound Lefurhrough/Right 350 25 25 - Southbound Lef3/Through/Righf 650 50 50 Northbound Left/Through/Right 200 50 50 - f.fl_ TRRtlJpaATim tin $iIGINr�R(nG, Eli I, Dec 6, 2018 j R-1-8 to Civic LC i Traffic Impact Analysis !Is 31 Table 10 Continued — Year 2018 Build 951° >percentile Quaue Len its, AMIPM Peak Hours Intersection I Available Link 95° Percentile Litteded or Movement Distance (Ft) Queue Wgt# a Blocked Roadway AM PM Scenic MS / Scenic Avenue Eastbound ThroughTight 500 25 25 Westbound Left/Through 425 75 50 - Northbound I.,eftMight 360 12.5 125 - Upton Road i Scenic Avenue Eastbound Left 150 50 75 - Eastbound Through/Right 350 25 25 - Westbound Left 425 25 25 - Westbound Through/Right 450 25 50 - Northbound Left 100 25 25 - Northbound Through,,'Right 200 25 50 - Southbound Left 225 100 125 - Southbound Through/Right 225 75 75 Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold; italic Results of the queuing analysis show small increases in queue lengths at study area intersections under year 2018 build conditions. The northbound left turn queue length at: Scenic Middle School on Scenic Avenue remains the same. The southbound left and through/right turn movements both increase slightly on Upton Road at Scenic Avenue under build conditions. Neither queue is shown to exceed its available storage. Refer to Appendix D for a full queuing and blocking report. Year 2018 Build Turn Lanes Turns lanes are not evaluated at the time of plan map amendment or zone change because exact development details are not known at this time. They will be evaluated at the time of development on Scenic Avenue at all access points. f.®. TunNrna-PrnTlorf Lt( I Dec 6; 2018 R-1-8 to Civic ZC j Traffic Impact Analysis 1 19 32 Figure 4a : Year 2018 Build Traffic Volumes, AAS Peak flour TU"SPOATAT10N �hGIH IIID, LL( Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim. parduccica gmall. com Scenic A venue Zone Change (R-1-8 to Civic) Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon Figure 4b : Year 2018 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour 0 NOT T6 -SCALE 0 m 0 c � O N 40 310255 255 13 Site AURORA LN SOUTTIZRN MUM T tANSDONNATION -UNCALUING. LLC Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim. parduccica gmail, corn E- G oc VICTORIA WY "+ PRINCESS WY WINDSOR WY KINGS WY Scenic Avenue Zone Change (Fii -1-8 to Civic) Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon VI. FUTURE YEAR 2038 NO -BUILD AND BUILD CONDITIONS Future Year 2038 No -Build Description Future year 2038 no -build conditions represent future year conditions for a study area without consideration of proposed development trips, This condition is evaluated to determine how a study area will be impacted by future background growth without traffic from proposed development trips. Background growth was derived using growth rates from the Interchange Area Management Plan (TAMP) for Exit 33 and volume comparisons between counts in 2010 and 2018 for 10" Street. The IAMP estimated 0.7% of growth per year on 10`I' Street between 2010 and future year 2034. We rounded that up to 1% to be conservative and applied it to all streets within the study area. Refer to Figures 5a and 5b for future year 2038 no -build traffic volumes during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Future Year 2038 Build Description Future year 2038 build conditions represent future conditions for a study area with background growth and proposed development trips considered. Build conditions are compared to no -build conditions to determine what kind of impacts will result from proposed development under future conditions. Future build conditions are evaluated in this analysis for the planning year of 2038. Refer to Figures 6a and 6b for future year 2038 build traffic volumes during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Intersection Operations Future year 2038 no -build and build traffic volumes were evaluated at study area intersections during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours to determine how background growth and proposed development trips impact the transportation system. Results of the analysis are summarized in Table 11. Table 1 i — Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Intersection Operations, AM and PM Peak Hours Performance Future Year 2038 Future Year 2038 lotersection- Standard No -Build Build PM F (SH) Upton ltoad / Scenic Avenue AM PM LOS D F(S13) F(SB) AM F (SB) Rock Way / Sccnic tivenue LOS D C. (SB) C, (sB) C, (SB) C. (se) Scenic -Middle School : Sccnic Avc Nona F" (NB) C, (NB) F, (NB) C, (NB) I ()N-1 "ol nf$wn�ir,� Tw_sf;.="wQ-,vay ,top controlled, 1,I8=northbound, SR-aouthbound NOW Exceeded performance standards exe shoAwi :n bold, italic Results of the analysis show tile. intersection of Upton Road and Scenic Avenue continues to exceed its performance standard under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions. The northbound movement at Scenic Middle School on Scenic Avenue is also shown to exceed LOS "D", but there is no performance standard for a private driveway so this isn't considered failing as much as it's noted to have a fair amount of delay during the a.m. peak hour, which includes both the school drop off and commuter morning traffic. When the subject property is developed with a specific use, a traffic analysis will evaluate the need for a center turn lane on Scenic Avenue in the study area and the re- routing potential of school traffic if Rock Way is extended and provides an alternate access. For purposes of the zone change analysis, the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) requires that an i.Q. hennrrnrrnil0ti fti0 ilfNHG, LLDec 6, 2018 R-1-8 to Civic 1C;'I rafflic impact Analysis 122 35 analysis determine whether the functional classification of streets serving the property would need to be changed as a result of proposed development or any Facility degraded beyond no -build conditions, Both intersections in Table 1 I that are shown to have traffic movements exceeding LOS "D" are no worse than under no -build conditions, and the functional classification is not shown to change for any study area street as a result of the proposed zone change to Civic, so the TPR is shown to be satisfied. Refer to Appendix E for synchro output sheets. Future Year 2038 N® -Build and Build 95th Percentile Queuing Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTraffic to determine 95"' percentile queue lengths at study area intersections under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions. Queue lengths were then rounded up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length) and reported for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours in Table 12. Table 12 — Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build 95`" Pereentile Queue Lengths, PM Peek Flour 95n' Percentile 95m Percentile Intersection I Available Link Queue Lengths QU469 Lengths Mdvement Distance (Ft) No -Build Bniid Alit PM AM PM Scenic Avenue / Rock Way Eastbound Left/Through/Right 425 25 25 25 25 Westbound Left? [Through/Right 350 25 25 25 25 Southbound Lef glirough/Right 650 50 50 50 50 Northbound Left/T}trou h/Ri ht 200 NA NA 50 50 Scenic NIS / Scenic Avenue Eastbound Through/Right 500 25 25 25 25 Westbound Left/Through 425 75 50 75 50 Northbound LefilRight 360 150 125 175 150 I'll, Pion Road / Scenic Avenue Eastbound Left 150 75 75 75 75 Eastbound Through/Right 350 25 50 25 50 Westbound Left 425 25 25 25 25 WesiboundThrough/Right 450 25 75 25 75 Northbound Left 100 25 25 25 25 Northbound Through/Right 200 50 50 25 50 Southbound Lefl 225 125 175 150 175 Southbound Through/Right 225 100 125 100 125 Notc Fred perforrmAva standards are shown in Wd, Italic Results of the queuing analysis show small increases in queue lengths at study area intersections under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions. The northbound left turn queue length at Scenic Middle School and Scenic Avenue increases from 125 feet in year 2018 to 175 feet (a.m. peak hour) and 150 feet (p.m. peak hour), respectively in the future year 2038, Similarly, the southbound left and through/right movements on Upton Road at Scenic Avenue also increase under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions. No link distances are shown to be exceeded as a result of the increases, however. Refer to Appendix F for a full queuing and blocking report. �,0. lnNOPOJ7 RHON EH(INL11 NG, LL( j Dec 6, 2018 1 R-1-8 to Civic Z.0 j Traffic Impact Analysis 123 36 d Figure 5a : Future Yr 2038 No -Build Traffic Volumes, AM Peak Hour 0 NOT TO SCALE s OEN�C�kl& 3104j 135 " # 130 1 I15 u Z H Z O u Site AURORA LN SOUT-Hu" MON TUNSPUTATION-EKINZRING, LLC Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim. parducciftmail. com C VICTORIA WY 1 a PRINCESS WY 3 WINDSOR WY KINGS WY Scenic Avenue Zone Change (R-1-8 to civic Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon -PO RO0 0 470 24.1 4 0 NOT TO SCALE s OEN�C�kl& 3104j 135 " # 130 1 I15 u Z H Z O u Site AURORA LN SOUT-Hu" MON TUNSPUTATION-EKINZRING, LLC Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim. parducciftmail. com C VICTORIA WY 1 a PRINCESS WY 3 WINDSOR WY KINGS WY Scenic Avenue Zone Change (R-1-8 to civic Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon Figure 5b : Future Yr 2038 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour SOUTAUH O"cnn TA-INSPOATATION LK Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim. parducciftmail. com Scenic Avenue Zone Change (R-1-8 to Civic) Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon Figure 6a : Future Yr 2038 Build Traffic Volumes, AM Peak Hour SOUTUD" OU40" T-RANSPOATATION 1KINZWK, LLC Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email.• kim.parducci�7a gmail. com Scenic Avenue Zone Change (R-1-8 to Civic) Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon Figure 6b : Future Yr 2038 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour SOUT-Hu" 0U6ON TATINSPOATATION 1KIN"AlK, LLC Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim.parducci ftmail. com Scenic Avenue Zone Change (R-1 w8 to Civic) Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon VII. CONCLUSIONS The findings of the traffic impact analysis conclude that the proposed zone change from R-1-8 to Civic on 37S2W03AB tax lots 4400, 4500, and 4600 is not shown to degrade the performance of any study area intersection such that it would cause an intersection to fail that was not otherwise failing or make an intersection worse that was already failing under existing or future conditions. Intersection operations, roadway classifications, and safety conditions were evaluated to address potential impacts to the transportation system. Results of the analysis show the following: f The intersection of Upton Road and Scenic Avenue is shown to exceed the City's level of service (LOS) "D" performance standard and operate at a LOS "F" under existing year 2018 no -build conditions. The intersection continues to operate at LOS "F" under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions, and will require mitigation. The type of mitigation will be evaluated and recommended at the time of development, however, when actual development is known and true impacts can be addressed. This analysis was undertaken to address issues of compliance with the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Code, and Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) in Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) Chapter 660, Division 012. Based upon our analysis, it is concluded that streets and intersections that serve the subject property will accommodate projected a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes for permitted uses under Civic zoning without requiring a change in the functional classification of any existing or planned facility, or degrade the performance of an existing or planned facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the City's Transportation System Plan (TSP) or Comprehensive Plan, f.O. I010 , Lf f 1 Dec 6, 2018 1 R-1-8 to Civic ZC. Traffic Impact Analysiq 128 41 Scenic Avenue R --l--8 to Civic Zone Change APPENDICES A -G December 61 2018 Prepared By: fOUTRI-RH ffucON TR-niyfPop TgTION[NG m -r -c *N , LLC SUUTWI-AN D,p-con T.ft,gmfD0,oT.fiTl17N ,bionzamc l L i Appendix A Traffic Count Data, Seasonal Adjustments 43 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Rock Way East-West: Scenic Ave Weather: Clear, Warm Veh Type: All Vehicles File Name : rockway-scenicave Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 10/9/2018 Page No : 1 44 Groups Printed- All V9h(ote8 From North From East From South From West Start Time Left Thai 4ipin Pud:. qp T:� , : _L.t:ft - Tnru Right R PeA5 ; r„-, Left Thru rrr� reds : 1 Leit ruu Rppi . - Peds -I , Tri, it !#u a 07:00 AM 6 0 0 0 6 0 24 0 0 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 33 0 0 34 64' 07:15 AM 8 0 0 0 8 0 33 6 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 1 45 0 0 46 93 07:30 AMI 10 0 1 0 11 0 45 2 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 2 78 0 0 80 138 07Ei _ �� eQ_ 1 0 9_. 0 44 5 0 49 r 4 0 0 0 0, 0 81 0 _ 0 131 139. Total i 32 0 2 0 34 0 146 13 0 159 ! 0 0 6 6 0 4 237 0 0 241. 434 08:00 AM ! 4 0 1 0 5 0 54 9 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 66 1 134 08:15 AM 7 0 1 8 16 0 54 6 0 60 ! 0 0 0 0 0 1 83 0 6 90 166 08:30 AM ; 8 0 3 1 12 0 54 8 0 62 0 0 0 0 O 2 125 0 0 127 201 OEt;45 AM �- -- _ 1. _ 0 _7 . 0 9} __ 6' 0 __48 __-__ D ___ 6 48 ! 84 Total 25 0 6 9 40 0 12� 2� 0 2 0 0 0^ 0 3 322 0 6 3311 585 BREAK 03:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 42 3 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 3 41 0 0 44 90 03:15 PM 5 0 1 6 12 0 58 6 1 67 0 0 0 0 0 5 49 0 0 54 133 03:30 PM 8 0 6 15 29 0 62 7 2 71 0 0 0 0 0 1 106 0 0 107 207 44_0 P 0 2- 2 11� 9 7�- 13 88 , 0 0 0 Q 4.. �_ 79 0 38 t 73 2i2 Total .� 21 0 - 9 23 53 1 0 237 31 --0 3 271 0 0 0 0 01 11 269 0 38 3181 642 04:00 PM 8 0 0 0 8 0 61 8 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 2 73 ; 150 04:15 PM 4 0 2 0 6 0 45 9 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 1 47 0 0 48 1 108 04:30 PM 6 0 1 0 7 0 65 15 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 51 138 QW,, 5 PM B- 0 0 6 0 56 15 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 39 91 168 Total 24 _0._ 0 3 27 0 227 47 0 274 r 0 6 0 0 0 2 -.51- 220 - -6 41 263 I 564 05:00 PM 4 0 3 3 10 0 67 12 0 79 0 0 0 0 0, 1 47 0 0 481 137 0515 PM 8 0 1 2 11 0 73 19 0 92 . 0 0 0 0 0 1 53 0 0 541 157 05:30 PM 10 0 2 0 12 0 73 10 0 83 : 0 0 0 0 0 4 56 0 0 60 155 P 8 0 0 9 0 89 6 �. i Q p 1 53 157 _0i:4 Total 30 __ 0 _ _1 7 5 421 0 302 47 0 - --95 349 ; - 6 6 0 _0 0 0 7 208 0 0 215 606 Grand Total 132 0 27 37 196 0 loos 165 3 1267 0 0 0 0 0 27 l268 0 85 1368 2831 Apprch % 67.3 0 13.8 16,9 0 86.7 13 0.2 0 0 0 0 2 91.8 0 6.2 Total % 4.7 0 1 1.3 6.9 0 38-8 5,8 0.1 44.8 j 0 0 0 0 0 1 44-4 0 3 48.3 44 i e SOUTHERNOREGON I TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Rock Way File Name : rockway-scenicave East-West: Scenic Ave Site Code 00000002 Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date : 10/9/2018 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No 2 45 From North From East From South R{r,•, nvu Left Peds StartLeft ThN Right i}rds Fvn '�w LER Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Red App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Int. Time North u ht s Tolai a ht s Total u ht s Totai I Total Peak Hour Analysts From 07:45 AM to 08:30 AM - Peak 1 of i I I Al.. Thm.-fitphL_ Poo � 0( .OI.. flI 0 i � 4f Peak Flour for Each Approach Begins at: i In - Peak F INi WAS AM +0 mins. OT 45 AM B 0 1 0 9 07 O5 AM 0 44 5 0 49 07 45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 07 45 AM 0 81 0 0 81 +15 mins. 4 0 1 0 5 0 54 9 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 66 +30 mins. ' 7 0 1 8 16 0 54 6 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 1 83 0 a 90 +45 mtns. 8 0 3 1_ 12 0 54 8. 0 62, 0 0 0 0 p; 2 125 0 4 12T Total volume 27 0 6 9 42 0 206 28 0 234 I 0 6 0 0 0 3 355 0 6 384 s.,Rpp-Tow : 643 0 I4-3 21,A _ 0 88 12 0 0 U. 0 0 0.8 1.6. PFIF .844 ,000 0 -. 81 ,B50 .--0d0 .964 .tf _QOQ _ _ 9201 .000 .660 .000 . .000 .000 -375 .97-5_ 710 --__0_ ,ano .2so 717 45 InAM .42 • Pgek l�gyf 1;4fi R{r,•, nvu Left Peds 4 --► Peak Hour Data North �_j 11� r I I Al.. Thm.-fitphL_ Poo � 0( .OI.. flI 0 i � 4f i In - Peak F INi WAS AM 45 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Rock Way East-West: Scenic Ave Weather: Clear, Warm Veh Type: All Vehicles File Name : rockway-scenicave Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 1019!2018 Page No :3 46 e+pp. Int, r'otal-i TOM . I 107 113 73 48 341 754 From North In - Peek Hpur. 03:30 PM From East Frc;rri South 64 t i r: VJSS; Start Left Thnt rr'� pude Left Thr Rig Ped App Left Thr i Rig ; Ped App Leri Thr Rig Ped Time r u ht - s Total - u , _ ht ;__ s, . Total u + 2' Peak Hour Analysis From 03:30 PM to 04:15 13M - Peak 1 of 1 o Peak Hour fpr Farah Approach 68g1•n" $t Q � � v 03 30 PM +0 mins. 8 0 6 15 29 62 7 2 71 03 30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 0 +15 mins. 7 0 2 2 11 0 75 13 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 2 73 0 38 +30 mins. 8 0 0 0 8 0 61 8 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 2 +45 mins. 4 0_ 2 0 6 0 45 9 0 54 Q_ 0 0 0 0 1 47 0 0 , ._ Total volume 27 _ _ 0 10 17 54 0 243 37 2 282 0 0 0 0 0 4 297 0 40 J App Told 50.. 0 14.5 31.5 0 86.2 1 _ 0;7 0 0 0 0 , 1.2 87.1 0..11.7 PHF ..B44_eQQO_ .417- .2Q3__A6Q W BsO ..7.1.2 _250 .801 .000 000 -No .000. oao�-.5Qa��QQ• _� -26$ 46 e+pp. Int, r'otal-i TOM . I 107 113 73 48 341 754 In - Peek Hpur. 03:30 PM 64 10: 0 27• 17 Right Thru Left Pecs 4 Peak Hour Data North V + 2' AJ VehialeeTI o Q � � v + o } LCR. .Tlpu., Ron Pea In - Peak Hour: 03:30 PM 46 e+pp. Int, r'otal-i TOM . I 107 113 73 48 341 754 47 L SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmaii.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Upton Road File Name : UptonScenic East-West: Scenic Avenue Site Code ; 00000003 Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date ; 10/9/2018 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No : 1 Groups Printed: A4 Vgk*t®s From North - _ From East _ _ F From South From Weal Slarl L@6 - ' ihO R�1 PeQ w.Z. Left_, •. T12r - ! Ri22 - PedOs - - o Left Thru i Right Peds tor. Left RV L Pe03S I f wi,To_M OT OO AM 3d 1 - 0 -l. .0 15 _iyp 16 17 -Thru 22 0 0 . � 391 - 116 07:15 AM31 0 22 1 54 i 0 16 32 0 48 1 1 1 3 6 17 34 2 15 68 jjj 176 07:30 AM 38 0 21 1 60 ' 2 24 31 0 57 2 0 2 0 4 27 59 0 0 86 207 07a45.Al - . 44__- 0-- 20 •• --_1 ,.5, _ 0 ._ 26 _ 35 ._� - ...69 3 1 7 3. 14 7d1a1. 129 0 74 3 206: 2 78 120 1 201 7 2 10 21 40 88 176 3 17 282 729 08:00 AM 31 08:15 AM 40 1 25 1 58 2 36 35 0 73 2 0 0 1 3 21 47 0 0 68 202 08:30 AM 39 2 3 22 24 1 0 65 66 0 1 38 38 20 25 0 1 58 65 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 24 64 0 3 91 214 _R45 AM - d _. --!1 k . 1 2- 7 16 1 45 . 1 1 1 1. 