Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 454 - LaRue Partition - Tent. Plan~~9a ~-~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 454 A RESOLUTION GRANTING TENTATIVE PLAN AT'PT20VAL p'OR A LAND PARTITION (Applicant (s) :LaRue Iacvclop~l~ent L.L.C. ) (3 7 2 W 02D Tax Lot 2900 } Recitals 1. Applicant(s) has/have szzbzrzitted an application for tentative plan approval for a land partition on a 4.92 -acre parcel, located C-4 Tourist and Off ce Professional zone in the City of Central Point, Oregon. 2. On July1999, the Central Point Planning ComEnission conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application, at which tune it reviewed the City staff reports and heard testimony and comments on the application. Now, therefore; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNTNG COMMISSION OF THE CTTY OF CENTRAL POTNT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approval Criteria. The requirements for approval of land partitions and tentative plans are set forth in CPMC Title 16 azad 17, relating to informational requirements, zoning, lot dimension, access, and similar requirements. Section 2. Finding and Conclusions. The PIanning Commission Ends and detezxnines as follows: A. Tentative Flan Requirements. The application and tentative plan are in the correct foznl and contain all of the information required by CPMC 16.10. B. Area and Width of Lot. This partitioning in an G4 Tourist and Office Professional zone would create the following parcels: Parcel l: Approximately .61 acres; Parcel 2: Approximately 1.18 acres; Parcel 3: Approximately 2.47 acres. Parcels 1 and 2 and 3 meet the zniniznum area { 5000 square feet for intcriot lots and 5000 square feet for coz-ner lots) and width (50 feet for interior lots and 50 feet for corner lots) requirements for lots in the C-4 Tourist and OfEce Professional zone as set forth in CPMC 17.44, and such parcels meet the general requirements for lots contained in CPMC 16.24.050. Parcel 1 zxzeets the area and width requirements for flag lots contained in CPMC 16.36.040. Planning Commission Resolution No. ~,4'LO 8 ) f ~~ q~ ~~ ~ C. Access to Flab Lot. CPMC 16.36.040 regz~ires an access of at feast 20 feet ir1 width, paved with cement or asphaltic sua•face, far all flag lots created by partitio~~. Tlzc tentative plan submitted herein provides fora 2Q-foot wide access, to be paved with concrete, which satisfied tl-ze City code requiremezzt. Section 3. Conditional Approval. The application far tentative plan for land partition Herein is hereby approved, subject to the corlditioa~rs set fortis on Exhibit "A" and 'B", attached hereto by reference incorporated herein, unposed u~~der authority of CPMC Chapter- 16.36. Passed by the Planning Commission ar-td signed by nZe in authentication of its passage this day of ~ , 199~.`~ C-~~ ~~~ Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Re~•e1~~ntative by me this ~ ~~ day of .~ ~ , 199~8``~ Planning Cammissioz~ Chair Planning Corrtmission Resolution No. _420 (051998 ) PLANNING DEPARTMENT RL<'COMMENDED CONDIT€ONS OI{ A€'€'ftOVAi~ l . The approval of the Tentative Plan shall expire in one year on 3uly 6, 2000 unless a~a application for final plat or extension leas been received by the City. 2. The project must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulatio~~s, 3. The tentative and final plats shall depict utility easements requested by tl~e City, BCVSA and WP Natural Gas. Any changes to utility layout including fire hydrants shall require subsequent approval by the respective service provider. C~~ of Gerttr~il Fait ~~ ' ~ Plana: Exhibit A ,,,." __-. 8 C'iS~~ c~[~E'~ntral I'c~iru CITY OE CENTRAL POINT 1' ~X~1I~It ~~ cnt DEPAf~TMEIVT OF= PUBf..IC WORfCS STAFF REPORT W_.,..,...... far LaRue Development TENTATIVE LAND PARTITION PLAN REVIEW PW##99033 Date: June 29, 1999 Applicant: LaRue Development, L.LC. Agent: Hoffbuhr & Associates, Inc., 1062 E. Jackson, Medford, Oregon 97504 Property Owner: Frank Pulver, et. al . 1460 Crater Lake Ave., Suite C, Medford, Oregon 97504 Project: LaRue Partition Location: South end of Peninger Road, at intersection with LaRue Drive. Legal: T37S, R2W, Section 2D, tax lot 2900. honing: C-4 Area: 4.5 Acres {approximately). Parcels: 3 Plans: 1 page entitled "Land Partition Tentative Plat", dated April B, 1999 prepared by Hoffbuhr & Associates. Report By: Lee N. Brennan, Public Works Director Purpose Provide information to the Planning Commission and Applicant (hereinafter referred to as "Developer") regarding City Public Works Department (PWD) standards, requirements, and conditions to be included in the development of the proposed land partition. This staff repor# provides general requirements, and is not intended to provide a thorough review of any development on these properties. Amore thorough staff report will be prepared when tentative site plans are presented to the City for consideration by the Planning Commission for development on the proposed parcels. Gather information from the DeveloperlEngineer regarding the proposed partition. Special Requirements Exisfin_q lnfrastrucfure: The Developer shall demonstrate that all connections