The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApril 2, 2019 Planning Commission PacketA CENTRAL POINT CITY OF CENTRAL POINT PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 2, 2019 - 6:00 p.m. I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL Planning Commission members, Mike Oliver (chair), Tom Van Voorhees, Amy Moore, Jim Mock, John Whiting, Kay Harrison, Chris Richey IV. CORRESPONDENCE V. MINUTES Review and approval of the March 5, 2019 Planning Commission meeting minutes. VI. PUBLIC APPEARANCES VII. BUSINESS A. Public hearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit application to allow Fire District 3 to operate a fire station at 1909 Scenic Avenue. The 1.76 acre site is within the Civic zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S 2W 03AB Tax Lots 4400, 4500 and 4600. File No. CUP -19001. Applicant: Fire District 3; Agent: Matt Small; Kistler, Small & White Architects. B. Public hearing to consider a Site Plan and Architectural Review application for the construction of a 10,200 square foot fire station, including parking and landscape areas, at 1909 Scenic Avenue. The 1.76 acre site is within the Civic zoning district and is identified on the Jackson County Assessor's Map as 37S 2W 03AB Tax Lots 4400, 4500 and 4600. File No. SPAR - 19001. Applicant: Fire District 3; Agent: Matt Small; Kistler, Small & White Architects. VIII. DISCUSSION A. Residential Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) Amendment. Present and discuss two preliminary mapping alternatives for the Residential UGB Amendment. File No. CPA - 19001. Applicant: City of Central Point. IX. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS X. MISCELLANEOUS XI. ADJOURNMENT City of Central Point Planning Commission Minutes March 5, 2019 I. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 6:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL Commissioners, Mike Oliver (chair), Amy Moore, John Whiting, Tom Van Voorhees, and Jim Mock and Kay Harrison were present. Also in attendance were: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director, Stephanie Holtey, Principal Planner, Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner and Karin Skelton, Planning Secretary. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIENCE III. CORRESPONDENCE Memo from City Attorney Sydnee Dreyer regarding hearings process Mr. Humphrey reviewed the noticing requirements for legislative hearings for the Commissioners February 6, 2019 letter from FEMA Ms. Holtey reviewed the letter for the planning commission saying the letter outlined conflict between two federal agencies due to a lawsuit. IV. MINUTES The Commissioners noted the date was incorrect and a typo on page 7. John Whiting made a motion to approve the minutes of the February 5, 2019 Planning Commission Meeting with the corrections mentioned. Amy Moore seconded the motion. ROLL CALL: Amy Moore, yes; John Whiting, yes; Tom Van Voorhees, yes; Jim Mock, yes; Kay Harrison, abstain. Motion passed. V. PUBLIC APPEARANCES There were no public appearances. VI. BUSINESS 2 A. Continued public hearing and consideration of the Housing Element (2019- 2019) of the Central Point Comprehensive Plan. Applicant: City of Central Point. File No.: CPA -18005. Mike Oliver read the rules regarding the public hearing. The commissioners had no bias, conflict of interest or ex parte contact to declare Ms. Holtey stated the public hearing for the Housing Element was continued from the February 5, 2019 meeting due to time constraints. Ms. Holtey said the Housing Element includes an analysis of housing needs within the City's urban area over a 20 -year period and addresses the City's capacity to accommodate that need within the existing Urban Growth Boundary. The last Housing Element was adopted in 2017. Since that time, population forecast changes and updated residential buildable lands information has resulted in an increased need for housing for the period 2019-2039. The proposed amendment to the Housing Element addresses these changes and maintains the previously adopted policies without changes. She said Portland State University (PSU) has come out with an updated Population forecast which indicates a 58% increase in population growth. This results in a need for 2887 new dwellings over the next 20 years. This would require 410 buildable acres. The available buildable land within the City is 105 acres. She explained there were three options for the City to meet this need. Change policy to increase efficiency of land use inside the UGB, expand the UGB to provide more residential land or take a hybrid approach. She said the City is taking a hybrid approach. Ms. Holtey reviewed household characteristics including owner occupied vs. renter occupied units, housing age, household size and income and special needs housing. She also reviewed the percentage of households at or below the federal poverty level. She added that the majority of the housing stock in the City was built after 1980 and was considered in good condition. The Commissioners discussed the vacancy rates in the City and the current housing markets. Ms. Holtey said that affordability continued to be an issue. Households spending more than 30% of their income toward housing are considered cost burdened. The City currently has an inventory of 105 buildable acres of residential land. Of the 410 acres needed to satisfy the future demand, a total of 305 new gross acres are needed to supplement the existing inventory. Ms. Holtey noted that detached single family dwellings were the preferred housing type. She noted that there is flexibility to accommodate this housing type in all zones except the High Density Residential zone. The Commissioners discussed the need for a variety of housing and zoning options. They discussed meeting the density requirements and the public's desire for single family housing. They agreed the need for flexibility was important. Mr. Oliver stated the term "great recession" used throughout the packet information should refer to a specific time frame so as to be clear which market floatation it referred to. Ms. Holtey suggested referring to it as the "great recession of 2008". Ms. Holtey reviewed the 9 Goals and policies of the Housing Element. She said no goals or policies have been changed. She added most of the Housing Element remained as it was in 2017. Moving forward the City is looking to use a hybridized approach, making adjustments to the minimum density allocations to maximize land use efficiency and amending the UGB to bring in the necessary acreage. The Commissioners wondered about incentives to encourage higher density development. Ms. Holtey said that was addressed in the Housing Implementation Plan. The public hearing was opened Larry Martin, Taylor Road Mr. Martin expressed his appreciation for the flexibility in zoning to allow for market fluxuation and housing needs. He acknowledged that detached single family residences were the preferred type of housing. He said he thought the lands brought into the UGB should be zoned with as much flexibility as possible in order to develop to current market demands. The commissioners discussed densities and the fluxuation of housing demands. The public hearing was closed. Amy Moore made a motion to recommend approval the Housing Element (2019-2019) of the Central Point Comprehensive Plan. Chris Richey seconded the motion. The Commissioners discussed the density calculations and number of acres needed. They questioned the use of the minimum density to project development. Ms. Holtey reviewed the calculations used to determine the land need over the next 20 years. She said development could exceed the minimum density, so using that as a base was the most prudent approach. Mr. Humphrey elaborated on how the zoning allowed for various types of development. He said it is a framework as it would be impossible to know exactly how future housing markets were going to evolve. Ms. Moore added if some of the land did not develop over the next 20 years, it would actually be in the citizens' best interests as it would keep housing costs down because supply would overshadow demand, therefore making housing more affordable. Amy Moore moved to modify her motion to recommend approval of the Housing Element with 2 modifications. 1) Change references to the "great recession" to the "great recession of 2008", and change the title of "New Density" in table 22 to "Minimum Gross Density Requirements". John Whiting seconded. ROLL CALL: Amy Moore, yes; John Whiting, yes; Tom Van Voorhees, yes; Jim Mock, yes; Kay Harrison, yes. Motion passed. DISCUSSION A. Residential Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) Amendment schedule. Mr. Humphrey reviewed the timeline for the upcoming UGB amendment. He said there would be draft maps to review by both the CAC and the Planning Commission in their next meetings. Additionally staff would introduce the Employment Buildable Lands Inventory and the Economic Element. Planning Update x Dominoes has participated in a pre -application meeting for property on Freeman Court x Snowy Butte Station is continuing development x A building across from the Post Office has been demolished, but no applications have been received regarding that property. x Makers space remodel is progressing well x The Cheese Festival is March 16th and 17th VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS IX. MISCELLANEOUS X. ADJOURNMENT Chris Richey made a motion to adjourn. John Whiting seconded the motion. All members said "aye". Meeting was adjourned 8:15 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the March 5, 2019 Planning Commission meeting were approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on the day of April, 2019. Planning Commission Chair CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- SCENIC AVE. -FIRE DISTRICT 3 STAFF REPORT AORIL CENTRAL POINT Oregon STAFF REPORT April 2, 2019 AGENDA ITEM: VII -A (File No. CUP -19001) Community Development Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit application to allow Fire District 3 to operate a fire station at 1909 Scenic Avenue. The 1.76 acre site is within the Civic zoning district and is identified on the ESD:137S 2W 03AB Tax Lots 4400, 4500 and 4600. Applicant: Fire District 3; Agent: Matt Small; Kistler, Small & White Architects. SOURCE Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner II BACKGROUND Fire District 3 is proposing a new fire station along the south side of Scenic Avenue, north of the Scenic Middle School site. The proposed fire station will replace an existing fire station along Table Rock Road, and will complement the existing fire station along South Front Street to improve response times to the ❑EDW IFRJMHIJ1M1SIJff9JI1z= The project involves circulation improvements, including the extension of Rock Way, which impact adjacent properties owned by School District 6 (properties to the west and south) and the Housing Authority of Jackson County (HAJC) (property to the cast). Consequently, the location and design of the proposed fire station required collaboration between Fire District 3 and surrounding property owners., Each property owner has reviewed the project and agreed on the overall design. Conditional uses require special consideration because of special attributes and to ensure they are properly located with respect to the surrounding neighborhoods. Fire stations, and other public facilities, are listed as conditional uses in accordance with section 17.29.050 of the Central Point Municipal Code. The application for Conditional Use Permit is being reviewed concurrently with an application for Site Plan and Architectural Review (SPAR -19001). Specific site development considerations are detailed in that application. Project Description: The proposed fire station is approximately 10,200 square feet and the site plan for the proposed development includes parking and landscape areas. A classroom will be available to the public, with anticipated use of one (1) to two (2) times per week. The fire station will be staffed by three (3) to four (4) shift firefighters per day. Development on the property requires improvements along the south side of Scenic Avenue. The Fire District has agreed to participate with the City on a shared cost agreement for improvements to the north side of Scenic Avenue. The improvements, which include sidewalks and bicycle lanes on both sides, a center left -turn lane and crosswalks, will improve safety along Scenic Avenue and improve pedestrian access to Scenic Middle School. The project also proposes an extension of Rock Way south of Scenic Avenue to the Scenic Middle School parking lot. The extension of Rock Way provides the primary access to the project site and improves the overall circulation for the adjacent middle school during peak pick up and drop off times. On site circulation is provided by a one-way drive aisle from Rock Way to Scenic Avenue. Rock Way will be constructed for two (2) way traffic and sidewalk on one side along the Fire District property. Sidewalks will be completed on the opposite side when the HAJC property develops in the future. The Fire District proposes to use the landscape areas DADI) I1TE] T E03MHCFP showcase best management practices for fire safe landscaping. The fire wise design emphasizes xeriscape principles with drought and fire resistant landscaping that reduces maintenance, water usage and fire risk adjacent to a structure. 3H1W1E1SS(lFD3NEE flf ❑CJhe landscape areas were designed to provide visual relief from adjacent properties, but take into consideration the location of trees and other vegetation along Scenic Avenue to increase visibility to the emergency exit drive for the fire station. Lighting in the proposed parking areas will be provided by pole lights installed adjacent to each of the on- site parking areas. Each light will be directed downward to prevent light from spilling onto adjacent properties or streets. The building is a single story building, with the roof above the apparatus bay extending to 27 -feet in height, and the main fagade of the structure facing north towards Scenic Avenue. The facades of the building are articulated with variations vertically and horizontally that includes variations in color and P Ddu Mffi11)XF1<P H7ZEE-® Td =EREI3 113UFNYF=NMEWHDpecific building design standards, the proposed fire station provides variation in massing, articulation and transparency to assure a pedestrian -scale that is compatible with and supports the residential character of the neighborhood. ISSUES There are two (2) issues related to the proposal as follows: Property Lines. Through the review of the project, it was noted that the proposal occupies three (3) legal tax lots. The proposed structure is located across the common property boundary between the lots. Structures are not permitted to cross property lines. Comment: It will be necessary to legally adjust or consolidate the lots as necessary to avoid conflicts between the proposed structure and the property lines. Staff recommends Condition of Approval No. 1 requiring legal lot line adjustment/consolidation of the lots prior to building permit issuance. 2. Traffic Mitigation. 7IJ4ESS tHIIFC P S>FW1LDD=, ❑ IJUL:%EfJH:HDKU:1 calculations for the proposed fire station and considered the effects on adjacent streets with current and future traffic volumes. Intersection operations and safety conditions were evaluated to address potential impacts and noted the following: a. Intersection Capacity and Level of Service. The TIA studied the efficiency of area intersections that may be influenced by traffic from the proposed fire station. The intersection at Scenic Avenue and Upton Road was initially shown to operate below an acceptable level of service per City standards. Further analysis, including a stop sign delay study, shows that the intersection is operation within acceptable standards and the traffic from the fire station will not further degrade the operating efficiency of the intersection below acceptable levels of service. No mitigation is required at this time. b. Turn Lane Criteria. Left and right turn lanes were evaluated along Scenic Avenue to determine whether turn lane criteria is met to require additional turn lanes along Scenic Avenue following the construction of the fire station. Following the construction of the fire station, the number of westbound vehicles projected to turn left during peak hours warrants a left -turn lane along Scenic Avenue at Rock Way and the intersection of Scenic Middle School. Comment: Per the TIA, the intersection at Upton Road and Scenic Avenue experiences the greatest delay for turning movements and operates at the lowest level of service in the study area. The TIA recommends a center two -way -left -turn -lane (TWLTL) along Scenic Avenue extending from the Scenic Middle School driveway east to the existing turn lane west of Upton Road. Staff recommends Condition No. 2 requiring the applicant to complete the frontage improvements along Scenic Avenue, including restriping Scenic Avenue to include a two-way left turn lane extending from the Scenic Middle School driveway to the intersection of Upton Road and Scenic Avenue. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Fire District 3 Scenic Avenue Fire Station Conditional Use Permit has been evaluated for compliance with the applicable Conditional Use Criteria set forth in CPMC 17.76 and found to comply as conditioned SSS IDQ®VWIP FBYZI CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall apply for a Type I Property Line Adjustment/Consolidation application to consolidate Tax Lot 4500 and Tax Lot 4600 and adjust the common property boundary between the consolidated tax lot and Tax Lot 4400. A recorded copy of the Map of Survey and Deed is required. 2. Prior to Public Works Final Inspection, the applicant shall complete Scenic Avenue frontage improvements and construction of Rock Way as required per the civil improvement and landscape and irrigation plans approved by the Public Works Department. ATTACHMENTS AttachmHIVEE-®Site Plan ❑NWIT H79E- FHTTI Architectural Elevations ❑VUI<P H:VVTI-FHMFloor Plan AttaFKP H3«7 -® Landscape Plan 10 ■ .IM a 610 OM K1105111 ■III 106MA I]Il��,dlllll AIi Awl ■ ❑NWW H W&❑ []Traffic Impact Analysis, dated 02-27-2019 ❑)MFEP 1-17�VL ®Parks & Public Works Department Staff Report, dated 03-19-2019 EI)MFEP H3 Y( ®Resolution No. 868 ACTION Consideration of Resolution No. 868, Conditional Use Permit for Fire District 3 and 1) approve; 2) approve with modifications; or 3) deny the application. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution No. 868 Conditional Use Permit for Fire District 3 per the Staff Report dated April 2, 2019, including all attachments thereto. 11 h ZOSL6 1f0 'lulod IeJiva0 �1N1prp ++ r (A v 5e any oluao5 6061 NOI1tl1S 3MI3 1NIOd IVNIN33 a e O £# 101M1SI0 3N13 AlNnOO NOSNOVr ss J{ co i �+ �� Iv ?a 2Q � QFiE E s o D sw a Tyne- t e x o 1 �:• Dis ': ° a Z i H O i, pna< .•a3,. LuZ w iii z ep OLU Lu z �{ x .-......+•eslry_�iecx x y o s y al s o s s i I o > , , A a < i I F � 0 j W w H 0 z _ f z i rc .w�''� ~ •~ a N Z w AVM ADOa Lu e i I ; a t I a w 1 i O 1 I 1 - - 12 I 3 1 I r -.i. f t j � I F [ o 0 1 � O I 12 I W U) m W D 8 5 a> O F 7U Z U O U N C7 W I � Z a3 n a � W ci -y r \ x Z L-4 W L �a Z O K _ LL W C O F U) z N O Q W J w m O z N? 2 N J D 8 5 a> O F 7U Z w m o Z F o O O C7 W I � Z a3 = N I W \ ED 2 � i Z iQ —�f H Z {� { K O rn 1 T I O w r w Q w 13 m rn cn +� 6 1-1 U i o U Q E O L i Z� O Q� H � Z W LU O LU U. LL w Z Z O D LU a o It J U O LU w H W U W U Q W 14 z� O Q°c H � N N N Z Win Q �_ LU it I— LL LL Q' Z J O � LU Il O tY J U gz O LU Z Y W U W U Q �Yo �L-� as �J� z . A# . � / t( \§ . | — � YZ z§ 15 �� i � \% ® !7 Via\ �� Ali & | . mA' a e \; 2 No1!¥Sku2@3 &! -§ �. g N � iMU g]¥w� NnOO NOS oV }[ ) " , . . \ \ � � - - - |,ul ..._..... ! ! ' /d ! \feoll )\}!|J �4RR�2 i� � Applicant: Jackson County Fire District 3 Attn: John Patterson 8383 Agate Road White City, OR 97503 541.826.7100 johnp(@*cfd3.com Agent: Kistler Small + White, Architects Attn: Matt Small 66 Water Street, Suite 101 Ashland, OR 97520 541.488.8200 ext 15 mattCa�-kistlersmallwhite.com Project: New Scenic Avenue Fire Station JCFD3 — New Scenic Avenue Fire Station Conditional Use Permit Project Narrative & Findings of Fact Project: • New +/-10,200 sq ft, six bay fire station, landscaping, driveways and Rock Way road extension. Project Location: 1909 Scenic Avenue. Project site is on the south side of Scenic Avenue and north of the existing Scenic Middle School. The new station will be located between the middle school and Scenic Avenue. Map + Tax Lot: • 37S 2W 3ab, Tax Lots: 4500, 4600 • To accomplish the project objectives, coordination is required between Jackson County Fire District 3 (JCFD3) and the adjoining landowners, including the Housing Authority of Jackson County (HAJC) (TL 4700 and 4800) and School District 6 (SD6) (TL 4300 and 4400). Zoning: • Civic Project Intent: • Construct a new fire station serving the Central Point area. The new station will improve response times significantly to areas currently served by other JCFD3 stations. In addition, the new facility will contain a classroom available to the public and a fire wise landscaped demonstration area. Background and Special Considerations: • Rock Way Extension: An extension to Rock Way Street is proposed. The new road would extend south to Scenic Middle School, intersecting the existing school parking lot. This new extension will serve the new fire station, improve vehicular circulation for Scenic Middle School and provide future access to housing proposed by HAJC to be located east of the fire station and Rock Way extension. The design team and the Fire District have worked extensively with the Central Point Public Works Department to assure a safe extension is provided meeting city standards. The construction of the extension will be phased, allowing JCFD3 to construct the portion of the road serving the 17 station now and having HAJC come in later and finish their half when they are ready to build. Phasing the extension minimizes the initial expense for the fire district. The middle school will be accessible via the extension in each phase. Lot Line Adjustment/Consolidation: The project involves (3) separate property Owners, JCFD3, HAJC and SD6 and the proposed project spans properties owned by all three Owners. This will require adjustments to the existing property lines. A Traffic Impact Analysis has been prepared and a copy of the report is included with these findings. Provided below are responses to the application approval criteria in Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 17.76, Conditional Use Permit. 17.76.011 Application and Review An application and review thereof shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 17.05 and all applicable laws of the state. The application shall be accompanied by a fee defined by the City's adopted planning application fee schedule. Finding CPMC 17.76.011: Per CPMC 17.05.100, Table 1, Conditional Use Permits are subject to the Type III review procedures set forth in CPMC 17.05.400. As evidenced by the application submittal documents, the application has been submitted to the City for review in accordance with these procedures. Conclusion CPMC 17.76.011: Consistent. 17.76.040 Findings and Conditions. The Planning Commission in granting a conditional use permit shall find as follows: A. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use and to meet all other development and lot requirements of the subject zoning district and all other provisions of this code; Finding CPMC 17.76.040(A): The site is of adequate size and shape as demonstrated by the attached Site Plan. Setbacks and lot coverage requirements are met. The site accommodates on site vehicular circulation well with adequate turning radii and parking. Lot lines will be adjusted as necessary. Conclusion CPMC 17.76.040(A): Consistent. B. That the site has adequate access to a public street or highway and that the street or highway is adequate in size and condition to effectively accommodate the traffic that is expected to be generated by the proposed use; Finding CPMC 17.76.040(B): Easy, efficient access to a public street is critical to the successful operation of a fire station. This site offers direct access to Scenic Avenue. In addition, the proposed project includes an extension of Rock Way Road which will offer an additional access to Scenic Avenue. Improvements will be made to Scenic Avenue along the fire station frontage to make it consistent with the existing conditions of Scenic east of Rock Way Road. Conclusion CPMC 17.76.040(B): Consistent. 18 C. That the proposed use will have no significant adverse effect on abutting property or the permitted use thereof. In making this determination, the commission shall consider the proposed location of improvements on the site; vehicular ingress, egress and internal circulation; setbacks; height of buildings and structures; walls and fences; landscaping; outdoor lighting; and signs; Finding CPMC 17.76.040(0): The proposed project has involved the collaboration of three different property owners, JCFD3, HAJC and SD6 with the goal of designing a project that benefits all parties. In doing so, this project will improve the vehicular circulation for the middle school and will offer vehicular access to Scenic Avenue for future HAJC housing projects. The new fire station is setback from the existing middle school sufficiently not to crowd or interfere with the view or operations of the existing school. The height of the proposed fire station is roughly 27'-0" well below the allowed height and consistent with scale of the surrounding buildings. A 6-0" chain link fence is proposed along the southern property line. Xeriscape landscaping is proposed resulting in minimal water use and a "fire wise" landscaped area is proposed as a demonstration area. Outdoor lighting will include devices to direct the light downward. A ground set monument sign, lighted by ground light fixtures, is proposed along the Scenic Avenue frontage. Conclusion CPMC 17.76.040(C): Consistent. D. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will comply with local, state and federal health and safety regulations and therefore will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhoods and will not be detrimental or injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the community based on the review of those factors listed in subsection C of this section; Finding CPMC 17.76.040(D): The proposed fire station will comply with all sate, federal and local health and safety regulations. Conclusion CPMC 17.76.040(D): Consistent. E. That any conditions required for approval of the permit are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare and may include: 1. Adjustments to lot size or yard areas as needed to best accommodate the proposed use; provided the lots or yard areas conform to the stated minimum dimensions for the subject zoning district, unless a variance is also granted as provided for in Chapter 17.13, 2. Increasing street widths, modifications in street designs or addition of street signs or traffic signals to accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed use, 3. Adjustments to off-street parking requirements in accordance with any unique characteristics of the proposed use, 4. Regulation of points of vehicular ingress and egress, W 5. Requiring landscaping, irrigation systems, lighting and a property maintenance program, 6. Regulation of signs and their locations, 7. Requiring fences, berms, walls, landscaping or other devices of organic or artificial composition to eliminate or reduce the effects of noise, vibrations, odors, visual incompatibility or other undesirable effects on surrounding properties, 8. Regulation of time of operations for certain types of uses if their operations may adversely affect privacy of sleep of persons residing nearby or otherwise conflict with other community or neighborhood functions, 9. Establish a time period within which the subject land use must be developed, 10. Requirement of a bond or other adequate assurance within a specified period of time, 11. Such other conditions that are found to be necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, 12. In considering an appeal of an application for a conditional use permit for a home occupation, the planning commission shall review the criteria listed in Section 17.60.190. Finding CPMC 17.76.040(E): No conditions are proposed as part of the Conditional Use Permit application. Conclusion CPMC 17.76.040(E): Not applicable. In conclusion, we believe the application submittal package demonstrates compliance with the approval criteria for zone map amendments in the Central Point Municipal Code. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. Matthew J. Small. Architect 20 SouT-u ,ftm Opium T RmfP0-RT QT10N -1 NGIN-CTP//fG, L L C 319 Eastwood Drive - Medford, Or. 97504 — Phone (541) 608-9923 — Email: Kim.parducci@gmail.com February 27, 2019 Matt Samitore, Parks and Public Works Director City of Central Point 140 So. 3rd Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: Proposed Fire Station Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Matt, Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC prepared a traffic impact analysis for a proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Fire Station on Township 37S Range 2W Section 3AB, tax lots 4400, 4500, and part of 4600 in Central Point, Oregon. The subject property is located along the south side of Scenic Avenue, west of Rock Way. Access is proposed from Scenic Avenue and through a planned extension of Rock Way. Proposed development includes a 10,200 square foot Fire Station, which is estimated to generate 9 trips during the a.m. peak hour and 5 trips during the p.m. peak hour. Study area intersections included: 1. Upton Road & Scenic Avenue 2. Rock Way & Scenic Avenue 3. Scenic Middle School & Scenic Avenue 4. Site Driveways Study area intersections were evaluated under existing year 2019 and design year 2020 no -build and build conditions during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours due to the close proximity of the site to Scenic Middle School. Trips were re-routed under design year 2020 build conditions as a result of a Rock Way street extension to the school parking lot. Summary & Conclusions The findings of the traffic impact analysis conclude that the proposed Fire Station on 37S2W03AB tax lots 4400, 4500, and part of 4600 is not shown to degrade the performance of any study area intersection or cause adverse conditions with proposed improvements in place. Intersection operations and safety conditions were evaluated to address potential impacts to the transportation system. Results of the analysis show the following: 1. Left turn lane criterion was shown to be met on Scenic Avenue at both the Rock Way / Scenic Avenue and Scenic Middle School / Scenic Avenue intersections. Recommended mitigation is to stripe Scenic Avenue to include a center two -way -left -turn -lane (TWLTL) from the Scenic Middle School driveway to the existing turn lane west of Upton Road. 2. Crosswalks are proposed on Scenic Avenue at Rock Way to support increased pedestrian and bicycle traffic as a result of the Rock Way extension to Scenic Middle School. The proposed Fire Station on 37S2W3AB tax lots 4400, 4500, and part of 4600 is shown to be in compliance with the Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Transportation System Plan and Municipal Code. Streets that serve the subject property are shown to have adequate capacity to support proposed development with proposed improvements. 5.u". T n)YfPo-PTAT10JYTHOH-1-IMM6, LLC I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 15 21 INTRODUCTION Background Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC prepared a traffic impact analysis for a proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Fire Station on Township 37S Range 2W Section 3AB, tax lots 4400, 4500, and part of 4600 in Central Point, Oregon. The subject property is located along the south side of Scenic Avenue, west of Rock Way. Access is proposed from Scenic Avenue and through a planned extension of Rock Way. A traffic impact analysis is required by the City of Central Point to address issues of compliance with the Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Transportation System Plan (TSP), and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) criterion. The scope of the analysis includes evaluating development impacts within the identified study area under existing and design year conditions during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Study area intersections included: 1. Upton Road & Scenic Avenue 3. Scenic Middle School & Scenic Avenue 2. Rock Way & Scenic Avenue 4. Site Driveways The proposed use for the site is a 10,200 square foot (SF) Fire Station, which is estimated to generate 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. trips to the transportation system during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Project Location The subject parcel is located along the south side of Scenic Avenue, west of Rock Way on Township 37S Range 2W Section 3AB, tax lots 4400, 4500, and parts of 4600 in Central Point, Oregon. Refer to Figure 1 for a vicinity map. Project Description The subject property is currently zoned Civic (C). A Fire Station is a conditional use in the Civic zone. A 10,200 SF Fire Station is estimated to generate 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. trips to the transportation system during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Trips will be split between an access on Scenic Avenue and through an access on a proposed Rock Way extension. 5.u". T n)YfPo-PTAT/0JYTHOH-1-IMM6, LLC I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 16 22 Figure 2: Site Plan . --qy%_ k �y ,L- . - •'r. � � I -_ I•': -',:.- - - - - " - -� � r:....? �•, � ^ - - dpi: - _ � " � n ' ; - :• - 5 ,. w :i may, M ,a 20 SF .•• - R. L"!s• FRE STRT@N - I r •. El ElI Y'�•,-�:.-'-�#:1,'':�__�'-';'•_ - _ _ ,-ice- I �'� •--'-'-- ___ _ - - -_ - I i t 4 I SOUT-I-EAN O-n-r.GON T-R-ANSPOAMT10N ENGINE��ING, LLC Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim. parducciO)gmail. com 24 j Fire District #3 Fire Station CUP Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon EXISTING CONDITIONS Site Conditions The proposed site is located on Township 37S Range 2W Section 3AB, tax lots 4400, 4500, and part of 4600. The subject property is currently vacant. Roadway Characteristics Table 1 provides a summary of existing roadway classifications and descriptions in the study area. Table 1 - Roadway Classifications and Descriptions Roadway Jurisdiction Functional Classification Lanes City Operational Standard posted Speed Scenic Avenue City of Central Point Minor Arterial 2-3 LOS D 20-30 mph 10`" Street City of Central Point Minor Arterial 2-3 LOS D 30 mph Upton Road City of Central Point Minor Arterial 2 LOS D 45 mph Rock Way City of Central Point Local 2 LOS D 25 mph Pedestrian and Bicycle Accessibility Pedestrian activity was observed to be high along Scenic Avenue and between Scenic Middle School and Rock Way through an existing gravel path. The majority of pedestrians walked along the south side of Scenic Avenue and crossed Scenic Avenue at either Rock Way or Upton Road. Sidewalks are currently provided on both side of Scenic Avenue east of Rock Way, on both side of Rock Way, and on both sides of Upton Road. A multi -use path exists along the south side of Scenic Avenue between Rock Way and the Scenic Middle School driveway. When the Fire Station develops, the south side of Scenic Avenue along its frontage will be improved with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. The Rock Way extension from Scenic Avenue to the Scenic Middle School parking lot will also be improved on the west side with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. The east side will have curb and gutter, but sidewalk improvements will be deferred until the Housing Authority develops on the adjoining property. Cyclist activity was observed to be low on Scenic Avenue and around the study area. Bike lanes are striped on Upton Road north of Scenic Avenue and on Scenic Avenue east of Rock Way, but do not continue west of Rock Way. There are also no bike lanes on Rock Way. Bike lanes will be striped on Scenic Avenue west of Rock Way when frontage improvements are made as part of the Fire Station site development. There is no plan to stripe bike lanes on the Rock Way extension to Scenic Middle School because it is classified as a local street. Traffic Counts Manual traffic counts were collected from 7:00-9:00 a.m. and 3:00-6:00 p.m. at study area intersections in early October of 2018. Counts were seasonally adjusted and balanced to reflect peak conditions. The a.m. peak hour was shown to occur from 7:45-8:45 a.m. and the p.m. peak hour from 3:30-4:30 p.m. in the surrounding area. A follow up stop -sign delay count was gathered on Upton Road at Scenic Avenue in January to determine what the actual average delay time per vehicle is for vehicles waiting on Upton Road during peak conditions. Counts are provided in the attachments. 5.u". T n)YfPo-PTAT10JYTHOM-1-I/M6, LLC I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 18 25 Background Growth Background growth was derived using growth rates from the Interchange Area Management Plan (IAMP) for Exit 33 and volume comparisons between counts in 2010 and 2018 for IOth Street. The IAMP estimated 0.7% of growth per year on 10th Street between 2010 and future year 2034. We rounded that up to 1 % to be conservative and applied it to all streets within the study area. U7. TAANSDO-RTATION -IN6IN-E-CRIN6, LLC I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 19 26 Figure 3a : Year 2019 No -Build Traffic Volumes, AM Peak Hour 3 O 1z CM 0 0 3 (125 113 H I10 'P0 / � V 5 \ 375 �1 21 ?17 SC -.V, PF U Z W U W 0 U Site AURORA LN SOUT-I-CAN O-n-r.GON T-2-INSPOATMION ENGIN-11-RIN6, LLC Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim. parducciO)gmail. com 27 �Q X02 101 303 146 1 3 D VICTORIA WY ^^ W Q PRINCESS WY 0 U WINDSOR WY KINGS WY Fire District #3 Fire Station CUP Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon Figure 3b : Year 2019 No -Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour 3 O Iz In 0 0 3 223 -T 207 H 20 60 Fi 'P0 5� � 313 25 257 SCFAVIc,4 PF H U Z W U Site AURORA LN �Q Q'O� - J 126 l91 212 177 37 � �7 D VICTORIA WY ^^ 3 Q PRINCESS WY � Z 3 O 0 U WINDSOR WY SOUT-I-CAN O-n-r.GON T-2-INSPOATMION INGIN-1-1-RIN6, LLC Medford, Oregon 97504 ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim. parducciO)gmail. com 28 KINGS WY Fire District #3 Fire Station CUP Traffic Impact Analysis Central Point, Oregon Intersection Capacity and Level of Service Intersection capacity calculations were conducted utilizing the methodologies presented in the Year 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Capacity and level of service calculations for signalized and unsignalized intersections were prepared using "SYNCHRO" timing software. Level of service quantifies the degree of comfort afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or along a roadway section. The level of service methodology was developed to quantify the quality of service of transportation facilities. Level of service is based on total delay, defined as the total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. Level of service ranges from "A" to "F", with "A" indicating the most desirable condition and "F" indicating an unsatisfactory condition. The HCM LOS designations for stop - controlled intersections are provided in Table 2. The HCM LOS designations for signalized intersections are provided in Table 3. Table 2 — HCM Level of Service Designations for Stop -Controlled Intersections Level of Service Delay Range A <10 B >10 — 15 C >15-25 D >25 — 35 E >35 — 50 F > 50 Table 3 — HCM Level of Service Designations for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Delay Range A <10 B >10-20 C >20 — 35 D >35 — 55 E >55 — 80 F > 80 Key intersections are under City of Central Point jurisdiction. The City of Central Point requires all study area intersections to operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS). The minimum acceptable level of service for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersection movements is LOS "D". Mitigation is required if proposed development is shown to degrade an intersection to a level of service worse than under no -build conditions. U7. T n q yfpOJ2TgT101/-CN6/N-[F-Rll/6, L L i I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 112 29 Year 2019 No -Build Intersection Operations Key intersections were evaluated under year 2019 no -build conditions during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Results are summarized in Table 4. Table 4 - Year 2019 No -Build Intersection Operations, AM and PM Peak Hours Intersection Performance Standard Traffic Control Year 2018 No -Build AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Upton Road / Scenic Avenue LOS D TWSC T' (SB), D2 (SB) T' (SB), D2 (SB) Rock Way / Scenic Avenue LOS D TWSC C, (SB) B, (SB) Scenic Middle School / Scenic Avenue None TWSC C, (NB) C, (NB) LOS=Level of Service, TWSC=Two-way stop controlled, NB=northbound, SB=southbound Notes: 1. Intersection LOS using Synchro Software 2. Intersection LOS from Stop Sign Delay measurement Results of the analysis show the intersection of Upton Road / Scenic Avenue operating at a level of service (LOS) "F" under existing year 2019 no -build conditions, which exceeds the LOS "D" standard. The critical movement is the southbound left turn movement, which drives the failing LOS. Before evaluating various mitigation options, however, we conducted a stop sign delay study to determine what the actual delay is for each vehicle waiting on Upton Road. The stop sign delay study showed the average delay per vehicle to be 31.22 seconds during the a.m. peak hour and 32.25 seconds during the p.m. peak hour. This coincides with a level of service "D". Based on this, it is concluded that the intersection is currently operating within acceptable standards. Remaining intersections are also shown to operate acceptably. Refer to the attachments for synchro and stop sign delay output sheets. Year 2019 No -Build 95th Percentile Queuing Queuing is the stacking up of vehicles for a given lane movement, and it can have a significant effect on roadway safety and the overall operation of a transportation system. Long queue lengths in through lanes can block access to turn lanes, driveways, and minor street approaches, as well as spill back into upstream intersections. As a result of this, the estimation of queue lengths is an important aspect of the analysis process for determining how a transportation corridor operates. Queue lengths are reported as the average, maximum, or 95th percentile queue length. The 95th percentile queue length is used for design purposes and is the queue length reported in this analysis. Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTraffic to determine 95th percentile queue lengths at study area intersections under existing conditions. Queue lengths were then rounded up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length) and reported in Table 5 for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. i.0. TngyfPaPTgT/01/ LLi I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 113 30 Table 5 — Year 2019 No -Build 95th Percentile Queue Lengths, AM and PM Peak Hours Intersection / Available Link 95'h Percentile Exceeded or Movement Distance (Ft) Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway AM PM Scenic Avenue / Rock Way Eastbound Left/Through 425 25 25 - Westbound Through/Right 350 25 25 - Southbound Left/RiQht 650 50 50 - Scenic MS / Scenic Avenue 0 0 0 0 1 Eastbound Through/Right 500 25 25 - Westbound Left/Through 425 75 75 - Northbound Left/Right 350 125 125 - Upton Road / Scenic Avenue Eastbound Left 150 50 75 - Eastbound Through/Right 350 25 25 - Westbound Left 425 25 25 - Westbound Through/Right 450 25 50 - Northbound Left 100 25 25 - Northbound Through/Right 200 25 50 - Southbound Left 225 125 125 - Southbound Throueh/Rieht 225 75 50 - Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic Results of the queuing analysis show no link distances at key intersections exceeded under year 2019 no -build conditions. The longest queues are the southbound left turn queue length on Upton Road at Scenic Avenue and the northbound left turn queue on the Scenic Middle School driveway at Scenic Avenue. Both are estimated to be 125 feet or the equivalent of 5 vehicles. At Scenic Middle School this queue is longer when buses are trying to make left turns onto Scenic Avenue. Refer to the attachments for a full queuing and blocking report. Crash History Crash data for the most recent five-year period was gathered from ODOT's crash analysis unit. Results were gathered for the period of January 1, 2012 through December 31St, 2016. Crash data is gathered to identify crash patterns that could be attributable to geometric or operational deficiencies, or crash trends of a specific type that would indicate the need for further investigation at an intersection. Tables 6 and 7 provide intersection crash rates and types of collisions at study area intersections. Intersections with no reported crashes were not included. Full crash reports are provided in the attachments. Table 6 - Study Area Intersection Crash Rates, 2012-2016 Total Crash ODOT Intersection 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Crashes ADT Rate Crash — Rate Rock Way / Scenic Ave 0 0 0 0 1 1 5,950 0.092 0.293' Upton Rd / Scenic Ave 1 0 0 0 2 3 7,780 0.212 0.408' ' y0"' Percentile Crash Kate trom Exhibit 4-1 in 1)DO I's Analysts Procedures Manual v2 ADT=average daily traffic f. 0. TngyfPaPTgT/01/ LLi I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 114 31 Table 7 - Crash History by Type, 2012-2016 Intersection Collision Type Severity Rear- Turning/ Head- Pedestrian/ Fixed Non - End Angle on Bicvclist Object I Inlury Injury Fatal Rock Way / Scenic Ave Upton Rd / Scenic Ave Results of the crash analysis show the intersection with the highest crash frequency being Scenic Avenue at Upton Road with three crashes occurring within a five-year period. All three crashes were turning collisions, with one involving a bicyclist traveling westbound. Two resulted in non-fatal injuries and one property damage only. At the intersections of Rock Way / Scenic Avenue, there was one reported crash within a five-year period. The crash involved a pedestrian crossing Scenic Avenue and being struck by an eastbound traveling vehicle that had a blind spot due to the morning sun. All collisions along Scenic Avenue occurred between 6:00-8:00a.m. and 1:00-3:00 p.m., which is during the school a.m. and p.m. peak periods when congestion is highest. The type of collision (turning) occurring along Scenic Avenue within the study area is common for stop -controlled intersections, where drivers from side streets are turning onto and off of the mainline based on the availability of adequate gaps in traffic. School traffic is an added factor that contributes to higher spikes in traffic with a greater mix of pedestrians and bicyclists during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods, but even considering this, the number of crashes reported within a five-year period is fairly low. Overall, the crash analysis does not raise any safety concerns regarding the number, type, or severity of collisions reported in the study area that would require further investigation. i.O. TngyfPaPTgT/01/ LLi I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 115 32 SITE TRAFFIC Trip Generation Trip generation calculations for the proposed Fire Station were prepared utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 10th Edition and local data. An ITE rate was used for land use 575 — Fire Station, but this land use only had data for the p.m. peak hour. Because the ITE had no a.m. data for a Fire Station, we gathered local data at the existing Fire Station on S. Front Street (OR 99). We gathered data on an average weekday from 7:00-9:00 a.m. and 3:00-6:00 p.m. to use in the analysis and compare to the ITE p.m. trip rate. The local data showed slightly higher trips during the a.m. peak hour than the p.m. peak hour, and the p.m. peak hour trips were surprisingly exactly what the ITE estimated for a 10,200 square foot Fire Station. This showed us that the data was reliable. No pass -by or internal trip reductions were taken. All trips were considered new trips to the transportation system. Table 8 provides a summary of generations. ITE descriptions and graphs are provided in the attachments. Table 8 — Development Trip Generations Land Use Unit Size Peak Hour Rates Peak Hour Trips AM PM AM PM Total In Out Total In Out ITE 575 — Fire Station 1000 SF 10.2 -- 0.48 -- -- -- 5 1 4 Local Data NA NA NA NA 9 6 3 5 1 4 Total Trips 9 6 3 5 1 4 SF = square feet Trip Distribution and Assignment Development trips were distributed based on existing traffic patterns at Rock Way in the study area. They varied depending upon which peak hour was being evaluated. During the a.m. peak hour, traffic to the site was shown to be roughly 15% to/from the west and 85% to/from the east. During the p.m. peak hour, 25% of traffic was to/from the west and 75% to/from the east. Refer to Figures 4a and 4b for development distribution percentages and trip assignments. f. 0. TngyfPaPTgT/01/ LLi I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 116 33 Figure 4a : Development Trip Distribution & Percentages, AM Peak Hour 1;1 AURORA LN 0% 35% i g H VICTORIA WY ^^ Q PRINCESS WY LU Z Z 3 O 0 U WINDSOR WY KINGS WY SOUTUAH OPIUM Fire District #3 T-2-INSPOATIITION �NGIN��ING, LLC Fire Station CUP Medford, Oregon 97504 Traffic Impact Analysis ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim.parducciggmail.com Central Point, Oregon 34 ,p00 3 I 07 0 U (Fire Station) Ix m cr —y— o Z 0 F 0 y 15% 15% —► 0 o 0 o C O N 1;1 AURORA LN 0% 35% i g H VICTORIA WY ^^ Q PRINCESS WY LU Z Z 3 O 0 U WINDSOR WY KINGS WY SOUTUAH OPIUM Fire District #3 T-2-INSPOATIITION �NGIN��ING, LLC Fire Station CUP Medford, Oregon 97504 Traffic Impact Analysis ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim.parducciggmail.com Central Point, Oregon 34 0 w } Il' 0 I 07 0 U (Fire Station) �C4� cr —y— o Z 9 AM Trips 6 in, 3 out F o U y z H Site 0 0� (Scenic Middle School) 1;1 AURORA LN 0% 35% i g H VICTORIA WY ^^ Q PRINCESS WY LU Z Z 3 O 0 U WINDSOR WY KINGS WY SOUTUAH OPIUM Fire District #3 T-2-INSPOATIITION �NGIN��ING, LLC Fire Station CUP Medford, Oregon 97504 Traffic Impact Analysis ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim.parducciggmail.com Central Point, Oregon 34 Figure 4b : Development Trip Distribution & Percentages, PM Peak Hour 1;1 AURORA LN 0% 0% i H VICTORIA WY ^^ Q PRINCESS WY LU Z Z 3 O 0 U WINDSOR WY KINGS WY SOUTUAH OPIUM Fire District #3 T-2-INSPOATIITION �NGIN��ING, LLC Fire Station CUP Medford, Oregon 97504 Traffic Impact Analysis ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim.parducciggmail.com Central Point, Oregon 35 ,p00 3 �� o Q, �. 1 °7 0 Z ° � (Fire Station) Ix m 04 —y— U Itz C o Z 0 VF 0 y 25% 10% —► 0 o ° C O M 1;1 AURORA LN 0% 0% i H VICTORIA WY ^^ Q PRINCESS WY LU Z Z 3 O 0 U WINDSOR WY KINGS WY SOUTUAH OPIUM Fire District #3 T-2-INSPOATIITION �NGIN��ING, LLC Fire Station CUP Medford, Oregon 97504 Traffic Impact Analysis ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim.parducciggmail.com Central Point, Oregon 35 o� o � 0 �� o Q, �. 1 °7 0 Z ° � (Fire Station) ScF N�C,q 04 —y— U Itz C o Z 5 PM Trips 1 in, 4 out VF U y 3 H Site 0 o� (Scenic Middle School) 1;1 AURORA LN 0% 0% i H VICTORIA WY ^^ Q PRINCESS WY LU Z Z 3 O 0 U WINDSOR WY KINGS WY SOUTUAH OPIUM Fire District #3 T-2-INSPOATIITION �NGIN��ING, LLC Fire Station CUP Medford, Oregon 97504 Traffic Impact Analysis ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim.parducciggmail.com Central Point, Oregon 35 DESIGN YEAR 2020 BUILD CONDITIONS Design Year 2020 Build Description Build conditions represent no -build conditions for a study area with the addition of proposed development trips considered. Build conditions are compared to no -build conditions to determine what impacts and/or mitigation measures will result from proposed development. Build conditions are evaluated in this analysis for the design year 2020. Year 2020 build traffic volumes during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours are provided in Figures 5a and 5b. Design Year 2020 Build Intersection Operations Design year 2020 build traffic volumes were evaluated at key intersections under a.m. and p.m. peak hour conditions. Results are summarized in Table 9. Table 9 — Design Year 2020 Build Intersection Operations, AM and PM Peak Hours Intersection Performance Standard Traffic Control Design Year 2020 Build AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Upton Road / Scenic Avenue LOS D TWSC F4 (SB), D2 (SB) F4 (SB), D2 (SB) Rock Way / Scenic Avenue LOS D TWSC C3, (SB) C3, (SB) Scenic Middle School / Scenic Avenue None TWSC C, (NB) B, (NB) Rock Way / Fire Station None None A, (EB) A, (EB) Scenic Avenue / Fire Station None None B, (NB) B, (NB) LOS=Level of Service, TWSC=Two-way stop controlled, NB=northbound, SB=southbound Notes: 1. Intersection LOS using Synchro Software 2. Intersection LOS from Stop Sign Delay measurement 3. Includes TWLTL improvement Results of the analysis show all intersections within the study area operating acceptably with the exception of Upton Road / Scenic Avenue. This intersection is shown in Synchro output to operate at a LOS "F", but was shown in a field -measured, stop sign delay study to operate at a LOS "D". The design year 2020 build condition showed very little change in delay from year 2019 no -build conditions. Based on this, the intersection will likely continue to operate at a LOS "D" with the additional trips from the proposed Fire Station development. When the delay for the southbound left turn movement exceeds the range for a LOS "D" then it is our recommendation to stripe the existing left turn lane on the Scenic Avenue east approach as a TWLTL to allow the southbound left turning movement to turn with a two-stage gap process. This is preferred to implementing an all -way stop because of the high traffic volumes on Scenic Avenue during peak conditions. An all -way stop will create queue lengths on Scenic Avenue that are currently minimal. Restriping the east leg of the Upton Road / Scenic Avenue intersection to a center TWLTL will reduce delay for the southbound movement. The main changes that occur within the study area are seen at Rock Way / Scenic Avenue and Scenic Middle School / Scenic Avenue as a result of the Rock Way extension and center TWLTL on Scenic Avenue. The extension of Rock Way to the Scenic Middle School parking lot allows school traffic to i.O. TRANIpii PTgT101/-CN6/N-[F-Rll/6, L L ( I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 119 36 re-route, which increases traffic at the Rock Way intersection, but decreases traffic at the Scenic Middle School driveway. The result is slightly higher delay at Rock Way during the p.m. peak hour, but lower delay at the Middle School driveway during afternoon pick-up and release time. Our analysis made assumptions for re-routed trips to/from Scenic Middle School, but did not make any assumptions for changes in school bus traffic patterns because this is will be evaluated at a later time by Scenic Middle School. Refer to the attachments for synchro output sheets. Design Year 2020 Build 95th Percentile Queuing Five simulations were run and averaged in SimTraffic to determine 95th percentile queue lengths at study area intersections under design year 2020 build conditions. Queue lengths were then rounded