HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 455 - Mallet, Michael - Site Plan~~~ ~..~ ax~~
PLANNING COMMISSION I2ISOI,UTION NO. 45S
A RESOLUTION CONllI`hIONAI,,LY ~1I'PROVING
A SI'I'E PLAN APPLICATION
{Applicant (s): Betsy and Michael Mallet)
{372W 11 D Tax Lot 2201)
Recitals
1. This matter came before the Planning Commission for hearing on July 6, 1999, on
applicant's site plan application for a variance in tl~c front and side yard setback requirements in an
R-1-6, Residential Single Family Zoning district of the City. The Planning Commission reviewed
the application and the City staff reports, and received comments froze all persons wishing to be
heard in favor of and opposed to the application.
Now, therefore;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL
POINT, OREGON, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Criteria Applicable to Decision. The following chapters of the Central
Point Municipal Cade apply to this application:
A. Chapter 17.20, R-1-6 Residential Single FamilyLoning District
B. Chapter 17.60, General Regulations;
C. Chapter 17.64, Off Street Parking and Loading;
D. Chapter i 7.72, Site Plan, Landscaping and Construction Plan Approval.
Section 2. Findin sand Conclusions. The Planning Commission hereby adopts by
reference all f nding of fact set forth in the City staff reports, and concludes that, except where
addressed in the conditions to approval, the application and proposal comply with the requirements
of the following chapters of the Central Point Municipal Code:
A. Chapter 17.20, relating to uses, lot size, lot coverage, setback, building height and
screening in the R-1-6, Residential Single Family Zoning district;
B. Chapter 17.60 relating to paving and landscaping requirements;
C. Chapter 17.64 relating to off street parking and loading facilities;
D. Chapter 17.72 relating to site plan requirements.
Section 3. Conditional A raval. The application for site plan approval is hereby
conditionally approved, subject to the conditions set forth on Exhibit "A" and "B", which is attached
hereto az~d by this reference incorporated herein.
Passed by the Planning Commission and signed by me in authentication of its passage this
1 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU"PION NO. 455 (07061999 }
6th day a~ Jti~ly, 1999.
I'la~lr~iz~~; Co~~~zx~issio~~ Chai~-~~~a~~
ATTEST:
City Re~•~s`~ntative
by me this b~ day of
~~"i ,19`~`~.
~ ~~-~~-
Planniz~~ Comnnissiaz~ Chaiz•~nan
2 -PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 455 (07061999 )
Attachment A
RECOMMENDED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OP APPROVAL
The approval of the Site Plan shall expire in ogle year on July 6, 2400 unless an applicatior,
for a buildzng permit ar an application for extension has been received by the City.
2. The project rr~ust comply with all applicable local, state at~d federal regulations including,
but not limited to, the Oregon Uniform lire Code and Structural Specialty Code.
3. The applicant steal I meet with the PIanning Department to design a suitable landscape plan that
complies with the zoning requirements of the R-I-8 zoning district.
~ F.
.~
Attachment B
I N T E R
MEMO
4 F F~ C E
To: Honorable Planning Commission Chairci~an and Members
From: Lee Brennan, Public Wor~CS Director
Subject: Public Works Department Comments Regarding tlae Request for Setback Variances for the
Proposed Residential Site Plan for 484 Grand A.velzue submitted by the Mallets.
Date: June 29, 1999
The Public Works Department has the following comments regarding the proposed subject development
and request for variance from the required front setback.
Front Sef6ack frartt Grand Avefu~e: As illustrated in the applicant's map, and as verified in the field,
the existing dwelling structure is located approximately 24 feet from the face of the existing southern
street curb of Grand Avenue. Grand Avenue has aright-of way width of SO feet, 2S feet from center
line. Thus the existing residential structure is located {"setback"} approximately 17 feet from the Gity's
right-of way. The applicants are proposing to further reduce the setback by an additional 5 feet, which
would result in a final set-back of 12 feet. This set-back is significantly shorter than the City's current
front set-back requirement of 2Q feet for this type of residential development. The required clear-vision
triangle of l5-feet for residential access to a residential street cannot be afforded with the proposed set-
back.
The existing structure and location of the proposed car-port would only provide for a maximum length of
driveway from the structure to the right-of=way of 34 feet, which only provides for the accommodation of
ofl=street parking far one vehicle.
The alley way to the south of the property provides driveable access to the southern portion of the
property. There is suitable vacant property on the southern portion of the property to accommodate
construction and utilization of a two-car garage ar car-port in this area, with access from the alley.
-- ~