HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 865 - Buildable Lands InventoryPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 865
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE
CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATING THE RESIDENTIAL
BUILDABLE LAND INVENTORY SECTION OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT
WHEREAS, on April 20, 2017 the City Council approved Resolution No. 1497, declaring the
City's Intent to initiate an Urban Growth Boundary amendment to add land for residential
development; and,
WHEREAS, the City is required to update its residential buildable lands inventory in
accordance with the ORS 197.296(2) to demonstrate sufficiency of buildable lands within the
urban growth boundary and additional residential land needs;
WHEREAS, the City of Central Point, in accordance with Section 17.05.500 of the City of
Central Point Municipal Code, initiated a Type IV Legislative change to the City's
Comprehensive Plan to update the City's Buildable Land Inventory; and
WHEREAS, the amendment has been prepared in compliance with ORS 197.296(2) and
consistent with definitions and safe harbors provided by Oregon Administrative Regulations as
relates to the calculation of buildable land; and
WHEREAS, the amendment does not amend any policies of the Central Point Comprehensive
Plan, but only serves to provide a factual accounting of the City's buildable land inventory; and
WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly -
noticed public hearing at which time it reviewed the City staff report and heard testimony and
comments on the Buildable Land Inventory;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission by the Resolution No. 865 does hereby accept, and forward to the City Council, the
Residential Buildable Land Inventory as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" for final consideration
and adoption.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5th
day of February, 2019
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
zl-� aA�A ,
City Representative
Planning Commission Resolution No. 865 (02/05/2019)
RESIDENTIAL BUILDABLE LANDS INVENTORY --LAND USE ELEMENT
221
STAFF REPORT
CENTRAL
POINT
STAFF REPORT
February 5, 2019
AGENDA ITEM VIII -C
Planning Department
Tom Humphrey, AICP,
Community Development Director
Consideration of the 2019 Residential Buildable Lands Inventory—Land Use Element of the Central
Point Comprehensive Plan. Applicant: City of Central Point. File No. CPA -18003.
STAFF SOURCE
Stephanie Holtey, Principal Planner
BACKGROUND
On January 8, 2019 the Planning Commission discussed a review draft of the Residential Buildable Lands
Inventory (BLI). The BLI tracks the availability of buildable lands as defined in ORS 197.295(1), which
includes lands that are available, suitable and necessary for development over the next 20 -years including
vacant and partially developed lands that are likely to be redeveloped. During the Planning Commission's
discussion staff presented a study of infill participation during the past 20 -years (1996-2016). The study
found that residential infill development accounted for 6% of the total housing units constructed and 8%
of the residential land supply during that time period. Consequently it is unlikely that 100% of the
available infill lands will redevelop over the next 20 -years. However, infill is an important aspect of the
City's development strategy and the City has adopted policies to support and encourage increased infill
development. The question is what infill rate will best reflect the City's ability to increase infill during a
20 -time period. Provided below is a table comparing a 10%, 15%, 20%, 30% and 100% infill adjustment
rate for buildable lands and the estimated impact on the City's additional residential land need over the
next 20 -years.
Total Gross Buildable Acres
410
410
410
410
410
Vacant Acres
83
83
83
83
83
Infill Acres
194
58
39
29
19
Redevelopment Acres
17
17
17
17
17
Total Available Buildable Acres
293
158
139
129
119
(Environmental Constrained Acres)
-33
-33
-33
-33
-33
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL BUILDABLE ACRES, 19-39
260
125
105
96
86
TOTAL ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL LAND NEED
150
285
305
314
324
The Citizen's Advisory Committee discussed the draft Residential BLI, including infill, and forwarded a
favorable recommendation to the Planning Commission based on application of a 20% infill adjustment.
Since that time staff has distributed the draft Residential BLI for review and comment and no comments
have been received. A copy is included as Attachment "A."
222
At the Planning Commission meeting on February 5, 2019 staff will present the final draft Residential
BLI reflecting a 20% infill adjustment per the CAC's recommendation to receive further input from the
Planning Commission and the public during a public hearing. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the
Planning Commission may:
1. Close the public hearing and proceed to discussion and action; or,
2. Continue the public hearing to allow for further public discussion and comment.
ISSUES
There are no known issues at this time. The most significant finding of the BLI will be the City's target
infill participation rate over the next 20 -years.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment "A" – Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (Final Draft)
Attachment `B" – Resolution No. 865
ACTION
Consideration of Resolution No. 865 forwarding a favorable recommendation to the City Council to
approve the Residential Buildable Lands Inventory—Land Use Element and 1) approve, 2) approve with
modifications, 3) deny, or 4) direct staff to prepare a revisions for consideration at the March 5, 2019
Planning Commission meeting
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Resolution No. 865.
223
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
ATTACHMENT "A"
Residential
Buildable
Lands
Inventory (BLI)
224
2019-2039
Final Draft 1/28/2019
City of Central Point
12/31/2018
Page 1 of 23
1. INTRODUCTION
The use and availability of buildable land is a critical component in tracking a community's rate of
growth, and the subsequent need for additional land to support future growth. The primary purpose
of the Residential Buildable Land Inventory (BLI) is to maintain a record of the availability of
buildable residential lands within the City's urban area (Figure 1). The BLI is prepared in
accordance with OAR 660-24-0050(1) requiring that cities maintain a buildable lands inventory
within the urban growth boundary sufficient to accommodate the residential needs for a 20 -year
planning period as determined in OAR 660-024-0040.
A
CPOINT L
r
Legend
0 c,* swan - Rbitow _ ON* l Q Gly Ln b
S S r� Lkua 0,*MH 80undv, )Figure I
URBAN AREA, 2018
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
225
Page 2 of 23
By definition the BLI is strictly a land inventory system. The BLI is not a policy document. The
BLI is used by other Comprehensive Plan elements as a resource for the development and
monitoring of policy.
The BLI is considered a living document that is continually updated as development activity occurs
and is entered into the BLI electronic data base (BLI2019).
2. LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS AND ZONING
The BLI maintains an accounting of all lands by land use classification and zoning. The City's
Comprehensive Plan contains six (6) land use classifications and sixteen (16) sub -classifications
(Table 1). Each of the land use classifications are supported by one, or more, of twenty (20) zoning
districts (Table 2). The Land Use Classifications and Zoning districts are defined and mapped in the
Land Use Element.
