Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 401 - Medford Labor Temple Site Plan~f ~ C o l ~~. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~'~C~ A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY .A.PPROVING A SITE PLAN APPLrCATION {Applicant: Medford Labor Temple Association) (37 2W 03B Tax Lot 1500) (37 2W 03B Tax Lot 1503) Recitals 1. This matter came before the Planning Commission for hearing an September 16, 1997, on applicant's site plan application for a 9600-square foot labor temple to house the administrative offices of several local labor unions in a C-5 district of the City. The Planning Commission reviewed the application and the City staff reports, and received comments from all persons wishing to be heard in favor of and opposed to the application. Now, therefore; BE rT RESOLVL'D BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.46, C-5, Tharnughfare Commercial District; B. Chapter 17.60, General Regulations; C. Chapter 17.64, Off-Street Parking and Loading; D. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval. Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The Planning Comrctissinn hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirements of the fnllowir.g chapters of the Central Point Municipal Cnde: A. Chapter 17.46 relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback, building height and screening in the C-5 distract; B. Chapter 17.60 relating to paving and landscaping requirements; C. Chapter 17.64 relating to off-street parking and loading facilities; D. Chapter 17.72 relating to site plan requirements. 1 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~{~ (092597) Section 3. Conditional A royal. The within application for site plan approval is hereby conditionally approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this "~''~ day of ~p ~-- `, 19 9 7 . LJ~- Planning Commission Chairman ATTEST: City Representative Approved by me this ~_'~day of 1997. Planning Commission Chairman 2 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~~ (092597) PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFI+ REPORT HEARING DATE: September 16, 1997 TO: Central Point Planning Commission FROM: Jim Bennett, City Administrator SUBJECT: Review and Determination Regarding a Site Plan Review Application to Allow the Construction of a Labor Temple Applicant! Medford Labor Temple Association Owner: 24 '/z South Grape Street Medford, OR 97501 Agent: Fred Phillips Engineez~ng 345 North Bartlett Street, Suite #203 Medford, OR 97501 Pro e / 37 2W 03B TL 1500 - 3.14 acres Z_ onin~ 37 2W 03B TL 1503 - 0.58 acres Description : C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial Summa,.: The project consists of a Site Plan Review to allow the construction of a 9,600 square foot, single-story labor temple to house the administrative offices of several local labor unions, including landscaping, irrigation., and paved off street parking. Annlicable_ City of Central Point Comprehensive Plan. Law: CPMC Chapter 1.24 Public Hearings Procedures CPMC Chapter 17.46 C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial District CPMC Chapter 17.72 Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval Authori CPMC 1.24.020 invests the Planning-CommissionwIth the authority to render a decision on any Site Plan Review application. 1 Background The Medford Labor Temple Association is proposing to construct a 9,600 square foot labor #emple adjacent to the new Oregon State Police (OSP} facility on North Paci£~c l-lighway. The labor temple would serve as the administrative offices for several local labor unions. The project site is approximateky 3.7 acres and lies directly south of the OSP site in a C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial zoning district. Access to North Pacific Highway would be via a common driveway shared with OSP. Across-access easement for this purpose has been agreed to between the State and the Labor Temple Association and was recorded on December 26, 1996. Site Plan Standards CPMC 17.72.040 sets out the standards that are fio be used as the basis for any decision on a Site Plan application: A. Landscaping and fencing must be consistent with the neighborhood and used to screen activities and uses that may impact existing neighboring uses. The site plan shows new landscaping adjacent to North Pacific Highway, at the four corners of the labor temple, and at the southeast corner of the site. A chain link fence will separate the labor temple from the OSP facility to the north. B. Ingress and egress points must be designed and located to maintain and improve traffic flaws on public streets. Access to the site will be from North Pacific Highway using