The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCAP031419 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Oregon City Council Meeting Agenda Thursday, March 14, 2019 Mayor Hank Williams Ward I Neil Olsen Ward II Kelley Johnson Ward III Brandon Thueson Ward IV Taneea Browning At Large Rob Hernandez At Large Michael Parsons At Large Michael Parsons Next Res(1571) Ord (2052) I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 1. Fire District #3 Annual Report 2. Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report (Holtey) V. PUBLIC COMMENTS Public comment is for non-agenda items. If you are here to make comments on a specific agenda item, you must speak at that time. Please limit your remarks to 3 minutes per individual, 5 minutes per group, with a maximum of 20 minutes per meeting being allotted for public comments. The council may ask questions but may take no action during the public comment section of the meeting, except to direct staff to prepare a report or place an item on a future agenda. Complaints against specific City employees should be resolved through the City’s Personnel Complaint procedure. The right to address the Council does not exempt the speaker from any potential liability for defamation. VI. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of February 28, 2019 City Council Minutes VII. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA VIII. ORDINANCES, AND RESOLUTIONS A. Ordnance No. ________, Updating and Adopting the Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039), Central Point Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element (Holtey) B. Ordinance No. ___________, Updating and Adopting the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element (2019-2039) (Humphrey) C. Ordinance No. ________, An Ordinance to Update and Adopt the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Population Element (2019-2039) (Holtey) D. Ordinance No. _________, a Minor Zone Map Amendment on 1.76 acres located at 1909 Scenic Avenue on property identified on the Jackson County Assessor’s Map as 37S 2W 03AB, Tax Lots 4400, 4500 & 4600. Applicant: Fire District 3. (File No. ZC-18007) (Gindlesperger) E. Ordinance No. _____, Amending in Part and Repealing In Part Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 8.05 Regarding Storm Drain Protection (Dreyer) F. Resolution No. _______, A Resolution Adopting the Special Event Fee Schedule 2019 (Samitore) IX. BUSINESS A. Planning Commission Report for the March 5, 2019 (Humphrey) X. MAYOR'S REPORT XI. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT XII. COUNCIL REPORTS XIII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS XIV. EXECUTIVE SESSION - 192-660 (2)(h) Legal Counsel The City Council will adjourn to executive session under the provisions of ORS 192.660. Under the provisions of the Oregon Public Meetings Law, the proceedings of an executive session are not for publication or broadcast. XV. ADJOURNMENT Individuals needing special accommodations such as sign language, foreign language interpreters or equipment for the hearing impaired must request such services at least 72 hours prior to the City Council meeting. To make your request, please contact the City Recorder at 541-423-1026 (voice), or by e-mail to Deanna.casey@centralpointoregon.gov. Si necesita traductor en español o servicios de discapacidades (ADA) para asistir a una junta publica de la ciudad por favor llame con 72 horas de anticipación al 541-664-3321 ext. 201 City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Community Development FROM: Stephanie Holtey, Principal Planner MEETING DATE: March 14, 2019 SUBJECT: Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report ACTION REQUIRED: Information/Direction RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable On behalf of the City, Northwest Research Group conducted a survey of citizens residing in Central Point earlier this year. The purpose of the survey is to determine citizen satisfaction and expectations relative to city service delivery and overall quality of life. Additionally the survey asked residents about priorities and preferences in regard to important City programs, budget items and policy related matters. Similar surveys have been conducted in 2010, 2012, and 2014/15 and are important part of maintaining regular communication and positive relationships with the community. At the March 14, 2019 meeting, Rebecca Elmore-Yalch and Nathan Wiggin will be presenting the survey results including the 5 Star Rating System score and a geographic analysis of survey results by neighborhood. A copy of the Neighborhood Map is attached for your reference along with a copy of the Final Report. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Neighborhood Areas 2. Citizen Survey Slides 4.2 Packet Pg. 3 I H G F E D C B A Central Point Neighborhood Areas E Legend Area A Area B Area C Area D Area E Area F Area G Area H Area I 0 1,600 3,200800 Feet Created by: Stephanie Holtey, Principal PlannerDate: October 16, 2018 4.2.a Packet Pg. 4 Attachment: Neighborhood Areas (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Council Presentation Date: March 14, 2019 City of Central Point, OR 2019 Resident Survey 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 1 4.2.b Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Overview •This is an “executive summary” •A final report containing detailed results for all questions is in draft form and should be completed by the end of the March •What’s covered •Who we talked to (Methodology / Outcome) •5-Star Rating •Things enjoyed most about Central Point •Key Drivers (How to “move the needle”) •Funding of City services and facilities •Police and Safety •Parks and Recreation 2 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 4.2.b Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Who we talked to Methodology and Outcomes 3 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 3 4.2.b Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Methodology •Address-Based Sample (ABS) and mixed mode data collection •ABS ensures complete coverage of all households in Central Point regardless of phone coverage •Different outreach methods (mail, email, and phone) increases response rates, notably among harder to reach populations (e.g., low income, renters, younger residents) Address only (no phone) •Invitation and reminder mailed •Emails sent if email available •Surveys completed online or inbound phone call •Incentive (choice of $5 water bill or $5 discount on city-run recreation program) given to those who completed survey online and inbound call Address + phone contact •Email invitation sent if email available, surveys completed online •Outbound calls to sample of phone numbers; focus on cell phone •Incentive given to those who completed survey online (email invite); no incentive for outbound calls 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 4 4.2.b Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Outcomes •A total of 1,054 surveys were completed •The is significantly larger than our target (n=400) and increases the reliability of the results for the total sample and for key subgroups (e.g., neighborhood / district, key demographic segments) 5 2016 2018 Online 295 745 Phone 216 232* Total 511 977 Margin of Error (95% confidence level) 4.3% 3.1% * Six of these calls were inbound calls 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY Sample sizes (n) are unweighted 4.2.b Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Sample Demographics •Sample demographics were monitored during data collection to ensure that key segments were represented •Data are weighted to address non- response bias and to ensure that responses represent Central Point’s diverse population 6 2018 Central Point Survey (unweighted) 2018 Central Point Survey (weighted) Central Point Population* Gender Male Female 43% 56% 49% 51% 49% 51% Age** 18–34 35–54 55 Plus 20% 32% 47% 27% 40% 33% 30% 39% 31% Race White Alone Not White Alone 68% 32% 47% 53% 47% 53% Income Less than $35,000 $35,000 or greater 17% 83% 24% 76% 28% 72% Children in Household None One or More 72% 28% 66% 34% 67% 33% Home Ownership Own Rent 75% 25% 70% 30% 55% 45% Years Lived in Central Point 0 < 5 5 < 10 10 < 20 20 More 32% 13% 24% 31% 35% 15% 27% 23% N/A *Source for population figures 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-year estimates **Age based on % of population 18+ who are head(s) of household 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 2019 Central Point Survey (unweighted) 2019 Central Point Survey (weighted) Central Point Population* Gender Male 18+ 42% 46% 46% Female 18+ 58% 54% 54% Age** 18 – 34 14% 23% 23% 35 – 54 30% 38% 38% 55 plus 56% 39% 39% Race / Ethnicity White Alone 87% 84% 83% Not White Alone 13% 16% 17% Annual Household Income Less than $35,000 18% 24% 39% $35,000 or Greater 82% 76% 61% Children in Household None 72% 64% 67% One or more 28% 36% 33% Home Ownership Own 83% 76% 61% Rent 17% 24% 39% 4.2.b Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Central Point’s 5-Star Rating How do you “stack-up”? 7 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 7 4.2.b Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) 5-Star Rating: Overview •The-5-Star Rating is a composite index that captures the essence of how well a city meets the critical needs and expectations of its residents and uses a robust theoretical and mathematical model •It is based on a weighted sum of five questions •Results for these 5 questions can be benchmarked against other cities nationwide, in the Pacific Northwest, within the State of Washington, and with other comparable communities 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 8 Overall Quality of Life Qverall Quality of Services Comparability to Other Communities Direction City is Headed Value of Services for Tax Dollar Paid Relative Weight in Model 4.2.b Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) 5-Star Rating: Results •Central Point is a 4-S t a r community •Just under half of Central Point residents give the city a rating of 4-S t a r s or higher and one-third rate Central Point as a 4.5 or 5-Star city. 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 9 -16% -37% 15% 16% 16% -70% -50% -30% -10% 10% 30% 50% 70% Overall % of Residents Rating Central Point as. . 5-Stars 4.5-Stars 4-Stars Less than 3.5-Stars 3.5 Stars 4.2.b Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) 5-Star Rating: Benchmarked •When benchmarked against other 4- Star communities nationwide, Central Point. . . •Performs similarly regarding quality of life and comparability to other communities, •B u t performs similar to a 3.5 start community in terms of the value of services for tax-dollar paid 5-Star Rating is a computed variable Quality of Life Quality of Services Comparability to Other Communities Direction Community is Headed Value of Services Central Point <3.5 Stars 3.5-Stars 4-Stars 4.5/5-Star 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 10 4.2.b Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Things Enjoyed Most about Living in Central Point 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 11 4.2.b Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Things Enjoyed Most About Central Point •Selected most often was the small-town feel followed closely by quiet neighborhoods. •Next on the rung was safety, parks and open spaces, the people, and special events. •Less often inclusions were the natural environment, schools, and downtown. GQ1— Which of the following do you enjoy most about living in Central Point? (multiple select, sum may add to >100%) 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 12 65% 59% 48% 45% 41% 40% 34% 27% 26% 4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Small town feel Quiet neighborhoods Safety Parks and open spaces The people Special events Scenery and the natural environment Schools Downtown Central Point Something else Things Enjoyed Most about Living in Central Point 4.2.b Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Things Enjoyed by Neighborhood •Residents in different neighborhoods find value in different things, especially those living in Area G who are most likely to mention enjoying quiet neighborhoods, safety, and parks and open spaces. •Residents Area C are most likely to mention special events. 13 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Small town feel Quiet neighborhoods Safety Parks and open spaces The people Special events Scenery and the natural environment Schools Downtown Central Point Things Enjoyed Most about Central Point by Neighborhood AREA A AREA B AREA C AREA D AREA E AREA F AREA G AREA H 4.2.b Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Key Drivers Analysis How to “Move the Needle” 14 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 14 4.2.b Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Overview of the Analysis •Respondents rated Central Point on 10 different attributes that could be applied to this model •These attributes are grouped into two dimensions and an overall score was computed for each •Regression analysis was used to determine which dimensions have the greatest impact on Central Point’s 5-Star rating •A similar approach was used to identify the impact of the individual factors within each dimension •Key Drivers Analysis looks at relationships between the overall dimensions or the attributes within each dimension and Central Point’s 5-Star Rating and identifies those that have the greatest influence on Central Point’s 5-Star Rating •Community strengths and areas of focus are identified based on these key drivers and the quality ratings •Strengths are those aspects of service that are key drivers of Central Point’s overall rating that receive above average ratings •Areas of focus are key drivers that receive below-average ratings for service 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 15 4.2.b Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Overall Key Drivers and Performance •Both dimensions have a significant impact on resident’s overall opinions of Central Point though residents weight Physical Attributes more than they do Government Performance 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 16 Key = signifies key driver of 5-s t a r rat i n g ; re d k e y = below-average performance; yellow key = average performance; green key = above-average performance [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] + Importance / + Performance: Maintain & Leverage - Importance / - Performance: Strategically Target + Importance / - Performance: Focus Here - Importance / + Performance: Maintain 4.2.b Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Physical Attributes: Key Drivers and Performance There are five attributes in the physical attributes bucket •All are key drivers of Central Point’s overall rating •Overall physical appearance of the City is the most significant driver and receives an rating •While less important, traffic flow is the area that could use the most improvement. 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 17 [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] + Importance / + Performance: Maintain & Leverage - Importance / - Performance: Strategically Target + Importance / - Performance: Focus Here - Importance / + Performance: Maintain 4.2.b Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Government: Key Drivers and Performance Five aspects of government performance were evaluated •All are significant drivers of Central Point’s overall rating •Confidence in police department to provide a safe and secure community has the greatest impact, and receives the highest rating within this group. •Areas of focus are the ease of contacting Council members and keeping residents informed. Both are of high importance with relatively low ratings. 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 18 Key = signifies key driver of 5-s t a r rat i n g ; re d k e y = below-average performance; yellow key = average performance; green key = above-average performance [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] [CELLRANGE] + Importance / + Performance: Maintain & Leverage - Importance / - Performance: Strategically Target + Importance / - Performance: Focus Here - Importance / + Performance: Maintain 4.2.b Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Funding of City Services and Facilities 19 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 19 4.2.b Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Financial Priorities •Top tier functions are: Police and safety services and Maintaining roads and sidewalks •Second tier functions are: Attracting new industries and businesses, Street improvements, Efficient and effective local government, Improv and maintain the physical parks system. •Functions regarding Recreation programs, Special events, and Tourism are given very low priority among residents. 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 20 3.88 3.94 4.95 9.15 10.74 11.87 12.41 18.13 24.93 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Increase visitors and tourism Develop / improve special events Develop / implement recreation programs Improve / maintain parks system Efficient and effective local government Street improvements Attract new businesses Maintaining roads and sidewalks Police and safety servicesTop Tier Priorities Second Tier Priorities Third Tier Priorities 4.2.b Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Revitalization Efforts •Overall, improvements to the Highway 99 Corridor South of Pine is the highest ranked revitalization effort, though this is substantially less important to residents living in Area B or H. •The other item to note is the strong importance of the East Pine Street and Interchange planning among residents in Area H. 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 21 39% 32% 29% 38% 29% 34% 23% 44% 33% 42% 28% 30% 40% 34% 26% 47% 30% 23% 48% 28% 24% 46% 34% 19% 26% 33% 42% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% The Highway 99 Corridor (South of Pine)Expand East Pine Street improvements in the downtown from 6th to 10th Street East Pine Street and Interchange Planning (East of 10th) Revitalization Efforts by Neighborhood Overall Area A Area B Area C Area D Area E Area F Area G Area H 4.2.b Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Police and Safety 22 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 22 4.2.b Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Police-Related Issues •Twenty-three percent of Central Point residents state that there are no serious police-related problems in their neighborhood. •The same number of residents feel that issues relating to theft are the most serious issues. •This is followed by speeding or traffic related issues and drug-related crime. 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 23 23% 3% 3% 4% 5% 7% 12% 18% 25% 0%10%20%30%40% Nothing, there are no police-related problems in my neighborhood Vandalism Juvenile crime Late night noise / partying Something else Code enforcement issues Drug-related crime Speeding / Traffic Theft 4.2.b Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Professionalism of and Confidence in Police •All residents were asked to rate the professionalism of Central Point’s police officers as well as their confidence in their ability o provide a safe and secure community •The police receive outstanding scores in both areas •There is high agreement across all residents regardless of geographic or demographic differences 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 24 -3% 93% 8.45 -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Confidence in Providing Safe / Secure City % Confident % Not Confident Mean -3% 93% 8.70 -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Professionalism of Officers % Professional % Not Professional Mean 4.2.b Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Homelessness •Nearly all residents feel that homelessness in Central Point is either a minor or major problem. Residents living in Area C and Area H are significantly more likely than other residents to feel homelessness is a major problem. •Overall, residents indicate each of the three strategies as being somewhat effective in combating homelessness. •Lower income residents are significantly more likely than other residents to feel that transitional housing and financial assistance are effective means of combating homelessness. Two-thirds of residents in this group feel these measures would be effective vs roughly half of residents of incomes higher than $35,000. 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 25 Major Problem, 40% Minor Problem, 54% Not a problem at all, 5% Homelessness as a Problem 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Zoning Transitional housing Financial Assistance Strategies to Combat Homelessness by Income Overall <$35k $35k-<$50k $50k-<$100k $100k+ 4.2.b Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Parks and Recreation 26 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 26 4.2.b Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Use of and Satisfaction with Parks and Rec Facilities •Three-quarters of residents have visited a parks and rec facility over the past 12 months. Those most likely to have done so are younger, have children, and/or have higher incomes. •Nearly all residents are satisfied with their parks and recreation experiences. 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 27 Yes, 76% No, 24% Visiting Park or Rec Facility -3% 0% -4% -1% 93% 96% 89% 95% 8.18 8.31 7.87 8.41 -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Overall 18-34 35-54 55-64 % Satisfied % Not Satisfied Mean 4.2.b Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Construction and Maintenance of Community Center •There is fairly solid support for building a new community center, however support significantly declines regarding raising the recreation fee by $3 / month to provide long-term funding for the center. 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 28 -12% -39% -13% -44% -3% -26% -13% -35% -15% -43% -11% -34% -12% -40% -11% -31% -14% -47% 79% 51% 75% 44% 92% 67% 80% 51% 77% 48% 78% 57% 77% 52% 81% 60% 76% 40% 7.59 5.35 7.27 4.80 8.82 6.44 7.66 5.55 7.66 4.98 7.52 5.70 7.41 5.23 7.91 6.28 7.21 4.75 -60% -50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Area A Area B Area C Area D Area E Area F Area G Area H Overall 4.2.b Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Recap 29 What we have learned and where we go from here 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 29 4.2.b Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) Take -Aways and Next Steps •Central Point is a strong 4-Star City •Very possible to see real improvement by focusing on ways to help residents understand the value of the services provided for tax dollars paid •“Low hanging fruit” •Communicate that you have a clear vision / strategy •Explore ways t o i n c re a s e visibility/communicability of City staff/council members •Putting your Money to Work •Continued focus on police and safety services •Continue funding infrastructure such as roads and sidewalks •Follow-up and track •Do additional, targeted research (focus groups?) •Continue to track progress—more frequently? 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 30 4.2.b Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) 3/6/2019 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019 RESIDENT SURVEY 31 4.2.b Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: Citizen Survey Slides (1115 : Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report) CITY OF CENTRAL POINT Oregon City Council Meeting Minutes Thursday, February 28, 2019 I. REGULAR MEETING CALLED TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Mayor Hank Williams II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL Attendee Name Title Status Arrived Hank Williams Mayor Present Neil Olsen Ward I Present Kelley Johnson Ward II Present Brandon Thueson Ward III Present Taneea Browning Ward IV Present Rob Hernandez At Large Present Michael Parsons At Large Present Also in attendance: City Manager Chris Clayton, Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore; Community Development Directory Tom Humphrey; City Attorney Dan O'Conner; Principle Planner Stephanie Hotley; Community Planner II Justin Gindlesperger; Finance Director Steve Weber; and City Recorder Deanna Casey. IV. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS Police Department Accreditation - Rescheduled V. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None VI. CONSENT AGENDA RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Michael Parsons, At Large SECONDER: Taneea Browning, Ward IV AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons A. Approval of February 14, 2019 City Council Minutes VII. PUBLIC HEARING A. Public Hearing and First Reading - Ordinance to consider a Minor Zone Map Amendment on 1.76 acres located at 1909 Scenic Avenue on property 6.A Packet Pg. 36 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Feb 28, 2019 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 28, 2019 Page 2 identified on the Jackson County Assessor’s Map as 37S 2W 03AB, Tax Lots 4400, 4500 & 4600. Applicant: Fire District 3. (File No. ZC-18007) City Manager Chris Clayton read the Quasi-judicial hearing statement. There were no conflicts of interest or bias declared. Council member Rob Hernandez stated that he has spoken with Chief Patterson regarding the sight and building options. Community Planner II Justin Gindlesperger explained that this is the first reading and public hearing for a minor zone map amendment at 1909 Scenic Avenue for a new Fire District station. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing in February to consider the request changing the zone from R-1-8 to Civic. He explained compatibility to the Comprehensive Plan and surrounding land use zones. A transportation impact analysis was conducted and indicates that the traffic generated by the land use change will not alter the functional classification for current or planned infrastructure. The proposed zone change can be accommodated by the transportation network and is consistent with the State Transportation Planning Rule. The Planning Commission and Council both agree that the intersection of Upton/10th should be watched and will need improvements in the near future. There is an error on page 17 of the Council Packet. It shows property adjacent to this lot as R-1-8, but was recently changed to R-3. Mayor Williams opened the public hearing. Fire District No. 3 Chief Paterson stated that they are excited about moving their temporary Table Rock Station to help serve Central Point better. Mayor Williams closed the public hearing. Rob Hernandez moved to second reading An Ordinance Amending the Central Point Zoning Map from R-1-8 (Residential Single Family) to Civic Zoning on 1.76 Acres Located at 1909 Scenic Avenue. RESULT: 1ST READING [6 TO 1] Next: 3/14/2019 7:00 PM MOVER: Rob Hernandez, At Large SECONDER: Michael Parsons, At Large AYES: Williams, Olsen, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons NAYS: Kelley Johnson B. Second Reading - Ordinance to Consider Update and Adoption of the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Population Element (2019-2039) Mr. Clayton read the legislative statement. There were no conflict of interests, bias or exparte communications declarations with the council members. Principal Planner Stephanie Holtey introduced an Ordinance that would update the Population Element of the Comprehensive Plan. She explained the background and why we need to update the elements in the Comprehensive Plan before we can 6.A Packet Pg. 37 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Feb 28, 2019 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 28, 2019 Page 3 submit our Urban Growth Boundary Amendment application to the State. The Population Element reflects the recently updated population forecast for Central Point’s Urban Area. The city is obligated to utilize the Portland State University Population Research Center (PRC) published on June 30, 2018. The proposed update is consistent with ORS and documents forecast growth over a 20 year period. The goals and policies remain unchanged, the update includes tables and text. The most significant finding is the increase in the City’s Average Annual Growth Rate which went from 1.1% to 1.5% over the next 20 years. The population forecast impacts our housing and residential land needs. The 2019-2039 Population Element update aligns with the City Council Goal to provide managed growth and infrastructure by continually ensuring that planning and zoning review and regulations are consistent with comprehensive plans and our vision for the city. The PSU numbers reveal that we have a steady growth in aging population. Mayor Williams opened the public hearing, no one came forward and the public hearing was closed. Brandon Thueson moved to second reading An Ordinance Updating and Adopting the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Population Element (2019- 2039). RESULT: 1ST READING [UNANIMOUS] Next: 3/14/2019 7:00 PM MOVER: Brandon Thueson, Ward III SECONDER: Kelley Johnson, Ward II AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons C. Second Reading of an Ordnance to Update and Adopting the Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039), Central Point Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Mr. Clayton asked if there were any conflict of interest, bias or exparte communications. Council members responded that they had none. Mrs. Holtey explained that there were a few corrections to items in the City Council Agenda Packet. The changes were items recommended by the Planning Commission. These items will be corrected before the second reading of this ordinance. Mrs. Holtey explained that the Planning Commission and Citizens Advisory Committee discussed changes to the working draft of the Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI) at meetings in January and February. Public testimony addressed the calculation of infill land likely to develop over the next 20 years. After listening to testimony the Planning Commission voted to approve the 2019-2039 Residential BLI recommending 20% infill. This document tracks the availability of buildable lands within the city’s urban area that is likely to be redeveloped. The City tracks the 6.A Packet Pg. 38 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Feb 28, 2019 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 28, 2019 Page 4 availability of buildable lands as building permits are issued. The city calculates acreage for vacant land, infill land, and redevelopment land that is over half an acre. The city has 260 gross acres of infill land representing 66% of the buildable land supply. During the 1996-2016 BLI we saw 8% of the infill lands develop. Planning Commission and staff recommendation is to apply a 20% infill rate. The city will continue to work on incentives to help with infill projects. Mayor Williams opened the public hearing. Katy Mallams, Heritage Road, Central Point Mrs. Mallams read a statement into the record and presented the City Recorder with a written copy. She does not agree with the amount of infill of 20%. The city should strive to make that 50% so that the city is working on infill and not expanding the UGB as much. Less expansion equals a more compact city, reducing the cost of infrastructure borne by the taxpayers. She does not agree with the assumptions used to calculate the number of acres that could be redeveloped due to demolition. Focusing on infill would help with the potential of blight in the older parts of town. The city should focus on revitalizing and increase the residential and commercial appeal and economic viability of the older part of the city and not expand the boundaries as far. Larry Martin, Taylor Road, Central Point - Representing Taylor West Group The Taylor West Group supports the BLI proposal. The Planning Commission has researched the infill numbers and the amount the city needs for the UGB expansion. They also support the Population Element. City staff has done a good job with the updates in order to propose a UGB amendment. Mayor Williams closed the public hearing. There was additional discussion regarding the infill amount of 20% and the facts that support that number. We have offered several incentives to help with infill or redevelopment of lots in town. The city will continue to be creative where we can for lots that are challenging. Taneea Browning moved to second reading An Ordinance Updating and Adopting the Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039), Central Point Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element. RESULT: 1ST READING [UNANIMOUS] Next: 3/14/2019 7:00 PM MOVER: Taneea Browning, Ward IV SECONDER: Rob Hernandez, At Large AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons D. Public Hearing and First Reading of an Ordinance Updating and Adopting the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element (2019-2039) Mr. Clayton asked if there were any conflicts of interest, bias, or exparte 6.A Packet Pg. 39 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Feb 28, 2019 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 28, 2019 Page 5 communications for this item. There were no conflicts for the council members. Community Development Director Tom Humphrey presented the staff report for the Public Hearing and First reading of an Ordinance Updating and Adopting the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element (2018-2038). This Element was last acknowledged in 1983 and is in need of updating to account for over 30 years of incremental changes that have occurred in the City of Central Point. The Urbanization Element is modeled after Statewide Planning Goal 14 which emphasizes the need for all communities to provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use; accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries; ensure efficient use of land; and provide for livable communities. The Urbanization Element’s primary responsibility is to establish criteria to manage the physical direction of the City’s planned growth. It relies on other Comprehensive Plan elements. He presented livability principles, urbanization factors as established by other Comp Plan elements. In order to expand the UGB the city must specify the need for the land, location of utilities, water, and sewer. The city would concentrate on lands that have been master planned first, and grow in a concentric pattern from the center of Central Point. Mayor Williams opened the public hearing. No one came forward and the public hearing was closed. Kelley Johnson moved to second reading An Ordinance Updating and Adopting the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element (2018-2038). RESULT: 1ST READING [UNANIMOUS] Next: 3/14/2019 7:00 PM MOVER: Kelley Johnson, Ward II SECONDER: Taneea Browning, Ward IV AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons VIII. ORDINANCES, AND RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. _______, Accepting the Annual Audit for Fiscal Year 2017-18 Finance Director Steve Weber explained that the accounting firm of Isler CPA’s presented the Audit Report at the February 14, 2019 Council meeting. The City Council needs to accept the report with the proposed resolution. Brandon Thueson moved to Approve Resolution No. 1569, Accepting the Annual Audit for Fiscal Year 2017-18. 6.A Packet Pg. 40 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Feb 28, 2019 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 28, 2019 Page 6 RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Brandon Thueson, Ward III SECONDER: Kelley Johnson, Ward II AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons B. First Reading of an Ordinance Amending in Part and Repealing In Part Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 8.05 Regarding Storm Drain Protection Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore explained that as of March 1, 2019 the City will take over the management of the MS4 Phase II Permit through the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality for our storm drain management. The new permit has very prescriptive requirements about ordinances and regulatory mechanisms and how they need to be placed by a particular time. The requirements represent all the necessary changes for the City to manage storm water protection within the city. Changes largely focus on how to deal with illicit discharge into the city’s storm drain system and for management of new construction site activities. These rules will be as restrictive as they were with RVSS when they were managing the program. Kelley Johnson moved to second reading an Ordinance Amending in Part and Repealing in Part Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 8.05 Regarding Storm Drain Protection. RESULT: 1ST READING [UNANIMOUS] Next: 3/14/2019 7:00 PM MOVER: Kelley Johnson, Ward II SECONDER: Michael Parsons, At Large AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons C. Resolution No. ________, A Resolution Accepting the Lowest Responsible Bidder for the Capital Improvement Project - ADA Ramps and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Roxy Ann Rock. Mr. Samitore explained that the city conducted a formal bid process for ADA Ramp upgrades and improvements on 3rd Street, 10th Street and East Pine Street. The city reviewed five submittals. Staff recommends awarding the bid to Roxy Ann Rock in the amount of $97,582.00 which was the lowest responsible bidder. The engineer’s project estimate was $112,000. Rob Hernandez moved to approve Resolution No. 1570, A Resolution Accepting the Lowest Responsible Bidder for the Capital Improvement Project - ADA Ramps and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Roxy Ann Rock. 6.A Packet Pg. 41 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Feb 28, 2019 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 28, 2019 Page 7 RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER: Rob Hernandez, At Large SECONDER: Brandon Thueson, Ward III AYES: Williams, Olsen, Johnson, Thueson, Browning, Hernandez, Parsons IX. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Williams reported that he attended The Medford Water Commission meeting and goal setting session. The Study Session tour of the ABK Court. The Central Point Chamber Greeters here in the Council Chambers. X. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Chris Clayton reported that: SOREDI is requesting funding from cities in the region to help pay for a study. They have asked the City of Central Point for a letter of support so that they can send it to the state and apply for a grant. They have also asked the City to contribute $53,000 towards the project. If the Council agrees to this contribution it would need to wait until after the budget process is approved. Council would like to have more information regarding the project, and what happens if the state does not approve the grant. Will they be asking the cities for additional funds. Council would also like to have an annual report from SOREDI to explain what they have done for Central Point and the region specifically before they move forward with this request. The tour of the ABK Court was very interesting. He was surprised at how many people were in the facility. It definitely gave staff ideas of what can be accomplished here in Central Point for our Community Center. He attended a meeting for the Water Rights review being conducted by the Other Cities Water Group. He will send an email tomorrow with sample ordinances from Oregon cities who have implemented a single use bag ban. Urban Renewal can look at incentives to help with infill. He thanked Mr. Humphrey and Mrs. Holtey for all the hard work they have done getting the elements updated for the UGB expansion. It is a lot of data to define and support. XI. COUNCIL REPORTS Council Member Kelley Johnson reported that she attended the Central Point Chamber Greeters at City Hall on February 19, 2019. 6.A Packet Pg. 42 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Feb 28, 2019 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 28, 2019 Page 8 Council Member Taneea Browning reported that: She attended Greeters here at City Hall. She was very pleased with the presentation city staff did to educate the business community on the workings of City Hall to help the businesses of Central Point. She attended a Fire District No. 3 meeting. They are working on a county bond to look at radio infrastructure. They installed 130 smoke detectors in homes during their last sweep. They are working on a new interface for education and engagement and saved $400,000 on seismic upgrades. She attended the Study Session on Monday. She was impressed with The Court facility. She attended the Central Point Visitors Information Center meeting. They have started talking about 4th of July, and music at Pfaff Park this summer. She is will be attending the LOC Mid-year conference in Ashland. She is offering to car pool for any others who will be attending. Council Member Mike Parsons reported that: He attended Greeters here at City Hall. He was able to tour the Makersspace with Mrs. Browning. He is very impressed with that facility. He attended the RVSS Board meeting, they are looking for a new board member but Central Point is well represented by Bill Stults and Kay Harrison. He attended the Study Session tour of The Court facility for ABK. He took the First aid/CPR class yesterday here at city hall for employees and volunteers. Council Member Neil Olson reported that he attended the City of Ashland Parks and Recreation meeting where they discussed a recreation pool facility. XII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Community Development Director Tom Humphrey reported that: The Planning Commission will be having a joint meeting with the Jackson County Planning Commission to discuss the UGB Amendment. There will be updated schedules in the Newsletter. The Cheese Festival will be March 17 - 18, 2019. As a Big Cheese Sponsor we have a few tickets to the Cheese Makers Dinner if any of the Council Members are interested. Finance Director Steve Weber reported that they had over 130 applicants for the vacant clerk position. Those applicants have been narrowed down to seven for interviews. He has been busy working on the budget. 6.A Packet Pg. 43 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Feb 28, 2019 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA) City of Central Point City Council Minutes February 28, 2019 Page 9 Police Chief Kris Allison reported that: Information Technology has been busy implementing a program to help the department comply with HB 2355. A mandate from the State to implement the STOP program requiring officers to report race, gender, age, during an officer initiated traffic stop. School Resource Officer Mannenbach is testing to be a High Risk Assessment Manager. He will be the first one in Southern Oregon. Parks and Public Works Director Matt Samitore reported that he and the City Attorney are working with Department of Justice regarding the Twin Creeks Crossing issues. The deadline to provide the rest of the data needed for twin creeks is next week. Principal Planner Stephanie Hotley has been working on UGB Amendment. There will be monthly updates in the City Newsletter. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Rob Hernandez moved to adorn, Neil Olsen seconded. All said aye and the meeting was adjourned at 9:11 p.m. The foregoing minutes of the February 28, 2019, Council meeting were approved by the City Council at its meeting of March 14, 2019. Dated: _________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: __________________________ City Recorder 6.A Packet Pg. 44 Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Feb 28, 2019 7:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Community Development FROM: Stephanie Holtey, Principal Planner MEETING DATE: March 14, 2019 SUBJECT: Ordnance No. ________, Updating and Adopting the Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039), Central Point Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element ACTION REQUIRED: Ordinance 2nd Reading RECOMMENDATION: Approval BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On February 5, 2019 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI) for 2019-2039, a component of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council. After considering the Planning Commission’s recommendation and conducting a public hearing at the February28, 2019 meeting, the City Council forwarded the Residential BLI to a second reading. Attached is a copy of the draft Residential BLI. It was last updated in 2017 as part of the Housing Element update. The current update is necessary to account the buildable lands available to accommodate housing needs for the next 20-years, a prerequisite to updating the Housing Element and amending the UGB. Residential BLI Overview: The Residential BLI tracks the availability of buildable lands within the City’s Urban Area (i.e. city urban growth boundary (UGB)). As defined in ORS 197.295(1), buildable lands include those lands in the City’s urban area that are available, suitable and necessary for development over the next 20-years, including vacant and partially developed lands that are likely to be redeveloped. The City maintains the Residential BLI database to track the availability of buildable lands as building permits are issued. The database includes most current Assessor’s Property Data and local land use information. Using this database, the City calculates acreage for the three types of buildable lands as follows:  Vacant land: Sum acreage of parcels with an improvement value of $0.  Infill land: Identify all residential lots greater than 0.5 acre in size that are developed with a single family dwelling. Subtract the area typical of a large home site (i.e. 10,890 SF). The remaining site area is considered infill lands, meaning it has enough land area outside a typical home site that can theoretically accommodate more residential units. 8.A Packet Pg. 45 This calculation does not take into account existing development patterns, land to improvement ratio, or other considerations that influence the ease and likelihood that the property will develop.  Redevelopment land: These are lands with existing dwellings expected to be demolished and replaced over the next 20-years. These are generally old structures with an improvement value less than the land value. Since the City has not historically tracked demolitions, redevelopment lands are calculated based on US Census methodology, which applies a loss rate by housing type and the age of the home. The most significant finding of the Residential BLI is that the City has 260 gross acres of infill land, representing 66% of the City’s gross buildable lands supply. Determining the likely participation rate for infill land over the next 20-years is the most significant issue associated with the Residential BLI and will affect the City’s Housing Needs Analysis in the Housing Element (CPA-18005). At the February 28, 2019 City Council meeting, staff presented the results of an infill participation study conducted for the period 1996-2016 (“Infill Study”). The Infill Study found that residential infill development accounted for 6% of the housing and 8% of the residential land supply during that time period. The study supports the finding that not all of the available infill lands will redevelop over the next 20-years. However, infill is an important aspect of the City’s development strategy and the City has adopted policies to support and encourage increased infill development. Table 1 illustrates six (6) possible scenarios discussed by the City Council. Table 1. Infill Participation Alternatives Analysis Infill Participation Rates 100% 50% 30% 20% 15% 10% Total Gross Buildable Acres 410 410 410 410 410 410 Vacant Acres 83 83 83 83 83 83 Infill Acres 194 97 58 39 29 19 Redevelopment Acres 17 17 17 17 17 17 Total Available Buildable Acres 293 197 158 139 129 119 (Environmental Constrained Acres) -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 -33 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL BUILDABLE ACRES, 19-39 260 164 125 105 96 86 TOTAL ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL LAND NEED 150 246 285 305 314 324 Staff recommends increasing the infill percentage from 8% to 20% for purposes of the 2019- 2039 Residential BLI. This recommendation is based on the need to increase infill participation per existing policies and a determination that 20% is likely to be achieved during the 20-year planning period as shown in Figure 1. The 20% infill scenario in Figure 1 is based on development inquiries received for land development, land use approvals for master plans and subdivisions, and anticipated build out of large lots in the Eastside TOD. Public testimony was received in opposition to this recommendation citing concerns that 20% would not constitute efficient use of land in the current UGB. In the alternative, a 50% Infill Adjustment was recommended to use more land within the current UGB and minimize the need to expand into the rural and agricultural lands in the City’s Urban Reserve Areas. Staff addressed questions of the Council relative to the public testimony. It was noted that the 8.A Packet Pg. 46 matter was discussed during the public hearing at the February 5, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. In light of the housing concerns facing the City and lack of evidence showing that 50% of the infill land is likely to occur by 2039, the Planning Commission voted to recommend a 20% infill adjustment for consideration by the City Council. Members of the Commission stated that 20% almost triples the historic infill participation rate and that, although the 20% scenario may not occur, it can be considered as likely to occur. City Council forwarded the Residential BLI to a second reading with the 20% infill adjustment. Per Table 1 the 20% infill adjustment results in 105 acres of buildable land that are available, suitable and necessary for development over the next 20-years. Figure 1. 20% Infill Participation Scenario FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: The buildable lands inventory tracks the availability of land and does not generate additional cost to the City beyond the in-kind staff expenses, postage and legal notification costs included and budgeted for Community Development. 8.A Packet Pg. 47 LEGAL ANALYSIS: The Residential BLI is a component of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Text amendments are considered “Major Amendments” per CPMC 17.96.300 and are subject to Type IV Legislative application procedures per CPMC 17.05.500. Conducting a second public hearing by the City Council is necessary and consistent with the requisite procedures to adopt changes to the forecast population. Aside from procedural compliance, the primary changes to be discussed include the likely Infill Adjustment and the City’s efforts to engage and inform the public about the availability of buildable lands over the next 20-years. COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: The City Council goal to provide managed growth and infrastructure is predicated on the ability of the City to forecast growth and the corresponding land and service needs over the long term relative to the ability of the City to accommodate growth within the current UGB. The 2019-2039 Residential BLI aligns with Council’s goal by tracking the City’s buildable lands, a prerequisite to, “Continually ensuring that planning and zoning review and regulations are consistent with comprehensive plans and vision.” STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Consider the Second Reading of the proposed amendment to the Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039) of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and 1) approve the ordinance; 2) approve the ordinance with revisions; or 3) deny the ordinance. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Approve Ordinance No. ____ Updating and Adopting the Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039), Central Point Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 865- Buildable Land inventory 2. ORDINANCE (Residential BLI) 3. 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) 8.A Packet Pg. 48 8.A.a Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Resolution 865- Buildable Land inventory (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) ATTACHMENT “C” Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE UPDATING AND ADOPTING THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDABLE LANDS INVENTORY (2019-2039), CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT Recitals: A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning Goals. B. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals and compatibility with City and County Comprehensive Plans. C. Pursuant to authority granted by the City Charter and the ORS, the City has determined it is in the public interest to update its Residential Buildable Lands Inventory, a component of the Land Element which was recently adopted in 2017 as part of the 2017 Housing Element update. D. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.10.100 Amendments – Purpose and Chapter 17.96.010, Procedure, the City has initiated the amendments and conducted the following duly advertised public hearings to consider the proposed amendments: a) Planning Commission hearing on February 5, 2019 b) City Council hearing on February 28, 2019. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Based upon all the information received, the City Council adopts the Staff Report and evidence which are incorporated herein by reference; determines that changing community conditions, needs and desires justify the amendments and hereby adopts the changes entirely. Section 2. The Residential Buildable Lands Inventory, in the City Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element is hereby updated and adopted as set forth in Exhibit A –Comprehensive Residential Buildable Lands Inventory, 2019-2039 which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 3. The City Manager or his designee is directed to conduct post acknowledgement procedures defined in ORS 197.610 et seq. upon adoption of the Population Element. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this ___ day of ____________, 2019. __________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: _____________________________ City Recorder 8.A.b Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: ORDINANCE (Residential BLI) [Revision 1] (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 1 of 23 Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI) 2019 – 2039 Final Draft City of Central Point 3/14/2019 8.A.c Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 2 of 23 1. INTRODUCTION The use and availability of buildable land is a critical component in tracking a community’s rate of growth, and the subsequent need for additional land to support future growth. The primary purpose of the Residential Buildable Land Inventory (BLI) is to maintain a record of the availability of buildable residential lands within the City’s urban area (Figure 1). The BLI is prepared in accordance with OAR 660-24-0050(1) requiring that cities maintain a buildable lands inventory within the urban growth boundary sufficient to accommodate the residential needs for a 20-year planning period as determined in OAR 660-024-0040. 8.A.c Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 3 of 23 By definition the BLI is strictly a land inventory system. The BLI is not a policy document. The BLI is used by other Comprehensive Plan elements as a resource for the development and monitoring of policy. The BLI is considered a living document that is continually updated as development activity occurs and is entered into the BLI electronic data base (BLI2019). 2. LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS AND ZONING The BLI maintains an accounting of all lands by land use classification and zoning. The City’s Comprehensive Plan contains six (6) land use classifications and sixteen (16) sub-classifications (Table 1). Each of the land use classifications are supported by one, or more, of twenty (20) zoning districts (Table 2). The Land Use Classifications and Zoning districts are defined and mapped in the Land Use Element. 