Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 443 - Beale Site Plan PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU'T'ION NO. 443 A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING A SITE PLAN APPLICATION (Applicant (s): Betty Beale} (3 72 W 11 D Tax Lot 1700} Recitals 1. This matter came before the Planning Coznznission for hearing on March, 2, 1999, on applicant's site plan application for a conditional use permit to construct a second single family dwelling behind an existing residence in an R-2, Residential Two-Family Toning district ofthe City. The Planning Con:rmission reviewed the application and the City staff reports, and received comments from all persons wishing to be heard in favor of and opposed to the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Cz•iteria Applicable to„Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.24, R-2 Residential, Two-Fazxzily District B. Chapter 17.64, General Regulations; C. Chapter 17.64, Off Street Parking and Loading; D. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval. Section 2. Findin sand Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by reference aI I finding of fact set Earth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirements oT'the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code: A. Chapter 17.24, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback, building height and screening in the R-2 Residential Two-Family district; B. Chapter 17.60 relating to paving and Iandscaping requirements; C, Chapter 17.64 relating to off-street parking and loading facilities; D. Chapter 17.72 relating to site plan requirements. Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application for site plan approval is hereby 1 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 443 ( 03021999 ) conditionally approved, subjectto the conditions set forth on l~xhibits "A & I3", which is attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Passed bythe Planning Comn~ission and signed by ine i~l authcnticatio~l of its passage this ',-'~`~ day of !u A~~~ , i 9 a~ . ATTEST: City Repr tative Ap oved by me this a~ day of MA-~x~~ -~ fJ~- Plannin~; Conlnlission Chairman I9 q°1. ~~ Planning Commission Chairman 2 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~~3 ( 03021999 ) Exhibit A RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OT' APPROVAL The approval of tlxe Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan shall expire in one year on March 2, 2000 unless an application for a building permit or an application. for extension has been received by the City. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations, 3. The applicant's representative shall contact BCVSA to establish design requirements, fees and permits for sewer extension and hook-up. ,8eale Residence or: GreenleaJLane Preliminary Site Plarr Review Februmy 23, 1999 Page 2 boundary of the property adjoining Bursell Road. 4. Si hf-Trion les: Field review of this property's access to Bursell Road indicates that the sight- triangles can afford the proper sight triangles for a local street that connects to a secondary arterial, with removal of the interfering parked vehicles, fencing, and vegetation. This type of street intersection requires a 55-foot sight triangle. 5. fmprov~menfs to Bursell Raad: Improvements to Bursell Road including, but not limited to, street section widening (up to 24 feet from centerline to curb-line), curbs, gutters, sidewalks, bikeways, street lights, storm drainage, and traffic control and delineation, shall be coordinated and approved by the JC Roads and the City PWD. The improvements should be constructed at the expense of the Developer and as part of the development of the proposed lot. These improvements extend for the entire frontage of the subject tax lot along Bursell Raad. The Developer shall coordinate with the Developer of the Shelterwood Subdivision {Michael Sullivan) on the completion of improvements of the intersection of Greenleaf Lane and Bursel[ Raad. As approved by the City Administrator, the Developer may request or be required to defer any or al! of the required improvements along Bursell Raad until a later date. If any or all of the improvements are to be deferred to a later date, then the Developer will be required to enter into a suitable deferred improvement agreement with the City/County for the developmentlimprovement of the street section and appurtenances {i.e. sidewalks, curb, gaffer, street lights, storm drainage, etc.} along the development's frontages with Bursell Road, as required and approved by the JC Roads and City PWD. 6. Site Drainage/Storm Drain Plan: The developer shag design and implement a site drainagelstorm drain plan that corrects and enhances existing site drainage far the entire tax lot. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onto the public rights-of-way, or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. The storm drainage infrastructure will be privately operated and maintained. During the design of the storm drain collection and conveyance system (SD System), which provides for storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development (either surface run-on or culvert or creeklditch conveyance), the Developer shall demonstrate that the storm water flows from the completion of the proposed development {and at any time prior to completion of development} do not exceed predevelopment flows; or #hat existing capacity, allowances, or provisions have been made (and approval of the applicable properties owners and regulatory agencies has been obtained), which accommoda#e any additional flow which exceed predevelopment flows. The Developer and the City PWD shall agree an the applicable run-off coefficients, curve numbers, retardance, etc., to be used in the engineering calculations. Developer's engineer shall provide a site drainage plan with the facilities being designed, at a minimum, to accommodate a 10 year storm event. The SD system must be designed to adequately drain the 10-year storm event without surcharging or must be provided with adequate storage to prevent surcharging; and be designed to not impact existing private or public storm drainage facilities. Any private storm drain system exceeding 3-inches in diameter shall be designed to directly connect to the public storm drain system (at a manhole or curb inlet only), and shall not be designed to discharge to the street surfaces. The potential retention of storm water run-off shall be coordinated with aspects of the proposed development to provide an Beale Residence on Greerrle~rJ'I,csrre Preliminary Site Plan Revietiv February 23, 1999 Page 3 aesthe#ically pleasing, efficient, non-hazardaus, and law maintenance facility. If applicable, the storm water retention facilities shall be suitably landscaped; designed to mitigate erosion and sediment and hydrocarbon deposition; and to mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these facilities. Catch basins, curb inlets, and area drains shall be designed for sediment and petroleum hydrocarbon retentian. General Exisfing Infrasfructure: The Developer shall provide suitable engineering certifica#ion and justification {i.e. calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,) #hat all connections to existing infrastructure {i.e. street; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the significant degradation {in the opinion of the Public Works Director) of the exis#ing effective level of service nr operation of the infrastructure facili#ies, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure; or the existing facilities will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows and/or demands while maintaining or improving the existing effective level of service of the affected facility. 