HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 5, 2020 Planning Commission PacketA
CENTRAL
POINT
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
May 5, 2020 - 6:00 p.m.
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
Planning Commission members, Mike Oliver (chair), Tom Van Voorhees, Amy Moore,
Jim Mock, Pat Smith, Kay Harrison, Chris Richey
IV. CORRESPONDENCE
V. MINUTES
Review and approval of the February 4, 2020 Planning Commission meeting minutes.
VI. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
VII. BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing to consider a Tentative Plan for the development of an 8 -lot
commercial subdivision. The project site is located in the C-4, Tourist and Office
Professional commercial zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County
Assessor's map as 37 2W 01C, Tax Lot 700. Applicant: South Salem, LLC,
Agent: Rogue Planning & Development Services, LLC
B. Public Hearing to consider a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map Amendment
to change the zoning designation on multiple properties south of Bush Street
between South 4th and South 1 st Streets from C -2(M) Commercial -Medical to R-
1-6 (Residential Single Family) and Civic. The properties involved in this
application are identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W
11BC, Tax Lots 800 through 5000 and 37S 2W11BL, Tax Lots 100-700.
Applicant: City of Central Point
VIII. DISCUSSION
A. Development Update
Individuals needing special accommodations such as sign language, foreign language interpreters or equipment for the hearing impaired
must request such services at least 72 hours prior to the City Council meeting. To make your request, please contact the City Recorder at
541-423-1026 (voice), or by e-mail at: de_anna.caseyji2central2ointoregon.-gov .
Si necesita traductor en espar3ol o servicios de discapacidades (ADA) para asistir a una junta publica de la ciudad por favor Ilame con
72 horas de anticipaci6n al 541-664-3321 ext. 201.
IX. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS
X. MISCELLANEOUS
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Individuals needing special accommodations such as sign language, foreign language interpreters or equipment for the hearing impaired
must request such services at least 72 hours prior to the City Council meeting. To make your request, please contact the City Recorder at
541-423-1026 (voice), or by e-mail at: deatina.casey(pceiitrifpointoregon.;ov .
Si necesita traductor en espaiiol o servicios de discapacidades (ADA) para asistir a una junta publica de la ciudad por favor flame con
72 horas de anticipaci6n al 541-664-3321 ext. 201.
City of Central Point Planning
Commission Minutes
February 4, 2020
I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 6:04 P.M
II. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Mike Oliver (chair), Tom Van Voorhees, Amy Moore, Pat Smith, Chris
Richey and Kay Harrison and Jim Mock were present. Also in attendance were: Tom
Humphrey, Community Development Director, Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner
and Karin Skelton, Planning Secretary.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIENCE
III. CORRESPONDENCE
Letter dated January 24, 2020 from Jackson County regarding Grant Road annexation
IV. MINUTES
Kay Harrison made a motion to approve the January 7, 2020 minutes. Pat Smith seconded the
motion. ROLL CALL: Tom Van Voorhees, yes; Kay Harrison, yes; Amy Moore, abstain; Jim Mock,
yes; Chris Richey, yes; Pat Smith, yes; Motion passed.
V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES
There were no public appearances.
VI. BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing for a Zone Map Change application. The zoning is proposed for
change from Employment Commercial (TOD) to General Commercial (TOD). The
0.99 acres are located in the western portion of the City's downtown corridor. The
project Site is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37-2W-10AA,
Tax Lots 6000 and 6100, Zoning Map and Zoning Code Text Amendments; and
CPMC 17.65 TOD Districts and Corridors.
Planning Commission Chair Mike Oliver stated this item is a public hearing and he read the rules for a
quasi-judicial hearing. The commissioners had no conflicts of interest, ex parte contact or bias to declare.
Community Development Director Tom Humphrey stated this item was presented to the Planning
Commission as a discussion item at the January 7, 2020 meeting. At that time the city was waiting for the
traffic analysis to be completed. The Commissioners directed him to proceed with the public hearing as
soon as the traffic study was complete. At this time the analysis has been completed and it has been
concluded the zone change will add no additional traffic issues. He explained the differences between the
Employment Commercial zone and the General Commercial zone stating the General Commercial zone
allows manufacturing and sales on the property whereas the Employment Commercial zone only allows
retail sales. He said the purpose of this change is to comply with the comprehensive plan, the
transportation planning rule and to facilitate expansion of a local business. He said it is compatible with
the surrounding area. The commissioners had no questions.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 4, 2020
Page 2
The public hearing was opened.
Craig Nelson, Medford
Mr. Nelson said he was the facility maintenance manager of the Rogue Creamery. The Creamery intends
to develop the property to expand their business. There were no questions.
The public hearing was closed.
Mr. Humphrey reviewed the differences in the zones. The Commissioners discussed the various
businesses in the area and concluded the change would not affect traffic or existing businesses.
Pat Smith made a motion to approve Resolution 878, a zone map change application to change from
Employment Commercial (TOD) to General Commercial (TOD). Kay Harrison seconded the motion.
ROLL CALL: Tom Van Voorhees, yes; Kay Harrison, yes; Amy Moore, yes; Jim Mock, yes; Chris
Richey, yes; Pat Smith, yes; Motion passed.
B. Public Hearing of an Annexation application at 3364 Grant Road to add 3.16 acres
of land into the City limits of low density residential development. The property is identified on the
Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 10 BC Tax Lot 2200. Applicant: WL Moore
Construction, Inc. Agent: Herb Farber. File No Annex -19001. Approval Criteria: ORS 222.125
(Annexation by consent for all owners of land and majority of electors): Proclamation of
Annexation as well as CPMC 1.20 Annexation Procedures.
Mike Oliver said the rules for a quasi-judicial hearing remained as previously stated. Amy Moore said
she was a principal at WL Moore Construction, Inc. and recused herself. There were no other conflicts of
interest, bias or ex parte contact declared.
Mr. Humphrey said this application is to annex land from the UGB and will increase the low density
residential inventory. The property is 3.16 acres located at 3664 Grant Road and is a single tax lot.
Including the Right of Way the annexed property will total 3.44 acres. There is an irrigation pond on the
site which will be addressed at the time of development. He explained the city cannot evaluate the
property until it is annexed. He gave examples of other subdivisions that had originally contained ponds
and wetlands and how those had been developed in the past.
Mr. Humphrey referred to the letter from Jackson County. He said the original submittal for the
annexation included a site plan showing a subdivision. He said the County provided comments regarding
roads, traffic and infrastructure. Those issues would be addressed at the time a tentative plat was
submitted. At this time the only issue was annexation. He added the property would be zoned R-1-10
which was low density. He added Public Works has indicated there are sufficient services in proximity to
the property.
Mike Oliver asked Chris Richey to read the County's letter into the record. Mr. Richey did so.
Mr. Humphrey explained how the jurisdiction of the roads would change at the time of the UGB
amendment.
Amy Moore
Ms. Moore stated she was a principal with WL Moore Construction and would be happy to answer any
questions. She reviewed the proposed plans stating there were mature trees on the property and they
would retain as many as possible.
Planning Commission Meeting
February 4, 2020
Page 3
Public Hearing was opened.
Daniel Coontz, Blue Heron Dr.
Mr. Coontz said he was very concerned about the development of that property. He said there were two
easements on his property and he wanted more information about utility construction. He was upset that
there would be trees removed. He also wanted information regarding the pond on the property.
Robin Garnica, Mendolia Way
Ms. Garnica said her property is on the east side of the subject property and is lower than the subject
property. She was concerned about drainage and how that was going to be handled. She also asked for
information regarding the R-1-10 zone
Mr. Humphrey explained the annexation is the first step in the process. The development would come at
a later date and would be a duly noticed public hearing and concerns regarding development would be
appropriate at that time. The applicant would then be able to demonstrate how these issues will be
addressed. He said there would be a public hearing on this annexation at the City Council meeting on
February 13, 2020 and everyone was welcome to attend.
The commissioners clarified the annexation was only to decide if the application met the criteria to bring
the land into the city limits and did not address any other issues.
Mr. Coontz asked if Ms. Moore was a member of the Planning Commission and if that was a conflict.
Mike Oliver said she was but she had recused herself and would not vote on this application.
Chris Richey made a motion to recommend approval of the annexation application at 3364 Grant Road to
add 3.16 acres of land into the City limits of low density residential development. Pat Smith seconded
the motion.
The commissioners discussed the annexation process and noticing requirements. Several members of the
audience expressed concern about negative impacts on surrounding properties.
Roll Call: Tom Van Voorhees, yes; Kay Harrison, yes; Jim Mock, yes; Chris Richey, yes; Pat Smith, yes;
Motion passed.
VII. DISCUSSION
Hazard Mitigation Plan update
Community planner Justin Gindlesperger said this update is a review of the risk assessment
portion of the Hazard Mitigation Plan. He said the purpose of the plan is to prepare the city and
its residents to be able to recover quickly from any loss or damage. He said the risk assessment
process includes identification of hazards, assessment of vulnerability and risk analysis. The
hazards the city is subject to are earthquake, flood, wildfire, severe weather, drought, volcanic
eruptions and landslides. He said vulnerability is assessed by evaluating the overlap between
natural hazards and community assets such as people, economy, built environment and natural
environment. The process of analyzing risk takes into account exposure analysis, historical
analysis and scenario analysis. He provided examples of each type of analysis. He then
Planning Commission Meeting
February 4, 2020
Page 4
showed how each hazard is ranked (high, medium or low risk) and which ones the city would
be most susceptible to.
The commissioners discussed the different hazards.
Mr. Gindlesperger stated the next steps will be to draft mitigation strategies and action items.
He hoped the plan would be completed by summer. He said after the plan has been approved
by the City, it would need to be approved by the State and FEMA.
B. Planning Update
• Central Point Station at Twin Creeks. It is a mixed use building with commercial use on
the first floor and residential on the upper floors.
• Domino's Pizza is moving ahead with the lot line adjustment for the property on
Freeman Court
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS
IX. MISCELLANEOUS
X. ADJOURNMENT
Tom Van Voorhees moved to adjourn the meeting. Pat Smith seconded the motion. All
members said "aye". Meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
Planning Commission Chair
61
City of Central Point, Oregon Ak
140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 CENTRAL
541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 POINT
www.centralpointoregon.gov
Oregon
STAFF REPORT
May 5, 2020
AGENDA ITEM: VII -A File No. PAR -20001
Community Development
Tom Humphrey, AICP
Community Development Director
Consideration of a Subdivision Tentative Plan for the development of an eight (8) lot commercial
subdivision in the Tourist and Office -Professional (C-4) Zoning District. The project site is located at
4245 Table Rock Road on property identified on the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37 2W 01C Tax
Lot 700. Applicant: South Salem, LLC; Agent: Rogue Planning & Development Services, LLC
STAFF SOURCE:
Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner II
BACKGROUND:
The applicant is proposing an eight (8) lot commercial subdivision on an approximately 7.01 acre
property at the southwest corner of Biddle Road and Table Rock Road (Attachment "A-1"). The
subdivision will provide for a variety of commercial uses with common access and circulation that will
function as a shopping center. Future developments on the individual lots will be subject to land use and
Site Plan and Architectural Review requirements.
Biddle and Table Rock Road are Jackson County Major Arterial roadways that require consolidated
access drives to serve the proposed lots. This is accomplished with a Private Retail Street that provides
east/west connectivity between Hamrick and Table Rock Road through existing development to the west.
As shown on the Tentative Plan, the Private Retail Streets have been designed to meet the City's block
length standards.
Water and sewer utilities are located just west of the subject property (Attachment "A-2"). Separate
services are required for each parcel and will require mainline extensions into the property from the
existing utility mains. Storm water facilities are located within the existing retail street to the west of the
site (Attachment "A-3").
ISSUES:
There are two (2) issues relative to this application as follows:
1. Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The applicant's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) examined trip
generation calculations for the proposed commercial subdivision and considered the effects on
adjacent streets with current and future traffic volumes. Per the TIA, the queue lengths at the
approaches following construction of the commercial subdivision will impact traffic on the
adjacent streets.
Comment: Comments from Jackson County Roads recommends limiting the turning movements
from the development to right -in, right -out, left -in (RIROLI) at the approaches to the public
streets. Staff recommends Condition No. 2(b) requiring the applicant to complete the access
improvements along Biddle Road and Table Rock Road in accordance with Jackson County
requirements.
140 South Third Street • Central Point, OR 97502 • 541.664.3321 • 541.664.6384
7
2. Block Perimeter. The newly created block, located north of the proposed retail street and west
of the retail street connecting to Biddle Road, is 2,153 feet in perimeter and exceeds the 2,000
foot block perimeter standard in CPMC 17.75.03l(B)(1).
Comment: In accordance with CPMC 17.75.031(13)(4)(d), the block perimeter standard may be
modified due to traffic safety concerns. The Private Retail Street access on Table Rock is 455 -ft
from the intersection of Table Rock and Biddle Road. Although the typical intersection spacing
distance is 300 -ft, the increased distance was deemed necessary to increase safety and traffic
movement. Staff recommends this adjustment to the block perimeter be approved as proposed to
minimize potential traffic safety concerns.
FINDINGS:
The proposed tentative plan has been reviewed against all applicable sections of 16.10, 16.24 and 17.75 of
the Central Point Municipal Code and found to comply as conditioned in the Staff Report dated May 5,
2020, the Applicant's Findings (Attachment "B") and the Planning Department Supplemental Findings
(Attachment "D").
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Prior to Final Plat approval, the applicant shall:
1. Provide documentation from the Jackson County Surveyor's Office that the name of the proposed
subdivision is unique relative to other approved land divisions in Jackson County.
2. Demonstrate compliance with all agency conditions of approval including the following:
a. Satisfy conditions of approval in the Public Works Staff Report dated April 15, 2020
(Attachment "E").
b. Satisfy conditions of approval in the Jackson County Roads and Engineering Staff
Report, dated April 27, 2020 (Attachment "F").
c. Comply with conditions of approval provided by the Rogue Valley Sewer Services in a
letter dated April 10, 2020 (Attachment "G").
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A"
— Tentative Plan Map
Attachment "B"
— Application Narrative
Attachment "C"
— Traffic Impact Analysis, dated 02-24-2020
Attachment "D"
— Planning Department Supplemental Findings
Attachment "E" —
Parks & Public Works Department Staff Report, dated 04-15-2020
Attachment "F" —
Jackson County Roads and Engineering Department Staff Report, dated 04-27-2020
Attachment "G"
— Rogue Valley Sewer Services Staff Report, dated 04-10-2020
Attachment "H"
— Resolution No. 879.
ACTION:
Consideration of Resolution No. 879 for the Table Rock Crossing Subdivision Tentative Plan and 1)
approve; 2) approve with revisions: or 3) deny the application.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Table Rock Crossing Subdivision Tentative Plan per the Staff Report dated May 5, 2020.
N.T.S. I
IFE il(
+ oa y
1S A � .
Ai
PRORC7 SITE
clrr ^R,
MruFEro
iwiwcii
VICINITY MAP
1
TENTATIVE PLAT
TABLE ROCK CROSSING SUBDIVISION
IdCATED WI
*MM I OF [AMD FRRT771011 F -OI -»!0
IN THE SW f /i DF SECTION T, 1375. R�ZW. WM,
CITY OF CEH RAL PRINT, JACKSON CDISNTY, OR,
AIZOWNE
sAuMzr tr
P.O. BOX 4450
-EIEOFORD, CREGON 4762s
-(541) 173-8325
AMEM
HOFFDUIIR a ASSOGIATES. 1N c.
80D OOEI VIEW DRIVE, '3417[ 20r
1+EDFORD, DAMON 9750+
(340 776••4841
AMI1
ROQUE PEJ WNQ R MELOPIIENT
U N. Cp b /213
"Wo D.
OREGCl1 97y01
(54s) 251-4020
2
251 ,706 Sq Ft I1.- f7 --y Sq r4
-J,;75:.00.
[0.
liO� p�li�li '
IR'IT�llewDl
CCNTIM INTERVAL . 1'
INDEX C"foulSi • S'
t
NOTES,
1. PUENREn
R RA-RHN
10.0
I. lOND DECIG{TEO As F.M.T.
SCHOOL ZONE 549C
IRRIGATION DISTRICT R,8N.I.D.
SANITATION DISTRICT R V.S..
AREA 9 07 ACRES
ZOHNNN G
EXISTING USE - VACANT
PROPOSEO USE - COMMERCIAL
O3
IL
r ; w .'��~ (PARCEL 1••,QF f?
Tri .
Z
11 +
PAR±ITIOiI.VL T NO. P-08�-202QJ� `
}
ry• 7+
� I_
0
:,
DO
1 1
1
`!'�
U
r i
I
fN
�yyr`•�,
I {
q �.
a r
r ¢
I I u+
78,383 Sq Ff
r .r..
AMI1
ROQUE PEJ WNQ R MELOPIIENT
U N. Cp b /213
"Wo D.
OREGCl1 97y01
(54s) 251-4020
2
251 ,706 Sq Ft I1.- f7 --y Sq r4
-J,;75:.00.
[0.
liO� p�li�li '
IR'IT�llewDl
CCNTIM INTERVAL . 1'
INDEX C"foulSi • S'
t
NOTES,
1. PUENREn
R RA-RHN
10.0
I. lOND DECIG{TEO As F.M.T.
SCHOOL ZONE 549C
IRRIGATION DISTRICT R,8N.I.D.
SANITATION DISTRICT R V.S..
AREA 9 07 ACRES
ZOHNNN G
EXISTING USE - VACANT
PROPOSEO USE - COMMERCIAL
I
lip I .I I
w 9E AI �'Ff 1$1 Sq 'P -f 1 rr Iti
I 1 I I
49,802 'Sq-il----- ----] a 1 I I
i I �I dR.• _ ,`�: I . .Mfr,,. Y
I i LSA 1 r +
F, . �
279.9' - _ 1127 �'• r+�,�"�77:SR��T ` 'fy
O { N N 1 1+ s1 , ■ 1 4
a I+N+ N` IST f � f ■
J ,11 7-r Y I- �I
D
46.010 Sq Ff x'211179 Sq Ff :N� �R4�'Sq yFl
1, 1 Y' K , • Ml
�+ 1
129.07'
.r•
568.53,
i
1 I
1 1
I I.
1
. N
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
F
I
I
I
I
I
I
O3
0
ry• 7+
� I_
0
----'
�
I r
lur I
1 1
1
��
�yyr`•�,
I {
78,383 Sq Ff
{{
•
rLo
+
V,
i •, 5'-Tr"h s 7.5'
-i
m •r 1
t ✓tilt 1
'•
•__.•• I• '
J-__ -EASi
_ -4-C.--
214.26' 77
_ I
''--.i.-
- �� 1 hid N���.-_.-�.�y_•.
.._.._ ___-_-. �_�11 p, ,. .
Itiv
n
66.86
�{
I
lip I .I I
w 9E AI �'Ff 1$1 Sq 'P -f 1 rr Iti
I 1 I I
49,802 'Sq-il----- ----] a 1 I I
i I �I dR.• _ ,`�: I . .Mfr,,. Y
I i LSA 1 r +
F, . �
279.9' - _ 1127 �'• r+�,�"�77:SR��T ` 'fy
O { N N 1 1+ s1 , ■ 1 4
a I+N+ N` IST f � f ■
J ,11 7-r Y I- �I
D
46.010 Sq Ff x'211179 Sq Ff :N� �R4�'Sq yFl
1, 1 Y' K , • Ml
�+ 1
129.07'
.r•
568.53,
i
1 I
1 1
I I.