7 1- 9 4_, 24 15 107 39 0 0- 1 1 132.' O 272 Total 129 7 82 2 220 4 139 96 2 241 3 2 2 9 16' 84 257 0 5 346 C _135 823 ""' BREAK 03:00 PM 12 1 17 0 30 3 27 23 0 53 1 0 1 0 2 19 23 0 0 42 127 03:15PM 5 PMI 28 1 25 0 54 3 40 17 0 60 1 2 2 1 6 27 24 2 2 55 1 175 03:30 PM 35 1 28 3 67 4 39 25 0 68 2 4 7 1 14 37 85 1 12 135 1 284 . } 42 -- ---$_4 0 7 3 -- -0 . 123dI 1- 2 1 3. 7 24 34 2� 87 1 4 Total 117 4 104 3 228 ; 13 157 134 0 304 5 8 11 5 . 29 107 _ 166 - 3 43 319 1 860 04:00 PM 140 0 28 0 68 0 41 54 1 96 . 0 0 1 56 57 37 43 1 0 61 1 302 04.15 PM ! 58 1 20 0 79 1 0 33 34 0 67 1 0 3 0 4 : 23 36 1 28 88 238 0430 PMI 40 3 35 2 80 ! 3 45 33 0 81 0 1 1 23 25 34 31 1 3 69 255 04:45 PM 1 46 184 Tolal 1 5 2673 ' 2 44 34 _ 34 _114 , 1 _ 0 _ 0_ _ - 4l__ __ 42.1 _23 26 _ 2 _ _ 9 300 60 _ Z" _ i 164______2 5 163 155 35 358 2 1 5 120 128 117 136 5 40 298 1084 l05:00 PM 48 0 29 0 77 0 50 34 1 85 ' 0 1 0 0 1 31 43 1 3 78 241 05:15 PMI 62 0 41 0 103 1 2 51 40 0 93 0 0 1 1 2 17 35 0 2 54 252 05:30 PMI 50 05:44.PM-; 48 0 0 41 40 0 91 ; 891_ 0 3--4g- 42 34 26 0 76 731 0 1 1 0 2 430 45 1 0 76 247 Total T 208 0 151 �1 1 360 5 186 -0 - ---0- -7 30- -- -0 - 7--1131 1022 W2 133 1 3271 0 2 2 10 14 107 206 2 6 321 i Grand Total 767 16 520 11 1314 29 725 638 39 1431 17 15 30 165 227 501 941 13 111 15661 4538 Apprch % 58.4 1.2 39.6 0.8 2 50.7 44.6 2.7 7.5 6,6 13.2 72.7 32 60.1 0.8 7.1 Total % 16.9 0.4 11.5 0.2 29 0.6 16 14.1 0.9 31.5 0A 0.3 0.7 3.6 5 11 20.7 0.3 2.4 34 5 47 L { SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kilm.parducci@gmaill.com (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Upton Road File Name : UptonScenic East-West: Scenic Avenue Site Code : 00000003 Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date : 10/8/2018 i Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No : 2 From North From East From South From West Slam -- Thr Rtg Ped App. r Left Thr Rig Ped APP• Lelt Thr Rig Ped App. Ina. Time Lett Thru R,gin rads y <n; Left u ht 5 Total u ht s Total u ht s • Total Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:45 AM to 08:30 AM - Peak 1 of 1 in - Peek HW,, WP45 AM x34 — 154.-- _ _ I Right Thru Left Peds3; P#lk Hour for Ego ApproacbI. BQgln>� Peak Hour Data Peak �r v g cv ► North ;U 1- AA1�� I 07.45 AM �i; A�_ nIA r 07 45 AM � 1 C Q� OAM � P +0 mins. 44 0 20 1 65 0 26 35 1 62 3 1 7 3 14 25 61 1 2 891 +15 mins. 31 1 25 1 58 2 36 35 0 73 2 0 0 1 3 21 47 0 0 68 +30 mins. 40 2 22 1 65 0 38 20 0 58: 0 0 0 0 0 24 64 0 3 91 +45 mins.3$ 3 24 Q_ 6 B I 3$_ � 1- 0- 1 1 7 9 24 107 0 1 132. _ , . _ . _ m i (lar vau0 1'54 6 91 3 254 3 '138 . _ 115 _ 2 _.— 258 � _ - 5 _ . 2 - _ 8 _ _ 11 26 94 2T9 1 6 38D ' %App Taw 60.5 2.4 35.8 1 2 _ _ _1.2_53,5 — _ 44.6 0.8_ _. 19.2 77 309. 42.3 2.4,7 73.4 0.3 1,6 PHF ..875 - .50-Q -910 _,759- __.962 375_ .908__821 500 ,_,_.884 .417 -..5[10 2Se ..393 .464 940 052 250 .500 720. 48 in - Peek HW,, WP45 AM x34 — 154.-- _ _ I Right Thru Left Peds3; 41- 1 Peak Hour Data Peak �r v g cv ► North ;U 1- AA1�� I r � � 1 C X � P 101 In - Peek Hour 07;45 AM 48 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gnlail.com (541) 941-4148 cell j North-South: Upton Road File Name : UptonScenic J East-West: Scenic Avenue Site Code : 00000003 Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date : 1019/201$ Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No :3 49 i From North From fast. 1ZBs From sputh From West Start Left Thru Pish1 Peds�,o tr Lett Thr Rig Ped App- Lc8 Thr Rig Ped App. Lett Thr Rig Ped App, Inn Time a ht -s Total North u ht s Total qw u lu S Tptat Tolai Peak Hour Anaiysls From 03:30 PM to 04:15 PM - Peak 1 or 1 _. _ v N L_ a _ PQgk:louf l9ir +~ach Approach Begins at: - LACI -Thtu ROk Pads . 92,1, In - Peak Hour. 03.30 PM +0 mins. 1`03 3G PM I 35 1 28 3 67 4 39 25 0 1 68' 0.1 30 PM 2 4 7 1 14 03:30 PM 37 85 1 12 135 +15 mins. 42 1 34 0 77 3 51 69 0 123 1 2 1 3 7 24 34 0 29 87 +30 mins. 40 0 28 0 68 0 41 54 1 96 0 0 1 56 S7 37 43 1 0 81 +45 mins... 56 _ 1 . 2Q___ __4 . _ T$ ! 0 33.. .34 0_ 67 1 0. 3. 0 . 4 . 23 36 1 28 Be Tolal Volume 175 3 110 3 291 7 164 182 1 .3$l 4 6 12 60 82 121 198 3 69 391 �4 AP9,14)(0 6011 _ _-_1- - 37;0 _ -1 2 46.3 51.4 _ 0:3 1 4-9 7,3 14.6 73,7 309 50,6 - 0.8 17.8 ,A21 ..438 .$04 ,�69 ,w250 J2 9, .SpO -375 O��G� .380 ' -8+6 .58� .750..595 724 49 l In -Peak Hw,, 8130 PM 1ZBs Right Thru LaH Peds Peak Hour Data . P North T V 0; y�1 lY Y qw Fm 14&1 I � v N L_ a _ LACI -Thtu ROk Pads . 92,1, In - Peak Hour. 03.30 PM 49 SOUTPERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Scenic Middle School File Name : scenicave middleschool East-West: Scenic Avenue Site Code : 00000001— Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date : 10/9/2018 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No : 1 t raups Pointed- Unshif-ad 50 I i Scenic Ave Middle School Scenic Ave From North From East From South From West �. Stihl Tim®� Left Thru j _Rtptq Peds 1 ky rrd Le,fl Thru RghF ; Pods apy. ew , 1,r31i Thru I Rpi4 Peds ; Left Thru R Vu r' 10s app Tw _ n 7qtpiom 07:00 AM j 0 0 0 0 0' 3 22 0 15 40 0 0 2 0 2 0 29 2 14 45 87 07:15 AM ` 0 0 0 0 0 3 28 0 0 31 0 0 3 0 3 0 41 4 1 46 80 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 12 34 0 1 47 0 0 4 0 4 0 76 7 1 84 135 07:45 AM_;_ _ 0 - _0.. 0 0___ . 0_: - 21. 23 0 0 44 : 4 0 _ 11 0 15., 0 70 _ 17 1 88, 147 Total • D 0 0 0 0 39 107 0 16 1621 4 0 20 _ 0 24 0 216 30 17 263, 449 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 28 27 0 1 56 13 0 22 0 35 0 41 27 2 70 ' 161 0 8: 15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 34 22 0 0 56 21 0 35 0 56 0 53 40 7 1001 212 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 D 23 31 0 0 54 25 0 44 0 69 0 81 34 6 121 244 05c45.A11a- 0 0 0 A 8.-._19 0 1 28 3 ®_ 12 t? 0_ � Total r .. .0 0 0 0 D 0 93 99 _ 0 2 . 194 62 0 113 0 - _75 . 175 ; 0 _-38 211 •.,.I 107 __.D 15 _ 333 702 """ BREAK 03:00 PM ; 0 0 0 0 0 4 38 0 0 42 2 0 2 0 4. 0 42 12 0 54 100 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 17 42 0 0 59 2 0 8 0 10 0 46 9 0 55 124 03;30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 29 39 0 0 68 33 0 44 9 86 0 63 9 1 73 227 18• 59 0 P _77 • 10 0 24 1 35. 0 51 6 1 53. 170_ Total 0 0 0 0 0 68 178 0 0 246. 47 0 78 10 135 D 202 36 2 240 621 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 S 55 0 0 61 6 0 21 3 30 0 50 1 1 52 143 04;15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 43 0 0 47 8 0 1 0 9 0 47 1 0 48 104 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 61 0 0 66 2 0 6 0 8 0 45 2 2 49 123 i14;15PM_r 0 0 0 0 0 6 _50 0 0 so 0 0 1 17 18_ 0 _51 6 1.4 71.. 145 Total! 0 6 6 6 0 21 209 6 0 230 16 0 29 20 65 0 193 10 17 220 515 05:00 PM ' 0 0 0 0 0 21 49 0 0 70 ; 10 0 24 4 38 0 44 10 1 55 163 05:15 PM 0 0 0 D 0 25 49 0 0 74 5 0 12 0 17 0 42 12 1 55 146 05:30 PM ! 0 0 0 0 0 26 49 0 0 75 8 0 20 0 28 0 40 21 0 til 164 05:45 PM , _0 , 0 _ _d _Q .._ 0 37 53 0 0 90. 7 0 _ 14 0 21_ ?2 0 60 171 Total' 0 0 0 0 0 109 200 0 0 309, 30 0 76 4 . 104 _0___,38, 0 164 85 2 231 644 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 330 793 0 18 1141 159 0 310 34 503 0 986 248 53 1287 2931 Apprch % r0 0 0 0 28.9 69.5 0 1.6 31.6 0 61.6 6 .6 0 76.6 19.3 4 .1 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 11.3 27.' 0 0.6 38 9 54 0 106 1.2 172 0 33.6 8.5 1.8 43.9 50 I i SOUT.HERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Scenic Middle School File Name : scenicave_middleschool East-West: Scenic Avenue Site Code : 00000001 Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date : 10/9/2018 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No :2 51 In - PBsk•h(our 07:45 AM Scenic Ave n Middle School Scenic Ave 0: o 0. 0 From North Right Th:t LeI1 Ped& From East From South From West II Start Left Tim, R!gh; Peds o ro;ai Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig _ Ped App, h Int. Times North u hl s Total u Tit s notal u ht s Totat Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:45 AM to 08-30 AM - Peak 1 of 1 i N , N Peak Hour for Each Approach.Begins at: L04- Thru Right Poos 83[ G 112 0 1T5; +0 mins. 07 45 AM 0 0 0 0 0' 07 45 AM 21 23 0 0 44 d5 AM 4 0 11 0 15 07 45 AM 0 70 17 1 86 +15 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 28 27 0 1 56 13 0 22 0 35 0 41 27 2 70 +30 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 34 22 0 0 56 21 0 35 0 56 0 53 40 7 100 +45 mins. 0 0 0 D 0 23 31 0 0 54 25 0 44_ 0 69. 0 all y°4 J$_ 7g1 Total volume 0 D 0 0 0 1D6 103 0 1 210 63 0 112 0 175 0 245 118 _ 16 378 ,7YRpp.TdW_ . Q. 0. 0 0_ _ 50.5 49 0 0.5 36 0 _ (34 0. I 6 64.6 37,81_. 4.2 _ pHF- 9,PQ,. ,600 .0.00..,00b 600 779 831, �QQO .259 .89$'.f3__Q..000 .fi36 . bbd ,834 ,.0.00 .7L8_,Ti3 :.571_ 51 In - PBsk•h(our 07:45 AM n 0: o 0. 0 Right Th:t LeI1 Ped& 1 l/ Peak Hour Data Q JJ ? b North 2 2 .air a i N , N L04- Thru Right Poos 83[ G 112 0 1T5; In • ?sstk T,IpLr: 47:45 nM 51 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci rr gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Scenic Middle School File Name : scenicave middleschool East-West: Scenic Avenue Site Code ; 00000001^ Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date : 10/912018 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No :3 52 Scenic Ave 9...-_.Q - ..4.! Middle School Right 'Thru Le41 Peds Scenic Ave From North From East Peak Hour Data From South From West Start Left Thru Right Peds Left rnu Rig Ped APP' Left Thr Rig Ped A 1 Left Thr Fri Ped 1 To j Int, j Time ic ht Total u t s Tots 37; 0 90 13 u hl s 1 al I --Total J Peak Hour Analysis From 03:30 PM to 04 15 PM - Peak 'I of 1 to Peak !-loaf. [::.'sC• rl�t __ - - ..__ Resk_FJo}x for Each Appraa0 Begins at: 03 30 PM +0 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 03 30 PM 29 39 0 0 68 i 03 30 PIA 33 0 44 9 86 03 N PM 0 63 9 1 73 +15 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 18 59 0 0 77 ; 10 0 24 1 35 . 0 51 6 1 56' +30 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 55 0 0 61 6 0 21 3 30 0 50 1 1 52 +45 mina.- . D 0 0 p _ - _ D_�- 4 43 --_- _ 0 47 I. 0 . 1 0 9 0 47 1 0 - Total volume 0 0 0 _8 57 0 -- - 90 13 _ 160 0 211 17 3 231 .. App --- Q 0 _ _2.2.5 77.5 n 4 _ 35.$ ._.- 0 ---- - 2 8.1 0 9637 . Z ..1:3. YT F i .400 _ ..Q 0- QOQ _�4�4. _ . 000 .R91 -. 836 _ 49t? 6017 82i ;..432_ .t}00-_...511 .5 _ _3�_i. .4+35 .OPO .837 i .478 .7${? ,791--1 52 9...-_.Q - ..4.! Right 'Thru Le41 Peds Peak Hour Data North H G T �.. .. LIIIIt 11114 to fi ic d P Lail Thru R ght Pr:ds 37; 0 90 13 1w to Peak !-loaf. [::.'sC• rl�t 52 53 four4.1-Pn ORz(;nn T,R,gNf aNPT,AT ION NGIN��?fNG, L L Appendix B ITE Trip Generation Data, Background Growth 54 Lard Use 522 Middle School!/Junior i -sigh School I ' Description I it middle or jun�or high school serves students who have completed eien'tOntary school and have not { yet entered high school, Both public and private middle schools,rjunior high schools are included in ttri.s land use. Elementary school (Land Use 520), high school (Land Use 530), private school (K-8) t.Land Use 534), primate school SK�12; {Land Use 536), and charter elementary school (Land Use r 537) are related uses. Additional Data The percentage of students at the .sites who were transported to school via bus varied considerably_ Due to the varied transit ,and school bus usage at ttlese sites, it is desirable that future studies f snchide additional, detail on the percentage of students who were bused to scftool and the percentage that were dropped off and picked up, Bemuse the ratio of floor space to student population varies widely among the schools surveyed, the number of students may be a more reliable independent Variable on which to establish trip i generation rates, ilrrte,of-day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A- For the two general .urban suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle vc4umes du?ing the AM and Phi on a weekday were counted between 7.00 and 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 and 6:00 p_m- respectively. The sites were sLI"yed in the 1990s, the 21OWs, and the 2010s in California, Connecticut, Delaware Florida, Minnesota, Nebraska, Oregon, Pennsylvania. and Tennessee_ Source Numbers 431. 444. 534, 536, 564. 575, 592 611, '71-9, 867, 936, 940 i. :b1 wrL- ata • III ilio a1 ;Land IJiter. li0ll—�,�u 55 I . I� Middle School/Junior High School (522) Vohlcle Trip Endre vs: SWdomis On s: Vft*Wsy ' 8vWnWIocat *m General UrbanlBuburbsn Number of Studies: 10 Avg Num of Students: 1079 - i3iwWna! ®istribubon 50% enteAing, 50% [exiting While Trip Gerwntion per Student Awrrai�jr Rate RL—w� 0 �8*6 standbrt4 i 00atknn 21 1.48-2.81 046 T-ap GwawmWn Meftuvl 10M E=dloon • Vcaiums 2 Lista , tnat ALMnsi (Land Urm 500- 56 00-56 Middle School/Junior High Scho 1 (522) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Students On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, On* Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m Setting/Location., General UrbantSuburban 22 A,,.', Nut- roi '�-�"-Ujderjs 937 1D i r 11CIO 1FIP %jenerazion per mudent A,erage Rang -o of Ratc-s DeoatIK-W) 058 006-"129 0.32 Data Plot and Equation X. x x x x xx x x x Study Site Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given Average Rate R'=.,.. Middle School/Junior High School t522) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Students On a: Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator Setting/LocatIon. General UrbantSuburban NUM,,beof Sudles 20 X,,,L ,; Dlrec�I,cnal DistriLhulion 46-.entteiioo 54�,- (,,xitr*,C',, Vehicle Trip Generation peir Student Data Plot and Equation ,!U� X = Nombe, Study Site Fihed Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) s 0.96 Ln(X) - 0,86 Ave -rage Rate R'= 0.58 W-7 1r,p Gwiooral;cf, klanual !0t58LU;W,)rj 2. Dam - Insfitulto.nal tLarid UtiE3 600-599) 311 IOTH tZ i 4 `sn s£J •� 1 r Sabi v �T N ton —OL J I 4 � oeL 01, 1 r- s� gm� 7 OEI tSSZ m m +-0 �f P n a o oLzs 1 r z� Q m� 58 � 0 J 1 Oz -j 1 Qw sLl ~ a YI t SGZ ti "' � •--SZT Ji4 rse sbL-� •� 1 r OK— OE') K—OE7 .t t OE J j 4 `5L 2—t 2� 1D iM n ^ o —Or oLj f r 0—• gp s1 ^ N �- 0E J 1 4 ro ons � l r OS -1 59 u 4 r ►, N n o a N O= o d � 00'0 O ti O OI L; O Q O amm � N LL to o dd d � £0'0 D Jj I. .ycs d o ` py 6 a f" v� m oe � 90 t0 Q a a v^i a li 4 Q a 6ru� it r C5 d a 0 N 1� o N 00 N a a ss� O N p ZZ'O 0 o E9'0 0 Ul O oil COLO 0 a V- N 0 b9'O-F^ o o u p � _ m o o d Z 0 ° M O6 � n1 d O N G co Q 0 Jnl o Q -i •�. yn'Q J �� o w m g � � o E N N E E E E QLI)ojmWW,H L5 oho +-OZ J t 4;- ,q rS9 J '1 t J d 4 rsoz DSJ -s t r DE1 �M� m g n LOTb —0 '1 t m � n a � o 1 `- asz set a szJ °1 t .moi r az 1 1 oom 109E . Ln �i •--OEY d 4 GYY OGT T r a SES 00 a M LSE O O ♦-7 J d 4 rsT z . m L 9z G_ O —0 J d SOT DLJ 7 t r 0–+ amo S� t SE mem �z d {0 st, 1 i S- 09 -� 60 w V o a YO'0 G 0 0 � O 99'0 v o d o d a u m m :r m v .Z -£T'0 J O �de1 rOT•T5 L'.T D' ZTl i t r L D'o 0TT deo oa mea m� o.o LSb03 0 0 d u � m n 0 0 dd �- D xsa� jj r 0 9001 0 0 a a a J TZ�O�I. '1 tt r o m o a a < wu Io .+ .–h9'0 0 x950 0 d Cl 9L'07+ 0 a ti :J m m C O P a •dd �• + LL 0 7 In �a d a d -id- m m 61 CL N d O a 10 0 r A O W d N M L 3 C! IL No- a aD � E 0 E E m C 5 p r r r r • SOUTA�JtN I OJt�GON TJtAHf DOQTAT/OM � -Inimirr,41nc L L C f Appendix C � Year 2018 No -Build and Build, �. Synchro Output L L 81 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Scenic Ave & Rock Way 11/17/2018 Inte Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement SBR - L ane Configurations Traffic Vol, vetdh 5 370 215 30 30 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 370 215 30 30 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 9 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT ChannelIdd - None - None - None Storage Length - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 5 6 3 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 474 276 38 38 6 ma oriminar N nrl t is art Niirar2 Conflicting Flow All 314 0 0 781 304 Stage 1 - - 295 - Stage 2 - 486 - Crdical Hdwy 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1258 366 740 Stage 1 - 760 - Stage 2 - 623 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1258 364 734 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 364 - Stage 1 - 755 - Stage 2 - 623 - Approacch EB WB S$ HUO Control Delay, S 0.' 0 i6A HCM LOS C EE:, EBT , Br VUBR SSLnl Capacity (vehlhl 1258 - - 392 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 0.114 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - 15.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.4 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Year 2018 No-Build—AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 62 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave 11/17/2018 intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7 Milicr1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.569 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 503 Movement. EST SR WEL 4:S T NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� - - 423 •1 y Oritical Hdwy Traffic Vol, veh/h 255 125 110 110 65 120 Future Vol, veh/h 255 125 110 110 65 120 Conflicting Peds, #mr 0 16 16 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - 0 265 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 Peak Hour Fedor 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 11 6 7 15 10 Mvmt Flow 327 160 141 141 83 154 Ma UMinar '42'ar1 F.'SI; ori Milicr1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.569 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 503 0 846 423 HCM Lane LOS Stage 1 - - 423 3A - 0.5 Stage 2 - - 423 - Oritical Hdwy - 4.16 6.55 6.3 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.55 Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 3.635 3,39 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1041 316 614 Stage 1 - - 634 - Stage 2 634 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 1027 265 606 S Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 265 - Stage 1 626 - Stage 2 540 Approach Eta VVB NB HCAI Control Delay, a 0 4.5 24.4 HCM LOS C t,ifli4' Lang=Waiol r4j -m -NI-I. 1 EE EP -7 VV5L W57 Capacity (vehlh) 417 - 1027 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.569 0.137 - HCM Control Delay (a) 24.4 ... 