Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 441 - Beall Estates IV Tent. Plan PLANNING COMMISSION ItLSOLUTION NO. X41 A RESOLUTION GRANTING "I7 ~N`l'A"I'1VI~ PLAN APPROVAL, FOR A RESIDENTIAL, SUBDIVISION (Applicant (s} : W.L. Moore Construction, Beall L"states IV} { 372W1 IDD Tax Lot 17000 and 17100) Recitals 1. Applicant(s)11as/have submitted an application for tezatativc plan approval foz- a zesidential subdivision an a 1.6 $ -acre parcel, located noz-th of Beall Lane east of its intersection with Mari lee Street, in the City of Central Point, Oregan. 2. On March 2, 1999, the Central Point Planning Commission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which time it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and corrzments on the application.. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI`I"Y OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section I .Approval Criteria. The requirements for approval of subdivisions and tentative plans are set forth in CPMC Title 16 and 17, relating to informational requirezxzents, zozung, lot dimension, access, and similar requirements. Section 2. Finding and Conclusions., The Planning Commission finds and detezrnines as follows: A. Tentative Plan Requirements. The application and tentative plan are in the correct foz~n and contain all of the information required by CPMC 16.10. This proj ect is an infill project creating a residential lane with no parking on the street, and no sidewalk on the east side of the lane. B. Area and Width of Lot. This subdivision in an R-2 zone would create a single family padlot subdivision totaling 9 Lots, which meets the density requirements for a maxin~zuzxz of 12 units per acre. Each parent lot meets the requirements of the City's subdivision and zoning codes for residential lots as well as the specific requirements of the R-2 zone. Planning Commission Reso[€ation No. 441 (Q30299) `~'ectian~. C~'~~t,~Lt:cc~ii ~1i,l~~i, ~~' "~[1x: al~~~'li~•~al{~~~ I~>a~ (cnt~,li~'~~ 171n~'t t~~r~~ti~~~li~: i~i~~n is1~er~l~y~ ~~pi'aveC~,subj~c##a#1~c~;Uncl~cd s<<~(~I~rc,~~~rts wily <<n~c~~~.i~~;~•til~ t<~ r,(~ ~iu~1 ti'7~~!~~~:~~.~ ~'til~lic ~,T~%nrl:.~ s'_<t(~i~ repast, special re~luircrneni~.rc';~~r~iit,~ic3c~l~~~ll;s,u~~1 i'1 il~.,nn~l<i~.cc~iia~~l~:I~~n:~lrlt~~~u,~lii 1 ~,~xl~~~,~,°i:cr~i'f re . reap' ~t~ recl-~Citic"t~Itt~n~~~s.~~i~~1~~r~~~-~arc~zl!tei~r,~~~i~tli(~r~~`~in~~~.;i~n~~;liilcrcdir~~~~rc>vcn=~~i~t<<~rc~~i,l~tat~ P~~ , ~,d~~ytl~7e~~i~~~nnii~s~ ~~~a~nmissiaa~~,n~l ~i~3n~:cll,yn`~eit7 ~~~~(hc~,(ic~iti~>t~aCits l~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~I~ : '~~ a~~y of ~' } 19~)f~. < ~ _ _s_~: ATTES'T`: ~I ,~ City £~e~:~ese~atal~v~. ,'l Apps°a~e~~ by rrme this ~" day aC~ , 19~ . ,~ ~ l~`tl " T'1az~ni, ~ ~ Can~issian CI°~, ~ r Planning Commission Resolu#ion Colo. 441 (a3(?299) A`I"1'AC'HMI?N'I' 'Pc PLANNING DEPAR'I`MCNT RI~C()MMI?NDED CE)NUIT'IONS E)E~ AI'I'ItOVAL l . Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shill submit to the City a copy of tk~e proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions {CC&Rs} far the I3eall Estates Subdivision Phase IV, 2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of affected public agencies and utilities as they pertain to the development of the Beall Estates Subdivision Phase 1V. l~vide~~ce of such compliance shall be submitted to the City prior to final plat approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state and local regulations, standards and requirements applicable to the development and constriction of tl~e Beall Estates Subdivision Phase IV. 4. The applicant shall provide all plats, legal descriptions and deeds necessary to demonstrate that all lot Lines are properly adjusted prior to I"inal Plat approval. Tl~e final plat must depict the recorded document number for the 10 foot strip of land deeded for right of way purposes adjoining Beall Lane. 5. The applicant shall provide separate utility service to each Single Family Dwelling and utility easements, approved by the City Building Department, for the eight padlots. G:1P LANNING199005. wpd ~~ CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT for BEALL ESTATES, PHASE 1V TENTATIVE PLAN REVIEW PW#99005 Date: February 22, 1999 Applicant: W.L. Moore Construction, LLC, 3600 Westover Drive, Central Point, Oregon 97502 Agent: Herb Farber, Farber Surveying, 120 Mistletoe St., Medford, Oregon 97501 Property Owner: Project: Location: Legal: Zoning Area: Units: Plans: Report By: Purpose W.L. Moore Properties, LLC, and Mark Burkhalter, 3640 Westover Dr1ve, Central Point, Oregon 97502 " Beall Estates, Prase IV Nar#h ofi Beall Street, between the Intersections of Marilee Street and Connel{ Avenue ~nrith Bea[I Lane T37S, R2W, Section 11 DD, tax lots 17000 and 17104. R-2 1.68 Acres (approximately). 