HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAP070920
CITY OF CENTRAL
POINT
Oregon
City Council Meeting Agenda
Thursday, July 9, 2020
Mayor
Hank Williams
Ward I
Neil Olsen
Ward II
Kelley Johnson
Ward III
Melody Thueson
Ward IV
Taneea Browning
At Large
Rob Hernandez
At Large
Michael Parsons
At Large
Michael Parsons
Next Res(1633) Ord (2067)
I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
IV. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
1. Police Officer Swearing In - Police Department Lawn Area
V. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public comment is for non-agenda items. If you are here to make comments on a specific agenda item, you must speak at
that time. Please limit your remarks to 3 minutes per individual, 5 minutes per group, with a maximum of 20 minutes per meeting being allotted for public comments. The council may ask questions but may take no action during the public
comment section of the meeting, except to direct staff to prepare a report or place an item on a future agenda.
Complaints against specific City employees should be resolved through the City’s Personnel Complaint procedure. The
right to address the Council does not exempt the speaker from any potential liability for defamation.
VI. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of June 25, 2020 City Council Minutes
VII. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA
VIII. PUBLIC HEARING
Public comments will be allowed on items under this part of the agenda following a brief staff report presenting the item
and action requested. The presiding officer may limit testimony.
A. First Reading/Public Hearing An Ordinance Amending the Central Point
Municipal Code Sections 5.04.050 and 5.04.090 Regarding Business License
Term (Weber)
IX. ORDINANCES, AND RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. ________, A Resolution appointing official designee of the City of
Central Point for purposes of approving traffic controls. (Samitore)
B. Resolution No. ________, A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign the
application applying for a Transportation Growth Management Grant from the
Oregon Department of Transportation for the Development of a Transportation
System Plan. (Samitore)
X. BUSINESS
A. League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities (Clayton)
B. Planning Commission Report
XI. MAYOR'S REPORT
XII. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
XIII. COUNCIL REPORTS
XIV. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
XV. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The City Council will adjourn to executive session under the provisions of ORS 192.660. Under the provisions of the
Oregon Public Meetings Law, the proceedings of an executive session are not for publication or broadcast.
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
Individuals needing special accommodations such as sign language, foreign language interpreters or equipment for the
hearing impaired must request such services at least 72 hours prior to the City Council meeting. To make your request,
please contact the City Recorder at 541-423-1026 (voice), or by e-mail to Deanna.casey@centralpointoregon.gov.
Si necesita traductor en español o servicios de discapacidades (ADA) para asistir a una junta publica de la ciudad por
favor llame con 72 horas de anticipación al 541-664-3321 ext. 201
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
Oregon
City Council Meeting Minutes
Thursday, June 25, 2020
I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Mayor Hank Williams
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Hank Williams Mayor Present
Neil Olsen Ward I Present
Kelley Johnson Ward II Present
Melody Thueson Ward III Remote
Taneea Browning Ward IV Present
Rob Hernandez At Large Present
Michael Parsons At Large Present
City Manager Chris Clayton; City Attorney Sydnee Dreyer; Police Chief Kris Allison;
Police Captain Dave Croft; Community Development Director Tom Humphrey, Finance
Director Steve Weber, Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore, IT Director Jason
Richmond, and Public Works Office Assistant Cyndi Weeks were also present.
IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS -None
V. CONSENT AGENDA
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Rob Hernandez, At Large
SECONDER: Taneea Browning, Ward IV
AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons
A. Approval of June 11, 2020 City Council Minutes
VI. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA
VII. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Resolution No. _______, A Resolution of the City of Central Point Approving a
2019-21 Supplemental Budget
A few projects that were finished but not invoiced in time are included in the need for
a supplemental budget. Those include the Twin Creeks rail crossing, freeway off-
ramp work, and a couple of street projects. There were also a few revenue items
reflected in the budget such as $14,000 in COVID-19 grants, $80,300 in credits for
the Chicory Village reverse development refund, $48,000 from the police asset
6.A
Packet Pg. 3 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 25, 2020 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)
City of Central Point
City Council Minutes
June 25, 2020
Page 2
forfeiture program.
Mike Parsons made a motion to approve the Resolution Approving the 2019-21
Supplemental Budget.
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Michael Parsons, At Large
SECONDER: Kelley Johnson, Ward II
AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez,
Parsons
VIII. ORDINANCES, AND RESOLUTIONS
A. Ordinance No. _______, An Ordinance Amending the Central Point
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps on Multiple Properties Totaling 12.12
Acres South of Bush Street between South 4th and South 1st Streets from C-
2(M) Commercial -Medical to R-1-6 (Residential Single Family) and Civic. (37S
2W 11BC, Tax Lots 800 Through 5000 and 37S 2W 11BL, Tax Lots 100-700)
Community Development Director Tom Humphrey presented a second reading of
this ordinance to change the zoning of the old Asante building from medical to
residential for School District #6.
Melody Thueson made a motion to approve an Ordinance Amending the
Central Point Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps on Multiple Properties
Totaling 12.12 Acres South of Bush Street between South 4th and South 1st
Streets from C-2(M) Commercial -Medical to R-1-6 (Residential Single Family)
and Civic. (37S2W 11BC, Tax Lots 800 Through 5000 and 37S 2W 11BL, Tax
Lots 100-7000).
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Melody Thueson, Ward III
SECONDER: Taneea Browning, Ward IV
AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez,
Parsons
B. Resolution No. _________, A Resolution Approving that Intergovernmental
Agreement for Central Point Branch Library between the City and Jackson
County and Authorizing City Manager to Execute Same
City Attorney Sydnee Dreyer reported that Jackson County decided not to be in
control of the library property and agreed to Quit Claim interest to the City. In turn,
this will allow the City to enter into an agreement with the Library District directly.
Kelley Johnson made a motion to approve the Resolution Approving that
Intergovernmental Agreement for Central Point Branch Library between the
City and Jackson County and Authorizing City Manager to Execute Same.
6.A
Packet Pg. 4 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 25, 2020 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)
City of Central Point
City Council Minutes
June 25, 2020
Page 3
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Kelley Johnson, Ward II
SECONDER: Michael Parsons, At Large
AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez,
Parsons
C. Resolution No. ________, A Resolution Approving that Intergovernmental
Agreement Between the City of Central Point and the Jackson County Library
District and Authorizing City Manager to Execute Same
City Attorney Sydnee Dreyer discussed the need to enter into a lease between the
City and Jackson County Library District that would direct the Library District to
operate, maintain and insure the property. The lease would be an initial 30-year term
with three options to renew for 5 years each.
Kelley Johnson made a motion to approve the Resolution Approving that
Intergovernmental Agreement Between the City of Central Point and the
Jackson County Library District and Authorizing City Manager to Execute
Same.
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Kelley Johnson, Ward II
SECONDER: Melody Thueson, Ward III
AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez,
Parsons
D. Resolution No. ________, Accepting the Lowest Responsible Bid from Knife
River Materials Inc, for the Mingus Creek at Freeman Road Culvert
Replacement and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract
Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore reported that the Mingus Creek
culvert on Freeman Rd is failing and needs replacement. Two bids were received for
the project, and Knife River was the low bid in the amount of $149,999. With the
short time frame for working in rivers and creeks, this project is to start after July 4th
and be completed in two weeks.
Rob Hernandez made a motion to Accept the Lowest Responsible Bid from
Knife River Materials Inc, for the Mingus Creek at Freeman Road Culvert
Replacement and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract.
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Rob Hernandez, At Large
SECONDER: Taneea Browning, Ward IV
AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez,
Parsons
E. Resolution No. ________, A Resolution accepting the Qualified Based
Selection Process for the Parks and Public Works Operations Center Project
and authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with S&B James
Construction, Inc.
Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore reported that the City conducted a
formal Qualified Based Selection process for the Parks and Public Works Operations
6.A
Packet Pg. 5 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 25, 2020 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)
City of Central Point
City Council Minutes
June 25, 2020
Page 4
Center. After receiving five bid submittals, two were rated highest based on
qualifications. Interviews with both firms were held and it was decided that S&B
James was the best fit for the project due to their experience with pre-fab buildings. If
approved, the next phases will be fast-tracked over the next few months. This would
be an 18 month project.
Council member Rob Hernandez declared a conflict of interest and did not
participate in the deliberations.
Kelley Johnson made a motion to approve A Resolution Accepting the
Qualified Based Selection Process for the Parks and Public Works Operations
Center Project and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with
S&B James Construction, Inc.
RESULT: APPROVED AS AMENDED [6 TO 0]
MOVER: Kelley Johnson, Ward II
SECONDER: Michael Parsons, At Large
AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Parsons
RECUSED: Rob Hernandez
F. Resolution No. ________, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Payment for
Fiscal Year 2020-2021 City of Central Point Insurance Premiums
City Manager Chris Clayton reported that the 2020-2021 insurance premiums are
18% higher than the previous year and exceeds the City Manager’s purchasing
authority. The increase seems to be on par for other cities increases in the area.
