Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolution 886 - Approving White Hawk Subdivision
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 886 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN FOR A 32 LOT SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS WHITE HAWK PHASE 1 (File No: SUB -20002) WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a tentative plan application to create a 32 lot subdivision consisting of a portion of residential property identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 02, Tax Lots 2700 and 2701, Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the project site is located in the Low Mix Residential (LMR) and Medium Mix Residential (MMR zoning districts within the Eastside Transit Oriented Development (ETOD) District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on January 19, 2021, at which time it reviewed the Staff Report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and, WHEREAS, after considering the proposed tentative subdivision plan for Phase 1, it is the Planning Commission's determination that the proposed land division application complies with all applicable standards and criteria as demonstrated in the Revised Staff Report dated January 19, 2021 (Exhibit 1) that includes a condition addressing on -street parking, and the Planning Department Findings (Exhibit 2). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 886 does hereby approve the Tentative Plan application for White Hawk Phase 1 subject to the conditions in the Revised Staff Report dated January 19, 2021 (Exhibit 1) and the Planning Department Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Exhibit 2). PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 19`h day of January 19, 2021. Planning Commission Chair ATT ST: City kepresentAive Planning Commission Resolution No. 886 (1/19/2021) Plannin De artment STAFF REPORT CommunitTom Humphrey, rector Community Development Director CENTRAL POINT January 19, 2021 Agenda Item: VIII -C Consideration of a 32 lot tentative subdivision plan to be known as White Hawk Phase 1. The 18.91 acre project site is within the White Hawk Master Plan area on property identified on the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S 2W 02, Tax Lots 2700 and 2701. Applicant: White Hawk Properties, LLC; Agent: Urban Development Service, LLC (Mark Knox). File No. SUB -20002. Staff Source Stephanie Holtey, Principal Planner Background The Applicant is proposing a 32 lot tentative subdivision plan on in the northwest corner or the White Hawk Master Plan Area (File No. 14004 and MOD -20005). The tentative plan includes frontage improvements along Park Street, North Street, Beebe Park Drive, Gebhard Road and a portion of Beebe Road (Attachment "A"). Street improvements include the intersection of Beebe/Gebhard Road as needed to correct the existing unsafe turning radius. Approval of the proposed improvements is subject to approval of the revised Master Plan (MOD -20005). Phases II (park) and III (apartments) are reserved for fixture development. The project site is within the Medium Mix Residential (MMR) and Low Mix Residential (LMR) zones. Per the Master Plan, residential densities are mixed across the site allowing 202 to 457 total units. The Master Plan includes 324 units, which is within the minimum/maximum density requirements. The proposed tentative plan will authorize construction of the first 48 units together with infrastructure and utility improvements. The proposed lots have been evaluated against the lot dimensions standards and found to comply. Issues There are two (2) issues/notes relative to this application as follows: Shallow Well Mitigation. To avoid potential impacts of the development process on the water table and shallow wells, the prior property owner was required to survey and sample identified wells in the vicinity of the project site. This work was completed between December 2015 and April 2016. The findings of the analysis and recommended mitigation measures are set forth in the APEX Report dated November 16, 2016 (Attachment "B"). Comment: Per the Public Works Staff Report dated January 4, 2021, the Applicant is required to design all utility and infrastructure improvements in accordance with the shallow well mitigation measures identified in the APEX report. These must be reviewed by the City's engineer and approved prior to the start of construction of any improvements. Staff recommends that the Planning commission approve Condition No. 1 that the Applicant satisfy all Public Works conditions of approval and Jackson County Roads conditions as applicable (Attachments "C" and «D„ Road Names. Emergency Communications of Southern Oregon (ESCO) submitted comments requesting that the road names for "Park Street," "North Street," and "Beebe Park Drive" be changed because they are either in use elsewhere in the County or incorporate multiple names from other existing streets. This can create confusion for emergency services. Comment: Staff recommends the Planning Commission require the street names to be changed in accordance with the ESCO email dated January 6, 2021. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law The proposed tentative has been reviewed in accordance with CPMC 17.66.050(C), including CPMC 16. 10, Tentative Plans, and found to comply as evidenced in the Planning Department Supplemental Findings (Attachment "G"). Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to final plat approval, the Applicant shall: a. Comply with the conditions set forth in the Public Works Staff Report dated January 4, 2021 (Attachment `B") and Jackson County Roads letter dated January 4, 2021 as applicable (Attachment "C"). b. Comply with the conditions set forth in the Rogue Valley Sewer Services letter dated January 4, 2021 (Attachment "D") c. Comply with the Fire District #3 conditions of approval set forth in the email dated January 6, 2021 (Attachment "E") d. Change the names of proposed streets per the ESCO email dated January 6, 2021 (Attachment "F"). 2. Prior to building permit issuance for any lot in Phase 1, a copy of the recorded plat shall be provided to the City of Central Point Community Development Department. Attachments: Attachment "A" — Tentative Plan Attachment `B" — Public Works Department Staff Report dated January 4, 2021 Attachment "C" — Jackson County Roads letter dated January 4, 2021 Attachment "D" — Rogue Valley Sewer Services letter dated January 4, 2021 Attachment "E" — Fire District #3 email dated January 6, 2021 Attachment "F" — ESCO email dated January 6, 2021 Attachment "G" — Planning Department Supplemental Findings (to be provided) Attachment "H" — Resolution No.886 (to be provided) Action Consider the proposed tentative subdivision plan and 1) Approve; 2) Approve with Modifications or 3) Deny the application. Recommendation Approve Tentative Plan subject to the recommended conditions in the staff report dated January 19, 2021. ATTACHMENT "A" sEaaHim �II ti°s11�y$ 7tSe`s ]1. }9a ti°]t{11t 17t ys6s ]s .t. s]fn silt ys 3$e 5!(a 39 $ F sat93t 71�3$e sl7i ss}tss]11 s t �1 2112 l i!! 4 i P P P! 4sE a 1 H 1 1 Y 1 1 E L 1'F r I al _ .. ,«, y, � � j48�j� �S•A9�x! �{�ty A - SII ATTACHMENT "B" Public Works Department CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT January 4, 2021 Matt Samitore, Director AGENDA ITEM: White Hawk Master Plan and Subdivision (MOD -2005 and Sub - 20002) 37S 2W 02 Tax Lot 2700 and 2701 —Modification of Master Plan and 32 lot subdivision Applicant: KDA Homes Agent: KDA Homes Traffic/Street Details: A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was completed for the project in 2014. The TIA indicates that full build -out of the development will contribute 11% towards Beebe Hamrick's intersection. Additionally, at build year, the intersection will degrade to a LOS F, which is below the City's minimum requirements. Per the TIA, the level of service decline will occur when trips generated by the development reach 107 PM Peak Hour Trips. To assure timely completion of the signal installation, the Planning Commission imposed a 96 PM Peak Hour Trip Cap. The proposed changes to Revised 1 will generate 40.64 PM Peak Hour trips, which is within the the Trip Cap. Since the development conditions have not changed in the Eastside Transit Oriented Development (ETOD) District since the Master Plan was approved and the proposed modifications are within scope of the original TIA, an updated TIA is not needed at this time. Street Details: Gehbard Road shall be developed to Public Works Standard ST -21R (12 foot center turn lane) Park Drive shall be developed to Public Works Standard ST -10. Beebe Park Drive shall be developed to Public Works Standard ST -20 (half street). North Street shall be developed to Public Works Standard ST -15 (half street). Existing infrastructure: Water: There are 12 -inch water lines in servicing the site. Streets: All streets surrounding the site are collectors that are currently county roads. Stormwater: There is a 48 -inch storm drain line in Beebe Road. Additionally, the City is installing a new outfall to Bear Creek near the project site. Storm Water Quality: The applicant will need to address stonnwater quality for the site. Background/Issues: The applicant is proposing a revision to the master plan switching the phasing so that the single-family portion can be built first. Public Works has the following issues/notes about the proposed modification and Phase 1 tenative plan. 140 South 3rd Street • Central Point, OR 97502 •541.664.3321 - Fax 541.664.6384 1. Any phase of development will need to include frontage improvements and amending the intersection of Beebe/Gebhard to align for a future bridge and allow for a safer turning radius. 2. The City will be installing a new signal at Hamrick/Beebe in the 21/23 FY budget. Additionally, the City is working on a new stormwater outfall near proposed North Street and Gebhard Road. 3. The City is working with Jackson County on a Jurisdictional Transfer for Gebhard and Beebe Roads. Once approved, all conditions for this development will be from the City. Conditions of A Prior to Public Works Civil Improvement Plan approval and the start of construction of infrastructure improvements for Phase 1 as modified, the Appliant shall: 1. Utility Design - The applicant shall address the water table and well issues within the area on their construction plans to limit groundwater disturbances. The design shall address findings in the attached APEX Report dated November 16, 2016. 