up to the nearest 25 feet (single vehicle length) and reported in Table 10 for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Table 10 — Design Year 2020 Build 95th Percentile Queue Lengths, AM and PM Peak Hours Intersection / Available Link 951h Percentile Exceeded or Movement Distance (Ft) Queue Lengths Blocked Roadway AM PM Scenic Avenue / Rock Way 500 100 225 350 25 50 0 75 25 - 25 - 0 - 75 - Eastbound Left 100 25 25 - Eastbound Through/Right 425 25 25 - Westbound Left 100 50 50 - Westbound Through/Right 350 0 25 - Northbound Left/Through/Right 650 50 50 - Southbound Left/Through/Right 200 50 50 - Scenic MS / Scenic Avenue Eastbound Through/Right Westbound Left Westbound Through Northbound Left/Right 500 100 225 350 25 50 0 75 25 - 25 - 0 - 75 - Upton Road / Scenic Avenue 100 0 25 - Eastbound Left 150 75 75 - Eastbound Through/Right 350 25 25 - Westbound Left 425 25 25 - Westbound Through/Right 450 25 50 - Northbound Left 100 25 25 - Northbound Through/Right 200 25 50 - Southbound Left 225 125 125 - Southbound Through/Right 225 75 75 - Scenic Avenue / Fire Station Eastbound Through/Right 225 0 75 - Westbound Left 100 0 25 - Westbound Through 250 0 25 - Northbound Left/Right 100 25 25 - Rock Way Ext. / Fire Station Eastbound Left/Right 100 25 25 - Northbound Left/Through 150 0 50 - Southbound Through/Right 150 0 125 - Note: Exceeded performance standards are shown in bold, italic Results of the queuing analysis show decreases in queue lengths within the study area as a result of the Rock Way extension. The impact of re-routed traffic from Scenic Middle School reduced queue lengths at the Scenic Middle School / Scenic Avenue intersection by splitting entering and exiting trips to/from the east with the Rock Way intersection. The addition of a center TWLTL along Scenic i.0. TRANIDOPTgT101/-11Y6/N-CF-RlIK, LL( I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 120 37 Avenue from Rock Way to Scenic Middle School reduced westbound left turning queues at both Rock Way and Scenic Middle School intersections. Refer to the attachments for a full queuing and blocking report. Design Year 2020 Build Turn Lanes Left and right turn lanes were evaluated on Scenic Avenue to determine whether turn lane criterion is met under design year 2020 build conditions at Rock Way during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Results show that right turn lane criterion is not met during either peak hour for the eastbound right turn movement, but left turn lane criterion is met during both peak hours for the westbound left turn movement. Turn lane graphs are provided in the attachments for further reference. Sight Distance Sight distance is provided at intersections to allow drivers adequate time to perceive other vehicles approaching the intersection and react in time to avoid collisions. The driver of a vehicle approaching an intersection should have an unobstructed view of the entire intersection. Likewise, stopped vehicles at intersections should have a sufficient view of the intersecting roadway to decide when to enter or cross without colliding with on -coming vehicles. Minimum sight distances are provided by the American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) in what is referred to as the AASHTO handbook. Departure sight triangles for intersections with stop control on the minor road should be considered for three situations: 1. Case B 1 — Left turns from the minor road 2. Case 132 — Right turns from the minor road 3. Case 133 — Crossing the major road from the minor road The length of the leg of the departure sight triangle along the major road for all stop -controlled movements is dependent upon the speed of the major roadway and perception reaction times of drivers. The minimum stopping sight distance (SSD) represents the minimum sight distance required by AASHTO. Intersection sight distance (ISD) is considered to be the desirable sight distance by AASHTO. The speed used in the analysis was 30 mph because the school zone speed of 20 mph is only specified during school times. x The minimum SSD for a left, through or right turn movement is 200 feet x The desirable ISD for a left turn movement is 335 feet x The desirable ISD for a right turn or crossing maneuver is 290 feet Sight distance was measured from the Rock Way / Scenic Avenue intersection, and estimated for the proposed new Fire Station driveway on Scenic Avenue approximately halfway between the Scenic Middle School driveway and Rock Way. From the Rock Way south approach, sight distance was measured to be 600 feet to the west and 485 feet to the east, which meet both minimum SSD and desirable ISD. From the north approach, sight distance was measured to be 550 feet to the west and 480 feet to the east, which also meet both SSD and ISD. From the proposed new Fire Station driveway on Scenic Avenue, sight distance was estimated to be approximately 600 feet in both directions based on the location shown on the site plan. U7. T n q yfpOJ2TgT101/-CN6/N-[F-Rll/6, L L i I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 121 38 Rock Way south approach - looking west Rock Way south approach - looking east Rock Way north approach — looking east Rock Way north approach - looking west S.O. TngyfpOJ2TgT101/-ON61N-[F-Rll/6, LL( I Feb 27, 2019 1 Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 122 39 Figure 5a : Design Year 2020 Build Traffic Volumes, AM Peak Hour 'P0 1z Do 0 o 530 298 144 35 + 80 4Q O O N 0 N � L n 101 121 0 308 151 3" s 799 135 52 90 35 (Fire Station) E�� N Ix —y— U 9 AM Trips AVE 6 in, 3 outUj h Site 0 o� (Scenic Middle School) AURORA LN D VICTORIA WY ^^ 3 Q PRINCESS WY � Z 3 O 0 U WINDSOR WY KINGS WY S O UT -I -CA N O-n-r.G O N Fire District #3 T-R-INSPOAMT10N INGIN-1-1-0IN6, LLC Fire Station CUP Medford, Oregon 97504 Traffic Impact Analysis ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim.parducci(?gmail.com Central Point, Oregon 40 Figure 5b : Design Year 2020 Build Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour 3 -P0, Ix m 0 0 0 oc _o<v 5 40 251 220 5 41 oo� �Q 0 261 0 �25� J 127 192 0 217 iso 3 7 3 231 231 15 20 H Z U (Fire Station) ��41,& D 04 —y— Itzo U 5 PM Trips 1 in, 4 out 3 a Site ° �h (Scenic Middle School) 1;1 AURORA LN H VICTORIA WY ^^ Q PRINCESS WY LU Z Z 3 O 0 U WINDSOR WY KINGS WY SOUTUAH OPIUM Fire District #3 T-2-INSPOATIITION �NGIN��ING, LLC Fire Station CUP Medford, Oregon 97504 Traffic Impact Analysis ph 541.608.9923 fax 541.535.6873 email: kim.parducciggmail.com Central Point, Oregon 41 CONCLUSIONS The findings of the traffic impact analysis conclude that the proposed Fire Station on 37S2W03AB tax lots 4400, 4500, and part of 4600 is not shown to degrade the performance of any study area intersection or cause adverse conditions with proposed improvements in place. Intersection operations and safety conditions were evaluated to address potential impacts to the transportation system. Results of the analysis show the following: 1. Left turn lane criterion was shown to be met on Scenic Avenue at both the Rock Way / Scenic Avenue and Scenic Middle School / Scenic Avenue intersections. Recommended mitigation is to stripe Scenic Avenue to include a center two -way -left -turn -lane (TWLTL) from the Scenic Middle School driveway to the existing turn lane west of Upton Road. 2. Crosswalks are proposed on Scenic Avenue at Rock Way to support increased pedestrian and bicycle traffic as a result of the Rock Way extension to Scenic Middle School. The proposed Fire Station on 37S2W3AB tax lots 4400, 4500, and part of 4600 is shown to be in compliance with the Central Point Comprehensive Plan, Transportation System Plan and Municipal Code. Streets that serve the subject property are shown to have adequate capacity to support proposed development with proposed improvements. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this analysis. Sincerely, Kimberly Parducci PE, PTOE SOUwaH ffumH TuHSPDXW10H -1min m, LLC Attachments: Manual Count Data Stop Sign Delay Data Crash Data Traffic Volume Development Synchro Output/SimTraffic Output Turn Lane Graphs Agency Requirements Cc: Client PR 539 E OREGON AWS I 3 i.O. TRANIpiiPTgT101/-CN6/N-[F-Rll/6, LLQ Feb 27, 2019 I Fire Station Dev I Traffic Impact Analysis 125 42 ATTACHMENTS 43 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Rock Way File Name East-West: Scenic Ave Site Code Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No ('miinc Printed- All Vehirlec rockway-scenicave 00000002 10/9/2018 1 *** BREAK *** 03:00 PM 1 From North 0 0 From East 0 42 From South 0 45 From West 0 0 Start Time Left Thru I Right I Peds App. To al Left Thru I Right I Peds App. Toa Left Thru I Right Peds App.Toai Left Thru I Right Peds App.Tota InLTotal 07:00 AM 6 0 0 0 6 0 24 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 1 33 0 0 34 64 07:15 AM 8 0 0 0 8 0 33 6 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 1 45 0 0 46 93 07:30 AM 10 0 1 0 11 0 45 2 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 2 78 0 0 80 138 07:45 AM 8 0 1 0 9 0 44 5 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 81 139 Total 32 0 2 0 34 0 146 13 0 159 0 0 0 0 0 4 237 0 0 241 434 08:00 AM 4 0 1 0 5 0 54 9 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 66 134 08:15 AM 7 0 1 8 16 0 54 6 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 1 83 0 6 90 166 08:30 AM 8 0 3 1 12 0 54 8 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 2 125 0 0 127 201 08:45 AM 6 0 1 0 7 0 25 4 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 48 84 Total 25 0 6 9 40 0 187 27 0 214 0 0 0 0 0 3 322 0 6 331 585 *** BREAK *** 03:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 42 3 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 3 41 0 0 44 90 03:15 PM 5 0 1 6 12 0 58 8 1 67 0 0 0 0 0 5 49 0 0 54 133 03:30 PM 8 0 6 15 29 0 62 7 2 71 0 0 0 0 0 1 106 0 0 107 207 03:45 PM 7 0 2 2 11 0 75 13 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 2 73 0 38 113 212 Total 21 0 9 23 53 0 237 31 3 271 0 0 0 0 0 11 269 0 38 318 1 642 04:00 PM 8 0 0 0 8 0 61 8 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 2 73 150 04:15 PM 4 0 2 0 6 0 45 9 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 1 47 0 0 48 108 04:30 PM 6 0 1 0 7 0 65 15 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 51 138 04:45 PM 6 0 0 0 6 0 56 15 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 1 51 0 39 91 168 Total 24 0 3 0 27 0 227 47 0 274 0 0 0 0 0 2 220 0 41 263 564 05:00 PM 4 0 3 3 10 0 67 12 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 1 47 0 0 48 137 05:15 PM 8 0 1 2 11 0 73 19 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 1 53 0 0 54 157 05:30 PM 10 0 2 0 12 0 73 10 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 4 56 0 0 60 155 05:45 PM 8 0 1 0 9 0 89 6 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 1 52 0 0 53 157 Total 30 0 7 5 42 0 302 47 0 349 0 0 0 0 0 7 208 0 0 215 606 Grand Total 132 0 27 37 196 0 1099 165 3 1267 0 0 0 0 0 27 1256 0 85 1368 2831 Apprch % 67.3 0 13.8 18.9 0 86.7 13 0.2 0 0 0 0 2 91.8 0 6.2 Total % 4.7 0 1 1.3 6.9 0 38.8 5.8 0.1 44.8 0 0 0 0 0 1 44.4 0 3 48.3 44 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Rock Way File Name East-West: Scenic Ave Site Code Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No rockway-scenicave 00000002 10/9/2018 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:45 AM to 08:30 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: From North From East From South From West StartLeft 42 6 0 27 9 Thru Right Peds App.Toal Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Int. Time 5 0 49 0 0 0 u ht s Total 0 u ht s Total 0 u ht s Total Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:45 AM to 08:30 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 45 07:45 AM In - Peak Hour: 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 42 6 0 27 9 07:45 AM Right Thru Left Peds 07:45 AM +0 mins. 8 0 1 0 9 0 44 5 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 81 +15 mins. 4 0 1 0 5 0 54 9 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 66 +30 mins. 7 0 1 8 16 0 54 6 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 1 83 0 6 90 +45 mins. 8 0 3 1 12 0 54 8 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 2 125 0 0 127 Total Volume 27 0 6 9 42 0 206 28 0 234 0 0 0 0 0 3 355 0 6 364 A. Total 64.3 0 14.3 21.4 0 88 12 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 97.5 0 1.6 PHF .844 .000 .500 .281 .656 .000 .954 .778 .000 .929 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 .375 .710 .000 .250 .717 45 In - Peak Hour: 07:45 AM 42 6 0 27 9 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data ul J 3. Nort h co m o 2 M t� �2 N O x oM M H o . All Vehicles c� w Y co r cD -4 c o a m D d ti 0 T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 0 01 0 0 In - Peak Hour: 07:45 AM 45 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Rock Way File Name East-West: Scenic Ave Site Code Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No rockway-scenicave 00000002 10/9/2018 3 Peak Hour Analysis From 03:30 PM to 04:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each ADDroach Beoins at: From North From East From South From West Start Left Thru Rlgnt Peds App.Toal Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Time 0 62 7 2 71 0 u ht s Total 1 u ht s Total +15 mins. u ht s Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:30 PM to 04:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each ADDroach Beoins at: 46 Int. Total 03:30 PM In - Peak Hour: 03:30 PM 03:30 PM 54 03:30 PM 10 0 27 17 03:30 PM Right Thru Left Peds +0 mins. 8 0 6 15 29 0 62 7 2 71 0 0 0 0 0 1 106 0 0 107 +15 mins. 7 0 2 2 11 0 75 13 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 2 73 0 38 113 +30 mins. 8 0 0 0 8 0 61 8 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 2 73 +45 mins. 4 0 2 0 6 0 45 9 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 1 47 0 0 48 Total Volume 27 0 10 17 54 0 243 37 2 282 0 0 0 0 0 4 297 0 40 341 App. Total 50 0 18.5 31.5 0 86.2 13.1 0.7 0 0 0 0 1.2 87.1 0 11.7 PHF .844 .000 .417 .283 .466 1 .000 .810 .712 .250 .801 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 .500 .700 .000 .263 .754 46 Int. Total In - Peak Hour: 03:30 PM 54 10 0 27 17 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data 1 a J ?4 M n North v ON H--- 11, = All Vehicles w c a c v v m 0 a N N � T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 0 01 0 0 In - Peak Hour: 03:30 PM 46 Int. Total SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Upton Road File Name : UptonScenic East-West: Scenic Avenue Site Code : 00000003 Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date : 10/9/2018 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No : 1 Grnuns Printart- All Vahiclac — BREAK "` 03:00 PM 12 1 17 0 30 3 27 23 0 53 1 0 1 0 2 19 23 0 0 42 127 03:15 PM 28 1 25 0 54 3 40 17 0 60 1 2 2 1 6 27 24 2 2 55 175 03:30 PM 35 1 28 3 67 4 39 25 0 68 2 4 7 1 14 37 85 1 12 135 284 03:45 PM 42 1 34 0 77 3 51 69 0 123 1 2 1 3 7 24 34 0 29 87 294 Total 117 4 104 3 228 13 157 134 0 304 5 8 11 5 29 107 166 3 43 319 880 04:00 PM 40 0 28 0 68 0 41 54 1 96 0 0 1 56 57 37 43 1 0 81 302 04:15 PM 58 1 20 0 79 0 33 34 0 67 1 0 3 0 4 23 36 1 28 88 238 04:30 PM 40 3 35 2 80 3 45 33 0 81 0 1 1 23 25 34 31 1 3 69 255 04:45 PM 46 1 26 0 73 2 44 34 34 114 1 0 0 41 42 23 26 2 9 60 289 Total 184 5 109 2 300 5 163 155 35 358 2 1 5 120 128 117 136 5 40 298 1084 05:00 PM 48 0 29 0 77 0 50 34 1 85 0 1 0 0 1 31 43 1 3 78 241 05:15 PM 62 0 41 0 103 2 51 40 0 93 0 0 1 1 2 17 35 0 2 54 252 05:30 PM 50 0 41 0 91 0 42 34 0 76 0 1 1 2 4 30 45 1 0 76 247 05:45 PM 48 0 40 1 89 3 45 25 0 73 0 0 0 7 7 29 83 0 1 113 282 Total 208 0 151 1 360 5 188 133 1 327 0 2 2 10 14 107 206 2 6 321 1022 Grand Total 767 16 520 11 1314 29 725 638 39 1431 17 15 30 165 227 501 941 13 111 1566 4538 Apprch % 58.4 1.2 39.6 0.8 2 50.7 44.6 2.7 7.5 6.6 13.2 72.7 32 60.1 0.8 7.1 Total % 16.9 0.4 11.5 0.2 29 0.6 16 14.1 0.9 31.5 0.4 0.3 0.7 3.6 5 11 20.7 0.3 2.4 34.5 EVA From North From East From South From West Start Time Left Thru Right I Peds APP Taal Left Thru Right Peds App, rocas Left Thru I Right Peds App rmai Left Thru Right I Peds nPP. rota' Int. Total 07:00 AM 16 0 11 0 27 0 12 22 0 34 1 0 0 15 16 17 22 0 0 39 116 07:15 AM 31 0 22 1 54 0 16 32 0 48 1 1 1 3 6 17 34 2 15 68 176 07:30 AM 38 0 21 1 60 2 24 31 0 57 2 0 2 0 4 27 59 0 0 86 207 07:45 AM 44 0 20 1 65 0 26 35 1 62 3 1 7 3 14 25 61 1 2 89 230 Total 129 0 74 3 206 2 78 120 1 201 7 2 10 21 40 86 176 3 17 282 729 08:00 AM 31 1 25 1 58 2 36 35 0 73 2 0 0 1 3 21 47 0 0 68 202 08:15 AM 40 2 22 1 65 0 38 20 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 24 64 0 3 91 214 08:30 AM 39 3 24 0 66 1 38 25 1 65 0 1 1 7 9 24 107 0 1 132 272 08:45 AM 19 1 11 0 31 1 27 16 1 45 1 1 1 1 4 15 39 0 1 55 135 Total 129 7 82 2 220 4 139 96 2 241 3 2 2 9 16 84 257 0 5 346 823 — BREAK "` 03:00 PM 12 1 17 0 30 3 27 23 0 53 1 0 1 0 2 19 23 0 0 42 127 03:15 PM 28 1 25 0 54 3 40 17 0 60 1 2 2 1 6 27 24 2 2 55 175 03:30 PM 35 1 28 3 67 4 39 25 0 68 2 4 7 1 14 37 85 1 12 135 284 03:45 PM 42 1 34 0 77 3 51 69 0 123 1 2 1 3 7 24 34 0 29 87 294 Total 117 4 104 3 228 13 157 134 0 304 5 8 11 5 29 107 166 3 43 319 880 04:00 PM 40 0 28 0 68 0 41 54 1 96 0 0 1 56 57 37 43 1 0 81 302 04:15 PM 58 1 20 0 79 0 33 34 0 67 1 0 3 0 4 23 36 1 28 88 238 04:30 PM 40 3 35 2 80 3 45 33 0 81 0 1 1 23 25 34 31 1 3 69 255 04:45 PM 46 1 26 0 73 2 44 34 34 114 1 0 0 41 42 23 26 2 9 60 289 Total 184 5 109 2 300 5 163 155 35 358 2 1 5 120 128 117 136 5 40 298 1084 05:00 PM 48 0 29 0 77 0 50 34 1 85 0 1 0 0 1 31 43 1 3 78 241 05:15 PM 62 0 41 0 103 2 51 40 0 93 0 0 1 1 2 17 35 0 2 54 252 05:30 PM 50 0 41 0 91 0 42 34 0 76 0 1 1 2 4 30 45 1 0 76 247 05:45 PM 48 0 40 1 89 3 45 25 0 73 0 0 0 7 7 29 83 0 1 113 282 Total 208 0 151 1 360 5 188 133 1 327 0 2 2 10 14 107 206 2 6 321 1022 Grand Total 767 16 520 11 1314 29 725 638 39 1431 17 15 30 165 227 501 941 13 111 1566 4538 Apprch % 58.4 1.2 39.6 0.8 2 50.7 44.6 2.7 7.5 6.6 13.2 72.7 32 60.1 0.8 7.1 Total % 16.9 0.4 11.5 0.2 29 0.6 16 14.1 0.9 31.5 0.4 0.3 0.7 3.6 5 11 20.7 0.3 2.4 34.5 EVA SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Upton Road File Name East-West: Scenic Avenue Weather: Clear, Warm Veh Type: All Vehicles Site Code Start Date Page No UptonScenic 00000003 10/9/2018 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:45 AM to 08:30 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: From North From East From South From West StartLeft 254 Thru Right Peds App.Toal Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Int. Time 35 1 62 3 1 7 u ht s Total 1 u ht s Total 1 u ht s Total Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:45 AM to 08:30 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 48 07:45 AM In - Peak Hour: 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 254 07:45 AM 91 6 154 3 07:45 AM Right Thru Left Peds +0 mins. 44 0 20 1 65 0 26 35 1 62 3 1 7 3 14 25 61 1 2 89 +15 mins. 31 1 25 1 58 2 36 35 0 73 2 0 0 1 3 21 47 0 0 68 +30 mins. 40 2 22 1 65 0 38 20 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 24 64 0 3 91 +45 mins. 39 3 24 0 66 1 38 25 1 65 0 1 1 7 9 24 107 0 1 132 Total Volume 154 6 91 3 254 3 138 115 2 258 5 2 8 11 26 94 279 1 6 380 App. Total 60.6 2.4 35.8 1.2 1.2 53.5 44.6 0.8 19.2 7.7 30.8 42.3 24.7 73.4 0.3 1.6 PHF .875 .500 .910 .750 .962 1 .375 .908 .821 .500 .884 1 .417 .500 .286 .393 .464 1 .940 .652 .250 .500 .720 48 In - Peak Hour: 07:45 AM 254 91 6 154 3 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data 1 T7t - w North ..m m o 2 H 2 2 eM = I All Vehicles co C � -4 a ,;—CD c a m D N T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 5 2 81 11 26 In - Peak Hour: 07:45 AM 48 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Upton Road File Name East-West: Scenic Avenue Weather: Clear, Warm Veh Type: All Vehicles Site Code Start Date Page No UptonScenic 00000003 10/9/2018 3 Peak Hour Analysis From 03:30 PM to 04:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each ADDroach Beoins at: From North From East From South From West Start Left Thru Rlgnt Peds App.Toal Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Time 4 39 25 0 68 2 u ht s Total 37 u ht s Total +15 mins. u ht s Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:30 PM to 04:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each ADDroach Beoins at: 49 Int. Total 03:30 PM In - Peak Hour: 03:30 PM 03:30 PM 291 03:30 PM 110 3 175 3 03:30 PM Right Thru Left Peds +0 mins. 35 1 28 3 67 4 39 25 0 68 2 4 7 1 14 37 85 1 12 135 +15 mins. 42 1 34 0 77 3 51 69 0 123 1 2 1 3 7 24 34 0 29 87 +30 mins. 40 0 28 0 68 0 41 54 1 96 0 0 1 56 57 37 43 1 0 81 +45 mins. 58 1 20 0 79 0 33 34 0 67 1 0 3 0 4 23 36 1 28 88 Total Volume 175 3 110 3 291 7 164 182 1 354 4 6 12 60 82 121 198 3 69 391 App. Total 60.1 1 37.8 1 2 46.3 51.4 0.3 4.9 7.3 14.6 73.2 30.9 50.6 0.8 17.6 PHF .754 .750 .809 .250 .921 1 .438 .804 .659 .250 .720 1 .500 .375 .429 .268 .360 1 .818 .582 .750 .595 .724 49 Int. Total In - Peak Hour: 03:30 PM 291 110 3 175 3 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data a _j 1 �" o rn 2 I No th " N 0)i .. M H C A O O = M z t All Vehicles ca �x w a c coo v m 0 a CL � T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 4 6 121 60 82 In - Peak Hour: 03:30 PM 49 Int. Total SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Scenic Middle School File Name : scenicave_middleschool East-West: Scenic Avenue Site Code : 00000001 Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date : 10/9/2018 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No : 1 Grnuns PrintPrl- Hnshiftd *** BREAK ** 03:00 PM 03:15 PM 03:30 PM 03:45 PM Total 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM Total 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 38 0 17 42 0 29 39 0 18 59 0 68 178 0 6 55 0 4 43 0 5 61 0 6 50 0 21 209 0 21 49 0 25 49 0 26 49 0 37 53 0 109 200 0 330 793 28.9 69.5 0 11.3 27.1 0 0 42 2 0 0 59 2 0 0 68 Scenic Ave 0 0 77 Middle School 0 0 246 Scenic Ave 0 0 61 6 0 0 From North 8 0 0 From East 0 0 56 0 From South 230 16 From West 70 10 Start Time Left Thru I Right I Peds App. To al Left Thru I Right I Peds App.T,t, Left Thru I Right I Peds F4p.Tm, Left Thru I Right FpedS App. Tote Wjotal 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 22 0 15 40 0 0 2 0 2 0 29 2 14 45 87 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 28 0 0 31 0 0 3 0 3 0 41 4 1 46 80 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 12 34 0 1 47 0 0 4 0 4 0 76 7 1 84 135 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 21 23 0 0 44 4 0 11 0 15 0 70 17 1 88 147 Total 0 0 0 0 0 39 107 0 16 162 4 0 20 0 24 0 216 30 17 263 449 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 28 27 0 1 56 13 0 22 0 35 0 41 27 2 70 161 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 34 22 0 0 56 21 0 35 0 56 0 53 40 7 100 212 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 23 31 0 0 54 25 0 44 0 69 0 81 34 6 121 244 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 8 19 0 1 28 3 0 12 0 15 0 36 6 0 42 85 Total 0 0 0 0 0 93 99 0 2 194 62 0 113 0 175 0 211 107 15 333 702 *** BREAK ** 03:00 PM 03:15 PM 03:30 PM 03:45 PM Total 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM Total 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 38 0 17 42 0 29 39 0 18 59 0 68 178 0 6 55 0 4 43 0 5 61 0 6 50 0 21 209 0 21 49 0 25 49 0 26 49 0 37 53 0 109 200 0 330 793 28.9 69.5 0 11.3 27.1 0 0 42 2 0 0 59 2 0 0 68 33 0 0 77 10 0 0 246 47 0 0 61 6 0 0 47 8 0 0 66 2 0 0 56 0 0 0 230 16 0 0 70 10 0 0 74 5 0 0 75 8 0 0 90 7 0 0 309 30 0 18 1141 159 0 1.6 0 61.6 31.6 0 0.6 38.9 5.4 50 0 2 0 4 0 8 0 10 0 44 9 86 0 24 1 35 0 78 10 135 0 21 3 30 0 1 0 9 0 6 0 8 0 1 17 18 0 29 20 65 0 24 4 38 0 12 0 17 0 20 0 28 0 14 0 21 0 70 4 104 0 310 34 503 0 61.6 6.8 0 10.6 1.2 17.2 0 42 12 0 54 100 0 46 9 0 55 124 0 63 9 1 73 227 0 51 6 1 58 170 0 202 36 2 240 621 0 50 1 1 52 143 0 47 1 0 48 104 0 45 2 2 49 123 0 51 6 14 71 145 0 193 10 17 220 515 0 44 10 1 55 163 0 42 12 1 55 146 0 40 21 0 61 164 0 38 22 0 60 171 0 164 65 2 231 644 0 986 248 53 1287 2931 0 76.6 19.3 4.1 0 33.6 8.5 1.8 43.9 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Scenic Middle School File Name : scenicave_middleschool East-West: Scenic Avenue Site Code : 00000001 Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date : 10/9/2018 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No :2 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:45 AM to 08:30 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:45 AM Scenic Ave Middle School Scenic Ave 07:45 AM From North From East From South From West 07:45 AM Start Left Thru Right Peds App.Toal Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Int. Time 0 15 0 70 17 1 u ht s Total 0 u ht s Total 0 u ht s Total Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:45 AM to 08:30 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 1-2 07:45 AM In - Peak Hour: 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM Right Thru Left Peds 07:45 AM +0 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 21 23 0 0 44 4 0 11 0 15 0 70 17 1 88 +15 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 28 27 0 1 56 13 0 22 0 35 0 41 27 2 70 +30 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 34 22 0 0 56 21 0 35 0 56 0 53 40 7 100 +45 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 23 31 0 0 54 25 0 44 0 69 0 81 34 6 121 Total volume 0 0 0 0 0 106 103 0 1 210 63 0 112 0 175 0 245 118 16 379 A. Total 0 0 0 0 50.5 49 0 0.5 36 0 64 0 0 64.6 31.1 4.2 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .779 .831 .000 .250 .938 1 .630 .000 .636 .000 .634 1 .000 .756 .738 .571 .783 1-2 In - Peak Hour: 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data ul Q J .3. O n North m >0O � N LCD �z To ~ C U pM 'c x co Unshifted W o ro c o .. r ooD a 'd° - CD A (D c �a m cn D T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 63 0 1121 0 175 In - Peak Hour: 07:45 AM 1-2 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: Scenic Middle School File Name : scenicave_middleschool East-West: Scenic Avenue Site Code : 00000001 Weather: Clear, Warm Start Date : 10/9/2018 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No :3 Peak Hour Analysis From 03:30 PM to 04:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: Scenic Ave Middle School Scenic Ave From North From East From South From West Start Left Thru Rignt Peds App.Toal Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Time 0 0 0 0 0 29 39 0 0 u ht s Total 9 u ht s Total 1 u ht s Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:30 PM to 04:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 03:30 PM 03:30 PM 03:30 PM 03:30 PM +0 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 29 39 0 0 68 33 0 44 9 86 0 63 9 1 73 +15 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 18 59 0 0 77 10 0 24 1 35 0 51 6 1 58 +30 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 6 55 0 0 61 6 0 21 3 30 0 50 1 1 52 +45 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 4 43 0 0 47 8 0 1 0 9 0 47 1 0 48 Total volume 0 0 0 0 0 57 196 0 0 253 57 0 90 13 160 0 211 17 3 231 ADD. Total 0 0 0 0 22.5 77.5 0 0 35.6 0 56.2 8.1 0 91.3 7.4 1.3 In - Peak Hour: 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data I North Unshifted +-] T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 57 0 901 13 160 In - Peak Hour: 03:30 PM MiAflle Srhnnl 52 S � O � Q M. C' c 2 01 O � � n r w D V WN W O a N O SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: 1 st Street File Name East-West: Fire Station DW Site Code Weather: Clear, 30-40 deg Start Date Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No Grouns Printed- Unshifted 1st St-FireStation3 00000001 2/5/2019 1 *** BREAK *** 03:00 PM 1st Street 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1st Street 0 0 Fire Station 1 1 0 0 From North 0 0 From East 03:15 PM 0 0 From South 0 0 From West 0 0 Start Time Left Thru I Right I Peds App. To al Left Thru I Right I Peds App. To al Left Thru I Right I Peds App.Tmai Left Thru I Right I Peds App, Tota Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 07:15 AM 0 1 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 07:30 AM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 5 07:45 AM 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total 0 4 4 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 2 16 08:00 AM 0 4 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 08:15 AM 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 7 08:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Total 0 8 1 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 1 0 2 0 3 19 *** BREAK *** 03:00 PM 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 03:30 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 03:45 PM 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 Total 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 04:00 PMI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 *** BREAK *** 04:30 PM 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 5 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 1 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 2 1 8 05:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:45 PM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 0 4 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 Grand Total 0 28 6 3 37 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 0 1 22 3 0 3 1 7 66 Apprch % 0 75.7 16.2 8.1 0 0 0 0 4.5 90.9 0 4.5 42.9 0 42.9 14.3 Total % 0 42.4 9.1 4.5 5 6.1 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 30.3 0 1.5 33.3 4.5 0 4.5 1.5 10.6 53 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: 1 st Street File Name : 1 st St-FireStation3 East-West: Fire Station DW Weather: Clear, 30-40 deg Veh Type: All Vehicles Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 2/5/2019 Page No :2 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 1st Street 1 at Street 1st Street Fire Station 07:00 AM From North From East From South From West 07:00 AM StartLeft Thru Right Peds App.Toal Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Int. Time 0 1 0 0 0 0 u ht s Total 3 u ht s Total 0 u ht s Total Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 54 07:00 AM 1 at Street 07:00 AM In - Peak Hour: 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 10 4 4 0 2 07:00 AM Right Thru Left Peds +0 mins. 