Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolution 853 - Approving Tent. Plan for View Crest Subdivision
City of Central Point, Oregon 140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 www,ce ntral p o i ntocW n4ov CENTRAL POINT STAFF REPORT June 5, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: VII -A File No. SUB -18001 EXHIBIT Community Development Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Consideration of a Tentative Plan for the development of a 16 -lot subdivision. The project site is located in the R-1-6 Residential Single -Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37 2W 1 IAC, Tax Lot 100. Applicant: Kodiak, LLC, Agent: Jim Zundel. STAFF_SOURCE: Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner II BACKGROUND: The applicant submitted a tentative plan application for View Crest Subdivision, a sixteen (16) lot subdivision on a 2.91 acre property on Pittview Avenue (Attachment "A-1"). Proposed improvements include two (2) new streets for access and utility connections, including water, sewer, and stormwater management. The property is currently developed with a single-family residence and a hardship dwelling approved in 1983 by Jackson County prior to annexation of the property into the City of Central Point. The two (2) residential structures were recognized by the City as a single- family residence and a nonconforming Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in 2016. The structures are planned for removal as part of the proposed subdivision. The property is located within the R-1-6 Residential Single Family zoning district. Minimum and maximum density in the R-1-6 zoning district is four (4) units per acre to six (6) units per acre. The project proposes 5.5 units per acre, which is within the minimum/maximum range for density. Minimum lot size provided in the proposed tentative plan is 4,752 square feet and the average lot size is 7.140 square feet, which is consistent with the minimum and maximum lot dimensions permitted in the R-1-6 zoning district. ISSUES: Through the review of the project, it was noted that Pittview Avenue is owned and operated by Jackson County. The County's access management standards do not permit direct driveway approaches from a Local Road for individual lots. The proposed tentative plan depicts a single lot, Lot 2, with direct access to Pittview Avenue. Comment. The City of Central Point classifies Pittview Avenue as a Local Access Street, and the City's access management standards permit direct driveway access to Local Access streets. The City is in the process of completing a jurisdictional transfer for Pittview Avenue, but may not have it complete until summer of 2019 due to budget constraints. If the tentative plan is changed in order to comply with Jackson County access management standards, the Page 1 of 3 applicant shall submit the modifications for review and approval. Staff recommends Condition No. 1(a) requiring any modifications to the tentative plan be submitted to the City for review pursuant to Chapter 17.09 of the CPMC. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: The proposed tentative plan has been evaluated against the applicable review criteria for Tentative Plans per CPMC 16.10 and the R-1-6 zoning district per CPMC 17.20 and found to comply as evidenced by the Planning Department Supplemental Findings (Attachment "B") and the Applicant's Findings (Attachment "C").. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: _ Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall: 1. Submit a revised tentative plan that reflects any changes to the lot layout to comply with Jackson County Roads Department access management standards. Any proposed modifications to the tentative plan shall be subject to the requirements in CPMC 17.09, Modification to Approved Plans and Conditions of Approval. 2. Demonstrate compliance with all agency conditions of approval including the following: a. Satisfy conditions of approval in the Public Works Staff report dated May 17, 2018 (Attachment "D"). b. Comply with conditions of approval provided by the Rogue Valley Sewer Services in a letter dated May 3, 2018 (Attachment "E"). c. Comply with conditions of approval provided by the Jackson County Roads Department in a letter dated May 4, 2018 (Attachment "F"). d. Coordinate with Fire District #3 to plan the location of and install fire hydrants and mark the east -west Residential Lane as "Fire Lane. No Parking" in accordance with Fire District #3 comments received on March 7, 2018 (Attachment "G") ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A-1" — Tentative Plan Attachment "A-2" — Subdivision Plat Name Approval, Jackson County Surveyor's Office, April 19, 2018 Attachment `B" — Planning Department Supplemental Findings of Fact as presented at the Planning Commission meeting on 6/5/2014. Attachment "C" — Applicant's Findings Attachment "D" — Parks & Public Works Staff Report Attachment "E" — RVSS Comments Attachment "F" — Jackson County Roads Department Comments Page 2 of 3 Attachment "G" — Fire District No. 3 Comments Attachment "H" — Resolution No. 853 ACTION: Consideration of the View Crest Subdivision Tentative Plan and 1) approve; 2) approve with modifications; or 3) deny the application. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the View Crest Subdivision Tentative Plan per the Staff Report dated June 5, 2418, including all attachments thereto. Page 3 of 3 }V rENTAr/W PLAT OF VIEW CREST SUBDIVISION In Lot 17, PITTV/EW SUBDIVISION AMENDED & located in the N.E. 1/4 of Sec. 11, T.37S., R.ZW., W.M. .i City of Central Point Jackson County, Oregon v WNCUAW MANOR; UNIT I .•..1,�'n".%:`.0 ,Of 9 �Ci IQ SLOT 11 •���.�� a 7. 1H9S J� 9EaPirvL o' fi;•Je I-. .. .'tu � err •... X!a k ' _[c0 ._ �r i ... S I I 7 r.01 ,a L _C',r E I I I I jl 0• +irMl I ,--N ti 1 —_.. • 'vP.S3F SE"'x .•—_ — — r W�' ATTACHMENT 19 is , iErylni/!'E �LF1' •Y" 5' LAND,1f7'J WA 1.AC R SCC � - ,V -'N 74. ]AC !'A,SOL`_" S7, S�IIE iCJ YlC4Y •w+ I4, LJ rR&tq •k k.SV-1AIY5 P. G ATTACHMENT 19 is 7, W 3,f r 5Ll / � L/ 1-1.71 s-� Subdivision andSurveyor's Office JACKSON 10 S. Oakdale Ave., #318 COUNTY Condominium Plat Name Medford, OR 97501 Approval Request Form surveyor@jacksoncounty.org This form must be submitted to the Jackson County Surveyor for subdivision and condominium plat name approval. This document may be submitted by email in PDF file formot. Before the plot name is approved a $100 processing fee must be paid. PROPOSED NAME: VIEW CREST SUBDIVISION Applicant/ Organization Name: L.J. FRIAR & ASSOCIATES, PC Address: PO BOX 1947 PHOENIX, OR 97535 Phone Number: ALTERNATE NAME: Map and Tax Lot Number: 372W11AC TL100 Location in City/County: 541-772-2782 1 CENTRAL POINT G Signature of Applicant: t Property Owner's Name and Address: f�,C-<1'. V - K- -7q --Tq y WIc� -pr-c -7 Oc� ''11:2 � I Date Surveyor/Engineer Name/Address: Same as Applicant This Plat name will be reserved for a period of two years after which It will automatically expire. This form is a result of Oregon Rolled Statutes Chapters 100.105 (5) & (6) and 92.090 (1) which states: ORS 92.090 Approval of subdivision plat names: requisites for approval of tentative subdivision or partition plan or plat. (1) Subdivision plat names shall be subject to the approval of the county surveyor or In the case where there Is no county surveyor, the county assessor. No tentative subdivision plan or subdivision plat of a subdivision shall be approved which bears a name similar to or pronounced the same as the name of any other subdivision in the same county, unless the land platted is contiguous to and platted by the same part that platted the subdivision bearing that name or unless the party filed and record the consent of the party that platted the contiguous subdivision bearing that name. ORS 100.105 Contents of declaration; property name; variable property description. (5) The name of the property shall include the word "condominium" or condominiums" or the words "a condominium." (6) A condominium may not bear a name which is the same as or deceptively similar to the name of any other condominium located in the same county. Plat Name Approved: S 1r fgkrcl1,L _ By: Jackson County Surveyor Date Fee Paid: 4111116 Invoice Number: 7.' o Date ATTACHMENT It is Public Works Department CENTRAL Matt Samitore, Director POINT PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT May 17, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: Pittview Subdivision (File No: PAR -18002) 794 Pittview Ave —16 lot subdivision Applicant: Chris Galpin Traffic: The applicant is proposing a 16 -unit single family subdivision. Per the ITE, single family dwellings generate 1.0 peak hour trips. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) threshold is 25 PHT. A TIA is not required for this development. Existing Infrastructure: Water: There is an 8 -inch line in Pittview Ave. Streets: Pittview Avenue is a County Local road. Stormwater: There is a 36 -inch line on the west side of the property. Background: The proposed 16 -lot subdivision has frontage on Pittview Avenue and proposes construction of two (2) new streets: Sydney Court, a Minor Local Street Retrofit (w/o landscape rows, ST -15), and a Residential Lane (no on -street parking, ST -10). Issues: There are two issues relative to this application as follows: 1. Jurisdictional Transfer. Currently Pittview Avenue is owned and operated by Jackson County. The City is in the process of completing a jurisdictional transfer but may not have it complete until summer of 2019 due to budget. This could affect the layout of the subdivision based on County access management provisions. In the event changes are made, the Applicant will need to submit the modification for review and approval to assure the proposed modifications address all applicable Public Works standards. 