LANDINVENTORY
As of December 31, 2018, the City of Central Point's urban area contained a total of 2,972 gross
acres (Table 1 and 2). Public right-of-way, parks/open space and civic uses accounted for 33% of
the City's total gross acreage, while residential (50%), commercial (8%), and industrial (9%) land
accounted for the remaining acreage. When public right-of-way is removed, there are 2,271 (77%)
net acres within the City's urban area.
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
226
Page 3 of 23
Table 1. City of Central Point
Urban Land Inventory by Comprehensive Plan Designation
NCom
TPCom
TCCom
GenCom
Em Com
Total City Total UGB Total Urban
Percentage
Comprehensive Plan Designation
Acres Acres Acres
of Total
VLRes
46 22 68
235
LRes
902 88 990
186 6%
MRes
194 23 216
HRes
215 - 215
119
28
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL
1,356 132 1,488
50%
NCom
TPCom
TCCom
GenCom
Em Com
15
103
12
56
29
8
8
3
-
-
23
111
16
56
29
OS
TOTAL COMMERCIAL
215
20
235
8%
78
186 6%
LInd
HInd
79
40
119
28
197
68
TOTAL INDUSTRIAL
1 118
147
265
9%
Civic
121
0
121
TOTAL CIVIC
121
0
121
4%
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 1 554 123 677 1 23%
TOTAL ALL LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS 2,472 500 2,972 100%
Note: Total acreage based on QS shape file for City and UCB 10/29/18
REVIEW DRAFT— 2019 Residential BLI
227
Page 4 of 23
OS
108
78
186
TOTAL PARKS & OPEN SPACE
108
78
186 6%
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 1 554 123 677 1 23%
TOTAL ALL LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS 2,472 500 2,972 100%
Note: Total acreage based on QS shape file for City and UCB 10/29/18
REVIEW DRAFT— 2019 Residential BLI
227
Page 4 of 23
Table 2. City of Central Point
Urban Land Inventory by Zoning
Note: Total acreage balances with GIS shape file for UGB 10/29/18
REVIEW DRAFT — 2019 Residential BLI
228
Page 5 of 23
Total City
Total UGB
Total Urban
Percentage of
Zoni
Acres
Acres
Area Acres
Total
R -L
46
22
68
6%
R-1-6
374
6
380
R-1-8
393
11
404
23%
R-1-10
34
22
56
LMR
111
48
159
100%
R-2
107
-
107
R-3
180
-
180
MMR
78
23
100
HMR
35
-
35
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL
1356
132
1 488
50%
C -2(m)
12
-
12
CN
3
8
10
C-4
103
8
111
C-5
12
3
16
EC
29
-
29
GC
56
-
56
TOTAL COMMERCIAL.
215
20
235
8%
M-1
79
119
197
M-2
40
28
68
TOTAL INDUSTRIAL
118
147
265
90
Note: Total acreage balances with GIS shape file for UGB 10/29/18
REVIEW DRAFT — 2019 Residential BLI
228
Page 5 of 23
BCG
OS
35
73
76
2
110
76
TOTAL PARKS & OPEN SPACE
108
78
186
6%
PUBLICRIGHT OF -WAY
554
123
677
23%
TOTAL ALL ZONING DISTRICTS
2,472
500
2,972
100%
Note: Total acreage balances with GIS shape file for UGB 10/29/18
REVIEW DRAFT — 2019 Residential BLI
228
Page 5 of 23
4. DEFINITIONS and METHODOLOGY
To maintain consistency in the maintenance of the BLI the definitions and methodology
used in preparing the BLI are presented in Appendix "A" — Definitions and Appendix "B" —
Methodology.
5. BUILDABLE RESIDENTIAL LAND INVENTORY
Within the City's urban area, there are approximately 1,490 acres of residential land distributed over
four (4) residential land use classifications and seven (7) zoning districts. Approximately 105 acres
(7%) of the City's total residential land is considered buildable acres. Table 3 and 4 identify the
unadjusted distribution of the residential vacant land by vacant land type (vacant, infill,
redevelopment), and total buildable acres. Figure 2 illustrates the geographic distribution of the
City's residential buildable land inventory (12/31/2018).
In calculating the Residential Buildable Lands a determination must be made that the buildable
lands are suitable, available and necessary (OAR 660-008-0005(2)) for development throughout the
20 -year planning period. There are two basic classifications of buildable residential land:
a. Vacant Land —Lands on which there is no development. Infrastructure is available within
the 20 -year planning period.
b. Redevelopable Land —Lands on which development has already occurred but on which, due
to present or expected market forces, there exists the strong likelihood that existing
development will be converted to more intensive residential uses during the planning period
(OAR 660-008-0050(7). Redevelopable Land is further categorized as:
i. Infill Land — These are lands which are partially developed, but have the potential
for infill development. Infra -structure is available; and
ii. Redevelopment (Demolition) Land — These are lands which are currently improved,
but the improvements are generally old and the land value exceeds improvement
value. Infra -structure is available.
Table 3
City of central Point
Buildable Vacant Residental Land Inventory by Comprehensive Plan Designation
The definition of "Buildable Land" uses the term "likely" in referencing redevelopable residential
land. For purposes of context the City refines the likelihood and reasonableness definition for
Redevelopable Land as follows:
5.1 Infill Lands Availability Adjusted. As defined in OAR 660-024-0050(2)(a) the infill
land classification accounts for an extraordinarily large percentage (67%) of the City's
vacant residential lands inventory (Tables 3 and 4). As a vacant land classification the
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
229
Page 6 of 23
(less)
(less)
Total
Total
Emir.
Envir.
Less
Total
Redev.
Infill &
Gross
Acres,
Acres,
Total Net
Public
Total
Comprehensive Plan
Vacant Vacant
Vacant
Infill
City&
Redev.
Vacant
Vacant
Infiil
Vacant
Need
Buildable
Desi nation
city, UGB'
Acres
Infill Cit
.UGI3
11GB
Acres
Acres
I.ands
Lands
Acres
Acres
Acres
VLRes
-
-
10
4
l
14
14
1
14
14
LRes
17 7
24
47
48
10
105
129
5
13
Ill
III
MRes
46 -
46
19
17
l
37
84
6
2
75
75
HRes
12
12
49
5
53
66
2
4
60
60
Vacant ResldentiaLAcres
76 7
83
125
68
17
210
293
13
20
26D
.60
Percent a of Total Gross Vacant Acres
1 28%1
43%
23%
6%1
72
The definition of "Buildable Land" uses the term "likely" in referencing redevelopable residential
land. For purposes of context the City refines the likelihood and reasonableness definition for
Redevelopable Land as follows:
5.1 Infill Lands Availability Adjusted. As defined in OAR 660-024-0050(2)(a) the infill
land classification accounts for an extraordinarily large percentage (67%) of the City's
vacant residential lands inventory (Tables 3 and 4). As a vacant land classification the
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
229
Page 6 of 23
reasonableness and likelihood of counting all Infill Land as being available for development
during the planning period is questionable. Infill Lands are small in size and comprised of
many individual property owners with a wide range of real estate development skills and
tolerance for risk. To assume that all Infill Land is available places a significant burden on
the City's ability to both effectively and efficiently address housing affordability. The City
acknowledges that Infill Land is an asset not be overlooked. The question is — to what
extent should Infill Lands be reasonably expected to participate?
