The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 879 - Tent. Plan for Table Rock CrossingPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 879 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TENTATIVE PLAN FOR AN 8 LOT SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS TABLE ROCK CROSSING. (File No: SUB -20001) WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a tentative plan application to create an 8 lot subdivision consisting of commercial property identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 01 C, Tax Lot 700, Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the project site is located in the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional zoning district; and WHEREAS, the application has been found to be consistent with the applicable approval criteria set forth in Title 16, Subdivisions and Title 17, Zoning, and per conditions noted in the Staff Report dated May 5, 2020; and WHEREAS, on May 5, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Point Planning Commission considered the Applicant's request for Tentative Plan approval for Table Rock Crossing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 879 does hereby approve the Tentative Plan application for Table Rock Crossing, based on the findings and conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibit "A," the Planning Department Staff Report dated May 5, 2020, including attachments incorporated by reference. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5'' day of May, 2020. Planning Com isslon Chair ATTE$ l: ---Ni/ City Reprbsentative Planning Commission Resolution No. 879 (05/04/2020) Citxof Central Point, Oregon Ak CENTRAL 140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 �� NT www.centralpointoregon.gov I 0repan STAFF REPORT May 5, 2020 AGENDA ITEM: VII -A File No. PAR -20001 Community Development Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Consideration of a Subdivision Tentative Plan for the development of an eight (8) lot commercial subdivision in the Tourist and Office -Professional (C-4) Zoning District. The project site is located at 4245 Table Rock Road on property identified on the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37 2W 0 1 C Tax Lot 700. Applicant: South Salem, LLC; Agent: Rogue Planning & Development Services, LLC STAFF SOURCE: Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner II BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing an eight (8) lot commercial subdivision on an approximately 7.01 acre property at the southwest corner of Biddle Road and Table Rock Road (Attachment "A-1" ). The subdivision will provide for a variety of commercial uses with common access and circulation that will function as a shopping center. Future developments on the individual lots will be subject to land use and Site Plan and Architectural Review requirements. Biddle and Table Rock Road are Jackson County Major Arterial roadways that require consolidated access drives to serve the proposed lots. This is accomplished with a Private Retail Street that provides east/west connectivity between Hamrick and Table Rock Road through existing development to the west. As shown on the Tentative Plan, the Private Retail Streets have been designed to meet the City's block length standards. Water and sewer utilities are located just west of the subject property (Attachment "A-2"). Separate services are required for each parcel and will require mainline extensions into the property from the existing utility mains. Storm water facilities are located within the existing retail street to the west of the site (Attachment "A-3"). ISSUES: There are two (2) issues relative to this application as follows: 1. Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The applicant's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) examined trip generation calculations for the proposed commercial subdivision and considered the effects on adjacent streets with current and future traffic volumes. Per the TIA, the queue lengths at the approaches following construction of the commercial subdivision will impact traffic on the adjacent streets. Comment: Comments from Jackson County Roads recommends limiting the turning movements from the development to right -in, right -out, left -in (RIROLI) at the approaches to the public streets. Staff recommends Condition No. 2(b) requiring the applicant to complete the access improvements along Biddle Road and Table Rock Road in accordance with Jackson County requirements. 140 South Third Street • Central Point, OR 97502 ■ 541.664.3321 ■ 541.664.6384 ITEM VII -A: CONSIDERATON OF AN 8 -LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION PLAN ON 7.01 ACRES AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF TABLE ROCK AND BIDDLE ROAD. 2. Block Perimeter. The newly created block, located north of the proposed retail street and west of the retail street connecting to Biddle Road, is 2,153 feet in perimeter and exceeds the 2,000 foot block perimeter standard in CPMC 17.75.031(B)(1). Comment: In accordance with CPMC 17.75.03 1 (B)(4)(d), the block perimeter standard may be modified due to traffic safety concerns. The Private Retail Street access on Table Rock is 455 -ft from the intersection of Table Rock and Biddle Road. Although the typical intersection spacing distance is 300 -ft, the increased distance was deemed necessary to increase safety and traffic movement. Staff recommends this adjustment to the block perimeter be approved as proposed to minimize potential traffic safety concerns. FINDINGS: The proposed tentative plan has been reviewed against all applicable sections of 16.10, 16.24 and 17.75 of the Central Point Municipal Code and found to comply as conditioned in the Staff Report dated May 5, 2020, the Applicant's Findings (Attachment `B") and the Planning Department Supplemental Findings (Attachment "D"). CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall: 1. Provide documentation from the Jackson County Surveyor's Office that the name of the proposed subdivision is unique relative to other approved land divisions in Jackson County. 2. Demonstrate compliance with all agency conditions of approval including the following: a. Satisfy conditions of approval in the Public Works Staff Report dated April 15, 2020 (Attachment "E"). b. Satisfy conditions of approval in the Jackson County Roads and Engineering Staff Report, dated April 27, 2020 (Attachment "F"). c. Comply with conditions of approval provided by the Rogue Valley Sewer Services in a letter dated April 10, 2020 (Attachment "G"). ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" — Tentative Plan Map Attachment `B" — Application Narrative Attachment "C" — Traffic Impact Analysis, dated 02-24-2020 Attachment "D" — Planning Department Supplemental Findings Attachment "E" — Parks & Public Works Department Staff Report, dated 04-15-2020 Attachment "F" — Jackson County Roads and Engineering Department Staff Report, dated 04-27-2020 Attachment "G" — Rogue Valley Sewer Services Staff Report, dated 04-10-2020 Attachment "H" — Resolution No. 879. ACTION: Consideration of Resolution No. 879 for the Table Rock Crossing Subdivision Tentative Plan and 1) approve; 2) approve with revisions: or 3) deny the application. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Table Rock Crossing Subdivision Tentative Plan per the Staff Report dated May 5, 2020. N.T.S. -• R IC+ Mr9 MOtr6P !IT[ m1 W WYAIdI Rp,Ap' �o"A VICINITY ^MAP TENTATIVE PLAT TABLE ROCK CROSSING SUBDIVISION UXATrfl % AAAOTi I er LA }AN:AoOR A -01 -XM IN TNL FW 1/a or sECrlor+ I, r375. Wtw. WN, OITY of CE1 RAL PCJkT, SACnSON [OU1RY, OR, AeZXAN V-0WflL8 SOLIIIe 7ALCu !LC 2,.0- 901 4410 Ur01OW1. 041.aH 92,521 0411 f7a-Os20 .>:tJBYEm Ii0)rOUHR t ASi0C1ATCi, OIC. sw POU 2,[w aNlvr, SUIIC 201 6110040, onroo" 97604 Mil 14-4441 A"Mi XWYK fl.1 W" A OCYCLOPLIENT 37 A. "AIRAL 0+213 X162,0$10, 0RC9011 gloat (,71 f1 961-4070 Attachment I'A-1" 'I I01lDl-- ''I D IN lll`�--- r .7. =TUR INTSAYAL 1' =TUR . s' NOTIS, 1. Ikkp0Af!!-[pay{ fA1PH1/T d 6nq PrIR[.IT[0 AS R.3. SCHOOL 70X9 Ma IAANMTION DISTAKr SANITATION DISTAKT RV.s.s AREA Sol ACRES ZONINO C4 C1(I57I149 USE - YACAM RIIOMS10 US[ - CONYERCUIL g d NOFl.IAL CYO RpRVN C+f+-f 4%, — X4911 I. hp6.- H1w"I f Y. 41 r ale } --PI Sy �• ,r,., — `4, 49,802 tq`_Ff I " �� i I Ml 1 ' � '•�• - _ _ ��; 279.0' I 1 • • . " a,;'sz•SI.1v.� ;n2, N ^' 'Sq 40,010 Sq F1 .848 .IFI )!-41.179 $q FI r 1 ,i ZPAI}1111GN"-7'LAT (PARCEL 1- Of NO" P--08••2020] 0 m�• pN I { ! yS . - " .I"' �; ,� 2 Ij 22$1700 Sq Ft I v T7.749 Sq F1 �- () 1 .�.�..�41,� O Til- vQ (oLA Jj a I4 .. Sq F! , ;Y f i.a��' �? 5•..,� 1 7 5' m �r � ti f >r l f�7 .� ,i, EASE 211.26''., -•._ ,An g d NOFl.IAL CYO RpRVN C+f+-f 4%, — X4911 I. hp6.- H1w"I f 128,07' t Nf19.39'ZA"E 568,56' ----------- I -- - I Y. 41 r ale } --PI Sy �• ,r,., — `4, 49,802 tq`_Ff I " �� i I Ml 1 ' s 279.0' 4411 > > , N ^' 'Sq 40,010 Sq F1 .848 .IFI )!-41.179 $q FI r 1 ,i 128,07' t Nf19.39'ZA"E 568,56' ----------- I -- - I r� I 7 I II Attachment "A-2" GoO I i a R � o ^ 9 A o o ^ ✓`'S z O 5 z � } 1 � 3- 3 i I r� I 7 I II Attachment "A-2" GoO I i a R � o ^ - NORTH A o o ^ ✓`'S z O 5 z � } 1 � Attachment "A-3" m .I. # n Z 9 tZi 0 m r NORTH Z P n z c _ � lr�l� � �t t� - I _• �It `� 0 a +L: Z � L $ n I i � i Attachment "A-3" m .I. # n Z 9 tZi 0 m r NORTH Z P n z c - 0 a Z � $ n Attachment "B" South Salem LLC Crossroads Community Shopping Center A Commercial Subdivision ROGUE PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC February 20, 2020 FINDINGS of FACT Tentative Plan Application for an eight -lot subdivision for a phased Community Shopping Center Subject Property Address: Map & Tax Lot: Comprehensive Plan Designation: Zoning: Property Owner: 4245 Table Rock Road 37 2W 01 C; 700 (Parcel 1) Commercial: Tourist and Office C-4: Tourist and Office South Salem LLC PO BOX 4460 Medford, OR 97501 Agent: Rogue Planning & Development Services, LLC Amy Gunter 33 N Central Avenue, Suite 213 Medford, OR 97501 Land Surveyor: Hoffbuhr and Associates Darrell Huck 880 Golf View Drive, Suite 201 Medford, OR 97504 Request: . Request for Tentative Plan approval to allow for an eight -lot subdivision to accommodate for a Community Shopping Center. The Crossroads Community Shopping Center conceptually demonstrates the layout and development of the property. Subsequent applications for Site Plan and Architectural Review approval to allow for the development of the lots within the subdivision as the development plans progress will be obtained. Page 1 of 18 Property Description: The subject property is located at 4245 Table Rock Road, Central Point Oregon, (37S 2W 01C; TL#700). The property is Parcel #2, vacant, 7.01 - acre parcel at the southwest corner of Table Rock Road and Biddle Road. A partition to divide a two -acre parcel at the northwest corner of the property and develop a car wash and oil change facility. (This plat has not been recorded yet but is anticipated in this month — see figure 4). The subject property is bound by Table Rock Road along the east property line and Biddle Road along the north property line. Hamrick Road is approximately 360 -feet to the south of the subject property. There are existing and proposed private retail streets that extend from Hamrick Road to the property's west boundary. Along the west boundary of the subject property, shared with the property to the west, a private retail street was approved with the previous partition and site plan review approval. Figure 1: Vicinity Mop 1 Table Rock Road is a County Arterial and is maintained bylackson County. Figure 2: Centroi Point Zoning Map Biddle Road is a County Minor Arterial and it is also maintained by Jackson County. There are curb, gutter, sidewalk, and utilities present along the frontages. The driveway curb cut was relocated to the western property line as part of the frontage improvements. The property is at the edge of the city of Central Point Urban Growth Boundary and the city limits. The property is zoned Commercial /Tourist (C-4). The adjacent property to the south (TL#3900) is outside of the City limits but is shown as the City of Central Point, Manufacturing (M-2). The property to the north and northwest, across Biddle Road, is a mixture of General Commercial and Residential. The properties to the east, across Table Rock Road, are zoned Jackson County Commercial. The Rogue Valley Airport, airport -related businesses, hotels, and office buildings are further east on Biddle Road. There are no floodplains, wetlands or other significant natural features on the property that would prevent the development of the property. There is a grove of large stature pine and cedar trees on the property. These trees have been evaluated by an arborist and it is recommended that the trees be removed. Page 2 of 18 `4246 Table Rock Rock Rd. uw :1.1V 11C, rRo !W •I 1 I I - G . i Figure 3:2018 Aerial Image i. 'i9.5 Aa, gLd1 �1pA pp law r �5 y7'i1't lO ni.]] O9) n . I PARC{L 1 -A rl ` WIN Cson.. 3/Y 193,e �. �nql. ow•uT9_�9. _. � i �'� FDA . P-03-2ws) f/R lam A 5�it 1 (11411 UYr11T RO. 29-29999, O.R.) a 2 uar JP0ASRCE�Lp AC I lr�to frFq. (A9R11CimIG] sAR3(E . Ai . x I ! w ! w t I AS --- r •) '•SEI:ROTEI- E Or C7 if.—'r_'_- moi• 'UG 7lNI11 ALY io11/A1,Yr Oi 'TRACT 11' KR IMSYIMW -SNM O"R. APO YOLOIIL AM MOF W OX /p 1 xereYalY N&W [rm arm'It M.Wj MI A/R MX 1—V37�.E7i. jI MST. MO. GO.OR44 CAL TM yam` Figure 4: Survey Plot of Parcel l Page 3 of IS Detailed proposal: The proposal is to subdivide the 7.01 -acre parcel (Figure 4) into an eight -lot subdivision to accommodate a Neighborhood Shopping Center, the Crossroads Community Shopping Center. Parcel 1 is a recently approved partition and site plan and architectural review, conditional use permit for an oil change and carwash facility (PAR -19002 and SPAR -19002). The proposed subdivision provides for eight developable parcels that comply with site design and layout standards in the C-4, Commercial: Tourist and Office zone for the development of neighborhood shopping center. Footprints areas totaling 54,595 square feet are proposed. The proposed uses include an anchor store, mixed uses (office, retail, other sales), fast food with drive-thru. The shopping center provides a group of commercial building areas of various sizes and types of building area to accommodate development of allowed uses within a shopping center. As the individual uses develop, Site Plan and Architectural Review will be proposed to demonstrate that the development complies or can demonstrate compliance with the layout proposed herein or with a revision that demonstrates compliance with the city of Central Point standards for commercial development. No buildings will exceed the maximum height in the zone of 60 -feet. A private retail street is proposed to provide internal circulation. The private retail street will be extended through the property, and to connect to the existing east/west private retail street that extends to Hamrick Road. The retail street also intersects with the approved north/south retail street that provides access to and from Biddle Road. This portion of the private retail street is along the west property line of Parcel 1 on the partition plat in Figure 4. Adequate transportation facilities are provided within the public rights-of-way and via the private retail street to accommodate the anticipated vehicular traffic. A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Community Shopping Center has been provided with the application. The TIA addresses the uses and the future trip generation. The intersections of the private retail street exceed the minimum separation of 300 -feet. The block length through the private retail street is 652.95 -feet. This slightly exceeds the maximum block length for vehicular traffic. This is due to a jog in the retail street to separate the intersection on Table Rock Road to accommodate turning and stacking movements for future traffic impacts. Pedestrian and bicycles will be able to traverse the interconnected parking lot system to reduce distances traveled. There are transit accommodations along Table Rock Road. A new stop was installed with the development of Hamrick Road and Table Rock Road with the development of Costco, less than 500 -feet south of the subject property. We believe the proposed subdivision of the C-4 zoned land will accommodate at neighborhood shopping center that will provide convenience shopping for the day to day needs of the consumers in the immediate neighborhoods. The proposed layout accommodates for building areas that exceed 50,000 Page 4 of 18 square feet and are less than the maximum of 100,000 square feet of gross floor areas. There is one anchor tenant space proposed in the concept layout that is less than 60 percent of the total gross floor area. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Amy Gunter Rogue Planning & Development Services, LLC 541-951-4020 Attachments: Land Partition Findings of Fact Assessor Map: Attachment A Legal Description: Attachment B Existing Deed: Attachment C Tentative Partition Plat Conceptual Subdivision Layout Conceptual Grading & Drainage Plan: C.1 Conceptual Utility Plan: C.2 Findings addressing the criteria from the City of Central Point Land Development ordinance can be found on the following pages. For clarity, the Central Point Land Development Ordinance criteria are in Times New Roman font and the findings in Calibri. Page 5 of 18 Findings of Fact 16.10 - Tentative Plans Finding: The proposal is to allow for a subdivision of the 7.01 -acre parcel at the intersection of Biddle Road and Table Rock Road. A tentative subdivision plan demonstrates the layout of the proposed commercial subdivision. There are no minimum lot dimensions, lot areas, lot coverages, in the C-4 zone. The subdivision layout provides for the adequate area to development the property to the standards of a neighborhood shopping center. A proposed conceptual development plan of a neighborhood shopping center has been provided with the application. The shopping center site plan provides for the development of the east to west private retail street that crosses the property to connect with the east west connection that exists across the adjacent properties to the west and leads to Hamrick Road. The Shopping Center layout is intended to accommodate a gross floor area of not less than 50,000 and not more than 100,000 gross floor area. The shopping center is conceptually proposed to provide for 54,595 square feet of structures with lot areas, drive isles and access, parking areas, and landscape buffer areas devoted to development of permitted and conditional uses of the C-4 zoning district. Each lot of the subdivision will provide for a separate site design review application as necessary by the standards. Future lot development will demonstrate compliance with the conceptual development plan and associated Traffic Impact Analysis. A private retail street is proposed to provide internal circulation. The private retail street will be extended through the property, and to connect to the existing east/west private retail street that extends to Hamrick Road. The retail street also intersects with the approved north/south retail street that provides access to and from Biddle Road. This portion of the private retail street is along the west property line of Parcel 1 on the partition plat in Figure 4. Adequate transportation facilities are provided within the public rights-of-way and via the private retail street to accommodate the anticipated vehicular traffic. A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Community Shopping Center has been provided with the application. The TIA addresses the uses and the future trip generation. Utility, access and maintenance easements for the private retail street that is proposed through the community shopping center will be provided with the survey plat map. A separate application for the development of a Firestone Complete Auto Care and Tire facility with associated site improvements has been filed. This development and the associated private retail street Page 6 of 18 provide the vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle connection through the property to the retail street network in the vicinity. 16.10.070 Explanatory information. A. A vicinity map showing all existing subdivisions, streets and unsubdivided land ownerships adjacent to the proposed subdivision and showing how proposed streets may be connected to existing streets; Finding: A vicinity map from the Jackson County Assessor is included in the application. The existing private retail street system through the adjacent properties to the west will connect through the development. B. Proposed deed restrictions in outline form; Finding: The property has existing deeds and easements. These will continue and will be demonstrated on the final plat of the partition plan. The public utility easements will remain along the frontages of the property. Private utility easements will be provided within the subdivision and provided for on the final partition plat. The easement for the retail street will be created providing cross access, mutual ingress/egress, maintenance, and other standard access easement language. A title report associated with the approved minor land partition is set to be recorded in February. A revised title report will provide for the easements of record on the 7.01 -acre parcel. The draft subdivision plan provides for public utility easement in the private retail street, public access of the private retail street, access from the private retail street to the development pads of the Community Shopping Center. C. Approximate centerline profiles showing the proposed finished grade of all streets, including the extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision; Finding: The property is nearly level and the centerline profile of the Private Retail Street that connects to an existing Private Retail Street appears unnecessary. D. The approximate location and size of all proposed and existing water and sewer lines and storm drainage systems. (Ord. 1650(part), 1990). Finding: Page 7 of 18 A preliminary grading and utility plan is provided with the application. The utility plan provides details regarding where the connections for the proposed water, sewer and storm drainage lines of the private retail street. Conceptual stub out locations for the Community Shopping Center pad lots are provided. 16.24.010 Blocks --Length, width, and shape. The lengths, widths, and shapes of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites suitable to the special needs of the type and use contemplated, needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and limitations and opportunities of topography. Finding: The lengths, widths, and shapes of the block are designed with regards to providing adequate building sites for the development of a Neighborhood Shopping Center. The access points onto Biddle Road and Table Rock Road are dictated by the standards of Jackson County. The proposed private retail street intersections dictate the block lengths and dimensions. 16.24.020 Blocks --Sizes. Blocks shall not exceed twelve hundred feet in length except blocks adjacent to arterial streets or unless the previous adjacent layout or topographical conditions justify a variation. The recommended minimum distance between intersections on arterial streets is three hundred feet. Finding: No block length in the development exceeds 1200 -feet. Two of the blocks are adjacent to arterial streets and the separation from the intersection of the arterial streets increases the block length and perimeters. The intersections of Table Rock Road and Biddle Road and the private retail streets exceed 300 -feet. The proposed private retail street connections through the community shopping center slightly exceed the block perimeters with 2,200 -feet. This is due to the shifting of the private retail street intersection south of the Biddle Road and Table Rock Road intersections. The jog in the retail street adds additional distance. The proposed block lengths through the development exceed the 600 -foot block length rule. The intersection of the private retail street that traverses Parcel 2, the 7.01 -acre area of the commercial subdivision and community shopping center, will have a more than 600 -foot block length to Table Rock and Biddle Road. Additionally, the block perimeter exceeds 2,000 feet. This is due to the separation standards from the intersection to the street and the sight -lines on Table Rock Road. The private retail street and connected parking lot system allow for pedestrians and bicycles to cross the site without following the block boundaries, only automobiles will be restricted to the private retail street and arterial street intersections. Page 8 of 18 The intersection of the retail street that traverses Parcel 2, will have a more than 600 -foot block length to Table Rock and Biddle Road. This is due to the presence of the major arterial streets, and intersection alignment issues, separation from the intersection to the street, and sight -lines on Table Rock Road and Biddle Road. 16.24.030 Blocks --Easements. A. Utility Lines. Easements for electric lines or other non -city -owned public utilities may be required, and shall be a minimum of ten feet in width located on the exterior portion of a single property. Easements for city utilities (i.e., water, storm drain and sanitary sewer mains) shall be a minimum of fifteen feet in width located on the exterior portion of a single property. Tie -back easements six feet wide by twenty feet long shall be provided for utility poles along lot lines at change of direction points of easements. 1. Structures Located within a City Utility Easement. a. Except for public utilities and for signs when developed in accordance with Chapter 15.24 (Sign Code), no person shall locate, construct, or continue to locate a structure (as defined in Chapter 16.08) within a city utility easement (as defined in Chapter 16.08), except as provided in subsections (A)(1)(b) and (A)(2) of this section. b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the city may approve fencing, concrete block walls/fencing, retaining walls, and similar fencing/wall structures that are otherwise in compliance with the building code, and with the clearance provisions noted herein, over an easement subject to the following requirements: i. Said fencing or wall structures that interfere with the installation, maintenance, access, or operation of a public utility or city utility may be removed by the utility provider or the city at the sole cost of owner. ii. Any replacement or relocation of the fencing or wall structures shall be at the sole cost of the property owner or occupant. iii. Owners and occupants of property shall not be entitled to compensation for damages related to removal of the fencing or wall structures. 2. Grass, Asphalt, and Concrete Installed within a City Utility Easement. a. Subject to the limitations of the building code, lawful owners and occupants of property may install grass, asphalt and concrete within a city utility easement. b. In the course of installing, accessing, maintaining, or operating its facilities in a city utility easement, a public utility or the city, as the case may be, may move or remove any asphalt, concrete, or vegetation located within said easement. After the same are moved or removed and after completion of the necessary work, the grass, asphalt or concrete shall be repaired and replaced in a reasonable manner at the sole cost of the public utility or city. Page 9 of 18 c. Owners and occupants of property shall not be entitled to compensation related to damages to grass, asphalt, or concrete so long as the repairs and replacement are done in a reasonable manner and in a reasonable time frame. Finding: It is not anticipated that there will be any construction within public utility easement excepting the circumstances outlined herein. B. Watercourses. Where a subdivision is traversed by a watercourse, drainage way, channel or stream, there may be required a stormwater easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the lines of such watercourse, and such further width as will be adequate for the purpose. Streets, parkways or access roads parallel to major watercourses may be required. Finding: Not applicable. C. Pedestrian Ways. in any block over seven hundred fifty feet in length a pedestrian way may be required. The minimum width of the pedestrian right-of-way must be at least six feet in width which shall be hard surfaced through the block and curb to curb in order to provide easy access to schools, parks, shopping centers, mass transportation stops or other community services. If conditions require blocks longer than twelve hundred feet, two pedestrian ways may be required for combination pedestrian way and utility easement. When essential for public convenience, such ways may be required to connect to cul-de-sacs. Long blocks parallel to arterial streets may be approved without pedestrian ways if desirable in the interests of traffic safety. Finding: Pedestrian access is provided through the proposed Community Shopping Center development parking areas. The pedestrian sidewalks are provided at six -feet within the development and have clear access to both arterial streets. Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the private retail street and sidewalks to city standards are or will be provided around the perimeter of the development as the properties develop. 16.24.040 Lots --Uses. A. The city may, in its discretion, deny approval for the creation of any lot by any manner if the effect of such creation of lot would be to facilitate perpetuation of a nonconforming use. Finding: The uses proposed and futures uses are all conforming uses in the C-4 zone. B. No lot shall be created unless it is in compliance with all applicable provisions of this code. Page 10 of 18 Finding: All proposed lots will comply with the standards of the C-4 zone. The Commercial Site Design Standards found in 17.75.035, detail that there are no minimum lot areas, width or depths. Future site development through Site Plan and Architectural Review will demonstrate compliance with any yard setback standards, building heights and other requirements from the commercial design standards. 16.24.050 Lots --Size and determination. Lot sizes shall conform with the zoning ordinance and shall be appropriate for the location of the subdivision and for the type of development and use contemplated. In the case of irregular lots, the width shall be measured along the front building line. In no case shall the average depth be more than two and one-half times the width. Corner lots for residential use shall have sufficient width to permit appropriate building setback from and orientation to both streets. Finding: No minimum lot sizes in the zone. A. In areas that cannot be connected to sewer lines, minimum lot sizes shall be sufficient to permit sewage disposal by an engineered system in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality, Jackson County environmental quality section, and public works standards. Such lot sizes shall conform to the requirements of the Jackson County environmental quality section. Finding: Adequate public sewer service is available to the proposed lots within the subdivision. B. Where property is zoned and planned for business or industrial use, other widths and areas may be required, at the discretion of the city. Depth and width of properties reserved or laid out for commercial and industrial purposes shall be adequateto provide for the off-street service and parking facilities required by the type of use and development contemplated. Finding: The Crossroads Community Shopping Center's is a neighborhood shopping center. The conceptual development plan demonstrates that adequate parking areas and drive aisles for the potential uses within the shopping center are provided. 16.24.060 Through lots. Page 11 of 18 Through lots shall be avoided except where essential to reduce access to primary or secondary arterial streets or streets of equivalent traffic volume, reduce access to adjacent nonresidential activities, or to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. A planting screen easement of at least ten feet may be required along the line of lots abutting such adjacent street. There shall be no right of access across such planting screen easements. Finding: Not applicable 16.24.070 Lot side lines. The side lines of lots shall run at right angles to the street upon which the lots face, as far as practicable, or on curbed streets they shall be radial to the curve. Finding: All lot lines run at right angles to the streets and private retail street. 