2. Sidewalk Construction. Sidewalks are required along the frontage of Pittview Avenue; however, construction deferral to building permit is typical to allow flexibility for locating the driveway approaches. Public Works deems sidewalk deferral acceptable for Lots 1, 2, and 16 provided that sidewalks are constructed prior to Public Works Final Inspection. Conditions of Approval: Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall satisfy the following conditions of approval: 1. Pittview Avenue Frontage Improvement — The applicant shall install curb and gutter and additional paving along the frontage of Pittview Avenue to match the standards of a standard city residential 140 South 3rd Street Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 ATTACHMENT 11 " street. Sidewalk construction shall be deferred to when new homes are constructed for lots 1, 2 and 16. East —West Street — Applicant is proposing a Residential Lane that will service five new homes. No parking shall be allowed on that street. The Applicant shall submit a no parking sign layout to be approved the City. 3. Water Looping — An 8 -inch waterline will be required to be looped through the proposed subdivision to Shayla Lane east of the proposed subdivision. 4. PW Standards and Specifications — Applicant shall comply with the public works standards and specifications for construction within the right of way. 5. Access Management. Any changes to the subdivision layout to address Jackson County requirements relative to access management shall be reviewed by the Public Works Department as necessary to determine that required infrastructure requirements can be met. 6. System Development Charge Credits - There are two existing homes on the parent parcel, but only one is a legal dwelling as the second structure was a hardship. Only one full System Development Charge (SDC) Credit shall be applied to the site. 04 SEr&p SP May 3, 2018 ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES Location: 138 West Vilas Road, Central Point, OR - Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3130, Central Point, OR 7502-0005 Tel. (541) 664-6300, Fax (541) 664-7171 www.RVSS.us City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: SUB 18001, View Crest Subdivision, Tax Lots 100, Map 37 2W 11AC The existing homes on the subject property are currently served by 4 inch service connections to the 8 inch main along Pittview Avenue. The proposed development will not affect these services. Our records indicate an additional service near the west property line which must be located and abandoned per RVSS standards if not in use. Sewer service for remainder of the proposed development will require a main line extension generally as shown on the preliminary layout. The project is within the Phase 2 stormwater quality area and will require a stormwater management plan in accordance with the Regional Stormwater Quality Design Manual. The proposed development will disturb more than one acre and will require an erosion and sediment control permit (NPDES 1200 -CN). Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of this project be subject to the following conditions: Prior to the start of construction: 1. Applicant must provide construction plans prepared per RVSS standards for approval. 2. Applicant must prepare a stormwater management plan in accordance with the Regional Stormwater Quality Design Manual. 3. Applicant must record an operations and maintenance agreement for all new stormwater quality features. During Construction: 1. Sewer facilities must be constructed and inspected per RVSS standards. 2. An abandonment permit must be obtained from RVSS prior to abandoning the existing unused service to the property. 3. Applicant must sequence construction so that the permanent stormwater quality features are installed and will be operational when stormwater runoff enters them. 4. Applicant must fence off exposed subgrade of stormwater quality features from equipment traffic and storage. K:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPT\PLANNG\SUBDIVISION\2018\SUB 18001 VIEW CREST SUB.DOC i ATTACHMENT " L Prior to Final acceptance of project: 1. All new sewer must be constructed, inspected and accepted per RVSS standards. 2. Applicant must have all stormwater quality facilities, including vegetation when applicable, inspected and approved by RVSS. At the conclusion of construction, RVSS will issue final acceptance in writing indicating that all sanitary sewer and stortnwatcr requirements have been met. Feel free to call me with any questions, X9- g aQ, Nicholas R. Bakke, PE District Engineer K:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPT\PLANNG\SUBDIVISION\2018\SUB 18001 VIEW CREST SUB.DOC Attention: Justin Gindlesperger City of Central Point Planning 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Residential Development off Pittview Avenue — county -maintained road. Planning File: SUB -18-001; 37-2W-11AC Tax Lot 100. Dear Justin: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this tentative Plan application for the development of a 16 -lot subdivision on 2.91 acres in the R-1-6 residential zoning district. The project site is at 794 Pittview Avenue. Jackson County Roads has the following comments: 1. The applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and obtain county permits if required. 2. We would like to be notified of future development proposals, as county permits may be required. 3. If frontage improvements are required along Pittview Avenue, they shall be permitted and inspected by Jackson County. Sidewalk placement on Pittview Avenue frontage if required should be directly behind the curb. Jackson County Roads does not maintain planter strips. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Commercial Road Approach permit from Roads for the new road approach to Pittview Avenue. 5. The paved approach shall have 20' radii and be to Central Point's standard road width. There shall be no direct driveway approaches off Pittview Avenue. 6. Roads recommend the removal of any existing driveways not being used on Pittview Avenue and replacing them with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. 7. The posted speed zone for Pittview Avenue is 25 mph, requiring an approach sight distance minimum of 150'. I:1Engineering\Deveiopment\CITIESICNTRLPTISUB-1 M01.doc ATTACHMENT is F-91 Roads Engineering � r ACKSON COUNTY Road s Mike Kuntz Connry Engineer 200 Antelope Road While City, OR 97503 Faxn(541) 774-6295774-6228 kuntzmCiacksoncounty org www jacksoncounty org May 4, 2018 Attention: Justin Gindlesperger City of Central Point Planning 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE: Residential Development off Pittview Avenue — county -maintained road. Planning File: SUB -18-001; 37-2W-11AC Tax Lot 100. Dear Justin: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this tentative Plan application for the development of a 16 -lot subdivision on 2.91 acres in the R-1-6 residential zoning district. The project site is at 794 Pittview Avenue. Jackson County Roads has the following comments: 1. The applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and obtain county permits if required. 2. We would like to be notified of future development proposals, as county permits may be required. 3. If frontage improvements are required along Pittview Avenue, they shall be permitted and inspected by Jackson County. Sidewalk placement on Pittview Avenue frontage if required should be directly behind the curb. Jackson County Roads does not maintain planter strips. 4. The applicant shall obtain a Commercial Road Approach permit from Roads for the new road approach to Pittview Avenue. 5. The paved approach shall have 20' radii and be to Central Point's standard road width. There shall be no direct driveway approaches off Pittview Avenue. 6. Roads recommend the removal of any existing driveways not being used on Pittview Avenue and replacing them with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. 7. The posted speed zone for Pittview Avenue is 25 mph, requiring an approach sight distance minimum of 150'. I:1Engineering\Deveiopment\CITIESICNTRLPTISUB-1 M01.doc ATTACHMENT is F-91 May 4, 2018 Page 2 of 2 8. Utility Permits are required from Roads for any utility work within the county road right- of-way. 9. Please note Pittview Avenue is a County Local Road. Average Daily Traffic counts for this road are unavailable. 10, If drainage is directed to Pittview Avenue, Jackson County Roads would like to review and comment on the hydraulic report including the calculations and drainage plan. Capacity improvements or on site detention, if necessary, shall be installed at the expense of the applicant. Upon completion of the project, the developer's engineer shall certify that construction of the drainage system was constructed per plan and a copy of the certification shall be sent to Jackson County Roads. 