1
. N
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
F
I
I
I
I
I
I
it
NORTH
� I
• ; I
r`
�I
c I I
ml
O I>
a Im
is
I
•
m
p z
I
� 0
m
a
>A
m zzsZ
�
y A 3
—
Z z n
z
0
-.y
3
O
WX
A ® ®
r
m
Z
n
Z
o
a Z g o
zn n
O O O O O
z$$$
O
Og '^
A-0 n
_ NORTH
y"
Am OT
A a i O y
O
_
Z2 Z m
_
n n_
y 3 3 Z
A
3
mD Cm ,vim
Z Z O Z Z
Z
T
O
O=
H
3
`,
Z p
z
Z
A
n
12
South Salem LLC
Crossroads Community Shopping Center
A Commercial Subdivision
ROGUE PLANNING G DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
13
February 20, 2020
FINDINGS of FACT
Tentative Plan Application for an eight -lot subdivision for a phased
Community Shopping Center
Subject Property
Address:
Map & Tax Lot:
Comprehensive Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Property Owner:
4245 Table Rock Road
37 2W 01 C; 700 (Parcel 1)
Commercial: Tourist and Office
C-4: Tourist and Office
South Salem LLC
PO BOX 4460
Medford, OR 97501
Agent: Rogue Planning & Development Services, LLC
Amy Gunter
33 N Central Avenue, Suite 213
Medford, OR 97501
Land Surveyor: Hoffbuhr and Associates
Darrell Huck
880 Golf View Drive, Suite 201
Medford, OR 97504
Request: .
Request for Tentative Plan approval to allow for an eight -lot subdivision to accommodate for a
Community Shopping Center. The Crossroads Community Shopping Center conceptually demonstrates
the layout and development of the property. Subsequent applications for Site Plan and Architectural
Review approval to allow for the development of the lots within the subdivision as the development
plans progress will be obtained.
Page 1 of 18
14
Property Description:
The subject property is located at 4245 Table Rock Road, Central Point
Oregon, (37S 2W 01C; TL#700). The property is Parcel #2, vacant, 7.01 -
acre parcel at the southwest corner of Table Rock Road and Biddle Road.
A partition to divide a two -acre parcel at the northwest corner of the
property and develop a car wash and oil change facility. (This plat has not
been recorded yet but is anticipated in this month — see figure 4).
The subject property is bound by Table Rock Road along the east property
line and Biddle Road along the north property line. Hamrick Road is
approximately 360 -feet to the south of the subject property.
There are existing and proposed private retail streets that extend from
Hamrick Road to the property's west boundary. Along the west boundary
of the subject property, shared with the property to the west, a private
retail street was approved with the previous partition and site plan
review approval.
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
i
Table Rock Road is a County Arterial and is maintained bylackson County. Figure 2: Central Point Zoning Map
Biddle Road is a County Minor Arterial and it is also maintained by Jackson County. There are curb, gutter,
sidewalk, and utilities present along the frontages. The driveway curb cut was relocated to the western
property line as part of the frontage improvements.
The property is at the edge of the city of Central Point Urban Growth Boundary and the city limits. The
property is zoned Commercial / Tourist (C-4). The adjacent property to the south (TL#3900) is outside of
the City limits but is shown as the City of Central Point, Manufacturing (M-2). The property to the north
and northwest, across Biddle Road, is a mixture of General Commercial and Residential. The properties
to the east, across Table Rock Road, are zoned Jackson County Commercial. The Rogue Valley Airport,
airport -related businesses, hotels, and office buildings are further east on Biddle Road.
There are no floodplains, wetlands or other significant natural features on the property that would
prevent the development of the property. There is a grove of large stature pine and cedar trees on the
property. These trees have been evaluated by an arborist and it is recommended that the trees be
removed.
Page 2 of 18
15
F4245 Table Rock Rock Rd.
Map: 374MII01C, Tax 100
Figure 3:2018 Aerial Image
FD. 5/B' REBAR�
PER /N 15056 ,
)
t453O.R.) I
� Rg
sw
a
Nr
k 1
S/N IMM
_ r
7 IVOR
T I^~$irOV><p -•� B 1D D L B RSA D
328.45,.--- r
I
i N0+ 23nc �.rq�tr� - I
PARCEL 1
66109 so
FD. I RE3AR ,r
PER '�! 16056
P-03-2004) 1
5/N 15056
(2-03 u.)
V -
1 - i
r
NEW
� Ie
LLC
(INSTRUMENT NO. 98-29959. O.R.)
PARCEL 2
7W.a71 rrr.
(7.01 AC.
,I YAR40RAR/ 9(2] OE
{
SEE NOTE 1
ypUSMERI,9 IGUNDANY OF 'TRACT 8' PER INSTRUMENT
OID, $3-21959 DR. AND VOLUME 433. PAGE 75. D.R.
- N09.352M 333.56• IN39'39 wL 533.55] _ -
FD. 3/6' REBAR �.Yr_-. M6.59'_
PER S/N 16425 I r_�R3�tl!)Ri?.4?•..,��.... ..—.----.__---
1N57. N0. 00-02434 Q.R.
N
Figure 4: Survey Plat of Parcel 2
Page 3 of 18
16
I
MI ; . 1
m ' 0
Detailed proposal:
The proposal is to subdivide the 7.01 -acre parcel (Figure 4) into an eight -lot subdivision to accommodate
a Neighborhood Shopping Center, the Crossroads Community Shopping Center.
Parcel 1 is a recently approved partition and site plan and architectural review, conditional use permit
for an oil change and carwash facility (PAR -19002 and SPAR -19002).
The proposed subdivision provides for eight developable parcels that comply with site design and layout
standards in the C-4, Commercial: Tourist and Office zone for the development of neighborhood
shopping center. Footprints areas totaling 54,595 square feet are proposed. The proposed uses include
an anchor store, mixed uses (office, retail, other sales), fast food with drive-thru. The shopping center
provides a group of commercial building areas of various sizes and types of building area to
accommodate development of allowed uses within a shopping center.
As the individual uses develop, Site Plan and Architectural Review will be proposed to demonstrate that
the development complies or can demonstrate compliance with the layout proposed herein or with a
revision that demonstrates compliance with the city of Central Point standards for commercial
development. No buildings will exceed the maximum height in the zone of 60 -feet.
A private retail street is proposed to provide internal circulation. The private retail street will be extended
through the property, and to connect to the existing east/west private retail street that extends to
Hamrick Road. The retail street also intersects with the approved north/south retail street that provides
access to and from Biddle Road. This portion of the private retail street is along the west property line
of Parcel 1 on the partition plat in Figure 4.
Adequate transportation facilities are provided within the public rights-of-way and via the private retail
street to accommodate the anticipated vehicular traffic. A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Community
Shopping Center has been provided with the application. The TIA addresses the uses and the future trip
generation. The intersections of the private retail street exceed the minimum separation of 300 -feet.
The block length through the private retail street is 652.95 -feet. This slightly exceeds the maximum block
length for vehicular traffic. This is due to a jog in the retail street to separate the intersection on Table
Rock Road to accommodate turning and stacking movements for future traffic impacts. Pedestrian and
bicycles will be able to traverse the interconnected parking lot system to reduce distances traveled.
There are transit accommodations along Table Rock Road. A new stop was installed with the
development of Hamrick Road and Table Rock Road with the development of Costco, less than 500 -feet
south of the subject property.
We believe the proposed subdivision of the C-4 zoned land will accommodate at neighborhood shopping
center that will provide convenience shopping for the day to day needs of the consumers in the
immediate neighborhoods. The proposed layout accommodates for building areas that exceed 50,000
Page 4 of 18
17
square feet and are less than the maximum of 100,000 square feet of gross floor areas. There is one
anchor tenant space proposed in the concept layout that is less than 60 percent of the total gross floor
area.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Amy Gunter
Rogue Planning & Development Services, LLC
541-951-4020
Attachments:
Land Partition Findings of Fact
Assessor Map: Attachment A
Legal Description: Attachment B
Existing Deed: Attachment C
Tentative Partition Plat
Conceptual Subdivision Layout
Conceptual Grading & Drainage Plan: C.1
Conceptual Utility Plan: C.2
Findings addressing the criteria from the City of Central Point Land Development ordinance can be
found on the following pages. For clarity, the Central Point Land Development Ordinance criteria are in
Times New Roman font and the findings in Calibri.
Page 5 of 18
18
Findings of Fact
16.10 - Tentative Plans
Finding:
The proposal is to allow for a subdivision of the 7.01 -acre parcel at the intersection of Biddle Road and
Table Rock Road. A tentative subdivision plan demonstrates the layout of the proposed commercial
subdivision. There are no minimum lot dimensions, lot areas, lot coverages, in the C-4 zone. The
subdivision layout provides for the adequate area to development the property to the standards of a
neighborhood shopping center.
A proposed conceptual development plan of a neighborhood shopping center has been provided with
the application. The shopping center site plan provides for the development of the east to west private
retail street that crosses the property to connect with the east west connection that exists across the
adjacent properties to the west and leads to Hamrick Road.
The Shopping Center layout is intended to accommodate a gross floor area of not less than 50,000 and
not more than 100,000 gross floor area. The shopping center is conceptually proposed to provide for
54,595 square feet of structures with lot areas, drive isles and access, parking areas, and landscape
buffer areas devoted to development of permitted and conditional uses of the C-4 zoning district.
Each lot of the subdivision will provide for a separate site design review application as necessary by the
standards. Future lot development will demonstrate compliance with the conceptual development
plan and associated Traffic Impact Analysis.
A private retail street is proposed to provide internal circulation. The private retail street will be extended
through the property, and to connect to the existing east/west private retail street that extends to
Hamrick Road. The retail street also intersects with the approved north/south retail street that provides
access to and from Biddle Road. This portion of the private retail street is along the west property line
of Parcel 1 on the partition plat in Figure 4.
Adequate transportation facilities are provided within the public rights-of-way and via the private retail
street to accommodate the anticipated vehicular traffic. A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Community
Shopping Center has been provided with the application. The TIA addresses the uses and the future trip
generation.
Utility, access and maintenance easements for the private retail street that is proposed through the
community shopping center will be provided with the survey plat map.
A separate application for the development of a Firestone Complete Auto Care and Tire facility with
associated site improvements has been filed. This development and the associated private retail street
Page 6 of 18
W
provide the vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle connection through the property to the retail street
network in the vicinity.
16.10.070 Explanatory information.
A. A vicinity map showing all existing subdivisions, streets and unsubdivided land ownerships adjacent
to the proposed subdivision and showing how proposed streets may be connected to existing streets;
Finding:
A vicinity map from the Jackson County Assessor is included in the application. The existing private retail
street system through the adjacent properties to the west will connect through the development.
B. Proposed deed restrictions in outline form;
Finding:
The property has existing deeds and easements. These will continue and will be demonstrated on the
final plat of the partition plan.
The public utility easements will remain along the frontages of the property. Private utility easements
will be provided within the subdivision and provided for on the final partition plat.
The easement for the retail street will be created providing cross access, mutual ingress/egress,
maintenance, and other standard access easement language.
A title report associated with the approved minor land partition is set to be recorded in February. A
revised title report will provide for the easements of record on the 7.01 -acre parcel. The draft subdivision
plan provides for public utility easement in the private retail street, public access of the private retail
street, access from the private retail street to the development pads of the Community Shopping Center.
C. Approximate centerline profiles showing the proposed finished grade of all streets, including the
extensions for a reasonable distance beyond the limits of the proposed subdivision;
Finding:
The property is nearly level and the centerline profile of the Private Retail Street that connects to an
existing Private Retail Street appears unnecessary.
D. The approximate location and size of all proposed and existing water and sewer lines and storm
drainage systems. (Ord. 1650(part), 1990).
Finding:
Page 7 of 18
20
A preliminary grading and utility plan is provided with the application. The utility plan provides details
regarding where the connections for the proposed water, sewer and storm drainage lines of the private
retail street. Conceptual stub out locations for the Community Shopping Center pad lots are provided.
16.24.010 Blocks --Length, width, and shape.
The lengths, widths, and shapes of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate building
sites suitable to the special needs of the type and use contemplated, needs for convenient access,
circulation, control and safety of street traffic and limitations and opportunities of topography.
Finding:
The lengths, widths, and shapes of the block are designed with regards to providing adequate building
sites for the development of a Neighborhood Shopping Center. The access points onto Biddle Road and
Table Rock Road are dictated by the standards of Jackson County. The proposed private retail street
intersections dictate the block lengths and dimensions.
16.24.020 Blocks --Sizes.
Blocks shall not exceed twelve hundred feet in length except blocks adjacent to arterial streets or unless
the previous adjacent layout or topographical conditions justify a variation. The recommended minimum
distance between intersections on arterial streets is three hundred feet.
Finding:
No block length in the development exceeds 1200 -feet. Two of the blocks are adjacent to arterial
streets and the separation from the intersection of the arterial streets increases the block length and
perimeters. The intersections of Table Rock Road and Biddle Road and the private retail streets exceed
300 -feet.
The proposed private retail street connections through the community shopping center slightly exceed
the block perimeters with 2,200 -feet. This is due to the shifting of the private retail street intersection
south of the Biddle Road and Table Rock Road intersections. The jog in the retail street adds additional
distance.
The proposed block lengths through the development exceed the 600 -foot block length rule. The
intersection of the private retail street that traverses Parcel 2, the 7.01 -acre area of the commercial
subdivision and community shopping center, will have a more than 600 -foot block length to Table Rock
and Biddle Road. Additionally, the block perimeter exceeds 2,000 feet. This is due to the separation
standards from the intersection to the street and the sight -lines on Table Rock Road. The private retail
street and connected parking lot system allow for pedestrians and bicycles to cross the site without
following the block boundaries, only automobiles will be restricted to the private retail street and arterial
street intersections.
Page 8 of 18
21
The intersection of the retail street that traverses Parcel 2, will have a more than 600 -foot block length
to Table Rock and Biddle Road. This is due to the presence of the major arterial streets, and intersection
alignment issues, separation from the intersection to the street, and sight -lines on Table Rock Road and
Biddle Road.
16.24.030 Blocks --Easements.
A. Utility Lines. Easements for electric lines or other non -city -owned public utilities may be required, and
shall be a minimum of ten feet in width located on the exterior portion of a single property. Easements for
city utilities (i.e., water, storm drain and sanitary sewer mains) shall be a minimum of fifteen feet in width
located on the exterior portion of a single property. Tie -back easements six feet wide by twenty feet long
shall be provided for utility poles along lot lines at change of direction points of easements.
1. Structures Located within a City Utility Easement.
a. Except for public utilities and for signs when developed in accordance with Chapter
15.24 (Sign Code), no person shall locate, construct, or continue to locate a structure (as
defined in Chapter 16.08) within a city utility easement (as defined in Chapter 16.08),
except as provided in subsections (A)(1)(b) and (A)(2) of this section.
b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the city may approve fencing, concrete block
walls/fencing, retaining walls, and similar fencing/wall structures that are otherwise in
compliance with the building code, and with the clearance provisions noted herein, over an
easement subject to the following requirements:
i. Said fencing or wall structures that interfere with the installation, maintenance,
access, or operation of a public utility or city utility may be removed by the utility
provider or the city at the sole cost of owner.
ii. Any replacement or relocation of the fencing or wall structures shall be at the
sole cost of the property owner or occupant.
iii. Owners and occupants of property shall not be entitled to compensation for
damages related to removal of the fencing or wall structures.
2. Grass, Asphalt, and Concrete Installed within a City Utility Easement.
a. Subject to the limitations of the building code, lawful owners and occupants of property
may install grass, asphalt and concrete within a city utility easement.
b. In the course of installing, accessing, maintaining, or operating its facilities in a city
utility easement, a public utility or the city, as the case may be, may move or remove any
asphalt, concrete, or vegetation located within said easement. After the same are moved or
removed and after completion of the necessary work, the grass, asphalt or concrete shall
be repaired and replaced in a reasonable manner at the sole cost of the public utility or city.
Page 9 of 18
22
c. Owners and occupants of property shall not be entitled to compensation related to
damages to grass, asphalt, or concrete so long as the repairs and replacement are done in a
reasonable manner and in a reasonable time frame.
Finding:
It is not anticipated that there will be any construction within public utility easement excepting the
circumstances outlined herein.
B. Watercourses. Where a subdivision is traversed by a watercourse, drainage way, channel or stream,
there may be required a stormwater easement or drainage right-of-way conforming substantially with the
lines of such watercourse, and such further width as will be adequate for the purpose. Streets, parkways
or access roads parallel to major watercourses may be required.
Finding:
Not applicable.
C. Pedestrian Ways. In any block over seven hundred fifty feet in length a pedestrian way may be required.
The minimum width of the pedestrian right-of-way must be at least six feet in width which shall be hard
surfaced through the block and curb to curb in order to provide easy access to schools, parks, shopping
centers, mass transportation stops or other community services. If conditions require blocks longer than
twelve hundred feet, two pedestrian ways may be required for combination pedestrian way and utility
easement. When essential for public convenience, such ways may be required to connect to cul-de-sacs.
Long blocks parallel to arterial streets may be approved without pedestrian ways if desirable in the
interests of traffic safety.
Finding:
Pedestrian access is provided through the proposed Community Shopping Center development parking
areas. The pedestrian sidewalks are provided at six -feet within the development and have clear access
to both arterial streets. Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the private retail street and
sidewalks to city standards are or will be provided around the perimeter of the development as the
properties develop.
16.24.040 Lots --Uses.
A. The city may, in its discretion, deny approval for the creation of any lot by any manner if the effect of
such creation of lot would be to facilitate perpetuation of a nonconforming use.
Finding:
The uses proposed and futures uses are all conforming uses in the C-4 zone.
B. No lot shall be created unless it is in compliance with al l applicable provisions of this code.
Page 10 of 18
23
Finding:
All proposed lots will comply with the standards of the C-4 zone.
The Commercial Site Design Standards found in 17.75.035, detail that there are no minimum lot areas,
width or depths.
Future site development through Site Plan and Architectural Review will demonstrate compliance with
any yard setback standards, building heights and other requirements from the commercial design
standards.
16.24.050 Lots --Size and determination.
Lot sizes shall conform with the zoning ordinance and shall be appropriate for the location of the
subdivision and for the type of development and use contemplated. In the case of irregular lots, the width
shall be measured along the front building line. In no case shall the average depth be more than two and
one-half times the width. Corner lots for residential use shall have sufficient width to permit appropriate
building setback from and orientation to both streets.
Finding:
No minimum lot sizes in the zone.
A. In areas that cannot be connected to sewer lines, minimum lot sizes shall be sufficient to permit sewage
disposal by an engineered system in accordance with Department of Environmental Quality, Jackson
County environmental quality section, and public works standards. Such lot sizes shall conform to the
requirements of the Jackson County environmental quality section.
Finding:
Adequate public sewer service is available to the proposed lots within the subdivision.
B. Where property is zoned and planned for business or industrial use, other widths and areas may be
required, at the discretion of the city. Depth and width of properties reserved or laid out for commercial
and industrial purposes shall be adequate to provide for the off-street service and parking facilities required
by the type of use and development contemplated.
Finding:
The Crossroads Community Shopping Center's is a neighborhood shopping center. The conceptual
development plan demonstrates that adequate parking areas and drive aisles for the potential uses
within the shopping center are provided.
16.24.060 Through lots.
Page 11 of 18
24
Through lots shall be avoided except where essential to reduce access to primary or secondary arterial
streets or streets of equivalent traffic volume, reduce access to adjacent nonresidential activities, or to
overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation. A planting screen easement of at least ten
feet may be required along the line of lots abutting such adjacent street. There shall be no right of access
across such planting screen easements.