8,1 0 -- HCM Lane LOS C - A A HCM 95th °%tile Q(veh) 3A - 0.5 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Year 2018 No -Build -AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 63 HCM 2010 TWSC 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St 1111712018 Intersactloo Int Delay, slveh 12.4 Movement UL EST EOR V. -SL kNfBT l''4BR N3L NST NBR 39L SST SBR Lane Configurafiarns w 1• 'ti T. � TI R E Traffic Vol, veh/h 100 300 1 3 145 120 5 2 8 160 6 95 Future Vol, veh/h 100 300 1 3 145 120 5 2 8 160 6 95 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 2 0 6 6 0 2 3 0 11 11 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 100 - 100 - 200 Veh In Medlan Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 3 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 4 0 7 Mvmt Flow 119 357 1 4 173 143 6 2 10 190 7 113 Ma orftnor M 'ort Ma ort Mimi Minot Cod irting Flow All 318 0 0 364 0 0 918 928 375 868 857 250 Stage 1 - - 602 602 - 255 255 - Stage 2 - - 316 326 - 613 602 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.14 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.14 5.5 - Criticat Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6,14 5,5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.536 4 3.363 PotCap-1 Maneuver 1204 1206 254 270 676 271 297 777 Stage 1 - - 490 492 - 745 700 - Stage 2 - - 699 652 - 476 492 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1202 1200 195 241 666 242 265 774 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 195 241 - 242 265 - Stage 1 - 439 441 - 670 697 - Stage 2 - 587 649 - 417 441 - Appfoach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.1 0.1 16,3 40.5 HCM LOS C E Minor LaneVh or ltlmr N80, N,St.n? EBL EBT EBR yVl L " �T Capacity (vehlli) 195 492 1202 1200 242 695 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 0.024 0.099 0.003 0.787 0,173 HCM Control Delay (s) 24 12.5 8.3 8 - 58.9 11.3 HCM Lane LOS C B A A F B HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) 0.1 0.1 0.3 0 - 5.8 0.6 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Year 2018 No -Build. -AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 64 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Scenic Ave & Rock Way 11/17/2018 Intersection Int Delay, siveh 0.8 Movement Eft EST yAIST WBR SSL S913 Lane Configurations 116 :t k B r( 0 - Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 310 255 40 28 10 Future Vol, veh/h 5 310 255 40 28 10 Conflicting Peds, Whr 2 0 0 2 0 17 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - D - Grade, % 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 5 3 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 356 293 46 32 11 Ma orlMinor ",1a ur1 tv a ur2 rlliroo' Conflicting Flow All 341 0 0 686 335 Stage 1 - - 318 - Stage 2 - - 368 - Cfical Hdwy 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Cr!Ucal Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1229 416 712 Stage 1 - 742 - Stage 2 - - 704 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cep -1 Maneuver 1227 412 701 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 412 - Stage 1 - 736 - Stage 2 - - - 703 - mach _ .lr8 W$ SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 13.6 HCM LOS B M in or L ar e W Rj c r Mvr-,l ESL EBT WBT Wt3R.5801 Capacity (vetvh) 1227 - - 462 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 0.095 HCM Coto] .Daky(s) 7.9 0 - 116 HCM Lane LOS A A - B HCM 95th We Q(veh) 0 - 0.3 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Year 2018 No -Build -PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 65 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave 1111712018 Interserdlon Int Delay, slveh 4.9 Minorl _ Conflicting Flow All 0 0 323 0 743 Movement ESQ" HCM Lane LOS - 310 - Stage 2 - Lane Configurations 11 Critical Hdwy 4.18 T 6.31 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Traffic Vol, veM 220 20 60 205 60 95 Future Vol, vehlh 220 20 60 205 60 95 Confilcting Peds, #Ihr 0 3 3 0 0 13 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 718 - Stage 2 0 581 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 25 8 3 13 11 Mvmt Flow 293 27 80 273 60 127 Ma+ orlKilor Ma ort Ma ort Minorl _ Conflicting Flow All 0 0 323 0 743 323 Stage 1 HCM Lane LOS - 310 - Stage 2 2.1 433 - Critical Hdwy 4.18 - 6.53 6.31 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - - 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.272 - 3.617 3.399 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1204 - 367 696 Stage 1 - - 719 - Stage 2 - 631 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 1201 337 689 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 337 - Stage 1 718 Stage 2 581 EB WB NB HCM Conlrol Delay, s 0 1-9 17.6 HCM LOS C Minor Lane{ alorfbmt N113 A 1 E3T EBR WOL WBT Capacity tvehlhj 491 - 1201 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0,421 0.067 HCM Conlrol Delay 1st 17.6 - 8:2 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.1 - 0.2 - R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Year 2018 No -Build, -PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 66 HCM 2010 TWSC 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St 11117/2018 Inlersectlon Int Delay, s/veh 15,8 Movement EBL EBT EBR VVBL WDT WBR N81. NBT NaR SSL SBT SBR Lane Configurations `I t¢ `S 1" I S. '1 t• Traffic Vol, veh/h 125 210 3 7 175 190 4 6 13 183 3 115 Future Vol, veh/h 125 210 3 7 175 190 4 6 13 183 3 115 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 69 69 0 1 3 0 60 60 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - - 100 100 - 200 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 5 10 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 Mvmt Flow 133 223 3 7 186 202 4 6 14 195 3 122 Me aG[MInar IVialorl on W, mm& r2 Conflicting Flow All 389 0 0 295 0 d' 927 963 354 863 863 291 Stage 1 - 560 560 - 302 302 Stage 2 - 367 403 561 561 Critical Hdwy 4.16 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.11 6.5 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.1 5.5 - 6,11 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - 2.2 3.5 4 3,3 3.509 4 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1148 - 1278 251 258 694 276 295 748 Stage 1 - - 516 514 709 668 - Stage 2 - 657 603 - 514 513 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1147 - 1205 177 214 621 227 244 746 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 177 214 - 227 244 - Stage 1 - 430 429 - 626 663 - Stage 2 - 542 599 - 416 428 Ap2roach E13 WS IVB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3.2 0.2. 16.1 49 HCM LOS C E Minor Lone!MgLor hWm: NBLn1 NFo2l EBL EBT EAR vale. WBT WaR540 Bl-rz2 Capacity (vehlh) 177 388 1147 1205 227 709 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.024 0,052 0,116 0,006 0.858 0.177 HCM.Controt Delay (s) 25.6 14.8 8,6 a 73.4 11.2 HCM Lane LOS D B A A - F B HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) 0.1 0.2 0.4 0 6.8 0.6 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Year 2018 No-Build—PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 67 HCM 2010 TWSC 5; Rock Way & Scenic Ave 1111712018 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 1.8 movement F -SL EBT EBR VY&L WS" tUSR NBL 'ABT NBR SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations A A 4> HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) 0.3 0 - 4. 0.5 "k {° Traffic Vol, vahth 5 370 18 15 215 30 10 0 19 30 0 5 Future Vol, vehlh 5 370 18 15 215 30 10 0 19 30 0 5 Con$cttng Peds, #!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh In Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 MvmtFlow 6 474 23 19 276 38 13 0 24 38 0 6 MaiarJMinor, - Ma]or-t_ Malor2 Mirzoi t Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 314 0 0 497 0 0 843 850 486 843 842 304 Stage 1 - - - 498 498 - 333 333 - Stage 2 - - - 345 352 . 510 509 - Cdtical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 7,1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6,1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -� Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1258 - 1077 286 300 585 286 303 740 Stage 1 - 558 548 - 685 647 - Stage 2 - - 675 635 550 541 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1258 1077 275 292 585 268 295 734 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 275 292 - 268 295 - Stage 1 - 554 544 - 680 633 - Stage 2 - 650 622 - 523 537 EB HCM ConlrotD'elay, s 0-1 0.6 14.4 19.4 HCM LOS B C Min or.Lane!MilaorMvmt NBL-q3 EBL EBT -:BR BOL WaT WSRSSLn1 Capacity {vehlh1 421 1258 - 107' - 295 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.088 0,005 - 0.018 - 0.152 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 7.9 0 - 8.4 0 19.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A C HCM 95th %tile 0(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - 0.5 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Year 2018 Build_AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 68 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave 11/17/2018 inWraacum Int Delay, s/veh 7.2 f1norl HCM LOS Conflicting Flow All 0 0 526 0 882 Movement ES.T .EBR .NEL FIST NBL NSR Lane Configurations 1' Critical Hdwy - 4.16 4 Nf Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Traffic Vol, veh/h 273 125 110 120 65 120 Future Vol, veh/h 273 125 110 120 65 120 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 16 16 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None Mov Cap -2 Maneuver None - None Storage Length - 610 - - 0 529 Veh In Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 11 6 7 15 10 Mvmt Flow 350 160 141 154 83 154 MaLariftar P,Mvmt1 +:1koi2 f1norl HCM LOS Conflicting Flow All 0 0 526 0 882 446 Stage 1 - - 446 - Stage 2 - - 436 - Critical Hdwy - 4.16 - 6.55 6.3 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 HCM 95th 0/able Q(veh) - 5.55 - CdkW Hdwy Sig 2 - - - 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - 3.635 3.39 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1021 - 301 596 Stage 1 - - 618 - Stage 2 625 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 1007 252 588 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 252 - Stage 1 610 - Stage 2 529 ES WS N8 HCM Control Delay. s 0 4.4 263 HCM LOS D - — S. Gapaclf (veh/h) 400 - 11007 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0,593 - 0.14 HCM Control Delay (s) 26.3 - 9.2 0 HCM Lane LOS D - A A HCM 95th 0/able Q(veh) 3.7 - 0.5 - R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Year 2018 Build -AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 69 HCM 2010 TWSC 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St 11/17/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 14-1 ovement E86. E5T EBR IML WBT WBR NBL N3T NHH SBL SOT SBR Lane Configurations Ri k - 71 11.5 1, D B *1 F• F k I 0.1 0.1 Tragic Val, vehlh 105 314 1 3 154 120 5 2 8 160 6 101 Future Vol, veh/h 105 314 1 3 154 120 5 2 8 160 6 101 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 6 6 0 2 3 0 11 11 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 100 - - 100 200 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Peak HourFactor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 3 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 4 0 7 Mvmt Flow 125 374 1 4 183 143 6 2 10 190 7 120 MajorlMinor Ma}orl Ma ort hilrmt_. FAlnor2 Conflicting Flow All 328 0 0 381 0 0 960 967 392 907 896 260 Stage 1 - - 631 631 - 265 265 - Stage 2 - 329 336 642 631- Critical Hdwy 4.19 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.14 6.5 6:27 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - - 6.1 5.5 6.14 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.14 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.536 4 3.363 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1193 - 1189 238 256 661 255 282 767 Stage 1 - 472 477 - 736 693 Stage 2 - 688 645 - 459 477 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1191 1183 179 227 652 226 250 764 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 179 227 - 226 250 - Stage 1 - 421 425 - 658 690 - Stage 2 - 570 642 399 425 Approach EB 'NB NB 8B HCM Control Doiay, a 2.1 01 17.1 47.2 HCM LOS C E Minor. Laae'MaiorMioml NSUONEU2 EBI EBT EBR 4VBL WBr t^r8R$aLr1 SSLn2 Capacity (vehR)i 179 474 1191 1183 - 226 685 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.033 0.025 0.105 0.003 - 0.843 0.186 HCM Control Delay (s) 25.8 12.8 8.4 - 8.1 - 71 11.5 HCM Lane LOS D B A A F B HCM 95th We Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0.4 - 0 6.5 0.7 R-1-8 to Clvic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Year 2018 Build -AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 70 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Rock Way & Scenic Ave 11/1712018 Intersemon Int Delay, slveh 1.4 ttiMa Ort blinor.l 0 012 - 0.114 Minot 8 0 15.6 Conflicting Flow All 341 0 0 359 0 0 739 moverwi. ESL EST ESR W8L WST WSR NBL ;NOT NBR $; SBT SBR Lane Configurations Stage 2 + 369 41„ 377 'T� - Critical Hdwy 4. 4.1 Traffic Vol, vehm 5 310 3 13 255 40 8 0 12 28 0 10 Future Vol, veh/h 5 310 3 13 255 40 8 0 12 28 0 10 Conflicting Peds, #mr 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1227 - 1211 321 339 691 330 349 701 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 627 - 0 - - 0 612 - 0 619 Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 356 3 15 293 46 9 0 14 32 0 11 Ma orlKnor MAW ttiMa Ort blinor.l 0 012 - 0.114 Minot 8 0 15.6 Conflicting Flow All 341 0 0 359 0 0 739 741 358 725 719 335 Stage 1 - 370 370 - 348 348 - Stage 2 - 369 371 377 371 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 22 - 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1229 1211 336 347 691 343 357 712 Stage 1 - 654 624 - 672 638 - Stage 2 - 655 623 - 649 623 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1227 - 1211 321 339 691 330 349 701 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 321 339 330 349 - Stage 1 - 650 620 - 667 627 - Stage 2 - 626 612 - 632 619 - E8 WS NB Sia HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 HCM LOS Mirror. LariBiklelor..I mt Capacity (vatvh) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control D618y (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th We 0(veh; NBU.1 0 3 13 15.6 B C ;BT EBR 11'BL iAIST VJERSBLr,I 473 12.27 - 1211 - 383 0.049 0,005 0 012 - 0.114 13 7.9 0 8 0 15.6 B A A A A C 0.2 0 - 0 - 0.4 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Year 2018 Build_PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 71 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave 11/1712018 Intersection Int Delay, sfveh 4.9 movement EST EER W81. WST NSL NER Lane Configurations It HCM Lane LOS C It rzr 2.1 Traffic Vol, vehlh 223 20 60 213 60 95 Future Vol, vehlh 223 20 60 213 60 95 ConAlcting Peds, #Ihr 0 3 3 0 0 13 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channalized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 25 8 3 13 11 Mvmt Flow 297 27 80 284 80 127 MpjorlMinor f..% art Iria c'2 mmarl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 327 0 758 327 Stage 1 - - 314 - Stage 2 - - 444 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.18 - 6.53 6.31 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 - - 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.272 - 3.617 3.399 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1200 360 694 Stage 1 - - 716 - Stage 2 624 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cain Maneuver - - 1197 331 685 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 331 - Stage 1 - - 715 - Stage 2 575 - A2proxh EB W6 NS l IGM Control Delay, s 0 1.8 V.9 HCM LOS C KofLanellaicrld%mt NKxl EDT EBR �NSL WET Capacity (we") 484 1197 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.427 0 067 - HCM Control Delay (9) 17.9 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %tife 0(veh l 2.1 0.2 - R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Year 2018 Build—PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 72 HCM 2010 TWSC 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St 11/17/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Moxerpla 17.2 EBL EST EBR 4AL VJBT WBR N5L NST NBR 0 0 SST SET Lane Configurations ryl T4 300 'f I- - - ", i= 577 i 14 - Tragic Vol, vehlh 129 218 3 7 183 190 4 6 13 183 3 120 Future Vol, vehlh 129 218 3 7 183 190 4 6 13 183 3 120 Conflicting Peds, 01hr 1 0 69 69 0 1 3 0 60 60 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop slop RT Channetized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage length 100 - 598 100 504 - 100 - - 200 - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 1195 - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 205 0 235 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 5 10 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 Mvmt Flow 137 232 3 7 195 202 4 6 14 195 3 128 Major/Minor major? Maor2 Minorl f0loor2 Conflicting Flow All 398 0 0 304 0 0 956 989 363 889 889 300 Stage 1 - - - - - - 577 577 - 311 311 - Stage 2 - - - 379 412 - 578 578 - CdOcal Hdwy 4.16 - 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.11 6.5 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.509 4 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1139 1268 240 249 686 265 285 740 Stage 1 - 506 505 - 702 662 - Stage 2 - - 647 598 - 503 504 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1138 - - 1195 167 205 614 217 235 738 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 167 205 - 217 235 - Stage 1 - - 419 419 - 617 657 Stage 2 - 528 594 405 418 Approach EB W6 HB SB HUA Control Delay, s 3.2 0.1 17,2 54.5 HCM LOS C F Mlhor Lane`l4lallot i' mit Nknl N902 EBL EST ESR WK *BT %IVBR ISO Ln1 S9Ln2 Capacity (vehlh) 167 377 1138 - 1195 217 701 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 0.054 0.121 - 0.006 0,897 0.187 HCM 06*61DAy (a] 27.1 15.1 8.6 - 8 - 83.5 11.3 HCM Lane LOS D C A A - F B HCM 95th °ktile 0(veh) 0.1 0.2 0.4 - 0 - 7.3 0.7 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Year 2018 Build_PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 73 sOUTMAN Nxom T,Q.aNfDowflTIoN INGINrc.