Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 436 - East Cherry Estates Tent. Plan~=' 17Sc1~7 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 436 A RESOLUTION GRANTING TEN'T'ATIVE PLAN APPROVAL p'OR A LAND PARTITION (Applicant (s) :Victor Kosmatka, East Cherz•y Estatcs) ( 37 2W2BC `Tax Lot 603) Recitals 1. Applicant(s) has/have submitted an application for tentative plan approval for an in I•ill develapnzent proposal to subdivide an existing 0.82 acre tax lot, located on the north side of Cherry Street west of its intersection with Norih 10th Street in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On December 15,1998, the Central Point Planning Commission condlzcted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which tune it reviewed the City staffreparts and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY Op' CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approval, Criteria. The requirements for approval of land partitions and tentative plans are set forth in CPMC Title 16 and 17, relating to design standards, zoning, lot dimension, access, improvezxzents and conditions of tentative approval. Section 2. Finding and Conclusions, The Planning Commission finds and determines as folla~ws: A. Tentative Plan Re uirements. The application and tentative plan are in the correct farm and contain all of the information required by CPMC 16.10. B. Area and Width of Lot. The project consists of a tentative plan application for the subdivision of approximately 0.82 acres for the purpose ofdeveloping asingle-family residential (padlot} subdivision called East Cherry Estates, creating a total of 81ots. The proposed single family subdivision meets the density requirement for the R-3 residential zone which is a zxzaximum of 25 uzlits per acre. Section 3. Conditional A royal. The application for a tentative plan for land partition is hereby approved, subj ect to the conditions set forth on attaclunent "A",attached hereto by reference incorporated Planning Commission Resolution No. 436 (121599) herei~i, imposed unde~• authority o~~'C' 1':~~1~;; C`1~ a i~ t~~~t.1f~. 'l~l~c al ~ 1 ~1ic~ t.t 1 ~~ti i I ] ah~> h u i s ~_l ~; ,> > i t ~ i, z~~ 2~" wide garage, o~~° provide 2 ofd' street covc:r;~cl h, u K i tls~', spaces, a~; rL•c~ u i red ~l~y llae c i (y. ~'a>s~dby~~;~ep] ~~,,r~ingCom~rt~ssi{int.u~lsi~,~~~,d~Zy~~x~eitaautl~~~~~ti~;a~tionoiit~~~~t~~~t~~~~this ~ day of ~ ~, 1 ~9~. 1f~ S'l~r~rzi~ag C~>~~tttti`~i~a~a C I ~-,r~. ._~. Approved by me tixis ~ ~i<« ~~ ~: _r ~ ° , 199. ~» F~`t -' ~ ~" , -r << ..,.. ~~Iar1T11'.i~ (~~`'~11111~ti~C?~ ~'~1i:7T Planning Commission Resolution No, 436 {121599) Attachment A PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall submit to the City a copy of the proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) for the East Cherry Estates Subdivision. 2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of the East Cherry Estates subdivision. Evidence of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with alI federal, state and local regulations, standards and requiremen#s applicable to the development and construction of the East Cherry Estates subdivision. G:IPLANt~€TNG1980'73. WI'D CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIG WORKS STAFF REPORT for East Cherry Estates (A Padlo# Development) PW#98073 Date; Applicant: Project: Location: Legal: Zoning: Lots: Units: Plans: Report By: Purpose 12/08/98 Victor and Daniel Kosmatka c/o Victor Kosmatka. 3094 Wells 1~argo Road, Central Point, Oregon 97502 Padlot Subdivision fVortheast of [ntersection of 10~' and Cherry Streets. T37S, R2W, Section 213C, Tax Lot 603 R-3 8 total (no phases proposed} 8 Single Family Residential - Padlot f=ast Cherry Esta#es (Tentative, A Padlot Development} Kaiser Surveying, revised 8-3-98 Lee Brennan, Public Works Director Provide information to the Punning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer"} regarding City Public Worlcs Department {PWD} standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed residential subdivision. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding the proposed development. Special Requirements 1. Existing Infrastrucfure; The Developer shall demonstrate that al[ connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. streets; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows andlor demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure, or will be unproved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows andlor demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the affected facility, as approved by (as applicable], the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/ar property owner invo{ved. 2. Che Street !m rovemenfs: In review of City fifes, there are no as-built drawings refiecting the improvements installed on Cherry Street. The curi-en# alignment of Cherry Street and the location of infrastructure (in particular the sanitary sewer line) may require additiona! dedication of easements and right-of way to match the existing conditions and to incorporate the existing infrastructure. We are recommending that the Developer be required to provide construction plans and make any applicable modification to the plat which reflect the as-built conditions. 3. Wafer and Sewer Laterals: There are only two existing water service laterals identified. The remaining six fats will require additiona! water service lateral connections to the mainline, which will likely require s#reet excavation. As discussed above, the City does not have any record of the sewer lateral installations. Sewer lateral connections to lots 6, 7, and 8 will likely require excavation work in the street. The City PWD is therefore recommending that the Developer be required to provide a suitable asphalt concrete (Type C mix) overlay of the northern half of Cherry street once off excavation work and street patching work is completed. 4. Overhead Electrical Tele hone and Cable ~lnes: Coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, US Wes#, and TCf Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within the F. C -hcrn• Fsr<NC.c Terucrtri~e> I'luri J7cr/) Report 1~eccmf>er S. 1998 l~c1~(' proposed development (as a minimum, the infrastructure on PPL pale no. 831544 and E331545) to underground facilities, and removal of the existing utility poles prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities, shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 5. Lot Draina e: The existing topography indicates that the proposed lots have surface drainage which drain the lot from the street #o the back of the Pots. It also appears that the existing sur€ace water drainage from tax lots 400, 500, and 501 drain to the northern portions of lots 1 through 6, with a general depression in the area of lot 6. The surface drainage from the proposed lots must not drain across another lot, and the existing drainage problem shall be addressed. Any discharge of accumulated waters on#o adjoining fax lots must be approved by the affected tax lot owners, prior to construction. A suggestion may include the incorporation of a private storm drain system (i.e french drain) that collects the surface water in #hese area, and conveys the wafer via an underground pipe to the City's storm drain system. 