Finding:
Not applicable
16.24.070 Lot side lines.
The side lines of lots shall run at right angles to the street upon which the lots face, as far as practicable,
or on curbed streets they shall be radial to the curve.
Finding:
All lot lines run at right angles to the streets and private retail street.
16.24.080 Large lot subdivision.
In subdividing tracts into large lots which at some future time are likely to be resubdivided, the location
of lot lines and other details of the layout shall be such that the resubdivisions may readily take place
without violating the requirements of these regulations and without interfering with the orderly
development of streets or other utilities. Restrictions of building locations in relationship to future rights-
of-way shall be made a matter of record if the city considers it necessary.
Finding:
Not applicable
16.36.030 Requirements.
A. All major and minor land partitions may, as a condition of approval, provide for improvements
including curbs, gutters, asphalt streets, sidewalks, underground utilities and such other improvements as
shall be deemed appropriate and necessary by the city council as a condition of approval, with all such
improvements to meet the standards required for subdivisions under this title.
Finding:
The majority of the public infrastructure was recently installed with the frontage improvements along
Table Rock Road. Utilities are available in the public right-of-way of the roads and in the proposed 15 -
foot wide public utility easements along the frontages of the property. The future sidewalk
connections will be installed along the frontages as the sites develop.
Underground utilities installed in streets will be constructed before the surfacing the retail street.
Stubs for service connections for underground utilities will be placed to reduce the necessity for
Page 12 of 18
25
disturbing the street improvements when future service connections are made. Easements for public
and private utilities will be provided on the subdivision plat.
A private, 12 -inch water line that exists within the existing east / west private retail street. An eight -
inch line connects to the site's northern boundary. A water circulation plan under the direction of the
City of Central Point Public Works Director will be completed to provide hydrants and adequate service
connections throughout the development area.
The property is within the Phase 2 Stormwater Quality Area and a stormwater management plan that
complies with the Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual for water quantity and quality is
provided. The proposal for the private retails street accommodates much of the stormwater generated
on as an above bioswale. Each lot will need to address their stormwater facilities. These will likely
include above ground swales in conjunction with underground detention facilities. The Stormwater
service is available to the site from a 24 -inch storm drain line that exists 260 -feet west of the project
site within the existing private driveway.
Sanitary sewer service is available to the west of the project site. This 8 -inch line will be extended
through the private retail street to accommodated the development of each of the sites.
B. In the case of major partitions, all streets or roads shall be improved to meet the standards required
for subdivisions under this title, and shall be dedicated to the city in the same manner as subdivision
roads and streets.
Finding:
The request is for Subdivision. The subdivision request includes a private retail Street to provide east to
west connectivity through the site.
Biddle Road is a County Minor Arterial and was recently improved from the intersection of Biddle and
Table Rock Road, west to the 1-5 freeway interchange. Table Rock Road is a County Arterial. Table Rock
Road also was recently improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage, and street lighting. Both
Table Rock Road and Biddle Road are maintained by Jackson County.
The Private Retail Street is not proposed to be dedicated to the City but is proposed to be installed per
the improvement standards.
Required by five-foot curb tight sidewalks are proposed along the north side of the private retail street
with a ten -foot landscape buffer between sidewalk and lot development areas. The south side of the
private retail street proposes a five-foot hardscape planter and a five-foot sidewalk. The site plan
accommodates a six-foot sidewalk in both instances due to anticipated code changes that will require a
six-foot sidewalk. Until that time, a five-foot sidewalk and larger planter areas will be provided.
Page 13 of 18
W,
C. Partition improvements shall be constructed prior to approval of the final partition plat unless, in the
city's sole discretion, deferral is allowed. In all cases of deferral, the applicant shall either execute an
agreement for improvements and comply with the bond requirements of
Section 16.12.070 and 16.12.080 of this title, or shall execute a deferred improvement agreement, which
shall be in a form and contain such terms as are specified by city and shall be recorded and be binding
upon and run with the land and bind the applicant and all successors in interest.
Finding:
All subdivision related improvements will be constructed to provide vehicular access through the
property. Permits for the driveway access from Table Rock Road will be obtained from Jackson County.
The landscape is proposed along Table Rock Road frontage behind the sidewalk. The vegetation will be
irrigated and maintained in a weed -free condition.
C-4, Tourist and Office Professional District:
17.44. Community shopping centers which may include any of the permitted uses in this section
and may also include but not be limited to:
a. Supermarkets;
b. Department stores;
c. Sporting goods;
d. Books and stationery;
e. Gifts, notions and variety;
f. Florists;
g. Leather goods and luggage;
h. Pet sales and related supplies;
i. Photographic supplies;
j. Health food;
k. Self-service laundry;
1. Antique shop;
m. Delicatessen;
n. Pastry and confectionery;
o. General apparel;
p. Shoes and boots;
q. Specialty apparel;
r. Jewelry;
s. Clocks and watches, sales and service;
t. Bakery, retail only;
u. Bicycle shop;
v. Audio, video, electronic sales and service;
w. Printing, lithography and publishing;
Finding:
Page 14 of 18
27
The proposal use of the property is for a neighborhood shopping center, the Crossroads Community
Shopping Center. The envisioned uses fall with the categories listed as permitted uses in the C-4
district.
All development of the individual lots within the subdivision will demonstrate compliance with the
standards 17.44, 17.64, 17.75 and the development standards for public infrastructure improvements
of the city of Central Point.
Design and Development Standards
17.75.031 General connectivity, circulation and access standards.
The purpose of this section is to assure that the connectivity and transportation policies of the city's
Transportation System Plan are implemented. In achieving the objective of maintaining and enhancing
the city's small town environment it is the city's goal to base its development pattern on a general
circulation grid using a walkable block system. Blocks may be comprised of public/private street right-
of-way, or accessways.
Finding:
The Table Rock Road frontage of the subdivision was recently improved Biddle Road is proposed to be
improved as the site develops. Throughout the development, there is a primary east to the west
connection provided via the private retail street. The private retail street will have street -like
improvements installed along the north side of the the development because of the proposed
development of Phase 1(Premier Oil) and Phase 2, Firestone. The retail street is proposed to have a five-
foot curbside sidewalk and a ten -foot landscape buffer to the parking areas. Along the south side, a
temporary bioswale to accommodate storm drainage facilities.
A. Streets and Utilities. The public street and utility standards set forth in the City of Central Point
Department of Public Works Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works
Construction shall apply to all development within the city.
Finding:
Table Rock Road along the frontage of the property has been improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk, utility
installations, etc.
The private retail street is proposed to be connected to the existing private retail street that exists as an
east/west connection from Hamrick Road (where parallel to Table Rock Road) as part of a pending
commercial shopping center proposal for the 7.01 -acre parcel. This private retail street will intersect
with a north/south, private retail street connection (approved access for Premier Oil).
Landscape medians and buffering and an interconnected five -foot -wide sidewalk system are provided
through the development to provide pedestrian connectivity to the public street system. (Note: the
conceptual subdivision plan demonstrates a six -foot -wide sidewalk through the development, this is in
Page 15 of 18
28
the event of anticipated code changes). As proposed with the individual developments, a five-foot
sidewalk is proposed.
The proposed development will comply with all utility standards set forth in the City of Central Point
Department of Public Works Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works
Construction.
B. Block Standards. The following block standards apply to all development:
1. Block perimeters shall not exceed two thousand feet measured along the public street right-of-
way, or outside edges of accessways, or other acknowledged block boundary as described in
subsection (B)(4) of this section.
Finding:
The proposed private retail street connections through the community shopping center slightly
exceed the block perimeters with 2,200 -feet. This is due to the shifting of the private retail street
intersection south of the Biddle Road and Table Rock Road intersections. The jog in the retail
street adds additional distance.
2. Block lengths shall not exceed six hundred feet between through streets or pedestrian
accessways, measured along street right-of-way, or the pedestrian accessway. Block dimensions
are measured from right-of-way to right-of-way along street frontages.
Finding:
The proposed block lengths through the development exceed 600 -feet.
The intersection of the retail street that traverses Parcel 2, will have a more than 600 -foot block
length to Table Rock and Biddle Road. This is due to the presence of the major arterial streets,
and intersection alignment issues, separation from the intersection to the street, stacking
distances, and sightlines on Table Rock Road and Biddle Road.
3. Accessways or private/retail streets may be used to meet the block length or perimeter standards
of this section, provided they are designed in accordance with this section and are open to the
public at all times.
Finding:
A private retail street system is used to attempt to meet the block length and perimeter
standards. The retail street has been designed per the requirements of this code.
Page 16 of 18
29
4. The standards for block perimeters and lengths may be modified to the minimum extent
necessary based on written findings that compliance with the standards are not reasonably
practicable or appropriate due to:
Finding:
The proposed block lengths through the development exceed the 600 -foot block length rule. The
intersection of the private retail street that traverses Parcel 2, the 7.01 -acre area of the
commercial subdivision and community shopping center, will have a more than 600 -foot block
length to Table Rock and Biddle Road. Additionally, the block perimeter exceeds 2,000 feet. This
is due to the separation standards from the intersection to the street and the sight -lines on Table
Rock Road. The private retail street and connected parking lot system allow for pedestrians and
bicycles to cross the site without following the block boundaries, only automobiles will be
restricted to the private retail street and arterial street intersections.
C. Driveway and Property Access Standards. Vehicular access to properties shall be located and
constructed in accordance with the standards set forth in the City of Central Point Department of Public
Works Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction, Section
320.10.30, Driveway and Property Access.
Finding:
The proposed civil improvements throughout the development will comply with all utility standards set
forth in the City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standard Specifications and Uniform
Standard Details for Public Works Construction. The Traffic Impact Analysis will be reviewed by Jackson
County Roads. The driveway access reservation will be made with Jackson County Roads upon approval
of the development.
D. Pedestrian Circulation. Attractive access routes for pedestrian travel shall be provided through the
public sidewalk system, and where necessary supplemented through the use of pedestrian accessways as
required to accomplish the following:
Finding:
There will be a complete sidewalk system along both public street frontages of the property. Through
the development, there are private retail streets and an interconnected parking lot system proposed.
These streets are proposed to have landscape buffers and sidewalk systems with sidewalk and parking
lot crossings that are distinguished from the driving surface to provide pedestrian connectivity through
the property.
Pedestrian scale streetlights and directional signage will provide interest and safety for pedestrians.
E. Accessways, Pedestrian. Pedestrian accessways may be used to meet the block requirements of
subsection B of this section. When used pedestrian accessways shall be developed as illustrated in Figure
Page 17 of 18
30
17.75.01. All landscaped areas next to pedestrian accessways shall be maintained, or plant materials
chosen, to maintain a clear sight zone between three and eight feet from the ground level.
Finding:
The pedestrian accessways provided through the development in the parking areas and along the Private
Retail Street will reduce the block length as a pedestrian can bisect the development vs. an automobile
which must stay on the driving surfaces.
All landscape areas will be professionally designed, installed and maintained. The plant materials
sections provide for clear sight zones and to provide safety and security throughout the sight. Vision
clearance triangles will be maintained at the intersections.
F. Retail Street. Retail streets may be used to meet the block requirements of subsection B of this section.
When used retail streets shall be developed as illustrated in Figure 17.75.02.
Finding:
The private retail street is proposed to attempt to meet the block requirements of subsection B. The
retail street is proposed to connect to existing retail streets developed on the adjacent properties. Utility,
access and maintenance easements for the private retail street that is proposed through the community
shopping center will be provided with the survey plat map.
Page 18 of 18
31
IL
TAX LAT NUMNICR
OMC_ I RECORD OF DESCRII JON.
OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR, JACKS
MMON
&b
BLOC[
N4, I NO.
11
RP 1 173
362k i l [1600
_ w.u. IM" No. 11
F�� y ES -SM r i
LEGAL -DESCRIPTION - ' ` w"
QavRsc TO rats uxa
Hu11 Lelah andimmonaaft..W P':. kn�
Commencing at the northeast corner of . 2 r c .
11, Twp 36 South, Range 2 West of the WA, and from said
corner running
west on the north boundary of said claim
and 76 links; thence
south 53chains and 71 links; thence
south 890
L5' east along south boundary of
29 chains and 76 links to the southeast corner
claim; thence
north on the east boundary of said claim
and 83 Links to the place of beginning.
29 chains
claim
of said
53 chains
Excepting that portion of said premises sold to Scott
V. Davis, described as the "soi th half of the east half"
of D.L.C. L2, in TwP 36 South, of Range 2 West of the
W•M•, 80 acres, more or less, together with a strip of
land 25 feet in width, beginning at the southeast corner
of the north half of the east half of said D.L.C. and
running thence
north to the intersection of the County Road.
Al so, . exceptin.g land described in Vol. 202 Waage 28L,
of the Deed Records of JC0.
Less tax lot 362W11-1801
32
YZAR i t
1946
1960
1962
Pz
946
960 1
962
O.R.f
ORr
I
-'73-09930
EXHIBIT "A"
f Beginning at the northeast corner of donation -land
claim Ido_ 42, township 36. south, range 2 west of the
Willamette Meridian in Jackson county, Oregon: thence
west along the north boundary of said claim, 29 chains
and 76 links:• thence south,. 53 cliains and 71 links;
thence south 89'45' east along the south boundary
{ of.said elaim,'29 chains and 75 links to the south -
t er of said claim= thence north on the east
ens corn
boundary of se_f.d- claim, '53 chains and 83 links to the
�.
- place of beginning, -containing 160 acre B,.more or leas.
y
' EXCEPTING THEREFROri'thAt portion af,said premises sold
.. • .to Scott V. Davis', described as the "soutIiltalf of the
' east haIf"•, of donation land claim no. 42 in township .•
`..35 south, range 2 .west of, the Willamette Meridian;. .
containing 80 -.acres, more or less, together with a.
strip of;,land 25 feet'in width, beginning at -the -
+
southeast corner of the' north half of the east'half
of ,said doi3atioli Lind -clai.m;. and -running thence north
to an intersection 4ith the -original southwesterly
f
..right ay line of Tab le.Itock�(county) .mad.
ALSO EXCEPTION TKEREFP0i4 the following described tract,
i
Beginning. it a concrete monument with bron$e disc
i
]seated at the northeast corner. of donation land
r.
claim no. 42,,. township 36 south; range 2 -west=,of the
-Willamette rleridian in'Jackson county, Oregon, thence
along .the north boundary of said cliiml,'south 89°53'35". -
west; south 0°25'20" east, 254,11'.
.323.74,feet;.'thence
'feet; thence sadth.-37"39'36•'` easti;;39.81 feet= - .thence
sout>3 0°52' east ;193.72,feet;'thence.north 89134'-20" -.
east, 29 .49 fest to the -east houndary.a£ said••ciaim;..
c
thence north 0°06'40",•west,,487:84 feet to the point ..,.
of beginni ig, ' eontaiairir} 3;:50- acres , •mare or less.
TOGETHER with a mutual, -egress easement 20 feet
-ingress
is width, being 10. feet on each side,of the following
J
centerline, - to-wi t:
Commencing at the northeast corner of donation land
r't
claim no. 42, township 36,south, range -Z west of the
{
willamette b.Kridian in Jackson county,. Dragon: thence
along thq north boundary of saiO claim-, south 89°52'35"
_
west, 323.78 feet; thence south 0°25'20" east', 264.11.
feet to the true point of beginning of said easement;
thence south 37.39'30" east, 39,81 feet; thence south
j
0'52' east, 20.04 feat aFLd there-tei-minating.
j
Exhibit "A"
e
Page 1. fl# 2
1 73-09930
•S
Together with an easement for the purpose of repairing, main-
taining and operating the irrigation ditches and control valves
} which are located on the remaining property of sellers so that
r purchaser may be able to irrigate the orchard property which is
the subject of this sale. Said easement, in any event, shall
terminate not later than June 1, 1998.
i`
SUB o CT TC):'-
-4,
,..at part_ .'Lyinq Within public. roads_
Y? R'
:. ttnrr zivhq of t7ay for. ditches aZcl cares Ls.
for tce' transev gai0-n a ed, ciistsihutibxx
uIzeatz#�ity;- and;for. exA?UrRo
dthses -g'rc .
Ttie C iftaii a ; t]regon . POweic .Company , a Cal iorxeia
corporation, liy: instreuna.rt''zerorded T.pii3..ZB' :1953 -in'
vo�.ygt .•379; pages •369:.of 1�4a:'$eei3 rcZ<<ards of Jackson:
coi k+y, orzgo7.
Hight of. way'.for••the ,'Eransm3zsiorf .znr}. dzstriL3utinr,. .
i C'f electra,r_i.tjr;:;'�itd' tem,4the-t�wrgoses; graated to
' da !:FjC. Powa�r and. Lfght, Company, h., GarPoratick&, •by -'
ns trvment 7recdorded,Mirah 970 .as " ;;, i ' ' '• ': I
nr_ c. iE ❑ffcf, '•reeC zds'n,c,;�1-
7 f-Jacksgia:cociasty.;.Cregazx..� -
�. ;;iea efedt`of Said r:,Z`;.' _ ,,.....;,,•;• ..; `•:` :; �' H
p�riperty, :'or' some":poz-Y iali `th erepf; _':-E j,•':r: i
lyingwithin,'+ e.bc : nciarie n .'thy' Tzble 73ock'�Impr vc menet `:i .
Coem�anyi".aKr3. righty, J.ze±ts=.and Assessment- r�ststtiry :. k
tharefroen-
j ;i'
p Exhibit "A.
S Page 2. of 2
PARTITION PLAT N0. ______�
LOCATED IN:
IN THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 1, T375, .11, WM,
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, JACKSON COUNTY, OR.
FOR:
SOUTH SALEM, L.LC.
P.O. BOX 4460
MEDFORD, OR. 97501
FOUND BRASS DISC
NE CORNER OF
DLC NO. 56 PER
1997 JACKSON COUNTY
.� qE-ESTAB
P0. 31X REBAR
PER i/ 1805e
(PARCEL 3 Or PARTITION PLAT NO. P-03-2004) i
S/N 18058 )
MOTES:
1. THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN ACCESS EASEMENT 1
CREATED PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2D04-073819, DEED
RECORDS OF JACKSON COUINTY, OREGON THE EASEMENT
BEING CREATED HEREON SATISFIES THE CONDITION OF
PARAGRAPH B2, WHEREBY THE LOCATION OF THE
EASEMENT SHALL BE DETERMINED BY SOUTH SALEM LLC
AT THE TIME IT SUBMITS PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT,
I;
FD. 5/5' ROAR '
PER 4/N 16429
I�
II
11
II
II
PARCEL 1
88,209 SOFT.
(2.03 AC.)
NP 1
1 ,�*
w,�-__ B ISD L E Req D— 1 _
V47 -v 328.45'
A� kcAj �• w��
S •�
R IpdO�y. 1
(INSTRUMENT NO. 85-20959, O.N)Ir I E M M
A- OUr4y NO, 2244 1
PARCEL 2
?105,471 Sa.rr.
(7.01 AC.)
STL'"TE 1
i
I
I o
I'
Rq x
In.p
SpUT aftty 90Y !)M OF "TRACT B' PER I""UM"a
x0. Po -xeric O.P. AND VOLUME 465. PAGE 75, O.R. qi l
Ne�4f'xe'E 58f -3e• {Nee'aP'20"E sBB,85') I,
SIW 1�49i TSRS8ROAA
/6 18424
L (DETITOYto BY CONSTRUCTION)
�I
HOFFBUHR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
- -•^•- ��'
FD. 5/8' IfEeARYPOINT
PER 3/N 160f
(LOT 3 OF HAMRICK BUSINESS PARK)
f
(TRACT B OF INST. NO. 2015-041455 O.B.) «.11
(541)779-4641
BY: DARRELL L HUCK PLS No. 2023
ETN, a/e REi4R TLR
g
Iv.w INgn•ss COOP EA=KNT TO
}
..rw.." ". MWATC ,,.,,.,..xw
9E - M
J 175' I
-MT,S'
S/N 18358
30' AMM a lac M. e... M — Out. Ne. 1DOO-0Y5810 J! ..