2. Stormwater Management Plan - The Applicant shall submit and receive approval for a stormwater management plan from the Public Works Department. The Stormwater Plan shall demonstrate compliance with the Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual for water quality and quantity treatment. Construction on site must be sequenced so that the permanent stormwater quality features are installed and operational when stormwater runoff enters. 3. Erosion and Sediment Control - The proposed development will disturb more than one acre and requires an erosion and sediment control permit (NPDES 1200-C) from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The applicant shall obtain a 1200-C permit from DEQ and provide a copy to the Public Works Department. Stormwater Quality Operations & Maintenance- The Applicant shall record an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for all new stormwater quality features and provide a copy of the recorded document to the Public Works Department. 4. Landscape and Irrigation flails - Applicant shall prepare and gain approval for a landscape and irrigation for all public landscape rows before any development occurs. Prior to the final plat for Phase 1, the applicant shall comply with the following conditions of approval: 1. Right of Way Dedication - Applicant shall dedicate the right of way shown on the tentative plat to meet collector standards for Gebhard Road and Beebe Park Drive. The right of way dedication and improvements are SDC credit eligible. 2. Frontage Improvements - Applicant shall develop half street improvements adjacent to Phase 1 of the modified master plan. Applicant shall also design and construct the proposed re-alighment of Beebe/Gebhard as part of the Phase 1 development. F�. APEX November 16, 2016 John Boyd People's Bank of Commerce 1311 East Barnett Rd. Medford, Oregon 97504 Re: White Hawk Development — Well Survey Results 718 Beebe Road Central Point, Oregon 2251-00 Dear Mr. Boyd: This letter provides the results of a well survey conducted in the vicinity of the proposed White Hawk Development and updates the evaluation of the potential for impacts to the water levels in wells near the development due to the installation of a proposed storm drain line along Gebhard Road. A preliminary evaluation was provided in a letter to you dated August 24, 2015. Subsequent to that letter, the City of Central Point requested that a survey be performed to identify domestic well owners in the vicinity of the development and, where possible, the construction of the wells (e.g., depth, use, screened interval if screened, etc.) to further evaluate the potential for negative impacts to water levels in wells located within the White Hawk transit oriented development (TOD) from the proposed construction of the storm drain line. The survey was completed between December 2015 and April 2016. The results of the survey and an updated evaluation on the potential impacts of the storm drain line on wells identified in the White Hawk TOD are provided below. WELL SURVEY A well survey form was sent to the residents located within the White Hawk TOD; Attachment A shows the boundaries and tax lots within the White Hawk TOD. Well surveys were sent to owners of the 31 tax lots within the White Hawk TOD, The well survey was sent at least two times to each tax lot owner; 11 completed surveys were returned to Apex. Attachment B includes copies of the completed surveys. Table 1 summarizes the results of the survey; two surveys were for property outside of the TOD and were not included on Table 1. Results of the well survey indicated the presence of six wells on five tax lots within the TOD. The location of these wells and the reported depth of the well is shown on Figure 1. Where information on the exact location of the well is not available, the location is approximated by placing it in the center of the tax lot for which the information was obtained. In addition, Apex reviewed Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD) online files to identify registered wells in the TOD. Ten well logs for wells located on 6 parcels within the TOD were identified. Attachment C contains the identified well logs and Table 2 summarizes the information on the identified wells, by parcel. Two of the parcels, with well logs registered by OWRD sent in completed well surveys; the other well logs provided additional information. Additionally, shown on Figure 1 are the locations of wells identified in a report prepared by Don Haggerty, PhD in February 20002. Dino Picollo, parcel 28 and Charlotte Holder, parcel 15; see Table 1. 2 Haggerty 2000. Report on Groundwater in the Vicinity of Beebe Rd., Jackson County, Oregon, February 28, 2000. 3015 SW First Avenue, Portland, OR 97201 T 503.924.4704 F 503.943.6357 www.apexcos.com John Boyd, People's Bank of Commerce November 16, 2016 Well Survey Results, White Hawk Development Page 2 It is unknown how many of the wells identified in the OWRD database or in the Haggarty report are still in use as only two property owners3 with wells identified in the OWRD database and/or the Haggerty report sent back completed well surveys (parcel owners were sent water well surveys in December 2015, January 2016, and/or March 2017). Additionally, the Haggerty report indicated 3 wells to be present on parcel number 15, but the completed well survey for this parcel indicated just one 50 -foot deepwell. Figure 1 shows the updated information from the well survey. Based on the information obtained from the well searches: • At least six wells are in use in the White Hawk TOD based on the well survey results; the well depths range from 12 to 50 feet, where known. • An additional 5 to 8 wells were identified from the OWRD w ell log database. Of these, all but two are sealed from ground surface to 20 feet or more. Additionally, the Himmelman well at parcel 30 appears to be 100 feet deep and sealed to 35 feet. • It is unclear whether the additional wells identified in the OWRD database are still in use. • The well logs in the OWRD database suggest that, in the vicinity of the development, the soil consists of clay to depths of 8 to 12 feet below grade, underlain be sand and gravel to at least 40 to 50 feet in most locations. Figure 1 shows that most of the wells are more than 100 feet from the proposed stormdrain line to be installed beneath Gebhard Road. However, wells are reported at parcels 3, 5, and 6 (see Figure 1) and the location of the wells are not known so the wells could be closer to the proposed utility. EVALUATION OF THE POTENTIAL FOR IMPACTS DURING STORM AND SANITARY LINE INSTALLATION Depth to first encountered water for shallow wells in the area appears to be about 9 feet below grade, but was historically reported as shallow as 4 feet below grade in some areas. Based on the OWRD well logs, it appears that most (if not all) of the wells are sealed to at least 9 feet below grade and are accessing water below that depth. The proposed storm and sanitary lines may be installed to depths of up to 10 to 12 feet and therefore, may intercept the water table in some areas. Based on this information, installation of the storm and/or sanitary lines could impact groundwater levels (and thereby impact the nearby water wells) from the following: • Dewatering during construction; • Infiltration into sewer lines; or • Longitudinal flow in trench backfill. If dewatering is necessary during construction, the water table would be lowered and these effects could extend to nearby water wells. This effect would be temporary and conditions would be expected to return to normal within a short period after completion of the work. Long-term, if the storm or sanitary lines leak, infiltration into the lines could permanently lower the water table in the vicinity of the utilities to the base of the lines; however, this effect would likely extend only a few feet from the utility trench. This potential impact is addressed by quality control during construction to assure the utility lines are installed in alignment, seals are in place, intact and tested, proper pipe bedding is used, and trench backfill is properly compacted. These conditions assure the lines have a tight seal and meet the required performance standards prior to acceptance by the City. 3 Dino Picollo, parcel 28 and Charlotte Holder, parcel 15; see Table 1. 3015 SW First Avenue, Portland, OR 97201 T 503 924 4704 F 503.943.6357 www apexcos.com John Boyd, People's Bank of Commerce Well Survey Results, White Hawk Development November 16, 2016 Page 3 If trench backfill is more permeable than native soil, water could flow longitudinally along the trench and discharge to surface water, permanently lowering the water table in the vicinity of the trench. Given the native soil conditions (clay soils in the upper 8 to 12 feet), it is possible that the trench backfill could be more permeable than the native soil in --the-areas-where the native clay extends below the bottom depth of the utility bedding. Depending on the depth to which the trench penetrates the water table, longitudinal flow could occur; however, the influence on the shallow water table would likely extend only a few feet laterally from the utility trench. This localized depression in the water table caused by the trench could be addressed by installing low -permeability plugs at intervals in the trench backfill. Given that dewatering of local wells was reported after a drain trench was installed in Beebe Road in 1998, it is recommended that low permeability trench plugs be installed in future utility trenches dug for the project. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS EVALUATION AND MITIGATION OPTIONS The potential impact of the installation and presence of the proposed storm and sanitary lines was performed in 2015 and is updated herein based on the updated well information obtained from the wells survey: Up to 21 wells may be located in the vicinity of the proposed project; it is unclear how many of these wells are still in use, however, at least three wells that are likely in use appear to be located within 100 feet of the proposed installation along Gebhard Road. The proposed utility installation is not expected to impact two of these wells because the wells are 35 and 140 feet deep and access water well below the depth of utility installation. The third well, located on parcel 3 (Figure 1) is of unknown depth. It is also unlikely that the utility installation will impact this well because the utility installations will penetrate only a few feet into the water table, if at all, at this location. • A 12 -foot depth well is reportedly located on parcel 28 that may be within 100 feet of proposed storm and sewer lines to be installed along the eastern development boundary (Figure 1). There is the potential that this well could be impacted by the utility installation, if the line extends into the water table at this location. • Wells located further than 100 feet from the installation would not be anticipated to be impacted by the utility installation. • It is also noted that three wells have been deepened over a period of 16 years, indicating that there is a long-term reduction in water level in the area, The following presents mitigation options to address potential concerns: • Prior to construction of the storm drain line proposed to be placed along Gebhard Road, verify the depth of the well located on parcel 3 and, if the well is less than a total depth of 15 feet, monitor water levels in that well during construction. • Prior to construction of storm or sewer lines tie-ins to the existing storm or sewer lines beneath Beebe Road, verify the presence of wells located on parcel 10 identified in the Haggerty report that may be located within 100 feet of the tie-ins and are reported to be shallower than 15 feet in depth. If these wells are still present and in use, monitor the water levels during the construction. • If installation does penetrate the water table, low -permeability plugs can be used to inhibit flow along the trench line. Assuming crushed rock is used for trench backfill, adding 5 percent (dry weight) bentonite to the backfill is sufficient to reduce the permeability of the backfill. The plugs should be placed from the bottom of the trench to 1 foot above the water table the full width of the trench and have a minimum length of 5 feet. A plug should be placed at the low end of each main sewer line. • In areas where the lines are installed below the water table, particular care needs to be taken to ensure that the lines have a tight seal. 3015 SW First Avenue, Portland, OR 97201 T 503 924 4704 F 503 943.6357 www apexcos corn John Boyd, People's Bank of Commerce Well Survey Results, White Hawk Development If you have any questions or need further information, please contact us at your convenience. Sincerely, Amanda Spencer, R.G. Principal Hydrogeologist ATTACHMENTS Table 1— Summary of Well Survey Results Table 2 — OWRD Well Survey Results Figure 1— Location of Wells in the White Hawk TOD Attachment A — White Hawk TOD Attachment B — Completed Surveys Attachment C — OWRD Well Logs for Wells Within the TOD cc: Matt Samitore, City of Central Point November 16, 2016 Page 4 3015 SW First Avenue, Portland, OR 97201 T 503 924.4704 F 503.943.6357 www.apexcos.com TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF WELL SURVEY RESULTS Parcel Owner Address Survey Wen? Inde. MAP TAX LOT Site Num Site St Owner (If different from Site Date Survey sent Returned? Well Depth Date Installed Notes Address 6026 Palmero Cir 12/22/2015 1 1372W02 400 No Address Cameron Park, CA 95682 ISMey sent 12/15 1/2 2016 N NA NA Undeveloped land 10 S Oakdale Ave 2 372W02 500 No Address 'Medford, OR 97501 Survey sent 3/3/16 3J11/2016 N NA NA Undeveloped land 3 372W02 2500 4757 Gebhard Karen and Randall Wales 'Survey sent 12/15 12/28/2015 y 'unknown unknown domestic use and yard/gardening 1355 Cora Ln 4 R72W02 600 No Address .Auburn, CA 95603 Survey sent 3/3/16 3/11/2016 N NA NA Undeveloped land domestic use and 5 :372W02 2601 4617 Gebhard David &Julie Webb •Survey sent 12/15 12/30/2015 Y 35 feet bps 1930? yard/gardening/orchard Survey not completed but OW RD well :Survey sent 12/15 log found dated 5/4/2012 for a 140 tool 6 372W02 2600 4613 Gebhard Sergio Mejia (Resent 3/3/16 N well :Survey sent 12/15 7 372W02 2602 4603 Gebhard William Jeshke (Resent 3/3/16 N IPO Box 996 :Survey sent 12/15 B 372W02D 501 No Address (Medford, OR 97501 IResent 3/3/16 3111/2016 N I FUndevelaped land :Survey sent 12/15 Completed Survey not rereived hu[ 3 10 372W02D 300 5B71Beebe (Ken Beebe? IResent 3/3/16 ry I7WRD well to siden[ified-See Tablet Cpmpleted Survey not received but 3 11 372W02D 200 Sit Beebe MI us Surveysent 3/3/16 .IN I7WRD well to siden[ifled-Ser Tablet :Survey sent 12115 12 372WOlC 2500 507 9eebe ferry & Harley Callahan IResent 3/3116 N !Survey sent 12/15 13 372WOlC 2400 495 Beebe James and Michelle Nistler IResent 3/9/16 N !Survey sent 12115 14 372WOlC 2300 4778aebe (Michelle Nisder IResent 3/3/16 N Survey sent 12/15lawn, gardening, watering orchard, fire 15 372WOlC 2301 44513eebe 'Charlotte Holder IResent 3/3/16 1/11/2016y 50 feet 1996 abatement Survey sent 12115 16 372WOlC 2200 443 Saehe (Rita Deann Tyner IResent 3/3116 N !Survey sent 12/15 17 372WO1C 1700 4511 Hamrick .lames Sutton IResent 3/3/16 •N Survey sent 12115 16 372WO1C 18D0 4497 Hamrick (Nick Kenneth Lee IResent 3/3116 N 1 'Survey sent 12/15 19 .372W01C13 1100 4475 Hamrick Gladys Muse IResent3/3/16 N !iurvey sent 12)15 20 372WO1C13 100D 44611iamrick IRichard Smith IResent 3/3116 N Note yellnw highlighted; surveys were ••turned becDhw the post office could not deliver :Survey sent 12/15 21 :372WOlCB 900 4439 Hamrick Humphrey&Windsor LLC IResent 3/3/16 N 22 372WO1BC 10100 446 Beebe Su"y Writ 3/3/16 h 23 ;372WO1BC 10200 444 Beebe :Survev sent 3/3/16 N Survey sent 12/15 24 ;372WO1BC 10000 4615 Hamrick kdle Silr4 'Resent 3/3/16 N Survey sent 12115 25 :372WO1BC 9800 4630 Hamrick iCA Galpin Resent 3/3/16 N Survey sent 12/15 26 372WMC 9900 456 Beebe IPicollp LLC Resent 3/3/16 N !Shepherd of the Valley Survey sent 12/15 Completed Survey not received but 27 :172WO2 3100 600 Beebe ICathgk Church Resent 3/3/16 N IDWRD well log identified - See Tablet One well at back of lot used for Irrigation; second well shared with 523 Beebe for (domestic and irrigation 1-12 feet 1 -Unknown IOWRD well log from 2/17/1983 for a 60 28 1372WO2 P 3000 628 Beebe 10ow Plcollo surweysent 12/15 32/231= 2 wells i • 34 feet 2. 19401sh (foot well - see Table 2 Ihand dug well .domestic use/irrigation/stock watering IDWRD well log found from 10/11/1994 'Steve & Carolyn -for a 100 foot well 30 372WB2 2O0 4848 Gephard Himmelman Survey sent 12/15 1/5/2016 I V 15 feet unknown 31 :372W02AA 2800 4920Gebhard Survey sent 3/3/16 1 N Note yellnw highlighted; surveys were ••turned becDhw the post office could not deliver TABLE 2: OWRO SURVEY RESULTS Pardcel MAP TAX LOT She Num Site St Owner Wen Log 0 Well Depth Date Installed Notes i 372W02 400 No Address None NA NA 2 372W02 500 No Address None NA NA 3 372W02 2500 4757 -Gebhard None unknown unknown domestic use and yard/gardening well onsite based on Well Survey (see Table 1) 4 372W02 600 No Address None NA NA 5 1372WO2 1 2601 4617 Gebhard None 35 fee[ 5 1930? domestic use and yard/gardening/orchard well onsite based on Well Survey (see Table 1 6 372W02 2600 4613 iGebhard Sergio Mejia JACK61181 L40 feet 5/4/2012 sealed from Oto SOTeetbelow grade; screened from 50 to 140 feet below grade 7 372WO2 2602 4603 iGebhard William leshke None 8 372W02D 501 No Address None 10 372W0213 JIM 587 Beebe Ken Beebe? JACK12262 12 feet JACK12264 156.5 feet JACK12261 13 feet 1965 and 1966 sealed 0 to 9 feet sealed 0 to 20 feet sealed 0 to 9 feet 11 372W0213 200 511 (Beebe IMingus JACK52926 204 feet JACK55868 136 feet JACK52660 59 feet 1999 2003 1998 sealed O to 59? Sealed 0 to 27 feet sealed 0 to 20 feet 12 372W01C 2500 507 (Beebe 'ferry & Harley Callahan None 13 :372WO1C 2400 495 (Beebe (lames and Michelle Nistler None 14 :372WO1C 2300 47113eebe Michelle Nlstler None 1S 372WOlC 2301 445 Beebe Charlotte Halder None Ifeet1998 lawn, gardening, watering orchard, fire abatement well onsite based on Well Survey (see Table 1) 16 372WOlC 22011 441 Beebe Aita Deann Tyner None 17 372WO1C 170al 4513 Hamrick Illames Sutton None 18 372WOlC 1800 44971Hamrick jlNick Kenneth Lee None 19 372WO1CB 1100 4475 Hamrick Gladys Muse None 20 j.372WO1CB 1000 4461 Hamrick Richard Smith None 21 ,372WO1CB 900 4439 Hamrick Humphrey&Windsor LLC 22 372WO1BC 10100 446 Beebe None 23 .372WO18C 10200 444 Beebe None 24 372W018C 10000 4615 Hamrick $clic Sliva Noce 25 .372WOlEIC 9800 4630 Hamrick CA Galpin None 26 .372WO10C 99001 45613eebe Picollo LLC Nono 27 372W02 3100 600 Beebe 'Shepherd of the Valley Calbolic Church JACK30394 90 feet 1990 Deelpeniof an existing well from 68 to 90 feet 28 1372W02 3tl00 628 Beebe glows Plcollo jACK12241 150 feet 1903 Deepening of an existing well from 35 feet to 60 feet. Sealed from 0 to 35 feet. 30 NW02 200 4848 Gebhard eve Himmelman lACK33759 100 feet 1994 sealed 0 to 35 feet 31 372W02AA 2800 4920 Gebhard None Legend: N\ - ,p Water Well (Based on Returned Survey; Location PppGvhnel0i ® Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD) Database Well Location B10 Water Well (Based on February 2000 Haggerty Report and/or OWRD Dalabese; Existence Nu{ CbnmmedJ 61st Depth of Well (UNK = Unknown Depth) Base map prepared I,am a Well Nmliefiwdm Area figure by CESINW I121D—Da1 In HIM r ■111 11 1111 t■■! i oil 111111 : 1111 II IIIc 1 1■ _ 1,1111 ,lii ,� ■1111 111 0� Islam 11111,1111x1 • 111■ us NIB loon urrrrrrrr rix rr � � ■�III��IIno ���1,1 � ■ �i +�� w I�� _ ■�j ■ 111 1 11 � �r "`- -'� -` � I ■ ■i 111 / ■��� ■ J� C� 1::'�iiiil:i�� : � �� r ��■ rr rrrr rrrrrrr rrrM� / �� 5 ■■� Location of Wells within White Hawk TOD -it Smr.cy and E.Al 1-, Leeo While Haw# Dcwelmprn- Cenual Poim, Orcgon 0 54] 1.000 Tti . Cin".." uc h �u-�-•� xxsl-oo fMgr- Approximate Scale in Feel ` sw nni —n,,� APEX Pad,ml, OieSoi9]zu Na.ember 2016 I Attachment A White Hawk TOD ffffi• • !!!!!■rr ■ ni■iiinn ■iii minions p !�!!!!!1!!l11 ■ as n ■n■ ■■ nn■rnr ■ ffff#rll#11 A ! iis■■■inn■■ !1 !1 ■ cliff �� :C �: ■ ori soon ON! ■ .. -.-. Irrr rrr■��r NO �� ...-.. ■llrrl�llrll� � f �• -• •. rrlrllr rll � �� � �f � �i •l�llll�lrll IrirrAfrrr rf rrAAAAAAArri iii 1NONNI 11 ENRON M �® �rrl �irllir, 11111 �� . w 1iun11 r � ,I ►.!�_ lfil t I� �i oleo 1yA � �IIAAAII 1111 it 1 �� •rl � ff�lrll+, � �!!!! i•frfrrr ff .• i■ Attachment B Completed Surveys orRivor, VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY 1. Please provide your address Apex -Por, Address. tr T f1i 11 a rW City, State, Zip; Ir 12 04 V 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well WeJLshared with one neighbor Centr)'Pcir�ttlilliiy Services Other (pleti—wdescfibe)� If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used we appreciate responses to the following questions: 3. What is the well water used for. In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY 1. Please provide your address Address: 4 City, State, Zip.- 2. ip: a 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? tl �ared h one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): Receive,-, J 1pex-Portt,__)r); If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. if Mater from a well is used, we aporeciate responses to the €oliowina auestions: 3. What is the well water used for: 11 In home domestic use Lawn and arden watering as,urelCrops Orc ar Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 00&�ew nvj 5. What is the depth of the well? Ukz41/ ,vowAl 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? it m4)ou x) VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY �z�ceiver 1. Please provide your address Address: la 2 City, State, Zip: CCN 2Hc Poj,,j02. 