Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 444 - La Via Site Plan PLANNING COMMISSION RISOI.,iJ'1'ION NO. 444 A RESOLUTION C()NDI'I'IONAI.,I_,Y APPROVING A SI'Z'E PI_,AN APPLI(:`A`I'ION {Applicant {s): Murcia IaaVia) (372W11C13 'fax I,ot 900) IZccitals I . This matter came before the Planning Cozn~nission for hearing on Apri16, 1999, an applicant's site plan application foz• an addition to a business located at 980 South Front Street in a C-5, Thoroughfare Commercial district of the Cite. The Planning Coznn7ission reviewed the application azad the City staff reports, and received co~l3zrzents from all persons wishizag to be heard in favor of and opposed to the application. 2. The applicant, Marcia LaVia has requested a Site Plan fora 6960 Square Foot building addition and associated improven~zents Iocated at 9$0 South I~ ront Street. There is currently an existing 2960 square foot building on site. Various site improvements are proposed including, but not limited to; parking, landscaping and signage. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY TkIE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Criteria A licable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code apply to this application: A. Chapter 17.46, C-5 Thoroughfare Commercial District B. Chaptcr 17.60, General Regulations; C. Chapter 17.64, Ofd Street Parking and Loading; D. Chapter 17.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval. Section 2. Findin s and Conclusions. The Planning Cozrzmissioz~ hereby adopts by reference all findings of fact set Earth in the attached City staff reports, and concludes that, except where addressed in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply with the z-equirements of t]~e afore mentioned chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code. 1 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 444 (04/06/99) ~a`~Ctl<>~TI ~. Ct~n~.~iiirr~ is ~-~i-,~~r, ~ll_. ~it1~' ,!~,~~iit,i~~"iO11 ~~"O~' ;, ~~I~iri 21~>Orl~,~:'a i:, i~~~rG~1r~~ CC7T1C~2~1.011i~~~~~ ~~]"J~'JXUFrGC"I. Sl(1)~cCl (i)1~1,' ;!)7~1~411'J71S 4>~'l I~)I~l~l i)I~! ~.;X~IL~"?t1~ `~%1", vV~LC~~i 1;, ~Ilil1(;I?l` ~ ~~1:';'i'lt) ~12C~ ~~r ~~TS l~Ci~r`CIZCC~ 111C{71'(~u?~~11~'(r ~lt't~itl. ~'assct~'~Tr ~~,r i'Iat~nirl~, C~`c,~-r-~r~~rt;<ica~~ G~~~c? ~;s~~7c;1 17y tt~e: i~~ ,~~;~I~~~~~!i~,~~ic,i~ t>1'iti~; ~:.~~,~i~~.;~ ilia; a A.I~~1'~~;T: . } - - (_,~~ Rti~~r~~,,;~;~ati~~; _ _- ,, A~lar~av~c~ by Y~7e this ~ , :, clay cif _ , l t~9~. ,~ _~ .r ~' ~_ T'lan~.u7~° t,;(~n)~r,,;ssi~~nt.l~~a:r~~~~a~Y ~ -1'r,~I~1NINC COLv1MISSI(JN R:~SC~ZUTIC}N NC). 444 (04/O6/~9) ATTACHMENT C RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in one year on April 6, 2D00 unless an application for a building permit or an application for extension has been received by the City. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations, 3. The project must meet the off street parking requirements for retail commercial buildings, and the parking, access and maneuvering areas shall be paved with durable materials far all-weather use and approved by the Public Works department. ~. The applicant sha11 submit final parking, landscaping, lighting, Fencing and sign plans to the Planning, Public Works and Building Departments far approval prior to obtaining any building permits. ~- 40 Attacltrnc~~t ~: CITY OF CENTRAL POINT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STAFF REPORT for LaVia Addition 980 South Front Street Commercial Facility Site Plan PW#99015 Date: Applicant: Agent: Project: Location: legal: Zoning: Units: Plans: Report By: Purpose March 29, 1999 Marcia A. LaVia, 4223 Old Stage Road, Central Point, Oregon 97502 Fred Phillips, Fred Phillips Engineering, 345 N. Bartlett St # 203, Medford, Oregon 97501 Commercial Building Addition 980 South Front Street (North of New Holland Ford Tractor) T37S, R2W, Section 11 CB, Tax Lot 900 G5 Existing 2,960 s.f. building; proposed addition adds 6,960 s.f.; parking {26 spaces) 1 page "Proposed Building Addition & Site Work", dated 211711999, prepared by Fred Phillips Engineering lee N. Brennan, Public Works Director Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding Public Works standards and additional standards and requirements to be included in the design. Gather information from the Developer/Engineer regarding proposed development. Special Requirement#s South Fron_t_Sfreet (Highway 99J Improvements: Improvements to South Front Street including, but not limited to, street section widening, acceleration and deceleration Panes, curbs, gutters, sidewalks (min. 6-foot