Melody Thueson made a motion to approve a Resolution Authorizing the City
Manager to Execute Payment for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 City of Central Point
Insurance Premiums.
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Melody Thueson, Ward III
SECONDER: Kelley Johnson, Ward II
AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez,
Parsons
G. Resolution No. _______, Approving the Regional Plan Progress Report, a Self-
Evaluation Monitoring Report Addressing Compliance with Regional Plan
Performance Indicators for the City of Central Point, Oregon
Community Development Director Tom Humphrey reported that as part of the
Regional Plan Element, the City is required to adhere to various performance
indicators and is subject to monitoring. Every five years, the City is required to
participate in a regular review process in the form of a self-evaluation report. If the
report is approved, it will become a main part of the UGB application being sent in
next week.
Mike Parsons made a motion to Approve the Regional Plan Progress Report, a
Self-Evaluation Monitoring Report Addressing Compliance with regional Plan
Performance Indicators for the City of Central Point, Oregon.
6.A
Packet Pg. 6 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 25, 2020 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)
City of Central Point
City Council Minutes
June 25, 2020
Page 5
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Michael Parsons, At Large
SECONDER: Melody Thueson, Ward III
AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez,
Parsons
IX. BUSINESS
A. 2040 City of Central Point Strategic Plan
City Manager Chris Clayton reported that the Planning Commission will review the
plan in July and make a formal adoption recommendation to the Council in order to
allow public comment. Some points to note are to maintain safe communities,
continue to police the “Central Point Way” of being a friendly town, and to develop
and foster a community policing program by building relationships with the
community.
RESULT: FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
X. MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Williams reported that he attended:
League of Oregon Cities weekly call
Scenic Fire Station grand opening
Study Session at the fire station
Ribbon cutting at Flanagan Park
XI. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Chris Clayton reported that:
Human Resources completed a salary survey on department directors and will be
incorporating Council in compensation agreements
Flanagan Park ribbon cutting was well attended and kids were already enjoying the play
structure
Telework policies have been finished and it is up to department directors to determine
who and when can work from home
The livestock auction is coming up and Mayor Williams is preparing to buy on behalf of
the City
COVID Update: Oregon is staying stable and we are getting public meetings figured out
either virtually or in person
ROW from Walmart has been acquired for the Hamrick/Biddle intersection
XII. COUNCIL REPORTS
Council Member Kelley Johnson reported that she attended:
6.A
Packet Pg. 7 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 25, 2020 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)
City of Central Point
City Council Minutes
June 25, 2020
Page 6
Weekly League of Oregon Cities calls
Study Session at the fire station
Council Member Melody Thueson reported that she attended the Fire Station ribbon
study session tour.
Council Member Rob Hernandez reported that he attended Study Session with the Fire
Station tour.
Council Member Taneea Browning reported that she attended:
Study Session
Fire District board meeting
Timber board meeting
Council Member Mike Parsons reported that he attended:
RVSS board meeting
Parks Foundation meeting
Flanagan Park ribbon cutting
Council Member Neil Olsen had no report.
XIII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore reported that:
Benches will be installed next week at Flanagan Park.
The water park is open, but the barrel is having issues and is being repaired.
The new SCADA system was done as of last week, and that cuts the overtime budget
down dramatically.
Drive-in movies were a success with one last weekend to go. There are plans to have
two movies in the park in August.
Community Development Director Tom Humphrey reported that:
Planning Commission will meet in July and August
Construction is happening on 10th and Freeman for medical offices
There is some activity in front of the vet clinic on E Pine
Table Rock and Biddle area is seeing activity with tire centers and the like
6.A
Packet Pg. 8 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 25, 2020 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)
City of Central Point
City Council Minutes
June 25, 2020
Page 7
Police Chief Kris Allison reported that:
She is very upset about the George Floyd murder and claims that it was not a police
move. The community has been positive to our officers and have sent cards and food to
the department in support. A handout was made of questions and answers about use of
body cameras, use of force and chokeholds, and other questions that have come about
after this tragedy.
The department will be involved in the 4th of July cruise, and the route has changed
again to encompass all neighborhoods.
Finance Director Steve Weber reported that information is being gathered to apply for a
grant and a one-on-one match for small business assistance.
XIV. EXECUTIVE SESSION
XV. ADJOURNMENT
Neil Olsen moved to adjourn, all said “aye” and the Council Meeting was adjourned at
9:02 p.m.
The foregoing minutes of the June 25, 2020, Council meeting were approved by the City
Council at its meeting of _________________, 2020.
Dated: _________________________
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Recorder
6.A
Packet Pg. 9 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jun 25, 2020 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)
City of Central Point
Staff Report to Council
ISSUE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
DEPARTMENT:
Finance
FROM: Steven Weber,
MEETING DATE: July 9, 2020
SUBJECT: First Reading/Public Hearing An Ordinance Amending the Central Point
Municipal Code Sections 5.04.050 and 5.04.090 Regarding Business
License Term
ACTION REQUIRED:
Public Hearing
Ordinance 1st Reading
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
During a discussion of the COVID-19 financial impact update at the May 18th City Council study
session, options were presented as ways to help those in the community that are being
impacted by the pandemic. One item in particular was extending the validity of current business
licenses from June 30, 2020 to September 30, 2020. During the discussion it was also noted
that the change in term is beneficial in that it avoids conflict with additional duties of the finance
department during fiscal year end. Council directed staff to extend the validity of current
business licenses to September 30, 2020 and to bring forward an ordinance to amend the
municipal code sections to change the business license term to the twelve-month period
beginning October 1st of each year and ending September 30th of the calendar year next
following.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:
N/A
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
N/A
COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS:
N/A
ACTION:
Open public hearing and consider the proposed amendment to Central Point municipal code
sections 5.04.050 and 5.04.090 regarding business license term, close the public hearing and 1)
forward the ordinance to a second reading, 2) make revisions and forward the ordinance to a
second reading, or 3) deny the ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Forward the ordinance amending the Central Point municipal code to a second reading.
8.A
Packet Pg. 10
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Ordinance Amending Business License Term
8.A
Packet Pg. 11
Ordinance No. ________ (July 9, 2020)
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 5.04.050 AND
5.04.090 REGARDING BUSINESS LICENSE TERM
RECITALS:
A. Pursuant to CPMC, Chapter 1.01.040, the City Council, may from time to time make revisions
to its municipal code which shall become part of the overall document and citation.
B. The City Council extended the validity of current business licenses to September 30, 2020 as
a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
C. Upon review, the staff and city attorney for the City of Central Point determined that
amendment to CPMC 5.04.050, Issuance of Business License, and CPMC 5.04.090 Fee-Term, is
advisable for consistency with the extension to current business licenses. Further the new
calendar term is beneficial in that it avoids conflicts with additional duties of the finance
department during fiscal year end.
D. Words lined through are to be deleted and words in bold are added.
THE PEOPLE OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 5.04.050, is amended as set forth below and incorporated herein by
reference.
5.04.050 Issuance.
Upon receipt of a business license application and the required fee, the same shall be
forwarded to the city designee who will cause the application to be reviewed by the
appropriate members of the city staff for compliance by the proposed business with all
applicable charter and ordinance provisions including, but not limited to, building, zoning and
public safety ordinances. Upon approval for compliance, the application will then be forwarded
to the city designee who shall issue a business license to the applicant. Licenses so issued shall
be valid until the thirtieth day of June September following the date of issuance of the license
(licenses issued before September 30, 1995 shall be valid). In the event an application is denied
for noncompliance of the proposed business with city charter or ordinance provisions, the
applicant shall have the right to appeal said denial to the city council at the next regularly
scheduled council meeting.
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: Ordinance Amending Business License Term (1296 : First Reading/Public Hearing An Ordinance Amending the Central Point
Ordinance No. ________ (July 9, 2020)
SECTION 2. Chapter 5.04.090, is amended as set forth below and incorporated herein by
reference.
5.04.090 Fee--Term.
A. The business license term shall be the twelve-month period beginning on July October 1st of
each year and ending June September 30th of the calendar year next following.
B. If any business subject to the provisions of this chapter comes into existence, or for the first
time commences its operations within the city at any time after January 1st of any business
license period, the license fee payable in connection with that business for the current business
license period shall be prorated as of the beginning date of the semi-annual period during
which the activity begins. The semi-annual periods for the purposes hereof shall begin on the
first day of January of each year.
C. The license fee for any business taxed hereunder shall be computed using the city of Central
Point business license fee schedule to include a basic fee and an additional fee for each
employee over two employees, but no fee hereunder shall exceed the maximum annual
amount set forth in the city of Central Point business license fee schedule. For the purposes of
this subsection, the term “employee” means and includes:
1. A person having no ownership interest in the business other than the ownership of
shares in a corporate owner of the business and who is regularly employed by, and under
the supervision and control of, the owner or owners of the business or their
representative in the course of the business activities; or
2. A natural person having an ownership interest in the business, who actively works in
and for the business on a full-time basis;
3. Any person who is not subject to state and federal employment and withholding taxes
by the business shall not be deemed an employee under this chapter.
