Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 337 - Fellows Partition - Countryside PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3-3~ A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A LAND PARTITION (Applicant: Robert Fellows) (37 2W 11AC Tax L,ot 4800) Recitals 1. Applicant has submitted an application far tentative plan approval for a land partition on a parcel located an Countryside Drive in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On December 19, 1995, the Central Paint Planning Commissinn conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A rnval Criteria. The requirements for approval of land partitions and tentative plans are set forth in CPMC Title 16 and Title 17, relating to informational requirements, zoning, lot dimension, access, and similar requirements. Section 2. Findin s and Conclusions. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. Tentative Plan Requirements. The application and tentative plan are in the correct form and contain all of the information required by CPMC Chapter 16.14. B. Area and width of Lat. This partitioning in an R-3 zone would create the following parcels: Parcel 1: Approximately 6064 square feet; Parcel 2: Approximately 6064 square feet. Both parcels meet the minimum area {604© interior lots and 7000 square feet for corner feet for interior lots and 74 feet for corner for lots in the R-3 zone as set forth in CPMC parcels meet the general requirements far lot; 16.24.050. square feet for lots) and width (60 lots) requirements 17.28.054, and such a contained in CPMC 1 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3~__. (121895) Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for tentative plan for land partition herein is hereby approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, imposed under authority of CPMC Chapter 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in au entication of its passage this ~~ day of , 1995. Planning Commission Chairman ATTESTe J City Repr enta ive Approved by me this ~ ~, day of _ ~~) ~, 1995. Planning Commission Chairman 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~~ X121895} EXHIBIT "A" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TFNTATIVI= PLAN CONDITIONS Fellows Tentative Plan A. This review for the Tentative Plan submitted by the applicant was done so in accordance with all the rules, regulations and ordinances in effect as of the date of this review. Any modifications by Developer of this project after City Planning Commission approval, could require resubmittal of an application, and approval by the City Planning Commission based on the recommendation of staff responsible for this review. B. All costs associated with this Development and the conditions placed on this Development shall be the sole responsibility of the applicant/owner. C. No construction will begin on this project or any building until such time as plans and specifications have been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and other required divisions of the City and a Construction Permit has been issued far each portion of the project requiring a permit. D. The Fina! Plat of this Subdivision shall not be approved by the Planning Commission until all conditions as herein stipulated and approved for this project have been met by construction and acceptance thereof or bonding for construction. 1=. The developer shall submit an AutoCAD compatible digital drawing of the Final Plat at the time of Final Plat Approval. Public 1Norks Department Tentative Plan Conditions Fellows Tentative Plan 1. Alf structures steal! have roof drains, area drains, and crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the structure and drain Lines connected to a curb drain, or an approved storm sewer. The developer shat[ provide the necessary storm drainage improvements and lot grading to assure that all streets, Pots, and all properties will drain properly. 2. Access to Parcel No. 5 shaft not be located within the street curve. 3. Some of the parcels may not have adequate existing sewer and water services. The streets currently are under moratorium. No cutting of the pavement shalE be allowed until the moratorium is lifted. 4. Development of Parcel 5 as planned may rewire some adjustment of the proposed property lines. Applicant shalt submit a copy of the plot plan far any construction on I~ot 5 with the Final Plat for this land division to clarify haw that development effects the locatian of the new [ot lines.