Table 4
City of Central Point
Buildable Residential Land Inventory by Zoning
For purposes of the BLI the City estimates that 20% of the Infill Land inventory is likely to
be developed during the 20 -year planning period. The 20% adjustment is acknowledged in
the Housing Element, along with a policy to encourage and monitor infill activity.
The 20% adjustment is based on a survey of infill development within the City between
1996 and 2016 (See Appendix "D"). Tables 5 and 6 adjust for the 20% infill land
participation.
5.2 Redevelopment (Demolition) Land. The City uses the U.S. Census Methodology to
determine the number of dwellings estimated to be demolished during the 20 -year
planning period. The methodology, and its application to the City are described in
Appendix "C". The redevelopment columns Tables 3 through 6 are based on the
methodology in Appendix "C".
Table 5
City of Central Point
Infill Availability Adjusted
Buildable Residental Land Inventory by Comprehensive Plan Designation
a,
(less) (less)
(less)
(less)
Total
Total
Envir. Envir.
Total
Total
Emir.
Envi r.
Gross
Leas
Total Net
Total
Comprehensive Plan
Total
Vacant
Infill City&
Redev.
Infill &
Gross
Acres,
Acres,
Total Net
Public
Total
Infill City UGB tl(1B
Vacant Vacant
Vacam
Lands Lands
In011
City&
Redev.
Vacant
Vacant
Infill
Vacant
Need
Buildable
Zoning
ciw UGB'
Acres
In0f1 City
UGB
UGB
Acres
Acres
Land,
1 -ands
Acres.
Acres
46
R -L
-
-
10
4
1
14
14
-
1
14
14
R-1-6
2
2
28
4
5
37
39
0
6
33
105
33
R-1-8
2 -
2
10
1
4
15
17
0
1
16
16
R-1-10
0 -
0
4
6
0
II
II
0
0
ll
Il
LMR
21
28
5
37
1
43
70
11
6
53
53
R-2
2 -
2
4
-
1
5
8
-
l
7
7
R-3
4 -
4
37
-
3
42
46
-
2
44
44
MMR
36
36
15
17
0
32
68
0
2
66
66
HMR
3
8
11
P
II
20
2
2
16
16
•Total Residential Acres
76 7
83
12.5
68
18
211
293
13
20
260
260
Percentage of Total Gross Vacant Acres
28 %
42 %
23%
6%
72
For purposes of the BLI the City estimates that 20% of the Infill Land inventory is likely to
be developed during the 20 -year planning period. The 20% adjustment is acknowledged in
the Housing Element, along with a policy to encourage and monitor infill activity.
The 20% adjustment is based on a survey of infill development within the City between
1996 and 2016 (See Appendix "D"). Tables 5 and 6 adjust for the 20% infill land
participation.
5.2 Redevelopment (Demolition) Land. The City uses the U.S. Census Methodology to
determine the number of dwellings estimated to be demolished during the 20 -year
planning period. The methodology, and its application to the City are described in
Appendix "C". The redevelopment columns Tables 3 through 6 are based on the
methodology in Appendix "C".
Table 5
City of Central Point
Infill Availability Adjusted
Buildable Residental Land Inventory by Comprehensive Plan Designation
a,
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
230
Page 7 of 23
(less) (less)
Total
Total
Envir. Envir.
Total
Redev.
Infill &
Gross
Acres, Acres,
Total Net
Total
Comprehensive Plan
Vacant Vacant
Vacant
Infill City&
Redev.
Vacant
Vacant Infill
Vacant
Buildable
Designation
Citi UGB'
Acres
Infill City UGB tl(1B
Acres
Arres
Lands Lands
Acres
Acres
IVLRes
-
2 1 1
4
4
1
3
3
LRes
17 7
24
9 10 10
29
53
5 13
35
35
MRes
46
46
4 3 1
8
55
6 2
46
46
HRes
12
12
10 5]4
27
2 4
21
21
Vacant Residential Acres
75.11 7
83
25 14 17
56
136
13 20
105
105
F-rc-.tage of Total Gross Vacant Acres
1 60%1
18% 10% 12%
40
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
230
Page 7 of 23
Table 7
Projected Residential Buildable Land Need
2019 to 2039
2018 Pop. 119,101
2032 Forecast
2039 Forecast 3
23,662
26,317
Population Increase
7,216
Persons/1-11-14
2.50
Household Increase
2,887
Average Gross Density'
7,04
Needed Gross Residential Acres
410
Total
Total Buildable Residential Acres
105
Additional Needed Gross Residential Acres
305
Portland State University Population Research Center, Preliminary Estimate, 2
Portland State University Population Research Center, Coordinated
Population Forecast for Jackson County, its Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB),
and Area Outside UGBs 2018-2068
' Based on PSU Interprolation Worksheet
° City of Central Point Population Element, 2017 - 2037
5 City of Central Point Regional Plan Element, 2015 - 2035
City of Central Point Buildable Lands Report, 2019 - 2039, Table 5. Infill
Availability Adjusted Buildable Vacant Land by Comprehensive Plan
Table 6
City of Central Point
Infill Availability Adjusted
Buildable Residential Land Inventory by Zoning
6. Residential Land Need
The primary function of the BLI is to assist in the identification of residential buildable land needs
during a 20 -year planning period. Table 7 identifies the estimated need for buildable residential as
of 12/31/2018. Table 7 is based on input from the Population Element, the Housing Element, and
the BLI. As noted earlier the BLI is a living document that changes as changes in residential
development activity and policy occur.
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
231
Page 8 of 23
(less) (less)
Total
Total
Envir. Envir.
Total
Redev.
Infill &
Gross
Acres, Acres,
Total Net
Total
Vacant Vacant
Vacant
Infill City &
Redev.