16.24.080 Large lot subdivision. In subdividing tracts into large lots which at some future time are likely to be resubdivided, the location of lot lines and other details of the layout shall be such that the resubdivisions may readily take place without violating the requirements of these regulations and without interfering with the orderly development of streets or other utilities. Restrictions of building locations in relationship to future rights- of-way shall be made a matter of record if the city considers it necessary. Finding: Not applicable 16.36.030 Requirements. A. All major and minor land partitions may, as a condition of approval, provide for improvements including curbs, gutters, asphalt streets, sidewalks, underground utilities and such other improvements as shall be deemed appropriate and necessary by the city council as a condition of approval, with all such improvements to meet the standards required for subdivisions under this title. Finding: The majority of the public infrastructure was recently installed with the frontage improvements along Table Rock Road. Utilities are available in the public right-of-way of the roads and in the proposed 15 - foot wide public utility easements along the frontages of the property. The future sidewalk connections will be installed along the frontages as the sites develop. Underground utilities installed in streets will be constructed before the surfacing the retail street. Stubs for service connections for underground utilities will be placed to reduce the necessity for Page 12 of 18 disturbing the street improvements when future service connections are made. Easements for public and private utilities will be provided on the subdivision plat. A private, 12 -inch water line that exists within the existing east / west private retail street. An eight - inch line connects to the site's northern boundary. A water circulation plan under the direction of the City of Central Point Public Works Director will be completed to provide hydrants and adequate service connections throughout the development area. The property is within the Phase 2 Stormwater Quality Area and a stormwater management plan that complies with the Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual for water quantity and quality is provided. The proposal for the private retails street accommodates much of the stormwater generated on as an above bioswale. Each lot will need to address their stormwater facilities. These will likely include above ground swales in conjunction with underground detention facilities. The Stormwater service is available to the site from a 24 -inch storm drain line that exists 260 -feet west of the project site within the existing private driveway. Sanitary sewer service is available to the west of the project site. This 8 -inch line will be extended through the private retail street to accommodated the development of each of the sites. B. In the case of major partitions, all streets or roads shall be improved to meet the standards required for subdivisions under this title, and shall be dedicated to the city in the same manner as subdivision roads and streets. Finding; The request is for Subdivision. The subdivision request includes a private retail Street to provide east to west connectivity through the site. Biddle Road is a County Minor Arterial and was recently improved from the intersection of Biddle and Table Rock Road, west to the 1-5 freeway interchange. Table Rock Road is a County Arterial. Table Rock Road also was recently improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage, and street lighting. Both Table Rock Road and Biddle Road are maintained by Jackson County. The Private Retail Street is not proposed to be dedicated to the City but is proposed to be installed per the improvement standards. Required by five-foot curb tight sidewalks are proposed along the north side of the private retail street with a ten -foot landscape buffer between sidewalk and lot development areas. The south side of the private retail street proposes a five-foot hardscape planter and a five-foot sidewalk. The site plan accommodates a six-foot sidewalk in both instances due to anticipated code changes that will require a six-foot sidewalk. Until that time, a five-foot sidewalk and larger planter areas will be provided. Page 13 of 18 C. Partition improvements shall be constructed prior to approval of the final partition plat unless, in the city's sole discretion, deferral is allowed. In all cases of deferral, the applicant shall either execute an agreement for improvements and comply with the bond requirements of Section 16.1.2.070 and 1 G.12.080 of this title, or shall execute a deferred improvement agreement, which shall be in a form and contain such terms as are specified by city and shall be recorded and be binding upon and run with the land and bind the applicant and all successors in interest. Finding: All subdivision related improvements will be constructed to provide vehicular access through the property. Permits for the driveway access from Table Rock Road will be obtained from Jackson County. The landscape is proposed along Table Rock Road frontage behind the sidewalk. The vegetation will be irrigated and maintained in a weed -free condition. C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District: 17.44. Community shopping centers which may include any of the permitted uses in this section and may also include but not be limited to: a. Supermarkets; b. Department stores; c. Sporting goods; d. Books and stationery; e. Gifts, notions and variety; f. Florists; g. Leather goods and luggage; h. Pet sales and related supplies; i. Photographic supplies; j. Health food; k. Self-service laundry; 1. Antique shop; m. Delicatessen; n. Pastry and confectionery; o. General apparel; p. Shoes and boots; q. Specialty apparel; r. Jewelry; s. Clocks and watches, sales and service; t. Bakery, retail only; u. Bicycle shop; v. Audio, video, electronic sales and service; w. Printing, lithography and publishing; Finding: Page 14 of 18 The proposal use of the property is for a neighborhood shopping center, the Crossroads Community Shopping Center. The envisioned uses fall with the categories listed as permitted uses in the C-4 district. All development of the individual lots within the subdivision will demonstrate compliance with the standards 17.44, 17.64, 17.75 and the development standards for public infrastructure improvements of the city of Central Point. Design and Development Standards 17.75.031 General connectivity, circulation and access standards. The purpose of this section is to assure that the connectivity and transportation policies of the city's Transportation System Plan are implemented. In achieving the objective of maintaining and enhancing the city's small town environment it is the city's goal to base its development pattern on a general circulation grid using a walkable block system. Blocks may be comprised of public/private street right- of-way, or accessways. Finding: The Table Rock Road frontage of the subdivision was recently improved Biddle Road is proposed to be improved as the site develops. Throughout the development, there is a primary east to the west connection provided via the private retail street. The private retail street will have street -like improvements installed along the north side of the the development because of the proposed development of Phase 1(Premier Oil) and Phase 2, Firestone. The retail street is proposed to have a five- foot curbside sidewalk and a ten -foot landscape buffer to the parking areas. Along the south side, a temporary bioswale to accommodate storm drainage facilities. A. Streets and Utilities. The public street and utility standards set forth in the City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction shall apply to all development within the city. Finding: Table Rock Road along the frontage of the property has been improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk, utility installations, etc. The private retail street is proposed to be connected to the existing private retail street that exists as an east/west connection from Hamrick Road (where parallel to Table Rock Road) as part of a pending commercial shopping center proposal for the 7.01 -acre parcel. This private retail street will intersect with a north/south, private retail street connection (approved access for Premier Oil). Landscape medians and buffering and an interconnected five -foot -wide sidewalk system are provided through the development to provide pedestrian connectivity to the public street system. (Note: the conceptual subdivision plan demonstrates a six -foot -wide sidewalk through the development, this is in Page 15 of 18 the event of anticipated code changes). As proposed with the individual developments, a five-foot sidewalk is proposed. The proposed development will comply with all utility standards set forth in the City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction. B. Block Standards. The following block standards apply to all development: 1. Block perimeters shall not exceed two thousand feet measured along the public street right-of- way, or outside edges of accessways, or other acknowledged block boundary as described in subsection (B)(4) of this section. Finding: The proposed private retail street connections through the community shopping center slightly exceed the block perimeters with 2,200 -feet. This is due to the shifting of the private retail street intersection south of the Biddle Road and Table Rock Road intersections. The jog in the retail street adds additional distance. 2. Block lengths shall not exceed six hundred feet between through streets or pedestrian accessways, measured along street right-of-way, or the pedestrian accessway. Block dimensions are measured from right-of-way to right-of-way along street frontages. Finding: The proposed block lengths through the development exceed 600 -feet. The intersection of the retail street that traverses Parcel 2, will have a more than 600 -foot block length to Table Rock and Biddle Road. This is due to the presence of the major arterial streets, and intersection alignment issues, separation from the intersection to the street, stacking distances, and sightlines on Table Rock Road and Biddle Road. 3. Accessways or private/retail streets may be used to meet the block length or perimeter standards of this section, provided they are designed in accordance with this section and are open to the public at all times. Finding: A private retail street system is used to attempt to meet the block length and perimeter standards. The retail street has been designed per the requirements of this code. Page 16 of 18 4. The standards for block perimeters and lengths may be modified to the minimum extent necessary based on written findings that compliance with the standards are not reasonably practicable or appropriate due to: Finding: The proposed block lengths through the development exceed the 600 -foot block length rule. The intersection of the private retail street that traverses Parcel 2, the 7.01 -acre area of the commercial subdivision and community shopping center, will have a more than 600 -foot block length to Table Rock and Biddle Road. Additionally, the block perimeter exceeds 2,000 feet. This is due to the separation standards from the intersection to the street and the sight -lines on Table Rock Road. The private retail street and connected parking lot system allow for pedestrians and bicycles to cross the site without following the block boundaries, only automobiles will be restricted to the private retail street and arterial street intersections. C. Driveway and Property Access Standards. Vehicular access to properties shall be located and constructed in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction, Section 320.10.30, Driveway and Property Access. Finding: The proposed civil improvements throughout the development will comply with all utility standards set forth in the City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction. The Traffic Impact Analysis will be reviewed by Jackson County Roads. The driveway access reservation will be made with Jackson County Roads upon approval of the development. D. Pedestrian Circulation. Attractive access routes for pedestrian travel shall be provided through the public sidewalk system, and where necessary supplemented through the use of pedestrian accessways as required to accomplish the following: Finding: There will be a complete sidewalk system along both public street frontages of the property. Through the development, there are private retail streets and an interconnected parking lot system proposed. These streets are proposed to have landscape buffers and sidewalk systems with sidewalk and parking lot crossings that are distinguished from the driving surface to provide pedestrian connectivity through the property. Pedestrian scale streetlights and directional signage will provide interest and safety for pedestrians. E. Accessways, Pedestrian. Pedestrian accessways may be used to meet the block requirements of subsection B of this section. When used pedestrian accessways shall be developed as illustrated in Figure Page 17 of 18 17.75.01. All landscaped areas next to pedestrian accessways shall be maintained, or plant materials chosen, to maintain a clear sight zone between three and eight feet from the ground level. Finding. The pedestrian accessways provided through the development in the parking areas and along the Private Retail Street will reduce the block length as a pedestrian can bisect the development vs. an automobile which must stay on the driving surfaces. All landscape areas will be professionally designed, installed and maintained. The plant materials sections provide for clear sight zones and to provide safety and security throughout the sight. Vision clearance triangles will be maintained at the intersections. F. Retail Street. Retail streets may be used to meet the block requirements of subsection B of this section. When used retail streets shall be developed as illustrated in Figure 17.75.02. Finding The private retail street is proposed to attempt to meet the block requirements of subsection B. The retail street is proposed to connect to existing retail streets developed on the adjacent properties. Utility, access and maintenance easements for the private retail street that is proposed through the community shopping center will be provided with the survey plat map. Page 18 of 18 IL LOT NUMn OFFIC_ I RECORD OF DESCRIF JON, OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR, JACKS S&CMU f TOWWMP- 2 LOT RP 1 173 362k l l L1600 MC. IM0. A' W& A S J .M. 1 MAP NO. 11_ • ,• r nA h f t u jv DEED cis ms+s� NOWLEGAL DESCR1pTION PURPOSES 'MAR If. HU -11 Commencing a the northeast corner o l i r Sec. 1916 11, Tarp 36 South, Range 2 west of the W.M., and from said 1960 corner running 1962 West on the north boundary of said claim 29 chains and 76 links; thence south 53 chains and 71 links; thence south 89*45' east along south boundary of claim 29 chains and 76 links to the southeast corner of said claim; thence north on the east boundary of said claim 53 chains and 83 links to the place of beginning. Excepting that portion of said premises Bold to Scott V. Davis, described as the '"soLth half of the east half" of D.L.C. h2, in Twrp 36 South, of -Range 2 West of -the W.M., 80 acres, more or less, together with a strip of land 25 feet 3n width, beginning at the southeast corner of the north half of the east half of said D.L.C. and running thence north to the intersection of the County Road. Also, excepting land described in Vol. 202 page 281, of the Deed Records of JC0, Less tax lot 362W11-1801 94{ 4,9 960 1 962 r Bf Q.R. -'r3-09930 i EXHIBIT "A" I Oeginni.ng at the north&ast corner of donation land I claim 110. 42, tcainship 36 youth. rangy 2 west of the Willamette Meridian in .7ackson county. Oregon; thenro west along the north boundary of said claim, 27 chains and 74 links; thence south,. 53 chains and 71 linksr thence south 89'45' east along the south hpunddrY south - of said claim, 29 chains and 76 links to the south- east coxnar•ol said claim: thence north an the east boundary of said claiie, 53 chains and 83 links to the r place of beginning, containing 160 acrds, more ar less. EXCEPTING TLIEREFROM that portion of said premises sold to Scott V. Davis. described as the "southhalf of the 4 east half". of donation land claim no. 32 .in township• 36 south,. range 2 -went of the Willamette Meridian, containing So.acrea, morn or less, together with a strip of land -25 feet in width, beginning at the E southeast corner of -the' north half of the east'half :' 1 of donation land claim, and ruining then an north. .said to an intersection with the original southwesterly right-of-K&Y liaa of Takla Rock. (county) road_' AtiO EXCEPTION THERDFlO 6 the following desciihed tract,- - ' Saginning at a concrote monument with brOnxe disc I ' located at the YsortheasL Corner of donation -land. claim no_ 42, tcunuhip 36 south,' range west•.eP the ' F7iliamette Maridian in Jackson county, Oregon, thence S eleng.khe north of said claim, -'south 89'52'35" -boundary pest, 323.74•feet;'thenee south 0'25'20" east, 264,12 . Eeats thence south •37139'3()m Qast'- 39.81 feet; thenca south 0.52' east 193.72 fest; thence ngttli'89°34'20" east, 295.49 feat to the eaot boundary Of said' Claim; -Was t thence north 0"06'40" t,.497.'80 fest to the point 7 of heginniny, containing 3,:50 acres,. more or less. a TOGETHER with a'mutual ingress -egress eaefNnent 20 feet in with, being 10 feet on eacil side of the follaxing . cantaxlina, to -wit: Commencing at the northeast corner of donation land Claim no. 42, township 36 south, range -2 west of the i Willamette Nexidian in Sackson county, Oregon; thence i thong the north boundary of said claim.,south 89'52'35" wes*, 323.74 feet; thence south 0°25'20" east, 264.11 feet to the true point of beginning of said easenent; thence south 37°39130" east, 39,81 feet-; thence south + 0°52' east, 20.00 feet and there terminating. I Exhibit "A" Page 1 of 2 i i Together wide an easement for the purpose of repairing, nain� taining and operating the irri9ati0n ditches and control valvas 'ahlell nre located on the remaining property of sellers so that purchaser may be able to irrigate the orchard piaVerty which is + the subject of this sale. Said easement, in any event, shall II terminate not later than June 1, iy98_ I, .That par't.