P0. 31X REBAR
PER i/ 1805e
(PARCEL 3 Or PARTITION PLAT NO. P-03-2004) i
S/N 18058 )
MOTES:
1. THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN ACCESS EASEMENT 1
CREATED PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2D04-073819, DEED
RECORDS OF JACKSON COUINTY, OREGON THE EASEMENT
BEING CREATED HEREON SATISFIES THE CONDITION OF
PARAGRAPH B2, WHEREBY THE LOCATION OF THE
EASEMENT SHALL BE DETERMINED BY SOUTH SALEM LLC
AT THE TIME IT SUBMITS PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT,
I;
FD. 5/5' ROAR '
PER 4/N 16429
I�
II
11
II
II
PARCEL 1
88,209 SOFT.
(2.03 AC.)
NP 1
1 ,�*
w,�-__ B ISD L E Req D— 1 _
V47 -v 328.45'
A� kcAj �• w��
S •�
R IpdO�y. 1
(INSTRUMENT NO. 85-20959, O.N)Ir I E M M
A- OUr4y NO, 2244 1
PARCEL 2
?105,471 Sa.rr.
(7.01 AC.)
STL'"TE 1
i
I
I o
I'
Rq x
In.p
SpUT aftty 90Y !)M OF "TRACT B' PER I""UM"a
x0. Po -xeric O.P. AND VOLUME 465. PAGE 75, O.R. qi l
Ne�4f'xe'E 58f -3e• {Nee'aP'20"E sBB,85') I,
SIW 1�49i TSRS8ROAA
/6 18424
L (DETITOYto BY CONSTRUCTION)
�I
HOFFBUHR & ASSOCIATES, INC.
880 GOLF VIEW DRIVE, SUITE 201
MEDFORD. OREGON 97504
(541)779-4641
BY: DARRELL L HUCK PLS No. 2023
ETN, a/e REi4R TLR
SCALE: 1 Inch = 100' JULY 29, 2019
TARfVCT Mm. "744BASIS
OF BEARING: SURVEY NO. 16429
O = Set 5/8"x24" Iron relnforcing pin with plastic cap
stamped "D. Huck LS 2023".
P( = Set 5/B"x30" Iron relnforcing pin with plastic cap
stamped "D. Huck LS 2023".
• = Found 5/8" Iron rebar par Survey No. 22744
unless noted otherwise
CMA RARE 1 OLLTA 1 istom KATRNO c110bb
0 = Found brass cap monument
C7
0
PUE = Easement for public U1111 les, eteem drafnege, Irrigation,
C4
g0e, water, eteolric, fsl!..oghorle, cobts television and
c5 RW-
ca
go- s.xer, Donetrwlion and maintenance
131,24. AlfAll-pil
O.R. = Official Records, Jackson County, Or.
C4
D.R. = Deed Records, Jackson County, Or.
S/N = Survey Number
uM TAKE
LTM[ Motil
[-] = Record per Survey No. 16429
LI
I—j = Record per Survey No. 18058
LE EAsr
RCCMsURED
PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR
u
1S
dIJPCPROMC COPY
LiM
U WEST"
I o.rflfy this plat to be an
AArg4L• xucK
exact copy of the original
r.yw. 8/30/2021
SURVEYOR
(H10820 .A2.
37 2W OIC TAX LOT 700
Starr x elP 2 x
35
a
0
a
o G a q
f�I i
PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - FOR REVIEW and DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
o
g M�F: RNE FRCgRV FqL a
♦A.3�IT
sauir�sune.ucm�g��1 4�� ♦ ��
1/I ■ si .neo, 11
y :11A. Am } $ n<
4M T.W Roc*R.d
io, ��. g J, 11 1
rn�` M.,&pmiM.aewsuz,=.;k atl$ ♦ film
M2W01C li: 36 f IlY7 �i'S a �%z
1 972 W01C Too �>
0
BIDDLE ROAD
e °
BLDG 11 I
I
�Xm Dm
r
o
k I I
r II
RI
s
m m
till! LA, :o! o { ISI
Uji
mI E
i• 7 0 l
I I
I, fl
� n I ill l
I
I 372WOlCTL3800 J I I
F— ------ 7-----------------------
372WOICTL3900I
I�
k
q
1
r}I p i v
o o z
SO n
m 3 p E- NORTH Z z ^
6� n
37
Table Rock Road
Commercial Development
Type III Procedure
Traffic Impact Analysis
February 28, 2020
Prepared By: T.PmPOPTUTION
-Enon-r-alnc, L L C
f our i -RN O-R-EGON T-mifPO-RT UTION -ENGIN-c-E-RING, L L C
38
Table Rock Road
Commercial Development
Type III Procedure
Traffic Impact Analysis
February 28, 2020
Prepared By:
OUTwipm ORiGON T-RRapox-fiTION L L C
39
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................5
II. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................6
Background..............................................................................................................................................6
ProjectLocation.......................................................................................................................................6
ProjectDescription...................................................................................................................................6
III. EXISTING YEAR 2020 NO -BUILD CONDITIONS..........................................................................9
SiteCondition...........................................................................................................................................9
RoadwayCharacteristics..........................................................................................................................9
TrafficCounts..........................................................................................................................................9
Intersection Capacity and Level of Service............................................................................................
l l
Year 2020 No -Build Intersection Operations.........................................................................................12
Year 2020 No -Build 95' Percentile Queuing.........................................................................................12
CrashHistory ..........................................................................................................................................14
BiddleRoad Access Point......................................................................................................................15
IV. DESIGN YEAR 2025 NO -BUILD CONDITIONS.............................................................................16
Design Year 2025 No -Build Description...............................................................................................16
Design Year 2025 No -Build Intersection Operations.............................................................................16
Design Year 2025 No -Build 95' Percentile Queuing............................................................................16
V. SITE TRAFFIC......................................................................................................................................19
TripGeneration......................................................................................................................................19
Trip Distribution and Assignment..........................................................................................................19
ProposedAccess Points..........................................................................................................................19
VI. DESIGN YEAR 2025 BUILD CONDITIONS...................................................................................21
Design Year 2025 Build Description.....................................................................................................21
Design Year 2025 Build Intersection Operations...................................................................................21
Design Year 2025 Build 95' Percentile Queuing..................................................................................21
Design Year 2025 Access Points............................................................................................................23
Table Rock Road Sight Distance............................................................................................................23
Design Year 2025 Build Turn Lane Criterion........................................................................................23
VII. FUTURE YEAR 2038 NO -BUILD AND BUILD CONDITIONS...................................................25
Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Descriptions..............................................................................25
Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Intersection Operations.............................................................25
Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build 951 Percentile Queuing.............................................................26
Future Year 2038 Build Turn Lane Criterion.........................................................................................27
FutureYear 2038 Access Operations.....................................................................................................27
VIII. CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................................30
40
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Roadway Classifications and Descriptions........................................................................................9
Table 2: HCM Level of Service Designations for Stop -Controlled Intersections.........................................11
FIGURE 2:
Table 3: HCM Level of Service Designations for Signalized Intersections..................................................11
Table 4: Year 2020 No -Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour........................................................12
Year 2020 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour..........................................................10
Table 5: Year 2020 No -Build 951 Percentile Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour..............................................12
FIGURE 4:
Table 6: Study Area Intersection Crash Rates, 2013-2017............................................................................14
Table 7: Crash History by Type, 2013-2017.................................................................................................14
Development Trip Assignments, PM Peak Hour...................................................................20
Table 8: Design Year 2025 No -Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour............................................16
FIGURE 6:
Table 9: Design Year 2025 No -Build 951 Percentile Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour.................................17
Table 10: Development Trip Generations.....................................................................................................19
Future Year 2038 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour...............................................28
Table 11: Design Year 2025 Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour................................................21
FIGURE 8:
Table 12: Design Year 2025 Build 95' Percentile Queues, PM Peak Hour..................................................22
Table 13: Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour ..........................25
Table 14: Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build 95' Percentile Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour................26
FIGURES
FIGURE1:
Vicinity Map............................................................................................................................7
FIGURE 2:
Conceptual Site Plan................................................................................................................8
FIGURE 3:
Year 2020 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour..........................................................10
FIGURE 4:
Design Year 2025 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour..............................................18
FIGURE 5:
Development Trip Assignments, PM Peak Hour...................................................................20
FIGURE 6:
Design Year 2025 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour....................................................24
FIGURE 7:
Future Year 2038 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour...............................................28
FIGURE 8:
Future Year 2038 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour.....................................................29
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: TRAFFIC COUNT DATA, SEASONAL ADJUSTMENTS
APPENDIX B: CRASH DATA, ITE TRIP GENERATIONS
APPENDIX C: EXISTING YEAR 2020 NO -BUILD SYNCHRO AND SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT
APPENDIX D: DESIGN YEAR 2025 NO -BUILD SYNCHRO AND SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT
APPENDIX E: DESIGN YEAR 2025 BUILD SYNCHRO AND SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT
APPENDIX F: FUTURE YEAR 2038 NO -BUILD SYNCHRO AND SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT
APPENDIX G: FUTURE YEAR 2038 BUILD SYNCHRO AND SIMTRAFFIC OUTPUT
APPENDIX H: TURN LANE GRAPHS
APPENDIX I: AGENCY REQUIREMENTS
41
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Summary
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC prepared a traffic analysis for a proposed
commercial development on the southwest corner of Table Rock Road and Biddle Road in Central
Point, Oregon. Phase 1 on the subject property has already been approved and includes a quick
lube and automated carwash. The remaining site is proposed to include 54,595 square feet (SF) of
commercial development or shopping center uses. Access to the site is proposed from Biddle Road
and Table Rock Road. North -south (N -S) and east -west (E -W) internal roads are also proposed to
Biddle Road and Hamrick Road.
The proposed 54,595 SF commercial development is estimated to be constructed by the year 2025
and generate 229 primary trips to the transportation system during the p.m. peak hour. Phase 1,
which includes a quick lube and automated car wash, is included as additional background traffic in
the existing year 2020 no -build, design year 2025 no -build, and future year 2038 no -build
scenarios. Five study area intersections were evaluated under existing year 2020, design year 2025,
and future year 2038 conditions to determine what impacts the proposed 54,595 SF commercial
development may have on the transportation system.
Conclusions
The findings of the traffic impact analysis conclude that the proposed commercial development can
be approved with recommended improvements without creating adverse impacts to the
transportation system. Results of the analysis are as follows:
All study area intersections operate acceptably under existing year 2020 and design year 2025
no -build and build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. The intersection of Hamrick Road /
East Pine Street exceeds its performance standard under future year 2038 no -build and build
conditions. By the future year 2038, improvements are planned in the local area, including a
Gebhard Road extension to East Pine Street with signalization. When this occurs, traffic is
expected to decrease specifically in the eastbound left and southbound right turn movements at
Hamrick Road / East Pine Street. It is our expectation that future mitigation for this
intersection, with different improvement scenarios, will be determined when the City prepares a
Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update in the next few years.
2. Right turn lane criterion was evaluated at proposed access points on Biddle Road and Table
Rock Road. A right turn lane is not shown to be warranted on Table Rock Road under any
analysis scenario. A right turn lane is shown to be warranted on Biddle Road under year 2025
build conditions. If acquiring off site right of way to construct this turn lane proves to be
difficult, this improvement can be delayed until the property to the west develops. This is not
considered a high-level safety concern.
3. Queue lengths in the future year 2038 build scenario are shown to potentially impact the full
movement access (referred to as the N -S Internal Road) with Biddle Road. It is concluded that
the full movement access may need to be restricted by this time. This should be further
discussed with Jackson County.
The proposed 54,595 SF commercial development on the southwest corner of Biddle Road and
Table Rock Road is shown to be in compliance with the Central Point Comprehensive Plan and
Land Development Code. Streets that serve the subject property will accommodate projected
p.m. peak hour traffic volumes within acceptable levels of service with identified improvements.
S.O. TJPAN1D0J2TAT/0N -INWIT-E UK, LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 15
Cy]
II. INTRODUCTION
Background
Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC prepared a traffic analysis for a proposed
commercial development on the southwest corner of Biddle Road and Table Rock Road in Central
Point, Oregon. A quick lube and automated car wash are pre -approved on the northwest corner of
the property (as Phase 1 development) and expected to be constructed in 2020. The remaining
property is proposed to include 54,595 SF of commercial development.
A limited traffic analysis is required by the City of Central Point in their land development code
section 17.05.900 to address impacts for a type III procedural application. Jackson County also
requires an analysis because Table Rock Road and sections of Biddle Road within the study area
are under County jurisdiction. The scope of the analysis includes evaluating impacts to the
surrounding transportation system under existing, development build year, and future year
conditions. The study area was determined by the City and County to include all access points to
the site and the following intersections:
1. Hamrick Road / East Pine Street
2. Meadowbrook Drive / Biddle Road
3. Table Rock Road / Biddle Road
4. Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road
Access to the site is proposed from Biddle Road and Table Rock Road. North -south (N -S) and
east -west (E -W) internal roads are also proposed to Biddle Road and Hamrick Road.
Project Location
The subject property is located on the southwest corner of Biddle Road and Table Rock Road on
Township 37S Range 2W Section 01, tax lot 700 in Central Point, Oregon. Refer to Figures 1
and 2 for a vicinity map and site plan.
Project Description
The subject property is zoned C-4 for tourist and office -professional commercial developments. It
is currently vacant. Phase 1 development, which included a quick lube and automated car wash,
was approved in 2019 and is scheduled to be constructed in 2020. For purposes of this analysis,
Phase 1 development was considered as background traffic in year 2020 no -build, design year 2025
no -build, and future year 2038 no -build scenarios. Remaining site development includes 54,595 SF
of commercial or shopping center uses. The commercial development is estimated to generate 229
primary trips to the transportation system during the p.m. peak hour.
S.O. TJPANIDOJRTATION-C11li/I/FFJRII/6, LL( I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 16
43
HAM RICK RD
S 0 UTTI-1-2 N O -N -N O N
T-DANSPOW-ATION 1NGINI-E lK, LLC
Medford, Oregon 97504
ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873
email: kim.parducciggmail.com
44
Table Rock Road
Commercial Development
Traffic Impact Analysis
Central Point, Oregon
igure 1
Vicinity Map
')
AIL ���:,
.
•
h •
t
r, ..
406 0
t
AM f «I
ItL,11-Ad-IL
F
HAM RICK RD
S 0 UTTI-1-2 N O -N -N O N
T-DANSPOW-ATION 1NGINI-E lK, LLC
Medford, Oregon 97504
ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873
email: kim.parducciggmail.com
44
Table Rock Road
Commercial Development
Traffic Impact Analysis
Central Point, Oregon
III. EXISTING YEAR 2020 NO -BUILD CONDITIONS
Site Conditions
The subject property is located on the southwest corner of Biddle Road and Table Rock Road on
Township 37S Range 2W Section 01, tax lot 700 in Central Point, Oregon. The site is currently
vacant. Access is proposed on Biddle Road and Table Rock Road.
Roadway Characteristics
The project study area includes intersections and driveways on Hamrick Road, Table Rock Road,
Meadowbrook Drive, Biddle Road and East Pine Street. A full movement access on Biddle Road
(through a N -S Internal Road) and a right -in, right -out, left -in access on Table Rock Road is
considered in the analysis for site circulation. Study area intersections and driveways are
analyzed in accordance with City of Central Point and Jackson County standards.
Table 1 provides a summary of existing roadway classifications and descriptions in the study
area.
Table 1 - Roadway Classifications and Descriptions
Roadway Jurisdiction Functional Lanes Operational Posted Speed
Classification Standard (MPH)
East Pine Street City of Central Point Minor Arterial 5 LOS D 35
V/C 0.95
Biddle Road Jackson County Minor Arterial 5 V/C 0.95 35-45
Hamrick Road City of Central Point Local 2 LOS D 30-40
Meadowbrook Drive City of Central Point Local 2 LOS D 25
Table Rock Road Jackson County Minor Arterial 2-5 V/C 0.95 45
Traffic Counts
Manual traffic counts (3-6pm) were collected in August of 2019 at study area intersections with
the exception of Hamrick Road/Table Rock Road, which was counted in February of 2020. Year
2019 counts were seasonally adjusted and then increased by 2% to account for one year of
growth, which is consistent with growth in the Exit 33 Interchange Area Management Plan
(IAMP) and Costco study. In comparing 2019 counts to more recent 2020 counts, it doesn't
appear that growth is occurring at that high of a rate but 2% is used to develop year 2020, design
year 2025, and future year 2038 no -build conditions to be consistent with other analyses in the
area. Additional background growth included approved Phase 1 development trips. Refer to
Figure 3 for year 2020 no -build traffic volumes during the p.m. peak hour. Counts are provided
in Appendix A.
S.O. TJPAN1D0J2TflT/0N-IN6/I/F-EPUK, LL( I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 19
46
Figure 3: Year 2020 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour
BEEBE ROAD _ Tall
..% d
ink.
Ui i t o
c
o moN° W oOvo`
265
380 42 2 60 50 O �_ 710 156 ) 1 489
567 667 552 679 560 - 22 320
200 10 17 � 2 m 197 102 40
O
_j w r
PINE STREET �;��EUDDLE RD
S0UTUAN 0-2-GON
T-DANSPOW-ATION 1NGINI•E lK, LLC
Medford, Oregon 97504
ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873
email: kim.parducci(agmail.com
47
Table Rock Road
Commercial Development
Traffic Impact Analysis
Central Point, Oregon
Intersection Capacity and Level of Service
Intersection capacity calculations were conducted utilizing the methodologies presented in the
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 6th Edition). Capacity and level of service calculations for
signalized and unsignalized intersections were prepared using "SYNCHRO" timing software.
Level of service quantifies the degree of comfort afforded to drivers as they travel through an
intersection or along a roadway section. The level of service methodology was developed to
quantify the quality of service of transportation facilities. Level of service is based on total delay,
defined as the total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle
departs from the stop line. Level of service ranges from "A" to "F", with "A" indicating the most
desirable condition and "F" indicating an unsatisfactory condition. The HCM LOS designations
for stop -controlled intersections are provided in Table 2. The HCM LOS designations for
signalized intersections are provided in Table 3.
Table 2 — HCM Level of Service Designations for Stop -Controlled Intersections
Level of Service
Delay Range
A
<10
B
>10 — 15
C
>15-25
D
>25 — 35
E
>35 — 50
F
> 50
Table 3 — HCM Level of Service Designations for
Signalized Intersections
Level of Service
Delay Range
A
<10
B
>10-20
C
>20 — 35
D
>35 — 55
E
>55 — 80
F
> 80
Streets within the study area are under City of Central Point and Jackson County jurisdiction.
The City of Central Point requires all study area intersections to operate at acceptable levels of
service (LOS). The minimum acceptable level of service for signalized intersections and
unsignalized intersection movements is LOS "D". Jackson County's operational standard
considers a volume -to -capacity (V/Q ratio standard. The acceptable performance standard for
signalized and unsignalized intersections per the Jackson County Transportation System Plan is a
v/c ratio no greater than 0.95 within the boundary of the Metropolitan Planning Organization
(MPO) and 0.85 outside of the MPO boundary. All intersections under Jackson County
jurisdiction are within the MPO. Mitigation is, therefore, required at study area intersections
operating below a LOS "D" if under City jurisdiction and a v/c ratio of 0.95 if under Jackson
County jurisdiction.