9 �SoZ 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used, we appreciate res p onses to the foIIowin uestions: 3, What is the well water used for: Inhome domestic use. n anar enwa enng Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Other (please describe) Z + Flu i 12CkS 4-0+ o -1--Hty2 T2- �5 �JE2,� LA2c;% (-.^A2DL'� �2APEf (Z�aP�l;22f�� .5i2A,1�N�r2lZlEs £TG. 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 35 FFET 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY 1. Please provide your address Address: City, Stab t�{ecei��►3 Apex+,oj,tlartu 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? -------------- i v �id u ividu Well shared with one neighbor Central Point a y ervices Other (please describe): .-. r' -,,1-17O r I l .A -i �N- - i r ov", fi-M If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used we appreciate res onses to the followi ng q uestions: 3. What is the well water used for: "esticng Pasture/ Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well instal ? T / Ch �,oe]v--- r oc f # Z_ 0-97-c::?a p -v H oa5e— -9a t 1 I 5. What is the depth of the well? ---T:r I q--tct ( r'�;)' 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? 4 \ �-�coV-' --tfZ- 4Sa�wr-2YDS VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY Apex-Porilnn' 1. Please provide your address Address: 6 o -7 6 'Pe- rti, C_ , r� ! City, State, Zip: i�'A'K CA. '117 L' e .2- 2. 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): 9 n P.r Q kN- l.G-�fL ,.nes i'iGr ,LT'Y/C.% (? Wo—1 If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used we appreciate responses to the following uestions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? E-Ceived VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY Apex-porttancl 1. Please provide your address /%�01/ Address: H� 1gZ:��l��2� City, State, Zip: rt �o 7ND1 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? individual well e s ared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used we appreciate responses to the following questions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering as ure ropsCOrctrarcf " Stock wate—dn Ot er (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 6t V WA) OW W 5. What is the depth of the well? /S" 19'PPJ?&X 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? �w _ i>��� Du? VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY 1. Please provide your address Address: City, Stag �eoeive- 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe) If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used we a pprec1ate res poases to the fol Iowin uestions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/CropsfOrc_h_ard Stock watering Other (please describe) _ Al" /1, 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? ytj Receiv- VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER, W$E §URVEY 1. Please provide your address "' Pex-Peri;, , Address: City, State, Zip: 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? 5-ev(0C? Individual well Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): t Je C V�' If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used we appreciate responses to the following uestions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6, Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? qp'c '. f VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEY Npe. 1. Pleaseaddress address— Address: rovide p Y Nl o i�:�au, al Address: (az, ? � Z / k- e,4, C,,,Ulz _ City, State, Zip: C -u HeroN `Pezw,r�, C -A 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services ,-Other (please describe): IL If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used, we appreciate responses to the following questions: 3. What is the well water used for In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE SURVEYte,�T�±� 1. Please provide your address rr Address: ,_1 4 � F— - P+ +ae— City, State, Zip: Ceojj&.l c�DQ. S�VT52- 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used, we appreciate responses to the following questions: 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Qther (please describe}_l> 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? nDt Vwc"Con 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? fs .2 )f f , VOLUNTARY RESIDENTIAL WATER USE Stt�l Y- 1. Please provide your address Address; % 5 O -z-4C d �1 City, State, Zip:I.l d jC,,L- oL 6S _ 2. What water source(s) are used on your property? Individual well Well shared with one neighbor Central Point Utility Services Other (please describe): nL;o ' X11 �c a Y -e- "u S' If you do not use an individual well on your property, then no further answers are necessary. If water from a well is used we appreciate responses to the following uestions. 3. What is the well water used for: In home domestic use Lawn and garden watering Pasture/Crops/Orchard Stock watering Other (please describe) 4. When was the well installed? 5. What is the depth of the well? 6. Was the well installed by a drilling contractor? Attachment C OWRD Well Logs for Wells Within the TOD STATE OF OREGON WATER SUPPLY WELL REPORT (as roqufred by DRS 537.763) Inztructiona for comoleilnst this report are on e of IhIs forn. (1) OWNER: Well Number 1 b L/ J-/ -9 Name Address Ci Q State Zi (2) TYPE OF WORT{ Nf *w Well L) Deepening [] Alteration (mpairlrecondi6m) [] Abandonment (3) DRILL METHOD: ®Rotary Air ❑RotaryMud ❑Cable ❑Auger ❑Other (4) PROPOSED USE: Domestic ❑Community ❑Industrial ❑Irrigation ❑ Thermal ❑ Injection ❑ Livestock ❑ Other C(5) BOREHOLE CONSTRUCTION: special Construction approval ❑ Yes CRN. Depth of Completed Well VA ft. Explosives used Dyes (Wo Type Amount HOLE SEAL Diameter From To Material From To seeks or pounds �- 001 o ao 0 How was seal placed: Method ❑ A ❑ B ❑ C ❑ D ❑ E 9 Other T 0 %-4- r a<l - -`Z> Cs � - Backfdl placed from ft. to ft. Material Gravel placed from ft. to n• Size of gravel (6) CAS[NGILINER: Diameter From To Gauge Steel Plastle Welded Threaded Caring '"A -2 --"'VA 19 ❑ ❑ Material o Teidplpe U From To size Number Diameter size Casing Liner ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Liner: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Final location of shoc(s)_ Z> "1 (7) PERFORATIONS 5CREE1tiS: Perforations Method Screens Type Material slot Teidplpe From To size Number Diameter size Casing Liner o V ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is 1 hour Flowing ❑Pump ❑Bailer C$kir ❑Artesian Yield yallmin Drawdown nr$ll stem at 71me f5 91 1 hr. Depth Artesian Flow Found Temperature of water Was a water analysis done? ❑ Yes By whom Did any strata contain water not suitable for intended use? ❑ Too little D Salty [:]Muddy ❑ Odor ❑ Colored ❑ Other Depth of strata: _ _— a� q� LA (START CARD) # 00 ` °� `"L (9) LOCATION OF WELL by legal description: County -a o,a)lf.6oAi Latidtde Longitude Township *A, n N or S Range eZ. E or W. WM. Section 02-0 cow 1/4 St 1/4 Tart Lot orio a Lot Block Subdivision Street Address of Well (or nearest address) 9-6 (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL: L ^I I - ft. below land surface. Date l o - a2 q, t Ariesian preasure lb, per square inch. Date (11) WATER REARING ;CONES: Depth at wh;ch water was first found Estimated (12) WELL LOG: Ground Elevation (anbonded) We ter Well Constructor CerdReal Ion : I certifyy that the work I performed on the construction, alteration. or abandonment of eh;s well;a in compliance with 0regon water supply wail con ttruetion ttandards. Materials used and information reported above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. �7WWC - Number SignedDare (bond ) ater Well Constructor Cer ti rk at ton' I accept responsibility for the conuruction, alteration, or abandonment work performed (M this well during the construction dates reported above. All work performed during this time is in c om phv cc with Oregon water supply well comatrucuayserr�fFds. This report is 0& to the lyst of my krwwlcdgaCd belief. NOTIC$ TO WATER WELLjt.-Li CT ii The original and itr, TER WELL REPORT of thisep�. filed with the STATE OF,o r, N STATE ENGINEER, SALEl4iQ, QR)rgQDT •. _ Please type or print) within 9Q days Exam the date _-= - of well CampletSon, (1) OWNER: Name 1) R A s Address (2) LOCATION OF WELL: [aunty 7A ks'Q N Drtller'e well number r I'd 3i Section T. 3 R, 14W.M. Bearing and distance from section or subdivision corner (3) TYPE OF WORK (check): Well 1$ Deepening ❑ Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑ andonment, describe material and procedure in Item 12. (4) PROPOSED USE (check): (5) TYPE OF WELL: Domestic ❑ Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Rotary ❑ Driven ❑ Cable ❑ Jetted ❑ Irrigation X Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Dug ❑ Bored pj (6) CASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded E]Jff .._- Diam. from . 1,485 ft. to .....L-st--_--- ft. Gage CAN.�R.. "_Diem. from ..__.4__._ €: to---= ft.., Gage-----._.:LLm .� Diam..from ............ _..— ft,-k9_..--�•—^-•,--- ft-_ Qage__ _:..........:....,.� (7) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? 2(Yes ❑ No Type of perforator used Size of Rerforations in. bi r .1. A (... ..-.... perforations from ft. to .......% perforations from ...... , ft. to ..;....................._.._... It. perforations from .- ..,,.. ft. to ..........._......___....... ft. perforatlons from.—.... It to -- it. perforations from .._.... r _. .......__ ft. to ............. _..._ ft. (8) SCREENS: Well screen installed 0 Yes X No Manufacturer's Name ............ ._.________._�---.,-Model No. -T.._ ............ _.... ___ i. -....-•-_---... Slot size Set from ..........__..,._ It. to ....... .......... __ _ ft Diam Slot -size __Set fro .. ft. to _................. ..... ft. (9) CONSTRUCTION: �p Well seal—Material used in seal Depth of seal ..» Z __.._.._. ft. . ,. Paker used? ...._.,[r.:�.— Diameter of well bore to bottom of, s* --- •• `111 in. Were any loose strata cemented off? ©'Yef_ g No Depth Was -a drive shop used? ❑ Yes '0 No Was well gravel packed? /❑ Yes N No.. $im of gravel:........ _...—_ . Gravel placed from _...Il..riS.tr f ............... it. Did any strata cohtain unusable wat EYes i No Type of water? DWI of strata Metbod of eealing strata o" — State Well NO. .._.»�...._ Sjtate Permit No. (11) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level la lowered below static level Was a pump teat made? A Yea r3 N. u yes, by whom? Yield. I ,:�_ galdmin, with,4drrE ft, drawdown after hrs. Bailer test gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hrs. Artesian flow ¢.p.m. Date Temperature of water �E4? Was a chemical analysis made? Q Yes �Na (12) WELL G: Diameter of well below casing _.