HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 383 - Beall Estates, Ph. III - Tent. Plan<~,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ijy~~
A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE PLAN
FOR BEALL ESTATES SUBDIVISION, PHASE III
(Applicants: Nae1 Maare and Bret Moore)
{37 2W 12C Tax Lot 34D4)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 Nature of Application. This is an application
far approval of a tentative plan far a 30-lot subdivision in an
R-2 district of Central Point, Oregon. The Planning Commission
reviewed the app~.icatian and tentative plan at a duly-noticed
public hearing on May 6, 1997.
Section 2 Approval Criteria. The criteria for approval of
this subdivision application are found in CPMC Title 16, relating
to tentative plans and subdivisions, and in Title 17, relating to
zoning and lot sizes.
Section 3 Findings and Conclusions. The Planning
Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. Tentative Plan Requirements. The application and
tentative plan herein are in the correct farm and contain all of
the information required for the same under CPMC Chapter 16.10.
B. Area and Width of Lats. The subdivision lots all meet
the R-2 district lot size requirements of 6,000 square feet for
interior lots and 7,000 square feet for corner lots. The minimum
width requirements are also met, with interior lets at least 60
feet wide and corner lots at least 70 feet wide.
C. Blocks and Streets. 'Fhe tentative plan proposal far the
layout and dimensions of streets and blocks is in compliance with
the requirements of CPMC Chapter 16.20 regarding streets and CPMC
Chapter 16.24 regarding blacks,
Section 4 Conditional Approval. The application far
tentative plan approval for the within subdivision is hereby
approved, subject to the conditions listed on Exhibit "A" hereto,
imposed under authority of CPMC 16.10.090.
Passed by the Planning Commissionfand signed y me in
authentication of its passage this 1~1 ~ day of ~~_., ,
1997.
Planning Commission Chairman
1 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. '~~~a {051297)
ATTEST:
~~ ~ ...
City Representative
,ir
Approved by ttte tha,s ~,~ day o~ ~'~~{,;~,~__.- 1997.
P1.anning Commission Chaa,rman
2 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ?~ '~ (051297)
EXI~IIBIT A.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS
1. The applicants shall comply with all requirements of BCVSA, Fire District #3, Jackson
County Roads Department, Rogue River Valfey Irrigation District and any other affected
agencies as they pertain to the development of the subdivision. Evidence of such compliance
shall be submitted to the City gnor to final plat approval.
2. The applicants shall submit a park development plan to the Planning Department indicating
the manner and schedule by which the neighborhood park within the subdivision will be
developed. This shall include any proposed landscaping, irrigation, natural azeas, architectural
features and play equipment.
3. 'I'he applicants shall submit a copy of the recorded covenants, conditions, and restrictions
{CC&Rs) for the subdivision to the Planning Department.
4. The applicants shall comply with all requirements of the Division of State Lands for the
project as indicated by its response to the Wetland Land Use Notification Form.
5. The approval of the tentative plan shall become void one yeaz following the date of~such
approval unless an application for a final plat has been submitted to the Planning Department.
6. The subdivision shall be developed in accordance with the tentative plan as approved by
the Planning Commission. Modifications to the tentative plan shall be subject to further
review and approval by the Planning Commission. -
Beal! Estates Phase 111
PWD Staff Report on 7"entative Plat
Apri130, ~ss~
Page 2
of oak trees located on the northwest portion of the proposed park site.
2. The Developer shall work with the City to obtain an easement through the
existing subdivision to the North of the proposed subdivision to obtain
pedestrian/bicycle access from lsorest Glen Drive to the proposed park
location.
General
~ . Developer shall submit to the City's Public Works Department {City's PWDy
far review and approval, plans and specifications #or all improvements
proposed for construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of-
ways and easements.
2. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streEts {including
sidewalks, curbs and gutters); storm drainage and sanitary sewer coI[ection
and conveyance systems; water distribution system {up to the service meter
and including fire protection); street lighting; and traffic control devices,
street signs and delineation.
3. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's Public
Works Standard Specifications and Details {City PWD Standards) and other
special specifications, details, standards, andlor upgrades as may be
approved by the City`s Public Works Director.
4. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted
in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to
installation.
5. No construction shall commence until the City PWD has reviewed, approved,
and issued a Public Works permit for the proposed improvements.
g
Beall Estates Phase !!!
PWD Sfaff Deport on 7"entative Plaf
Apri130, 1937
Page 4
1 1 . All fill placed in the development shall be "engineered fill", and compacted to
City standards. All existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures,
clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed
from the site and either recycled ar properly disposed of in accordance with
the requirements of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.
12. Identify easement dedications and widths on the Plot Plan.
13. Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm
drain) must be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines.
Easements far storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be
dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.E. Centerline of buried infrastructure
shall be aligned a minimum of five {5y feet from the edge of the easement.