3. LAND INVENTORY As of December 31, 2018, the City of Central Point’s urban area contained a total of 2,972 gross acres (Table 1 and 2). Public right-of-way, parks/open space and civic uses accounted for 33% of the City’s total gross acreage, while residential (50%), commercial (8%), and industrial (9%) land accounted for the remaining acreage. When public right-of-way is removed, there are 2,271 (77%) net acres within the City’s urban area. 8.A.c Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 4 of 23 Comprehensive Plan Designation Total City Acres Total UGB Acres Total Urban Acres Percentage of Total VLRes 46 22 68 LRes 902 88 990 MRes 194 23 216 HRes 215 - 215 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 1,356 132 1,488 50% NCom 15 8 23 TPCom 103 8 111 TCCom 12 3 16 GenCom 56 - 56 EmpCom 29 - 29 TOTAL COMMERCIAL 215 20 235 8% LInd 79 119 197 HInd 40 28 68 TOTAL INDUSTRIAL 118 147 265 9% Civic 121 0 121 TOTAL CIVIC 121 0 121 4% OS 108 78 186 TOTAL PARKS & OPEN SPACE 108 78 186 6% PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 554 123 677 23% TOTAL ALL LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS 2,472 500 2,972 100% Note: Total acreage based on GIS shape file for City and UGB 10/29/18 Table 1. City of Central Point Urban Land Inventory by Comprehensive Plan Designation 8.A.c Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 5 of 23 Zoning Total City Acres Total UGB Acres Total Urban Area Acres Percentage of Total R-L 46 22 68 R-1-6 374 6 380 R-1-8 393 11 404 R-1-10 34 22 56 LMR 111 48 159 R-2 107 - 107 R-3 180 - 180 MMR 78 23 100 HMR 35 - 35 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL 1,356 132 1,488 50% C-2(m)12 - 12 CN 3 8 10 C-4 103 8 111 C-5 12 3 16 EC 29 - 29 GC 56 - 56 TOTAL COMMERCIAL 215 20 235 8% M-1 79 119 197 M-2 40 28 68 TOTAL INDUSTRIAL 118 147 265 9% Civic 121 0 121 TOTAL CIVIC 121 0 121 4% BCG 35 76 110 OS 73 2 76 TOTAL PARKS & OPEN SPACE 108 78 186 6% PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 554 123 677 23% TOTAL ALL ZONING DISTRICTS 2,472 500 2,972 100% Table 2. City of Central Point Urban Land Inventory by Zoning Note: Total acreage balances with GIS shape file for UGB 10/29/18 8.A.c Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 6 of 23 4. DEFINITIONS and METHODOLOGY To maintain consistency in the maintenance of the BLI the definitions and methodology used in preparing the BLI are presented in Appendix “A” – Definitions and Appendix “B” – Methodology. 5. BUILDABLE RESIDENTIAL LAND INVENTORY Within the City’s urban area, there are approximately 1,490 acres of residential land distributed over four (4) residential land use classifications and seven (7) zoning districts. Approximately 105 acres (7%) of the City’s total residential land is considered buildable acres. Table 3 and 4 identify the unadjusted distribution of the residential vacant land by vacant land type (vacant, infill, redevelopment), and total buildable acres. Figure 2 illustrates the geographic distribution of the City’s residential buildable land inventory (12/31/2018). In calculating the Residential Buildable Lands a determination must be made that the buildable lands are suitable, available and necessary (OAR 660-008-0005(2)) for development throughout the 20-year planning period. There are two basic classifications of buildable residential land: a. Vacant Land –Lands on which there is no development. Infrastructure is available within the 20-year planning period. b. Redevelopable Land –Lands on which development has already occurred but on which, due to present or expected market forces, there exists the strong likelihood that existing development will be converted to more intensive residential uses during the planning period (OAR 660-008-0050(7). Redevelopable Land is further categorized as: i. Infill Land – These are lands which are partially developed, but have the potential for infill development. Infrastructure is available; and ii. Redevelopment (Demolition) Land – These are lands which are currently improved, but the improvements are generally old and the land value exceeds improvement value. Infra-structure is available. The definition of “Buildable Land” uses the term “likely” in referencing redevelopable residential land. For purposes of context the City refines the likelihood and reasonableness definition for Redevelopable Land as follows: 5.1 Infill Lands Availability Adjusted. As defined in OAR 660-024-0050(2)(a) the infill land classification accounts for an extraordinarily large percentage (67%) of the City’s vacant residential lands inventory (Tables 3 and 4). As a vacant land classification the Table 3 City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Designation Vacant City1 Vacant UGB1 Total Vacant Acres Infill City Infill UGB Redev. City & UGB Total Infill & Redev. Acres Total Gross Vacant Acres (less) Envir. Acres, Vacant Lands (less) Envir. Acres, Infill Lands Total Net Vacant Acres Less Public Need Acres Total Buildable Acres VLRes - - - 10 4 1 14 14 - 1 14 14 LRes 17 7 24 47 48 10 105 129 5 13 111 111 MRes 46 - 46 19 17 1 37 84 6 2 75 75 HRes 12 - 12 49 - 5 53 66 2 4 60 60 Vacant Residential Acres 76 7 83 125 68 17 210 293 13 20 260 260 Percentage of Total Gross Vacant Acres 28%43%23%6%72% Buildable Vacant Residental Land Inventory by Comprehensive Plan Designation 8.A.c Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 7 of 23 reasonableness and likelihood of counting all Infill Land as being available for development during the planning period is questionable. Infill Lands are small in size and comprised of many individual property owners with a wide range of real estate development skills and tolerance for risk. To assume that all Infill Land is available places a significant burden on the City’s ability to both effectively and efficiently address housing affordability. The City acknowledges that Infill Land is an asset not be overlooked. The question is – to what extent should Infill Lands be reasonably expected to participate? For purposes of the BLI the City estimates that 20% of the Infill Land inventory is likely to be developed during the 20-year planning period. The 20% adjustment is acknowledged in the Housing Element, along with a policy to encourage and monitor infill activity. The 20% adjustment is based on a survey of infill development within the City between 1996 and 2016 (See Appendix “D”). Tables 5 and 6 adjust for the 20% infill land participation. 5.2 Redevelopment (Demolition) Land. The City uses the U.S. Census Methodology to determine the number of dwellings estimated to be demolished during the 20-year planning period. The methodology, and its application to the City are described in Appendix “C”. The redevelopment columns Tables 3 through 6 are based on the methodology in Appendix “C”. Table 5 City of Central Point 0.20 Comprehensive Plan Designation Vacant City1 Vacant UGB1 Total Vacant Acres Infill City Infill UGB Redev. City & UGB Total Infill & Redev. Acres Total Gross Vacant Acres (less) Envir. Acres, Vacant Lands (less) Envir. Acres, Infill Lands Total Net Vacant Acres Total Buildable Acres VLRes - - - 2 1 1 4 4 - 1 3 3 LRes 17 7 24 9 10 10 29 53 5 13 35 35 MRes 46 - 46 4 3 1 8 55 6 2 46 46 HRes 12 - 12 10 - 5 14 27 2 4 21 21 Vacant Residential Acres 75.8 7 83 25 14 17 56 138 13 20 105 105 Percentage of Total Gross Vacant Acres 60%18%10%12%40% Buildable Residental Land Inventory by Comprehensive Plan Designation Infill Availability Adjusted Table 4 City of Central Point Buildable Residential Land Inventory by Zoning Zoning Vacant City1 Vacant UGB1 Total Vacant Acres Infill City Infill UGB Redev. City & UGB Total Infill & Redev. Acres Total Gross Vacant Acres (less) Envir. Acres, Vacant Lands (less) Envir. Acres, Infill Lands Total Net Vacant Acres Less Public Need Acres Total Buildable Acres R-L - - - 10 4 1 14 14 - 1 14 14 R-1-6 2 - 2 28 4 5 37 39 0 6 33 33 R-1-8 2 - 2 10 1 4 15 17 0 1 16 16 R-1-10 0 - 0 4 6 0 11 11 0 0 11 11 LMR 21 7 28 5 37 1 43 70 11 6 53 53 R-2 2 - 2 4 - 1 5 8 - 1 7 7 R-3 4 - 4 37 - 5 42 46 - 2 44 44 MMR 36 - 36 15 17 0 32 68 0 2 66 66 HMR 8 - 8 11 - 0 11 20 2 2 16 16 Total Residential Acres 76 7 83 125 68 18 211 293 13 20 260 260 Percentage of Total Gross Vacant Acres 28%42%23%6%72% 8.A.c Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 8 of 23 6. Residential Land Need The primary function of the BLI is to assist in the identification of residential buildable land needs during a 20-year planning period. Table 7 identifies the estimated need for buildable residential as of 12/31/2018. Table 7 is based on input from the Population Element, the Housing Element, and the BLI. As noted earlier the BLI is a living document that changes as changes in residential development activity and policy occur. Table 6 City of Central Point Buildable Residential Land Inventory by Zoning Zoning Vacant City1 Vacant UGB1 Total Vacant Acres Infill City Infill UGB Redev. City & UGB Total Infill & Redev. Acres Total Gross Vacant Acres (less) Envir. Acres, Vacant Lands (less) Envir. Acres, Infill Lands Total Net Vacant Acres Total Buildable Acres R-L - - - 2 1 1 4 4 - 1 3 3 R-1-6 2 - 2 6 1 5 11 13 0 6 7 7 R-1-8 2 - 2 2 0 4 7 8 0 1 7 7 R-1-10 0 - 0 1 1 0 2 3 0 0 3 3 LMR 21 7 28 1 7 1 9 37 11 6 19 19 R-2 2 - 2 1 - 1 2 4 - 1 4 4 R-3 4 - 4 7 - 5 12 16 - 2 15 15 MMR 36 - 36 3 3 0 7 43 0 2 41 41 HMR 8 - 8 2 - 0 2 11 2 2 7 7 Total Residential Acres 76 7 83 25 14 18 56 139 13 20 105 105 Percentage of Total Gross Vacant Acres 59%18%10%13%41% Infill Availability Adjusted Table 7 Projected Residential Buildable Land Need 2019 to 2039 2018 Pop.1 19,101 2032 Forecast2 23,662 2039 Forecast3 26,317 Population Increase 7,216 Persons/HH4 2.50 Household Increase 2,887 Average Gross Density5 7.04 Needed Gross Residential Acres 410 Total Buildable Residential Acres6 105 Additional Needed Gross Residential Acres 305 1 Portland State University Population Research Center, Preliminary Estimate, 2018 2 Portland State University Population Research Center, Coordinated Population Forecast for Jackson County, its Urban Growth Boundaries (UGB), and Area Outside UGBs 2018-2068 3 Based on PSU Interprolation Worksheet 4 City of Central Point Population Element, 2017 - 2037 5 City of Central Point Regional Plan Element, 2015 - 2035 6 City of Central Point Buildable Lands Report, 2019 - 2039, Table 5. Infill Availability Adjusted Buildable Vacant Land by Comprehensive Plan 8.A.c Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 9 of 23 8.A.c Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 10 of 23 APPENDIX “A” – Definitions The 2019 BLI was last updated December 30, 2018. The following definitions are used in preparing and maintain the residential BLI. Definitions Buildable Land, Residential: Residentially designated lots or parcels within the City’s urban area, including vacant and developed lots or parcels likely to be redeveloped that are suitable, available and necessary for residential uses (OAR 660-008-0005(2)). Land is generally considered “suitable and available” unless it: 1. Is severely constrained by natural hazards as determined under Statewide Planning Goal 7; 2. Is subject to natural resource protection measures determined under Statewide Planning Goals 5, 6, 15, 16, 17 or 18; 3. Has slopes of 25 percent or greater; 4. Is within the 100-year flood plain; or 5. Cannot be provided with public facilities. Developed Land, Residential: Residentially designated lots or parcels of less than one-half acre that are currently occupied by a residence. (OAR 660-024-0050(2)(b). Infill Acres, Residential: Developed Residential Land of one-half acre or more, less one-quarter acre (10,890 square feet). OAR 660-024-0050(2)(a). Land to Improvement Ratio (L:I Ratio): The ratio between the real market value of land and the real market value of improvements as measured by taking the real improvement value of a parcel divided by the real land value based on the Jackson County Assessor records. Net Buildable Acre, Residential: Consists of 43,560 square feet of residentially designated buildable land, after excluding present and future rights-of-way for streets and roads (OAR 660- 024-0010(6)). Planning Area: The area within an existing, or proposed, urban growth boundary. Cities and counties with urban growth management agreements must address the urban land governed by their respective plans as specified in the urban growth management agreement for the affected area (OAR 660-009-0005(7)). Redevelopment Acres, Residential: Land zoned for residential use on which development has already occurred but on which, due to present or expected market forces, there exists the strong likelihood that existing development will be converted to more intensive residential uses during the planning period (OAR 660-008-0005(7)). Note: The BLI uses a methodology developed by the U.S. Census to determine the rate of residential redevelopment based on the age of structures. The specific methodology is presented in Appendix C, Methodology for State and County Total Housing Unit Estimates (Vintage 2017). Urban Area: Land within a UGB (OAR 660-24-10) 8.A.c Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 11 of 23 Vacant Acres, Residential: All residentially designated lots or parcels not currently containing permanent buildings or improvements. For purposes of determination of the presence of permanent buildings/improvements all residential lots or parcels with an improvement value of zero (0), as determined by the Jackson County Assessor, are considered vacant. 8.A.c Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 12 of 23 APPENDIX “B” - Methodology for Calculation of Residential Buildable Land The methodology used to inventory and calculate buildable lands is based on the definitions defined in Appendix A. The base data source for identification of buildable lands is the Jackson County Assessor’s Records dated April 2018, which has been modified to include such additional information as Comprehensive Plan designations, zoning, development status, etc. The modified database is referred to as the Buildable Lands Inventory (BLI2019.xls). Step 1. Urban Area, Gross Acres – Using the City’s GIS the total geographic limits of the City’s urban area are mapped and the gross acres within the limits of the shape file calculated by area within the City Limits and UGB. Step 2. Net Urban Area by Land Use and Zoning – Using BLI2018 sum by land use and zoning all tax lots within the City’s urban area (City Limits and UGB). Tax lots identified for street, road, or access right-of-way (public or private) purposes are not included. Step 3. Right-of-Way – Deduct the totals (City Limits and UGB) in Step 2 total from Step 1 total, the balance representing acreage used for right-of-way for the City Limits and UGB. The results of Steps 1 – 3 are presented in Tables 1 and 2 of the 2019 Residential BLI. Step 4. Buildable Acres, Residential. The methodology for calculating Buildable Residential Land involves the following steps: Step 4a. Residential Vacant Acres. The BLI identifies all tax lots by their land use designation, development status, and improvement value. When the improvement value of a property is zero the property is defined as Residential Vacant Land. The BLI sums the acreage for all Residential Vacant Land by land use and zoning for the City Limits and the UGB. Step 4b. Residential Infill Acres. The BLI identifies all residential tax lots for their infill potential. Residential properties in excess of .5 acres and with an improvement value in excess of zero are defined as Residential Developed Land. By deducting 10,890 sq. ft. from each Residential Developed Land record the balance is defined as Residential Infill Land. The BLI then sums the Residential Infill Land for all residentially designated properties, by land use and zoning for the City Limits and the UGB. Step 4c. Residential Redevelopment Acres. The BLI identifies all residential tax lots by the year the primary residence was built. Using the U.S. Census housing loss methodology presented in Appendix C. The BLI then sums the Residential Redevelopment Land for all residentially designated properties, by land use and zoning for the City Limits and the UGB. Step 4d. Gross Vacant Residential Acres. Using the sum of the totals generated from Steps 4a through 4c the BLI calculates the Gross Buildable Residential land by land use and zoning for the City Limits and the UGB. 8.A.c Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 13 of 23 Step 4e. Environmentally Constrained Acres. The BLI includes information on the acreage within each vacant and infill lot or parcel that is considered environmentally constrained. The BLI sums the environmentally constrained land for all residentially designated properties, by land use and zoning, developed, vacant, and infill/redevelopment. Step 4f. Total Buildable Residential Acres. The BLI takes the results from Step 4d, less the results from Step 4e, to yield Buildable Residential Land by land use and zoning. Step 5. Infill Lands Adjustment. The Infill Lands inventory is adjusted per the Infill Study in Appendix D. An adjustment of 20% is used to determine the amount of Infill Land that will be available during the 20-year planning period (Tables 5 and 6). The 20% adjustment accounts for “likelihood and availability” of Infill Lands (See Appendix D for Infill Methodology). Note: Per the Regional Plan Element’s measurement of residential development density as gross density it is important to note that for residential purposes the Buildable Residential Land number is used as a net figure, it does not include lands for public right-of-way, parks/open space, schools, or other public uses. For Employment lands public right-of-way is excluded. 8.A.c Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 14 of 23 APPENDIX “C” – Methodology for Identifying Residential Redevelopment (Demolition) Land The City does not maintain records for demolitions necessitating the use of another methodology for determining the number and rate of residential demolitions within the City’s urban area. The methodology used was found on the U.S Census web site and is referred to as Methodology for State and County Total Housing Unit Estimates (Vintage 2017): April 1, 2010 to July 1, 20171 (Methodology). The Methodology was applied to the City of Central Point as follows: Step 1. Demolition Rate by Region, Type of Housing Unit, and Age. The Methodology provided a loss rate based on the region, type of housing unit, and age of housing unit (Table 1). Step 2. Determine Distribution of Housing by Age and Type. The BLI maintains an inventory of housing by type, year built, and land use designation and zoning. Tables 2A through 2D identifies the housing construction in Central Point by type and year built segregated into age categories as presented in Table 1. 1 https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/methodology/2010-2017/2017-hu- meth.pdf Table 1. Type of Unit and Age Loss Rate (Units Lost/1,000 Units) House, Apartment 10 Years or less (2008-2018)0 11 to 30 years (1988-2007)0.37 31 to 59 years (1959-1987)0.54 60 or more years (1958 and Earlier)0.64 Mobile Home 1.8 Source: Methodology for State and County Total Housing Unit Estimates (Vintage 2017): April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2017 Housing Unit Loss Rate by Housing Type and Age, Western Region 8.A.c Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 15 of 23 Table 2C. City of Central Point, 1959 - 1987 Land Use Class Total Housing Units Built Total Mobile Homes Less Prior Periods Total Adjusted Units, 1959 - 1987 Annual Demolitions, SFR, MFR 20-Year Demolitions, SFR, MFR 20-Year Demolitions, MH Total Demolitions, 1959 - 1987 VLRes 92 2 30 60 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.7 LRes 3,891 85 2,515 1,291 0.7 13.9 3.1 17.0 MRes 1,009 2 899 108 0.1 1.2 0.1 1.2 HRes 1,831 456 1,079 296 0.2 3.2 16.4 19.6 Residential Units 6,823 545 4,523 1,755 1 19 20 39 0.54 1.8 Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Housing Type and Age Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolished, 1959 - 1987 Annual Demolition Rate per 1,000 Units: Table 2A. City of Central Point, 2008 - 2018 Land Use Class Total Housing Units Built Total Mobile Homes Installed Less Prior Period Built SFR and MFR Total Adjusted Units Built, 2008 - 2018 Annual Demolitions, SFR, MFR 20-Year Demolitions, SFR, MFR 20-Year Demolitions, MH Total Demolitions, 2008 - 2018 VLRes - - - - - - - - LRes 203 - - 203 - - - - MRes 216 - - 216 - - - - HRes 158 - - 158 - - - - Residential Units 577 - - 577 - - - - - - 1.80 Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Housing Type and Age Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolished, 2008 - 2018 Annual Demolition Rate per 1,000 Units: Table 2B. City of Central Point, 1988 - 2007 Land Use Class Total Housing Units Built Total Mobile Homes Less Prior Period Total Adjusted Units, 1988 - 2007 Annual Demolitions, SFR, MFR 20-Year Demolitions, SFR, MFR 20-Year Demolitions, MH Total Demolitions, 1988 - 2007 VLRes 30 - - 30 0.0 0.2 - 0.2 LRes 2,588 82 203 2,303 0.9 17.0 3.0 20.0 MRes 839 0 216 623 0.2 4.6 - 4.6 HRes 1,444 365 158 921 0.3 6.8 13.1 20.0 Residential Units 4,901 447 577 3,877 1 29 16 45 0.37 1.8 Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Housing Type and Age Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolished, 1988 - 2007 Annual Demolition Rate per 1,000 Units: Table 2D. City of Central Point, 1958 and Earlier Land Use Class Total Housing Units Built Total Mobile Homes Less Prior Period Total Adjusted Units, 1958 - Earlier Annual Demolitions, SFR, MFR 20-Year Demolitions, SFR, MFR 20-Year Demolitions, MH Total Demolitions, 1958 - Earlier VLRes 23 - - 23 0.0 0.3 - 0.3 LRes 190 1 - 189 0.1 2.4 0.0 2.5 MRes 204 1 - 203 0.1 2.6 0.0 2.6 HRes 155 3 - 152 0.1 1.9 0.1 2.1 Residential Units 572 5 - 567 0 7 0 7 0.64 1.8 Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Housing Type and Age Annual Demolition Rate per 1,000 Units: Dwelling Units Built and Dwelling Units Demolished, 1958 and Earlier 8.A.c Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 16 of 23 Step 3. Determine Annual Demolitions. Tables 2A through 2D apply the Methodology loss rates per 1,000 units (Table 1) by land use classification and age. Take the sum of the demolitions and multiply by 20 (projected years). Step 4. Determine Projected Demolitions and Related Acreage. Multiply the annual loss by the density for each land use classification. Take the sum of the annual demolitions and acreage and multiply by 20 (projected years) to get projected acres made available over the course of the 20-year planning period Table 3. Table 3 City of Central Point Estimated Dwelling Unit Demolitions by Land Use Classification 2019-2039 Land Use Class Total Demolitions Average Density (Units/Gross Acre) Demolition Acres VLRes 1 1 1 LRes 39 4 10 MRes 8 7 1 HRes 42 9 5 Totals 91 17 8.A.c Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 17 of 23 Methodology for State and County Total Hous ing Unit Estimates (Vintage 2017): April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2017 OVERVIEW The U.S. Census Bureau estimates the number of housing units for each year since the most recent decennial census. With each annual release of housing unit estimates, the entire time series of estimates beginning w ith April 1, 2010 is revised and updated. The estimates use building permits, estimates of non- permitted construction, mobile home shipments, and estimates of housing loss to estimate change in the housing stock. These component data come from various Census Bureau surveys. We produce housing unit estimates for all states and counties annually. We release these estimates to the public, and they are used as controls for several Census Bureau surveys, including the American Community Survey (ACS), the American Housing Survey (AHS), and the Housing Vacancy Survey (HVS). In addition to state and county housing unit estimates, w e also produce subcounty housing unit estimates. These estimates are central to the production of population estimates for cities and tow ns across the nation. METHOD We produce housing unit estimates using the components of housing change. In this model, w e add together the 2010 Census count of housing units, estimated new residential construction, and estimated new mobile homes. From this sum w e subtract the estimated housing units lost. The computation of annual July 1 housing unit estimates is expressed by the follow ing formula: 2010 C e n sus Hou s i ng Un i ts Ne w Re s i de ntial C on s truction Ne w Mobi l e Hom e s Hou s i ng Un i ts Los t Ju l y 1 Hou s i ng Unit Es ti m ate After these data are combined to produce a preliminary set of housing estimates, they are review ed by members of the Federal-State Cooperative for Population Estimates (FSCPE) and by local jurisdictions. The final housing estimates may reflect updates from their review of the estimates . Each component of the housing unit change model is described below . 2010 Census Housing Units Every year, w e re-tabulate the 2010 Census counts of housing units in current legal geographic boundaries to form the base for the annual housing unit estimates. The base for the housing estimates reflects annual geographic boundary updates from the Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS) that are legally effective as of January 1. The base also includes the results of completed Count Question Resolution (CQR) actions and geographic program revisions incorporated into the Master Address File (MAF)/TIGER Database through May of each estimate’s year. 8.A.c Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 18 of 23 New Residential Construction Residential construction is the largest component of housing change. We estimate new residential construction in tw o parts: permitted construction and non-permitted construction. The calculation of new residential construction is represented by the follow ing formula: Pe rm i tted C onstruction Bu i l din g Pe rm i ts Is s u e d Pe rm i t C om pl etion Rate Non - pe rm i tted C on s truction Ne w Re s i de ntial C on s truction Permitted Construction According to the Census Bureau, more than 98 percent of all new housing units are erected in places that issue building permits. We calculate estimates of new permitted construction by multiplying the number of residential building permits issued by a permit completion rate. Data on issued permits come from the Building Permits Survey (BPS). 1 This survey includes reported permits from approximately 20,000 jurisdictions. These data are reported to the BPS by calendar year for cities and tow ns across the country. Implicit in the method of using calendar year permits is an assumption of a six-month lag time betw een w hen a building permit is issued and w hen the housing unit is completed. Thus, permits that are issued in the first six months of a particular calendar year are not processed in the housing unit estimates until the follow ing year. For example, the July 1, 2014 housing unit estimates are based on permits issued betw een January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. Permits issued between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014 w ill be processed in the 2015 housing unit estimates. The permit completion rates used to calculate new permitted construction are based on national estimates of permits that are either abandoned or deemed “out of scope” by the Survey of Construction (SOC). 2¸3 We update the completion rate every year, as new survey data become available. The 2014 permit completion rate reflects the percent of building permits issued in calendar year 2013 that resulted in completed housing units. The Cens us Bureau conducts the BPS. For more information about this s urvey, s ee http://www.census.gov/construction/bps/. 2 Abandoned permits are permits that the s urvey res pondent or building permit office has indicated that construction of the housing unit(s) authorized by that permit will not be completed using that permit. Out of s cope permits are thos e that were reported as permits for new, privately -owned housing units by the building permit office, but it was later determined that the units did not meet the definition of new privately -owned housing units (e.g., the units were intended as group quarters, for commercial us e, etc.). 3 The Cens us Bureau conducts the SOC. For more information about this s urvey, s ee http://www.census.gov/econ/overview/co0400.html. 8.A.c Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 19 of 23 Non-permitted Construction We calculate estimates of new non-permitted construction using data on new residential housing units constructed in places that do not issue building permits . These data also come from the SOC. The estimates of non-permitted construction are regional-level data that w e distribute to all places that do not receive building permits, based on each place’s share of the region’s total housing units enumerated in the 2010 Census. For example, if a place contained 5 percent of the region’s housing units as of the 2010 Census, and does not issue building permits, w e distribute 5 percent of the region’s non-permitted units in the SOC to that place. There is no lag time applied to the estimates of non-permitted construction. The sampling frame for the SOC does not include any non-permitting areas in the West; therefore, w e do not distribute non-permitted housing units to places in that region. New Mobile Homes The data w e use to create estimates of new mobile homes come from the Manufactured Homes Survey (MHS).4 We calculate annual mobile home estimates by compiling monthly state shipment data from July of the previous year through June of the current year. For example, the July 1, 2014 mobile home estimates are based on mobile home shipment data from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014. We distribute the state- level mobile home estimates to each place w ithin the state based on each place’s share of the state’s total mobile homes . To do so, w e use information from the Census 2000 long form on “type of structure” for housing units. Housing Unit Loss We calculate housing unit loss by applying an annual loss rate to the housing stock. The vintage 2017 estimates of housing units lost are based on regional-level data from the 2009 and 2011 American Housing Survey (AHS).5 A unit is counted as lost if a survey w as completed in 2009, but it w as listed as a non-response (Type C, 30 – Demolished) in the 2011 survey. The housing loss rates vary by type and age of structure, w hich are obtained from the 2010 American Community Survey (ACS) single-year file. Housing units fall under one of three types: houses (including apartments and flats), mobile homes, or other types of housing units. The vintage 2017 housing loss rates are as follow s: 4 The Cens us Bureau conducts the MHS. For more information about this s urvey, s ee https://www.census.gov/programs -surveys/mhs.html. 5 The Cens us Bureau conducts the AHS. For more information about this s urvey, s ee http://www.census.gov/programs -surveys/ahs/. 