to existing infrastructure (i.e. streets; water, sanitary sewer, storm drain systems; natural drainage systems; etc.,) will not interfere with or provide for the degradation of the existing effective level of service or operation of the infrastructure facilities, and that the existing infrastructure facilities have either adequate capacities to accommodate the flows and/or demands imposed on the existing infrastructure as the result of the connection of the proposed development's infrastructure, or will be improved by and at the expense of the Developer to accommodate the additional flows and/or demands; while maintaining or improving the existing level of service of the affected facility, as approved by (as applicable), the regulatory agency, utility owner, and/or property owner involved. 2. Traffic Impact Sfudy. Because of the large volume of truck traffic in this area, a traffic impact study may be warranted that evaluates the effects on the neighboring intersections and freeway interchange as the result of development on these parcels. Based on the current truck and vehicle traffic on this portion of Peninger Road, it is expected that any development on these parcels would be development that typically has few expected traffic movements during "peak" hours. __ 9 (~tRrn~ 1 >c'ri•hy~nu•rN Ii'rrrrNn'<~ l'ctrlrlror! F'l,tti, Ttr~ 1nt ~9(7(! I' 1 S'11,1'lrtl/ I~r7mrr ,Iu1rt~ ~,ti. 1994 74rt*r _' 3. Rights-of--Way and Easemenfs: Suitable righ#-of-way dedication will need to be provided for the extension of LaRue Drive and Peninger Road. Additional right-of-way dedication may also be warranted on the existing streets that are adjacent to or within the proposed partition, depending on the type of development that will actor. The Developer should provide suitable and acceptable easements (minimul-n 15-foot in width} for any existing public works infrastructure, or public works infrastructure required far the development, that are located outside the public rights-of-way. A separate 70-foot minimum width public utilities easement (P.U.E.] should also be dedicated by the Developer for utility installation outside the LaRue Drive and Peninger Road right-of-way along the property's exterior frontage with these streets. 4. Street L.aYout. The proposed street layout may need to be modified to provide proper ingress and egress into the proposed development and for future development of tax lot 2600 (which is currently "landlocked"} and possibly for tax lot 2700. Tax lot 2700 is a flag lot with access off of Pine Street. Any commercial development on Tax lot 2700 with access to Pine Street would require a separation of 200 feef from any intersection for development of a commercial driveway an Pine Street. Currently there is not enough distance from the I-5 off-ramp/on-ramp intersection to the access point on Pine Street for a commercial driveway access for tax lot 2700, without a variance. Thus access far tax lot 2700 off of LaRue Drive may be preferred. 5. Erosion Gontry! Plan: To meet current DEQ requirements, and pending federal mandated Phase Il Storm Water Quality requirements, a suitable erosion control pion, utilizing best management practices and procedures, must be prepared and submitted to the Oregon Depar#men# of Environmental Quality (DEQ] and the City PWD for review and approval for the construction of any improvements associated with this development. The construction plans associated with this development wi{[ not be approved by the City PWD until the City PWD receives a copy of the written approval of the erosion control plan by the DEQ. The approved erosion control plan must then be implemented to control and mitigate construction site storm water run-off, erosion control, silt and sand migration, nuisance dust generation and migration, and pollution prevention. 6. Masfer Plans: In association with City PWD staff, the Developer shall prepare master plans for the storm drain collection, retention, and conveyance system, the sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system, and the water distribution system for this area of the City. The master plans should take into account the flaws or demands of the proposed development, any future development an neighboring portions of the subject tax lot, on neighboring properties, and any areas deemed by the City that wilt need to connect-into the proposed development's or existing neighboring infrastructure. The prepared master plans should take into account any previous master plans that have been prepared and approved by the City, Jackson County, ODOT, and 13CVSA, as applicable. 7. Water ©istrif.~utian System: Any development on these parcels will be connecting into the ~2- inch-diameter water line that is aligned in Peninger Road. This would result in a "single-feed" non-reinforced water distribution system. City PWD would suggest that the designed system be of reinforced {"looped") design, with a second connection to the City's water distribution system ~ ~ ! ~rl~rrr ! 4'r,~(,y~rnrrrr 1 ,r,r,! !',utu;,"f l,v:r~rnrr I'l,rrr 1 ~!f 1 f ,~I~11J !i<'l~,~r'f 1urr~' ~'1- I U{1U 1'elL c' .