SECTION 2. Codification. Provisions of this Ordinance shall be incorporated in the City Code and
the word "ordinance" may be changed to "code", "article", "section", "chapter" or another
word, and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered, or re-lettered, provided however
that any recital clauses and boilerplate provisions (i.e. Recitals A-D) need not be codified and
the City Recorder is authorized to correct any cross-references and any typographical errors.
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: Ordinance Amending Business License Term (1296 : First Reading/Public Hearing An Ordinance Amending the Central Point
Ordinance No. ________ (July 9, 2020)
SECTION 3. Effective Date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance enacted by
the Council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The effective date of this
ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading.
PASSED by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this ____ day of July,
2020.
___________________________________
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
__________________________________
City Recorder
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: Ordinance Amending Business License Term (1296 : First Reading/Public Hearing An Ordinance Amending the Central Point
City of Central Point
Staff Report to Council
ISSUE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
FROM: Matt Samitore, Parks and Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: July 9, 2020
SUBJECT: Resolution No. ________, A Resolution appointing official designee of the
City of Central Point for purposes of approving traffic controls.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Motion
Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Central Point Municipal Code 10.04.020 provides that the
Council, or its designee, may approve traffic controls for the best use of the City streets.
Previously, the Council had extended this authority to a City Traffic Control Committee. The
Committee had long-term success. However, there were not many requests for traffic
controls, and the Committee was dispanded in 2011. Since that time all minor traffic control
changes have been brought to Council for amendment. These requests have been mostly
related to new stop signs.
After reviewing the code recently with regard to parking enforcement in certain areas, staff
discovered that since the Traffic Safety Committee was disbanded, no other designee has
been authorized to act on the Council’s behalf in approving traffic controls. Staff is
recommending that the Public Works Director be named the designee in order to streamline
some of these decisions. It would be the Public Works Director’s intention to review such
decisions with the City Engineer or City Traffic Engineer for any issues that may arise
regarding minor traffic revisions.
The type of revisions allowed to be made are listed in the recital section of the Resolution.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: N/A
LEGAL ANALYSIS: N/A
COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS:
Transportation
Goal 1- Ensure citizens can get where they want to be, when they want to be
there, enjoy the trip, and eliminate the stress of travel.
9.A
Packet Pg. 15
Strategies:
a. Provide easy access to transportation;
b. Aggressively encourage connectivity throughout all new development
c. Encourage retrofitted and expanded connectivity throughout existing
development;
d. Refine Transportation Systems Plan (TSP) to include new growth areas;
City of Central Point Strategic Plan
e. Designate and preserve “right of way” in growth areas, encourage early
purchase of “right of way” easements;
f. Develop policies and ordinances to encourage development of activity
centers;
g. Support individual transportation choices;
h. Pursue grants and public private funding sources for developing healthy
communities;
i. Implement recommended and locally acceptable street improvements and
traffic controls in the Central Business District (includes Highway 99) to
reduce driving speeds and make walking safer and more desirable.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Public Works Director as the official designee of
the City of Central Point for the purposes of approving traffic control devices.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. ____ appointing the Public
Works Director the official designee of the City of Central Point for the purposes of approving
traffic control devices.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. RESO Naming Designee for Traffic Control
9.A
Packet Pg. 16
Resolution No. _____________ (July 9, 2020)
RESOLUTION NO. ______________
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING OFFICIAL DESIGNEE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT FOR
PURPOSES OF APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROLS
Recitals:
A. Central Point Municipal Code 10.04.020 provides that the Council, or its designee, may
approve the following traffic controls for the best use of the City streets in the public
interest:
1. Time limitations applicable to parking, in particular designated here as on the city
streets;
2. Through streets;
3. One-way streets;
4. Truck routes;
5. Streets where trucks, machinery or any other large or heavy vehicles exceeding
specified weights are prohibited, except for delivering or picking up materials or
merchandise but then only by entering such streets at the intersection nearest the
destination of the vehicle and leaving by the shortest route;
6. The location and the time of operation of traffic control signals;
7. Bus stops, bus stands, taxicab stands and stands for other passenger common carrier
vehicles;
8. The location of passenger loading zones for use in connection with a hotel,
auditorium, theater, church, school or public building;
9. Loading zones for commercial purposes;
10. Intersections or areas where drivers of vehicles shall not make right, left or U-turns
and the time when the prohibition applies;
11. Crosswalks, safety zones, parking spaces, traffic lanes and other symbols;
12. Traffic control signs;
13. All other signs, signals, markings and devices required to implement traffic and
parking controls enacted by the council or required by state law or regulation.
B. The Council desires to appoint the Public Works Director as its designee to approve the
foregoing traffic controls for the best use of City streets in the public interest.
The City of Central Point resolves as follows:
Section 1. The Public Works Director is hereby appointed the Council’s designee to approve
traffic controls on City streets pursuant to CPMC 10.04.020(A).
9.A.a
Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: RESO Naming Designee for Traffic Control (1294 : Designee to Approve Traffic Controls)
Resolution No. _____________ (July 9, 2020)
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this _____ day
of July, 2020.
_______________________________
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
______________________________
City Recorder
9.A.a
Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: RESO Naming Designee for Traffic Control (1294 : Designee to Approve Traffic Controls)
City of Central Point
Staff Report to Council
ISSUE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
FROM: Matt Samitore, Parks and Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: July 9, 2020
SUBJECT: Resolution No. ________, A Resolution authorizing the City Manager to
sign the application applying for a Transportation Growth Management
Grant from the Oregon Department of Transportation for the Development
of a Transportation System Plan.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Motion
Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: City staff has been working on updating the City’s Urban
Growth Boundary (UGB) as well as coordinating with fellow Rogue Valley entities to produce
a Rogue Valley Active Transportation Plan. Both of these projects are slated to be
completed in the next six to eight months. Moreover, both amendments will require the City
to update our Transportation System Plan (TSP) to incorporate new objectives and capital
projects.
The City last updated its TSP in December 2008. The identified Tier 1 projects have
remained some of the City’s areas of focus for capital infrastructure improvements. These
include the Highway 99 Streetscape Project (2010), Pinest Street/Downtown Improvements
including new signals on 2nd and 4th Streets (2018), Twin Creeks Rail Crossing (2019),
Scenic and Highway 99 Signal (2022), Beebe and Hamrick Signal (2021) and Hamrick and
Pine Signal Upgrades (2020 or 2021).
With the upcoming Urban Growth Boundary expansion, a new series of goals and projects
will be needed incorporate into an updatd TSP as growth occurs within the system over the
next twenty years. Inasmuch, the current plan needs to be amended to reflect these new
areas of growth, and the associated demands within the system. Additionally, the City has
been an active participant in the Rogue Valley Active Transportation Planning process that
will identify projects within the City that will contribute to a regional transportation system.
Ultimately, the new plan and projects need to be incorporated into the updated TSP.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:
The estimated cost of the project is $200,000. The grant requires a minimum of a 12% match.
The City will be matching at 15% or approximately $30,000, from the street maintenance fund.
9.B
Packet Pg. 19
LEGAL ANALYSIS: N/A
COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS:
2020 City of Central Point Strategic Plan
Managed Growth and Infrastructure
Goal 3- Continually update infrastructure plans.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City to apply for a Transportation Growth
Management Grant from the Oregon Department of Transportation for the Development of a
Transportation System Plan.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. ____ authorizing the City of
Central Point to apply for a Transportation Growth Management Grant from the Oregon
Department of Transportation for the development of a Transportation System Plan (TSP) and
delegating authority to the City Manager to sign the application.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. resol_tgm support
9.B
Packet Pg. 20
1 - Resolution No. ________ (07/09/2020 Council meeting)
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT TO APPLY
FOR A TRANSPORTATION GROWTH MANAGEMENT GRANT FROM THE
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
OF A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN AND DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO
THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE APPLICATION.
RECITALS:
A. WHEREAS, the Oregon Department of Transportation is accepting
applications for the Transportation Growth Management Grant; and
B. WHEREAS, the City of Central Point desires to participate in this grant
program to the greatest extent possible, as a means of developing a local
comprehensive transportation system management plan and incorporating the
Rogue Valley Active Transportation Plan; and
C. WHEREAS, the Central Point City Council desires to develop a
balanced and interconnected transportation network necessary to support
mobility, equity, environmental stewardship, long term grown and economic
vitality of the community; and.
D. WHEREAS, the City of Central Point has available, local matching
funds to fulfill its share of obligation related to this grant application should the
grant funds be awarded;
The City of Central Point resolves as follows:
Section 1. The City of Central Point is authorized to submit a grant application
to the Oregon Department of Transportation for a Transportation Growth
Management Grant for the preparation and adoption of a transportation system
plan (the “Grant Application”).
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to sign the Grant Application.
Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its
passage and approval.
Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage
this _____ day of _____________________, 2020.
9.B.a
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: resol_tgm support [Revision 1] (1295 : Transportation Growth Management Grant)
2 - Resolution No. ______ (07/09/2020 Council Meeting)
__________________________
Mayor Hank Williams
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Recorder
9.B.a
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: resol_tgm support [Revision 1] (1295 : Transportation Growth Management Grant)
City of Central Point
Staff Report to Council
ISSUE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
DEPARTMENT:
City Manager
FROM: Chris Clayton, City Manager
MEETING DATE: July 9, 2020
SUBJECT: League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities
ACTION REQUIRED:
Motion
RECOMMENDATION:
Not Applicable
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
For the past three months, seven policy committees have been working to identify and
propose specific actions as part of the LOC’s effort to develop a pro-active legislative agenda
for the 2021 session. They have identified legislative objectives as set forth in the enclosed
ballot and legislative recommendation materials. These objectives span a variety of issues
and differ in the potential resources required to seek their achievement. Therefore, it is
desirable to prioritize them in order to ensure that efforts are focused where they are most
needed.
While the attached ballot reflects the top policies developed in each of the policy
committees, each undertook a broad look at a range of issues impacting cities. Many issues
reflect the LOC’s ongoing mission to support cities’ work and their home rule authority to
develop and use a variety of tools to meet the needs of residents. Each city is being asked to
review the recommendations of the policy committees and provide input to the LOC Board of
Directors as it prepares to adopt the LOC’s 2021 legislative agenda. After your city council has
had the opportunity to review the proposals and discuss them with your staff, please return
the enclosed ballot indicating the top four issues that your city council would like to see the
LOC focus on during the 2021 session. The deadline for response is August 7, 2020. The board
of directors will then review the results of this survey of member cities, along with the
recommendations of the policy committees, and determine the LOC’s 2021 legislative agenda.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS:
Not Applicable
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Not Applicable
COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS:
10.A
Packet Pg. 23
Our Vision
Through the leadership of the governing body, The City of Central Point has
created a community:
With a “small town” commitment and feel that promotes community pride,
safety, and friendliness.
Which provides consistent quality in guiding growth, beautifying and
strengthening the downtown area, and providing adequately for City
services, while being flexible and updating citizens.
Where we work jointly with our community schools, libraries, and
public/private institutions to increase opportunities for the development of
our youth and our citizens.
Where city, county, state, and federal agencies work together as partners
with a “can do” attitude
That protects our unique identity – People know when they are in the
“Heart of the Rogue Valley” – Central Point.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends city council select and forward four issues to be considered legislative
priorities by the League of Oregon Cities during the 2021 legislative session.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
I move to approve the following four issues ____, ____, ____, ____ as legislative priorities for
the League of Oregon Cities during the 2021 legislative session.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final
10.A
Packet Pg. 24
June 5, 2020
Dear Chief Administrative Official:
For the past three months, seven policy committees have been working to identify and propose specific
actions as part of the LOC’s effort to develop a pro-active legislative agenda for the 2021 session. They
have identified legislative objectives as set forth in the enclosed ballot and legislative recommendation
materials. These objectives span a variety of issues and differ in the potential resources required to seek
their achievement. Therefore, it is desirable to prioritize them in order to ensure that efforts are focused
where they are most needed.
While the attached ballot reflects the top policies developed in each of the policy committees, each
undertook a broad look at a range of issues impacting cities. Many issues reflect the LOC’s ongoing
mission to support cities’ work and their home rule authority to develop and use a variety of tools to meet
the needs of residents. Each city is being asked to review the recommendations of the policy committees
and provide input to the LOC Board of Directors as it prepares to adopt the LOC’s 2021 legislative agenda.
After your city council has had the opportunity to review the proposals and discuss them with your staff,
please return the enclosed ballot indicating the top four issues that your city council would like to see the
LOC focus on during the 2021 session. The deadline for response is August 7, 2020. The board of
directors will then review the results of this survey of member cities, along with the recommendations of
the policy committees, and determine the LOC’s 2021 legislative agenda.
Your city’s participation and input will assist the board in creating a focused set of specific legislative
targets that reflect the issues of greatest importance to cities. If you have individual questions about the
ballot topics do not hesitate to reach out to committee members who serve on the seven policy committees.
Thank you for your involvement, and thanks to those among you who gave many hours of time and
expertise in developing these proposals.
Do not hesitate to contact me or Jim McCauley, Legislative Director, with additional questions.
Sincerely,
Mike Cully Jim McCauley
Executive Director Legislative Director
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
INSTRUCTIONS
Each city should submit one form that reflects the consensus opinion of
its city council on the top four legislative priorities for 2021. Here are
the ways to submit your ballot. Ballots in any form must be submitted
by August 7, 2020.
1. Fill out the online survey that has been sent to your city’s chief
administrative official; or
2. Fill out the attached hard copy form and return it to the LOC at the
address or fax number provided below. Simply place an X or
check mark in the space to the right of the city’s top four
legislative proposals. The top four do not need to be prioritized.
Return hard copy ballots to:
Jenna Jones
League of Oregon Cities
1201 Court St. NE, Suite 200
Salem, OR 97301
Fax – (503) 399-4863
jjones@orcities.org
Thank you for your participation.
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
City of: _________________________________
Legislation
A. Beer and Cider Tax Increase
B. Broadband Infrastructure and Technical Assistance Funding
C. Building (Reach) Code – Energy Efficiency Local Option
D. COVID-19 Economic Recovery Investments
E. Digital Equity and Inclusion
F. Expedited Siting for Shelter and Affordable Housing
G. Green Energy/Renewables – Expanded Local Option
H. Housing and Services Investment
I. Increased Budgetary Flexibility During Budgetary Emergency
J. Infrastructure Financing and Resilience
K. Local Climate Action Planning Resources
L. Local Energy Generation Project Support
M. Local Speed Setting Authority
N. Long Term Transportation Infrastructure Funding
O. Low-Income Energy Efficiency and Affordability Programs
P. Marijuana Tax Local Rate Limitation Increase
Q. Mental Health Service Delivery
R. Municipal Broadband and Municipal Pole Protection
S. New Mobility Services
T. Photo Enforcement Safety Cameras
U. Property Tax Reform
V. Reducing Wastewater Impacts from Wipes and Other “Non-Flushables”
W. Right-of-way/Franchise Fees Authority Preservation
X. State Highway Funds Formula
Y. Tort Liability Reform
Z. Water Utility Rate and Fund Assistance
In addition to your ranking of the priorities shown above, please use this space to provide
us with any comments (supportive or critical) you may have on these issues, or thoughts on
issues or potential legislative initiatives that have been overlooked during the committee
process.):
Please mark 4 boxes with an X or check mark that reflects
the top 4 issues that your city recommends be added to the
priorities for the LOC’s 2021 legislative agenda.
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
A. Beer and Cider Tax Increase
Legislation:
The League proposes increasing the state taxes on beer and cider to assist with rising public safety costs,
improve public health, reduce alcohol consumption by minors, and provide alcohol tax equity with wine
and liquor.
Background:
Oregon’s tax has not been increased since 1978 and is currently $2.60 per barrel which equates to about 8
cents on a gallon of beer. The tax is by volume and not on the sales price, meaning the tax is less than 5
cents on a six-pack. Oregon has the lowest beer tax in the country, and to get to the middle of the states
Oregon would need to raise the tax to $30.00 per barrel or 54 cents per six pack (a more than 10-fold
increase). Given recent challenges to the craft brewing industry tied to bar and restaurant closures it may
be appropriate to delay or phase-in the increase. Cities are preempted from imposing alcohol taxes. In
exchange, cities receive approximately 34% of the state alcohol revenues, but the state takes 50% of beer
and wine taxes off the top prior to this distribution. Cities have significant public safety costs related to
alcohol consumption, and the beer tax does not come close to covering its fair share of these costs.
Presented by the Finance and Taxation Committee
B. Broadband Infrastructure and Technical Assistance Funding
Legislation:
Seek additional state support and funding for increased broadband infrastructure deployment and technical
assistance.
Background:
The deployment of broadband and telecommunications networks and services (public and/or private) throughout
Oregon is critical to economic development, education, health and safety and the ability of residents to be linked
to their governments. Research shows areas of the state either not served or underserved by competitive
broadband technology. A significant barrier to the deployment of broadband infrastructure is funding. Cities need
additional funding and support from various sources, including the state and federal government, allocated for
increased or new, reliable, low latency broadband infrastructure that reaches speeds of at least 25 Mbps download
and 3 Mbps upload or any updated speed standards as adopted by the FCC. Many federal grant programs require
localities to have a broadband strategic plan in place before they are eligible for funds. Therefore, there is a need
for funding sources to help cities with technical assistance as well as infrastructure.