-lying rcLYhi, pul3iic roads_ ; `! 2. %' xis ti rig,, rights. of saay' for c7itctees epi canals_ fi r3;. itzgh of Ftaajy fps titre' traria e " amission •acid di�trltyntie)n .off-'eIectrtCity,• wind,:_ve�'.btlaer gees' rantsQ to: TiCe•,Caixfntnia,Cr 'H a' egon Pow�ei Cniapanyr ai Cai„i,fgrnia .by : iristruman "recorded A AI..18 "19 53 n 4 ' vo.iwae 379'i gage..g69 of ,,�4e eed ,r ' i t • c:aiRtt Jv;.; :. ' drfasrda Gi dacissp• ';yyyN, r;.�:�•• Y.. Oregosi.:•. _ S-'-"�Yr.;'- i'.;;.w.�... ��;•.:;.; n� ''' '/ �`�'�`ti: }i'. ':]n-� {, J. -:F :r. x.[• .n• Ya'-�1�"' r r'k^-�n.F-'•l ' - r• -'l •� .. ?,r ," < �;5: •-r fffff '•° .!�•...5. kr.:� ,...err:':•.. y.r`{�,y;=�-: icy{�t .r:...rf• i' 1��7rc ti F!'. Rig h.t 'ai:'Way ' for the ttaasmi ss inn'; r • - i,.: �,f� •r;. ; f' and;:distrib Q<, t% eotxiciiy; • attd fCr D v -.j:F •� fix• �uxposBs. "granted t;o'.ti r:.r ..;fr.k.i.• .. •i?r � j' �•.C7 dC FAC .-POVO.r and., Light• 4�vrapaa ,: 'd4r�7OX4t34i]', by' I P. AA j �.�•i4 1 5 n5 Erwnent xecoxcied-March `Ilu; 97D ' :of file official'•- oOxds, #..7ac]CEc o • :Y{; ; ; • p;R'. ca�inEy' ' Oregon. ,.�•r, 9, { ' .1�,.i• Ye'i-,". :;,: i;sy:� -y r:� f,; 1., ; :,� l; .r� .s•r.'• z}S,'..t The e££eet G. said ert L•i Vii; �; ' '%' � • ,, � �•. ]� � � PxeP jh:'; er'saiae::Poxiafi'ttiezea; •{ " 'lying' tai tlii11 the boun4ari es n -'the "Taf�1e'.heck maps odeszent,'' .:. �. ! Colfsaay , ' and right -T, urns .d' ass tberofra¢s_ . :.'an ace a,r a,SSment:.?Cesu.ir�q`.•• .y.�,Y�= Ir( - -.��;�. ' .. .. .,:•�.; i.k.'{'.�,+7 ir2;:�-T �' • 1.r,�';i �ir.N'��t .: `\�1y-=pilir. 1Y..7; !'}�r• 1- ••r 'r .:...;r2. te,•..'•- =� •,. : p Exhibit ^A'., i Page 2.of 2 PARTITION PLAT NO. LOCATED IN, IN THE SW 1`4 OF SECTION 1, T37S, R2W, WM, CITY Or DEN7TRAL POINT, JACKSON COUNTY, OR. FOR_ SOUTH SALEM, L,LC. P.O. go)( -60 MEDFORD, OR- 97501 FOUND BRASS DISC NC CORNER OF DLC NO, 56 PER 1997 JACKSON COUNTY [� pf-[STAB .. _.-. -•_ •-._. .. `�� F. .- - _...gt'bi'1iY 329.45' EDi PEp /N (674 � r. `E v; ti• (tat [ w nJ4141U,1 eU'AA[SS rum) (TRACT 0 Or INET. NO. 2015-041455 O.R.) +.I PARCEL 2M_{ 471 5a" .. E PARCEL 1 w6 R. d1 AC� �p CA rR3S V91 170 r5 9 I :.WD[S5-[wtl:6 LNEwOAIr `_ � c 8 ;a c9rltiT mpr 77.70- .7c.[aayzw[u s4splsm w ✓i{ [,M_I [CD Gf f[fA�Li[ ODDI1�C4f >F j ] I I s/x 1e7se [ aa' I,.frurl4Ai.14 w.w.e[_grr_1y�1, Mw xe4ya>3�1� P%..r.: NOTE ED PEP (PARCEL 3 Or PARTRION PLAT W. P-0-2004) SIN 1ENI5e , i 1. THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN ACCESS EASENENT i CREATED PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2W1-OT391 B, DEED RECORDS OF JACKSON COUNTY. OREGON THE EASEMENT BONG CREATED HEREON SArSFIES THE CONDIRON OF PARAGRAPH B2. WHERDJY 111E LOCATION OF THE EASEMENT SHALL BE DETERMINED SY SCUM 5ALEM LLC AT THE TIME IT SUBMITS PLANS FOR OEVELOPMENT. • I ygyfl{RtT 4CID14P[A OF "TRACT B' PER IW1RbvFNt +I gpwjt p} AI10 YOLUNE 495. PA6i 75, D.R. :I 1 HOFFBUHR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 880 GOLF VIEW DRIVE, SUITE 201 MEDFORD'OREGON 97504 (541)779-4041 BY: DARRELL LHUCK PLS No. 2023 SCALE: 1 Inoh = 100' JULY 29, 2019 BASIS OF BEARING. SURVEY NO. 10429 o = Sel 5/5"s24" Iron r.Irf...I g pin wllh p1®tic cap clamped "D. Huck LS 2023". X( = Se1 5/9"x30"Iron minloreing ph wllh P1.01. cap e1..p.d "D. Huck LS 2023'. • = Found 5/0" Iron robot per Survey No. 22744 unleee nol.J olherwlee rqund bra%D col) monam4nt PUE = Eoeemenl far paw le 011114m, rearm drnlmge. Irrtgallon, poo, Toler. V*w1c. tMpTlen., cab:4 I.!nl.lan and conllory ewer. 9onflnEe{lon and malnl.nonae O.R. = Offl.lal Record., Jack— County, Or. D.R. = Deed Record,, Jackean County, Or, S/N = Survey Number [-] - R.cord per Survey No. 16429 I -I = RaaOrd per Survey No. 16058 W M O G IAN LOT 'DO 'e" 40%41 rtFAY i (GC41 tP 11' CONSTRUCTION) di Yi'3��k'r1�t71l� [TC.f� tt7Q7, fiFirii[T4S4S»�T7<I17 LT7iSy# �iiTf?Sll':=iT11TS�!!'R� - f?'IF!7i1 Lfignp Rd��T ? �tTwl lir?: TIrRs cy ArmorAme , I Ell Ify.thl la. be >�ssrr :s ml py rig[ SURVEYOR �`It4�ll"i3 r. v; ti• F R (INSTRUMENT N0. 99-28959, CH.) PARCEL 2M_{ 471 5a" .. i tT05 Aor". o le...,) �p CA rR3S V91 170 r5 I :.WD[S5-[wtl:6 LNEwOAIr `_ � c 8 ;a c9rltiT mpr j ] I I NOTE ygyfl{RtT 4CID14P[A OF "TRACT B' PER IW1RbvFNt +I gpwjt p} AI10 YOLUNE 495. PA6i 75, D.R. :I 1 HOFFBUHR & ASSOCIATES, INC. 880 GOLF VIEW DRIVE, SUITE 201 MEDFORD'OREGON 97504 (541)779-4041 BY: DARRELL LHUCK PLS No. 2023 SCALE: 1 Inoh = 100' JULY 29, 2019 BASIS OF BEARING. SURVEY NO. 10429 o = Sel 5/5"s24" Iron r.Irf...I g pin wllh p1®tic cap clamped "D. Huck LS 2023". X( = Se1 5/9"x30"Iron minloreing ph wllh P1.01. cap e1..p.d "D. Huck LS 2023'. • = Found 5/0" Iron robot per Survey No. 22744 unleee nol.J olherwlee rqund bra%D col) monam4nt PUE = Eoeemenl far paw le 011114m, rearm drnlmge. Irrtgallon, poo, Toler. V*w1c. tMpTlen., cab:4 I.!nl.lan and conllory ewer. 9onflnEe{lon and malnl.nonae O.R. = Offl.lal Record., Jack— County, Or. D.R. = Deed Record,, Jackean County, Or, S/N = Survey Number [-] - R.cord per Survey No. 16429 I -I = RaaOrd per Survey No. 16058 W M O G IAN LOT 'DO 'e" 40%41 rtFAY i (GC41 tP 11' CONSTRUCTION) di Yi'3��k'r1�t71l� [TC.f� tt7Q7, fiFirii[T4S4S»�T7<I17 LT7iSy# �iiTf?Sll':=iT11TS�!!'R� - f?'IF!7i1 Lfignp Rd��T ? �tTwl lir?: TIrRs cy ArmorAme , I Ell Ify.thl la. be >�ssrr :s ml py rig[ SURVEYOR �`It4�ll"i3 o a 0 0 o 0 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTMICTION - FOR REVIEW and DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY gg a> DD -� it elf -n A I<�4� ♦ mm S 00 ..� --4D 0 11 0 j tl N i e wP�2VT: II IRW F/�g111V idl: PBnm�i!^rl yyy gym. { � � Mea-a.onersoi q �,I II S9�I� ii�@ m i WGIe�Ctoir- 372C 7W gg a> DD -� it elf -n A I<�4� ♦ mm S 00 ..� --4D 0 J� ! RIDDLE ROAD` �. _ BLDG I I\ I I g I f Dm ilt III �;I i I F '^I I l Diq 14 > jl .111111 VIM f F 1 � ID I m I o I I I II I kk �I II j 372W01CTL3800 l - - - -- - - - —ICTL3900 J . � �- 372 f I I jIII� JII jjj � m p Z 1 a yA ZZ i p D m 7 A T 22 K Z Z ,_ •�.._., 2 Z? d in hlcNwrM z z A E- Ij!� Attachment "C" Table Rock Road Commercial Development Type III Procedure Traffic Impact Analysis February 28, 2020 Prepared By: T unsPoPUTIOn L L C flTl1Tumi Upson TumfPOP TMION .1monzRIN6, L L Table Rock Road Commercial Development Type III Procedure Traffic Impact Analysis February 28, 2020 Prepared By: f ❑uua-ftm Uuon T.?ANSPOP rWIUH-[NCJn-'-'-pima, L L TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................5 II. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................6 Background..............................................................................................................................................6 ProjectLocation.......................................................................................................................................6 ProjectDescription...................................................................................................................................6 III. EXISTING YEAR 2020 NO -BUILD CONDITIONS..........................................................................9 SiteCondition...........................................................................................................................................9 RoadwayCharacteristics..........................................................................................................................9 TrafficCounts..........................................................................................................................................9 Intersection Capacity and Level of Service............................................................................................ l l Year 2020 No -Build Intersection Operations.........................................................................................12 Year 2020 No -Build 9511 Percentile Queuing.........................................................................................12 CrashHistory ..........................................................................................................................................14 BiddleRoad Access Point......................................................................................................................15 IV. DESIGN YEAR 2025 NO -BUILD CONDITIONS.............................................................................16 Design Year 2025 No -Build Description...............................................................................................16 Design Year 2025 No -Build Intersection Operations.............................................................................16 Design Year 2025 No -Build 9511 Percentile Queuing..........................................................16 .................. V. SITE TRAFFIC......................................................................................................................................19 TripGeneration......................................................................................................................................19 Trip Distribution and Assignment............................................................:..:..........................................19 ProposedAccess Points..........................................................................................................................19 VI. DESIGN YEAR 2025 BUILD CONDITIONS...................................................................................2I Design Year 2025 Build Description.....................................................................................................21 Design Year 2025 Build Intersection Operations...................................................................................21 Design Year 2025 Build 95t1 Percentile Queuing..................................................................................21 DesignYear 2025 Access Points............................................................................................................23 TableRock Road Sight Distance ........................ :................................................................................... 23 Design Year 2025 Build Turn Lane Criterion........................................................................................23 VII. FUTURE YEAR 2038 NO -BUILD AND BUILD CONDITIONS...................................................25 Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Descriptions..............................................................................25 Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Intersection Operations...........:.................................................25 Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build 9511 Percentile Queuing...................................:.........................26 Future Year 2038 Build Turn Lane Criterion.........................................................................................27 Future Year 2038 Access Operations.....................................................................................................27 VIII. CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................................30 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Roadway Classifications and Descriptions........................................................................................9 Table 2: HCM Level of Service Designations for Stop -Controlled Intersections.........................................1 l Table 3: HCM Level of Service Designations for Signalized Intersections.................................:................1 l Table 4: Year 2020 No -Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour........................................................12 Table 5: Year 2020 No -Build 95' Percentile Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour.................:............................12 Table 6: Study Area Intersection Crash Rates, 2013-2017............................................................................14 Table 7: Crash History by Type, 2013-2017.................................................................................................14 Table 8: Design Year 2025 No -Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour............................................16 Table 9: Design Year 2025 No -Build 95`h Percentile Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour.................................17 Table 10: Development Trip Generations.....................................................................................................19 Table 11: Design Year 2025 Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour................................................21 Table 12: Design Year 2025 Build 95th Percentile Queues, PM Peak Hour..................................................22 Table 13: Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour ..........................25 Table 14: Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build 95`h Percentile Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour................26 FIGURES FIGURE1: Vicinity Map..................................•......................................................................................._.7 APPENDIX B: FIGURE2: Conceptual Site Plan................................................................................................................ 8 FIGURE 3: Year 2020 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour..........................................................10 APPENDIX E: FIGURE 4: Design Year 2025 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour..............................................18 FUTURE YEAR 2038 NO -BUILD SYNCHRO AND SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT FIGURE 5: Development Trip Assignments, PM Peak Hour...................................................................20 FIGURE 6: Design Year 2025 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour....................................................24 FIGURE 7: Future Year 2038 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour...............................................28 FIGURE 8: Future Year 2038 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour..........:.:........................................29 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: TRAFFIC COUNT DATA, SEASONAL ADJUSTMENTS APPENDIX B: CRASH DATA, ITE TRIP GENERATIONS APPENDIX C: EXISTING YEAR 2020 NO -BUILD SYNCHRO AND SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT APPENDIX D: DESIGN YEAR 2025 NO -BUILD SYNCHRO AND SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT APPENDIX E: DESIGN YEAR 2025 BUILD SYNCHRO AND SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT APPENDIX F: FUTURE YEAR 2038 NO -BUILD SYNCHRO AND SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT APPENDIX G: FUTURE YEAR 2038 BUILD SYNCHRO AND SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT APPENDIX H: TURN LANE GRAPHS APPENDIX I: AGENCY REQUIREMENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Summary Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC prepared a traffic analysis for a proposed commercial development on the southwest corner of Table Rock Road and Biddle Road in Central Point, Oregon. Phase 1 on the subject property has already been approved and includes a quick lube and automated carwash. The remaining site is proposed to include 54,595 square feet (SF) of commercial development or shopping center uses. Access to the site is proposed from Biddle Road and Table Rock Road. North -south (N -S) and east -west (E -W) internal roads are also proposed to Biddle Road and Hamrick Road. The proposed 54,595 SF commercial development is estimated to be constructed by the year 2025 and generate 229 primary trips to the transportation system during the p.m. peak hour. Phase 1, which includes a quick lube and automated car wash, is included as additional background traffic in the existing year 2020 no -build, design year 2025 no -build, and future year 2038 no -build scenarios. Five study area intersections were evaluated under existing year 2020, design year 2025, and future year 2038 conditions to determine what impacts the proposed 54,595 SF commercial development may have on the transportation system. Conclusions The findings of the traffic impact analysis conclude that the proposed commercial development can be approved with recommended improvements without creating adverse impacts to the transportation system. Results of the analysis are as follows: 1. All study area intersections operate acceptably under existing year 2020 and design year 2025 no -build and build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. The intersection of Hamrick Road / East Pine Street exceeds its performance standard under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions. By the future year 2038, improvements are planned in the local area, including a Gebhard Road extension to East Pine Street with signalization. When this occurs, traffic is expected to decrease specifically in the eastbound left and southbound right turn movements at Hamrick Road / East Pine Street. It is our expectation that future mitigation for this intersection, with different improvement scenarios, will be determined when the City prepares a Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update in the next few years. 