#Imc L L Appendix D Year 2018 No -Build and Buil., Sim"F raffic Output 74 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Year 2018 No -Build AM Peak Hour 11/17/2018 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Start Time 7:35 7:35 7:35 7,35 7:35 7:35 End Time 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 Time Recarded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 3 3 3 3 3 3 # of Recorded Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 Vehs Entered 1307 1402 1330 1398 1334 1354 Vehs Exited 1316 1399 1338 1399 1340 1358 Starting Vehs 23 15 16 15 20 15 Ending Vehs 14 18 8 14 14 13 Travel Distance (mi) 338 361 347 358 349 351 Travel Time (hr) 15.7 17.5 16.0 17.7 16.3 16.6 Total Delay (hr) 2.8 3.6 2.7 3.9 3.0 3.2 Total Stops 760 879 747 857 778 805 Fuel Used (gal) 14.1 15.2 14.5 15.3 14.6 14.7 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 7:35 End Time 7:45 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. No data recorded this interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 423 506 440 480 466 453 Vehs Exited 425 497 432 466 467 456 Starting Vehs 23 15 16 15 20 15 Ending Vehs 21 24 24 29 19 24 .mom Travel Distance (mi) 102 124 108 114 116 113 Travel Time (hr) 4.8 6.4 6.0 6.1 5.6 5.6 Total Delay (hr) 0.9 1.7 0.9 1.7 1.2 1.3 Total Stops 236 309 222 275 265 259 -A Fuel Used (gal) 4.4 5.3 4.6 5.1 5.0 4.9 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 75 SimTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Simulation Summary ! + Year 2018 No-Bulld AM Peak Hour 11117/2018 Interval #2 Information Recordinq Start Time 8:00 End Time 8:45 Total Time (min) 45 r Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors. Anti PHP. Ruil N _ 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 884 896 890 918 868 890 Vehs Exited 891 902 906 933 873 904 Starting Vehs 21 24 24 29 19 24 Ending Vohs 14 18 8 14 14 13 Travel Distance (mi) 236 237 239 244 233 237 Travel Time (hr) 10.9 11,0 11.0 11.6 10.7 11.1 Total Delay (hr) 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.2 1.8 1.9 Total Stops 524 570 525 582 513 542 Fuel Used (gal) 9.7 9.8 9.9 10.2 9.6 9.9 R-1.8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 76 SimTraiflc Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2018 No -Build AM Peak Hour 11117/2018 Intersection: 5: Scenic Ave & Rock Wav Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Ee NS S9 LT TR I.R. 41 20 45 4 1 21 22 10 47 437 340 357 Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave Y I Movemam E3 l:'B rla _ Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 15 117 162 Average Queue (ft) 1 31 66 95th Queue (ft) 11 79 121 _ Link Distance (ft) 220 437 592 Upstream Blk Time (%) 143 88 Average Queue (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 4 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 8 63 41 Storage Bilk Time (%) 57 13 12 Queuing Penally (veh) 25 30 1 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St Movement Ei E6 V;3 W.5 NE 14B SS 0C Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) - 69 28 18 46 35 38 143 88 Average Queue (ft) 24 1 1 4 6 8 63 41 95th Queue (ft) 57 13 12 22 25 30 120 71 Link Distance (ft) 340 459 167 223 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 100 200 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 77 SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Year 2018 No -Build PM Peak Flour 1111712018 Summary of All Intervals Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 3:20 End Time 3;30 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, No data recorded this interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 3:30 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Al!IM1111111111 Start Time 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 End Time 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 3 3 3 3 3 3 # of Recorded Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 Vehs Entered 1460 1406 1354 1352 1457 1404 Vehs Exited 1461 1415 1354 1350 1456 1407 Starting Vehs 19 20 19 13 19 19 Ending Vehs 18 11 19 15 20 16 Travel Distance (mi) 345 331 315 325 345 332 Travel Time (hr) 17.2 16.1 15.0 15.5 17.0 16.2 Total Delay (hr) 3.9 3.4 2.8 3.1 3.8 3.4 Total Stops 885 844 802 802 902 847 Fuel Used (gal) 15.0 14.2 13.3 13.7 14.8 14.2 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 3:20 End Time 3;30 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, No data recorded this interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 3:30 End Time 3:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 502 467 443 450 514 475 Vehs Exited 496 460 445 442 511 472 Starting Vehs 19 20 19 13 19 19 Ending Vehs 25 27 17 21 22 23 Travel Distance (mi) 110 100 95 99 113 104 Travel Time (hr) 5.4 5.0 4.6 4.8 5.8 5.1 Total Delay (hr) 1.2 1.2 0.9 1.0 1.4 1.2 Total Stops 291 257 244 253 289 266 Fuel Used (gal) 4.8 4.4 4.0 4.3 4.9 4.5 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 78 SimTraffic Report Page 1 L. - R -1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave SimTraffic Report LSouthern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 79 SimTraffic Simulation Summary (� Year 2018 No -Build PM Peak Hour I 1111712018 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 3;45 End Time 4;30 Total Time (min) 45 Volumes adjusted by {growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 .3 4 Vehs Entered 958 939 911 902 943 933 Vohs Exited 965 955 949 908 945 935 Starting Vehs 25 27 17 2.1 22 23 Ending Vohs 18 11 19 15 20 16 Travel Distance (mi) 235 230 219 225 232 228 Travel Time (hr) 11.7 11.1 10.4 10.7 11,2 11,0 Total Delay (hr) 2.7 2.2 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.2 Total Stops 594 587 558 549 613 578 Fuet Used (gal) 10.2 9.7 9.3 9.4 9.9 9.7 L. - R -1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave SimTraffic Report LSouthern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 79 Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2018 No -Build PM Peak Hour 1111712018 Intersection: 5: Scenic Ave & Rock moyemwlt Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th,Queuelit) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) BB 1;S S$ LT TR LR 57 10 49 5 0 24 28 5 49 437 340 357 Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave Movement EE SVS IN _ Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 14 74 107 Average Queue (ft) 0 15 52 95th Queue (ft) 7 51 83 Link Distance (ft) 220 437 592 Upstream Blk Time (%) 154 79 Average Queue (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 3 19 Storage Say Dist (ft) 15 66 37 Storage Blk Time (%) 64 22 20 Queuing Penalty (veh) 17 41 122 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St Movement EB. EB AL WL VV3 Flip NS SB SB _ Directions Served L TR TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 84 45 34 105 30 44 154 79 Average Queue (ft) 32 4 3 19 3 15 66 37 95th Queue (ft) 64 22 20 63 17 41 122 60 Link Distance (ft) 340 459 167 223 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 100 200 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 80 SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Year 2018 Build AM Peak Hour 1111712018 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Av Start Time 7:35 7:35 7:35 7:35 7:35 7;35 End Time 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 6:45 Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 #of Intervals 3 3 3 3 3 3 # of Recorded Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 Vehs Entered 1404 1341 1414 1369 1390 1384 Vehs Exited 1413 1343 1429 1377 1399 1393 Starting Vehs 23 23 23 22 22 21 Ending Vehs 14 21 8 14 13 11 Travel Distance (mi) 358 349 355 352 352 353 Travel Time (hr) 17.0 16.3 17.1 16.4 16.7 16.7 Total Delay (hr) 3.3 3.0 3.4 2.9 3.2 3.2 Total Stops 840 803 853 827 825 832 Fuel Used (gal) 15.1 14.6 15.0 14.8 14.6 14.8 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 7:35 End Time 7:45 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. No data recorded this interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, Run Number i 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 496 448 490 468 487 476 Vehs Exited 491 444 489 467 484 473 Starting Vehs 23 23 23 22 22 21 Ending Vehs 28 27 24 23 25 26 Travel Distance (mi) 121 108 121 116 120 117 Travel Time (hr) 6.2 5,2 6.1 5:4 5.9 5.8 Total Delay (hr) 1.5 1.1 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.3 Total Stops 313 266 282 263 267 279 Fuel Used (gal) 5.3 4.6 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.0 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 81 SimTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Year 2018 Build AM Peak Hour 1111712018 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 8:00 End Time 8:45 Total Time (min) 45 —` _ Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF Run Number t-- j _ —3-- Vehs Entered, 908 893 924 901 903 903 Vehs Exited 922 699 940 910 915 917 Starting Vehs 28 27 24 23 25 26 Ending Vehs 14 21 8 14 13 11 ' Travel Distance (mi) 237 240 234 236 232 236 Travel Time (hr) 10.9 11.1 11.11 11.0 10.8 10.9 Total Delay (hr) 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 Total Stops 527 537 571 564 558 552 Fuel Used (gal) 9.8 10.0 9.8 9.8 9.5 9.8 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 82 SimTraftc Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2018 Build AM Peak Hour 11/17/2018 Intersection: 5: Rock Way & Scenic Ave Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Bilk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 96th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (% Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB N9 TR LTR LTR LTR LTR 48 51 41 52 4 6 19 24 24 29 44 60 430 343 184 358 Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 96th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (% Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB N9 TR LT LR 11 95 158 0 32 63 6 79 116 220 430 592 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St Movement EB EB we WB NO NO S8 SO Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0 L TR L TR L TR L TR 61 28 18 29 35 38 116 79 25 2 1 2 5 9 55 44 55 14 9 15 24 32 98 73 343 459 167 223 100 100 100 200 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave SimTraffic Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 83 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Year 2018 Build PM Peak Hour 1111712018 Summary of All Intervals Pon Number 1 2 3 4 5 AV` Vehs Entered Start Time 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 471 End Time 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 19 Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 24 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 105 # of intervals 3 3 3 3 3 3 5.4 # of Recorded Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.3 Vehs Entered 1426 1479 1465 1432 1408 1440 Fuel Used (gal) Vehs Exited 1430 1484 1467 1433 1412 1448 ' Starting Vehs 14 19 17 17 21 17 Ending Vehs 10 14 15 16 17 12 yENO Travel Distance (mi) 349 349 344 337 342 344 Travel Time (hr) 17.1 16.9 17.3 16.0 16.8 16.8 Total Delay (hr) 3.7 3.6 4.1 3.1 3.6 3.6 Total Stops 903 874 888 863 894 884 Fuel Used (gal) 14.8 15.0 14.8 14.3 14.5 14.7 Interval #0 Information Seedil Start Time 3:20 End Time 3:30 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. No data recorded this interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 3:30 End Time 3:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 473 511 493 476 468 481 Vehs E)dted 471 504 486 472 466 478 Starting Vehs 14 19 17 17 21 17 Ending Vehs 16 26 24 21 23 19 Travel Distance (mi) 108 106 109 105 105 107 Travel Time (hr) 5,5 5.4 5.5 5.2 5.4 6.4 Total Delay (hr) 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.3 Total Stops 277 263 286 266 308 278 Fuel Used (gal) 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.7 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 84 SimTraffic Report Page 1 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC C 85 SimTraffic Report Page 2 k SimTraffic Simulation Summary Year 2018 guild PM Peak Hour 11/1712018 interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 3:45 End Time 4;30 Total Time (min) 45 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. C R�i7�itlfilplher 1 � 3 .4 .5 7A : V" Entered 953 968 972 956 940 957 Vehs Exited 959 980 981 961 946 967 Starting Vehs 16 26 24 21 23 19 Ending Vehs 10 14 15 16 17 12 Travel Distance (mi) 240 242 235 232 236 237 r Travel Time (hr) 11.6 11.5 11.7 14.8 11.4 11,4 Total Delay (hr) 2.4 2.2 2.7 2.0 2.3 2,3 Total Stops 626 611 602 597 586 641 t Fuel Used (gal) 10.1 10.3 10-1 9.7 9.9 10-0 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC C 85 SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2018 Build PM Peak Hour 11/17/2018 Intersection: 5: Rock Way & Scenic Ave r0o)jameni _ _ _ Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (°h) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) ES V43 NB SB LTR LTR _ LTR LTR 53 50 35 49 4 5 16 21 25 28 41 47 430 343 184 358 Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (% Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) C E, rA115 NIR TR LT LR 31 62 168 1 18 61 17 58 116 220 430 592 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St I Mnvement EE ES -s' $ 1'xS X46 NB SS SB Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 92 46 34 72 29 40 148 101 Average Queue (ft) 34 5 2 16 3 12 69 40 95th Queue (ft) 72 26 17 53 19 37 123 72 Link Distance (ft) 343 459 167 223 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Say Dist (ft) 100 100 100 200 Storage Blk 7irne (°lay 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty {veh) 0 0 0 0 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: l R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 86 SimTraffic Report Page 3 f nury,un Oa.clmn T,umfPaPUTIOM Lyon-cr, ic, L L C Appendix E Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build, Synchro Output 87 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Scenic Ave & Rock Way 1111712018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement E9L EST WST WBR SBL SBF Lane Configurations e1 11 HCM Lane LOS A A C Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 430 245 35 35 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 430 245 35 35 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 9 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT ChannelIzed - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 5 6 3 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 551 314 45 45 6 Ma cilM'inor k1a o"I t,•',a orr knor Conflicting Flow All 359 0 0 900 346 Stage 1 - - 337 - _ Stage 2 - 563 - Crifical Hdwy 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2,2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1211 312 702 Stage 1 - 728 - Stage 2 - 574 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1211 310 697 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 310 - Stage 1 - 723 - Stage 2 - 574 L3 proach EB WB 89 HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 17.8 HCM LOS C WIT t.are%Inior rvtlnit EBL EST WBT WBR SSW Capacity (vehlh) 121 i - - 333 1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 0.154 HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0 - 17,8 HCM Lane LOS A A C HCM 95th %file Q(veh) 0 - - 0.5 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Future Year 2038 No-Build—AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 88 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave 11/1712018 lnteMec8on Int Delay, s/veh 9 Minorl Contlicling Flow All 0 0 580 Movem - EST ESR .VBL VJ8T NBL N8R Lane Configurations it - - 467 ht `r" Traffic Vol, veh/h 310 130 115 135 70 125 Future Vol, vehlh 310 130 115 135 70 125 Conflicting Peds. #/hr 0 16 16 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 0 - Veh In Median Storage, # 0 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - 577 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 11 6 7 15 10 Mvmt Flow 397 167 147 173 90 160 ma �c Ma art M$ ort Minorl Contlicling Flow All 0 0 580 0 964 497 Stage 1 - - - - 497 - Stage 2 - - 467 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 6.55 6.3 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 3.635 3.39 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 974 268 557 Stage 1 - 585 - Stage 2 - 605 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 961 220 550 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 220 - Stage 1 577 Stage 2 - 503 Approach N9 HCM Control Delay, s 0 4,3 35.3 HCM LOS E min9r NS n', EBT EBR tNGL VM Capacity (vehlh) 358 961 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.698 0153 - HCM Control Way (s) 35.3 9A 0 = HCM Lane LOS E A A HCM 95th 96t;1e 0(veh) 5.1 0.5 - R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Future Year 2038 No-Build_AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 89 HCM 2010 TWSC 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St 11/17/2018 IntersecUon Int Delay, s/veh 27 KINal PAInorl 1134 WOO 641 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 365 0 0 430 0 0 1052 1065 Movement IBL EBT EBR AWL V BT ti.JSR NSL NBT NSR SBL _SST_ SSR_ Lane Configurations 360 t. - 704 "ti t• Critical Hdwy 4.19 4.1 7.1 6.5 i� 6.5 Traffic Vol, vehlh 110 355 1 3 170 135 5 2 10 180 7 105 Future Vol, veh/h 110 355 1 3 170 135 5 2 10 180 7 105 Conflicting Peds, Whr 2 0 6 6 0 2 3 0 11 11 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None 1134 - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 150 100 -193 219 100 - - 200 - 395 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 395 - 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 3 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 4 0 7 Mvmt Flow 131 423 1 4 202 161 6 2 12 214 8 125 MajorWinor Ma of 1 KINal PAInorl 1134 WOO 641 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 365 0 0 430 0 0 1052 1065 441 997 985 288 Stage 1 - - 692 692 - 293 293 - Stage 2 A F 360 373 - 704 692 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.14 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5,5 - 6.14 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.14 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.536 4 3,363 PotCap-1 Maneuver 1156 1140 206 224 621 221 250 739 Stage 1 - 437 448 - 711 674 - Stage 2 - - 662 622 - 424 448 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1154 1134 150 196 612 -193 219 736 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 150 196 -193 219 - Stage 1 - 385 395 - 629 670 - Stage 2 539 618 - 363 395 - WS NS S6 HGIU Control Delay, a 2 0-1 18-1 95.9 HCM LOS C F Minor l ane/h',aior k",unit NBLn l Pi13L-2 ESL FBT ESP INK WELT WBR S3 r.l 56Ln2 Capacity (vehm) 150 452 1151 1134 193 641 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 0.032 0.113 0.003 1.11 0,208 HCM Control Delay (s) 30 13.2 8.5 8.2 - 148.1 12.1 HCM Lane LOS D B A A F B HCM 95th We a(veh) 0.1 0.1 0.4 0 10.4 0.8 Notes -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Future Year 2038 No -Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 90 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Scenic Ave & Rock Wav 11/19/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.9 ERL EST i•VST tV8R SBL SSR Lane Configurations Stage 1 4 T9 - Stage 2 0 - Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 370 305 45 30 10 Future Vol, veh/h 5 370 305 45 30 10 Conflicing Peds, Whr 2 0 0 2 0 17 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 648 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % 0 0 we S$ 0 - Peak Hour Factor 87 67 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 5 3 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 425 351 52 34 11 Ma or[Mmoriota ort t,�a or2 Mlnor2 HCM Lana VIC Ratin Conflicting Flow All 405 0 0 816 396 Stage 1 - 379 - Stage 2 0 - 437 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1165 349 658 Stage 1 - 696 - Stage 2 - 655 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1163 345 648 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 345 Stage 1 - 690 - Stage 2 - 654 Approach EB we S$ HCM Control Way, is 0.1 0 15.4 HCM LOS C Mkior LaOe fdajar Nliv EBL EBS INST WBR U' ni Capacity (vehlh) 1163 - 391 HCM Lana VIC Ratin 0 005 - 0.118 HCM Control Delay (a) 8.11 0 16.4 HCM Lane LOS A A C HCM 95th %tile C(veh) 0 - 0.4 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Future Year 2038 No-Build_PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 91 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave 11/19/2018 lmerseotlog Int Delay, s/veh 5.7 movement EST EBR ;1r5L b'S'' NSL NSR Lane Configurations T� HCM Lane LOS C •1 'l' 3.1 Traffic Vol, vetA 275 25 65 250 65 100 Future Vol, veh/h 275 25 65 250 65 100 Conflicting Reds, Whr 0 3 3 0 0 13 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh In Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 25 8 3 13 11 Mvmt Flow 367 33 87 333 87 133 Ma ori[Ainor Ma ati t0a"or2 I Conflicting Flow All 0 0 403 0 894 400 Stage 1 - - - 387 - Stage 2 - 507 - Critical Hdwy 4.18 - 6.53 6.31 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.272 3.617 3.399 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 1124 298 631 Stage 1 663 - Stage 2 583 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 1121 269 623 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 269 - Stage 1 662 - Stage 2 528 Approach ES WS NB - - HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.7 23.5 HCM LOS C Knort..ane'.NlaiarMvn;t NBLi1 Ed- EBR A6L WST Capacity ivehAt] 410 1121 - 14CM Lane V/C Ratio 0.537 0 077 - HCM Control Delay (s) 23.5 8.5 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A HCM 95th %fife Q(v6h] 3.1 0.3 - R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Future Year 2038 No -Build -PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 92 HCM 2010 TWSC 30: JC Housm /U ton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St 11/19/2018 Intersecilon Int Delay, s/veh 35.2 WDvetmenl. EaL EST ESR INEL "IST WOR NSL NBT NBR M SST SSR Lane Configurations 'S I. 