8.A.c Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) REVIEW DRAFT – 2019 Residential BLI Page 20 of 23 V2017 Housing Unit Loss Rates by Region, Type and Age Type of Unit Loss Rate (Units Lost/1,000 Units) Northeast South Midwest West House, Apartment/Flat 10 years or less 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 to 30 years 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 31 to 59 years 0.40 1.31 2.57 0.54 60 or more years 0.75 3.68 6.85 0.64 Mobile Homes 8.74 4.08 3.64 1.80 Other Housing Units6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 The rates of loss for units less than 10 years old is too small for us to estimate w ith confidence w ith the data w e have available, therefore, w e assume that the rate is zero. We also assume that the “Other Housing Units” are constantly churning and, since we have no grow th component for this category, a loss rate of zero seems appropriate. Numeric estimates of loss are then calculated by applying the above rates to the base file as it is aged to the current vintage year. The base file is given type and age of structure characteristics by applying distributions calculated from the 2010 ACS single-year file. After aging the base from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2010, the process iterates annually and units increase in age by 1 year at each iteration. July 1, 2010 Housing Unit Estimates We use one quarter of the 2010 permitted and non-permitted construction, mobile homes, and housing loss to produce the July 1, 2010 estimates. This represents the change in housing stock during the three month period from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2010. REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES The preliminary housing unit estimates are distributed for review to members of the FSCPE. Some FSCPE members provide revisions to the estimates, in the form of alternative housing component data, based on information they compile from the jurisdictions within their respective states. Alternative housing component data include local building permits, mobile home placements, demolitions, and housing completions derived from non-permitted construction, certificates of occupancy and housing 6 “Other Hous ing Units” include boats, recreational vehicles, and oth er types of housing arrangements. 8.A.c Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) ESTIMATES CHALLENGE AND SPECIAL CENSUS REVISIONS Localities that challenge the Census Bureau’s subcounty population estimates have the option of revising the housing component data specific to their area. 7 These revisions are included in the final housing unit estimates. The final estimates may also include other changes due to revisions that occur outside the component estimation framework and are the result of special censuses8 for full jurisdictions. Special census revisions are reflected in the July 1, 2010 to July 1 of the year follow ing the special census. 7 For a lis t of accepted s ubcounty population challenges, s ee https://www.census.gov/programs - s urveys/popest/about/challen ge -program/results.html. 8 Special Cens us Program res ults are available here https://www.census.gov/programs -surveys/specialcensus/data_products/official_counts.html. For a lis t of accepted s pecial census res ults incorporated into the Population Es timates, s ee https://www.census.gov/programs - surveys/popest/about/special-census.html. 8.A.c Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) 2019 – 2039 Residential BLI Page 22 of 23 APPENDIX “D” – Infill Survey, City of Central Point, 2019-2039 The Infill Land classification in Table 3 and Table 4 represents an extraordinarily large percentage (67%) of the City’s buildable residential lands inventory. As a vacant land classification the reasonableness of counting all Infill lands as being available for development during the 20-year planning period is questionable. Infill Lands are small in size and comprised of many individual property owners, each with a varying range of market knowledge and risk tolerance. To assume that all Infill Lands are available places a significant burden on the City’s ability to both effectively and efficiently address housing affordability. The City acknowledges that Infill Lands are an asset not be overlooked. The question is the extent of participation as a component of the buildable lands determination? To gather some insights into the role of Infill lands as a part of the City’s residential buildable lands inventory the City surveyed residential infill development activity between 1996 and 2016, a 20-year period. The findings of the survey are presented in Table 1. It was found that during the survey period infill activity accounted for development of approximately 30 acres, with maximum yield of 270 housing units. During the same period the City experienced development of 3,619 dwelling units. Assuming that all infill units surveyed were developed during the survey period this would have accounted for approximately 8% (Participation Rate, Housing) of the total housing built and 6% (Participation Rate, Land) of the buildable residential consumed acres in the City from 1996 to 2016. For Infill Land purposes it is recommended that the 6% Participation Rate be upwardly adjusted to 20%. The 20% Participation Rate serves as a goal for future infill development. Throughout the 20-year planning period the Participation Rate should be tracked and policies adopted to encourage infill development at the 20% rate, or greater. The survey results are not absolutes, but instead provide a reference from which to view and evaluate the role of Infill lands in the City’s residential BLI. The Housing Element recognizes the findings of the Infill Survey and sets a 20% Participation Rate for Land. The Residential BLI has been adjusted to recognize the 20% participation rate as a reasonable measure of the availability of Infill lands. To be monitored over the next 20-years. The Housing Element further encourages the development of policies that will improve the rate of participation. 8.A.c Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) 2019 – 2039 Residential BLI Page 23 of 23 Table 1. City of Central Point Infill Development Activity 1996 through 2016 SUBDIVISION YEAR PLATTED # OF PARCELS DUs ZONING LAND USE GROSS ACRES Whittle Partition Feb-96 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.50 Whittle Partition Mar-96 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.50 Whittle Partition Mar-96 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.50 Whittle Partition Mar-96 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.50 Countryside Village Phase II Mar-96 5 15 R-3 HRes 0.94 Lowe Partition Jun-96 2 2 R1-6 LRes 0.42 Countryside Village Phase II Aug-96 3 9 R-3 HRes 0.56 Gutches & Gifford Aug-96 2 2 R1-6 LRes 0.42 Crown West Partition Aug-96 6 12 R-2 MRes 1.50 Governor Partition Aug-96 4 8 R-2 MRes 1.00 Jangaard Partition Jan-97 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.50 Countryside Village Feb-97 4 12 R-3 HRes 0.75 Fancher Partition Jun-97 3 3 R1-6 LRes 0.63 Governor Partition Jan-98 2 6 R-3 HRes 0.38 Snowy Mountain View Phase 1 Partition May-98 6 18 R-3 HRes 1.13 Forest Glen Partition Jun-98 2 2 R-3 HRes 0.13 Snowy Mountain View Partition Sep-98 22 22 R-3 HRes 1.38 Sandlin Partition Mar-99 3 9 R-3 HRes 0.56 Brink Partition Apr-99 4 12 R-3 HRes 0.75 Thumler Partition Jun-99 3 3 R1-6 LRes 0.63 Key West Proerties Partition Jun-99 2 2 R1-8 LRes 0.42 Cavin/Smith Partition Oct-00 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.50 LDS Partition Oct-00 2 2 R1-10 LRes 0.42 Smith Partition Jan-01 2 2 R1-6 LRes 0.42 Lafon Partition Apr-01 2 2 R1-8 LRes 0.42 Giese Partition Apr-01 2 2 R1-6 LRes 0.42 Orr Partition Jul-01 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.50 Higinbotham Partition Feb-02 2 4 R1-8 LRes 0.83 Williamson Partition May-02 2 2 R1-6 LRes 0.42 Dekorte Partition May-03 3 3 R1-8 LRes 0.63 Ross Partition Sep-03 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.50 Rogers Partition May-04 2 2 R1-8 LRes 0.42 Coffin Partition May-04 4 8 R-2 MRes 0.50 Lamson Partition May-04 2 2 LMR MRes 0.13 A.R.E Properties May-04 2 2 R1-6 LRes 0.42 Lamson Partition Oct-04 2 2 TOD-MMR HRes 0.13 Twin Creek Partition Mar-05 2 2 LMR MRes 0.13 Castellano Partition Jun-05 3 3 R1-6 LRes 0.63 Twin Creeks Partition Jul-05 2 2 LMR MRes 0.13 Grissom Partition Sep-05 2 2 TOD-MMR HRes 0.13 Magel Homes Partition Oct-05 2 2 LMR MRes 0.13 Dahl House Partition Oct-05 3 3 R1-8 LRes 0.63 Williams Partition Nov-05 3 3 LMR MRes 0.19 Skillman Brothers Partition Jan-06 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.25 Cascade Meadows Phase 1 Mar-06 3 3 TOD-LMR MRes 0.19 Altus Construction May-06 4 8 R-2 MRes 0.50 CoWest Partition Jun-06 2 2 R1-10 LRes 0.42 Whitten Partition Jun-06 3 3 R1-8 LRes 0.63 Lisk Partition Jul-06 2 2 R1-10 LRes 0.42 Pattison Addition Aug-06 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.25 Skillman Brothers Partition Aug-06 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.25 Bursell Rd Nov-06 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.25 Block 70 of Plat of CP Dec-06 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.25 Danbrook Partition Jan-07 2 6 R-3 HRes 0.38 Rambo Partition Oct-07 2 2 R-L VLRes 1.25 Brown Partition Apr-08 1 1 R1-6 LRes 0.21 Hatten Partition Dec-13 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.25 Lee Partition Apr-15 2 2 R1-6 LRes 0.42 Kottke Partition Apr-16 3 6 R-2 MRes 0.38 Lewellyn Partition May-16 3 3 R1-8 LRes 0.63 Adams Partition Jan-06 2 4 R-2 MRes 0.25 TOTALS 174 285 29.77 Units Constructed in the City, 1996-2016 3,619 601.40 Percentage 7.9%5% 8.A.c Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: 2019 BLI Residential 20% (Final Draft) (1112 : Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Community Development FROM: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: March 14, 2019 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. ___________, Updating and Adopting the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element (2019-2039) ACTION REQUIRED: Ordinance 2nd Reading RECOMMENDATION: Approval BACKGROUND: The City’s Urbanization Element was last acknowledged in 1983 and is in need of updating to account for over 30 years of incremental changes that have occurred. The Urbanization Element is modeled after Statewide Planning Goal 14, which emphasizes the need for all communities to: “Provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities.” As stated in the element itself, urbanization is not responsible for the building of functional, or dysfunctional cities, beautiful, or blighted cities, it is merely the process that fuels the building of cities. The quality of the built city is a function of a community’s ability to define and diligently pursue a preferred future. Central Point’s preferred future is currently guided by two documents; the Fair City Vision 2020 and The Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan. The City has also adopted revisions to its Population Element, Housing Element and Land Use Element which provide additional direction for projected urban residential and employment growth. Central Point Forward, Fair City Vision 2020 highlights the City’s unique identity, livability objectives and the mission, vision and values upon which the Urbanization program is based. The document has helped elected officials and City staff to focus and to attract the type of innovative, responsible and community-minded residents and businesses that contribute to a healthy Central Point future. Important concepts of the vision plan are emphasized in the Urbanization Element. The Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan is a fifty-year planning document that was created in collaboration with Jackson County and five other cities to address long-term urbanization needs of the region. The most significant product(s) of the Regional Plan is the establishment of requirements which affect the form and function of future urban-level 8.B Packet Pg. 74 development and the creation of Urban Reserve Areas (URAs). Regional Plan requirements are emphasized in the Urbanization Element and the URAs are targeted when considering the locational criteria. The Urbanization Element’s primary responsibility is to establish criteria (goals and policies) that manage the physical direction of the City’s planned growth. Therefore it must rely on other Comprehensive Plan Elements. These elements include the Population Element, the Housing Element, the Economic Element, the Parks and Recreation Element, the Land Use Element, the Transportation Element and the Public Facilities Element. A brief explanation of the content and resources each of these elements provide are discussed in the Urbanization Element. Aside from a demonstration that there is a need to accommodate the City’s long-range population growth and related land needs there is a requirement that the boundaries within which the City’s urban lands are located be given some forethought. The location of the City’s urban growth boundary (UGB) and changes to the UGB are determined by evaluating alternative boundary locations consistent with ORS 197.020, and with consideration of the following locational criteria: 1. Properties that abut either the City Limits, or the current UGB. 2. Properties that are in excess of 10 acres. 3. Properties that abut or are within 500 ft. of basic urban services; i.e. water, sewer, storm water, transportation. 4. Properties that are proximate to, or include, mixed use/pedestrian friendly areas. 5. Compatibility with nearby agricultural uses outside the proposed UGB. 6. Proximity to transportation infrastructure. 7. Lands that have been master planned. 8. Readiness for development 9. Proximity to the City Center, using a Central Growth Pattern Attached is the final draft of the Urbanization Element (Attachment A) for the City Council’s consideration, input and ultimate approval. The document and locational criteria were discussed with both the CAC and the Planning Commission who both endorsed the Element. The last three locational criteria have been introduced to the Urbanization Element with the intent of minimizing land speculation that often occurs during UGB Amendments. ISSUES: The primary issues in considering the Urbanization Element are ensuring there is agreement between state and local purposes and that the City’s choice of locational criteria is reasonable and justifiable. FISCAL ANALYSIS The Urbanization Element update does not generate additional cost to the City beyond the in- kind staff expenses, postage and legal notification costs included in the budget for Community Development. The fiscal impact of extending public infrastructure and services will be evaluated at such time the City proposes amendments to its UGB. LEGAL ANALYSIS The Urbanization Element Comprehensive Plan text amendments are considered “Major Amendments” per CPMC 17.96.300 and are subject to Type IV Legislative application procedures per CPMC 17.05.500. Conducting a second public hearing by the City Council is necessary and consistent with the requisite procedures to adopt changes to the element. Aside from procedural compliance, the primary changes to be discussed include those identified by ORS 197.020 evaluating alternative boundary locations for UGB Amendment. COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS 8.B Packet Pg. 75 The City Council goal to provide managed growth and infrastructure is predicated on the ability of the City to forecast growth and the corresponding land and service needs over the long term. The 2019-2039 Urbanization Element aligns with Council’s goal by, “Continually ensuring that planning and zoning review and regulations are consistent with comprehensive plans and vision.” ACTION Consider the second reading of the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Urbanization Element (2019-2039), and 1) approve the ordinance; 2) approve the ordinance with revisions; 3) deny the ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Approve Ordinance No. ___ An Ordinance Updating and Adopting the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element (2019-2039) ATTACHMENTS: 1. Approval Resolution 02-05-19 2. ORDINANCE (Urbanization) 3. Urbanization Element 2019 8.B Packet Pg. 76 ATTACHMENT “B” Planning Commission Resolution No. 867 (02/05/2019) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 867 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2018-2038 URBANIZATION ELEMENT WHEREAS, the latest version of the Urbanization Element was adopted in 1983 and needs to be updated to reflect the latest population projections and housing needs; and WHEREAS, the City has recently adopted its Population Element, Economic Element, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Transportation Element, Regional Plan Element, and Housing Element each addressing specific land use issues and needs; and WHEREAS, it is timely and appropriate to apply the land use findings of the above Comprehensive Plan elements to the Urbanization Element; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly- noticed public hearing at which time it reviewed the City staff report (File No. 18002) and heard testimony and comments on the draft City of Central Point 2018-38 Urbanization Element. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 867 does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of the 2018-38 Urbanization Element as presented in Attachment “A”. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5th day of February, 2019 ___________________________________ Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Representative Approved by me this 5th day of February, 2019. ___________________________________ Planning Commission Chair 8.B.a Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Approval Resolution 02-05-19 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) ATTACHMENT “C” Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE UPDATING AND ADOPTING THE CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN URBANIZATION ELEMENT (2019-2039) Recitals: A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning Goals. B. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals and compatibility with City and County Comprehensive Plans. C. ORS 197.296-298 directs jurisdictions to prioritize land to be included in the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). Additionally, the locational factors in the Urbanization Element of the Comprehensive Plan are updated to reflect the City’s preferred future. D. Pursuant to authority granted by the City Charter and the ORS, the City has determined to update its Urbanization Element which was originally adopted and acknowledged in 1983. E. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.10.100 Amendments – Purpose and Chapter 17.96.010, Procedure, the City has initiated the amendments and conducted the following duly advertised public hearings to consider the proposed amendments: a) Planning Commission hearing on February 5, 2019 b) City Council hearing on February 28, 2019. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Based upon all the information received, the City Council adopts the Staff Reports and evidence which are incorporated herein by reference; determines that changing community conditions, needs and desires justify the amendments and hereby adopts the changes entirely. Section 2. The City Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element is hereby updated and adopted as set forth in Exhibit A –Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Element, 2019-2039 which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 3. The City Manager is directed to conduct post acknowledgement procedures defined in ORS 197.610 et seq. upon adoption of the Urbanization Element. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this ___ day of ____________, 2019. __________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: _____________________________ City Recorder 8.B.b Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: ORDINANCE (Urbanization) (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) City of Central Point ATTACHMENT “A” COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Chapter 2 – Urbanization Element, 2010 City of Central Point URBANIZATION ELEMENT 2019-2039 Draft 3/4/2019 8.B.c Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) Page 2 of 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Purpose of the Urbanization Element .......................................................................................................... 3 A Preferred Future .................................................................................................................................... 3 Central Point Forward, Fair City Vision 2020 ............................................................................................ 3 The Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan (Regional Plan) .................................................................. 5 Livability Principles ........................................................................................................................................ 6 PLANNING TIME FRAME, 2019 – 2039 ................................................................................................................ 7 Urbanization Factors ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Population Element .................................................................................................................................. 7 Housing Element ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Economic Element .................................................................................................................................... 8 Parks and Recreation Element .................................................................................................................. 8 Land Use Element ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Public Facilities Element ........................................................................................................................... 9 Transportation Element (Transportation System Plan) ............................................................................ 9 Environmental Element ............................................................................................................................ 9 Urban Growth Boundary Location Criteria ................................................................................................... 9 Urban Growth Boundary Amendment ProceDures .................................................................................... 10 Major Amendment.................................................................................................................................. 10 Minor Urban Growth Boundary Adjustments ........................................................................................ 11 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT ...................................................................................... 11 URBANIZATION GOALS & POLICIES ..................................................................................................................... 12 Goal ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 Policies .................................................................................................................................................... 12 8.B.c Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) Page 3 of 13 INTRODUCTION Urbanization is defined as the movement of people from rural to urban environments, and from urban environments to other urban environments. This movement can be motivated by any number of reasons; such as jobs, housing, health care, retirement, and education. The product of urbanization is realized in the incremental increase in the demand for urban services such as housing, and supporting physical and social infrastructure, and the land necessary to support the urbanization process. Urbanization has its most negative impact when the demand for support infrastructure exceeds supply, resulting in a reduction in livability as evidenced by overcrowded schools, poor health care, traffic congestion, urban blight, inadequate utility services, environmental pollution, housing affordability, etc. Urbanization is not responsible for the building of functional, or dysfunctional cities, beautiful, or blighted cities, it is merely the process that fuels the building of cities. The quality of the built city is a function of a community’s ability to define and diligently pursue a preferred future. Over the course of the next twenty years Central Point’s population will continue to increase, fueling the urbanization process and resulting in millions of dollars in public and private investment for housing, businesses, and infrastructure. The outcome of that investment will be defined by the City’s preferred future, and the urbanization strategies, policies and implementing ordinances adopted to attain that preferred future. PURPOSE OF THE URBANIZATION ELEMENT The significance of urbanization on the economic, environmental, and general welfare of communities throughout the state is acknowledged in Statewide Planning Goal 14, Urbanization; which establishes as a statewide goal the need for all communities to: “Provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities.” The purpose of the City’s Urbanization Element is modeled after the Statewide Planning Goal 14 purpose, but with an emphasis on attaining the City’s preferred future as described in the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the City’s Urbanization Element is to: “Provide for the orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use in accordance with the goals and policies of the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan as necessary to accommodate projected urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use of land, as necessary to provide for the City’s preferred future.” A Preferred Future There are two documents; the Fair City Vision 2020 and The Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan that together define the City’s preferred future, and as such serve as the cornerstone of the Urbanization Element. Because of the significance of their role in defining the City’s urbanization these two documents are briefly discussed in the Urbanization Element. Central Point Forward, Fair City Vision 2020 (Vision 2020) – Vision 2020 addresses the City’s unique identity and livability objectives, and the mission, vision, and values 8.B.c Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) Page 4 of 13 on which the City’s urbanization program is based. By keeping the focus on livability, the City will not only be able to maintain its policy focus but also be able to attract the type of innovative, responsible and community-minded residents and businesses that will contribute to the pursuit of a successful future for the City of Central Point. Maintaining an acceptable level of livability consistently rises to the top as one of the primary challenges confronting all communities as they grow. For Central Point livability is a point of pride and the primary reason people are attracted to the City as a place to live, work, and play. In 1998 the City adopted its first strategic plan to guide its general growth and decision making process. This plan served the community well and was updated in 2007 as Central Point Forward, Fair City Vision 2020 (Vision Plan). The significance of the Vision Plan is that it defines basic livability objectives to be applied by elected officials in their deliberation on issues related to the City’s urbanization. Participants in the Vision Plan attribute Central Point's livability to a matrix of factors. The citizens of Central Point realize that their preferred level of livability does not come about by chance, but rather is intentionally created through collaborative community efforts, innovative planning, public policy, and effective and efficient implementation strategies. The Vision Plan’s livability objectives are presented in three core elements; Mission, Vision, and Values. These core elements are carried forward and incorporated in the Urbanization Element’s goals and policies. Our Mission. “It is the mission of the City of Central Point to build and maintain a highly livable community by working in harmony and being a catalyst for partnership with all members of the community, public and private.” Our Vision. To create a community:  With a “small town” commitment and feel that promotes community pride, safety, and friendliness. 