Vacant
Vacant Infill
Vacant
Buildable
Zoning
City UGB'
Acres
Will City UGB UGB
Acres
Acres
Lands Lands
Acres
Acres
R -L
2 1 1
4
4
1
3
3
R-1-6
2
2
6 1 5
11
13
0 n
7
7
R-1-8
2 -
2
2 0 4
7
8
0 1
7
7
R-1-10
0
0
1 1 0
2
3
0 0
3
3
LMR
21 7
28
1 7 l
9
37
II
19
19
R-2
2
2
l 1
2
4
I
4
4
R-3
4
4
7 5
12
16
2
15
15
MMR
36
36
3 3 0
7
43
0 2
41
41
HMR
8
8
2 0
2
11
2 2
7
7
Total Residential Acres
76 7
83
25 14 18
56
139 13 20
1 105
1. 105
Percentage of Total Gross Vacant Acres
59%
18% 10% 13%
41%
6. Residential Land Need
The primary function of the BLI is to assist in the identification of residential buildable land needs
during a 20 -year planning period. Table 7 identifies the estimated need for buildable residential as
of 12/31/2018. Table 7 is based on input from the Population Element, the Housing Element, and
the BLI. As noted earlier the BLI is a living document that changes as changes in residential
development activity and policy occur.
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
231
Page 8 of 23
La
Aik
CENTRAL
- Vacant Residential Land
- Infill Land (Partially Developed a 0.5 ac)
® Redevelopment Land (LI c 0.3) Figure 2.
Updated December 31,2018 Residential Buildable Lands Inventory, 2019
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
232
Page 9 of 23
APPENDIX "A" — Definitions
The 2019 BLI was last updated December 30, 2018. The following definitions are used in preparing and
maintain the residential BLI.
Definitions
Buildable Land, Residential: Residentially designated lots or parcels within the City's urban area,
including vacant and developed lots or parcels likely to be redeveloped that are suitable, available
and necessary for residential uses (OAR 660-008-0005(2)). Land is generallX considered "suitable
and available" unless it:
1. Is severely constrained by natural hazards as determined under Statewide Planning Goal 7;
2. Is subject to natural resource protection measures determined under Statewide Planning
Goals 5, 6, 15, 16, 17 or 18;
3. Has slopes of 25 percent or greater;
4. Is within the 100 -year flood plain; or
5. Cannot be provided with public facilities.
Developed Land, Residential: Residentially designated lots or parcels of less than one-half acre
that are currently occupied by a residence. (OAR 660-024-0050(2)(b).
Infill Acres, Residential: Developed Residential Land of one-half acre or more, less one-quarter
acre (10,890 square feet). OAR 660-024-0050(2)(a).
Land to Improvement Ratio (L:I Ratio): The ratio between the real market value of land and the
real market value of improvements as measured by taking the real improvement value of a parcel
divided by the real land value based on the Jackson County Assessor records.
Net Buildable Acre, Residential: Consists of 43,560 square feet of residentially designated
buildable land, after excluding present and future rights-of-way for streets and roads (OAR 660-
024-0010(6)).
Planning Area: The area within an existing, or proposed, urban growth boundary. Cities and
counties with urban growth management agreements must address the urban land governed by their
respective plans as specified in the urban growth management agreement for the affected area (OAR
660-009-0005(7)).
Redevelopment Acres, Residential: Land zoned for residential use on which development has
already occurred but on which, due to present or expected market forces, there exists the strong
likelihood that existing development will be converted to more intensive residential uses during the
planning period (OAR 660-008-0005(7)).
Note: The BLI uses a methodology developed by the U.S. Census to determine the rate of residential redevelopment based
on the age of structures. The specific methodology is presented in Appendix C, Methodology for State and County Total
Housing Unit Estimates (Vintage 2017).
Urban Area: Land within a UGB (OAR 660-24-10)
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
233
Page 10 of 23
Vacant Acres, Residential: All residentially designated lots or parcels not currently containing
permanent buildings or improvements. For purposes of determination of the presence of permanent
buildings/improvements all residential lots or parcels with an improvement value of zero (0), as
determined by the Jackson County Assessor, are considered vacant.
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
234
Page 11 of 23
APPENDIX "B" - Methodology for Calculation of Residential Buildable Land
The methodology used to inventory and calculate buildable lands is based on the definitions defined in
Appendix A. The base data source for identification of buildable lands is the Jackson County Assessor's
Records dated April 2018, which has been modified to include such additional information as
Comprehensive Plan designations, zoning, development status, etc. The modified database is referred to as
the Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI2019.xls).
Step 1. Urban Area, Gross Acres — Using the City's GIS the total geographic limits of the City's
urban area are mapped and the gross acres within the limits of the shape file calculated by area
within the City Limits and UGB.
Step 2. Net Urban Area by Land Use and Zoning — Using BLI2018 sum by land use and zoning
all tax lots within the City's urban area (City Limits and UGB). Tax lots identified for street, road,
or access right-of-way (public or private) purposes are not included.
Step 3. Right -of -Way — Deduct the totals (City Limits and UGB) in Step 2 total from Step 1 total,
the balance representing acreage used for right-of-way for the City Limits and UGB.
The results of Steps I — 3 are presented in Tables l and 2 of the 2019 Residential BLI.
Step 4. Buildable Acres, Residential. The methodology for calculating Buildable Residential Land
involves the following steps:
Step 4a. Residential Vacant Acres. The BLI identifies all tax lots by their land use
designation, development status, and improvement value. When the improvement value of
a property is zero the property is defined as Residential Vacant Land. The BLI sums the
acreage for all Residential Vacant Land by land use and zoning for the City Limits and the
UGB.
Step 4b. Residential Infill Acres. The BLI identifies all residential tax lots for their infill
potential. Residential properties in excess of .5 acres and with an improvement value in
excess of zero are defined as Residential Developed Land. By deducting 10,890 sq. ft. from
each Residential Developed Land record the balance is defined as Residential Infill Land.
The BLI then sums the Residential Infill Land for all residentially designated properties, by
land use and zoning for the City Limits and the UGB.
Step 4c. Residential Redevelopment Acres. The BLI identifies all residential tax lots by
the year the primary residence was built. Using the U.S. Census housing loss methodology
presented in Appendix C. The BLI then sums the Residential Redevelopment Land for all
residentially designated properties, by land use and zoning for the City Limits and the UGB.
Step 4d. Gross Vacant Residential Acres. Using the sum of the totals generated from
Steps 4a through 4c the BLI calculates the Gross Buildable Residential land by land use and
zoning for the City Limits and the UGB.
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
235
Page 12 of 23
Step 4e. Environmentally Constrained Acres. The BLI includes information on the
acreage within each vacant and infill lot or parcel that is considered environmentally
constrained. The BLI sums the environmentally constrained land for all residentially
designated properties, by land use and zoning, developed, vacant, and infill/redevelopment.
Step 4f. Total Buildable Residential Acres. The BLI takes the results from Step 4d, less
the results from Step 4e, to yield Buildable Residential Land by land use and zoning.
Step 5. Infill Lands Adjustment. The Infill Lands inventory is adjusted per the Infill Study in
Appendix D. An adjustment of 20% is used to determine the amount of Infill Land that will be
available during the 20 -year planning period (Tables 5 and 6). The 20% adjustment accounts for
"likelihood and availability" of Infill Lands (See Appendix D for Infill Methodology).
Note: Per the Regional Plan Element's measurement of residential development density as gross density it is important to note
that for residential purposes the Buildable Residential Land number is used as a net figure, it does not include lands for public
right-af--Kwy, parks/open space, schools, or other public uses. For Employment lands public right-of-way is excluded.
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
236
Page 13 of 23
APPENDIX "C" — Methodology for Identifying Residential Redevelopment (Demolition)
Land
The City does not maintain records for demolitions necessitating the use of another methodology for
determining the number and rate of residential demolitions within the City's urban area. The methodology
used was found on the U.S Census web site and is referred to as Methodology for State and County Total
Housing Unit Estimates ([vintage 2017): April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2017' (Methodology). The Methodology
was applied to the City of Central Point as follows:
Step 1. Demolition Rate by Region, Type of Housing Unit, and Age. The Methodology provided a loss
rate based on the region, type of housing unit, and age of housing unit (Table 1).
Table 1.
Housing Unit Loss Rate by Housing Type and Age,
Western Region
Type of Unit and Age
Loss Rate (Units
Lost/1,000 Units)
House, Apartment
10 Years or less (2008-2018)
0
11 to 30 years (1988-2007)
0.37
31 to 59 years (1959-1987)
0.54
60 or more years (1958 and Earlier)
0.64
Mobile Home
1.8
Source: Methodology for State and County Total
Housing Unit Estimates (Vintage 2017): April 1,
2010 to July 1, 2017
Step 2. Determine Distribution of Housing by Age and Type. The BLI maintains an inventory of housing
by type, year built, and land use designation and zoning. Tables 2A through 21) identifies the housing
construction in Central Point by type and year built segregated into age categories as presented in Table 1.
1 https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/methodology/2010-2017/2017-hu-
meth.pdf
REVIEW DRAFT — 2019 Residential BLI Page 14 of 23
237
Table 2A.
Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Housing Type and Age
City of Central Point, 2008 - 2018
Annual Demolition Rate per 1,000 Units: 1.80
Table 2B.
Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Housing Type and Age
City of Central Point, 1988 - 2007
Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolished, 2008 - 2018
Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolished, 1958 and Earlier
Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolisheck 1959 -1987
Less Prior
Total
Total
Total
Total Mobile Period Built
Adjusted
Annual 20 -Year 20 -Year
Total
20 -Year 20 -Year
Housing
Homes SFR and
Units Built,
Demolitions, Demolitions, Demolitions,
Demolitions,
Land Use Class
Units Built
Installed MFR
2008-2018
SFR, MFR SFR MFR MH
2008-2018
VLRes
30
-
-
0.0 0.2 -
-
LRes
203
82 203
203
0.9 17.0 3.0
20.0
Mlles
216
0 216
216
0-2 4.6 -
4.6
HRes
158
365 158
158
0.3 6.8 13.1
20,0
Residential Units
577
447 577
Fi5.
1 29 16
45
Annual Demolition Rate per 1,000 Units: 1.80
Table 2B.
Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Housing Type and Age
City of Central Point, 1988 - 2007
Annual Demolition Rate per 1,000 Units: 0.37 1.8
Table 2C.
Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Housing Type and Age
City of Central Point, 1959 -1987
Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolished, 1988 - 2007
Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolished, 1958 and Earlier
Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolisheck 1959 -1987
Total
Total
Total
I
Adjusted
Annual 20 -Year 20 -Year
Total
20 -Year 20 -Year
Housing
Total Mobile Less Prior
Units, 1988-
Demolitions, Demolitions, Demolitions,
Demolitions,
Land Use Class
Units Built
Homes Period
2007
SFR MFR SFR, MFR MH
19$8-2007
VLRes
30
-
30
0.0 0.2 -
0.2
Likes
2,588
82 203
2,303
0.9 17.0 3.0
20.0
MRes
839
0 216
623
0-2 4.6 -
4.6
HRes
1.444
365 158
921
0.3 6.8 13.1
20,0
Residential Units
4901
447 577
3,877
1 29 16
45
Annual Demolition Rate per 1,000 Units: 0.37 1.8
Table 2C.
Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Housing Type and Age
City of Central Point, 1959 -1987
Annual Demolition Rate per 1,000 Units: 0.54 1.8
Table 2D.
Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Housing Type and Age
City of Central Point, 1958 and Earlier
Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolished, 1958 and Earlier
Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolisheck 1959 -1987
Total
Total
Total
Adjusted
Annual
20 -Year 20 -Year
Total
Housing
Adjusted Annual
20 -Year
20 -Year
Total
Land Use Class
Housing
Total Mobile
Less Prior
Units, 1959 - Demolitions, SFR,
Demolitions,
Demolitions,
Demolitions,
Land Be Class
Units Built
Homes
Periods
1987 MFR
SFR, MFR
MH
1959-1987
VLRes
92
2
30
60 0.0
0.6
0.1
0.7
LRes
3,891
85
2,515
1,291 0.7
13.9
3.1
17.0
MRes
1,009
2
899
108 0.1
1,2
0.1
1.2
HRes
1,831
456
1,079
296 0.2
3.2
16.4
19.6
Residential Units
6.823
545
4,523
1,755 1
19
20
1 39
Annual Demolition Rate per 1,000 Units: 0.54 1.8
Table 2D.
Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Housing Type and Age
City of Central Point, 1958 and Earlier
Luund Demolition Rate per 1,000 Units: 0-64 1 x
REVIEW DRAFT - 2019 Residential BLI Page 15 of 23
238
Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolished, 1958 and Earlier
Total
Total
Adjusted
Annual
20 -Year 20 -Year
Total
Housing
Total Mobile Less Prior Units,1958-
Demolitions,
Demolitions, Demolitions,
Demolitions,
Land Use Class
Units Built
Homes Period Earlier
SFR, MFR
SFR, MFR MH
1958 - Earlier
VLRes
23
23
00
0.3 -
0.3
LRes
190
1
- 189
01
2.4 0.0
2.5
MRes
204
1
203
0.1
2.6 0.0
2.6
HRes
155
3
152
0.1
1.9 0.1
2.1
Residential Units
572
5
567
0
7 0
7
Luund Demolition Rate per 1,000 Units: 0-64 1 x
REVIEW DRAFT - 2019 Residential BLI Page 15 of 23
238
Step 3. Determine Annual Demolitions. Tables 2A through 2D apply the Methodology loss rates per 1,000
units (Table 1) by land use classification and age. Take the sum of the demolitions and multiply by 20
(projected years).
Step 4. Determine Projected Demolitions and Related Acreage. Multiply the annual loss by the density
for each land use classification. Take the sum of the annual demolitions and acreage and multiply by 20
(projected years) to get projected acres made available over the course of the 20 -year planning period Table
3.
Table 3
City of Central Point
Estimated Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Land Use Classification
2019-2039
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
239
Page 16 of 23
Average
Density
Total
(Units/Gross
DeBIGH Li on
Lanti Use Class
Demolitions
Acre
kcres
VLRes
1
1
1
LRes
39
4
10
Mlles
8
7
1
HRes
42
9
5
"Totals
91
17
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
239
Page 16 of 23
Methodology for State and County Total Housing Unit Estimates (Vintage 2017): April 1, 2010 to
July 1, 2017
OVERVIEW
The U.S. Census Bureau estimates the number of housing units for each year since the most recent
decennial census. With each annual release of housing unit estimates, the entire time series of estimates
beginning with April 1, 2010 is revised and updated. The estimates use building permits, estimates of non -
permitted construction, mobile home shipments, and estimates of housing loss to estimate change in the
housing stock. These component data come from various Census Bureau surveys.
We produce housing unit estimates for all states and counties annually. We release these estimates to the
public, and they are used as controls for several Census Bureau surveys, including the American
Community Survey (ACS), the American Housing Survey (AHS), and the Housing Vacancy Survey (HVS).
In addition to state and county housing unit estimates, we also produce subcounty housing unit estimates.
These estimates are central to the production of population estimates for cities and towns across the nation.
METHOD
We produce housing unit estimates using the components of housing change. In this model, we add
together the 2010 Census count of housing units, estimated new residential construction, and estimated
new mobile homes. From this sum we subtract the estimated housing units lost. The computation of
annual July 1 housing unit estimates is expressed by the following formula:
201 CensusHous! New New Mobile 1111111P Units
July 1
ng Units + Residential + Homes Units Lost Housing Unit
Construction Wimate
After these data are combined to produce a preliminary set of housing estimates, they are reviewed by
members of the Federal -State Cooperative for Population Estimates (FSCPE) and by local jurisdictions.
The final housing estimates may reflect updates from their review of the estimates. Each component of
the housing unit change model is described below.
2010 Census Housing Units
Every year, we re -tabulate the 2010 Census counts of housing units in current legal geographic
boundaries to form the base for the annual housing unit estimates. The base for the housing estimates
reflects annual geographic boundary updates from the Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS) that are
legally effective as of January 1. The base also includes the results of completed Count Question
Resolution (CQR) actions and geographic program revisions incorporated into the Master Address File
(MAF)/TIGER Database through May of each estimate's year.
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
240
Page 17 of 23
New Residential Construction
Residential construction is the largest component of housing change. We estimate new residential
construction in two parts: permitted construction and non -permitted construction. The calculation of new
residential construction is represented by the following formula:
Permitted Construction
A
Building i' rmits Issuedx Permit "r No 11- ISM New
Completion permitted Residential
Rate C Dristruction Construction
Permitted Construction
According to the Census Bureau, more than 98 percent of all new housing units are erected in places that
issue building permits. We calculate estimates of new permitted construction by multiplying the number of
residential building permits issued by a permit completion rate. Data on issued permits come from the
Building Permits Survey (BPS). t This survey includes reported permits from approximately 20,000
jurisdictions. These data are reported to the BPS by calendar year for cities and towns across the country.
Implicit in the method of using calendar year permits is an assumption of a six-month lag time between
when a building permit is issued and when the housing unit is completed. Thus, permits that are issued in
the first six months of a particular calendar year are not processed in the housing unit estimates until the
following year. For example, the July 1, 2014 housing unit estimates are based on permits issued between
January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. Permits issued between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014 w
ill be processed in the 2015 housing unit estimates.
The permit completion rates used to calculate new permitted construction are based on national estimates
of permits that are either abandoned or deemed "out of scope" by the Survey of Construction (SOC). 2.3
We update the completion rate every year, as new survey data become available. The 2014 permit
completion rate reflects the percent of building permits issued in calendar year 2013 that resulted in
completed housing units.
The Census Bureau conducts the BPS. For more infonration about this survey, see
h t p ltwww.c ensus.eovtco strati ionlbnsl,
2 Abandorwdperrrbtsare pernalsthattheSwVcyrespondentorbuildingpemritoffice has indicated thatconstruction
of the housing unit(s) authorized by that pemrit will not be completed using thatpemrit. Out ofscopepemrits are thosethatwere reported as
pemtits for new, privately -owned housing units bythe building pemrit office, but it was later detemrined that the units did not meet thedefmition of
new privately -owned housing units (e.g., the units were intendedas group quarters, forcomrercialuse, etc.).
3 The Census Bureauconductsthe SOC. Forinxeinforrrationabout this survey, see litIpB_www.calsLis, gov/ccoWove:view/coW.htod.
REVIEW DRAFT — 2019 Residential BLI Page 18 of 23
241
Non -permitted Construction
We calculate estimates of new non -permitted construction using data on new residential housing units
constructed in places that do not issue building permits. These data also come from the SOC. The estimates
of non -permitted construction are regional -level data that we distribute to all places that do not receive
building permits, based on each place's share of the region's total housing units enumerated in the
2010 Census. For example, if a place contained 5 percent of the region's housing units as of the 2010
Census, and does not issue building permits, we distribute 5 percent of the region's non -permitted units in
the SOC to that place. There is no lag time applied to the estimates of non -permitted construction. The
sampling frame for the SOC does not include any non -permitting areas in the West; therefore, we do not
distribute non -permitted housing units to places in that region.
New Mobile Homes
The data we use to create estimates of new mobile homes come from the Manufactured Homes Survey
(MHS).4 We calculate annual mobile home estimates by compiling monthly state shipment data from July
of the previous year through June of the current year. For example, the July 1, 2014 mobile home estimates
are based on mobile home shipment data from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014. We distribute the state -
level mobile home estimates to each place within the state based on each place's share of the state's total
mobile homes. To do so, we use information from the Census 2000 long form on "type of structure" for
housing units.
Housing Unit Loss
We calculate housing unit loss by applying an annual loss rate to the housing stock. The vintage 2017
estimates of housing units lost are based on regional -level data from the 2009 and 2011 American
Housing Survey (AHS).5 A unit is counted as lost if a survey was completed in 2009, but it was listed as a
non -response (Type C, 30 — Demolished) in the 2011 survey.
The housing loss rates vary by type and age of structure, which are obtained from the 2010 American
Community Survey (ACS) single -year file. Housing units fall under one of three types: houses (including
apartments and flats), mobile homes, or other types of housing units. The vintage 2017 housing loss rates
are as follows:
4 The Census Bureau conducts the MHS. For more in format ion about this survey, see
httpsl/www.census.gov/Voizraim -survQ6/nj2s.h_ft4.
5 The CensusBureauconductstheAHS.Formoreinfonationaboutthissurvey,seehttpJ/www.census.gov/Mograrns -surveys/ahs/.
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
242
Page 19 of 23
V2017 Housing Unit Loss Rates by Region, Type and Age
Type of Unit
Loss Rate (Units Lost/1,000 Units)
Northeast South Midwest West
(House, Apartment/Flat
.10 years or less
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11 to 30 years
0.37
0.37
0.37
0.37
31 to 59 years
0.40
1.31
2.57
0.54
160 or more years
0.75
3.68
6.85
0.64
iMobile Homes
8.74
4.08
3.64
1.80
Other Housing Units6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
The rates of loss for units less than 10 years old is too small for us to estimate with confidence with the
data we have available, therefore, we assume that the rate is zero. We also assume that the "Other
Housing Units" are constantly churning and, since we have no growth component for this category, a loss
rate of zero seems appropriate.
Numeric estimates of loss are then calculated by applying the above rates to the base file as it is aged to
the current vintage year. The base file is given type and age of structure characteristics by applying
distributions calculated from the 2010 ACS single -year file. After aging the base from April 1, 2010 to
July 1, 2010, the process iterates annually and units increase in age by 1 year at each iteration.
July 1, 2010 Housing Unit Estimates
We use one quarter of the 2010 permitted and non -permitted construction, mobile homes, and housing
loss to produce the July 1, 2010 estimates. This represents the change in housing stock during the three
month period from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2010.
REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES
The preliminary housing unit estimates are distributed for review to members of the FSCPE. Some
FSCPE members provide revisions to the estimates, in the form of alternative housing component data,
based on information they compile from the jurisdictions within their respective states. Alternative
housing component data include local building permits, mobile home placements, demolitions, and
housing completions derived from non -permitted construction, certificates of occupancy and housing
6"OtherHousingUnits"includeboats,recreationaIvehicles,andothertypesofhousingarrangements.
REVIEW DRAFT -2019 Residential BLI
243
Page 20 of 23
ESTIMATES CHALLENGE AND SPECIAL CENSUS REVISIONS
Localities that challenge the Census Bureau's subcounty population estimates have the option of revising
the housing component data specific to their area.7 These revisions are included in the final housing unit
estimates. The final estimates may also include other changes due to revisions that occur outside
the component estimation framework and are the result of special censuses$ for full jurisdictions.
Special census revisions are reflected in the July 1, 2010 to July 1 of the year following the special census.
7 For afist ofacceptedsubcountypopulationchallenges, seehttosJAvww.cemus.gov/uow-&m- surve / uest/about/challen
W:WQgmrr *esuhs.htmL
B Special Census Program results are available here hitpsJ/www.census.gW/Wgrmns oduct 2Lkial couns.htmi. For
a list ofaccepted special census results incorporated into thePopulation Estimates, see httpsl/www.census.gov/prograns
surveys/honest/about/special-census.htmt
244
2019 — 2039 Residential BLI
APPENDIX "D" - Infill Survey, City of Central Point, 2019-2039
The Infill Land classification in Table 3 and Table 4 represents an extraordinarily large percentage (67%)
of the City's buildable residential lands inventory. As a vacant land classification the reasonableness of
counting all Infill lands as being available for development during the 20 -year planning period is
questionable. Infill Lands are small in size and comprised of many individual property owners, each with
a varying range of market knowledge and risk tolerance. To assume that all Infill Lands are available
places a significant burden on the City's ability to both effectively and efficiently address housing
affordability. The City acknowledges that Infill Lands are an asset not be overlooked. The question is the
extent of participation as a component of the buildable lands determination?
To gather some insights into the role of Infill lands as a part of the City's residential buildable lands
inventory the City surveyed residential infill development activity between 1996 and 2016, a 20 -year
period. The findings of the survey are presented in Table 1. It was found that during the survey period
infill activity accounted for development of approximately 30 acres, with maximum yield of 270 housing
units. During the same period the City experienced development of 3,619 dwelling units. Assuming that
all infill units surveyed were developed during the survey period this would have accounted for
approximately 8% (Participation Rate, Housing) of the total housing built and 6% (Participation Rate,
Land) of the buildable residential consumed acres in the City from 1996 to 2016.
For Infill Land purposes it is recommended that the 6% Participation Rate be upwardly adjusted to 20%.
The 20% Participation Rate serves as a goal for future infill development. Throughout the 20 -year
planning period the Participation Rate should be tracked and policies adopted to encourage infill
development at the 20% rate, or greater.
The survey results are not absolutes, but instead provide a reference from which to view and evaluate the
role of Infill lands in the City's residential BLI. The Housing Element recognizes the findings of the Infill
Survey and sets a 20% Participation Rate for Land. The Residential BLI has been adjusted to recognize
the 20% participation rate as a reasonable measure of the availability of Infill lands. To be monitored over
the next 20 -years. The Housing Element further encourages the development of policies that will improve
the rate of participation.
Page 22 of 23
245
2019 - 2039 Residential BLI
Table 1.
City of Central Point Infill Development Activity
1996 through 2016
Page 23 of
246
GROSS
SVBOIVISION
YEARPLATTEO 40FPARCEL5
DU,%
ZONING
LANOUSE
AURES 71
Whittle Partition
Feb -96
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.50
Whittle Partition
Mar -96
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.50
Whittle Partition
Mar -96
?
4
R-2
MRes
0.50
Whittle Partition
Mar -96
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.50
Countryside Village Phase II
Mar -96
5
15
R-3
HRes
0.94
Lowe Partition
Jun -96
2
2
RI -6
LRes r
0.42
Countryside Village Phase II
Aug -96
3
9
R-3
HRes
0.56
Gutches & Gifford
Aug -96
2
2
111-6
LRes
0.42
Crown West Partition
Aug -96
6
12
R-2
MRes
1.50
Governor Partition
Aug -96
4
8
R-2
MRes
1.00
Jangaard Partition
Jan -97
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.50
Countryside Village
Feb -97
d
12
R-3
HRes
0.75
Fancher Partition
Jun -97
3
3
R1-6
LRes
r 0.63
Governor Partition
Jan -98
2
6
R-3
HRes
0.38
Snowy Mountain View Phase 1 Partition
May -98
6
1$
R 3
HRe3
1.13
Forest Glen Partition
Jun -98
2
2
R-3
HRes
0.13
Snowy Mountain View Partition
Sep -98
22
22
R-3
HRes
1.38
Sandlin Partition
Mar -99
3
9
R-3
HRes
0.56
Brink Partition
Apr -99
4
12
R-3
HRes
0.75
Thumler Partition
Jun -99
3
3
RI -6
LRes
0.63
Key West Proerties Partition
Jun -99
2
2
R1-8
LRes
0.42
Cavin/Smith Partition
Oct -00
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.50
LDS Partition
Oct -00
2
2
R1-10
LRes
0.42
Smith Partition
Jan -01
2
2
R1-6
LRes
0.42
Lafon Partition
Apr -01
2
2
R1-8
LRes
0.42
Giese Partition
Apr -01
2
2
R1-6
LRes
0.42
Orr Partition
Jul -01
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.50
Higinbotham Partition
Feb -02
2
4
111-8
LRes
0.83
Williamson Partition
May -02
2
2
111-6
LRes
0.42
Dekorte Partition
May -03
3
3
111-8
LRes
0.63
Ross Partition
Sep -03
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.50
Rogers Partition
May -04
2
2
R1-8
LRes
0.42
Coffin Partition
May -04
4
a
R-2
MRes
0.50
Lamson Partition
May -04
2
2
LMR
MRes
0.13
A.R.E Properties
May -04
2
2
R1-6
LRes
0.42
Lamson Partition
Oct -04
2
2
TOD-MMR
HRes
0.13
Twin Creek Partition
Mar -05
2
2
LMR
MRes
0.13
Castellano Partition
Jun -05
3
3
R1-6
LRes
0.63
Twin Creeks Partition
Jul -05
2
2
LMR
MRes
0.13
Grissom Partition
Sep -05
2
2
TOD-MMR
HRes
0.13
Magel Homes Partition
Oct -05
2
2
LMR
MRes
0.13
Dahl House Partition
Oct -05
3
3
R1-8
LRes
0.63
Williams Partition
Nov -05
3
3
LMR
MRes
0.19
Skillman Brothers Poi Lidun
Jan -06
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.25
Cascade Meadows Phase 1
Mar -06
$
3
TOD-LMR
MRes
0.19
Altus Construction
May -06
4
a
R-2
MRes
0.50
Coldest Partition
Jun -06
2
2
R1-10
LRes
0.42
Whitten Partition
Jun -06
3
3
RI -8
LRes
0.63
Lisk Partition
Jul -06
2
2
R1-10
LRes
0.42
Pattison Addition
Aug -06
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.25
Skillman Brothers Partition
Aug -06
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.25
Bursell Rd
Nov -06
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.25
Block 70 of Plat of CP
Dec -06
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.25
Danbrook Partition
Jan -07
2
6
R-3
HRes
0.38
Rambo Partition
Oct -07
2
2
R -L
VLRes
1.25
Brown Partition
Apr -08
1
1
R1-6
LRes
0.21
Hatten Partition
Dec -13
2
4
R-2
MRes
0.25
Lee Partition
Apr -15
2
2
R1-6
LRes
0.42
Kottke Partition
Apr -16
3
6
R-2
MRes
0.38
Lewellyn Partition
May -16
3
3
111-8
LRes
0.63
Adams Partition
Jan -06
2
A
R-2
MRes
0.25
TOTALS
17A
183-
. -' -
-
- 191"
Units Constructed Ln She City, 1996-2016
31619
601.A0
petcentage
7,9%
53
Page 23 of
246
ATTACHMENT "B"
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 865
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE
CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATING THE RESIDENTIAL
BUILDABLE LAND INVENTORY SECTION OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT
WHEREAS, on April 20, 2017 the City Council approved Resolution No. 1497, declaring the
City's Intent to initiate an Urban Growth Boundary amendment to add land for residential
development; and,
WHEREAS, the City is required to update its residential buildable lands inventory in
accordance with the ORS 197.296(2) to demonstrate sufficiency of buildable lands within the
urban growth boundary and additional residential land needs;
WHEREAS, the City of Central Point, in accordance with Section 17.05.500 of the City of
Central Point Municipal Code, initiated a Type IV Legislative change to the City's
Comprehensive Plan to update the City's Buildable Land Inventory; and
WHEREAS, the amendment has been prepared in compliance with ORS 197.296(2) and
consistent with definitions and safe harbors provided by Oregon Administrative Regulations as
relates to the calculation of buildable land; and
WHEREAS, the amendment does not amend any policies of the Central Point Comprehensive
Plan, but only serves to provide a factual accounting of the City's buildable land inventory; and
WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly -
noticed public hearing at which time it reviewed the City staff report and heard testimony and
comments on the Buildable Land Inventory;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Central Point Planning
Commission by the Resolution No. 865 does hereby accept, and forward to the City Council, the
Residential Buildable Land Inventory as set forth in attached Exhibit "A" for final consideration
and adoption.
PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5th
day of February, 2019
Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
City Representative
Planning Commission Resolution No. 865 (02/05/2019)
247
Approved by me this 5th day of February, 2019.
Planning Commission Chair
Planning Commission Resolution No. 865 (02/05/2019)
248