2. Right turn lane criterion was evaluated at proposed access points on Biddle Road and Table Rock Road. A right turn lane is not shown to be warranted on Table Rock Road under any analysis scenario. A right turn lane is shown to be warranted on Biddle Road under year 2025 build conditions. If acquiring off site right of way to construct this turn lane proves to be difficult, this improvement can be delayed until the property to the west develops. This is not considered a high-level safety concern. 3. Queue lengths in the future year 2038 build scenario are shown to potentially impact the full movement access (referred to as the N -S Internal Road) with Biddle Road. It is concluded that the full movement access may need to be restricted by this time. This should be further discussed with Jackson County. The proposed 54,595 SF commercial development on the southwest corner of Biddle Road and Table Rock Road is shown to be in compliance with the Central Point Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code. Streets that serve the subject property will accommodate projected p.m. peak hour traffic volumes within acceptable levels of service with identified improvements. 5.D. TBAIIfpoRT!lTIOII -[IIGInF-[JtIM6, LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 15 II. INTRODUCTION Background Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC prepared a traffic analysis for a proposed commercial development on the southwest corner of Biddle Road and Table Rock Road in Central Point, Oregon. A quick lube and automated car wash are pre -approved on the northwest corner of the property (as Phase 1 development) and expected to be constructed in 2020. The remaining property is proposed to include 54,595 SF of commercial development. A limited traffic analysis is required by the City of Central Point in their land development code section 17.05.900 to address impacts for a type III procedural application. Jackson County also requires an analysis because Table Rock Road and sections of Biddle Road within the study area are under County jurisdiction. The scope of the analysis includes evaluating impacts to the surrounding transportation system under existing, development build year, and future year conditions. The study area was determined by the City and County to include all access points to the site and the following intersections: 1. Hamrick Road / East Pine Street 2. Meadowbrook Drive / Biddle Road 3. Table Rock Road / Biddle Road 4. Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road Access to the site is proposed from Biddle Road and Table Rock Road. North -south (N -S) and east -west (E -W) internal roads are also proposed to Biddle Road and Hamrick Road. Project Location The subject property is located on the southwest corner of Biddle Road and Table Rock Road on Township 37S Range 2W Section 01, tax lot 700 in Central Point, Oregon. Refer to Figures l and 2 for a vicinity map and site plan. Project Description The subject property is zoned C-4 for tourist and office -professional commercial developments. It is currently vacant. Phase 1 development, which included a quick lube and automated car wash, was approved in 2019 and is scheduled to be constructed in 2020. For purposes of this analysis, Phase 1 development was considered as background traffic in year 2020 no -build, design year 2025 no -build, and future year 2038 no -build scenarios. Remaining site development includes 54,595 SF of commercial or shopping center uses. The commercial development is estimated to generate 229 primary trips to the transportation system during the p.m. peak hour. I.O. TA4tiiPUATgTlgti,[fIGIN-CFRIHG, LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 16 Figure 1 : Vicinity Map SOUTHIAH 0 -u -con T-RAMSPOW-ATION Ih HUAIK, LLC Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541, 535.6873 email: kim.parducclOgmail.com Table Rock Road Commercial Development Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon Figure 2: Conceptual Site Plan S O UT -H -u h 0 -A -M" T-AANSP0-RTATION I11GINUAW, LL( Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email., kim.parduccic@gmail.com com Table Rock Road Commercial Development Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon III. EXISTING YEAR 2020 NO -BUILD CONDITIONS Site Conditions The subject property is located on the southwest corner of Biddle Road and Table Rock Road on Township 37S Range 2W Section 01, tax lot 700 in Central Point, Oregon. The site is currently vacant. Access is proposed on Biddle Road and Table Rock Road. Roadway Characteristics The project study area includes intersections and driveways on Hamrick Road, Table Rock Road, Meadowbrook Drive, Biddle Road and East Pine Street. A full movement access on Biddle Road (through a N -S Internal Road) and a right -in, right -out, left -in access on Table Rock Road is considered in the analysis for site circulation. Study area intersections and driveways are analyzed in accordance with City of Central Point and Jackson County standards. Table 1 provides a summary of existing roadway classifications and descriptions in the study area. Table 1 - Roadway Classifications and Descriptions Roadway Jurisdiction Functional Classification Lanes Operational Standard Posted Speed (hII'iI) East Pine Street City of Central Point Minor Arterial 5 LOS D V/C 0.95 35 Biddle Road Jackson County Minor Arterial 5 V/C 0.95 35-45 Hamrick Road City of Central Point Local 2 LOS D 30-40 Meadowbrook Drive City of Central Point Local 2 LOS D 25 Table Rock Road Jackson County Minor Arterial 2-5 V/C 0.95 45 Traffic Counts Manual traffic counts (3-6pm) were collected in August of 2019 at study area intersections with the exception of Hamrick Road/Table Rock Road, which was counted in February of 2020. Year 2019 counts were seasonally adjusted and then increased by 2% to account for one year of growth, which is consistent with growth in the Exit 33 Interchange Area Management Plan (IAMP) and Costco study. In comparing 2019 counts to more recent 2020 counts, it doesn't appear that growth is occurring at that high of a rate but 2% is used to develop year 2020, design year 2025, and future year 2038 no -build conditions to be consistent with other analyses in the area. Additional background growth included approved Phase 1 development trips. Refer to Figure 3 for year 2020 no -build traffic volumes during the p.m. peak hour. Counts are provided in Appendix A. f.0. T PotifPORF/RFIOd -EnclntcRlnc, LLC I February 28,20201 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 19 Figure 3: Year 2020 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour r � f � i BEEBE ROAD ' 5 M alio 66 J 66 z 60 J 511 O 567 7 �' 552—rte 679 10 I 1 2 Cy _ _ -- = B DDLE RD • r ,r ,'- . QT TO S�A 0 S 0 UT -LILA H O -R-16 0 H T-A-ANSPORTAT10H LPiG111IMK, LL( Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 emaih kim.parducci@agmail.com _!o'"`1 r ` O+ LLJ �— 710 �-- r 1 756 489 560 � 2) I 4 320 Z= r 40 , 19 1 102 / r Site ..:� 4 Y U O a w J 'low—'�* z .` Table Rock Road Commercial Development Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon 0 1O Intersection Capacity and Level of Service Intersection capacity calculations were conducted utilizing the methodologies presented in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 6`h Edition). Capacity and level of service calculations for signalized and unsignalized intersections were prepared using "SYNCHRO" timing software. Level of service quantifies the degree of comfort afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or along a roadway section. The level of service methodology was developed to quantify the quality of service of transportation facilities. Level of service is based on total delay, defined as the total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. Level of service ranges from "A" to 'T", with "A" indicating the most desirable condition and 'T" indicating an unsatisfactory condition. The HCM LOS designations for stop -controlled intersections are provided in Table 2. The HCM LOS designations for signalized intersections are provided in Table 3. Table 2 — ACM Level of Service Designations for Stop -Controlled Intersections Level of Service Delay Range A <10 B >10— 15 C >15-25 D >25 — 35 E >35 — 50 F >50 Table 3 -- HCM Level of Service Designations for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Delay Range A <10 B >10-20 C >20 — 35 D >35 — 55 E >55 — 80 F > 80 Streets within the study area are under City of Central Point and Jackson County jurisdiction. The City of Central Point requires all study area intersections to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS). The minimum acceptable level of service for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersection movements is LOS "D". Jackson County's operational standard considers a volume -to -capacity (V/Q ratio standard. The acceptable performance standard for signalized and unsignalized intersections per the Jackson County Transportation System Plan is a v/c ratio no greater than 0.95 within the boundary of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and 0.85 outside of the MPO boundary. All intersections under Jackson County jurisdiction are within the MPO. Mitigation is, therefore, required at study area intersections operating below a LOS "D" if under City jurisdiction and a v/c ratio of 0.95 if under Jackson County jurisdiction. f.0. TAAMfDOATlITIOH �IIGIHF�ItIHG, L LC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA Ill Year 2020 No -Build Intersection Operations Study area intersections were evaluated under existing year 2020 no -build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Results are summarized in Table 4. 951h Percentile Exceeded or Movement Table 4 - Year 2020 No -Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway Intersection Performance Traffic Year 2020 No -Build Standard Control 300 - Hamrick Road / East Pine Street LOS D, V/C 0.95 Signal C, 0.85 Meadowbrook Drive / Biddle Road LOS D, V/C 0.95 TWSC C, 0.19 SBL Table Rock Road / Biddle Road V/C 0.95 Signal 0.63 Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road V/C 0.95 TWSC 0.31 EBL N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road V/C 0.95 TWSC C, 0.06 NBL LOS = level of service, V/C = volume -to -capacity, TWSC = two-way stop controlled, EBL = eastbound left, SBL = southbound left, NBL = northbound left Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic Results of the analysis show all study area intersections operate acceptably (within performance standards) under existing year 2020 no -build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Refer to Appendix C for synchro output sheets. Year 2020 No -Build 95th Percentile Queuing Queuing is the stacking up of vehicles for a given lane movement, and it can have a significant effect on roadway safety and the overall operation of a transportation system. Long queue lengths in through lanes can block access to turn lanes, driveways, and minor street approaches, as well as spill back into upstream intersections. As a result of this, the estimation of queue lengths is an important aspect of the analysis process for determining how a transportation corridor operates. Queue lengths are reported as the average, maximum, or 95`x' percentile queue length. The 95`h percentile queue length is used for design purposes and is the queue length reported in this analysis. Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTraffic to determine 95h percentile queue lengths. Queues were evaluated at study area intersections under existing year 2020 no - build conditions. Queue lengths were rounded up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length) and reported in Table 5 for the p.m. peak hour. Table 5 — Year 2020 No -Build 95`h Percentile Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour Intersection / Available Link 951h Percentile Exceeded or Movement Distance (Ft) Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway East Pine Street / Hamrick Road Eastbound Left 400 300 - Eastbound Through/Right 675 175 - Westbound Left 300 25 - Westbound Through/Right 825 250 - Northbound Left' 450 250 - Northbound Through/Right' 450 75 - Southbound Left/Through 350 125 - Southbound Right 200 225 f.0. TA71 IPLIPTATIOn LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 112 Table 5 Continued — Year 2020 No -Build 95" Percentile Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour Intersection / Available Link 95' Percentile Exceeded or Movement Distance (Ft) Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway Meadowbrook / Biddle Road Eastbound Left 200 50 - Eastbound Through/Right 825 0 - Westbound Left 385 25 - Westbound Through/Right 1100 0 - Northbound Left 100 25 - Northbound Through/Right 425 25 Southbound Left 100 50 - Southbound Through/Right 375 50 - Table Rock Road / Biddle Road Eastbound Left 425 225 - Eastbound Through/Right 525 125 - Eastbound Right 200 50 - Westbound heft 150 75 - Westbound Through/Right 1400 200 - Westbound Right 250 125 - Northbound Left 425 125 - Northbound Through/Right 1025 150 - Southbound Left 650 150 Southbound Throughtiti t 650 200 - Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road Eastbound Left 225 100 - Eastbound Right 1000 50 - Northbound Left 300 50 Northbound Through 400 0 Southbound Through/Right 1025 25 - N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road Eastbound Through/Right 500 0 - Westbound Left 100 25 - Northbound Left 400 50 - Northbound Right too 50 - Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic 1. Planned improvements (south approach restriped with a left tum and through/right lane) considered in place Results of the queuing analysis show no study area intersection queue lengths are exceeded under existing year 2020 no -build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Queue lengths were field verified specifically at the signalized intersections of Hamrick Road / Pine Street and Table Rock Road / Biddle Road during the peak hour, and then adjusted in our model (with decreased saturation flow rates) until the output was consistent with observations. The eastbound left and eastbound through queue lengths on Biddle Road at Table Rock Road were the only queues that reported lower 95"' percentile queue lengths, but the reported max queue lengths were a good match to field conditions so those queues are reported in Table 5. Refer to Appendix C for a full queuing and blocking report. S.O. TRAHfr70J1TATIOH �IIGItlFFJ?ING, LCC I February 28,20201 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 113 Crash History Crash data for the most recent 5 -year period was provided from ODOT's crash analysis unit. Results were provided for the period of January 1, 2013 through December 31st, 2017. Crash data was analyzed to identify crash patterns that could be attributable to geometric or operational deficiencies, or crash trends of a specific type that would indicate the need for further investigation at an intersection. Study area intersection crash rates were also compared to 90a` percentile rates using the HCM prediction model. Tables 6 and 7 provide a summary of results. Crash data is provided in Appendix B. Table 6 - Study Area Intersection Crash Rates, 2013-2017 Rear- End Turning /Angle Other Pedestrian/ Bicyclist Intersection 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Crashes ADT Crash Rate ODOT 90m % Hamrick / E Pine Street 5 2 1 7 5 20 26,650 0.411 0.860 Meadowbrook / Biddle 1 0 0 1 Table Rock / Biddle 3 3 4 7 0 4 2 21 13,700 25,800 0.080 0.446 0.408 0.860 Hamrick / Table Rock 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,200 0.000 0.293 