Presented by the Telecom, Broadband & Cable Committee
C. Building (Reach) Code – Energy Efficiency Local Option
Legislation:
The LOC will pursue/support legislation to allow communities to adopt the Reach Code as the mandatory
residential or commercial building code within the city’s jurisdictional boundaries. The Reach Code would
represent a building energy code that would be at least 10 percent more efficient than the statewide
building code. Under this proposal, cities would be able to adopt the more efficient Reach Code or would
continue to use the standard statewide building code as the base code.
You are reviewing the hard copy of the ballot. There are hyperlinks in the digital copy that
may provide more background information. You can find the digital version with hyperlinks
by going to this web address: https://www.orcities.org/download_file/1038/0. It is best opened
in Google Chrome.
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
Background:
Under current state law, cities are preempted from adopting local building codes. Instead, development is
subject to statewide codes, including for new residential and commercial development. In 2009, legislation
was passed to implement a new, optional code (Reach Code) that would allow developers to exceed
statewide codes and streamline the construction of higher-performance buildings through efficiencies
gained in the building exterior envelope as well as heating, ventilation, air conditioning, piping insulation
and lighting. The Reach Code is optional for builders to use, but a local government can’t mandate a
builder to use it. This legislative recommendation would allow a city to adopt the Reach Code within their
jurisdiction in order to promote additional energy efficiency for new residential and commercial structures.
If a city does not wish to adopt the Reach Code, the statewide code would remain in place. The LOC
Energy & Environment Committee discussed whether this recommendation would impact housing costs
and believes that long-term cost savings may be gained through increased energy efficiency in newly built
units. Ultimately, the decision on whether to utilize the standard code or the enhanced (Reach) code would
be at the discretion of the city.
Presented by the Energy and Environment Committee
D. COVID-10 Economic Recovery Investments
Legislation:
The League will advocate for continued economic recovery strategies and investments for small business
and workforce assistance in response to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Background:
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on Oregon’s small businesses and workforce.
While the federal government and the state have made recent investments to support small business, these
resources have yet to meet current needs and more resources will be needed to support long term economic
recovery for Oregon’s communities. The League will work in coordination with economic development
partners to advocate for continued investments to support long-term recovery and economic development.
Presented by the Community Development Committee
E. Digital Equity and Inclusion
Legislation:
Support legislation and policies that are inclusive and equitable to all, individuals and communities, so that they
have the information technology capacity needed for full participation in our society, democracy and economy.
Background:
Connectivity is crucial to modern life. It is being relied on more for how people do business, learn, and receive
important services like healthcare. As technology has evolved, the digital divide has become more complex and
nuanced. It is no longer about the existence of technology in certain places. Now, the discussion of the digital
divide is framed in terms of whether a population has access to hardware, to the Internet, to viable connection
speeds and to the skills and training they need to effectively use it. The LOC will partner with schools, healthcare,
and other stakeholders to ensure technologies are relevant, available, affordable, and accessible to the diverse
populous and communities of Oregon. Additionally, the LOC will advocate for digital literacy programs to help
learn these new technologies.
Presented by the Telecom, Broadband & Cable Committee
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
F. Expedited Siting for Shelter and Affordable Housing
Legislation:
The League will pursue legislation to expedite the siting of emergency shelter and other affordable housing
that follows the intent of the 2020 shelter siting bill (HB 4001) but retains more local decision making in
the process. The League will pursue this priority in coordination with affordable housing partners and
other land use stakeholders.
Background:
The League worked closely with city and county partners during the 2020 session to gain improvements to
HB 4001, which sought to preempt all local siting and zoning regulations and the land use appeals process,
for approving the siting of emergency shelters for a one-year period. HB 4001 received strong legislative
support in 2020. Draft omnibus legislation for a potential future special session has included the text of HB
4001 and the League expects to see HB 4001 reintroduced in the 2021 session.
This priority will empower cities and counties to proactively introduce alternative legislation, similar to
existing statute in California, which requires jurisdictions to identify places where shelters can locate
instead of mandating that jurisdictions allow shelters to be sited anywhere. The California model requires
cities and counties to accommodate their need for emergency shelters on sites where the use is allowed
without a conditional use permit and requires cities and counties to treat transitional and supportive
housing projects as a residential use of property.
Presented by the Community Development Committee
G. Green Energy/Renewables – Expanded Local Option
Legislation:
The LOC will pursue/support policies that increase local control opportunities for cities that want to
establish a community-scale green energy program. This program would be optional for cities that choose
to pursue it. Cities who choose to, would be allowed to adopt resolutions that would opt-in residential,
commercial, and industrial customers to a voluntary renewable energy option if it is provided by an
investor owned utility that serves the city and its electric customers. Under this proposed program, a city
would be able to pursue a more aggressive green energy portfolio and would better position cities to meet
local climate action goals.
Background:
Under current law, customers of investor-owned utilities can opt-in to voluntary renewable energy options
for their customers. These options allow customers to invest in additional green energy generation. In
2019, the state of Utah passed legislation (SB 411) that allows cities and counties to opt-in to programs on
a community-scale basis, while still allowing individual customers to opt-out. Under this proposal, any city
within the territory of an investor-owned utility, would be able to pursue this option for community-scale
renewable energy (net-100% renewable).
Presented by the Energy and Environment Committee
H. Housing and Services Investment
Legislation:
The League will support increased investments for affordable housing, homeless assistance, and related
services including funding for: shelter, homeless services, case management, rent assistance, the
development and preservation of affordable housing, and permanent supportive housing.
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
Background:
Cities large and small were facing escalating homelessness rates before the COVID-19 pandemic and the
current economic downturn will only increase the number of Oregonians facing eviction or experiencing
homelessness. State general fund programs like the Emergency Housing Assistance (EHA) and State
Homeless Assistance Program (SHAP) have seen record investments in previous legislative sessions. The
legislative emergency board also voted recently to dedicate $12M in general funds to support rent
assistance and safe shelter in response to COVID-19.
Oregon’s lack of available housing, high rents and high home prices are causing housing instability and
homelessness to increase. The Legislature has made record investments in recent years to fund the LIFT
affordable housing program and preserve Oregon’s existing affordable housing infrastructure. These
programs are funded through general obligation bonds and lottery backed bonds.
Permanent Supportive Housing is a key strategy for ending chronic homelessness that reduces downstream
costs to public systems like public safety, emergency health care and corrections. The 2019 Legislature
invested over $50M to stand up a three-pronged permanent supportive housing program that includes 1)
development costs to build, 2) rent assistance to keep units deeply affordable, and 3) wrap around services
that are key to ensuring residents’ long-term stability. The state should continue investing in this model to
bring more Permanent Supportive Housing across the state and ensure that the housing developed with the
original $50M continues receive the necessary ongoing funding for rent assistance and supportive services.
Presented by the Community Development Committee
I. Increased Budgetary Flexibility During Budgetary Emergency
Legislation:
The League proposes relaxing budgetary constraints in state law so that cities may better be able to
withstand revenue losses related to natural disasters and public health emergencies. These losses will
inevitably force many cities to cut services and lay off staff, the legislature can reduce the effect of losses
by increasing flexibility for use of funds during and after a declared emergency.
Background:
Cities anticipate a tremendous loss in revenue due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Reduced revenues already
include losses to lodging taxes, gas taxes, park fees, development fees, parking fees, utility charges, and so
on. Further out, there is widespread concern that there will be impacts to the real estate market going into
2021, and by extension a reduction in 2021-22 property tax revenues. Cities want maximum flexibility in
using funds that are subject to statutory limitations but will negotiate terms on individual funding sources
including payback requirements if necessary. This flexibility should apply during and after declared
emergencies, including both the current pandemic and future natural disasters.
Presented by the Finance and Taxation Committee
J. Infrastructure Financing and Resilience
Legislation:
The League will advocate for an increase in the state’s investment in key infrastructure funding sources,
including, but not limited to, the Special Public Works Fund (SPWF), Brownfield Redevelopment Fund,
and Regionally Significant Industrial Site loan program. The advocacy will include seeking an investment
and set aside through the SPWF for seismic resilience planning and related infrastructure improvements to
make Oregon water and wastewater systems more resilient.
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
Background:
Cities continue to face the challenge of how to fund infrastructure improvements (both to maintain current
and to build new). Increasing state resources in programs that provide access to lower rate loans and
grants will assist cities in investing in vital infrastructure. Infrastructure development impacts economic
development, housing, and livability. The level of funding for these programs has been inadequate
compared to the needs over the last few biennia and the funds are depleting and unsustainable without
significant program modifications and reinvestments. This priority will focus on maximizing both the
amount of funding and the flexibility of the funds to meet the needs of more cities across the state to
ensure long-term infrastructure investment.
Presented by the Community Development Committee
K. Local Climate Action Planning Resources
Legislation:
The LOC will seek grant funding and technical assistance resources for cities to pursue, adopt or expand
local climate action plans. In addition, the LOC will pursue opportunities to work with the Oregon Climate
Change Research Institute (through Oregon State University) to provide cities and counties with
local/regional data that can better inform the adoption and implementation of climate adaptation and
mitigation at the local level.