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins. 0 1 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 +30 mins. 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 +45 mins. 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 0 4 4 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 2 A. Total 0 40 40 20 0 0 0 0 25 75 0 0 50 0 0 50 PHF .000 .500 .333 .250 .625 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 .250 .375 .000 .000 .500 1 .250 .000 .000 .250 .500 54 1 at Street In - Peak Hour: 07:00 AM 10 4 4 0 2 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data T wo oo 2 North m T O .. N Unshifted �� O N a Ila t r �x o C CD p 0 c �a m D a 0 T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 1 3 01 0 4 In - Peak Hour: 07:00 AM 54 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: 1 st Street File Name : 1 st St-FireStation3 East-West: Fire Station DW Weather: Clear, 30-40 deg Veh Type: All Vehicles Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 2/5/2019 Page No :3 Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 04:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Beqins at: 1st Street 1 st Street 1st Street Fire Station From North From East From South From West Start Left Thru Right g Peds App.Toal Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Time 0 2 0 0 2 0 u ht s Total +15 mins. u ht s Total 0 u ht s Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 04:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Beqins at: 55 Int. Total 04:00 PM 1 st Street 04:00 PM In - Peak Hour: 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 3 0 3 0 0 04:00 PM Right Thru Left Peds +0 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins. 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 +45 mins. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total volume 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 2 11, A. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 50 0 50 0 PHF .000 .250 .000 .000 .250 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 1 .000 .375 .000 .000 .375 .250 .000 .250 .000 .250 55 Int. Total 1 st Street In - Peak Hour: 04:00 PM 3 0 3 0 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data a � J� oo 2 North —o JS - O .. N 0 7 in = L� Unshifted 4 0 O c LL) c 0 v m 0 a N 0 � 47 T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 3 01 0 3 In - Peak Hour: 04:00 PM 55 Int. Total SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: OR 99 (Front St) File Name : 99-FireStation3 East-West: Fire Station Site Code : 00000001 Weather: Clear, 30-40 deg Start Date : 2/5/2019 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No : 1 Grouns Printed- Un%hifted — BREAK "` 03:00 PM 0 OR 99 (Front) 0 0 Fire Station 0 0 OR 99 (Front) 0 0 0 175 0 0 175 0 0 From North 0 0 From East 03:15 PM 0 113 From South 0 113 From West 0 0 Start Time Left Thru Right I Peds App Total Left Thru Right Peds App, T-1 Left Thru I Right Peds App Total Left Thru Ri ht Peds Avv. Tocai Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 67 0 0 68 0 0 1 0 1 0 76 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 145 07:15 AM 0 116 0 0 116 1 0 0 0 1 0 96 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 213 07:30 AM 0 172 0 0 172 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 0 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 321 07:45 AM 0 198 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 0 0 139 0 0 0 0 0 337 Total 1 553 0 0 554 1 0 1 0 2 0 460 0 0 460 0 0 0 0 0 1016 08:00 AM 0 153 0 0 153 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 0 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 287 08:15 AM 0 143 0 0 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 247 08:30 AM 0 130 0 0 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 247 08:45 AM 1 112 0 0 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 126 0 0 0 0 0 239 Total 1 538 0 0 539 0 0 0 0 0 0 481 0 0 481 0 0 0 0 0 1020 — BREAK "` 03:00 PM 0 138 0 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 0 313 03:15 PM 0 113 0 0 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 183 0 0 183 0 0 0 0 0 296 03:30 PM 0 160 0 0 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 0 0 197 0 0 0 0 0 357 03:45 PM 0 159 0 0 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 166 0 0 166 0 0 0 0 0 325 Total 0 570 0 0 570 0 0 0 0 0 0 721 0 0 721 0 0 0 0 0 1291 04:00 PM 0 178 0 0 178 0 0 1 0 1 0 148 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 327 04:15 PM 0 138 0 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 0 0 171 0 0 0 0 0 309 04:30 PM 1 123 0 0 124 0 0 1 0 1 0 189 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 0 314 04:45 PM 0 129 0 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 0 0 190 0 0 0 0 0 319 Total 1 568 0 0 569 0 0 2 0 2 0 698 0 0 698 0 0 0 0 0 1269 05:00 PM 0 125 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 0 0 216 0 0 0 0 0 341 05:15 PM 0 125 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 209 0 0 209 0 0 0 0 0 334 05:30 PM 0 113 0 0 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 176 0 0 176 0 0 0 0 0 289 05:45 PM 0 108 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 126 0 0 0 0 0 234 Total 0 471 0 0 471 0 0 0 0 0 0 727 0 0 727 0 0 0 0 0 1198 Grand Total 3 2700 0 0 2703 1 0 3 0 4 0 3087 0 0 3087 0 0 0 0 0 5794 Apprch % 0.1 99.9 0 0 25 0 75 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 1 0.1 46.6 0 0 46.7 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 53.3 0 0 53.3 0 0 0 0 0 56 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: OR 99 (Front St) File Name : 99-FireStation3 East-West: Fire Station Site Code : 00000001 Weather: Clear, 30-40 deg Start Date : 2/5/2019 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No :2 Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 OR 99 (Front) Fire Station OR 99 (Front) From North From East From South From West StartLeft Peak Hour for Each Approach Thru Right Peds App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Int. Time 07:00 AM 07:00 AM u ht s Total 07:00 AM u ht s Total +0 mins. u ht s Total Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 OR 99 (Front) In - Peak Hour: 07:00 AM 554 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 0 553 1 0 Right Thru Left Peds 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM J ? 3 07:00 AM O 2 North m T +0 mins. 1 67 0 0 68 0 0 1 0 1 0 76 0 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins. 0 116 0 0 116 1 0 0 0 1 0 96 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins. 0 172 0 0 172 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 0 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 +45 mins. 0 198 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 0 0 139 0 0 0 0 0 Total Volume 1 553 0 0 554 1 0 1 0 2 0 460 0 0 460 0 0 0 0 0 A. Total 0.2 99.8 0 0 50 0 50 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .250 .698 .000 .000 .699 1 .250 .000 .250 .000 .500 1 .000 .772 .000 .000 .772 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 57 OR 99 (Front) In - Peak Hour: 07:00 AM 554 0 553 1 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data Q J ? 3 o 0 O 2 North m T O �3 0 C p C EnN = o Unshifted Y co r CD N~0 CD 4 CL c oa m 0 D d ti 0 T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 460 01 0 460 In - PeakHour: 07:00 AM 57 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 975041 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell North-South: OR 99 (Front St) East-West: Fire Station Weather: Clear, 30-40 deg Veh Type: All Vehicles File Name : 99-FireStation3 Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 2/5/2019 Page No :3 Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 04:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hnnr fnr Fach Annrnach Renins at - OR 99 (Front) Fire Station OR 99 (Front) From North From East From South From West Start Left Thru Right Peds App.Toal Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Time 0 148 0 0 148 0 u ht s Total +15 mins. u ht s Total 138 u ht s Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 04:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hnnr fnr Fach Annrnach Renins at - 58 glnt�T 04:00 PM OR 99 (Front) 04:00 PM In - Peak Hour: 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 569 04:00 PM 0 568 1 0 +0 mins. 0 178 0 0 178 0 0 1 0 1 0 148 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 +15 mins. 0 138 0 0 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 0 0 171 0 0 0 0 0 +30 mins. 1 123 0 0 124 0 0 1 0 1 0 189 0 0 189 0 0 0 0 0 +45 mins. 0 129 0 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 0 0 190 0 0 0 0 0 Total volume 1 568 0 0 569 0 0 2 0 2 0 698 0 0 698 0 0 0 0 0 A. Total 0.2 99.8 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .250 .798 .000 .000 .799 1 .000 .000 .500 .000 .500 1 .000 .918 .000 .000 .918 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 58 glnt�T OR 99 (Front) In - Peak Hour: 04:00 PM 569 0 568 1 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data a J 1 s 0 ..o 02 t--- North N 4_7 'c v -n F- ° H Unshifted o 2 N ° c N ca CD 0 O 7 CL c 0 v m 0 a° N 0 T r Left Thru Ri ht Peds 0 698 01 0 In - Peak Hour: 0400 PM 58 glnt�T SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell Lane 1: Southbound Left Lane 2: Southbound Through/Right Weather: Clear, 40 deg Veh Type: All Vehicles File Name : Upton -Scenic _SID Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/15/2019 Page No : 1 L No. n. Joined Queue Released From Queue Delay 1 66 7:40:00 AM 7:40:02 AM 2 1 67 7:40:35 AM 7:40:47 AM 12 1 68 7:40:48 AM 7:41:02 AM 14 1 69 7:40:49 AM 7:41:09 AM 20 1 70 7:40:55 AM 7:41:12 AM 17 1 71 7:41:36 AM 7:41:48 AM 12 1 172 7:41:45 AM 7:41:55 AM 10 1 73 7:42:23 AM 7:42:33 AM 10 1 74 7:42:24 AM 7:43:37 AM 73 1 75 7:42:53 AM 7:44:36 AM 103 1 76 7:42:54 AM 7:44:41 AM 107 1 77 7:42:56 AM 7:44:43 AM 107 1 78 7:43:30 AM 7:44:47 AM 77 1 79 7:43:45 AM 7:44:52 AM 67 1 80 7:44:40 AM 7:45:09 AM 29 1 81 7:46:08 AM 7:46:12 AM 4 1 82 7:46:33 AM 7:46:51 AM 18 1 83 7:46:35 AM 7:46:58 AM 23 1 84 7:46:37 AM 7:47:03 AM 26 1 85 7:46:39 AM 7:47:06 AM 27 1 86 7:46:49 AM 7:47:10 AM 21 1 87 7:47:22 AM 7:47:27 AM 5 1 88 7:47:41 AM 7:47:49 AM 8 1 89 7:47:54 AM 7:48:07 AM 13 1 90 7:48:12 AM 7:48:24 AM 12 1 91 7:48:40 AM 7:48:44 AM 4 1 92 7:49:05 AM 7:49:09 AM 4 1 93 7:49:05 AM 7:49:56 AM 51 1 94 7:49:13 AM 7:50:05 AM 52 1 95 7:49:22 AM 7:50:32 AM 70 1 96 7:49:31 AM 7:50:46 AM 75 1 97 7:49:44 AM 7:51:14 AM 90 1 98 7:50:16 AM 7:51:20 AM 64 1 99 7:50:53 AM 7:51:26 AM 33 1 100 7:50:57 AM 7:51:32 AM 35 1 101 7:51:16 AM 7:51:38 AM 22 1 102 7:52:08 AM 7:52:24 AM 16 1 103 7:52:18 AM 7:52:27 AM 9 1 104 7:52:26 AM 7:52:42 AM 16 1 105 7:52:44 AM 7:52:54 AM 10 1 106 7:52:47 AM 7:53:25 AM 38 1 107 7:52:50 AM 7:54:05 AM 75 1 108 7:52:57 AM 7:54:09 AM 72 1 109 7:53:04 AM 7:54:17 AM 73 1 110 7:54:11 AM 7:54:19 AM 8 1 111 7:55:04 AM 7:55:18 AM 14 1 112 7:55:07 AM 7:55:25 AM 18 1 113 7:56:49 AM 7:57:09 AM 20 1 114 7:57:16 AM 7:57:18 AM 2 1 115 7:57:17 AM 7:57:21 AM 4 1 116 7:57:26 AM 7:57:27 AM 1 1 117 7:57:29 AM 7:57:35 AM 6 1 118 7:57:38 AM 7:57:42 AM 4 1 119 7:57:43 AM 7:58:25 AM 42 1 120 7:58:19 AM 7:58:35 AM 16 1 121 7:58:51 AM 7:59:16 AM 25 1 1122 7:59:29 AM 1 7:59:45 AM 116 1 1123 7:59:34 AM 7:59:55 AM 121 59 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell Lane 1: Southbound Left File Name : Upton -Scenic _SD Lane 2: Southbound Through/Right Site Code :00000000 Weather: Clear, 40 deg Start Date :1/15/2019 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No :2 L No. Joined Queue Released From Delay n. Queue 129 8:03:19 AM 8:03:24 AM 115 130 8:04:10 AM 8:04:20 AM 1 10 131 8:04:12 AM 8:04:28 AM 1 16 137 8:09:01 AM 8:09:18 AM 1 17 138 8:10:15 AM 8:10:24 AM 19 139 8:10:41 AM 8:10:44 AM 13 145 8:13:00 AM 8:13:10 AM 10 146 8:13:06 AM 8:13:18 AM 12 147 8:13:35 AM 8:13:37 AM 12 153 8:16:43 AM 8:16:49 AM 116 154 8:16:46 AM 8:16:53 AM 17 155 8:16:48 AM 8:17:09 AM 121 161 8:19:07 AM 8:19:27 AM 120 162 8:19:13 AM 8:19:46 AM 133 163 8:20:26 AM 8:20:32 AM 16 1 1169 8:21:29 AM 8:21:37 AM A33 1 170 8:22:12AM 8:22:25 AM3 1 171 8:22:16AM 8:22:49 AM 1 1177 8:25:56 AM 8:26:18 AMA26 2 1 178 8:26:11 AM 8:27:20 AM 9 1 179 8:28:41 AM 8:29:07 AM 60 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell Lane 1: Southbound Left Lane 2: Southbound Through/Right Weather: Clear, 40 deg Veh Type: All Vehicles File Name : Upton -Scenic _SID Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/15/2019 Page No :3 L No. Joined Queue n. Released From Queue Delay 1 182 8:28:58 AM 8:30:22 AM 84 1 183 8:29:25 AM 8:30:28 AM 63 1 184 8:30:27 AM 8:30:37 AM 10 1 185 8:30:31 AM 8:30:41 AM 10 1 186 8:30:33 AM 8:30:56 AM 23 1 187 8:30:36 AM 8:31:31 AM 55 1 1188 8:30:59 AM 8:31:37 AM 38 1 189 8:31:04 AM 8:31:47 AM 43 1 190 8:31:30 AM 8:31:52 AM 22 1 191 8:31:59 AM 8:32:00 AM 1 1 192 8:31:59 AM 8:32:12 AM 13 1 193 8:32:29 AM 8:33:17 AM 48 1 194 8:32:58 AM 8:33:29 AM 31 1 195 8:33:00 AM 8:33:53 AM 53 1 196 8:33:11 AM 8:34:01 AM 50 1 197 8:33:16 AM 8:34:34 AM 78 1 198 8:33:39 AM 8:34:39 AM 60 1 199 8:33:40 AM 8:35:03 AM 83 1 200 8:34:02 AM 8:35:35 AM 93 1 201 8:34:04 AM 8:35:38 AM 94 1 202 8:34:08 AM 8:36:09 AM 121 1 203 8:34:21 AM 8:36:13 AM 112 1 204 8:34:45 AM 8:36:21 AM 96 1 205 8:35:22 AM 8:36:21 AM 59 1 206 8:35:26 AM 8:36:24 AM 58 1 207 8:35:27 AM 8:36:30 AM 63 1 208 8:36:17 AM 8:36:43 AM 26 1 209 8:36:28 AM 8:36:55 AM 27 1 210 8:36:28 AM 8:37:13 AM 45 1 211 8:36:29 AM 8:37:18 AM 49 1 212 8:36:38 AM 8:37:21 AM 43 1 213 8:37:03 AM 8:37:43 AM 40 1 214 8:37:28 AM 8:38:05 AM 37 1 215 8:37:30 AM 8:38:11 AM 41 1 216 8:37:42 AM 8:38:39 AM 57 1 217 8:37:47 AM 8:38:44 AM 57 1 218 8:38:24 AM 8:39:07 AM 43 1 219 8:38:30 AM 8:39:25 AM 55 1 220 8:38:42 AM 8:39:30 AM 48 1 221 8:39:32 AM 8:39:34 AM 2 1 222 8:39:40 AM 8:39:43 AM 3 1 223 8:39:41 AM 8:39:45 AM 4 2 33 7:40:34 AM 7:40:37 AM 3 2 34 7:41:45 AM 7:41:51 AM 6 2 35 7:42:15 AM 7:42:21 AM 6 2 36 7:43:09 AM 7:43:13 AM 4 2 37 7:44:18 AM 7:44:37 AM 19 2 38 7:45:53 AM 7:46:01 AM 8 2 39 7:46:03 AM 7:46:07 AM 4 2 40 7:46:19 AM 7:46:21 AM 2 2 41 7:46:48 AM 7:46:52 AM 4 2 42 7:49:36 AM 7:49:45 AM 9 2 43 7:52:08 AM 7:52:20 AM 12 2 44 7:52:09 AM 7:52:24 AM 15 2 145 7:52:26 AM 7:52:30 AM 4 2 146 7:52:29 AM 7:52:36 AM 7 2 147 7:52:33 AM 7:52:43 AM 10 2 148 7:53:28 AM 7:53:39 AM 11 61 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell Lane 1: Southbound Left File Name : Upton -Scenic _SD Lane 2: Southbound Through/Right Site Code :00000000 Weather: Clear, 40 deg Start Date :1/15/2019 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No :4 L No. Joined Queue Released From Delay n. Queue 54 7:59:54 AM 7:59:56 AM 12 55 8:00:43 AM 8:00:46 AM 13 56 8:01:25 AM 8:01:28 AM 13 62 8:06:09 AM 8:06:13 AM 114 63 8:07:32 AM 8:07:37 AM 15 64 8:09:04 AM 8:09:09 AM 15 70 8:12:49 AM 8:13:05 AM 16 71 8:12:55 AM 8:13:09 AM 14 72 8:13:07 AM 8:13:14 AM 17 78 8:14:53 AM 8:15:05 AM 12 79 8:14:58 AM 8:15:09 AM 11 80 8:15:19 AM 8:15:23 AM 14 86 8:17:24 AM 8:17:30 AM 116 87 8:17:28 AM 8:18:09 AM 141 88 8:17:36 AM 8:18:32 AM 156 2 194 8:22:19 AM 8:22:32 AM 13 2 195 8:22:45 AM 8:22:49 AM 4 2 196 8:22:47 AM 8:22:52 AM 5 2 1102 8:25:35 AM 8:25:39 AM4 2 103 8:25:44 AM 8:25:47 AM 3 2 104 8:26:21 AM 8:26:26 AM 5 62 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell Lane 1: Southbound Left Lane 2: Southbound Through/Right Weather: Clear, 40 deg Veh Type: All Vehicles L n. No. Joined Queue Released From Queue Delay 93 Dela ed Vehicle Count: 2 107 8:28:40 AM 8:28:55 AM 15 Average Stopped Time: 31.22 2 108 8:28:44 AM 8:29:01 AM 17 0 2 109 8:29:48 AM 8:29:59 AM 11 2.40 2 110 8:29:50 AM 8:30:07 AM 17 1.38 2 111 8:30:16 AM 8:30:20 AM 4 2 112 8:30:47 AM 8:30:53 AM 6 2 113 8:30:55 AM 8:31:07 AM 12 2 114 8:31:01 AM 8:31:13 AM 12 2 115 8:32:01 AM 8:32:04 AM 3 2 116 8:33:57 AM 8:34:05 AM 8 2 117 8:34:35 AM 8:34:38 AM 3 2 118 8:35:51 AM 8:36:12 AM 21 2 119 8:36:12 AM 8:36:19 AM 7 2 120 8:36:46 AM 8:36:59 AM 13 2 121 8:37:25 AM 8:37:32 AM 7 2 122 8:38:07 AM 8:38:12 AM 5 2 1123 8:39:05 AM 8:39:10 AM 5 2 1124 8:39:18 AM 8:39:25 AM 7 2 1125 8:39:47 AM 8:39:48 AM 1 Summary Information: File Name : Upton -Scenic _SID Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 1/15/2019 Page No :5 7:40:00 AM - 8:40:00 AM Lane 1 Lane 2 Total Vehicle Count: 158 93 Dela ed Vehicle Count: 158 93 Through Vehicle Count: 0 0 Average Stopped Time: 31.22 8.656 Maximum Stopped Time: 121 56 Min. Secs. for Delay: 0 0 Average Queue: 1.38 0.226 Queue Density: 2.40 1.254 Maximum Queue: 8 3 Dela in Vehicle Hour: 1.38 0.23 Total DelaV: 4933 805 63 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell Lane 1: Southbound Left File Name : Upton-Scenic-SD—PM Lane 2: Southbound Through/Right Site Code : 00000002 Weather: Clear, 55 deg Start Date : 1/15/2019 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No : 1 L No. n. Joined Queue Released From Queue Delay 1 26 3:28:35 PM 3:28:37 PM 2 1 27 3:28:55 PM 3:28:57 PM 2 1 28 3:29:00 PM 3:29:04 PM 4 1 29 3:29:08 PM 3:29:43 PM 35 1 30 3:29:21 PM 3:29:47 PM 26 1 31 3:29:37 PM 3:30:48 PM 71 1 132 3:29:48 PM 3:30:58 PM 70 1 33 3:29:55 PM 3:31:07 PM 72 1 34 3:30:03 PM 3:31:11 PM 68 1 35 3:30:23 PM 3:31:48 PM 85 1 36 3:30:43 PM 3:32:25 PM 102 1 37 3:31:05 PM 3:32:29 PM 84 1 138 3:31:17 PM 3:32:41 PM 84 1 39 3:31:23 PM 3:32:46 PM 83 1 40 3:31:37 PM 3:32:58 PM 81 1 41 3:32:28 PM 3:33:04 PM 36 1 42 3:32:50 PM 3:33:42 PM 52 1 43 3:32:53 PM 3:33:59 PM 66 1 44 3:33:13 PM 3:34:46 PM 93 1 45 3:33:32 PM 3:34:59 PM 87 1 46 3:36:35 PM 3:36:38 PM 3 1 47 3:36:47 PM 3:37:20 PM 33 1 48 3:37:02 PM 3:37:26 PM 24 1 49 3:37:37 PM 3:37:43 PM 6 1 50 3:37:39 PM 3:37:49 PM 10 1 51 3:37:50 PM 3:37:55 PM 5 1 52 3:37:58 PM 3:38:23 PM 25 1 53 3:38:02 PM 3:38:28 PM 26 1 54 3:38:16 PM 3:38:35 PM 19 1 55 3:39:21 PM 3:39:30 PM 9 1 56 3:39:25 PM 3:39:47 PM 22 1 57 3:39:26 PM 3:39:52 PM 26 1 58 3:39:30 PM 3:39:56 PM 26 1 59 3:39:39 PM 3:40:06 PM 27 1 60 3:40:40 PM 3:41:37 PM 57 1 61 3:40:56 PM 3:42:27 PM 91 1 62 3:41:10 PM 3:42:43 PM 93 1 63 3:41:15 PM 3:42:53 PM 98 1 64 3:41:33 PM 3:43:06 PM 93 1 65 3:42:01 PM 3:43:10 PM 69 1 66 3:43:43 PM 3:43:50 PM 7 1 67 3:44:16 PM 3:44:19 PM 3 1 68 3:44:30 PM 3:44:41 PM 11 1 69 3:44:31 PM 3:44:44 PM 13 1 70 3:44:36 PM 3:44:49 PM 13 1 71 3:44:38 PM 3:44:56 PM 18 1 72 3:44:54 PM 3:45:08 PM 14 1 73 3:45:18 PM 3:45:19 PM 1 1 74 3:45:22 PM 3:46:01 PM 39 1 75 3:45:30 PM 3:46:17 PM 47 1 76 3:45:48 PM 3:46:59 PM 71 1 77 3:46:10 PM 3:47:07 PM 57 1 178 3:46:11 PM 3:47:08 PM 57 1 79 3:46:21 PM 3:47:30 PM 69 1 80 3:46:43 PM 3:47:46 PM 63 1 81 1 82 1 83 3:46:55 PM 3:47:19 PM 3:47:34 PM 3:47:59 PM 3:48:13 PM 3:48:42 PM 64 54 68 64 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell Lane 1: Southbound Left File Name : Upton-Scenic-SD—PM Lane 2: Southbound Through/Right Site Code : 00000002 Weather: Clear, 55 deg Start Date : 1/15/2019 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No :2 L No. Joined Queue n. Released From Queue Delay 1 84 3:47:39 PM 3:48:50 PM 71 1 85 3:48:07 PM 3:48:55 PM 48 1 86 3:48:16 PM 3:49:05 PM 49 1 87 3:48:26 PM 3:49:15 PM 49 1 88 3:48:27 PM 3:49:43 PM 76 1 89 3:48:56 PM 3:49:55 PM 59 1 90 3:49:02 PM 3:50:00 PM 58 1 91 3:50:39 PM 3:51:13 PM 34 1 92 3:51:10 PM 3:51:25 PM 15 1 93 3:51:41 PM 3:51:53 PM 12 1 94 3:51:46 PM 3:52:00 PM 14 1 95 3:51:49 PM 3:52:14 PM 25 1 96 3:53:10 PM 3:53:17 PM 7 1 97 3:53:15 PM 3:54:02 PM 47 1 98 3:53:19 PM 3:54:11 PM 52 1 99 3:53:40 PM 3:54:17 PM 37 1 1100 3:53:55 PM 3:54:33 PM 38 1 101 3:54:05 PM 3:54:52 PM 47 1 102 3:54:19 PM 3:55:10 PM 51 1 103 3:54:43 PM 3:55:17 PM 34 1 104 3:54:59 PM 3:55:22 PM 23 1 105 3:55:38 PM 3:55:43 PM 5 1 106 3:55:39 PM 3:55:51 PM 12 1 107 3:55:54 PM 3:56:12 PM 18 1 108 3:56:33 PM 3:57:24 PM 51 1 109 3:56:36 PM 3:57:31 PM 55 1 110 3:56:46 PM 3:58:08 PM 82 1 111 3:57:30 PM 3:58:13 PM 43 1 112 3:57:43 PM 3:58:31 PM 48 1 113 3:57:47 PM 3:58:32 PM 45 1 114 3:57:48 PM 3:58:52 PM 64 1 115 3:58:14 PM 3:58:53 PM 39 1 116 3:58:19 PM 3:59:00 PM 41 1 117 3:58:23 PM 3:59:47 PM 84 1 118 3:58:33 PM 3:59:50 PM 77 1 119 3:58:45 PM 3:59:56 PM 71 1 120 4:00:12 PM 4:00:24 PM 12 Pr 1 121 4:00:40 PM 4:00:53 PM 13 1 122 4:00:43 PM 4:00:59 PM 16 1 123 4:00:52 PM 4:01:03 PM 11 1 124 4:01:33 PM 4:01:40 PM 7 1 125 4:01:45 PM 4:01:48 PM 3 1 126 4:01:59 PM 4:02:07 PM 8 1 127 4:02:32 PM 4:03:03 PM 31 1 128 4:03:06 PM 4:03:09 PM 3 1 129 4:04:04 PM 4:04:08 PM 4 1 130 4:04:06 PM 4:04:12 PM 6 1 131 4:04:46 PM 4:04:52 PM 6 1 132 4:05:25 PM 4:06:12 PM 47 1 133 4:05:43 PM 4:06:20 PM 37 1 134 4:06:16 PM 4:06:30 PM 14 1 135 4:06:27 PM 4:06:36 PM 9 1 136 4:06:34 PM 4:06:42 PM 8 1 137 4:06:41 PM 4:06:56 PM 15 1 138 4:06:50 PM 4:07:02 PM 12 1 139 4:06:54 PM 4:07:04 PM 10 1 140 4:07:36 PM 4:07:40 PM 4 1 141 4:07:48 PM 4:07:51 PM 3 65 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell Lane 1: Southbound Left File Name : Upton-Scenic-SD—PM Lane 2: Southbound Through/Right Site Code : 00000002 Weather: Clear, 55 deg Start Date : 1/15/2019 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No :3 L n. No. Joined Queue Released From Queue Delay 2 2 5 11 14 3 Ell 1 142 4:08:39 PM 4:08:41 PM 1 143 4:09:24 PM 4:09:26 PM 1 144 4:09:51 PM 4:09:56 PM 1 145 4:10:30 PM 4:10:41 PM 1 146 4:10:32 PM 4:10:46 PM 1 147 4:11:39 PM 4:11:42 PM 1 1148 4:12:07 PM 4:12:46 PM 39 1 149 4:12:42 PM 4:13:06 PM 24 1 150 4:12:45 PM 4:13:28 PM 43 1 151 4:12:57 PM 4:13:41 PM 44 1 152 4:13:03 PM 4:13:55 PM 52 1 153 4:13:31 PM 4:14:03 PM 32 1 154 4:13:42 PM 4:14:04 PM 22 1 155 4:13:52 PM 4:14:19 PM 27 1 156 4:14:08 PM 4:14:27 PM 19 1 157 4:14:34 PM 4:14:58 PM 24 1 158 4:14:38 PM 4:15:14 PM 36 1 159 4:14:41 PM 4:15:22 PM 41 1 160 4:14:52 PM 4:15:33 PM 41 1 161 4:15:15 PM 4:15:34 PM 19 11 16 8 2 3 23 1 4 4 8 15 14 20 20 4 1 9 13 14 3 4 3 4 4 11 2 4 4 8 9 2 2 2 2 3 5 16 2 1 162 4:16:00 PM 4:16:11 PM 1 163 4:16:42 PM 4:16:58 PM 1 164 4:16:55 PM 4:17:03 PM 1 165 4:18:56 PM 4:18:58 PM 1 166 4:19:03 PM 4:19:06 PM 1 167 4:19:08 PM 4:19:31 PM 1 168 4:19:55 PM 4:19:56 PM 1 169 4:21:37 PM 4:21:41 PM 1 170 4:21:40 PM 4:21:44 PM 1 171 4:21:59 PM 4:22:07 PM 1 172 4:22:38 PM 4:22:53 PM 1 173 4:22:46 PM 4:23:00 PM 1 174 4:23:15 PM 4:23:35 PM 1 175 4:23:20 PM 4:23:40 PM 1 176 4:24:28 PM 4:24:32 PM 1 177 4:24:34 PM 4:24:35 PM 1 178 4:24:39 PM 4:24:48 PM 1 179 4:24:41 PM 4:24:54 PM 1 180 4:24:44 PM 4:24:58 PM 1 181 4:25:06 PM 4:25:09 PM 1 182 4:26:03 PM 4:26:07 PM 1 183 4:27:09 PM 4:27:12 PM 1 184 4:27:22 PM 4:27:26 PM 1 185 4:27:25 PM 4:27:29 PM 1 186 4:27:48 PM 4:27:59 PM 2 19 3:28:08 PM 3:28:10 PM 2 20 3:28:45 PM 3:28:49 PM 2 21 3:29:02 PM 3:29:06 PM 2 22 3:29:19 PM 3:29:27 PM 2 23 3:30:24 PM 3:30:33 PM 2 24 3:31:13 PM 3:31:15 PM 2 25 3:32:34 PM 3:32:36 PM 2 126 3:32:42 PM 3:32:44 PM 2 27 3:33:29 PM 3:33:31 PM 2 28 3:33:51 PM 3:33:54 PM 2 29 3:35:26 PM 3:35:31 PM 2 30 3:38:04 PM 3:38:20 PM 2 31 3:38:39 PM 3:38:41 PM 66 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell Lane 1: Southbound Left File Name : Upton-Scenic-SD—PM Lane 2: Southbound Through/Right Site Code : 00000002 Weather: Clear, 55 deg Start Date : 1/15/2019 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No : 4 L n. No. Joined Queue Released From Queue Delay 2 32 3:38:46 PM 3:38:48 PM 2 2 33 3:38:52 PM 3:38:54 PM 2 2 34 3:39:00 PM 3:39:03 PM 3 2 35 3:41:09 PM 3:41:12 PM 3 2 36 3:41:22 PM 3:41:25 PM 3 2 37 3:41:42 PM 3:41:57 PM 15 2 38 3:42:06 PM 3:42:08 PM 2 2 39 3:43:00 PM 3:43:03 PM 3 2 40 3:44:02 PM 3:44:07 PM 5 2 41 3:44:35 PM 3:44:39 PM 4 2 142 3:45:34 PM 3:45:50 PM 16 2 43 3:45:38 PM 3:45:56 PM 18 2 44 3:45:45 PM 3:46:02 PM 17 2 45 3:45:54 PM 3:46:08 PM 14 2 46 3:46:18 PM 3:46:24 PM 6 2 47 3:46:22 PM 3:46:35 PM 13 2 48 3:46:30 PM 3:46:40 PM 10 2 49 3:46:54 PM 3:46:58 PM 4 2 50 3:49:00 PM 3:49:04 PM 4 2 51 3:50:33 PM 3:50:42 PM 9 2 52 3:50:54 PM 3:50:57 PM 3 2 53 3:51:34 PM 3:51:42 PM 8 2 54 3:53:00 PM 3:53:04 PM 4 2 55 3:53:30 PM 3:53:45 PM 15 2 156 3:53:35 PM 3:53:56 PM 21 2 57 3:54:34 PM 3:54:37 PM 3 2 58 3:55:47 PM 3:55:49 PM 2 2 59 3:56:03 PM 3:56:09 PM 6 2 60 3:56:23 PM 3:56:32 PM 9 2 61 3:58:08 PM 3:58:10 PM 2 2 62 3:58:30 PM 3:58:35 PM 5 2 63 3:58:47 PM 3:58:50 PM 3 2 64 3:58:58 PM 3:58:59 PM 1 2 65 3:59:06 PM 3:59:17 PM 11 2 66 3:59:16 PM 3:59:26 PM 10 2 67 3:59:31 PM 3:59:35 PM 4 2 168 4:02:23 PM 4:02:24 PM 1 2 69 4:02:23 PM 4:02:31 PM 8 2 70 4:02:45 PM 4:02:54 PM 9 2 71 4:03:44 PM 4:03:47 PM 3 2 72 4:04:00 PM 4:04:02 PM 2 2 73 4:04:17 PM 4:04:20 PM 3 2 74 4:04:45 PM 4:04:51 PM 6 2 75 4:05:18 PM 4:05:20 PM 2 2 176 4:05:26 PM 4:05:29 PM 3 2 77 4:05:42 PM 4:05:45 PM 3 2 78 4:05:57 PM 4:05:59 PM 2 2 79 4:06:29 PM 4:06:32 PM 3 2 80 4:06:40 PM 4:06:55 PM 15 2 81 4:07:22 PM 4:07:25 PM3 2 82 4:09:46 PM 4:09:49 PM 3 2 83 4:10:09 PM 4:10:10 PM 1 2 84 4:10:42 PM 4:10:44 PM 2 2 85 4:10:48 PM 4:10:51 PM 3 2 86 4:10:49 PM 4:10:58 PM 9 2 87 4:11:00 PM 4:11:08 PM 8 2 88 4:11:27 PM 4:11:31 PM 4 2 89 4:12:25 PM 4:12:28 PM 3 67 SOUTHERNOREGON TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Medford, Oregon 97504 1 Kim.parducci@gmail.com 1 (541) 941-4148 cell Lane 1: Southbound Left File Name : Upton-Scenic-SD—PM Lane 2: Southbound Through/Right Site Code : 00000002 Weather: Clear, 55 deg Start Date : 1/15/2019 Veh Type: All Vehicles Page No :5 L n. No. Joined Queue Released From Queue Delay 98 Dela ed Vehicle Count: 2 90 4:12:37 PM 4:12:48 PM 11 Average Stopped Time: 32.25 2 91 4:13:56 PM 4:13:59 PM 3 0 2 92 4:14:27 PM 4:14:33 PM 6 2.56 2 93 4:15:27 PM 4:15:30 PM 3 1.46 0.15 2 94 4:15:44 PM 4:15:47 PM 3 2 95 4:15:51 PM 4:15:53 PM 2 2 96 4:16:10 PM 4:16:13 PM 3 2 97 4:16:40 PM 4:16:41 PM 1 2 98 4:16:59 PM 4:17:02 PM 3 2 99 4:17:02 PM 4:17:04 PM 2 2 1100 4:17:17 PM 4:17:18 PM 1 2 101 4:17:42 PM 4:17:47 PM 5 2 102 4:18:41 PM 4:18:42 PM 1 2 103 4:19:13 PM 4:19:15 PM 2 2 104 4:20:00 PM 4:20:18 PM 18 2 105 4:20:46 PM 4:20:49 PM 3 2 106 4:20:50 PM 4:20:52 PM 2 2 107 4:21:24 PM 4:21:26 PM 2 2 108 4:22:52 PM 4:22:56 PM 4 2 109 4:22:58 PM 4:23:08 PM 10 2 110 4:24:59 PM 4:25:03 PM 4 2 111 4:25:15 PM 4:25:19 PM 4 2 112 4:25:21 PM 4:25:23 PM 2 2 113 4:25:31 PM 4:25:34 PM 3 2 114 4:26:30 PM 4:26:32 PM 2 2 115 4:27:06 PM 4:27:08 PM 2 2 116 4:27:51 PM 4:27:53 PM 2 Summary Information: 3:28:00 PM - 4:28:00 PM SBL SBTR Total Vehicle Count: 162 98 Dela ed Vehicle Count: 162 98 Through Vehicle Count: 0 0 Average Stopped Time: 32.25 5.316 Maximum Stopped Time: 102 21 Min. Secs. for Delay: 0 0 Average Queue: 1.46 0.145 Queue Density: 2.56 1.111 Maximum Queue: 6 3 Dela in Vehicle Hour: 1.46 0.15 Total DelaV: 5224 521 68 7 69 5J5q§;) q §)(\)(($)\ \ \\$\)\\)\\ ) {\)))(k)))) ) )(k))(())(\ ) ` e ; \ \\ ) ^ (\)\\\ } )()\)()))() § 2.2?2 )§7/74 ) ))())f))(§] ! )((\k\(()(\ � ± B ° §§AmaH ff§ggq.; E,:::: §§§§§E§""§§ 7 69 t v m r y m E- N o a m .n OL 40il 00'0 J o_ R U rSb r Lb'0 J o mrnY }_IL rST, m J ,,i- > Mo O LL mm Ol 58b� m Q Q O C m Q O!l )lJl!lW b'H a, �, R 1 O Q) v c L C14 Q) Ob io rn a m r �tiry —OT o0o L£0'0 J _ d Loo �• r08T .3 11 �+ X98'0 3 0 ;,z O c L n h 041 '1 i (� J 6Z'01+ '1 i f" �C G S� ane J 8E'0� tiN > W H 0£� m .