14. All design, construction plans and specifications, and as-built drawings must
be prepared to acceptable pro#essional standards.
15. All street and water improvement plans must be approved in writing by Fire
District 3 prior to review by the City's PWD.
16. If the proposed development places structures within the i 00-year
flaodzone, haw does the placement of these structures modify the
floadzone. What affect will it have on the #[oodplain elevation and flaodzone
boundary, and what affects will the modification of the f[oodplain elevation
and floodzone boundary have on the existing facilities and properties
surrounding the proposed development.
17. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the
proposed improvements, the following must be submitted:
^ A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the final street and
water system improvement plans for the proposed development.
~~
Beall Bstates Phase 111
PWO Staff Report an Tentative Plat
.4pri130, 1997
Page 6
Streets/Traffic
Existing Improvements _ Beall Inane -Secondary Arterial. ROW 60' wide,
pavement 30' wide. Jurisdiction -Jackson
County.
- Woodridge Drive -ROW 50' wide, street width 3fi'
- Gatepark Drive -ROW 50' wide, street width 36'
1. Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting
Plan and Tra#fic Control Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City
PWD. The construction drawings shall include clear vision areas designed to
meet the City's PWD Standards. 25-foot unobstructed sight triangle areas
shall be required at all uncontrolled intersections. 55 feet shall be required at
arterial intersections.
2. The City PWD shaft, at the cost of the Developer, evaluate the strength of
the native soils and determine the street section designs in accordance with
the City PWD Standards. The City's engineering staff or selected
engineering consultant {at Developer`s expense), shall evaluate the strength
of the native soils and determine the street section designs in accordance
with the City PWD Standards. Minimum street section shall be as follows:
- 3-inches Class "B" A.C.
- 4-inches of 1 "-0" crushed rock
- S-inches of 4"-0"~ crushed rock (City of Medford specifications?,
woven geotextile fabric over compacted subgrade. ,
Street section (excluding the asphalt concrete portionl shall be extended
underneath the sidewalk portion of the street section to provide structural
support for the sidewalk section.
3. All improvements to Beall Lane including, but not Limited to, street section,
curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and traffic control and de{ineation, shall be
coordinated and approved by the JC Roads and the City PWD. Acceleration
and deceleration lanes meeting JC Roads standards may need to be provided
at the proposed development's intersection of Circlewood Drive with Beall
Lane.
i3
Beall Estates Phase 111
PW,Q Staff Report an Tentative Plat
ApriI30, 1997
Page 8
3. Need plan and profile drawing of HGL in Elk Creek channel and indication of
floodway and flood-zone boundary during the ~ 00-year flood event. The City
DPW does not have a complete copy of the fiood study work performed on
Elk Creek in this area. Was the flood study done with the inclusion of the
proposed development? If the proposed development was not included in
the original study, then a revised study (with the inclusion of the proposed
development and surrounding future developments (if applicable} wilt need to
be performed.
4. Easements need to be i 5-feet wide, and need clause in final property deeds
or final CC&Rs to maintain driveable access to manholes for getting
vactor/jester to manholes. Need copy of either document prior to approval of
construction plans.
5. During the design of the SD System, the Developer`s engineer shall consider
the effect of finished lot elevations with regards to the floodway and ~ 00
year floadplain for Elk Creek and the drainage ditch on the east side of the
proposed development. The allowable flow rates into Elk Creek or into the
unnamed ditch from the proposed development shall not be greater than the
run-of# flow rates experienced from the property in its current status. The
Developer's engineer must provide suitable hydrological calculations and
storm hydrographs to depict the existing condition and the finished condition
of the proposed development.. The Developer's engineer and the City PWD
shall agree on the applicable run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance
etc., used ire the Developer engineer's calculations. Provide analysis of the
drainage ditch along the east side of the development as weft as Elk Creek.
fi. Plans which propose to include discharge to Elk Creek or the existing
drainage ditch and any construction thereof, shall be in compliance with DSL,
ACQE, ODFW,.and DEQ guidelines and requirements. Any modifications to
the drainage ditch and Elk Creek shaii be done in accordance with any
requirements and applicable conditions of the DSL, AC4E, andlor DEQ.
7. The discharge point and ~iotential retention 'o# storm water run-off shall be
coordinated with aspects of the proposed park to provide an aesthetically
pleasing, useful, and Iow maintenance facility.
15
Beall Estates Phase Ill
PWIa Staff Report on Tentative Plat
April 30, 1397
Page 10
^ Convey the collected groundwater and storm water with the minimum
cleaning velocities and without surcharging the collection and
conveyance piping; and
^ Minimize silts, sands, gravels, and fines migration from the native soils
into the SD system.
The plotted HGL shat( include both the groundwater infiltration, and the
storm water run-off and run-on inflows into the SD system.