11. Jackson County's General Administration Policy #1-45 sets forth the County's position as it relates to the management of County roads located within existing or proposed city limits or Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB). The County has no current plans for improvements to Pittview Avenue Jackson County Roads recommends that the city request road jurisdiction of Pittview Avenue and the proposed new roads. 12. We concur with any right-of-way dedicated. Sincerely, ltd, ,- Mike Kuntz County Engineer F lRF Jackson County Fire District 3 8383 Agate Road White City, OR 97503-1075 (541) 826-7100 (Office) (541) 826-4566 (Fax) pfs rf11C�, www.jcfd3.com Request for Comments Permit #none 794 Pittview Ave Central Point, OR. 97502 A Request for comments for a pre -application meeting were requested for a 15 lot subdivision. The Comments are below. Plan review completed by: DFMMark Northrop This plan review Is conducted utilizing the 2014 Oregon Fire Code as amended an adopted by ]CFD3. The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any provision of applicable codes and standards. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of a code, ordinance, or standard shall not be valid. The approval and issuance of a permit based on construction documents and other data shalt not prevent the fire code official from requiring the correction of errors In the construction documents or data, Review and approval by the fire code official shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility ofcompliance with applicable codes, ordinances, and standards. A set of approved plans must be kept at the construction site at all times for use during inspections and installation. date date Item# Noncompliance Reference Corrective action corrected approved 1 No Fire Hydrants noted on site plan OFC Appendix C Please provide 1 or 2 Fire Hydrants depending upon location. They must be within 200 feet of road frontage and not more than 400 between hydrants. 2 20 foot access roadway OFC Appendix D (Please provide Fire lane no parking signs on both sides of the street North and South for the street running East to West. 3 if a connection was made to Shayla Lane the hydrant distance would increase to 250 to road frontage and 500 feet average spacing between hydrants. 4 0 �� ©77-11 0 8 0 L� _ 0 11 0 0 ATTACHMENT It " Prepared by Mark Northrop 5/29/2018 Page 1 EXHIBIT "�" REVISED PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No.: SUB -18002 Before the City of Central Point Planning Commission Consideration of a Tentative Plan for the View Crest Subdivision Applicant: Kodiak., LLC 744 Cardley Ave, Ste 100 Medford, OR 97502 Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law PART 1 INTRODUCTION The applicant submitted a tentative plan application (Type III) for the View Crest Subdivision to subdivide 2.91 acres into sixteen (16) lots ("Application"). The property is located within the R-1-6 Residential Single Family zoning district. A subdivision tentative plan is reviewed as a Type III application. Type III applications are reviewed in accordance with procedures provided in Section 17.05.400, which provides the basis for decisions upon standards and criteria in the development code and the comprehensive plan, when appropriate. The standards and criteria for the proposal are set forth in CPMC Title 16, Subdivisions, and Chapter 17.20, Residential Single Family. The following findings address each of the standards and criteria as applies to the subdivision tentative plan. PROJECT BACKGROUND The proposed subdivision is an infill development, located in an area with existing subdivision developments on the west, north and east sides of the subject property. The existing development pattern in the area, including block sizes and street patterns, limits the connectivity between the proposed subdivision and the surrounding development. The project proposes 5.5 units per acre, which is within the minimum/maximum range for density. Minimum lot size provided in the proposed tentative plan is 4,752 square feet and the average lot size is 7.140 square feet, which is consistent with the minimum and maximum lot dimensions permitted in the R-1-6 zoning district. Page 1 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 Figure 1. Tentative Plan X TENTATIVE PLAT OF VIEW CREST SUBDIVISION In Lot 17, P17TVIEW SUBDIVISION AMENDED & located in the NE 1/6 of Sec 11, T.37S, R.2W, IY.M City of Central Point Jackson County, Oregon KING$LAND MANOR UNI" I LOT 9 LOT 10 LOf I1 LOT 12 LOT ' LOT 14 ass ro' ourouc aas] xr xi. r� I —T — - ..•� R. I I ryfl•�: .. ! wr 11 LOT w LOT 9 ! .aT a :Orr f 'LOT s I �o sa .. I W — _� _T •c' nR LOT I� o �ypy i IL nTyw ! Lol 2 II I I LCT 5 JnMV.•n. I , sh ft 17•R50" — �� •� ;la 1 7 r Fief (IT 5 • nl 6ea] >7 •, yr 1 LOT fi 7 n4,I I LOT 14 I iLOT I 6&]i To IT I I 1 I I Z •.Cl e Y 1 ,y ,rw+�' Krmrn .1 I 10T ;5LOT 3, , f I LOT . 1 LCT 2 Or 16 ; T LOT 1 PITTVIFW_ „_,.AVENUE — — q. O ���• I �' IS.YfRflV( PLAT z p •T6rL4 �fyyW.YO Si�W srnvfrac row T L�K�pr aK Sr�7504rc TOo htraTpv d —on OIL, — r— :l.,.Ae .ak .Srtrrc •uv , KKVt ]wx� EO .w,wF✓ r>. ae1 r�MR p[ A4 WET PC �.• n`[w •x4 ., w .frit Page 2 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 Figure 2. Vicinity Map View Crest Subdivision 37 2W 11AC, Tax Lot 100 794 PittviewAvenue Zone: R-1-6 Legend QVieioi Crest S u bd ivis io r, - BCG=Bear Creek Greenway _ C-2 (M)= Commercial- Medical District C-4= Tourist and Office C-5 = Thoroughfare Commercial CN = Neighborhood Commercial C uric ETOD Crvic EC = Employment Commercial(TO D) ETOD MMR` GC =General Commercial(TOD) OS = Open Spacel Parks HMR = High Mix Residential/Commeroial(TOD) - R-3 = Multiple F amity R esidential LMR = Low Mix R es id entia I(TO D) R-2 = Two -F amity Residential ETOD LMR' R-1-6 = SF R esidential - 6,000 M-1 = Industrial R -1-S = SF Residential - 5,000 M-2= Industrial General R-1-10= SF Residential -10,000 MMR = Medium Mix Residerdial(TOD) R -L= Low Density Residential Page 3 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 PART 2 SUBDIVISIONS Title 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) establishes standards and criteria for land division applications including tentative plans and final plats. The sections of CPMC 16 applicable to the Application are: Chapter 16.10 - Tentative Plans. CPMC 16.10.010 Submission of application — Filing fee. The applicant shall submit an application and tentative plan together with improvement plans and other supplementary material as may be required to indicate the development plan and shall submit ten copies to the city together with a filing fee defined in the city's adopted planning application fee schedule. The diagrams submitted shall consist of three copies at the scale specified in Section 16.10.020 and one copy in an eight -and -one -half-inch by eleven -inch format. (Ord. 1941 §11, 2010; Ord. 1786 §4, 1998; Ord. 1684 §6, 1993; Ord. 1650(part), 1990). Finding CPMC 16.10.010: The applicant submitted the tentative plan application along with the required $3,100 application fee on April 16, 2018. The submittal was reviewed and accepted on May 3, 2018 as complete for review in accordance with the submittal requirements in CPMC 16.10, CPMC 17.05, and CPMC 17.20. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.010: Consistent. CPMC 16.10.015 Application and review --Fees. Applications and review thereof shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.05 and all applicable city ordinances and laws of the state. All costs of administrative and legal staff time costs, plans checks, construction inspection, preparation of agreements, in excess of the filing fee, shall be borne by the applicant and paid upon billing by city. Failure to pay such costs as billed shall constitute grounds for denial of final plat approval or building permits. (Ord. 1650(part), 1990). Finding CPMC 16.10.015: See Finding CPMC 16.10.010. Conclusion: 1610.015: Consistent. CPMC 16.10.020 Scale. The tentative plan shall be drawn on a sheet eighteen by twenty-four inches in size or a multiple thereof at a scale of one inch equals one hundred feet or, for areas over one hundred acres, one inch equals two hundred feet, and shall be clearly and legibly reproduced. (Ord. 1650(part), 1990). Finding CPMC 16.10.020: The tentative plan is drawn on a sheet that is eighteen inches by twenty-four inches and at a scale of one -inch equals thirty feet, which is clearly and legibly produced relative to the project area. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.020: Consistent. Page 4 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 CPMC 16.10.030 General information. The following general information shall be shown on or included with the tentative plan: A. Proposed name of the subdivision. This name must not duplicate or resemble the name of another subdivision in the county; Finding CPMC 16.10.030(A): The proposed subdivision is named "View Crest Subdivision, " which is unique relative to other approved land divisions in Jackson County. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.030(A): Consistent. B. Date, north point, and scale of drawing; Finding CPMC 16.10.030(B): The tentative plan was drawn on April 11, 2018 and includes the scale and north arrow. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.030(B): Consistent. C. Location of the subdivision by section, township, and range, and a legal description sufficient to define the location and boundaries of the proposed tract or the tract designation or other description according to the records of the county assessor; Finding CPMC 16.10.030(C): Figure 1 provides the section, township and range (37 2W IIAC, Tax Lot 100) and Figure 2 provides a site vicinity map. Combined with the legal description submitted with the application, these items define the location and boundaries of the project site. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.030(C): Consistent. D. Names and addresses of the owner or owners, applicant and engineer or surveyor; Finding CPMC 16.10.030(D): The applicant and authorized agent are listed on the tentative plan (Figure 1) as Jim Zundel of Kodiak, LLC and the surveyor is listed as L.J. Friar & Associates, P. C. out of Phoenix, Oregon. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.030(D): Consistent. E. A title report indicating all interests of record in the property which is the subject of the application. Finding CPMC 16.10.030(E): A title report prepared by First American Title Company on April 10, 2018 was provided with the original submittal on April 16, 2018. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.030(E): Consistent. Page 5 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 CPMC 16.10.040 Existing conditions. The following existing conditions shall be shown on the tentative plan: A. The location, widths and names of all existing or platted streets or other public ways within or adjacent to the tract, easements, railroad rights-of-way and such other important features within or adjacent to the tract as may be required by the city; Finding CPMC 16.10.040(A): The tentative plat illustrates the location and width of Pittview Avenue, which is south of and adjacent to the project site, and Sydney Court, which is south of of Pittview Avenue and aligns with the proposed street. There is an existing 15 -ft Storm Drainage Easement (SDE) along the west side of the project site, which is shown on the Tentative Plan. There is a 10 ft Public Utility Easement (PUE) created to serve the Kensington Court subdivision, S ft of which is within the SDE and the remaining S ft to the west of the west property boundary. As shown on the Tentative Plan there is a 5 - ft PUE along the north property line to serve Kingsland Manor Unit I and another PUE that abuts a small portion of the east property line. There are no other existing easements or rights-of-way within or adjacent to the tract. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.040(A): Consistent. B. Contour lines related to some established bench mark or other datum as approved by the city when the city determines that the nature of the topography or size of the subdivision requires such data. Contour lines shall have the following minimum intervals: 1. Two -foot contour intervals for ground slopes less than five percent; 2. Five-foot contour intervals for ground slopes exceeding five percent; Finding CPMC 16.10.040(B): Figure 1 includes topographic information at two foot contour intervals. The slope of the property is less than five percent at approximately one percent. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.040(B): Consistent. C. The location of at least one temporary bench mark within the plat boundaries; Finding CPMC 16.10.040(C): The tentative plat submittal (Figure 1) provides the basis of survey including the bearings and elevations. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.040(C): Consistent. D. Location and direction of all watercourses and drainage systems; Finding CPMC 16.10.040(D): There are no drainage systems on the project site; however, per the Public Works Staff Report dated May 17, 2018, there is a 36 -inch storm drain line within the Storm Drainage Easement on the west side of the property (Figure]). There is 12 -inch storm drain line on the south side of Pittview Avenue right-of-way, which is shown on the Tentative Plan. There are no watercourses on or immediately adjacent to the project site. Page 6 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 Conclusion CPMC 16.10.040(D): Consistent. E. Natural features, such as rock outcroppings, marshes and wooded areas; Finding CPMC 16.10.040(E): Per staff site visits and aerial imagery, the project site contains two home sites with some vegetation, but it primarily consists of a flat, open grass field. There are no rock outcroppings, marshes or woodland areas on the project site. Conclusion 16.10.040(E): Consistent. F. Existing uses of the property, including location of all existing structures which the subdivider proposes to leave on the property after platting; Finding CPMC 16.10.040(F): The property is currently developed with a single-family residence and a hardship dwelling approved in 1983 by Jackson County prior to annexation of the property into the City of Central Point. The two (2) residential structures were recognized by the City as a single-family residence and a nonconforming Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in 2016 The structures are planned for removal as part of the proposed subdivision. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.040(F): Consistent. G. The location within the subdivision and in the adjoining streets and property of existing sewers and water mains, culverts and drain pipes, and all other existing or proposed utilities to be used on the property to be subdivided and invert elevations of sewers at points of probable connections; Finding CPMC 16.10.040(G): The existing infrastructure locations within the Pittview Avenue right-of- way are provided as part of Figure I relative to existing conditions. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.040(G): Consistent. H. Zoning on and adjacent to the tract. Finding CPMC 16.10.040(H): Zoning designations on the project site and adjacent properties are denoted on the Vicinity Map (Figure 2). Conclusion CPMC 16.10.040(H): Consistent. CPMC 16.10.050 Additional information. The following additional information shall also be included on the tentative plan: A. Streets, showing location, width, proposed names, approximate grades and approximate radii of curves and the relationship of all streets to any projected streets as shown of any development plan adopted by the city; Finding CPMC 16.10.050(A): The proposed tentative plat map (Figure 1) identifies two proposed internal streets, including their location, and width. The project proposes to align the proposed north - Page 7 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 south oriented street with an existing street south of Pittview Avenue. The name of the proposed street matches the existing street opposite the project site along Pittview Avenue. The east -west oriented portion of the street will also be named Sydney Court. Condition CPMC 16.10.050(A): Consistent. B. Easements, showing the width and purpose; Finding CPMC I6.10.050(B): The tentative plat proposes a 10 ft Public Utility Easement (PUE) along the frontage of all proposed lots consistent with the Public Works Standards. No other easements are proposed on the project site. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.050(B): Consistent. C. Lots, showing approximate dimensions, area of smallest lot or lots and utility easements and building setback lines to be proposed, if any; Finding CPMC 16.10.050(C): Public utility easements and approximate dimensions of each proposed lot are shown on the tentative plan (Figure 1). Conclusion CPMC 16.10.050(C): Complies as conditioned. D. Sites, if any, proposed for purposes other than dwellings; Finding CPMC 16.10.050(D): No lots or other sites are proposed for purposes other than dwellings. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.050(D): Not applicable. E. Area in square footage of each lot and the average lot area. Finding CPMC 16.10.050(E): The lot area for the each of the proposed sixteen lots is provided on the tentative plat map (Figure 1). Conclusion CPMC 16.10.050(E): Consistent. CPMC 16.10.060 Partial development. When the property to be subdivided contains only part of the tract owned or controlled by the applicant, the city may require a development plan of a layout for streets, numbered lots, blocks, phases of development, and other improvements in the undivided portion, indicating inter -relationship with the portion sought to be divided. The city shall have authority to require that any adjacent parcel or parcels owned or controlled by the applicant but not included in the proposed subdivision boundaries be included in the development whenever inclusion of such parcel or parcels would be an appropriate extension of the development and in the best interests of the public, considering the development plan and the relationship between the surrounding area and the area of proposed development. Finding CPMC 16.10.060: The project site is approximately 2.91 acres and the proposed subdivision, including individual lots, streets and other improvements, will occupy the subject property in its entirety. Page 8 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 Conclusion CPMC 16.10.060: Not Applicable. 