8.B.c Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) Page 5 of 13  That provides consistent quality in guiding growth, beautifying and strengthening the downtown area, and providing adequately for City services, while being flexible and updating citizens.  Where we work jointly with our community schools, libraries, and public/private institutions to increase opportunities for the development of our youth and our citizens.  Where city, county, state, and federal agencies work together as partners with a “can do” attitude.  That protects our unique identity – People know when they are in the “Heart of the Rogue Valley” – Central Point. Our Values. In achieving the City’s mission and vision it is important to set forth a system of values on which to base our behavior in addressing the urbanization challenges. These values are: Growth: We value planned growth that will retain our small town atmosphere. Public Safety: We value a professional service oriented public safety policy that promotes a sense of safety and security in our city. Transportation: We value a system of transportation and infrastructure that is modern, efficient, and sensitive to the environment. Community: We value a clean and attractive city with parks, open space and recreational opportunities. Service: We provide the highest level of service possible in the most efficient and responsible manner. The Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan (Regional Plan) – establishes the basic planning timeframe and urbanization needs, goals, and policies for the region and its participating cities, including the City of Central Point. The Regional Plan is the product of a regional land-use planning project involving Ashland, Central Point, Eagle Point, Medford, Phoenix, Talent, and Jackson County (Participants). The purpose of the Regional Plan was to define a preferred future of the Participants to accommodate projected population and job growth to the year 2060, an approximate 50 year planning period. The most significant products of the Regional Plan are the establishment of minimum residential density requirements and, through the establishment of urban reserve areas (URAs), the efficient use of land by each of the Participants. The purpose of the 8.B.c Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) Page 6 of 13 URA is to reserve land for future urban-level development. The method of establishing an urban reserve is defined in state law (see ORS 195.137–145). The State legislature’s findings in the bill creating the urban reserve statute are succinct in stating their value: “The Legislative Assembly finds that…long-range planning for population and employment growth by local governments can offer greater certainty for…commerce, other industries, other private landowners and providers of public services, by determining the more [likely] and less likely locations of future expansion of urban growth boundaries and urban development.”1 The Regional Plan provides Central Point with an additional 1,720 gross acres in the 8 urban reserve areas. The goal of the plan is to protect the valley’s farmland while allowing urbanization to progress in areas planned to accommodate growth. This plan also provides participants with a roadmap for the future to ensure that as urbanization occurs, the necessary infrastructure is able to be put in place to support projected growth. LIVABILITY PRINCIPLES Although the primary objective of the state’s Urbanization Goal is the efficient use of land, it is important that we do not lose sight of maintaining a livable community. The ultimate goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to provide a roadmap for the City of Central Point to maintain and enhance the livability of the City as it continues to grow. The SPOT chart (below) identifies the Strengths, Problems, Opportunities and Threats facing Central Point as it moves forward. The livability principles identified in this section can be incorporated into each comprehensive plan element to encourage the development of a livable community. A description of each element and how they relate to the Urbanization Element and livability is described below. The six livability principles and the City’s aligned Vision are: 1 ORS 197.139 8.B.c Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) Page 7 of 13 1. Promote transportation choices Continue to support the development of safe, reliable and economical transportation choices that improve the City’s multi-modal transportation mix to decrease household transportation costs, improve air quality, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote public health. 2. Promote equitable, affordable housing Expand housing choices for people of all ages, incomes, races and ethnicities to increase housing mobility and lower the cost of housing and transportation. 3. Enhance economic competitiveness Improve economic competitiveness through reliable and timely access to employment centers, educational opportunities, services, and other basic needs by workers, as well as expanded business access to markets. 4. Support existing neighborhoods Continue targeting funds toward existing neighborhoods – through strategies like transit-oriented, mixed-use development, and redevelopment, to increase community revitalization and the efficiency of public works investments. 5. Coordinate and leverage investment policies Align the City’s capital improvement programs to collaborate, leverage funding, and increase the accountability and effectiveness of all levels of government to plan for the City’s future growth. 6. Value our neighborhoods Enhance the unique “small town” characteristics of the City by investing in healthy, safe, and walkable neighborhoods. PLANNING TIME FRAME, 2019 – 2039 The urbanization needs of the City are based on two timeframes; a twenty (20) year time frame addressing the City’s urban land needs, and an extended timeframe (an additional 30 years) addressing the planning period identified in the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan, which is based on a doubling of the region’s population by approximately 2060. For purposes of this Urbanization Element the planning period 2019 to 2039 will be used, with the Regional Plan’s timeframe serving as a longer term review. URBANIZATION FACTORS The Urbanization Element’s primary responsibility is to establish criteria (goals and policies) that manage the physical direction of the City’s planned growth. To do this it must rely on the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The following is a brief description of other elements of the Comprehensive Plan and their key contributions to the Urbanization Element. Population Element The basic input to the urbanization process is population growth. In accordance with ORS 195.033 Portland State University’s Population Research Center (PRC) is responsible for preparing population projections for all counties and cities in the state, and updating their projections on a four year cycle. 8.B.c Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) Page 8 of 13 The Population Element maintains the City’s population and demographic forecasts, and is the resource document for the Urbanization Element in all references to the City’s population and demographic characteristics. Key Contribution: Population forecasts. Housing Element Housing is a key component of any city’s urbanization and is directly related to Livability Principle No. 2 above. The Housing Element supports the Urbanization Element by analyzing trends that affect the City’s housing needs during the planning period. The City’s Housing Element provides an assessment of current and future housing needs to ensure that there are a variety of housing options for Central Point including varying densities and affordability. The Housing Element aims to ensure that future, residential design standards, infrastructure and development help to preserve the small town feel of Central Point, protect agricultural land and provide housing to all citizens at all income levels. The Housing Element maintains the City’s housing goals and policies, and is the resource document for the Urbanization Element in all references to the City’s housing needs. Key Contribution: Residential acreage needs. Economic Element The City’s livability is dependent on a dynamic, diversified, and growing economic base that complements and reinforces the small town character goal (Livability Principle No. 3) . Central Point will be regionally competitive with policies that attract and retain businesses and employment for its citizens, provide essential services and maintain a strong tax base. Economic competitiveness and prosperity will be the means of supporting a quality of life that is distinctive among Valley communities. The economic element will support and facilitate the City’s Urbanization Element through the development and implementation of policies and implementation measures that promote opportunities for a variety of economic activities within the City’s urban area, improving the health, welfare, and prosperity of its citizens. The Economic Element provides a written framework for meeting the City’s economic goal to diversify its economic base. The Economic Element maintains the City’s goals and policies related to the City’s economic growth. It is also the resource document for the Urbanization Element in all references to the City’s economy. Key Contribution: Employment acreage needs. Parks and Recreation Element The long-term parks and recreation needs of the City are described in the Parks and Recreation Element. The Parks and Recreation Element not only determines the acreage needs of the City, but also identifies the general location of the City’s future community and neighborhood parks. Key Contribution: Parks and recreation acreage need and general location. 8.B.c Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) Page 9 of 13 Land Use Element The use of land and its percentage distribution are common indicators of how a community grows and responsibly expands its infrastructure. The Land Use Element addresses the City’s past, present and future use of land and also introduces the concept of ‘Activity Centers’. The Land Use Element maintains the City’s land use goals and policies, and is the resource document for the Urbanization Element in all references to the City’s land use. Key Contribution: Geographic distribution of urban land. Public Facilities Element The Public Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan is directly related to Livability Principle No. 5 and will address and assure the provision of city services. These services include sewer, storm drainage, and water. As the city grows, these services will have to be able to meet the needs of citizens in newly developed areas as well as continue to provide for current residents. This element provides an assessment of the current public facilities to meet citizens’ needs. Also, any future extension of services will be guided by this element to ensure that future growth is supported by an adequate and efficient network of public facilities in order to meet the needs of all its citizens. Key Contribution: Existing and planned availability of public facilities. Transportation Element (Transportation System Plan) The Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan is directly related to Livability Principle No. 1 and No. 5 by providing quality roads and other modal options to city residents and businesses. As growth occurs, the City will have to ensure that all residents have access to transportation and that the roads and other modes of transportation are able to accommodate the community’s needs. Future improvements to the transportation system will be guided by this element to ensure that future growth is supported by an adequate and efficient network of roads in order to meet the needs of all its residents. Key Contribution: Existing and planned availability of the City’s transportation system. Environmental Element The purpose of the Environmental Element is to identify the goals and policies addressing both the City’s environmental assets and potential disasters, and to integrate those policies with the Urbanization and Land Use Elements. There is no one specific livability goal for environmental protection; instead, environmental protection is woven throughout all of the livability goals. This element will support the Urbanization element by providing goals and policies that encourage sustainability and protection of natural resources that occurs simultaneously with growth in Central Point. URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY LOCATION CRITERIA Aside from a demonstration that there is a need to accommodate the City’s long-range population growth and related land needs there is a requirement that the boundaries within which the City’s urban lands are located be placed with forethought. The location of the City’s urban growth boundary (UGB) and changes to the UGB shall be determined by evaluating alternative boundary locations consistent with ORS 197.020, and with consideration of the following locational criteria: 8.B.c Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) Page 10 of 13 1. Properties that abut either the City Limits, or the current UGB. 2. Properties that are in excess of 10 acres. 3. Properties that abut or are within 500 ft. of basic urban services; i.e. water, sewer, stormwater, transportation. 4. Properties that are proximate to, or include, mixed use/pedestrian friendly areas. 5. Compatibility with nearby agricultural uses outside the proposed UGB. 6. Proximity to transportation infrastructure. 7. Lands that have been master planned. 8. Readiness for development. 9. Proximity to City Center, using a ‘concentric growth pattern’ URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY AMENDMENT PROCEDURES Periodically it will be necessary to amend the City’s urban growth boundary due to changes in circumstances. The procedures for the review and amendment of the Urban Growth Boundary are as follows: Major Amendment Major revisions to the Urban Growth Boundary or Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement will be considered amendments to both the city and county comprehensive plan, and as such are subject to a legislative review process. A major revision shall include any UGB amendment that would necessitate revisions to the intent of the city or County comprehensive plan goals, policies, or text, that has widespread and significant impact on the immediate area, such as quantitative changes for substantial changes in population, or significant increases in resource impacts, qualitative changes in land use itself, such as conversion of residential and industrial use, or spatial changes that affect large areas, or many different ownerships. Any change in the policies of the Urbanization Element is considered a major revision. Major revisions will be considered by the city and county at five-year intervals the date of adoption of the UGB and urbanization policies. If the city and County governing bodies find that prevailing circumstances have a significant effect on the public health, safety, or general welfare of the community, a major revision can be considered in less than five years. A request for a major revision can be initiated by an individual or group, citizen’s advisory committee, affected agencies, and governing bodies. Parties should file adequate written documentation with the city and County governing bodies. Final legislative acts on major revisions requests shall be based on the following factors: a. Demonstrated need for the change to accommodate unpredicted population trends, to satisfy urban housing needs, or to assure adequate employment opportunities; b. The orderly and economic provision of key urban public facilities and services; 8.B.c Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) Page 11 of 13 c. The maximum efficiency of land uses within the current urbanizable area; d. Environmental, energy, economic, and social consequences; e. The compatibility of the proposed change with other elements of the city and County comprehensive plans; and f. The state-wide planning goals. Major revision proposals shall be subject to a mutual city and County review and agreement process involving affected agencies, citizen advisory committee, and the general public. If the city and county cannot agree on a major revision, or until an acceptable revision is mutually agreed upon and adopted, both jurisdictions will continue to use existing UGB, areas of regional planning concern boundaries, and urbanization policies. Minor Urban Growth Boundary Adjustments Minor adjustments to the UGB may be considered subject to similar procedures used by the city and county in hearing zoning requests. A minor revision is defined as one focusing on specific individual properties, and not having significant impact beyond the immediate area of the change. An application for a minor UGB amendment can be made only by property owners, their authorized agents, or by a city or County governing body. Written application for a minor adjustment may be filed with the Jackson County Department of Development Services on forms prescribed by the County. The standards for processing an application are as follows: a. Final action on the minor use of UGB adjustment shall be based in the same six factors required for major revision requests as listed in the preceding section, major revisions. b. Application shall be reviewed by the affected city and County citizens planning advisory committees annually. c. Strategic, location of roads, golf courses, or other visible public or semi-public open spaces; d. Compliance with the City’s Agricultural Mitigation standards; e. All UGB amendments shall include adjacent streets and other transportation rights-of- way; URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT Development within the UGB, but outside the City Limits shall be subject to the policies of the most recent Urban Growth Boundary Management Agreement (UGBMA), jointly adopted by both the City and the County. 8.B.c Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) Page 12 of 13 URBANIZATION GOALS & POLICIES Goal “Provide for the orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use in accordance with the goals and policies of the City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan as necessary to accommodate projected urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use of land, as necessary to provide for the City’s preferred future. Policies 1. All urban level development shall conform to city standards, shall be consistent with the City’s comprehensive plan, and shall meet all requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance and Map. 2. Urban facilities and services must be adequate in condition and capacity to accommodate the additional level of growth, as allowed by the comprehensive plan, prior to and or concurrent with land-use changes. 3. To maintain an inventory of buildable lands within the UGB in all land use classifications sufficient to accommodate the City’s most recent 20-year population projection2. a. Vacant lands within the UGB that have farm or open space tax benefits are not classified as vacant until such time as the farm or open space tax benefits are removed3. b. At the time of the population projection updates the City shall evaluate the need to expand the UGB. c. The calculation for In-Fill lands available for development shall be discounted based on their likelihood of developing during the planning period. A determination of the in-fill acreage likely to develop shall be maintained in the Buildable Lands Inventory, including the methodology of determining the term “likely”. 4. Promote compact, orderly and efficient urban development by guiding future growth to vacant sites and redevelopment areas within the established areas of the city, and to urbanizable lands where future annexation and development may occur. 5. Promote efficient and economical patterns of mixed land uses and development densities that locate a variety of different life activities ,such as employment, housing, shopping and recreation in convenient proximity; and that are, or can be made, accessible by multiple modes of transportation —including walking, bicycling, and transit in addition to motor vehicles —within and between neighborhoods and districts. 2 ORS 197 requires that Portland State University, Population Research Center provide updated population projections on a 4-year cycle. 3 ORS 197.756 8.B.c Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) Page 13 of 13 6. Provide an adequate level of urban services, including but not limited to public water, wastewater, storm water management systems, environmental services and an urban multi-modal transportation system as urban development occurs within the City’s UGB. 7. Maintain and reinforce the City’s small town image by emphasizing and strengthening the physical connections between people and nature in the City’s land development patterns and infrastructure design. 8. Create opportunities for innovative urban development and economic diversification. Prior to expanding an urban growth boundary, local governments shall demonstrate that needs cannot reasonably be accommodated on land already inside the urban growth boundary. 9. The City of Central Point General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Map and zoning designations for unincorporated urbanizable land, and all other city development and building safety standards, shall apply only after annexation to the city; or through a contract of annexation between the city, Jackson County, and other involved parties; or after proclamation of an annexation having a delayed effective date pursuant to ORS 222.180(2). 8.B.c Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Urbanization Element 2019 (1113 : Ordinance to Consider Urbanization Element Update) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Community Development FROM: Stephanie Holtey, Principal Planner MEETING DATE: March 14, 2019 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. ________, An Ordinance to Update and Adopt the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Population Element (2019-2039) ACTION REQUIRED: Ordinance 2nd Reading RECOMMENDATION: Approval BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On February 5, 2019 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider an update to the City’s Comprehensive Plan Population Element and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council. Following consideration of the Planning Commission’s recommendation and a public hearing at the February 28, 2019 City Council meeting, the draft Population Element was forwarded to a second reading. Attached is a draft of the Population Element. It was last updated in 2016 to account for impacts of the Great Recession and HB2253/ORS 195.033, which assigns population forecasting responsibility for all Oregon counties and cities to Portland State University Population Research Center (PRC). Population Element Overview: The draft Population Element update reflects the recently updated population forecast for Central Point’s Urban Area (city limits and Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) published by the PRC on June 30, 2018. Per ORS 195.033, the City is obligated to utilize the PRC Forecast when updating its Comprehensive Plan or land use regulations. The proposed update is consistent with ORS 195.033 and documents forecast growth over 20-year period 2019-2039. Changes include updated tables and text; however, the goal and policies remain unchanged. The most significant finding in the updated PRC Forecast and 2019-2039 Population Element update is the increase in the City’s Average Annual Growth Rate from 1.1% to 1.5.% over the next 20-years. The result is a forecast population increase of 7,216 people within the City’s urban area by 2039. As the City grows, this will impact the need for housing and estimated residential land need as shown in Table 1 below. Table 1. Summary of Population Forecast Changes & Housing Impacts Population and Housing Characteristics 2015 PRC Forecast 2018 PRC Forecast Change (+/-) Population 2019 Population 18,919 19,101 182 2039 Population 23,497 26,317 2,820 8.C Packet Pg. 92 Population Change (2019-2039) 4,578 7,216 2,638 Housing No. Persons Per HH 2.5 2.5 0 Forecast No. Housing Unit Need 1,831 2,886 1,055 Land Need Average Density 7.04 7.04 0 Gross Land Need 260 410 150 (2019-2039 Buildable Lands) (105) (105) 0 Estimated Additional Land Need 155 305 150 The estimated impact of population change impacts to housing and residential land need in Table 1 are for illustration purposes only. Final assessment of buildable land availability and residential land needs are subject to approve of the Residential Buildable Lands Inventory (CPA-18003) and the 2019-2039 Housing Element (CPA-18005) FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: The forecast population change does not generate additional cost to the City beyond the in-kind staff expenses, postage and legal notification costs included within the budgeted funds for Community Development. The fiscal impact of extending public infrastructure and services will be evaluated at such time the City proposes amendments to its UGB. LEGAL ANALYSIS: The Population Element Comprehensive Plan text amendments are considered “Major Amendments” per CPMC 17.96.300 and are subject to Type IV Legislative application procedures per CPMC 17.05.500. Conducting a second public hearing by the City Council is necessary and consistent with the requisite procedures to adopt changes to the forecast population. Aside from procedural compliance, the primary changes to be discussed include those identified in the 2018 PRC Forecast as required by ORS 195.033 and the City’s efforts to engage and inform the public about forecast growth over the next 20-years. COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: The City Council goal to provide managed growth and infrastructure is predicated on the ability of the City to forecast growth and the corresponding land and service needs over the long term. The 2019-2039 Population Element aligns with Council’s goal by: “Continually ensuring that planning and zoning review and regulations are consistent with comprehensive plans and vision.” STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Consider the second reading of the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Population Element (2019-2039) and 1) approve the ordinance, 2) approve the ordinance with revisions; 3) deny the ordinance. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Approve Ordinance No. ____ Updating and Adopting the Central Point Comprehensive Plan Population Element (2019-2039). 8.C Packet Pg. 93 ATTACHMENTS: 1. ORDINANCE (Population) 2. PC Resolution 864 (Population) 3. 02052019 Population Element 8.C Packet Pg. 94 ATTACHMENT “C” Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE UPDATING AND ADOPTING THE CENTRAL POINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POPULATION ELEMENT (2019-2039) Recitals: A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning Goals. B. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals and compatibility with City and County Comprehensive Plans. C. ORS 195.033 directs jurisdictions to utilize the most current population forecast data published by Portland State University Research Center (PRC) as the basis for Comprehensive Plan and land use regulation amendments. D. The PRC published an updated Coordinated Population Forecast for Jackson County and Urban Growth Boundaries on June 30, 2018. E. Pursuant to authority granted by the City Charter and the ORS, the City has determined it in the best interest of the city to update its Population Element which was recently adopted in 2016 as necessary to comply with ORS 195.033. F. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.10.100 Amendments – Purpose and Chapter 17.96.010, Procedure, the City has initiated the amendments and conducted the following duly advertised public hearings to consider the proposed amendments: a) Planning Commission hearing on February 5, 2019 b) City Council hearing on February 28, 2019. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Based upon all the information received, the City Council adopts the Staff Reports and evidence which are incorporated herein by reference; determines that changing community conditions, needs and desires justify the amendments and hereby adopts the changes entirely. Section 2. The City Comprehensive Plan Population Element is hereby updated and adopted as set forth in Exhibit A –Comprehensive Plan Population Element, 2019-2039 which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 3. The City Manager or his designee is directed to conduct post acknowledgement procedures defined in ORS 197.610 et seq. upon adoption of the Population Element. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this ___ day of ____________, 2019. __________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: _____________________________ City Recorder 8.C.a Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: ORDINANCE (Population) [Revision 2] (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) Planning Commission Resolution No. 867 (02/05/2019) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 864 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT 2019-2039 POPULATION ELEMENT WHEREAS, the latest version of the Population Element was adopted in 2016 and needs to be updated to reflect the latest population projections produced by Portland State Population Research Center; and WHEREAS, Portland State Population Research Center is responsible population forecasting for Oregon counties and urban growth boundaries every four years per ORS 195.033; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted a duly- noticed public hearing at which time it reviewed the City staff report (File No. 18004) and heard testimony and comments on the draft City of Central Point 2019-39 Population Element. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Central Point Planning Commission by Resolution No. 864 does hereby recommend to the City Council approval of the 2019-39 Population Element as presented in Exhibit “A”. PASSED by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5th day of February, 2019 ___________________________________ Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Representative Approved by me this 5th day of February, 2019. ___________________________________ Planning Commission Chair 8.C.b Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: PC Resolution 864 (Population) (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) ` Population & Demographics Element 2019-2039 City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Final Draft 1-29-2019 Adopted Central Point City Council Ordinance No. 2030 Recertified Central Point City Council Resolution No. ____ DLCD Acknowledged 8.C.c Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 1 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 2. SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 3 3. POPULATION HISTORY & CHARACTERISTICS ..................................................................... 3 3.1. Historic Growth Rate ................................................................................................................ 4 3.2. Percentage Share of the County Population. ............................................................................. 4 3.3. Race and Ethnicity .................................................................................................................... 5 3.4. Components of Population Growth. .......................................................................................... 5 3.5. Natural Increase ........................................................................................................................ 6 3.6. Net Migration. ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.7. Age Characteristics. .................................................................................................................. 7 3.8. Household Types....................................................................................................................... 8 3.8.1.Family Households. ................................................................................................................ 8 3.8.2.Non-Family Households: ........................................................................................................ 8 3.8.3.Group Quarters........................................................................................................................ 9 3.9. Average Household Size; .......................................................................................................... 9 3.10.Median Household Income. ................................................................................................... 10 4. ASSUMPTIONS FOR FUTURE POPULATION CHANGE ....................................................... 12 5. POPULATION PROJECTIONS 2016 to 2036 ............................................................................. 12 6. PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH CHARACTERISTICS ............................................... 13 6.1. Age Characteristics. ................................................................................................................ 13 6.2. Growth Rate. ........................................................................................................................... 13 6.3. Percentage Share of County. ................................................................................................... 13 6.4. Race & Ethnicity. .................................................................................................................... 14 6.5. Source of Growth. ................................................................................................................... 14 6.6. Household Characteristics. ...................................................................................................... 14 6.7. Median Household Income. .................................................................................................... 14 7.Population & Demographic Goals & Policies ......................................................................................... 14 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................................................. 15 8.C.c Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 2 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Population Element is to track the historic characteristics and growth of the City’s population, and based on that information develop a 20-year forecast of the population. Based on the 20-year population forecast the City can plan for land and urban service needs to accommodate the population growth. The City’s Population & Demographics Element (Population Element) was updated in 2016. The 2016 update accounted for two events that significantly affected the results of the City’s 2008 Population Element. The first event was the Great Recession; the second was HB 2253 designating the Portland State University Population Research Center (PRC) as the sole and official provider of population forecasts for cities and counties throughout the state1.Together these two events necessitate an update of the City’s Population Element. The Great Recession Within a year of completion of the Jackson County 2007 Population Element (Feb. 2007)2, which was the basis for the City’s 2008 Population Element, the national economy was hit hard by the Great Recession (December 2007 to June 2009). The economic impacts of the Great Recession were severe and the recovery period extremely sluggish and tenuous. Because job losses were deep across all sectors of the economy and the recovery in job creation slow, the reliance on net migration as a key component to population growth had a significant impact on the City’s 2008 population forecasts. HB 2253 Prior to 2013 Oregon law required that counties prepare coordinated population forecasts according to "generally accepted" demographic methods. The result was population projections throughout the state that were based on highly diverse methods of forecasting that varied from county to county, both in terms of frequency of completion and outcome. Recognizing that population forecasting is the foundation for long-term planning the Oregon legislature in 2013 approved House Bill 2253 assigning Portland State Population Research Center (PRC) the responsibility for preparing coordinated population forecasts for all counties and cities. The population forecasting requirements of HB 2253 were later adopted as ORS 195.033. The population forecasts presented in this Population Element are from the Coordinated Population Forecast 2018 through 2068 for Jackson County dated June 2018 prepared by PRC (“PRC Population Forecast”) in accordance with ORS 195.033 and is attached to this Population Element as Appendix A. Typically, the City’s Population Element is based on a 20-year planning period. The PRC Population Forecast uses a fifty (50) year forecasting period3 with a four (4) year update cycle4, allowing for consideration of both short and long term population change variables, and the re-evaluation of demographic trends and economic events used in prior forecasts. Consequently, every four years the City’s Population Element will be updated using the latest PRC Jackson County forecast. 1 The Portland Metro is exempt from this requirement. 2 Basis for determining the City’s 2008 population projections. 3 ORS 195.003(6) 4 ORS 195.033(4) 8.C.c Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 3 This update represents the first update for the PRC Population Forecast for Jackson County. The next update is tentatively scheduled to occur in 2022. PRC’s population forecasts are not considered land use decisions and as such are not subject to review or appeal other than as provided in ORS195.033. However, the City’s Population Element, because it contains policies based on assumptions beyond the PRC Population Forecasts, is considered a land use action and therefore subject to the procedural requirements of Section 17.96, Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments, City of Central Point Municipal Code. With the completion of each 4-year cycle the Population Element will be reviewed for changes in forecasted population and any needed policy changes. If no policy changes are required then the Population Element will be re-certified by resolution of the City Council, including incorporation of the up-dated PRC Population Forecast as an appendix to the Population Element. If, for any reason, the policies of the Population Element need to be modified, then the Population Element shall be updated by ordinance in accordance with ORS 195.033. 2. SUMMARY When factors such as the economy, fertility, social trends, etc. are factored into the latest population forecast for the planning period 2019-2039 the result was a 12% reduction in the City’s initial 2008 population forecast figures5 (29,006 vs 25,933). When measured in terms of the population’s average annual growth rate (AAGR) the forecasted AAGR for the planning period dropped from 4.3% to 1.4%. Based on the forecasted growth rate it is projected that between 2019 and 2039 the City of Central Point is expected to realize a net increase in population of 7,216. Based on a projected average household size of 2.5 persons6 the population increase will result in the formation of 2,886 new households by 2039. The City’s population is aging and is expected to continue to do so over the course of the planning period. Net in-migration will be the primary source of population growth (97%), while natural increases will continue to decline (3%). The City’s population will also become racially and ethnically more diverse, a trend which is expected to continue throughout the planning period. 3. POPULATION HISTORY & CHARACTERISTICS The Town of Central Point was founded on February 26, 1889 and by 18907 had a population of 543. With the exception of the decade between 1910 and 1920 the City has steadily grown (Figure 1), and today is the third largest city in Jackson County. 5 Extended to 2036 from the Jackson County 2007 Population Element. 6 City of Central Point Regional Plan Element 7 1890 U.S. Census 8.C.c Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 4 Source: U.S. Census and PRC Coordinated Population Forecast, Jackson County 3.1. Historic Growth Rate Between 2000 and 2007 the City of Central Point’s average annual growth rate (AAGR) was 4.5%, three times Jackson County’s AAGR of 1.5% (Figure 2). Since the Great Recession the City and County have experienced a significant slowdown in population growth, particularly from net in-migration. For the period 2010-2015 the City’s AAGR dropped below 1%, while the County’s AAGR dropped to .6%. As Figure 2 illustrates the decline in AAGR is not an unusual event following recessions, but does bounce back as the economy improves. Source: U.S. Census & U.S. Census Bureau American Fact Finder 3.2. Percentage Share of the County Population. The City’s percentage of the county population has consistently increased. In 1900 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 Population FIGURE 1. HISTORIC & FORECAST POPULATION, CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, 1900-2039 2018 PSU 2016 PSU 8.C.c Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 5 Central Point’s population accounted for 2.4% of the County’s population, and remained fairly constant until 1970 when the City’s percentage participation jumped from 3.1% to 4.2%. By 2018, the City accounted for 8.7% of the County’s population. 3.3. Race and Ethnicity Since the 2000 Census the City’s racial diversity has continued to increase, particularly within the Hispanic Community, which more than doubled in size from 4% in 2000 to 9% in 2014 (Figure 4). During this same period the County’s Hispanic population increased from 7% to 11% (Figure 5). Source: 2000 U.S. Census & U.S. Census Bureau American Fact Finder Source: 2000 U.S. Census & U.S. Census Bureau American Fact Finder 3.4. Components of Population Growth. There are two basic sources of population growth: natural increase (births minus deaths) and net migration (in-migration minus out-migration). 8.C.c Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 6 3.5. Natural Increase Growth occurring as a result of natural increase typically represents a very small percentage of a community’s population growth. Since 2000 the City’s net natural increase rate (Figure 6) went from 7.6 to 8.0 per thousand population, representing 3% of the City’s total population increase during that period. During the same period the County’s rate of natural increase dropped from 1.0 to 0.8 (Figure 7). 3.6. Net Migration. By far the most significant contributor to a community’s population growth is net migration. Based on the 2010 U.S. Census, the predominant source of growth for Jackson County was due to net migration, which was responsible for over 80% of the county’s population growth8. Source: PRC Coordinated Population Forecast, Jackson County 8 U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 8.C.c Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 7 Source: PRC Coordinated Population Forecast, Jackson County 3.7. Age Characteristics. Between 2000 and 2014 the City’s median age increased from 34.4 to 37.5 reflecting the continued aging of the Baby Boom generation. For the County the median age changed from 39.2 to 42.7 during the same period. Figures 8 and 9 illustrate the changes in the three major age cohort categories as a percentage of the City’s and County’s total population. 8.C.c Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 8 3.8. Household Types. A by-product of population growth is household formation. The U.S. Census allocates the population to one of two household types; family and non-family. By definition a household consists of all the people occupying a housing unit9, which is the basic unit for residential land use planning. Since the early 1900’s (Figure 10) these two household types (family and non-family) have been gradually changing in response to socio-economic conditions. The following is a brief overview of these characteristics as they relate to the City. In addition to the decline in average household size, the distribution of households by type has been gradually shifting from family to non-family households. 3.8.1. Family Households. Family households are comprised of two or more people who are related by marriage, birth, or adoption. Family households are most commonly represented by married-couples. Family households have, and continue to, dominate household types. Although the formation of family households continues to increase, it is doing so at a decreasing rate. In 1990, family households in the City accounted for 77% of all households. By the 2010 Census, and through 201410, family households represented 71% of total households. 3.8.2. Non-Family Households: Non-family households are comprised of single persons, or two or more people who are not related. In 1990, non-family households represented 23% of all households within the City. By 2010 non-family households represented 29% of all households. As the City’s population grows older, the number of non-family households is expected to increase as the elderly lose spouses and the young postpone marriage, or get divorced. 9 U.S. Census, Current Population Survey (CPS) - Definitions and Explanations 10 American Fact Finder, 2014 8.C.c Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 9 3.8.3. Group Quarters. To a much lesser extent there is a third, and smaller segment of the population that is housed in what is referred to as group quarters. Group quarters are defined as non-institutional living arrangements for groups not living in conventional housing units or groups living in housing units containing ten or more unrelated people or nine or more people unrelated to the person in charge. Examples of people in group quarters include a person residing in a rooming house, staff quarters at a hospital, college dormitories, or in a halfway house. The City’s Group Housing population has historically accounted for a very small percentage of the population. Based on the 2000 Census City’s Group Housing population accounted for 0.8% (106) of the City’s total population and by 2010 had dropped to 0.4% (70) of the total population. 3.9. Average Household Size; Historically, the City’s average household size has been gradually declining from 3.42 average persons per households in 1960 to 2.61 in 2010 (Figure 11). At 2.61 the Cities average household size exceeded the County’s average of 2.40, and by 2010 is slightly higher than the U.S. average of 2.58. 8.C.c Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 10 3.10. Median Household Income. Figure 13 compares the median household income for the City of Central Point and the County from 2000 to 2014. As illustrated in Figure 12 the City’s median household income over the past 15 years peaked in 2010 and by 2014 declined to $46,765. In Figure 13 the median household income for 2010 and 2014 has been adjusted to 2000 dollars. The Great Recession’s impact on median household income has not yet recovered from 2000 median income level, which is consistent with national and state changes in median household income. Figure 14 compares the changes in income distributions from 2000, 2010, and 2014. 8.C.c Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 11 Source: 2000 U.S. Census & U.S Census Bureau American Fact Finder As of 2014 The City of Central Point had the second highest median income of all cities in Jackson County (Figure 15). 8.C.c Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 12 Source: U.S Census Bureau American Fact Finder 4. ASSUMPTIONS FOR FUTURE POPULATION CHANGE The City’s future population projections are from the Coordinated Population Forecast 2018 through 2068 Jackson County (Appendix A). These projections are based on the Cohort- Component method of population forecasting, which essentially relies on trends in age, fertility/births, mortality, and net migration. As the population of Jackson County continues to age the fertility rate will continue to decline. The decline in the fertility rate will be minimal, dropping from 1.9 in 2015 to 1.8 by 206511. Historically changes in fertility rates have not had a significant impact on the City’s population growth. Similarly, the death rate, although increasing is expected to have a minimal impact on population growth over the next twenty years. When these two components are combined the net difference does not yield any significant increases in the population. As previously discussed of all the components of population change migration is the greatest contributor to population growth throughout the planning period. Migration is also the most volatile component and is very sensitive to changes in the economy, both positive and negative. 5. POPULATION PROJECTIONS 2019 to 2039 Over the course of the next twenty (20) years the City of Central Point’s population is expected to increase at an average annual rate of 1.5%, taking the population from 19,101 in 2019 to 26,317 in 2039 (Table 1). During this same period the City’s percentage of the County population is expected to increase from 8.5% to 9.9%. By 2068 Central Point will be the second largest City in Jackson County12. 11 Coordinated Population Forecast 2015 through 2065 Jackson County 12 ibid 8.C.c Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 13 6. PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH CHARACTERISTICS The following represents a general overview of the City’s and County’s population characteristics throughout the 2019-39 planning period. The information is taken from PRC’s Coordinated Population Forecast 2018 through 2068, Jackson County. 6.1. Age Characteristics. Based on the projected County age cohorts (Figure 16) the City’s population will continue to get older with the 65+ cohort claiming a larger percentage of the population. Although the City has a younger overall population it will experience a similar increase in the 65+ cohort over the next 20-years. The aging of the population will also have an effect on the demand for housing services, ranging from reductions in household size to changing demand for housing types (i.e. senior housing). 6.2. Growth Rate. The City’s population will continue to grow, but at a decreasing average annual growth rate of 1.5% vs. the 2.9% experienced between 2000 and 2010. Similarly, the County’s average annual growth rate is expected to decline to 0.9% vs. 1.1%. 6.3. Percentage Share of County. Year Central Point Jackson County 2019 19,101 219,270 2020 19,714 235,066 2025 21,035 246,611 2030 22,920 257,256 2035 24,815 263,006 2039 26,317 264,951 Change 7,216 45,681 Source: 2018 PRC Coordinated Population Forecast, Jackson County TABLE 1. POPULATION GROWTH PROJECTIONS CITY OF CENTRAL POINT AND JACKSON COUNTY 16.9% 15.6% 60.7% 58.5% 22.4% 25.9% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2019 2039 FIGURE 16. COUNTY AGE STRUCTURE OF THE POPULATION, 2019 vs. 2039 0-14 15-64 65+ 8.C.c Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 14 As illustrated in Table 2 the City’s percentage of the County’s population will continue to increase from 8.7% in 2016 to 9.9% by 2039. 6.4. Race & Ethnicity. The race and ethnicity of both Jackson County and the City of Central Point are expected to continue to diversify. However, over the 20-year planning period the White, non-Hispanic population will remain the dominant race. 6.5. Source of Growth. The City’s primary source of growth will come from net migration (90%+), which is heavily dependent on the economy. 6.6. Household Characteristics. As illustrated in Figure 11 the average household size has been declining since 1960. For the City of Central Point, the average household size has dropped from 3.42 in 1960, to 2.61 in 2010. It is expected that during the term of the planning period (2016 - 2036) the average household size will continue to decrease, but at a decreasing rate. The City of Central Point Regional Plan Element uses an average household size of 2.5. 6.7. Median Household Income. Changes in median household income will be a function of the strength of the general economy and the rate of inflation. Time will tell. 7. Population & Demographic Goals & Policies Goal - To maintain population and demographic forecasts as the primary data source for developing and implementing plans and programs for management of the City’s growth. Policy 1 - Population Forecast: The population data presented in Table 1 is the acknowledged population forecast for the period 2019 through 2039 and is to be used in maintaining and updating the City’s Comprehensive Plan. It shall be the responsibility of the City to update the data presented in Table 1 based on the decennial U.S. Census. During the interim census periods adjustments to Table 1 will be based on the latest PRC Forecast (4-year cycle). Policy 2 - Average Household Size. For purposes of calculating household formation, the City will use an average household size of 2.5 for lands within the urban growth boundary. This figure will serve as the basis for determining the number of households expected to be formed throughout the planning period. It shall be the responsibility of the City to periodically monitor and, if necessary, update the average household size through data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau. Policy 3 - Household Distribution. For purposes of calculating household formation, the City will use 70% as the percentage of households that are family households and 30% as Non- Family Households. These figures shall be used in maintaining and updating the City’s Comprehensive Plan. It shall be the responsibility of the City to periodically monitor and, if necessary, update the percentage of family households through data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau. Policy 4 – Racial and Ethnic Diversity. Racial and Ethnic Diversity. The City acknowledges the changing racial and ethnic diversity of the community and will continue to develop the strategies and tools necessary to ensure that the benefits of growth meet the needs of all people within the 8.C.c Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan Element 1 - Population and Demographics Page 15 community regardless of race or ethnicity. APPENDIX A – Coordinated Population Forecast, 2018 Through 2068, Jackson County 8.C.c Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: 02052019 Population Element (2019-19 : Population Element Update (2019-2039)) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Community Development FROM: Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner II MEETING DATE: March 14, 2019 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. _________, a Minor Zone Map Amendment on 1.76 acres located at 1909 Scenic Avenue on property identified on the Jackson County Assessor’s Map as 37S 2W 03AB, Tax Lots 4400, 4500 & 4600. Applicant: Fire District 3. (File No. ZC-18007) ACTION REQUIRED: Ordinance 2nd Reading RECOMMENDATION: Approval BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at its regular meeting on February 5, 2019 to consider a minor zone map amendment request from R-1-8 to Civic and made a favorable recommendation to the City Council. The Council conducted a public hearing on February 28, 2019 and forwarded the Ordinance to a second reading. The subject properties consist of 1.76 acres on Scenic Avenue immediately north of the existing Scenic Middle School. It is the applicant’s intent to develop the property as a fire station. In considering the zone change, the Planning Commission and City Council addressed three (3) approval criteria pursuant to CPMC 17.10.400: 1. Comprehensive Plan Compatibility. The current land use plan designation for the property was amended from Low Density Residential to Civic as part of the Land Use Element update in 2018. The Civic Comprehensive Plan designation allows for the proposed Civic zoning designation. Per the updated Land Use Element, the Civic zoning designation is consistent with the Civic designation and abuts properties to the south that are zoned the same. 2. Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning. The subject property for the proposed zone change is located along Scenic Avenue. The abutting property to the south is zoned Civic and is developed with the Scenic Middle School. The zoning of the properties to the east were recently amended to R-3 to accommodate future expansion of Scenic Heights, an affordable housing development owned and operated by the Housing Authority of Jackson County. The Housing Authority is in the preliminary stages of developing plans for the high density development, which is tentatively planned for construction in 5-years. 8.D Packet Pg. 113 3. Traffic Impacts. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required to address compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, the Municipal Code and the Oregon State Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). The TPR in OAR 660-012-0060 requires changes to land use plans and land use regulations (i.e. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and Zoning Map Amendments) to be consistent with the function and capacity of existing and planned transportation facilities. As shown in the Applicant’s TIA, the traffic generated by the increased land use intensity will not alter the functional classification for any existing or planned infrastructure. As demonstrated in in the Planning Department Supplemental Findings, the proposed zone change can be accommodated by the transportation network and is consistent with the TPR. Based on the application’s demonstrated compliance with the relevant approval criteria, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the minor zone map change by the City Council (Attachment “A”). FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: Financial impact to the City is limited to staff in-kind expenses which are recovered with planning- related service fees. LEGAL ANALYSIS: The primary issues to be considered and discussed at the meeting will be related to CPMC 17.10.400. 1. A decision for a map amendment shall be based on approval criteria, applicable regulations and factual evidence in the record. 2. A decision may be for denial, approval or approval with conditions. COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: Managed Growth and Infrastructure, Goal 4; Continually ensure that planning and zoning review and regulations are consistent with comprehensive plans and vision. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Consider the second reading of the proposed amendment to the Zoning Map and 1) approve the ordinance, 2) approve the ordinance with revisions, or 3) deny the proposed zone change ordinance. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Approve Ordinance No. ____ An Ordinance amending the Central Point Zoning Map from R-1-8 (Residential Single-Family) to Civic zoning on 1.76 acres located at 1909 Scenic Avenue (37S 2W 03AB Tax Lots 4400, 4500 & 4600). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Attachment A - PC Resolution No 863 2. Attachment B - City Council Ordinance 8.D Packet Pg. 114 8.D.a Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment A - PC Resolution No 863 (1109 : Fire District 3 Zone Map Amendment) City of Central Point, Oregon 140 S 3rd Street, Central Point, OR 97502 541.664.3321 Fax 541.664.6384 www.centralpointoregon.gov STAFF REPORT February 5, 2019 AGENDA ITEM: VII-A File No. ZC-18007 Consideration of a Zone (map) Change application from R-1-8 (Residential Single Family) to Civic for three (3) properties approximately 1.76 acres in size located at 1909 Scenic Avenue. The properties are identified on the Jackson County Assessor’s map as 37S 2W 03AB, Tax Lots 4400, 4500 & 4600. Applicant: Fire District No. 3 Approval Criteria: CPMC 17.10.400, Zoning Map and Zoning Code Text Amendments. STAFF SOURCE: Justin Gindlesperger, Community Planner II BACKGROUND: The proposed minor zone map amendment is to change the current zoning of the property from R-1-8 to Civic. The requested change will allow the applicant to prepare for construction of a new fire station. In considering the zone change, there are three (3) components that must be addressed pursuant to CPMC 17.10.400: 1. Comprehensive Plan Compatibility. The current land use plan designation for the property was amended from Low Density Residential to Civic as part of the Land Use Element update in 2018. The Civic Comprehensive Plan designation allows for the proposed Civic zoning designation. Per the updated Land Use Element, the Civic zoning designation is consistent with the Civic Comprehensive Plan designation and abuts property to the south that is zoned the same. 2. Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning. The subject property for the proposed zone change is located along Scenic Avenue. The abutting property to the south is zoned Civic and is developed with the Scenic Middle School. The zoning of the properties to the east were recently amended to R-3 to accommodate future expansion of Scenic Heights, an affordable housing development owned and operate by the Housing Authority of Jackson County. The Housing Authority is in the preliminary stages of developing plans for the high density development, which is tentatively planned for construction in 5-years. 3. Traffic Impacts. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required to address compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, the Municipal Code and the Oregon State Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). The TPR in OAR 660-012-0060 requires changes to land use plans and land use regulations (i.e. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments and Zoning Map Amendments) to be consistent with the function and capacity of existing and planned transportation facilities. As shown in the Applicant’s TIA, the traffic generated by the increased land use intensity will not alter the functional classification for any existing or planned infrastructure. As demonstrated in in the Planning Department Supplemental Findings (Attachment “D”), the proposed zone change can be accommodated by the transportation network and is consistent with the TPR. Community Development Tom Humphrey, AICP Community Development Director 8.D.a Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment A - PC Resolution No 863 (1109 : Fire District 3 Zone Map Amendment) ISSUES: There are no issues relative to this application for minor Zone (Map) Change. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: None. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment “A” –Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps Attachment “B” – Traffic Impact Study, dated December 6, 2018 Attachment “C” – Applicant’s Findings Attachment “D” – Planning Department Supplemental Findings Attachment “E” – Resolution No. 863 ACTION: Open public hearing and consider the proposed amendment to the Zoning Map, close public hearing and 1) recommend approval to the City Council; 2) recommend approval with revisions; or 3) deny the application. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of Resolution No. 863. Per the Staff Report dated February 5, 2019 and supported by Findings of Fact. 8.D.a Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment A - PC Resolution No 863 (1109 : Fire District 3 Zone Map Amendment) Figure 1. Current Comprehensive Plan Map Figure 2. Current Zoning Map 8.D.a Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment A - PC Resolution No 863 (1109 : Fire District 3 Zone Map Amendment) Figure 3. Proposed Zone Map Change 8.D.a Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment A - PC Resolution No 863 (1109 : Fire District 3 Zone Map Amendment) ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CENTRAL POINT ZONING MAP FROM R-1-8 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY) TO CIVIC ZONING ON 1.76 ACRES LOCATED AT 1909 SCENIC AVENUE (37S 2W 03AB TAX LOTS 4400, 4500 & 4600). Recitals: A. The City of Central Point (City) is authorized under Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) Chapter 197 to prepare, adopt and revise comprehensive plans and implementing ordinances consistent with the Statewide Land Use Planning Goals. B. The City has coordinated its planning efforts with the State in accordance with ORS 197.040(2)(e) and OAR 660-030-0060 to assure compliance with goals and compatibility with City Comprehensive Plans. C. Pursuant to authority granted by the City Charter and the ORS, the City may amend the Central Point Zoning Map which was originally adopted on August 29, 1980 and has been amended at various times since. D. Pursuant to the requirements set forth in CPMC Chapter 17.10.100 Zoning Map and Zoning Code Text Amendments – Purpose and Chapter 17.05.010, Applications and Development Permit Review Procedures, the City has accepted an application and conducted the following duly advertised public hearings to consider the proposed amendment: a) Planning Commission hearing on February 5, 2019 b) City Council hearings on February 28, 2019 and March 14, 2019. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Based upon all the information received, the City Council adopts the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the City staff report; determines that changing community conditions, needs and desires justify the amendments and hereby adopts the changes entirely. Section 2. The City zoning map is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit 1 which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. 8.D.b Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment B - City Council Ordinance (1109 : Fire District 3 Zone Map Amendment) EXHIBIT 1 Section 3. The City Manager is directed to conduct post acknowledgement procedures defined in ORS 197.610 et seq. upon adoption of the changes to the zoning and Comprehensive Plan maps. Section 4. Effective date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance enacted by the council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _____________________, 20___. __________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: _____________________________ City Recorder 8.D.b Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment B - City Council Ordinance (1109 : Fire District 3 Zone Map Amendment) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: City Attorney FROM: Sydnee Dreyer, City Attorney MEETING DATE: March 14, 2019 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. _____, Amending in Part and Repealing In Part Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 8.05 Regarding Storm Drain Protection ACTION REQUIRED: Motion Ordinance 2nd Reading RECOMMENDATION: Approval BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City has applied for its own MS4 Phase II Permit through the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Rogue Valley Sewer Services (RVSS) will no longer be holding the city’s permit, and the City will be responsible for covering the Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination and Construction site runoff control and Post-construction runoff management. The city’s new permit is expected to be issued March 1st, 2019 and the new permit has very prescriptive requirements about ordinances and regulatory mechanisms and how they need to be in place by a particular time. As an example, the new permit is very specific about how DEQ wants the City’s to address any offenders. The permit reads: “The permit registrant (the City) must develop, implement and maintain a written escalating enforcement and response procedure. The procedure must address repeat violations through progressively stricter response, as needed, to achieve compliance. The escalating enforcement and response procedure must describe how the permit registrant will use enforcement techniques to ensure compliance. The enforcement procedures must include timelines for compliance and, when formulating response procedures, must consider factors such as the amount of pollutant discharged, the type of pollutant discharge, and whether the discharge was intentional or accidental. The escalating enforcement procedure must be submitted with the third Annual Report.” The requirements presented in the first reading represent all the necessary changes for the City to manage storm water protection within the City. Furthermore, changes largely focus on how to deal with illicit discharge into the City’s Storm Drain System and for management of new construction site activities 8.E Packet Pg. 122 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: Existing City Personnel will be handling all aspects of the program, and no additional costs are anticipated with the management of the program. Additionally, the city will be recovering approximately $45,000 per year in revenue that was previously appropriated to RVSS for contract services. LEGAL ANALYSIS: COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve Second reading of an Ordinance Amending in Part and Repealing in Part Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 8.05 Regarding Storm Drain Protection RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance No. _______, An Ordinance Amending in Part and Repealing in part Central Point Municipal Code Chapter 8.05 Regarding Storm Drain Protection ATTACHMENTS: 1. ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 8.E Packet Pg. 123 _____________________________________________________________________________________ 1 | Ordinance No. _____; February 28, 2019 ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING IN PART AND REPEALING IN PART CENTRAL POINT MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 8.05 REGARDING STORM DRAIN PROTECTION RECITALS: A. Pursuant to CPMC, Chapter 1.01.040, the City Council, may from time to time make revisions to its municipal code which shall become part of the overall document and citation. B. Upon review, the staff and city attorney for the City of Central Point determined that amendment to Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection is required to comply with legal requirements in managing the City’s MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. C. In particular, the amended provisions set forth the obligations and prohibitions in managing the City’s stormwater system, exemptions from prohibitions, the City’s right to inspect and enforce such systems, and the City’s ability to abate violations of the code. D. Words lined through are to be deleted and words in bold are added. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 8.05 is amended in part and repealed in part as set forth below and incorporated herein by reference. Chapter 8.05 STORM DRAIN PROTECTION Sections: 8.05.005 Purpose 8.05.010 Definitions. 8.05.015 Applicability 8.05.020 Land owner responsibility/Discharge prohibitions. 8.05.025 Compatibility with other regulations. 8.05.030 Designation of public works director or his/her designee. 8.05.035 Ultimate responsibility. 8.05.040 Abatement. <repealed> 8.05.045. Watercourse protection. 8.E.a Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 (2019-21 : Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection) _______________________________________________________________________________________ 2 | Ordinance No. _____; February 28, 2019 8.05.050 Penalty. <repealed> 8.05.055 Right of entry; inspection and sampling. 8.05.060 Requirement to prevent, control, and reduce storm water pollutants by the use of best management practices. 8.05.065 Low impact development. 8.05.070 Violations, enforcement, and penalties. 8.05.075 Appeal of notice of violation. 8.05.085 Civil penalties. 8.05.090 Enforcement measures after abatement. 8.05.095 Cost of abatement of the violation. 8.05.100 Violations deemed a public nuisance. 8.05.105 Remedies not exclusive. 8.05.110 Severability. 8.05.005. PURPOSE. The purpose of this chapter is to provide for the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Central Point through the regulation of non-storm water discharges to the storm drainage system to the maximum extent practicable as required by federal and state law. This chapter establishes methods for controlling the introduction of pollutants into the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) in order to comply with requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit process. The objectives of this chapter are: 1. To regulate the contribution of pollutants to the MS4 by storm water discharges by any user. 2. To prohibit illicit connections and discharges to the MS4. 3. To establish legal authority to carry out all inspections, surveillance, monitoring, and enforcement procedures necessary to ensure compliance with this chapter. 8.05.010. DEFINITIONS. For the purposes of this chapter, the following shall mean: A. “Best Management Practices (BMPs)” means schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, general good housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants directly or indirectly to storm water, receiving waters, or storm water conveyance systems. BMPs also include treatment practices, operating procedures, and practices to control site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or water disposal, or drainage from raw materials storage. B. “City” means City of Central Point. 8.E.a Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 (2019-21 : Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection) _____________________________________________________________________________________ 3 | Ordinance No. _____; February 28, 2019 C. “Construction Activities” means activities subject to NPDES Construction Permits. These include construction projects resulting in land disturbance of one acre or more. Such activities include but are not limited to clearing and grubbing, grading, excavating, and demolition. D. “Hazardous Materials” means any material, including any substance, waste, or combination thereof, which because of its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious characteristics may cause, or significantly contribute to, a substantial present or potential hazard to human health, safety, property, or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed of, or otherwise managed. E. “Illegal Discharge” means any direct or indirect non-storm water discharge to the storm drain system, except as exempted in Section 8.05.020(B) of this chapter. F. “Illicit Connections” are defined as either of the following: 1. Any drain or conveyance, whether on the surface or subsurface that allows an illegal discharge to enter the storm drain system including but not limited to any conveyances that allow any non-storm water discharge including sewage, process wastewater, and wash water to enter the storm drain system and any connections to the storm drain system from indoor drains and sinks, regardless of whether said drain or connection had been previously allowed, permitted, or approved by an authorized enforcement agency or, 2. Any drain or conveyance connected from a commercial or industrial land use to the storm drain system that has not been documented in plans, maps, or equivalent records and approved by an authorized enforcement agency. G. “Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4)” means the system of conveyances (including sidewalks, roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains) owned and operated by the City and designed or used for collecting or conveying storm water, and that is not used for collecting or conveying sewage. H. “Non-Storm Water Discharge” means any discharge to the storm drain system that is not composed entirely of storm water. I. “Person” means any individual, association, organization, partnership, firm, corporation or other entity recognized by law and acting as either the owner or as the owner's agent. J. “Pollutant” means anything which causes or contributes to pollution. Pollutants may include, but are not limited to: paints, varnishes, and solvents; oil and other automotive fluids; non-hazardous liquid and solid wastes and yard wastes; refuse, rubbish, garbage, litter, or other discarded or abandoned objects, ordinances, and accumulations, so that same may cause or contribute to pollution; floatables; pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers; hazardous substances and wastes; sewage, fecal coliform and pathogens; dissolved and particulate metals; animal wastes; wastes and residues that result from constructing a building or structure; and noxious or offensive matter of any kind. K. “Premises” means any building, lot, parcel of land, or portion of land whether improved or unimproved including adjacent sidewalks and parking strips. L. “Storm Drainage System” means publicly-owned facilities by which storm water is collected and/or conveyed, including but not limited to any roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, gutters, curbs, inlets, piped storm drains, pumping 8.E.a Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 (2019-21 : Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection) _______________________________________________________________________________________ 4 | Ordinance No. _____; February 28, 2019 facilities, retention and detention basins, natural and human-made or altered drainage channels, reservoirs, and other drainage structures. M. “Stormwater” means any surface flow, runoff, and drainage consisting entirely of water from any form of natural precipitation and resulting from such precipitation. 8.05.015. APPLICABILITY. This chapter shall apply to all water entering the storm drain system generated on any developed and undeveloped lands unless explicitly exempted by the City. 8.05.020 LAND OWNER RESPONSIBILITY/ DISCHARGE PROHIBITIONS. A. No person shall, intentionally or unintentionally, wash, sweep, push, dump or otherwise allow any debris, water contaminant, or potential water contaminant to enter the city’s storm drain system. B. Any person or persons who causes or allows any type of construction to take place on his or her property shall be responsible for the prevention of any debris, contaminant or potential contaminant from entering the city’s storm drain system, and shall adhere to and abide by the guidelines for erosion control and sediment prevention, as described in the City of Central Point Standard Specifications and Uniform Standard Details for Public Works. C. No person or persons shall allow any debris, contaminant, or potential contaminant from accumulating on any city street, alley, sidewalk, or public way adjacent to his/her property, to an extent that said debris, contaminant, or potential contaminant, if allowed to enter the city’s storm drain system, could cause a disruption to the proper functioning of the city storm drain system, necessitate cleaning of any portion of the city storm drain, or pose a threat to water quality in the Bear Creek watershed. (Ord. 1847 §1(part), 2004). A. Prohibition of Illegal Discharges. No person shall throw, drain, or otherwise discharge, cause, or allow others under its control to throw, drain, or otherwise discharge into the MS4 any pollutants or waters containing any pollutants, other than storm water. Pollutants include, but are not limited to: 1. Septic, sewage, and dumping or disposal of liquids or materials other than stormwater into the MS4; 2. Discharges of washwater resulting from the hosing or cleaning of gas stations, auto repair garages, or other types of automotive services facilities; 3. Discharges resulting from the cleaning, repair, or maintenance of any type of equipment, machinery, or facility, including motor vehicles, cement-related equipment, and port-a-potty servicing, etc.; 4. Discharges of washwater from mobile operations, such as mobile automobile or truck washing, steam cleaning, power washing, and carpet cleaning, etc.; 8.E.a Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 (2019-21 : Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection) _____________________________________________________________________________________ 5 | Ordinance No. _____; February 28, 2019 5. Discharges of washwater from the cleaning or hosing of impervious surfaces in municipal, industrial, commercial, or residential areas (including parking lots, streets, sidewalks, driveways, patios, plazas, work yards and outdoor eating or drinking areas, etc.) where detergents are used and spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have occurred (unless all spilled material has been removed); 6. Discharges of runoff from material storage areas, which contain chemicals, fuels, grease, oil, or other hazardous materials from material storage areas; 7. Discharges of pool or fountain water containing chlorine, biocides, or other chemicals. 8. Discharges of sediment, unhardened concrete, pet waste, vegetation clippings, or other landscape or construction-related wastes; 9. Discharges of trash, paints, stains, resins, or other household hazardous wastes. 10. Discharges of food-related wastes (grease, restaurant kitchen material and trash bin washwater, etc.). B. Exemptions from Prohibitions. The commencement, conduct or continuance of any illegal discharge to the storm drain system is prohibited except as described as follows: 1. The following discharges are exempt from discharge prohibitions established by this chapter: water line flushing, landscape irrigation, diverted stream flows, rising ground waters, uncontaminated ground water infiltration, uncontaminated pumped ground water, discharges from potable water sources, foundation drains, air conditioning condensation, irrigation water, springs, water from crawl space pumps, footing drains, lawn watering, individual residential car washing, flows from riparian habitats and wetlands, dechlorinated swimming pool discharges, and street wash water. 2. Discharges or flow from firefighting, and other discharges specified in writing by the City as being necessary to protect public health and safety. 3. Discharges associated with dye testing, however this activity requires a verbal notification to the City prior to the time of the test. 4. Any non-storm water discharge permitted under an NPDES permit, waiver, or waste discharge order issued to the discharger and administered under the authority of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), provided that the discharger is in full compliance with all requirements of the permit, waiver, or order and other applicable laws and regulations, and provided that written approval has been granted for any discharge to the storm drain system. 8.05.025. COMPATIBILITY WITH OTHER REGULATIONS. This chapter is not intended to modify or repeal any other ordinance, rule, regulation, or other provision of law. The requirements of this chapter are in addition to the requirements of any other ordinance, rule, regulation, or other provision of law, and where any provision of this chapter imposes restrictions different from those imposed by any other ordinance, rule, regulation, or other provision of law, whichever provision is more restrictive or imposes higher protective standards for human health or the environment shall control. 8.E.a Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 (2019-21 : Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection) _______________________________________________________________________________________ 6 | Ordinance No. _____; February 28, 2019 8.05.030. DESIGNATION OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE. The Public Works Director, or his/her designee, is appointed to administer and implement this chapter and the requirements/restrictions thereof. Any powers granted or duties imposed upon the Public Works Director may be delegated in writing by the Director to persons or entities acting in the beneficial interest of or in the employ of the agency. 8.05.035. ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY. The standards set forth herein and promulgated pursuant to this chapter are minimum standards; therefore this chapter does not intend or imply that compliance by any person will ensure that there will be no contamination, pollution, or unauthorized discharge of pollutants. 8.05.040 Abatement. A. In the event that enforcement should become necessary, the public works director, or his/her designee, shall make a reasonable effort to contact the property owner or other responsible party and notify him/her of the infraction. If neither the property owner nor other responsible party can be reached, the public works director, or his/her designee, shall make all necessary arrangements to correct the infraction(s) at the property owner’s expense. B. The property owner shall be given sufficient time, as determined by the public works director, or his/her designee, to correct any infractions. Should the property owner fail to correct the infraction(s) in the allotted time he/she will be subject to possible fine, work stoppage, and reimbursement, to the city, of all costs associated with correcting the infraction. 