Background:
According to the Oregon Department of Energy’s 2018 Biennial Energy Report (BER), since the early
1990s, major international and U.S. scientific assessments have concluded that both climate change
mitigation and adaptation efforts are necessary in response to climate change. The BER goes on to explain
that adaptation is often thought of as actions “to prepare for and adjust to new conditions, thereby reducing
harm or taking advantage of new opportunities or simply to reduce society’s vulnerability to climate
change impacts.” Local climate action plans, adopted by cities or counties, can help communities better
understand how climate change will impact their communities, and can provide localized solutions to help
mitigate against the impacts of climate change. The LOC is aware of fourteen cities that have adopted local
climate action plans. There are other cities that are interested in doing the same but that do not have the
financial and/or staffing resources that are necessary.
Presented by the Energy and Environment Committee
L. Local Energy Generation Project Support
Legislation:
The LOC will support/pursue funding, technical assistance and other tools that make local energy
generation more feasible for cities to pursue.
Background:
Local energy generation projects can better position cities to pursue and achieve local climate action goals,
address capacity constraints of existing electric transmission lines, and can help cities respond to
individual businesses that may be seeking green energy options. The types of local energy generation
projects discussed by the committee include, but are not limited to, small-scale hydropower, in-conduit
hydropower, methane capture, biomass and solar. Such projects are not intended to conflict with existing
low-carbon power purchase agreements but can position cities to pursue local climate action goals and
supplement energy needs through renewable generation. Under this recommendation, the LOC will work
to identify barriers and potential solutions to local energy generation and will pursue funding assistance for
feasibility studies and project implementation.
Presented by the Energy and Environment Committee
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
M. Local Speed Setting Authority
Legislation:
Support legislation that provides legislative authority for ODOT to delegate local speed setting authority to
Oregon cities that meet state criteria. I Improve safety and speed limit consistency in Oregon cities by
establishing a clear delegation process that is consistent with recently adopted statewide speed zone rules.
(OAR 734-020-0014, 734-020-0015, and 734-020-0016). This will be permissive legislation allowing
cities to opt-in and thus will not be a mandate.
Background:
The state of Oregon and cities across the state are all committed to improving safety on our streets.
National and international research has shown that setting appropriate speed limits on city streets is a
critical tool for improving safety and saving lives. During the 2020 legislative session, HB 4103 gained
widespread support for setting up a collaborative process with ODOT and cities that opt into a process for
gaining local speed setting authority. Despite strong support, HB 4103 did not pass due to the legislative
clock running out. Going forward, LOC will work with safety advocates and cities and use HB 4103 from
the 2020 session as a template for legislation in 2021. Delegated authority should be made available to all
cities that meet ODOT’s criteria; participation by cities is permissive (not required). Cities should be able
to determine speeds that are adequate and safe for their communities, working within the OAR speed zone
framework. This will improve safety and make speed setting more consistent across local government
jurisdictions.
Presented by the Transportation Committee
N. Long Term Transportation Infrastructure Funding
Legislation:
Support expansion and consideration of revenue-generating options to fund multimodal transportation
infrastructure, which includes state and local facilities. Support state and local projects that are part of the
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program.
Background:
Oregon has made two significant state-wide transportation investments in the last 15 years. In 2009 the
Jobs and Transportation Act (JTA). This was a successful effort from local governments and the business
community to invest in maintenance and capacity building projects state-wide. In 2017, HB 2017
established Oregon’s first ever comprehensive, multimodal, transportation investment with what is known
as “Keep Oregon Moving,” which was a $5.3 billion package. Although HB 2017 will not have its full
funding until 2024 LOC and other transportation advocates will need to constantly explore other sources of
revenue including a possible future replacement of Oregon’s gas tax with a road user charge system.
Oregon has been pioneering a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) tax within the MyOReGo pilot program. The
program is voluntary and can provide several benefits to users. Ultimately the long-term structure for
transportation investment may well take on a similar structure.
Presented by the Transportation Committee, endorsed by the Community Development Committee
O. Low-Income Energy Efficiency and Affordability Programs
Legislation:
The LOC will provide support for programs that seek to expand upon low-income energy and heating
assistance programs, including programs targeted to make energy more affordable for rental properties. In
addition, the LOC will work to support programs that provide for energy bill payment assistance and
expand opportunities for low-income Oregonians to access resources for home weatherization.
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
Background:
According to Oregon Housing & Community Services, approximately 396,182, or about 25 percent of all
households, are considered energy-burdened because of their energy-related expenditures (as of 2018). A
household is considered energy burdened if six percent or more of its gross income is consumed by
energy-related expenses. In recent years, legislation has been introduced in Oregon that would have
provided additional assistance to low-income homeowners and renters that struggle with energy
affordability. Unfortunately, legislation did not pass. The need for such assistance has increased as a result
of the economic hardships resulting from COVID-19. In addition to bill payment assistance, there is a need
for programs that will support low-income home weatherization in order to make energy bills more
affordable in the long-term.
Presented by the Energy and Environment Committee
P. Marijuana Tax Local Rate Limitation Increase
Legislation:
The League proposes increasing the current 3% cap on local marijuana taxes. This would give local voters
greater choice in choosing a rate that reflects their needs or their community.
Background:
Retailers licensed by the Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) are required to charge a state-
imposed retail sales tax of 17 percent for all recreational marijuana sold. Cities and counties
(unincorporated areas only) may also impose a local retail sales tax of up to 3%, subject to voter approval.
Tax rates for recreational marijuana vary widely across the states, but the total Oregon tax burden at a
maximum of 20% is the lowest of West Coast states. Washington imposes a 37% state excise tax, but with
a state sales tax of 6.5% and local rates of up to 1.9% the total rate can reach over 45%. California has a
retail tax of only 15%, but with a state sales tax of 7.5% and local taxes up to 15.25% the total rate can
reach up to 37.75%. Oregon consistently ranks among the lowest of the states for marijuana prices. Cities
are sensitive to the desire to not push consumers to the black market and will work with the legislature on
an increased cap that balances that concern with local revenue needs.
Presented the Finance and Tax Committee
Q. Mental Health Service Delivery
Legislation:
Support the delivery of mental health services in order to reduce negative police interactions and ensure
that those in need receive the help they require.
Background:
The Committee and the LOC membership have prioritized the delivery of mental health services periodically over
the last 5 years. Items contained in this priority have included crisis intervention training for police officer,
mobile police and social worker teams to proactively work with people in danger of going into crisis, jail
diversion, mental health courts and greater access to care. In the immediate past short session, the LOC worked
with its coalition partners to obtain $9 million in additional funding for aid-and-assist, community care and jail
diversion but was unsuccessful due to a lack of quorum.
While the measurements are subjective and not in general agreement, most surveys of behavioral health and
alcohol and drug addiction service availability place Oregon near or at the bottom of state rankings. As a result,
Oregon ranks third in the nation for alcohol related deaths, and above the national average in suicides.
Anecdotally, most police chiefs that have participated in LOC conversations on this topic report a growing
number of calls for service stemming from people in mental health crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic has
exacerbated some of these issues with Portland Police Bureau reporting a 41% increase in suicide related calls
(including attempts and threats) over this time last year. This priority would include but not be limited to:
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
Investment: The stark truth is that Oregon has never financially supported mental health services at a level
commensurate with need. More beds and more capacity will allow for greater delivery. The spending plan may
be complicated but many advocates bristle at the idea of “mental health reform” when it’s never been funded as a
priority. The League does not have a specific number at this time but is in conversation with partners to develop
one.
Decimalization of Mental Illness: People suffering from mental illness that interact with the criminal justice
system typically spend more time incarcerated and suffer a disruption in treatment. Jail diversion has been
something the League has advocated for in previous sessions and but will require changes in law, training and
investments.
Workgroups Outcomes: There are currently several workgroups developing behavioral health reform plans that
have yet to be completed, much of that work has been interrupted by COVID 19. LOC staff can update the
Committee on these their work continues but cannot make recommendations on them now.
Alcohol Availability: The prevalence of cheap and potent alcoholic beverages that are produced and sold for the
express purpose of achieving rapid intoxication has been a concern for Oregon Recovers, an advocacy group for
those recovering from addiction. OLCC sells several 750 ml bottles for under $10 and some as low as $5.
Creating a minimum price per international unit of alcohol has had an impact on consumption of cheap, potent
beverages in Scotland and is believed to have had an impact on consumption there. Raising the price of low cost
but high-volume products would also increase city shared revenue and provide additional funding for behavioral
health services.
Mental Health Parity: Oregon and the federal government have enacted statutes to ensure that mental health
services are treated as a health issues in a manner identical to physical health by health insurers. The legislative
intent behind these laws has not been met as evidence by reports of denied coverage. Ensuring effective parity
would increase treatment an access.