16.10.070 Explanatory information. Any of the following information may be required by the city and, if it cannot be shown practicably on the tentative plan, it shall be submitted in separate statements accompanying the tentative plan: A. A vicinity map showing all existing subdivisions, streets and un -subdivided land ownerships adjacent to the proposed subdivision and showing how proposed streets may be connected to existing streets; Finding CPMC 16.10.070(A): The proposed subdivision is an infill development, located in an area with existing subdivision developments on the west, north and east sides of the subject property. The existing development pattern in the area, including block sizes and street patterns, limits the connectivity between the proposed subdivision and the surrounding development. Figure 1 illustrates the existing lot configuration for the adjacent subdivisions and connection to Pittview Avenue. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.070(A): Consistent. B. Proposed deed restrictions in outline form; Finding CPMC 16.10.070(B): The proposed subdivision does not include any proposed deed restrictions. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.070(B): Not applicable. C. Approximate centerline profiles showing the proposed finished grade of all streets, including the extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision; Finding CPMC 16.10.700(C): Street profiles are not provided with the tentative plan application. Condition of Approval No. 4 in the Public Works Staff Report dated May 17, 2018 requires that the applicant comply with all Public Works requirements prior to final plat to ensure the streets are completed in accordance with current standards. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.070(C): Complies as conditioned. D. The approximate location and size of all proposed and existing water and sewer lines and storm drainage systems. Finding CPMC 16.10.070(D): Existing and proposed water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems are illustrated in Figure 1. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.070(D): Consistent. CPMC 16.10.080 Tentative plan approval. A. Approval of the tentative plan shall not constitute final acceptance of the final plat of the proposed subdivision or partition for recording; however, approval of the tentative plan shall be binding Page 9 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 upon city for the purpose of the approval of the final plat if the final plat is in substantial compliance with the tentative plan and any conditions of approval thereof. A tentative plan approval shall expire and become void one year from the date on which it was issued unless the final plat has been approved pursuant to Chapter 16.12 or an application for extension is filed and approved subject to the requirements of Section 16.10.100 and Chapter 17.05. Finding CPMC 16.10.090(A): Upon receipt of a final plat application within the required time limitation per CPMC 16.12 or CPMC 16.10.100 and 17.05, the City will evaluate the final plat application to assure that the final plat is substantially compliant with the tentative plan and that all conditions have been met. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.090: Consistent. B. When it is the intent to develop a tentative plan and record a final plat in phases, the city, at the time of tentative plat approval, may authorize a time schedule for platting the various phases in periods exceeding one year, but in no case shall the total time period for platting all phases be greater than five years without review of the tentative plan for compliance with the current code and comprehensive plan. Each phase so platted shall conform to the applicable requirements of this chapter. Phases platted after the passage of one year from approval of the tentative plan will be required to modify the tentative plan as necessary to avoid conflicts with changes in the comprehensive plan or this chapter. Finding CPMC 16.10.090(B): Per the tentative plan, the final plat and development of the proposed View Crest Subdivision will not be completed in phases. Conclusion CPMC 16.10.090(B): Not applicable. Chapter 16.20, Streets and Other Ways — Design Standards. CPMC 16.20.010 Creation of streets. A. Streets created by subdivisions and partitions shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the requirements of the city's comprehensive plan, this code, the city's public works standards, and all conditions established by the city. Finding CPMC 16.20.010(A): Access to the proposed subdivision will be provided by a new Minor Residential Street (retrofit), which aligns with and will serve as an extension of Sydney Court on the opposite side of Pittview Avenue. The northern lots propose to take access from a Residential Lane, oriented in an east -west direction near the north end of the property. The Residential Street and Residential Lane are designed to minimum construction standards per the Public Works Staff Report dated May 17, 2018. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.010(A): Consistent. B. The construction of streets shall include subgrade, base, asphaltic concrete surfacing, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drainage, street signs, street lighting, and underground utilities. Page 10 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 Finding CPMC 16.20.010(B): The Applicant's Findings of Fact (Exhibit 2) state that the proposed roadways will be designed to comply with the City's codes including the Public Works Design Specifications for street construction. This is supported by the Tentative Plan (Figure 1) and the Public Works Staff Report dated May 17, 2018. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.010(B): Consistent. C. All streets, including the entire right-of-way necessary for the installation of the items mentioned in the preceding paragraph, shall be dedicated to the city. Finding CPMC 16.20.010(C): The streets, including the entire right-of-way necessary for installation, will be dedicated to the City at the time offinal plat. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.010(C): Consistent. CPMC 16.20.020 Streets — Generally The location, width, and grade of streets shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographical conditions as they relate to drainage and the operation of the water, sewer systems, to public convenience and safety and their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets. Where location is not shown in a development plan, the arrangement of streets in a subdivision shall either: A. Provide for the continuation or appropriate projection of existing streets in surrounding areas; or, Finding CPMC 16.20.020(A): The properties to the north, west and east do not allow for connectivity from the project site. Access to the proposed subdivision will be provided by a new Minor Residential Street (retrofit), which aligns with and will serve as an extension of Sydney Court on the opposite side of Pittview Avenue. Conclusion CPMC -16.20.020(A): Consistent B. Conform to the plan for the neighborhood approved or adopted by the city to meet a particular situation where topographical or other conditions make continuance or conformance to existing streets impractical. Finding CPMC 16.20.020(B): The project site is not part of a master plan or larger plan of development for the surrounding area. The development on the adjacent properties established the development pattern in the area, which is reflected in the proposed residential infill subdivision. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.020(B): Not applicable. CPMC 16.20.030 Streets --Reserve strips. Reserve strips ("street plugs") controlling the access to public ways may be required, in the discretion of city. Finding CPMC 16.20.030: Reserve strips are not proposed or determined necessary for any part of the proposed View Crest Subdivision. Page 11 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 Conclusion CPMC 16.20.030: Not Applicable. CPMC 16.20.050 Streets --Extension. Where a subdivision adjoins acreage, streets which in the option of the city should be continued in the event of the subdivision of the acreage will be required to be provided through to the boundary lines of the tract. Reserve strips and street plugs may be required to preserve the objectives of street extensions. Finding CPMC 16.20.050: The project site is not adjacent to properties that may be further developed. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.050: Not applicable. CPMC 16.20.060 Existing streets. Whenever existing streets within a tract are determined by the city to be of inadequate width, additional right-of-way shall be provided as required. Finding CPMC 16.20.060: There are no existing streets within the project site. Sufficient right-of-way exists along Pittview Road to accommodate curb, gutter, sidewalk and paving to match the standards of a city residential street (ST -I5), which is required as Condition of Approval No. 1 in the Public Works Staff Report dated May 17, 2018. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.060: Consistent. CPMC 16.20.070 Half streets. Half streets while generally not acceptable may be approved where essential to the reasonable development of the subdivision when in conformity with the other requirements of these regulations and when the city finds it will be practical to require the dedication of the other half when the adjoining property is developed. Whenever a half street is adjacent to a tract to be subdivided, the other half of the street shall be platted within such tract. Reserve strips and street plugs may be required to preserve the objectives of half streets. Finding CPMC 16.20.070: As shown on the Tentative Plan (Figure 1), half street improvements are not proposed as part of the View Crest Subdivision tentative plan application. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.070: Not applicable. CPMC 16.20.080 Cul-de-sac. A cul-de-sac shall be as short as possible and shall in no event be more than four hundred feet long nor serve more than twelve single-family dwellings or seventy-five dwelling units. All cul-de-sacs shall terminate with a circular turn -around. Finding CPMC 16.20.080: The Residential Lane is less than 400 feet in length and provides adequate turn -around area for emergency vehicles. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.080: Consistent. Page 12 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 CPMC 16.20.090 Streets --Names. No street name shall be used which will duplicate or be confused with the names of existing streets except for extensions of existing streets. Street names and numbers shall conform to the established pattern in the city and the surrounding area and shall be subject to the approval of the city. Finding CPMC 16.20.090: The proposed street provides an extension of Sydney Court from the south, and directly opposite the access along Pittview Avenue. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.090: Complies. CPMC 16.20.100 Streets --Adjacent to railroad right-of-way. Wherever the proposed subdivision contains or is adjacent to a railroad right-of-way, provisions shall be made for a street approximately parallel to and on each side of such right-of-way at a distance to be determined by city. Such distance shall be determined with due consideration at cross streets of the minimum distance required for approach grades to a future grade separation. Finding CPMC 16.20.100: There are no railroad rights-of-way within or adjacent to the project site; therefore, the provision of this section do not apply. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.100: Not applicable. CPMC 16.20.110 Planting easements. Where physical conditions require approval of streets less than fifty feet in right-of-way width, additional easements for planting of street trees or shrubs may be required. Finding CPMC 16.20.110: Per the Public Works Staff Report dated May 17, 2018, the Public Works Department is not requiring any easements for planting of street trees or shrubs. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.110: Not applicable. CPMC 16.20.120 Alleys. A. Location. Alleys may be provided in commercial and industrial districts, unless other permanent provisions for access to off-street parking and loading facilities are made as approved by the city. Finding CPMC 16.20.120(A): The tentative plat (Figure 1) does not include alley development. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.120(.4): Not applicable. B. Intersections. Alley intersections and sharp changes in alignment shall be avoided. The corners of necessary alley intersections shall have a radius of not less than twenty feet. Finding CPMC 16.20.120(B): The tentative plat does not include alley development. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.120(B): Not applicable. Page 13 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 CPMC 16.20.130 Sidewalks. Sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with such standards as are adopted by the city. Sidewalk construction shall be completed on each individual lot prior to the city building inspector granting a certificate of occupancy for any construction upon said individual lot. No application for a building permit shall be granted without a requirement in the building permit for construction of sidewalks to city's standards. Finding CPMC 16.20.130: Sidewalks shall be constructed along Sydney Court and Pittview Avenue per public works standards. Conclusion CPMC 16.20.130: Consistent. Chapter 16.24, Blocks and Lots—Design Standards The lengths, widths and shapes of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites suitable to the special needs of the type and use contemplated, needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and limitations and opportunities of topography. Finding CPMC 16.24: The proposed subdivision is an infill development, located in an area with existing subdivision developments on the west, north and east sides of the subject property. The existing development pattern in the area, including block sizes and street patterns, limits the connectivity between the proposed subdivision and the surrounding development. Conclusion CPMC 16.24: Not applicable. PART 3 ZONING ORDINANCE The purpose of Title 17 of the CPMC is to encourage the most appropriate use of land, promote orderly growth of the city, and promote public health, safety, convenience and general welfare. The sections of CPMC 17 applicable to the application are: Chapter 17.05, Applications and Types of Review Procedures This Chapter establishes standard decision-making procedures that enable the city, the applicant, and the public to review applications and participate in the local decision making process. There are four (4) types of review procedures, Type I, II, II, and IV that are applied to land use and development applications in Table 17.05. 100. 1. It also establishes when a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required. Finding CPMC 17.05: As identified in Table I, Section 17.05.100.1 a subdivision tentative plan is reviewed using Type III procedures. As evidenced by the mailed and posted notice documents in Exhibit 1, the application has been noticed and processed in accordance with the Type III review procedures per Section 17.05.400. Per Section 17.05.900, a TIA for residential development is required when Average Daily Trips (ADT) exceed 250. Per the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a Page 14 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 single family dwelling generates 9.57 ADT or 153 ADT for the proposed subdivision tentative plan. A TIA is not required. Conclusion CPMC 17.05: Complies. Chapter 17.20 — R-1, Residential Single Family Districts The purpose of the R-1 district is to stabilize and protect the urban low density residential characteristics of the district while promoting and encouraging suitable environments for family life. Finding CPMC 17.20: The proposed tentative plan has been reviewed in accordance with the applicable zoning regulations provided in Chapter 17.20. Table 1. Applicable Zoning Regglations Standard R-1-6 Zone Proposed Minimum Density Maximum Density 4 units/ acre 6 units/acre 5.5 units/acre Minimum Lot Area (interior) 4,500 square feet 4,725 square feet Maximum Lot Area interior 9,000 square feet 7,140 square feet Minimum Lot Area (corner) 7,000 square feet 7,031 square feet Maximum Lot Area corner N/A 8,275 square feet Minimum Lot Width (interior) 50 -feet 52 -feet Minimum Lot Width (comer) 60 -feet 60 -feet Minimum Lot Depth N/A 91 -feet As shown in Table 1, above, the proposed 16 lot tentative plan on 2.91 acres complies with the lot dimension standards in the R-1-6 zone. Conclusion CPMC 17.20: Consistent. PART 4 SUMMARY CONCLUSION As evidenced in Planning Department Supplemental Findings, the proposed tentative plan application for the View Crest Subdivision is, as conditioned in the Staff Report dated June 5, 2018, in compliance with the applicable criteria set forth in Title 16 and Title 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code. Page 15 of 15 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -18001 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING State of Oregon ss. County of Jackson EXHIBIT 1 I, Justin P. Gindlesperger, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the Community Planner II for the City of Central Point, a municipality in the State of Oregon. On the 3rd day of May, 2018, I caused a Notice of Public Hearing, a copy of which is attached hereto to be placed in the United States Mail at Central Point, Oregon, addressed to the persons whose addresses are attached hereto. Subscribed and sworn to before me this Ray of May, 2018. DFFIClAL STAMP DEANNA L fGH CASEY NOTARY PUBLIC -OREGON COMMISSION NO. 960044 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NAY 10, 200 Notary Public for Oregon My commission expires: S-10-2240 CENTRAL POINT City of Centra/ Point PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Notice of Public Hearing Planning Commission Meeting Dates: June 5, 2018 Time: 6:00 p.m. Place: Central Point City Hall 140 S. 3rd Street Central Point, Oregon NATURE OF MEETING Beginning at the above time and place, the Central Point Planning Commission will consider a Subdivision Tentative Plan application for the development of a 16 -lot subdivision (File No. SUB -18001) pursuant to § 16.10, Tentative Plans of the Central Point Municipal Code. The project site is in the R-1-6 Residential Single -Family zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 11 AC, Tax Lot 100. Applicant: Kodiak LLC. Agent: Jim Zundel. Pursuant to ORS 197.763 (3) (e), failure to raise an issue during this hearing, in person or in writing, with sufficient specificity to afford the decision -makers and the parties an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to the close of the final hearing means that an appeal based on that issue cannot be raised at the State Land Use Board of Appeals. CRITERIA FOR DECISION Criteria for the subdivision tentative plan application are set forth in the CPMC 16. 