a common driveway shared with OSP. C. Off-street parking and interior circulation must be adequate to serve the site and maintain goad pedestrian and vehicle traffic flaws. The project proposes 126 off-street parking spaces, including three (3} handicapped parking spaces. This meets ar ezceeds the off-street parking requirements for this project. D. Signs for the project must be designed and located to be compatible with the use and not interfere with traffic control devices or traffic flows. Any identification sign for the proposed uses an the site well require a sign permit and will be subject #a local sign regulations. E. The site must be designed to be accessible to fire apparatus and have adequate fire fighting facilities. Fire apparatus wilt have access to the site from North Pacific Higlrway. Fire lrydrarrts will be installed in accordance with Fire District #3 and city standards. F. The project must comply with all applicable city ordinances and regulations and must be aestheNca!!y acceptable in relation to the neighborhood and the City of Central Point_ The project is in compliance with all city ordinances and regulatiarrs. Most of the surrounding properties in the area are zoned far or developed with commercial, industrial or public uses. Crater High School is located across Griffin Greek in a residential zone. Recommendation: Staff recorr~mends that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions: 1. Approve the Site Plan Review application for Medford Labor Temple Association, based on the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the record and subject to the recommended conditions of approval; or 2. Deny the Site Plan Review application; or 3. Continue review of the Site Plan Review application at the discretion of the Commission. Exhibits A. Site Plan, Building Elevations, Landscaping Plan for Labor Temple B. Notice of Public Hearing C. Recommended Planning Conditions of Approval D. Public Works Staff Report & Requirements E. Written Continents Q h ~ t r t t t i i r yr.rd r o~ y ~ ~ f/ t t /' , t ,~^ %.r '~~~~~~ Ibsr fCm k. ~i++G Co*s r r ~ / / r~~ ./• ~ ~ I d ` r ~r~.. RI 3J~ /pp 1....... ~~.....~.~~.~IGL.-..D.CILA 'I 1 _ ........ .....................J ___.' IJ I //•/Y .^f' (__ _ f5?''1'~"JOl'1 4~~) r5r=i ~ ~~ 't' ~/~ r.~n,r „x,t . ~ ~,~ ~ r j' f' t ~~ _.. YICtNTfY MpP ~ ~ f <F /i 6 ~ ~ r / /`r/ GrrrrriltMef A Pk'epaeed $v~ldin 4 u ~ ~ /'• ~ l20r x eor ~ /I dI t. n.yK,~aw..+».Mw...~.r.t:~A.,erruM.. /~ ; / /I /' Tlr lw'W1 rr.r•KM1PrjhNM rM.r~p,wmN~ / i ~ ~ r..•. ~~ ~ y fJl z T1. w h.. pren4e h'.~wlnrr.ly ty h.flir7 rwe.4 tlree M "Z'. -tir*.e~.mnr~rr.,-r.uws.v.n..e~y.rl.eA •Na.r ~ r ~ ~ ,p~ i ae...~.n.nrM.rw,w..tw r,r L.ew d~d.w.iar cwr... • ~ f 4 ~ e~+4o-}c.•r n•awr•ty •~e C1y.fCnwM MRar.r..N AP / / ~ , ~ acMrc. w4h kI ~re~.rwM.w nTArN3f'M [~. ~ ~. =~"e'C.f.'T^^+IAMe Can.n..sw d..frf +- • r~~.~ • 37ib9~ f ~ ~~ '~ j ~ . ~Q /~rr w~% /' ~~ r ~! «m SnArt ~ ~~' ~ ;. 5~nm ~, ~ _ t:,<,r~, a. >>7M ~. C.vrt..~ l'r}~ of 5rw.cyps Toso~npfk ~1at. r Site Plan R 1~ ~~~~ ~~.. ~ ~_ Yom' m ~ ~: ,~ ~ 5',w;,~ ~. ,w; d ~ ~.' t- ~ :.:, . ~ . ~;y ~. N ~ ~ .~ ~r ty, [•8: wi ~' ri +.nr~ ! AxM, y . MIL / Jsi.r/.n - ~~ '~. ,y ,, k ~ ,.:./~f fs~ .Y.s~rrp B/xr W./I i . ~ c G~ C/ew .e Ityr, ~,r ~ . ~ ,} ~~~ v © ~ ~ ~ ~ -as .nary ....h..a'- i12.ae . `~! ' e 6 Y~ f d ~ xr ~wa . is ~ w~io ~ ~* 4 4 ' • .4 s - C~ s7 revs ,dr .x ' .. Y h ~ ' k ~ ~~•~ ! ~^~ ' ~. Seut/f G7e vs~'.~ei7 '~ y-fib-17 .~.+. ice, y .•~ fJf.~ r ~p•~ r O ~. `~ 0 ~- . ~ ~ -p ~ ~ ~ 3~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~2~ ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~~~ ~ T ~~a~a,~ ~'~~ f 3• ~ > ~ f~ 3 ~~7~~9~~ °~~ 4 y1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ m ~ ~ (y~ T ~ ~ ~ -a ~ !i ~' ~ x C w ~ cy~ ~~]~ II ~4 ~ ~ lv ~a0~'"~} -- - - v ~' :i~ i~ . ~ - ~ ~~ ~' 1: rt ~ • A ~ T i. _. ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ 9 ~~ ~~ k~ Ek E{ e ~i 'k ~~ k L _~!r k .~ ~ ~~ Z : • ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ •~ 1 ~ ~ { ~~ I .~ t T 4 y, ~ [ 4 . F . ~ i' g ~a 1` er . _ .. ' i ~ + - ~..1 .. p , . r ~ ~ €:.: ~ ~ - ~ e ~ ' ° r . . 4~? a ~ ~:k.~~' s "y ~i_~ r ~ ~: ~ . ~ ~. ~ ~ +• Y _ ~ ~. T .