2. Development Plans: Developer shall submit to the City's PWD for review and approval, plans and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of-way and easements or for connections to City infrastructure. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streets {including sidewalks, driveway aprons and, curbs and gutters}; storm drainage and sani#ary sewer collection and conveyance systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter and including fire protection); street lighting; and traffic control devices, street signs, and delineation. AI! construction of public improvements shall conform to the City`s PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, and/or upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD far approval prior to installation. The right-of-way for Greenleaf Lane extends to a point approximately 2.5Q feet behind the face of curb. The required 20-foot setback is from the back of right-of-way, and not the back of curb as shown on the site plan. Thus the residence would have to be setback a minimum of 2 additional feet. 3. A~ rp ovals: Fire District No. 3 (fire hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access) and Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority {BCVSA, for sanitary sewers} written approval of construction plans shall be submitted to the City PWD prior #o final construc#ion plan review and approval by City PWD. ~. As-Builts: Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. if feasible, the Beale Residence on Greenleaf I arse Preliminary Site Plan Review February 23, 1999 Page 4 Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Myla~) and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD~, or other form as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-fine" changes to fins[ approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate} pf actual installed items, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet; street light locations, other below grade utility fines; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Myfar®}, or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic fife to the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure #acilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. 5. Efevafions: All elevations used an the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied into an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. 6. Existing Infrastructure: As applicable, field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locotions {i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.}, to which the proposed development will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facilities, shall be accurately portrayed (both horizontally and vertically) on the construction plans. 7. Fill Placemenf: All fill placed in the development shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD and Building Department standards, except for the upper 1.5-feet of fil[ placed outside of public rights-of-way and that does not underlie building, structures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parking areas. 8. Burrell Road Sfreef Section: The City PWD, a# the cost of the Developer, shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the street section designs for the Bursell Road street section in accordance with the City PWD Standards. The City's engineering staff or selected engineering consultant (at Developer's expense), sha[I evafua#e the strength of the native soils and de#ermine the street section designs in accordance with the City PWD Standards. Minimum street section for Burrell Road shall be as follows: - 4-inches Class "B" A.C. - 7-inches of 1 "-0" crushed rock - '13-inches of ~"-0" crushed rack {City of Medford specifications), - Woven geotextile fabric over compacted subgrade. Street section {excluding the asphalt concrete portion) shat[ be extended undersea#h and a minimum of two feet beyond the curb and gutter section, and underneath the driveway apron Beale Residence on Greenleaf I,nne Preliminary Site Plan Review February 23, 1999 Page S connection of Greenleaf Lane with Bursell Road. 9. Utiliy Plans: We did not receive any utility plans for the proposed development. The utility plans shall be drawn to scale with accurate horizontal and vertical depiction of utility lines and appurtenances (transformers, valves, etc.). 14. Wafer S stem Cross Connection Control: Developer shall comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for crass connection control. Water will not be "turned on" by the City until such requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the City's designated inspector. 11. Roof/Area/Underfloor Drains: AI! structures shalt have roof drains, area drains, and/or crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the buildings. Roof drains and underfloor (foundation) drains shall not be directly connected to public storm drain lines, and shall drain either to an on- site private storm drain system or discharge at the curb face. 12. Grading Plans: Grading plans should have origmallexisting grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier line width and solid. Contour lines should be labeled with elevations. 13. Existing Easements; If applicable, Developer shall comply with all existing easement owner requirements regarding any proposed development that may overlap any existing easement. Any development proposed which overlaps or afters an existing easement should be approved by the easement's owner in writing, and a copy of that written approval should be submitted to the City PWD prior to submission of construction plans far City PWD review and approval. All existing easement locations and those proposed for this development shall be shown on the final plat with re#erence to the recordation number and Grantee.