� 00 O i Z m w ¢ Q 4 W mm LSSZ N m m m '-0 0 o L9£'0 J M r SOb 9S'0 J o u W N N V > 0 O Q n ^ m m 00 Lq NB OFF OLZ1 Z— o r ¢N> (1 170'0-1 58 pti as a � N O N O OM ti O OZ 1 7 i J LT'0� Q � ST o d L O f6 L S6Z O L ZZ'0 d u m g) F .a. M y '—SZT o x£9'0 (I n d 6 OF j 4 rS6 roto aNb'W338d SbT 1 .� i . 11ObT— m o m �+ N v > ROL- O£7 O au u v F ¢ ¢ 0 v1 LOE '— Z 19 M o � n n of 10THS .J j L. rsi .�1 4 +ZT'0 a m ( Z1 7 i f a TT'O+w '1 iff" .`T' o 0~ U Z� o d a U .2 S( M M a s o o U) (J o a c E > S� N LOT o J CD > '-O � o 3 rS x+90.0 J d> OT 1 .T i O J 80'0+ > 0— o fY6 ry � 7 S� O � = N CL O N Q j u 0 hA A w Q C C i o LO£a E E N tip '1rO C `+� +ZT'0 J m m 04 041 nc 3 8b'O+ �� E E S— p Y w OSS w ti 7 u u N y L (A m E omo LS ^mo o M O ,._o a° a 0 �n m HOZ o c LTO'0 a m d w= m ami U '� 1 �• r OS .� j �. «r 6L'0 3 a 3 0 01 = •� y ami rnY 591 •1 i f a Z9'0� '1 if" m LL O y Q V c R u a� O m SZ— a 99'0 m omo '" 7 mo �o p H Q d so9 LL a a „ GV )IJIYLAivH m m o a •0 z L �a 1% E [11 yLOL umm a —ST 0 0 -t£T'0 J'� 1 �' rSbZ ,rOT'T 3 o O a051 '1 1 �LS'01 '11 r 2 LL$� vN ZTO a > d'OE N O OOO00 m U Q (V W mu 0 o LOTb O m u ti —00 o LS6'0 3 0� j r Sbs «1 11 r S9'0 0 0 u C) u m > N C > N n n U m 00 a U � 49�L NBOFF o9z1 i r a1 rZ— v a N >SOTom o p m SZ 1 '1 i 0 TZ'O- om oz 00 m as L3 m � c L o9E 40J:-) L LZ'O a o am a) 0 o n vii �—OET 79'0 a d 5g off roTT r9so aNb'W33yd 06T1 . i . 3 if'ObT� m m m 0RDLSE7 m O a u v F m m 0 LSE .� v o ooN -Z o0 10TH S .J j L- rST .�1 4 +LT'o a m z1 1 r' a TO'O+ 1 if' ° U °~ NTN Ov Z� o o a c .2 S( M M a s o o U) (D E o a c 3 > LSz m J 0 CD i V 1 3 'j L. r°T ~lb' �+8T'o 0 N d > OT 1 i o 3 9T'O+ 0— T t6 m 7 S Gl O N = N O N a E O U 0 hA :� A w a C C i L) N LSE � M _ M m m O r_Z O 0 m0 '1 1 �' r ° mC .-��. 6T'0 J ff m m 04 sb1 '1 i f nc 3 L8.0-+,. '1 f" E E C S� 0ir1i� Co d H H pp Y W °9� lL a J o ti 7 AMBeak Bour(7:45 H8:45AM) SeasonallyAdjusted 35 35 261 222 5 1 0 1 30 95 1 6 1 160 0 220 1 220 1 5 30 245 1 245 100 ScenicRISRScenic Ave 110 1 370 Rock%/ypgcenic Ave 215 1 300 UptonRcXcenic Ave FireStation Bev ®rips AM 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 5 5 0 Scenic[OSMenic Ave 1 0 Rock®dy�cenic Ave 0 2 UptonRcXcenic Ave 2019MB (AMBeak) 35 35 263 223 5 1 0 1 30 96 1 6 1 161 0 222 222 5 30 247 247 101 ScenicRISRScenic Ave 112 375 Rock%/yMcenic Ave 1 217 303 UptonBdMcenic Ave Design®ear 2020 BB (AMBeak) 35 35 264 225 5 0 1 30 96 1 6 1 162 0 224 1 224 1 5 30 1 249 249 101 ScenicRISMcenic Ave 114 378 Rock®dyMcenic Ave 219 1306.03 UptonBdVEcenic Ave Rek7outed2020 ®B With eock®Jay Extension IbScenic MS(AMBeak ) 35 35 264 224 5 0 1 30 96 1 6 1 162 0 169 1 169 5 1 30 249 1 249 101 ScenicRISRScenic Ave 134 1 298 Rock%/yMcenic Ave 1 144 306 UptonBdMcenic Ave Design®ear 2020 Build (AMBeak) 35 35 266 224 5 0 1 30 98 1 6 1 162 0170 1 170 1 5 30 1 254 254 101 SceniclISRScenic Ave 135 298 Rock®dylgcenic Ave 144T 1 1 308 UptonBdMcenic Ave 72 PMBeakBour(B:30 M:308M) SeasonallyAdjusted 38 F45 301 321 10 1 0 1 28 115 1 3 1 183 0 265 1 265 1 5 40 295 1 294 125 ScenicRISRScenic Ave 205 1 310 Rock%/yMcenic Ave 255 1 210 UptonBdMcenic Ave FireStation Bev ®rips BM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 ScenicWS�cenic Ave 1 0 Rock®dyj5cenic Ave 1 0 3 UptonBdMcenic Ave 2019NB (PMBeak) 38 F45 303 323 10 1 0 1 28 116 1 3 1 184 0267 1 267 1 5 1 40 297 1 297 126 ScenicEISRScenic Cave 207 1 1 313 Rock®Jyj9cenic Ave 1 257 212 UptonBdMcenic Ave Design®ear 2020 BB (PMBeak) 38 F46 305 325 10 1 0 1 28 117 1 3 1 185 0270 1 270 1 5 40 1 300 300 127 ScenicWS�cenic Ave 210 316 Rock%/yIScenic Ave 260 214 UptonBdMcenic Ave ReH7outed202O Nl3 M ith Bock®day Extension fb8cenic NIS(PMeeak ) 38 F46 305 325 10 1 0 1 28 117 1 3 1 185 0 250 1 250 5 1 40 300 1 300 127 ScenicRISRScenic Ave 230 1 251 Rock%/yMcenic Ave 1 220 214 UptonBdMcenic Ave Design®ear 2020 Build WMBeak) 38 F46 305 325 10 1 0 1 28 117 1 3 1 185 0251 1 251 1 5 40 1 301 301 127 Scenic69SRScenic Ave 231 251 Rock®dylgcenic Ave 220 217 UptonBdMcenic Ave 73 `o m R a G ® ❑ Ll LJ s Ll LJ ti W ❑ D ® r ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ W 0 � w Q W w s 0 E ti ❑ ❑o ❑ ® ❑ ❑ W ❑Q®o Wo Ela[] am O EI O U ❑ oQ❑bo®o QaEl ❑ems❑ ❑❑t1�❑`❑ .awoo Ll LJ El El LU ®v❑Bfi❑ �❑ Q❑❑❑~c f3o ❑ El El m p ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El Li LU El L El 0 ❑ ❑ Q�❑❑� ❑ w ❑Q❑OL, ❑ G U El 11El ❑ ® 0 W o ❑ ❑ o W m ❑ E Li❑ 0 ❑❑ a o � ❑ ❑ W Q W G Ll ❑ o Ll W El El 74 ro E N X � N r 0 N U ui o 9 0 c0 N ❑ _ o a = m m 7 ❑ z z z z U i 0 0 o 0 0 o t'i o O Q N U E� ❑ W O Z o O Z 0 O Z 0 O Z 0 O Z 0 E 0 .0 5 m ~ -O` m ` h '> Q $ Q E u _ CS 0 0 0 0 WW W 0 0 U E 5 J N 3 v iA ❑ 0 o z a ¢ co a 2 c a c Q o a Q �❑ zz Nz az 3 ?6 d ad 0 m 0 16 9 o `. g s m o e° i �0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ W w z O w z O _ O w z O w z O vm U Z 00 ❑o❑❑w•o❑❑ yN 3 x yN yN ❑ f�W ❑❑ z >> Y > w z z >> Y > w z 00 z m 00 m 00 w z 030 3❑tl n❑03030 -:- 0 z > zz 0 z a 00 z > m z3 ? Y 03 ? (D z > 3 tl- o❑❑v❑ WE ❑ o❑ 'i ❑ ❑ F Z rc FO y? Nz m F Z m H w NN 1 3H fnz rc N Nz m g m wm w wm 0 0 0 0 0 ? z O ? m o s m o s m o s m ❑❑❑❑ zd>za 0 O z6za a zoaa o zoaa a 0 O zoaa < 3❑3❑ 4oo UU❑ zoo Qna w Yom?-+ mp zz-+ QQ? colcc ❑ro❑ 0 0 0 ❑❑o zzz LD fN zzz 0 f� zz> 0 N 0 ❑ W U dQ ®o O zv~i O zv~i O z0 o G❑❑ NI 0 Lq 0 0 L4 1� ® M...o o ❑ ❑ UWV W WW D D o F ? z o z ? o z H z U o W ❑ W W ❑ ❑off Q U Q U Q U ❑ o G o 0 o z N N 3 z w N 3 z N N 3 U W D W❑❑ Y Y O Y ®❑ W o om g tg O yz O y zs ❑ 0 u QI u❑I U, j o 0 2 o U, -2 o lo 01022 z`bzz op moO z zz ..n mDO z`r°zz r r o Q❑ cdm ca oN cma oN ❑ ❑❑m❑ ❑ N�oN c Yew c YS ON c ❑ ®❑ UU❑❑-°cisme-°cisme-4cis� w N tw w N w N c 0 r hQ 3 99, r n z ti m v z o a v z ~ 30EIEI El❑El❑ 3000 030z z z z z z o o E ❑❑❑a ❑E101100tl z z z z z z C 9 m 0 0 33❑❑ D ❑ V N W r c $ m of❑opo ® ®❑ ❑ �mZLL �UZ�i or� o�UZu o V 74 `o d R a o11® ❑❑ s W LJ Ey oLi ® N ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o W LU D a Q W W ti Ll p ❑ Ll Ll® D ❑ s W ❑Q®o 0 �®❑b 00m ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ V 0 ❑ ❑ c ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ Qa❑o?❑ ❑❑t1�❑❑ ❑ ❑ r2 y ❑ Q W [C;❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ LU ®�❑17 1 Elefi❑ �❑ U El 1:1 m ❑ ❑ EAo ❑ U ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ W ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 El Q � ❑ ❑ W El ❑ Q ❑ Q p El® V W o❑ El❑ W s ❑ oLi o 0 El a I Li W ❑ W p IA ❑ o Ll W El El ULLO, ❑ LL a ® R> o $ F IL 0 O O W U W N ❑ g E� O ❑ Z W J, Sg U0 ,2:2 Nyp Q O N ❑ O U O O 0 0 0 W WW W Q U in 0 o m o v f�❑ Zm d b Wo S. C m0 ,s ❑ oa ❑ � m ❑ rA w op ❑ ®ov�oo ❑000 W -D 00 ❑ yN 00 00 030 LL 30V n®03030 w Z 3 tl- > o00vo W E 0 N f o o N z a 0 o U ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑" Z 0000 zoaa N n 3731030 y o ❑ 0 1z ❑❑o UU❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑❑❑ zzz ❑ z ❑ O W U V dQ O El z v~ o p ❑ ❑ Lq ❑a w ❑ Q❑❑ UWU W H 000 azo W ❑ W W � ❑o° 3 ❑ o x o ® o o O O ❑ ❑ E I T 3 U W v D W ❑ a N o ❑ p o W o o y vg ❑ U ❑ Q ❑ O 2 $ ❑ o o 0 ❑ $ ❑❑c>�� z-zz a ❑o o ❑ c u o Q Y�oN ❑o ❑ m o v w N UU ❑ ❑ -f6,U� ❑w a❑❑ N's G G o❑ o 0 30000000 z 30 00 000 >- 0006 0000 z ❑000Dov z 03300 y o ❑ U ol❑ ❑° ❑o om� ® o o p o z x m z 0 Z 0 U 75 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Scenic Ave & Rock Way 02/04/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations +T T+ y Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 375 217 30 30 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 375 217 30 30 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 9 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 5 6 3 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 481 278 38 38 6 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 316 0 - 0 790 306 Stage 1 - - - - 297 - Stage 2 - - 493 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1256 - 362 739 Stage 1 - - 758 - Stage 2 - - 618 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1256 - 359 733 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 359 - Stage 1 - 753 Stage 2 - 618 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 15.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1256 - - 387 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 0.116 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - 15.5 HCM Lane LOS A A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.4 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Year 2019 No-Build—AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 76 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave 02/04/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 7.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ HCM Lane LOS C - 4 y 3.5 - Traffic Vol, veh/h 260 125 110 112 65 120 Future Vol, veh/h 260 125 110 112 65 120 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 16 16 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 11 6 7 15 10 Mvmt Flow 333 160 141 144 83 154 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 509 0 855 429 Stage 1 - - - - 429 - Stage 2 - 426 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 6.55 6.3 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 3.635 3.39 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1036 312 609 Stage 1 - 630 - Stage 2 - 632 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1022 262 601 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 262 - Stage 1 - 622 Stage 2 - 537 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.5 24.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 413 - 1022 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.574 - 0.138 HCM Control Delay (s) 24.8 - 9.1 0 HCM Lane LOS C - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.5 - 0.5 - Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Year 2019 No-Build—AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 77 HCM 2010 TWSC 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St 02/04/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 12.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations HCM Control Delay (s) T 12.5 8.3 - T. - 61.7 Vi T C B T. A Traffic Vol, veh/h 101 303 1 3 146 121 5 2 8 161 6 96 Future Vol, veh/h 101 303 1 3 146 121 5 2 8 161 6 96 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 6 6 0 2 3 0 11 11 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 100 - 100 - 200 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 3 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 4 0 7 Mvmt Flow 120 361 1 4 174 144 6 2 10 192 7 114 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 320 0 0 368 0 0 926 936 379 875 864 251 Stage 1 - - - - - - 608 608 - 256 256 - Stage 2 - - - - 318 328 - 619 608 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 - 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.14 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.14 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.14 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 - 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.536 4 3.363 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1201 - 1202 - 251 267 672 268 294 776 Stage 1 - - - - 486 489 - 744 699 - Stage 2 - - - - 698 651 - 473 489 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1199 - 1196 - 192 238 663 239 262 773 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 192 238 - 239 262 - Stage 1 - - 435 438 - 668 696 Stage 2 - - 585 648 - 413 438 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.1 0.1 16.4 42.2 HCM LOS C E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnl SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 192 489 1199 1196 - 239 693 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 0.024 0.1 - 0.003 - 0.802 0.175 HCM Control Delay (s) 24.3 12.5 8.3 - 8 - 61.7 11.3 HCM Lane LOS C B A - A - F B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0.3 - 0 - 6 0.6 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Year 2019 No -Build -AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 78 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Scenic Ave & Rock Way 02/04/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 0.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations +T 1+ y Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 313 257 40 28 10 Future Vol, veh/h 5 313 257 40 28 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 0 2 0 17 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 87 87 87 87 87 87 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 5 3 0 0 Mvmt Flow 6 360 295 46 32 11 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 343 0 - 0 692 337 Stage 1 - - - - 320 - Stage 2 - - 372 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1227 - 413 710 Stage 1 - - 741 - Stage 2 - - 702 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1225 - 409 699 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 409 - Stage 1 - 735 Stage 2 - 701 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 13.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1225 - - 459 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - - 0.095 HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0 - 13.7 HCM Lane LOS A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.3 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Year 2019 No-Build—PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 79 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave 02/04/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 4.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ HCM Lane LOS C - 4 y 2.1 - Traffic Vol, veh/h 223 20 60 207 60 95 Future Vol, veh/h 223 20 60 207 60 95 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 3 3 0 0 13 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 25 8 3 13 11 Mvmt Flow 297 27 80 276 80 127 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 327 0 750 327 Stage 1 - - - - 314 - Stage 2 - 436 - Critical Hdwy 4.18 6.53 6.31 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.272 3.617 3.399 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1200 364 694 Stage 1 - 716 - Stage 2 - 629 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1197 335 685 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 335 - Stage 1 - 715 Stage 2 - 579 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.8 17.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 488 - 1197 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.423 - 0.067 HCM Control Delay (s) 17.7 - 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS C - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.1 - 0.2 - Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Year 2019 No-Build—PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 80 HCM 2010 TWSC 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St 02/04/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 16.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations HCM Control Delay (s) T 14.9 8.6 - T. - 77.1 Vi T D B T. A Traffic Vol, veh/h 126 212 3 7 177 191 4 6 13 184 3 116 Future Vol, veh/h 126 212 3 7 177 191 4 6 13 184 3 116 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 69 69 0 1 3 0 60 60 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 100 - 100 - 200 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 5 10 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 Mvmt Flow 134 226 3 7 188 203 4 6 14 196 3 123 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 392 0 0 298 0 0 935 971 357 871 871 294 Stage 1 - - - - - - 565 565 - 305 305 - Stage 2 - - - - 370 406 - 566 566 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 - 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.11 6.5 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.509 4 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1145 - 1275 - 248 255 692 273 291 745 Stage 1 - - - - 513 511 - 707 666 - Stage 2 - - - - 654 601 - 511 511 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1144 - 1202 - 175 211 620 224 241 743 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 175 211 - 224 241 - Stage 1 - - 427 426 - 624 661 Stage 2 - - 538 597 - 413 426 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3.2 0.1 16.8 51.2 HCM LOS C F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnl SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 175 385 1144 1202 - 224 706 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.053 0.117 - 0.006 - 0.874 0.179 HCM Control Delay (s) 26.1 14.9 8.6 - 8 - 77.1 11.2 HCM Lane LOS D B A - A - F B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 0.4 - 0 - 7 0.6 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Year 2019 No -Build -PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 81 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Year 2019 No -Build -AM Peak Hour 02104/2019 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Start Time 7:35 7:35 7:35 7:35 7:35 7:35 End Time 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 3 3 3 3 3 3 # of Recorded Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 Vehs Entered 1323 1438 1340 1333 1330 1350 Vehs Exited 1338 1444 1334 1357 1342 1362 Starting Vehs 27 20 13 35 24 24 Ending Vehs 12 14 19 11 12 12 Travel Distance (mi) 348 369 348 351 347 353 Travel Time (hr) 16.2 17.5 16.3 16.7 16.3 16.6 Total Delay (hr) 3.0 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.0 3.1 Total Stops 787 882 802 792 789 810 Fuel Used (gal) 14.5 15.4 14.6 14.6 14.5 14.7 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 7:35 End Time 7:45 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. No data recorded this interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 446 488 459 429 448 452 Vehs Exited 449 483 451 449 454 457 Starting Vehs 27 20 13 35 24 24 Ending Vehs 24 25 21 15 18 19 Travel Distance (mi) 110 119 114 109 112 113 Travel Time (hr) 5.3 5.7 5.6 5.2 5.3 5.4 Total Delay (hr) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 Total Stops 261 285 269 236 242 258 Fuel Used (gal) 4.7 5.0 4.9 4.6 4.8 4.8 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 82 SimTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Year 2019 No-Build—AM Peak Hour 02104/2019 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 8:00 End Time 8:45 Total Time (min) 45 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 877 950 881 904 882 898 Vehs Exited 889 961 883 908 888 904 Starting Vehs 24 25 21 15 18 19 Ending Vehs 12 14 19 11 12 12 Travel Distance (mi) 238 250 234 242 236 240 Travel Time (hr) 10.8 11.8 10.7 11.5 11.0 11.2 Total Delay (hr) 1.8 2.2 1.8 2.2 1.9 2.0 Total Stops 526 597 533 556 547 552 Fuel Used (gal) 9.7 10.4 9.8 10.0 9.7 9.9 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 83 SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2019 No-Build—AM Peak Hour 02/04/2019 Intersection: 5: Scenic Ave & Rock Way Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB SB LT TR LR 35 18 47 3 1 24 17 11 47 437 340 357 Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB TR LT LR 28 92 149 1 33 66 13 76 113 220 437 592 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0 EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB L TR L TR L TR L TR 73 33 12 55 30 29 141 79 22 2 1 5 5 9 63 38 57 14 10 28 23 30 113 64 340 459 167 223 100 100 100 200 0 0 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 84 SimTraffic Report Page 3 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Year 2019 No -Build -PM Peak Hour 02104/2019 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Start Time 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 End Time 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 3 3 3 3 3 3 # of Recorded Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 Vehs Entered 1438 1384 1454 1453 1437 1436 Vehs Exited 1436 1400 1465 1475 1441 1444 Starting Vehs 19 28 22 33 16 22 Ending Vehs 21 12 11 11 12 11 Travel Distance (mi) 343 332 338 353 344 342 Travel Time (hr) 17.2 15.8 16.2 17.2 17.1 16.7 Total Delay (hr) 4.1 3.1 3.3 3.7 3.8 3.6 Total Stops 895 807 836 864 892 858 Fuel Used (gal) 14.9 14.0 14.4 15.2 14.9 14.7 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 3:20 End Time 3:30 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. No data recorded this interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 3:30 End Time 3:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 504 505 460 458 497 487 Vehs Exited 501 516 461 476 484 488 Starting Vehs 19 28 22 33 16 22 Ending Vehs 22 17 21 15 29 20 Travel Distance (mi) 114 114 99 106 110 109 Travel Time (hr) 6.3 5.6 4.8 5.3 5.5 5.5 Total Delay (hr) 1.9 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.4 Total Stops 309 275 233 248 276 267 Fuel Used (gal) 5.2 5.1 4.3 4.7 4.7 4.8 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 85 SimTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Year 2019 No-Build—PM Peak Hour 02104/2019 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 3:45 End Time 4:30 Total Time (min) 45 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 934 879 994 995 940 949 Vehs Exited 935 884 1004 999 957 958 Starting Vehs 22 17 21 15 29 20 Ending Vehs 21 12 11 11 12 11 Travel Distance (mi) 229 217 239 247 234 233 Travel Time (hr) 10.9 10.2 11.4 11.9 11.5 11.2 Total Delay (hr) 2.1 1.8 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.2 Total Stops 586 532 603 616 616 588 Fuel Used (gal) 9.8 9.0 10.2 10.5 10.2 9.9 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 86 SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Year 2019 No-Build—PM Peak Hour 02/04/2019 Intersection: 5: Scenic Ave & Rock Way Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB SB LT TR LR 49 31 62 3 1 25 21 14 51 437 340 357 Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB TR LT LR 10 111 139 0 18 60 5 64 111 220 437 592 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 90 39 31 72 24 43 138 79 Average Queue (ft) 31 3 3 15 3 15 66 37 95th Queue (ft) 68 20 16 52 18 39 114 61 Link Distance (ft) 340 459 167 223 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 100 200 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 87 SimTraffic Report Page 3 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Rock Way Ext/Rock Way & Scenic Ave 02/21/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 3.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 21.6 T B A T. C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4+ 0 - 0.2 - 4� Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 298 35 80 144 30 20 0 82 30 0 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 298 35 80 144 30 20 0 82 30 0 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - 200 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 78 78 92 92 78 78 92 92 92 78 92 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 5 2 2 6 3 2 2 2 0 2 0 Mvmt Flow 6 382 38 87 185 38 22 0 89 38 0 6 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 223 0 0 420 0 0 803 810 401 836 810 213 Stage 1 - - - - - - 413 413 - 378 378 - Stage 2 - - - - 390 397 - 458 432 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.1 6.52 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.1 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.1 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.5 4.018 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1358 - 1139 - 302 314 649 289 314 832 Stage 1 - - - - 616 594 - 648 615 - Stage 2 - - - - 634 603 - 587 582 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1358 - 1139 - 279 289 649 234 289 826 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 279 289 - 234 289 - Stage 1 - - 614 592 - 645 568 Stage 2 - - 577 557 - 504 580 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 2.4 13.9 21.6 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 515 1358 - 1139 261 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.215 0.005 - 0.076 - 0.172 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.9 7.7 - 8.4 - 21.6 HCM Lane LOS B A - A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 0 - 0.2 - 0.6 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Design Year 2020 Build Re -routed -AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 88 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave 02/21/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 2.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ HCM Lane LOS Vi + y 1 - Traffic Vol, veh/h 299 90 35 135 45 40 Future Vol, veh/h 299 90 35 135 45 40 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 16 16 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 11 6 7 15 10 Mvmt Flow 383 115 45 173 58 51 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 514 0 720 457 Stage 1 - - - - 457 - Stage 2 - 263 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 6.55 6.3 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.55 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.55 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 3.635 3.39 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1031 376 587 Stage 1 - 611 - Stage 2 - 752 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1017 355 579 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 355 - Stage 1 - 603 Stage 2 - 719 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.8 16.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 434 - 1017 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.251 - 0.044 HCM Control Delay (s) 16.1 - 8.7 HCM Lane LOS C - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - 0.1 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Design Year 2020 Build Re-routed—AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 89 HCM 2010 TWSC 11: Fire Station & Scenic Ave 02/21/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ HCM Lane LOS Vi + y 0 - Traffic Vol, veh/h 338 1 0 169 1 0 Future Vol, veh/h 338 1 0 169 1 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 0 0 4 0 0 Mvmt Flow 367 1 0 184 1 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 368 0 552 368 Stage 1 - - - - 368 - Stage 2 - 184 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1202 498 682 Stage 1 - 704 - Stage 2 - 852 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1202 498 682 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 573 - Stage 1 - 704 Stage 2 - 852 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 11.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 573 - 1202 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.3 - 0 HCM Lane LOS B - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Design Year 2020 Build Re-routed—AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 90 HCM 2010 TWSC 13: Rock Way Ext & Fire Station 02/21/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations y 4 1+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 100 110 5 Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 0 100 110 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 5 0 0 Mvmt Flow 2 0 0 109 120 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 232 123 125 0 0 Stage 1 123 - - - - - Stage 2 109 - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 761 933 1474 - Stage 1 907 - - - Stage 2 921 - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 761 933 1474 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 761 - - - Stage 1 907 - - Stage 2 921 - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.7 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1474 - 761 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 9.7 - HCM Lane LOS A - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Design Year 2020 Build Re-routed—AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 4 91 HCM 2010 TWSC 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St 02/21/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 13.