10 lots (8 pad tots, 1 std lot, and one remaining std lot. 1 page entitled `Tentative Padiot Subdivision Plat of Beall Estates, Phase IV", dated '[217198, prepared by Farber and Sons, Inc. (received by the City on 1!12199) Lee N. Brennan, Public Works Director Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the design and development of the proposed residential subdivision. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineerregording the proposed development. Special Requirements ~, lstrn Infrastructure: The Developer shall demonstrate that ail connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. streets; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure faa{ifies, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows andlor demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows andlor demands; while maintaining or improving the existing [eve! of service of the affected facility, as approved by (as appGcabie), the regulatory agency, utility owner, andlor property owner involved. 2. ~esldentfaf Lane: The Developer is proposing the use of a residential cane with a hammerhead turnaround. The PWD has proposed that in revision of the City PWD standards, that a residential Lane standard be established, and that this standard would spedfy that residential lanes be designed to serve a maximum of 'i2 tots. The proposed layout viii serve 10 cots. We would also request that Benjamin `Court" should be renamed Benjamin "Lane" to coincide with the City's classlfica#ion of the street as a "residential cane" and.nof a `standard residential stree#". The residential Pane has the following standards: Beall Estates IV Tentative Plan Review, Prf'IJ StaJjReporr February l2, 1999 Page 1 ^ A 25-foot-wide traveled section (curb-to-curb width), with a 2 percent crown ^ Standard curb and gutters ^ A 2-foot-wide strip located behind the curb for installation of water meter service boxes, ire hydrants, street lights etc. © Requires a 30-foot-wide right-af way. ^ Street parking not allowed on residential lanes. Another concern regarding the use of a residential cane for this development is the lack of visitor parking within the development and on the closest s#reet to the development (i.e Beall Lane) Street). We would suggest the possibility of inclusion of an off-street visitor parking area within the development. A suitable City approved permanent traffic barricade shall be designed and implemented at the terfiinus of Benjamin Lane. A suitable "T" shaped `hammefiead" turnaround shall be designed and implemented, as approved by the City PWD and Fire District No. 3. The connection to Beall Lane will be a standard driveway connection with a 2-foot concrete "landing" behind the driveway apron; the driveway apron shall have a 30-foot throat. 3. Removal of Drivewa Gonnectians to Beall Lane: it should be required to have the existing driveway connections of proposed lot 73 and the remainder of tax tat 17000 removed and require connection to Benjamin Lane. These driveway connection would have to start a minimum of 25- feet behind the right-~of-way of Beall Lane, to provide for proper sight distances and allow fuming movements onto these lots that are not made on Beall Lane. ~4. Street Parkfna: As we are proposing in the revised PWD standards, the use of residential lanes require that street parking not be allowed. We would recommend that street parking not be allowed on Benjamin Lane. 5. Gonnectian to BeaII Lane: Need 30-foot radii: on right-of~way as it connects to Beall Lane right- of-way. Suggest wider taper road section of the residential cane to 34 feet {curt to curb distance) as it connects to Beall Lane to facilitate turning movements from secondary artetlal. May also need to construct tapered acceleratioNdeceleration cane improvements on Beall Lane, to-meet County requirements. 6. Sidewalks and Sidewalk Easement: The residential cane does not provide far sidewalks. The City PWD is recommending that a 5-foot wide public sidewalk section {with a suitable public ingress and egress easement requirement) be provided adjoining the right-of-way on the east and west sides of Benjamin Lane. This will also require that the structure setback be increased to 25 feet to afford driveway parking that does not interfere with pedestrian traffic on the sidewalk. The 10-foot~wide public utilities easement would be moved to the outside of the sidewalk easement to mitigate interference with public utility instalia#ion and facility placement (i.e transformers, risers, pedestals, etc.). As required on recent developments utilizing the residential lane street standard, the sidewalk would be installed at the Developers expense as part of the development and will be maintained by the property owner, similar to the Cit}Ps can-ent sidewalk ordinance requirements. 