Presented by the General Government/Human Resources Committee, endorsed by the Community
Development Committee
R. Municipal Broadband and Pole Protection
Legislation:
Oppose legislative efforts to restrict existing municipal authority to provide broadband services, and own and
operate poles in the rights-of-way.
Background:
As the public grows more dependent on the Internet for expanding parts of their lives, community choices for
gaining access at a reasonable price, for both consumers and producers, are dwindling. Some municipalities
choose to become service providers themselves. Municipal broadband is sometimes the only way to bring high
speed internet to a community and it can serve as an access point to neighboring communities. Additionally,
municipal broadband adds competition to the market and can help lower prices for community members. As there
is a push for more connectivity and bridging the digital the divide, the LOC will protect localities rights to be
internet service providers for their own communities. Additionally, as more and more small cell and 5G
technology is deployed in the rights-of-way, the LOC will protect the right of municipalities to own, operate and
regulate attachments that are allowed on their poles.
Presented by the Telecom, Broadband & Cable Committee
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
S. New Mobility Services
Legislation:
Support for a variety of new mobility services that promote a safe, sustainable, and equitable multimodal
transportation system, while preserving local government's authority to regulate services and ensure they
best serve the local context.
Background:
Transportation mobility has been rapidly changing over the last few years. The emergence of ridesharing
services such as Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) now provide the public with more options to
get from point “a” to point “b.” New platforms continue to emerge such as scooters, shared bikes, electric
delivery tricycles for package delivery and the possibility of future driverless delivery and vehicle fleets.
Cities must have the flexibility to address the impacts of emerging technologies on their communities such
as increased congestion and air pollution while protecting consumers and maintaining a safe transportation
network that recognizes the unique needs of individual communities.
Presented by the Transportation Committee
T. Photo Enforcement Safety Cameras
Legislation:
Support continuation and expansion of fixed speed and red-light cameras and mobile speed radar state-
wide to improve public safety in high-crash corridors. Explore changes that enable more streamlined
processing of citations. Allow for local governments to form IGA’s with other local governments to
facilitate the use of safety cameras and mobile radar in their communities.
Background:
The Oregon Transportation Safety Action Plan sets a goal of no deaths or life-changing injuries on
Oregon’s transportation system by 2035. In 2015, the Oregon Legislature granted the city of Portland the
authority to implement a fixed speed safety camera program (HB 2621). Portland’s fixed speed camera
systems have been operating on “urban high crash corridors” for the past several years. Data collected at
these locations shows a distinct change in driver behavior that has reduced the risk of collisions (See
PBOT Report). Under existing statutes, photo radar is allowed in the cities of Albany, Beaverton, Bend,
Eugene, Gladstone, Medford, Milwaukie, Oregon City, Portland and Tigard. LOC’s goal is to bring this
authority state-wide providing all cities with the choice of operating speed radar in their communities to
improve safety and reduce the risk of high-speed crashes.
Presented by the Transportation Committee
U. Property Tax Reform
Legislation:
The League of Oregon Cities proposes that the Legislature refer a constitutional measure and take statutory
action to reform the property tax system as part of the 2021 session. With the passage of the Corporate
Activities Tax Oregon has taken a step towards long term financial stability at the state and school district
level, but local budgetary challenges persist and the legislature must take action to allow cities and other
local governments to adequately fund the services that residents demand.
Background:
The property tax system is broken and in need of repair due to Measures 5 and 50, which are both now over 20
years old. The current system is inequitable to property owners and jurisdictions alike, is often inadequate to
allow jurisdictions to provide critical services, removes all local choice, and is incomprehensible to the majority
of taxpayers. Local governments and schools rely heavily on property tax revenues to pay for services and capital
expenses. Therefore, the League will take a leadership role in forming coalitions to help draft and advocate for
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
both comprehensive and incremental property tax reform option packages. The League will remain flexible to
support all legislation that improves the system, with a focus on a property tax package that includes, but may not
be limited to these elements:
• To restore local choice, a system that allows voters to adopt tax levies and establish tax rates outside of
current limits and not subject to compression (requires constitutional referral).
• To achieve equity, a system that has taxpayers’ relative share tied to the value of their property, rather
than the complex and increasingly arbitrary valuation system based on assessed value from Measure 50
(requires constitutional referral).
• To enhance fairness and adequacy, a system that makes various statutory changes, some of which would
adjust the impact of the above changes. For example, as a part of comprehensive reform the League
supports a new reasonable homestead exemption (percentage of RMV with a cap) but also supports
limiting or repealing various property tax exemptions that do not have a reasonable return on investment.
Presented by the Finance and Tax Committee, endorsed by the Community Development Committee
V. Reducing Wastewater Impacts from Wipes and Other “Non-Flushables”
Legislation:
The LOC will work with other stakeholders, including the Oregon Association of Clean Water Agencies
address challenges resulting from wipes and other non-flushable items. Legislation pursued will likely
focus on requirements for manufacturers to clearly label product packaging to indicate that the product
should not be flushed, however, the LOC will additionally explore other viable opportunities to address the
public health, environmental and economic challenges resulting from improper disposal of these products.
Background:
In recent years, public wastewater systems have experienced significant increases in sewer line clogs,
environmental impacts, infrastructure impacts and costs associated with wipes being flushed down toilets.
Most wipes don’t break down when flushed, and even wipes that are labeled as “flushable” can clog
pipelines and pumps and can cause sewage overflows in residences and the environment. The COVID-19
pandemic has made this challenge even worse due to shortages of toilet paper and increased use of
disinfecting wipes. The EPA and other national organizations, as well as statewide and local wastewater
agencies, are working to get the message out to avoid costly as well as environmental impacts of wipes in
our sewer and treatment systems. In March of 2020, the state of Washington passed legislation requiring
manufacturers to label products with a “do not flush” logo if the product does not meet national
“flushability” standards (i.e. breaking down in the sewer system).
Presented by the Water/Wastewater Committee
W. Right-of-Way/Franchise Fees Authority Preservation
Legislation:
Oppose legislation that, in any way, preempts local authority to manage public rights-of-way and cities’
ability to set the rate of compensation for the use of such rights-of-way.
Background:
In its commitment to the protection of Home Rule and local control, the LOC consistently opposes restrictions on
the rights of cities to manage their own affairs. From time to time, in the context of public rights-of-way
management authority discussions, legislative proposals to restrict this authority arise. Efforts to restrict local
authority often include proposals for a statewide right-of-way access policy and compensation system as well as
limiting the ability of cities to charge fees of other government entities. This is contrary to local government
management authority; the ability to enter into agreements with users of the right-of-way either by
agreement/contract or ordinance; to set terms of right-of-way use and to set the rate of compensation. In recent
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
years the FCC has passed rulemaking through various orders like the Small Cell Orders (FCC 18-133 and FCC
18-111) and the Cable Franchising Order (FCC 19-80) that erode cities’ right-of-way and franchising authority.
Local governments around the U.S. are fighting these orders in court. There is a fear that the language of these
orders will be codified in state legislatures. This would mean if the orders are overturned in court at the federal
level, they will still impact cities in states that have passed laws codifying the orders.
Presented by the Telecom, Broadband & Cable Committee
X. State Highway Funds Formula
Legislation:
Consider opening the state highway fund distribution formula to allow for an additional percentage to
cities. Currently the split is 50-30-20 with the State receiving 50%, Counties receiving 30% and the
balance going to Cities 20%.
Background:
Oregon has had a distribution formula for the state highway fund for decades. This fund combines the
revenues generated from the state’s gas tax, weight-mile tax on heavy trucks, licenses, fees, and bond
proceeds. Approximately 77 percent of the total revenue collected by Oregon Department of
Transportation (ODOT) is from state sources, while only 23 percent comes from federal sources. During
the 2017 session base level funding for the least populated counties was established along with a $5
million-dollar small city fund for cities under 5,000 in population with a maximum award of $100,000 and
no match requirement. LOC will engage with other transportation interests to determine if there is
adequate support to advance legislation that would revisit the current 50-30-20 distribution.
Presented by the Transportation Committee
Y. Tort Liability Reform
Legislation:
COVID-19 and existing federal court decisions have added risk exposure to cities in areas where their
authority has been limited or have not received adequate support. This priority seeks to ensure that cities
are not held liable in these areas.
Background:
CIS has already had a COVID related claim filed against it for a COVID related exposure. While there
may be many legitimate reasons for a person to seek damages related to the outbreak, local governments
have been hampered by inadequate supplies of PPE, testing capability, direct financial support, and
legislative relief.
Additionally, the Boise decision that prevents cities from enforcing no camping rules and ordinances
subject cities to additional tort liability. The ruling holds that if a person has no place else to go, a city
must allow them to sleep somewhere. While there is a logical basis for the core of the ruling, if a city
allows a person to sleep in an area that is not designed for camping, such as a park, the person may seek
damages. Please note that recreational users of parks may not seek damages due to Oregon’s recreational
immunity statute that were corrected in 2017.
Finally, in previous sessions, legislation has been introduced but not passed to require cities to permit
shelters in areas where they may not be appropriate and “codify” the Boise decision in state law. This
legislation did not include immunity from tort liability while removing city authority.