�&)y ..-. Depth drilled ft. Depth of completed well it. >! ormation: Describe by color, character, size of 7naterlat and structure, and show thickness o1 aqui era and the kind and nature of the material 17% each stratum penetrated, wth at least one entry for each change of formation. (13) PUMP: Manufacturer's Name .._... x .. ...................................................... ...._................ Type: ........_--.r.. ............... ......................._......_.................... H.P. Y Water Well Contractor's Certification: This well waa drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to the best of my knowledge and �b'e�liet. NAME _'� '�` .� 7 A % I � + 1 ... __..._.r..................................................... (Perron, firm or corpovaLon) (Typo or print) Address JA .... L4 -WL. .......... RP ........... ........_.. Drilling Machine perator s License No. �.. (10) WATER LEVELS: ` T — f [Signed] Static level ft. bei ' ?end aurlace Date ti'S �. �i qi ou (F7atisr VveU Contraoior7 ....w'.� Artealen ressure lbs.ware inch Dates Contractor's License No..... Date ' (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) - STATE OF OREGON WATER SUPPLY WELL REPORT (-'s required by OR5 537.7d5) Instructions for completing this report are on the last page of this form (1) OWNER: Well Number: L62623 JACK 55868 - Name -.• EaMest- Miflaus Address S1 i 6e bgjKd__ city Central -Pilaw— State Q1R_ zip 97502 (2) TYPE OF WORK: IX] New Well r j Deepening '`J'Alteration (repairlrecondition) []Abandonment (3) DRILL METHOD: [X7, Rotary Air L] Rotary R Mud Cable ]Auger .] Other (4) PROPOSED USE: [X' Domestic DI Community []Industrial -iirrigation �DThermai 1 1Injection JlLivestook F.10ther (5) BORE HOLE CONSTRUCTION: Steel _ - Spec"ra1 Consffuafwn 9ppidva7 Yes XNo _p . _ __P -_ De $i of Com leted Well Explosives used ]Yes [X No Type Amount HOLE SEAL Amount Diameter From To Material From To sacks or pounds _5.5_ Bentonite _ 0 D Sacks _ 7 50, I _ 16 Sand 44 20 sacks Liner: 10 x 2 S nd ] 20 SacksSand �._ I ] Gravel q4_54 55 How was seal placed: Method ❑ A C] B [_] C C-] D [ ] E uOther Poured Dry Backfill placed from ft to ft. Material Gravel placed from fL to ft Size of gravel (6) CASING/LINER: Diameter From To Gauge Steel Plastic Welded Threaded Casing- - - -- 6 +2 31 .250 T F jEf`] lu' J L] 0 _J L Liner: ] _ �._ I ] Final location of shoes) (7) PERFORATIONS/SCREENS: ,Perforation Method 1XI Screens Type Q��- - - Material stainwali slot TeWpipe From To size Number Diameter size Casing Liner ❑ a (8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is 1 hour L]Pump []bailer IX]Air ❑FlowingArtesisn Yield gal/min Drawdown Drill stem at Time Temperature of Water 3r Depth Artesian Flow found Was a water analysis donee Yes By whom Did any strata contain water not suitable for intended use? []Too rail- [ 1 Selty ❑ Muddy [-,]Odor [_I Colored I`l Other �- Depth of strata: — -- WELL ID # L _ L62623 (START CARD) # 1.53g11 (e) LOCATION OF WELL by legal d6scrlption: County —Jadmt7 n Latitude _ _ Longitude _ Township _31S_ Nor S. Range ..... .2W—__--_ E or W. of WM. Stiction _2 SW 1/4 SE -.1/4 ---------------- Tax lot Lot Block Subdivision 200 ------- Street Address of Well (or nearest address) 511 Beebe JILL (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL: 12 ft b6aw land surface Date 1V412W2__ Artesian pressure Ib per square inch. Date (11) WATER BEARING ZONES: Depth at which water was first found 6! From -- -.8 3 GPM _--- 1 (12) WELL LOG: Ground elevation Date started 12/212UQ2_., _ Completed 1214t200x (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification: I certify that ft work I performed on the construction, alteration, or abandonment of this well is in compliance with Oregon vwefer suadAy well construction standards Materials used and inf alion reported abo true to my best knowledge and belief. C Number 1407 Signed Date 1/6/2003 Ashland Dri#i Inc. (bonded) Water Well Constructor Certification: I accept responsibility for the construction, alteration, or abandonment work performed on this well during the construction dates reported above All work performed during this time is in compliance with Oregon water supply well construction standar Thi report ra$tsa to best of my knowledge and belief % WWC Number 14Z$— Signed— - Date 1/6/2003 shiand Drit ing ine: ORIGINAL - WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FIRST COPY - CONSTRUCTOR SECOND COPY - CUSTOMER 0 1") STATE OF OREGON WATER SUPPLY WELL (,, WkedbyORS 537.765) (1) r RECEIVED FEB 16 1999 tR RESOURCES DEPT. 5�9 START CARD • o a Wall Number ^� iI►+G40-'5' State (2) TYPE UV vrutt+ & New Wbll Aoepeasng ❑ Alrexrtiw {repaaA� ❑ Abandonment RotwyAir ❑ROIaryMud []Cable ❑Auger Other us . Domrntic ❑Community ❑Inautrial ❑irrigation Thermal ir,jiM FlLives6o& other approval ❑ Yes poo. Depth of Completed Well S.1B Special Caoshvdion Explosives used ❑ Yes Wo Type Amoant ROLE SEAL Dissesrar Pon 7i MWeW Rroo A�. To swk*lr rra a r L5 r6t� How was seal placed: Method ❑ A ❑ B ❑ C ❑ D ❑E ❑ Other fg BKMW placed from ft. W Mstaial �� gravel planed from & to ft. Sias of gravel A DlsmMss �� T,, (;,W8srsl ❑ pians WsMed TM -AW ❑ ❑ ❑ cuing. ❑ ❑ ❑ O —9 c]❑ ❑ ❑ d ❑ K c c -D ❑ Liner: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Final location of shoe(.) (9) LOCATION OF WEILL by legal 41WHOW: countyLaogxrudo—�� y C rL 3.altude �sulk. 5octioa�_� � ems. 114 lI4 ,rax Let 2,e? Lel J Bloc Subdivision Ree StreetAddms Of Well (Or dearest 4ddreu) S 11 A Y T .�—ft. below land uffrcc. Date �—— Aricsian pteanre lb. Per square in&, Date (11) WATER R kp& at which wafer was first found ®perforations Method MMWW— ❑Saeem Type T WW SkiLhw Froo To do Nemi+r DsaE048r do 0 ❑ :28 o a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (9) WELLTESTS: Miolmum testing time is 1 boar Flowing ❑PUMP [:]Bader Air ❑Artestm I)r-a+dswa 'Dvii slaw $t Timvkw V"M lllr. Temperature Of water Depth Artesian Flow Found Was a water analysis done? ❑ Yes By whom Did any strata contain water not suitable for intended use? Too little ❑ Salty ❑ Muddy []Odor ❑ Colored ❑ Other Depth of strata (12) wEU LOG: Ground Elevation I earl;() that rhe wO& I performed on the caru4ucti�. +�lu ratia4 or abandaards. of ibis we l is in eoatplisace with Oregon Asreusupply theWeU w my kaohonn standards. Mg.riaia used attd' =oo reported sadbelief. WWC; Number Date ;!goad (banded) Water WtIl COdttructor CertlApflon: [ rept respogs'Nuty for the construciim alteradon, or abamdoeruuAelnlrwork w� performed on this well during the conrtruaian tabor rgon ad performed during shit rime is in conosace with Oregon water wpp1g well d I 'Ibis report is out: to the best of my ktwwtedgc and �beligef. 6 l 1 n , t t I WWC Number �L� ORIGINAL & FIRST COPY -WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT S&01 O -CONSTRUCTOR TIURD COPY CUSTOMER NOTICE TO WATER W>.I. CO wCTipR The original and' first epp of thin report f� to be J �� ailed with, tha STATE ENGINEER, SALEM 2p, fyR WTIL � within 30 days from the dltGe v of well completion. R WELL REPORT 3 1 �� STATE Or, OREGON r_-_1NEPAase type or print] -maw -maw (1) OWNER: Name r, W 46 Z 4: Address ; i k17 r; is A �Q P6 i ly T IL (2) LOCATION OF WELL: county C7 A 1, k 9A Driller's well number -- -- % 3i Section_ _1k T. 3.7,$R. W.M. - Bearing and dlsta_n_ce_ from, section or subdivision corner SAu1 h 3!X) A_ cF 8,Gs P WA }� 0A 'T uta€ 6 u .NSA -4 W Is P, AqC Ha 4,5 aAwn i's L (3) TYPE OF WORK (check): well pf Deepening ❑ Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑ andonment, describe, material and procedure in Item 12. (4) PROPOSED U E (check): (5) TYPE OF WELL: Domestic ❑ Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Rotary ❑ Driven ❑ Irrigation J* Test Well ig Other ❑ Dile O Bored d❑ W � J1 (s),CASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded [j,/..p.,.-...." Diam, from ljrn sv ft. to ._.L.�.S.......... ft. Gag. C.Y(NC.L ------........._ DIEM. from ...�______.._ ft. to __ - -- _ ft. Gage .................. _ ..............r' Diam. from ...;--.------....__ ft. to ........_........._ ft. Cagc .... ....�.._... t (7) PERFORATIONS: Perforated? `d Yes ❑ No T�rpe of perforator used Size of Perforations in. 8 in. ty- �, .. .......,.... lprftrab9 from m.... ft. to -.. - �.4.....-. ft. „. e. fornt=l from it. to it. _.. .. ............ perforatlons from ........... Q—_._........ ft to ..................,. perforations from _._ � ft to ft perforations from .......„._.........._ ft, to ,„.......__...._.v....,, it. (8) SCREENS: Well screen inAelled ❑ Yes 0 No Manufacturer's Name ....,._.............. Aff Model No. s . ......... ...- Slot size ;„„ Set from .....,.... _ ft to .................. ft. Diam...........:... Slot sizeI Set from ri -• ft to ft - (9) CONSTRUCTI N: WeII seal --Material used ,im .seal ..._�� Depth of seat --.- ...... }�,.� IL W'as a ockeer used? ........ Diameter of well bore toll bottom- of sea'L .- • 1n_ Were any koose strata cemented off? ❑ Yes No DiWth Was a drive shoe used? ❑ Yes .4 No _ Was well gravel Hacked?jl ❑Yes ANo Size of gravel: —. Gravel placed fmm W �� JVX . ft to it. Did any strata contain ubusable water Yes Iff No Type of water? 1l of strata Method of sealing strata ff- (10) WATER LEVELS: static level ft. below_ I..d surface D to s �C ^ k,�, Artesian pressure 1115, cer souare inch_ Date State Well No. 7/,9 State Permit No. (11) WELL TESTS' Drawdown is amount water level is lowered below static level Was a pump test made? JXYes ❑ No If yes, by whom? Yield: gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hra. Sailer test gal./min. with ft, drawdown after hrs. Artesian flow g.p.m. Date _ Temperature of water .fd Was a chemical analgai5 made? ❑ Yee [ No (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing ....NSI .A..._ Depth drilled Z4 ft, Depth of completed well ft. FormnLinn. Dasoribe b color, character, size Of materlat and stmettera, and show thickmesa of a�tei are and the kind and nature of the material to each stratum penetrated, r�th at least one entry for each chanps of formation. MATERIAL FROM TO W A/Yh — Work started / 19 Comnleted 186 Date well drilling machine moved off of wen (13) PUMP: Manufacturer's Name ............ ._ ... .� „. Type: _........... _ _ ..._._.._..._........... ..._ H.P. Water Well Contractor's Certification: This well was drilled udder my jurisdiction and this report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. NAMEI.,.''1-...._..... (Person, firm or roryopsuua) tTyva or print) Address ./A.11_211...._.....lfl.L.. !.._..._ e5�.................... Drilling Machin Operator's License No........__..�{.,-_._,. _- ��[[�� [Signed] ?L; :...._............ [Water Well Castor] // ._..``. Contractor's License No..3-460.--- Date (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) NOTICE To WATER WELL COIQA The origins, and, first c NOV of this report sre rob l■ filed with, the STATE ith 3 ad ya *dm th)iaA� of well completion. ; +, 1 5 1965 ER WELL REPORT 5 N G i N E ESTATE OF OREGON ease type or print) •-- ui t� r n N (1) OWNER: Name D. R. Adams Address �81 B8A]39 R(�• (2) LOCATION O WELL: coon Jackson Driller's well number 3� s� tlon T. R• W.M. Bearing and distance froin section or subdivision corner l (3) TYPE OF WORK (check): Well�]i Deepening ❑ Reconditioning ❑ ' Abandon ❑ andonment, describe material and procedure In Item 18. (4) PROPOSED USE (check): (5) TYPE OF WELL: Rotary El Driven ❑ Domestic arindustrlaii ❑ Municipal ❑ Cable ��Jetted ❑ Irrigation 0 Test Well ❑ Other [] Dug ❑ gored ❑ (6) CASING INSTALLED: Threaded ❑ Welded&-- " Dlam. from ..... ft. to __ ..... ft. Gage nl •8A P _........... —" Dia. from ..- _.� ft. to ..._ ._. �- ft- Gage m ... - " m • ,Dia. from ......... it to .� _ft. Gage (�) PERFORATIONS: Perforated?,5t-ves ❑ rro TY of rY ar9ta: ssed,�C Size of erforations / in. b in. „.„...-.._. perfgra oitd from-- ft. to ft. perfora[ions from .. =- ft- to ..-_------ :.__..._ ..... ft. ..... . perforations from __ -_-.._ _,__ it. to ... _ ._ -._.- ft. perforations from _. _ . _...- .-•••-• _it. to _____ ft• perforvtlons from ft, to .._.._-..__.._._-- it. (8) SCREENS: Well screen installed? ❑ Yes gi.JFo _` j v - .. . State Well No. ""' State Permit No. (11) WELL TESTS' lowered below satic level Cr ��1« Was a pump test made? Yes If yes. by whom? Yield: aI./min. with ft. drawdown after hrl. Bailer test gal./ruin. with ft, drawdown after hrs. Artesian flow m. Date Tem eraturc of wafer Was a ehemtcsl anal ala made? Yes o (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing ..-_.,._».....». f De th drilled i"t. Depth of Ecom eted well l�grmatlon: Describe iy calor, character size of material and atm Cure, and stratum peneaated with ¢t mast onsatenirnyd far eachfcti agx�aoof Jarmatian Manufacturer's Name -_-- Model No - slot size ............ Set ffiom ....... ...........__ it. to ...._. _ — it. Dtam......... __ Slot sizg ...... - Set�om ...._.__ --_.-._ ft. to .. _�. ft - (9) CONSTRUCTION: Well seal -Material usL in Depth of seal .....49�2•••--•-•---- ft. Was a packer used? Diameter of well bore.to bottom of seal •••.-••- ••• Were any loose strata ieemented off? [1 Yes Malo Del? _.. Was a drive shoe useMJR-I lss ❑ NO Was well gravel parked? ❑ Yes X•1M_?. Size of gravel :...... _..__.. . �.... Grave�placed frCm ... .. to _...-._.............__... ftDid acontain unusable wa 7 ca No depth�of strata e of water?,rfl�,,,�i��s Method of sealsstrsta off !p►��dXJ/f�� (10) WATER LEVELS: Static level ft. below land mrface Date i Artesian ressure er s uare inch Date - r (USE ADDITIONAL S MATERIAL TO Work started J "8 19 65 Com leted 2 Date well drilling machine moved off of well 1.1-10 19 05 (13) PUMP: Manufacturer's Name. -_..........- Type:........_...- Water well Contractor's Certification: This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. NAME CRATERWELL DRILLING, INC. „•.- .. ........... .... .......-......... (Person, firm or corporation) (Type or print) Address .061 .Crater Lake A,F..e_ra.l�ediQa.4j.¢�.�..-•-- Drilling Mach,��G tox's L N ...._1.................[Signed]l.�.. a7se Well Contractor) Contractor's License No. 83 Date 11��� ..... 19•-d5 HEETS IF NECESSARY) STATE OF OREGON - WATER WELL REPORT (ae required by ORS 537.786) Well Numbeg-_ N.m6HE� EARD� OF THE VALLI ARCHDIOCESE T'ORTLAND Addre600 BEE$E ROAD City CENTRAL POINT State OR ziP9 502 (2) TYPE OF WORK: ❑ New Well U Deepen ❑ Recondition _ ❑ Abandon (3) DRILL METHOD r ftRotaryAir ❑ Rotary Mud ❑ Cable ❑ ❑ther (4) PROPOSED USE: Domestic ❑ Community ❑ Industrial ❑ Irrigation ❑ Thermal ❑ Injection ❑ Other (5) BOREHOLE CONSTRUCTION: Special Construction approval a No Depth of Completed Well 90 ft. Yee No El xx Explosivesused Type , Amount HOLE SEAL Amount • Diameter From To Material From To sacks or pounds 6" 68 90 DEEPENIN How was seal placed: Method ❑ A ❑ B ❑ C ❑ D ❑ E ❑ Other Backfill placed from ft. to ft. Gravel placed from fL to ft. (6) CASING/LINER: Diameter From To Gauge Casing:. ID Material Size of gravel Steel Plastic Welded Threaded ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Final location of shoe(s) (7) PERFORATIONS/SCREENS: M Perforations Method ❑ Screens Type Material Slot Tele/pipe • From To aim Number Diameter size Casing Liner ❑ ❑ 1xs � 6 ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is 1 hour Flowing ❑Pump ❑ Bailer Air ❑ Artesian Yield gal/min Drawdown — Drill stem at Time BGPM 1. 90 1 hr. Temperature of water 54 Depth Artesian Flow Found Was a water analysis done? ❑ Yeay whom _ Did any strata contain water not suitable for intended use? ❑ Too little ❑ Salty ❑ Muddy ❑ Odor ❑ Colored ❑ Other Depth of strata: ORIGINAL d FIRST COPY- WATER RF SOURCES DEPARTMENT (START CARD) # 21199 12- (8) LOCATION OF WELL by legal description: County JACYLSaN Latitude Longitudo Township 37S NnrB, Ranges_ 2W Eor W, WM. Section 2 w u Tar Lot 3100 l.ot Alock Subdivision Street Address of Well (or nearest address) SAME AS #1 (10) STATIC7 WATER LEVEL: R. below land surface. Date 9-14-90 Artesian pressure lb. per square inch. Date (11) WATER BEARING ZONES: Depth at which water was first found From To Estimated Flow Rate SWL 75 85 WPM (12) WELL LOG: Ground elevation (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification: I certify that the work I performed on the construction, alteration, or abandonment of this well is in compliance with Oregon well construction standards. Materials used and information reported above are true to my best knowleftlad belief. MEDIA� WWCNumber Signed Date p�� (band y'�eft�' ' i r kation: I accept re�@ar ons alteration, or abandonment t na ion dates reported above. all work performed h1 work performed during this tiet�in compliance with Oregon well construction standards. This report is true to th beet of my knowledge and belief. 1207 W WC NuVbg7� S:gme ate 11 SECOND THIRD COPT - CUSTOMER GONC alga STATE OF OREGON WATER WELL REPORT (as required by ORS 637.766) J U L 2 7 10989 (START CARD) # 1.0374 If (1) OWNER: WellNumber: Name MARGARET NIXON Address 71$_BEEBE ROAD _ City CENTRAL P0INT state OR _ Z1i07502 (2) TYPE OF WORK: 9 New Well ❑ Deepen ❑ Recondition ❑ Abandon (3) DRILL METHOD M Rotary Air ❑ Rotary Mud. ❑ Cable ❑ Other (4) PROPOSED USE: Domestic ❑ Community ❑ Industrial ❑ Irrigation ❑ Thermal ❑ Injection ❑ Other i (8) BOREHOLE CONSTRUCTION: Special Construction approval e No Depth of Completed Well 10 0 ft. Yes No Explosives used ❑ ® Type Amount HOLE SEAL Amount 0 Diameter From To Material From To sacks or pounds n 6"50 10 How was seal placed. Method ❑ A ❑ B ` C ❑ D ❑ E ❑ Other Backfdlplacedfrom ft. to ft. Material Gravel placed from ft. to ft. Size of gravel (6) CASINGILINER: Diameter From To Gauge Steel Plastic Welded Threaded Casing- 6" +1 59 .25 [AX ❑ M ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n 1 ❑ Liner: Final location ofshos(s) 59 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (7) PERFORATIONS/SCREENS: 90 12GPM 28 IKPerforations Method SAW ❑ Screens Type . Material Slot Tele/pipe From To size umber Diameter size Casing Liner IN J 40 1 6U IXBXf3 60! ❑ L" f' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ (8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is 1 hour ❑ Pump ❑ Bailer ftAir Flowing ❑ Artesian Yield gallmin Drawdown Drill stem at Time 12 GPM 72 100 1hr. Temperature of water _ Depth Arteslan Flow Found Was a water analysis done? ❑ Yea_„ By whom Did any strata contain water not suitabli.for intended use? ❑ Too little ❑ Salty ❑ Muddy ❑ Odor ❑ Colored ❑ Other Depth of strata: ORIGINAL & FIRST COPY - WATER RESOURCES PEPARTMENT SECON by legal description: Longitude Township 3 N or S, R,9nPe 2. W E or W, WM. Section a7 A , Tat Lot 9 700 Lot-- Block - Subdivision Street Address of Well (or nearest address) S -A -MF -A-S #1 -- - (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL: 2R ft. below land surface. Date 7-6-89 Artesian pressure lb. per square inch. Date (11) WATER BEARING ZONES: Depth at which water was first found From To Estimated now Rate SWL 60 90 12GPM 28 (12) WELL LOG: Ground elevation (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification: I certify that the work I performed on the construction, alteration, or abandonment of this well is in compliance with Oregon well construction standards. Materials used and information reported above are true to nay best knowledge and belief. WWC Number Signed Date (bonded) Wat81 Mq f %Tj('*icatlon: I ae�eg�,.r,�,py;}si�(it A t r, ,mgt rite dates r or abandonment work per a �/ dt9n 'the edit mn dates reported above. all work performed t�64' 30in compliance with Oregon well construction Stan is report is true to he best of my knowledge and belief. W WC Number 12 0 7 Signed � nate _7-9-82 D C0PYCC6NSTfCTOR THIRD VY . CUSTOMER game alas .. WATER WELL REPORT RECEIVED � FEBstate welt Ne. STATE OF OREGON i.�, E 2 w 1983 Vr "7 WATER RESOURCES DEPf.atePermitNo........................................ SALEM, OREGON (1) OWNER: Perforated? ❑ Yea ❑ N Name Gus Pieo110 of ora r used Arirl~rss ea Be Road c Centril Pointte r@gan (2) TYPE OF WORK (check): New Well ❑ Deepening Ek Reconditioning ❑ Abandon ❑ If abandonment. describe material and mxrduM in Item 12. perforations from ......�_ .... ft. (3) TYPE OF WELL: (4) PROPOSED USE (check): Rotary Air R Driven ❑ Domestle gt Industrial '-' Municipal ❑ Rotary Mud ❑ Dug ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Well C : Other ❑ ❑ Bored .❑ Thermal: Withdrawal D Reinfection U ( CASING INSTALLED: steel ❑ Plastic ❑ Threaded ❑ —Welded ........ .." Diam. from ........... .. ft_ to .... ....-...... ft_ Gauge ....................... ..... .......... "Diam.from........ .__-.,.ft to............�ft. Gauge .................... ........ ` R INSTALLED: Was a tort made? C] Yea ...........:. D from ............... ft. to ............... ft. Gauge .............. .............. (6) PE RA'T'IONS: Perforated? ❑ Yea ❑ N of ora r used Size of PeaoratEA in. by - ........................................... .._.. _perforations from ............ . ft. to ............... ft. perforations from ......�_ .... ft. r. .»....w .... ............... rforations from ...... ....... ft, to ............... ft. (7) SCREENS:\Welscreen installed? ❑ -❑ No Manufacturer's Name .......... �� ...........»_-_......... Type ...................._�.................... .... Model No.....Diam. .._..............................getf m......._...» tt to..».