S.O. TJ2ANfP0PTAT/0n -11Y6/NFFJ//N6, L LC I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 111
48
Year 2020 No -Build Intersection Operations
Study area intersections were evaluated under existing year 2020 no -build conditions during the
p.m. peak hour. Results are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4 - Year 2020 No -Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour
Intersection /
Intersection
Performance
Standard
Traffic
Control
Year 2020 No -Build
Hamrick Road / East Pine Street
LOS D, V/C 0.95
Signal
C, 0.85
Meadowbrook Drive / Biddle Road
LOS D, V/C 0.95
TWSC
C, 0.19 SBL
Table Rock Road / Biddle Road
V/C 0.95
Signal
0.63
Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road
V/C 0.95
TWSC
0.31 EBL
N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road
V/C 0.95
TWSC
C, 0.06 NBL
LOS = level of service, V/C = volume -to -capacity, TWSC = two-way stop controlled, EBL = eastbound left, SBL = southbound left,
NBL = northbound left
Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic
Results of the analysis show all study area intersections operate acceptably (within performance
standards) under existing year 2020 no -build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Refer to
Appendix C for synchro output sheets.
Year 2020 No -Build 95th Percentile Queuing
Queuing is the stacking up of vehicles for a given lane movement, and it can have a significant
effect on roadway safety and the overall operation of a transportation system. Long queue
lengths in through lanes can block access to turn lanes, driveways, and minor street approaches,
as well as spill back into upstream intersections. As a result of this, the estimation of queue
lengths is an important aspect of the analysis process for determining how a transportation
corridor operates.
Queue lengths are reported as the average, maximum, or 95th percentile queue length. The 95th
percentile queue length is used for design purposes and is the queue length reported in this
analysis. Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTraffic to determine 95th percentile
queue lengths. Queues were evaluated at study area intersections under existing year 2020 no -
build conditions. Queue lengths were rounded up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length)
and reported in Table 5 for the p.m. peak hour.
Table 5 — Year 2020 No -Build 95th Percentile Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour
Intersection /
Available Link
95th Percentile Exceeded or
Movement
Distance (Ft)
Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway
East Pine Street / Hamrick Road
Eastbound Left
400
300 -
Eastbound Through/Right
675
175 -
Westbound Left
300
25 -
Westbound Through/Right
825
250 -
Northbound Left'
450
250 -
Northbound Through/Right'
450
75 -
Southbound Left/Through
350
125 -
Southbound Richt
200
225 -
S.O. TJ2ANfP0PTAT/0n-11%/JU_Vft1l16, L LC I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 112
49
Table 5 Continued — Year 2020 No -Build 95" Percentile Oueue Lengths, PM Peak Hour
Intersection /
Available Link
951' Percentile Exceeded or
Movement
Distance (Ft)
Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway
Meadowbrook / Biddle Road
525
125 -
Eastbound Left
200
50 -
Eastbound Through/Right
825
0 -
Westbound Left
385
25 -
Westbound Through/Right
1100
0 -
Northbound Left
100
25 -
Northbound Through/Right
425
25 -
Southbound Left
100
50 -
Southbound Throuch/Riaht
375
50 -
Table Rock Road / Biddle Road
Eastbound Left
425
225 -
Eastbound Through/Right
525
125 -
Eastbound Right
200
50 -
Westbound Left
150
75 -
Westbound Through/Right
1400
200 -
Westbound Right
250
125 -
Northbound Left
425
125 -
Northbound Through/Right
1025
150 -
Southbound Left
650
150 -
Southbound Through/Right
650
200 -
Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road
Eastbound Left
225
100 -
Eastbound Right
1000
50 -
Northbound Left
300
50 -
Northbound Through
400
0 -
Southbound Throueh/Rieht
1025
25 -
N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road
Eastbound Through/Right 500 0 -
Westbound Left 100 25 -
Northbound Left 400 50 -
Northbound Right 100 50 -
Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic
1. Planned improvements (south approach restriped with a left turn and through/right lane) considered in place
Results of the queuing analysis show no study area intersection queue lengths are exceeded under
existing year 2020 no -build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Queue lengths were field
verified specifically at the signalized intersections of Hamrick Road / Pine Street and Table Rock
Road / Biddle Road during the peak hour, and then adjusted in our model (with decreased
saturation flow rates) until the output was consistent with observations. The eastbound left and
eastbound through queue lengths on Biddle Road at Table Rock Road were the only queues that
reported lower 95th percentile queue lengths, but the reported max queue lengths were a good
match to field conditions so those queues are reported in Table 5. Refer to Appendix C for a full
queuing and blocking report.
f.0. TJ2ANfPOPTAT1On-11YOM.U.P111(i, L LC I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 113
50
Crash History
Crash data for the most recent 5 -year period was provided from ODOT's crash analysis unit.
Results were provided for the period of January 1, 2013 through December 31St, 2017. Crash data
was analyzed to identify crash patterns that could be attributable to geometric or operational
deficiencies, or crash trends of a specific type that would indicate the need for further
investigation at an intersection. Study area intersection crash rates were also compared to 90th
percentile rates using the HCM prediction model. Tables 6 and 7 provide a summary of results.
Crash data is provided in Appendix B.
Table 6 - Study Area Intersection Crash Rates, 2013-2017
Intersection 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total AD Crash ODOT
Crashes Rate 90th
Hamrick / E Pine Street
5
2
1
7
5
20
26,650
0.411
0.860
Meadowbrook / Biddle
1
0
0
1
0
2
13,700
0.080
0.408
Table Rock / Biddle
3
3
4
7
4
21
25,800
0.446
0.860
Hamrick / Table Rock
0
0
0
0
0
0
12,200
0.000
0.293
Table 7 - Crash History by Type, 2013-2017
Intersection Collision Type Severity
The highest crash frequency occurred at the intersections of Hamrick Road / E Pine Street and
Table Rock Road / Biddle Road. At Hamrick Road / E Pine Street, 65% of collisions were
turning or angle collisions, 30% were rear -end, and 5% were fixed -object. At Table Rock Road /
Biddle Road, 86% were rear -end collisions and 10% were turning or angle. Of the rear -end
collisions, 12 of 17 were northbound on Table Rock Road and five were southbound likely from
congestion on Table Rock Road. Turning and angle collisions were split from the north and
south and involved permissive left turning vehicles. Turning movement and angle collisions are
common at signalized intersections with protected/permissive turning movements and at
unsignalized intersections with center turn lanes. Rear -end collisions are common under
congested conditions. More than half of the collisions resulted in injury at Table Rock Road /
Biddle Road and 50% at Hamrick Road / East Pine Street, but none resulted in fatalities. There
was a more serious injury (INJA) at Table Rock Road / Biddle Road in September of 2015
involving a driver northbound with a driver making a southbound left turn movement. The
southbound left turning driver failed to yield right-of-way. None of the study area intersection
crash rates reached the 90th percentile rate or were identified as a SPIS site.
Widening improvements on Table Rock Road south of Biddle Road and intersection striping
changes have occurred since the last year of available crash data was reported (2017).
Congestion, specifically along Table Rock Road, has decreased as a result of widening
S.O. TJ2ANfP0PTAT/0n -11Y6/NFFJ//N6, L LC I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 114
51
Rear-
End
Turning
/Angle
Other
Pedestrian/
Bicyclist
Non- Injury
Injury
Fatal
Hamrick / E Pine Street
6
13
1
0
10 ] 0
0
Meadowbrook / Biddle
0
1
1
0
1 1
0
Table Rock / Biddle
18
2
1
0
7 14
0
Hamrick / Table Rock
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
The highest crash frequency occurred at the intersections of Hamrick Road / E Pine Street and
Table Rock Road / Biddle Road. At Hamrick Road / E Pine Street, 65% of collisions were
turning or angle collisions, 30% were rear -end, and 5% were fixed -object. At Table Rock Road /
Biddle Road, 86% were rear -end collisions and 10% were turning or angle. Of the rear -end
collisions, 12 of 17 were northbound on Table Rock Road and five were southbound likely from
congestion on Table Rock Road. Turning and angle collisions were split from the north and
south and involved permissive left turning vehicles. Turning movement and angle collisions are
common at signalized intersections with protected/permissive turning movements and at
unsignalized intersections with center turn lanes. Rear -end collisions are common under
congested conditions. More than half of the collisions resulted in injury at Table Rock Road /
Biddle Road and 50% at Hamrick Road / East Pine Street, but none resulted in fatalities. There
was a more serious injury (INJA) at Table Rock Road / Biddle Road in September of 2015
involving a driver northbound with a driver making a southbound left turn movement. The
southbound left turning driver failed to yield right-of-way. None of the study area intersection
crash rates reached the 90th percentile rate or were identified as a SPIS site.
Widening improvements on Table Rock Road south of Biddle Road and intersection striping
changes have occurred since the last year of available crash data was reported (2017).
Congestion, specifically along Table Rock Road, has decreased as a result of widening
S.O. TJ2ANfP0PTAT/0n -11Y6/NFFJ//N6, L LC I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 114
51
improvements. Costco traffic has also normalized in the area. No further investigation is shown
to be necessary.
Biddle Road Access Point
A full movement access on Biddle Road has been approved for Phase 1 development, which will
eventually become a N -S Internal Road that connects to an existing E -W Internal Road from
Hamrick Road to the subject property. The existing E -W Internal Road currently ends just west
of the subject property but will be extended to the N -S Internal Road as part of the proposed
54,595 SF shopping center development. The full -movement access on Biddle Road will be
located approximately 525 feet west of Table Rock Road (measured from stop bar) and 485 feet
east of Meadowbrook Drive. The traffic movements that need to be monitored include the
eastbound left, through, and right turn queue lengths on Biddle Road at Table Rock Road, and the
westbound left turn queue length on Biddle Road at Meadowbrook Drive. Queue lengths from
these traffic movements could spill back and impact the Biddle Road access. An aerial is shown
below.
The westbound left turn movement at Meadowbrook Drive is shown to have a 95th percentile
queue length of 25 feet under existing conditions. Similarly, the eastbound left, through, and
right turn movements are shown to have 95th percentile queue lengths of 225 feet, 125 feet, and
50 feet, respectively. Queue lengths were field verified to make sure the model simulations were
reporting accurate queue lengths. Results show that no existing queue length from either
direction is shown to reach or impact the proposed development access on Biddle Road under
year 2020 no -build conditions (including Phase 1 development) during the p.m. peak hour.
S.O. LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 115
52
IV. DESIGN YEAR 2025 NO -BUILD CONDITIONS
Design Year 2025 No -Build Description
Design year 2025 no -build conditions represent development build year conditions for a study
area without consideration of proposed development trips. This condition is evaluated to
determine how a study area will be impacted by area background growth. Background growth in
the analysis, as previously stated, was kept consistent with growth used in the I-5 Exit 33 IAMP
and Costco study for consistency. Growth (-2% per year) was determined using model runs
provided by ODOT's Transportation Planning Analysis Unit (TPAU). Additionally, trips from
Phase 1 development (quick lube and automated car wash) were included. Refer to Figure 4 for
design year 2025 no -build traffic volumes during the p.m. peak hour.
Design Year 2025 No -Build Intersection Operations
Study area intersections were evaluated under design year 2025 no -build conditions during the
p.m. peak hour. Results are summarized in Table 8.
Table 8 — Design Year 2025 No -Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Performance
Standard
Traffic
Control
Year 2025 No -Build
Hamrick Road / East Pine Street
LOS D, V/C 0.95
Signal
C, 0.90
Meadowbrook Drive / Biddle Road
LOS D, V/C 0.95
TWSC
C, 0.22 SBL
Table Rock Road / Biddle Road
V/C 0.95
Signal
0.69
Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road
V/C 0.95
TWSC
0.37 EBL
N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road
V/C 0.95
TWSC
C, 0.07 NBL
LOS=Level of Service, V/C=Volume-to-Capacity, TWSC=Two-way stop controlled, EBL=eastbound left, SBL=southbound left,
NBL=northbound left
Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic
Results of the analysis show all study area intersections continue to operate acceptably (within
performance standards) under design year 2025 no -build conditions during the p.m. peak hour.
Refer to Appendix D for synchro output sheets.
Design Year 2025 No -Build 951h Percentile Queuing
Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTraffic to determine 95th percentile queue lengths
at study area intersections under design year 2025 no -build conditions. Queue lengths were
rounded up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length) and reported in Table 9 for the p.m. peak
hour.
f. 0. TJ2ANfP0PTATI0n-1/16/JU_Vft1l16, LLC I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 116
53
Table 9 — Design Year 2025 No -Build 95th Percentile
Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour
Intersection /
Available Link
95" Percentile Exceeded or
Movement
Distance (Ft)
Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway
East Pine Street / Hamrick Road
Eastbound Right
200
Eastbound Left
400
450 -
Eastbound Through/Right
675
225 -
Westbound Left
300
25 -
Westbound Through/Right
825
275 -
Northbound Left'
450
275 -
Northbound Through/Right'
450
75 -
Southbound Left/Through
350
125 -
Southbound Right
200
275 -
Meadowbrook / Biddle Road
Eastbound Left
200
50 -
Eastbound Through/Right
825
0 -
Westbound Left
385
25 -
Westbound Through/Right
1100
0 -
Northbound Left
100
25 -
Northbound Through/Right
425
25 -
Southbound Left
100
50 -
Southbound Throueh/Rieht
375
50 -
Table Rock Road / Biddle Road
Eastbound Left
425
275 -
Eastbound Through/Right
525
150 -
Eastbound Right
200
50 -
Westbound Left
150
75 -
Westbound Through/Right
1400
200 -
Westbound Right
250
125 -
Northbound Left
425
125 -
Northbound Through/Right
1025
150 -
Southbound Left
650
175 -
Southbound Throueh/Rieht
650
225 -
Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road
Eastbound Left
225
100 -
Eastbound Right
1000
50 -
Northbound Left
300
50 -
Northbound Through
400
0 -
Southbound Through/Right
1025
25 -
N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road
Eastbound Through/Right
500
0 -
Westbound Left
100
25 -
Northbound Left
400
50 -
Northbound Rieht
100
50 -
Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic
1. Planned improvements (south approach restriped with a left turn and through/right lane) considered in place
Results of the queuing analysis show no study area intersection queue length is exceeded under
design year 2025 no -build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. The eastbound left turn queue
length on Biddle Road at Table Rock Road increases from 225 feet to 275 feet, but this is still
well below the 425 feet of available storage length. The westbound left turn queue length on
Biddle Road at Meadowbrook Drive stays the same (25 feet). The westbound left turn queue
length on Biddle Road at the N -S Internal Road also stays the same (25 feet). The N -S Internal
Road, therefore, continues to operate acceptably as a full movement access on Biddle Road under
design year 2025 no -build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. Refer to Appendix D for a full
queuing and blocking report.
f.0. TJ2ANfPOPTAT1On -11 OM.U.P111(i, L LC I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 117
54
Figure 4: Design Year 2025 No-Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour
,d
�_ 21
BEEBE ROAD, I
F J_:, •
o
W
420 4660 1j 50 Q� �_ 783 170 11 290
625 r�1T 735 610 r 752 O r - 6540
17 22 .' 45
220 1 I� II I 1 2 Ism 1355 y 97
' •r I10��1��
LU ba
r '�~��• r
PINE STREET
a ... B_IDDLE RD
Site
TO
jo
S0UTUAN 0-2-GON
T-DANSPOW-ATION 1NGINI-E lK, LLC
Medford, Oregon 97504
ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873
email: kim.parducciggmail.com
55
Table Rock Road
Commercial Development
Traffic Impact Analysis
Central Point, Oregon
V. SITE TRAFFIC
Trip Generation
Trip generation calculations for the proposed 54,595 SF commercial development were prepared
utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 10th Edition. ITE rates
were used for land use code 820 — Shopping Center. Pass -by trips were considered in accordance
with ITE recommended practices. No internal trip reductions were taken. Table 10 provides a
summary of trip generations. ITE graphs are provided in Appendix B.
Table 10 — Development Trip Generations
Land Use Unit Size PM Peak PM PM Peak Hour
Rate Trips
SF = Square Feet
Trip Distribution and Assignment
Development trips were distributed in accordance with existing traffic volumes within the study
area and engineering judgement. Roadway volumes were compared in the local project vicinity
to estimate the percentage of trips going to and coming from Hamrick Road, East Pine Street,
Biddle Road, Meadowbrook Drive, and Table Rock Road. This resulted in 15% to/from the north
on Hamrick Road, 30% to from the west on East Pine Street, 5% to/from Meadowbrook Drive,
15% to/from the north on Table Rock Road, 10% to/from the south on Table Rock Road, and
20% to/from the east on Biddle Road. Refer to Figure 5 for shopping center development trip
distributions and assignments during the p.m. peak hour.
Proposed Access Points
Under design year 2025 no -build and
build conditions, a full movement access
via a N -S Internal Road exists at Biddle
Road. A second access is proposed on
Table Rock Road under design year 2025
build conditions approximately 450 feet
south of Biddle Road and 600 feet north
of Hamrick Road. This access is
proposed as a right -in, right -out, left -in
access.
S.O. TPa1YfP0PT4T/0M-[/161iFTft1J%, LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 119
56
Total
% In In % Out Out
820 — Shopping Center 1000 SF 54.595 Fitted
347
0.48 167 0.52 180
34% Pass -by
(118)
(59) (59)
Total Primary Trips
229
108 121
SF = Square Feet
Trip Distribution and Assignment
Development trips were distributed in accordance with existing traffic volumes within the study
area and engineering judgement. Roadway volumes were compared in the local project vicinity
to estimate the percentage of trips going to and coming from Hamrick Road, East Pine Street,
Biddle Road, Meadowbrook Drive, and Table Rock Road. This resulted in 15% to/from the north
on Hamrick Road, 30% to from the west on East Pine Street, 5% to/from Meadowbrook Drive,
15% to/from the north on Table Rock Road, 10% to/from the south on Table Rock Road, and
20% to/from the east on Biddle Road. Refer to Figure 5 for shopping center development trip
distributions and assignments during the p.m. peak hour.
Proposed Access Points
Under design year 2025 no -build and
build conditions, a full movement access
via a N -S Internal Road exists at Biddle
Road. A second access is proposed on
Table Rock Road under design year 2025
build conditions approximately 450 feet
south of Biddle Road and 600 feet north
of Hamrick Road. This access is
proposed as a right -in, right -out, left -in
access.
S.O. TPa1YfP0PT4T/0M-[/161iFTft1J%, LLC I February 28, 2020 1 Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 119
56
Figure 5: Shopping Center Trip Assignments, PM Peak Hour
S 0 UTTI-1-2 N 0-2-G O N
T-DANSPOW-ATION 1NGINI-E lK, LLC
Medford, Oregon 97504
ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873
email: kim.parducciggmail.com
Table Rock Road
Commercial Development
Traffic Impact Analysis
57 I Central Point, Oregon
VI. DESIGN YEAR 2025 BUILD CONDITIONS
Design Year 2025 Build Description
Build conditions represent no -build conditions for a study area with the addition of proposed
development trips considered. Build conditions are compared to no -build conditions to determine
what impacts and/or mitigation measures will result from proposed development. Build
conditions in year 2025 are for a 54,595 SF commercial/shopping center development.
Design Year 2025 Build Intersection Operations
Design Year 2025 build traffic volumes were evaluated at study area intersections during the p.m.
peak hour to compare impacts. Results are summarized in Table 11.