7. Utility Basements: A 1(3-foot wide pcrblic ufifity easement (PUE} viii be required oufslde the City's right-ofJway of Benjamin Lane, on both sides of the Pane. To facilitate placement of the sidewalk 8 Beall Estates !V Tentative Plan Review, PLf'D Sta~RcParr February 12, 1994 Page 3 section, the PUE would be located adjacent to the sidewalk easement, and extend 15-feet behind the right-of-way. An easement to the City of Central Point shall be dedicated across lot 77 far the underground infrastructure aligned in the 25-foot easement along lots 38 and 39 of Beall Estates Phase II. it is suggested that this easement be set at a width of 23.71 feet to line up with the western boundary of the Benjamin Lane right-of-way. 8. Beall„Lane Right-af--Way. Beall Lane is identified as a secondary arterial. Comprehensive plan specifies right-0f way width required is 80-88 feet. Current right-of way width: 60 feet. Not likely to be able to obtain 80-88 foot wide necessary right-~of-way from existing development on Beall Lane, except by condemnation. Would suggest minimum right-of--way of 80 feet {40-feet from centerline}, lot 73 and on the remainder of tax lot 17000. 9. Sighf-Triangles: Field review of this property's access to Beall Lane indicates that the sight- triangles can afford the proper sight triangles for a local street that connects to a secondary arterial, with removal of the interfering trees and vegetation. This type of street intersection requires a 55-foot sight triangle. 10. Improvements to_Beafl_Lane: Improvements to Beall Lane including, but not limited to, street section widening (to 30 feet from centerline to curb-line}, acceleration and deceleration lanes, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bikeways, street lights, storm drainage, and traffic control and delineation, steal[ be coordinated and approved by the JC Roads and the City PWD. The improvements should be constructed at the expense of the Developer and as part of the development of the proposed subdivision. Acceleration and deceleration lanes meeting JC Roads standards may need to be provided at the proposed development's intersections with Beall Lane. These improvements extend for the entire frontage of the tentative plat: from the southwest comer of lot 73 to the southeast comer of the remainder of tax lot 17000; a distance of approximately 257 feet. As approved by the City Administrator, the Developer may request or be required to defer any or all of the required improvements along Beal[ Lane until a Eater date. If any or all of the improvements are to be deferred to a later date, then the Developer will be required to enter into a suitable deferred improvement agreement with the CityiCounty far the developmentCmprovement of the street section and appurtenances (i.e. sidewalks, curb, gutter, street lights, storm drainage, etc.} along the development's frontages with Beall Lane, as required and approved by the JC Roads and City PWD. General Ail construction of public improvements shaE! conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, andlor upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the Gty PWD for approval prior to implementation. 2. Developer shall provide copies of any permits, variances, approvals, and conditions as may be required by other agencies, including, but not limited to, the Oregon Department of Fish and I~PU11 f_cf,N,'S I! ft'+Nirfn'c' 1'Iarn Kt'~'u•tr', f'il.1T.17,r11 f~ry+nfY f~+~la~rr<rrr '_ l9Uy f'rt~<' J Wildlife (DFW}, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DCQ), Oregon Division of State Lands {DSt_}, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE}, affected irrigation districts, and JC Roads, as applicable. 3. Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer ar surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a hard copy" form (produced on Mylar"~} and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD~, or other form as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the Cify which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construc#ion plans that identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate) of actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; road alignment; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral stationing; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet locations; street light locations; other below grade utility line locations and depfhs; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (an My[ar~}, or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic file to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 4. All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied in#o an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent benchmark shall be provided far the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer. 5. If applicable, all existing concrete, pipe, building materials, structures, clear and grub materials, and other deleterious materials shall be removed from the site and either recycled or properly disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the DEQ. 6. Easements for City infrastructure (i.e. sanitary sewer, water, and storm drain [if applicable]) should be a minimum of 15-feet wide, and should not split lot lines. Easements far public