width), bikeways, street lights, storm drainage, and traffic control and delineation, shall be coordinated and approved by the Oregon Department a# Transportation (ODOT) and the City PWD and should be designed and implemented at the expense of the Developer. Tie-ins to the existing installed storm drainage system along Highway 99 must be permitted and approved by ODOT. The driveways into the proposed development should be designed and posi#ioned in a manner that will accommodate the turning movements and access of a WB-67 truck, without crossing into an opposing lane or additional travel lane of traffic. Need to show truck turning movement on construction plans. Acceleration and deceleration lanes meeting ODOT standards may need to be provided at the proposed development's intersections with Front Street. As approved by the City Administrator, the Developer may request or be required to defer any or all of the required improvements along South Front Street until a later date. if any or all of the improvements are to be deferred to a later date, then the Developer will be required to enter into a suitable deferred improvement agreement with the City/ODOT for the development improvement of the street section and appurtenances (i.e. sidewalks, curb, gutter, street lights, storm drainage, etc.) along the development's frontages with South Front Street, as ., d 4 I.ai'ia ~Cldi(io+t, 980 South Frarf Sfreei Pimp SlaJf Repnr! March 29, 1998 Page 2 required and approved by ODOT and City PWD. 2. Site Drainage/Sform Drain Plan: The developer shall design and implement a site drainage/storm drain plan that corrects and enhances existing site drainage for the entire area noted on the site plan. Sheet flow surface drainage from the property onta the public rights-of- way {including the right-of-way of 15' Street}, or onto neighboring properties is unacceptable. The storm drainage infrastructure will be privately operated and maintained. A suitable system wilt need to be designed for a minimum 10-year storm event. The discharge paint and potential retention of storm water run-off shall be coordinated with aspects of the proposed development to provide an aesthetically pleasing, efficient, and law maintenance facility. The storm water retention facilities shall be designed to mitigate erosion and sediment and hydrocarbon deposition, and to mitigate the "attractive nuisance" hazards associated with these facilities. The developer shaft also secure written permission to connect/discharge into adjoining storm water conveyance facilities managed by other jurisdictional agencies. Catch basins, curb inlets, and area drains shall be designed for sediment and petroleum hydrocarbon retention. 3. Existin_g Infrasfructur~: The Developer shall provide suitable engineering certification and justification {i.e. calculations, analyses, plots, etc.,} that all connections to existing infrastructure {i.e. street; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) wilt not interfere with or provide for the significant degradation (in the opinion of the Public Works Director) of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities #o accommodate the flows andlor demands imposed on the exis#ing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infras#ructure; or the existing facilities will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additiana! flows andlor demands while maintaining or improving the existing effective level of service of the affected facility. 4. Utility Easements: A 10-foot wide public utility easement {PUEr} should be required along the property's frontage with South Front Street. 5. Wafer Service: The site is currently seiviced with a 518-inch meter and a 314-inch service lateral fordomestic water. If the building addition requires either the meter or the service line to be up- sized to accommodate the building addition, then cost far the upsizing of the lateral andlor meter shall be at the expense of the Developer. 6. Fire_Hydrants: Fire Hydrant placement shall be as determined by Fire District No. 3. There is an existing fire hydrant on South Front Street, located approximately 92 feet to the north of the center of the proposed entrance. 7. Zero Setback: The proposed building has a zero setback to the First Street right-of^way. The building's foundation should no# encroach into the right-of-way. This will likely require that the building will need to have some set-back from the edge of the right-of-way. 45 I,aI'ia Addiliort, 980 South f=rnrr! Strt~t't f Yf~D .5'ta~-Reporl Mnrch 29, 1998 Page 3 General 1. Development Plans: Developer shall submit to the City's PWD for review and approval, plans and specifications for all improvements proposed for construction or modifications within the City or public rights-of-way and easements or for connections to City infrastructure. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, streets (including sidewalks, curbs and gutters and landscape buffers}; storm drainage and sanitary sewer collection and conveyance systems; water distribution system (up to the service meter and including fire protection); street lighting; and traffic control devices, street signs, and delineation. All construction of public improvements shall conform to the City's PWD Standards, the conditions approved and stipulated by the Planning Commission, and other special specifications, details, standards, andlor upgrades as may be approved by the City Administrator or his designee prior to the approval of the construction plans for the proposed development. During construction, changes proposed by the Developer shall be submitted in writing by the Developer's engineer to the City PWD for approval prior to installation. 2. Approvals; Fire District No. 3 {fire hydrant placement, waterline sizing, and emergency vehicle access), Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority {BCVSA, far sanitary sewers), City of Medford Regional Water Reclamation Facility (commercial/industrial wastewater discharge permit} and Oregon Department of Transportation {storm water discharge into Highway 99 storm drainage facilities and drivewaylaccess road connections) written approval of construction plans shall be submitted to the City PWD prior to final construction plan review and approval by City PWD. 3. ,4s-Buiits: Prior to approval and acceptance of the project, the Developer's engineer or surveyor shall provide the Public Works Department with "as-built" drawings. If feasible, the Developer's engineer or surveyor should provide the drawings in both a "hard copy" form (produced on Myla~} and in a "digital" format compatible with AutoCAD®, or other form as approved by the City PWD. As-built drawings are to be provided to the City which provide "red-line" changes to final approved construction plans which identify the locations and or elevations (as appropriate} of actual installed i#ems, including, but not limited to, invert, inlet, and rim or lip elevations; spot elevations identified on drawings; water lines, valves, and fire hydrants; water and sewer lateral; modifications to street section; manhole and curb inlet; street light locations; other below grade utility lines; etc. Provide a "red-line" hard copy (on Myla~), or an approved alternative format, of construction drawings, and if feasible, an acceptable AutoCAD® compatible drawing electronic file #o the City at completion of construction and prior to acceptance of public infrastructure facilities completed as part of the proposed development, or as otherwise approved by the City Administrator or his designee. ~4. Elevations: All elevations used on the construction plans, on temporary benchmarks, and on the permanent benchmark shall be tied info an established City approved benchmark and be so noted on the plans. At least one permanent Benchmark shall be provided for the proposed development, the location of which shall be as jointly determined by the City PWD and the Developer's surveyor. 4fi I a1'ia ~tdditian, 98(1 South f rat! S~rr>cf Pit'() Staff ReE~or1 A~arcla 29, 1998 Page 4 5. Exisfin Infrasfrucfure: As applicable, field verify all existing infrastructure elevations and locations (i.e. pipe inverts, curb elevations, street elevations, etc.}, to which the proposed development will connect into existing improvements, prior to final construction plan design and submittal for final approval. The accurate locations of any existing underground and above ground public infrastructure, and the location of the associated easements with these facili#ies, shalt be accurately portrayed {both horizontally and vertically} on the construction plans, 6. Fill Placement: All fill placed in the development shall be engineered fill that is suitably placed and compacted in accordance with City PWD and Building Department standards, except for the upper 1.5-#eet of fill placed outside of public rights-of-way and that does not underlie building, structures, or traveled vehicular access ways or parking areas. 