Table 11— Design Year 2025 Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour
Intersection '
Performance
Standard
Traffic
Control
Year 2025 Build
Hamrick Road / East Pine Street
LOS D, V/C 0.95
Signal
C, 0.94
Meadowbrook Drive / Biddle Road
LOS D, V/C 0.95
TWSC
C, 0.28 SBL
Table Rock Road / Biddle Road
V/C 0.95
Signal
0.72
Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road
V/C 0.95
TWSC
0.38 EBL
N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road
V/C 0.95
TWSC
C, 0.20 NBL
Site Access / Table Rock Road
V/C 0.95
TWSC
0.06 EBR
LOS=Level of Service, V/C=Volume-to-Capacity, TWSC=Two-way stop controlled, EBL=eastbound left, EBR=eastbound right,
SBL=southbound left, NBL=northbound left
Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic
Results of the analysis show all study area intersections continue to operate acceptably (within
performance standards) under design year 2025 build conditions during the p.m. peak hour.
Small changes occur at the signalized intersections of Hamrick Road/ E. Pine Street and Table
Rock Road / Biddle Road, but both continue to meet their performance standard. The new site
driveway on Table Rock Road is shown to have minor delay with the critical movement being the
eastbound right turn movement. The critical movement (northbound left) v/c ratio at the N -S
Internal Road intersection with Biddle Road increases from a v/c ratio of 0.07 (LOS C) to 0.20
(LOS C) as a result of proposed shopping center development, but continues to meet the County
performance standard. Synchro output sheets are provided in Appendix E for further reference.
Design Year 2025 Build 95th Percentile Queuing
Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTraffic to determine 95th percentile queue lengths
at study area intersections under design year 2025 build conditions. Queue lengths were rounded
up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length) and reported in Table 12 for the p.m. peak hour.
f. 0. TJ2ANfP0PTAT/0n-1/16/JU_Vft1l16, LLC I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 121
58
Table 12 — Design Year 2025 Build 95" Percentile
Queue Lengths, PM Peak Hour
Intersection /
Available Link
95t1 Percentile Exceeded or
Movement
Distance (Ft)
Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway
East Pine Street / Hamrick Road
Northbound Left
400
Eastbound Left
400
450 -
Eastbound Through/Right
675
250 -
Westbound Left
300
25 -
Westbound Through/Right
825
300 -
Northbound Left'
450
350 -
Northbound Through/Right'
450
75 -
Southbound Left/Through
350
175 -
Southbound Right
200
300 -
Meadowbrook / Biddle Road
Eastbound Left
200
50 -
Eastbound Through/Right
825
0 -
Westbound Left
385
25 -
Westbound Through/Right
1100
0 -
Northbound Left
100
25 -
Northbound Through/Right
425
25 -
Southbound Left
100
50 -
Southbound Through/Right
375
50 -
Table Rock Road / Biddle Road
Eastbound Left
425
275 -
Eastbound Through/Right
525
175 -
Eastbound Right
200
50 -
Westbound Left
150
75 -
Westbound Through/Right
1400
225 -
Westbound Right
250
125 -
Northbound Left
425
150 -
Northbound Through/Right
1025
150 -
Southbound Left
650
175 -
Southbound Through/Right
650
250 -
Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road
Eastbound Left
225
100 -
Eastbound Right
1000
50 -
Northbound Left
300
50 -
Northbound Through
400
0 -
Southbound Throueh/Right
600
25 -
N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road
Eastbound Through/Right
500
25 -
Westbound Left
100
50 -
Northbound Left
400
75 -
Northbound Right
100
75 -
Site Access / Table Rock Road
Eastbound Right
200
50 -
Northbound Left
450
25 -
Southbound Throueh/Riaht
450
0 -
Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic
1. Planned improvements (south approach restriped with a left turn and through/right lane) considered in place
Results of the queuing analysis show small increases in queue lengths at study area intersections
under design year 2025 build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. The northbound left turn
queue length on Hamrick Road at East Pine Street increases to 350 feet from additional traffic
using the E -W Internal Road when leaving the commercial development. Similarly, the
northbound left and right turn queue lengths on the N -S Internal Road at Biddle Road increase as
f.0. TJ2ANfPOPTAT/On -11Y6/NFFJ//N6, L L C I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 122
59
a result of additional traffic from the commercial development, but no significant changes are
shown to occur. Refer to Appendix E for a full queuing and blocking report.
Design Year 2025 Access Points
Site access points under design year 2025 build conditions are shown to operate acceptably with
additional traffic from shopping center development. The full movement access on Biddle Road,
which becomes the N -S Internal Road connection to the E -W Internal Road from Hamrick Road,
experiences a small increase in delay (northbound left turn movement) of 17 seconds to 20
seconds with a v/c ratio increase of 0.07 to 0.20, but these are considered minor changes. The
new site access on Table Rock Road is shown to have an average delay of 11 seconds in the
eastbound right turn movement and 9 seconds in the northbound left turn movement. Our
simulations and intersection operations output show both access points on Biddle Road and Table
Rock Road operating acceptably with build out of the shopping center in year 2025. Nothing
indicates a need to restrict the full movement access on Biddle Road as a result of shopping
center traffic under this analysis scenario. If, at any time, queue lengths on Biddle Road increase
to a point that having a full movement access between Table Rock Road and Meadowbrook Drive
becomes problematic, however, the County has the right to restrict access to the N -S Internal
Road. Until that occurs, there's a benefit to having more access options for drivers because it
preserves capacity at surrounding intersections.
Table Rock Road Sight Distance
The new site access on Table Rock Road is proposed as a right -in, right -out, left -in access. The
movements that need visual clearance include the eastbound right and northbound left turn
movements. Table Rock Road is straight and flat in this section. Sight distance is unrestricted
for both movements and shown to be adequate.
Design Year 2025 Build Turn Lane Criterion
Right Turn Lane
Right turn lane criterion was evaluated on Biddle Road at the N -S Internal Road and on Table
Rock Road at the proposed site driveway during the p.m. peak hour to determine whether right
turn deceleration lanes are necessary under design year 2025 build conditions for the eastbound
and southbound movements, respectively. Results of the analysis show criterion is met on Biddle
Road and, therefore, warrants a deceleration lane. This may be determined to be difficult,
however, because the street frontage needed for the turn lane is off site. From our perspective,
the right turn lane is not a high safety concern because there are two eastbound travel lanes on
Biddle Road, which reduces the potential for rear -end collisions. If the off-site frontage is not
able to be obtained for a right turn lane and Jackson County cannot condemn it, then construction
of a right turn lane can be delayed until the property to the west develops without creating
significant safety concerns. Criterion was not shown to be met on Table Rock Road. Refer to
Appendix H for right turn lane graphs.
S.O. TJ2ANfP0PTAT10M -11Y6/NFFJ//N6, LLC I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 123
60
Figure 6: Design Year 2025 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour
BEEBE ROAD r
ilk
o
v v,
420 51
655 740
220 T1 j `I I/
N /4'
PINE STREET
U,' o 0
I 60 55
655 762
}� 2
d&
B_IDDLE RD
r•' a
K 1
S0UTUAN 0-2-GON
T-DANSPOW-ATION 1NGINI-E lK, LLC
Medford, Oregon 97504
ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873
email: kim.parducciggmail.com
61
al
0
C�
��
LU
W
J �I�
m 11
763 Q - 9 L)0 290
597 555
v
62 . 385 1j
50
89 — � 110�
• 1 4 �
a'''.
35
Table Rock Road
Commercial Development
Traffic Impact Analysis
Central Point, Oregon
VII. FUTURE YEAR 2038 NO -BUILD & BUILD CONDITIONS
Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Description
Future year 2038 no -build conditions represent development build year conditions without
consideration of build development trips. Future year 2038 build conditions represent no -build
conditions with the addition of development trips considered. Growth between design year 2025
and future year 2038 was developed using a 2% annual growth, as stated previously in this report.
Study area intersections were then balanced. Refer to Figures 7 and 8 for future year 2038 no -
build and build traffic volumes during the p.m. peak hour.
Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Intersection Operations
Study area intersections were evaluated under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions
during the p.m. peak hour. Results are summarized in Table 13.
Table 13 — Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build Intersection Operations, PM Peak Hour
Intersection
Performance
Standard
Traffic
Control
Future Year
2038 No -Build
Future Year
2038 Build
Hamrick Road / East Pine Street
LOS D, V/C 0.95
Signal
D, 1.12
E, 1.14
Meadowbrook Drive / Biddle Road
LOS D, V/C 0.95
TWSC
C, 0.38 SBL
C, 0.53 SBL
Table Rock Road / Biddle Road
V/C 0.95
Signal
0.90
0.93
Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road
V/C 0.95
TWSC
0.61 EBL
0.64 EBL
N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road
V/C 0.95
TWSC
C, 0.09 NBL
D, 0.25 NBL
Site Access / Table Rock Road
V/C 0.95
TWSC
NA
0.07 EBR
LOS=Level of Service, V/C=Volume-to-Capacity, TWSC=Two-way stop controlled, EBL=eastbound left, EBR=eastbound right,
SBL=southbound left, NBL=northbound left
Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic
Results of the analysis show the signalized intersection of Hamrick Road / East Pine Street
exceeding its performance standard under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions. All
other study area intersections are shown to operate acceptably with and without proposed
shopping center development trips. By the future year 2038, planned improvements in the local
area, including a Gebhard Road connection to East Pine Street, are expected to re-route traffic at
the intersection of Hamrick Road / East Pine Street. Re-routing is specifically expected to
decrease traffic in the eastbound left and southbound right turn movements. Once these
improvements are in place, it can be determined whether additional mitigation is necessary at
Hamrick Road / East Pine Street. If the Gebhard Road connection does not occur by the future
year 2038, then required mitigation will likely include a second eastbound left turn lane on East
Pine Street and possibly an additional westbound receiving lane for the southbound right turn
movement on Hamrick Road. These improvements have been previously discussed in the Exit 33
IAMP and other studies. It is our conclusion that specific mitigation for this intersection, if
shown to be necessary, will likely be determined when the City prepares a Transportation System
Plan (TSP) Update in the next few years. Refer to Appendices F and G for synchro output sheets.
S.O. TJ2ANfP0PTAT10M -1/16/JU_Vft1l16, LLC I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 125
62
Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build 951h Percentile Queuing
Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTraffic to determine 95th percentile queue lengths
at study area intersections under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions. Queue lengths
were rounded up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length) and reported in Table 14 for the
p.m. peak hour.
Table 14 — Future Year 2038 No -Build and Build 95" Percentile Queue Lengths, PNI Peak Hour
Intersection / Available Link 95th Percentile 95th Percentile Exceeded or
Movement Distance (Ft) Queue Lengths Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway
No -Build Build
East Pine Street / Hamrick Road
Eastbound Left
400
600
625 Bank Driveway
Eastbound Through/Right
675
275
300
Westbound Left
300
100
100 -
Westbound Through/Right
825
525
625 -
Northbound Left'
450
375
500 E -W Internal Road
Northbound Through/Right'
450
100
175 -
Southbound Left/Through
350
250
275 -
Southbound Right
200
325
325 Right Turn Storage
Meadowbrook / Biddle Road
650
250
250 -
Eastbound Left
200
75
75 -
Eastbound Through/Right
825
0
0 -
Westbound Left
385
25
25 -
Westbound Through/Right
1100
0
0 -
Northbound Left
100
25
25 -
Northbound Through/Right
425
25
25 -
Southbound Left
100
50
50 -
Southbound Throueh/Rieht
375
50
50 -
Table Rock Road / Biddle Road
Eastbound Left
425
275
325 -
Eastbound Through/Right
525
200
225 -
Eastbound Right
200
75
75 -
Westbound Left
150
75
100 -
Westbound Through/Right
1400
300
300 -
Westbound Right
250
225
250 -
Northbound Left
425
200
250 -
Northbound Through/Right
1025
225
225 -
Southbound Left
650
250
250 -
Southbound Through/Right
650
350
425 -
Hamrick Road / Table Rock Road
Eastbound Left
225
200
225 -
Eastbound Right
1000
200
175 -
Northbound Left
300
50
50 -
Northbound Through
400
0
0 -
Southbound Throueh/Rieht
1025/600
25
25 -
N -S Internal Road / Biddle Road
Eastbound Through/Right
500
25
25 -
Westbound Left
100
50
50 -
Northbound Left
400
50
75 -
Northbound Right
100
50
75 -
Site Access / Table Rock Road
Eastbound Right
200
-
50 -
Northbound Left
450
-
25 -
Southbound Through/Right
450
-
0 -
Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic
1. Planned improvements (south approach restriped with a left turn and through/right lane) considered in place
f.0. TJ2ANfPOPTAT/On -11Y6/NFFJ//N6, L L C I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 126
63
Results of the queuing analysis show three traffic movements exceed their available storage
lengths at the intersection of Hamrick Road / East Pine Street under future year 2038 no -build and
build conditions. These include the southbound right turn, eastbound left turn, and northbound
left turn movements. No other traffic movements at study area intersections are shown to exceed
their storage length. Refer to Appendices F and G for a full queuing and blocking report.
Future Year 2038 Build Turn Lane Criterion
Right Turn Lane
Right turn lane criterion was evaluated on Biddle Road and shown to be met under design year
2025 build conditions, so this was not re-evaluated under future conditions. Turn lane criterion
was evaluated on Table Rock Road at the proposed site access under future year 2038 build
conditions. Results of the analysis show criterion is not met on Table Rock Road as a result of
shopping center development and a turn lane is not warranted. Refer to Appendix H for right turn
lane graphs.
Future Year 2038 Access Operations
Under future year 2038 no -build and build conditions, a full movement access on Biddle Road
and a right -in, right -out, left -in access on Table Rock Road was considered. Both access points
were evaluated and shown to operate acceptably (within City of Central Point and Jackson
County performance standards). The eastbound left turn queue on Biddle Road at Table Rock
Road is shown to increase from 275 feet to 325 feet under build conditions. The available storage
distance, assuming 100 feet of storage for the westbound left turn movement on Biddle Road at
the N -S Internal Road, is approximately 425 feet. This leaves approximately 100 feet of margin
before the back to back queue lengths overlap within the available storage length. Based on this,
it is our conclusion that the N -S Internal Road access on Biddle Road may need to be restricted
under future year 2038 build conditions. It is our recommendation to discuss this further with
Jackson County.
The right -in, right -out, left -in site access on Table Rock Road is located over 400 feet south of
Biddle Road. The northbound left turn queue length on Table Rock Road at Biddle Road is the
queue that could potentially impact the northbound left -in movement at this access. The
northbound left turn queue length at Table Rock Road / Biddle Road is reported to increase from
200 feet to 250 feet under future year 2038 build conditions, which is well below the allowable
storage length. Based on this, it is our conclusion that the proposed site access can remain as
evaluated without creating any adverse impacts to the transportation system.
S.O. TJ2ANfP0PTAT1On -11Y6/NFFJ//N6, L LC I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 127
64
Figure 7: Future Year 2038 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour
BEEBE ROAD _ r
/ F
�, Noy
510 _ �T 60
780— 945
285 15
m
, PINE STREET
BIDDLE RD
rte• _
L4
S0UTUAN 0-2-GON
T-DANSPOW-ATION 1NGINI-E lK, LLC
Medford, Oregon 97504
ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873
email: kim.parducciggmail.com
65
O
LH
m +
308 Q —220 375
695
14 60
2 . 0
• 140 �
1 i
O � N
N 7
j s
7 4k
Table Rock Road
Commercial Development
Traffic Impact Analysis
Central Point, Oregon
Figure 8: Future Year 2038 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour
BEEBE ROAD _ r
lr�
nN�
510 ! 65
810 950
285 15
c.�
, PINE STREET
r
Q
2
I
BB DDLE RD
I r.• 1 _
:mak I
S0UTUAN 0-2-GON
T-DANSPOW-ATION 1NGINI-E lK, LLC
Medford, Oregon 97504
ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873
email: kim.parducciggmail.com
...
_��� i' II; • �
a.0 4
t _ I
to
i W
J _I_
m 1
988 Q -375
235 710
2
62 480 1j 65
'57 �— • 140C
N 7
j s
�, 1b
•
Y •c ."17
�1
35
Table Rock Road
Commercial Development
Traffic Impact Analysis
Central Point, Oregon
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
Conclusions
The findings of the traffic impact analysis conclude that the proposed commercial development can
be approved with recommended improvements without creating adverse impacts to the
transportation system. Results of the analysis are as follows:
All study area intersections operate acceptably under existing year 2020 and design year 2025
no -build and build conditions during the p.m. peak hour. The intersection of Hamrick Road /
East Pine Street exceeds its performance standard under future year 2038 no -build and build
conditions. By the future year 2038, improvements are planned in the local area, including a
Gebhard Road extension to East Pine Street with signalization. When this occurs, traffic is
expected to decrease specifically in the eastbound left and southbound right turn movements at
Hamrick Road / East Pine Street. It is our expectation that future mitigation for this
intersection, with different improvement scenarios, will be determined when the City prepares a
Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update in the next few years.
2. Right turn lane criterion was evaluated at proposed access points on Biddle Road and Table
Rock Road. A right turn lane is not shown to be warranted on Table Rock Road under any
analysis scenario. A right turn lane is shown to be warranted on Biddle Road under year 2025
build conditions. If acquiring off site right of way to construct this turn lane proves to be
difficult, this improvement can be delayed until the property to the west develops. This is not
considered a high-level safety concern.
3. Queue lengths in the future year 2038 build scenario are shown to potentially impact the full
movement access (referred to as the N -S Internal Road) with Biddle Road. It is concluded that
the full movement access may need to be restricted by this time. This should be further
discussed with Jackson County.
The proposed 54,595 SF commercial development on the southwest corner of Biddle Road and
Table Rock Road is shown to be in compliance with the Central Point Comprehensive Plan and
Land Development Code. Streets that serve the subject property will accommodate projected
p.m. peak hour traffic volumes within acceptable levels of service with identified improvements.
S.O. TJ2ANfPOPTAT10M -11Y6/NFFJ//N6, LLC I February 28, 2020 I Table Rock Commercial Dev TIA 130
67
Table Rock Road
Commercial Development
Type III Procedure
APPENDICES A -I
February 28, 2020
Prepared By:
OUT -II pm O- ion T-RwmfpO-QT QTION -1 NGIN-c-cpliY6, L L C
68
OUT411 aN Up'loN
TP,Qtifpo,PT-IITION -ENGIN-c-E,RING, LLC
Medford, Oregon 97504
Phone 541.608.9923 Fax 541.535.6873
Email: Kim.parducci@gmail.com
69
PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
File No.: SUB -20001
Before the City of Central Point Planning Commission
Consideration of a Tentative Plan for the Table Rock Crossing Subdivision
Applicant:
South Salem, LLC
PO Box 4460
Medford OR 97501
Findings of Fact
and
Conclusion of Law
PART 1
INTRODUCTION
The applicant submitted a tentative plan application (Type III) for the Table Rock Crossing Subdivision to
subdivide 7.01 acres into eight (8) commercial lots ("Application"). The property is located within the
Tourist and Office Professional (C-4) zoning district.
A subdivision tentative plan is reviewed as a Type III application. Type III applications are reviewed in
accordance with procedures provided in Section 17.05.400, which provides the basis for decisions upon
standards and criteria in the development code and the comprehensive plan, when appropriate.
The standards and criteria for the proposal are set forth in CPMC Title 16, Subdivisions, and Chapter
17.75, Development and Design Standards. The following findings address each of the standards and
criteria as applies to the subdivision tentative plan.