~ .ir - y - ,.f. ' ~ : City of ~ (~entral ,('oint ~~~ ~~~~x~~ ~- jamcs X-i. 13erz~tctt, ATC~' City Admimiistratar(!'Ia~uvang ~irectar i~en GcrscF~ler i'Laxuting Tccfizucian Deautn,a Gregory AdministrativeJZ'Ianx~icig Secretary notice of Meeting Date of Notice: September 2, X997 Meeting Date: Tune: Place: September ~ b, 1997 7:Q0 p.rn. (Approximate) Central Point City Hall 1 S5 South Second Street Central Point, Oregon ~N'ATLTRF OF ME NG City of Central Point ~~:~I~IT ~s~.:t Plannizi~ Department Beginning at the above place and time, the Central Point Planning Commission will review a Site Pfau Review applic~tioz~ for the construction of an aff~ce building to be located at 4484 North Pacific Highway. The parcel is located in the (G-5) Thoroughfare-commercial district on Jaeksan County Assessment Plat 37 2'~l 43$, Tax Lots ISO4. CKITFRiA FORD ~Z~~~ The mquirements for Site Plan Review are set forth i?n Chapter l 7 of the Central Point Municipal Coder relating to General Regulations, Off-street pad~ing, Site Pian, Landscaping and Cansiruc~ian Plans. The proposed plan is also reviewed in accordance to the City's Public Worlrs Standards. ~~~~~~ I . Any persaninterested in commenting on tiieabove-mentioned Iand use decision may submit written. comments up until. the close of the meeting scheduled far Tuesday, September 16, 1997. 2. 'Written comments may be sent in advance of the meeting to Central Point City Hall, 1.55 South Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502. 1SS South Second Street ~ Central. Point, OR 97SQ2 ~ (S41) X54-3321 • Fax: (541j 664-6384 3. Issues which may provide the basis for an appeal on die matters shall tie raised prior to the expiration of the comment period noted above. Any testimony and written comments about the decisions described above will need to be related to the proposal and should be stated clearly to the PIanning Commission. ~. 4. Copies of all evidence relied upon by the applicant are available for public review at City Hall, 155 South Second Street, Central Point, Oregon. Copies of the same are available at 15 cents per page. 5. Far additional information, the public may contact the Planning Department at (541) 664- 3321 ext. 231. S>~TMMARY OF PROCEDY7R~ At the meeting, the Planning Commission will review the applications, technical staff reports, hear testimony from the applicant, proponents, opponents, and hear arguments on the application. Any testimony or written comments must be related to the criteria set forth above. At the conclusion of the review the Planning Commission may approve or deny the Tentative Plan. Ciry regulations provide that the Central Point City Council be informed about all Planning Commission decisions. Si3B~I13CT PF 8 155 South Second Street ~ Central Point, OR 97502 ~ (541)6643321 • Fax: {541) 664-6384 EXI-IIBIT C RECOMMENDED PLANNING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan to the Planning Department for approval. Landscaping for the project shall be installed in accordance with the approved landscaping plan. All landscaping shall be continuously maintained in a healthy, growing condition. An automatic irF-igation system shall be installed to service all landscaping subject to approval by the Building Department. 2. The applicant shall install a slatted chain link fence, where appropriate, to enclose the labor temple site in accordance with the approved site plan. A fencing plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. No barbed wire fencing shall be permitted. 3. Off street parking shall be provided as shown on the approved site plan and subject to the requirements of CPMC Chapter 1'x.54. 4. All signage proposed for the project shall require a separate application to the Building Department and issuance of a building permit. 5. Access to and from the project site shall be provided as shown on the approved site plan. All buildings on the premises shall be accessible to fire fighting apparatus. 6. Alt outdoor lighting and illuminated signage shall be designed and installed so that it will not impact adjacent properties or interfere with any traffic control device. 7. The site plan approval shall expire on September l6, 1998, unless a building permit is issued by the Building Department and construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completion. 8. The applicant shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations .and the requirements of all affected agencies. 9. The project shall be constructed in accordance with the approved site plan and subject to the issuance of a building permit. Any modifications proposed to the approved site plan sha11 be subject to review by the Planning Commission. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued for the use ar occupancy of the buildings approved on the site plan. until all requirements and conditions approved by the Planning Gornmission have been completed. 