storm drainage, sani#ary sewer, and water lines should be dedicated to the City and not just a P.U.lr. Centerline of buried infrastructure shall be aligned a minimum of five (5) feet from the edge of the easement. If two ar more City owned utilities are located within an easement, then a minimum of 20-foot width should be required. Easement dedications in final deeds or CC&Rs need a statement which should clearly indicate that easements must be maintained with suitable, driveable vehicular access to Cify public infrastructure facilities, as determined by the City PWD. 7. Prior to the City PWD final approval of the construction plans for the proposed improvements, the following should be submitted: C~ A copy of written approval from Eire District 3 of the final s#reet and driveway layout, site access, fire hydrant placement, and water system improvement plans for the proposed development. ^ The plans relating to the sanitary sewers should be approved in writing by 13CVSA, and the appropriate signature blocks should be completed on the plans. Seal! ~srates Iii 7entali~e Plnrr Revaex~, P{i'p S1nfJ~Rcporr Fe6ruarv_ 12, 1999 Page S © A copy of written approval from JC Roads regarding Beall Lane improvements (as applicable) and street connections to Beall Lane. 8. Field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, fop of banks, ditchlchannel inverts, street elevations, etc.), to which the proposed development's infrastructure will connect into existing improvements, prior fa final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. 9. Overhead power lines. If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and Light, US West, and TCl Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within or adjoining the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities, shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. 10. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shah be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans and as-built drawings. 11. The Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide to the Public Works Department a drawing of the recorded Final Plat map reproduced on Myla~ and in an acceptable electronic form in AutoCAD® format. The Final Plat shall be tied to a legal Government corner and the State Plane Coordinate System. The Final Plat shall either reflector be later modified to reflect any applicable "red-line" changes no#ed in the construction "as-bunts", at the discretion of the City Administrator or his designee. StreetslTraffic Existing Improvements - Beall Lane -Secondary Arterial. Current ROW 60' wide, varying street width. Right-of Way required: 80-88 foot width. Right-of--way requested 80-foot width; 40-foot on either side of centerline. Jurisdiction -Jackson County. Construction drawings for this Tentative Plan shall include a Street Lighting Plan and Traffic Delineation Plan in accordance with the requirements of the City PWD. Street lights shall be placed in a `zig-zag' pattern along the streets and at maximum 200-foot spacing (as measured from light post to light post) to afford better lighting of the public rights-of-way. The Street Lighting Plan shall include placing street lights on the residential lane, and be of a design and at locations as approved by the City PWD and Pacific Power. Street lights will also need to be installed or possibly modified along Beall Lane to afford proper lighting of the street intersection. 2. The City PWD, at the cost of the Developer, shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the street section designs for Benjamin Lane and Beal! Lane in accordance with the City PWD Standards. The Cifiy's engineering staff or selected engineering consultant (at Developer's expense), shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the street section designs in accordance with the City PWD Standards. Minimum street section far Benjamin Lane shall be as follows: ~~ Beall F:slares !6' l~enraiive Plan Revrew, P1i'f) SrafJ Report Februar7~ 21, 1444 lage6 - 3-inches Class "B" A.C. - 6-inches of 1 "-0" crushed rock - 8-inches of 4"-0" crushed rock {City of Medford specifications), - Woven geotextile fabric over compacted subgrade. Minimum street section for Beall Lane shall be as follows: - 4-inches Class "B" A.C. - 7-inches of 1 "-0" crushed rock - 13-inches of 4"-0" crushed rock (City of Medford specifications}, - Woven geotexti[e fabric aver compacted subgrade. Street section (excluding the asphalt concrete portion) shall be extended underneath and a minimum of two feet beyond the curb and gutter section, and underneath the driveway apron connection with Beall Lane. 3. As applicable, stop signs and traffic delineation (i.e. "stop bars") shall be required and installed by the City PWD (at the Developer's expense} at the proposed development's intersections with Beall Lane. Storm Drainage, Irrigation {mprovements Existing Improvements - 15-inch-diameter storm drain stub-out from Beal[ Estates it