Table 7 - Crash History by Type, 2013-2017 14 0 Hamrick / Table Rock 0 0 Intersection Collision Type 0 0 Severity 0 The highest crash frequency occurred at the intersections of Hamrick Road / E Pine Street and Table Rock Road / Biddle Road. At Hamrick Road / E Pine Street, 65% of collisions were turning or angle collisions, 30% were rear -end, and 5% were fixed -object. At Table Rock Road / Biddle Road, 86% were rear -end collisions and 10% were turning or angle. Of the rear -end collisions, 12 of 17 were northbound on Table Rock Road and five were southbound likely from congestion on Table Rock Road. Turning and angle collisions were split from the north and south and involved permissive left turning vehicles. Turning movement and angle collisions are common at signalized intersections with protected/permissive turning movements and at unsignalized intersections with center turn lanes. Rear -end collisions are common under congested conditions. More than half of the collisions resulted in injury at Table Rock Road / Biddle Road and 50% at Hamrick Road / East Pine Street, but none resulted in fatalities. There was a more serious injury (INJA) at Table Rock Road / Biddle Road in September of 2015 involving a driver northbound with a driver making a southbound left turn movement. The southbound left turning driver failed to yield right-of-way. None of the study area intersection crash rates reached the 90'h percentile rate or were identified as a SPIS site. Widening improvements on Table Rock Road south of Biddle Road and intersection striping changes have occurred since the last year of available crash data was reported (2017). Congestion, specifically along Table Rock Road, has decreased as a result of widening S.D. T PmfPOJ?TATION LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 114 Rear- End Turning /Angle Other Pedestrian/ Bicyclist Non- Injury Injury Fatal Hamrick / E Pine Street 6 13 1 0 10 10 0 Meadowbrook / Biddle 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Table Rock / Biddle 18 2 1 0 7 14 0 Hamrick / Table Rock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The highest crash frequency occurred at the intersections of Hamrick Road / E Pine Street and Table Rock Road / Biddle Road. At Hamrick Road / E Pine Street, 65% of collisions were turning or angle collisions, 30% were rear -end, and 5% were fixed -object. At Table Rock Road / Biddle Road, 86% were rear -end collisions and 10% were turning or angle. Of the rear -end collisions, 12 of 17 were northbound on Table Rock Road and five were southbound likely from congestion on Table Rock Road. Turning and angle collisions were split from the north and south and involved permissive left turning vehicles. Turning movement and angle collisions are common at signalized intersections with protected/permissive turning movements and at unsignalized intersections with center turn lanes. Rear -end collisions are common under congested conditions. More than half of the collisions resulted in injury at Table Rock Road / Biddle Road and 50% at Hamrick Road / East Pine Street, but none resulted in fatalities. There was a more serious injury (INJA) at Table Rock Road / Biddle Road in September of 2015 involving a driver northbound with a driver making a southbound left turn movement. The southbound left turning driver failed to yield right-of-way. None of the study area intersection crash rates reached the 90'h percentile rate or were identified as a SPIS site. Widening improvements on Table Rock Road south of Biddle Road and intersection striping changes have occurred since the last year of available crash data was reported (2017). Congestion, specifically along Table Rock Road, has decreased as a result of widening S.D. T PmfPOJ?TATION LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 114 improvements. Costco traffic has also normalized in the area. No further investigation is shown to be necessary. Biddle Road Access Point A full movement access on Biddle Road has been approved for Phase 1 development, which will eventually become a N -S Internal Road that connects to an existing E -W Internal Road from Hamrick Road to the subject property. The existing E -W Internal Road currently ends just west of the subject property but will be extended to the N -S Internal Road as part of the proposed 54,595 SF shopping center development. The full -movement access on Biddle Road will be located approximately 525 feet west of Table Rock Road (measured from stop bar) and 485 feet east of Meadowbrook Drive. The traffic movements that need to be monitored include the eastbound left, through, and right turn queue lengths on Biddle Road at Table Rock Road, and the westbound left turn queue length on Biddle Road at Meadowbrook Drive. Queue lengths from these traffic movements could spill back and impact the Biddle Road access. An aerial is shown below. storage stnrage, - 100' .. - « J 425' RL eill `storage ref Kew N -S Phase 1 x Internal Road y . site driveway ' The westbound left turn movement at Meadowbrook Drive is shown to have a 95l' percentile queue length of 25 feet under existing conditions. Similarly, the eastbound left, through, and right turn movements are shown to have 95h percentile queue lengths of 225 feet, 125 feet, and 50 feet, respectively. Queue lengths were field verified to make sure the model simulations were reporting accurate queue lengths. Results show that no existing queue length from either direction is shown to reach or impact the proposed development access on Biddle Road under year 2020 no -build conditions (including Phase 1 development) during the p.m, peak hour. I.O. T R,71lfPO-RTllTlgti -[H6INFCJR1ll6, L LC I February 28, 20201 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 115 IV. DESIGN YEAR 2025 NO -BUILD CONDITIONS Design Year 2025 No -Build Description Design year 2025 no -build conditions represent development build year conditions for a study area without consideration of proposed development trips. This condition is evaluated to determine how a study area will be impacted by area background growth. Background growth in the analysis, as previously stated, was kept consistent with growth used in the I-5 Exit 33 IAMP and Costco study for consistency. Growth (-2% per year) was determined using model runs provided by ODOT's Transportation Planning Analysis Unit (TPAU). Additionally, trips from Phase 1 development (quick lube and automated car wash) were included. Refer to Figure 4 for design year 2025 no -build traffic volumes during the p.m. peak hour. Design Year 2025 No -Build Intersection Operations Study area intersections were evaluated under design year 2025 no -build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Results are summarized in Table 8. Table 8 — Design Year 2025 No -Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour Performance Traffic Intersection Standard Control Year 2025 No -Build Hamrick Road / East Pine Street LOS D, V/C 0.95 Signal C, 0.90 Meadowbrook Drive / Biddle Road LOS D, V/C 0.95 TWSC C, 0.22 SBL Table Rock Road / Biddle Road V/C 0.95 Signal 0.69 Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road V/C 0.95 TWSC 0.37 EBL N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road V/C 0.95 TWSC C, 0.07 NBL LOS=Level of Service, V/C=Volume-to-Capacity, TWSC=Two-way stop controlled, EBL=eastbound left, SBL=southbound left, NBL=northbound left Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic Results of the analysis show all study area intersections continue to operate acceptably (within performance standards) under design year 2025 no -build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Refer to Appendix D for synchro output sheets. Design Year 2025 No -Build 95th Percentile Queuing Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTraffic to determine 95`' percentile queue lengths at study area intersections under design year 2025 no -build conditions. Queue lengths were rounded up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length) and reported in Table 9 for the p.m. peak hour. f.0. TJ?AnfP0,PTlIT10n LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 116 Table 9 — Desiz2 Year 2025 No -Build 95" Percentile Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour Intersection ! Available Link 95' Percentile Exceeded or Movement Distance (Ft) Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway East Pine Street / Hamrick Road Eastbound Left 400 450 - Eastbound Through/Right 675 225 - Westbound Left 300 25 - Westbound Through/Right 825 275 - Northbound Left) 450 275 - Northbound Through/Right' 450 75 - Southbound Left/Through 350 125 - Southbound Ri ht 200 275 - Meadowbrook / Biddle Road Eastbound Left 200 50 - Eastbound Through/Right 825 0 - Westbound Left 385 25 - Westbound Through/Right 1100 0 - Northbound Left 100 25 Northbound Through/Right 425 25 - Southbound Left 100 50 Southbound Through/Right 375 50 Table Rock Road / Biddle Road Eastbound Left 425 275 - Eastbound Through/Right 525 150 - Eastbound Right 200 50 _ Westbound Left 150 75 Westbound Through/Right 1400 200 - Westbound Right 250 125 Northbound Left 425 125 Northbound Through/Right 1025 150 - Southbound Left 650 175 - Southbound Through/Right 650 225 - Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road Eastbound Left 225 100 - Eastbound Right 1000 50 - Northbound Left 300 50 - Northbound Through 400 0 - Southbound Through/Right 1025 25 - N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road Eastbound Through/Right 500 0 - Westbound Left 100 25 - Northbound Left 400 50 - Northbound Right 100 50 - Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic 1. Planned improvements (south approach restriped with a left tum and through/right lane) considered in place Results of the queuing analysis show no study area intersection queue length is exceeded under design year 2025 no -build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. The eastbound left turn queue length on Biddle Road at Table Rock Road increases from 225 feet to 275 feet, but this is still well below the 425 feet of available storage length. The westbound left turn queue length on Biddle Road at Meadowbrook Drive stays the same (25 feet). The westbound left turn queue length on Biddle Road at the N -S Internal Road also stays the same (25 feet). The N -S Internal Road, therefore, continues to operate acceptably as a full movement access on Biddle Road under design year 2025 no -build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Refer to Appendix D for a full queuing and blocking report. f.0. Tannsvonrnr19n �nc�n��ainc, LLC I February 28,20201 Table Rock Commercial Dev TTA 117 Figure 4: Design Year 2025 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour BEEBE ROAD. SOT TO ' BIDDLE RD l � h sour -W -1-D" H- Non TD-AMSPOW-flTIUM -MINTI-Dent. LLC Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim.parducciOrgmail.com rim Zen ' }� 170 J 540 355 45 110 •mak _b< t I - 1 Table Rock Road Commercial Development Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon V. SITE TRAFFIC Trip Generation Trip generation calculations for the proposed 54,595 SF commercial development were prepared utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 10''' Edition. ITE rates were used for land use code 820 — Shopping Center. Pass -by trips were considered in accordance with ITE recommended practices. No internal trip reductions were taken. Table 10 provides a summary of trip generations. ITE graphs are provided in Appendix B. Table 10—Development Trip Generations Land Use Unit She PM Peak PM PM Peak Sour Rate Trips Total % In In % Out Out 820 — Shopping Center 1000 SF 54.595 Fitted 347 0.48 167 0.52 180 34% Pass -by (118) (59) (59) Total Primary Trips 229 108 121 SF = Square Feet Trip Distribution and Assignment Development trips were distributed in accordance with existing traffic volumes within the study area and engineering judgement. Roadway volumes were compared in the local project vicinity to estimate the percentage of trips going to and coming from Hamrick Road, East Pine Street, Biddle Road, Meadowbrook Drive, and Table Rock Road. This resulted in 15% to/from the north on Hamrick Road, 30% to from the west on East Pine Street, 5% to/from Meadowbrook Drive, 15% to/from the north on Table Rock Road, 10% to/from the south on Table Rock Road, and 20% to/from the east on Biddle Road. Refer to Figure 5 for shopping center development trip distributions and assignments during the p.m. peak hour. Proposed Access Points Under design year 2025 no -build and build conditions, a full movement access via a N -S Internal Road exists at Biddle Road. A second access is proposed on Table Rock Road under design year 2025 build conditions approximately 450 feet south of Biddle Road and 600 feet north of Hamrick Road. This access is proposed as a right -in, right -out, left -in access. f.0. TAAMfPOPUTION -CHOH-CO ic, LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 119 Figure 5: Shopping Center Trip Assignments, PM Peak Hour BEEBE ROAd fFi A. t0 LU "m JIB ANOT�T0—' a DDLE RD SouTuI-An OP.160H T-DAHSPOWAT10H -EMG HU-nW, LL( Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim. parducci a gmaif. com Table Rock Road Commercial Development Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon UI �Q i qra SouTuI-An OP.160H T-DAHSPOWAT10H -EMG HU-nW, LL( Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim. parducci a gmaif. com Table Rock Road Commercial Development Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon VI. DESIGN YEAR 2025 BUILD CONDITIONS Design Year 2025 Build Description Build conditions represent no -build conditions for a study area with the addition of proposed development trips considered. Build conditions are compared to no -build conditions to determine what impacts and/or mitigation measures will result from proposed development. Build conditions in year 2025 are for a 54,595 SF commercial/shopping center development. Design Year 2025 Build Intersection Operations Design Year 2025 build traffic volumes were evaluated at study area intersections during the p.m peak hour to compare impacts. Results are summarized in Table 11. Table 11— Design Year 2025 Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance Standard Traffic Control Year 2025 Build Hamrick Road / East Pine Street LOS D, V/C 0.95 Signal C, 0.94 Meadowbrook Drive / Biddle Road LOS D, V/C 0.95 TWSC C, 0.28 SBL Table Rock Road / Biddle Road V/C 0.95 Signal 0.72 Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road V/C 0.95 TWSC 0.38 EBL N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road V/C 0.95 TWSC C, 0.20 NBL Site Access / Table Rock Road V/C 0.95 TWSC 0.06 EBR LOS=Level of Service, V/C=Volume-to-Capacity, TWSC=Two-way stop controlled, EBL=eastbound left, EBR=eastbound right SBL=southbound left, NBL=northbound left Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic Results of the analysis show all study area intersections continue to operate acceptably (within performance standards) under design year 2025 build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Small changes occur at the signalized intersections of Hamrick Road/ E. Pine Street and Table Rock Road / Biddle Road, but both continue to meet their performance standard. The new site driveway on Table Rock Road is shown to have minor delay with the critical movement being the eastbound right turn movement. The critical movement (northbound left) v/c ratio at the N -S Internal Road intersection with Biddle Road increases from a v/c ratio of 0.07 (LOS C) to 0.20 (LOS C) as a result of proposed shopping center development, but continues to meet the County performance standard. Synchro output sheets are provided in Appendix E for further reference. Design Year 2025 Build 95th Percentile Queuing Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTrafffc to determine 95h percentile queue lengths at study area intersections under design year 2025 build conditions. Queue lengths were rounded up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length) and reported in Table 12 for the p.m. peak hour. f. 0. TItmyfPugTATIOII �nGInFdJtIHG, LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 121 Table 12 — Design Year 2025 Build 95" Percentile Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour Intersection ! Available Link 95' Percentile Exceeded or Movement Distance (Ft) Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway East Pine Street / Hamrick Road Eastbound Left 400 450 Eastbound Through/Right 675 250 Westbound Left 300 25 Westbound Through/Right 825 300 Northbound Left' 450 350 Northbound Through/Right' 450 75 Southbound Left/Through 350 175 - Southbound Richt 200 300 Meadowbrook / Biddle Road Eastbound Left 200 50 Eastbound Through/Right 825 0 Westbound Left 385 25 Westbound Through/Right 1100 0 Northbound Left 100 25 - Northbound Through/Right 425 25 - Southbound Left 100 50 - Southbound Throueh/Rieht 375 50 - Table Rock Road / Biddle Road Eastbound Left 425 275 - Eastbound Through/Right 525 175 - Eastbound Right 200 50 - Westbound Left 150 75 - Westbound Through/Right 1400 225 - Westbound Right 250 125 - Northbound Left 425 150 - Northbound Through/Right 1025 150 - Southbound Left 650 175 - Southbound Through/Right 650 250 - Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road Eastbound Left 225 100 - Eastbound Right 1000 50 - Northbound Left 300 50 - Northbound Through 400 0 - Southbound Throueh/Rieht 600 25 - N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road Eastbound Through/Right 500 25 - Westbound Left 100 50 - Northbound Left 400 75 - Northbound Right 100 75 - Site Access / Table Rock Road Eastbound Right 200 50 Northbound Left 450 25 - Southbound Through/Right 450 0 - Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic I Planned improvements (south approach restriped with a left turn and through/right lane) considered in place Results of the queuing analysis show small increases in queue lengths at study area intersections under design year 2025 build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. The northbound left turn queue length on Hamrick Road at East Pine Street increases to 350 feet from additional traffic using the E -W Internal Road when leaving the commercial development. Similarly, the northbound left and right turn queue lengths on the N -S Internal Road at Biddle Road increase as f. 0. Tl7AHfPOJtrvr1on LLC I February 28,20201 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 122 a result of additional traffic from the commercial development, but no significant changes are shown to occur. Refer to Appendix E for a full queuing and blocking report. Design Year 2025 Access Points Site access points under design year 2025 build conditions are shown to operate acceptably with additional traffic from shopping center development. The full movement access on Biddle Road, which becomes the N -S Internal Road connection to the E -W Internal Road from Hamrick Road, experiences a small increase in delay (northbound left turn movement) of 17 seconds to 20 seconds with a v/c ratio increase of 0.07 to 0.20, but these are considered minor changes. The new site access on Table Rock Road is shown to have an average delay of 11 seconds in the eastbound right turn movement and 9 seconds in the northbound left turn movement. Our simulations and intersection operations output show both access points on Biddle Road and Table Rock Road operating acceptably with build out of the shopping center in year 2025. Nothing indicates a need to restrict the full movement access on Biddle Road as a result of shopping center traffic under this analysis scenario. If, at any time, queue lengths on Biddle Road increase to a point that having a full movement access between Table Rock Road and Meadowbrook Drive becomes problematic, however, the County has the right to restrict access to the N -S Internal Road. Until that occurs, there's a benefit to having more access options for drivers because it preserves capacity at surrounding intersections. Table Rock Road Sight Distance The new site access on Table Rock Road is proposed as a right -in, right -out, left -in access. The movements that need visual clearance include the eastbound right and northbound left turn movements. Table Rock Road is straight and flat in this section. Sight distance is unrestricted for both movements and shown to be adequate. Design Year 2025 Build Turn Lane Criterion Right Turn Lane Right turn lane criterion was evaluated on Biddle Road at the N -S Internal Road and on Table Rock Road at the proposed site driveway during the p.m. peak hour to determine whether right turn deceleration lanes are necessary under design year 2025 build conditions for the eastbound and southbound movements, respectively. Results of the analysis show criterion is met on Biddle Road and, therefore, warrants a deceleration lane. This may be determined to be difficult, however, because the street frontage needed for the turn lane is off site. From our perspective, the right turn lane is not a high safety concern because there are two eastbound travel lanes on Biddle Road, which reduces the potential for rear -end collisions. If the off-site frontage is not able to be obtained for a right turn lane and Jackson County cannot condemn it, then construction of a right turn lane can be delayed until the property to the west develops without creating significant safety concerns. Criterion was not shown to be met on Table Rock Road. Refer to Appendix H for right turn lane graphs. U7. TAINIfPu-RTAT10H �IIGIN��IIIIIG, LLC I February 28, 20201 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 123 Figure 6: Design Year 2025 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour 'PA BEEBE ROAD - _ -- _44 • Y ti ti• O.` ..r. -, •. 1Aw Q1 n v +iy f UJB 7 r n d _ J l� S 420 � 51 .� CO! �_- � �__ �� Q 190J �55� 55 y r 740 = 65; 7(�2 , * '97 62 1 �. -3 50 220 ! 11 I ( �' ,K9 1 w I10 1 LJLJI PINE STREET - BIDDLE RD �r r ,SNOT- TO - 5 " i S O UTTI-U H O -A -16 O M T-A-INSPOW-flTION MIMI-1-RIN6, LI_( Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email,- kirn.parducci(Ogmail.corn Table Rock Road Commercial Development Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon VII. FUTURE YEAR 2038 NO -BUILD & BUILD CONDITIONS Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Description Future year 2038 no -build conditions represent development build year conditions without consideration of build development trips. Future year 2038 build conditions represent no -build conditions with the addition of development trips considered. Growth between design year 2025 and future year 2038 was developed using a 2% annual growth, as stated previously in this report. Study area intersections were then balanced. Refer to Figures 7 and 8 for future year 2038 no - build and build traffic volumes during the p.m. peak hour. Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Intersection Operations Study area intersections were evaluated under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Results are summarized in Table 13. Table 13 — Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour Intersection Performance Standard Traffic Control Future Year 2038 No -Build Future Year 2038 Build Hamrick Road / East Pine Street LOS D, V/C 0.95 Signal D, 1.12 E, 1.14 Meadowbrook Drive / Biddle Road LOS D, V/C 0.95 TWSC C, 0.38 SBL C, 0.53 SBL Table Rock Road / Biddle Road V/C 0.95 Signal 0.90 0.93 Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road V/C 0.95 TWSC 0.61 EBL 0.64 EBL N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road V/C 0.95 TWSC C, 0.09 NBL D, 0.25 NBL Site Access / Table Rock Road V/C 0.95 TWSC NA 0.07 EBR LOS=Level of Service, V/C=Volume-to-Capacity, TWSC=Two-way stop controlled, EBL=eastbound left, EBR=eastbound right SBL=southbound left, NBL=northbound left Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic Results of the analysis show the signalized intersection of Hamrick Road / East Pine Street exceeding its performance standard under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions. All other study area intersections are shown to operate acceptably with and without proposed shopping center development trips. By the future year 2038, planned improvements in the local area, including a Gebhard Road connection to East Pine Street, are expected to re-route traffic at the intersection of Hamrick Road / East Pine Street. Re-routing is specifically expected to decrease traffic in the eastbound left and southbound right turn movements. Once these improvements are in place, it can be determined whether additional mitigation is necessary at Hamrick Road / East Pine Street. If the Gebhard Road connection does not occur by the future year 2038, then required mitigation will likely include a second eastbound left turn lane on East Pine Street and possibly an additional westbound receiving lane for the southbound right turn movement on Hamrick Road. These improvements have been previously discussed in the Exit 33 IAMP and other studies. It is our conclusion that specific mitigation for this intersection, if shown to be necessary, will likely be determined when the City prepares a Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update in the next few years. Refer to Appendices F and G for synchro output sheets. S.O. TannfPOATJlTIO/1 �nGIHFFAInG, LLC I February 28, 20201 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 125 Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build 951h Percentile Queuing Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTraffic to determine 95`'' percentile queue lengths at study area intersections under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions. Queue lengths were rounded up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length) and reported in Table 14 for the p.m. peak hour. Table 14 — Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build 95" Percentile Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour Intersection 1 Available Link 95" Percentile 950' Percentile Exceeded or Movement Distance (Ft) Queue Lengths Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway No -Build Build East Pine Street / Hamrick Road Eastbound Left 400 600 625 Bank Driveway Eastbound Through/Right 675 275 300 - Westbound Left 300 100 100 - Westbound Through/Right 825 525 625 - Northbound Left' 450 375 500 E -W Internal Road Northbound Through/Right' 450 100 175 - Southbound Left/Through 350 250 275 - Southbound Right 200 325 325 Right Turn Storage Meadowbrook / Biddle Road Eastbound Left 200 75 75 - Eastbound Through/Right 825 0 0 - Westbound Left 385 25 25 - Westbound Through/Right 1100 0 0 - Northbound Left 100 25 25 - Northbound Through/Right 425 25 25 - Southbound Left 100 50 50 - Southbound Through/Right 375_ 50 50 - Table Rock Road / Biddle Road Eastbound Left 425 275 325 - Eastbound Through/Right 525 200 225 - EaAbound Right 200 75 75 - Westbound Left 150 75 100 - Westbound Through/Right 1400 300 300 - Westbound Right 250 225 250 - Northbound Left 425 200 250 - Northbound Through/Right 1025 225 225 - Southbound Left 650 250 250 - Southbound Through/Right 650 350 425 - Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road Eastbound Left 225 200 225 - Eastbound Right 1000 200 175 - Northbound Left 300 50 50 - Northbound Through 400 0 0 - Southbound Through/Right 1025/600 25 25 - N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road Eastbound Through/Right 500 25 25 - Westbound Left 100 50 50 - Northbound Left 400 50 75 - Northbound Right 100 50 75 - Site Access / Table Rock Road Eastbound Right 200 - 50 - Northbound Left 450 - 25 - Southbound Through/Right 450 - 0 - Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic I. Planned improvements (south approach restriped with a left turn and through/right lane) considered in place 5.0. T gmifG0AT11T10d -IMO 1F-CJNH6, LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 126 Results of the queuing analysis show three traffic movements exceed their available storage lengths at the intersection of Hamrick Road / East Pine Street under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions. These include the southbound right turn, eastbound left turn, and northbound left turn movements. No other traffic movements at study area intersections are shown to exceed their storage length. Refer to Appendices F and G for a full queuing and blocking report. Future Year 2038 Build Turn Lane Criterion Right Turn Lane Right turn lane criterion was evaluated on Biddle Road and shown to be met under design year 2025 build conditions, so this was not re-evaluated under fixture conditions. Turn lane criterion was evaluated on Table Rock Road at the proposed site access under future year 2038 build conditions. Results of the analysis show criterion is not met on Table Rock Road as a result of shopping center development and a turn lane is not warranted. Refer to Appendix H for right turn lane graphs. Future Year 2038 Access Operations Under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions, a full movement access on Biddle Road and a right -in, right -out, left -in access on Table Rock Road was considered. Both access points were evaluated and shown to operate acceptably (within City of Central Point and Jackson County performance standards). The eastbound left turn queue on Biddle Road at Table Rock Road is shown to increase from 275 feet to 325 feet under build conditions. The available storage distance, assuming 100 feet of storage for the westbound left turn movement on Biddle Road at the N -S Internal Road, is approximately 425 feet. This leaves approximately 100 feet of margin before the back to back queue lengths overlap within the available storage length. Based on this, it is our conclusion that the N -S Internal Road access on Biddle Road may need to be restricted under future year 2038 build conditions. It is our recommendation to discuss this further with Jackson County. The right -in, right -out, left -in site access on Table Rock Road is located over 400 feet south of Biddle Road. The northbound left turn queue length on Table Rock Road at Biddle Road is the queue that could potentially impact the northbound left -in movement at this access. The northbound left turn queue length at Table Rock Road / Biddle Road is reported to increase from 200 feet to 250 feet under future year 2038 build conditions, which is well below the allowable storage length. Based on this, it is our conclusion that the proposed site access can remain as evaluated without creating any adverse impacts to the transportation system. f.0. TnnNfDORTnTIOH �nGInF�JtInG, LLC I February 28,20201 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 127 Figure 7: Future Year 2038 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour r i OF -•BEEBE RaAD f •� - I~ - w f A ~ _ A to) 60 Iso W 295 ( , .ET BIDDLE RD ��,TV �r -- HAMRICK RD-- - SOUTAIAH HIM" TAMSDOATATI0h 1i9GltiIUM, LLC Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email.' kim.parducci cr gmail. com 75 W ii R__ i Table Rock Road Commercial Development Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon Figure 8: Future Year 2038 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour 4 -fop 4k It I BEEBE ROADS 1z. -r.. I U D _ 65 = h41 5] ❑ 9811 235 .375 950 - 5 8 1 ❑ 772 62 48fl _.. .10 o� H v�D vl x J X LU PINE STRE BIDDLE RD 0 i SOS 10 s 0 �40 1� —� a5 tf 35 F - _ .. HAMRICK RD 178 LU 130� _j 14 N T TO SCAL �. MUT41-1-Dn OX60" Table Rock Road T-A-fl"SPO -ATIon 1WHIUM, LL( Commercial Development �► Medford, Oregon 97504 Traffic Impact Analysis ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 p Y email' kim.parducciC gmail.com Central Point, Oregon a VIII. CONCLUSIONS Conclusions The findings of the traffic impact analysis conclude that the proposed commercial development can be approved with recommended improvements without creating adverse impacts to the transportation system. Results of the analysis are as follows: All study area intersections operate acceptably under existing year 2020 and design year 2025 no -build and build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. The intersection of Hamrick Road / East Pine Street -exceeds its performance standard under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions. By the future year 2038, improvements are planned in the local area, including a Gebhard Road extension to East Pine Street with signalization. When this occurs, traffic is expected to decrease specifically in the eastbound left and southbound right turn movements at Hamrick Road / East Pine Street. It is our expectation that future mitigation for this intersection, with different improvement scenarios, will be determined when the City prepares a Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update in the next few years. Right turn lane criterion was evaluated at proposed access points on Biddle Road and Table Rock Road. A right turn lane is not shown to be warranted on Table Rock Road under any analysis scenario. A right turn lane is shown to be warranted on Biddle Road under year 2025 build conditions. If acquiring off site right of way to construct this turn lane proves to be difficult, this improvement can be delayed until the property to the west develops. This is not considered a high-level safety concern. 