~ (preferably with a second connection to the water main on Pine Street). Required fire flows for development on these parcels, and projected development on adjoining parcels will likely dictate line sizes. The water mains will be of such diameter that facilitate water demands for projected future development in fhe surrounding areas, and for completion of the City's water main distribution system in this portion of the City. On other recent devefopment projects, the City has or is proposing to reimburse the developer for a portion of the costs for up-sizing of water fines above the minimum water line diameter of 8-inches. The proposed water line reimbursement is only for projects where the required up-sizing was not the result of the flow demands of the development, but is the direct result of providing additional capacity far the supplemental demands that may be placed on the water distribution system caused by additional surrounding future development- The proposed reimbursement methodology far water line up-sizing includes payment of the estimated material cost differences for fhe 8-inch-diameter versus 12-inch- diameter pipe and appurtenances. This reimbursement methodology is similar to the methodology used by the Medford Water Commission for this same type of water-line up-sizing, We would propose this same type of reimbursement methodology for development on the proposed partition. 8. Storm Drainage System: The storm drain system shall be designed to accommodate the storm water run-off from and run-on onto the proposed development {either surface run-on or culvert or creek/ditch conveyance); any future development on adjacent properties; conveyed storm drainage or surface water flow, and any flows from areas deemed by the City that will need to connect-into the proposed development's SD System. It appears that drainage from tax lots 2600 and tax lot 2700 will need to drain to and be conveyed through the designed storm drainage conveyance system associated with the development on tax lot 2900. Thus City PWD is recommending that the Developer(s) of these parcels be required to design the storm drainage collection and conveyance system to accommodate projected post-development flows from these adjoining tax lots- Storm drainage conveyance pipe stub-outs, through suitable easements in the development, will need to be provided and storm drain conveyance lines may need to be up-sized as necessary to accammodate existing and future developed property storm water run-off from the applicable tax lots (i.e. "Area of Benefit"). if the s#orm drain lines are needed to be up-sized from the size necessary to accommodate the development on tax lot 2900 and the storm water flows from the existing development of the tax lots (i.e. "Area of Benefit") in the vicinity of the proposed development, to provide additional capacity to accommodate the projected future developed flows of the Area of Benefit tax lots, then the PWD would propose to compensate the Developer far the upsizing above a minimum pipe size of 24-inch-diameter as per the methodology approved by the City Council. 9. Off-Site Storm Drainage fnfrastructure: For any storm drainage infrastructure constructed or improved outside the City's rights-of-way or easements for drainage of surface waters from the subject development, the Developer shall provide a suitable document or documents which contain approvals for the implementation of such connection andlor improvements and which describe: ^ Who is responsible for the operation, maintenance, and repair of the infrastructure facilities to maintain the original design parameters associated with the infrastructure. If the City is to operate and maintain the infrastructure, the applicable funding mechanism that will be created (.e local improvement district) for the associated City expenditures; 1' 1,rlitn' 11r,','1r~l+rur'ru 1,rriJ1'<rrlrlr,+rr l.'n7,rlrn• IY<r,r .lrun' _'~~, 1 ~1~1r1 1'<t~r' J U How will access be afforded and sr~aintained indefinitely to maintain and repair the infrastructure facilities; That an easement or other suitable conveyance document has been granted, as necessary, to provide suitable access on private property for fhe inspec#ion, maintenance, and repair work to be performed on the infrastructure facilities. The easement shall include a s#atement which allows access by City persanne€ for inspection and maintenance purposes. 10. Water Rights: ff applicable, Developer shall provide a Statement of Water Rights (on a City approved form), far any affected properties of the proposed development that have existing water rights, or which are going to obtain water rights. For properties determined to have water rights, the developer will coordinate with the State Watermaster the re-allocation of any waters attached to lands no longer irrigable as a result of the proposed development. 11. Sanitary Sewer. All sanitary sewer collection and conveyance system {SS System) design, construction and testing shall conform to fhe standards and guidelines of the Oregon DEQ, 1990 APWA Standards, Oregon Chapter, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority {BCVSA), and the City f'WD Standards, where applicable. ~ ~~