9 CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT for LABOR TEMPLE COMMERCIALlINDUSTRIAL FACILITY SITE PLAN PW#9(o0 t5 Date: Applicant: Project: Location: Legal: Zoning: Units: Plans: Report By: Purpose September 11, 1997 Medfard Labor Temple Association 24 % South Grape Street Medford, Oregon 97501 Agent: Fred E. Phillips Engineering Labor Hall Construction Highway 99 (Just South of New OSP Facilities] T37S, R2W, Section 36, Tax Lots 1500 and 1503 C-5 1 - 9,600 square foot building and parking 112E spaces} 4 pages {1 of 4 [Site Plan] and 2 of 4 [Elevations]: Fred E. Phillips [515187]; 1 of Topographic Map: Neathamer Surveying [E16197]; and 1 of 1 Landscape Plan: Natural Systems [7/17!97] Lee N. Brennan, Public Works Director Provide informatian to the Planning Commission and Applicant {hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding Public Works standards and additional standards and requirements to lie included in the design. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineer regarding proposed development. Special Requirements 1. ~.andscape Plan: Developer has prepared and submitted a preliminary landscape plan for the project. A final plan, meeting the requirements of the Oregon Department of T~ranspartatian {if applicable} and the City Public Works Department {PWD], shall be prepared and implemented by and at the expense of the Developer. At a minimum, the landscape plan shad provide for a landscape buffer adjacent to the public right-of-way along Highway 99, white affording proper sight triangles at the driveway entrance with the highway. 2. Hi hvva 991m ravements: All improvements on and connections to Highway 99 shall be coordinated and approved by the Oregon Department of Transportation {ODOT} and the City PWD, and should be designed and implemented at the expense of the Developer. Tie-ins to the newly installed s~orm drainage system along Highway 99 must be permitted and approved by ODOT. ~: Labor Temple Site Plan PWD Staff Report September lI, 1997 Page 2 3. Site Drainage/Storm. Drain Plan: The developer shall design and implement a site drainagelstorm drain plan that corrects and enhances existing site drainage far the entire area noted on the site plan. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of-way, into Griffin Creek, or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. The storm drainage infrastructure will be privately operated and maintained. A suitable system will need to be designed #or a minimum 10-year storm event, designed to the City's PWD Standard Specifications and Details (PWD Standards}, or as otherwise approved by the City Adminis#ra#or or his designee. The discharge point and potential retention of storm water run- offshall be coordinated wi#h aspects of the proposed development to provide an aesthetically pleasing, efficient, and low maintenance facility. The storm water retention facilities steal[ be suitably landscaped; designed to mitigate erosion and sediment and hydrocarbon deposition; and to mitigate the "attractive nuisance hazards associated with these facilities. The developer shall also secure written permission to connect/discharge into adjoining storm water conveyance facilities managed by other jurisdictional agencies. 4. Erosion Confrol Plan: A suitable erosion control plan must be implemented prior to and during the construction of any improvements associated with this developmen#. S. Exisfin Infrasfrucfure: The Developer's engineer shall provide suitable engineering certification and justification (i.e. calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,) that all connections to existing infrastructure (Le. street; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the significant degradation (in the opinion of the Public Works Director) of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows andlor demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure; or the existing facilities will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows andlor demands while maintaining or improving the existing effective level of service of the affected facility. Genera! 1. Developer shall submit to the City's Public Works Department (City's PWD} for review and approval, plans and specifications #or all improvements proposed for construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of--way and easements. 2. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streets (including sidewalks, curbs and gutters and landscape buffers}; storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection and conveyance systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter and including fire protection); street lighting; and traffic control devices, street signs, and delineation. 3. Al[ construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, andlor upgrades as may be approved by the City v_.+ V ~.1 Labor Temple Site Plan P Zr~D Staff Report September !l, 1997 Page 3 Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to installation. 