HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 419 - CP UGB and Policy Agreement
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4I9
A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
CHANGES TO POLICY 9 OF THE JACKSON COUNTYI CENTRAL POINT
URBAN GROWTI-I BOUNDARY AND POLICY AGREEMENT
Recitals
This matter came before the Central Point Planning Commission for an amendment to Policy 9 of
the City's Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement.
2. On May 5, 1998, the Central Point Planning Commission and the Jackson County Planning
Commission conducted a Joint Meeting and Pubic Heaz•ing of the proposed changes to the Urban Growth
Boundary azad Policy Agreement and recommended approval.
Now, therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANMNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL
POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS;
Section 1. Criteria applicable t~,Decision. The requirements for Comprehensive Plan
Amendment are set forth in Chapter 17 of the Central Point Municipal Code and in the Urban Growth
Boundary and Policy Agreement, relating to Procedure, Initiation, maj or Revisions, Schedule of Public
Hearings, Substantive Standards and Action by the City Council.
Section 2. Findings,~nd Conclusions. The Central Point Planning Commission hereby approves
the recommended changes to Policy 9 of the Urban Growth Boundary and Policy Agreement as stated
on Attachment "A", which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this 5 day
of ~t~. , 1998.
Planning Commission Chairman
Approved by me this S``~` day of , 1998.
ATT
City Representative
~' r _
Planning Commission Chairman
I -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 419 (050598)
ATTACI-IMENT "A"
PROPOSED CHANGES TO POLICY 9
OF THE UBG AGREEMENT
"9 In mutual recognition of the impoz•tant agricultural resource and community economic assets
represented by the properties shown on Map 2 attached, the City azzd
County ackz~zowledge the impoz-tance of protecting these lands.
. Therefore:
LL
7
w~s~
LL•
~-
LL•
5
CC )> LC )>
7
[['
77
"A~) While the subjectpz°operties are in agricultural use, the City will
apply the below standards when adjacent lands are proposed for ut•ban residential
developfnent:
"i. To mitigate the potential of vandalism, the development's design should
incorporate the use of visible public orsemi-public open space adj acent to the
agricultural lands.
"ii. To mitigate nuisances originating fiom agricultural noise, odors, in-igation z2u~z-off,
and agricultural spray drift, the development's design should incorporate:
"a. The use of landscaping and berms where a positive buffering benefit can
be demonstrated.
"b. The orientation of structures and fencing relative to usable exterior space
such as patios, reaz• yards and courts, such that the potential impacts from
spray drift, dust, odors, and noise intrusion are minimized.
"c. The design and constz•uction of all habitable buildings, including window
and door locations, should be such that the potential impact of spray drift,
zaoise, dust and odors upon interior living/working areas will be minimized.
"d. Physical separation between agricultural lands and urban development
shall be utilized to the greatest extent possible to minimize adverse
impacts. bite design emphasizing the appropriate use of open space
areas, streets, and areas not designed specifically for public recreation or
assembly shall be considered.
"B"~) The City and County ~ mutually agree ~ herewith that the fi~~ buf~fezing
standaYds established by Policy #9 have or can and v~1ill be •~ met, prior to
annexation or urban development ofthese lands adjacent to the subjectpf°operties after
1995"
NOTE: Deleted material ~ez~; new material in italics.