PART 2
SUBDIVISIONS
Title 16 of the Central Point Municipal Code (CPMC) establishes standards and criteria for land
division applications including tentative plans and final plats. The sections of CPMC 16 applicable to
the Application are:
Chapter 16.10 - Tentative Plans.
This section of code provides design standards and principles of acceptability, the information
required on a tentative plan map and other supplementary material that may be required for review
of the application.
Finding CPMC 16.10: The tentative plan, as represented by Attachment "A-1 " of the Planning
Department Staff Report dated April 28, 2020, has been reviewed for compliance with the
Page 1 of 3 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -20001
70
requirements of Chapter 16.10 and found to contain all the necessary information. As a condition
of approval, the applicant is required to submit a subdivision plat name from the Jackson County
Surveyor.
Conclusion CPMC 16.10: Complies as conditioned.
CPMC 16.20.020 Streets – Generally
Streets created by subdivisions and partitions shall be designed and constructed in conformance
with the requirements of the city's comprehensive plan, this code, the city's public works
standards, and all conditions established by the city.
Finding CPMC 16.20: Access to the proposed subdivision will be provided by a new Retail
Street, which provides access to Table Rock Road and Biddle Road with a connection to Hamrick
Road through existing developments to the west. The Retail Streets are designed to minimum
construction standards, provides landscape rows and sidewalk connections throughout the site.
Internal circulation will be provided by access easements
Conclusion CPMC 16.20: As evidenced by the Tentative Plan and Parks & Public Works Staff
Report referenced above, the proposed retail streets are designed and planned for construction
consistent with City standards.
Chapter 16.24, Blocks and Lots—Design Standards
The lengths, widths and shapes of blocks shall be designed with due regard to providing adequate
building sites suitable to the special needs of the type and use contemplated, needs for convenient
access, circulation, control and safety of street traffic and limitations and opportunities of topography.
Finding CPMC 16.24: While the proposed perimeter block length of 2,152 feet exceeds the maximum
perimeter block length of 2, 000 feet, the standards may be modified due to traffic safety concerns. The
intersection of the private street along Table Rock Road was increased from the 300 foot minimum to
455 feet to increase safety and traffic movement along Table Rock Road, and accounts for the
increase in perimeter block length.
Conclusion CPMC 16.24: Complies.
PART 3
ZONING ORDINANCE
The purpose of Title 17 of the CPMC is to encourage the most appropriate use of land, promote orderly
growth of the city, and promote public health, safety, convenience and general welfare. The sections of
CPMC 17 applicable to the application are:
Chapter 17.05, Applications and Types of Review Procedures
This Chapter establishes standard decision-making procedures that enable the city, the applicant, and
the public to review applications and participate in the local decision making process. There are four
Page 2 of 3 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -20001
71
(4) types of review procedures, Type I, II, II, and IV that are applied to land use and development
applications in Table 17.05. 100. 1. It also establishes when a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is
required.
Finding CPMC 17.05: As identified in Table I, Section 17.05.100.1 a subdivision tentative plan is
reviewed using Type III procedures. The application has been noticed and processed in accordance
with the Type III review procedures per Section 17.05.400. A TIA was submitted by Southern Oregon
Transportation, for the proposed development in accordance Section 17.05.900.
Conclusion CPMC 17.05: Complies.
Chapter 17.75, Design and Development Standards
CPMC 17.75.031 General Connectivity, Circulation and Access Standards
The purpose of this section is to assure that the connectivity and transportation policies of the city's
Transportation System Plan are implemented. In achieving the objective of maintaining and enhancing
the city's small town environment it is the city's goal to base its development pattern on a general
circulation grid using a walkable block system. Blocks may be comprised of public/private street
right-of-way, or accessways.
Finding CPMC 17.75.031: The proposed development will use private retail streets to provide
connections to the public streets. The private streets will also permit the development to meet the
perimeter block length standards and provide connections from Hamrick Road through existing
developments to the west
While the proposed perimeter block length of 2,152 feet exceeds the maximum perimeter block length
of 2, 000 feet, the standards may be modified due to traffic safety concerns. The intersection of the
private street along Table Rock Road was increased from the 300 foot minimum to 455 feet to
increase safety and traffic movement along Table Rock Road, and accounts for the increase in
perimeter block length.
The Retail Streets are designed to minimum construction standards, provide landscape rows and
sidewalk connections throughout the site. Internal circulation for vehicles andpedestrians will be
provided by access easements
Conclusion CPMC 17.75.031: Complies.
PART 4
SUMMARY CONCLUSION
As evidenced in Planning Department Supplemental Findings, the proposed tentative plan application for
the Table Rock Crossing Subdivision is, as conditioned in the Staff Report dated May 5, 2020, in
compliance with the applicable criteria set forth in Title 16 and Title 17 of the Central Point Municipal
Code.
Page 3 of 3 Findings & Conclusions of Law File No.: SUB -20001
72
pp--
PAp%kk
ublic Works Department CENTRAL
POINT
Oregon
PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT
April 15, 2020
AGENDA ITEM:
SUB- 20001 —8 lot commercial subdivision
Traffic:
Matt Samitore, Director
The applicant is proposing an 8 lot commercial subdivision. The City uses the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Volume 10 for scoping Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The
threshold is 25 PHT, on a particular intersection, or can be required as part of a conditional use
permit. A TIA was completed by Southern Oregon Transportation for this use. Access to the
site is controlled by Jackson County Roads on both Table Rock Road and Biddle Avenue. They
are allowing right in and out on and left in on both movements. The TIA also points out that at a
future year more improvements are needed at Hamrick and Biddle/Pine. The City is working
on a plan to expand the intersection as well as future north bound movements via a Gebhard
Road project. Both are scheduled to be completed during the planning horizon.
Existing Infrastructure:
Water: There is 8 inch waterline in the private drive to the west of the development
Streets: Table Rock and Biddle Road are major arterial streets owned and maintained by
Jackson County. The private drive to the west is a private retail street.
Storm Water: There is 24" Storm Drain line in the private drive that has adequate capacity for
the proposed development. Jackson County also has a line on Biddle that may be
accessible.
Issues:
There are two main issues:
Reciprocal Access — The application shows public access thru the subject site. Permanent
easements for the development of the private retail street and the access to the west are
needed for access, circulation and vehicular movements.
2. Storm Utility Connection - The proposed development shows connection to the Jackson
County storm drain system. There is limited capacity in this system, so it will be
necessary for the applicant to coordinate with Jackson County to determine if any of the
storm run-off associated with this development can be connected to the existing system.
73
Conditions of Approval:
1. PW Standards and Specifications — Applicant shall comply with the public works
standards and specifications for construction within the right of way.
2. Jackson County — Applicant shall obtain all the necessary approvals from Jackson County
Roads for the construction of a new access for the private retail street on to Table Rock
Road and for any public utility connections.
3. Landscape Row - The applicant will be required to install a landscape row with street
trees on the Biddle Road and Table Rock Road frontage. Maintenance of that landscape
row is required by the adjoining property owner, in this case each individual lot, per
CPMC.
4. Storm Water Quality - The project is within the Phase 2 stormwater quality area and will
require a stormwater management plan that is in accordance with the Rogue Valley
Stormwater Quality Design Manual (RVSQDM). An operations and maintenance
agreement for all new stormwater quality features is required. Construction on site must
be sequenced so that the permanent stormwater quality features are installed and
operational when stormwater runoff enters.
5. Erosion Control. — The proposed development will disturb more than one acre and will
require an erosion and sediment control permit (NPDES 1200-C) from the Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ).
74
Roads
Engineering
14 Chuck D0..vier
Constniciion Engineer
ri—INAIN I a AMC& —iiiiI I
JACKSON COUNTY 200
Whi Antelope Road
White City, OR 97503
Phone: (541) 774-6255
Roads Fax: (541) 774-6295
dejanvca@jacksoncounty.org
www.jacksoncounty.org
April 27, 2020
Attention: Justin Gindlesperger
City of Central Point Planning
140 south Third Street
Central Point, OR 97502
RE. Subdivision tentative plat for an 8 -lot commercial subdivision on
Table Rock Road at Biddle Road— county -maintained roads.
Planning File: SUB -20-001- Revision 1; 37 -2W -01C Tax Lot 700
Dear Justin:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on consideration of a Subdivision tentative plan for an
8 -lot commercial subdivision on an approximately 7 -acre property within the C-4 zoning district at 4245
Table Rock Road. Jackson County Roads offers the following comments:
Prior to opening of this phase, Jackson County requests the Biddle Road full movement access
be modified to a right -in, right -out, left -in (RIROLI) lane. The turn and receiving lanes shall have
adequate queuing to ensure safe and efficient operation of the intersection during the first year
of opening. This work will require a Minor Road Improvement Permit from Jackson County.
2. Prior to opening of this phase, Jackson County requests construction of a right -in, right -out, left -
in (RIROLI) lane on Table Rock Road. This work will require a Minor Road Improvement Permit
from Jackson County.
3. The applicant shall submit construction drawings including the median designs for review,
comment and approval prior to the project pre -construction meeting
4. Jackson County reserves the right to restrict the left -in accesses at any time if either became a
safety concern in the judgement of Jackson County. Further it is likely this restriction will be
required at one or both locations within 20 years.
5. If frontage improvements are required, the applicant shall obtain a minor road improvement
permit from Jackson County Roads Sidewalk placement on Biddle Road frontage if required
should be directly behind the curb. Jackson County Roads does not maintain planter strips.
6. Roads requires the removal of any existing driveways not being used on either Table Rock
Road or Biddle Road and replacing them with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. If curb, gutter and
sidewalk is not existing, it will be required.
7. Utility Permits are required from Roads for any utility work within the county road right-of-way.
On longitudinal trenches within a travel lane 100' or greater in length, unless otherwise
approved by the Engineer, the existing pavement shall be removed and replaced to full paving -
75
April 27, 2020
Page 2 of 2
machine width (normally 10'-12') for a travel lane restoration. Drag boxes or other pull -type
asphalt spreaders will not be permitted for longitudinal trench pavement replacement.
8. Per Oregon Revised Statute 209.150, any survey monuments of record removed, disturbed or
destroyed within the permit area must be referenced prior to construction and replaced after
construction by a registered professional land surveyor. All costs associated with this surveying
work are the responsibility of the permit holder
9. Biddle Road is a County Minor Arterial and is maintained by the County. The Average Daily
Traffic count was 9,984 for eastbound lanes 450 east of Hamrick Road on July 31, 2018 and
9,677 for westbound lanes on July 31, 2018 450 feet east of Hamrick Road.
10. Table Rock Road is a County Arterial and is maintained by the County. The Average Daily
Traffic count was 20,723 750 north of Biddle Road on July 9, 2018.
11. If county storm drain facilities are to be utilized, the applicant's registered Engineer shall provide
a hydraulic report and plans for review and approval by Jackson County Roads. Storm
drainage runoff is limited to that area currently draining to the County storm drainage system.
Upon completion of the project the developer's Engineer shall certify that the construction of the
drainage system was constructed per the approved plan. A copy of the certification shall be
sent to Chuck DeJanvier at Jackson County Roads.
12. We would like to be notified of future development proposals, as county permits may be
required.
13. We concur with any right-of-way dedicated.
Sincerely,
^t�
Chuck DeJavier, PE
Construction Engineer
I:\Engineering\Development\CITIES\CNTRLPT\SUB-207601-revision 1.doc
ioO' SEwe# N,
��-
April 2020
ROGUE VALLEY SEWER SERVICES
Location: 138 West Vilas Road, Central Point, OR - Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3130, Central Point, OR 7502-0005
Tel. (541) 664-6300, Fax (541) 664-7171 www.RVSS.us
Justin Gindlesperger
City of Central Point Planning Department
155 South Second Street
Central Point, Oregon 97502
Re: SUB -20001, Table Rock Crossing, Tax Lot 700, Map 37 2W 01C
The existing property currently does not have sewer service. There is an existing 8 inch sewer main
and manhole just west of the subject property. Sewer service for the proposed development will
require a sewer main extension into the property from the existing manhole. Sewer connection
permits will be issued upon acceptance of the sewer main and payment of related fees.
Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of the application be subject to the following
conditions:
1. The applicant must provide sewer construction plans prepared per RVSS standards for
review and approval.
Feel free to call me with any questions.
Sincerely,
Nicholas R. Bakke, PE
District Engineer
K:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPT\PLANNG\SUBDIVISION\2020\SUB-20001_TABLE ROCK
CROSSING.DOC
77
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 879
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A TENTATIVE PLAN
FOR AN 8 LOT SUBDIVISION TO BE KNOWN AS TABLE ROCK CROSSING.
(File No: SUB -20001)
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a tentative plan application to create an 8 lot subdivision
consisting of commercial property identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 01C, Tax
Lot 700, Central Point, Oregon; and
WHEREAS, the project site is located in the C-4, Tourist and Office Professional zoning district; and
WHEREAS, the application has been found to be consistent with the applicable approval criteria set forth
in Title 16, Subdivisions and Title 17, Zoning, and per conditions noted in the Staff Report dated May 5,
2020; and
WHEREAS, on May 5, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Point Planning
Commission considered the Applicant's request for Tentative Plan approval for Table Rock Crossing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by
Resolution No. 879 does hereby approve the Tentative Plan application for Table Rock Crossing,
based on the findings and conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibit "A," the Planning
Department Staff Report dated May 5, 2020, including attachments incorporated by reference.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5th day of
May, 2020.
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
City Representative
Planning Commission Resolution No. 879 (05/04/2020)
78
79
City_ of Central Point, Oregon
140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502
541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384
www.centralpointoregon.gov
P5W__
AOW%k
CENTRAL
PANT
Oregon
STAFF REPORT
May 5, 2020
AGENDA ITEM: File No. CPA -19006
Community Development
Tom Humphrey, AICP
Community Development Director
Public Hearing to Consider a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Map Change
application to change the zoning designation on multiple properties totaling 12.12 acres south of
Bush Street between South 4th and South 1St Streets from C -2(M) Commercial -Medical to R-1-6
(Residential Single Family) and Civic. The project area is identified on the Jackson County
Assessor's map as 37 2W 11BC, Tax Lots 800 through 5000 and 37S 2W 11BL, Tax Lots 100-
700. Applicant: City of Central Point.
STAFF SOURCE:
Tom Humphrey AICP, Community Development Director
BACKGROUND:
The City is initiating minor comprehensive plan and zone map amendments in an area
identified as the C2MLand Use Study Area in the Land Use Element of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. This area has been in transition since the close of the Asante Medical
Facility. The Asante property and adjoining home sites were designated for Commercial -
Medical uses in the past but this designation is no longer applicable. At the time the Land
Use Element was being considered for adoption in 2018 the Asante Corporation was
negotiating the sale of their property and it is clear with its sale to School District #6 that the
property will no longer be used for medical purposes.
The School District asked the City to initiate a zone change for their property alone but under
the circumstances the City considers it wise to eliminate the medical zoning designation
altogether. Since there are many single family homes in the C -2(M) zoning district, residents
and property owners may wish to have their commercial zoning changed to residential
zoning at no expense to them. The change will allow residents to maintain their single family
homes or duplexes and to add ADUs if they choose. It will also allow the future expansion of
School District #6 facilities. In consideration of this application, there are four criteria that
should be addressed:
Statewide Planning Goals. A finding of consistency with the applicable statewide
planning goals applies to both major and minor amendments to the Comprehensive
Plan (reference CPMC, Chapter 17.96.500 Approval criteria). The proposed
Comprehensive Plan Land Use revision and Map change constitute an amendment to
employment and residential land uses in Central Point. In each case the City has
performed a Buildable Lands Inventory the results of which support these changes.
80
The changes are compatible with 1) a Civic Goal: To include in each land use
category sufficient public lands for land uses related to community public facilities,
such as city hall, public schools, community centers, etc. and 2) a Residential Goal:
To preserve the value and character of older -single-family neighborhoods through
proper zoning, including reasonable efforts to encourage maintenance and
rehabilitation as an alternative to transitional development at higher densities. Staff
believes that proposed changes are consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 2 — Land
Use Planning (Attachment B).
2. Comprehensive Plan Compliance. The current land use plan designation for the
property is Commercial Medical and was designated a study area in the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element because it was an area in transition. The
proposed Low Density Residential and Civic land use and zoning designations would
be consistent with the existing and the proposed uses in the neighborhood. The
properties in question will be given more realistic land use categories that have been
adopted by the City and are consistent with City goals, policies and actions.
3. Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning. The proposed zone map
amendment occurs on thirty three (33) lots south of Bush Street between South 4th
and South 1St Streets. South 2nd Street is the main entrance into the School District
property. This is an established neighborhood of predominantly single family homes
which is contiguous to other neighborhoods of single family homes and civic uses to
the north, south and east.
Property owners and lenders have periodically questioned the legal non -conforming
status of homes in this area during property sales and refinancing. This typically
hasn't proven to be a problem in the C -2(M) zoning district but it will be much
clearer in the future if the homes were zoned exclusively residential. Preliminary staff
analysis indicated that rezoning will not change property tax assessment.
4. Traffic Impacts/Transportation Planning Rule Compliance. The State
Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) in OAR 660-012-0060 requires changes to land
use plans and land use regulations (i.e. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and
Zoning Map Amendments) to be consistent with the function and capacity of existing
and planned transportation facilities. The City contracted with a local engineering
group (Ausland) who evaluated the impact the comp plan and zone change will have
on traffic within the vicinity (Attachment ("C"). Their conclusion is that the proposed
amendments will generate more daily trips than the current land use designations.
Upon further investigation it appears that trips generated from homes in the existing
zoning district were not included in the analysis. They do show up in the proposed
zoning district. If assumptions are reexamined, there should be no net increase in
Daily Trips from one zone to the next. The Planning Department Supplemental
Findings (Attachment `B") reflect the conclusions in the engineer's analysis.
ISSUES:
Staff is awaiting an answer from the traffic consultant and a resolution of assumptions used
for the traffic analysis.
81
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment "A" — Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps
Attachment `B" — Planning Department's Findings
Attachment "C" — Ausland Group Traffic Impact Analysis
Attachment "D" — Resolution No. 880 (Distributed at a later date)
ACTION:
Open public hearing and consider the proposed amendment to the Zoning Map, close public
hearing and 1) recommend approval to the City Council; 2) recommend approval with revisions;
or 3) deny the application.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 880 Per the Staff Report dated May 5, 2020 and
supported by Findings of Fact.
82
ATTACHMENT "A
Current Comprehensive Plan Map
83
—�
CENTRAL
Z
POINT
Current Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Designation
Community Commercial
File No, ZC-18006
Legend
- –
\ �.. f
i - !
C -2(M) Current Comp Plan
Very Low Density
Low Density
Medium Density,
- High Density
- Community Commercial
— Employment Commercial
- General Commercial
Civic
® C21VI Land use Study Area
Tal
Created by:
Stephanie Holtey, Principal Planner
Date,
October 15, 2018
oiso sao aco F-
1
83
Current Zone Designation Map
84
.
CENTRAL
.