4. As applicable, Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE}, affected irrigation districts, and JC Roads. 5. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. if feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Myia~) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAC~, or other form as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; road alignment; water lines, valves, and fre hydrants; water and sewer lateral stationing; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet locations; street light locations; other below grade utility line locations and depths; etc. Provide a "red- line" hard copy (on Mylar'~, or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic fife to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infras#ructure facilities compie#ed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 6. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent Benchmark shall be provided for each phase of the proposed development, the locations of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer's surveyor. 7. Ali existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the DEQ. 8. All improvement plans should be approved in writing by Fire District 3 prior to approval by the City's PWD. 9. If the proposed development places structures or other improvements within the 100-year floodzone, the Developer's engineer will be required to explain and provide detail as to what affects will the placement of these structures have an the floodzone; what affect will it have on the floodplair~ elevation and floodzone boundary; and what affects will the modification of the 12 Labor Temple Slle Plan PWD SiaffRepori September 11, 1997 Page 4 floodplain elevation and floodzone boundary have on the existing and proposed facilities, and properties surrounding the proposed development. As applicable, the Developer's engineer shall determine the existing Base Flood Elevation contours and illustrate the existing boundaries of the Floodplain and floodway fora 100-year storm event (commonly referred to as the "Base Flood Event") associated with Griffin Creek, on the construction plans submitted for the development. The drawings shall also indicate the revised Base Flood Elevation contours and boundaries of the 1=loodplain and Floodway expected to occur following the comple#ion of any development within the identified floodzone (also referred to as the 'Area of Special Flood Hazard"). 10. Prior to the City PWD fins[ approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following should be submitted: ~ A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the final street and water system improvement plans for the proposed development. ~! The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BGVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans. d As applicable, copies of written approvals andlor permits including conditions from the various agencies involved: DSL, DFW, DEQ, andlor ACOE. 11. Field verify a!1 existing infrastructure elevations and locations {i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed subdivision will connect into existing improvements, prior to fnal construction plan design and submittal far final approval. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically} on the construction plans. Storm Drainage, Irrigatiar~ Improvements 1. Developer's engineer shall develop a facility plan for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system (SD System) which provides far storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creeklditch conveyance}, any existing or future development on adjacent properties, conveyed storm drainage, or surface water flow (i.e. Griffin Creek), and, if applicable, any areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. 2. Developer's engineer shall determine haw SD system will work during 10-year and 100 year flood events associated with Griffin Creek. Identify the HGL in Griffin Creek during 10- and 100-year storm event, and what affect will it have on the proposed outlets and storm drain system. System should be designed to adequately drain 10-year storm without surcharging or should be provided wi#h adequate s#orage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to prevent backflow of wa#er from Griffin Greek up into SD system during storm events. ~. 