6. Utility Easements: A 10-foot wide P.U.E. should be required on the north side of the Cherry Sfreof right-of-way, on Lots 1 through 8. General All construction o€ public improvements shall conform to the Ci#y's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifrcatians, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to implementation. 2. Developer shat[ provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to {as applicable}, Fire District No. 3, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DI=Q}, Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers {ACOE}, affected irrigation districts, and JC Roads. 3. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Mylar~) and in a "digital" format compatble with AufoCAD®, or other form as approved ~by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the Cify which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans that identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate} of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; road alignment; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral stationing; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet locations; street light locations; other below grade utility line locations and depths; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Mylar~'), or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 4. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied info an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent benchmark sha11 be provided for the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer. 1, c ~lt<'rrs I~.crcuc•. I~rrN,rrr+r !'lcrrr,~?cl/l h'r/wr'r 1'cr,tz' ~ 5. If applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the DEQ. 6. Easements €or City infrastructure {i.e, sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable)) should be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements for public storm drainage, sanitary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.F.. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five {5) feet from the edge of the easement. If two or more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width should be required. Easement dedica#ions in final deeds ar CC&Rs need a statement which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, driveable vehicular access to City public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. 7. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following should be submitted: A copy of written approval from Fire District 3 of the final stree# and driveway layouf, site access, fire hydrant placement, and water system improvement plans far the proposed development. C] The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by BCVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, tap of banks, ditch/channel inverts, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed development's infrastructure will connect info existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shalt be accurately portrayed {both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans and as-built drawings. 10. The Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the recorded Final Plat map reproduced on Myla~' and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCADO format. The Final Plat shad be tied to a legal Government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System. The Final Plat shall either reflect or be later modified to reflect any applicable "red-line" changes noted in the construction "as-bunts", at the discretion of the City Administrator or his designee. 11. Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and shall drain either to an on-site private storm drain system or discharge at the curb face. 12. Storm drain pipe materials within the City's rights-of-way or easements shall be PVC, HDPE, or reinforced concrete, with water-tight joints meeting the requirements of ASTM D3212, F477, and C-443M, as applicable. Provide concrete {in areas within the rights-of-way) orsand-cement slurry {in areas outside the rights-of-way) encasement where required in areas of minimum cover. 13. As applicable, Developer's engineer shall provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations and flaw line plots for private and public sform drains. Plot HGL on profile or provide a separate profile drawing that indicates the HGL on the profile. Pipes should maintain cleansing velocity (minimum 2.0 feet per second} and have adequate capacities without surcharging during the design sform. 14. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of-way or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. I~. (~hr•rrt l~.zr~rrr~ 1 ~~'+trrrln•r !'(<rrr .ti7rrJJ 1{<'(u1r! 15. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system (SS System) design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA), and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. 16. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shall identify lateral stationing for construction of ester and sanitary fewer service laterals. 17. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will forward the plans to BCVSA €or completion of the review process. Upon completion of the review by BCVSA, completion of Tina! revisions #a the plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in final form. 18. All fasting and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA requirements, at Developer's expense. The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with test reports, N reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to final acceptance. 19. Developer shall comply with Oregon 1-lea(th Division (Ot~ID) and City requirements for backflow prevention. 20. Grading plans should have originallexisting grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour fines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 29 . Afl structures shall have roof drains, area drains, andlor crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building. 23. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company which reflects all utility line locations, crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. 24. Utility locations must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings.