Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 869 - Approving SPAR for Fire Station in Civic DistrictPLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 869 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR A FIRE STATION ON LANDS WITHIN THE CIVIC ZONING DISTRICT. (File No: SPAR -19001) WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a site plan and architectural review application to develop a 10,200 square foot fire station on a 1.76 acre site within the Civic zoning identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03AB, Tax Lots 4400, 4500 and 4600, Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to Site Plan and Architectural Review in accordance with Section 17.72 and Design and Development Standards in accordance with Section 17.75; and WHEREAS, on April 2, 2019, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Point Planning Commission considered the Applicant's request for Site Plan and Architectural Review approval, at which time it reviewed the Staff Report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 869 does hereby approve the Site Plan and Architectural Review application for Fire District 3, based on the findings and conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibit "A," the Planning Department Staff Report dated April 2, 2019, including attachments incorporated by reference. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 2nd day of April, 2019. Planning Commission Chair �TTEST: M11 %4h4v it Represen a ive Planning Commission Resolution No. 869 (04/02/2019) r Iii I-1. lulu April 2, 2019 Anda tem: iaA Discuss preliminary mapping alternatives for the Residential Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) Amendment. Applicant: City of Central Point. File No. CPA -19001. Aa --M Erce: Stephanie Holtey, Principal Planner Baca--r❑Cnd The City's last residential Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) amendment occurred in 1983. Since that time, the City has grown substantially adding 4,450 units on 885 gross acres. It is expected that the City will continue to grow at a steady rate adding 7,216 people and 2,887 households over the next 20 -years. Based on the Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI), the City doesn't have enough land inside the current UGB to accommodate forecast growth and will need to expand its UGB to provide land supply for residential, park and school needs (Table 1). 2019-2039 Forecast Population Growth 2019-2039 7,216 people No. Persons per Household 2.5 No. New Households 2019-2039 2,887 Average Minimum Gross Density 2019-2039 7.04 units/acre Gross Residential Land Need 410 acres Available Buildable Lands 105 acres Additional Residential Land Need 305 acres As the City adds new housing, additional parkland and school capacity will be needed. The Parks Element identifies a need to add 54 acres of parkland to serve forecast population growth for the 20 -year planning period. Per School District 6, additional land may be needed to accommodate a new school. At this time, the City is evaluating alternative boundary locations for a residential UGB amendment, including 305 acres for housing, 54 acres of park land and 16 acres for schools. Locational Analysis Description: When considering amendments to the UGB, the City must demonstrate a need for the added land as well as forethought regarding its location. The Urbanization Element establishes a list of locational criteria to be used in evaluating alternative boundary locations. These include: 1. Properties that abut either the City Limits or current UGB; 2. Properties that are greater than 10 acres in size; 3. Properties that abut or are within 500 -ft of basic urban services (i.e. water, sewer, stormwater); 141 4. Properties that are proximate to or include mixed use/pedestrian friendly areas; 5. Compatibility with nearby agricultural uses outside the proposed UGB; 6. Proximity to transportation infrastructure; 7. Lands that have been master planned; 8. Readiness for development; and, 9. Proximity to the City Center using a central growth pattern. Attached for discussion and input are two (2) alternative boundary locations prepared by staff. These represent two possible scenarios based on application of coarse locational criteria: the location of larger parcels (i.e. greater than 10 acres) that abut the UGB, are within 500 -ft of basic urban services, and have a master plan. Additional consideration has been given to proximity to and inclusion of activity centers, proximity to transportation infrastructure and whether there is any evidence of development readiness (i.e. master plan, written request to be included in the UGB). The two alternatives prepared for preliminary consideration include: Staff Alternative I (Attachment "A"). This alternative applies the coarse locational criteria addressed above but emphasizes inclusion of larger lots (i.e. greater than 10 acres) resulting in greater acreage east of Interstate 5 between Upton and Gebhard Roads and north to Wilson Road. Staff Alternative 1 B (Attachment `B"). This alternative applies the coarse locational criteria addressed above but increases the emphasis on small to mid-size parcels with access to services and exception lands in proximity to basic urban services. D Uc Ei=n At the April 2, 2019 Planning Commission, staff will present the preliminary alternative boundary scenarios for discussion and input. At the conclusion of the meeting staff is seeking direction regarding the preferred alternative and any necessary changes or refinements. Suggested topics for discussion include: Questions or concerns with how the criteria were applied. Preferred approach to locational analysis: 1 or 1B. • Recommended changes to the mapping based on adopted locational criteria. The alternative boundary locations including Planning Commission comments will be presented at the April 9, 2019 CAC meeting for further public input. It is recommended that a follow-up discussion based on Planning Commission, CAC and public input be scheduled for the May 7, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. This will allow the Planning Commission to review further comments and input received along with recommended changes prior to finalizing the mapping needed for the Residential UGB Amendment application. Attachment❑ Attachment "A" — Preliminary Residential UGB Amendment, Staff Alternative 1 A Attachment "B" — Preliminary Residential UGB Amendment, Staff Alternative 1B 142 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAPPING ALTERNATIVES 140 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 869 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND ARCIIITECTURAL REVIEW FOR A FIRE STATION ON LANDS WITHIN THE CIVIC ZONING DISTRICT. (File No: SPAR -19001) WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a site plan and architectural review application to develop a 10,200 square foot fire station on a 1.76 acre site within the Civic zoning identified on the Jackson County Assessor's map as 37S 2W 03AB, Tax Lots 4400, 4500 and 4600, Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's consideration of the application is based on the standards and criteria applicable to Site Plan and Architectural Review in accordance with Section 17.72 and Design and Development Standards in accordance with Section 17.75; and WHEREAS, on April 2, 2019, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Point Planning Commission considered the Applicant's request for Site Plan and Architectural Review approval, at which time it reviewed the Staff Report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 869 does hereby approve the Site Plan and Architectural Review application for Fire District 3, based on the findings and conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibit "A," the Planning Department Staff Report dated April 2, 2019, including attachments incorporated by reference. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 2nd day of April, 2019. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Planning Commission Resolution No. 869 (04/02/2019) Attachrftnt "E"