Subdivision. During the design of the storm drain collection and conveyance system (SD System), which shall provide for and convey storm wa#er run-aff from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creeklditch conveyance), the Developer shall demonstrate that the storm water flows from the completion of the proposed development (and at any time prior to completion of development} do not exceed predevelopment flows; or tha# existing capacity, allowances, or provisions have been made (and approval of the applicable properties owners and regulatory agencies has been obtained), which accommodate any additional flow which exceed predevelopment flows. The Developer and the City PWD shat[ agree an the app{icab{e run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations. 2. Developer's engineer shall provide a site drainage p{an with the facilities being designed, at a minimum, to accommodate a 10 year storm event. The SD system must be designed to adequate{y drain the 1 D-year storm event without surcharging or must be provided with adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to not impact existing public storm drainage facilities. Any private storm drain system exceeding 3-inches in diameter shall be designed to directly connect to the public storm drain system (at a manhole or curb inlet only}, and shall not be designed to discharge to the street surfaces. 3. Roof drains and underdrains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and shall drain either to an on-site private storm drain system or discharge at the curb face. 4. Prior to City PWD construction plan review, the Developer shalt provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydro{ogic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the SD system, which shall incorporate the use of the City PWD's rainfa[Untensity curve, and City approved run- ~2 Beall EArtates IV Tentative Pfan Revre~ti~, PaVD Sta~Report February 11, 1999 Page 7 off coeffcients, curve numbers, retardance, pipe roughness coefficients, etc., that are used in the engineering calculations. 5. Storm drain pipe materials shall be PVC, HDPE, or reinforced concrete, with water-tight joints meeting the requirements of ASTM D3212, F477, and C-443M, as applicable. Provide concrete (in areas within the rights-of-way) orsand-cement slurry (in areas outside the rights-of-way} encasement where required in areas of minimum cover. 6. If inletslcatch basins are to exceed 4.5 feet in depth from the lip of the inlet, then the inlets and catch basins shat[ be designed to afford suitable "man" entry into the inletslcatch basin for main#enancelcleaning purposes. 7. Developer's engineer shat[ provide hydrology and hydraulic calculations and flow line plots for private and public storm drains. Plot HG[_ on profile or provide a separate profile drawing that indicates the HGL on the profile. Pipes should maintain cleansing velocity (minimum 2.0 feet per second} and have adequate capacities without surcharging during the design storm. 8. The Developer may wish to incorporate the use of a perforated SD system. If so, then the perforated storm drain system shall be designed to have adequate capacities to: d Gonvey the collected groundwater and storm water with the minimum cleaning velocities and without surcharging the collection and conveyance piping; and © Minimize silts, sands, gravels, and fines migration from the native soils into the SD system. The plotted HGL shall include both the groundwater infiltration, and the s#orm water run-off and run-on inflows into the SD system. 9. Maintain a minimum 0.2-foot drop between inlet and outlet pipe inverts in manholes and curb inlets, unless flow through velocities during the design storm event exceed 3.0 feet per second (fps}. If flaw velocities exceed 3.0 fps and the inlet pipe is in relatively direct (i.e. 180 ~ 5 degree} horizontal alignment with the outlet pipe, then as a minimum, the pipe slope shall be maintained through the base of the manhole or curb inlet. If flow velocities exceed 3.0 fps, and there is ether than relatively direct horizontal alignment between the inlet and outlet pipes, then a minimum of a d.1-foot drop between inlet and'outlet pipe inverts in manholes or curb inlet must be maintained. A bottom channel shall be farmed in the manhole or curb inlet base to mitigate transitional losses and enhance flow through the manhole or curb inlet. 10. Sheet flow surface drafiage from the property onto the public rights-of-way ar onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. Sanitary Sower 1. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system {SS System} design, construction and testing shall conform to the standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 199fl APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority (BCVSA}, and the City PWD Standards, where applicable. ~~ Beall Estates lY 7"entarive Plan Review, PWD S1afJReporl February 22, 1949 Page 8 2. The construction plans and the as-built drawings shat[ identify lateral stationing for construction of sewer laterals. 