't 1, i 1- 'l $1 Traffic Vol, vehlh 140 255 5 10 215 215 5 7 15 200 4 130 Future Vol, veh/h 140 255 5 10 215 215 5 7 15 200 4 130 Conflicting Peds, 411ir 1 0 69 69 0 1 3 0 60 60 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 100 - 100 - - 200 - Veh in Median Storage. # - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 5 10 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 Mvmt Flow 149 271 5 11 229 229 5 7 16 213 4 138 Ma ormnor Ma ort M&•or2 klirnnr,'i Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 459 0 0 345 0 0 1081 1122 403 1010 1010 348 Stage 1 - - - 641 641 - 367 367 - Stage 2 - 440 481 643 643 - Crifical Hdwy 4.16 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.11 6.5 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2,254 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.509 4 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1081 1225 197 208 652 219 242 695 Stage 1 - - 466 473 - 655 626 - Stage 2 - 600 557 - 464 472 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1080 1155 129 167 584 -174 195 693 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 129 167 - -174 195 - Stage 1 - 378 385 - 564 619 - Stage 2 - 471 551 - 362 384 - AEpfoach EB Wa N8 $8 HCM Control Delay, s 3.1 0.2 20.1 120.9 HCM LOS C F Minur LerneWa or Mvrnt r' BLn i NB'_'12 EBL EST CBR VOL WS' WbR m1: to Capacity (vel*) 129 325 1080 - 1155 174 544 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 0.072 0.138 0.009 1,223 0.2211 HCM Ctltittol way (s) 34.1 16.9 8.9 - 8.1 193.7 12.2 - - HCM Lane LOS D C A - A F B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 0.5 - 0 11.7 0.8 Nates -: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined •: All major volume in platoon Synchro 9 - Report R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Future Year 2038 No -Build - PM Peak Hour Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 93 HCIVI 2010 TWSC 5: Rock Way & Scenic Ave 11/19/2018 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 1.9 Mavernent ESL EBT IEBR WBL 'ABT W_613 . NBL Nri NBR SBL 89T SGR Lane Configurations C A A 11• C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) •z• - 0.1 - 0.8 T. � Traffic Vol, vehfh 5 430 18 15 245 35 10 0 19 35 0 5 Future Vol, vehlh 5 430 18 15 245 35 10 0 19 35 0 5 Conflicting Peds, *hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehlces, % 0 5 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 551 23 19 314 45 13 0 24 45 0 6 Ma 90minor Wor2 Confliding Flow All 359 0 0 574 0 0 962 972 563 962. 961 346 Stage 1 - - - - - 575 575 - 375 375 - Stage 2 - - - 387 397 587 586 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1211 1009 - 237 254 530 237 258 702 Stage 1 - - 507 506 - 650 621 - Stage 2 - - 641 607 - 499 500 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1211 1009 228 246 530 221 250 697 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 228 246 - 221 250 - Stage 1 - 503 502 645 606 - Stage 2 - 615 592 473 497 - Approach EB wB NB S8 HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.4 16 23.8 HCM LOS C C Minot ianeWaim Mvmi NBUO EBL EB7 EOR 1{j6L VVBT VVBR SSLn1 Capacity (vehlh) 364 1211 - - 1009 - 242 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0-102 0.005 - - 0,019 0.212 HCM Control Delay (s) 16 8 0 - 8.6 0 23.8 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0 - - 0.1 - 0.8 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Future Year 2038 Build, -AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 94 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave 11/19/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 9.7 EBT EBR WEL WBT 146L N9 Lane Configurations 'k 521 Stage 1 - *t ," - 521 Traffic Vol, veh/h 328 130 115 145 70 125 Future Vol, veh/h 328 130 115 145 70 125 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 0 16 16 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 11 6 7 15 10 Mvmt Flow 421 167 147 186 90 160 Ma'orlMinor Ma orl P,101 -W Mimr-1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 504 0 1001 521 Stage 1 - - - 521 Stage 2 - 480 Critical Hdwy 4.16 6.55 63 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - 3.635 3.39 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 954 - 255 540 Stage 1 - 570 - Stage 2 - 596 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov CW1 Maneuver 941 208 533 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 208 - Stage 1 563 - Stage 2 492 Approach EB WB N8 HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.2 39.7 HCM LOS E Nil. i nor Lane,Maa cr ' ;: rw r;BLn' EBT ESR WEL tir+9T Capacity (veh/h) 34? 941 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.733 0.157 - HCM Control Delay (s) 39.7 9.5 0 HCM Lane LOS E A A HCM 95th We 0(veh) 5.5 0.6 - R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Future Year 2038 Build—AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 95 HCM 2010 TWSC 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St 1111912018 inleraection Int Delay, slveh Movement. 31 E8- EST ESR VV131- WIRT WSW NEL W.83 NBR SPIL SBT_ _5138 Lane Configurations 1024 T+ Stage 1 `i is 'I 1F - 304 ''] I. Stage 2 Traffic Vol, vehlh 115 369 1 3 179 135 5 2 10 180 7 111 Future Vol, veh/h 115 369 1 3 179 135 5 2 10 180 7 111 Conflicting Peds, Whr 2 0 6 6 0 2 3 0 11 11 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channellized - - None - - None - - None Stage 2 - None Storage Length 100 615 - 410 100 - Platoon blocked, % 100 - 200 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - 0 206 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 185 - 0 - - 0 - 0 381 Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 64 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 3 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 4 0 7 Mvmt Flow 137 439 1 4 213 161 6 2 12 214 8 132 MaiorRAinor melprl_ h1a;0� Minorl Mmor2 _ Conflicting Flow All 376 0 0 446 0 0 1095 1104 457 1036 1024 299 Stage 1 - - 720 720 - 304 304 - Stage 2 - - - - 375 384 - 732 720 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.14 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.14 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.14 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.536 4 3.363 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1145 - 1125 193 213 608 -208 237 729 Stage 1 - - 422 435 - 701 667 Stage 2 - - 650 615 - 410 435 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1143 - 1119 138 185 599 -181 206 726 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 138 185 --181 206 - Stage 1 - 370 381 - 616 663 - Stage 2 522 611 348 381 - roach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2 0.1 19 111.9 HCM LOS C F Minor NB t1BL 2 ESL EST EER WSL WRT WO R SBL n 18 BLn2 Capacity (Yoh/h) 138 436 1143 1119 181 631 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.043 0.033 0.12 - 0,003 1,184 0.223 HCM Control Delay (s) 32.3 13.5 8.6 - 8.2 177.2 12.3 HCM Lane LOS D B A - A F B HCM 95th °lathe 0(veh) 0.1 0.1 0.4 - 0 11.3 0.8 Volume exceeds capacity 5: Delay exceeds 30 Js +: Computation Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Future Year 2038 Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 96 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Rock Wav & Scenic Ave 11/19/2018 Intersection Int Delay, Slveh Movement 1.5 E9! EBT EBR WSW WET t%JBR N9L 14ST NaR SEL SST SBR Lane Configurations 427 41► 849 396 Stage 1 - 11� 439 - •r` 409 Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 370 3 13 305 45 8 0 12 30 0 10 Future Vol, veh/h 5 370 3 13 305 45 8 0 12 30 0 10 Conflicting Peds, #Por 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 607 584 - 595 581 - Platoon blocked, % Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 269 292 0 Stage 1 - 0 597 Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 425 3 15 351 52 9 0 14 34 0 11 N1a'.(jrt{r1;P..r 'M1 jG'1 Macr2 Muton HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 0,005 W0 0.146 HCM Control Delay Is) Conflicting Flow All 405 0 0 478 0 0 869 874 427 855 849 396 Stage 1 - 439 439 - 409 409 - Stage 2 - 430 435 - 446 440 - Crttical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Cd ical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1165 1142 274 290 632 281 300 658 Stage 1 - - -. - 601 582 - 623 600 - Stage 2 - - - 607 584 - 595 581 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1163 1 142 261 282 632 269 292 648 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 261 282 - 269 292 - Stage 1 - 597 578 - 617 589 - Stage 2 - 578 573 578 577 - A roach Ela 118 N8 $B HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.3 14.5 18.4 HCM LOS B C 10111ur L d e i:4a;cr "'Iv.ra NBl.i,1 C -BL EBT EBR 'A"EL NET ti 12R $81_n7 Capacity (Vah)h) 403 1163 - - 1142 - 315 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 0,005 - 0.013 - 0.146 HCM Control Delay Is) 14.5 8.1 0 8.2 0 18.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A C HCM 95th We Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - 0.5 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Future Year 2038 Build -PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 97 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave 11119/2018 Int Delay, s/veh 5.7 Movement EBT EBR 0V8L WBT NBL NSR Lane Configurations 11 Stage 2 - •I Critical Hdwy - 4.18 Traffic Vol, veh/h 278 25 65 258 65 100 - Future Vol, veh/h 278 25 65 258 65 100 Conflicting Peds, #/for 0 3 3 0 0 13 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 25 8 3 13 11 Mvmt Flow 371 33 87 344 87 133 MaiofUnor Mit 'iorl Mn.0 %1rincrl _ Conflicting Flow All 0 0 407 0 909 404 Stage i - - 391 _ Stage 2 - - 518 - Critical Hdwy - 4.18 - 6.53 6.31 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.272 - 3.617 3.399 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 1120 292 628 Stage 1 - - 660 - Stage 2 - - 576 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1117 263 620 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 263 - Stage 1 659 Stage 2 521 - EB WS NB HCM Control Delay,_5 0 1.7 24.1 HCM LOS C Minor LaneQla;or Mmil, r';8i,.r.1 `5T E31;_ tML V, Capacity'Nah1h) 404 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.545 HCM Control Delay (s) 24.1 HCM Lane LOS C HCM 95th %Ole Q(veh) 3.2 1117 0.078 - 8.5 0 A A 0.3 - R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Future Year 2038 Build_PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 98 HCM 2010 TWSC 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St 11/19/2018 fnterswiOR Int Delay, s/veh 38.7 Moveraenl EBL EBT EBR ;VBL WaT WBR NBL NST NBR 58L $BT SOR Lane Configurations '1 k 35.8 'i 1, - 8.2 218.6 11 HCM Lane LOS 1, C Traffic Vol, vehfi 144 263 5 10 223 215 5 7 15 200 4 135 Future Vol, veh/h 144 263 5 10 223 215 5 7 15 200 4 135 Conflicting Peds, #fir 1 0 69 69 0 1 3 0 60 60 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 100 - 100 200 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 5 10 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 Mvmt Flow 153 280 5 11 237 229 5 7 16 213 4 144 Ma ori'minor tufa ort WjW 14 not 4 WW Conflicting Flow All 467 0 0 354 0 0 1109 1147 412 1035 1035 356 Stage 1 - - - - 658 658 - 375 375 - Stage 2 - - 451 489 660 660 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 4.1 7.1 6,5 6.2 7.11 6.5 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.1 5.5 6.11 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2,254 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.509 4 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1074 1216 189 201 644 -211 234 688 Stage 1 - 457 464 - 648 621 Stage 2 - 592 553 - 454 463 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1073 1146 122 161 577 -166 187 686 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 122 161 - -166 187 - Stage 1 - 369 375 555 614 - Stage 2 459 547 352 374 Lponh_ _ .EB YV8 NB SS HCM Control Delay, s 3.1 0.2 20.7 134.1 HCM LOS C F Minot Lane&: or SDL I r,IELn2 EEL EBT ESP, 'ASL '<'ST INLER S8Ln1:S91_n2 Capacity (vehfi) 122 317 1073 - 1146 166 637 ',-ICM Lane VAC Ratio 0.044 0.074 0.143 0.009 1.282 0.232 F+',M CaaV01 .?elay (s) 35.8 17.3 8.9 - 8.2 218.6 12,4 HCM Lane LOS E C A - A F B HCM 95th %tile O(vett) 0.1 0.2 0.5 - 0 - 12.3 0.9 Notes Volume exceeds capeeity $: 00ay exceeds 300s +: Computatlon Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Future Year 2038 Build -PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 99 ;our��an O�Fcon T P-wif P axarian nr�� r��.� r►��, L L C Appendix F Future Year 2038 leo-Build and Build, SimTraffic Output 100 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Future Year 2038 No -Build AM Peak Hour 11117/2018 Summary of All Intervals Run NumNr 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Start Time 7:35 7,35 7:35 7,35 7:35 7:35 End Time 8:45 8:45 8:45 6:45 8:45 6:45 Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 #of Intervals 3 3 3 3 3 3 # of Recorded Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 Vehs Entered 1532 1526 1456 1434 1460 1481 Vehs Exited 1555 1542 1480 1452 1479 1500 Starting Vehs 35 31 40 26 31 32 Ending Vehs 12 15 16 8 12 12 Travel Distance (mi) 408 397 372 375 375 386 Travel Time (hr) 20.2 19.4 18.6 17.9 17.6 18.7 Total Delay (hr) 4.7 4.3 4.4 3.6 3.3 4.1 Total Stops 943 908 882 869 828 885 Fuel Used (gal) 17.5 16.8 16.0 15.6 15,8 16.3 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 7:35 End Time 7:45 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, No data recorded this interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, Run Numlter 1 2. 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 512 482 503 462 454 480 Vehs Exited 515 490 527 465 462 492 Starting Vehs 35 31 40 26 31 32 Ending Vehs 32 23 16 23 23 24 Travel Distance (mi) 140 125 130 121 116 126 Travel Time (hr) 7.5 6.7 7.4 6.1 5.7 6.7 Total Delay (hr) 2.2 1.9 2.4 1.5 1.3 1,9 Total Stops 335 293 324 278 270 298 Fuel Used (gal) 6.2 5.5 5.9 5.1 5.0 5.5 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 101 SimTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Future Year 2038 No -Build AM Peak Hour 11/1712018 Interval #2 Information ReGordir Star: Time 8:00 End Time 8:45 Total Time (min) 45 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF Rug. um ber - 1 2 3 a – – - S AvI — Vehs Entered 1020 _ 1044 953 972 1006 998 Vehs Exited 1040 1052 953 987 1017 1011 Starling Vehs 32 23 16 23 23 2.4 Ending Vohs 12 15 16 8 12 12 Travel Distance (mi) 269 272 242 254 258 259 Travel Time (hr) 12.8 12,8 11.2 11.8 11.9 12.1 Total Delay (hr) 2.5 2.4 1.9 21 2.0 2.2 Total Stops 608 515 558 591 558 585 Fuel Used (gai) 11.3 11.4 10.0 10.5 10.8 10.8 R•1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 102 SimTratilc Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Future Year 2038 No -Build AM Peak Hour 11/17/2018 Intersection: 5: Scenic Ave & Rock Wav Movement EB ''66 $13 Directions Served LT TR LR Maximum Queue (ft) 38 24 57 Average Queue (ft) 4 1 25 95th Queue (ft) 23 12 51 Link Distance (ft) 437 340 357 Upstream Blk Time (%) 170 165 Average Queue (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 1 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 12 71 46 Storage Blk Time (%) 63 22 11 Queuing Penalty (veh) 16 36 137 Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave Movement ES We 1,.5 Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 1'R LT LR 8 96 206 0 35 71 4 77 143 220 437 592 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St movemem Eta EB VA3 IAB NB NR S8` Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 80 50 24 34 23 45 170 165 Average Queue (ft) 26 2 1 3 3 12 71 46 95th Queue (ft) 63 22 11 19 16 36 137 87 Link Distance (ft) 340 459 167 223 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 100 200 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 1 0 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 1 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 103 SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Future Year 2038 No -Build PM Peak Hour 11117/2018 Summary of All Intervals Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 3:20 End Time 3:30 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, No data recorded this Interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 3:30 1 2 4. _ __5 Avg Start Time 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 End Time 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 3 3 3 3 3 3 # of Recorded intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 Vehs Entered 1559 1550 1531 1533 1553 1548 Vehs Exited 1570 1565 1536 1550 1558 1555 Starting Vehs 24 26 20 27 22 24 Ending Vehs 13 11 15 10 17 14 Travel Distance (mi) 364 374 363 360 370 366 Travel Time (hr) 18.9 18.4 18.3 18.7 18.8 18.6 Total Delay (hr) 5.0 4.2 4.4 5.0 4.6 4.6 Total Stops 914 912 876 884 961 909 Fuel Used (gal) 16.0 16.0 15.8 15.9 16.0 15.9 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 3:20 End Time 3:30 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, No data recorded this Interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 3:30 End Time 3:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Rim Number 1 2 3 S 5 _ Avg Vehs Entered _ 516 496 500 497 525 508 Vehs Exited 516 503 495 504 524 510 Starting Vehs 24 26 20 27 22 24 Ending Vehs 24 19 25 20 23 22 Travel Distance (mi) 113 112 115 110 118 114 Travel Time (hr) 6.2 5.5 5.9 6.1 6.3 6.0 Total Delay (hr) 1.9 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.7 Total Stops 286 272 266 283 302 283 Fuel Used (gal) 5.2 4.8 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.1 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 104 SimTraffic Report Page 1 SimTrafFc Simulation Summary I Future Year 2038 No-Build PM Peak Hour 11/17/2018 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 3:45 End Time 4:30 Tota! Erne (miry) 45 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Antl PHF. Run. Number 1 2 3 4 .5- M Vehs Entered 1043 1054 1031 1036 1028 1039 Vohs Exiled 1054 1062 1041 1046 1034 1045 Starting Vahs 24 19 25 20 23 22 Ending Vers 13 11 15 10 17 14 Travel Distance (mi) 251 262 248 250 252 253 Travel Tams (hr) 12.7 12.9 12.4 12.6 12.5 1Z6 Total [Delay (hr) 3.1 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.9 Total Stops 628 640 610 601 659 627 Fuel Used (gal) 10.8 11.2 10.8 10.8 14.8 10.9 L R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave SimTraHic Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 105 