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations HCM Control Delay (s) T 12.6 8.4 - T. - 66.1 Vi T C B T. A Traffic Vol, veh/h 101 308 1 3 151 121 5 2 8 162 6 98 Future Vol, veh/h 101 308 1 3 151 121 5 2 8 162 6 98 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 6 6 0 2 3 0 11 11 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 100 - 100 - 200 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 3 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 4 0 7 Mvmt Flow 120 367 1 4 180 144 6 2 10 193 7 117 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 326 0 0 374 0 0 939 948 385 887 876 257 Stage 1 - - - - - - 614 614 - 262 262 - Stage 2 - - - - 325 334 - 625 614 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 - 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.14 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.14 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.14 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 - 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.536 4 3.363 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1195 - 1196 - 246 263 667 263 290 770 Stage 1 - - - - 483 486 - 739 695 - Stage 2 - - - - 692 647 - 469 486 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1193 - 1190 - 187 234 658 234 258 767 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 187 234 - 234 258 - Stage 1 - - 432 435 - 664 692 Stage 2 - - 577 644 - 410 435 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.1 0.1 16.7 44.7 HCM LOS C E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnl SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 187 483 1193 1190 - 234 689 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.032 0.025 0.101 - 0.003 - 0.824 0.18 HCM Control Delay (s) 24.9 12.6 8.4 - 8 - 66.1 11.4 HCM Lane LOS C B A - A - F B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 0.3 - 0 - 6.3 0.7 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Design Year 2020 Build Re -routed -AM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 5 92 HCM 2010 TWSC 5: Rock Way Ext/Rock Way & Scenic Ave 02/21/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 16.3 T B A T. C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4+ 0 - 0.1 - 4� Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 251 5 41 220 40 20 0 68 28 0 10 Future Vol, veh/h 5 251 5 41 220 40 20 0 68 28 0 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - 200 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 87 87 92 92 87 87 92 92 92 87 92 87 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 6 2 2 5 3 2 2 2 0 2 0 Mvmt Flow 6 289 5 45 253 46 22 0 74 32 0 11 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 301 0 0 294 0 0 693 695 292 709 674 295 Stage 1 - - - - - - 304 304 - 368 368 - Stage 2 - - - - 389 391 - 341 306 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.1 6.52 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.1 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.1 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.5 4.018 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1272 - 1268 - 358 366 747 352 376 749 Stage 1 - - - - 705 663 - 656 621 - Stage 2 - - - - 635 607 - 678 662 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1270 - 1268 - 337 351 747 307 360 737 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 337 351 - 307 360 - Stage 1 - - 701 660 - 652 598 Stage 2 - - 594 585 - 608 659 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 1 12.4 16.3 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 585 1270 - 1268 363 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.164 0.005 - 0.035 - 0.12 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.4 7.8 - 7.9 - 16.3 HCM Lane LOS B A - A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - 0.1 - 0.4 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Design Year 2020 Build Re -routed -PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 1 93 HCM 2010 TWSC 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave 02/21/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ HCM Lane LOS Vi + y 0.7 - Traffic Vol, veh/h 231 15 20 231 40 30 Future Vol, veh/h 231 15 20 231 40 30 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 3 3 0 0 13 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 25 8 3 13 11 Mvmt Flow 308 20 27 308 53 40 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 331 0 683 334 Stage 1 - - - - 321 - Stage 2 - 362 - Critical Hdwy 4.18 6.53 6.31 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.53 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.53 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.272 3.617 3.399 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1196 399 688 Stage 1 - 711 - Stage 2 - 681 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1193 389 679 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 389 - Stage 1 - 710 Stage 2 - 665 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.6 14.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 476 - 1193 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.196 - 0.022 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 - 8.1 HCM Lane LOS B - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 0.1 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Design Year 2020 Build Re-routed—PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 2 94 HCM 2010 TWSC 11: Fire Station & Scenic Ave 02/21/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ HCM Lane LOS Vi + y 0 - Traffic Vol, veh/h 261 0 0 250 1 0 Future Vol, veh/h 261 0 0 250 1 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 4 0 0 4 0 0 Mvmt Flow 284 0 0 272 1 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 284 0 556 284 Stage 1 - - - - 284 - Stage 2 - 272 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1290 496 760 Stage 1 - 769 - Stage 2 - 778 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1290 496 760 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 579 - Stage 1 - 769 Stage 2 - 778 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 11.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 579 - 1290 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.2 - 0 HCM Lane LOS B - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Design Year 2020 Build Re-routed—PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 3 95 HCM 2010 TWSC 13: Rock Way Ext & Fire Station 02/21/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 0.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations y +T T+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 0 0 85 45 1 Future Vol, veh/h 3 0 0 85 45 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 5 0 0 Mvmt Flow 3 0 0 92 49 1 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 142 50 50 0 - 0 Stage 1 50 - - - - - Stage 2 92 - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 4.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 2.2 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 856 1024 1570 - Stage 1 978 - - - Stage 2 937 - - - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 856 1024 1570 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 856 - - - Stage 1 978 - - Stage 2 937 - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.2 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1570 - 856 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 9.2 - HCM Lane LOS A - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 - Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Design Year 2020 Build Re-routed—PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 4 96 HCM 2010 TWSC 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St 02/21/2019 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 17.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations HCM Control Delay (s) T 15 8.6 - T. - 82.2 Vi T D C T. A Traffic Vol, veh/h 127 217 3 7 180 192 4 6 13 185 3 117 Future Vol, veh/h 127 217 3 7 180 192 4 6 13 185 3 117 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 1 0 69 69 0 1 3 0 60 60 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 100 - 100 - 200 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 6 5 10 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 Mvmt Flow 135 231 3 7 191 204 4 6 14 197 3 124 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 396 0 0 303 0 0 946 982 362 881 881 297 Stage 1 - - - - - - 572 572 - 308 308 - Stage 2 - - - - 374 410 - 573 573 - Critical Hdwy 4.16 - 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.11 6.5 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.254 - 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.509 4 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1141 - 1269 - 243 251 687 268 288 742 Stage 1 - - - - 509 508 - 704 664 - Stage 2 - - - - 651 599 - 506 507 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1140 - 1196 - 170 207 615 220 238 740 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 170 207 - 220 238 - Stage 1 - - 423 423 - 620 659 Stage 2 - - 534 595 - 408 422 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3.1 0.1 17 54.3 HCM LOS C F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnl SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 170 379 1140 1196 - 220 703 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 0.053 0.119 - 0.006 - 0.895 0.182 HCM Control Delay (s) 26.7 15 8.6 - 8 - 82.2 11.3 HCM Lane LOS D C A - A - F B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.2 0.4 - 0 - 7.3 0.7 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Design Year 2020 Build Re -routed -PM Peak Hour Synchro 9 - Report Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC Page 5 97 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Design Year 2020 Build Re -routed -AM Peak Hour 02121/2019 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Start Time 7:35 7:35 7:35 7:35 7:35 7:35 End Time 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 8:45 Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 3 3 3 3 3 3 # of Recorded Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 Vehs Entered 1404 1412 1427 1427 1491 1428 Vehs Exited 1397 1423 1427 1437 1506 1440 Starting Vehs 12 19 14 21 27 18 Ending Vehs 19 8 14 11 12 10 Travel Distance (mi) 329 336 332 337 353 337 Travel Time (hr) 15.6 16.2 15.8 16.3 17.2 16.2 Total Delay (hr) 2.8 3.2 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.1 Total Stops 751 799 784 859 876 813 Fuel Used (gal) 13.9 14.2 14.3 14.6 15.2 14.5 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 7:35 End Time 7:45 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. No data recorded this interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 7:45 End Time 8:00 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 444 468 495 487 506 478 Vehs Exited 445 468 498 481 512 481 Starting Vehs 12 19 14 21 27 18 Ending Vehs 11 19 11 27 21 16 Travel Distance (mi) 100 106 110 105 116 107 Travel Time (hr) 4.9 5.5 5.4 5.2 6.0 5.4 Total Delay (hr) 1.0 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.5 1.3 Total Stops 251 264 252 267 302 265 Fuel Used (gal) 4.3 4.7 4.8 4.7 5.1 4.7 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 98 SimTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Design Year 2020 Build Re-routed—AM Peak Hour 02121/2019 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 8:00 End Time 8:45 Total Time (min) 45 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 960 944 932 940 985 951 Vehs Exited 952 955 929 956 994 958 Starting Vehs 11 19 11 27 21 16 Ending Vehs 19 8 14 11 12 10 Travel Distance (mi) 230 230 222 232 237 230 Travel Time (hr) 10.7 10.7 10.4 11.1 11.2 10.8 Total Delay (hr) 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.0 1.9 Total Stops 500 535 532 592 574 546 Fuel Used (gal) 9.7 9.5 9.5 9.9 10.1 9.7 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 99 SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Design Year 2020 Build Re-routed—AM Peak Hour 02/21/2019 Intersection: 5: Rock Way Ext/Rock Way & Scenic Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served L TR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 18 24 55 9 71 50 Average Queue (ft) 1 1 16 0 38 24 95th Queue (ft) 11 11 44 7 61 50 Link Distance (ft) 198 342 87 358 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB NB TR L LR 16 60 97 1 14 47 7 42 86 221 586 KI Intersection: 11: Fire Station & Scenic Ave Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 19 Average Queue (ft) 1 95th Queue (ft) 10 Link Distance (ft) 102 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 100 SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report Design Year 2020 Build Re-routed—AM Peak Hour 02/21/2019 Intersection: 13: Rock Way Ext & Fire Station Movement EB NB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 24 14 Average Queue (ft) 3 0 95th Queue (ft) 17 0 Link Distance (ft) 105 126 Upstream Blk Time (%) 61 40 Queuing Penalty (veh) 66 12 11 19 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 33 118 Storage Blk Time (%) Link Distance (ft) Queuing Penalty (veh) 167 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 75 24 30 38 29 29 168 79 Average Queue (ft) 27 1 1 3 4 10 61 40 95th Queue (ft) 66 12 11 19 22 33 118 69 Link Distance (ft) 342 459 167 223 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 100 200 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 101 SimTraffic Report Page 4 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Design Year 2020 Build Re -routed -PM Peak Hour 02121/2019 Summary of All Intervals Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Start Time 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 3:20 End Time 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 4:30 Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70 Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60 # of Intervals 3 3 3 3 3 3 # of Recorded Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2 Vehs Entered 1395 1435 1348 1499 1465 1428 Vehs Exited 1400 1442 1371 1500 1471 1435 Starting Vehs 20 21 30 15 17 19 Ending Vehs 15 14 7 14 11 9 Travel Distance (mi) 312 328 300 337 330 322 Travel Time (hr) 15.4 16.0 14.8 17.1 16.2 15.9 Total Delay (hr) 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.9 3.4 3.4 Total Stops 843 822 815 955 873 858 Fuel Used (gal) 13.6 14.2 13.4 14.9 14.4 14.1 Interval #0 Information Seeding Start Time 3:20 End Time 3:30 Total Time (min) 10 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. No data recorded this interval. Interval #1 Information Recording Start Time 3:30 End Time 3:45 Total Time (min) 15 Volumes adjusted by PHF, Growth Factors. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 420 444 459 512 491 465 Vehs Exited 422 447 466 496 484 462 Starting Vehs 20 21 30 15 17 19 Ending Vehs 18 18 23 31 24 22 Travel Distance (mi) 86 93 96 109 98 96 Travel Time (hr) 4.0 4.6 5.1 5.6 4.9 4.8 Total Delay (hr) 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.1 Total Stops 205 216 271 306 248 250 Fuel Used (gal) 3.6 4.1 4.4 4.9 4.3 4.2 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 102 SimTraffic Report Page 1 SimTraffic Simulation Summary Design Year 2020 Build Re-routed—PM Peak Hour 02121/2019 Interval #2 Information Recording Start Time 3:45 End Time 4:30 Total Time (min) 45 Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors, Anti PHF. Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg Vehs Entered 975 991 889 987 974 962 Vehs Exited 978 995 905 1004 987 971 Starting Vehs 18 18 23 31 24 22 Ending Vehs 15 14 7 14 11 9 Travel Distance (mi) 226 235 205 228 232 225 Travel Time (hr) 11.4 11.4 9.7 11.5 11.4 11.1 Total Delay (hr) 2.5 2.3 1.8 2.5 2.3 2.3 Total Stops 638 606 544 649 625 612 Fuel Used (gal) 10.0 10.1 9.0 10.1 10.0 9.8 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 103 SimTraffic Report Page 2 Queuing and Blocking Report Design Year 2020 Build Re-routed—PM Peak Hour 02/21/2019 Intersection: 5: Rock Way Ext/Rock Way & Scenic Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served L TR L TR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 34 35 54 17 66 54 Average Queue (ft) 2 2 10 1 36 26 95th Queue (ft) 14 17 36 10 59 51 Link Distance (ft) 198 342 87 358 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 8: Middle School & Scenic Ave Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (ft) Average Queue (ft) 95th Queue (ft) Link Distance (ft) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) EB WB WB NB TR L T LR 23 52 6 106 1 7 0 37 11 32 4 76 221 183 586 KI Intersection: 11: Fire Station & Scenic Ave Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 18 Average Queue (ft) 1 95th Queue (ft) 9 Link Distance (ft) 102 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 104 SimTraffic Report Page 3 Queuing and Blocking Report Design Year 2020 Build Re-routed PM Peak Hour 02/21/2019 Intersection: 13: Rock Way Ext & Fire Station Movement EB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 Average Queue (ft) 4 95th Queue (ft) 20 Link Distance (ft) 105 Upstream Blk Time (%) 40 Queuing Penalty (veh) 106 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 30 Storage Blk Time (%) 21 Queuing Penalty (veh) 14 Intersection: 30: JC Housing/Upton Rd & Scenic Ave/10th St Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L TR L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 69 38 25 93 30 40 179 106 Average Queue (ft) 30 4 1 21 4 14 75 40 95th Queue (ft) 62 23 12 65 20 39 138 74 Link Distance (ft) 342 459 167 223 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 100 100 200 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 0 Fire District 3 Fire Station Dev - Scenic Ave Southern Oregon Transportation Engineering, LLC 105 SimTraffic Report Page 4 RockWayG13cenicMvenue[ Intersectiono Exhibit 7-2 Right Turn Lane Criterion FYear[2020 BuiId,1AM/PM[Peak1Hours1fl Note: If there is no right turn lane, a shoulder needs to be provided. If this intersection is in a rural area and is a connection to a public street, a right turn lane is needed. AM93eak3iour1NW PM[1Peak3iour1fl W XIM-3531PHIN Xrg-S VPHD Y=13333/PHD Y=2563/PHM Criterion:Mot[i\AW Criterion:Mot[in/IetO 106 0 Right Turn Lane Criterion - Soo - see note 700 600 45 mph o 500 400 - 45 mph Q 300 200 0 ¢ 100 - d 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Right -Turn Volume (vph) Note: If there is no right turn lane, a shoulder needs to be provided. If this intersection is in a rural area and is a connection to a public street, a right turn lane is needed. AM93eak3iour1NW PM[1Peak3iour1fl W XIM-3531PHIN Xrg-S VPHD Y=13333/PHD Y=2563/PHM Criterion:Mot[i\AW Criterion:Mot[in/IetO 106 0 RockWayG13cenicMvenuel Intersectiono Exhibit 7-1 Left Turn Lane Criterion (TTI) FYear[2020 BuIIId,CAM/PM1Peak3ioursM M tv E 09 4 J Left Turn Lane Criterion Left -Turn Volume (Design Hour Volumes) • *(Adti:utcing VchunelNumber ofAdvanciag Through Lanes) + {Opposing Volume. Nimber of Opposing Through T ones} 17 107 AM93eaklIlliour0 W PMTeak3iourl] W XIM-16031PHM XrEA13/PHD Y=1592WPHI] Y=1562WPHI] Criterion:WletYl Criterion:WletYl 107 3/25/14 12:26 PM 32 ❑11❑1H1❑ ❑ De 111in 320.10.01- Design Standards The purpose of these standards is to provide a consistent policy under which certain physical aspects of street and related design and plan preparation will be observed by the engineer. The Engineer should be aware that certain alternate street standards for the Transit Oriented District and Transit Oriented Corridor might apply to the design and construction streets in these areas of the city. These alternate standards are fully described in the Central Point TOD Design Requirements and Guidelines. They are also briefly described in lesser detail in these Standards and Specifications. This section contains design standards to ensure the safe and efficient operation of each facility type for all users and the best use of public space. The requirements in this section are established as minimum standards to follow and apply to both new construction and reconstruction, except as otherwise specified. Designs shall consider the needs of people with disabilities and the aged, such as visually impaired pedestrians and mobility impaired pedestrians. Every effort should be made to locate street hardware away from pedestrian locations and provide a surface free of bumps and cracks, which create safety and mobility problems. Smooth access ramps shall be provided where required. All designs shall conform to the current American Disabilities Act (ADA) or as adopted by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The determination of the pavement width and total right-of-way shall be based on the operational needs for each street as determined by a technical analysis. The technical analysis shall use demand volumes that reflect the maximum number of pedestrians, bicyclists, parked vehicles and motorized vehicle traffic expected when the area using the street is fully developed. Technical analysis shall take into consideration, transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, TOD, neighborhood plans, approved tentative plans as well as existing commercial and residential developments. All street designs shall be coordinated with the design of other new or existing infrastructure. These standards set forth the minimum requirements for materials and street design. The Public Works Director shall have discretion to require a higher or different standard for materials or design when in his judgment it is in the best interest of the public's health, safety and welfare when considering all aspects and circumstances of the project. The minimum geometric requirements for all street classifications are defined in Tables 300 — 1 through 300 — 7. 320.10.02 — Traffic Impact Analysis The purpose of this section is to assist in the determination of which road authorities participate in land use decisions, and to implement Section 660-012-0045(2)(e) of the State Transportation 37 City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standards and Specifications 108 3/25/14 12:26 PM Planning Rule that requires the city to adopt a process to apply conditions to development proposals in order to minimize impacts and protect transportation facilities. This chapter establishes the standards for when a proposal must be reviewed for potential traffic impacts; when a traffic impact analysis must be submitted with a development application in order to determine whether conditions are needed to minimize impacts to and protect transportation facilities; what must be in a traffic impact analysis; and who is qualified to prepare the study. A traffic impact analysis shall be prepared by a traffic engineer or civil engineer licensed to practice in the state of Oregon with special training and experience in traffic engineering. If the road authority is the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), consult ODOT's regional development review planner and OAR 734-051-180. If the road is the authority of Jackson County, consult Jackson County's road design requirements. The Public Works Director may, at his/her discretion, waive the study of certain intersections when it is concluded that the impacts are not substantial. 320.10.03 — Traffic Impact Analysis Applicability (1) The level of detail and scope of a traffic impact analysis (TIA) will vary with the size, complexity, and location of the proposed application. Prior to any TIA, the applicant shall submit sufficient information to the City for the Public Works Department to issue a scoping letter. If stipulations to reduce traffic are requested by an applicant, it must first be shown by means of an analysis that an unconditional approval is not possible without some form of mitigation to maintain an adequate LOS. This will determine whether a stipulation is necessary. (2) Extent of Study Area: The study area shall be defined by the Public Works Department in the scoping letter and shall address at least the following areas: a) All proposed site access points; b) Any intersection where the proposed development can be expected to Contribute 25 or more trips during the analysis peak period. Impacts of less than 25 peak period trips are not substantial and will not be included in the study area. This volume may be adjusted, at the discretion of the Public Works Department, for safety or unusual situations; and c) Any intersections directly adjacent to the subject property. (3) When required: TIA shall be required when a land use application involves one or more of the following actions: a) A change in zoning or a plan amendment designation that generates 300 average daily trips (ADT) more than the current zoning; b) Any proposed development or land use action that a road authority, including the city, Jackson County or ODOT, states may have operational or safety concerns along its facilities; c) An increase in site traffic volume generation by 250 average daily trips (ADT) or more, or 25 Peak Hour Trips (PHT); 38 City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standards and Specifications 109 3/25/14 12:26 PM d) An increase in peak hour volume of a particular movement to and from the State highway by 20 percent or more; e) An increase in use of adjacent streets by vehicles exceeding twenty thousand pounds gross vehicle weight by 10 vehicles or more per day; f) The location of the access driveway does not meet minimum sight distance requirements, as determined by the city engineer, or is located where vehicles entering or leaving the property are restricted, or such vehicles queue or hesitate on the state highway, creating a safety hazard at the discretion of the community development director; or g) A change in internal traffic patterns that, at the discretion of the Public Works Director, may cause safety problems, such as back-up onto a street or greater potential for traffic accidents. (4) Submittals: Provide two copies of the TIA for Public Works Department to review. (5) Elements of Analysis: A TIA shall be prepared by a Traffic Engineer or Civil Engineer licensed to practice in the State of Oregon with special training and experience in traffic engineering. The TIA shall be a thorough review of the effects a proposed use will have on the transportation system. The study area shall include all streets and intersections in the analysis, as defined in subsection (2) above. Traffic generated from a proposed site will be distributed throughout the transportation system using existing count data or the current transportation model used by the City. Any alternate distribution method must be based on data acceptable to the Public Works Department. The following checklist outlines what a TIA shall contain. Incomplete reports shall be returned to the applicant for completion without review: a) The scoping letter as provided by the Public Works Department; b) The Final TIA shall be signed and stamped by a Professional Civil or Traffic Engineer registered in the State of Oregon; c) An executive summary, discussing the development, the major findings of the analysis, and the mitigation measures proposed; d) A vicinity map of the proposed site and study area; e) Project characteristics such as zoning, potential trip generations (unless stipulated to less than potential), proposed access(s), and other pertinent factors; f) Street characteristics within the study area including functional classification, number of travel lanes, lane width, shoulder treatment, bicycle path corridors, and traffic control at