Presented by the General Government/Human Resources Committee
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
Z. Water Utility Rate and Fund Assistance
Legislation:
The League will work during the 2021 legislative session to provide water utility funding assistance for
ratepayers that are experiencing ongoing or recent economic hardships. In addition, the LOC will work to
identify opportunities for additional investments in public infrastructure, including water supply,
wastewater treatment, stormwater management, green infrastructure opportunities and resilience for water
systems. Finally, the LOC Water & Wastewater Policy Committee has identified a need for additional,
targeted grant funding assistance that will benefit smaller communities. This includes additional funding to
conduct rate studies, feasibility studies and funding to help communities comply with new regulatory
requirements, including the requirement to include a seismic risk assessment and mitigation plan within
regular water master plan updates.
Background:
In response to economic impacts associated with the spread of COVID-19, many of Oregon’s drinking
water and wastewater utility providers have offered additional assistance to ratepayers. The LOC is aware
that most water utility providers have temporarily ceased water service shut offs (disconnections) for non-
payment or past due bill collection during this period of economic hardship. Impacts associated with
residential ratepayer revenue losses and decreased water consumption from businesses that have either
closed or limited operations has resulted in revenue losses for many Oregon water utility providers. Some
water utilities have outstanding debt from prior infrastructure investments and have expressed concerns
that reductions in revenue may impact the ability to make the ongoing debt payments. In addition, the
economic hardships that are being experienced by many Oregonians, especially in low-income and
minority communities, will be ongoing; highlighting the need for additional ratepayer assistance
investments that focuses on equity and our most vulnerable populations.
The LOC will work to identify funding for water utility ratepayer assistance and will work to establish a
framework for the distribution of funds and will seek to ensure that this crisis does not exacerbate existing
inequities, especially for Black, Indigenous, other Communities of Color and for rural Oregonians.
In addition, while COVID-19 has created unique revenue challenges for water utility providers, a key issue
that most cities continue to face is how to fund infrastructure improvements (including maintaining,
repairing and replacing existing infrastructure and building new infrastructure to address capacity and
regulatory requirements). Increasing resources in programs that provide access to lower-rate loans and
infrastructure-specific grants will assist cities in investing in vital infrastructure improvements which will
also help bolster economic recovery. Infrastructure development impacts economic development, housing,
and livability. The level of funding for these programs has been inadequate compared to the needs over the
last few biennia and the funds are depleting and unsustainable without significant program modifications
and reinvestments.
The LOC will pursue additional funding through the state’s Special Public Works Fund, which provides
funding assistance through Business Oregon for a variety of public infrastructure needs and will explore
state bonding capacity opportunities for water-specific infrastructure needs. In addition, LOC will pursue
funding for small communities that face regulatory and operational challenges. Examples of small-
community funding assistance opportunities may include expanded grant opportunities through existing
funding programs and additional funding assistance to help communities with regulatory compliance and
engage in utility best practices, including rate studies.
Presented by the Water/Wastewater Committee, endorsed by the Community Development Committee
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)
Acknowledgements
Thank you to all that participated in the policy committee process.
Community Development
Committee
Brian Latta, Dallas (Chair)
Timothy Rippe, Forest Grove (Vice-Chair)
Tom Armstrong, Portland
Michael Boquist, La Grande
Barbara Bull, Corvallis
Steve Clements, La Grande
Katy Dunsmuir, Estacada
Len Goodwin, Veneta
Allen Hobson, Winston
Kelly Madding, Ashland
Hilary Norton, Halsey
Heather Richards, McMinnville
Scot Siegel, Lake Oswego
Michael Sykes, Scappoose
Derrick Tokos, Newport
Ryan Wells, Cornelius
Kenna West, Willamina
John Williams, West Linn
Steve Wright, Seaside
Stacy Cowan, Portland
Erik Kancler, Bend
Ethan Nelson, Eugene
Eric Noll, State, Portland
Anne Davies, Lane Council of
Governments
Spencer Parsons, Beery, Elsner &
Hammond
Ariel Nelson, LOC
Energy & Environment
Committee
Steve Uffelman, Prineville (Chair)
Kathryn Hyzy, Milwaukie (Vice-Chair)
Thomas Brownson, Astoria
Steve Dahl, Drain
Steve Forrester, Prineville
Jerry Gillham, Sutherlin
Tonya Graham, Ashland
Scott Hill, McMinnville
Theresa Kohlhoff, Lake Oswego
Vinh Mason, Portland
Sandra Spelliscy, Talent
Biff Traber, Corvallis
Stacy Cowan, Portland
Jennifer Joly, OMEU
Tracy Rutten, LOC
Finance & Taxation Committee
Don Hudson, Tualatin (Chair)
Paul Chalmers, Pendleton (Vice-Chair)
Martha Bennett, Lake Oswego
David Bodway, Sherwood
Nancy Brewer, Corvallis
Thomas Brownson, Astoria
Gretchen Buehner, King City
Barbara Bull, Corvallis
Katy Dunsmuir, Estacada
Jessica Eden, Portland
Joseph Gall, Sherwood
Peter Hall, Haines
Bessie Johnson, Albany
Suzanne Lineen, Hillsboro
Heidi Lueb, Tigard
Anthony Martin, Hillsboro
Brian McDowell, Union
Seth Reeser, Wood Village
Tim Rosener, Sherwood
Byron Smith, Hermiston
Jim Snyder, Phoenix
Andrew Struthers, Corvallis
Tyler Wallace, Portland
Kenna West, Willamina
Steve Wright, Seaside
Eric Chambers, Gresham
Ethan Nelson, Eugene
Eric Noll, Portland
Carol Samuels, Piper Sandler & Co.
Mark Gharst, LOC
General Government/Human
Resources Committee
Jake Boone, Cottage Grove (Chair)
Aaron Cubic, Grants Pass (Vice-Chair)
David Allen, Newport
David Bodway, Sherwood
Jerry Gillham, Sutherlin
Mark Gissiner, Eugene
Jeff Groth, Sherwood
Cathy Henson, Portland
Allen Hobson, Winston
Bessie Johnson, Albany
Heidi Lueb, Councilor, Tigard
Stephanie Moran, Junction City
Lisa Morgan, Prineville
Ethan Nelson, Eugene
Jim Snyder, Phoenix
Steve Uffelman, Prineville
Tyler Wallace, Portland
Stacy Cowan, Portland
Eric Noll, Portland
Scott Winkels, LOC
Telecom, Broadband and Cable
Committee
Peter Truax, Forest Grove (Chair)
Ryan Zink, Salem (Vice-Chair)
Pam Berrian, Eugene
Steve Callaway, Hillsboro
Len Goodwin, Veneta
Anne Hill, Portland
Robert Kellogg, Tualatin
Marilyn Morton, Independence
Elisabeth Perez, Portland
Seth Reeser, Wood Village
Heather Richards, McMinnville
Tim Rosener, Sherwood
Byron Smith, Hermiston
Pam Vaughan, Corvallis
Nancy Wyse, Corvallis
Maja Haium, Portland
Jennifer Joly, OMEU
Eric Noll, Portland
Reba Crocker, ROW Consultants LLC
Anne Davies, Pricipal Attorney, Lane
Council of Governments
Spencer Parsons, Beery, Elsner &
Hammond
Chris Tamarin, Buisness Oregon
Jenna Jones, LOC
Transportation Committee
Ken Woods, Dallas (Chair)
Timm Slater, North Bend (Vice-Chair)
Mike Bisset, McMinnville
Tom Boyatt, Springfield
Gretchen Buehner, King City
Steve Callaway, Hillsboro
Shoshana Cohen, Portland
Joseph Gall, Sherwood
Scott Hill, McMinnville
Rob Inerfeld, Eugene
Robert Kellogg, Tualatin
Theresa Kohloff, Lake Oswego
Jamie Kranz, Troudale
Brian Latta, Dallas
Keith Mays, Sherwood
Walt Perry, Jefferson
Michael, Quilty, Central Point
Timothy Rippe, Forest Grove
Tim Rosener, Sherwood
Michael Sykes, Scappoose
Biff Traber, Corvallis
Julie Warncke, Salem
John Williams, West Linn
Stacy Cowan, Portland
Kayla Hootsmans, ODOT
Jim McMauley, LOC
Water/Wastewater Committee
Jason Pulley, Salem (Chair)
Niki Iverson, Hillsboro (Vice Chair)
Alice Brawley-Chesworth, Portland
Steve Dahl, Drain
Tim Gross, Newport
Jan Lee, Sandy
Brian McDowell, Union
Sara Petrocine, Portland
Paul Rheault, Bend
Dean Sawyer, Newport
Julie Smitherman, Ashland
Eric Noll, Portland
Susie Smith, ACWA
Tracy Rutten, LOC
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: LOC 2021 Leg Priority Ballot - Final (1293 : League of Oregon Cities Legislative Priorities)