3. The City upon completion of initial construction plan review and preliminary approval, will forward the plans to BCVSA for completion of the review process. Upon completion of the review by BCVSA, completion of final revisions to the plans by the Developer's engineer, and following the final approval and signature on the construction plans by BCVSA, the Public Works Director will approve the plans in final form. 4. Ali testing and video inspection of lines and manholes shall be done in accordance with BCVSA requirements, at Developer's expense, The Developer shall provide BCVSA and the City with test reports, N reports and certification of the sewer system construction prior to lino[ acceptance. Water System - Existing 8-inch-diameter water line installed from Westrop Drive to Beall Lane. 'l . The water system shall be designed to provide the required fire flow demand capacities for the proposed facility, which meet Fire District 3 requirements, with fire hydrant placement as approved by the City PWD and Fire District 3. Maximum spacing of fire hydrants shall be 3Qa feet. Water service lateral connection stationing and size shall be provided on construction plans and as-built drawings. 2. Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division {OHD) and City requirements far backfiow prevention. 3. Water service meter boxes shall be City PWD specified "Christy" brand meter boxes, that accommodate the Sensus touch-read equipment. City PWD wilt perform all "hot" connections to active water tines, including service lateral taps, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director. Site work, Grading, and Utility Plans Grading plans should have original/existing grades and fnal grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour tines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on fop of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 2. A![ structures shaft have roof drains, area drains, andlar craw[ spaces with positive drainage away from the building. 3. Provide City with a utility plan approved by each utility company which reflects a[I utility line locations, crossings, transformer locations, valves, etc. 4. Utility locations must be accurately included on the as-built drawings, or as a separate set of drawings attached to the as-built drawings. 5. Alf fill placed in development shall be engineered fit that is suitably placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD and 199 UBC standards, except for the upper ~ .5-foot of tiff placed ~~ Beal! Eslates IV Tentative Plan Review, PWD Sta,~"Report February 2l, 1949 Page 9 outside of public rights-of-way and that does not underlie buildings, structures, or vehicular access ways or parking areas. Rights of WayslEasements ~. if applicable, Developer shat[ provide a Statement of Water Rights {on a City approved form}, for any affected properties. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer wilt coordinate with the State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer imgabie as a result of the proposed development. ~.5 RESOLUTION NO. $47 A RESOLUTION AMENDING PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 441, GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, the Central Point Planning Commission approved Planning Comnssion Resolution No. 441, Granting Tentative Plan Approval for a Beall Estates Phase IV Subdivision on March 2,1999; and WHEREAS, the Central Point City Council reviewed the Tentative Plan Application far Beall Estates Phase IV Subdivision at its meeting on March 25,1999, and specif tally the tentative approval for a residential Iane allowing a single sidewalk and no on street parking; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it in the best interest ofthe citizens of Central Point to amend Planning Commission Resolution No. 441, requiring sidewalks on both sides of Benjamin Lane in the Beall Estates Phase IV Subdivision excluding the hammerhead turn around; and WHEREAS, the City Council concurs with the decision of the Planning Commission that no on street parking be allowed along Benjamin Lane. NOW, THEREFORE, Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Central Point, Oregon, that the following amendment is hereby made to Planning Commission Resolution Na. 441. Section 2.. Finding and Conclusions. A. Tentative Plan Requirements. The application and tentative plan are in the correct form and contain all ofthe information wired by CPMC 1 b.10. This pmj ect is an infill proj ect creating a residential lane with no parking an the street and sidewalks along both sides excluding the hammerhead turnaround. Passed by the Council and signed by mein authentication of its passage this,3~y of~~rc~, 1.999. Mayor Bill Walton ATTEST: City Representative APPROVED b me this ~ y ~ day of 1999. ~- Mayor Bill Walton 1-Resolution No. 847 (3/25/99}