15. All storm drain easements must be 15-feet wide, and include a clause to
maintain driveable access to manholes for getting a suitable truck mounted
vactor/fetter machine to manholes, clean-outs, or inlets.
i 6. As illustrated on the tentative plat, a 30-foot wide storm drainage easement
shall be located on the northern portion of. lots 49, 50, and. 51 to afford
access to the llk Creek channel.
i 7. Construction of private storm drains is discouraged by the City. However, if
a private storm drain is to be constructed, the following information must be
provided to the City:
- How will the private storm drains be maintained, repaired, etc.
- All roof and lot drainage must 6e drained to the curbline.
- Provide invert elevations and lateral stationing for construction
of private storm drain system.
- Provide plan and profile views and elevations for any private
storms drain system that may be proposed.
'l 8. Provide 0.2-foot drop through all manholes and curb inlets.
19. Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to public storm
drain lines, and shall drain to the street at the curbline, whenever possible.
Lots should be raised if necessary. Building foundation under drains (and
these type of facilities only} may drain to private storm drain lines that
~~
Beal! Estates Phase 111
PWD Staff Report on Tentative Plat
Apri130, 1397
Page 72
4. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary
approval, will forward the plans to BCVSA for completion of the review
process with D~Q. Upon completion of the review by DE~a and BCVSA,
completion of final revisions to the plans by the Developer`s engineer, and
following the final approva! and signature on the construction plans by
BCVSA, the Public Works Director wit! approve the plans in final form.
5. A!1 testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shaft be done in
accordance with BCVSA requirements, at Developer`s expense. Thy
Developer shall provide DSQ, BCVSA, and the City with test reports, TV
reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final
acceptance.
6. The SS System shalt be designed in accordance with any master planning
prepared by Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA} and/or the City to
provide adequate capacity far the proposed development area, any future
development on adjacent properties, and any existing sanitary sewer
collection systems that may need to connect-into the proposed
development's SS System. if a master plan for the proposed development
area is unavailable, then a master plan shall be prepared far the proposed
development which accommodates the capacity needs far the proposed
development as well as the capacity needs for the adjoining properties, and
any additional flows as determined by BCVSA and the City PWD.
7. Any proposals requesting the City ar BCVSA to share in costs #or
development of the sanitary sewer collection system to accommodate the
upgrade of line sizing to handle the additional capacity requirements for
surrounding development, shall include detailed engineering calculations and
costs analyses. The Developer will be responsible to coordinate and develop
any cost sharing agreements with any identified adjacent property
ownersldevelopers.
i~
Beall Estates Phase !ll
PWD Sfaff Report on Tentative Plaf
Aprr130, 1997
Page 14
5. Specifications for the design and construction of the water system shall be in
accordance with City PWD Standards.
6. Lateral I connection stationing and size shall be provided on construction
plans and as-built drawings.
7. Developer's engineer shall provide a reinforced flaw ("looped") water system
with connections at Woodridge Drive, Gatepark Drive and the existing 12
inch City water line in Beall Lane.
8. Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD} and City
requirements for backflow prevention. An OHD approved backflow
prevention assembly shall be installed immediately downstream of the water
meter serving each dwelling unit.
9. Ganstructian drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water
mains, hydrants, air valves, service connection, and other appurtenance
details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the
City PWD.
10. All connections to the water supply system must comply with OHD
requirements. Water will not be "turned an" by the City until such
requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the City's designated
inspector (currently the Jackson County plumbing inspector).
11. Water system shall be tested in accordance with City PWD Standards and
requirements at Developer's expense and must be approved by the City.
~~
Beall Estates Phase 111
PWD Staff Report an Tentative Plat
Apri130, 1997
Page 16
6. Need to place street lights on plans, with table indicating stationing and
offsets.
7. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company which
reflects all utifity crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc.
8. Utility locations must be accurately depicted on the as-built drawings, or as a
separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings.
Rights of Waysl~asements
1. A!l easements for improvements dedicated to the City shalt have a minimum
15 foot width and shall be located {whenever possible) contiguously along
the exterior boundaries of properties and shall not split lot lines. Public utility
easements shall have a minimum width of 10 feet.
2. The City will require a 50 foot ROW width on local streets and 60 foot ROW
on collector streets.
3. Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights {on a City approved
farm), for the affected property (Tax lot 3404}. For properties determined to
Dave water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Watermaster,
the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a
result of the proposed development.
4. Developer shall comply with all existing easement owner requirements
regarding any proposed development that may overlap any existing
easement. Any development proposed which overlaps or alters an existing
easement must be approved by the easement's owner in writing, and a copy
of that written approval must be submitted to the City PWD prior to
submission of construction plans for City PWD review and approval:
5. Al! existing easement locations and those proposed for this development
~~