intersections; g) Description of existing transportation conditions including transit accessibility, accident history, pedestrian facilities, bicycle facilities, traffic signals, and overall traffic operations and circulation; h) Peak period turning movement counts of at least two-hour minimums at study area intersections, less than 2 years old. These counts shall be adjusted to the design year of the project and consider seasonal traffic adjustments when required by the scoping letter; i) A "Figure" showing existing peak period (AM, noon, or PM, whichever is largest) turning movement volumes at study area intersections, as shown in Example 1. Approved applications obtained from the City that have not built out but will impact study 39 City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standards and Specifications mus 3/25/14 12:26 PM area intersections shall be included as pipeline traffic. An appropriate adjustment factor shall be applied to existing count data if counts were taken during the off-peak season; j) Potential "Project" trip generation using the most current edition of the ITE Trip Generation, as required by the Public Works Department at the time of scoping. Variations of trip rates will require the approval of the Public Works Department. Such approval will require submission of adequate supporting data prior to first submittal of the TIA; k) A "Figure" illustrating project turning movement volumes at study area intersections for peak periods, as shown in Example 2. Adjustments made for pass -by traffic volumes shall follow the methodology outlined in the latest edition of the ITE Trip Generation, and shall not exceed 25% unless approved by the Public Works Director; 1) A "Figure" illustrating the combined traffic of existing, background, and project turning movement volumes at study area intersections for peak periods, as shown in Example 3; m) Level of Service (LOS) analysis at study area intersections under the following conditions: (A) Existing plus pipeline traffic (B) Existing plus pipeline traffic and project traffic. A table shall be prepared which illustrates all LOS results. The table shall show LOS conditions with corresponding vehicle delays for signalized intersections and the critical movement at unsignalized intersections. If the proposed use is scheduled to be completed in phases, a LOS analysis shall be prepared for each phase; n) A mitigation plan if impacts to the study area reduce level of service (LOS) below minimums. Mitigation measures may include stipulations and/or construction of necessary transportation improvements. Mitigation measures shall be required to the extent that the transportation facilities, under City jurisdiction, operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS) with the addition of project traffic; and o) Intersections under jurisdiction of another agency, but still within the City limits, shall be evaluated by either the City's criteria or the other jurisdiction's criteria, or both, whichever is considered applicable by the Public Works Department. If the TIA is not consistent with the scoping letter (including any amendments) then the TIA will be returned to the applicant without review. (6) Analysis criteria: a) All trip distributions into and out of the transportation system must reflect existing traffic count data for consistency or follow the current transportation model used by the City. If alternate splits are used to distribute traffic then justification must be provided and approved by the Public Works Department prior to first submittal of the TIA. b) If progression analysis is being evaluated or queuing between intersections is a concern, the peak period used in the analysis must be the same for every intersection along the street and reflect that of the most critical intersection being evaluated. If a common peak period is not requested by the Public Works Department, then the actual peak period of every intersection shall be used. c) Counts performed must be a minimum of two hours and include the peak period for analysis purposes. All documentation shall be included in the TIA. d) All supporting count data, LOS analyses, pass -by deductions, growth rates, traffic 40 City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standards and Specifications `E 3/25/14 12:26 PM distributions, or other engineering assumptions must be clearly defined and attached to the TIA when submitted in report form to the City for review. e) All LOS analyses shall follow operational procedures per the current Highway Capacity Manual. Ideal saturation flow rates greater than 1800 vehicles per hour per lane should not be used unless otherwise measured in the project vicinity. Queue lengths shall be calculated at the 95th percentile where feasible. Actual peak hour factors should be used for each movement or lane grouping in the analysis. Peak hour factors over 0.90 shall not be used unless justified by specific counts at that location. f) Signal timing used in capacity or progression analysis shall follow City timing plans and account for pedestrian crossing times, unless otherwise noted in the scoping letter. g) Arrival Type 3 (random arrivals) shall be used unless a coordinated plan is in place during the peak period. 320.10.04 — Maintenance of level of Service D Whenever level of service is determined to be below level D for arterials or collectors, development is not permitted unless the developer makes the roadway or other improvements necessary to maintain level of service D respectively. 41 City of Central Point Department of Public Works Standards and Specifications `MN Public Works Department March 20, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: ACity-f Matt Samitore, Director CENTRAL POINT Oregon PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT SPAR -18001 1110,200 sq. ft. Fire Station Traffic: The applicant is proposing a 10,200 sq. ft. fire station. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) threshold is 25 PHT. A TIA was conducted by Southern Oregon Transportation. The results of the study show a center turn lane is needed from the intersection of Upton Road and Scenic Avenue west to the Scenic Middle School entrance. This center turn lane will allow for better overall circulation to the individual properties and queuing for traffic along Scenic Avenue. The intersection of Upton Road and Scenic Avenue is currently operating at a level of service m Land is expected to continue to function in that capacity. Public Works will continue to monitor the intersection as development applications in the area are submitted. Public Works concurs with the analysis. Existing Infrastructure: Water: There is 12 inch line in Scenic Avenue. Streets: Scenic is a two lane collector. Storm Water: There is 12 FT6W LL1iI2Q Offit the east side of the project site. Issues: There are two main issues: Scenic Avenue Improvements: The Fire District has agreed to improve the south side of Scenic Avenue in front of the subject site west to the entrance to Scenic Middle School. The City would like the street fully improved and has agreed to fund the improvements along the north side of Scenic Avenue. An Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) will need to be finalized based upon the engineers estimate and actual construction costs. 2. Storm Drain Improvements []There is no storm drain immediately in front of the project site. The existing 12 inch line will need to be extended at the LSS470QWexpense. Conditions of Approval: 1. PW Standards and Specifications ❑Applicant shall comply with the public works standards and specifications for construction within the right of way. 140 South 3rd Street Central Point, OR 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 113 2. Street Tree/Landscape Plan ❑Applicant will need to prepare a landscaping and irrigation plan to be reviewed and approved by the City for the existing landscape row. 3. Public Utility Easement - ❑SS(RDE LE13F 8 ] IMP HYB 8 ( Scenic Avenue frontage. 4. Scenic Avenue Construction []Applicant shall work with the City on an Intergovernmental Agreement for shared costs associated with the improvements along the north side of Scenic Avenue. 5. Scenic Avenue Center Turn Lane ❑Per the TIA findings and conclusions, the Scenic Avenue center turn lane shall be extended from the intersection of Upton Drive and Scenic Avenue west to the Scenic Middle School entrance. 6. Phasing ❑Proposed phasing of public improvements is not permitted. All infrastructure, including Scenic Avenue improvements and Rock Way construction, shall be completed prior to a final inspection by the Public Works Department. 7. Stormwater Management. ❑The project is within the Phase 2 stormwater quality area and will require a stormwater management plan that is in accordance with the Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual (RVSQDM). An operations and maintenance agreement for all new stormwater quality features is required. Construction on site must be sequenced so that the permanent stormwater quality features are installed and operational when stormwater runoff enters. 8. Erosion Control. ❑The proposed development will disturb more than one acre and will require an erosion and sediment control permit (NPDES 1200 -CN) from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). 114 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 868 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FIRE STATION ON LANDS WITHIN THE CIVIC ZONING DISTRICT. (File No: CUP -19001) WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a 1.76 acre site within the Civic zone with a 10,200 square foot fire station; and WHEREAS, on April 2, 2019 the City of Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly -noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the Staff Report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and WHEREAS, the application has been found to be consistent with the approval criteria applicable to Conditional Use Permits in accordance with Section 17.76 of the Central Point Municipal Code; and per conditions noted in the Staff Report dated April 2, 2019; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 868 does hereby approve the Conditional Use Permit application for Fire District 3. This approval is based on the findings and conditions of approval as set forth in Exhibit FA, ❑ the Planning Department Staff Report dated April 2, 2019, including attachments incorporated by reference. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 2nd day of April, 2019. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Planning Commission Resolution No. 868 (04/02/2019) ism SITE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW - SCENIC AVE. - FIRE DISTRICT 3 STAFF REPORT AORIL CENTRAL POINT Oregon STAFF REPORT March 26, 2019 AGENDA ITEM: VII -B (File No. SPAR -19001) Community Development Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director Consideration of a Site Plan and Architectural Review application for the construction of a 10,200 square foot fire station, including parking and landscape areas, at 1909 Scenic Avenue. The 1.76 acre site is within the Civic zoning district IND07S 2W 03AB Tax Lots 4400, 4500 and 4600. Applicant: Fire District 3; Agent: Matt Small; Kistler, Small & White Architects. SOURCE Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner II BACKGROUND The project area consists of three (3) properties that are located along the south side of Scenic Avenue, north of the Scenic Middle School site. A Zone Map Amendment to change the zoning designation of the property from Residential Single Family (R-1-8) to Civic was approved by the Central Point City Council on March 14, 2019 by Ordinance No. 2055. The use of the property for a public facility (fire station) is subject to a Conditional Use Permit review and approval (CUP -19001). Project Description: The current application is a Site Plan and Architectural Review for the construction of a 10,200 square foot fire station. The site plan for the proposed development includes parking, landscaping, street frontage improvements along Scenic Avenue and the extension of Rock Way to the south ®)WIT ❑7VEI7-11). The extension of Rock Way provides the primary access to the site and improves the overall circulation for the middle school during peak pick up and drop off times. On site circulation is provided by a one- way drive aisle with 45 -degree parking located along the south and west of the building. The apparatus bays feature a pull-through design so fire trucks will enter the site from Rock Way and access Scenic Avenue directly from the front of the building. The building is a single story building, with the roof above the apparatus bay extending to 27 -feet in height, and the main facade of the structure facing north towards Scenic Avenue. The facades of the building are articulated with variations vertically and horizontally that includes variations in color and material (Attachment FU - ISSUES There are two (2) issues relative to the proposal as follows: Property Lines. Through the review of the project, it was noted that the proposal occupies three (3) legal tax lots. The proposed structure is located across the common property boundary between the lots. Structures are not permitteldio cross property lines. Comment: As required per the Conditional Use Permit (File No. CUP -19001), the applicant shall legally adjust or consolidate the lots as necessary to avoid conflicts between the structure and the property lines. 2. Traffic Mitigation. 7ICESS MIIF�P SIFWI, ❑ EMIEEP Ism ELELDRm calculations for the proposed fire station and considered the effects on adjacent streets with current and future traffic volumes. Intersection operations and safety conditions were evaluated to address potential impacts and noted the following: a. Intersection Capacity and Level of Service. The TIA studied the efficiency of area intersections that may be influenced by traffic from the proposed fire station. The intersection at Scenic Avenue and Upton Road was initially shown to operate below an acceptable level of service per City standards. Further analysis, including a stop sign delay study, shows that the intersection is operation within acceptable standards and the traffic from the fire station will not further degrade the operating efficiency of the intersection below acceptable levels of service. No mitigation is required at this time. b. Turn Lane Criteria. Left and right turn lanes were evaluated along Scenic Avenue to determine whether turn lane criteria is met to require additional turn lanes along Scenic Avenue following the construction of the fire station. Following the construction of the fire station, the number of westbound vehicles projected to turn left during peak hours warrants a left -turn lane along Scenic Avenue at Rock Way and the intersection of Scenic Middle School. Comment: As required per the Conditional Use Permit (File No. CUP -19001), the applicant shall complete the frontage improvements along Scenic Avenue, including restriping Scenic Avenue to include a two-way left turn lane from the Scenic Middle School driveway east to the existing left turn lane of Upton Road. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The Fire District 3 Scenic Avenue Fire Station Site Plan and Architectural Review has been evaluated for compliance with the applicable Site Plan and Architectural Review Criteria set forth in CPMC 17.72 and CPMC 17.75 SS(lHXW = W NE,A) ON' ■I■J'lll■ ■1111 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall: a. Demonstrate compliance with the following conditions listed in the Public Works ■ ■'. :1A A1111 LN", Xi i is; ■'. ► :h�1111 .�di�.�' ■■��III ■111 118 i. Submit a landscape and irrigation plan for landscape and street tree installation along Scenic Avenue and the Rock Way extension. ii. Submit civil improvement plans to the Public Works Department for the street frontage improvements and street construction. The applicant shall use the 2014 revised Public Works Standards and Specifications for all new construction drawings. iii. Submit a stormwater management plan for the entire tax lot demonstrating compliance with the MS4 Phase II stormwater quality standards. iv. Any modifications to the site plan necessary to meet stormwater quality requirements shall be subject to CPMC 17.09, Modifications to Approved Plans and Conditions of Approval. v. Apply for an erosion and sediment control permit (NPDES 1200 -CN) and provide a copy to the Public Works Department. vi. Pay all System Development Charges and permit fees. b. Demonstrate compliance with the following conditions listed in the Rogue Valley Sewer 6 =EV6 WI ® C SKMEIN EP =WE= i. Submit construction plans, prepared per RVSS standards, for approval. ii. Obtain a sewer service permit from RVSS. This permit will be issued by RVSS upon submittal of appropriate plans and payment of appropriate fees. 2. Prior to Public Works Final Inspection, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the following: a. Complete Scenic Avenue frontage improvements and construction of Rock Way as required per the civil improvement and landscape and irrigation plans approved by the Public Works Department. b. Complete stormwater management improvements per the Stormwater Management Plan approved by the Public Works Department. c. Record an operations and maintenance agreement for all new stormwater quality features. d. Pay all System Development Charges and permit fees. 119 ATTACHMENTS AttachmEEWU—Site Plan ❑VMF1P EEWE-®Architectural Elevations ❑VMIT EIWU - Floor Plan ❑VMIT EIWU- Landscape Plan ❑)WEP DDYE ❑ ❑ ❑ SSUFEEWFindings ❑VMIT [BY&❑ ❑Parks & Public Works Department Staff Report dated 03-19-2019 ❑)MFEP EDND ❑ ❑Rogue Valley Sewer Services Staff Report dated 03-20-2019 ❑)MFEP EM =Resolution No. 869 ACTION Consideration of Resolution No. 869, Site Plan & Architectural Review application for Fire District 3 and 1) approve; 2) approve with modifications; or 3) deny the application. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution No. 869, Site Plan & Architectural Review for Fire District 3 per the Staff Report dated April 2, 2019, including all attachments thereto. 120 h ZOSL6 1f0 'lulod IeJiva0 �1N1prp ++ r (A v 5e any oluao5 6061 NOI1tl1S 3MI3 1NIOd IVNIN33 a e O £# 101M1SI0 3N13 AlNnOO NOSNOVr ss J{ co i �+ �� Iv ?a 2Q � QFiE E s o D sw a Tyne- t e x o 1 �:• Dis ': ° a Z i Lu H O i, pna< .•a3,. Z w iii z ep O Lu z �{ x .-......+•eslry_�iecx x y o s y al s o LU s s i I o > , , A a < i I F � 0 j W w H 0 z _ f z i rc .w�''� ~ •~ a N Z w AVM ADOa Lu e i I ; a t I a w 1 i O 1 I 1 - - 121 I 3 1 I r -.i. f t j � I F [ o 0 1 � O I 121 122 z� O Q z W 0 5 = LU U. LL > z� wO D CL O It J U 0 O LU w H W U W U Q W N Z LU N r z LU LU { LU m li I .-.9 W Q m I LU � U O U N { n a � x w z w O K _ LL W C O r z 0 Z D Q } OCO 3 w N m z o U W QW� O 2 J ? C6 90 0 r 0 20 0 J J o $ I I a 3 = N I m r w � Q uj O y Z m z Q � } I LL r Z I � � O I i I i t Rit O N O l�' w J L I io I LU � ly w 122 z� O Q z W 0 5 = LU U. LL > z� wO D CL O It J U 0 O LU w H W U W U Q W 123 z O Q°c H � N N N Z Win Q �_ LU it I— LL LL Q' Z J O � LU Il O tY J U gz O LU Z Y W U W U Q �Yo �L-� as �J� z . A# . � / t( \§ . | — � YZ z§ 124 �� i � \% ® !7 Via\ �� Ali & | . mA' a e \; 2 No1!¥Sku2@3 &! -§ �. g N � iMU g]¥w� NnOO NOS oV }[ ) " , . . \ \ � � - - - |,ul ..._..... ! ! ' /d ! \feoll )\}!|J �4RR�2 i� � Applicant: Jackson County Fire District 3 Attn: John Patterson 8383 Agate Road White City, OR 97503 541.826.7100 6ohnp(@0cfd3.com Agent: Kistler Small + White, Architects Attn: Matt Small 66 Water Street, Suite 101 Ashland, OR 97520 541.488.8200 ext 15 matt c�]r kistlersmallwhite.coii7 Project: New Scenic Avenue Fire Station JCFD3 — New Scenic Avenue Fire Station Site Plan and Architectural Review Project Narrative & Findings of Fact SECTION 1 — PROJECT NARRATIVE Project: • New +/-10,200 sq ft, six bay fire station, landscaping, driveways and Rock Way road extension. Project Location: • 1909 Scenic Avenue. Project site is on the south side of Scenic Avenue and north of the existing Scenic Middle School. The new station will be located between the middle school and Scenic Avenue. Map + Tax Lot. • 37S 2W 3ab, Tax Lots: 4500, 4600 • To accomplish the project objectives, coordination is required between Jackson County Fire District 3 (JCFD3) and the adjoining landowners, including the Housing Authority of Jackson County (HAJC) (TL 4700 and 4800) and School District 6 (SD6) (TL 4300 and 4400). Zoning: • Civic Project Intent: • Construct a new fire station serving the Central Point area. The new station will improve response times significantly to areas currently served by other JCFD3 stations. In addition, the new facility will contain a classroom available to the public and a fire wise landscaped demonstration area. Background and Special Considerations: • The design and location of the proposed fire station has required close collaboration between three separate property owners with each entity owning property affected by the proposed design. These entities include, Jackson County Fire District 3, School District 6 and the Housing Authority of Jackson County. Each property owner has reviewed the proposed design and have agreed to adjusting the property lines as necessary to accommodate the proposed design. 126 Rock Way Extension: An extension to Rock Way Street is proposed. The new road would extend south to Scenic Middle School, intersecting the existing school parking lot. This new extension will serve the new fire station, improve vehicular circulation for Scenic Middle School and provide future access to housing proposed by HAJC to be located east of the fire station and the Rock Way extension. The design team and the Fire District have worked extensively with the Central Point Public Works Department to assure a safe extension is provided meeting city standards. The construction of the extension will be phased, allowing JCFD3 to construct the portion of the road serving the station now and having HAJC come in later and finish their half when they are ready to build. Phasing the extension minimizes the initial expense for the fire district. The middle school will be accessible via the extension in each phase. There are no utilities planned or required in the Rock Way extension. Lot Line Adjustment/Consolidation: The project involves (3) separate property Owners, JCFD3, HAJC and SD6 and the proposed project spans properties owned by all three Owners. This will require adjustments to the existing property lines. A Traffic Impact Analysis has been prepared and a copy of the report is included with these findings. Provided below are responses to the application approval criteria in Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 17.72, Site Plan and Architectural Review. SECTION 2 — SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (CPMC 17.72) 17.72.020 Applicability No permit required under Title 15, Buildings and Construction, shall be issued for a major or minor project as defined in this section, unless an application for site plan and architectural review is submitted and approved, or approved with conditions as set forth in this chapter. A. Exempt Projects. Except as provided in subsection (B)(3) of this section the following projects do not require site plan and architectural review: 1. Single-family detached residential structures; 2. Any multiple -family residential project containing three or less units; 3. Landscape plans, fences, when not part of a major project; 4. Storage sheds, patio covers, garages and carports, decks, gazebos, and similar non - occupied structures used in conjunction with residential uses; and 5. Signs that conform to a previously approved master sign program for the project site. Exempt projects are required to comply with all applicable development standards of this chapter. Findinq CPMC 17.72.020(A): As evidenced by these application submittal documents, the application has been submitted to the City for review in accordance with this section. Conclusion CPMC 17.72.020(A): Consistent. B. Major Projects. The following are "major projects" for the purposes of the site plan and architectural review process and are subject to Type 2 procedural requirements as set forth in Chapter 17.05, Applications and Types of Review Procedures: 1. New construction, including private and public projects, that: a.lnclude a new building or building addition of five thousand square feet or more; 127 b.lnclude the construction of a parking lot of ten or more parking spaces; or c.Requires one or more variances or conditional use permits and, in the judgment of the director, will have a significant effect upon the aesthetic character of the city or the surrounding area; 2. Any attached residential project that contains four or more units; 3. Any minor project, as defined in subsection C of this section, that the director determines will significantly alter the character, appearance, or use of a building or site. Finding CPMC 17.72.020(B): The proposed project includes the construction of a new, 10,200 square foot fire station, extensive site work including landscaping and vehicular circulation/parking and therefore is considered a "major project". Per CPMC 17.05.100, Table 1, Site Plan and Architectural Review (Major Project) is subject to the Type II review procedures set forth in CPMC 17.05.300. As evidenced by the application submittal documents, the application has been submitted to the City for review in accordance with these procedures. Conclusion CPMC 17.72.020(B): Consistent. C. Minor Projects. Except when determined to be an exempt project or a major project pursuant to subsections A and B of this section respectively, the following are defined as "minor projects" for the purposes of site plan and architectural review, and are subject to the Type I procedural requirements of Chapter 17.05, Applications and Types of Review Procedures: 1. New construction, including private and public projects, that involves a new building or building addition of less than five thousand square feet; 2. Signs that meet all applicable standards as set forth in Section 17.75.050, Signage standards; 3. Exterior remodeling within the commercial or industrial zoning districts when not part of a major project; 4. Parking lots less than ten parking spaces; 5. Any project relating to the installation of cabinets containing communications service equipment or facilities owned and operated by a public utility and not subject to Section 17.60.040, Antenna standards; 6. Minor changes to the following: 7. Plans that have previously received site plan and architectural review approval; 8. Previously approved planned unit developments; 9. At the discretion of the director any changes to previously approved plans requiring site plan and architectural review. As used in this subsection, the term "minor" means a change that is of little visual significance, does not materially alter the appearance of previously approved improvements, is not proposed for the use of the land in question, and does not alter the character of the structure involved. At the discretion of the director if it is determined that the cumulative effect of multiple minor changes would result in a major change, a new application for site plan and architectural review is required. All minor changes must comply with the development standards of this chapter. Finding CPMC 17.72.020(C): Not Applicable. 128 Conclusion CPMC 17.72.020(C): Not Applicable. 17.72.030 Information Required. Application for site plan and architectural review shall be made to the community development department and shall be accompanied by the application fee prescribed in the city of Central Point planning department fee schedule. The application shall be completed, including all information and submittals listed on the official site plan and architectural review application form. Finding CPMC 17.72.030: A completed Site Plan and Architectural Review Application form has been submitted along with the following: $3100 application fee, Architectural Site Plan (with legal description), Architectural Elevations, Landscape Plan, Irrigation Plan, written authority from Property Owner, these Findings of Fact, Traffic Impact Analysis, Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan and mailing labels. Conclusion CPMC 17.72.030: Consistent. 