�....ft. Dian................................... Set m ............... ft. to ............... ft. (S) WEI�I. TESTS: d s amount water level is lowered c level Was a tort made? C] Yea 3\.,)m"7. whom? - 1Jmia ft. drawdown after bra. rr Air Les! 9.1kin, A drill stem at ft. hm Bailer test Ellmam wi ft, drawdowa after hra. alar flow nature of water D,,plh antes flt (9) CONSTRUCTI Special star, Well seal—Material used .......................�-,....... ..... Well sealed from land to I ...... �.. Diameter of well lore bottom of seal ..... ....... .... in. Diameter of well bon low seal .. ......... in Nhmhber of sacks of nt used in well seal .......„ ........ How wan cement ut placed? .............. .........r-.......... ft. Yes ❑ No ❑ ......... ..............I.... ft. sacks 4 .................... .................. .... ...... ..._.p,.o.....,�•�,........Rn,.„ ... ........._..... Was pump' led?.........................Typo .,,,`....... HP........__. Depth .._........ ft. Was a ch shoe used? ❑ Yes ❑ No uge Si.e: location .. ........ ft. Me od of sealing strata off WZ well gravel necked? ❑ Yea M No Sim of caravel :............ (10) LOCATION OF WELL: Jackson Drilleeswelln r 83-3 _ 'A V, u Sectiarn T. R W.M. . Tax Lot AL_ 1"UO Blk Subdivision Address at well location I of e@ Be hoacL Central o n , U7regon (11) WATER LEVEL: Completed well. Depth at which water was Arot found_ see below static level fLbelow landsurface. Date Artesianpressure lbs. per square inch. Date (12) WELL LOG: Diameter of well below casing 6 ,iX1C.. Depth drilled ft. 22Ethof2ampletedwell 4-5 ft. Formation: Describe color, texture, grain sire and structure of materials; and show thickness and nature of each stratum and aquifer penetrated, with at least one entry for each change of formation. Report each change in position of Static Water Level and indicate principal water -bearing strata. Drilling Machine Operator's Certification: This well was constructed under nzy direct super rislon. Materials used and iafa n bov a to my best knowledge and belief. [Signed] I a ....... . %�........... Date. 2-17_103.. 3.. ti)rilling Machine Operator] Drilling Machine Operator's License No..... QQ ................................ Water Well Contractor's Certification: We well was drilled under nay jurisdiction and this report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Name.... arwlno Addreas . � b Hi�hra�..Ashland,l �re�an0 [Signed] (Water well trwiw) Cmltractaea Licet>so No... 7.9......Date.................. 2-17 ---.... 1981. ft. ta. �..... •,.......... ft NOTIOE TO. WATER WELL CONTRA -MR WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, . _ . T. orlg a l emd first oar of this -pert SALEM, OREGON 97310 SP'�12658.890 ..lire to be filed with the within 30 days from the data of well completion. .1 14 STATE OF OREGON WATER WELL REPORT (as required by ORS 537.765) Instructions for completing 0* IP 37755 ren 2 PCT 1.31994 Drilling 1C. (STARTCARD)#_ 65619 _ trrn. WATFR Ft L.: • .. (1) OWNER: Well Number _ _1 Name $ Vhimm-elman Address P • Box 4 - ._..... _ - Ci J k n State 7i (2) TYPE OF WORK ®New Wnl1 Deepening [J Alteration (repairfrecondition) ❑ Abandonment (3) DRILL METHOD: ® Rotary Air ❑ RotaryMud ❑Cable E _ ❑Other _ -- — (4) PROPOSED USE: ®Domestic []Community ❑Industrial []Irrigation ❑Thermal ❑ Injection - ❑Livestock W -0Othei • (5) BOREHOLE CONSTRUCTION: Special Construction approval ❑ Yes [&No Depth of Completed Well 1 0 Q ft. Explosives used E] Yes ®No Type_ Amount - � — HOLE C1 a7:`ll Diameter From Tb Material From To Sacks or pounds n How was seal placed: Method ❑ A ❑ B QC- [j D ❑>? ® Other P Q u red �: . Backfill placed from ft. to_ fL _ Material Gravel placed from ft. to ft. Sire of ravel (6) CASING/LINER: Diameter From To Gauge Steel Plastic Welded Threaded it 5912 ®_ ❑ Casing; +1 ®. ❑ - ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _ ❑_ ❑- _❑ F1a El_M � .._ ❑ _. . Liner: ❑ ® ® ❑ Final location ofshoe(s) t • (7) PERFORATIONSISCREENS: ®Perforations Method Seryl ❑Scree_ns - Type Material Slot Tidel pe From Tb size Number Diameter size Casing Liner n AD N (8) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is 1 hour Flowing ❑Pump ❑Barer -- - ® Air ❑Artesian Yleld l/min Drawdown Drill stem at Time 711 1 flh I I hr. Temperature of water 5 Depth Artesian Flow Found Was a water analysis done? ❑ Yes By whom Did any strata contain water not suitable for intended use? ❑ Too little ❑ Salty ❑Muddy ❑ Gdor gra UOtiler• Depth of strata: qqLL���k�i L,; k X- . ! (9) 1.C'A'1'I OF WELL by legal description: County J a C k S O n Latitude —Longituder _ Township 375; Nor S "e 9W E or W. WM. Section SW 1/4 NW 1/4 Tax Lot 2M—Lot—Block _ Subdivision —_ Street Address of Well (or nearest address) 4 R 4 8 1? e h h a r h R d_ - Cp,0fral Point Ore 97502 (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL: 22 ft. below land surface. Date _l n /5/94 Artesian pressure Ib. per square inch. Date (11) WATER BEARING ZONES: Depth at which water was first found (12) WELL LOG: Ground Elevation .. From Date started In/5/94 — - Completed 4 (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification: I certify that the work i performed on the construction, alteration, or abandonment of this well is in onmpiiance with Oregon water supply well construction standards - Materials used and information reported above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. WWC Number Signed Date (bonded) Water Well Constructor Cetiilication t I acceptppaansibility for the construction, alteration, or abandonment work performed on�ths's well during the construction dates reported above. All work performed during this time is in compliance with Oregon water supply well construction stand This report is true to the b t of my knowledge and belief. WWC Number tJs Signed Date .U► ORIGINAL & FIRST COPY -WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SECOND COPY-EORSTRUCTOR THIRD COPY -CUSTOMER To Estimated Flow Rate SWL —From �r? _ (12) WELL LOG: Ground Elevation .. From Date started In/5/94 — - Completed 4 (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification: I certify that the work i performed on the construction, alteration, or abandonment of this well is in onmpiiance with Oregon water supply well construction standards - Materials used and information reported above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. WWC Number Signed Date (bonded) Water Well Constructor Cetiilication t I acceptppaansibility for the construction, alteration, or abandonment work performed on�ths's well during the construction dates reported above. All work performed during this time is in compliance with Oregon water supply well construction stand This report is true to the b t of my knowledge and belief. WWC Number tJs Signed Date .U► ORIGINAL & FIRST COPY -WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SECOND COPY-EORSTRUCTOR THIRD COPY -CUSTOMER STATE OF OREGON WATER SUPPLY WELL REPORT (ORS 537,765 & OAR 690-205-0210) Instructions for completive this report are on the last JACK 61181 of this form. (1) LANDOWNER Owner Well LD. First Name Las me ompany 140nddress City State 7.ip (2) TYPE OF WORK P4ew ❑ Conversion ❑ Deepening ❑ Alteration (complete Sections 2a & 10) ❑ Abandonment (complete Section 53) (2a) PRF. -ALT RA Well Depth ft. Seat Material Casing Type: ❑ Steel ❑ Plastic ❑ Other Casing Gauge Casing Diameter (3) DRILL METHOD OgRotary Air ❑ Rotary Mud ❑ Auger ❑ Cable ❑ Cable Mud ❑ Reverse Rotary ❑ Other (4) PROPOSED USE D&Domestic ❑ Irrigation ❑ Community ❑ Industrial/Commercial ❑ Livestock ❑ Dewatering ❑ Injection ❑Thermal ❑Other_ _ (5) BORE HOLE Depth of Completed Well ft. Special Standard: ❑ Yes (attach copy) BORE HOLE SEAL Dia I From I To k Material From I To I Amount I Scks/I How was se placed: Mc[h ❑ A ❑ B ❑ C ❑ D ❑ E B Othcr'V cNi ,f •.� 4k(.A Backfill placed from ft. to R. Material 'ilter pack from ft. to ft. Material Size (58) ABANDONMENT USING UNHYDRATED BENTONITE.- Calculated ENTONITE:Calculated Amount Proposed to he Used: sacks/lbs Actual Amount Used: sacks/lbs (6) CASING/LINER Csne Lim Dia From To Gauge I Steel Plastic Welded Thrd I 5 i Shoe ❑ InsideJagutside ❑ Other Location of shoe(s) _ Temporary casing ❑ Yes Diameter From To (7) PERFORATIONi;l'.4CREEN13 Perforations Method Screens Type Material Screen Scrn Cana Lim- Dia Tele/ Slot # of pipe enath I slots size (S) WELL TESTS: Minimum testing time is 1 hour ❑ Pump ❑ Bailer WAir ❑ Flowing Artesian Yield g• Ilmin Drawdown Drill sic;nfflump de lh I Duration (hr) %0 'emperature5:?—_ °F Lab analysis ❑ Yes By Water quality concerns? ❑ Yes (describe below) TDS _ ppm From I To I Description I Amount I Units WELL LABEL # L r START CARD # ORIGINAL LOG # (9) LOCATION OF WELL (1 ak descrip ion) County Ul Twp V N" Oi Nangq,E or W W.M. Sec �^ 114 of the 114 Tax Lot _ Tax Map Number Lot Lat 410L° _'_ _ ar� DMS or DD Long°T _'f_._ "or�gg�,�DMS orDD Street Ad fess of W ' (or n aresl addressEeuaa"6)—f� (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL Date SWL(psi) + I SWL (ft) Existing WcIVI'm-Alteralion # ) 1 -15�d Completed Well Flowing Anesian? El Yes Dry Hole? Y WATER BEARING ZONES Depth water was first found c SWL Date From To Est Flow SWL i r SWL R (11) WELL LOG Ground Elevation (unbonded) Water Well Constructor Certification I certify that the work I performed on the construction, deepening, alteration, or abandonment of this well is in compliance with Oregon water supply well construction standards. Materials used and information reported above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. RECIIVIED License Number Date JUN 0 4 2012 Signed (bonded) Water Well ConstruciorCerlificatioNVAI JEH HESOURGESDEPT I accept responsibility for the construction, deepcnQl(IEA%QIF1frG0N abandonment work performed on this well during the construction dates reported above. All work performed during this time is in compliance with Oregon water supply well construction standards. This report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. License Number ! D �l Date r Signed Contact Info. (optional) ORIGINAL. — WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT ONE COPY FOR CONSTRUCTOR ONE COPY FOR CUSTOMER SUBMITTED TO THE WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF WORK 01/02/2009 JACKSON COUNTY Roads January 4, 2021 Attention: Stephanie Holtey City of Central Point Planning 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 ATTACHMENT "C" Roads Engineering Chuck DeJanvier Construction Engineer 200 Antelope Road White City, OR 97503 Phone: (541) 774-6255 Fax: (541) 774-6295 www jacksoncounty org RE: Major Modification to the White Hawk Master Plan and 32 -lot subdivision (White Hawk Phase 1) off Gebhard Road and Beebe Road — county -maintained roads. Planning File: MOD -20-005 & SUB -20-002; 37-2W-02CA Tax Lots 2700 and 2701. Dear Stephanie: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal amends the phasing plan to allow construction of the townhomes/duplexes first. Also includes the following changes in Phase I: housing type, removal of 2 lots, addition of 16 Accessory Dwelling Units, change of traditional architectural style to contemporary style, and eliminates one of three (3) alleys in Phase I and the thirty-two (32) lot subdivision to be known as White Hawk Phase I. Project site is 18.91 acres and is adjacent to the intersection of Gebhard Road and Beebe Road (37-2W-02 Tax lots 2700 & 2701). Jackson County Roads has the following comments: 1. rhe applicant shall submit construction drawings to Jackson County Roads and obtain county permits if required. 