3. Queue lengths in the future year 2038 build scenario are shown to potentially impact the full movement access (referred to as the N -S Internal Road) with Biddle Road. It is concluded that the full movement access may need to be restricted by this time. This should be further discussed with Jackson County. The proposed 54,595 SF commercial development on the southwest corner of Biddle Road and Table Rock Road is shown to be in compliance with the Central Point Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code. Streets that serve the subject property will accommodate projected p.m. peak hour traffic volumes within acceptable levels of service with identified improvements. f. 0. Tigti PTNIOtl {NGINFFltING, LLC I February 28, 20201 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 130 Table Rock Road Commercial Development Type III Procedure APPENDICES A -I February 28, 2020 Due to the length of the document of the document Appendices A-1 have been removed and are available upon request. Prepared By: f DuTapm ❑,uron TunfP&PUTIonr - r►Grn �nr�, C C C �QUl"A�-RM LI��GQ� T�IAHf PQAiA]'IQrr �NGI1lAAA1HG, L � C Medford, Oregon 97544 Phone 541.608.9933 Fax 541.535.6873 Email: Kim.parducci@gmaii.com Attachment "M PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW File No.: SUB -20001 Before the City of Central Point Planning Commission Consideration of a Tentative Plan for the Table Rock Crossing Subdivision Applicant: South Salem, LLC PO Box 4460 Medford OR 97501 Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law PART 1 INTRODUCTION The applicant submitted a tentative plan application (Type III) for the Table Rock Crossing Subdivision to subdivide 7.01 acres into eight (8) commercial lots ("Application"). The property is located within the Tourist and Office Professional (C-4) zoning district. A subdivision tentative plan is reviewed as a Type III application. Type III applications are reviewed in accordance with procedures provided in Section 17.05.400, which provides the basis for decisions upon standards and criteria in the development code and the comprehensive plan, when appropriate. The standards and criteria for the proposal are set forth in CPMC Title 16, Subdivisions, and Chapter 17.75, Development and Design Standards. The following findings address each of the standards and criteria as applies to the subdivision tentative plan. PART 2 SUBDIVISIONS Title 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) establishes standards and criteria for land division applications including tentative plans and final plats. The sections of CPMC 16 applicable to the Application are: Chapter 16.10 - Tentative Plans. This section of code provides design standards and principles of acceptability, the information required on a tentative plan map and other supplementary material that may be required for review of the application. Finding CPMC 16.10: The tentative plan, as represented by Attachment "A-1 " of the Planning Department Staff Report dated April 28, 2020, has been reviewed for compliance with the Page 1 of 3 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -20001 requirements of Chapter 16.10 and found to contain all the necessary information. As a condition of approval, the applicant is required to submit a subdivision plat name from the Jackson County Surveyor. Conclusion CPMC 16.10: Complies as conditioned. CPMC 16.20.020 Streets – Generally Streets created by subdivisions and partitions shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the requirements of the city's comprehensive plan, this code, the city's public works standards, and all conditions established by the city. Finding CPMC 16.20: Access to the proposed subdivision will be provided by a new Retail Street, which provides access to Table Rock Road and Biddle Road with a connection to Hamrick Road through existing developments to the west. The Retail Streets are designed to minimum construction standards, provides landscape rows and sidewalk connections throughout the site. Internal circulation will be provided by access easements Conclusion CPMC 16.20: As evidenced by the Tentative Plan and Parks & Public Works Staff Report referenced above, the proposed retail streets are designed and planned for construction consistent with City standards. Chapter 16.24, Blocks and Lots—Design Standards The lengths, widths and shapes of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building sites suitable to the special needs of the type and use contemplated, needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and limitations and opportunities of topography. Finding CPMC 16.24: While the proposed perimeter block length of 2,152 feet exceeds the maximum perimeter block length of 2, 000 feet, the standards may be modified due to traffic safety concerns. The intersection of the private street along Table Rock Road was increased from the 300 foot minimum to 455 feet to increase safety and traffic movement along Table Rock Road, and accounts for the increase in perimeter block length. Conclusion CPMC 16.24: Complies. PART 3 ZONING ORDINANCE The purpose of Title 17 of the CPMC is to encourage the most appropriate use of land, promote orderly growth of the city, and promote public health, safety, convenience and general welfare. The sections of CPMC 17 applicable to the application are: Chapter 17.05, Applications and Types of Review Procedures This Chapter establishes standard decision-making procedures that enable the city, the applicant, and the public to review applications and participate in the local decision making process. There are four Page 2 of 3 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -20001 (4) types of review procedures, Type I, II, II, and IV that are applied to land use and development applications in Table 17.05. 100. 1. It also establishes when a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required. Finding CPMC 17.05: As identified in Table I, Section 17.05.100.1 a subdivision tentative plan is reviewed using Type III procedures. The application has been noticed and processed in accordance with the Type III review procedures per Section 17.05.400. A TIA was submitted by Southern Oregon Transportation for the proposed development in accordance Section 17.05.900. Conclusion CPMC 17.05: Complies. Chapter 17.75, Design and Development Standards CPMC 17.75.031 General Connectivity, Circulation and Access Standards The purpose of this section is to assure that the connectivity and transportation policies of the city's Transportation System Plan are implemented. In achieving the objective of maintaining and enhancing the city's small town environment it is the city's goal to base its development pattern on a general circulation grid using a walkable block system. Blocks may be comprised of public/private street right-of-way, or accessways. Finding CPMC 17.75.031: The proposed development will use private retail streets to provide connections to the public streets. The private streets will also permit the development to meet the perimeter block length standards and provide connections from Hamrick Road through existing developments to the west While the proposed perimeter block length of 2,152 feet exceeds the maximum perimeter block length of 2, 000 feet, the standards may be modified due to traffic safety concerns. The intersection of the private street along Table Rock Road was increased from the 300 foot minimum to 455 feet to increase safety and traffic movement along Table Rock Road, and accounts for the increase in perimeter block length. The Retail Streets are designed to minimum construction standards, provide landscape rows and sidewalk connections throughout the site. Internal circulation for vehicles and pedestrians will be provided by access easements Conclusion CPMC 17.75.031: Complies. PART 4 SUMMARY CONCLUSION As evidenced in Planning Department Supplemental Findings, the proposed tentative plan application for the Table Rock Crossing Subdivision is, as conditioned in the Staff Report dated May 5, 2020, in compliance with the applicable criteria set forth in Title 16 and Title 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code. Page 3 of 3 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -20001 Public Works Department April 15, 2020 AGENDA ITEM: CENTRAL POINT PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT SUB- 20001 —8 lot commercial subdivision Traffic: Attachment "E" Matt Samitore, Director The applicant is proposing an 8 lot commercial subdivision. The City uses the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Volume 10 for scoping Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The threshold is 25 PHT, on a particular intersection, or can be required as part of a conditional use permit. A TIA was completed by Southern Oregon Transportation for this use. Access to the site is controlled by Jackson County Roads on both Table Rock Road and Biddle Avenue. They are allowing right in and out on and left in on both movements. The TIA also points out that at a future year more improvements are needed at Hamrick and Biddle/Pine. The City is working on a plan to expand the intersection as well as future north bound movements via a Gebhard Road project. Both are scheduled to be completed during the planning horizon. Existing Infrastructure: Water: There is 8 inch waterline in the private drive to the west of the development Streets: Table Rock and Biddle Road are major arterial streets owned and maintained by Jackson County. The private drive to the west is a private retail street. Storm Water: There is 24" Storm Drain line in the private drive that has adequate capacity for the proposed development. Jackson County also has a line on Biddle that may be accessible. Issues: There are two main issues: Reciprocal Access — The application shows public access thru the subject site. Permanent easements for the development of the private retail street and the access to the west are needed for access, circulation and vehicular movements. 2. Storm Utility Connection - The proposed development shows connection to the Jackson County storm drain system. There is limited capacity in this system, so it will be necessary for the applicant to coordinate with Jackson County to determine if any of the storm run-off associated with this development can be connected to the existing system. April 27, 2020 Page 2 of 2 machine width (normally 10'-12') for a travel lane restoration. Drag boxes or other pull -type asphalt spreaders will not be permitted for longitudinal trench pavement replacement. 8. Per Oregon Revised Statute 209.150, any survey monuments of record removed, disturbed or destroyed within the permit area must be referenced prior to construction and replaced after construction by a registered professional land surveyor. All costs associated with this surveying work are the responsibility of the permit holder 9. Biddle Road is a County Minor Arterial and is maintained by the County. The Average Daily Traffic count was 9,984 for eastbound lanes 450 east of Hamrick Road on July 31, 2018 and 9,677 for westbound lanes on July 31, 2018 450 feet east of Hamrick Road. 10. Table Rock Road is a County Arterial and is maintained by the County. The Average Daily Traffic count was 20,723 750 north of Biddle Road on July 9, 2018. 11. If county storm drain facilities are to be utilized, the applicant's registered Engineer shall provide a hydraulic report and plans for review and approval by Jackson County Roads. Storm drainage runoff is limited to that area currently draining to the County storm drainage system. Upon completion of the project the developer's Engineer shall certify that the construction of the drainage system was constructed per the approved plan. A copy of the certification shall be sent to Chuck DeJanvier at Jackson County Roads. 12. We would like to be notified of future development proposals, as county permits may be required. 13. We concur with any right-of-way dedicated. Sincerely, r ( -µ / Chuck DeJanvier, PE Construction Engineer I:\Engineering\Development\CITIES\CNTRLPT\SUB-20-001-revision 1.doc 'tol SEWS. April 10, 2020 Attachment "G" ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES Location 138 West Vilas Road, Central Point, OR - Mailing Address: P,O Box 3130, Central Point, OR 7502-0005 Tel. (541) 664-6300, Fax (541) 664-7171 www.RVSS.us Justin Gindlesperger City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: SUB -20001, Table Rock Crossing, Tax Lot 700, Map 37 2W 01C The existing property currently does not have sewer service. There is an existing 8 inch sewer main and manhole just west of the subject property. Sewer service for the proposed development will require a sewer main extension into the property from the existing manhole. Sewer connection permits will be issued upon acceptance of the sewer main and payment of related fees. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of the application be subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must provide sewer construction plans prepared per RVSS standards for review and approval. Feel free to call me with any questions. Sincerely, Nicholas R. Bakke, PE District Engineer K:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPT\PLANNG\SUBDIVISION\2020\SUB-2000I_TABLE ROCK CROSSING.DOC Conditions of Approval: 1. PW Standards and S ecifications — Applicant shall comply with the public works standards and specifications for construction within the right of way. 2. Jackson County — Applicant shall obtain all the necessary approvals from Jackson County Roads for the construction of a new access for the private retail street on to Table Rock Road and for any public utility connections. 3. Landscape Row - The applicant will be required to install a landscape row with street trees on the Biddle Road and Table Rock Road frontage. Maintenance of that landscape row is required by the adjoining property owner, in this case each individual lot, per CPMC. 4. Storm Water Quality - The project is within the Phase 2 stormwater quality area and will require a stormwater management plan that is in accordance with the Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual (RVSQDM). An operations and maintenance agreement for all new stormwater quality features is required. Construction on site must be sequenced so that the permanent stormwater quality features are installed and operational when stormwater runoff enters. Erosion Control. — The proposed development will disturb more than one acre and will require an erosion and sediment control permit (NPDES 1200-C) from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). JACKSON COUNTY Road s April 27, 2020 Attention: Justin Gindlesperger City of Central Point Planning 140 south Third Street Central Point, OR 97502 RE Subdivision tentative plat for an 8 -lot commercial subdivision on Table Rock Road at Biddle Road— county -maintained roads. Planning File: SUB -20-001- Revision 1; 37 -2W -01C Tax Lot 700 Dear Justin. Attachment "F" Roads Engineering Chuck DeJanvier Consrnicrion Engineer 200 Antelope Road White City, OR 97503 Phone: (541) 774-6255 Fax: (541) 774-6295 i dejanvca@jacksoncounty.org www.jacksoncounty.org Thank you for the opportunity to comment on consideration of a Subdivision tentative plan for an 8 -lot commercial subdivision on an approximately 7 -acre property within the C-4 zoning district at 4245 Table Rock Road. Jackson County Roads offers the following comments: Prior to opening of this phase, Jackson County requests the Biddle Road full movement access be modified to a right -in, right -out, left -in (RIROLI) lane. The turn and receiving lanes shall have adequate queuing to ensure safe and efficient operation of the intersection during the first year of opening. This work will require a Minor Road Improvement Permit from Jackson County. 2. Prior to opening of this phase, Jackson County requests construction of a right -in, right -out, left - in (RIROLI) lane on Table Rock Road. This work will require a Minor Road Improvement Permit from Jackson County. 3. The applicant shall submit construction drawings including the median designs for review, comment and approval prior to the project pre -construction meeting 4. Jackson County reserves the right to restrict the left -in accesses at any time if either became a safety concern in the judgement of Jackson County. Further it is likely this restriction will be required at one or both locations within 20 years. 5. If frontage improvements are required, the applicant shall obtain a minor road improvement permit from Jackson County Roads Sidewalk placement on Biddle Road frontage if required should be directly behind the curb. Jackson County Roads does not maintain planter strips. 6. Roads requires the removal of any existing driveways not being used on either Table Rock Road or Biddle Road and replacing them with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. If curb, gutter and sidewalk is not existing, it will be required. 7. Utility Permits are required from Roads for any utility work within the county road right-of-way. On longitudinal trenches within a travel lane 100' or greater in length, unless otherwise approved by the Engineer, the existing pavement shall be removed and replaced to full paving-