17.72.040 Site Plan and Architecture Standards. In approving, conditionally approving, or denying any site plan and architectural review application, the approving authority shall base its decision on compliance with the following standards: A. Applicable site plan, landscaping, and architectural design standards as set forth in Chapter 17.75, Design and Development Standards; Finding CPMC 17.72.040(A): See Section 3, Design and Development Standards Findings. Conclusion CPMC 17.72.040(A): Consistent. B. City of Central Point Department of Public Works Department Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works Construction; Finding CPMC 17.72.040(6): All pertinent details and construction elements will be constructed to the City of Central Point's Public Works standards. A civil engineer is included as part of the project team. Conclusion CPMC 17.72.040(B): Consistent. C. Accessibility and sufficiency of firefighting facilities to such a standard as to provide for the reasonable safety of life, limb and property, including, but not limited to, suitable gates, access roads and fire lanes so that all buildings on the premises are accessible to fire apparatus. Finding CPMC 17.72.040(C): The proposed facility is a new fire station with fire apparatus on the premises and sufficient access to this apparatus as demonstrated in the attached Site Plan. Conclusion CPMC 17.72.040(C): Consistent. SECTION 3 - 17.75 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Address the proposal's compliance with standards in CPMC 17.75 below. If a standard is not applicable, check the "N/A" box and explain why the standard doesn't apply in the "Finding" section. 129 CPMC 17.75.031 General Connectivity, Circulation & Access Standard N/A Finding The Rock Way extension will be constructed to the City of Central 17.75.031(A) Streets & Utilities 17.75.035(A) Commercial Site That the proposed fire station meets these standards. Point standards. There are no utilities proposed or required for the n ❑ Rock Way extension. The existing stormwater system along Scenic Table 17.75.01 Commercial Site Development Standards Avenue will be replaced with a new system including curb/gutter and C -N C -2(M) C-4 catch basins matching the system in place on Scenic Avenue east of Lot Area N/A the site. No new blocks will be created. 17.75.031(B) Block Standards X 1. Block Perimeter No new blocks will be created. X 2. Block Length X No new blocks will be created. 3.Accessways and/or X No new blocks will be created. Private/Retail Streets Front Yard 4. Modification of block X No new blocks will be created. perimeters and length Side Yard 17.75.031(C) Driveway and 5 ft. N/A' All new access and driveways will be constructed in Property Access Standards LJ € accordance with the City of Central Point standards. _ 17.75.031 (D) Pedestrian Lot Coverage A new sidewalk is proposed along the fire station's Scenic Circulation N/A Avenue frontage matching the existing sidewalk east of 35 ft. _ 35 ft. 60 ft. the site. An entry plaza fronting Scenic Avenue will 1. Unless otherwise demonstrated at time of site plan and architectural review approval wherever the side or rear yard resent a safe, pleasant entry into the proposed facility. 17.75.031(E) Accessways, X No new blocks will be created. Pedestrian 17.75.031(F) Retail Streets X No new blocks will be created. CPMC 17.75.035 Commercial Site Design & Development Standards Standard i N/A Finding 17.75.035(A) Commercial Site That the proposed fire station meets these standards. Design per Table 17.75.01 (Below) n Table 17.75.01 Commercial Site Development Standards C -N C -2(M) C-4 C-5 Lot Area N/A N/A N/A N/A Lot Width N/A N/A N/A 50 ft. Lot Depth N/A N/A N/A 100 ft. Setbacks Front Yard N/A 15 ft. N/A N/A Side Yard N/A 5 ft. N/A' N/A' Rear Yard N/A N/A N/A2,3 N/A2,3 Lot Coverage 50% 50% N/A N/A Bldg. Height 35 ft. _ 35 ft. 60 ft. 35 ft. 1. Unless otherwise demonstrated at time of site plan and architectural review approval wherever the side or rear yard property lines of a commercially zoned parcel abut parcels in a residential district, a solid wall or fence, vine -covered 130 open fence or compact evergreen hedge six feet in height shall be located on that property line and continuously maintained to ensure effective buffering and visual screening between the two land uses. 2. Where abutting a residential zone the rear yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten feet. 3. Except when the rear property line abuts any residential district or any unincorporated lands, the rear yard shall be increased by one-half foot for each foot of building height in excess of twenty feet. Lprmu ia.0 iu urr-atreez rarKing uesign ana ueveiopment btanaaras Standard N/A Finding The proposed parking areas connect to the neighboring 17.75.039(A) Connectivity ❑ middle school and future housing development via the _promo osed Rock Way extension. Per CPMC 17.75.039, Table 17.75.02 for 90 degree 17.75.039(6) Parking Stall Minimum Dimensions ❑ parking the required dimensions are as follows: 1. Width: 9'-0". 2. Length: 19'-0". Proposed parking stall widths are 9'-0" and lengths 19'-0" with 24"-0" aisle widths. 17.75.039 (C) Access Parking areas are served by a minimum 24'-0" deep ❑ access aisle and direct access to on-site vehicular circulation. 17.75.039(D) Driveways Per current City of Central Point Public Works standard drawing A-10 driveways shall be 12'-0" to 50'-0" wide. There are three driveways — two of them are within ❑ drawing A -10's limitations at 24'-0" and 36'-0" wide. The third driveway serves the apparatus bay and is 58'-4" wide, exceeding the standard's limitations. The extra width is required to adequately serve the three -bay ❑ apparatus space. The criteria for this section are met as evidenced by the 17.75.039(E) Improvement of Parking Spaces responses below. 1. Concrete curb wheel stops X Wheel stops are not being used. i.... 2.Paving and striping ......... The proposed parking areas are paved ac paving and requirements graded such that stormwater will be directed into an on- site stormwater drainage system. Individual parking spaces are delineated with painted stripes. 3. Design for uses other than one Parking spaces are designed so that no backing and two family dwellings I] movements or other maneuvering within a street or other __public right-of-way is necessary. 4. Lighting for off-street parking The lighting of the proposed parking areas will be and loading areas achieved by way of pole lights erected adjacent to each ❑ parking area. Each light fixture will be directed downward to eliminate light spilling onto adjacent properties and/or streets. 5.Service drive minimum ❑Vision .................. clearance "triangles" have been provided at each clearance area of the service driveways. 6. Perimeter off-street parking X There are no proposed perimeter off street parking space containment space proposed. 7. Parking, loading, orThere are no parking spaces proposed within the maneuvering setback ❑ required setbacks. limitations 131 8.Vehicle turnaround and --The facility has no parking areas that directly access a maneuvering requirements. street. _ 17.75.039(F) Limitation on Use of The proposed parking areas are designed exclusively for Parking Areas. the use of parking. They are paved with stormwater drainage incorporated into the design and concrete sidewalks directing pedestrians to the primary entries of the building. 17.75.039(G) Parking/Loading The criteria for this section are met as evidenced by the Facility Landscaping and �^1— responses below. Screening. 1. Perimeter and Street Meets standard. Frontage Landscaping L Requirements Table 17.75.03 Parkin /Loading Facility Perimeter and Street Frontage Landscaping Standards Plants Required per 100 Lineal Ft of Abutting Min. Planting Area Width Pro ert Street Fronta a Trees Shrubs Arterial/Collector 15 ft. 4 20 Local 10 ft. 3 15 Perimeter (Abutting) Land Use Residential 20 ft. 4 20 Commercial loft - 3 15 _____ Industrial 5 ft. 2 10 2. Terminal and Interior Islands X Proposed parking areas do not exceed ten parking spaces. 3. Bioswales The stormwater management for the project will direct all X stormwater to a detention/treatment pond located outside of the parking areas. CPMC 17.64.40, Table 17.64.04 does not specify a 17.75.039(H) Bicycle Parking number of bicycle parking spaces required for a fire station. In lieu of a specified number the Applicant proposes to meet the 2 spaces or 1 space per 1,000 sq. Cl ft. whichever is greater requirements typical of other, similar facilities. Calculating the required number of spaces therefore: 10,200 sq. ft./1000 sq. ft. = 10.2 bicycle parking spaces required. The Applicant is proposing 10 bicycle spaces. 1. Location of Bicycle Parking Ten bicycle parking spaces are provided at the northeast corner of the building near the entry into the proposed LI classroom and near the main public entry into the facility. The parking is attached to and accessed from a proposed concrete sidewalk. 2. Bicycle Parking Design As evidenced below the proposed bicycle parking areas Standards n have been designed per the City of Central Point E] standards. ........ The parking surface will be concrete. A single bicycle rack is proposed able to accommodate a. Surfacing b. Parking Space Dimension Standard ten bicycles. The concrete surface is proposed to be 6'- 132 CPMC 17.75.042 Commercial Building Design Standards Standard NIA 6" deep by 14'-0" wide to easily accommodate the 17.75.042(A) Massing, bicycles. c. Lighting The bike rack will be lighted via a proposed street light to ❑ be located at the southwest corner of Scenic Avenue and ❑ the proposed Rock Way extension. A 5'-0" maneuvering area is provided by the adjacent d. Aisles ❑ gabled roofs, each clearly articulating the building space sidewalk. e. Signs The bike rack is located on the frontlentry side of the length and therefore must comply with this standard. The X facility facing Scenic Avenue and will be readily visible building into three primary building components each from the primary rights of way and the main facility entry. having its own gable roofline. In addition, the front fagade 3. Exceptions to BicycleX Exceptions to the bicycle parking codes are not Parking building facade is further articulated with a consistent 24" requested. CPMC 17.75.042 Commercial Building Design Standards Standard NIA Findin 17.75.042(A) Massing, Articulation, Transparency and ❑ Entrances 1. Building Massing The top of the building is emphasized by a series of ❑ gabled roofs, each clearly articulating the building space _below it. The front, Scenic Avenue facade is roughly 145'-0" in 2. Fagade Articulation length and therefore must comply with this standard. The fagade articulation is accomplished by dividing the building into three primary building components each having its own gable roofline. In addition, the front fagade is staggered with offsets of 5'-6", 8'-4" and 15'-6". The building facade is further articulated with a consistent 24" tall concrete base and varying exposures of cementitious horizontal siding above. The siding is divided by a horizontal band at header height creating two distinct areas on the facade and allowing a change in color and siding exposures. The main pedestrian entrance for the station faces Scenic 3. Pedestrian Entrances Avenue. It is identified by a change in direction of the roofline as well as a setback of the front fagade. The recessed area and overhang from the roof clearly define ❑ this area as the main entrance. In addition there are planter areas on each side of the entrance — the symmetry of these planters further define the location of the main entry as do two, prominent flag poles located near the entrance. 4. Transparency ❑ The intent of this section is met as demonstrated in the responses 4a. — 4e. below. a. Ground Floor Facade Wall The percentage of transparent glazing proposed for the Area ❑ fagade wall is 46% as follows: Total Wall = 1,746 s.f. X 40% = 698.4 s.f. Total proposed glazing = 810.06 s.f. > 698.4 s.f. 133 b. Second Floor I X The facility is one story c. Single -story building The percentage of transparent glazing proposed for the facades greater than 20- "second floor" of the facade wall is 25% as follows: Total feet ❑ Wall (above 15'-0" and between 3%0" and 8'-0") = 117.08 s.f. X 25% = 29.3 s.f. Total proposed glazing = 29.3 s.f. _ 29.3 s.f. d. Wall facades built to interior X The building does not have a wall built to an interior mid - mid -block property line block property line. e. Alternative design solutions Not applicable. The proposed building includes X transparent windows on the front facade in excess of the 40% requirement. 5. Wall Faces. The intent of this section is met as demonstrated in the responses 5a. — 5c. below. a. Fagade Wall Face This criterium is met as the building's front facade has three setbacks greater than 24" and gabled roofs. In addition the front facade has three changes in color and material creating three distinctive horizontal bands. The ❑ three bands include 1. a concrete base, 2. horizontal siding matching the header heights of the windows painted gray and 3. another band of horizontal siding painted a lighter shade of gray separated from the lower band with a trim board painted with an even lighter shade of gray. b. Building Wall Face The intent of this section is met by providing the following: East Wall Face: 1. Gable roof provides a varying roof height. 2. A secondary, glazed, storefront entrance is provided on this elevation. 3. The form of the wall face includes a 24'-0" setback and a sloped roof and the materials include a 2'-0" tall concrete base, standing seam metal roofing and horizontal cementitious siding. West Wall Face: 1. Gable roof provides a varying roof height. 2. A secondary, glazed, storefront type entrance is provided on this elevation. 3. The form of the wall face ❑ includes two 7'-0" setbacks and a sloped roof and the materials include a 2'-0" tall concrete base, standing seam metal roofing and horizontal cementitious siding. South Wall Face: 1. Varying rooflines by using gabled roofs. 2. Three glazed secondary entrances are provided. 3. Variation of building form and materials demonstrated by the following: Form: wall face is comprised of two distinctive three-dimensional forms defined by changes in rooflines and setbacks. Material: use of a metal roofing, concrete base and two types of horizontal siding. c. Other Wall Faces X No other walls abut a residential area. f The criteria for this section is met as demonstrated in the 6. Service Area & Rooftop n Equipment Screening responses below. 134 a. Service Areas U b. Rooftop Equipment X There are two on grade service areas proposed — one for HVAC units and one for a compressor. Each area will be enclosed by 6'-0" tall concrete masonry walls and metal gates. There will be no roof mounted equipment. In conclusion, we believe the application submittal package demonstrates compliance with the approval criteria for zone map amendments in the Central Point Municipal Code. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. Matthew J. Small, Architect Kistler Small + White, Architects 541.488.8200 Ext 15 135 Public Works Department March 20, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: ACity-f Matt Samitore, Director CENTRAL POINT Oregon PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT SPAR -18001 1110,200 sq. ft. Fire Station Traffic: The applicant is proposing a 10,200 sq. ft. fire station. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) threshold is 25 PHT. A TIA was conducted by Southern Oregon Transportation. The results of the study show a center turn lane is needed from the intersection of Upton Road and Scenic Avenue west to the Scenic Middle School entrance. This center turn lane will allow for better overall circulation to the individual properties and queuing for traffic along Scenic Avenue. The intersection of Upton Road and Scenic Avenue is currently operating at a level of service m Land is expected to continue to function in that capacity. Public Works will continue to monitor the intersection as development applications in the area are submitted. Public Works concurs with the analysis. Existing Infrastructure: Water: There is 12 inch line in Scenic Avenue. Streets: Scenic is a two lane collector. Storm Water: There is 12 FT6W LL1iI2Q Offit the east side of the project site. Issues: There are two main issues: Scenic Avenue Improvements: The Fire District has agreed to improve the south side of Scenic Avenue in front of the subject site west to the entrance to Scenic Middle School. The City would like the street fully improved and has agreed to fund the improvements along the north side of Scenic Avenue. An Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) will need to be finalized based upon the engineers estimate and actual construction costs. 2. Storm Drain Improvements []There is no storm drain immediately in front of the project site. The existing 12 inch line will need to be extended at the LSS470QWexpense. Conditions of Approval: 1. PW Standards and Specifications ❑Applicant shall comply with the public works standards and specifications for construction within the right of way. 140 South 3rd Street Central Point, OR 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 136 2. Street Tree/Landscape Plan ❑Applicant will need to prepare a landscaping and irrigation plan to be reviewed and approved by the City for the existing landscape row. 3. Public Utility Easement - ❑SS(RDE LE13F 8 ] IMP HYB 8 ( Scenic Avenue frontage. 4. Scenic Avenue Construction []Applicant shall work with the City on an Intergovernmental Agreement for shared costs associated with the improvements along the north side of Scenic Avenue. 5. Scenic Avenue Center Turn Lane ❑Per the TIA findings and conclusions, the Scenic Avenue center turn lane shall be extended from the intersection of Upton Drive and Scenic Avenue west to the Scenic Middle School entrance. 6. Phasing ❑Proposed phasing of public improvements is not permitted. All infrastructure, including Scenic Avenue improvements and Rock Way construction, shall be completed prior to a final inspection by the Public Works Department. 7. Stormwater Management. ❑The project is within the Phase 2 stormwater quality area and will require a stormwater management plan that is in accordance with the Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual (RVSQDM). An operations and maintenance agreement for all new stormwater quality features is required. Construction on site must be sequenced so that the permanent stormwater quality features are installed and operational when stormwater runoff enters. 8. Erosion Control. ❑The proposed development will disturb more than one acre and will require an erosion and sediment control permit (NPDES 1200 -CN) from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). 137 'U01 sfw . - March 19, 2018 F1 F1 ❑ F1 ❑A❑❑E❑ FIE F1 E❑ FIE ❑❑FCE❑ Location: 138 West Vilas Road, Central Point, OR - Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3130, Central Point, OR 7502-0005 Tel. (541) 664-6300, Fax (541) 664-7171 www.RVSS.us City of Central Point Planning Department 155 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon 97502 Re: SPR 19001 & CUP -19001, Fire Dist 3, Tax Lots 4400, 4500 & 4600, Map 37 2W 03AB Ref: PRE 18005 The existing property is currently served by a 4 inch sewer connection to the 8 inch main along Scenic Avenue. The existing service may be used for the development if found to be in good working condition. If the service is not in good condition it must be abandoned per RVSS standards and a new tap must be provided. Rogue Valley Sewer Services requests that approval of this project be subject to the following conditions: Prior to the start of construction: 1. Applicant must provide civil construction plans for RVSS review. 2. Applicant must provide architectural plumbing plans for the calculation of related SDC fees. 3. Applicant must obtain a sewer connection permit or sewer tap and abandonment permit from RVSS as applicable. 4. Applicant must pay related sewer connection fees. During Construction: Sewer facilities must be constructed and inspected per RVSS standards. Feel free to contact me with any questions. 112 113-alel� Nicholas R. Bakke, PE District Engineer K:\DATA\AGENCIES\CENTPT\PLANNG\SITEPLANREVIEW\2019\SPR 19001, CUP- 19001_FIRE DIST 3.DOC 138 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 869 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR A FIRE STATION ON LANDS WITHIN THE CIVIC MINI 101217K1111;7[ON 9 (File No: SPAR -19001) WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a site plan and architectural review application to develop a 10,200 square foot fire station on a 1.76 acre site within the Civic zoning identified on the Jackson ❑REEVOEI M11REMP ESQ 2 103AB, Tax Lots 4400, 4500 and 4600, Central Point, Oregon; and WHEREAS, W:13 WTU LURP P S criteria applicable to Site Plan and Architectural Review in accordance with Section 17.72 and Design and Development Standards in accordance with Section 17.75; and WHEREAS, on April 2, 2019, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City of Central Point Planning EIRP P 1=1R FRI IT SSffiEMffor Site Plan and Architectural Review approval, at which time it reviewed the Staff Report and heard testimony and comments on the application; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 869 does hereby approve the Site Plan and Architectural Review application for Fire District 3 S Planning Department Staff Report dated April 2, 2019, including attachments incorporated by reference. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 2nd day of April, 2019. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: City Representative Planning Commission Resolution No. 869 (04/02/2019) 139 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAPPING ALTERNATIVES 140 ❑❑A❑❑ ❑E❑❑❑❑ April 2, 2019 A❑enda [tem: ❑®A Discuss preliminary mapping alternatives for the Residential Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) Amendment. Applicant: City of Central Point. File No. CPA -19001. ❑taini❑❑rce: Stephanie Holtey, Principal Planner Bac❑❑r❑❑nd The City's last residential Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) amendment occurred in 1983. Since that time, the City has grown substantially adding 4,450 units on 885 gross acres. It is expected that the City will continue to grow at a steady rate adding 7,216 people and 2,887 households over the next 20 -years. Based on the Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI), the City doesn't have enough land inside the current UGB to accommodate forecast growth and will need to expand its UGB to provide land supply for residential, park and school needs (Table 1). —7019-2039 Residential Forecast Population Growth 2019-2039 7,216 people No. Persons per Household 2.5 No. New Households 2019-2039 2,887 Average Minimum Gross Density 2019-2039 7.04 units/acre Gross Residential Land Need 410 acres Available Buildable Lands 105 acres Additional Residential Land Need 305 acres As the City adds new housing, additional parkland and school capacity will be needed. The Parks Element identifies a need to add 54 acres of parkland to serve forecast population growth for the 20 -year planning period. Per School District 6, additional land may be needed to accommodate a new school. At this time, the City is evaluating alternative boundary locations for a residential UGB amendment, including 305 acres for housing, 54 acres of park land and 16 acres for schools. Locational Analysis Description: When considering amendments to the UGB, the City must demonstrate a need for the added land as well as forethought regarding its location. The Urbanization Element establishes a list of locational criteria to be used in evaluating alternative boundary locations. These include: 1. Properties that abut either the City Limits or current UGB; 2. Properties that are greater than 10 acres in size; Properties that abut or are within 500 -ft of basic urban services (i.e. water, sewer, stormwater); 141 4. Properties that are proximate to or include mixed use/pedestrian friendly areas; 5. Compatibility with nearby agricultural uses outside the proposed UGB; 6. Proximity to transportation infrastructure; 7. Lands that have been master planned; 8. Readiness for development; and, 9. Proximity to the City Center using a central growth pattern. Attached for discussion and input are two (2) alternative boundary locations prepared by staff. These represent two possible scenarios based on application of coarse locational criteria: the location of larger parcels (i.e. greater than 10 acres) that abut the UGB, are within 500 -ft of basic urban services, and have a master plan. Additional consideration has been given to proximity to and inclusion of activity centers, proximity to transportation infrastructure and whether there is any evidence of development readiness (i.e. master plan, written request to be included in the UGB). The two alternatives prepared for preliminary consideration include: x Staff Alternative IA (Attachment "A"). This alternative applies the coarse locational criteria addressed above but emphasizes inclusion of larger lots (i.e. greater than 10 acres) resulting in greater acreage east of Interstate 5 between Upton and Gebhard Roads and north to Wilson Road. x Staff Alternative 1B (Attachment `B"). This alternative applies the coarse locational criteria addressed above but increases the emphasis on small to mid-size parcels with access to services and exception lands in proximity to basic urban services. IMMENSE At the April 2, 2019 Planning Commission, staff will present the preliminary alternative boundary scenarios for discussion and input. At the conclusion of the meeting staff is seeking direction regarding the preferred alternative and any necessary changes or refinements. Suggested topics for discussion include: x Questions or concerns with how the criteria were applied. x Preferred approach to locational analysis: I or 1B. x Recommended changes to the mapping based on adopted locational criteria. The alternative boundary locations including Planning Commission comments will be presented at the April 9, 2019 CAC meeting for further public input. It is recommended that a follow-up discussion based on Planning Commission, CAC and public input be scheduled for the May 7, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. This will allow the Planning Commission to review further comments and input received along with recommended changes prior to finalizing the mapping needed for the Residential UGB Amendment application. Attachment❑ Attachment "A" — Preliminary Residential UGB Amendment, Staff Alternative I Attachment `B" — Preliminary Residential UGB Amendment, Staff Alternative 1B 142 CENTRAL POINT A❑❑AC❑ME❑❑ ❑A❑ CN • -- - - - - - _ _ _ Ou®4onaHe Furore: May h �n negpllaAon kr wrNnu EfrtJnmstl tonloc aan cenneclleri \ ktxeen GeMertl,WNon ena Upton Boon Pah {Chrauneaa SMom plWictBPmpeRy _ N tixAY Ixmerl 941 CP -1C lW aMnineba in SmlaAhemmhe beraum� Zl Faaw�ee�[w�de cnn�aMihN�lafonam ea _-- 157 ate_ .. Lo C 1 wamr faciBy ran�uon G.e. eruem bopnel. o I Nm pandeMean Plnn. xlnYh Face SmNAiMrn Mese Ids W Mws n w�nnaRl� -- -•--- vemamim siwn m,rr tamer 143 Residential UGB Amendment Project Staff Alternative -JAZ AEEACEME00 EIBE N50 -- AOM& CENTRAL POINT 144 Residential UGB Amendment Project Staff Alternative -JAZ .............................. ....... ... In tln bb mbar on &cmk 157 1 7_—T 942 o N50 -- AOM& CENTRAL POINT 144 Residential UGB Amendment Project Staff Alternative -JAZ