2. We would like to be notified of future development proposals, as county permits may be required. 3. Jackson County's General Administration Policy #1-45 sets forth the County's position as it relates to the management of County roads located within existing or proposed city limits or Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB). The County has no current plans for improvements to Gebhard Road or Beebe Road. Jackson County Roads recommends that the city request road jurisdiction of the proposed new roads. 4. If frontage improvements are required along either Gephard Road or Beebe Road, they shall be permitted and inspected by Jackson County Roads. Sidewalk placement on either Gephard Road or Beebe Road frontage if required should be directly behind the curb. Jackson County Roads does not maintain planter strips. The developer shall obtain a Minor Road Improvement Permit prior to commencing work in the County right-of-way. 5. The applicant shall obtain a Road Approach permits from Roads for any new or improved road approaches to either Gephard Road or Beebe Road, 6. The radius for road intersection along a collector road shall be a thirty-foot radius. The road approach shall be perpendicular to Gebhard Road or Beebe Road and aligned directly across from a road approach on the other side of the road if possible. January 4, 2021 Page 2of2 7. There shall be no direct driveway approaches off Beebe Road or Gebhard Road. 8. Roads recommend the removal of any existing driveways not being used on Gebhard Road and Beebe Road and replacing them with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. 9. ADA curb ramps must be located wherever there are curbs or other barriers to entry from a pedestrian walkway or sidewalk, including any intersection where it is legal for a pedestrian to cross the street, whether or not there is any designated crosswalk. 10. If drainage is directed to either Gebhard Road or Beebe Road, Jackson County Roads would like to review and comment on the hydraulic report including the calculations and drainage plan Capacity improvements or on-site detention, if necessary, shall be installed at the expense of the applicant. Upon completion of the project, the developer's engineer shall certify that construction of the drainage system was constructed per plan and a copy of the certification shall be sent to Jackson County Roads. 11. Gebhard Road has a load limit restriction, the applicant needs to indicate to the County where the alternative construction access will be. 12. Utility Permits are required from Roads for any utility work within the county road right-of-way. On longitudinal trenches within a travel lane 100' or greater in length, unless otherwise approved by the Engineer, the existing pavement shall be removed and replaced to full paving - machine width (normally 10'-12') for a travel lane restoration. Drag boxes or other pull -type asphalt spreaders will not be permitted for longitudinal trench pavement replacement. 13. Per Oregon Revised Statute 209.150, any survey monuments of record removed, disturbed or destroyed within the permit area must be referenced prior to construction and replaced after construction by a registered professional land surveyor. All costs associated with this surveying work are the responsibility of the permit holder. 14. Please note Beebe Road is a County Urban Minor Collector Road with an Average Daily Traffic count of 1,244 as of 6/9/2020, 50' west of Hamrick. 15. Please note Gebhard Road is a County Urban Minor Collector Road with an Average Daily Traffic count of 730 as of 6/9/2020, 150' south of Wilson Road. 16. We concur with any right-of-way dedicated. 17. Be Advised: other permits from local State or Federal Agencies' or Departments may be required prior to starting work. Sincerely, Chuck DeJanvier, PE Construction Engineer I:\Engineering\Development\CITIES\CNTRLPT\MOD-20-005 & SUB-20-002.doc ATTACHMENT "D" ROGUE VALLEY �- SEWER SERVICES R lop CLEAN WATER •HEALTHY COMMUNITIES January 4, 2021 City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: SUB -20002 & MOD -20005, White Hawk Subdivision, Map 37S 2W 02, Tax Lots 2700 & 2701 There are sewer facilities adjacent to the property as generally shown on the submitted tentative site plan. The 12 inch sewer adjacent to the property located on tax lots 2800 & 200 is shallow, has poor grade, and is in very poor condition. Connection to this portion of the sewer will not be allowed. Sewer service for the development can be had by sewer main extension from the existing 12 inch sewer on Gebhard Road. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of this development be subject to the following conditions: 1. All sewer design and construction must comply with RVSS standards. Construction drawings must be submitted to RVSS for review and approval prior to construction. 2. Sewer sizing calculations must be prepared per RVSS standards and submitted to RVSS for review and approval. Sizing calculations must account for up -stream sewer drainage areas in full build -out condition. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Nicholas R. Bakke, PE District Engineer �. (541) 664-6300 138 W Vilas Rd, Central Point, OR 97502 Q t www.RVSS.US P.O. Box 3130, Central Point, OR 97502 ATTACHMENT "E" Stephanie Holte From: Mark Northrop <MarkN@jcfd3.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 8:57 AM To: Stephanie Holtey Subject: RE: ACTION NEEDED: Request for Agency Comments on Land Use Applications Stephanie: My Comments remain unchanged. 1. The Location of the FDC(s) shall be approved by the AHJ if required. a. OFC 903.3.7 Fire department connections. The location of fire department connections shall be approved by the fire code official. 2. Fire lanes will need to be signed and painted. a. OFC D103.6 Signs. Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING—FIRE LANE 3. Fire hydrants are not located on site map and will be needed. Location to be approved before final plat by the AHJ at a later date. a. C102.1 Fire hydrant locations. Eire hydrants shall be provided along required fire apparatus access roads and adjacent public streets. Drm MarL Northrop, IAAI, CF I J�cle�on Count rice l)istric.t 3 8383 /gate Rci, White City, OK 97503 nrlti►C?�1� .Cpni Office: 541 .8 3 I _Z776 Cell 541.660.7689 www.jcCJ3.coni Together We're Better a RR 000 From: Stephanie Holtey <Stephanie.Holtey@centraIpointoregon.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 4:39 PM To: Matt Samitore <Matt.Samitore@centralpointoregon.gov>; Mike Ono <Mike.Ono@centralpointoregon.gov>; Justin P, Gindlesperger <Justin.Gindlesperger@centralpointoregon.gov>; 'nbakke@rvss.us'<nbakke@rvss.us>; Bobbie Pomeroy <Bobbie.Pomeroy@centralpointoregon.gov>; 'chad.murders@ecso911.com' <chad.murders@ecso911.com>; Mark Northrop <MarkN@jcfd3.com>; mark.kimmelshue@centurylink.com; jeff.wedman@centurylink.com; surveyor@jacksoncounty.org; nickolas.c.eufemi@usps.gov; rrvid@rrvid.org;' (dbaker@roguedisposal.com)' <dbaker@roguedisposal.com>; JuddAJ@jacksoncounty.org; David.McFadden@avistacorp.com; ed.devries@pacificorp.com; Mike Kuntz <KuntzM@jacksoncounty.org>; ptownsend@rvtd.org; seisma@rvtd.org; Derek Zwagerman <Derek.Zwagerman@centralpointoregon.gov>; Spencer Davenport <spencer.davenport@district6.org>; HOROWITZ Micah (Micah.HOROWITZ@odot.state.or.us) <Micah.HOROWITZ@odot.state.or.us> Subject: ACTION NEEDED: Request for Agency Comments on Land Use Applications Importance: High Good afternoon, The City is reviewing two (2) applications on property located at the intersection of Beebe and Gebhard Roads. The first is a modification to the White Hawk Master Plan (File No. MOD -20005). The original master plan was approved in 2015 and set forth instructions for future development of the site. Most of the changes are minor in nature; however, the Applicant is eliminating one of three (3) alleys in proposed Phase I located in the northwest portion of the site. Additionally, the proposal modifies the architectural style from traditional to contemporary, a significant departure from the original approval. More information about the modification request is available online (see the attached form for a link to the website). The second application is a tentative subdivision plan for Phase I (File No. SUB -20002). The proposal includes nnctrltlrtion of most frontage improvements along Beebe and Gebhard Road. Phase II (future park) and Phase III are Identified as reserve acreage for future land division and development. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Wishing you all a very happy new year! Stephanie Holtey, CFM Principal Planner Community Development City of Central Point 140 South Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 Desk: 541-664-3321 (x244) Fax: 541-664-6384 www.centraipointoLggon.gov This electronic communication, including any attached documents, may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information that is intended only for use by the recipient(s) named above If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the communication and any attachments Emails are generally public records and therefore subject to public disclosure unless exempt from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Law ATTACHMENT "F" Stephanie Holte From: Chad Murders <chad.murders@ecso911.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 6,20214:42 PM To: Stephanie Holtey Subject: White Hawk Subdivision Hi Stephanie, We would like to discourage the use of "North Street" and "Park Street" these are already in use in Jackson County. We would encourage a unique street name that leaves no confusion for Emergency Services. While, Beebe Park Drive is a unique name, it does incorporates multiple names of places in the same location. For this reason, we would also encourage a new name for this one. (. li-el � --/, M014' o MSAG/GIS/CAD Programming Emergency Communications of Southern Oregon Office: (541)774-5066 [EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.