. Iff L
POINT
Current Zoning Designation
\ \
C -2(M) - Commercial -Medical District
File No. ZC-18006
j
�\
\
\ STI '
✓
\ _
�
1
Legend
JM 2MLBndl SAyAres
O Tnld
-BCG -Beat Creek GreenxaV
� 42(M) = Gom—.1-Med1ca1 Di—
G1 = TW dee end OIXtt
GS=TM1em�glM1hre Cemmarnal
�/ CN = NeighbaXaatl Commercial
Chw
Eroo cb2
_EC=Empbymen[Coeniemial90�I
GC = U-1 Cemmeich.l [BOO)
\
_
NMR = Ni6M1 M'¢ ReeMentiallCemrrerdal (TOp)
LMR = La• W RWd-1900)
LIL
EfO�LMR•
M-1 =fndasbh
\
j
V V
\ /
_ M2=Induehhl Genxal
MMR = Medium Mp Resldentul {i00)
EM
OMMR•
05= Open Spaoel Parke
-R3=MUXiple Fa ly Resitlentiaf
-R-2=Tvp-FamlMRestle 1
R = ar ReeTial -6,000
r
\
% 1
— L—
-
R. 1 -0 = Sr Res—
iaenvai - 8,000
R-1-10 = ar Rseldenthl -16,600
R�L = Law censl[y Resgmtisl
created by:
Stephanie Haltey, Principal Planner
Date:
October 15, 2018
0 150 300 500 Feet
84
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Designation
CENTRAL
POINT
Proposed Lancs Use Designation
Legend
= Ta)dots
5tudyArea
05
Very Low density
ILLJ Medium Density
Law Density
- High Density
- Commercial
Civic
85
0 170 340 680 Feet.
Created 6y_
Eileen Mitchell, Community Planner 1
Date- 913 0120 19
Proposed Zoning Map Change
Ak
CENTRAL
POINT
Proposed Zoning Designation
Legend
® 5tudyArea
Taxlot
Civic
GC (TOD)
LMR (TOD)
MMR (TOD)
OS
- R-3
R-1-6
R -1-B
86
170 340 680 Feet
Created 6y_
Eileen Mitchell, GammunityPlan ner 1
Date: 11112!2019
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
File No. CPA -19006
Before the City of Central Point Planning Commission
Consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Land Use Redesignation on multiple
properties totaling 12.12 acres south of Bush Street between South 4th and South I't Streets. The
property is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S2W IIBC, Tax Lots 800
through 5000 and 37S 2W 11BL, Tax Lots 100-700.
Applicant:
City of Central Point and ) Findings of Fact
Central Point School District #6 ) and Conclusion of Law
PART 1
INTRODUCTION
The above referenced tax lots are proposed to be redesignated and rezoned to low density residential and
civic uses to conform with existing residential activity and to allow the redevelopment of a former
medical facility for civic activity. The proposal will not have a widespread and significant impact
beyond the immediate area.These findings have been prepared with the understanding that both the
Comprehensive Plan (Map) and Zoning Map will be changed to become consistent with one another.
The Comprehensive Plan Amendment involves a quasi-judicial map amendment, which is processed
using Type III application procedures. These procedures are set forth in Section 17.05.400 and provide
the basis for decisions upon standards and criteria in the development code and the comprehensive plan,
when appropriate.
Applicable development code criteria for this Application include:
1. Statewide Planning Goals
2. Comprehensive Plan
3. State Transportation Planning Rule
4. CPMC, Chapter 17.96
Findings will be presented in six (6) parts addressing the requirements of Section 17.05.400 as follows:
1. Introduction
2. Statewide Planning Goals
3. Comprehensive Plan
4. StatewideTransportation Rule
5. Zoning Ordinance
6. Summary Conclusion
PART 2
STATEWIDE PLANNING GOALS
A finding of consistency with the applicable statewide planning goals applies to both major and minor
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (reference CPMC, Chapter 17.96.500 Approval criteria).
87
Goal 2: Land Use Planning
PART I — PLANNING
To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decision and actions
related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for such decisions and actions ...
Finding: The proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use revision and Map change constitute an
amendment to employment and residential land uses in Central Point. In each case the City has
performed a Buildable Lands Inventory the results of which support these changes. The changes
are compatible with a Civic Goal: To include in each land use category sufficient public lands
for land uses related to community public facilities, such as city hall, public schools, community
centers, etc. and a Residential Goal: To preserve the value and character of older -single-family
neighborhoods through proper zoning, including reasonable efforts to encourage maintenance
and rehabilitation as an alternative to transitional development at higher densities. The
proposed language reflects land use changes made by the City over time and identifies current
land uses and zones approved by the City and acknowledged by the state. The Oregon
Department of Land Conservation and Development was notified of this Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and has not yet commented.
Conclusion: Consistent with Statewide Planning Goal for Land Use Planning.
PART 3
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map currently designates the properties in question as the C2M
Land Use Study Area and the land use application proposes to re -designate this land for Low Density
Residential and Civic uses to match neighborhood designations. This area has been in transition since
the close of the Asante Medical Facility. The Asante property and adjoining homesites were designated
for Commercial -Medical uses but this designation no longer applicable. At the time the Land Use
Element was being considered for adoption the Asante Corporation was negociating the sale of their
property and it is clear with its sale to School District #6 that the property will no longer be used for
medical purposes.
Finding: The properties in question will be given land use categories that have been adopted by
the City and are consistent with City goals, policies and actions.
Conclusion: Consistent.
PART 4
STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION RULE
Section 660-012-0060(1) Where an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive
plan, or a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility,
the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule to assure that
allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standards (e.g.
level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) of the facility. A plan or land use regulation amendment
significantly affects a transportation facility if it would:
a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility;
88
b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or
c) As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted transportation system
plan:
(A) Allow types or levels of land uses that would result in levels of travel or access that are
inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility;
(B) Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility below the
minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is
otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard
identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(a): The proposed plan amendment and zone change does not change
the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility. The proposed zone
change from C -2(M) to R-1-6 and Civic will not necessitate a change to any of the surrounding
street classifications. Bush Street and South 1St, 2nd and 4' Streets are all local residential streets.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(a): No significant affect.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(b): A traffic analysis was performed for the proposed plan
amendment and zone change however an error in an assumption of existing conditions rendered
an incorrect conclusion about daily trips generated. Once the assumption is corrected it is
expected that there will be no or an insignificant increase in daily trips from the existing zoning
to the proposed zoning. Consequently, the proposed amendments will not cause a change to
standards implementing the City's transportation system.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(b): No significant affect.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(c)(A): The proposed plan amendment and zone change will not cause
an increase in land uses that would result in levels of travel or access that would be inconsistent
with the City's functional street classification system for existing and planned transportation
facilities.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(c)(A): No significant affect.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(c)(B): There are no known operational of safety concerns as a result
of the proposed land use amendment and zone change. The proposed zone change will not
reduce the performance of any existing or planned transportation facilities below the minimum
acceptable performance standard identified in the Master Plan, or in the City's Transportation
System Plan.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(c)(B): No significant affect.
Finding 660-012-0060(1)(c)(C): The proposed plan amendment and zone change will not cause
the worsening of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to
perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the Master Plan or
89
Comprehensive Plan. No captital improvements are scheduled in the City's TSP nor are they
anticipated in this sector of the community.
Conclusion 660-012-0060(1)(c)(C): No significant affect.
PART 5
ZONING ORDINANCE
17.10.300 Quasi-judicial amendments.
A. Applicability of Quasi -Judicial Amendments. Quasi-judicial amendments are those that involve
the application of adopted policy to a specific development application or code revision, and not the
adoption of new policy (i. e., through legislative decisions). Quasi-judicial zoning map amendments
shall follow the Type III procedure, as governed by Section 17.05.400, using standards of approval in
subsection B of this section. The approval authority shall be as follows:
1. The planning commission shall review and recommend land use district map changes that do
not involve major amendments;
2. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the city council on an application
for a comprehensive plan map amendment. The city council shall decide such applications; and
3. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the city council on a land use
district change application that also involves a comprehensive plan map amendment
application. The city council shall decide both applications.
Finding 17.10.300(A): A plan amendment and zone change application has been submitted to
redesignate 12.12 acres from Commercial -Medical to Low Density Residential and Civic. The
proposal will not have a widespread and significant impact beyond the immediate area. The
proposal will be considered by the planning commission and a recommendation will be made to
the City Council for final decision.
Conclusion 17.10.300(A): Consistent.
B. Criteria for Quasi -Judicial Amendments. A recommendation or a decision to approve, approve
with conditions or to deny an application for a quasi-judicial amendment shall be based on all of the
following criteria:
1. Approval of the request is consistent with the applicable statewide planning goals;
Finding 17.10.300(B)(1): See Part 2, Statewide Planning Goals findings and conclusions.
Conclusion 17.10.300(B)(1): Consistent
2. Approval of the request is consistent with the Central Point comprehensive plan;
Finding 17.10.300(B)(2): See Part 3, Comprehensive Plan findings and conditions.
Conclusion 17.10.300(B)(2): Consistent.
90
3. The property and affected area is presently provided with adequate public facilities, services and
transportation networks to support the use, or such facilities, services and transportation
networks are planned to be provided in the planning period; and
Finding 17.10.300(B)(3): Public facilities, services and transportation networks have been
established pursuant to the City's TSP and are sufficient to serve the allowable uses. The
proposal will not significantly increase the demand on public facilities over the current uses.
Conclusion 17.10.300(B)(3): Consistent.
4. The change is in the public interest with regard to neighborhood or community conditions, or
corrects a mistake or inconsistency in the comprehensive plan or land use district map regarding
the property which is the subject of the application.
Finding 17.10.300(B)(4): The proposed plan amendment and zone change are consistent with
Strategic Planning goals, are in the interest of the community, are compatible with surrounding
land uses and correct inconsistencies in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning maps.
Conclusion 17.10.300(B)(4): Consistent.
17.10.600 Transportation planning rule compliance.
Section 660-012-0060(1) Where an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive
plan, or a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility,
the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule to assure that
allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standards (e.g.
level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) of the facility. A plan or land use regulation amendment
significantly affects a transportation facility if it would:
a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility;
b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or
c) As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted transportation system
plan:
(A) Allow types or levels of land uses that would result in levels of travel or access that are
inconsistent with the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility;
(B) Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility below the
minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan; or
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is
otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard
identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
Finding 17.10.600(1): See Part 4, Statewide Transportation Planning Rule findings and
conclusions.
Conclusion: Consistent.
91
PART 6
SUMMARY
Conclusion: As evidenced in findings and conclusions, the proposed plan amendment and zone change
are consistent with applicable standards and criteria in the Central Point Municipal Code, including the
Statewide Planning Goals (where applicable), Comprehensive Plan, and Statewide Transportation
Planning Rule.
92
FNGINEERS. RUILDERS CONSUITANTS
March 17, 2020
Tom Humphrey AICP
City of Central Point
130 S. 3rd. Street
Central Point, OR 97502
Re: Traffic Impacts of Comprehensive Plan L Zone Change for Former Asante Property
(CPA -19006, Map 37-2W-11 BC)
Dear Mr. Humphrey,
This letter provides a summary of findings regarding the traffic impact of the pending
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zone Change for the former Asante property located
south of Bush Street between S. I 5 Street and S. 4th Street (Map 37-2W-1 1 BC).
BACKGROUND
A Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) and Zone Change (ZC) joint application has been
submitted for the subject properties, which include the former Asante property (formerly Cascade
Community Hospital) and 24 existing single-family residential properties. The current land use
designation is proposed to change from Commercial -Medical District (C -2(M) Zone) to a mix of
Residential -Low Density (R-1-6) and Civic (C), as the Jackson County School District 6 has acquired
this property. These properties and the changes are as depicted in Figures 1-4.
TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS
The pending CPA and ZC require an assessment of the potential traffic increase from the proposed
land use changes. Accordingly, we began our trip generation analysis by looking at the existing
land use scenario versus the proposed scenario. We then matched up the land use categories
(per the Central Point Municipal Code) with the most similar classifications in the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. Utilizing the ITE data for each
classification, we were able to calculate the total number of daily trips, as well as AM and PM
peak trips. In some cases, the ITE allows for "pass -by" trips... a reduction in the number of daily
trips. However, since this pass -by reduction only applies to commercial and retail developments
it has no effect in these scenarios. The trip counts are summarized in Table A.
3935 Highland Avenue 321 Mill Street, Ste #3 130 A Street, Ste #617
Grants Pass, OR 97526 Eugene, OR 97401 Ashland, OR 97520
office: 541.476.3788 office: 541.345.1094 office: 541.482.0923
93
WWW.AUSLANDGROUP.COM
WASH: Ausibi906CB ORE: 172333 CALIF: 906735
Figure 1. Current Comprehensive Plan Map
Current Land Use Designation
Legend L
�••.�. aw Denvh
®'.;.— � fth Denvl/ 0 170 390 680 Feel
CENTRAL i. Cenena.mal
POINTely Lew Danvl CI.1e C.ealed by
61— Milchell CCmmumly Planner 1
FleCium Densly Dale 111ID2019
Figure 3. Current Zoning Map
A
CENTRAL
POINT
Figure 2. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map
1.
0- tl
I
Proposed Land Use Designation
L7T.d
0 ra.ana Lm. D—M,
CENTRAL ®S[°'yA.. 14yh Density 0 170 390 680 Feel
DS Cemmmnal . . . - . .
POINT ryLaw Deer cm, Cleeled
Mad— Den' 61een Mdch.1LCemmundy Planned
Dale 9!3012019
Figure 4. Proposed Zoning Map
Legend
®SNOyArea MMR (rOD)
CENTRAL 0 Ta.1ol OS 190 399 69390 669 Feel
POINT c—- R3 ta -.
GC (TOD) R -1L 61— Mdchelt Cammu mry Planum1
LMR (TOD) R-1-8 Dale 11/12/2019
Page 2 of 3
94
Current Zoning Designation
Legend
C -2(M)
®SMdyAma
MMR DOD)
O T lot
OS 0170 112 680 Feel
CnIL
R-3 -
GC (TOD)
R -1L Cleated by
LMR (TOD)
61een Mitchell C...—, Parma I
R-1-3 Dala 9/]0!2019
Figure 2. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map
1.
0- tl
I
Proposed Land Use Designation
L7T.d
0 ra.ana Lm. D—M,
CENTRAL ®S[°'yA.. 14yh Density 0 170 390 680 Feel
DS Cemmmnal . . . - . .
POINT ryLaw Deer cm, Cleeled
Mad— Den' 61een Mdch.1LCemmundy Planned
Dale 9!3012019
Figure 4. Proposed Zoning Map
Legend
®SNOyArea MMR (rOD)
CENTRAL 0 Ta.1ol OS 190 399 69390 669 Feel
POINT c—- R3 ta -.
GC (TOD) R -1L 61— Mdchelt Cammu mry Planum1
LMR (TOD) R-1-8 Dale 11/12/2019
Page 2 of 3
94
Table A - Estimated Trip Generation (Weekday Daily, AM and PM Peak)
References: Trip Grnrrulion ,Manual, 91h lid. In;tilute of Trunsporhilnm FJiguurrs, 2012
Trip Genera hon I lundhook, 2nd lid., Institute of TransporFnhou Engineers, 200.1 -
CONCLUSION
Per Table A, the Existing land use scenario generates 342 daily trips, and the Proposed scenario
generates 628 daily trips. This results in an increase of 286 daily trips, in addition to an increase of
128 AM peak trips, and an increase of 31 PM peak trips. Therefore, there is definitely an increased
traffic impact for the pending CPA and ZC on the subject parcels.
Per the City of Central Point Municipal Code Article 17.05.900 Traffic Impact Analysis; a traffic
impact analysis (TIA) is required if a non-residential development is projected to generate an
increase in peak hour volume of a particular movement to and from the state highway by twenty
percent or more, or increase in site traffic volume generation of two hundred fifty (250) average
daily trips (ADT) or more. Since the pending CPA and ZC generate an increase of 285 daily trips,
a TIA is required.
Sincerely,
Charles L. Kroning, PE
Sr. Civil Engineering Manager
Page 3 of 3
95
Net Change
Existing
Proposed
Pro Exist
C -2(M)
R-1-6 Civic
.tonin
Commercial
Residential
'Land Use
Medical District
Low Density Civic
T1.100-1900,2000-
Tax Lot
All Tax Lots in Study Area
TL 5000-5303
2500, 4800, 5100
ITE land Use
Hospital
Single -Family Elementary
Detached School
ITE Code
610
210 520
Building Size (KSF)
2590
0.00 2590
0.00
Dwelling Units
0.00
24 0
24
Lot Size (AC)
12.12
5.53 6.59
0.00
Daily Trip Rate (Trip/KSF or Trip/DU)
13-22
952 1543
-
Daily Trips
342.40
228.48 39964
285.72
Passby Reduction
0%
0% 0%
-
Daily Trips w/ Passby Reduction
342.40
228.48 399.64
285.72
Daily Trips/Acre
28.25
41 32 6064
73.71
AM Peak Trip Rate (Trip/KSF or Trip/DU)
0.95
075 5.2
AM Peak Trips
24.61
1800 134 68
128.08
AM Peak Trips w/ Passby Reduction
24.61
18.00 134.68 1
128.08
PM Peak Trip Rate (Trip/KSF or Trip/DU)
0.93
1 121
PM Peak Trips
24-09
24.00 31 34
31.25
IPM Peak Trips w/ Passbv Reduction
24.09
24.00 31.34
31.25
References: Trip Grnrrulion ,Manual, 91h lid. In;tilute of Trunsporhilnm FJiguurrs, 2012
Trip Genera hon I lundhook, 2nd lid., Institute of TransporFnhou Engineers, 200.1 -
CONCLUSION
Per Table A, the Existing land use scenario generates 342 daily trips, and the Proposed scenario
generates 628 daily trips. This results in an increase of 286 daily trips, in addition to an increase of
128 AM peak trips, and an increase of 31 PM peak trips. Therefore, there is definitely an increased
traffic impact for the pending CPA and ZC on the subject parcels.
Per the City of Central Point Municipal Code Article 17.05.900 Traffic Impact Analysis; a traffic
impact analysis (TIA) is required if a non-residential development is projected to generate an
increase in peak hour volume of a particular movement to and from the state highway by twenty
percent or more, or increase in site traffic volume generation of two hundred fifty (250) average
daily trips (ADT) or more. Since the pending CPA and ZC generate an increase of 285 daily trips,
a TIA is required.
Sincerely,
Charles L. Kroning, PE
Sr. Civil Engineering Manager
Page 3 of 3
95
ATTACHMENT "D"
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 880
A RESOLUTION FORWARDING A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO THE
CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONE MAP
AMENDMENTS ON MULTIPLE PROPERTIES FROM COMMERCIAL -MEDICAL
C -2(M) TO RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, R-1-6 AND CIVIC ON 12.12 ACRES
LOCATED SOUTH OF BUSH STREET BETWEEN SOUTH 4TH AND SOUTH IST
STREETS.
(37S 2W 11BC, Tax Lots 800 through 5000 and 37S 2W 11BL, Tax Lots 100-700)
File No. CPA -19006
Applicant: City of Central Point
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is proposed to re -designate the property
identified by the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S 2W 11BC Tax Lots 800 through
5000 and 37S 2W 11BL, Tax Lots 100 to 700 as Low Density Residential (R-1-6) and Civic;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed R-1-6 and Civic zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and surrounding land uses; and
WHEREAS, adequate public services and transportation networks are available to the site;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed zone change from C -2(M) to R-1-6 and Civic has been determined
to be consistent with the State Transportation Planning Rule.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission, by this Resolution No. 880, does recommend that the City Council approve the
change of zone on the property identified by the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S 2W
11BC Tax Lots 800 through 5000 and 37S 2W 11BL, Tax Lots 100 to 700. This decision is
based on the Staff Report dated May 5, 2020 including Attachments A through D attached
hereto by reference and incorporated herein.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
5th day of May, 2020.
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Resolution No. 880 (05/05/2020)
96
ATTACHMENT "D"
City Representative
Planning Commission Resolution No. 880 (05/05/2020)
97