Queuing and Blocking Report Future Year 2038 No -Build PM Peak Hour 11/17/2018 Intersection: 5: Scenic Ave & Rock Mlovement EB V1,13 13,1111111L DirectionsServed LT TR - LR Maximum Queue (ft) 42 36 54 Average Queue (ft) 4 2 26 95th Queue (ft) 25 18 51 Link Distance (ft) 437 340 357 Upstream Blk time (%) 201 156_ - Average Queue (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 21 Storage Say Dist (ft) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 92 48 Storage Blk Time (%) Storage Blk Time (%) 45 18 Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing Penalty, (veh) 43 171 107 Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave Movement EG EB VrB Di,edions Sea jed TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 39 84 164 Average Queue (ft) 2 17 59 95th Queue (ft) 15 56 111 Link Distance (ft) 220 437 592 Upstream Blk Time (%) 201 156_ - Average Queue (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) 10 3 21 Storage Say Dist (ft) 16 92 48 Storage Blk Time (%) 68 45 18 Queuing Penalty (veh) 26 43 171 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St Movoment £3 EB VrB INN pis Iib SE ala Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 77 82 31 96 30 52 201 156_ - Average Queue (ft) 34 10 3 21 6 16 92 48 95th Queue (ft) 68 45 18 64 26 43 171 107 Link Distance (ft) 340 459 167 223 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 100 200 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 1 1 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty. 2 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 106 SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Future Year 2038 Build AM Peak Hour Summary of All Intervals 1111712018 Run Number 1 2 3 4 5. Avg Start Time 7:35 7:35 7:35 7:35 7:35 7:35 End Time 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 3 3 3 3 3 3 # of Recorded Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 Vehs Entered 1538 1503 1532 1462 1452 1501 Vehs Exited 1540 1492 1551 1478 1477 1509 Starting Vehs 19 14 33 30 39 23 Ending Vehs 17 25 14 14 14 18 Travel Distance (mi) 388 373 396 367 372 379 Travel Time (hr) 18.9 18,3 19.6 18.1 18.1 18,6 Total Delay (hr) 4.1 4.0 4.3 4.1 3.9 4.1 Total Stops 918 893 994 867 874 908 Fuel Used (gal) 16.4 15.9 16,9 15.6 15.6 16.1 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 7:35 End Time 7:45 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. No data recorded this Interval, Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, Run Number 1 2 3 4 5. Avg Vehs Entered 489 517 481 482 468 487 Vehs Exited 488 493 488 482 488 487 Starting Vehs 19 14 33 30 39 23 Ending Vehs 20 38 26 30 19 23 Travel Distance (mi) 123 122 126 121 121 122 Travel Time (hr) 61 6.4 6.7 6.6 6.4 6.4 Total Delay (hr) 1.4 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.8 Total Stops 295 312 338 307 278 304 Fuel Used (gal) 5.2 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.3 5.4 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave SimTraffic Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 107 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Future Year 2038 wild AM Peak Hour 11/1712418 Interval #2 Information Recordin Start Time 6:40 End Time 8:45 Total Time [min] 45 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1. 2' 3 _ - 6 Ad Vehs Entered 1049 986 1051 980 984 1010 Vehs Exited 1052 999 1063 996 989 1420 Starting Vehs 20 38 26 30 19 23 Ending Vehs 17 25 14 14 14 18 Travel Distance {ml) 265 251 270 247 250 257 Travel Time (hr) 12.8 11.9 12.9 11.5 11.7 12.2 Total Delay (hr) 2.7 2.3 2..5 2-1 2.1 2-3 Total Stops 623 581 656 560 596 502 Fuel Used (gal) 11.2 10.4 11.4 10-2 10.3 10.7 R-1.8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 108 SlmTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Future Year 2038 Build AM Peak Hour 11/17/2016 Intersection: 5: Rock Way & Scenic Ave nflQvemenr E3 VJ3 N6 03 Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) LTR LTR LTR LTR 45 59 44 63 3 6 16 26 22 32 42 53 430 343 184 358 Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave Movement EB W6 rV _ Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 17 '120 258 Average Queue (ft) 1 38 79 95th Queue (ft) 7 87 170 Link Distance (ft) 220 430 592 Upstream Blk Time (%) 184 140 Average Queue (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 1 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 10 71 44 Storage Blk Time (%) 67 21 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 19 32 136 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St ibvernanl EL, E6 'r;B :$ Pdi3 Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 88 33 24 39 29 29 184 140 Average Queue (ft) 29 2 1 3 4 10 71 44 95th Queue (ft) 67 21 9 18 19 32 136 90 Link Distance (ft) 343 459 167 223 Upstream Blk Time VA) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 100 200 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 0 Zone Summary _ Zone wide Queuing Penalty; 2 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 109 SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Future Year 2038 Build PM Peak Hour Summary of All Intervals 11/17/2018 Run Number 1 2 3 4 5. AV Start Time 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 End Time 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 3 3 3 3 3 3 # of Recorded Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 Vehs Entered 1542 1612 1574 1563 1582 1574 Vehs Exited 1543 1622 1582 1582 1593 1584 Starting Vehs 24 30 24 30 27 24 Ending Vehs 23 20 16 11 16 15 Travel Distance (mi) 363 382 372 366 373 371 Travel Time (hr) 18.1 19.9 18.1 19.5 19.5 19.0 Total Delay (hr) 4.2 5.3 3.8 5.5 5.2 4.8 Total Stops 916 972 941 944 950 947 J01IM6 Fuel Used (gal) 15.8 16.6 16.0 16.3 16.4 16.2 Interval #0 Information Seedini Start Time 3:20 End Time 3:30 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. No data recorded this interval. Interval #1 Information Recordi Start Time 3:30 End Time 3:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors, E Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Av Vehs Entered 484 499 500 517 515 503 Vohs Exited 480 498 499 521 511 503 Starting Vehs 24 30 24 30 27 24 Ending Vohs 28 31 25 26 31 29 Travel Distance (mi) 105 110 111 116 118 112 Travel Time (hr) 5.2 5.6 5.5 7.0 6.2 5.9 I Total Delay (hr) 1.2 1.5 1.2 2.6 1.7 1.6 Total Stops 251 282 277 293 302 tj 281 Fuel Used (gal) 4.5 4.7 4.9 5.4 5.2 5.0 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 110 SimTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Future Year 2038 Build—PM Peak Hour 11/17/2018 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 3;45 End Time 4:30 Total Time (min) 45 Volumes adjusted by Growth ractors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3.. 4 6- Vehs Entered 1458 1113 1074 1046 1067 1073 Vehs Exited 1063 1124 1083 1061 1082 1082 Starting Vehs 28 31 25 26 31 29 Ending Vehs 23 20 16 11 16 15 Travel Distance (mi) 259 272 261 249 255 259 Travel Time (hr) 12.9 14.2 12-6 12.5 13.3 13.1 Total Delay (hr) 3.0 3.8 2.6 2,9 3.5 3.2 Total Stops 665 690 664 651 648 663 Fuel Used (gal) 11.3 11.9 11.1 10.9 11.2 11.3 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Future Year 2038 Build PM Peak Hour 1111712018 Intersection: 5: Rock Way & Scenic Ave sravemenl EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 44 42 44 61 Average Queue (ft) 5 5 14 26 95th Queue (ft) 25 23 40 53 Link Distance (ft) 430 343 184 358 Upstream Bilk Time (%) 69 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 44 167 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Blk Time (%) 343 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 167 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Storage Blk Time (%) Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St Movement t=6 EB Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave Movemeru ;:a ;v8 NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (ft) 12 80 185 Average Queue (ft) 0 18 66 95th Queue (ft) 4 60 133 Link Distance (ft) 220 430 592 Upstream Bilk Time (%) 92 49 95th Queue (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) 37 17 69 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 44 167 110 ' Storage Blk Time (%) 343 Queuing Penalty (veh) 167 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Upstream BlkTime (%) Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St Movement t=6 EB Vis %NS Ne NO c6 8I3 Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 95 56 30 96 34 53 183 147 Average Queue (ft) 38 8 3 23 4 17 92 49 95th Queue (ft) 75 37 17 69 22 44 167 110 ' Link Distance (ft) 343 459 167 223 Upstream BlkTime (%) 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 100 200 Storage BIk Time (%) 0 0 0 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 3 1 Zone Summary _ Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 4 R-1-8 to Civic Zone Change - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 112 SimTraffic Report Page 3 0 a r r a-��Gonr Tit apox,moM �NGIN��?1MG, LLC Appendix G Agency Requirements 113 320.00.00 — Design 320.10.01— Design Standards 3/25114 12:26 PM The purpose of these standards is to provide a consistent policy under which certain physical aspects of street and related design and plan preparation will be observed by the engineer. The Engineer should be aware that certain alternate street standards for the Transit Oriented District and Transit Oriented Corridor might apply to the design and construction streets in these areas of the city. These alternate standards are fully described in the Central Point TOD Design Requirements and Guidelines. They are also briefly described in lesser detail in these Standards and Specifications. This section contains design standards to ensure the safe and efficient operation of each facility type for all users and the best use of public space. The requirements in this section are established as minimum standards to follow and apply to both new construction and reconstruction, except as otherwise specified. Designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility impaired pedestrians Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of-way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. These standards set forth the minimum requirements for materials and street design. The Public Works Director shall have discretion to require a higher or different standard for materials or design when in his judgment it is in the best interest of the public's health, safety and welfare when considering all aspects and circumstances of the project. The minimum geometric requirements for all street classifications are defined in Tables 300 — 1 through 300 — 7. 320.10.02 — Traffic impact Analysis The purpose of this section is to assist in the determination of which road authorities participate in land use decisions, and to implement Section 660-012-0045(2)(e) of the State Transportation 37 City of Central Point Department of Public Works l _ Standards and Specifications 114 3/25/14 12:26 PM Planning Rule that requires the city to adopt a process to apply conditions to development proposals in order to minimize impacts and protect transportation facilities. This chapter establishes the standards for when a proposal must be reviewed for potential traffic impacts; when a traffic impact analysis must be submitted with a development application in order to determine whether conditions are needed to minimize impacts to and protect transportation facilities; what must be in a traffic impact analysis; and who is qualified to prepare the study. A traffic impact analysis shall be prepared by a traffic engineer or civil engineer licensed to practice in the state of Oregon with special training and experience in traffic engineering. If the road authority is the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), consult ODOT's regional development review planner and OAR 734-051-180. If the road is the authority of Jackson County, consult Jackson County's road design requirements. The Public Works Director may, at his/her discretion, waive the study of certain intersections when it is concluded that the impacts are not substantial. 320.10.03 — Traffic Impact Analysis Applicability (1) The level of detail and scope of a traffic impact analysis (TIA) will vary with the size, complexity, and location of the proposed application. Prior to any TIA, the applicant shall submit sufficient information to the City for the Public Works Department to issue a scoping letter. If stipulations to reduce traffic are requested by an applicant, it must first be shown by means of an analysis that an unconditional approval is not possible without some form of mitigation to maintain an adequate LOS. This will determine whether a stipulation is necessary. (2) Extent of Study Area: The study area shall be defined by the Public Works Department in the scoping letter and shall address at least the following areas: a) All proposed site access points; b) Any intersection where the proposed development can be expected to Contribute 25 or more trips during the analysis peak period. Impacts of less than 25 peak period trips are not substantial and will not be included in the study area. This volume may be adjusted, at the discretion of the Public Works Department, for safety or unusual situations; and c) Any intersections directly adjacent to the subject property. (3) When required: TIA shall be required when a land use application involves one or more of the following actions: a) A change in zoning or a plan amendment designation that generates 300 average daily trips (ADT) more than the current zoning; b) Any proposed development or land use action that a road authority, including the city, Jackson County or ODOT, states may have operational or safety concerns along its facilities; c) An increase in site traffic volume generation by 250 average daily trips (ADT) or more, or 25 Peak Hour Trips (PHT); 38 City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standards and Specifications 115 3125/14 12:26 PM d) An increase in peak hour volume of a particular movement to and from the State highway by 20 percent or more; e) An increase in use of adjacent streets by vehicles exceeding twenty thousand pounds gross vehicle weight by 10 vehicles or more per day; f) The location of the access driveway does not meet minimum sight distance requirements, as determined by the city engineer, or is located where vehicles entering or leaving the property are restricted, or such vehicles queue or hesitate on the state highway, creating a safety hazard at the discretion of the community development director; or g) A change in internal traffic patterns that, at the discretion of the Public Works Director, may cause safety problems, such as back-up onto a street or greater potential for traffic accidents. (4) Submittals: Provide two copies of the TIA for Public Works Department to review. (5) Elements of Analysis: A TIA shall be prepared by a Traffic Engineer or Civil Engineer licensed to practice in the State of Oregon with special training and experience in traffic engineering. The TIA shall be a thorough review of the effects a proposed use will have on the transportation system. The study area shall include all streets and intersections in the analysis, as defined in subsection (2) above. Traffic generated from a proposed site will be distributed throughout the transportation system using existing count data or the current transportation model used by the City. Any alternate distribution method must be based on data acceptable to the Public Works Department. The following checklist outlines what a TIA shall contain. Incomplete reports shall be returned to the applicant for completion without review: a) The scoping letter as provided by the Public Works Department; b) The Final TIA shall be signed and stamped by a Professional Civil or Traffic Engineer registered in the State of Oregon; c) An executive summary, discussing the development, the major findings of the analysis, and the mitigation measures proposed; d) A vicinity map of the proposed site and study area; e) Project characteristics such as zoning, potential trip generations (unless stipulated to less than potential), proposed access(s), and other pertinent factors; f) Street characteristics within the study area including functional classification, number of travel lanes, lane width, shoulder treatment, bicycle path corridors, and traffic control at intersections; g) Description of existing transportation conditions including transit accessibility, accident history, pedestrian facilities, bicycle facilities, traffic signals, and overall traffic operations and circulation; h) Peak period turning movement counts of at least two-hour minimums at study area intersections, less than 2 years old. These counts shall be adjusted to the design year of the project and consider seasonal traffic adjustments when required by the scoping letter; i) A "Figure" showing existing peak period (AM, noon, or PM, whichever is largest) turning movement volumes at study area intersections, as shown in Example 1. Approved applications obtained from the City that have not built out but will impact study City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standards and Specifications 39 116 3125/14 12;26 PM area intersections shall be included as pipeline traffic. An appropriate adjustment factor shall be applied to existing count data if counts were taken during the off-peak season; j) Potential "Project" trip generation using the most current edition of the ITE Trip Generation, as required by the Public Works Department at the time of scoping. Variations of trip rates will require the approval of the Public Works Department. Such approval will require submission of adequate supporting data prior to first submittal of the TIA; k) A "Figure" illustrating project turning movement volumes at study area intersections for peak periods, as shown in Example 2. Adjustments made for pass -by traffic volumes shall follow the methodology outlined in the latest edition of the ITE Trip Generation, and shall not exceed 25% unless approved by the Public Works Director; 1) A "Figure" illustrating the combined traffic of existing, background, and project turning movement volumes at study area intersections for peak periods, as shown in Example 3; m) Level of Service (LOS) analysis at study area intersections under the following conditions: [ (A) Existing plus pipeline traffic (B) Existing plus pipeline traffic and project traffic. A table shall be prepared which illustrates all LOS results. The table shall show LOS conditions with corresponding vehicle delays for signalized intersections and the critical movement at unsignalized intersections. If the proposed use is scheduled to be completed in phases, a LOS analysis shall be prepared for each phase; n) A mitigation plan if impacts to the study area reduce level of service (LOS) below minimums. Mitigation measures may include stipulations and/or construction of necessary transportation improvements. Mitigation measures shall be required to the extent that the transportation facilities, under City jurisdiction, operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS) with the addition of project traffic; and o) Intersections under jurisdiction of another agency, but still within the City limits, shall be evaluated by either the City's criteria or the other jurisdiction's criteria, or both, whichever is considered applicable by the Public Works Department. If the TIA is not consistent with the scoping letter (including any amendments) then the TIA will be returned to the applicant without review. (6) Analysis criteria: a) All trip distributions into and out of the transportation system must reflect existing traffic count data for consistency or follow the current transportation model used by the City. If alternate splits are used to distribute traffic then justification must be provided and approved by the Public Works Department prior to first submittal of the TIA. I b) If progression analysis is being evaluated or queuing between intersections is a concern, the peak period used in the analysis must be the same for every intersection along the street and reflect that of the most critical intersection being evaluated. If a common peak period is not requested by the Pub. lic Works Department, then the actual peak period of every intersection shall be used. c) Counts performed must be a minimum of two hours and include the peak period for analysis purposes. All documentation shall be included in the TIA i d) All supporting count data, LOS analyses, pass -by deductions, growth rates, traffic 40 City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standards and Specifications 117 3125/14 12:26 PM distributions, or other engineering assumptions must be clearly defined and attached to the TIA when submitted in report form to the City for review. e) All LOS analyses shall follow operational procedures per the current Highway Capacity Manual. Ideal saturation flow rates greater than 1600 vehicles per hour per lane should not be used unless otherwise measured in the project vicinity. Queue lengths shall be calculated at the 95th percentile where feasible. Actual peak hour factors should be used for each movement or lane grouping in the analysis. Peak hour factors over 0.90 shall not be used unless justified by specific counts at that location. f) Signal timing used in capacity or progression analysis shall follow City timing plans and account for pedestrian crossing times, unless otherwise noted in the scoping letter. g) Arrival Type 3 (random arrivals) shall be used unless a coordinated plan is in place during the peak period. 