3 Labor Temple Sire Plan PWD Stafj'Report September 1 !, 1997 Page S 3. During the design of the SD system, the Developer's engineer shall consider the effect of the proposed improvements and structures with regard to the 700-year base flood event flaodway and floadplain of Griffin Creek and the stormwater drainage system associated with Highway 99. The allowable flow rates into Griffin Creek and the ditches along Hanley Road from the proposed development shall not be greater than the run-off flow rates experienced from the property in its current status, unless otherwise approved by the City PWD or ODOT, as applicable. The developer's engineer shall provide suitable hydrological calculations and storm hydrographs to depict the existing predevelopment, and projected post development conditions of the development area on Griffin Creek and the storm drainage system along Highway 99. The Developer's engineer and the City PWD shall agree on the applicable run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, etc., to be used in the Developer engineer's calculations. 4. Plans which propose to include the discharge to Griffin Creek or the existing storm drainage system an Highway 99, any construction or modification within the floodway of Griffin Creek or 'the right-of-way of Highway 99, shall be in compliance with DSL, ODOT, ACOE, ODFW, DEQ, ,~C Roads, andlor City PWD (as applicable) guidelines and requirements and any applicable conditions and yr approvals, of these regulatory agencies. 5. Prior to construction plan approval of the improvemen#s for this Tentative Plan, the Developer's engineer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system. The engineer shall use the rainfallrntensity curve obtained from the City PWD for hydrologic calculations, and the negotiated run-off parameters. Sanitary Sewer All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System} design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, ~ 990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA}, and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. 2. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. Wa#er System Existing Improvements - A 'I2-inch-diameter D.I. water line is aligned along the Highway 99 frontage of the subject tax lot. 1. Developer's engineer shall design the water system to provide a minimum flaw of 1,000 g.p.m. and conform to Fire District 3 requirements. Construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by Fire District 3 prior to submitting to DPW. ~4 Labor Temple Site flan PWD Staff Report September 11, 1497 Page 6 2. Laterallconnection stationing and size shall be provided on construction plans and as-built drawings. 3. Construction drawings shall include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, air valves, service connection, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. 4. The design and all connections to the water supply system should comply with OHD and City requirements, including backflow prevention. Water will not be "turned on" by the City until such requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the City's designated inspector (currently the Jackson County plumbing inspector}. Site work, Grading and Design, and Utility Plans All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, andlor crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building. If applicable, drain lines shall be connected to the curb and gutter and discharge from the curb face or other approved discharge point or system. 2. Grading plans should have original/existing grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with eieva#ions. 3. Indicate location of parking area lights on plans. 4. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company which reflects all utility crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. Utility locations should be accurately depicted an the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. Rights of WayslEasements All easements for improvements dedicated to the City shall have a minimum 15 foot width and shall be located (whenever possible} contiguously along the exterior boundaries of properties and shall not split lot lines. Public utility easements shall have a minimum width of 10 feet. 2. If applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved form), for any affected properties. Por properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. 3. Developer shall comply with all existing easement owner requirements regarding any proposed development that may overlap any existing easement. Any development proposed which overlaps or alters an existing easement should be approved by the easement's owner in 15 Labor Temple Stte Plan Pu'.D Staff Report September I1, 1997 Page 7 writing, and a copy of that written approval should be submitted to the City PWD prior to submission of construction plans fiar City PWD review and approval. 4. All existing easement locations and those proposed for this development shall be shown on the final plat with reference to the recordation number and Grantee. ~6