8.05.045. WATERCOURSE PROTECTION. Every person owning property through which a watercourse passes, or such person's lessee or agent, shall keep and maintain that part of the watercourse within the property free of trash, debris, excessive vegetation, and other obstacles that would pollute, contaminate, or significantly retard the flow of water through the watercourse. In addition, the owner, lessee or agent shall maintain existing privately-owned structures within or adjacent to a watercourse, so that such structures will not become a hazard to the use, function, or physical integrity of the watercourse. 8.05.050 Penalty. Violation of the terms of this chapter shall be punishable, upon conviction, under the general penalty ordinance. 8.05.055 RIGHT OF ENTRY; INSPECTION AND SAMPLING. Provided the City gives 24-hours advance notice, the City shall be permitted to enter and inspect premises subject to regulation under this chapter as often as may be necessary when entrance is deemed by the City to be necessary to determine compliance with this chapter. However, in cases of emergency or ongoing discharge, the City shall be given immediate access. 8.E.a Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 (2019-21 : Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection) _____________________________________________________________________________________ 7 | Ordinance No. _____; February 28, 2019 1. Facility operators shall allow the City ready access to all parts of the premises for the purposes of inspection, sampling, examination and copying of records that must be kept under the conditions of an NPDES permit to discharge storm water, and the performance of any additional duties as defined by state and federal law. 2. The City shall have the right to set up on any permitted facility such devices as are necessary in the opinion of the Public Works Director to conduct monitoring and/or sampling of the facility's storm water discharge. 3. The City has the right to require the discharger to install monitoring equipment as necessary. The facility's sampling and monitoring equipment shall be maintained at all times in a safe and proper operating condition by the discharger at its own expense. All devices used to measure storm water flow and quality shall be calibrated to ensure their accuracy. 4. Unreasonable delays in allowing the City access to a permitted facility is a violation of a storm water discharge permit and of this chapter. A person who is the operator of a facility with an NPDES permit to discharge storm water associated with industrial activity commits an offense if the person denies the City reasonable access to the permitted facility for the purpose of conducting any activity authorized or required by this chapter. 5. The City may seek issuance of an administrative search warrant from any court of competent jurisdiction if it has been refused access to any part of the premises from which stormwater is discharged, and 1) is able to demonstrate probable cause to believe that there may be a violation of this chapter, or 2) that there is a need to inspect and/or sample as part of a routine inspection and such sampling program is designed to verify compliance with this chapter or any order issued hereunder, or 3) to protect the overall public health, safety, and welfare of the community. 8.05.060. REQUIREMENT TO PREVENT, CONTROL, AND REDUCE STORM WATER POLLUTANTS BY THE USE OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. The City will adopt requirements identifying Best Management Practices for any activity, operation, or facility which may cause or contribute to pollution or contamination of storm water, the storm drain system, or waters of the United States. The owner or operator of such activity, operation, or facility shall provide, at their own expense, reasonable protection from accidental discharge of prohibited materials or other wastes into the municipal storm drain system or watercourses through the use of these structural and non-structural BMPs. Further, any person responsible for a property or premise that is, or may be, the source of an illicit discharge, may be required to implement, at said person's expense, additional structural and non- structural BMPs to prevent the further discharge of pollutants to the MS4. Compliance with all terms and conditions of a valid NPDES permit authorizing the discharge of storm water associated with industrial activity, to the extent practicable, shall be deemed compliance with the provisions of this section. These BMPs shall be part of a storm water management plan (SWMP) as necessary for compliance with requirements of the NPDES permit. 8.05.065. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT A. Low-impact development (LID) is a term used to describe a land planning and engineering design approach to manage stormwater runoff as part of green infrastructure. LID emphasizes conservation and use of on-site natural features to 8.E.a Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 (2019-21 : Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection) _______________________________________________________________________________________ 8 | Ordinance No. _____; February 28, 2019 protect water quality. B. Post-Construction Stormwater Development/Management Guidelines – Refer to most current version of the “Rogue Valley Stormwater Quality Design Manual”. C. Maintenance Agreement - Stormwater treatment practices shall have an enforceable operation and maintenance agreement to ensure the system functions as designed. This agreement will include: 1. Access to Stormwater treatment facilities at the site by the City for the purpose of inspection and repair. 2. A legally binding document specifying the parties responsible for the proper maintenance of the Stormwater treatment facilities. The agreement will be recorded and run with the land. 3. For stormwater controls that include vegetation and/or soil permeability the operation and maintenance manual must include maintenance of these elements to maintain the functionality of the feature. 4. The person responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater facility shall have the operation and maintenance manual on site and available at all times. Records of the maintenance and repairs shall be retained and available for the last 5 years and available for inspection by the City. D. Violation of this section shall be subject to the provisions of 8.05.070. 8.05.070 VIOLATIONS, ENFORCEMENT, AND PENALTIES. A. Violations. 1. It shall be unlawful for any person to violate any provision or fail to comply with any of the requirements of this chapter. Any person who has violated or continues to violate the provisions of this chapter, may be subject to the enforcement actions outlined in this section or may be restrained by injunction or otherwise abated in a manner provided by law. 2. In the event the violation constitutes an immediate danger to public health or public safety, the City is authorized to enter upon the subject private property, without giving prior notice, to take any and all measures necessary to abate the violation and/or restore the property. The City is authorized to seek costs of the abatement as outlined in Section 8.05.095. B. Warning Notice. When the City finds that any person has violated, or continues to violate, any provision of this chapter, or any order issued hereunder, the City may serve upon that person a written Warning Notice, specifying the particular violation believed to have occurred and requesting the offender to immediately investigate the matter and to seek a resolution to correct the violation. Investigation and/or resolution of the matter in response to the Warning Notice in no way relieves the alleged violator of liability for any violations occurring before or after receipt of the Warning Notice. Nothing in this subsection shall limit the authority of the City to take any action, including emergency action or any other enforcement action, without first issuing a Warning Notice. In addition to serving the alleged violator, such warning shall be mailed to the last known address of the owner as shown on the County assessor’s records. 8.E.a Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 (2019-21 : Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection) _____________________________________________________________________________________ 9 | Ordinance No. _____; February 28, 2019 C. Notice of Violation. Whenever the City finds that a person has violated a prohibition or failed to meet a requirement of this chapter, the City may order compliance by written notice of violation to the responsible person. In the event the responsible person is someone other than the owner of the property, such notice shall also be mailed to the last known address of the owner as shown on the County assessor records. The Notice of Violation shall contain: 1. The name and address of the alleged violator; 2. The address when available or a description of the building, structure or land upon which the violation is occurring, or has occurred; 3. A statement specifying the nature of the violation; 4. A description of the remedial measures necessary to restore compliance with this chapter and a time schedule for the completion of such remedial action; 5. A statement of the penalty or penalties that shall or may be assessed against the person to whom the notice of violation is directed; 6. A statement that the determination of violation may be appealed to the City Manager by filing a written notice of appeal within ten days of service of notice of violation; and 7. A statement specifying that, should the violator fail to restore compliance within the established time schedule, the work will be done by a designated governmental agency or a contractor and the expense thereof shall be charged to the violator and assessed as a lien against the property. Such notice may require without limitation: 1. The performance of monitoring, analyses, and reporting; 2. The elimination of illicit connections or discharges; 3. That violating discharges, practices, or operations shall cease and desist; 4. The abatement or remediation of storm water pollution or contamination hazards and the restoration of any affected property; and 5. The implementation of source control or treatment BMPs. D. Stop Work Order When the City finds that construction activity has resulted in violations of any provision of this chapter or any order issued hereunder, or that the person’s past violations are likely to recur, the City may issue a stop work to such person, directing such person committing the alleged violations to stop work immediately and directing that no further work be performed until compliance with this chapter is demonstrated. E. Emergency Cease and Desist Orders When the City finds that any person has violated, or continues to violate, any provision of this chapter, or any order issued hereunder, or that the person’s past violations are likely to recur, and that the person’s violation(s) has (have) caused or contributed to an actual or threatened discharge to the MS4 or waters of the State which reasonably appears to present an imminent or substantial endangerment to the health or welfare of persons or to the environment, the City may issue an order to the violator directing it immediately to cease and desist all such violations 8.E.a Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 (2019-21 : Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection) _______________________________________________________________________________________ 10 | Ordinance No. _____; February 28, 2019 F. Suspension Due to Illicit Discharges in Emergency Situations The City may, without prior notice, suspend MS4 discharge access to a person when such suspension is necessary to stop an actual or threatened discharge that presents or may present imminent and substantial danger to the environment, or to the health or welfare of persons, or to the MS4 or Waters of the State. If the violator fails to comply with a suspension order issued in an emergency, the City may take such steps as it deems necessary to prevent or minimize damage to the MS4 or Waters of the State. G. Suspension Due to the Detection of Illicit Discharge Any person discharging to the MS4 in violation of this chapter may have its MS4 access suspended if such suspension would abate or reduce an illicit discharge. The City will notify the violator of the proposed suspension of its MS4 access. The person may petition the City for reconsideration and hearing as provided in section 8.05.075. A person commits an offense if the violator reinstates MS4 access to premises suspended pursuant to this chapter, without the prior approval of the City. A person commits an offense if the person reinstates MS4 access to premises terminated pursuant to this Section, without the prior approval of the Public Works Director. 8.05.075. APPEAL OF NOTICE OF VIOLATION. Any person receiving a Notice of Violation or suspension of permit may appeal to the city manager for relief with 10 days after service of notice. The petition shall include the facts upon which the petitioner relies for relief from the obligations of this chapter in relation to the property. If the city manager finds that it would work a real and unnecessary hardship upon the petitioner to comply with the terms of this chapter, then the city manager may relieve the petitioner of the obligations of the chapter in relation to the particular property, but nothing therein shall be construed as obligating the city to remove or abate the nuisance without charging the cost as a lien against the said property. 8.05.085. CIVIL PENALTIES. For each violation of this chapter a civil penalty may be assessed in the amount of up to $500 per stormwater feature, not to exceed $1,000 per day. Each day a violation exists shall be considered a separate violation. The City shall consider the following criteria in determining the amount of any civil penalty to be assessed under this Section. 1. Amount of pollutant discharged. 2. The type of pollutant discharged. 3. Whether the discharge was intentional or accidental. 4. The magnitude and seriousness of the impact of the discharge. 8.05.090. ENFORCEMENT MEASURES AFTER APPEAL. If the violation has not been corrected pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Notice of Violation, or, in the event of an appeal, within 10 days of the decision of the City Manager upholding the decision of the Public Works Director, then representatives of the Public Works Director shall enter upon the subject private property and are authorized to take any and all measures necessary to abate the violation and/or restore the property. It shall be unlawful for any person, owner, agent or person in possession of any premises to refuse to allow the government 8.E.a Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 (2019-21 : Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection) _____________________________________________________________________________________ 11 | Ordinance No. _____; February 28, 2019 agency or designated contractor to enter upon the premises for the purposes set forth above. 8.05.095. COST OF ABATEMENT OF THE VIOLATION. A. Within 15-calendar days after abatement of the violation, the owner of the property will be notified of the cost of abatement, including administrative costs. The notice will provide that the costs of abatement, including administrative costs, is a special assessment against the property and will become a lien against the property unless paid within 60-days of the date of such notice. The property owner may file a written protest objecting to the amount of the assessment within 30-days from the date of notice. Objections to the proposed assessment shall be heard and determined by the council in its regular course of business. B. An assessment for the cost of abatement as determined by the council shall be made by resolution of the council and shall thereupon be entered in the docket of city liens and, upon such entry being made, it shall constitute a lien upon the property from which the illicit discharge was abated. C. The lien shall be enforced in the same manner as liens for street improvements are enforced and shall bear interest at the rate of six percent per year. Such interest shall commence to run thirty days after the entry of the lien in the lien docket. D. An error in the name of the owner or agent in charge of the property shall not void the assessment nor will a failure to receive the notice of the assessment render the assessment void, but it shall remain a valid lien against the property. 8.05.100. VIOLATIONS DEEMED A PUBLIC NUISANCE. In addition to the enforcement processes and penalties provided, any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter is a threat to public health, safety, and welfare, and is declared and deemed a nuisance, and may be summarily abated or restored at the violator's expense, and/or a civil action to abate, enjoin, or otherwise compel the cessation of such nuisance may be taken. 8.05.105. REMEDIES NOT EXCLUSIVE. The remedies listed in this chapter are not exclusive of any other remedies available under any applicable federal, state or local law and it is within the discretion of the City to seek cumulative remedies. The City may recover all attorney’s fees court costs and other expenses associated with enforcement of this chapter, including sampling and monitoring expenses. 8.05.110 SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this chapter are hereby declared to be severable. If any provision, clause, sentence, or paragraph of this chapter or the application thereof to any person, establishment, or circumstances shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions or application of this chapter. SECTION 2. Codification. Provisions of this Ordinance shall be incorporated in the City Code and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "code", "article", "section", "chapter" or another word, and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered, or re-lettered, 8.E.a Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 (2019-21 : Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection) _______________________________________________________________________________________ 12 | Ordinance No. _____; February 28, 2019 provided however that any Whereas clauses and boilerplate provisions (i.e. Recitals A-C) need not be codified and the City Recorder is authorized to correct any cross-references and any typographical errors. SECTION 3. Effective Date. The Central Point City Charter states that an ordinance enacted by the Council shall take effect on the thirtieth day after its enactment. The effective date of this ordinance will be the thirtieth day after the second reading. PASSED by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this ____ day of _____________ 2019. ___________________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: __________________________________ City Recorder 8.E.a Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: ORD - Storm Drain Protection 2-20-19 (2019-21 : Ordinance Amending Chapter 8.05 Storm Drain Protection) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Public Works FROM: Matt Samitore, Parks and Public Works Director MEETING DATE: March 14, 2019 SUBJECT: Resolution No. _______, A Resolution Adopting the Special Event Fee Schedule 2019 ACTION REQUIRED: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Approval BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Currently, city staff operates under an antiquated and confusing price structure for special events/special event permits. Inasmuch, we are proposing a new event pricing schedule, which includes resident and non-resident rates and offers dedicated blocks of time to allow for easier scheduling of our parks and recreation facilities. Furthermore, we have proposed an alteration to our permit pricing so it would “fall in line” with other current city fees. We have also added two additional permits—one for water facility usage and one for inflatable bounce houses—as both require additional staff time for initial setup and post-use maintenance. Another new addition to our pricing schedule is the availability of ‘Rec & Go’ Rentals. Our department received a very positive response to last summer’s initial Rec & Go program, and therefore, we are requesting approval to use Rec & Go to offer rentals in conjunction with our Central Point Parks Gazebos. The rental would include either 2 or 4 hours, during which Rec & Go would travel to a gazebo of choice in Central Point, and our assigned staff member would facilitate games, activities, and recreation for party/event participants. Rec & Go would be available May through September. The associated rate includes the cost of one Rec & Go staff member (seasonal staff) and the cost for rental of a park gazebo. Lastly, we have added additional charges for extra trash associated with our park rentals. Last year we had an increase in trash being left behind and some events that extended into evening/nighttime hours, which requires staff to work overtime. We currently plan on each gazebo rental associated with a special event to get at least one empty garbage container. In the fall of 2018 staff presented updates to our special event rates to the Parks Commission. They recommended approval of the rate adjustment. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: Staff does not anticipate a significant “uptick” in revenue should the council decide to amend the current rate schedule/structure per the above-described. 8.F Packet Pg. 136 LEGAL ANALYSIS: N/A COUNCIL GOALS/STRATEGIC PLAN ANALYSIS: Recreation Goal 2 – Provide high-quality facilities, parks, and open spaces that attract resident and non-resident use. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of a resolution adjusting the special event fee schedule. RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move to approve Resolution ___ adopting the Special Event Fee Schedule 2019. ATTACHMENTS: 1. RESO - Special Events Fee Schedule 2019 2. Special Event Rate Sheet proposed 3. Current Special Events Fee Schdule. 8.F Packet Pg. 137 Res. No.___________; March 14, 2019 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. _________ A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE SPECIAL EVENT FEE SCHEDULE 2019 RECITALS: A. The City of Central Point currently has a fee schedule for special events based upon the number of occupants attending an event. B. The revised fee schedule simplifies the rental based upon time rather than number of occupants. C. The revised fee schedule includes fees for Rec and Go and for specialty items associated with an event such water usage, bounce houses and additional garbage. The City of Central Point resolves as follows: Section 1. The City hereby adopts the revised Special Event Fee Schedule 2019 in the form attached hereto as Exhibit “A” to be effective immediately upon its passage. Passed by the Council and signed by me in authentication of its passage this _____ day of March, 2019. __________________________ Mayor Hank Williams ATTEST: _____________________________ City Recorder ______________________________________________________________________________ 8.F.a Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: RESO - Special Events Fee Schedule 2019 [Revision 1] (1116 : Special Event Rate Adjustment) Exhibit "A" Hours Resident Price Non-Resident Price Deposit Add. GazeboResident Price Add. GazeboNon-Resident Price 4 100$ 120$ 200$ 40$ 50$ 6 120$ 140$ 200$ 40$ 50$ 8 140$ 160$ 200$ 40$ 50$ All day 200$ 220$ 200$ 40$ 50$ Alcohol $15 *only allowed at Twin Creeks Park and Pfaff Park Amplified Sound $15 Water Usage $15 *only allowed at Twin Creeks, Pfaff Park and Don Jones Bounce House* $30 *only allowed at Twin Creeks Park Any Rec & Go Rental must be done in conjunction with a Central Point Parks Gazebo Rental Hours Resident Price Non-Resident Price 2 150$ 170$ 4 250$ 270$ Longer hours will be considered, please call Parks and Rec for more information. Overflowing Trash $15 Extra trash bags $5 per bag Hoses, couplers, spidear boxes are availble for rent. Please call Parks & Rec for more information and pricing. Special Event Rate Sheet Extra Permits Extra Charges (Deducted From Deposit) Additional Rentals Rec & Go Rental A special event is for any park rental over 75 people, weddings or includes any extra permit Special Events are held at any of our parks - specific parks do have a capactiy limit 8.F.b Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Special Event Rate Sheet proposed (1116 : Special Event Rate Adjustment) 8.F.b Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Special Event Rate Sheet proposed (1116 : Special Event Rate Adjustment) Central Point Parks and Recreation 2018 Fee Schedule Special Event and Wedding Facility Rental Fees: A special event is any event with 75 or more attendees or any event that requires special permitting. Special event permit applications must be submitted a minimum of 30 days prior to date of the event. Permits are subject to department approval and are not guaranteed. (See Special Event Handbook for planning details and applications): x Damage Deposit: All special events held at a city park or facility will require a $200security and damage deposit. This deposit is refundable with no damage to facility,property or violation of municipal codeDQG ZLOOEHUHIXQGHGLQGD\V x Special event fees are based on group size. Group Size Gazebo – First 4 Hour Blocks Gazebo – Additional 2 Hour Blocks Refundable Damage Deposit Resident Non Resident Resident Non Resident 75 – 100 $70 $100 $30 $40 $200 101 – 150 $120 NA $30 $40 $200 151 – 200 $150 NA $30 $40 $200 201 – 300 $170 NA $30 $40 $200 301 + $200 NA $30 $40 $200 Special Event Rates for each additional gazebo: Residents - $30 minimum 4 hourEORFNV; Non Residents $40 minimum 4 hourEORFNV Special Event – Permit Fees: Permits are required for use of alcohol, amplified sound equipment and water as part of a special event: Alcohol Permit $15 Amplified Equipment $15 6PDOO(YHQW*D]HER5HQWDO)HHVGazebo reservations are available for individual or group small events planned for 75 people or less. Group Size Gazebo – First 2 Hours Each Additional 2 Hours Less than 75 People Resident Non Resident Resident Non Resident $50 $60 $25 $35 )LHOG5HQWDOV)HHVAthletic fields, basketball and tennis courts are available for reservation: Individual Field Rental – First 2 Hours Each Additional 2 Hours Resident Non Resident Resident Non Resident $50 $60 $25 $35 Seasonal Group Rental March - June September - November $125 $125 6PDOO(YHQW*D]HER5HQWDO)HHVGazebo reservations are available for individual or group small events planned for 75 people or less. $GGLWLRQDO&KDUJHV •Overflowing trash cans $15 per can will be deducted from deposit •Extra trash bags for disposal $5 per bag will be deducted from deposit $GGLWLRQDOEquipmentIf additional equipment is needed like hoses, couplers or spider boxes, rental fees must be discussed in advance with Special Events Coordinator. Water Permit (water bounce house, dunk tank, etc)$15 8.F.c Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Current Special Events Fee Schdule. (1116 : Special Event Rate Adjustment) City of Central Point Staff Report to Council ISSUE SUMMARY TO: City Council DEPARTMENT: Community Development FROM: Tom Humphrey, Community Development Director MEETING DATE: March 14, 2019 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Report for the March 5, 2019 ACTION REQUIRED: Information/Direction RECOMMENDATION: Approval The following items were presented by staff and discussed by the Planning Commission at its regular meeting on March 5, 2019. A. A Public Hearing to continue consideration of the Housing Element (review draft), which has been updated based on changes to the Population Element and BLI (File No. CPA-18005) The Housing Element was last updated in 2017 and was based on an earlier population forecast that estimated a residential land need of 150 acres. The revised population numbers will potentially increase the City’s long term residential need to 305 acres. Revising the Housing Element will enable the City to demonstrate a greater land need when expanding its UGB this year. The Commission received testimony from residents in favor of the Housing unit and acreage projections. After discussion the Commission recommended approval of the revised Housing Element. B. Discussion of the Residential Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) Amendment Schedule. A tentative UGB Amendment schedule was proposed by planning staff that included current Comp Plan document revisions. 9.A Packet Pg. 142