320.10.04 — Maintenance of level of Service D Whenever level of service is determined to be below level D for arterials or collectors, development is not permitted unless the developer makes the roadway or other improvements necessary to maintain level of service D respectively. 41 City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standards and Specifications 118 Jackson County Fire District 3 December 13, 2018 8383 Agate Road White City, OR 97503 Project Narrative & Findings of Fact (Scenic Avenue Fire Station Project) Affected Parcels: This application is a request for zone changes on these parcels: 37 2W 03 AB TL 4400 currently owed by School District 6, and, 37 2W AB TL 4500 & 4600 currently owned by Jackson County Fire District 3. Project Summary: The purpose of the requested Zone Map Amendment is to change the zoning designation on the above listed parcels to Civic Use as needed to prepare for construction of a new fire station on these properties located along Scenic Avenue in Central Point. As well as to comply with the comprehensive plan designations recently approved by the City of Central Point. Provided below are responses to the application approval criteria in Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 17.10, Zoning Map and Zoning Code Text Amendments. 17.10.200 Initiation of amendments. A proposed amendment to the code or zoning map may be initiated by either: • A resolution by the planning commission to the city council; • A resolution of intent by the city council; or for zoning map amendments, ■ An application by one or more property owners (zoning map amendments only), or their agents, of property affected by the proposed amendment. The amendment shall be accompanied by a legal description of the property or properties affected, proposed findings of facts supporting the proposed amendment, justifying the some and addressing the substantive standards for such an amendment as required by this chapter and by the Land Conservation and Development Commission of the state. (Ord. 1989 §1 (part), 2014). Findings for 17.10.200: Section 17.10.200 item C is met. As evidenced by the application submittals, the zoning map change(s) is/are being requested by the property owners, specifically Fire District 3 and on behalf of School District 6 by their authorization. Conclusion of 17.10.200: The aipphcation for a zone map change has been initiated consistent with the requirements of this section. 17.10.300 Major and minor amendments. There are two types of map and text amendments: A. Major Amendments. Major amendments are legislative policy decisions that establish bylaw general policies and regulations for future land use decisions, such as revisions to the zoning Attachment "C" 119 and land division ordinance that have widespread and significant impact beyond the immediate area. Major amendments are reviewed using the Type IV procedure in Section 17.05.500. B. Minor Amendments. Minor amendments are those that involve the application of adopted policy to a specific development application, and not the adoption of new policy (i.e., major amendments). Minor amendments shall follow the Type 111 procedure, as set forth in Section 17.05.400. The approval authority shall be the city council after review and recommendation by the planning commission. (Ord. 1989 §1(part), 2014; Ord. 1874 §3(part), 2006). Findings for 17.10.300: On March 8, 2018, the City approved Ordinance No. 2043 updating and adopting the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element. As part the Land Use Element Update, the City re -designated the Project Site properties from Low Density Residential to Civic Use. At this time, the zoning for these properties is R-1-8, Low Density Residential, which is consistent with the prior land use designation. The purpose of the proposed zone map change is to comply with the new Comprehensive Plan land use designation (i.e. Civic Use), and to prepare the properties for construction of a new fire station. No new policies or zoning regulations are proposed as part of this application. Since the request is to apply the existing Civic designation to the subject properties, and does not create new policy, it qualifies as a Minor Zone Map amendment subject to Type III procedures. Conclusion to 17.10.300: The proposed zone map change is a Minor Amendment consistent with this section. 17.10.400 Approval Criteria A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve with conditions or to deny an application for a text or map amendment shall be based on written findings and conclusions that address the following criteria: A. Approval of the request is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals (major amendments only); Findings for 17.10.400(N.- The proposal is a Minor Zone Map Amendment (see Findings for 17.10.300). Conclusion of 17.10.400(A1: Sub -section (A) is not applicable to this request. B. Approval of the request is consistent with the Central Point comprehensive plan (major and minor amendments); Findings for 17.10.400(B): The proposed zone map amendment would change the current R-1-8 zoning designations to Civic Use, which is consistent with the recently updated Land Use Element, Land Use Map Civic land use designation. 120 Conclusion to 17.10.400(B): The proposed zone change complies with the land use and zoning map designations and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. C. If a zoning map amendment, findings demonstrating that adequate public services and transportation networks to serve the property are either available, or identified for construction in the city's public facilities moster plans (major and minor amendments), and Findings for 17.10.400(C): As stated in the Pre -Application Conference Report dated March 20, 2018 (File No. PRE -18005), the project site is currently served with water, sewer and storm drainage facilities, which serves existing development on portions of the site and existing surrounding development. Any future infrastructure upgrades will be a function of development, per the City's requirements for public services and streets. Conclusion to 17.10.400(C1: The project complies with this standard. D. The amendment complies with OAR 660-012-0060 of the Transportation Planning Rule. (Ord. 1989 §1(part), 2014; Ord. 1874 §3(part), 2006. Formerly 17.10.300(8)). Findings for 17-10.400(D): A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by Southern Oregon Traffic Engineering, LLC on November 19, 2018 for the Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map Amendments on the Project Sites. The purpose of the Traffic Study is to demonstrate how the proposed change complies with the Transportation Planning Rule and City regulations. Per the Traffic Study analysis, "...the proposed zone change... is not shown to degrade the performance of any study area intersection under existing or future conditions." And, "...it is concluded that streets and intersections that serve the subject property will accommodate projected a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes from permitted uses under Civic zoning without requiring a change in the functional classification of any existing or planned facility, or degrade the performance of an existing or planned facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified...". The Traffic Impact Study is included with this application. Conclusion of 17.10_400(D): Based on the Traffic Study analysis and findings, the proposed zone map amendment complies with the Transportation Planning Rule and the City's Comprehensive Plan. In conclusion, we believe the application submittal package demonstrates compliance with the approval criteria for zone map amendments outlined in the Central Point Municipal Code. On behalf of Jackson County Fire District 3 and School District 6 I request approval of this zone change for the subject properties. John Patterson Deputy Chief Jackson County Fire District 3 541-831-2752 121 w z w U_ z LU U U) f � o w w ' > U O C) Of Z UOZJ LLI:z fL)Yr WD ia7�.0 J Q a O � = Z Z -�I C -)O O �e U j f N 122 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No.: ZC-18007 Before the City of Central Point Planning Commission Consideration of a Zone (Map) Change Application on 1.76 acres at 1909 Scenic Avenue. The property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03AB, Tax Lots 4400, 4500 and 4600. Applicant: Fire District Number 3 8383 Agate Road White City, OR 97503 PART 1 INTRODUCTION Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law It is requested that the above referenced tax lots be rezoned from Residential Single Family (R-1- 8) to Civic. The purpose of the application is to comply with the Civic Use Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation for the property and prepare for the construction of a new fire station. The zone change request is a quasi-judicial map amendment, which is processed using Type III application procedures. Type III procedures set forth in Section 17.05.400 provide the basis for decisions upon standards and criteria in the development code and the comprehensive plan, when appropriate. Applicable development code criteria for this Application include: 1. Comprehensive Plan 2. State Transportation Planning Rule 3. CPMC, Chapter 17.10 PART 2 FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS Staff has reviewed the Applicant's Findings (Attachment "C" in the Staff Report dated February 5, 2019) and are herein incorporated by reference, and found that they address all of the applicable development code criteria for the proposed zone (map) amendment. However, the Planning Department is providing supplemental findings addressing the State Transportation Planning Rule below. OAR 660-012-0060 — Transportation Planning Rule The State Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) in OAR 660-012-0060 requires changes to land use plans and land use regulations (i.e. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and Zoning Map Amendments) to be consistent with the function and capacity of existing and planned transportation facilities. Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-012-0060 subsection (1) states the following: Attachment "D" 123 (1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility, then the local government must put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule, unless the amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10) of this rule. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would: (a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility (exclusive of corrections of map errors in an adopted plan); Finding OAR 660-012-0060(1)(a): A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared for the proposed zone change by Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC on December 8, 2018. The Study evaluates the proposed zone change on the 1.76 acre project site (37S 2W 03AB Tax Lots 4400, 4500 & 4600) from R-1-8 to Civic. The TIA evaluates the surrounding streets and intersections, including Scenic Avenue (Minor Arterial), 10`h Street (Minor Arterial), Upton Road (Minor Arterial, and Rock Way (Local). Per the TIA, the zone change trip generation was evaluated based on a middle school with 107 students because it produces the highest number of trips for permitted uses in the Civic zoning district. The analysis reported 228 additional daily trips and 37 additional PM Peak trips, which does not result in any changes to the functional street classifications on the surrounding streets. Per the TIA, the traffic generated by the increased land use intensity will not alter the functional classification for any existing or planned infrastructure. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(l)(a): As shown in the Applicant's TIA, the functional street classifications for existing and planned facilities will not change as a result of the minor zone map amendment. (b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or Finding OAR 660-012-0060(1)(6): The standards implementing a functional classification system are based on the Street Classification standard in the Public Works Department Standard Specifications and Uniform Details for Public Works Construction (2014). As shown in the TIA, the proposed minor zone map amendment does not alter the performance standards for any of the street intersections with existing and planned improvements per the Public Works Standards noted above. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(1)(6): Consistent. (c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection based on projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP. As part of evaluating projected conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be generated within the areas of the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes an enforceable, ongoing requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not limited to, transportation demand management. This 124 reduction may diminish or completely eliminate the significant effect of the amendment. (A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility; Finding OAR 660-012-0060(1)(c)(A): The Public Works Standards, Table 300-6 Driveway and Property Access Dimensions, specifies that direct site access is generally not allowed unless no other reasonable access is available. Per the Applicant's TIA, access to the site isfrom om Scenic Way and from a future extension of Rock Way along the westproperty boundary. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(1)(c)(A): The access and travel on existing and planned facilities is consistent with the functional classification standards set forth in the Public Works Standard Specifications and TSP and Comprehensive Plan. (B) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that it would not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or, Finding OAR 660-012-0060(1)(c)(B): As shown in Table 1, the intersection of Upton Road and Scenic Avenue is currently operating at an unacceptable level of service (LOS) "F" under current conditions (Year 2018 No -Build). The critical movement is the southbound left turn movement, which causes the failing LOS. Table 1. r pact 8unimau Roadway Functional city Year Year Future Future Intersection Classification Operational 2018, 2018, Year Year Standard No -build Build 2038, No 2038, Build Build Upton Road/ Minor Arterial LOS "D" LOS "17" LOS 'T" LOS "17" LOS "17" Scenic Avenue Rock Way/ Collector/ LOS "D" LOS "B" LOS "B" LOS "C" LOS "C" Scenic Avenue Minor Arterial Scenic Middle Private Drive/ None LOS "C" LOS "D" LOS "E" School/Scenic Ave Minor Arterial The TIA also examined the intersection of the Scenic Middle School driveway with Scenic Avenue. Despite an LOS "E"for this intersection, the critical movement is northbound traffic exiting the middle school and there is no operational standard for private driveways. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(1)(c)(B): The TIA demonstrates that the existing facilities at Upton Road and Scenic Avenue perform below the acceptable performance standards in the TSP or Comprehensive Plan (i.e. LOS "F) for the 125 planning period (i.e. 2038).However, the turning movement that contributes to the failing performance (Southbound Left Turn) is not impacted by the proposed zone change and does not change between the "Build" and "No -Build" analysis for the planning period. When a specific use is proposed for site development, further traffic analysis will be needed per CPMC 17.05.900(A)(2)(b) and (g) to evaluate mitigation that would allow the intersection to operate within an acceptable LOS during the planning period. (C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(1)(c)(C): See Finding OAR 660-012-0060(1)(c)(B). Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(1)(c)(C): Consistent. (2) If a local government determines that there would be a significant effect, then the local government must ensure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standards of the facility measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP through one or a combination of the remedies listed in (a) through (e) below, unless the amendment meets the balancing test in subsection (2)(e) of this section or qualifies for partial mitigation in section (11) of this rule. A local government using subsection (2)(e), section (3), section (10) or section (11) to approve an amendment recognizes that additional motor vehicle traffic congestion may result and that other facility providers would not be expected to provide additional capacity for motor vehicles in response to this congestion. (a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land uses are consistent with the planned, function, capacity, and performance standards of the facility. (b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive plan to provide transportation facilities, improvements or services adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent with the requirements of this division; such amendments shall include a funding plan or mechanism consistent with section (4) or include an amendment to the transportation finance plan so that the facility, improvement, or service will be provided by the end of the planning period. (c) Amending the TSP to modify the planned function, capacity or performance standards of the transportation facility. (d) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a development agreement or similar funding method, including but not limited to transportation system 126 management measures or minor transportation improvements. Local governments shall, as part of the amendment, specify when measures or improvements provided pursuant to this subsection will be provided. (e) Providing improvements that would benefit modes other than the significantly affected mode, improvements to facilities other than the significantly affected facility, or improvements at other locations if: (A) The provider of the significantly affected facility provides a written statement that the system -wide benefits are sufficient to balance the significant effect, even though the improvements would not result in consistency for all standards; (B) The providers of facilities being improved at other locations provide written statements of approval; and, (C) The local jurisdictions where facilities are being improved provide written statements of approval. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(2): As demonstrated in the findings and conclusions for OAR 660-012-0060(1), the proposed zone map change does not significantly affect transportation facilities. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(2): Not applicable. (3) Notwithstanding sections(1) and (2) of this rule, a local government may approve an amendment that would significantly affect an existing transportation facility without assuring that the allowed land uses are consistent with the function, capacity, and performance standards of the facility where: (a) In the absence of the amendment, planned transportation facilities, improvements and services as set forth in section (4) of this rule would not be adequate to achieve consistency with the identified function, capacity or performance standard for that facility by the end of the planning period identified in the TSP. (b) Development resulting from the amendment will, at a minimum mitigate the impacts of the amendment in a manner that avoids further degradation to the performance of the facility by the time of the development through one, or a combination of transportation improvements or measures; (c) The amendment does not involve property located in an interchange area as defined in paragraph (d)(C); and For affected state highways, ODOT provides a written statement that the proposed funding and timing for the identified mitigation improvements or measures are, ata minimum, sufficient to 127 avoid further degradation to the performance of the affected state highway. However, if a local government provides the appropriate ODOT regional office with written notice of a proposed amendment in a manner that provides ODOT reasonable opportunity to submit a written statement into the record of the local government proceeding, and ODOT does not provide a written statement, then the local government may proceed with applying subsections (a) through (c) of this section. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(2): As demonstrated in the findings and conclusions for OAR 660-012-0060(1), the proposed zone map change does not significantly affect transportation facilities. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(2): Not applicable. (4) Determinations under sections (1) through (3) of this rule shall be coordinated with affected transportation facility and service providers and other affected local governments. (a) In determining whether an amendment has a significant effect on an existing or planned transportation facility under subsection (1)(c) of this rule, local governments shall rely on existing transportation facilities and services and on the planned transportation facilities, improvements and services set forth in subsections (b) and (c) below. (b) Outside of interstate interchange areas, the following are considered planned facilities, improvements, and services: (A) Transportation facilities, improvements or services that are funded for construction or implementation in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program or a locally or regionally adopted transportation improvement program or capital improvement plan or program of a transportation service provider. (B) Transportation facilities, improvements or services that are authorized in a local transportation system plan and for which a funding plan or mechanism is in place or approved. These include, but are not limited to, transportation facilities, improvements or services for which: transportation systems development charge revenues are being collected; a local improvement district or reimbursement district has been established or will be established or will be established prior to development; a development agreement has been adopted; or conditions of approval to fund the improvement have been adopted. (C) Transportation facilities, improvements or services in a metropolitan planning organization (MPO) area that are part of the area's federally -approved, financially constrained regional transportation system plan. (D) Improvements to state highways that are included as planned improvements in a regional or local transportation system plan or comprehensive plan when ODOT 128 U provides a written statement that the improvements are reasonably likely to be provided by the end of the planning period. (E) Improvements to regional and local roads, streets or other transportation facilities or services that are included as planned improvements in a regional por local transportation system plan or comprehensive plan when the local government9s) or transportation service provider(s) responsible for the facility, improvement or service provides a written statement that the facility, improvement or service is reasonably likely to be provided by the end of the planning period. (c) Within interstate interchange areas, the improvements included in (b) (A -(C) are considered planned facilities, improvements and services, except where: (A) ODOT provides a written statement that the proposed funding and timing of mitigation measures are sufficient to avoid a significant adverse impact on the Interstate Highway system, then local governments may also rely on the improvements identified in paragraphs (b)(D) and (E) of this section; or, (B) There is an adopted interchange area management plan, then local government may also rely on the improvements identified in that plan and which are also identified in paragraphs (b)(D) and (E) of this section. (d) As used in this section and section (3): (A) Planned interchange means new interchanges and relocation of existing interchanges that are authorized in an adopted transportation system plan or comprehensive plan; (B) Interstate highway means Interstates 5, 82, 84, 105, 205 and 405; and, (C) Interstate interchange area means: (i) Property within one-quarter mile of the ramp terminal intersection of an existing or planned interchange on an Interstate Highway; or, (ii) The interchange area as defined in the Interchange Area Management Plan adopted as an amendment to the Oregon Highway Plan. (e) For purposes of this section, a written statement provided pursuant to paragraphs (b)(D), (b)(E), or (c)(A) provided by ODOT, a local government or transportation facility provider, as appropriate, shall be conclusive in determining whether a transportation facility, improvement or service is a planned transportation facility, improvement or service. In the absence of a written statement, a local government can only rely upon planned transportation facilities, improvements and services identified in paragraphs 129 (b)(A)-(C) to determine whether there is a significant effect that requires application of the remedies in section (2). Finding OAR 660-012-0060(4): As demonstrated in the findings and conclusions for OAR 660-012-0060(1), the proposed zone map change does not significantly affect transportation facilities. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(4): Not applicable. (9) Notwithstanding section (1) of this rule, a local government may find that an amendment to a zoning map does not significantly affect an existing or planned facility if all of the following requirements are met: (a) The proposed zoning is consistent with the existing comprehensive plan map designation and the amendment does not change the comprehensive plan map; Finding OAR 660-012-0060(9)(a): The City of Central Point completed a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment in 2018 with the adoption of Ordinance No. 2043. The amendment designated the subject property as Civic. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(9)(a): The City of Central Point uses a two (2) map system with the Comprehensive Plan Map and the Land Use Map. The Comprehensive Plan Map provides a broad view of development within the City; whereas, the Land Use Map, commonly referred to as the Zoning Map, represents the spatial distribution of all land uses and provides parcel specific information for development. The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment designated the subject property as Civic in 2018, but did not change the Land Use Map. The requested change is consistent with the recent amendment. (b) The local government has an acknowledged TSP and the proposed zoning is consistent with the TSP; and, Finding OAR 660-012-0060(9)(b): The Transportation System Plan for the City of Central Point was acknowledged in 2008. The Land Use Goals and Policies in the TSP direct the City to effectively manage the use of land within the urbanized area and manage the Land Element of the Comprehensive Plan in a manner that is consistent with the successful implementation of the TSP. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(9)(b): As noted in the findings for OAR 660-012- 0060(9)(a), the Comprehensive Plan Map was amended in 2018 and the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map was included as part of the update to the Land Use Element. The Land Use Element determines where a land use will be physically sited and how it will be managed to achieve the City 's land use goals. The Land Use Element includes the street classification system for all streets within the City's urban area to 130 ensure the land uses are compatible with the surrounding infrastructure. At the time of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map, the subject property was designated as Civic and determined to be consistent with the transportation system. (c) The area subject to the zoning map amendment was not exempted from this rule at the time of an urban growth boundary amendment as permitted in OAR 660-024-0020(1)(d), or the area was exempted from this rule but the local government has a subsequently acknowledged TSP amendment that accounted for urbanization of the area. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(9)(c): The subject property and the surrounding area were not exempted from the Transportation Planning Rule at the time of an urban growth boundary expansion. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(9)(c):Not applicable. (10) Notwithstanding sections (1) and (2) of this rule, a local government may amend a functional plan, a comprehensive plan or a land use regulation without applying performance standards related to motor vehicle traffic congestion (e.g. volume to capacity ratio or V/Q, delay or travel time if the amendment meets the requirements of subsection (a) of this section. This section does not exempt a proposed amendment from other transportation performance standards or policies that may apply including, but not limited to, safety for all modes, network connectivity for all modes (e.g. sidewalks, bicycle lanes) and accessibility for freight vehicles of a size and frequency required by the development. (a) A proposed amendment qualifies for this section if it: (A) Is a map or text amendment affecting only land entirely within a multimodal mixed-use area (MMA); and (B) Is consistent with the definition of an MMA and consistent with the function of the MMA as described in the findings designating the MMA. (b) For the purpose of this rule, "multiniodal mixed-use area" or "MMA" rneans an area: (A) With a boundary adopted by a local government as provided in subsection (d) or (e) of this section and that has been acknowledged; (B) Entirely within an urban growth boundary; (C) With adopted plans and development regulations that allow the uses listed in paragraphs (8)(b)(A) through (C) of this rule and that require new development to be consistent with the characteristics listed in paragraphs (8)(b)(D) through (H) of this rule; 131 (D) With land use regulations that do not require the provision of off-street parking, or regulations that require lower levels of off-street parking than required in other areas and allow flexibility to meet the parking requirements (e.g. count on -street parking, allow long-term leases, allow shared parking); and (E) Located in one or more of the categories below: (i) At least one-quarter mile from any ramp terminal intersection of existing or planned interchanges; (ii) Within the area of an adopted Interchange Area Management Plan (TAMP) and consistent with the LAMP; or (iii) Within one-quarter mile of a ramp terminal intersection of an existing or planned interchange if the mainline facility provider has provided written concurrence with the MMA designation as provided in subsection (c) of this section. (c) When a mainline facility provider reviews an MMA designation as provided in subparagraph (b)(E)(iii) of this section, the provider must consider the factors listed in paragraph (A) of this subsection. (A) The potential for operational or safety effects to the interchange area and the mainline highway, specifically considering: (i) Whether the interchange area has a crash rate that is higher than the statewide crash rate for similar facilities; (ii) Whether the interchange area is in the top ten percent of locations identified by the safety priority index system (SPIS) developed by ODOT; and (iii) Whether existing or potential future traffic queues on the interchange exit ramps extend onto the mainline highway or the portion of the ramp needed to safely accommodate deceleration. (B) If there are operational or safety effects as described in paragraph (A) of this subsection, the effects may be addressed by an agreement between the local government and the facility provider regarding traffic management plans favoring traffic movements away from the interchange, particularly those facilitating clearing traffic queues on the interchange exit ramps. (d) A local government may designate an MMA by adopting an amendment to the comprehensive plan or land use regulations to delineate the boundary following an 132 existing zone, multiple existing zones, an urban renewal area, other existing boundary, or establishing a new boundary. The designation must be accompanied by findings showing how the area meets the definition of an MMA. Designation of an MMA is not subject to the requirements in sections (1) and (2) of this rule. (e) A local government may designate an MMA on an area where comprehensive plan map designations or land use regulations do not meet the definition, if all of the other elements meet the definition, by concurrently adopting comprehensive plan or land use regulation amendments necessary to meet the definition. Such amendments are not subject to performance standards related to motor vehicle traffic congestion, delay or travel time. Finding OAR 660-012-0060(10): The proposed amendment affects land within an Activity Center, an area designated in the comprehensive plan for mixed uses with medium to high density. The activity center promotes pedestrian oriented development with transit services. However, the activity centers are not consistent with the definition of a Mulitmodal Mixed Use Area (MMA), as defined in the TPR. The performance standards for traffic congestion, delay and travel time were applied to the proposed amendment. As shown in the Applicant's TIA and demonstrated in the findings and conclusions for OAR 660-012-0060(1), the proposed zone map change does not significantly affect transportation facilities and the functional plan will not change. Conclusion OAR 660-012-0060(10): Not applicable. PART 3 SUMMARY CONCLUSION As evidenced in findings and conclusions provided in Part 2, the proposed zone change is consistent with applicable standards and criteria in the Central Point Municipal Code, including the Statewide Planning Goals (where applicable), Comprehensive Plan, and Statewide Transportation Planning Rule. 133 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 863 A RESOLUTION FORWARDING A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE MINOR ZONE MAP AMENDMENT FROM RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY (R-1-8) TO CIVIC (CIVIC) ON 1.76 ACRES LOCATED AT 1909 SCENIC AVENUE. (37S 2W0 3AB Tax Lot 4400, 4500 & 4600) File No. ZC-18007 Applicant: Fire District 3; WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is proposed to re -designate the property identified by the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S 2W 03AB Tax Lots 4400, 4500 & 4600 as Civic; and WHEREAS, the proposed Civic zoning is a Civic zoning district consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and surrounding land uses; and WHEREAS, adequate public services and transportation networks are available to the site; and WHEREAS, the proposed zone change from R-1-8 to Civic has been determined to be consistent with the State Transportation Planning Rule. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning Commission, by this Resolution No. 863, does recommend that the City Council approve the change of zone on the property identified by the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S 2W 03AB Tax Lots 4400, 4500 & 4600. This decision is based on the Staff Report dated February 5, 2019 including Attachments A through D attached hereto by reference and incorporated herein. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5th day of February, 2019. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Planning Commission Resolution No. 863 (02/05/2019) 134 Attachment "E"