10, Tentative Plans. The Central Point Municipal Code is available online at www.centra! ointore on. ov. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person interested in commenting on the above-mentioned land use decision may submit written comments up until the close of the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for June 5, 2018. 2. Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 140 South Third Street, Central Point, OR 97502 or by e-mail to iustin.gindlesperger@centra pointoreaon.gov. 140 S. Third Street 0 Central Point, OR 97502 9 (541) 664-3321 0 Fax: (541) 664-6384 Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on the matters shall be raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decision described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the Planning Commission. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicants are available for public review at City Hall located at 140 South Third Street, Central Point, Oregon. The City File Number is SUB -18001. Copies of the same are available at a reasonable cost. Project information is available on the City's website at: h t tp : //%vww. ce ntra I p o i nto re gon . q ovi cdlp ro iectivi ew-crest-subdivision For additional information, the public may contact Justin Gindlesperger at (541) 664-3321 Ext. 245 or Tustin. indles er er central ointore on. ov. SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the tentative plan application; hear testimony from the applicants, proponents, opponents; and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review, the Planning Commission may approve, approve with conditions or deny the application. 140 S. Third Street 0 Central Point, OR 97502 0 (541) 664-3321 0 Fax: (541) 664-6384 .7 i�l l'..-. .. r.,.c: h"•� j: r. .. ;Ijelj1.r.. Irl.. ',1 ! rLIL+ 1,. 71.1.1 Ir [il; .]U,1Ilr,t S3dViS 372W11AC00500 372W11AC00400 372W11AC00300 Randall Bryan Cochran Holding Co LLC Jon Hoel 3622 Bursell 1523 Satellite Dr 1052 Kensington Ct Central Point, OR 97502 Medford, OR 97504 Central Point, OR 97502 372W11 AC00200 372W11 AD06300 372W11 AD06400 Donald Thumler Audie Stodola T Mc Cartney 3558 Bursell Rd 764 Pittview Ave 726 Pitt View Ave Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 372W11 D000500 372W11 DBO6400 372W11 DB01200 Jason Artner William Hale Jr Michael Higginbotham 721 Pittview Ave 765 Pittview 843 Pittview Ave Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 372W11 DB00200 372W11 DB01400 372W11 DB01300 Brandon Font Todd Rufener Cecil Whitten 2130 South Pacific Hwy 3520 Bursell Rd 7993 Atlantic Ave Talent, OR 97540 Central Point, OR 97502 White City, OR 97503 372W11 DB01500 372W 11 AC06600 372W11 AC06700 Ward B Lefebvre Ray Terry Partsafas 560 F St Pmb 433 2844 Stonebrook Dr 3730 Madrona Ln Grants Pass, OR 97526 Medford, OR 97504 Medford, OR 97501 372W 11 AC06800 372W11 AC07300 372W 11 AC07400 Elaine Cook Janice Collins Starling Reese 690 Primrose Dr 967 Elkader St 555 Freeman Rd 240 Central Point, OR 97502 Ashland, OR 97520 Central Point, OR 97502 372W1 1 AC07500 372W 11 AC07600 372W 11 AC07700 Suppression #49 Russell Edwards Jonathon Martin 841 Juanita Way 840 Juanita Way 850 Juanita Way Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 372W 11 AC07800 372W 11 AC07900 372W 11 AC08000 Hannelore Hoppe James Hilderbrand Steve Strohman 860 Juanita Way 870 Juanita Way 880 Juanita Way Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 372W11AC08100 372W11 DB00100 372W11 DB01100 Jennifer Walt Jacob Williams Justin Kramer 1595 Fifth Ave 955 Sydney Ct 934 Sydney Ct Belmont, CA 94002 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 372W11 DBO1000 372W11 DB00900 372W11AD02300 Nancy Ramey Christopher Winney Jesse Layton 952 Sydney Court 964 Sydney Court 905 Juanita Way Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 STAPLESO label size i " x 2 5/8" compatible with .Avery @5160/8 160 '"iquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm comoatible avec Avery @5160/8-160 ndA 3 7 �.1 iS 372W11AD02400Recinda Smart 372W11AD06000Terri Zunino 372W11AD06100EIdon Olson 909 Juanita Way 912 Juanita Way 908 Juanita Way Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 372W11AD06200 372W11 DB00101 372W11AC00201 Box D Properties LLC Christopher Christian Thomas Terbeck 1595 Fifth Ave 4231 Chaban Dr 14790 Hwy 62 Belmont, CA 94002 Concord, CA 94521 Eagle Point, OR 97524 372W11AC00202 372W11AD06301 372W11AD06302 Donald Thumler Jodi Hanson Donna Mc Michael 3558 Bursell Rd 1075 Shayla Ln 1065 Shayla Ln Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 372W11AD06303 372W11AD06304 372W11AD06305 Cindy Bedingfield Seth Dunn Melody Beckwith 1060 Shayla Ln 1070 Shayla Ln 1080 Shayla Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 372W1 IAD06306 372W1 1AC00401 372W11 AC00402 Ruth Cox Adrian Penner Dieguita Montgomery 1090 Shayla Ln 3606 Bursell Rd 3592 Bursell Rd Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 372W 11 AC00403 372W1 IAC00301 372W 11 AC00302 Frank Carreon David Ackles Levi Moffitt 1040 Kensington Ct 1064 Kensington Ct 1076 Kensington Ct Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 372W11 AC00303 372W 11 AC00304 372W11 AC00305 Michael Robinson Ernest Johnston Thomas lanieri 1088 Kensington Ct 1085 Kensington Ct 1073 Kensington Ct Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97202 Central Point, OR 97502 372W 11 AC00306 372W 11 AC00404 372W 11 AC00405 Alexander Allen Jon Hoel Zachary Lampella 1061 Kensington Ct 1052 Kensington Ct 1049 Kensington Ct Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 372 W 11 AC00406 372W 11 AD06507 372W11 AD06508 Caitlin Schulzke Christopher Figueroa Michael Kilbane 1037 Kensington Ct 1067 Cathedral Way 1073 Cathedral Way Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 372W11 D B06508 372W 11 AC00602 372W1 1AC00603 Jianying Chen Vernon Littrell Fred Wallace 950 Covington Ct 3656 Bursell Rd 718 Black Oak Dr A Central Point, OR 97502 Central Point, OR 97502 Medford, OR 97504 �� Cal]e1 3178 1" X 2 X118` coiiTl�udbli, ��jilh Aomr( r7.5i 160/8 160 TARES' uliquette do ror rnaz 25 rnm x 67 mm cornpatlble avec Avery (0515018160 04A "J 'd 39 10AV)'W'2 MV] iy 'R JAU X91 lOS3la��y V, I I [�! PA I I U 00X C azl'; 1@ 1 372W1 IAC00604Francisco Bugarin 3664 Bursell Rd Central Point, OR 97502 372W11DB01300 Cecil Whitten 7993-a Atlantic Ave White City, OR 97503 372W11 DB01 301 Cecil Whitten 7993 Atlantic Ave White City, OR 97503 372W111AC00100 Barbara Ritter 794 Pittview Ave Central Point, OR 97502 372W11 DB01 302Kevin Whitten 849 Piftview Ave Central Point, OR 97502 372W1 1AC00201 Thomas Terbeck 14790 Hwy 62 Eagle Point, OR 97524 label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery (D5160/8160 STAPLES Etiquette do Format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/81 60 04A u u 0 E u flenylock Av 'ti AM10o * Cr y�* 'Hopkins ■sy R -m -t Am4Y7Cm Titl!? u C 9 q L E i �uanita m L' tkview A This map/plat Is being furnished as an aid In locating the herein described land In relation to adjoiningstreets, natural boundaries and other land, and Is not a survey of the land depicted. Except to the extent a policy of title Insurance Is expressly modlFled by endorsement, If any, the company does not Insure dimensions, distances, location of easements, acreage or other matters shown thereon. geoAdvantag Application for Tentative Plat BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT OREGON: IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR } FINDINGS OF FACT LAND DIVISION OF PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS } AND 371W17DD TL 700 } CONCLUSIONS KODIAK LLC, APPLICANT } OF LAW JIM ZUNDEL, AGENT I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Applicant: KODIAK LLC 744 Cardley Ave, Suite 100 Medford, OR 97504 Agent: Jim Zundel Property: 744 Cardley Ave, Suite 100 Medford OR 97504 371W17DD TL 700 Kodiak LLC 794 Pittview Ave Central Point, OR 97502 2.91 Acres Single Family Residential (6) units per acre (R-1-6) City of Central Point EXHIBIT 2 Summary This application is submitted to comply with the Central Point Municipal Code Section 16.10, titled Tentative Plans FINDINGS OF FACT: Of the 2.91 -acre parcel, there is a 15' -wide easement for storm water granted to the city of Central Point on the most Westerly 15 feet of Lot 17 of the amended plat of Lots 3 to 10 inclusive, Pittview Subdivision, recorded subdivision located in the City of Central Point, Oregon and shown on map. The Tentative plat submitted with this application has been designed to be consistent with the Eena-preherfsive44ars,-tie-Gener4k,ind-Use-Pla-n-Map-(6-L-FJ-R); T -fan atief-Sy&tL ; -(TSR, ar�d all applicable design standards for the proposed public improvements as well as the lot design standards of the Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC). 