7. Road/Drivewa /Parkin Areas: The Developer shall evaluate the strength of the native soils and determine the access road, parking, and driveway section designs fa handle the expected loads (including fire equipment} to be traveled on these private driveways, access roads, and parking areas. Need to provide section for review. The driveways, access roads, and truck parking and turning areas on the proposed development must be designed and positioned in a manner that will accommodate the turning movements and access of a WB-67 truck, without crossing into an opposing lane or additional travel lane of traffic. $. Unlit Py_ Ions: We did not receive any utility plans for the proposed development. The utility plans shall be drawn to scale with accurate horizontal and vertical depiction of utility lines and appurtenances (transformers, valves, etc.). 9. Area Li hfin Plan: Need to provide and implement an adequate area lighting plan for parking and public access areas, including the driveway entrance from South Front Street, and if applicable, South Front Street (as may be required by ODOT or City PWD). 10. Public_Utilify Easements: A minimum 10-foot wide public utilities easement {PUE} shall be dedicated an the proposed developmen# for the installation of public utilities and should be located outside the public rights-of-way. At a minimum, the PUE should be aligned along the exterior boundaries of the property that border South Front Street, if a PUE is not currently present in this area. 11. Clear Vision Areas: The construction drawings and landscape plans shag include clear vision areas (i.e. sight triangles) at driveway entrances designed to meet the City's PWD requirements. 12, Fire Hydrants: Provide locations of existing and any new required fire hydrants. Fire Hydrants need to be connected to 8-inch-diameter and larger lines. If applicable, s#eamer ports at hydrants located near the building shall face the buildings. Fire hydran#s shall be sui#ably protec#ed from potential vehicle damage and encroachment. 13. Water S stem Cross Connection Control: Developer shalt comply with Oregon Health Division (OHD) and City requirements for cross connection control. Need to know projected activities and water uses for commercial building to determine requirements for cross connection 4 `7 La 1 'ia : fdcfirin~i. 95'0 .S•r>t~rh F)~nnr .Srrc~rl 1'J4'D SIriJ)-flc'pot'r A~arcfr ?9. f 99S Page 5 control and fire protection. Water will not be "turned on" by the City until such requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the City's designated inspector (currently the Jackson County plumbing inspector}. 14. Wafer System: Construction drawings shat{ include the size, type, and location of all water mains, hydrants, valves, service connection, meter, service laterals, and other appurtenance details in accordance with City PWD Standards and as required by the City PWD. '15. Sanita Sewer Industrial Dischar a Permif: If applicable, obtain industrial discharge permit fror-n City of Medford Regional Water Reclamation Facility {Medford RWRF}. Obtain Medford RWRF's written approval to connect to the sanitary sewer system. Copy of application can be obtained from City PWD. 16. Roof/Area Drains: All structures shall have roof drains, area drains, andlor crawl spaces with positive drainage away from the building. Roof drains shall not be directly connected to the public storm drain system. 17. Grading Plans: Grading plans should Rave ariginallexisting grades and final grades plotted on the plan. Typically, existing grade contour lines are dashed and screened back, and final grade contour lines are overlaid on top of the existing grades and are in a heavier fine width and solid. Contour tines should be labeled with elevations. 7 $. Overhead Power Lines: If applicable, coordinate efforts with Pacific Power and bight, US West, and TCI Cable, to convert any overhead electrical power, telephone, or cable facilities within or adjoining the proposed development to underground facilities, prior to the acceptance by the City PWD of the public improvements associated with the proposed development. All agreements and costs associated with the conversion of these facilities from overhead to underground facilities, shall be by and between the utility owners and the Developer. ~ 9. Storm Drain System Design: Prior to construction plan approval of the improvements for this development plan, the Developer's engineer shall provide the City PWD with a complete set of hydrologic and hydraulic calculations and profile plots for sizing the site storm drain system. The engineer shall use the rainfalllintensity curve obtained from the City PWD for hydrologic calculations, and the negotiated run-off parameters. ~~