1 The lots established with this plat conform to the standards of the CPMC for length, width, square footage, lot frontage, and access. The Road is designed to the standards set by the Central Point Public Works Department Standards and Specification Table 300-11) Minor Local Street and Residential Lanes Widths and Rights of Way Widths Conclusions-of-law,7Tfie-Warming-C-ommiss-iomeane-anclede the prepesed-tentative I ism Ftsistet wit#-the-Cenaprehet-isive-Pfa�akwy-et#ef-appiic-able-spedk-filar s-them"c4eding-NeighbeFh e • RT!"iR�17-TFT! r'I- T�;LTr�S�frsl fA�7Tra�zrrrr�r� 17.20.020 Permitted uses. The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted in an R-1 district: A. Single-family dwelling; FINDINGS OF FACT: The tentative plat is for single story, single family homes only. 17.20.050 Density, lot area, lot width, dimension, building height, lot coverage, and yard requirements. The density and lot requirements of the R-1 zoning district are governed by the subcategories of R-1-6, R-1-8 and R-110 districts, as delineated on the official zoning map of Cental Point. The density, lot area, lot dimensions, building height, lot coverage and yard requirements of these subcategories shall be in accordance with the following table: NEXT PAGE 2 Development Requirements R-1-6 Minimum density 4 units/acre Maximum density 6 units/acre Minimum lot area (interior) 4,500 Maximum lot area (interior) 9,000 Minimum lot area (corner) 7,000 Maximum lot area (corner) N/A Minimum lot width (interior) 50 feet Minimum lot width (corner) 60 feet Minimum lot depth N/A Minimum front yard 20 feet Minimum side yard (interior) 5 feet* Minimum side yard (street side) 10 feet** Minimum rear yard . 15 feet Maximum building height 35 feet Maximum lot coverage Density: The subject property is 2.91 acres within the R-1-6 zoning district. The minimum density is 11.64 single family units and the maximum density allowed is 17.46 single family units and the application is for 16 single family units. Lot Area: All four corner lots 1-6-12-16 meet the minimum lot size of 7.000 square feet and don't exceed the maximum lot size of N/A. They range from 7031 to 8275 with an average size of 7,580 The remaining twelve (12) lots meet the minimum lot size of 4500 square feet and not exceeding the maximum lot size of 9000. The range from 4725 to 7140 square feet with an average size of 6,132. Set Backs -Heights -Lot Coverage: All these elements will be addressed and followed per CPMC at the time of final plat and all will be what is allowed per Code. The street layout proposed is designed to be consistent with the area's circulation plan and provides circulation opportunities for the existing and proposed development in the vicinity. 3 I. Relevant Approval Criteria Land Aeveio rnent Code Title 16 Subdivision Criteria: The approving authority (Planning Commission) shall not approve any tentative plat unless it first finds that, the proposed land division together with the provisions for its design and improvement: 16.10.010 Submission of application --Filing fee. The applicant shall submit an application and tentative plan together with improvement plans and other supplementary material as may be required to indicate the development plan and shall submit ten copies to the city together with a filing fee defined in the city's adopted planning application fee schedule. The diagrams submitted shall consist of three copies at the scale specified in Section 16.10.020 and one copy in an eight -and -one -half-inch by eleven -inch format. (Ord. 1941 §11, 2010; Ord. 1786 §4, 1998; Ord. 1684 §6, 1993; Ord, 1650(part), 1990). FINDINGS OF FACT: On April 16, 2018 a full application was submitted along with tentative plans, title report, pre -application meeting notes along with fees. 16.10.020 through 16.10.50 All the required items have been incorporated into the plat and was submitted with the application, also title report engineer, and surveyor were included in application. FINDINGS OF FACTS: Surveyor: L.J. Friar and Associates (Jim Hibbs) 1585 Siskiyou Blvd Ste B, Medford, OR 97504 Engineer: CEC Engineering (Mark Klamrath) 132 W. Main Street Land Development Code § 16.10.030: 16.10,030 General information. The following general information shall be shown on or included with the tentative plan: A. Proposed name of the subdivision, This name must not duplicate or resemble the name of another subdivision in the county; FINDINGS OF FACT: The name has been reserved at the Jackson County Surveyors so as not to be in conflict with any other names. 4 qediri8ers-vr�urws �...... The4)4ar}R+fig Gantmi � -c. the divisionr name prepesedl"W*his application is a 16.20.010 Creation of streets. A. Streets created by subdivisions and partitions shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the requirements of the city's comprehensive plan, this code, the city's public works standards, and all conditions established by the city. FINDINGS OF FACT: The Road is designed to the standards set by the Central Point Public Works Department Standards and Specification Table 300-1D Minor Local Street and Residential Lanes Widths and Rights of Way Widths. And is aligned with Sydney Court making it a continuation not requiring a new name. 16.20.020 Streets --Generally. The location, width, and grade of streets shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to topographical conditions as they relate to drainage and the operation of the water, sewer systems, to public convenience and safety and their appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets. Where location is not shown in a development plan, the arrangement of streets in a subdivision shall either: FINDINGS OF FACTS: The only road with connectivity was Sydney Court directly on the South of Pittview from our property, we aligned Sydney Court and continued it into our project making it fit in. The properties on the North, East and West allowed for no connectivity, so we consulted with public works and designed a T intersection built to city road standards. 16.20.090 Streets --Names. No street name shall be used which will duplicate or be confused with the names of existing streets except for extensions of existing streets. Street names and numbers shall conform to the established pattern in the city and the surrounding area and shall be subject to the approval of the city. (Ord. 1650(part), 1990). FINDINGS OF FACTS: If the continuation of Sydney Court is unacceptable to the city we will name the street with a unique name that is acceptable. Additional Narrative Roadway: The proposed road has no connectivity on three sides, so it has no through traffic and relative low localized traffic, we have taken this into account and planned plenty of off-street parking and even laid out the sub -division to allow for maximum on street parking. Parking is also allowed on Pittview Avenue frontage. The final plat will contain double car garages with parking for two cars to park in the drive- way. The Right of way proposed is 52' from the public works standards and specifications (Table 300-11)) with 2 new lanes @ 10' each, 1 parking lane @ 8', 2 sidewalks @ 5' each, -a . 16.16.010 Standards and procedures. All improvements shall conform to the requirements of this title and other improvement standards or specifications adopted by the city and conditions of tentative plan approval, and shall be installed in accordance with the following procedure: FINDING OF FACTS: Mark Klamath of CEC Engineering will prepare all construction drawings including but not limited to underground utilities, sewer, storm drain system, road we will submit these for final plat no work will commence until plans are submitted and approved. Storm Water Quality will be done to the RVSS standards that are applicable for this area. Nb Improvements will be done until the City has been notified i6 advance and gives their approval. Developer will comply with C., D., and E. below C. Improvements shall be constructed under the inspection and to the satisfaction of the city. The city may require changes in typical sections and details if unusual conditions arise during construction to warrant such change in the public interest. D. Underground utilities installed in streets by the subdivider shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of such streets. Stubs for service connections for underground utilities shall be placed to such length as will obviate the necessity for disturbing the street improvements when service connections are made. E. A map showing public improvements as built shall be filed with the city upon completion of said improvements. (Ord. 1650(part), 1990). 6 APPLICATION SUMMARY AND CONCLUSSIONS: This application for a Subdivision on the subject property demonstrates compliance with all relevant sections contained within the City of Central Point Municipal Code. On behalf of the applicant, I respectfully request the approval of the application for approval of this Subdivision Re ectivel , Jim Zundel/Agent 7